It's quite amusing that David Wood, who doesn't speak Arabic, confidently quotes Quran verses. He's convinced he understands what he's saying, and yet asserting that the Quran is only comprehensible to Arabs. Quite the contradiction, isn't it?
That's his point. Allah says the Arabs needed a book in their own language. Why would a book in an Arabic language be the book for all people? Each people is supposed to get their own messenger according to Quran.
@@Nick_LambSo he is arguing for atheism now? Because this sort of "argument" ruins the Torah and Judaims and the NT and Christianity. Please don't tell us you don't think the KJV or any other translation of the Bible is divinely revealed? Just something to think about.
@@Nick_Lamb You're overlooking a crucial aspect: Allah chose to unveil the Quran in the eloquence of Arabic. The Quran initially addressed Arabs as its primary audience, yet it explicitly declares that Prophet Muhammad was sent to all of humanity. The true contradiction would emerge if the prophet conveyed his message to the Arabs in Hebrew, English, or Chinese. However, there's no paradox when a prophet communicates in the language of his people while simultaneously being a messenger to all of humanity.
@@Nick_LambMy brother, the Qur'an is the word of god for many reasons, including rhetoric in the arabic language and the way the words are consistent. It is impossible for humans, especially the Arabs,to come up with such consistency and words the Qur'an is designed in the miraculous way that no one can disort. You will not understand because you are not Arab learn Arabic and you will learn what I mean, secondly, the Qur'an mentioned things 1400 years ago that science discovered recently. Look for the number of Christian scholars who converted to islam because of the things that were mentioned in the Qur'an which are impossible to be discovered 1400 years ago due to the lack of development. Everything that was discovered now by science is mentioned in the Qur'an from 1400. A year, I hope that god will guide you and I hope that you will conduct further research on the miracle of the Qur'an
@@tachikoma7757 So the Quran is for everyone to understand, but not actually. Besides, that just means there is no reason to bother with Islam. If Islam is true, and we are "blind" to it, it's only because your god wants us to be. Allah being the greatest of deceivers and all that.
@@EmberBright2077 nope. The Quran is understandable. But disbeliever chose to not understand it. That's why they argue about trivial things like language.
@@truthspeaker2405 there is an exception made for muhammad as he was the mercy upon mankind until the hour, and its explicit throughout the Quran and hadith that he is the final messenger sent to all of man kind. One of these was the verse brother farid quoted and another in surah anbya. Now its either you take it or you leave it. I wish you the best my brother. May God Guide Us All.
@@gamerjj777 The Arabs did have prophets sent to them Hud, Salih, Shuayb, and Muhammad (could make argument for Ismail but I digress). Also the Quran never says it’s ONLY for Arabs, the Quran was revealed in arabic for its rich and descriptive words as stated in surah fusilat, and the fact Muhammad’s message started in arabia and then was instructed to spread Islam as said in surah nahl. Not to mention Muhammad’s final khutba were he explicitly says an Arab is not greater than a 3ajam and a 3ajam is not greater than an arab except by good deeds and righteousness. Also christian, atheist, and Jewish Arabs and arabic speakers have never made these types of arguments as they are just silly.
Whats amazing to me is how he says the book is the most boring and useless and subhanallah the verses he shows (41-44) says "as for those who disbelieve there is heaviness in their ears and it is blindness for them , they are those who are called from a place far away"( so they neither listen nor understand)
The Quran also states the mushrikeen polytheists and jews are the most in enmity towards the believers and yet inspite of this knowledge they fulfill that description against themselves proving the Quran right about them
I personally like how he claims you cant understand it unless it is in Arabic but then says it's boring and useless as if 1) He suddenly understands Arabic or 2) He doesnt know Arabic but could easily understand it XD
This piece of Wood is is only good for humans to use as an inanimate object for their daily comforts as a table chair or keeping them warm using to make a fire for cooking besides all these uses the rest is useless Shredded and thrown away as sawdust just like his nugget
Has David even seen how awful the Bible is, especially when god ordered to make a cake with human excrement (Ezekiel 4:12) Ordered Isaiah to walk naked outside the street 20:2-3 Sent two bears to eat children (2 Kings 2:23-24)
Bobby from "Bobby's perspective" read the Qur'an in a language he understood idk if it was English German or Macedonian but he read it and he reverted alhamdulillah. May Allah preserve him and make his voice even more heard and may Allah give him good in this world and the next for his efforts. Ameen.
@@jayd4ever It's not a card. It's the basics, we muslim encourage and focus more on arabic that's why we are still firm in our beliefs, well how many Christians knew Hebrew...??? Although it doesn't matter 🤷♂️🤷♂️ after all they can't defend trinity not in English nor in Hebrew 😂😂
@@yasinkhan5007 the trinity has been explained so many times. please stop lying. also if the trinity is the only thing keeping you in Islam its a weak ledge to hold on to. cheers
@@ragnarlothbrok2782 he didn't even claim anything that weird. your claim that god exists is even crazier, and you also have no source. technically you have a source, but a bad source doesn't count.
@@marlonmarquez4798 Our claim is actually what human beings are born believing in. The belief in One God is something the human being is born with as proven by a study in oxford university lead by Justin Barrette. We know every innate and universal belief of the human being is true (causality and belief that the past actually occured etc etc) and belief in God is one of them hence it is also true.
Dense idiot. No where does it claim the Qur'an was sent to India or China @@truthspeaker2405 😂😂 No one knows what their names were. All that matters is that we follow the final one. "surah 14:4 All the Messengers that We sent spoke the language of their people so that they could explain (their message to them). God guides or causes to go astray whomever He wants. He is Majestic and All-wise. this verse has no exception and therefore Muhammad should speak language of the people and from the group of that folk" You have reading comprehensions. The verse is clearly saying that All Messengers that were sent spoke the language of the PEOPLE the MESSENGER was sent TO. It does not mean all Prophets spoke ALL LANGUAGES. Your stupidity is mindbreaking. "Quran says in order to make message clear to them that means allah will not send a message unless is in your language so that you will understand is arabic clear message to You Muslims don't lie.." Yes. Especially if your native tongue is Arabic. You can really read and actually see the eloquence. Muslims who don't speak Arabic have access to translations. The same way there are English translations of the Bible. Don't be stupid. But of course translating from one language from another may suffer from slight mistranslations due to the Language it is being translated into.
@@truthspeaker2405 not all messengers are mentioned in the Quran so you even know how many messengers there were? No ofcourse not I guess second of all same can be said for you Jesus was only sent for the lost sheaps in Israel not even one claim that he is for all mankind and lastly prophet Muhammad spoke the language of his qauwm or should he speak English to them you can’t even show me in the Bible where the book itselfs claims to be a revelation from God
@@EmberBright2077 Bible is one of the most corrupted book in history. The Quran was for all mankind unlike the Gospel that was only for the jews. The primary audience of the Quran could understood the message perfectly. But same can't be spoken about the Bible. If the primary audience can understand, the knowledge can be passed down to the secondary audience.
Which version in original language? The one that has 6236 verses or one that has 6214 verses? Which one is the right version? Which one did Muhammad recite? Which one matches the eternal preserved tablets that is with Allah? Interesting fact: Did you know the the official version of the Quran was only finalized in 1924 in Cairo, Egypt? It was only authorized officially as recently as 1985, in Saudi Arabia. Why did it take 1300 years for the world to finalize and authorize the Quran, if there has always been just the one and the same Quran all ver the world?
They're not the only ones! What percentage of Muslims do you think know of it? I've asked 10 Muslims just now (including one imam) and none knew. That's a 0% hit rate. They are obviously all clowns by your standard. 🤦♂ Moreover, you don't need to know this tafseer to prove Islam false! The stupidity of Muslims is legendary and you prove it once again!
I just memoried Surah at-Tin and it is one of the most beautiful and powerful chapters I have ever recited, I cannot stop getting goosebumps from it. It’s addicting to recite. It’s a short surah too. There is nothing in the christian bible that can top it. Especially their English translations.
This argument is nonsensical; he is using the English translation of the Bible. So you can’t use that as an argument against the Quran because that will backfire spectacularly at him. What an idiot!
I just read it and I genuinely don't see what could be special about it? To be fair, I don't know arabic, but I don't see how changing the language would somehow make this meaningful. I think something like Psalm 23 is much more touching.
Refuting arguments, if done for the sake of Allah and defending the truth, is never a waste of time. On top of that, you are spreading knowledge to thousands of people. It's hard to imagine a more rewarding use of time. Some naseeha is not naseeha, even if it appears correct. The key is wisdom, which way too many people that give naseeha lack.
What is your definition of truth though? As someone who has read the Quran, and numerous tafsirs, sahih hadiths, etc, and as someone who has studied science and read a lot of history, I find that the Quran contains many local man-made myths, legends and incorrect scientific ideas of the time. Muslims always say to consult "the experts", and I hold a PhD, but when I point these out I immediately get dismissed because what I say, and the facts that I present, contradict what Muslims want to believe. So, what is your definition of truth? If any other religions under discussion had silly old myths that someone tried to relate to modern science, Muslims would be quick to point them out and laugh at them, but not so when it's their religion.
Prob, Why would god only revile his word to Arabs and not the world? I like how he said Arabs was the best people to get shown the message when at the same time Mohamed was a illiterate person who could not read or write.
No. But that’s not what he claims. DW says translations are valid, and you don’t need to learn a different language to read the Bible. Muslims claim that the Quran only makes sense if you read it in Arabic.
@@avgrando2024No muslim claims you need to learn Arabic to read the Qur'an. We only claim you can appreciate it more if you know the original language, and this applies to any other literature works.
