Favorite topic! I ask Allah to reward you with the best in dunya and akhirah ameen You can buy Farid's book 'Necessity of Hadith' in the Daru Al Arqam online store. Order Farid's books here: www.daral-arqam.co.uk/
When muslim is becoming a murtad, first level is to deny %30 of hadiths. Second level is to deny %100 hadith. After few years, third level is to reject Quran.
People who reject the hadith don't know that they're rejecting the same people who transmitted Qur'an aswell. The thing is, the world of the hadith is deep, and you can't take Islam with cherry picking hadiths, or from a single hadith. There are scholars who deal with such matters.
@@KORAN-ALONEIndeed , There Is. An example is Hafs and Assim Is One Most Qurans Are Printed In. Which Tell You where that Specific Recitation Came From.
General is a good word there are many quotes in the Quran that have useful to Muslims for centuries ‘soul will taste death’ ‘Indeed allah is the most merciful’, etc.
The Ahadith Serve to explain the quran E.g Theres no mention of how to pray nor how many rakats to pray in the Quran. Hadith rejectors have bo basis for praying salah.
They do the standing, rukuk and sujud movement but ignoring the recitation part. I don't think any one of them remembers the Quran besides the verse that benefits them.
If anyone rejects Hadiths then they’re blind about Islamic history. Without Hadiths we’ll never know how the noble Qur’an was preserved or anything about the life of Prophet (saws).
@@Vomitting Seeing as the Quran tells us to follow the Sunnah, it is you that is rejecting Quran. You hadith rejectors don't even know how to perform salah, how to do Hajj ( or when ), what the sacred months are, what the adhaan is, what Jummah salah is, and not to mention many things in the Quran reference commands to the Prophet and the sahaba that aren't actually mentioned in the Quran which indicate not all revelation the Prophet sallahu alayhi wassalam received was Quran. If you follow Quran only, you don't even have any Eids, no funeral prayer, no funeral rites. You can just go cremate someone if you want to. You reject the religion the sahaba spread through the world, in favour of something you invented yourself and then label the majority of the Ummah as being misguided whilst your tiny little cult is on the truth.
One explanation, that I remember from one of my asatidz, on why we need hadiths is because it's the way for us to ittiba'. Al-Imran : 31 And Al-Kahfi : 103-106 shows that Ittiba' is waajib.
The prophet named the countries by specific that would become Muslim. Egypt-Sahih Muslim 2543B. Sham (jordan, Syria, Iraq etc) Sunan abi dawud 2483. Türkiye- musnad ahmed vol4 page 335 India- An Nasa’i 3175 The prophet predicted that when kisra (king of persia) dies, there will be no kisra after him. Sahih Muslim 2918 a The prophet predicted the conquest of Rome and Persia and Arabia. The equivalent to that is like an average man today claiming that his people will overcome china and USA. Sahih Muslim 2900 The prophet predicted Arabs will be overflowed with wealth. Today we see Saudi Arabia and the UAE are stacked with oil which is the product that is highly valued. are one of the richest countries today. Sahih bukhari 1036 The prophet predicted Bedouin Arabs, (not just any arab, the Bedouin arabs) will compete in tall building. Burj khalifa. Sunan An-Nasa’i 4990
Farid. Can you make a video on the maturity of Aisha? For example how she was up to the prophets shoulder demonstrating adult height and how at the age of 8 she was aiding in wars as a nurse. What’s your thoughts on this?
We don't need to keep trying to prove Aisha RA was at the age capable to be married and consummated this wasn't an issue a couple hundred years ago in any other country in the world the age was still appropriate at the time we shouldn't be weary or worry about proving anything to the kuffar Allah swt guides who he wills we can simply relay the message any sincere person this isn't even a talking point past helping then realize that this was the norm culturally and to be fair world wide at the time nor does him marrying Aisha RA would cause him not to be the rasoolAllah sallalahu alayhi wa Salem or the faxt that islam is the truth may Allah swt guide all of us
@@musahawkins8765but the issues that i run into is that her age directly contradicts specific events in which she should have been much older. So then how is it that this is sahih Hadith? If the hadith were made by a human wouldnt there be some error that we can assume?
The same Qur'an only people don't seem to realise the same people who brought us hadith also helped to keep the Qur'an passed down and preserved If their trustworthy then we can trust both the Qur'an and sunnah and if their not trustworthy then...
no brother the quran got compiled right after the prophet death the hadith got compiled at minimum 100 years after the prophet death plz don't say that read my comment type recent in the comment section we can discuss there
@@mrenigma1564 😂🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ the quran was memorized and taught their students the verses. They didnt make a copy and spread the copies and everyone learned from it, thats not how it went bc the original uthman mushaf didnt have diacritical marks and u were not able to differentiate between words if you didnt memorize it prior. Ahadith were compiled and they were relied upon the same method of how Quranic Quiraat were classified as valid and invalid ways of reciting. U even have ahadith which where written by Ali radiallahuanhu or the earliest compilation was by Anas ibn Malik in his muwatta and he was a Tabi‘ii which was not
@@maganhassan2627yeah, and? Did you read what I wrote? The written mushaf cant be properly read by just looking at it. Thats why the people first learned it from their shuyukh and then looked if they match with the skeletol script (rasm) of the mushaf. Nobody started taking a mushaf copy and start memorizing thats not how it worked
Brother can u make a video on the clips that Nabi asli has been making on CZcams it sounds like the channel is misconceptions but it is so many clips for me to find the answers especially when I don’t know Arabic I barely have the alphabet and vowels memorized
if the only reason for the existence of the hadith was to test us if we would obey Allah when he asks us to obey his prophet, that would be more than enough of a reason.
The fact that imam malik compiling hadith trying to weed out the false ones proved that false hadith existed since forever. And its a significant large number of it too.
If it weren't in the Qur'an then it's important to know that the prophet ﷺ did it, there are reason as to why in the Qur'an Allah ﷻ said the prophet is the example for us to follow For example - how to do prayer The order to do it is in the Qur'an but the instruction doesn't so *how* does one *perform the prayer?* According to hadith, the way of the prophet Muhammad ﷺ
This shuts the whole argument down. There many, many things that you can refer to from the Quran that point to following what the prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم does and instructs, but a lot of people like to play dumb and this argument seals it.
@@legendaryag1 there are things that are clear and then, there's don't hence why we should follow the example set by the prophet ﷺ but how should we do that? Mind you, the Qur'an is not biography of the prophet, obviously. So the hadiths IS important in this regard
@@Bruddatab I think you misunderstood me, I'm 1000% agreeing with you. I'm saying that people say the Quran suffices and when you point to verses that say follow thr prophet and in some those who come after the prophet/who holds authority, they play dumb and say it means something else. One of the sahabah had someone approach them saying that the Quran suffices and he pointed out the salat issues if we follow the logic. They only wanna innovate and corrupt, but will never succeed.
@@legendaryag1 yeah, I did 😅. Sorry bout that, being getting offence with these hadith rejectors quite lately so I'm abit perk up with the new reply May Allah ﷻ bless and grant you good health always. Amin Ya Rabb
Hablum minalAllah Hablum minnas Relationship with the All Mighty; And Our relationship with our fellow men. Rasullulah SAW is a Father, Husband, relative to a large extended family members, a Neighbour, a Leader, a Statesman, a Warrior, a Teacher. In summary - a role model Extraordinaire ❤ Allahuma salli ala Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa ala alihi Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa Sahbihi aajmain ❤ BarakaAllahu feekum Wassalam
Hello Farid, I think it would do some good to reply to some criticisms of classical hadith scholarship. I have come along some of the western perspective and it seems too be too cut-throat in terms of their skepticism, but at the same time you seem to accept all hadiths. I remember your response video with Mansur and Iljaz on Dan Bru-baker's book, I think something along this line of deconstructing the arguments of western scholars would do measures. Would it be possible to undertake this approach for the PhD thesis of Joshua Little on the Aisha hadith? I have been trying to understand his approach and reasoning, but I am left in a cloud of confusion in trusting early hadith maintenance and the motivations of early Muslims hadith scholars.
Joshua's totally unreasonable. I don't feel that it deserves a thorough response even though I've shared my opinions on some sections in the past. He goes out of his way to accuse major transmitters instead of minor unknown transmitters, just because he has the opportunity to.
@@FaridResponds Thanks for the response, would it be possible to at-the-very least tackle some of his general arguments? I find that there is very little interaction from Muslim figures explaining this topic. If not, could you recommend some books that do tackle those arguments, mostly in the realm of trustworthiness of early Muslim scholars?
@@FaridRespondsone simple argument would be his methodology. I presume you believe in the Aisha Hadith, so that would mean you trust it’s authenticity, bearing that what parts of his methodology does he get wrong? It doesn’t have to be too hyper specific, but I would like to understand what and where the disagreement comes from.
@@wramo8088 He is lenient with attributions that lead to Hisham. He is harsh with attributions to other than Hisham. His goal is to make Hisham the only narrator in order to support the hypothesis that Hisham concocted the report and doesn't have corroborations. But here is the thing... even if Hisham was the only narrator (which he isn't), that isn't enough to dismiss a report about the age of his great-aunt. It is the type of information that is expected to be carried down by relatives.
Farid, does this book (or any of your other works) address Western criticism to traditional hadith scholarship such as that following Schacht? This has had big impact in Orientalist circles, and a genuine refutation of such criticism would go a long way
@@FaridResponds Not so fast. Schacht's observations are very much in accordance with other historical research connected with Islam. Islam seems not to have been established in the 7th century but developed over a few centuries after that and then everything was redacted back to the 7th century. For example, there is no complete quran dating back from the 7th century. The terms Islam and Muslim were not found until after the 7th century. The city of Mecca was not mentioned anywhere until after the 7th century and it also started appearing on maps a few centuries later. It seems that Mecca came about only AFTER the establishment of Islam and indeed no artifacts have ever been found that suggest that Mecca is as old as Islam claims. If that is the case, then how could Muhammad have lived in a city that did not exist? And if that is the case (which it is), then the conclusion is obvious: Islam must be false. There is a lot more evidence for this but what I just told you is enough to prove Islam false. The historical record is crystal clear!
For people claiming the hadith's preservation to be even near close to Qura'an's one are obliged to check for the oldest hadith manuscripts and isnaad of 10million hadiths alleged by bukhari to have memorised. They are also obliged to check the divine claims the Qura'an makes and the divine claims hadith makes(if any). Anyone under the misconception of thinking that hadiths were divine revelations are challenged to produce a case for Qura'an and hadith being same thereof in divine regards such as-language, fractal, guidance, truthfulness, history etc.
how bhukari used to pray before he collected sahih hadith for salah? was there any difference in his salah if there was did he corrected his salah after that?
