@@slavemariyakibtia2666 they are jealous and ashamed that books written by paul and friends don't even have any isnad, nobody even knows who wrote them lol
@@jxcess3891 Remember the hadith are a secondary source, it may or may not be authentic. However I have a verse from your bible, your primary source. Genesis 38 7 Judah got a wife for Er, his firstborn, and her name was Tamar.7But Er, Judah's firstborn, was wicked in the LORD's sight; so the LORD put him to death. 8 Then Judah said to Onan, "Lie with your brother's wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to produce offspring for your brother." 9 But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so whenever he lay with his brother's wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from producing offspring for his brother. 10 What he did was wicked in Lord Jesus' sight; so he put him to death also. So after a man dies the brother can sleep with his wife. That's his religious duty. Lol. Crikey!
Subhanallah, im a recent revert and just 20 minutes ago, i saw that there are mulitple versions of the Quran due to the inclusion of these extra marks. It put a small amount of doubt in my mind (not much but it slightly fractured my view and i questioned the Quran for a second) this is the first video i opened and it has already answered my questions and doubts, without me even trying to have it answered right now. Glory to Allah
On reddit there is a community called r/Quraniyoon. Someone posted your video there and from what I read, I think that they believe that there is only one Qira’a which doesn’t make any sense. The problem with them, is that it is harder to convince them than atheists. If you prove to them that they’re wrong, they might convert to another religion or stop believing in God because they are so convinced that Bukhari is a liar and that the method of transmission can’t be trusted. May Allah guid them
Salam alaykom Honestly Bro Farid, it’s so weird to have less than 13K subscribers. May Allah open every closed gate for you and ease your path in Shaa Allah
no hadith is no Quran, easiest verse to refute them, Quran 6 :89 - They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) who are not disbelievers therein.
Haven't talked to a lot of Hadith deniers, but those I have often ask stuff like, "What if they fabricated something and no one else knew?", "What if only one person knew it?" To which I simply respond, there are literally specific terminologies for hadith with only one chain, hadith with an unreliable narrator, hadith with multiple chain, hadith that are a bit different but have similar meaning. They ask as if those things haven't been taken into account when they totally have and hence even have different grades of ahadith.
The best question to pose them is whether they ever studied usool al hadith. Most of the time the answer will be no. You can end your discussion there. Does a biologist argue regarding biology with someone who never even studied it? Seems like a waste of time, doesn't it. I have one principle these days: don't argue with people who don't know Arabic. It saves a lot of time
The first time I met a hadith rejecter was about 15 years ago while praying maghrib jama'ah in a Masjid. This guy decided to pray separately than the jama'ah. When my friend next to me told him to come closer and connect the feet and shoulder, he refused. After the salah was finished, he started to explain why. He claimed not to believe in Hadith. Man, was he was the weirdest person(aside from a gay sikh revert) Muslim I ever met. He was spewing ayaat after ayaat and making connections with them to formulate something I couldn't grasp. My friend and I couldn't even follow the connection he was making. He spoke straight for like almost 10 minutes prolly reciting over 20 ayaat from different parts of the Qur'an. He had a British accent as well. Wonder if it was the same guy. Seems like he was prepared for it. After he spoke, my friend was like ok salam alaikum. We simply had no idea where to start discussing with such a guy like him. Never ever met someone like him in the past. Btw, he seemed like someone from the Indian sub-continent. So that added more of a twist.
To a foot to foot salafi, I cant see how anyone can speak to you with logic and reason. But I will assume you believe in the Quran. Here are 2 verses he may have recited: 31.6 and 77.50. Both have the word Hadith in them. There are many others. Read those and the surrounding ayah for now. Inshallah the deen will start to be more logical and reasonable for you. As Allah intended.
@Abu mujaddid no need to get hung up on culture and sexual orientation. This is what ruined Islam and not what it stands for. Culture and tradition are nothing in the aaaakhirah
إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ سَوَآءٌ عَلَيْهِمْ ءَأَنذَرْتَهُمْ أَمْ لَمْ تُنذِرْهُمْ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ Indeed, those who disbelieve - it is all the same for them whether you warn them or do not warn them - they will not believe. (quran 2:6)
Mashallah brother may Allah bless you for what your doing. I think you and all the other Muslims youtubers mohammed hijab etc should start a series together like the one with cp and apostate but really goes in depth about who these people are there intentions etc and guy tackling and exposing these people who constantly lie. At the moment David wood is the biggest one with the most views whos constantly lying and misguiding Muslims who haven't studied the deen properly and don't know how to refute them and get easily manipulated and misguided. Salamwalakum hope you have a blessed ramadan and eid.
They already knows our questions, so they memorized weird, complication answers. If you are an average Muslim, you might fall for it. Surprise them with a new questions like Farid did.