@@avgrando2024 That’s not what Muslims claim. Muslims can learn the meaning through transmission by people of knowledge. David says no. ‘You have to listen to me for the meaning of the Quran.’🥴🤣
@@umarabdaziz make sense for "appreciate it more if you know the original language". how about the other point about messenger for each nation? it said every nation has messenger so arab will have Muhammad. I don't see Farid address this point. Farid said "You don't have to have a book". but seems like Quran position is to let them be judged by their book (Q5:47)
So we learn about the prophets stories so we well learn from them. There’s a hasan hadith that even says there was 124,000 prophets. But we only have 25 named ones and maybe if you count some other you can go to like 47 max. So the Qur’an being a concise book it only tells us the stories of the prophets we can learn from and not the prophets from India and china but trust me they existed.
You should watch David's full video, as Farid completely missed the point that David was making. Muslims always speak about how important context is, but then ignore it themselves.
@@theastronomer5800 The problem of David is that he is too dishonest, lazy and simple minded to understand the refinement of Quran. He always strawman the Quran because he can not attack the Quran directly. 1/ Allah doesn't say that someone cannot believe or understand if the revelation is in another language , He says that He revealed in arabic so that these dishonest arabs would not have any(serious) excuse, the fact that he doesn't know the difference tells a lot about his intelligence.. Actually Allah is responding to people like him who find excuses to not believe. 2/The text being in the language of people is not a condition for them to believe, it is a mercy and wisdom of Allah to make the understanding of verses easier for people who are chosen to be ambassadors (companions of the prophet) And the fact that God makes life" easier" for some and "harder" for others is part of the wisdom of God, some have the capacity to live being disabled , poor, sick etc It doesn't mean that life is impossible for them , it is harder but not impossible. He has an anti God logic (dumb logic) , for him equity = equality. Likewise the Quran is harder to understand for non arabs but not impossible, the proof is that many non arabs understand and practice better the Quran than arabs. 3/ Allah says in another verse that these arabs were suprised that it was revealed in arabic, meaning they will always find an excuse . Like in the verse right after the one that David quoted, Moise had a revelation in a language of his people but many disbelieved. It is like saying "miracles (and beauty of the Quran) are a condition to believe" (his logic and many rabbis logic, it is a superficial materialistic logic) No it is not, it is a plus and it reinforces the faith, but faith is based on a universal and simple logic that anyone can understand miracle or not, dishonest people will always find an excuse miracle or not.. 4/ The cause of the text being in arabic is not only for Quraysh to understand, it has many reasons that we know and that we don't know(like all wisdoms of God) it is only one reason of many but again David is too heavy minded to understand simple nuances in language. First of all arabic is the most profound language, a word can have many meanings and there are a lot of nuances and variation of words to describe one thing. It is the language of eloquence and logic (no wonder that arabs were strong in mathematics) so that humanity can have a clear and eloquent final message (that is why Allah says that arabic is clear) It is simple in grammar, doesn't have useless/ counter intuitive rules like many other languages It is a language of great oral tradition so that people can easily memorize it(writing is not the most reliable method to preserve ) It is a miracle language by itself,being present in a lifeless desert and having great poets etc it is the closest language to Abraham's, Moses's Adam's language, actually modern hebrew needed arabic in order to reborn. Hebrew and aramaic were almost dead even before the 6th century.. We use arabic to better understand hieroglyphs, babylonian language african language north african languages etc Even european and asian languages have many words that we can better understand their origins and etymology because of arabic (and not because of greek like they pretend, greeks learned from phoenicians a semitic language) exemples logy (in biology etc) means language or the word language itself "lugha" in arabic, Deus, Dieu (God in french and greek) comes from the word "diya" (light ) in arabic cover comes from kafir, kafara in arabic genes, genealogy , jin in japanese ,origin comes from janine (the foetus in arabic) anata(you) in japanese comes from anta (you) in arabic
Funny thing is, Arabic language used in Quran is different than the one usually use in every day life of Arab people. Quran have it's own style of Arabic language.
It's the Arabic of the 7th century, but also a lot of the grammatical rules are dropped when forcing rhyme etc, as the Quran is written in a poetic style of it's time which makes it easier to memorize. The Arabs of the time we know composes and remembered very long poems.
No, but I can read what scholars who have PhD in the field of Quranic studies say. Just like you can't read ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics for example, but you can depend on experts in the field to tell you much information about them. Your question/argument is very weak, because even if I did, then you would ask me if I'm a Muslim, if I said that I was but not anymore, then you would say that I never was a "real" Muslim. And if I was a Muslim, you would say that I don't understand what I'm talking about, etc. You simply dismiss any and all evidence, regardless the source or expertise, if it contradicts your BELIEF. This is why Muslims do basically no serious research in Quranic studies - as the well educated (Yale) Dr. Yassir Qadhi said, if they reach a "red line", a problem which would show holes in the standard narrative, they do not cross it and say that "Allah knows best". This is not honest scholarship. @@Dontcallmeapusok
@@Dontcallmeapusok ignore the jahil plz . He cannot help but expose his ignorance by replying to the comments here with inane drivel. Bro can’t even show me one grammatical rule the Quran dropped to keep a rhyme. Little does he know that the Arab poets at the time, u know, the experts in their craft, couldn’t find any. If the linguistic masters couldn’t do it, what makes a rando jahil from the internet think he can? The arrogance of ppl istg.
@@digitalonetouch9781 Nah christianity makes no sense tho, how is a perfect God gonna transform into an imperfect human with no knowledge about the hour? You tellin me all the prophets before Jesus spoke about the oneness of God then all of a sudden Jesus comes and there's 3 Gods. What?
@boriserjavec6470 here's what I hear from pew research: "People are leaving Christianity in droves. About 106 million Christians are expected to switch affiliation from 2010 to 2050, while only about 40 million people are expected to enter Christianity." 😂😂😂 Your nonsensical religion is dead, and there's nothing you can do about it.
@@boriserjavec6470I heard that. Yet the primary source of that is hard to find. Can you provide the primary source of it? Not the secondary as there are contradictory comments made about it.
"dont feed the trolls" Unfortunately we Muslims have to stop responding to people like him because he's just a irl troll, he's just a waste of time and like many Shaitans, they only job is stop us from practicing Islam and worshipping Allah. I've been on the internet for 20+ years and Trolls go away when we stop giving them attention
Farid I just found your content today Alhumdulliah. Im surprised youtube algorithm didnt show it to me sooner. You are doing the work of Allah SWT! I pray for you and your family and continue to fight these evil people trying lie and spread misinformation. Peace by upon you my brother.
Many vudeos like this have already been madem i advise watching Arabic 101's video on the criteria of the quran's miraculous eloquence and explaining why it is actually an ibjective criteria.
crazy that David Wood feed himself and his whole family for being an Islamophobe for over 20 years and used the very same topics and arguments over and over and over, so not only he's an arrogant individual, he's shameless. and if anyone wonders how did he get his "hammer time" nickname, it's from his 'past life' where he tried to murder his own father with hammer, and he shamelessly proud of that nickname.
Anyone who uses the word "Islamophobe" cannot be taken seriously as it shows that they do not have a valid argument. Most of David's content consists of showing the most trusted Islamic sources, are they therefore Islamophobic?! As for making content on youtube, if you spend a lot of time finding information and presenting it, as people do on many subjects here, what's wrong with getting paid for it? Don't Muslims who make ridiculous videos about Islam (for example about nonsense such as "scientific miracles") get paid for their efforts?
@@theastronomer5800 u never watched his contents, it showed. Islamophobe is a business in the hundreds of millions $ openly and probably in the billions under the carpet. u don't stating the very same false narratives all your life, u gotta get paid to do it, there's limit to hate and ignorance, and then there's a business that pays.
@@theastronomer5800 yeah, he quotes the sources and then proceeds to spew inane drivel in his typical fashion when applying his “totally informed and unbiased” straw man spin on what those sources say.
@@Nick_Lamb The Quran cannot be criticised in English as there is no such thing. The English interpretation is not the Quran, it is merely an interpretation of the meanings translated. The Quran is purely in Arabic.
@@Nick_Lamb You can't criticize the elequence if you have no idea of the arabic. That does not mean the meaning can't be understood. You can't also insist that your translation is the only valid interpretation because multiple interpretation exist in the arabic itself.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku I was tañking about the content not the eñoquence. When an Arabic speaker criticizes the eloquence what do you say? As for interpretation, based on what you say is it wrong for muslims to say there is only one interpretation?
These clowns have mentioned so many arguments by now that they contradict one another. So I honestly want them to give us a concise run-down of the few arguments that don't contradict one another that they actually believe in so that we can dismantle them all at once. E.g. they claim Muhammad sallahu alayhi wa salam would've written the Quran, then they claim somebody else did and he used it. Then they claim the Sahaba radiallahuanhum would've made it up, etc. . They say all these things, yet only one can be true (if we were to act like these 3 were the only 3 possibilities)
@@truthspeaker2405 are we gonna search the name of 12.400 Prophets that was sent all round the world? i'm not interest in that, i'd rather follow the last and final Prophet.
قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: (ولن تزال هذه الأمة على أمر الله، لا يضرهم من خالفهم، حتى يأتي أمر الله) The prophet pbuh said: (this ummah will remain on the orders of Allah, unharmed by those who oppose them, until the order of Allah (say of judgment) arrives) They try to defeat Islam, but it is in vain
Farid do the narrations that say Allah has 2 right hands mean both his hands are blessed? I have heard this and have seen a Hadith that says Allah has a one right and one left hand.
