@@abiabi9353 If Allah describes them in the Quran as mothers of the believers, and this did not happen to the wives of the prophets Noah and lot , peace be upon them, Who are you or someone else to come and attack the mothers of the believers?
@babahadjimohamed9339 Mother of believers is a legal title, meaning that it is impermissible for any of the wives of the Prophet ﷺ to get remarried after his passing. (Since it is haram to marry your mother). The term has nothing to do with merit. The Prophet had both good and bad wives. And the bad wives were a test for him from Allah ﷽.
@@Adam-iz5kh legal title ? Said who exactly ? Why were the wives of the prophets Noah and Lot, peace be upon them, not described in Quran as mothers of the believers? If the intention was to prohibit marriage to the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him only, why did the prohibition not come without a title of honor for them, which is mothers of the believers?
dude trynna doing tafsir with english translation LOOL, you know he is a con-artist. because they dont have any tafsir + all their books are not authentic. so they built everything upon lies.
Truly the people of my house (Ahl al-Bayt) in my community is like Noah's ark: Whoever takes refuge therein is saved and whoever opposes it is drowned."
@@jessep517 Minor variations of this hadith appear in the works of Sunni scholars such as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Abd-Allah al-Tabari, al-Suyuti, and al-Shablanji.
I mean basically all you tried to accomplish in this video was trying to downplay his words but you didn’t actually refute anything he said with solid evidence and it took you this long to make a response to one of his topics what about the other videos 😂
Are you saying it's alright for a wife to lie and say her husband mouth smells just for fun? What's your defense? We learn Rasullah never lied even in jokes. And how is Aisha even 16 in medina?
He is saying ammar is an inconsistent liar slandering the wives of the prophet salallahu aleihi wa salam who stayed married to him till his death in the holy month of ramadan in public . Hope this helps your understanding .
No one is infalliable except the prophet pbuh everyone has a qareen with them which is shytan that tempts them expect the prophet pbuh also keep in mind I think Aisha and had sa ra repented afterwards that innixdent
I am not satisfied with this response. Ammar Nakshawani came with strong evidence from our books. I hope you can clarify. It has created a lot of doubts.
@@iceycones654 1. I have seen these types of comments a lot recently and farid exposed a similar comment in one of his video 2. Because of this concept of taqiyya shias can't be trusted. Look at that comment,this peter guy is definitely a shia lol .
@@Check_my_playlists What do you mean by exposed? And generalizing a whole group of people because of a concept? Do you even know what Taqqiya means? It means to hide your identity in fear of death or execution, this peter guy doesn't seem to be in any danger. Also this is what the Quran says about this, "Surah 3:28, “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”
17:50 the reason “it’s a test” is valid for the question of why prophet Muhammad stayed married, is because Aisha is one of, if not THE central figure in the Sunni/Shia schism It’s a test for every Muslim after him - when faced with a question like Jamal, whose side are you on? I notice some sneaky language you used at the beginning… aisha was merely “involved” with Jamal… Why dance around it? The weight of what she did, compared against all the Hadiths we have about Ali’s status? Don’t whitewash the battle of Jamal, while being ready to criticize others for their creative uses of language. Did her father Abu Bakr not kill those who went against his Khilaafa? So by keeping Aisha around, this becomes the ultimate test for every Muslim to pick a side. You simply cannot be intellectually honest and remain neutral Once you start putting the Hadiths in favor of Ahlulbayt, and comparing the actions of some sahabis against those Hadiths, then you can see that early Islamic figures were not exactly the most pure of people So then the question becomes, who do you take your religion from? If Omar/Aisha/Abu Bakr are not good enough, then WHO IS? Enter the pure household of Allah’s messenger, which solves all the moral problems a new studying Muslim would have… both through prophetic wisdom passed down and purity of character guaranteed by Allah
its not a conspericy...lol...ammar may not speak very calmly, but this is not conpericy brother are you blind? Its in the QURAN, IN SAHIH, IN BUKHARI....
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 the Quran also didn’t give authority to Abu bakr. It also didn’t give Umar the authority to creat “good bidah” passed the prophet Mohammad’s death. The Quran does not verify many things. We are talking about history and comparing 3rd party sourcing though Hadith. The Quran is a backing to the claims. Lut and Nuh peace be upon them didn’t need to divorce their wives for Allah to tell us in the Quran they are going to hell. If you’re looking for all the proofs of 3rd party sourcing in the Quran. And they were all there. There wouldn’t be Shia. Sunni. Selifi. Wahabi. Ahmadi and many more splits within the religion. There wouldn’t be different school of thoughts in Sunni Islam as well as Shia Islam. If it was all “clear”. Just because Sayid Ammar has an outlook and view on the sourcing you may not have does not make him wrong. He’s been studying for 20+ years traveling the world and studying. We should respect those who dedicate their lives to studying these sources. Shia Sunni or whoever. Their analysis counts. And so does yours. If this was supposed to be easy, we would all have 1 simple narrative. Love you brother I appreciate the points. And for all of us as Muslims. We should look into each point for ourselves. Open the sourcing ourself. And read! As Allah has commanded us to. Salam Habibi 🤲🏼✊🏽♥️
Such a weak response - classic Sunni response when the truth is clear even within your own books.. ‘oh they’re plotting because they loved the prophet’ ‘they would make the prophet upset because they were joking’ ‘the chain of narration is weak’. If only you defended the real Prophet like you defend your idols. It is a known fact and even among Sunni academics this is known to be a verse about these two wives (Hafsa and Aisha). God just decides to reveal a verse to defend the prophet and threaten these two if they continue to mock the Prophet out of bants? God doesn’t know that they were jealous because they ‘loved’ him? Wake up ya Akhi. Why do you make these people infallible and always find an excuse?
It’s because that story is an addition added by the publishers and isn’t actually from Al Bukhari so the authors didn’t want to add anything to Al bukhari itself so they added it on the footnote to A. Give context and B. Not ascribe it to bukhari
@@Abu_Jihad why would this context be provided when it is rejected and other contexts are available which conflict and hence the premise of this video?
Notice how they always use their annoying tone to get their point across. Ironically every ashura they smack themselves anyway, so they’re losing brain cells by the year. That’s why their arguments get weaker overtime lol
@Azharq2023 annoying voice? So he's voice is more important than his message? Remember mocking people was one of the attributes of kafir during the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) so this makes me think you guys are just focusing on being funny then learning the truth.
Man after seeing him share a clip of Omar suleiman describing Aishah and how rosy and sugar coated it is - as if there are no issues at all, I’d rather face the truth from Ammar than be blinded by Sunni scholars.
You need to do this reaction academically(give reference from sunni book) If not, your comment only based on your opinion, emotion and it is weak argument. Salam Ramadan, brother!
I don't understand. He showed him to be dishonest with his usages of sources . Do you need a hadith saying that ammar says a book is from abdulwahab when it's not lol?
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Thank u Syed ammar your truths have rattled so many cages n the true colours of those who still refuse or deny even their own books by twisting and turning it as they twist n turn the words of Allah swt to fit their agendas!
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
May Allah help u Sunnis. With u guys the verse “it’s not the eyes that’s are blind, it’s the heart” is well and true. Syed Ammar using ur books to prove u wrong and u still can’t accept the truth
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm crazy conclusions? 😂😂 he read the facts from ur books and told u what they said? He didn’t conclude these things… ur scholars did. This farid brother is trying his best to escape the truth by looking for silly ways out
salaams brother. I came across a Shia on social media who pointed out a few hadith in Abd al-Razzaq's Musannaf asserting that Ibn Umar (RA) held the view that taraweeh/Qiyam should not be prayed in the masjid. could you perhaps make a video on this?
Sayyed ammar made a whole video about the taraweeh prayer and all of the sources are from sunni books, I recommend you go watch it and inshallah Allah swt will open your eyes to the truth
@@bubblegumniece8952 He has a bad habit of using inauthentic hadith to make points against the sahaba, whilst presenting them as if they are sahih. otherwise he misrepresents/misinterprets the sahih ones. That alone makes him untrustworthy, and I dont think it is wise as a layman to take knowledge from such a person.
@@Shobob okay how about this, you go to Sayed Ammar's video about the taraweeh prayers, get your own copy of sahih Al-bukhari and other Hadiths mentioned and open the Hadith to which he opens to. I can see your sincere heart is willing to go on the right path. all this propaganda you heard about Sayed Ammar are pure hate speeches so don't listen to others and see for yourself
@@Shobob Hey, i have personally viewed some of the videos regarding these controversial topics, and i must say, not out of bias, hate nor lie; that most, if not ALL of the evidence used are compiled from the 6 'believed' sahihs; through this, Amaar Nakshawani clealy shows the authenticity of the book, and reads the wording of the 'sahih' hadith/s word for word. Im sure that its not too hard for you to make your own judgment through the use of pure logic and clearly shown evident sources. So, please go and watch the entirety of the video, and i can assure you that you will be further educated regarding this topic. Hope this clarifies a few things.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed.. It fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Nice try fooling the ummah without showing proofs, so that they dont go read the Quran and their own books. All of the ahlulbayt were given the merit of shahadat, including the Holy Prophet pbuh. And the ones to kill Him pbuh were his own wives. May Allah never forgive them
@@condorianonegdiffsgokuthe reality is Quran cannot be understood with our Hadith. If you read the tafsir of the Ayat ul tathir it is clear who the members of the Ahlulbayt are, and the prophet makes it clear in the Hadith that it is not his wife/ wives.