@hadith rejectors: here are some verses about obeying the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him), so you cannot absolutely deny that we are commanded to obey him 1) *"Say Obey Allah and the Messenger. But if they turn away, then Allah does not like the disbelievers"* [Quran 3:32] 2) *"And whoso obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad) then they will be in the company of those on whom Allah has bestowed His Grace, of the Prophets, the Siddiqun (those followers of the Prophets who were first and foremost to believe in them, like Abu Bakr As-Siddiq the martyrs, and the righteous. And how excellent these companions are!"* [Quran 4:69] 3) *"They ask you (O Muhammad)about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allah and the Messenger.” So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers"* [Quran 8:1] 4) *"O you who believe! Obey Allah and His Messenger, and turn not away from him (i.e. Messenger Muhammad) while you are hearing"* [Quran 8:20] 5) *"The believers, men and women, are Auliya’ (helpers, supporters, friends, protectors) of one another; they enjoin (on the people) Al-Ma’ruf (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do), and forbid (people) from Al-Munkar (i.e. polytheism and disbelief of all kinds, and all that Islam has forbidden); they perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and give the Zakat, and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah will have His Mercy on them. Surely Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise"* [Quran 9:71] 6) *"He who obeys the Messenger has indeed obeyed Allah, but he who turns away, then we have not sent you as a watcher over them"* [Quran 4:80] so at this point, the fact that we (muslims) are commanded to obey the messenger (may peace be upon him) is pretty much heavily established in the quran. why would the quran tell us multiple times that we need to obey him (may peace be upon him)? how would we (the ummah) obey him (may peace be upon him)? in order to obey him (may peace be upon him), we would need to know his teachings in the first place, wouldn't we? so that leads us to the hadith, the actions and sayings of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him). now, my issue with people who only read from the quran and not the hadith is the following verse: *"O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad, pbuh), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination"* [Quran 4:59] this verse tells us clearly that we refer to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) and the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) when we differ amongst ourselves. how do we refer to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ)? we use the quran how do we refer to the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him)? through his teachings. and let me emphasise again, his teachings is in the Hadiths this verse also points out that we can't just freely determine what each verse means just like that. we need to understand the verses. and so, wouldn't it make sense to refer to both the quran and hadith seeing the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) is the prophet who preached these verses to us? if we ONLY used quran, we wouldn't be referring to the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) at all for any of the verses, and would end up freely interpreting the verses. how do you expect do understand the context of the verses without the hadith in the first place? to top all this up, the quran says that the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) preaches to us what is halal and haram in this verse: *"Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in what they have of the Torah and the Gospel, who enjoins upon them what is right and forbids them what is wrong and makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the evil and relieves them of their burden and the shackles which were upon them. So they who have believed in him, honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him - it is those who will be the successful"* [Quran 7:157] how do you know what the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) has revealed what is haram and halal? through his teachings. to further prove that the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) was sent to explain the quran is in these verses: *"With clear signs and Books (We sent the Messengers). And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad SAW) the reminder and the advice (the Quran), that you may explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought"* [Quran 16:44] what do you think this verse means when it says "explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought"???? it can't get anymore clear than this. furthermore: *"And We have not sent down the Book (the Quran) to you (O Muhammad SAW), except that you may explain clearly unto them those things in which they differ, and (as) a guidance and a mercy for a folk who believe"* [Quran 16:64] so this leads me to a question: WHERE do you expect to see the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him)??? the quran is the word of ALLAH (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ), and the hadith is the actions and sayings of the PROPHET MUHAMMAD (may peace be upon him)!!! fr ask urself, if we don't need to know the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him), then why didn't Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) just give the whole quran to those arabs and tell them that's all they need to understand the quran? why was the quran revealed over 23 years, with the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) explaining it??? *"[We sent them] with clear proofs and written ordinances. And We revealed to you the message that YOU MAY MAKE CLEAR to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought."* [16:44] this verse states that explanation of the quran OUTSIDE of the quran is VALID, and specifically valid if it comes from the PROPHET MUHAMMAD (MAY PEACE BE UPON HIM) so if Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) HIMSELF says that Muhammad's (may peace be upon him) explanation is valid, then the AUTHENTIC HADITHS ARE VALID. the same people who gave us the hadith are the same people who compiled the quran into a book through memory that's how the quran was originally preserved, by memorisation and scribes. when it was turned into a book was after the passing of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him). and how did they turn it into a book? by recollection of memory, as well as the scribes but not the scribes alone so, you can accept the quran but will deny hadiths from the same people who passed down the quran? mutawatir sahih hadiths were written down and mostly preserved via memory by the same people who preserved the quran through memory. these weren't different people, yet you reject these people who compiled the quran into a book? may Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) guide us
JazakAllah Khair brother it's sad there's so many Prophecies that Muhammad made and came true watch THE FORBIDDEN PROPHECIES for any Muslim to reject this is equivalent to Kufr
@@ultimatetruth9241 are you familiar with what the term "right hand possess" in the quran? "And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your *right hands possess* . [This is] the decree of Allah upon you. And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. And there is no blame upon you for what you mutually agree to beyond the obligation. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise" [4:24] im sure those women in that hadith were basically is what the right hand possess (concubines). the only way you can obtain a concubine is through war.
By rejecting Hadith ALL TOGETHER your Also rejecting the Seerah of the Prophet because Hadiths are snapshots of the Seerah so using this logic we don't Know who Muhammad PBUH was All we know is the Quran, WE DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN ARABIA DURING HIS LIFE NOTHING
@Anon Ymous by that your contradicting the Ayat of Quran Surah Al Qalam Ayat 4: And verily, you (O Muhammad ) are on an exalted standard of character. Using your logic how do we know who he really was since He was the Last Prophet???? Quran says multiple places OBEY THE MESSENGER And in Surah Nisa 4:59 O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result So How do we refer back to the Messenger if the Hadiths are false????
@Abd Al-Razzaq and the Quran itself* The Hadith gives us context on when the ayats we're revealed without it some ayats don't make sense ex. Surah Al Masad without Hadith we don't know what the Surah is talking about or the background on what's going on or why it was revealed
@@islamicdefender2941 There was a hadith narrated by Aisha ra, where she said the prophet was the Quran in his action, so his character would be literally following the Quran. But Allahu 3alam tbh. They also say the first Caliphas didn't like hadiths, and that Judges didn't use hadiths for jurisprudence, and that they are hearsay. To be real, i'm still battling this stuff. The Quran has more detail on how to establish salat than i thought tho, a brother compiled many ayat and did a Quranic prayer and he got it quite close to what we do, without using hadiths... in fact another hadith narrated by Aisha ra states the prayers were sets of 2 and later they got incremented in rakat, and the brother got that there are two rakat in every salat using the Quran alone. But Allahu 3alam brother. I think we should follow the Quran, and the rest is debatable. But takfiring someone without right is as dangerous as what some do with the Quran, reading metaphores when the verses are clearly literal... if you get me... that's wrong. Especially when we have this: 5:69 إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ وَٱلَّذِينَ هَادُوا۟ وَٱلصَّـٰبِـُٔونَ وَٱلنَّصَـٰرَىٰ مَنْ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْـَٔاخِرِ وَعَمِلَ صَـٰلِحًۭا فَلَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ ٦٩ Indeed, the believers, Jews, Sabians and Christians-whoever ˹truly˺ believes in Allah and the Last Day and does good, there will be no fear for them, nor will they grieve. - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran (And the verse about Islam means that, submission, whoever seeks other than submission as his way it won't be accepted from him/her, but if you interpret submission to mean sunnism then that's exactly what Allah says is "wishful thinking" or desires) 2:111 وَقَالُوا۟ لَن يَدْخُلَ ٱلْجَنَّةَ إِلَّا مَن كَانَ هُودًا أَوْ نَصَـٰرَىٰ ۗ تِلْكَ أَمَانِيُّهُمْ ۗ قُلْ هَاتُوا۟ بُرْهَـٰنَكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ صَـٰدِقِينَ ١١١ The Jews and Christians (((and many other sects))) each claim that none will enter Paradise except those of their own faith. These are their desires. Reply, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Show ˹me˺ your proof if what you say is true.” - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran 2:112 بَلَىٰ مَنْ أَسْلَمَ وَجْهَهُۥ لِلَّهِ وَهُوَ مُحْسِنٌۭ فَلَهُۥٓ أَجْرُهُۥ عِندَ رَبِّهِۦ وَلَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ ١١٢ But no! Whoever submits themselves to Allah and does good will have their reward with their Lord. And there will be no fear for them, nor will they grieve. - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran Assalamu alaikum
Great work brother. I always pose to them to explain sura al fil (elephant) for me as they all interrupt it so differently. But with Hadith it gives you all the understanding clear as day
Circumstances made me who I am like i said people have different views on different suras without the context and hadith has alot of context not all but alot. Hence why i used sura al fil as if you just read it without knowledge on it you could explain it many ways. Hadith clarify this and hadith is from Muhammed pbuh the same man that brought you Quran so its not complicated. Remember who brought you the quran, Muhammad transmitted through to shahaba who transmited it into book form. Same as hadith.