Ya farid have you seen david and apus's latest stream? At around 2:23:00 apus spent like 2 minutes saying that you are "well-meaning and knowledgeable but not intelligent" and then says that when you see people like apus you only see them as ignorant because they are "further advanced" LMAO David also used the al Nadr argument again even tho you debunked it 💀
I do think that you didn't exactly understand the point under contetion here. .... The issue is that there is a contradiction. The Holy Quran clearly says who is the recipient of the revelation. However, Other Muslims claim that it was sent to the whole world, against the same word of the Quran. Is that not a contradiction?
because Rasulullah was arab. if Quran revealed in france, none of the arabs, sahabat including the prophet can understand it🤣🤣 david wood is a comedian who act like a true scholar 🤣🤣🤣
You clearly don't understand David's argument at all. You seem to either be trying too hard to focus on and respond to every while not listening to the entire argument or you're just being dishonest.
Man Being Ex Muslim and Misleading Information of Islam its Profitable Sadly truth to be told Not believe me? Those that said so Have Patreon, Video advertising and Merchandise Meanwhile people that spread Islam many with disable ads or Limited Advertising and Merch usually useful for learn Islam
I love how David makes it sound like u can’t read the Quran or know what it’s saying without learning Arabic or listening to the “dawah guys.” Bro should really go outside more lol. He doesn’t seem to be in touch with reality these days.
You don't understand David's point because you only watched the little out of context clip by Farid, not the entire video by David. He recently responded to Farid's video, you might want to look at that... Muslims always say that context is key, but then don't bother to look at it themselves. Why?
@@theastronomer5800 u wouldn’t know this, but I have actually watched David’s videos. The content is laughably devoid of proper context, and even coherent logic for that matter. I get it that he believes making islamophobic content can be a source of income, but there are easier ways to make money that actually contribute to society. Btw, I love how u generalize about a quarter of the world’s population 😆. “Muslims always…”
Islam.. Mormonism.. Scientology.. Hindus.. Zynist.. jesuits. Cabala.. Catholics.. Most christian churches.. All are connected to "Freemasonry"..The Mason's only enemy is.. "JESUS THE CHRIST "... All these debaters on both sides.. Don't talk on these channels about the christian bible and all the prophecies that came to past.." It's undeniable"... The seven year tribulation is about to begin..(Jacob's trouble).. Prepare Yourselves...JOHN 3:16
So according to Davids's so-called logic, the Quran needed to be sent in language that no one understands or speaks that way it can be for all mankind that does not understand or speak that language. I now believe that David did actually think he can change the weather, he needs to be sent back to the Loony house and needs get back on his medicine.
@@EmberBright2077 Quran needed to be in arabic because the sahabah were the primary audience. It is for all time but they were the ones who knew the context behind revelation of each verse and propagated it to the rest of the world. If they didn't understand it, Islam wouldn't have spread.
@EmberBright2077 logic is the reasoning used to make the arguement. The arguement is built on the logic. We can use his logic to make arguements he didn't make but it would still be his logic. If I'm quoting a book to prove a point. My arguement is built on the logic that the book I'm quoting is credible. Someone could say "by your logic the book also says X y and z (assume I is false fact). So is that also true now?" The arguement is simply one application of the logic.
"1 in the beginning was the hammer, the hammer was with wood, and the hammer was wood. 2 he was with the hammer from the beginning. 3 through him David-19 spread out, without him there is peace and love that isn't there when he is around. 4 in him was his hammer, and that hammer was the reason for his father's permanent brain damage. 5 that hammer is the couse of darkness in the light, but light will over come it, despite the hate of wood." -- wood 1:1-5
Im agnostic and even i know Christians dont believe in 3 gods. Is it not 1 god in 3? sort of like how a river can start as one and break off into 3 different rivers?
@@andrewwillis9759 they say they believe in 3 persons of one god cuz thats how they worship 3 gods without having to call themselves polytheists. Would like to know how 1 thing can have 3 persons and not be 3 things but i guess they havent figured it out themselves so its a **divine mystery** i guess.
@@NCSiebertdesign if god is who god is. Then why did no early christian for 300 years believe in the trinity? or for 4000 years of jewish history no one intepreted a triune god. john 17:3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. Jesus seperates himself from the only true god as clear as day. Why do you call him God when he himself never did so.
@@FD-kt1rz you're on slippery slope and terrible cherry picker . Early Christians and even disciples (in fact many of them were Jews!!!) fully recognised Jesus as the Son of God as in truine with Father and Holy Spirit. It's clear as day that if you read bible cover to cover that Jesus is God. There are Jews acknowledged the God personhood is plural (Genesis 1:26; 3:22 to name a few) but they do not know fully who God is until Jesus was manifesting in form of a man. Jesus said to the disciple who are still Jewish, "if you really know me, you will know my Father as well... " John 14:7. Case closed.
He already admitted that his soul source of income is Islamaphobic content. I believe he knows, but this will lead to him losing everything. Which would be worth it of course.
@@laquanabdul-rahim848 He's said on multiple occasions that he is not attached to a livelihood of responding to Islam. The fact that he gives full permission for people to repost his videos on their own channels should make it clear it's not about the money.
Did he say the Bible needs to be read in Greek and Aramaic? No. Christians believe translations are valid. Muslims believe Quran can only be read in one language.
Language do not matter, it's the message that matters regardless of what language is revealed and translated into. Hence why bible is the most translated book in the world with same message. Jesus is Lord.
@@myuzairy7324 he agrees with it, that's the point of holy book language (bible in this case, not false book of Quran). You guys are missing his point. Language matters in Quran according to Muslims... "AsHkULly, yOU neEd To ReAD QuRAn iN ArAbic to FuLLy unDERsTand iT." Islam is the most ridiculous of all false religion there is.
“The Quran is the most boring….” -David. Says the man who’s Bible says, “take a goat and cut it in half. Then peel of one ear but not the other one. The cut the uncut ear in 4/5 of put it on the stove. But don’t break of it a single bone 🦴 because of no thank you “Jesus” and the Romans 🥱😴😴😴😴😴😴”
This is a 2nd post but I thought your subscribers might want to know what happened to Moses in the Arabian Peninsula. Now as to the whereabouts of Moses after he rejoined Yether (Jethro). (The name Yether is from the Old South Arabian root 'wtr' and means foundation or founder in the case of Moses' father-in-law). Moses headed for Yether's and his ancestral home described in Surah atTeen: By the Fig (tree) and by the Olive (Tree) and by Tur AsSineen and by this Secured/Honorable City... " This place was an oasis located in a valley of Mount Sineen (also spelled Sina' Q 23:20) where grew fig trees and olive trees. Moses was first commissioned as a prophet in this oasis. Moses had newly fled from Egypt where he was raised in the court of the Egyptian king, a place where he was educated in and conversed in the ancient Egyptian language. At that time the valley was known to Moses as the 'sacred valley of Tuwa' (Taha, 20/12; an-Naziat, 79/16). Tuwa is an Egyptian verb and means 'to supplicate', 'to appeal'. The hieroglyphic spelling is X1 - V4 - G1 - A30. So, the 'sacred valley of Tuwa' is the sacred valley where the petitioner supplicates Allah (swt). That valley was known to Bani Israel as Bakka or the Valley of the weeping (flowing) well. Psalm 84 indicates that Bani Israel made numerous pilgrimages to Bayith Elah or Bayt Allah in Arabic (verses 3 & 4), so it is little wonder that Moses returned to his ancestral place of worship, a valley where Abraham and Ishmael built the Kaba or Bayt Allah. As for Tur Sina', the name derives from the Akkadian word 'sinu' and means 'moonlight'. The word 'sinu was adapted into Arabic as 'snu/sny' but the word was redefined to mean : gleam, shine, radiate, to be resplendent in other words 'to exude light'. Tur Sina (moonlight mountain) later became known as Jabal AnNur or the Mountain of Light. This is where Moses received the Torah during his time of wandering in the Arabian Peninsula after he led Bani Israel out of Egypt. The Arabian Peninsula was not only his ancestral home, it was the only place where Bani Israel would be safe from Firawn. (Firawn does not mean pharaoh ( pr a'a - great house in Egyptian). The meaning in Egyptian is the house of wailing (pr awn) because the crown prince, Kewab, died before he ascended the throne). Conclusion, Moses seems to have been in Mecca and Allah (swt) knows best).
@@ax3226A bunch of rocks just kept piling up throughout millions of years and formed a person and a computer and they just happened to post that silly comment. That seems like the logical answer.😂😂😂
David is just looking for views, popularity and donation from ignorance Islam haters. Nothing's logic in his arguments. I would just smile when his supporters fall in his weird baseless opinion. 😊😊
In surah al Maidah verse 67 Allah says "O Messenger! Allah will ˹certainly˺ protect you from the people. At that time, according to Ashia, Mo had bodyguards. So, Mo told his bodyguards to discontinue his protection. In the beginning of his massage, Mo asked the Arabs to protect him. Mo had to flee the threats he faced in Mecca to Medina for his own safety. In addition, Mo and Abu baker had to hide in a cave when they were being followed. During wars, Mo's followers used to build a tent for him away from all the fighting and provide him with security detail for protection. During the Uhud battle, Mo was attacked and suffered major injuries. AND THE MOST IMPORTANT EVENT IS MO'S DEATH FROM THE POISON WHICH ZANAB BINT AL HARETH, GAVE HIM. Did Allah certainly˺ protect Mo from the people. Just Thinking!!