Peace Farid, Argument A P1. If the Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran, then the “Quran only” position is false. P2.The Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran. C13. Therefore, the Quran only” position is false. RHETORICAL QUESTION In your book, The Necessity of Hadith, on pages 45-46 you wrote: “Quranist conflate the word hadith meaning statement in the verse, with the “prophetic hadith” that we are all used to today.” The operative term in your statement, of course, is ‘hadith.’ Your position, along with that of Sunni Islam paradigm attempts to advertently or inadvertently, undermine the nature of a rhetorical question in general, and the rhetorical nature of 45:6 in specific. This approach is not rational/logical. The nature of a rhetorical question is to make a point, not to seek a literal answer. In fact, by its nature, a rhetorical question is incapable of expecting a literal answer; seeking one would defeat its purpose. Surah 45:6 poses a rhetorical question, whose intent is not to seek information as a standard question does, but to affirm the book/Quran’s authority, completeness, and sufficiency to guide. It simultaneously negates the notion that following sources other than the Book/the Quran for guidance is acceptable to Allah. Thus, suggesting that ‘some hadith’ are acceptable to Allah contradicts the rhetorical nature of 45:6, not to mention other clear verses which state the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient to guide. Again, a rhetorical question, by its nature, cannot be treated as if it’s seeking a literal answer. A rhetorical question cannot simultaneously be rhetorical and not rhetorical. Likewise, sufficient cannot mean sufficient and simultaneously mean not sufficient. Thus, 45:6 precludes any extra-Quranic hadith from being used as guidance in Deen Al-Islam. 45:6, then, is a blanket command by Allah that NO hadith is acceptable to Him relative to guidance, except, His hadith the Book/the Quran: 39:23: 39:23 Allah has revealed the best announcement/hadith, a book conformable in its various parts, repeating, whereat do shudder the skins of those who fear their Lord, then their skins and their hearts become pliant to the remembrance of Allah; this is Allah's guidance, He GUIDES WITH IT whom He pleases; and (as for) him whom Allah makes err, there is no guide for him. 45:6 and 38:23, among other verses, establishes that the Book/The Quran is fully detailed and sufficient for guidance. ARGUMENT FOR QURAN ALONE Argument B P1. All claims are either true claims or false claims. P2. All claims made by Allah are necessarily true claims. P3. Allah claims that He is the Truth, and the Truth is from Him, and He speaks the Truth, and none is truer in word than Him. These are necessarily true claims. P4. If Allah claims something to be sufficient for a particular purpose, then He cannot simultaneously claim that same thing is not sufficient for that particular purpose. This is necessarily a true claim. P5. Allah claims that Hell is sufficient/kafa to burn, He is sufficient/kafa to guide, and the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient/kafa to guide. These, then, are necessarily true claims. P6. Allah’s claims, being necessarily true claims, cannot contradict each other. C1. Allah’s claim that the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient alone for guidance is necessarily a true claim. Therefore: C2. The claim that the Book/the Quran is not fully detailed and sufficient alone for guidance is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C3. The claim that the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C4. The claim that “obey the Messenger” means the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C5. The claim that solaa is a ritual prayer is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C6. The position that sunnah and hadith books are necessary is a false claim. Therefore: C7. The position that the Quran alone position is false is a false claim. P1. Law of the Excluded Middle P2. 31:30; 4:170; 33:4; 10:82; 4:122 P3. 31:30; 4:170; 33:4; 10:82; 4:122 P4. Law of Noncontradiction P5. 4:55; 25:31; 29:51 P6. Law of Noncontradiction Therefore: C1. 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C2. 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C3. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C4. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C5. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C6. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C7. P1-C6 NOTE: An important distinction between Argument A and Argument B is the following: The conclusion/C1 in Argument B is a true claim stated by Allah. In contrast, the conclusion/C1 in Argument A,, is the claim of the author. Whose claim then must necessarily be a true claim…A or B? Looking forward to your reply.
Very well said my brother. Unfortunately Mushriks cannot respond with logical answers because they're so blinded by their nonsensical hadith and scholars. So, why bother with them?
Can someone answer my question why ahadith are not compiled and approved by the first 4 caliphs? To make matters complicated it was reported the first and second caliphs prevented it being spread out. On the other hand the written Quran was passed down by each caliphs and being authoticanted by the third caliph, thank you.
They were worried that the hadith might be confused for the Quranic text, and this was also a worry during the Prophet pbuh's time but however, in Medina he did allow it to be written down. The third caliph actually promoted such a cause and its said the fourth caliph had his own book of judisciary with ahadith contained within. The student of a companion called hammam ibn munabih has a saqifah written as well.
@@Kzam19-ux8wg not yet, the earliest extant book discovered yet, is of the student of the companion Abu Hurairah. The name is sahifah of hammam ibn munnabih. Comparisons with hadith's from musnad Ahmed ibn hanbal have been made as far as i know.
@@Rabidracc000ns written culture was not widely prevalent amongst Arabs. Of course the eloquence and literary merit of the Quran is unmatched. But to one who is not aware, he might undermine that by confusing it with hadith's
Allah swt. revealed us muslims 2 things and most laymen muslim don't know that is the Quran and the Hikmah. The Hikmah is the tradition of the Prophet saw. did in situation. The Hikmah specializes the things where like Brother Farid said correctly the Quran is mostly a general guidance. Hopefully i have it correctly. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Allah swt. knows best and may He guide us.
I think of the Qur'an as being the Book of Wisdom. The Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, was the ruler, the Emir of the Muslims. His job was not merely to guide and educate the ummah, but to provide an economy and judicial stability. As such he appropriately interpreted the Qur'an, had other wahi which have him guidance for different situations and used his wisdom to socially guide the Muslims from jahil to knowledge. Muslim scholars have described the Injeel as wisdom and knowledge that Jesus could metaphorically do his hand into. There is no resulting Sharia to guide the Christians through the physical necessities of life. Bro Paul Williams has noted that Christian society used the Greek philosophers to develop their legal systems. So, I think the hadith are essential.
I saw people bring up surah 6:114 as proof we don't need hadith as the quran explains things perfectly how should we understand this verse? To me since Allah said we should follow the prophet (peace be upon him) as he is our role model there's your answer to why we need hadith right? Just need more clarification what Allah means from the verse I mentioned. Jazakallah khair for those helping me to understand. Saw people even question how the quran is clear as Allah said it is 🤷♂️
Assalamwalikum, that verse really has nothing to do with what they claim it to be. It is talking about seeking a judge other than Allah(s.w) or other than what Allah(s.w) has revealed. If you read the tafsir, you would know that it really has nothing to do with what they are trying to make it out to be. By the way, check out the video by muslim lantern, complete annihilation of hadith rejectors methedology. It will be of great help to you to see how their position is just ridiculous and has too many holes.
I thought Quran is sufficient as Umar Ibn Khattab responded to Prophet Muhammad SAWW when he asked for a pen and paper so he could write something after which Ummah wouldn’t go astray. To which Umar responded to the Prophet حسبنا کتابا meaning that Quran is sufficient for us and we do not need your will (Na’uzubillah). Here you are disapproving Umar’s claim and confirming his disobedience to the Prophet (read Sahi Al Bukhari, Volume I, Book of Knowledge, Hadith Number 114)
There are a number of different narrations but the majority of them say that once ummar said that the quran is sufficient, the companions began arguing with each other near the prophet, so the prophet didn't write that thing because of their noise.
@ 0:57 he said the Quran would lose its poetic nature if the detailed laws were in it and that’s why they are found in Hadiths🤦🏾. If that is the reason then would it be mandatory that the Hadiths be written and saved when the Prophet (saw) was on earth?
A comment here mentioned that there were a written hadith or compilation of ahadith by the 4th caliph and a student of a companion by the name hammam ibn munabil, is that true? Where can i get the copy of these written ahadith.
Brother i know that we have chains of narrations from Prophet Muhammad to Hadith Book authors but what is the chain from them to us? Please Answer, Brother!!! Hope that someday you will see it. The answer is very important for me.
Why would anyone ask this question in the first place? Imagine you were living in the time of the prophet peace be upon him, or just right after he passed away. Then you are hearing sahaba reporting what he said qnd what he did. Would you tell them do i need this or that? It doesn't make any sense to reject Hadiths. Finding anything said or done by the prophet should be valuable to muslims even a weak hadith should be considered . Of course fabricated ones should be rejected and also caralogued for the sake of awareness and warning to fall into believing they are true.
Will we be questioned about the hadiths on the day of judgment? If Allah asks you why you did not wear gold and silk, what will you say? Won't Allah ask you in which verse: Gold and silk are forbidden? God says he will question us from the Quran, so why do we follow someone else without questioning?
We will be asked about everything…. So what will your soul see when your mouth answers God when God asked “why did you disregard Sayings of Muhammad?” Hadith are collection, very important collections of the prophets life and what he said, the way we worship as a Muslim is not found in the quran but in the Hadith, do you then invent your own way of worship and claim to know better than the prophet has demonstrated?
@@DavidHoang-bq3ss Then I say, what is the evidence that the prophet said these things? Also, didn't you say that you will be questioned from the book? I suggest you check if the hadiths are written in the book? I wonder why you are asking me about something that is not in the book?
@@shwanmirza9306 The Quran is the only source from which we can be questioned. The Quran itself says this. If we make mistakes while questioning the Quran, Allah will forgive us. If we make mistakes by taking other things as resources, God will not forgive us.
@@necmettinmutlu306 Wasn't the Prophet ﷺ the last messenger of Allah? So anything he said is 100% right. Why wouldn't an average Muslim obey his orders?
I will make it easy for you bro, the sahabas didn't do it, they knew islam the best after the prophet. They never made dua to the dead, they only made dua to Allah. Just stick to what the Prophet and the Sahaba did and inshallah you will go to paradise if you die upon what their upon.
@@jamworthy14Yeah brother, we need to stay strong and reject innovations and disbelief in the religion. In our time there is so much new things that muslims created that the prophet and sahaba simply never believed or did.
3:52 🤦🏾for the Quran to truly be appreciated you must understand history? Statements like this dangerous. It’s say that you need Hadith for the Quran, yet the Hadith were never made mandatory to document during the time when the prophet was on earth.
The way I see it people who reject the hadith is someone who reject the dictionary,, You know they don't need for someone to explain to them but they have more understanding about the world more then everyone,, You all wrong because you listened to Muhammad saw to whom the Qur'an is revealed, we don't need him because we who is in years 2020 have more understanding about the Qur'an then Muhammad saw,, Is like saying I know more about coffee because I drink it and read the book off coffee, I know more than the farmers who grow it and fick the coffee from the farm and drying it and cook it and grinding it, 🤦🤦🤦
I find it so funny that Hadith deniers claim to know more than the Prophet…. Basically saying I only do as the Quran told is like saying I know more than the prophet
Please read ALL literature in its cultural, linguistic and historical context. Do not expect literature to meet the expectations of a culture which is different/foreign to that literature's origin. Even in the case where the reader shares the same location as the literature, there will be problems as the history, culture and language will have evolved over time. The idea is to appreciate the literature in its own context. In the case of the commentators on said literature, their views are reflections of the history, language and culture in which they wrote. No serious scholar would ever reject a literary production because it did not fulfill the expectations of that scholar's contemporary standards of scholarship. This applies to the muhadditheen too. THE QURAN ALONE TRANSCENDS ALL HUMAN STANDARDS OF SCHOLARSHIP.
Umar believed the Quran alone was sufficient on the Prophet's deathbed. He brought about many reforms as caliph, too, so the "sunnah" was never meant to be absolute.
@@FaridResponds sorry brother farid, ive got to ask this question. Why did our second caliph does not compile a written book of ahadith as per the Quran. Thank you.