Circumstances made me who I am so history is ok but hadiths are not!? So believing in historians is ok but not the shahaba i get you stance. Everyone can have their own opinions. But yours is a pretty weak with one from that statement you just made.
Circumstances made me who I am without hadiths you have no knowledge of islamic history as you have already concluded. I think your just struggling in the whole concept of hadiths and the way they were preserved through time. The science to hadiths are astonishingly amazing, just as the quran came from the same people that complied them, you believe these people to be liers or decieving but the fact is they came from the same people that brought the quran. You can send me verses but me going through them is not going to confirm to you that there correct as you already have your back to the wall regarding these issues. Theres many many more issues we could go through all day along regarding these issues. eid mubarak and may allah bless us all inshallah
@@Guyanababoo217 I agree with a lot of what you said. In fact, isn't it better if we take a more Qur'an centric position than to over-rely on Hadith? I will add on if I can. Salamun alaikum, eid mubarak
Circumstances made me who I am you keep talking about people being illogical when you’re the illogical one yourself. You found some contradictory hadith so you conclude that all hadith are untrustworthy. You wouldn’t apply this level of skepticism to anything else except the Hadith. I’ll have you know, that the reason there are contradictory hadith and hadith that go against the Qur’an is because they were made to be that way by the Abassids. The Abassids destroyed all the previous hadith books and instead forced the hadith authors at the time to compile books with supervision from the political black hand. So that’s why you will see hadith in the SAME book that contradict one another. The compilers weren’t stupid, they were under pressure to fabricate hadith otherwise the books would never have been allowed to be made. You’re just one side of the extreme. You have fanatics who believe that ALL hadith no matter what are authentic if they come from an authentic source regardless if they clearly contradict the Qur’an and then there are people like you who reject ALL hadith even if they compliment the Qur’an. Both extremes are wrong. We must take a moderate approach and a Qur’an centric approach concerning hadith.
Yes, a very simple question is very effective to make someone to start thinking.. May Allah gives us a wisdom to spread truth. "أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِى حَآجَّ إِبْرَٰهِۦمَ فِى رَبِّهِۦٓ أَنْ ءَاتَىٰهُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلْمُلْكَ إِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَٰهِۦمُ رَبِّىَ ٱلَّذِى يُحْىِۦ وَيُمِيتُ قَالَ أَنَا۠ أُحْىِۦ وَأُمِيتُ قَالَ إِبْرَٰهِۦمُ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأْتِى بِٱلشَّمْسِ مِنَ ٱلْمَشْرِقِ فَأْتِ بِهَا مِنَ ٱلْمَغْرِبِ فَبُهِتَ ٱلَّذِى كَفَرَ وَٱللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ" Al-Baqara (2:258) "Have you not considered the one who argued with Abraham about his Lord [merely] because Allah had given him kingship? When Abraham said, "My Lord is the one who gives life and causes death," he said, "I give life and cause death." Abraham said, "Indeed, Allah brings up the sun from the east, so bring it up from the west." So the disbeliever was overwhelmed [by astonishment], and Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people." Al-Baqara (2:258)
@@carljohnson2194 My friend, there are two kinds of people in the world - those who care about the great writings and texts of the past, and those who don't. I watch both channels. The reality is, people generally increase their knowledge by watching all dedicated serious debates and discussions. Unlike many CP followers, I like Farid and I like Muslims. He doesn't need to be 'right,' he needs to be learned for me to watch him, and he often is. Muslims' devotion is not in question in my mind. Neither is their sincerity.
And besides which, there is SO MUCH rubbish talked about and debated all over the world these days - do you not realize you are participating in the greatest intellectual argument of our times? We should all be grateful just to be here, and listen to all sides.