What is your definition of truth though? As someone who has read the Quran, and numerous tafsirs, sahih hadiths, etc, and as someone who has studied science and read a lot of history, I find that the Quran contains many local man-made myths, legends and incorrect scientific ideas of the time. Muslims always say to consult "the experts", and I hold a PhD, but when I point these out I immediately get dismissed because what I say, and the facts that I present, contradict what Muslims want to believe. So, what is your definition of truth? If any other religions under discussion had silly old myths that someone tried to relate to modern science, Muslims would be quick to point them out and laugh at them, but not so when it's their religion.
Muslims really are slow. When have you heard Christian’s say that you can only understand the Bible unless you read it in Greek? But Muslims say you must read the Quran in Arabic to understand it.
You're really braindead. Some words aren't accurately translated due to how rich Arabic is compared to English. However reading the book in the language it was revealed it makes it easier to understand it without these translation errors. @@avgrando2024
Christians don’t claim that you need to read the Bible in Greek or Aramaic. Christians believe translations are fine. Muslims claim Quran can only be read in Arabic.
Someone who is sincere towards their creator will recognize that Quran is the only remaining message in the world today which teaches true monotheism. You don't need to hold a PhD in Arabic to understand this. Compound that with the consistent message of the Quran, its lack of contradictions, its rhythmic and rhyming beauty, the prophecies all proven to be true, its description of natural phenomena that are still being uncovered by the tools of modern science- and it becomes evident why it is a miraculous book. But for the non Arab (and Arab alike), the message is clear- there is no religion or way of life today that has not been corrupted by the desires and prejudices of men except Islam, one who is sincere will see this clearly.
Keep in mind that the "monotheism" of Islam developed out of the Judeo-Christian tradition and the belief in Yahweh by the early Israelites. Yahweh was one of several late Bronze early Iron Age gods that the early Israelites followed, along with Baal. Yaweh and Baal were two of the sons of the Sumerian god El, in ancient Ugaritic texts. Eventually Yahweh was adopted as their main and then the only god, adopting the characteristics of the other gods. From this, Christianity and then Islam emerged. As for lack of contradictions, that is ONLY what Muslims say. As a scientist I can for example point out many and show ancient local myths and scientific ideas that the Quran uses, but of course you will dismiss ALL of them (and I actually hold a PhD in astrophysics, but that becomes irrelevant even though Muslims always say to talk to experts...).
Monotheism isn't something exclusive to the Abrahamic faiths and can be found mentioned in the texts of many ancient religions. Not sure what you mean to suggest with this point, that Islam is somehow secretly paganist? Gotta wonder what kind of scientist you are to spout a bunch of conjecture in such absolute terms.
I never said that it is exclusive. Only that in the case of the Abrahamic religions they developed over time from a polytheistic worldview. The oldest texts in the OT speak of other gods. As for being a scientist, that is not relevant to the historical origins of a religion. It is however to pointing out things in the Quran which are wrong, but combined with history it gives one more understanding. Take the 7 heavens view for example. This was a very common cosmological view in MANY ancient cultures of the time because of the seven objects that moved in the sky (Sun, Moon and five visible planets) - they were each thought to have a celestial sphere or "heaven". Some models had stars in the lowest heaven, which the Quran has. The Quran simply adopts these ancient (and incorrect) ideas, and because no scientist view the world that way today Muslims claim that these are things not yet understood, while they don't understand their historical background. @@omarz2145
It is not fully understood, nor is it needed to be understood in order to worship our creator. So long as we have established the belief through examination of all the evidences, then accepting what we may not understand is a matter of we hear and obey.
My guy I think you completely missed David's argument , you might convinced some people (those whose parents are cousins) with this argument but I don't thinks this works with the rest
If David hammer wood thinks Quran is boaring than it's his problem not worlds. Just what happening in Palestine westerners picking Quran and found it amazingly inspirational hence reverting! So it's you problem not ours !!
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
![Did Muhammad ﷺ Perform Miracles? [Response to David Wood and Apostate Prophet]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zgHtmG55-w0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Did Muhammad ﷺ Perform Miracles? [Response to David Wood and Apostate Prophet]](/img/tr.png)
![Refuting Yasir Qadhi AND David Wood [The Prophet's ﷺ Marriage to Zaynab]](/img/n.gif)
It's quite amusing that David Wood, who doesn't speak Arabic, confidently quotes Quran verses. He's convinced he understands what he's saying, and yet asserting that the Quran is only comprehensible to Arabs. Quite the contradiction, isn't it?
That's his point. Allah says the Arabs needed a book in their own language. Why would a book in an Arabic language be the book for all people? Each people is supposed to get their own messenger according to Quran.
@@Nick_LambSo he is arguing for atheism now? Because this sort of "argument" ruins the Torah and Judaims and the NT and Christianity. Please don't tell us you don't think the KJV or any other translation of the Bible is divinely revealed? Just something to think about.
@@Nick_Lamb You're overlooking a crucial aspect: Allah chose to unveil the Quran in the eloquence of Arabic. The Quran initially addressed Arabs as its primary audience, yet it explicitly declares that Prophet Muhammad was sent to all of humanity. The true contradiction would emerge if the prophet conveyed his message to the Arabs in Hebrew, English, or Chinese. However, there's no paradox when a prophet communicates in the language of his people while simultaneously being a messenger to all of humanity.
@@Nick_LambMy brother, the Qur'an is the word of god for many reasons, including rhetoric in the arabic language and the way the words are consistent. It is impossible for humans, especially the Arabs,to come up with such consistency and words the Qur'an is designed in the miraculous way that no one can disort. You will not understand because you are not Arab learn Arabic and you will learn what I mean, secondly, the Qur'an mentioned things 1400 years ago that science discovered recently. Look for the number of Christian scholars who converted to islam because of the things that were mentioned in the Qur'an which are impossible to be discovered 1400 years ago due to the lack of development. Everything that was discovered now by science is mentioned in the Qur'an from 1400. A year, I hope that god will guide you and I hope that you will conduct further research on the miracle of the Qur'an
@@cledwards No, not even remotely to do with atheism. You should watch his video and actually try to understand his point.
Somehow burnt wood doesn't realise that the verse he quoted actually describes him.
true!
Could you explain how?
@@EmberBright2077easy. Pause @6:22 and read the full verse. Especially the part that is not underline.
@@tachikoma7757 So the Quran is for everyone to understand, but not actually.
Besides, that just means there is no reason to bother with Islam. If Islam is true, and we are "blind" to it, it's only because your god wants us to be. Allah being the greatest of deceivers and all that.
@@EmberBright2077 nope. The Quran is understandable. But disbeliever chose to not understand it. That's why they argue about trivial things like language.
I think David Woody prefers the book to be revealed in Gujarati language.
@@truthspeaker2405 there is an exception made for muhammad as he was the mercy upon mankind until the hour, and its explicit throughout the Quran and hadith that he is the final messenger sent to all of man kind.
One of these was the verse brother farid quoted and another in surah anbya. Now its either you take it or you leave it. I wish you the best my brother. May God Guide Us All.
@@truthspeaker2405 right here:
We have sent you ˹O Prophet˺ only as a mercy for the whole world.
(Quran 21:107)
He says that the quran was revealed in arabic for arabs because they had no prophets sent to them. So quran was not for the whole world.
@@truthspeaker2405 Mankind innit not Arabs
@@gamerjj777 The Arabs did have prophets sent to them Hud, Salih, Shuayb, and Muhammad (could make argument for Ismail but I digress). Also the Quran never says it’s ONLY for Arabs, the Quran was revealed in arabic for its rich and descriptive words as stated in surah fusilat, and the fact Muhammad’s message started in arabia and then was instructed to spread Islam as said in surah nahl. Not to mention Muhammad’s final khutba were he explicitly says an Arab is not greater than a 3ajam and a 3ajam is not greater than an arab except by good deeds and righteousness. Also christian, atheist, and Jewish Arabs and arabic speakers have never made these types of arguments as they are just silly.
Whats amazing to me is how he says the book is the most boring and useless and subhanallah the verses he shows (41-44) says "as for those who disbelieve there is heaviness in their ears and it is blindness for them , they are those who are called from a place far away"( so they neither listen nor understand)
The Quran also states the mushrikeen polytheists and jews are the most in enmity towards the believers and yet inspite of this knowledge they fulfill that description against themselves proving the Quran right about them
I personally like how he claims you cant understand it unless it is in Arabic but then says it's boring and useless as if 1) He suddenly understands Arabic or 2) He doesnt know Arabic but could easily understand it XD
This piece of Wood is is only good for humans to use as an inanimate object for their daily comforts as a table chair or keeping them warm using to make a fire for cooking besides all these uses the rest is useless Shredded and thrown away as sawdust just like his nugget
Has David even seen how awful the Bible is, especially when god ordered to make a cake with human excrement (Ezekiel 4:12)
Ordered Isaiah to walk naked outside the street 20:2-3
Sent two bears to eat children (2 Kings 2:23-24)
@@karkum3122 it backfires when you consider Aramaic was the langugage of Bible
Bobby from "Bobby's perspective" read the Qur'an in a language he understood idk if it was English German or Macedonian but he read it and he reverted alhamdulillah. May Allah preserve him and make his voice even more heard and may Allah give him good in this world and the next for his efforts. Ameen.