@@May-mp9vw The verses of Quran are not random sentences stiched together. They have coherency, order and a story. And it is very clear if you read the verses serially, the wives (ra) are part of ahlul bayt. The hadiths have a weaker strength than what is clear in the Quran. And our sunni hadiths don't even exclude the wives. And I don't read shia tafsirs. Sunni tafsirs say this verse refers to the wives (ra). Based on context the term ahlul bayt might be used for the wives or it might be used for the family of Ali (ra) or for both. In this verse, however, it is primarily directed to the wives and it indirectly may include other members as an addition. If 11:73 includes sarah (as), there is no reason to doubt the verse of ahlul bayt includes the wives of prophet (saws). It's very similar in structure.
@@everythingandroidois Only in the sense that we can’t marry them. This “mothers” verse you quote was Allah’s response to Talha’s proclamation he wanted to marry Aisha, and he was a so-called “righteous Sahabi” at the same time You cannot have it both ways, we either have logic or we have this blind Nasibi idolization
Farid great response ex shia here. and i was deep into it my whole life, i can say that ammar has changed. alot. in 2011 and before he used to hate speakers like yasser habib who used to do these types of videos cause of shia sunni unity and causing the killing of shias in the middle east due to there cursing of respected personalities. he was opposed of shia lecturers using the mimbar to curse or defame these figures for it has no positive bearing. until he got sponsored he always was afollower of sistani. but that changed when he got sponsored by hussein tv a shirazi tv show now why is that important. ayatollah shirazi is the teacher of yasser habib. and is one of the few ayatollahs who opposes unity with sunnis. and openly courages cursing tatbir. and other things made haram by sistani and khamenei to name two prominoate ayatollahs or marjas who oppose shirazi arrested his brother in qom. ever since he got money his message changed he began being more distasteful it first began with his ISIS refrence to the first caliph abu bark (ra) and every year since he gotten more bold. ayatollah khamenei made a fatwa against these scholars. and sais they were m15 m16 agents or british shia he called them only useful to cause hatred between sunni and shia for the UK and its allies like america and israel. hamdulilah i left shiasm many years ago. but still hold respect for khamenei for giving fatwas against cursing against tatbir. and urging sunni shia unity. unlike shirazi who now owns ammar nakshawani. anyways bit of insight good video
Bro, you are not saying the truth. Please study more and carefully, so that you can see the truth with your naked eyes Habibi. Mahe Ramadhan Kareem to you and your loved ones. May ALLAH grants you hidayah through the blessings of this Holy Month.
12:34 The book “رسالة في الرد على الرافضة” has been attributed to multiple authors in various sources: Muhammad Hayyat ibn Ibrahim al-Sindhi1, an Islamic scholar known for his contributions to the Hanafi and Hanbali schools of thought. Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the founder of Wahhabism, whose works include a book with a similar title Muhammad bin Khalil bin Yusuf Abu Hamid al-Balbisi al-Shafi’i, also known as Al-Ramli Al-Maqdisi, who has a book with the same title.
Lmao. Clearly the points you're making in this video are absurd, taking parts of the ayah and saying that Allah is praising them. How blind could you guys be wallah? That's the problems us shias/rawafidh/kuffar/murtad (whatever you wanna call us, it's quite expected from you guys now) have with you, maybe not with the certain personalities in fact. You praise them to such an extent that they clearly don't deserve. It's clear as day. When you say Aisha was the most beloved, best wife bla bla all nonsense, that for us is the biggest disrespect to Sayyeda Khadija (AS). And we praise the ahlul bayt (AS) because they for sure well deserve that praise, plus we have clear evidence from your literature with nothing that can disregard their status.
@@AH_5878 what kind of stupid comparative question this is? Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was the wife of Rasul Allah while imam Ali (AS) was his successor. Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was his most beloved among the wives and imam Ali (AS) was his most beloved among the companions.
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 haha yes. Also, I'm trying to find the word 'happly' in the dictionary. Couldn't find in the one we have on the internet, lemme know if someone is a Shakespeare fan or smth, maybe it is a word.
@@user-gb7uo6cc7k The Quran says he sought their pleasure. So he didn't actually make halal haram in the true sense but rather decided that their pleasure is a must so he needs to refrain. Why did he seek their pleasure?
So while he used your books and quoted direct sources you just engaged in ad hominem attacks on him and twisting words instead of actually refuting any of what he said? Sounds about right
Theres literally no word in the dictionary as happly...its a typo and the word is supposed to be happily. Do not misguide people by making new definitions
Haply is a word in dictionary and word used in arabic is عَسَىٰ which means perhaps/Maybe. Idk which Kinda Dictionary and Quran you are using and only one who is misguiding people is you at the moment.
I think if you pointed out how Allah had regard the people who spread rumors about Aisha’s supposed “infidelity” *Astagfirullah* and how they were condemned it would make this video stronger by making it clear that they are committing the same action that had those people condemned.
And you failed to actually falsify his claims. Watch his full lecture. Aisha got exposed, cry about it. Because I’m pretty sure Allah and his prophet love a person so much they’d threaten them by saying god is on his side and so is Gabriel and the believers and the angels. It’s not a cop out to say she was a test. Aisha was a test. Everything in this life is a test, Ammar bin yaser said himself, verily Allah has tested you with Aisha to see if you choose him or her. Your arguments are based on emotion rather than intellectual enquiry grow up Literally you’ll happily say Aisha being a test is a cop out because it emotionally gets to you but you’ll happily say the children in Gaza are dying because they’re being tested. Why is one a cop out and one isn’t? A test has a purpose, ie to choose Allah or her. Because whether you like it or not, Aisha has demonstrated many evidences or herself being against Allah. And literally refuted your own claim, you said at the beginning, if you have a opinion on a personality like hitler, giving charity this will be seen as bad. You’ve literally done the same thing. You’ve assumed Aisha is a good person so any Hadith narrated from her must be from a good place like kisa, why have you assumed that? That’s based on emotion. Again the shia just show that there is a lot of evidence to show that Aisha is shady person and thus we must dissociate from her
You claim that these people are the righteous of believers and second to the Prophet (saw), all Sayed Ammar is doing is showing you from your OWN literature and Sahih texts that this CLEARLY is utter nonsense. To say these people are human and they made mistakes and so on so on but you keep them as your TOP guide to the Sunnah of the Prophet is delusional, it is simple, we Shia do not want them, we do not need them, Allah, his messenger, Quran and his Ahlulbayt are “sufficient”for us. if you truly follow Umar’s teachings then you should remove all Hadith literature from your houses and studying as Umar said to the prophet of GOD in Sahih al Bukhari, “The Quran is sufficient for us”, we do not need to get you a pen and paper! May Allah guide us All.
Seriously? Really? Who’s got a HUUUGE number of hate books against the other? Who’s whole sect is based upon the hate of the other? Who’s sect has got some dumb ass stories or bidas about the other? Think u need to reevaluated ur life if that’s what u think
We’re not the ones chopping Sunnis heads. Destroying their civilizations. And funding terrorism. The Shia are the only ones helping the Sunni Palestinians right now. While the 1.9billion Sunni watch and pray from home. We are focused on you you’re right. Focused on protecting you and sharing the truth.
Speaker’s Corner bashes Shia every other week. What are you smoking And yeah it’s kinda hard to NOT focus on the Bakri sect when all sectarian militias in the Middle East & South Asia come from them lol Y’all need to start acting human
Prove from the books just like Syed Amaar does i think it would give us a better understanding. Additionally, could i understand which Sunni Book or books specifically would be consider authentic and/or which can be considered 100% authentic?
