- 377
- 10 176 485
Farid Responds
Registrace 25. 01. 2018
A channel dedicated to refuting anti-Islamic content.
Refuting the Claim: Hadiths were Fabricated 250 Years Later
Refuting the Claim: Hadiths were Fabricated 250 Years Later
zhlédnutí: 9 541
Video
New Proofs for Muhammad ﷺ in the Bible
zhlédnutí 33KPřed měsícem
PDF: sapienceinstitute.org/abraham-fulfilled Amazon: tinyurl.com/2xkv4ynu
Eid Message & Gift to Ammar Nakshawani
zhlédnutí 12KPřed měsícem
www.academia.edu/117281524/The_Distortions_of_al_Kulayni
The Real Prophet of Islam - Response to Ammar Nakshawani
zhlédnutí 23KPřed měsícem
The Real Prophet of Islam - Response to Ammar Nakshawani
This 900 year old book refutes modern argument!
zhlédnutí 24KPřed měsícem
This 900 year old book refutes modern argument!
Ammar Nakshawani FAILS to Prove 12 Imams from Shia Sources
zhlédnutí 21KPřed měsícem
Ammar Nakshawani FAILS to Prove 12 Imams from Shia Sources
Ammar Nakshawani / Assassination of the Prophet ﷺ [Debunked]
zhlédnutí 15KPřed měsícem
Ammar Nakshawani / Assassination of the Prophet ﷺ [Debunked]
Ammar Nakshawani Accuses Umar (ra) of Denying the Will of the Prophet ﷺ
zhlédnutí 23KPřed měsícem
Ammar Nakshawani Accuses Umar (ra) of Denying the Will of the Prophet ﷺ
Response to Ammar Nakshawani on A'isha and Hafsa Conspiracy (may Allah be pleased with them both)
zhlédnutí 23KPřed měsícem
Response to Ammar Nakshawani on A'isha and Hafsa Conspiracy (may Allah be pleased with them both)
Refuting Oxford Scholar Dr. Joshua Little on Hadith
zhlédnutí 17KPřed 2 měsíci
Refuting Oxford Scholar Dr. Joshua Little on Hadith
The Poet that Defeated the Quran! [Response to David Wood for 3rd Time]
zhlédnutí 20KPřed 4 měsíci
The Poet that Defeated the Quran! [Response to David Wood for 3rd Time]
Christian Prince Lies about Bible (2021 re-upload)
zhlédnutí 12KPřed 4 měsíci
Christian Prince Lies about Bible (2021 re-upload)
Are Hadiths Necessary? Isn't the Quran Enough?
zhlédnutí 11KPřed 4 měsíci
Are Hadiths Necessary? Isn't the Quran Enough?
David Wood's Top Argument Debunked (Islamic Dilemma)
zhlédnutí 24KPřed 4 měsíci
David Wood's Top Argument Debunked (Islamic Dilemma)
Why Quran was Revealed in Arabic? [Response to David Wood]
zhlédnutí 32KPřed 5 měsíci
Why Quran was Revealed in Arabic? [Response to David Wood]
David Wood Challenged me to Refute this Video
zhlédnutí 41KPřed 5 měsíci
David Wood Challenged me to Refute this Video
How Bad is Brother Rasheed? (Top Christian Apologist in Arabic)
zhlédnutí 19KPřed 6 měsíci
How Bad is Brother Rasheed? (Top Christian Apologist in Arabic)
Douglas Murray is smart and sophisticated
zhlédnutí 20KPřed 6 měsíci
Douglas Murray is smart and sophisticated
Destroying Qadianis with ONE Question
zhlédnutí 24KPřed 6 měsíci
Destroying Qadianis with ONE Question
Response to David Wood: Who Pays for Your Sins in Islam?
zhlédnutí 17KPřed 6 měsíci
Response to David Wood: Who Pays for Your Sins in Islam?