Ameen
yes it is translated now but when muslims have problem they always go to arabic card
@@jayd4ever It's not a card. It's the basics, we muslim encourage and focus more on arabic that's why we are still firm in our beliefs, well how many Christians knew Hebrew...??? Although it doesn't matter 🤷♂️🤷♂️ after all they can't defend trinity not in English nor in Hebrew 😂😂
@@yasinkhan5007 the trinity has been explained so many times. please stop lying. also if the trinity is the only thing keeping you in Islam its a weak ledge to hold on to. cheers
@@cannonbolt14 Explain to us, please
Woody is American, learning another language is his kryptonite.
The younger generation is more open to learning new language
@@Marta1Bucksource: trust me bro
@@ragnarlothbrok2782 broke
@@ragnarlothbrok2782 he didn't even claim anything that weird. your claim that god exists is even crazier, and you also have no source. technically you have a source, but a bad source doesn't count.
@@marlonmarquez4798 Our claim is actually what human beings are born believing in. The belief in One God is something the human being is born with as proven by a study in oxford university lead by Justin Barrette. We know every innate and universal belief of the human being is true (causality and belief that the past actually occured etc etc) and belief in God is one of them hence it is also true.
"We'll never recover from this." 😂😂 Farid too funny
@@truthspeaker2405 4/10 do not recommend your review.
Dense idiot.
No where does it claim the Qur'an was sent to India or China @@truthspeaker2405 😂😂
No one knows what their names were. All that matters is that we follow the final one.
"surah 14:4
All the Messengers that We sent spoke the language of their people so that they could explain (their message to them). God guides or causes to go astray whomever He wants. He is Majestic and All-wise.
this verse has no exception and therefore Muhammad should speak language of the people and from the group of that folk"
You have reading comprehensions. The verse is clearly saying that All Messengers that were sent spoke the language of the PEOPLE the MESSENGER was sent TO. It does not mean all Prophets spoke ALL LANGUAGES. Your stupidity is mindbreaking.
"Quran says in order to make message clear to them that means allah will not send a message unless is in your language so that you will understand
is arabic clear message to You Muslims don't lie.."
Yes. Especially if your native tongue is Arabic. You can really read and actually see the eloquence. Muslims who don't speak Arabic have access to translations. The same way there are English translations of the Bible. Don't be stupid. But of course translating from one language from another may suffer from slight mistranslations due to the Language it is being translated into.
@@truthspeaker2405u know there were 124k messengers with only 25 being mentioned in the quran
Yet again Farid completely missed the point that David Wood was making. The stupidity of Muslims is legendary, and it's proven time and time again 🤦♂
@@truthspeaker2405 not all messengers are mentioned in the Quran so you even know how many messengers there were? No ofcourse not I guess second of all same can be said for you Jesus was only sent for the lost sheaps in Israel not even one claim that he is for all mankind and lastly prophet Muhammad spoke the language of his qauwm or should he speak English to them you can’t even show me in the Bible where the book itselfs claims to be a revelation from God
"Farid it's 3ayb to respond to everything" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lamao
Salam what doea tayb mean?
Salam what doea tayb mean?
@@theyellowflash100Wa'alaikum Assalam. 'Good' or 'righteous'.
@@gurutruthspeak598 jhazakhallah khayr akhi
Basically he is jealous that our book is intact in original languange..
What has he said that could lead to that conclusion?
@@EmberBright2077 Bible is one of the most corrupted book in history. The Quran was for all mankind unlike the Gospel that was only for the jews. The primary audience of the Quran could understood the message perfectly. But same can't be spoken about the Bible. If the primary audience can understand, the knowledge can be passed down to the secondary audience.
@@EmberBright2077his hatred toward islam says alot
Which version in original language? The one that has 6236 verses or one that has 6214 verses?
Which one is the right version? Which one did Muhammad recite? Which one matches the eternal preserved tablets that is with Allah?
Interesting fact: Did you know the the official version of the Quran was only finalized in 1924 in Cairo, Egypt? It was only authorized officially as recently as 1985, in Saudi Arabia. Why did it take 1300 years for the world to finalize and authorize the Quran, if there has always been just the one and the same Quran all ver the world?
@@TEPMOBETEP 😂😂😂😂 why are you using the same script as David wood?
It is absolutely disgraceful that those clowns never heard of tafseer as-sa'di
They're not the only ones! What percentage of Muslims do you think know of it? I've asked 10 Muslims just now (including one imam) and none knew. That's a 0% hit rate. They are obviously all clowns by your standard. 🤦♂
Moreover, you don't need to know this tafseer to prove Islam false!
The stupidity of Muslims is legendary and you prove it once again!
I just memoried Surah at-Tin and it is one of the most beautiful and powerful chapters I have ever recited, I cannot stop getting goosebumps from it. It’s addicting to recite. It’s a short surah too. There is nothing in the christian bible that can top it. Especially their English translations.
Nah
He's right
This argument is nonsensical; he is using the English translation of the Bible. So you can’t use that as an argument against the Quran because that will backfire spectacularly at him. What an idiot!
he's right@@EmberBright2077
I just read it and I genuinely don't see what could be special about it? To be fair, I don't know arabic, but I don't see how changing the language would somehow make this meaningful. I think something like Psalm 23 is much more touching.
Refuting arguments, if done for the sake of Allah and defending the truth, is never a waste of time. On top of that, you are spreading knowledge to thousands of people. It's hard to imagine a more rewarding use of time. Some naseeha is not naseeha, even if it appears correct. The key is wisdom, which way too many people that give naseeha lack.
What is your definition of truth though? As someone who has read the Quran, and numerous tafsirs, sahih hadiths, etc, and as someone who has studied science and read a lot of history, I find that the Quran contains many local man-made myths, legends and incorrect scientific ideas of the time. Muslims always say to consult "the experts", and I hold a PhD, but when I point these out I immediately get dismissed because what I say, and the facts that I present, contradict what Muslims want to believe. So, what is your definition of truth? If any other religions under discussion had silly old myths that someone tried to relate to modern science, Muslims would be quick to point them out and laugh at them, but not so when it's their religion.
Ignore the jahil in ur comment section plz. He just enjoys trolling in Islamic channels. Plz don’t give him any attention.
He's doing it intentionally... He's intentionally stupid and evil... I don't think this should be asked even as a rhetorical question.. 🤢🤢
"Low IQ type of argument from David Wood", as opposed to all his other arguments lol
His own "book" only exists originally in Greek and yet his man-god never spoke Greek. How about that, David?
Jesus historically spoke Koine Greek which the exact language the New Testament was written in. His mother tongue was Aramaic.
@@eniolaelisery1503press X to doubt
@@eniolaelisery1503proof
@@eniolaelisery1503Is there evidence of this?
What kind of point do you think you're making?
Like, what conclusion are we supposed to come to?
You know its good when he gives the definition of contradict in the first 3 minutes.
yes but Muslims contradict when Quran says that it was revealed in Arabic for Arabs to understand
If it was revealed in Chinese would he still ask why in Chinese?
Prob, Why would god only revile his word to Arabs and not the world? I like how he said Arabs was the best people to get shown the message when at the same time Mohamed was a illiterate person who could not read or write.
Even if it were in English lmao. Anything to make a dime off of his islamophobic videos.
no we would say that chinese prophet was for chinese not the world
@@jayd4ever why is that?
If muslims would claim it can only be correctly understood in Chinese, yes, he would
Does he believe the bible was revealed in English or something?
No. But that’s not what he claims. DW says translations are valid, and you don’t need to learn a different language to read the Bible. Muslims claim that the Quran only makes sense if you read it in Arabic.
@@avgrando2024No muslim claims you need to learn Arabic to read the Qur'an. We only claim you can appreciate it more if you know the original language, and this applies to any other literature works.
@@avgrando2024
That’s not what Muslims claim.
Muslims can learn the meaning through transmission by people of knowledge.
David says no. ‘You have to listen to me for the meaning of the Quran.’🥴🤣
@@umarabdaziz make sense for "appreciate it more if you know the original language". how about the other point about messenger for each nation? it said every nation has messenger so arab will have Muhammad. I don't see Farid address this point. Farid said "You don't have to have a book".
but seems like Quran position is to let them be judged by their book (Q5:47)
So we learn about the prophets stories so we well learn from them. There’s a hasan hadith that even says there was 124,000 prophets. But we only have 25 named ones and maybe if you count some other you can go to like 47 max. So the Qur’an being a concise book it only tells us the stories of the prophets we can learn from and not the prophets from India and china but trust me they existed.
"Room temperature argument." Lols
Good catch Farid. He did a sleight of hand, from learning the book and its teachings and appreciating the beauty.
You should watch David's full video, as Farid completely missed the point that David was making. Muslims always speak about how important context is, but then ignore it themselves.
@@theastronomer5800 The problem of David is that he is too dishonest, lazy and simple minded to understand the refinement of Quran.
He always strawman the Quran because he can not attack the Quran directly.
1/ Allah doesn't say that someone cannot believe or understand if the revelation is in another language , He says that He revealed in arabic so that these dishonest arabs would not have any(serious) excuse, the fact that he doesn't know the difference tells a lot about his intelligence..
Actually Allah is responding to people like him who find excuses to not believe.
2/The text being in the language of people is not a condition for them to believe, it is a mercy and wisdom of Allah to make the understanding of verses easier for people who are chosen to be ambassadors (companions of the prophet)
And the fact that God makes life" easier" for some and "harder" for others is part of the wisdom of God, some have the capacity to live being disabled , poor, sick etc It doesn't mean that life is impossible for them , it is harder but not impossible. He has an anti God logic (dumb logic) , for him equity = equality.
Likewise the Quran is harder to understand for non arabs but not impossible, the proof is that many non arabs understand and practice better the Quran than arabs.