What caused Aisha RA to fight imam Ali in Jamal... clearly shows even if you are related to prophet doesn't mean you are always on right path. May allah be pleased with her she had done damage to the islam too
Bummer I was trying not to be sectarian or get into polemics at all this Ramadan,… cuz of you know Gaza,.. But I have been in the Sunni mosque all month so far,. Except one day,. And praying like you, I see you as brothers ,. But I also hear a lot of snide comments from ignorance,. (Not towards me but in general/ probably cuz they watch these dawah bro channels) this is why,. We practice taqiyya,. I haven’t subverted or even preached one word ,. Of Shia thought ,. Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) would be proud 😊 Anyways it sucks your books that are sahih are not sahih as soon as our argument appears,… as sahih,. Get over it Gaza is starving 😢
As salamu aleykum Farid, your camera has gotten much better 🤣. I've had something on my mind not talked about much in either anti islam and islamic circles. A christian told me about the north pole where the sun doesn't set . He asked rhetorically how a muslim would pray/fast here, could you make a video on this? As salamu aleykum
@@FaridResponds I saw a clip from shaykh Hisham at Tahiri saying that it should be estimated based on the hadith where the first day when dajjal comes will be like a year and the sahabah asked how they should pray.
@ukimenustah26 It literally does. Do you know about the hadith? Cause if you do, I don't think you would have assumed that his question is unrelated to that hadith.
@@rcmysm9123 where's the comparison your making your own comparison again it was again refering to the disbeliefing wives of prophet not the other thing apart
I'm super glad I watched this. Nakshawani very effectively why the Shia narrative makes sense...and the Sunni narrative does not. I do respect Farid, though, and hope he and his followers come to the truth.
Good video, but if the story of the Prophet pbuh and Maria is not true, what about Sunan an Nasai 3959? It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed: "O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse. (Authentic according to darussalam)
Bro, he is literally reading Quran and the commentary. When are you going to even listen to him? When are you going to actually read Quran and the commentary yourselves? This isn't rocket science. Put your sectarianism aside and open your eyes. Read Quran. Ask yourself, how were Ahlulbayt (a.s.) were respected and treated in the history? Keep it that simple and start from there.
This video is a clear example that you are Ahlul Sunnah is focusing on the Rafidha. If they weren't, this video wouldn't even exist. Especially because it is a direct response to Ammar.
May Allah be pleased with all the wives of the Prophet pbuh. I'll be honest I genuinely find it kind of funny and endearing that Aisha ra and Hafsa ra clearly had a BFF relationship going on lol. How many hadith do we have where they are both involved 😂 it's nice to see they were actually normal people and they were pretty young as well and clearly still a bit immature and acting like it. Alhumdulillah that Allah never exposes our own immaturity when we were young, how many of us have done silly things as teenagers lol
Did I get this right? Doesn’t his last point establish from their own book that the Prophet (SAW) wanted Abu Bakr and Umar (RA) for first and second succession of Khalifa, and not Ali (RA).
Rafida are like St.paul. He tampered the risala of Isa (Al), while rafida also tries to undermine the risala of rasululah by tampering the quran, where it says she is a pure women and is a mother of the believers.
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Alhmdulil Allah for shia and followers of ahlul bayte when even the sunnies can not find fault in tbem yet but we find many contradiction in Aisha and the first 3 khalifa of sunnies.
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm we make it? when its even in your OWN books? you guys you guys are blind lol now it makes sense that when Allah says in Quran that "its not the eyes that are blind but the hearts". we will see in hereafter in sha Allah
@@asefhosseini3074 yeah count me out from venerating people so highly to worship them and to make claims of infallibility and divinity to certain individuals who were somehow oppressed at the same time. You guys are in a cult and the sooner you realize the better. May Allah guide you all.
Jazakallah khair brother Farid. You have splendidly and concisely explained the background. That is enough for seekers of truth. And those whose heart has disease will not understand. When sahaba asked the Prophet pbuh, "who do you love the most," he replied "Ayesha" and they asked amongst men, he replied "her father." This is enough for us to believe. May Allah Ta'ala bless the souls of all the mothers of believers. Aameen
Your response to Syed Ammar is not strong at all if you watch any of his videos he uses Sunni books and gives the book name published hadeeth number and author and volume and makes his case from Sunni books and Quran to outline the Shia view of Aisha and Hafsa all you did was reiterate what he basically said and just give your own opinions but didn’t give hard concrete sources that lead to a solid believable conclusion
Shia ..worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦♂️🤣
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
Rafida focus on criticizing the wives and ashaab of prophet Muhammad A.S. Make the jealousy out of love turn out to be enmity. May Allah guide them or curse them.
It’s not just an insult to the mothers of the believers radhi allahu anyu but an insult against the prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam! How can you call yourself a follower of his and insult his wives and imply that he isn’t a good enough judge of character to know who he’s marrying?
AlhamdulliLAH Allahuma Subhana ❤ Allahuma salli ala Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa ala alihi Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa Sahbihi Taslima was Salam ❤ Allahuma inna ala ZikrikA wa Syukrika wa Husni Ibadatiq Allahuma Bestow upon us the constant Remembrance of You, In Gratitude to You And Performing all manner beautiful, good deeds seeking Your Approval and Acceptance Allahuma Subhana Aameen BarakaAllahu feekum Wassalam
I am sunni, but to be honest I found your rebuttal to be weak. You are just beating around the bush. please come up rebuttal of every hadees Ammar quoted with reference, page number and book and the publisher. I have double checked everything ammar has said. I am eager to hear you reply. Please help me, I am feeling uneasy about what I have been thought my entire life
Brother we shais are not all the same, as a shia myself I don't agree with Ammar on everything but his last vid on Hafsa/Ayesha had a very strong argument. Brother read About Ghadir khum, and what happened in saqeefa
You see how Ammar twisted the word 'happly', I found him dishonesty on this, he mocked Allah subhana hu wa taala directly really ... What else he was on his bad intentions? BTW Is tattoo allowed in shiaism?
I am sunni and i found his rebuttal more than sufficient barak allahu feehu. He showed multiple instances of lies and misattributions by ammar. If you had a specific thing maybe mention it and we can try to help inschallah. But if all things of ammar you still find convincing... Even this interpretation of the hadith about fitnah from the east coming from aisha's home ..idk man. No words I can say in ramadan
Completely agree with you, this was a weak rebuttal. His responses through out this was based of opinion not whats written. Sated Ammar is pointing out exactly what's written. That to in Sunni literature only. And through the Quran. And what we got back was no he's misunderstood it when it's written clearly.
The end of sunni deception is on the horizon. You have never rebuttled any shia narrative sufficiently..May Allah guide you non shia to the truth of the family of the rasul. (S.a.a. w.a..w.s)
Brother, you are playing with words and not negating what Sayed Ammar was saying. You are down playing the actions or softening. Mashallah, you have many books behind you, and would of been better for you for showed us forgiveness from the wives of the Holy Prophet (saws) that was they have done was wrong. Or at the very least show another sahih hadith negating one of the Sayed Ammar's sahih hadith (under discussion) that he was wrong. But it is ok, because we will all go back to our Lord and we will be judged on our conclusions. P.S It's really unfortunate that some people that comment here are saying the Shias are not Muslim. Most Sunni scholars, whilst disagreeing obviously with the Shi’a on matters of difference, have accepted them within the Muslim community and do not consider them as following another religion.
I have a question god said in the Quran the prophet nor is misguided nor erred but he doesn’t speak from his owns whims only revealtion revealed yet in another verse god saids oh prophet why did you make that halal haram on yourself how can we reconcile these 2 verses?
21:46 1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died 2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels 3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 daleel like yours. FYI both the wives were destroyed like other people in front of the Prophets. But u have given your allegiance to majoosis and yahoodis (remember your forefather, ibn sahab the prime enemy of Islam)
What are you saying? It's not like Muslims are supposed to hunt down rafidhis for being rafidhis. Most people do other stuff. Also, Sufis, for all their flaws, do rebuke Shias for speaking negatively about the Prophet SAWW wives when confronting them.
Great rebuttal. We shouldn't even be debating any of this when the Quran clearly says the wives of the Prophet are the mothers of the believers. How can the mothers of the believers be disbelievers
20:48 And that's one of the problems with the Shia, they are fine with the prophet warning people about Aisha then continue his marriage with her. And when you asked a Shia would you continue your marriage to your wife if your wife gone against Ali!!? Or if she is a Kaffir, or if she is a Zaniah? And they always refuse or divorce their wives, but they are fine with the prophet being that. It is the hate they have been growing with that blinded them with such obvious facts.
First of all the prophet isn't your regular human being, he is the best of the creations of Allah (SWT) and about prophets staying with their kafir wives the Quran has given an example in the same surah 66, where Allah (SWT) talks about the wives of prophet Nuh(As) and Lot(As).
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them) First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them) First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut stayed with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. ah yes the same old example. First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do. Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not. Here is a verse "وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..." Chapter 2 verse 221 Translation. "Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..." So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist. But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!! Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26. "لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ" Translation "Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision" So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman. Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end? No they died and got their punishments. So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
Allah literally told Aisha to fix up coz she betrayed him 😂😂. Allah said he can divorce her and he would be happy even though Allah says he does not like divorce.