Did Muhammad ﷺ Perform Miracles? [Response to David Wood and Apostate Prophet]
zhlédnutí 15KPřed 7 měsíci
Did Muhammad ﷺ Perform Miracles? [Response to David Wood and Apostate Prophet]
Unexpected Exchange in South Carolina
zhlédnutí 22KPřed 8 měsíci
Unexpected Exchange in South Carolina
In the Quran it says that not even the Prophet knows the hypocrites among him, only Allah. How then would the scholars with their chains have known years later who they could trust and who they couldn't?
DAVIDWOOD BASHED HIS FATHER SKULL IN WITH HAMMER. HE IS MENTALLY STABLE NOW DON'T KNOW FOR HOW LONG BUT I WOULD DEFINITELY FOLLOW A MENTAL CASE. FUN FACTS LETS SEE WHAT BIBLE SAY ABOUT IT. Matthew 15:4: For God said, 'Honor your father and mother' and 'Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. ' BIBLE HAS PUT FORTH A GOOD CAUSE CHALLENGE TO DAVID'S FOLLOWER. IF THEY ONLY RESPECT IT.
Most people in antiquity and today of all nations wash (their privates) after going to the toilet it's not a uniquely Moslem thing, discovered by your prophet. If you need someone to tell you that's a good thing then I guess you took a while to catch on. Back then there was no toilet paper and water was what everyone had to use. Or are you implying people just walked around with shitty assholes. RETARDED Jesus wasn't a primary school teacher or someones mum, and He didn't need to teach people who already know how to use water how to wash themselves. We weren't NEANDERTHALS MATE! Jesus had much greater things to teach, like how to be compassionate, and ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE!!!
If anyone pauses each of the examples he shows including the bible ones you can clearly see the stark contrast of context, as you pick just a tiny piece of each to make your very dull points. EG The mohamed ones do indeed involve sex with a minor, yet his bible extract clearly involves a dead person being revived, which to this day is the only practical and acceptable way of giving mouth to mouth resuscitation!
Truly disgusting, I watched intently for you to disprove something hoping that all the foul things I've witnessed around the world in the name of Islam could be dispelled, by a people of God, but you just beat around the bush and I feel shocked. You really came into this with very little ammo to defend by. You corrected some minor mistakes but the meat and veges of his this David persons argument are literally still there. Kissing a child on the lips! Having sex with MINORS! (but it's OK cause she had her monthly. (Science! biology anatomy i thought Islam was progressive and claimed knowledge and inventions) Licking your own fingers or saying you will not be harmed by evil if you lick mine! Yep, take away the tongue sucking, and other people licking fingers etc, like you say and YOU STILL HAVE THE MAIN ARGUMENT REMAIN.
The expansion of the universe is not just a modern and relative consensus but rather a fundamental concept in cosmology that's based on empirical observation.
Question....when did any grown man lick the lips (OR TONGUE) of a child, male or female, regardless of relation? I have never met ANY person who kisses a child (son, daughter or other) on the lips. One would kiss them on the cheek at most, AT MOST! Let alone lick the lips or tongue. your argument is ridiculous!
without lies islam, islam dies
so the sun sets in a place of muddy waters, or not??? what about the 43 virgins is that for real or a mis interpretation of the perfect quran.??
No 43 or 72 virgins in Quran actually.
DAVIDWOOD HAS NO MORALS. HE BASHED HIS FATHER'S HEAD WITH HAMMER. ACCORDING TO BIBLE. Matthew 15:4: For God said, 'Honor your father and mother' and 'Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. ' NOW I ASK DAVID'S FOLLOW TO HONER YOUR BIBLE. I HIGHLY DOUBT THEY RESPECT THEIR OWN BIBLE.
Dude. Did u just wake up hangover?
I see some people trying to defend islam by saying that aisha had hit puberty at the time of the time of the consumation. Most outrageous thing i ever heard. YOU DO NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH ANYONE WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTANDS IT TO THE FULLEST. Even if the person is of appropriate age. Thas all i would say
muslims doing their best to re-interpret the obvious, jesus christ told us by their deeds you shall know them, and mohamed has a lot of scarry deeds in his life, he has nothing to do with our god of the bible, allah is an imposter pretending to be our god of the bible..