brother here you are saying that the quran is incomplete by saying that it says general rulings and not details and we need hadiths this is shirk you litterly are saying that God made his religion incomplete and associate people to further complet his message !! this contradict with the quran surah al nahl وَيَوْمَ نَبْعَثُ فِي كُلِّ أُمَّةٍ شَهِيدًا عَلَيْهِم مِّنْ أَنفُسِهِمْ ۖ وَجِئْنَا بِكَ شَهِيدًا عَلَىٰ هَٰؤُلَاءِ ۚ وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ تِبْيَانًا لِّكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً وَبُشْرَىٰ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ (89) ۚ وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ تِبْيَانًا لِّكُلِّ شَيْءٍ
surat an aam وَمَا لَكُمْ أَلَّا تَأْكُلُوا مِمَّا ذُكِرَ اسْمُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ وَقَدْ فَصَّلَ لَكُم مَّا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْكُمْ إِلَّا مَا اضْطُرِرْتُمْ إِلَيْهِ ۗ وَإِنَّ كَثِيرًا لَّيُضِلُّونَ بِأَهْوَائِهِم بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ ۗ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِالْمُعْتَدِينَ (119 الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا [المائدة:3 الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ then how and why most scholars deny this or twisting it hadiths are written at minimum 100 years after the prophet death most of AL KAHANOT who support the claim that sunnah abrogate the quran are in thalel / astray about the way of the salat brother it comes to us through tawator alyawmi even in the hadiths they are not hadiths about the details on how should we pray it comes to us through the teachers of the our prophet tawator alyawmi you pray your son sees you pray like you etc..... that's how we learn how to pray the claim that the ones preserved the quran are the ones who preserved the hadith is also a lie we know the time and the place of when the quran was compiled and when right after the prophet death the hadiths on the other hand are in minimum compiled 100 years after the prophet death besides not all muslims believe in al bukhari or muslm ( or any the so called ahl sunnah books and tafasir ) meanwhile the ahlu sunnah don't believe the compiled version of hadith from the shia so why differ !!! yet all of them believe that the quran is preserved so why not take our AHKEM from the quran why take hadiths that are written in the abbasid caliphate God knows of what fitnah they want to establish i think you are familiar with this verse in al baqara 180 كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمْ إِذَا حَضَرَ أَحَدَكُمُ الْمَوْتُ إِن تَرَكَ خَيْرًا الْوَصِيَّةُ لِلْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ ۖ حَقًّا عَلَى الْمُتَّقِينَ (180) here allah says ''كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمْ'' and we found that most of the so called scholars of islam when they saw this hadith about '' لا وصية لوارث '' they say we follow the hadith they say that verse in the quran GOT ABROGATED by this hadith imagine if you have some sense of logic imagine God changing a verse from the Quran and put it in another book not in his book instead of saying that hadith is aa lie because it contradict the quran they say no we take this hadith and we don't take the verse in the quran that litterly says '' كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمْ '' like '' {كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمُ الصِّيَامُ '' same importance but yes i know that anyone who is reading this probably will say i'm going astray that's the brainwash of AL KAHANOT we are going astray of what GOD revealed and instead follows the madhahib ( acting like gods saying which is haram and which is not ) when GOD SAID '' فَصَّلَ لَكُم مَّا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْكُمْ '' we don't need to understand everything in the quran we need to understand what God wants us to understand '' in surah al imran ! (6) هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ وَأُخَرُ مُتَشَابِهَاتٌ ۖ فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ ۗ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِّنْ عِندِ رَبِّنَا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّا أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ (7) '' هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ '' this is what we need to enter paradise everyone understand these verses crystal clear '' آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ''' but instead they focus on this ' فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ ۗ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِّنْ عِندِ رَبِّنَا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّا أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ '' until the majority of the muslims abondoned what God said in the quran in surah al rom 32 it says : مِنَ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا ۖ كُلُّ حِزْبٍ بِمَا لَدَيْهِمْ فَرِحُونَ (32) this applies to the different madhahib and i know what i'm saying they are difference in rulings some give ahkem and say '' makroh '' some say it's '' haram '' saying haram like that when only God says whats haram call me whatever you like '' im following what God revealed to his prophet '' وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ وَآمَنُوا بِمَا نُزِّلَ عَلَىٰ مُحَمَّدٍ وَهُوَ الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ ۙ كَفَّرَ عَنْهُمْ سَيِّئَاتِهِمْ وَأَصْلَحَ بَالَهُمْ (2) ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا اتَّبَعُوا الْبَاطِلَ وَأَنَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّبَعُوا الْحَقَّ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ ۚ كَذَٰلِكَ يَضْرِبُ اللَّهُ لِلنَّاسِ أَمْثَالَهُمْ (3) if you can argue with me ( plz be respectful or don't reply keep living without using your brain )
Probably because alot of the rules of islam are from the hadith and it would make peoples lives more easier if they ignore it and follow their desires. For example Music is prohibited clear cut in the hadith, while in the Quran its implied.
Too much work for them... They don't also trust the men who brought hadith yet they are the same who brought Quran to their English translator who they do trust blindly.... Kufars
Ever present is God. Always been there before we wrote down anything. One of the Ancient cultures are Arabs and the first religion was Jewish. The Greeks also an ancient people who invented western civilization and eventually became the Roman Greek empire and where Muslims learned from them and for years have had no issue taking full advantage of the benefits. The Greeks were the first to be approached by the Jews about Christ. How you see christ does not offend me or bother me. How you Muslims see the world and how you depend on your prophet for your life's trajectory offends me. And especially since he took from other religions to make a stagnant religion that refuses to learn and go forward. I also blame the Catholic religion for single handedly destroying Christianity. They also offend me. And they also were an enemy that which we the enlightened thinkers had to reckon. May the continue to enlighten you.
My my my. The Greeks certainly were an incredible civilization that definitely contributed to the world as a whole. But I'm at perplexed at the notion that by somehow learn equates to theft of intellect or plagiarism? By that wonderful logic any automotive innovation is a theft from Henry Ford and you can extend this analogy to other contexts. That's how innovation occurs my simpleton friend. Stagnant! Oh my, in what regard? Because we had our golden age where we flourished while western Europe was in its dark ages. So the notion that Islam necessitates "stagnation" is quite an uneducated statement to make, but one that's quite typical for the superficial idiots who praise themselves as being on the moral high ground yet are the worst when you really examine their own hypocrisy. Enlightenment? Meaning accepting the wonderful letters as part of modern christianity? Sex work as something that's praise worthy? Both of which have a history of psychological pathologies and trauma attached to them? To the point where even mainstream sentiments in the "enlightened" circles have started going opposite of these liberal sentiments. You're simply filled with blind hate because you'll be the kind to meet a Muslim and act like piece of work even they're being nice and respectful to you. The problem is you, you've lost your identity and have become nothing more than shallow fiend that has no qualms about doing anything as long as no one finds out and when push comes to shove, you'll throw everyone to the fire for your own benefit. But in society and social circles, you'll constantly preach love, compassion, equality and such, but you really don't show what's beneath the surface. Your the real cancer is the world, you just hide your sickness better.
One should not compare history with the hadith, hadith is a requirement otherwise one is not a Muslim. There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of God O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe in Allah and the Last Day: That is best, and most suitable for final determination. An Nisa 4:59
Most hadith arent an issue for me, however an example of hadiths that just dont make sense to me and my heart rejects are like the shaytan pees in your ear or shaytan is in your nose during sleep or the age of aisha, etc.
You are limited to 3 dimensional world... And you know the jinns live in other dimensions were they see us and we don't, they teleport and fast travel and we don't, they shape shift and we don't.... So him doing something doesn't mean you will see it or feel it...
Hadith is not for layman to read and extrapolate a ruling, there is 100 hadiths talking about one thing from deferent perspective. It's a scholarly work. I find zero problem collection of Bukhari hadiths...
What's wrong with Shaytaan in your nose? In Islam we believe in idea's such as hell, heaven, angels, jhinn's so this idea of shaytaan in your nose is not crazy, This is like saying "hell and heaven cannot be real because it doesn't make sense and it's not scientifically possible" There are 2 interpretations of this hadith, 1. Shaytaan LITERALLY spends time in the persons nose while they are asleep and this is how shaytaan can enter into the dreams and meadows of peoples heads. There's nothing wrong with this as it's a metaphorical reality 2. this may be a figurative expression meaning shaytaan in your nose causes laziness and negligence and all these states are satanic dispositions similarly one could tell you that your phone is a shaytaan because it embodies satanic dispositions of laziness, so when you keep your nostrils unclean it has you personifying satanic tendencies. Both can be correct as they show you the importance of cleaning your nose
Hey farid, question for you. Been pondering the quran more than usual of late and the word kafir keeps ringing alot. Wondered what it really meant. Kept digging and found a different take than the usual ‘’INFIDEL”. False claimers of guidance. I wonder, what if that definition means people like you. a false claim or a false path of guidance. interesting innit. Just a quick thought but we will for sure find out on judgment day. I’l keep an eye out for you to see the predicament you land yourself in. If it’s heaven, advance congratulations and if it’s hell, i won’t say I’d be surprised. Cheers.
Tawatur… The sunnie religion is based on tracing their books to mohammed pbuh and that’s sufficient for them to believe so the reason behind their belief is not God but mohammed If your belief in the book is based on the book, then the way of transmission has no meaning, but if your belief in the book is based on the way of transmission, then your belief has no meaning… We did not believe the people that brought the Quran, but we believed the Quran. The person who delivers a message has done a human effort, but his human effort is not responsible for the truth it conveys nor is it responsible for my belief in that truth.... The truth is from God and my belief in the truth is not from that person, and thats what really matters... The issue of tawatur is a silly issue, because the credibility of the Qur’an was never due to its attribution to Muhammad or because so-and-so companion transmitted it, but rather the credibility of the Qur’an is generated from itself and the testimony of the text itself. The believers did not believe the Qur’an because Muhammad brought it, but rather they believed it when they heard it and knew that it was the truth... ( 28:53 ) : “And when it is recited to them they say: We believe in it, it is the truth from our Lord” ( 5:83 ) : “when they listen to that which has been revealed to the messenger, you see their eyes overflow with tears, because of their recognition of the truth” ( 72:1-2 ) : “Lo! We have heard a marvelous Quran, which guides to righteousness, so we believed in it” All of these verses confirm to the believer that the verses are self evident and their validity stems from them and not from men or a method of transmission. On the contrary, the infidels were the ones who wanted to attribute the Qur’an to a man of high social standing in order for them to believe him... “And they said: Oh that this Quran had but been revealed to a great man of the two cities!” ( 43:31 )
Farid Explainations be like 👆🔁⏭️🔼◀️⏫⏬⏮️▶️🔀⏫🔽⏩🔼. Here is the Explainations of God. Quran 77:50, Quran 7:185, Quran 17:46, Quran 45:6-7, Quran 6:114. Etc FOLLOW THE QURAN ALONE😎
Comparing the Quran to poetry and literature is the ultimate shirk. You belie the words of Allah swt when he told us the and scholars that this Quran is not like poetry nor anything else the was brought before it. This is propaganda. Can you have Islam without Hadith? Answer this question may Allah guide us ameen
Just remember one thing Quran transferred through ijma and tawatur! Meaning Quran became public book in prophet’s life! Hadiths are individual news and became public much later! Abu bakr ra burned his hand written book of 500 Hadiths. Umer ra was advised to compile a Hadith book but he refused! It’s no problem if you see some details in Hadiths about something briefly mentioned in Quran! The issue starts when Hadiths start influencing the meaning of popular words of Quran!
The hadith about Abu Bakr is not authentic. And about Umar(r.a), hin and some other sahabas saw compiling hadiths as disliked, while some others had the opposite take on it such as Ali ibn Abi Talib(r.a) and so on. And no hadiths were not individual news, it is evident that the sahabas were learning these hadiths from eachother. Even the Quran wasn't complied right away until Umar(r.a) gave the suggestion to Abubakr(r.a) because of the death of many Hufaz. Compiling it in a written format is a different topic. So, claiming that hadiths were individual news is false. 1400+ years of Islam, and here you are, claiming we should just use the hadiths only for a reference and so on. May Allah(s.w) guide you
@@AbdulazizKider There can't be a Hufaz of the Quran as a whole book when the Quran as a whole book does not exist yet! The hadith has a loophole! The Quran became a public book in the Prophet's life that's what this Hadith proves!
Brother Farid, Take a look at this magnificient verse: "" Say, "I do not find (laa ajidu) within that which was revealed to me [anything] forbidden (oohiya ilayya muharraman) to one who would eat it unless (illa) it be a dead animal or blood spilled out or the flesh of swine - for indeed, it is impure - or it be [that slaughtered in] disobedience, dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit], then indeed, your Lord is Forgiving and Merciful."" {6:145} This verse mentions that the Messenger DOES NOT find in what was INSPIRED (oohiya) to him anything haram except 4 things: 1 - Dead animal 2 - blood spilled 3 - swine 4 - anything dedicated to other than Allah. There are 3 other verses in the Qur'an that make mention of these 4 things. So, you can see the perfect harmony and consistency throughout the Book of Allah. However, we find a whole load of haram things within the hadeeth literature (domestic donkeys, animals with claws, etc). How do you reconcile between the 2?? And please don't give me this "some verses have been abrogated" nonsense! Because the only way around this is to reject these Verses of Allah to exchange them with your fabricated hadeeths and call it abrogation! 😊
@@Mimi-Maa18 chapter 5 verse 3 simply elaborates and adds further details and clarifies those 4 things that Allah has made haram to eat. Please read and reflect on the Verses of Allah without letting lahwal- hadeeths divert you from the truth!
It seems that you do not understand the whole issue.The biggest problem here is that when hadiths contradict the Quran.For traditional muslim mad- habs,one hadith is stronger many Quran verses on same issue.Hadith based religion is quite different from Quran based one.The prophet collected Quran in written form,and he was ordered to deliver his message.When you say the hadiths are wahy,then you insist that the prophet ignored to deliver that part of the religion.The sahaaba after him did not collect hadith either.The religion was complete when the prophet,peace upon him,died.