When we are fighting amongst ourselves.who needs enemies.why would U insult anyone close to the prophets.when the Qur'an makes it obvious they are pios and god.fearing ...if people put the same energy they put in hating something into searching the truth .we would have accomplished so much❤
When you love aisha more than prophet (Sawa), this is why god keeps you in darkness and turn you blind, I pray to allah to guide my all sunni brothers and sisters to the reality and help them to accept the truth
@@sadikkadom9566 the judgment is already in the Quran lmao Shi’ites cannot prove imamah/wilayah from the Kitab of Allah 😂 Shi’ites love to read Sahih collections of Hadith, what are you hiding in your own books? Why don’t we open up Al Kafi and see what’s in there, hmm?
![Refuting Yasir Qadhi AND David Wood [The Prophet's ﷺ Marriage to Zaynab]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-5K7r8DDM24/mqdefault.jpg)
May Allah be pleased with the mothers of believers
Yes they are mothers of believers but their hearts are deviated just like the wives of prophets Nuhu and Lut.
@@abiabi9353 If Allah describes them in the Quran as mothers of the believers, and this did not happen to the wives of the prophets Noah and lot , peace be upon them, Who are you or someone else to come and attack the mothers of the believers?
@@abiabi9353bro these are your mothers your talking about do you think their blood is halal?
@babahadjimohamed9339 Mother of believers is a legal title, meaning that it is impermissible for any of the wives of the Prophet ﷺ to get remarried after his passing. (Since it is haram to marry your mother). The term has nothing to do with merit. The Prophet had both good and bad wives. And the bad wives were a test for him from Allah ﷽.
@@Adam-iz5kh legal title ? Said who exactly ? Why were the wives of the prophets Noah and Lot, peace be upon them, not described in Quran as mothers of the believers? If the intention was to prohibit marriage to the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him only, why did the prohibition not come without a title of honor for them, which is mothers of the believers?
The "happly" part was the funniest part of the video. Change my mind.
Ibn kuthair.
@@Bulayla1426Yeah that one too 😂
its "haply" actually which means perhaps, not happily, which he misread 'happly' as... he should read more old books.
dude trynna doing tafsir with english translation LOOL, you know he is a con-artist. because they dont have any tafsir + all their books are not authentic. so they built everything upon lies.
@@Bulayla1426 why he sound different... he try to give every word his own touch...😅
"Rafidha are the donkeys of Jews"
Minhaj al-Sunnah by Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, vol 1, page 21.
Truly the people of my house (Ahl al-Bayt) in my community is like Noah's ark: Whoever takes refuge therein is saved and whoever opposes it is drowned."
@@Adam-iz5kh Majoosi Hadith attributed to the prophet ﷺ
@@jessep517 Minor variations of this hadith appear in the works of Sunni scholars such as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Abd-Allah al-Tabari, al-Suyuti, and al-Shablanji.
@@Adam-iz5kh Check Da’if al-Jamī’ al-Sāghīr by al-Albāni, Hadith 1974.
Current situation in Gazza shows who are the donkeys of jews.
Ahmak.
May Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى reward you immensely for defending the Prophet ﷺ’s honor, and the mother of the believers رضي الله عنهم
May Allah bless the Prophet ﷺ and his pure beloved progeny.
Ameen
I think ( رضي الله عنهنَّ ) will be more accurate as mothers of the believers are woman
امين it is incumbent upon us to speak up against these batil munafiqs ❌ thank you Br Farid بارك الله فيك
Clearly can’t handle the facts they wasn’t part of 33.33 only a fool can’t see it
People always be targeting Islam for no reason
why do you have shaytan in your name?
@@Adam-iz5kh Making fun of Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism)
Twelver Shias are not Muslims.
@@lithium8847-er2oj Why?
Because they believe in prophets after the the last and final messenger this takes you out of the fold of islam and they go against the Quran ofcourse
I mean basically all you tried to accomplish in this video was trying to downplay his words but you didn’t actually refute anything he said with solid evidence and it took you this long to make a response to one of his topics what about the other videos 😂
Only if you listen to it properly instead of typing stupid stuff then you would of understood
lol he is literally saying this is not sahih bukhari because that book doesnt have brackets @@MuhammedKus-iu7ls 😂😂
@@MuhammedKus-iu7ls understand what bro? They guy commenting said it as it is no refuting no evidence end of story. Khalaas
Are you saying it's alright for a wife to lie and say her husband mouth smells just for fun? What's your defense? We learn Rasullah never lied even in jokes. And how is Aisha even 16 in medina?
He is saying ammar is an inconsistent liar slandering the wives of the prophet salallahu aleihi wa salam who stayed married to him till his death in the holy month of ramadan in public .
Hope this helps your understanding .
@@ashketchum1793but is it alright to lie when you are jealous? Is this what aisha is teaching. And what does age have to do with anything
No one is infalliable except the prophet pbuh everyone has a qareen with them which is shytan that tempts them expect the prophet pbuh also keep in mind I think Aisha and had sa ra repented afterwards that innixdent
I want to see it in the books - where is it mentioned Aishah was 16. Brother Farid needs to point it out
@@ashketchum1793 Reading the Quran and "sahih" Sunni hadiths = Slander?
I am not satisfied with this response. Ammar Nakshawani came with strong evidence from our books. I hope you can clarify. It has created a lot of doubts.
okay 'Peter'
You missed the part 'As a sunni' in your comment .
I know you do taqiyya but this is embarrassing 😂
@@Check_my_playlists You can't label anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view as a shia doing taqiyya lol.
@@iceycones654 1. I have seen these types of comments a lot recently and farid exposed a similar comment in one of his video
2. Because of this concept of taqiyya shias can't be trusted.
Look at that comment,this peter guy is definitely a shia lol .
@@Check_my_playlists What do you mean by exposed? And generalizing a whole group of people because of a concept? Do you even know what Taqqiya means? It means to hide your identity in fear of death or execution, this peter guy doesn't seem to be in any danger. Also this is what the Quran says about this,
"Surah 3:28, “Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.”
17:50 the reason “it’s a test” is valid for the question of why prophet Muhammad stayed married, is because Aisha is one of, if not THE central figure in the Sunni/Shia schism
It’s a test for every Muslim after him - when faced with a question like Jamal, whose side are you on?
I notice some sneaky language you used at the beginning… aisha was merely “involved” with Jamal…
Why dance around it? The weight of what she did, compared against all the Hadiths we have about Ali’s status? Don’t whitewash the battle of Jamal, while being ready to criticize others for their creative uses of language.
Did her father Abu Bakr not kill those who went against his Khilaafa?
So by keeping Aisha around, this becomes the ultimate test for every Muslim to pick a side. You simply cannot be intellectually honest and remain neutral
Once you start putting the Hadiths in favor of Ahlulbayt, and comparing the actions of some sahabis against those Hadiths, then you can see that early Islamic figures were not exactly the most pure of people
So then the question becomes, who do you take your religion from? If Omar/Aisha/Abu Bakr are not good enough, then WHO IS?
Enter the pure household of Allah’s messenger, which solves all the moral problems a new studying Muslim would have… both through prophetic wisdom passed down and purity of character guaranteed by Allah
Great analysis
They say ,. Find a clear proof of any Imam(as) in Quran ,. I wanna see where a prophet (as) appointed his best friend to succeed him 😮😅
@@jaleel42do you deny hadith Thaqalayn?
@@Virgoingaway re read what I wrote
Of course they take it from them. Omar called the Prophet (saw) a delirious and they agreed what else you want as proof.
its not a conspericy...lol...ammar may not speak very calmly, but this is not conpericy brother are you blind? Its in the QURAN, IN SAHIH, IN BUKHARI....
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 the Quran also didn’t give authority to Abu bakr. It also didn’t give Umar the authority to creat “good bidah” passed the prophet Mohammad’s death. The Quran does not verify many things. We are talking about history and comparing 3rd party sourcing though Hadith. The Quran is a backing to the claims.
Lut and Nuh peace be upon them didn’t need to divorce their wives for Allah to tell us in the Quran they are going to hell.
If you’re looking for all the proofs of 3rd party sourcing in the Quran. And they were all there. There wouldn’t be Shia. Sunni. Selifi. Wahabi. Ahmadi and many more splits within the religion. There wouldn’t be different school of thoughts in Sunni Islam as well as Shia Islam. If it was all “clear”.
Just because Sayid Ammar has an outlook and view on the sourcing you may not have does not make him wrong. He’s been studying for 20+ years traveling the world and studying.
We should respect those who dedicate their lives to studying these sources. Shia Sunni or whoever. Their analysis counts. And so does yours.
If this was supposed to be easy, we would all have 1 simple narrative.
Love you brother I appreciate the points. And for all of us as Muslims. We should look into each point for ourselves. Open the sourcing ourself. And read! As Allah has commanded us to.