Akhi how do we join your online sessions?
You never actually answered the point though. What would Muhammads poetry being eloquent and us not being able to produce the like thereof have to do with it being divine revelation, how does that follow? Thats what David was saying at 11:25; in response you just said "the quran being unique is not the argument!" he wasnt saying it was, he was saying that that’s at best the conclusion the argument would lead to as opposed to it leading to the conclusion that its divinely inspired, if we were to accept the premise that nobody could produce the like thereof. You also never explain why a human cant come up with the like of the Quran, youre making a case for its eloquence but that doesnt justify the claim in question; David points out the hilarity of your breakdown of the verses not because hes “strawmanning you” saying that your claim is that a human couldnt say قل 1:01:00 but because literally nothing youre pointing out necessitates or even indicates the supernatural. Thats what hes getting at. Your response is just conceding that everything you've pointed out is humanly possible, if thats the case though then theres simply no argument because that means literally everything you pointed out is within human capacity for eloquence; therefore a human being couldve produced the quran.
Salaam Alaikum wrb. Brother if you think you know Islam better go to him and start a dialoog. To start what you are doing is beyond your own understanding. To fight online is a shame.
I ask Atheist friend can you recall anything from your childhood and he said yes lot of stuff. I then ask him why you can recall any memories is it because it was recorded for some reason? I ask what was the purpose of this recording when we are going to die? Or better yet who want your personal information and it is important enough to be recorded and even you can recall it. Many near death experience folks say their entire life flashed before their eyes, interesting . Hence the term JUDGEMENT DAY. That affirmative heaven action will not work, eveyone will be judge hence the name JUDGEMENT DAY. 3:185 Every soul will taste death. And you will only receive your full reward on the Day of Judgment. Whoever is spared from the Fire and is admitted into Paradise will ˹indeed˺ triumph, whereas the life of this world is no more than the delusion of enjoyment.
32:12 If only you could see the wicked hanging their heads ˹in shame˺ before their Lord, ˹crying:˺ “Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back and we will do good. We truly have sure faith ˹now˺!” (32:22) And who is more unjust than he who is given good counsel through the Signs of his Lord and yet he turns away from them? Surely We will exact full retribution from such criminals. (29:2) Do people think that they will be let go merely by saying: “We believe,” and that they will not be tested,1 (29:3) for We indeed tested those who went before them?
QUESTION IS WHY CHRISTIAN LIE A LOT EVEN THOU JESUS TOLD THEM NOT TO LIE. IT IS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT FOLLOW JESUS, THEY FOLLOW PAUL. ACCORDING TO PAUL IT IS OK TO LIE TO SPREAD RELIGION. 2 Corinthians 12:16 16 Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. Yet, crafty fellow that I am, I caught you by trickery! When you think you actually talking to sincere people, that is far from it. You can't get blood from stone. Notice how these apologist steer clear from Judasm because they are afraid loosing money. So people who put Jesus on the cross get a clean pass, let look for easy targets. Even Islamaphobe followers never challenge the hypocrites they truly believe that Old testament folks accept them. Old testament folks spit on them religiously any chance they get. So honesty is not one of their virtue.
Hygiene is important when you lead an army
Oh it's all so confusing there are so many interpretations and so much uncertainty about Islam !!!
The truth about translations of the Qur'an is that how good it seems does depend on how good the translation is which is a human's attempt to tell you the meaning of the Qur'an. I think David also used a clunky translation delibrately because most translations are not so clunky.
-.-.Example of different ruling of Fiqh due to change in grammatical position of a word: Top one is Hafs and the bottom is al Duri. In Hafs Recitation, Arjulakum (being mansub) is linked to washing, while in Duri Quran recitation, Arjulikum (being Majrur) is linked to wiping. Thus, we get two fiqh rulings from the two different Quran riwayat i.e.: 1. Feet are to be washed in wudu. 2. Feet are to be wiped. Chapter Five: 6 The Wiping or Washing of the Feet in the ‘Wudhu’ The scholars of Islam have differed on the type of purification of the feet required for the parts of the ‘wudhu. It is different in riwayah of Hafs an Asim comp to al-Douri from the Qiraʼat of Abu 'Amr ibn al-'Ala' al-Basri.