The Qur'an is meant for every individual to read and find guidance. No other sources other than the guidance of Allah is needed. Remember that putting Hadiths side by side next to the Qur'an is creating partnership (shirk) so be aware dear Muslim.
there’s a real contradiction in practically all abrahamic faiths, their holy books are simultaneously the immortal word of God, but somehow also require historical contexts. You’re basically just picking and choosing what bits allah directed at us and which were just meant for the people of mohammed’s time.
Many verses were revealed on situations the Prophet pbuh encountered, and since he’s the example we follow it is wise to reveal such verses. Additionally, the Quran was sent down to All of Mankind until the Day of Judgement. It is not only for the Prophet pbuh and his time, that’s just false.
I can see what you mean, when you apply it to the OT, or the Torah and NT books. They range from statements like "God said..." to biographical stories to personal musings. In Islamic idiom these would be hadith kudsi, hadith and, especially with respect to the writing of Paul et al, rulings or fatwa, philosophy and personal journaling. The Qur'an is very different. We say it's from Allah, via angel Jibril, to Muhammad peace be upon him. Non Muslims would at least agree with final delivery being from Muhammad. Authorship is then a subject, since we know Muhammad was illiterate. Accusations from the pagan Arabs was he had others author it but that was rebutted in the Qur'an and they had no answer. One can read the Qur'an and easily find verses that have personal meaning. However, to then give teachings, make a fatwa or ruling, or judge by the Qur'an requires a very deep knowledge, and that is where the hadith provide a wealth of additional information and often precedent rulings. I hope this contextualises the matter for you, albeit in a very short form.
@@thetriumphsprintthe Qurans rebuttal u claimed no one could answer was “They claim a man is is teaching him yet the man they speak of speaks a foreign tongue and this is a Quran in Arabic.” There’s such a thing as translator existing and learning language as well obviously he had at a minimum a translator otherwise he couldn’t live there cuz he wouldn’t be able to communicate So I don’t understand how u think no one has a response to this
@@Rabidracc000ns that's a very reasonable question. Translation doesn't assist us, since the claim is about teaching. Yes, Muhammad PBUH could have discussed stories with this unnamed person, but the person couldn't have inserted his stories in perfect Arabic into the Quran, otherwise no need to mention "the tongue" (lisānu) being foreign (ajamiyyun). That leaves us with the idea captured in this verse of Muhammad PBUH being taught the stories. He would then have to create an Arabic interpretation using the richness found in the Qur'an. Yet he was known by his contemporaries, including the Meccan Qurashi, to be illiterate and never exhibited a capacity for poetry or literary talent. The verse before, 6:102, says Say, [O Muḥammad], "The Pure Spirit [i.e., Gabriel] has brought it down from your Lord in truth to make firm those who believe and as guidance and good tidings to the Muslims." - Saheeh International So that's a clear statement in the Qur'an to accompany the response to the Qurashi in 103. The tafsirs of ibn Kathir and Maududi say the following: The Idolators' Claim that the Qur'an was taught by a Human, and the Refutation of their Claim Allah tells us about the idolators' lies, allegations, and slander when they claimed that this Qur'an which Muhammad had recited for them, was actually taught to him by a human. They referred to a foreign (i.e., non-Arab) man who lived among them as the servant of some of the clans of Quraysh and who used to sell goods by As-Safa. Maybe the Messenger of Allah used to sit with him sometimes and talk to him a little, but he was a foreigner who did not know much Arabic, only enough simple phrases to answer questions when he had to. So in refutation of their claims of fabrication, Allah said: ﴿لِّسَانُ الَّذِى يُلْحِدُونَ إِلَيْهِ أَعْجَمِىٌّ وَهَـذَا لِسَانٌ عَرَبِىٌّ مُّبِينٌ﴾ (The tongue of the man they refer to is foreign, while this (the Qur'an) is a (in) clear Arabic tongue.) meaning, how could it be that this Qur'an with its eloquent style and perfect meanings, which is more perfect than any Book revealed to any previously sent Prophet, have been learnt from a foreigner who hardly speaks the language No one with the slightest amount of common sense would say such a thing. §16.50.1 Passage 16:103-105 We know very well what they say about you: "Surely a certain person teaches him."107 But the person to whom they allude speaks a foreign tongue, and this (Qur'an) is in plain Arabic. It is a fact that Allah does not show guidance to those who do not believe in His Revelations, and there is a painful torment for them. (The Prophet is not forging any false thing but) those, who do not believe in the Revelations of Allah, are inventing falsehoods108 they are indeed the liars. §16.50.109 Footnote 107 In this connection, traditions mention the names of several persons, one of whom (Jabar), according to the disbelievers of Makkah taught the Holy Prophet; however, one thing particularly noteworthy about all these persons is that they were non-Arab slaves. Whosoever he might be, the fact that he used to recite the Torah and the Gospel and had an acquaintance with the Holy Prophet, gave an opportunity to the disbelievers for spreading this false report that it was the particular slave who was the real author of the Holy Qur'an, but Muhammad (Allah's peace be upon him) presented it as the Word of God. This not only shows that his opponents were very impudent in spreading false accusations against the Holy Prophet but also that, in general, people are not just in judging the worth of their contemporaries. They were ill-treating like this that great personality who has had no parallel in history. Nevertheless, these people who had become blind in their opposition, preferred to attribute the authorship of the matchless Arabic Qur'an to a non-Arab slave who had a smattering of the Torah and the Gospel. Instead of accepting the claim of the Holy Prophet, who was an embodiment of truth, they attributed its authorship to an insignificant foreign slave.
@@Rabidracc000ns BTW I'll thank you for the opportunity to read and understand a bit more of Qur'an. The period of prophethood in Mecca was 13 years. The early Surahs tend to be short, theological ones designed to make their audience think about the existence of and nature of humans, and their destiny after judgement comes. Later on Surahs become longer and include parables for the listeners to think about, and, especially with the Madinan Surahs, there is legislation as well. Surah An-Nahl is dated to late Meccan, as it references incidents that happened during that 13 year period. One can make the assumption that the Meccans could have grabbed that fellow and got the story out of him that he taught Muhammad PBUH. Well we know that didn't happen. I think it didn't happen because the Meccan leaders had a tendency with Muhammad PBUH, of throwing mud out, in the hope some of it sticks. In modern parlance we are seeing a similar thing happening with Mr D Trump at the moment.
What? 😂 Sunni Islam is the largest religious sect in the world. Larger than Catholicism. We went from 1.8 billion to over 2 billion as of 2023 for Sunni Islam.
@@If_I_loose_my_hair_i_will_kms sunnism isn't Islam, everything in sunnism is linked to mullas, whatever their mullas call saheeh, their leymen follow like sheep. Sunnism is dying, sunni kids are apostating and hiding their apostasy, and 100s of sunni "huffath" are becoming apostates, and many so called "imams" are confessed disbelievers, but keep doing what they do to keep their status, and many sunnis remain in sunnism because of sunnis being masses (a bandwagon fallacy), one girl who memorized Quran fully told me that she's afraid of her (sunni) father when I asked her what's stopping her from accepting Qur'an alone. So sunnis are like that, some are afraid, others are just careless. And I was a sunni, and reading Quran by myself and investigating into its Arabic roots made me realize much which sunnis teach does not align with Quran, I still followed Hadiths tho, but as I studied some Hadiths (even the first Book of Bukhari) I saw by 3 errors in each Hadith, cuz I already knew some of Quranic basis, so I started doubting Ahadith, also cuz Qur'an has verses telling us to not follow which we don't know/ , while following baseless Hadiths and "praying" behind mullas was exactly an action I didn't know why I did, and when I asked "imams" (whom I call mullas now, they're not worthy of title "imam"), they avoided my questions, and instead told me irrelevant stuff and told me to read some books like "sababu nuzul" which is by itself a kufr book, cuz disbelievers ask the reason for revelations/ 2:26, while I wasn't asking reasons for revelations, I was asking reasons for what they do which isn't apart of the revelation (i.e. Quran). So I witnessed those mullas avoiding, and slandering on me, and them sending away the orphans and the needy from the mosques, and making women sweep the mosques in front of men, dayyuth sunnis. I had no a shred of respect left for any of them, none of them advise another to stop those injustices they do, but if they advise, they'll be removed and governments will replace them with other (obedient) mullas, that's because their lords are those devils, they serve hypocrite governments, they wanna give legislation to Taghut as Allah taught in 4:60.
Favorite topic! I ask Allah to reward you with the best in dunya and akhirah ameen
You can buy Farid's book 'Necessity of Hadith' in the Daru Al Arqam online store.
Order Farid's books here:
www.daral-arqam.co.uk/
Ordered the book today. Hopefully won’t take too long to get to the U.S. can’t wait!
@@sammu I ask Allah to make you benefit from it ameen
Why we should have to know how the prophet (saw) intercourse with his wives? Even if it's it's historical..
When muslim is becoming a murtad, first level is to deny %30 of hadiths. Second level is to deny %100 hadith. After few years, third level is to reject Quran.
Thank you for this video br Farid and for those of us who haven't done so already, I recommend the purchase of Farid's book "The Necessity of Hadith"
Finally! I’ve been waiting for this one
Very strong response dear brother. Jazak Allah khayran
JazakAllah Khair
alhamdulliah seeing farid more active on yt
People who reject the hadith don't know that they're rejecting the same people who transmitted Qur'an aswell.
The thing is, the world of the hadith is deep, and you can't take Islam with cherry picking hadiths, or from a single hadith. There are scholars who deal with such matters.
Then why are not isnad of the Quran
@@KORAN-ALONEIndeed , There Is. An example is Hafs and Assim Is One Most Qurans Are Printed In. Which Tell You where that Specific Recitation Came From.
@@DrBen85000 oh okey
@QURAN-UNIVERSAL every Hafidh of Qur'an has an Isnad, they have a certificate called Ijjaaza.
@@EruRoraitoX then i have to have this certificate to be a hafidh?
watta plug at the end well played farid 🐢
General is a good word there are many quotes in the Quran that have useful to Muslims for centuries ‘soul will taste death’ ‘Indeed allah is the most merciful’, etc.
barakAllah feek
WalekumaSalam Wa RahmatUllahi Wa Barakatuhu
اللھم اجمع شملنا
The Ahadith Serve to explain the quran
E.g
Theres no mention of how to pray nor how many rakats to pray in the Quran.
Hadith rejectors have bo basis for praying salah.
They do the standing, rukuk and sujud movement but ignoring the recitation part.
I don't think any one of them remembers the Quran besides the verse that benefits them.
@@panduvandal but do they know what to say during standing, rukut and sujud by Quran? No !
If anyone rejects Hadiths then they’re blind about Islamic history. Without Hadiths we’ll never know how the noble Qur’an was preserved or anything about the life of Prophet (saws).
@@Vomitting Who wrote the Quran?
@@Vomitting How you gonna be guided when you nothing about the man it was revealed too??
@@Vomitting No, because it’s not his biography book.
@@Vomitting Why are you running? Who wrote the Quran.
@@Vomitting Seeing as the Quran tells us to follow the Sunnah, it is you that is rejecting Quran. You hadith rejectors don't even know how to perform salah, how to do Hajj ( or when ), what the sacred months are, what the adhaan is, what Jummah salah is, and not to mention many things in the Quran reference commands to the Prophet and the sahaba that aren't actually mentioned in the Quran which indicate not all revelation the Prophet sallahu alayhi wassalam received was Quran.
If you follow Quran only, you don't even have any Eids, no funeral prayer, no funeral rites. You can just go cremate someone if you want to. You reject the religion the sahaba spread through the world, in favour of something you invented yourself and then label the majority of the Ummah as being misguided whilst your tiny little cult is on the truth.
Hadith rejectors target revert and people don’t speak arabic like Pakistan, India, malaysia. Itis rarely to see hadith rejecter speaking arabic
One explanation, that I remember from one of my asatidz, on why we need hadiths is because it's the way for us to ittiba'.
Al-Imran : 31 And Al-Kahfi : 103-106 shows that Ittiba' is waajib.
The issue with hadith is that people place them on a level as if they are in COMPETITION with the Kitaab, as opposed to being SUPPLEMENTARY.
*Video Request:* Make some videos on hadith prophecies.
The prophet named the countries by specific that would become Muslim.
Egypt-Sahih Muslim 2543B.
Sham (jordan, Syria, Iraq etc) Sunan abi dawud 2483.