Salam Habibi 🤲🏼✊🏽♥️
1.Are you dumb????????????? NUH AND LUT DIVORCED THEIR WIVES WTFFFFF 2. Bro he used Bukhari and Muslim are you blind or what?@@abdelqadir5227
@@abdelqadir5227 why are you pretending to be a muslim?
@@abdelqadir5227very weak response .
Nah Ammar won this one, your video is very weak and this comes from a Muslim who doesn’t consider himself Shia or Sunni
Such a weak response - classic Sunni response when the truth is clear even within your own books.. ‘oh they’re plotting because they loved the prophet’ ‘they would make the prophet upset because they were joking’ ‘the chain of narration is weak’. If only you defended the real Prophet like you defend your idols. It is a known fact and even among Sunni academics this is known to be a verse about these two wives (Hafsa and Aisha). God just decides to reveal a verse to defend the prophet and threaten these two if they continue to mock the Prophet out of bants? God doesn’t know that they were jealous because they ‘loved’ him?
Wake up ya Akhi. Why do you make these people infallible and always find an excuse?
Glorification of the sahaba at the prophet (saws) and his family’s (as) expense,… eVERy tIme 😮😢
Jazakallah Akhi
You clearly didn’t watch the video properly. Go watch it again and especially about the verse of repentance
Salam. Why is the story referenced as a footnote in bukhari? Please answer. Jazakallah.
It’s because that story is an addition added by the publishers and isn’t actually from Al Bukhari so the authors didn’t want to add anything to Al bukhari itself so they added it on the footnote to A. Give context and B. Not ascribe it to bukhari
The footnote also contradicts other reports by sahih hadiths
@@Abu_Jihad why would this context be provided when it is rejected and other contexts are available which conflict and hence the premise of this video?
Notice how they always use their annoying tone to get their point across. Ironically every ashura they smack themselves anyway, so they’re losing brain cells by the year. That’s why their arguments get weaker overtime lol
😅
@Azharq2023 annoying voice? So he's voice is more important than his message? Remember mocking people was one of the attributes of kafir during the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) so this makes me think you guys are just focusing on being funny then learning the truth.
Ok sons of bidah 👍🏽
@@user-gb7uo6cc7k clown shia shut up
Man after seeing him share a clip of Omar suleiman describing Aishah and how rosy and sugar coated it is - as if there are no issues at all, I’d rather face the truth from Ammar than be blinded by Sunni scholars.
Brother Farid, I bought your book on the martyrdom of hussein ra. InshaAllah I will read it. It's a bengali translation.
Great video Akhi. Jazakallah Khairan for making it
You need to do this reaction academically(give reference from sunni book) If not, your comment only based on your opinion, emotion and it is weak argument. Salam Ramadan, brother!
I don't understand. He showed him to be dishonest with his usages of sources . Do you need a hadith saying that ammar says a book is from abdulwahab when it's not lol?
@@ashketchum1793 Have you watched his (Sayed Ammar) video? He uses the Sahih Books and Holy Quran. In the end, you make your judgement.
Show sources
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
JazakAllahu kiran
why does he keep saying "kuthayr"?
cringe fr
Thank u Syed ammar your truths have rattled so many cages n the true colours of those who still refuse or deny even their own books by twisting and turning it as they twist n turn the words of Allah swt to fit their agendas!
Facts ❤
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
May Allah help u Sunnis. With u guys the verse “it’s not the eyes that’s are blind, it’s the heart” is well and true. Syed Ammar using ur books to prove u wrong and u still can’t accept the truth
Facts they have no imam.
Facts 😂
As a Sunni, I agree that Ammar was impressive in his arguments, but Farid was very weak in the rebuttal
Syed Ammar literally made crazy conclusions and you are here with your confirmation biases without listening to what Farid actually has to say.
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm crazy conclusions? 😂😂 he read the facts from ur books and told u what they said? He didn’t conclude these things… ur scholars did. This farid brother is trying his best to escape the truth by looking for silly ways out
4:33
He speaks as if God were like humans Sometimes he is ready and sometimes he is not ready .
Asalamu alaikum wa rahmatuLahi wa barakatu brother. It's honestly amazing to me how you keep your cool with that guy.
salaams brother. I came across a Shia on social media who pointed out a few hadith in Abd al-Razzaq's Musannaf asserting that Ibn Umar (RA) held the view that taraweeh/Qiyam should not be prayed in the masjid. could you perhaps make a video on this?
Sayyed ammar made a whole video about the taraweeh prayer and all of the sources are from sunni books, I recommend you go watch it and inshallah Allah swt will open your eyes to the truth
@@bubblegumniece8952 He has a bad habit of using inauthentic hadith to make points against the sahaba, whilst presenting them as if they are sahih. otherwise he misrepresents/misinterprets the sahih ones. That alone makes him untrustworthy, and I dont think it is wise as a layman to take knowledge from such a person.
@@Shobob okay how about this, you go to Sayed Ammar's video about the taraweeh prayers, get your own copy of sahih Al-bukhari and other Hadiths mentioned and open the Hadith to which he opens to. I can see your sincere heart is willing to go on the right path. all this propaganda you heard about Sayed Ammar are pure hate speeches so don't listen to others and see for yourself
@@Shobob Hey, i have personally viewed some of the videos regarding these controversial topics, and i must say, not out of bias, hate nor lie; that most, if not ALL of the evidence used are compiled from the 6 'believed' sahihs; through this, Amaar Nakshawani clealy shows the authenticity of the book, and reads the wording of the 'sahih' hadith/s word for word. Im sure that its not too hard for you to make your own judgment through the use of pure logic and clearly shown evident sources. So, please go and watch the entirety of the video, and i can assure you that you will be further educated regarding this topic.
Hope this clarifies a few things.
@@soldier_x7212 Ive already watched his video on taraweeh. I was not impressed lol.
How funny you said it’s private matter , if it’s private why Allah would mention it in Quran !!
Beautiful question. I'll share an answer on twitter.
If it's public why doesn't it mention them by name . Please listen to the video properly
I mean the Prophet SAW didn’t marry like 50 women. So if it’s saying 2 wives in Quran, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out who could be.
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed.. It fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 don’t say Allah fails
Nice try fooling the ummah without showing proofs, so that they dont go read the Quran and their own books.
All of the ahlulbayt were given the merit of shahadat, including the Holy Prophet pbuh. And the ones to kill Him pbuh were his own wives. May Allah never forgive them
I memorzie whole Quran with meaning (learned arabic for that) and ahlul bayt in the Quran is the wives of the prophet (sa).
@@condorianonegdiffsgokuthe reality is Quran cannot be understood with our Hadith. If you read the tafsir of the Ayat ul tathir it is clear who the members of the Ahlulbayt are, and the prophet makes it clear in the Hadith that it is not his wife/ wives.
@@May-mp9vw
The verses of Quran are not random sentences stiched together. They have coherency, order and a story. And it is very clear if you read the verses serially, the wives (ra) are part of ahlul bayt. The hadiths have a weaker strength than what is clear in the Quran. And our sunni hadiths don't even exclude the wives. And I don't read shia tafsirs. Sunni tafsirs say this verse refers to the wives (ra). Based on context the term ahlul bayt might be used for the wives or it might be used for the family of Ali (ra) or for both. In this verse, however, it is primarily directed to the wives and it indirectly may include other members as an addition.
If 11:73 includes sarah (as), there is no reason to doubt the verse of ahlul bayt includes the wives of prophet (saws). It's very similar in structure.
May Allah bless you brother inshallah looking forward for more videos like this
Alhamdulillah
Can you please confirm whether the books he is narrating from authenic sunni books.
If you watch his video you'll get the answer
Watch the video
Please watch the video, because unfortunately this video does no justice. He is reading only for Sahih Books and Holy Quran.
Did Farid really compare Aisha and Hafsa with Hitler ? 😂
More like I compared how people can treat Hitler is a more objective way than how some Shias treat the wives in their understanding of the narratives.
Don't say the 'wives', we respect them. It's only those 2. And I think Sayed Ammar has clarified that stance as well.
@@Ali-ti8hfThey are both your mothers.
@@everythingandroidois
Only in the sense that we can’t marry them. This “mothers” verse you quote was Allah’s response to Talha’s proclamation he wanted to marry Aisha, and he was a so-called “righteous Sahabi” at the same time
You cannot have it both ways, we either have logic or we have this blind Nasibi idolization
Farid great response ex shia here. and i was deep into it my whole life, i can say that ammar has changed. alot. in 2011 and before he used to hate speakers like yasser habib who used to do these types of videos cause of shia sunni unity and causing the killing of shias in the middle east due to there cursing of respected personalities. he was opposed of shia lecturers using the mimbar to curse or defame these figures for it has no positive bearing. until he got sponsored he always was afollower of sistani. but that changed when he got sponsored by hussein tv a shirazi tv show now why is that important. ayatollah shirazi is the teacher of yasser habib. and is one of the few ayatollahs who opposes unity with sunnis. and openly courages cursing tatbir. and other things made haram by sistani and khamenei to name two prominoate ayatollahs or marjas who oppose shirazi arrested his brother in qom. ever since he got money his message changed he began being more distasteful it first began with his ISIS refrence to the first caliph abu bark (ra) and every year since he gotten more bold. ayatollah khamenei made a fatwa against these scholars. and sais they were m15 m16 agents or british shia he called them only useful to cause hatred between sunni and shia for the UK and its allies like america and israel. hamdulilah i left shiasm many years ago. but still hold respect for khamenei for giving fatwas against cursing against tatbir. and urging sunni shia unity. unlike shirazi who now owns ammar nakshawani. anyways bit of insight good video
Bro, you are not saying the truth. Please study more and carefully, so that you can see the truth with your naked eyes Habibi.