@@carljohnson2194 Depends what you mean 'Christian...' lol Jesus Christ's ancestors were Joseph, the chief adviser to the Egyptian king, and his wife Asaneith, the Graeco-Egyptian priestess of Neith (Athene) in the court of the Pharaoh. Which makes Jesus Christ a Greek-Egyptian in substantial part and a high aristocrat at that. He and his mother spent fourteen years at 'the mansion of his Uncle, Cleophas, in Egypt; this would be the same kind of thing as if I said I spent fourteen years in a mansion in Mayfair, London which belonged to my uncle 'Mr Windsor...' The Romans FEARED some claim to kingship by Jesus at the specific time and tried him for that charge - Jesus was there within 60 - 40 years of the life of Julius Caesar, whom the Romans had committed the patricide of (murdered), and who everyone knows, including all academic historians without exception, had a son by Cleopatra, the very last regent of Egypt. Jesus was NEVER king OF the House of Judah, he was king OVER Judah at the time according to law... So what do I think? I think all of you, Muslims and Christians alike have it all f*d up massively and are avoiding going after the main game - WHO killed the legitimate heir to the throne of Egypt and Rome? And why do people to this day seek to obscure this issue, the attachment of blame to those to whom it must be held responsible, and the restoration of a legitimate kingship of any mind of so-called 'Sacred Throne' which is what people called the line of Theuth (Dawud in the Arabic, David in the Hebrew) without which there is no legitimacy to ANY rulership on this planet anywhere that claims line of descent through the civilizations of Greece, Rome, and even London, where let's face it, they too committed the regicide of their own real king Charles I. This is the true meaning of 'kufr;' namely, those who COVER UP MURDERS. It started with Cain killing Abel, and it hasn't stopped since. Both 'sides' (not to even bother mentioning the ludicrous Hebrew religion and ideology) are riddled with fabricated stories and filled with third-hand mischief designed to keep you all ignorant and your arrogant and petty little heads filled with confused simplistic gibberish taking any chance of understanding away from you. Your leaders spend atrocious amounts of time and money talking nonsense that can add not one single second onto your life, not one hair onto your head, nor open one single narrow doorway to the heaven that you claim to seek. While you live, your ego arrogance takes you ever and ever further away from understanding, and on your deathbed, well, you expire, and your soul flies about twittering like a pathetic little bat in a darkened cave from which there is no escape. Is there only one god, or three gods? Or three gods in one God? And nine gods in Egypt and 33 million officially in India? One god, but his messenger killed people... Or one of Three Gods, but that one was killed by ordinary people, and then went away so we can't ask him any questions... You are confused, all of you. Bring me a glass of water, I won't turn it into wine for you, but I do need to drink it for the heat from all of your stupidity. And no, I am not an atheist. You are all pathetic. You argue about things you don't know the first thing about. God is POWER, powerful, and GOOD. He kills no one and desires no one's death. But YOU live in death, and you seek it, and you desire it, and you do it, every day in every thing you say and think and do. You - the human - have death residing in you, and you are in love with it. You have ignorance living in you and you are in love with it. I am not your savior, and moreover, I will not save you. Save yourselves. If you can. Let your Muhammad from the punishment of the grave, save you, if he can. Let your Quran, save you, if it can. All dead things. Dead, dead, dead. Command them to stand and walk. If you can. Call to them to help you, if they will answer you. You think you are honest and sincere, devoted to God. But you are lying to yourself. Don't ask me who my God is. I will not tell you.
@@carljohnson2194 alaikom assalam we can say that he is the same God who sent Moses, David, Jacob, and all the prophets, peace be upon them, but we cannot equate them in the attributes. The Jewish god regrets and makes mistakes, and he is afraid of Adam to eat from the tree of eternity and many other deficient characteristics. These attributes cannot Be in God Almighty ALLAH.
I had several dialogues with Quranists who rejecting ritual solat. Then I asked them how Rasulullah established his prayers which has been mentioned in 49 verses in Al-Quran. Since most of the QUranists like to list all the berses, I also lists all the 49 verses' number here, too. May Allah guides us all. Al-Baqara (2:3,43,83,110,125,177,277) Aal-i-Imraan (3:39) An-Nisaa (4:77,102,103,142,162) Al-Maaida (5:6,12,55) Al-An'aam (6:72) Al-A'raaf (7:170) Al-Anfaal (8:3) At-Tawba (9:5,11,18,71) Yunus (10:87) Hud (11:114) Ar-Ra'd (13:22) Ibrahim (14:31,37,40) Al-Israa (17:78) Taa-Haa (20:14) Al-Anbiyaa (21:73) Al-Hajj (22:35,41,78) An-Noor (24:37,56) An-Naml (27:3) Al-Ankaboot (29:45) Ar-Room (30:31) Luqman (31:4,17) Al-Ahzaab (33:33) Faatir (35:18,29) Ash-Shura (42:38) Al-Mujaadila (58:13) Al-Muzzammil (73:20) Al-Bayyina (98:5)
Yo Salam farid , I think u should make response videos to ‘islam critiqued’ Cos he makes some stupid claims and his audience really thinks great of him 😂
@Farid Responds Ya akhee, why don't you start teaching us some basic stuff about Quran (history) and how hadith is compiled including the history of the compilers. Many of us could benefit inshaallah. Jazakallah!
@@OriginalAndroidPhone why do we have written copies of the quran al kareem from approx hijra, when we have hadith from when? what is the oldest written copy of a hadith book you know? 300 yrs after? long time, who was your forefather from 300 years ago? was he truthful or a liar? you will probably say truthful.. such is the course of isnad and usool. if you dont like my hadith you will find a transmitter to be a liar, such is the case for most transmitters. no validity, far from the quran. the diacritical marks were engrained in qirat, while the consonants were written concurrently. lets not pretend the sanaa manuscripts were found with hadithi instructions on how to "do islam, because the quran is not intelligible" not intelligible for the idiot farsi scholars who were scared to get killed by ruthless rulership.
@@c5quared626 Lots pf problems with what you have written. (1) EVERY argument you make against the historical reliability of hadith just further undermines the Quran. Every one. This is because there is no Quranic history/authenticity without hadith. None. (2) Hadith were always a natural part of Islam from day 0. Bukhari was written around 200 yrs later, but hadith did not begin with Bukhari...
@@OriginalAndroidPhone so the letters of Umar r.a. are not a historical record? The Quran amongst the people of kufa is like the buzzing of the bees, make sure and not distract them with hadith. And he didnt threaten to beat Abu hurrairah for narrating false hadith and quotes? Esteemed Sunni scholars have acknowledged their validity, but swept them under the rug. Along with hadith, " do not write what I do". And the fact that umar and Abu bakr r.a. burned their hadith collections after hearing this. A few miscreants were able to hold on to hadith and those were corrupted soon enough. To the point where we have discrepancy in every single point. Pee sitting down or stand up? There are hadith for both, and then endless nonsense about how to justify one scholars position, everyone gets bullied into submission. Recall imam Abu hanifah died incarcerated. Why? Going against the rulers, so do we know what his thoughts really were? My theory is that he was against circulating hadith(my self and many historians believe kitab al athar is not the work of imam A.H.). Then came abrogation of the Quran with hadith, this is what imam shafi started, check the books brother. Ask your mufti.