Türkiye- musnad ahmed vol4 page 335
India- An Nasa’i 3175
The prophet predicted that when kisra (king of persia) dies, there will be no kisra after him.
Sahih Muslim 2918 a
The prophet predicted the conquest of Rome and Persia and Arabia. The equivalent to that is like an average man today claiming that his people will overcome china and USA. Sahih Muslim 2900
The prophet predicted Arabs will be overflowed with wealth. Today we see Saudi Arabia and the UAE are stacked with oil which is the product that is highly valued. are one of the richest countries today. Sahih bukhari 1036
The prophet predicted Bedouin Arabs, (not just any arab, the Bedouin arabs) will compete in tall building. Burj khalifa. Sunan An-Nasa’i 4990
سُبْحَانَ ٱللّٰهِ
Very cool
Bro ur hair is majestic, u gotta drop ur hair care routine
Farid. Can you make a video on the maturity of Aisha? For example how she was up to the prophets shoulder demonstrating adult height and how at the age of 8 she was aiding in wars as a nurse. What’s your thoughts on this?
source?
We don't need to keep trying to prove Aisha RA was at the age capable to be married and consummated this wasn't an issue a couple hundred years ago in any other country in the world the age was still appropriate at the time we shouldn't be weary or worry about proving anything to the kuffar Allah swt guides who he wills we can simply relay the message any sincere person this isn't even a talking point past helping then realize that this was the norm culturally and to be fair world wide at the time nor does him marrying Aisha RA would cause him not to be the rasoolAllah sallalahu alayhi wa Salem or the faxt that islam is the truth may Allah swt guide all of us
@@musahawkins8765but the issues that i run into is that her age directly contradicts specific events in which she should have been much older. So then how is it that this is sahih Hadith? If the hadith were made by a human wouldnt there be some error that we can assume?
That it's a lot of bulloney!
@@UnDEADToutomsunnah discourse made a video in which brother Farid responds to this topic. Its called “the age of aisha: the final verdict”
The same Qur'an only people don't seem to realise the same people who brought us hadith also helped to keep the Qur'an passed down and preserved
If their trustworthy then we can trust both the Qur'an and sunnah and if their not trustworthy then...
no brother the quran got compiled right after the prophet death
the hadith got compiled at minimum 100 years after the prophet death plz don't say that
read my comment
type recent in the comment section we can discuss there
@@mrenigma1564 😂🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ the quran was memorized and taught their students the verses. They didnt make a copy and spread the copies and everyone learned from it, thats not how it went bc the original uthman mushaf didnt have diacritical marks and u were not able to differentiate between words if you didnt memorize it prior. Ahadith were compiled and they were relied upon the same method of how Quranic Quiraat were classified as valid and invalid ways of reciting. U even have ahadith which where written by Ali radiallahuanhu or the earliest compilation was by Anas ibn Malik in his muwatta and he was a Tabi‘ii which was not
The quran had pachmemts with verses written during prophet Muhammad's time it was only compiled as a complete book since abu bakr's reign @@Klotz237
@@maganhassan2627yeah, and? Did you read what I wrote? The written mushaf cant be properly read by just looking at it. Thats why the people first learned it from their shuyukh and then looked if they match with the skeletol script (rasm) of the mushaf. Nobody started taking a mushaf copy and start memorizing thats not how it worked
Also would be very difficult for people to memorize
Brother can u make a video on the clips that Nabi asli has been making on CZcams it sounds like the channel is misconceptions but it is so many clips for me to find the answers especially when I don’t know Arabic I barely have the alphabet and vowels memorized
if the only reason for the existence of the hadith was to test us if we would obey Allah when he asks us to obey his prophet, that would be more than enough of a reason.
6:38 debunks your opening statement instantly.
When you running a stream again akhi?
Try reading this small old publication by Allamah Hafiz Mohammad Ayub Dehlavi titled " The Mischief of Rejection of Hadith (Tradition)
جَزَاكَ ٱللَّٰهُ خَيْرًا
There is so much noor on farid’s face
It's called lighting.
@@FaridResponds Lol. A lot of Muslims see virtue in that though
The fact that imam malik compiling hadith trying to weed out the false ones proved that false hadith existed since forever. And its a significant large number of it too.
They been thrown out by the scholars long ago
Farid akhi can I ask you a question, I don’t want anyone to get bad thoughts so I wanted to ask you if I can ask you privately?
Salam, is there ebook available?
If it weren't in the Qur'an then it's important to know that the prophet ﷺ did it, there are reason as to why in the Qur'an Allah ﷻ said the prophet is the example for us to follow
For example - how to do prayer
The order to do it is in the Qur'an but the instruction doesn't so *how* does one *perform the prayer?*
According to hadith, the way of the prophet Muhammad ﷺ
This shuts the whole argument down. There many, many things that you can refer to from the Quran that point to following what the prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم does and instructs, but a lot of people like to play dumb and this argument seals it.
@@legendaryag1 there are things that are clear and then, there's don't hence why we should follow the example set by the prophet ﷺ but how should we do that? Mind you, the Qur'an is not biography of the prophet, obviously. So the hadiths IS important in this regard
@@Bruddatab I think you misunderstood me, I'm 1000% agreeing with you. I'm saying that people say the Quran suffices and when you point to verses that say follow thr prophet and in some those who come after the prophet/who holds authority, they play dumb and say it means something else.
One of the sahabah had someone approach them saying that the Quran suffices and he pointed out the salat issues if we follow the logic.
They only wanna innovate and corrupt, but will never succeed.
@@legendaryag1 yeah, I did 😅. Sorry bout that, being getting offence with these hadith rejectors quite lately so I'm abit perk up with the new reply
May Allah ﷻ bless and grant you good health always. Amin Ya Rabb
@@Bruddatab It's ok, I've done it too 🙂 jazak Allah kheer. May we all inshallah be United in fardos alala
Can some one elaborate the serious warning in surah 25 verse 30, thank you.
They never would bro! Because they all know the Qur'an has been abandoned for their man made traditions (hadeeth, etc).
If someone rejects hadith, he also rejects quran
He might ended up in the hell for ever
I follow only Quran, the best Hadith
@@KORAN-ALONESo who's understanding of the Quran do you follow? Or You interpret it yourself?
@@mysticminority9060 i understand it according to the truth
@@KORAN-ALONESo enlighten me what's the true way of understanding the Quran. Maybe you can guide a misguided person as myself.
@@mysticminority9060 Ask Allah for guidance, not me brother and never lower yourself
Akhi can you please tell me where to buy Tarikh al Madina(Ibn Shabbah) , or is there a translation in English or not
Doubt it is in English. Use neelwafurat.com for online purchases.
@@FaridResponds shukran , thank you!
Hablum minalAllah
Hablum minnas
Relationship with the All Mighty;
And
Our relationship with our fellow men.
Rasullulah SAW is a Father, Husband, relative to a large extended family members, a Neighbour, a Leader, a Statesman, a Warrior, a Teacher. In summary - a role model Extraordinaire ❤
Allahuma salli ala Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa ala alihi Saiyiddina Muhammad ❤ wa Sahbihi aajmain ❤
BarakaAllahu feekum
Wassalam
Hello Farid, I think it would do some good to reply to some criticisms of classical hadith scholarship. I have come along some of the western perspective and it seems too be too cut-throat in terms of their skepticism, but at the same time you seem to accept all hadiths. I remember your response video with Mansur and Iljaz on Dan Bru-baker's book, I think something along this line of deconstructing the arguments of western scholars would do measures. Would it be possible to undertake this approach for the PhD thesis of Joshua Little on the Aisha hadith? I have been trying to understand his approach and reasoning, but I am left in a cloud of confusion in trusting early hadith maintenance and the motivations of early Muslims hadith scholars.
Joshua's totally unreasonable. I don't feel that it deserves a thorough response even though I've shared my opinions on some sections in the past. He goes out of his way to accuse major transmitters instead of minor unknown transmitters, just because he has the opportunity to.
@@FaridResponds Thanks for the response, would it be possible to at-the-very least tackle some of his general arguments? I find that there is very little interaction from Muslim figures explaining this topic. If not, could you recommend some books that do tackle those arguments, mostly in the realm of trustworthiness of early Muslim scholars?
@@wramo8088 Specify an argument.
@@FaridRespondsone simple argument would be his methodology. I presume you believe in the Aisha Hadith, so that would mean you trust it’s authenticity, bearing that what parts of his methodology does he get wrong? It doesn’t have to be too hyper specific, but I would like to understand what and where the disagreement comes from.
@@wramo8088 He is lenient with attributions that lead to Hisham. He is harsh with attributions to other than Hisham. His goal is to make Hisham the only narrator in order to support the hypothesis that Hisham concocted the report and doesn't have corroborations.
But here is the thing... even if Hisham was the only narrator (which he isn't), that isn't enough to dismiss a report about the age of his great-aunt. It is the type of information that is expected to be carried down by relatives.
Farid, does this book (or any of your other works) address Western criticism to traditional hadith scholarship such as that following Schacht? This has had big impact in Orientalist circles, and a genuine refutation of such criticism would go a long way
Azmi already destroyed Schacht fifty years ago.
@@FaridResponds
You mean Muhammad Mustafa al-Azami?
If so, thanks for the reference!
@@FaridResponds Not so fast. Schacht's observations are very much in accordance with other historical research connected with Islam. Islam seems not to have been established in the 7th century but developed over a few centuries after that and then everything was redacted back to the 7th century. For example, there is no complete quran dating back from the 7th century. The terms Islam and Muslim were not found until after the 7th century. The city of Mecca was not mentioned anywhere until after the 7th century and it also started appearing on maps a few centuries later. It seems that Mecca came about only AFTER the establishment of Islam and indeed no artifacts have ever been found that suggest that Mecca is as old as Islam claims. If that is the case, then how could Muhammad have lived in a city that did not exist? And if that is the case (which it is), then the conclusion is obvious: Islam must be false. There is a lot more evidence for this but what I just told you is enough to prove Islam false. The historical record is crystal clear!
For people claiming the hadith's preservation to be even near close to Qura'an's one are obliged to check for the oldest hadith manuscripts and isnaad of 10million hadiths alleged by bukhari to have memorised.
They are also obliged to check the divine claims the Qura'an makes and the divine claims hadith makes(if any).
Anyone under the misconception of thinking that hadiths were divine revelations are challenged to produce a case for Qura'an and hadith being same thereof in divine regards such as-language, fractal, guidance, truthfulness, history etc.
how bhukari used to pray before he collected sahih hadith for salah?
was there any difference in his salah if there was did he corrected his salah after that?
Peace Farid,
Argument A
P1. If the Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran, then the “Quran only” position is false.
P2.The Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran.
C13. Therefore, the Quran only” position is false.
RHETORICAL QUESTION
In your book, The Necessity of Hadith, on pages 45-46 you wrote:
“Quranist conflate the word hadith meaning statement in the verse, with the “prophetic hadith” that we are all used to today.”
The operative term in your statement, of course, is ‘hadith.’ Your position, along with that of Sunni Islam paradigm attempts to advertently or inadvertently, undermine the nature of a rhetorical question in general, and the rhetorical nature of 45:6 in specific. This approach is not rational/logical. The nature of a rhetorical question is to make a point, not to seek a literal answer. In fact, by its nature, a rhetorical question is incapable of expecting a literal answer; seeking one would defeat its purpose. Surah 45:6 poses a rhetorical question, whose intent is not to seek information as a standard question does, but to affirm the book/Quran’s authority, completeness, and sufficiency to guide. It simultaneously negates the notion that following sources other than the Book/the Quran for guidance is acceptable to Allah. Thus, suggesting that ‘some hadith’ are acceptable to Allah contradicts the rhetorical nature of 45:6, not to mention other clear verses which state the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient to guide. Again, a rhetorical question, by its nature, cannot be treated as if it’s seeking a literal answer. A rhetorical question cannot simultaneously be rhetorical and not rhetorical. Likewise, sufficient cannot mean sufficient and simultaneously mean not sufficient. Thus, 45:6 precludes any extra-Quranic hadith from being used as guidance in Deen Al-Islam.