Mahe Ramadhan Kareem to you and your loved ones.
May ALLAH grants you hidayah through the blessings of this Holy Month.
Thank you for making this video
JazakAllahu khairan
Wallahi, I can’t stand his way of talking, let alone his broken aqida…
Same. He sounds like emasculated zesty transgender part of the rainbow community
Same my man, I felt like muting D':
same here.. ammar’s voice is as irritating as appus n hatun…
@@eerievon2208 Him saying Ibn Kuthayr was the peak for me 💀
@@ifad 🤣🤣.. ibn kuthayr.. too much persian slang.. 🤣🤣🤣.. oh someone please make ammar bite the curb… 🤣🤣
What a pathetic response
12:34 The book “رسالة في الرد على الرافضة” has been attributed to multiple authors in various sources:
Muhammad Hayyat ibn Ibrahim al-Sindhi1, an Islamic scholar known for his contributions to the Hanafi and Hanbali schools of thought.
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, the founder of Wahhabism, whose works include a book with a similar title
Muhammad bin Khalil bin Yusuf Abu Hamid al-Balbisi al-Shafi’i, also known as Al-Ramli Al-Maqdisi, who has a book with the same title.
Lmao. Clearly the points you're making in this video are absurd, taking parts of the ayah and saying that Allah is praising them. How blind could you guys be wallah? That's the problems us shias/rawafidh/kuffar/murtad (whatever you wanna call us, it's quite expected from you guys now) have with you, maybe not with the certain personalities in fact. You praise them to such an extent that they clearly don't deserve. It's clear as day. When you say Aisha was the most beloved, best wife bla bla all nonsense, that for us is the biggest disrespect to Sayyeda Khadija (AS). And we praise the ahlul bayt (AS) because they for sure well deserve that praise, plus we have clear evidence from your literature with nothing that can disregard their status.
Who was more beloved to prophet (sa)? Khadiza or Ali (ra)?
@@AH_5878 what kind of stupid comparative question this is? Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was the wife of Rasul Allah while imam Ali (AS) was his successor. Sayyeda Khadija (AS) was his most beloved among the wives and imam Ali (AS) was his most beloved among the companions.
From what gathered so far his points were : she's 16 = she's a young innocent lady. And also replace happily with happly
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 haha yes. Also, I'm trying to find the word 'happly' in the dictionary. Couldn't find in the one we have on the internet, lemme know if someone is a Shakespeare fan or smth, maybe it is a word.
@@iamibrahim99
the word is ''Haply''... which means by chance. There could be a typo in the book I guess.
He did it because he loves them? 😂😂😂😂 at this point I can’t even argue it’s beyond stupid!
So you think prophet (SA) made halal haram at whim?
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku another stupid response. I think it’s this level of stupidity is common in responses!
@@user-gb7uo6cc7k
The Quran says he sought their pleasure. So he didn't actually make halal haram in the true sense but rather decided that their pleasure is a must so he needs to refrain. Why did he seek their pleasure?
@@user-gb7uo6cc7k
You are too dumb to understand my point.
Why did he seek their pleasure?
Fareed, brother, can you answer the videos against you from "Muhammad" (Hadeeth rejector)?
Specify a point worth refuting.
indeed Ayesha prayed and did good things but also she fought against the forth Khalif which was not a good thing.
See my video on al-Jamal.
So while he used your books and quoted direct sources you just engaged in ad hominem attacks on him and twisting words instead of actually refuting any of what he said? Sounds about right
Exactly lol this clown Farid has no comebacks to Sayed Ammar
Well explained brother.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Theres literally no word in the dictionary as happly...its a typo and the word is supposed to be happily. Do not misguide people by making new definitions
Haply is a word in dictionary and word used in arabic is عَسَىٰ which means perhaps/Maybe. Idk which Kinda Dictionary and Quran you are using and only one who is misguiding people is you at the moment.
@@belabarlina6627your mothers lol 😂
Who's Ibn Kuthair?
I think if you pointed out how Allah had regard the people who spread rumors about Aisha’s supposed “infidelity” *Astagfirullah* and how they were condemned it would make this video stronger by making it clear that they are committing the same action that had those people condemned.
Worst response I've seen in a while xD watch the whole video of Syed Ammar, fear god for your cherry picking.
And you failed to actually falsify his claims. Watch his full lecture. Aisha got exposed, cry about it. Because I’m pretty sure Allah and his prophet love a person so much they’d threaten them by saying god is on his side and so is Gabriel and the believers and the angels. It’s not a cop out to say she was a test. Aisha was a test. Everything in this life is a test, Ammar bin yaser said himself, verily Allah has tested you with Aisha to see if you choose him or her. Your arguments are based on emotion rather than intellectual enquiry grow up
Literally you’ll happily say Aisha being a test is a cop out because it emotionally gets to you but you’ll happily say the children in Gaza are dying because they’re being tested. Why is one a cop out and one isn’t? A test has a purpose, ie to choose Allah or her. Because whether you like it or not, Aisha has demonstrated many evidences or herself being against Allah. And literally refuted your own claim, you said at the beginning, if you have a opinion on a personality like hitler, giving charity this will be seen as bad. You’ve literally done the same thing. You’ve assumed Aisha is a good person so any Hadith narrated from her must be from a good place like kisa, why have you assumed that? That’s based on emotion. Again the shia just show that there is a lot of evidence to show that Aisha is shady person and thus we must dissociate from her
Waalaikum salam wa rahmatullah wa barakatuhu. Jazakallahu khair for this, especially for doing it respectfully.
I've checked from sunni sources and these 2 wives of the holy prophet were not good
You claim that these people are the righteous of believers and second to the Prophet (saw), all Sayed Ammar is doing is showing you from your OWN literature and Sahih texts that this CLEARLY is utter nonsense. To say these people are human and they made mistakes and so on so on but you keep them as your TOP guide to the Sunnah of the Prophet is delusional, it is simple, we Shia do not want them, we do not need them, Allah, his messenger, Quran and his Ahlulbayt are “sufficient”for us. if you truly follow Umar’s teachings then you should remove all Hadith literature from your houses and studying as Umar said to the prophet of GOD in Sahih al Bukhari, “The Quran is sufficient for us”, we do not need to get you a pen and paper! May Allah guide us All.
We focus on our worship and religion and they focus on us
Seriously? Really? Who’s got a HUUUGE number of hate books against the other? Who’s whole sect is based upon the hate of the other? Who’s sect has got some dumb ass stories or bidas about the other? Think u need to reevaluated ur life if that’s what u think
So sunnis have never made vids on shias? Ur not that bright r u?
We’re not the ones chopping Sunnis heads. Destroying their civilizations. And funding terrorism.
The Shia are the only ones helping the Sunni Palestinians right now. While the 1.9billion Sunni watch and pray from home.
We are focused on you you’re right. Focused on protecting you and sharing the truth.
Speaker’s Corner bashes Shia every other week. What are you smoking
And yeah it’s kinda hard to NOT focus on the Bakri sect when all sectarian militias in the Middle East & South Asia come from them lol
Y’all need to start acting human
Prove from the books just like Syed Amaar does i think it would give us a better understanding. Additionally, could i understand which Sunni Book or books specifically would be consider authentic and/or which can be considered 100% authentic?
What caused Aisha RA to fight imam Ali in Jamal... clearly shows even if you are related to prophet doesn't mean you are always on right path. May allah be pleased with her she had done damage to the islam too
❤❤❤❤❤
Bummer I was trying not to be sectarian or get into polemics at all this Ramadan,… cuz of you know Gaza,..
But I have been in the Sunni mosque all month so far,. Except one day,. And praying like you, I see you as brothers ,. But I also hear a lot of snide comments from ignorance,. (Not towards me but in general/ probably cuz they watch these dawah bro channels) this is why,. We practice taqiyya,. I haven’t subverted or even preached one word ,. Of Shia thought ,. Imam Jafar as Sadiq (as) would be proud 😊
Anyways it sucks your books that are sahih are not sahih as soon as our argument appears,… as sahih,. Get over it Gaza is starving 😢
Now they don't want Sayyidah Aisha AS to even be human, and to be a robot like the rawafidh🤦🏼♂
As salamu aleykum Farid, your camera has gotten much better 🤣. I've had something on my mind not talked about much in either anti islam and islamic circles. A christian told me about the north pole where the sun doesn't set . He asked rhetorically how a muslim would pray/fast here, could you make a video on this? As salamu aleykum
Wa alaykum alsalam.