No it's not. If you would continue reading after this ayah, it's pretty clear exactly what the reading is. Use your common sense, is that too much to ask a salafi? I guess
Did Arabs at the time of the Messenger know how to read and write Arabic and as they did how does knowing how to read a word prove that we must follow hadith? Reading the Arabic Qur'an and reciting orally has come down through non hadith chains of narrators so this is not proving the necessity of hadith authors, just proving that hadith are casting doubt on the authenticity of the Qur'an and we need hadith to re-establish the authenticity of the Qur'an!!!!! That is the level of 'scientific' hadith transmission and understanding!
Riaz Qureshi Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And (remember) Loot (Lot), when he said to his people: ‘Do you commit the worst sin such as none preceding you has committed in the ‘Aalameen (mankind and jinn)? Verily, you practise your lusts on men instead of women. Nay, but you are a people transgressing beyond bounds (by committing great sins)’” [al-A’raaf 7:80-81] “And (remember) Loot (Lot), when he said to his people: ‘You commit Al‑Faahishah (sodomy the worst sin) which none has preceded you in (committing) it in the ‘Aalameen (mankind and jinn)’” [al-‘Ankaboot 29:28]
That is a very fair question to ask to anyone about any document, not just hadith rejector or about quran. If someone doesnt really know the correct sentences or statement in a document, how can they say they understand the correct message the document try to convey?
1.Root words are defined by the context not diacritical marks. Arabic today doesn’t even bother with diacritical marks so claiming that’s a big deal is an utter lie. 2. The Quran is not for recitation but for understanding which is what a message is for. Always on this mystical magical Arabic nonsense.
Salam brother first i have you thank you for dealing with honey man and his approch to representing Quran stories ..i am a big fan. But i also want to thank you for this video because i am now even more adamant about being a hadith rejector and rely on Quran alone. Salam Alaykom brother.
Amazing response against that hadith rejector. Eid Mubarak! Can you please respond to people making fake testimonies of going to heaven or hell. These are mostly Christians.
Qur'anists do not realise that they only represent an insignificant minority and that Allah (swt) would never have allowed the followers of Truth to be in such a small number. Sunni Muslims represent the majority of Muslims, therefore, the majority of Muslims are on the right path.
@Mehmet Ekrem Barut Pathetic logic, you say ? Then you're saying that Allah (swt) did not keep his promise of spreading Islam all over the world (most Muslims are Sunni) and that the Prophet (asws) did not tell the truth when he said that towards the end of times Muslims would be in great numbers (most are Sunni), albeit useless for most, and that practically all his efforts and suffering, as well as those of his supporters, were for nearly nothing, only ending up with a ridiculous number of 'true' followers ? Do you really believe that Allah (swt) will allow in Jennah an insignificant portion of humanity (prob. a few 100 000s), namely a tiny sect which doesn't even follow the teachings of the Prophet (asws), against billions in Gehennem ? No, you're the one with the pathetic logic.
@@ilhamh4359 Perhaps you should take into account that you are quoting "Muslims would be in great numbers" instead of "Sunnis would be in great numbers"
@@ExtremeCrafter Sunnis are the only true Muslims and they are in great numbers. Anybody who deviates from the Sunnah of the Prophet (asws) is a phony Muslim.
@@ExtremeCrafter Sunnis are not a sect, they are the true Muslims, even if many nowadays are not practicing properly, and this does not make them deviant.
Not a hadith rejecter but if you read the next verse.. I think it gets clear that the previous one clearly means : "The Romans are vanquished" and not the other way around.
@@TheLuminationCZcams You realize that the word in the next verse can also be read as "victorious" without any diacritical marks also right? It's the same root, ghalaba.
Couldn’t you also bring up that the Qur’an also has a sanad? Hafs narrates from Asim who narrates from Abi Abdur Rahman al Sulamee narrates from Zaid ibn Thabit narrates from Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ)? So if anyone rejects the Hadith transmission tradition is implicitly rejecting Qur’anic transmission?
That is basically the point that Br. Farid implied in his story. With no diacritical marks, the only way to properly know the correct recitation is through the sanad of the Qur'an. This sanad goes through the same processes as the isnad of the hadith so this is why we say if you reject hadith you have rejected the Qur'an.
Talal Siddiqui the Quran is not about the correct recitation but about understanding the message and Arabic doesn’t concern itself with diacritical marks it’s meaning all depend on root words. Stop talking about things you have no knowledge of.
@@TheQuranExplainsItself Brother Farid literally showed in his video how changing diacritical marks can change the meaning from the Romans lost to the Romans won. How can you say they're not important then? And this is just an example Br. Farid used to show how sanad applies to the Qur'an just like it does to hadith.
@@ng3933 ok so if I was to procure a manuscript with a bunch of hadith, and their valid isnad attached.. is it rational to just start believing in it? And betting your afterlife on it? That my friend is irrational, and that my friend is exactly what hadith are to me.
There is a channel called Quran Centric. Please invite him on/speak to him. He sounds very similar to this guy because when I talked to him he had an answer to everything no matter how incoherent or inconsistent it was. Especially watch his video on Quran complication, in the first 7 minutes he uses circular reasoning to prove his points i.e. he is clueless about the complication of the Quran and just assumes things. So yeah, please check it out.
@@JA-be7me When you are trying to prove the Quran you have is the one that Muhammad pbuh revealed and use the Quran itself to prove this it is using the conclusion in the premise I.e. circular reasoning. First you have to establish the verses you are using are legit before using them. Otherwise your assuming what you were supposed to prove.