45:6, then, is a blanket command by Allah that NO hadith is acceptable to Him relative to guidance, except, His hadith the Book/the Quran: 39:23:
39:23 Allah has revealed the best announcement/hadith, a book conformable in its various parts, repeating, whereat do shudder the skins of those who fear their Lord, then their skins and their hearts become pliant to the remembrance of Allah; this is Allah's guidance, He GUIDES WITH IT whom He pleases; and (as for) him whom Allah makes err, there is no guide for him.
45:6 and 38:23, among other verses, establishes that the Book/The Quran is fully detailed and sufficient for guidance.
ARGUMENT FOR QURAN ALONE
Argument B
P1. All claims are either true claims or false claims.
P2. All claims made by Allah are necessarily true claims.
P3. Allah claims that He is the Truth, and the Truth is from Him, and He speaks the Truth, and none is truer in word than Him. These are necessarily true claims.
P4. If Allah claims something to be sufficient for a particular purpose, then He cannot simultaneously claim that same thing is not sufficient for that particular purpose. This is necessarily a true claim.
P5. Allah claims that Hell is sufficient/kafa to burn, He is sufficient/kafa to guide, and the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient/kafa to guide. These, then, are necessarily true claims.
P6. Allah’s claims, being necessarily true claims, cannot contradict each other.
C1. Allah’s claim that the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient alone for guidance is necessarily a true claim.
Therefore:
C2. The claim that the Book/the Quran is not fully detailed and sufficient alone for guidance is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C3. The claim that the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C4. The claim that “obey the Messenger” means the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C5. The claim that solaa is a ritual prayer is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C6. The position that sunnah and hadith books are necessary is a false claim.
Therefore:
C7. The position that the Quran alone position is false is a false claim.
P1. Law of the Excluded Middle
P2. 31:30; 4:170; 33:4; 10:82; 4:122
P3. 31:30; 4:170; 33:4; 10:82; 4:122
P4. Law of Noncontradiction
P5. 4:55; 25:31; 29:51
P6. Law of Noncontradiction
Therefore:
C1. 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C2. 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C3. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C4. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C5. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C6. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C7. P1-C6
NOTE: An important distinction between Argument A and Argument B is the following: The conclusion/C1 in Argument B is a true claim stated by Allah. In contrast, the conclusion/C1 in Argument A,, is the claim of the author.
Whose claim then must necessarily be a true claim…A or B?
Looking forward to your reply.
Very well said my brother. Unfortunately Mushriks cannot respond with logical answers because they're so blinded by their nonsensical hadith and scholars. So, why bother with them?
سبحان الله
❤
I wish Omar saw this video before saying "The book of Allah is enough for us" and banning hadith for generations.
Huh
Brother farid please respond to the video done by muhammed(quranist) responding to this exact video
الله أكبر
Can someone answer my question why ahadith are not compiled and approved by the first 4 caliphs? To make matters complicated it was reported the first and second caliphs prevented it being spread out. On the other hand the written Quran was passed down by each caliphs and being authoticanted by the third caliph, thank you.
They were worried that the hadith might be confused for the Quranic text, and this was also a worry during the Prophet pbuh's time but however, in Medina he did allow it to be written down. The third caliph actually promoted such a cause and its said the fourth caliph had his own book of judisciary with ahadith contained within. The student of a companion called hammam ibn munabih has a saqifah written as well.
@@abdullahsiddiqui7168 do we have ahadith book by the 4th caliph and compare it with bukhari muslim ect. Thank you.
@@abdullahsiddiqui7168if they don’t believe anyone can make a verse like Quran even how were they afraid Hadith would be confused with Quran
@@Kzam19-ux8wg not yet, the earliest extant book discovered yet, is of the student of the companion Abu Hurairah. The name is sahifah of hammam ibn munnabih. Comparisons with hadith's from musnad Ahmed ibn hanbal have been made as far as i know.
@@Rabidracc000ns written culture was not widely prevalent amongst Arabs. Of course the eloquence and literary merit of the Quran is unmatched. But to one who is not aware, he might undermine that by confusing it with hadith's
Allah swt. revealed us muslims 2 things and most laymen muslim don't know that is the Quran and the Hikmah. The Hikmah is the tradition of the Prophet saw. did in situation. The Hikmah specializes the things where like Brother Farid said correctly the Quran is mostly a general guidance. Hopefully i have it correctly. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Allah swt. knows best and may He guide us.
Some one said the Hikmah is another name of the Quran.
Why do you think people care so much about the “why” question?
I think of the Qur'an as being the Book of Wisdom. The Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, was the ruler, the Emir of the Muslims. His job was not merely to guide and educate the ummah, but to provide an economy and judicial stability. As such he appropriately interpreted the Qur'an, had other wahi which have him guidance for different situations and used his wisdom to socially guide the Muslims from jahil to knowledge.
Muslim scholars have described the Injeel as wisdom and knowledge that Jesus could metaphorically do his hand into. There is no resulting Sharia to guide the Christians through the physical necessities of life. Bro Paul Williams has noted that Christian society used the Greek philosophers to develop their legal systems.
So, I think the hadith are essential.
I saw people bring up surah 6:114 as proof we don't need hadith as the quran explains things perfectly how should we understand this verse? To me since Allah said we should follow the prophet (peace be upon him) as he is our role model there's your answer to why we need hadith right? Just need more clarification what Allah means from the verse I mentioned. Jazakallah khair for those helping me to understand.
Saw people even question how the quran is clear as Allah said it is 🤷♂️
Assalamwalikum, that verse really has nothing to do with what they claim it to be. It is talking about seeking a judge other than Allah(s.w) or other than what Allah(s.w) has revealed. If you read the tafsir, you would know that it really has nothing to do with what they are trying to make it out to be. By the way, check out the video by muslim lantern, complete annihilation of hadith rejectors methedology. It will be of great help to you to see how their position is just ridiculous and has too many holes.
hadith is the second revelation from Allah. first one if quran, second one is the prophets sunnah.
I hope a rich guy finds your vids and donates, if i was rich I'd donate a lot
I thought Quran is sufficient as Umar Ibn Khattab responded to Prophet Muhammad SAWW when he asked for a pen and paper so he could write something after which Ummah wouldn’t go astray. To which Umar responded to the Prophet حسبنا کتابا meaning that Quran is sufficient for us and we do not need your will (Na’uzubillah). Here you are disapproving Umar’s claim and confirming his disobedience to the Prophet (read Sahi Al Bukhari, Volume I, Book of Knowledge, Hadith Number 114)
There are a number of different narrations but the majority of them say that once ummar said that the quran is sufficient, the companions began arguing with each other near the prophet, so the prophet didn't write that thing because of their noise.
@ 0:57 he said the Quran would lose its poetic nature if the detailed laws were in it and that’s why they are found in Hadiths🤦🏾. If that is the reason then would it be mandatory that the Hadiths be written and saved when the Prophet (saw) was on earth?
A comment here mentioned that there were a written hadith or compilation of ahadith by the 4th caliph and a student of a companion by the name hammam ibn munabil, is that true? Where can i get the copy of these written ahadith.
Who put the AC in that corner, ya zalamy?
Brother i know that we have chains of narrations from Prophet Muhammad to Hadith Book authors but what is the chain from them to us?
Please Answer, Brother!!!
Hope that someday you will see it.
The answer is very important for me.
well, they wrote physical books, once its on paper an oral isnad isn't necessary, we also have manuscripts.
Faird are the things Muhamed said on his death bed true?
Watch your words. He, prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was in pain not delusional agony
Why would anyone ask this question in the first place?
Imagine you were living in the time of the prophet peace be upon him, or just right after he passed away. Then you are hearing sahaba reporting what he said qnd what he did. Would you tell them do i need this or that? It doesn't make any sense to reject Hadiths.
Finding anything said or done by the prophet should be valuable to muslims even a weak hadith should be considered . Of course fabricated ones should be rejected and also caralogued for the sake of awareness and warning to fall into believing they are true.
👍
hey brother
I made a response to this video
Hala akhi. Will respond if I feel compelled to. ;)
@@FaridResponds "if I feel compelled to", pft coward, then write your name fully, "Farid responds if he feels compelled to".
Will we be questioned about the hadiths on the day of judgment?
If Allah asks you why you did not wear gold and silk, what will you say?
Won't Allah ask you in which verse: Gold and silk are forbidden?
God says he will question us from the Quran, so why do we follow someone else without questioning?
We will be asked about everything…. So what will your soul see when your mouth answers God when God asked “why did you disregard Sayings of Muhammad?”
Hadith are collection, very important collections of the prophets life and what he said, the way we worship as a Muslim is not found in the quran but in the Hadith, do you then invent your own way of worship and claim to know better than the prophet has demonstrated?
@@DavidHoang-bq3ss Then I say, what is the evidence that the prophet said these things? Also, didn't you say that you will be questioned from the book? I suggest you check if the hadiths are written in the book? I wonder why you are asking me about something that is not in the book?
@@necmettinmutlu306Yes both the Qur'an and Sunnah
@@shwanmirza9306 The Quran is the only source from which we can be questioned. The Quran itself says this.
If we make mistakes while questioning the Quran, Allah will forgive us.
If we make mistakes by taking other things as resources, God will not forgive us.
@@necmettinmutlu306 Wasn't the Prophet ﷺ the last messenger of Allah? So anything he said is 100% right. Why wouldn't an average Muslim obey his orders?
bro a hadith rejecter channel named "mohammad from god" gave you a reponse,will you look into it if you are honest
Ya akhi, could you shed some light on istaghata and basically giving us advice that these matters wont get us in hell or heaven.
I will make it easy for you bro, the sahabas didn't do it, they knew islam the best after the prophet. They never made dua to the dead, they only made dua to Allah. Just stick to what the Prophet and the Sahaba did and inshallah you will go to paradise if you die upon what their upon.
@@mysticminority9060 i know akhi. There r still many people that believe in these things.
@@jamworthy14Yeah brother, we need to stay strong and reject innovations and disbelief in the religion. In our time there is so much new things that muslims created that the prophet and sahaba simply never believed or did.
3:52 🤦🏾for the Quran to truly be appreciated you must understand history? Statements like this dangerous. It’s say that you need Hadith for the Quran, yet the Hadith were never made mandatory to document during the time when the prophet was on earth.
The way I see it people who reject the hadith is someone who reject the dictionary,,
You know they don't need for someone to explain to them but they have more understanding about the world more then everyone,,
You all wrong because you listened to Muhammad saw to whom the Qur'an is revealed, we don't need him because we who is in years 2020 have more understanding about the Qur'an then Muhammad saw,,
Is like saying I know more about coffee because I drink it and read the book off coffee, I know more than the farmers who grow it and fick the coffee from the farm and drying it and cook it and grinding it, 🤦🤦🤦
I find it so funny that Hadith deniers claim to know more than the Prophet…. Basically saying I only do as the Quran told is like saying I know more than the prophet
Why didn't the Sahabis have the hadiths written down like the Quran at the same time? According to Sunnis, without the hadith the Quran is useless.
I guess the best answer to that is they had first hand experience with how the Prophet lived
Please read ALL literature in its cultural, linguistic and historical context. Do not expect literature to meet the expectations of a culture which is different/foreign to that literature's origin. Even in the case where the reader shares the same location as the literature, there will be problems as the history, culture and language will have evolved over time. The idea is to appreciate the literature in its own context. In the case of the commentators on said literature, their views are reflections of the history, language and culture in which they wrote. No serious scholar would ever reject a literary production because it did not fulfill the expectations of that scholar's contemporary standards of scholarship. This applies to the muhadditheen too. THE QURAN ALONE TRANSCENDS ALL HUMAN STANDARDS OF SCHOLARSHIP.
Umar believed the Quran alone was sufficient on the Prophet's deathbed. He brought about many reforms as caliph, too, so the "sunnah" was never meant to be absolute.
Omar narrated hundreds of hadith.
@@FaridResponds sorry brother farid, ive got to ask this question. Why did our second caliph does not compile a written book of ahadith as per the Quran. Thank you.
Quran 39:23 (It says here Quran is the best Hadith) so why should I follow Bukhari?????!!!
The book actually explains that. ;)
@@FaridRespondsbukhari explains the Quran? Dont make me laugh 😅
Hadith rejectors are not Muslim, right?