And?
Wait this is your rebuttal? 😂 i can't believe dumb guys in the comments are praising you that you destroyed him. Wallahi some muslims in the comments have made a better attempt than you have
Wait this is your rebuttal? 😂 i can't believe dumb guys in the comments are praising you that you destroyed him. Wallahi some muslims in the comments have made a better attempt than you have
David wood fans coming back after 4 years of coping lol.
Without lies Islam dies
Religion is based on logic, if you want to know the logic, try thinking about it Islam continues to say Christians are unreasonable, stupid, idiots but still cannot prove that Jesus or Isa was sinful, Many Christians who have converted to Islam also said that Christianity makes no sense but still cannot prove that Jesus was a sinner. But millions of former Muslims who believe in Jesus would definitely say that Muhammad's life was very evil and depraved, as said by Nabeel Quraeshi, a former Pakistani Muslim who said that Muhammad in history was very different from Muhammad in the Muslim hearts. Try to think about which logic is true, Christianity or Islam, think deeply about the millions of ex-Islamists who say it themselves, doesn't that mean there is something wrong? think seriously for the safety of your soul. Study Muhammad's life carefully, is Muhammad really a figure whose life should be emulated? If you're curious, why don't you want to study Muhammad's historical life in the Koran and Hadith? See Nabi asli. CZcams channel discussed based on the Koran and Hadith itself
Cool
Is he on expired weeds?
Hey man isn’t this a liberal argument. Like slavery was practiced. And is even preferred.
Why These books focus on Sex 😟 Prophet ko sex karna tha or he was doing charity ? Clearly Mohd was materialistic man. God only knows how God can like a materialistic man. Definitely he wasn’t a spiritual man. Too busy with his own sensory pleasure and worldly matters
You didnt deny anything though?
Here we go. Need to know Arabic again.
There should be no errors, according to what your apologists say in defense of the Qu’ran.
HUNDRED IDIOT ABDUL HERE HAHAHA, GO CALL HIM AND YOU ALL WILL CRY MORE
Very nice
Just a suggestion read captured thoughts by ibn Jawzi must read!!!
14:46 because Jesus Christ didn’t come to have sex with woman. He came to teach us the laws he wanted us to follow and how to live a holy life. Are u saying ur prophet Mohammed was God? That’s what ur insinuating… sex was ment only to multiply. But living in this flesh it’s hard for us that are born in sin, but not Jesus since he was born from a virgin.
Cool
Does anyone really believe that God speaks to people only in Arabic? Nonsesns.
Nobody claims that.
Then why, when a Muslim is asked a specific question about verses in the Qu’ran that are derogatory to Jews and Christians, the response is invariably that the translations are not reliable but the Arabic is. Always a cop out from Muslim apologists. Tell us how the baby is formed?
TBF you sometimes see Muslims doing #2. Like I sometimes see people going "weak/fabricated hadith!" about the hadiths referring to A'isha's age... in Sahih al-Bukhari
Bring me just one historical proof that Mohammed existed. If the Muslim have it, why they not present it?
1000+ reports by eye witnesses.
@@FaridRespondsBirmingham Manuscript, grave of Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), his house 😂
@@mrsaluyt Birmingham ha? Okay, where you find on this single sheet the name Mohammed? But my firend, look, Wiki says: Although the Quran text witnessed in the two Birmingham leaves almost entirely [12] conforms to the standard text. OMG ALMOST! And about the grave-of-mohammed...hahah my friend WHO is the one gave you that proof? I want to know him too..hahah
@@FaridResponds Bring me only one manuscript from 7th century please, where i see the name Mohammed, reported by a eye witness. Thank you. hahahha
@@philippkaelin3673 A contemporaneous manuscript isn't the only method to ascertain the existence of a historical figure, smartass.
Let's see those manuscripts.