We are presented with a straw man hadith rejecter and a 'refutation'. Pray this, how do you do that etc. but what is lacking is any Qur'anic authorisation for a true muslim to follow the hadith and sunnah of a man, even if he was a Messenger. There is no Qur'anic verse from Allah stating that the Messenger could give his sayings as a source of guidance, and in fact we have a set thatabsolutely, unambiguously, most certainly has him being commanded by Allah not to given any: 69:40 This is the revealed Word in the dialect of a noble Messenger. [44:58] 69:41 This is not the utterance of a poet. Seldom do you choose to believe. 69:42 Nor is it the word of a soothsayer. Little of your intellect do you bring to use. 69:43 It is a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. 69:44 And if he had ascribed his sayings to Us, 69:45 We would have taken him by the right hand, 69:46 And would have cut off his Aorta. [‘Wateen’ = Artery of the heart = Life line = Life-artery = Strength = Revelation to the Prophet. This implies that no true Prophet could possibly propagate falsehood] 69:47 And none of you could stop Us from doing that. 69:48 But, it is a Reminder and a giver of eminence to those who seek to live upright. 69:49 We know well that among you will be deniers. 69:50 And this denial will become a source of regret for the rejecters. 69:51 It is the absolute truth. 69:52 Strive to manifest the glory of your Lord’s Tremendous Name. So the only hadith and sunnah we are to follow as per the Qur'an are the hadith and sunnah of Allah contained within the Qur'an. All the verses like obey the Messenger, the Messenger does not speak of his own accord, etc that are misunderstood to mean the hadith and sunnah of the Messenger, blatantly contradict the above verses and so cannot mean this. But that is all the Bukharian hadith worshippers have as evidence; SO THEY ARE QUR'AN REJECTERS! I will take my chances on Judgement Day as a hadith rejecter, can you do the same?
@@gilabola4642 There is no verse in the Qur'an to follow the hadith and sunnah as recorded in Bukhari etc. so my argument refuting the rejection of a 'hadith rejecter' stands. can you provide a Qur'anic argument destroying Qur'an alone?
@@truehikma your argument doesnt even have a leg, let alone can stand. Muslim recite quran because we recite as per narration from imam of qiraat. The knowledge of how to recite as Farid clearly explained in the video, reaches us through different chain of narrations all the way back to Rasulullah ﷺ. Even when trying to refute ahadith, you yourself have to depend on chain of narrators. Quite sad really
@@gilabola4642 I am sorry but the Qur'an has come down to us by both oral and written, each protecting the other, as Allah said He would collect and preserve it. Now we have hadith stating that an unknown recited it differently and it is only the hadith narrators that protects the Qur'an from corruption. UTTER RUBBISH! The Qur'an reciters have preserved this 100% as does the manuscripts, no doubt, but everyone knows that forged, weak, doubtful, dubious, not agreed upon, hadith abound in the fairy-tale collections so where was this 100% preservation of the hadith when they 100% preserved the Qur'an? If the same people did it then something went wrong. Also, and you have failed to understand the only important point that needs addressing, DOES THE QUR'AN AUTHORISE THE MESSENGER TO GIVE US HIS HADITH AND SUNNAHS AS PART OF OUR ISLAMIC DEEN? You and the Bukharians say yes, the Qur'an says no. Your choice, Qur'anic Islam or shirk 'islam'.
@@truehikma chain of narrators are still required in oral or written transmission. When someone memorised the whole quran, they will receive an ijaza in Quran recitation with a chain of narration to Rasulullah ﷺ. There is still chain of narration and narrators in that transmission. You really dont have a slightest clue about this, do you?
Farid please talk about how stoning is mentioned for adulterers in Bukhari but not mentioned in Quran? Why the prophet said to kill anybody who leaves their religion but the Quran says the opposite? Why did Aisha say the stoning verse got eaten by a goat? Why is homosexuality punishable by death but no prescribed punishment is given in the Quran? I haven’t found satisfactory answers so thanks a lot if you respond 🙂
RedAkira _ Thanks for the answer. But isn’t the goat eating the stoning verse sort of related to other Hadith which mention the prophet ordering people to be stoned? Umar (RA) had asked why the stoning punishment was done then this goat eating hadith comes along. All aside, why did the prophet order stoning for a punishment when it’s not in the Quran? We have to reject that Hadith no? It contradicts Quran.
the quran says obey the messenger (may peace be upon him) the messenger (may peace be upon him) spoke of the stoning punishment, and also implemented it therefore, the stoning punishment is a legitimate hadud punishment in islam
homosexuality is punished by death under strict circumstances one of the circumstances is sodomy occurring in public. are you going to defend people commiting sodomy in public?
The adoption of hadith is a big contradiction to the belief that the Quran is perfect and complete. The use of hadiths in conjunction with the Quran can only be justified through cognitive dissonance and justified idolatry. Interestingly, Farid seems to suggest that the current Quran is not perfect and complete.
Mohamed Ismail You merely justify the use of the Sunnah without addressing the core issue here. What does being perfect and complete mean? The hadiths don’t just supplement the Quran, they add things to it as well. As such they complement the Quran, which in essence implies the incompleteness of the Quran. What is the purpose of the Quran? The Sunnah also implies that Muhammad was under divine inspiration 24/7 insofar all his utterances and actions were divinely inspired. In essence that would also make him divine. Are you claiming divinity for Muhammad? At some point you must stop to realize the implications of your beliefs. Please speak to the points, not around them. Can you provide where the Quran says unequivocally ( that is without having to resort to stretchy extrapolations) that Muhammad’s actions and words should be recorded to serve as a supplement to the Quran? Was Muhammad the message himself? If indeed, he was a mere messenger and had delivered through Quran the very message that aught to save human souls, wouldn’t that fact relegate the hadiths to mere historical texts without any impact on the salvation of the Muslim? You cannot reconcile all these contradictions. Either you accept that the Quran is not perfect and complete and therefore is made perfect and complete by Muhammad, or you continue to cling to the claim of perfection and completeness of the Quran and reject the hadiths as salvational texts. You can’t logically make both claims.