Move to civilization is my suggestion.
@@FaridResponds
I saw a clip from shaykh Hisham at Tahiri saying that it should be estimated based on the hadith where the first day when dajjal comes will be like a year and the sahabah asked how they should pray.
@@FaridRespondsوالله اعلم
@@Mustafa_Shahzadhow does that answer the question?
@ukimenustah26 It literally does. Do you know about the hadith? Cause if you do, I don't think you would have assumed that his question is unrelated to that hadith.
Aisha and Hafsa were like the wives of Noah and Lott. They never divorced them, yet they were evil. Aisha and Hafsa were evil the same way.
Prove that Nuh (as) and Lut (as) knew about the reality of their wives.
Where they punished the same way ???
@@rcmysm9123it was example of betrayal and disbelief unlike incase of hafsa and Aisha while Ammar is exaggerating
@@rcmysm9123 where's the comparison your making your own comparison again it was again refering to the disbeliefing wives of prophet not the other thing apart
@@rcmysm9123 when it comes to ppl like something obvious doesn't matter
I'm super glad I watched this. Nakshawani very effectively why the Shia narrative makes sense...and the Sunni narrative does not. I do respect Farid, though, and hope he and his followers come to the truth.
Yea right
The fact that he looks so satisfied takes the cake. By the way, Allah exonerated Aisha, the mother of the believers. FULL STOP.
Allah also said u n one side n me one one side.
If Allah SWT even did, that exoneration happened BEFORE this incident
@@user_db769 Allah says, "The Prophet is more worthy of the believers than themselves, and his wives are their mothers." [Surah al-Ahzab 33:6]
@@user_db769I love prophet Muhammad Sallahu Alayahi Wa Salaam more than all my family combined and love those whom he loved like Aisha R.A.
Good video, but if the story of the Prophet pbuh and Maria is not true, what about Sunan an Nasai 3959?
It was narrated from Anas, that the Messenger of Allah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but 'Aishah and Hafsah would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, revealed:
"O Prophet! Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to you.' until the end of the Verse.
(Authentic according to darussalam)
Bro, he is literally reading Quran and the commentary. When are you going to even listen to him? When are you going to actually read Quran and the commentary yourselves? This isn't rocket science. Put your sectarianism aside and open your eyes. Read Quran. Ask yourself, how were Ahlulbayt (a.s.) were respected and treated in the history? Keep it that simple and start from there.
People focus on worship and these rafidha focus on us😂❤
They are real kufar they worship 12 demigods
Rafidah are divorced from the Quran and the seerah. Rafidah are only interested in tabloid fabricated narrations....
Silly shias...trix are for kids!!
This video is a clear example that you are Ahlul Sunnah is focusing on the Rafidha. If they weren't, this video wouldn't even exist. Especially because it is a direct response to Ammar.
@@Adam-iz5kh
Shiaism is a myth about 12 demigods.
Islam is about Allah
@@Adam-iz5kh Ammar was the one who started these accusations lol. What are you on?
May Allah be pleased with all the wives of the Prophet pbuh. I'll be honest I genuinely find it kind of funny and endearing that Aisha ra and Hafsa ra clearly had a BFF relationship going on lol. How many hadith do we have where they are both involved 😂 it's nice to see they were actually normal people and they were pretty young as well and clearly still a bit immature and acting like it. Alhumdulillah that Allah never exposes our own immaturity when we were young, how many of us have done silly things as teenagers lol
You can trivilialize serious matters like that as being immature??
Aisha mocked Lady Khadija’s (AS) age & appearance in front of our Prophet. You find that behavior acceptable?
Did I get this right? Doesn’t his last point establish from their own book that the Prophet (SAW) wanted Abu Bakr and Umar (RA) for first and second succession of Khalifa, and not Ali (RA).
He is arguing that Hafsa was told that Abu Bakr and Omar were going to steal the caliphate. Of course, the report doesn't say that either.
@@FaridResponds Aaaah!!! Bizarre! 🤷🏽 Like your work bro. Allahumma Baarak. Keep at it.
@@FaridResponds Typical Shia creating a scenario then refute it.
When we ask rafidhis to prove their false religion from their own books: *opens sahih bukhari and draws his own imaginary conclusions*
lmaooo true. These guys have no shame and I saw Ammaar's videos on Mut'ah, I had a good laugh. I can't believe these guys are real
يا ذاكر الأصحاب...
Rafida are like St.paul. He tampered the risala of Isa (Al), while rafida also tries to undermine the risala of rasululah by tampering the quran, where it says she is a pure women and is a mother of the believers.
The actualy paul of islam is called umar ibn khattab , the one who introduced bidas in islam.
a polytheist, dajjal found.@@noorhussain6462
Come face me in real life I’ll fix you
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
Do you know WHY that verse was revealed? And how it relates to Talha the Sahabi?
Alhmdulil Allah for shia and followers of ahlul bayte when even the sunnies can not find fault in tbem yet but we find many contradiction in Aisha and the first 3 khalifa of sunnies.
Kaafir bark elsewhere.
what
@@Mayochup191 they make their own delusions lol
@@UmarNaseef-eg1zm we make it? when its even in your OWN books? you guys you guys are blind lol now it makes sense that when Allah says in Quran that "its not the eyes that are blind but the hearts". we will see in hereafter in sha Allah
@@asefhosseini3074 yeah count me out from venerating people so highly to worship them and to make claims of infallibility and divinity to certain individuals who were somehow oppressed at the same time. You guys are in a cult and the sooner you realize the better. May Allah guide you all.
Jazakallah khair brother Farid. You have splendidly and concisely explained the background. That is enough for seekers of truth. And those whose heart has disease will not understand.
When sahaba asked the Prophet pbuh, "who do you love the most," he replied "Ayesha" and they asked amongst men, he replied "her father." This is enough for us to believe.
May Allah Ta'ala bless the souls of all the mothers of believers. Aameen
Your response to Syed Ammar is not strong at all if you watch any of his videos he uses Sunni books and gives the book name published hadeeth number and author and volume and makes his case from Sunni books and Quran to outline the Shia view of Aisha and Hafsa all you did was reiterate what he basically said and just give your own opinions but didn’t give hard concrete sources that lead to a solid believable conclusion
Shia ..worship graves and 12 semi-deity imams, believe in distorting the Qur’an, declare 120,000 companions to be infidels, and attack the honor of the Mothers of the Believers 🤦♂️🤣
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
Rafida focus on criticizing the wives and ashaab of prophet Muhammad A.S. Make the jealousy out of love turn out to be enmity. May Allah guide them or curse them.
It’s not just an insult to the mothers of the believers radhi allahu anyu but an insult against the prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam! How can you call yourself a follower of his and insult his wives and imply that he isn’t a good enough judge of character to know who he’s marrying?
They're الكفار just like the so-called "Quraniyun".
Nakshawani is a prick i think but mate hes reading your books and looks like your books have got alot of the shia beliefs there
Madness
AlhamdulliLAH
Allahuma Subhana ❤
Allahuma salli ala Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa ala alihi Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa Sahbihi Taslima was Salam ❤
Allahuma inna ala ZikrikA wa Syukrika wa Husni Ibadatiq
Allahuma
Bestow upon us the constant
Remembrance of You,
In Gratitude to You
And
Performing all manner beautiful, good deeds seeking Your Approval and Acceptance
Allahuma Subhana
Aameen
BarakaAllahu feekum
Wassalam
السلام عليكم
I am sunni, but to be honest I found your rebuttal to be weak. You are just beating around the bush. please come up rebuttal of every hadees Ammar quoted with reference, page number and book and the publisher. I have double checked everything ammar has said. I am eager to hear you reply. Please help me, I am feeling uneasy about what I have been thought my entire life
Brother we shais are not all the same, as a shia myself I don't agree with Ammar on everything but his last vid on Hafsa/Ayesha had a very strong argument. Brother read About Ghadir khum, and what happened in saqeefa
You see how Ammar twisted the word 'happly', I found him dishonesty on this, he mocked Allah subhana hu wa taala directly really ... What else he was on his bad intentions? BTW Is tattoo allowed in shiaism?
I am sunni and i found his rebuttal more than sufficient barak allahu feehu. He showed multiple instances of lies and misattributions by ammar.
If you had a specific thing maybe mention it and we can try to help inschallah. But if all things of ammar you still find convincing...