3/ Allah says in another verse that these arabs were suprised that it was revealed in arabic, meaning they will always find an excuse .
Like in the verse right after the one that David quoted, Moise had a revelation in a language of his people but many disbelieved.
It is like saying "miracles (and beauty of the Quran) are a condition to believe" (his logic and many rabbis logic, it is a superficial materialistic logic)
No it is not, it is a plus and it reinforces the faith,
but faith is based on a universal and simple logic that anyone can understand miracle or not, dishonest people will always find an excuse miracle or not..
4/ The cause of the text being in arabic is not only for Quraysh to understand, it has many reasons that we know and that we don't know(like all wisdoms of God)
it is only one reason of many but again David is too heavy minded to understand simple nuances in language.
First of all arabic is the most profound language, a word can have many meanings and there are a lot of nuances and variation of words to describe one thing.
It is the language of eloquence and logic (no wonder that arabs were strong in mathematics) so that humanity can have a clear and eloquent final message (that is why Allah says that arabic is clear)
It is simple in grammar, doesn't have useless/ counter intuitive rules like many other languages
It is a language of great oral tradition so that people can easily memorize it(writing is not the most reliable method to preserve )
It is a miracle language by itself,being present in a lifeless desert and having great poets etc
it is the closest language to Abraham's, Moses's Adam's language, actually modern hebrew needed arabic in order to reborn.
Hebrew and aramaic were almost dead even before the 6th century..
We use arabic to better understand hieroglyphs, babylonian language african language north african languages etc
Even european and asian languages have many words that we can better understand their origins and etymology because of arabic (and not because of greek like they pretend, greeks learned from phoenicians a semitic language)
exemples
logy (in biology etc) means language or the word language itself "lugha" in arabic,
Deus, Dieu (God in french and greek) comes from the word "diya" (light ) in arabic
cover comes from kafir, kafara in arabic
genes, genealogy , jin in japanese ,origin comes from janine (the foetus in arabic)
anata(you) in japanese comes from anta (you) in arabic
@@RafanFarooquib perfect, JazakAllah. I have noticed that in David’s other videos he loves employing strawmen.
Funny thing is, Arabic language used in Quran is different than the one usually use in every day life of Arab people.
Quran have it's own style of Arabic language.
Factttsssss
It's the Arabic of the 7th century, but also a lot of the grammatical rules are dropped when forcing rhyme etc, as the Quran is written in a poetic style of it's time which makes it easier to memorize. The Arabs of the time we know composes and remembered very long poems.
@@theastronomer5800 yeah can you speak Arabic fluent ?
No, but I can read what scholars who have PhD in the field of Quranic studies say. Just like you can't read ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics for example, but you can depend on experts in the field to tell you much information about them.
Your question/argument is very weak, because even if I did, then you would ask me if I'm a Muslim, if I said that I was but not anymore, then you would say that I never was a "real" Muslim. And if I was a Muslim, you would say that I don't understand what I'm talking about, etc. You simply dismiss any and all evidence, regardless the source or expertise, if it contradicts your BELIEF. This is why Muslims do basically no serious research in Quranic studies - as the well educated (Yale) Dr. Yassir Qadhi said, if they reach a "red line", a problem which would show holes in the standard narrative, they do not cross it and say that "Allah knows best". This is not honest scholarship. @@Dontcallmeapusok
@@Dontcallmeapusok ignore the jahil plz . He cannot help but expose his ignorance by replying to the comments here with inane drivel. Bro can’t even show me one grammatical rule the Quran dropped to keep a rhyme. Little does he know that the Arab poets at the time, u know, the experts in their craft, couldn’t find any. If the linguistic masters couldn’t do it, what makes a rando jahil from the internet think he can? The arrogance of ppl istg.
I love this channel, may allah forgive your sins for your efforts. The dawah scene lacked this in the west on this scale online
I always wait for the end for a hilarious surprise! and this one is the best so far!
Why do I feel stupider every time I listen to David Wood?
Because Islam has blinders over your eyes
At least you realise that. You'd have to be stupid to be a follower of David Wood.
Stupidity is a disease that spreads.
@@digitalonetouch9781 Nah christianity makes no sense tho, how is a perfect God gonna transform into an imperfect human with no knowledge about the hour? You tellin me all the prophets before Jesus spoke about the oneness of God then all of a sudden Jesus comes and there's 3 Gods. What?
@digitalonetouch9781 or maybe just cos he a is just some diagnosed phyco (in his own words) tryna make some money?
I don't hate many things in life, but David Wood's face is definitely on that list
Jazaka'Allah brother. May Allah continue to guide and protect you.
Its good to brother Farid.. because we need to reply again and again the Taufiq so we can remember and Taufiq for the our new Muslim and muslimah..
The guy is only upset that his religion is dead while Islam followers are increasing at light speed
Didn't you hear from muslim apologists that there is an avalanche of apostasy
@boriserjavec6470 here's what I hear from pew research: "People are leaving Christianity in droves. About 106 million Christians are expected to switch affiliation from 2010 to 2050, while only about 40 million people are expected to enter Christianity." 😂😂😂
Your nonsensical religion is dead, and there's nothing you can do about it.
@@boriserjavec6470I heard that. Yet the primary source of that is hard to find. Can you provide the primary source of it? Not the secondary as there are contradictory comments made about it.
@@boriserjavec6470 They are being replaced with better Muslims. So what exactly is stopping you to become a Muslim?
the stupidity and immorality of your religion@@FreePalestine_____
"dont feed the trolls" Unfortunately we Muslims have to stop responding to people like him because he's just a irl troll, he's just a waste of time and like many Shaitans, they only job is stop us from practicing Islam and worshipping Allah. I've been on the internet for 20+ years and Trolls go away when we stop giving them attention
Farid I just found your content today Alhumdulliah. Im surprised youtube algorithm didnt show it to me sooner. You are doing the work of Allah SWT! I pray for you and your family and continue to fight these evil people trying lie and spread misinformation. Peace by upon you my brother.
Make a video highlighting the exceptional eloquence of quran
Many vudeos like this have already been madem i advise watching Arabic 101's video on the criteria of the quran's miraculous eloquence and explaining why it is actually an ibjective criteria.
crazy that David Wood feed himself and his whole family for being an Islamophobe for over 20 years and used the very same topics and arguments over and over and over, so not only he's an arrogant individual, he's shameless.
and if anyone wonders how did he get his "hammer time" nickname, it's from his 'past life' where he tried to murder his own father with hammer, and he shamelessly proud of that nickname.
Anyone who uses the word "Islamophobe" cannot be taken seriously as it shows that they do not have a valid argument. Most of David's content consists of showing the most trusted Islamic sources, are they therefore Islamophobic?!
As for making content on youtube, if you spend a lot of time finding information and presenting it, as people do on many subjects here, what's wrong with getting paid for it? Don't Muslims who make ridiculous videos about Islam (for example about nonsense such as "scientific miracles") get paid for their efforts?
@@theastronomer5800 u never watched his contents, it showed.
Islamophobe is a business in the hundreds of millions $ openly and probably in the billions under the carpet.
u don't stating the very same false narratives all your life, u gotta get paid to do it, there's limit to hate and ignorance, and then there's a business that pays.
@@theastronomer5800 yeah, he quotes the sources and then proceeds to spew inane drivel in his typical fashion when applying his “totally informed and unbiased” straw man spin on what those sources say.
David Woods career was destroyed by Mohammad Hijab years ago... If you haven't watched it go and check it out
Right!!! That was too funny 😂🤣😆
@@brandonray2496 yeah it was hilarious...david woods literally sh*t himself
".. Low-tier, low-IQ, room -temperature IQ type of argument by..."
Aren't all dead-wood arguments against Islam of this type?
Love and respect towards you ..... ❤
that last clip was amazing
Even when the Qur'an revealed in English, the people other than English, will also do the same...
and it will on and on and on...
When the Quran is criticized in English people are dismissed as not knowing Arabic.
@@Nick_Lamb The Quran cannot be criticised in English as there is no such thing. The English interpretation is not the Quran, it is merely an interpretation of the meanings translated. The Quran is purely in Arabic.
@@Akhi_Umar You prove my point and also disagree with the person I actually replied to. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.
@@Nick_Lamb
You can't criticize the elequence if you have no idea of the arabic. That does not mean the meaning can't be understood. You can't also insist that your translation is the only valid interpretation because multiple interpretation exist in the arabic itself.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku I was tañking about the content not the eñoquence. When an Arabic speaker criticizes the eloquence what do you say?
As for interpretation, based on what you say is it wrong for muslims to say there is only one interpretation?
These clowns have mentioned so many arguments by now that they contradict one another. So I honestly want them to give us a concise run-down of the few arguments that don't contradict one another that they actually believe in so that we can dismantle them all at once.
E.g. they claim Muhammad sallahu alayhi wa salam would've written the Quran, then they claim somebody else did and he used it. Then they claim the Sahaba radiallahuanhum would've made it up, etc. .
They say all these things, yet only one can be true (if we were to act like these 3 were the only 3 possibilities)
dont u know bro, hes a christian. 3 is 1
@@gsuth20202😭😭😭
@@gsuth20202 sad
he acts dumb to make dumb arguments to his dumb audience... it's like talking to a 4 year old child
@@truthspeaker2405 are we gonna search the name of 12.400 Prophets that was sent all round the world?
i'm not interest in that, i'd rather follow the last and final Prophet.
Thanks for your response letting everyone knows the truth. Jajak Allah Khair.
قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: (ولن تزال هذه الأمة على أمر الله، لا يضرهم من خالفهم، حتى يأتي أمر الله)
The prophet pbuh said: (this ummah will remain on the orders of Allah, unharmed by those who oppose them, until the order of Allah (say of judgment) arrives)
They try to defeat Islam, but it is in vain
Farid do the narrations that say Allah has 2 right hands mean both his hands are blessed? I have heard this and have seen a Hadith that says Allah has a one right and one left hand.
It means he has 2 right hands and Allah sub7ana wa ta'3la knows best
Actually we don't know the hand is look like. I mean take example of clock. Clock have 2 hand 1 face. Is that mean the clock have hand like us?
There are differing interpretations among Muslims about the interpretation of this, and it can go pretty deep down the rabbit hole so to speak
Our god has two RIGHT hands.
The god of David Wood has two FALSE hands.
Law has hands, too, and sometimes you can't escape those unless you are rich 😂😂😂.
Farid, your arguments are light
David will burn any wood just to get sparks 😅
Ya farid have you seen david and apus's latest stream? At around 2:23:00 apus spent like 2 minutes saying that you are "well-meaning and knowledgeable but not intelligent" and then says that when you see people like apus you only see them as ignorant because they are "further advanced" LMAO
David also used the al Nadr argument again even tho you debunked it 💀
6:45 Allah answers his question but his eyes can see, the hearts is blind
If only reply videos were still a thing. Then it would've been difficult for them to ignore refutations
This is the most stupid question ,,😂
Just imagine God revealed the torah to Moses in mandarin ,a language which Moses himself didn't understand 😂😂😂
I do think that you didn't exactly understand the point under contetion here. ....
The issue is that there is a contradiction. The Holy Quran clearly says who is the recipient of the revelation. However, Other Muslims claim that it was sent to the whole world, against the same word of the Quran. Is that not a contradiction?
@asiootieno7846 hahaha 😆 you need the one who asks this question should check their understanding issues asap
because Rasulullah was arab. if Quran revealed in france, none of the arabs, sahabat including the prophet can understand it🤣🤣
david wood is a comedian who act like a true scholar 🤣🤣🤣
You clearly don't understand David's argument at all. You seem to either be trying too hard to focus on and respond to every while not listening to the entire argument or you're just being dishonest.
The after scene was great 😂
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN... I AM EATING A STEAK RN.. THANK U
Man Being Ex Muslim and Misleading Information of Islam its Profitable Sadly truth to be told Not believe me? Those that said so Have Patreon, Video advertising and Merchandise
Meanwhile people that spread Islam many with disable ads or Limited Advertising and Merch usually useful for learn Islam
The end is gold
Salam alaikum, good and important video
Did you looked up the name المختار بن فلفل 🙃
I love how David makes it sound like u can’t read the Quran or know what it’s saying without learning Arabic or listening to the “dawah guys.” Bro should really go outside more lol. He doesn’t seem to be in touch with reality these days.
You don't understand David's point because you only watched the little out of context clip by Farid, not the entire video by David. He recently responded to Farid's video, you might want to look at that... Muslims always say that context is key, but then don't bother to look at it themselves. Why?
@@theastronomer5800 u wouldn’t know this, but I have actually watched David’s videos. The content is laughably devoid of proper context, and even coherent logic for that matter. I get it that he believes making islamophobic content can be a source of income, but there are easier ways to make money that actually contribute to society.
Btw, I love how u generalize about a quarter of the world’s population 😆. “Muslims always…”
@@tatooinenative860 Ignore tht dude he is an atheist lmao.Always see him in every dawah videos
@@RafanFarooquib JazakAllah for the heads up. When I see regular Islamophobes in the comments I let others know too
Islam.. Mormonism.. Scientology.. Hindus.. Zynist.. jesuits. Cabala.. Catholics.. Most christian churches.. All are connected to "Freemasonry"..The Mason's only enemy is.. "JESUS THE CHRIST "... All these debaters on both sides.. Don't talk on these channels about the christian bible and all the prophecies that came to past.." It's undeniable"... The seven year tribulation is about to begin..(Jacob's trouble).. Prepare Yourselves...JOHN 3:16
So according to Davids's so-called logic, the Quran needed to be sent in language that no one understands or speaks that way it can be for all mankind that does not understand or speak that language. I now believe that David did actually think he can change the weather, he needs to be sent back to the Loony house and needs get back on his medicine.
That's not his argument. How on Earth did you think that was his argument?
@@EmberBright2077 Quran needed to be in arabic because the sahabah were the primary audience. It is for all time but they were the ones who knew the context behind revelation of each verse and propagated it to the rest of the world. If they didn't understand it, Islam wouldn't have spread.
@@EmberBright2077 according to his logic he said. Not his arguement. Theres a difference between the two that your not catching.
@@FD-kt1rz Could you please explain?
@EmberBright2077 logic is the reasoning used to make the arguement. The arguement is built on the logic.
We can use his logic to make arguements he didn't make but it would still be his logic.
If I'm quoting a book to prove a point. My arguement is built on the logic that the book I'm quoting is credible.
Someone could say "by your logic the book also says X y and z (assume I is false fact). So is that also true now?"
The arguement is simply one application of the logic.
"1 in the beginning was the hammer, the hammer was with wood, and the hammer was wood. 2 he was with the hammer from the beginning. 3 through him David-19 spread out, without him there is peace and love that isn't there when he is around. 4 in him was his hammer, and that hammer was the reason for his father's permanent brain damage. 5 that hammer is the couse of darkness in the light, but light will over come it, despite the hate of wood."
-- wood 1:1-5
و عليك السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته إن شاء الله
David Wood believes in three gods.
Im agnostic and even i know Christians dont believe in 3 gods. Is it not 1 god in 3? sort of like how a river can start as one and break off into 3 different rivers?
@@andrewwillis9759 they say they believe in 3 persons of one god cuz thats how they worship 3 gods without having to call themselves polytheists. Would like to know how 1 thing can have 3 persons and not be 3 things but i guess they havent figured it out themselves so its a **divine mystery** i guess.
@@FD-kt1rz Because God is who God is...
@@NCSiebertdesign if god is who god is. Then why did no early christian for 300 years believe in the trinity? or for 4000 years of jewish history no one intepreted a triune god.
john 17:3
Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
Jesus seperates himself from the only true god as clear as day. Why do you call him God when he himself never did so.
@@FD-kt1rz you're on slippery slope and terrible cherry picker . Early Christians and even disciples (in fact many of them were Jews!!!) fully recognised Jesus as the Son of God as in truine with Father and Holy Spirit. It's clear as day that if you read bible cover to cover that Jesus is God. There are Jews acknowledged the God personhood is plural (Genesis 1:26; 3:22 to name a few) but they do not know fully who God is until Jesus was manifesting in form of a man. Jesus said to the disciple who are still Jewish, "if you really know me, you will know my Father as well... " John 14:7. Case closed.
السلام عليكم
‘Even a fool will find a bigger fool to follow him’. This is how I rationalize a charlatan like David Wood having a following. 😂
Let him belief what he want to belief. We know one things "from Allah we come, to Allah we will return.
Inna lillahi we Inna ileyhi radjiun ALLAHU AKBAR
Y'know what's funny? All the points he put forth applied to Christianity so well than it is to Islam 😂
Examples?
Wood needs to work it out
@@EmberBright2077Almost every "argument" he makes.
No wonder this guy is a diagnosed phyco
Keyboardwarrior? 😂🤣😅
@@DMC1982 yea there are keyboard warriors hating on us everywhere indedd
David Wood knows in his heart that the Quran is the truth.
You know in your heart that the Quran is lies.
He already admitted that his soul source of income is Islamaphobic content. I believe he knows, but this will lead to him losing everything. Which would be worth it of course.
You are hallucinating. Too much hashish !!
We know in our hearts and our minds and our souls that the Qur'an is false. You drink camel urine because your prophet says so? Fools.
@@laquanabdul-rahim848 He's said on multiple occasions that he is not attached to a livelihood of responding to Islam. The fact that he gives full permission for people to repost his videos on their own channels should make it clear it's not about the money.
Can you please do a video on what the quran and hadiths say about bad botox, Mr Wood needs good advice
DW is the biggest victim of the Dunning Krueger effect and of his own arrogance. What a poor fool.
he acts like a book critic when instead of reading books he eats pages off of them
like the goat right?
@@andrewwillis9759 thats right david wood is the goat LOL
did he realize that the bible is revealed in ..........
uhh, sorry what language actually the bible revealed in?
Did he say the Bible needs to be read in Greek and Aramaic? No. Christians believe translations are valid. Muslims believe Quran can only be read in one language.
_uhh, sorry what language actually the bible revealed in?_
Most definitely not English 🤣
Language do not matter, it's the message that matters regardless of what language is revealed and translated into. Hence why bible is the most translated book in the world with same message. Jesus is Lord.
@@NCSiebertdesign _Language do not matter, it's the message that matters_
Good. Tell your fellow Christian DW that.
@@myuzairy7324 he agrees with it, that's the point of holy book language (bible in this case, not false book of Quran). You guys are missing his point. Language matters in Quran according to Muslims... "AsHkULly, yOU neEd To ReAD QuRAn iN ArAbic to FuLLy unDERsTand iT." Islam is the most ridiculous of all false religion there is.
“The Quran is the most boring….” -David.