Mohamed Ismail Look at my initial post, you can clearly see that I’ve attached the two words, because that’s the belief I am addressing. You’re claiming that you think the Quran to be perfect but not complete, right? Yet you didn’t define what perfect means as I asked you. In fact you haven’t addressed anything at all. You simply stated the negative. I asked for verses that do not require extrapolations, unequivocal ones. Muhammad was the embodiment of the Quranic message? Expand on that please: what does that mean and what are the implications of such belief? I am curious to see how you define perfection as related to the Quran. I asked you to tell me the purpose of the Quran, which you didn’t answer. Once you answer my questions fully you will see the contradictions in your beliefs. You seem to be the one using straw man’s argument: I never claimed that complete and perfect mean the same thing. I simply used them in conjunction, since that’s the belief I was addressing initially. You’ve responded that the Quran was perfect, without clarifying the extent and nature of the perfection, and saying nothing about completeness. Your initial response was just dogmatic and failed to clearly summarize your belief. Had you said that you believe the Quran to be perfect but not complete, we could have saved substantial time. But the contradictions are still salient. Can you please answer my questions properly so we can fully address the verse you’ve cited?
Mohamed Ismail Bro, you’re playing, right? The questions are in my last post that you’ve just responded to. Ok then 1 what is the definition of perfection as related to the Quran? Please briefly elaborate on the religious implications of such definition. 2. What is the purpose of the Quran? 3. What do you mean by Muhammad is the embodiment of the Quranic message? What’s the religious implication?
No you idiot. The hadith books provides chains of narrators in order for us investigate the authenticity of each report. And Abu Dawud himself the compiler of Sunan Abu Dawud commented on some hadiths in his book as being Daif, so does this means that Abu Dawud is rejecting his book?. If a Hadith is Daif it's because the chain of narrators is disconnected (I.e narrators didnt hear from each other) or one of the narrators is unknown. when we say its Daif it's because of evidence and chain of narrators We dont say that all hadiths are Daif. We don't say that Quran is Daif you buffoooooooon. You don't even know what chain of narrators is. You are a joke idiot Your Bible is written by unknown authors whom you dont even know the first letter of their first name to begin with. And Bible was edited hundreds of times and still being edited. Your Christianity is a joke
I'm surprised he did not have an answer. The answer is the same way that the poetry of pre-Islamic Arabia is known to us... Arabic heavily leans on context to provide for the diacritical marks, clearly this is why they were not employed in the first place.. it was thought unnecessary for a native speaker. The marks were finally written down not for the Arabs, but to make reading easy for the non-Arabs. I think with your example though, you are alluding to the fact that the preservation of the qira'at are similar to hadith so its difficult to accept one and not the other, which is a separate issue.
The next verse right after "the romans were defeated" gives you the right sense without the diacritical marks. If in the verse 2, you read it as they won, the verse 3 does not make sense. How can they win, and then stand again from their defeat and win ? No need for hadith here.
@@EchosDeSagesse 1) that only solves the meaning, not how it was recited out of the 3 options given (differing dialects in that area at that time are not doubted by any linguist). You have no Quranic basis to assume it is recited how arabs would today recite it based on todays dialect for passive verbs
Salam alaykum, as a student of Arabic I need help mainly with the words of Arabic. I get confused sometimes. Nahw and Sarf isn’t the hardest thing for me alhamdulillah I struggle with wording sometimes. Any books/pdf to help with this?
You should study basic nahw books in Arabic and focus on the i'raab/tarkeeb (syntactical dissection). E.g. شرح مئة عامل، هداية النحو ، الكافية لابن حاجب. In the process you will do a whole lot of expanding vocab and discovering wording and phrases (make sure to read the commentaries).
كتب في البلاغة والأدب (لغة): الكامل في اللغة والأدب للمبرد (i advice this one) ، أو أدب الكاتب لابن قتيبة، أو البيان والتبيين للجاحظ، أو الأمالي لأبي علي القالي، أو سحر البلاغة وسرُّ البراعة لأبي منصور الثعالبي؛ These are some adab and arabic related books that will make you a faseeh inshallah, it's also what students of knowledge advice, also the books of "ghareeb alhadeeth" or "ghareeb al Quran" which talks about the ambiguous words in kitab & sunnah; and they should come first. Allah knows best and we ask him to increase in knowledge
6:43 It's been around a looong time. I used to have a book in the 80's that talks abt deriving all those things from Quran verses. Hmmm I wonder where is it now (the book) LOL
Contact Farid on twitter and also Tell him to do a series with help of Adnan rashid and Mansur etc on Bill warner he is very famous anti islamic people
go to 24.58 and 2.238, and u find how many prayers u have to do which they are 3, fajr, isha and WUSTA, now let me ask you this,for those who follow hadiths, where did u get asr and zhur from? and where did u get rakats if it is not in the quran? many people also confuse tasbee with salat, if u go to 24.41 it tells u there is a difference.
I have listened to a lot of Ahal al Hadith saying if you don't believe all of what Bukhari says you are a kafir. They use three fallacies: 1) Follow the messenger means follow the Nabi 2) If you read Quran how do you know how to pray? 3) Quran transmission is the same as Hadith transmission. The first fallacy ignores that it says follow the rasool because he has a Rasaleh - The Quran not a book written 200 years after prophet Muhammad (pbuh) without his permission. The second fallacy ignores the fact that the hadith will not tell you how to pray from A-Z, Muslims already prayed for 200 years before the Hadith and the Quran teaches us how to do wuduh, where to face, when to pray and prostrating actions. The third fallacy (which is used in this example) is trying to tell people that the Hadith is transmitted the same way as the Quran. His example is poor as you can find the meaning in the next verse. But when it comes Quran transmission - it was compiled 20 years after the prophet's death following that it was mass transmitted which made it difficult to change and easy to see if faults happen when it was copied. Also, it is done in a certain style. The Ahadith were written down 200 years afterwards and overwhelmingly ahad (single narrator) where provided Bukari feels the narrator is trustworthy anything can be said. By the way, I am don't deny all hadith, but for clerics to say all hadith must followed without the matn compared to the Quran is negligent on their part.
@@FaridRespondsHi Farid, We know from various historical accounts (both Muslim and non- Muslim) that Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) lived around the time stated that he lived. We know that the Quran would have had to be produced before the 4 Khalifah died as Sunnis and Shia use the same Quran.
So the hadith contains the correct pronunciation of the quran? Not sure what point he was making, but maybe i missed it. I thought the quran was remembered in the hearts of the believers.