Allah knows best, but generally we can say that they are not Muslims.
brother here you are saying that the quran is incomplete by saying that it says general rulings and not details and we need hadiths this is shirk you litterly are saying that God made his religion incomplete and associate people to further complet his message !! this contradict with the quran
surah al nahl
وَيَوْمَ نَبْعَثُ فِي كُلِّ أُمَّةٍ شَهِيدًا عَلَيْهِم مِّنْ أَنفُسِهِمْ ۖ وَجِئْنَا بِكَ شَهِيدًا عَلَىٰ هَٰؤُلَاءِ ۚ وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ تِبْيَانًا لِّكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً وَبُشْرَىٰ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ (89)
ۚ وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ تِبْيَانًا لِّكُلِّ شَيْءٍ
surat an aam
وَمَا لَكُمْ أَلَّا تَأْكُلُوا مِمَّا ذُكِرَ اسْمُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ وَقَدْ فَصَّلَ لَكُم مَّا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْكُمْ إِلَّا مَا اضْطُرِرْتُمْ إِلَيْهِ ۗ وَإِنَّ كَثِيرًا لَّيُضِلُّونَ بِأَهْوَائِهِم بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ ۗ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِالْمُعْتَدِينَ (119
الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا [المائدة:3
الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ
then how and why most scholars deny this or twisting it hadiths are written at minimum 100 years after the prophet death
most of AL KAHANOT who support the claim that sunnah abrogate the quran are in thalel / astray
about the way of the salat brother it comes to us through tawator alyawmi
even in the hadiths they are not hadiths about the details on how should we pray
it comes to us through the teachers of the our prophet
tawator alyawmi you pray your son sees you pray like you etc..... that's how we learn how to pray
the claim that the ones preserved the quran are the ones who preserved the hadith is also a lie we know the time and the place of when the quran was compiled and when right after the prophet death the hadiths on the other hand are in minimum compiled 100 years after the prophet death
besides not all muslims believe in al bukhari or muslm ( or any the so called ahl sunnah books and tafasir ) meanwhile the ahlu sunnah don't believe the compiled version of hadith from the shia so why differ !!!
yet all of them believe that the quran is preserved so why not take our AHKEM from the quran why take hadiths that are written in the abbasid caliphate God knows of what fitnah they want to establish
i think you are familiar with this verse in al baqara 180
كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمْ إِذَا حَضَرَ أَحَدَكُمُ الْمَوْتُ إِن تَرَكَ خَيْرًا الْوَصِيَّةُ لِلْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ ۖ حَقًّا عَلَى الْمُتَّقِينَ (180)
here allah says ''كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمْ''
and we found that most of the so called scholars of islam when they saw this hadith about '' لا وصية لوارث '' they say we follow the hadith they say that verse in the quran GOT ABROGATED by this hadith
imagine if you have some sense of logic imagine God changing a verse from the Quran and put it in another book not in his book
instead of saying that hadith is aa lie because it contradict the quran they say no we take this hadith and we don't take the verse in the quran that litterly says '' كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمْ ''
like '' {كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمُ الصِّيَامُ '' same importance
but yes i know that anyone who is reading this probably will say i'm going astray that's the brainwash of AL KAHANOT we are going astray of what GOD revealed and instead follows the madhahib ( acting like gods saying which is haram and which is not ) when GOD SAID '' فَصَّلَ لَكُم مَّا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْكُمْ ''
we don't need to understand everything in the quran we need to understand what God wants us to understand ''
in surah al imran !
(6) هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ وَأُخَرُ مُتَشَابِهَاتٌ ۖ فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ ۗ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِّنْ عِندِ رَبِّنَا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّا أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ (7)
'' هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ '' this is what we need to enter paradise everyone understand these verses crystal clear '' آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ'''
but instead they focus on this ' فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ ۗ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِّنْ عِندِ رَبِّنَا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّا أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ ''
until the majority of the muslims abondoned what God said in the quran
in surah al rom 32 it says :
مِنَ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعًا ۖ كُلُّ حِزْبٍ بِمَا لَدَيْهِمْ فَرِحُونَ (32)
this applies to the different madhahib and i know what i'm saying
they are difference in rulings some give ahkem and say '' makroh '' some say it's '' haram '' saying haram like that when only God says whats haram
call me whatever you like '' im following what God revealed to his prophet ''
وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ وَآمَنُوا بِمَا نُزِّلَ عَلَىٰ مُحَمَّدٍ وَهُوَ الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ ۙ كَفَّرَ عَنْهُمْ سَيِّئَاتِهِمْ وَأَصْلَحَ بَالَهُمْ (2)
ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا اتَّبَعُوا الْبَاطِلَ وَأَنَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّبَعُوا الْحَقَّ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ ۚ كَذَٰلِكَ يَضْرِبُ اللَّهُ لِلنَّاسِ أَمْثَالَهُمْ (3)
if you can argue with me ( plz be respectful or don't reply keep living without using your brain )
Why do people reject Hadith anyway?
Probably because alot of the rules of islam are from the hadith and it would make peoples lives more easier if they ignore it and follow their desires. For example Music is prohibited clear cut in the hadith, while in the Quran its implied.
Too much work for them... They don't also trust the men who brought hadith yet they are the same who brought Quran to their English translator who they do trust blindly.... Kufars
Read the Qur'an 6:112-116, then 25:30-31, then 45:6-8, then 2:116-117 & 33:67-68, and there you have your answer.
@@ALGfunkliar.
@@mysticminority9060liar.
Ever present is God. Always been there before we wrote down anything. One of the Ancient cultures are Arabs and the first religion was Jewish. The Greeks also an ancient people who invented western civilization and eventually became the Roman Greek empire and where Muslims learned from them and for years have had no issue taking full advantage of the benefits. The Greeks were the first to be approached by the Jews about Christ. How you see christ does not offend me or bother me. How you Muslims see the world and how you depend on your prophet for your life's trajectory offends me. And especially since he took from other religions to make a stagnant religion that refuses to learn and go forward. I also blame the Catholic religion for single handedly destroying Christianity. They also offend me. And they also were an enemy that which we the enlightened thinkers had to reckon. May the continue to enlighten you.
My my my. The Greeks certainly were an incredible civilization that definitely contributed to the world as a whole. But I'm at perplexed at the notion that by somehow learn equates to theft of intellect or plagiarism? By that wonderful logic any automotive innovation is a theft from Henry Ford and you can extend this analogy to other contexts. That's how innovation occurs my simpleton friend.
Stagnant! Oh my, in what regard? Because we had our golden age where we flourished while western Europe was in its dark ages. So the notion that Islam necessitates "stagnation" is quite an uneducated statement to make, but one that's quite typical for the superficial idiots who praise themselves as being on the moral high ground yet are the worst when you really examine their own hypocrisy.
Enlightenment? Meaning accepting the wonderful letters as part of modern christianity? Sex work as something that's praise worthy? Both of which have a history of psychological pathologies and trauma attached to them? To the point where even mainstream sentiments in the "enlightened" circles have started going opposite of these liberal sentiments.
You're simply filled with blind hate because you'll be the kind to meet a Muslim and act like piece of work even they're being nice and respectful to you. The problem is you, you've lost your identity and have become nothing more than shallow fiend that has no qualms about doing anything as long as no one finds out and when push comes to shove, you'll throw everyone to the fire for your own benefit. But in society and social circles, you'll constantly preach love, compassion, equality and such, but you really don't show what's beneath the surface. Your the real cancer is the world, you just hide your sickness better.
One should not compare history with the hadith, hadith is a requirement otherwise one is not a Muslim.
There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of God
O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe in Allah and the Last Day: That is best, and most suitable for final determination. An Nisa 4:59
Most hadith arent an issue for me, however an example of hadiths that just dont make sense to me and my heart rejects are like the shaytan pees in your ear or shaytan is in your nose during sleep or the age of aisha, etc.
Unfortunately, I emphasize with this dilemma all too well. Some hadiths just touch you and others leave you confused..
You are limited to 3 dimensional world... And you know the jinns live in other dimensions were they see us and we don't, they teleport and fast travel and we don't, they shape shift and we don't....
So him doing something doesn't mean you will see it or feel it...
Hadith is not for layman to read and extrapolate a ruling, there is 100 hadiths talking about one thing from deferent perspective. It's a scholarly work.
I find zero problem collection of Bukhari hadiths...
Yeah because the one who lives in the world of ghaib follow the rules of this world
What's wrong with Shaytaan in your nose? In Islam we believe in idea's such as hell, heaven, angels, jhinn's so this idea of shaytaan in your nose is not crazy, This is like saying "hell and heaven cannot be real because it doesn't make sense and it's not scientifically possible"
There are 2 interpretations of this hadith,
1. Shaytaan LITERALLY spends time in the persons nose while they are asleep and this is how shaytaan can enter into the dreams and meadows of peoples heads. There's nothing wrong with this as it's a metaphorical reality
2. this may be a figurative expression meaning shaytaan in your nose causes laziness and negligence and all these states are satanic dispositions similarly one could tell you that your phone is a shaytaan because it embodies satanic dispositions of laziness, so when you keep your nostrils unclean it has you personifying satanic tendencies.
Both can be correct as they show you the importance of cleaning your nose
Hey farid, question for you. Been pondering the quran more than usual of late and the word kafir keeps ringing alot. Wondered what it really meant. Kept digging and found a different take than the usual ‘’INFIDEL”. False claimers of guidance. I wonder, what if that definition means people like you. a false claim or a false path of guidance. interesting innit. Just a quick thought but we will for sure find out on judgment day. I’l keep an eye out for you to see the predicament you land yourself in. If it’s heaven, advance congratulations and if it’s hell, i won’t say I’d be surprised. Cheers.
They are Kifar. I wouldn't waste my time to dismenttled their claims....
Let them first figure out how to pray, pay Zakat, perform hajj and fast...
Bro they are very cunning. They will say its living sunnah of prophet to pray salah or zakat
Rather you are the Kuffar.
And I've already refuted you in one of my comments on this comment section.
@@ahmadabdullahnazib1486
They can't know how without hadith.... That's why they don't pray and perform hajj...
@@ALGfunk They also try to interpret quran in their own way.
The moment I read the one that said "the mandatory prayers only has 1 rakkat", I have a belief they're genuinely in a state of confusion
The Hadith is the main source of arguments.
Among hypocrites and cultural muslims
If you watch Marvellous Quran channel, you can understand the Quran better. Follow the evidences.
I have some videos responding to him. See my playlists.
Tawatur…
The sunnie religion is based on tracing their books to mohammed pbuh and that’s sufficient for them to believe so the reason behind their belief is not God but mohammed
If your belief in the book is based on the book, then the way of transmission has no meaning, but if your belief in the book is based on the way of transmission, then your belief has no meaning…
We did not believe the people that brought the Quran, but we believed the Quran.
The person who delivers a message has done a human effort, but his human effort is not responsible for the truth it conveys nor is it responsible for my belief in that truth....
The truth is from God and my belief in the truth is not from that person, and thats what really matters...
The issue of tawatur is a silly issue, because the credibility of the Qur’an was never due to its attribution to Muhammad or because so-and-so companion transmitted it, but rather the credibility of the Qur’an is generated from itself and the testimony of the text itself.
The believers did not believe the Qur’an because Muhammad brought it, but rather they believed it when they heard it and knew that it was the truth...
( 28:53 ) : “And when it is recited to them they say: We believe in it, it is the truth from our Lord”
( 5:83 ) : “when they listen to that which has been revealed to the messenger, you see their eyes overflow with tears, because of their recognition of the truth”
( 72:1-2 ) : “Lo! We have heard a marvelous Quran, which guides to righteousness, so we believed in it”
All of these verses confirm to the believer that the verses are self evident and their validity stems from them and not from men or a method of transmission.
On the contrary, the infidels were the ones who wanted to attribute the Qur’an to a man of high social standing in order for them to believe him...
“And they said: Oh that this Quran had but been revealed to a great man of the two cities!” ( 43:31 )
But couldn’t God make anything poetic? 0:52
He's a disbeliever he can't reason.
@@AbduAlrahman19 saying someone is a disbeliever without good proof, is not exactly the best idea you would think it does
@@AbduAlrahman19So we the majority are all kuffar and going to hell? And your going to paradise?
.