Says the man who’s Bible says, “take a goat and cut it in half. Then peel of one ear but not the other one. The cut the uncut ear in 4/5 of put it on the stove. But don’t break of it a single bone 🦴 because of no thank you “Jesus” and the Romans 🥱😴😴😴😴😴😴”
This is a 2nd post but I thought your subscribers might want to know what happened to Moses in the Arabian Peninsula. Now as to the whereabouts of Moses after he rejoined Yether (Jethro). (The name Yether is from the Old South Arabian root 'wtr' and means foundation or founder in the case of Moses' father-in-law). Moses headed for Yether's and his ancestral home described in Surah atTeen: By the Fig (tree) and by the Olive (Tree) and by Tur AsSineen and by this Secured/Honorable City... " This place was an oasis located in a valley of Mount Sineen (also spelled Sina' Q 23:20) where grew fig trees and olive trees. Moses was first commissioned as a prophet in this oasis.
Moses had newly fled from Egypt where he was raised in the court of the Egyptian king, a place where he was educated in and conversed in the ancient Egyptian language. At that time the valley was known to Moses as the 'sacred valley of Tuwa' (Taha, 20/12; an-Naziat, 79/16). Tuwa is an Egyptian verb and means 'to supplicate', 'to appeal'. The hieroglyphic spelling is X1 - V4 - G1 - A30. So, the 'sacred valley of Tuwa' is the sacred valley where the petitioner supplicates Allah (swt). That valley was known to Bani Israel as Bakka or the Valley of the weeping (flowing) well. Psalm 84 indicates that Bani Israel made numerous pilgrimages to Bayith Elah or Bayt Allah in Arabic (verses 3 & 4), so it is little wonder that Moses returned to his ancestral place of worship, a valley where Abraham and Ishmael built the Kaba or Bayt Allah.
As for Tur Sina', the name derives from the Akkadian word 'sinu' and means 'moonlight'. The word 'sinu was adapted into Arabic as 'snu/sny' but the word was redefined to mean : gleam, shine, radiate, to be resplendent in other words 'to exude light'. Tur Sina (moonlight mountain) later became known as Jabal AnNur or the Mountain of Light. This is where Moses received the Torah during his time of wandering in the Arabian Peninsula after he led Bani Israel out of Egypt. The Arabian Peninsula was not only his ancestral home, it was the only place where Bani Israel would be safe from Firawn. (Firawn does not mean pharaoh ( pr a'a - great house in Egyptian). The meaning in Egyptian is the house of wailing (pr awn) because the crown prince, Kewab, died before he ascended the throne). Conclusion, Moses seems to have been in Mecca and Allah (swt) knows best).
Two guys believing fairy tales discussing Wich fairy tale is less of a fairy tale.
Yet you’re here watching and commenting 🥴
@@ax3226A bunch of rocks just kept piling up throughout millions of years and formed a person and a computer and they just happened to post that silly comment. That seems like the logical answer.😂😂😂
@@Raydandenwolf seriously, these people are delude bro
@@ax3226 its entertaining... Aren't you watching movies or shows even tho you know its unreal?
@@Raydandenwolf nah some old guy in heaven formed us from clay. Didn't you know?
David is just looking for views, popularity and donation from ignorance Islam haters.
Nothing's logic in his arguments.
I would just smile when his supporters fall in his weird baseless opinion.
😊😊
In surah al Maidah verse 67 Allah says "O Messenger! Allah will ˹certainly˺ protect you from the people. At that time, according to Ashia, Mo had bodyguards. So, Mo told his bodyguards to discontinue his protection. In the beginning of his massage, Mo asked the Arabs to protect him. Mo had to flee the threats he faced in Mecca to Medina for his own safety. In addition, Mo and Abu baker had to hide in a cave when they were being followed. During wars, Mo's followers used to build a tent for him away from all the fighting and provide him with security detail for protection. During the Uhud battle, Mo was attacked and suffered major injuries. AND THE MOST IMPORTANT EVENT IS MO'S DEATH FROM THE POISON WHICH ZANAB BINT AL HARETH, GAVE HIM. Did Allah certainly˺ protect Mo from the people. Just Thinking!!
That part that David said about the Quran being bad and all disgusted me
Thanks Allah for truth in islam❤
What is your definition of truth though? As someone who has read the Quran, and numerous tafsirs, sahih hadiths, etc, and as someone who has studied science and read a lot of history, I find that the Quran contains many local man-made myths, legends and incorrect scientific ideas of the time. Muslims always say to consult "the experts", and I hold a PhD, but when I point these out I immediately get dismissed because what I say, and the facts that I present, contradict what Muslims want to believe. So, what is your definition of truth? If any other religions under discussion had silly old myths that someone tried to relate to modern science, Muslims would be quick to point them out and laugh at them, but not so when it's their religion.
@@theastronomer5800 only islam worship one true God the creator, other religion worship the creation as God.
Was bible revealed in english?
New testament -greek
Old testament -hebrew
😅
Injeel was revealed in aramic as far as i know
Muslims really are slow. When have you heard Christian’s say that you can only understand the Bible unless you read it in Greek? But Muslims say you must read the Quran in Arabic to understand it.
@@Soldier-Of-Mahdi isa(as) used to speak in aramic preached ingil in aramic but the book was not preserved.
You're really braindead.
Some words aren't accurately translated due to how rich Arabic is compared to English.
However reading the book in the language it was revealed it makes it easier to understand it without these translation errors. @@avgrando2024
❤️❤️🌹🌹🌹🌹🤲
After over 1400 years, a contradiction in the Quran is finally discovered by a cross dresser. Much wow.
does he actually think his arguments are strong?
so bold of them make these arguments while a lot of them Christians doesn't even know what the original language of Bible was
Christians don’t claim that you need to read the Bible in Greek or Aramaic. Christians believe translations are fine. Muslims claim Quran can only be read in Arabic.
💥💥💥 there it is akhi
of course u can understand it’s in every language
IN THE NAME OF GOD THE MERCIFUL THE COMPASSIONATE
WE DEMAND WORLD PEACE.
AMEN AMIN
12:50 look how shocked they look 🤣🤣🤣
Simple answer, it was revealed to a man who speaks Arabic 😂
Someone who is sincere towards their creator will recognize that Quran is the only remaining message in the world today which teaches true monotheism. You don't need to hold a PhD in Arabic to understand this. Compound that with the consistent message of the Quran, its lack of contradictions, its rhythmic and rhyming beauty, the prophecies all proven to be true, its description of natural phenomena that are still being uncovered by the tools of modern science- and it becomes evident why it is a miraculous book. But for the non Arab (and Arab alike), the message is clear- there is no religion or way of life today that has not been corrupted by the desires and prejudices of men except Islam, one who is sincere will see this clearly.
Keep in mind that the "monotheism" of Islam developed out of the Judeo-Christian tradition and the belief in Yahweh by the early Israelites. Yahweh was one of several late Bronze early Iron Age gods that the early Israelites followed, along with Baal. Yaweh and Baal were two of the sons of the Sumerian god El, in ancient Ugaritic texts. Eventually Yahweh was adopted as their main and then the only god, adopting the characteristics of the other gods. From this, Christianity and then Islam emerged.
As for lack of contradictions, that is ONLY what Muslims say. As a scientist I can for example point out many and show ancient local myths and scientific ideas that the Quran uses, but of course you will dismiss ALL of them (and I actually hold a PhD in astrophysics, but that becomes irrelevant even though Muslims always say to talk to experts...).
Monotheism isn't something exclusive to the Abrahamic faiths and can be found mentioned in the texts of many ancient religions. Not sure what you mean to suggest with this point, that Islam is somehow secretly paganist? Gotta wonder what kind of scientist you are to spout a bunch of conjecture in such absolute terms.
I never said that it is exclusive. Only that in the case of the Abrahamic religions they developed over time from a polytheistic worldview. The oldest texts in the OT speak of other gods.
As for being a scientist, that is not relevant to the historical origins of a religion. It is however to pointing out things in the Quran which are wrong, but combined with history it gives one more understanding. Take the 7 heavens view for example. This was a very common cosmological view in MANY ancient cultures of the time because of the seven objects that moved in the sky (Sun, Moon and five visible planets) - they were each thought to have a celestial sphere or "heaven". Some models had stars in the lowest heaven, which the Quran has. The Quran simply adopts these ancient (and incorrect) ideas, and because no scientist view the world that way today Muslims claim that these are things not yet understood, while they don't understand their historical background.
@@omarz2145
It is not fully understood, nor is it needed to be understood in order to worship our creator. So long as we have established the belief through examination of all the evidences, then accepting what we may not understand is a matter of we hear and obey.
❤❤❤❤❤
Why is it a issue, the whole ummah pray in arabic, ummah is everywhere❤
My guy I think you completely missed David's argument , you might convinced some people (those whose parents are cousins) with this argument but I don't thinks this works with the rest
إخرس
It's because The Prophet Muhamamd(SAW) and his companions and their descendants spoke that language.
Thanks to wood for making me to realize that, I am not that dumb(stupid).
He is really a scale to calculate the stupidity of an individual.
Who?
@@AkashDhingra-fw3jf woody
David Wood is literally living in Denial mode lately
I remember watching this video of david and thinking, Davie boy is finished. He's ran out of arguments.
If David hammer wood thinks Quran is boaring than it's his problem not worlds. Just what happening in Palestine westerners picking Quran and found it amazingly inspirational hence reverting!
So it's you problem not ours !!
We need brothers like you who handle in responses. Otherwise these jahils will run around spreading nonsense without being fact checked
Can you do a video about the bible talking about false prophets
Sure and that’s why the Israelite people should understand Greek written gospels
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ )
They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
exactly
May Allah expose the liars and all of their lies
they expose themselves. may Allah let them do it.
Also Arabia wasnt under empire control and dominance which made it easier for dawah away from political influence