Even this interpretation of the hadith about fitnah from the east coming from aisha's home ..idk man. No words I can say in ramadan
Thank you for being honest, I encourage you to continue looking for the truth may Allah guide you
Completely agree with you, this was a weak rebuttal. His responses through out this was based of opinion not whats written.
Sated Ammar is pointing out exactly what's written. That to in Sunni literature only. And through the Quran. And what we got back was no he's misunderstood it when it's written clearly.
The end of sunni deception is on the horizon. You have never rebuttled any shia narrative sufficiently..May Allah guide you non shia to the truth of the family of the rasul. (S.a.a. w.a..w.s)
I would really appreciate you if you reply to the hadith where ayisha disrespects Khadija bint khwailid.s.a
Was waiting for this brother
نَحْنُ النَّار والاِعْصَار مَهْمَا صَار
لَنْ نَرْكَعْ علي!
كَا الزِّلزَال لِلْاَرْذَالْ كُلُّنْ قَال
لَنْ نَرْكَعْ علي!
عَمْرُوْ عَابِسُنْ بَشْرُ
مُسْلِمُنْ بَدْرُ
نَفْتَدِيْكَا نَفْتَدِيْكَا
فَخْرُ يَوْمَ عَاشُوْرَاء نُسْعِدُ الزَّهْرَاء
يا حسين يا حسين
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
😂😂😂
Brother, you are playing with words and not negating what Sayed Ammar was saying. You are down playing the actions or softening. Mashallah, you have many books behind you, and would of been better for you for showed us forgiveness from the wives of the Holy Prophet (saws) that was they have done was wrong. Or at the very least show another sahih hadith negating one of the Sayed Ammar's sahih hadith (under discussion) that he was wrong.
But it is ok, because we will all go back to our Lord and we will be judged on our conclusions.
P.S It's really unfortunate that some people that comment here are saying the Shias are not Muslim. Most Sunni scholars, whilst disagreeing obviously with the Shi’a on matters of difference, have accepted them within the Muslim community and do not consider them as following another religion.
I have a question god said in the Quran the prophet nor is misguided nor erred but he doesn’t speak from his owns whims only revealtion revealed yet in another verse god saids oh prophet why did you make that halal haram on yourself how can we reconcile these 2 verses?
Rafzis worship abululu and have a big shrine (temple) of that majoosi in iran
21:46
1.Nabii Lut and Nuh never divorced their wives too. They were with their women until they died
2. Sayyed Ammar succeeds in providing daleels
3. So the ayah of ifk too fails to prove it was about Aisha as claimed..Allah fails to say it is Aisha. Because until you refer to hadeeths you get an idea
The Qur'an fails to mention Abubakr in the cave
This means the Qur'an also fails to mention number of rakaats, what to recite in Salah. etc
Salaam.
@@abdelqadir5227 daleel like yours. FYI both the wives were destroyed like other people in front of the Prophets. But u have given your allegiance to majoosis and yahoodis (remember your forefather, ibn sahab the prime enemy of Islam)
@@admin202
Your Umar literally tried to recite TORAH in front of our holy Prophet, who’s following Judaism now buddy😂😂
Bro it sounds like your confirming what the Shia guy said
Because it is undeniable
@@Adam-iz5kh
In your shia demigods dream
@@uthman2281 Allah (swt) is my lord.
@@Adam-iz5kh
Yeah + 12 demigods
@@uthman2281 La ilaha illallah ☝️
بارك الله فيك يا فريد
As always no response from Sufis against rafidis. Zindeeq people
What are you saying?
It's not like Muslims are supposed to hunt down rafidhis for being rafidhis.
Most people do other stuff.
Also, Sufis, for all their flaws, do rebuke Shias for speaking negatively about the Prophet SAWW wives when confronting them.
Great rebuttal. We shouldn't even be debating any of this when the Quran clearly says the wives of the Prophet are the mothers of the believers. How can the mothers of the believers be disbelievers
Ask yourself why would Allah reveals such verses about some of these wives ?!!!
@@almoola1for context
They are the mother of the believers in the sense that you can't marry them after the prophet,that's what Allah means there.Can you marry your mother?
The thumbnail made me almost fly out of my chair because for a second I thought Mike the situation from Jersey Shore reverted to Islam 🤣🤣🤣
Rafidha ain't Muslim.
"... would rule after HIIIIIIiiiiiimmmm"
I lost it hahahahha
20:48
And that's one of the problems with the Shia, they are fine with the prophet warning people about Aisha then continue his marriage with her.
And when you asked a Shia would you continue your marriage to your wife if your wife gone against Ali!!? Or if she is a Kaffir, or if she is a Zaniah?
And they always refuse or divorce their wives, but they are fine with the prophet being that.
It is the hate they have been growing with that blinded them with such obvious facts.
First of all the prophet isn't your regular human being, he is the best of the creations of Allah (SWT) and about prophets staying with their kafir wives the Quran has given an example in the same surah 66, where Allah (SWT) talks about the wives of prophet Nuh(As) and Lot(As).
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them)
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
Did prophets Noah and Lut (peace and blessings be upon them)
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut stayed with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
ah yes the same old example.
First the Sharia of those before us don't apply to us unless the prophet taught us and obliged us to do.
Isn't the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is the best of example to all Muslims!? And he is the best example to do what the Quran teaches!? Ofcours he is, can a prophet teach us something good and do its opposite!!? Ofcours not.
Here is a verse
"وَلَا تَنكِحُوا۟ ٱلْمُشْرِكَـٰتِ حَتَّىٰ يُؤْمِنَّ ۚ وَلَأَمَةٌۭ مُّؤْمِنَةٌ خَيْرٌۭ مِّن مُّشْرِكَةٍۢ وَلَوْ أَعْجَبَتْكُمْ ۗ..."
Chapter 2 verse 221
Translation.
"Do not marry polytheistic women until they believe; for a believing slave-woman is better than a free polytheist, even though she may look pleasant to you..."
So with your understanding the prophet is teaching us to never marry a polytheist kaffir and marrying a sl*ve Muslim woman is far better even if you like the polytheist.
But you are saying the prophet didn't take to the verse and married to a Kaffirah!? And he knows and stayed with her!!
Here is another verse in Surah Al-nor verse 26.
"لْخَبِيثَاتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَالْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَاتِ ۖ وَالطَّيِّبَاتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَالطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَاتِ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ ۖ لَهُم مَّغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ"
Translation
"Wicked women are for wicked men, and wicked men are for wicked women. And virtuous women are for virtuous men, and virtuous men are for virtuous women. The virtuous are innocent of what the wicked say. They will have forgiveness and an honourable provision"
So we know the prophet is the best man and most virtues in all creation so how can he marry to a wicked woman even tho the verse is saying good virtues people are for good virtues woman.
Secondly did prophets Noah and Lut (blessings be upon them) stay with their wives until the end?
No they died and got their punishments.
So plz becarful, when you try to insult or slander the wives of the prophet you are actually insult and slander the prophet himself.
Allah literally told Aisha to fix up coz she betrayed him 😂😂. Allah said he can divorce her and he would be happy even though Allah says he does not like divorce.
This is what he’s doing in Ramadan? SMH these people are insufferably pathetic.
@19:21 "ALLAH NEVER EXPOSED AISHA." What happened to Surah Tahreem and Hadeeths?
When we are fighting amongst ourselves.who needs enemies.why would U insult anyone close to the prophets.when the Qur'an makes it obvious they are pios and god.fearing ...if people put the same energy they put in hating something into searching the truth .we would have accomplished so much❤
Anyone who insults Rasulullah's (SAW) companions is not of us. This isn't "fighting along ourselves", because they're not even Muslims.
I will never follow someone that has stressed Rasool Allah or his family
Twelver Shia are not Muslims they’re enemies of Islam and commit shrik and beat themselves
reminds me of 2016 farid with the shia refutations
When you love aisha more than prophet (Sawa), this is why god keeps you in darkness and turn you blind, I pray to allah to guide my all sunni brothers and sisters to the reality and help them to accept the truth
Mate your knowledge and explanation is no where near syed Amman naqshwani.Explanation has been given from Sunni books not his own text
Unbelievable the deception these people are capable of.
Absolutely insane!
brother keep responding and exposing this guy cuz he's been yapping a lot lately.
I wish he would see this or that you would say this in real life and he'd overhear you.
@@jaclynholland-strauss7054or what? He gonna smoke some shisha or get another tattoo lmao?
You goof
Exposing what, he is reading from Sahih Books and the Holy Quran. At the end you make up your own judgement.
@@sadikkadom9566 the judgment is already in the Quran lmao Shi’ites cannot prove imamah/wilayah from the Kitab of Allah 😂
Shi’ites love to read Sahih collections of Hadith, what are you hiding in your own books?
Why don’t we open up Al Kafi and see what’s in there, hmm?
@@dontwatchmee I encourage you to read.