Farid Explainations be like 👆🔁⏭️🔼◀️⏫⏬⏮️▶️🔀⏫🔽⏩🔼.
Here is the Explainations of God. Quran 77:50, Quran 7:185, Quran 17:46, Quran 45:6-7, Quran 6:114. Etc
FOLLOW THE QURAN ALONE😎
Comparing the Quran to poetry and literature is the ultimate shirk. You belie the words of Allah swt when he told us the and scholars that this Quran is not like poetry nor anything else the was brought before it. This is propaganda. Can you have Islam without Hadith? Answer this question may Allah guide us ameen
First
Just remember one thing Quran transferred through ijma and tawatur!
Meaning Quran became public book in prophet’s life!
Hadiths are individual news and became public much later!
Abu bakr ra burned his hand written book of 500 Hadiths. Umer ra was advised to compile a Hadith book but he refused!
It’s no problem if you see some details in Hadiths about something briefly mentioned in Quran!
The issue starts when Hadiths start influencing the meaning of popular words of Quran!
The hadith about Abu Bakr is not authentic. And about Umar(r.a), hin and some other sahabas saw compiling hadiths as disliked, while some others had the opposite take on it such as Ali ibn Abi Talib(r.a) and so on. And no hadiths were not individual news, it is evident that the sahabas were learning these hadiths from eachother. Even the Quran wasn't complied right away until Umar(r.a) gave the suggestion to Abubakr(r.a) because of the death of many Hufaz. Compiling it in a written format is a different topic. So, claiming that hadiths were individual news is false. 1400+ years of Islam, and here you are, claiming we should just use the hadiths only for a reference and so on. May Allah(s.w) guide you
@@AbdulazizKider There can't be a Hufaz of the Quran as a whole book when the Quran as a whole book does not exist yet!
The hadith has a loophole!
The Quran became a public book in the Prophet's life that's what this Hadith proves!
Brother Farid,
Take a look at this magnificient verse:
"" Say, "I do not find (laa ajidu) within that which was revealed to me [anything] forbidden (oohiya ilayya muharraman) to one who would eat it unless (illa) it be a dead animal or blood spilled out or the flesh of swine - for indeed, it is impure - or it be [that slaughtered in] disobedience, dedicated to other than Allah . But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit], then indeed, your Lord is Forgiving and Merciful."" {6:145}
This verse mentions that the Messenger DOES NOT find in what was INSPIRED (oohiya) to him anything haram except 4 things:
1 - Dead animal
2 - blood spilled
3 - swine
4 - anything dedicated to other than Allah.
There are 3 other verses in the Qur'an that make mention of these 4 things. So, you can see the perfect harmony and consistency throughout the Book of Allah.
However, we find a whole load of haram things within the hadeeth literature (domestic donkeys, animals with claws, etc). How do you reconcile between the 2??
And please don't give me this "some verses have been abrogated" nonsense! Because the only way around this is to reject these Verses of Allah to exchange them with your fabricated hadeeths and call it abrogation! 😊
What about surah 5 verse 3?
@@Mimi-Maa18 chapter 5 verse 3 simply elaborates and adds further details and clarifies those 4 things that Allah has made haram to eat. Please read and reflect on the Verses of Allah without letting lahwal- hadeeths divert you from the truth!
I don't think if Allah exists these atrocities won't happen in this world ... All religions r human made!!!
It seems that you do not understand the whole issue.The biggest problem here is that when hadiths contradict the Quran.For traditional muslim mad- habs,one hadith is stronger many Quran verses on same issue.Hadith based religion is quite different from Quran based one.The prophet collected Quran in written form,and he was ordered to deliver his message.When you say the hadiths are wahy,then you insist that the prophet ignored to deliver that part of the religion.The sahaaba after him did not collect hadith either.The religion was complete when the prophet,peace upon him,died.
The Qur'an is meant for every individual to read and find guidance. No other sources other than the guidance of Allah is needed. Remember that putting Hadiths side by side next to the Qur'an is creating partnership (shirk) so be aware dear Muslim.
Only satan fallows hadith
there’s a real contradiction in practically all abrahamic faiths, their holy books are simultaneously the immortal word of God, but somehow also require historical contexts. You’re basically just picking and choosing what bits allah directed at us and which were just meant for the people of mohammed’s time.
Many verses were revealed on situations the Prophet pbuh encountered, and since he’s the example we follow it is wise to reveal such verses. Additionally, the Quran was sent down to All of Mankind until the Day of Judgement. It is not only for the Prophet pbuh and his time, that’s just false.
I can see what you mean, when you apply it to the OT, or the Torah and NT books. They range from statements like "God said..." to biographical stories to personal musings. In Islamic idiom these would be hadith kudsi, hadith and, especially with respect to the writing of Paul et al, rulings or fatwa, philosophy and personal journaling.
The Qur'an is very different. We say it's from Allah, via angel Jibril, to Muhammad peace be upon him. Non Muslims would at least agree with final delivery being from Muhammad. Authorship is then a subject, since we know Muhammad was illiterate. Accusations from the pagan Arabs was he had others author it but that was rebutted in the Qur'an and they had no answer. One can read the Qur'an and easily find verses that have personal meaning. However, to then give teachings, make a fatwa or ruling, or judge by the Qur'an requires a very deep knowledge, and that is where the hadith provide a wealth of additional information and often precedent rulings.
I hope this contextualises the matter for you, albeit in a very short form.
@@thetriumphsprintthe Qurans rebuttal u claimed no one could answer was
“They claim a man is is teaching him yet the man they speak of speaks a foreign tongue and this is a Quran in Arabic.”
There’s such a thing as translator existing and learning language as well obviously he had at a minimum a translator otherwise he couldn’t live there cuz he wouldn’t be able to communicate
So I don’t understand how u think no one has a response to this
@@Rabidracc000ns that's a very reasonable question.
Translation doesn't assist us, since the claim is about teaching. Yes, Muhammad PBUH could have discussed stories with this unnamed person, but the person couldn't have inserted his stories in perfect Arabic into the Quran, otherwise no need to mention "the tongue" (lisānu) being foreign (ajamiyyun).
That leaves us with the idea captured in this verse of Muhammad PBUH being taught the stories. He would then have to create an Arabic interpretation using the richness found in the Qur'an. Yet he was known by his contemporaries, including the Meccan Qurashi, to be illiterate and never exhibited a capacity for poetry or literary talent.
The verse before, 6:102, says
Say, [O Muḥammad], "The Pure Spirit [i.e., Gabriel] has brought it down from your Lord in truth to make firm those who believe and as guidance and good tidings to the Muslims."
- Saheeh International
So that's a clear statement in the Qur'an to accompany the response to the Qurashi in 103.
The tafsirs of ibn Kathir and Maududi say the following:
The Idolators' Claim that the Qur'an was taught by a Human, and the Refutation of their Claim
Allah tells us about the idolators' lies, allegations, and slander when they claimed that this Qur'an which Muhammad had recited for them, was actually taught to him by a human. They referred to a foreign (i.e., non-Arab) man who lived among them as the servant of some of the clans of Quraysh and who used to sell goods by As-Safa. Maybe the Messenger of Allah used to sit with him sometimes and talk to him a little, but he was a foreigner who did not know much Arabic, only enough simple phrases to answer questions when he had to. So in refutation of their claims of fabrication, Allah said:
﴿لِّسَانُ الَّذِى يُلْحِدُونَ إِلَيْهِ أَعْجَمِىٌّ وَهَـذَا لِسَانٌ عَرَبِىٌّ مُّبِينٌ﴾
(The tongue of the man they refer to is foreign, while this (the Qur'an) is a (in) clear Arabic tongue.) meaning, how could it be that this Qur'an with its eloquent style and perfect meanings, which is more perfect than any Book revealed to any previously sent Prophet, have been learnt from a foreigner who hardly speaks the language No one with the slightest amount of common sense would say such a thing.
§16.50.1 Passage 16:103-105
We know very well what they say about you: "Surely a certain person teaches him."107 But the person to whom they allude speaks a foreign tongue, and this (Qur'an) is in plain Arabic. It is a fact that Allah does not show guidance to those who do not believe in His Revelations, and there is a painful torment for them. (The Prophet is not forging any false thing but) those, who do not believe in the Revelations of Allah, are inventing falsehoods108 they are indeed the liars.
§16.50.109 Footnote 107
In this connection, traditions mention the names of several persons, one of whom (Jabar), according to the disbelievers of Makkah taught the Holy Prophet; however, one thing particularly noteworthy about all these persons is that they were non-Arab slaves. Whosoever he might be, the fact that he used to recite the Torah and the Gospel and had an acquaintance with the Holy Prophet, gave an opportunity to the disbelievers for spreading this false report that it was the particular slave who was the real author of the Holy Qur'an, but Muhammad (Allah's peace be upon him) presented it as the Word of God. This not only shows that his opponents were very impudent in spreading false accusations against the Holy Prophet but also that, in general, people are not just in judging the worth of their contemporaries. They were ill-treating like this that great personality who has had no parallel in history. Nevertheless, these people who had become blind in their opposition, preferred to attribute the authorship of the matchless Arabic Qur'an to a non-Arab slave who had a smattering of the Torah and the Gospel. Instead of accepting the claim of the Holy Prophet, who was an embodiment of truth, they attributed its authorship to an insignificant foreign slave.
@@Rabidracc000ns BTW I'll thank you for the opportunity to read and understand a bit more of Qur'an.
The period of prophethood in Mecca was 13 years. The early Surahs tend to be short, theological ones designed to make their audience think about the existence of and nature of humans, and their destiny after judgement comes. Later on Surahs become longer and include parables for the listeners to think about, and, especially with the Madinan Surahs, there is legislation as well.
Surah An-Nahl is dated to late Meccan, as it references incidents that happened during that 13 year period. One can make the assumption that the Meccans could have grabbed that fellow and got the story out of him that he taught Muhammad PBUH. Well we know that didn't happen. I think it didn't happen because the Meccan leaders had a tendency with Muhammad PBUH, of throwing mud out, in the hope some of it sticks.
In modern parlance we are seeing a similar thing happening with Mr D Trump at the moment.
Sunnism is dying 😂
Islam is not dying
What? 😂 Sunni Islam is the largest religious sect in the world. Larger than Catholicism. We went from 1.8 billion to over 2 billion as of 2023 for Sunni Islam.
Islam is the quran and that’s what’s growing
@@If_I_loose_my_hair_i_will_kms sunnism isn't Islam, everything in sunnism is linked to mullas, whatever their mullas call saheeh, their leymen follow like sheep.
Sunnism is dying, sunni kids are apostating and hiding their apostasy, and 100s of sunni "huffath" are becoming apostates, and many so called "imams" are confessed disbelievers, but keep doing what they do to keep their status, and many sunnis remain in sunnism because of sunnis being masses (a bandwagon fallacy), one girl who memorized Quran fully told me that she's afraid of her (sunni) father when I asked her what's stopping her from accepting Qur'an alone. So sunnis are like that, some are afraid, others are just careless.
And I was a sunni, and reading Quran by myself and investigating into its Arabic roots made me realize much which sunnis teach does not align with Quran, I still followed Hadiths tho, but as I studied some Hadiths (even the first Book of Bukhari) I saw by 3 errors in each Hadith, cuz I already knew some of Quranic basis, so I started doubting Ahadith, also cuz Qur'an has verses telling us to not follow which we don't know/ , while following baseless Hadiths and "praying" behind mullas was exactly an action I didn't know why I did, and when I asked "imams" (whom I call mullas now, they're not worthy of title "imam"), they avoided my questions, and instead told me irrelevant stuff and told me to read some books like "sababu nuzul" which is by itself a kufr book, cuz disbelievers ask the reason for revelations/ 2:26, while I wasn't asking reasons for revelations, I was asking reasons for what they do which isn't apart of the revelation (i.e. Quran). So I witnessed those mullas avoiding, and slandering on me, and them sending away the orphans and the needy from the mosques, and making women sweep the mosques in front of men, dayyuth sunnis. I had no a shred of respect left for any of them, none of them advise another to stop those injustices they do, but if they advise, they'll be removed and governments will replace them with other (obedient) mullas, that's because their lords are those devils, they serve hypocrite governments, they wanna give legislation to Taghut as Allah taught in 4:60.