@Ahmad Shaikh okay thanks Ahmad. Although i imagine writing it down during the prophet's time played a role in its preservation. You have all these fabricated hadiths that came afterwards, but not fabricated qurans.
@Ahmad Shaikh So apparently, hadiths were collected by a few companions but then Umar ibn Khattab instructed them to be burned due to fear of mixing up with Gods words. But then hadiths were later instructed to be written down during the late ummayad and early abasid period, which would place them in the 8th century. These were during political strife so you can imagine the motivations to fabricate hadiths in favour of one party over another. Because of this, I dont think you can exactly compare the Quran with hadiths in terms of reliability. E.g., if someone cites me a passage from the Quran, I'm not going to ask him which narrator said this. In general, I dont think there was much of a debate about the quranic recitation, although I'll admit, I dont know much about the history of the quran and you do have anti-Muslims exclaiming the Quran isnt reliable either. With that said, I'm also not saying that the hadith are unreliable. I understand that muslim scholars tried their best to sift out the bad from the good. Hadiths do play an important part of the muslim lifestyle b/c they contain wisdom and guidance.
zaynab and Islamhater:Muhammad married adopted sons wife? zayed was salve, Muhammad freed him take him as adopted son and give marriage him with zaynab,Muhammad also gave marriage gift,,, but zaynab cant continue her marriage with him because zaynab was quraish and mismatch with zayed,, when zayed told Muhammad that he cant continue with zaynab then Muhammad told him not to be divorced, but though Muhammad loved zaynab, so Allah revealed his love,, and then after divorce Muhammad sent her request of marriage through zayed and zaynab prayed sothat Allah sent a ayat for her about her marriage with Muhammad,,, Allah didnt abolish child adoption, Allah clear that adopted son is not anyone’s own son, in married life zaynab tell ayesha with pleased that Allah sent a ayat mentioning her name,, if Muhammad had lust on zaynab why he gave marriage his son zayed to zaynab,,rather he could marry zaynab,, but he loved his adopted son zayed so he give marriage his with zainab,,, one thing was zayed was a black slave in his first life but then Muhammad freed him and take him as adopted son and give marriage to zaynab who was quraish,, so a girl from quraish cant continue her marriage life with zayed who was black slave,,, but Muhammad also loved zayed no matter he black or not Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said: وَإِذْ تَقُولُ لِلَّذِىٓ أَنْعَمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَأَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ وَاتَّقِ اللَّهَ وَتُخْفِى فِى نَفْسِكَ مَا اللَّهُ مُبْدِيهِ وَتَخْشَى النَّاسَ وَاللَّهُ أَحَقُّ أَنْ تَخْشٰىهُ ۖ فَلَمَّا قَضٰى زَيْدٌ مِّنْهَا وَطَرًا زَوَّجْنٰكَهَا لِكَىْ لَا يَكُونَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ فِىٓ أَزْوٰجِ أَدْعِيَآئِهِمْ إِذَا قَضَوْا مِنْهُنَّ وَطَرًا ۚ وَكَانَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ مَفْعُولًا "And [remember, O Muhammad], when you said to the one on whom Allah bestowed favor and you bestowed favor, Keep your wife and fear Allah, while you concealed within yourself that which Allah is to disclose. And you feared the people, while Allah has more right that you fear Him. So when Zayd had no longer any need for her, We married her to you in order that there not be upon the believers any discomfort concerning the wives of their adopted sons when they no longer have need of them. And ever is the command of Allah accomplished." (QS. Al-Ahzaab 33: Verse 37)
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته يا اخونا، عساك بخير و في صحة و عافية. كان عندي سؤال عن الشيخ ربيع المدخلي، و قلت خليني اسألك عشانك ذكرته في احد فيديوهاتك. سؤالي هي ايش رأي العلماء فيه، و ايش منهجه عشان دائما نسمع كلمة مدخلي تطلق في الغرب بشكل سلبي. الي اعرفه ان الشيخ كان يمسح الارض بالإخوان في ايامه، و لكن تلامذته تعصبوا على الناس و صار عندهم انحراف و بدؤو يشددوا على الناس، و تجد كثير منهم في الغرب و يسمون انفسهم سلفيين، و لكن تجدهم متشددين. بس الزبدة، ايش رأي العلماء فيه (علماء الخليج اقصد)، و ايش منهجه و كيف اختلف مع بقية العلماء و لماذا سمي فرقة خاصة بإسمه. و شكرا على القصة المشوقة، و الله يبارك فيك و ينفع بك الامة و المسلمين و تقبل الله منا و منكم شهر رمضان.
HOW TO LEARN ARABIC LANGUAGE and Also from Online for Free kindly HELP brother and i am learning Basic of Arabic language for free from FreeQuranEducation CZcams channel
@@Hello-vz1md It's great that you are learning Arabic, a difficult but beautiful language that will help you understand Islam better. Good luck and may Allah bless you.
Assalamualaikum bro Farid this group in USA they have you tube channel D muslims lead by Hamzah Abdul Malik ....they have madrasahbin Indonesia Ad Zaytun
In fact the second way of recitation is the correct one, the Roman were victorius!. The first contact Muslim army against the Roman occured in September 629AD where the muslim army moved north with rocky hills of Moab on their left, not too long after they crossed the lower foothills of the mountain suddenly they found themselves in the presence of Roman army 3x larger, estimated 10 thousand strong of Byzantine soldiers. Inexperience Muslim army were trapped! The Muslim defeated, the Roman was victorius. The exact location of Mu'tah battle is a small plain near a village of Mota (Mu'tah) located what is today southern Jordan. In the summer 636AD, the battle of Yarmuk, lasted 6 days near the Yarmuk river. The battle regarded as one of the most decisive victory for the Muslim army. This was a complete victory for the muslim which took place 7 years after an embarrassing loss in the first contact at a battle of Mu'tah, a fulfillment of prophecy Quran 30:4.
A Muslim who is logical would reject some Hadith which the scholars call authentic. There’s Hadith which go against the Quran and science. The prophets people rejected Hadith which they felt didn’t sound right that weren’t logical.
This is also ridiculous as we already have Qur'an!! Which is the guidance! So why are we wasting time trying to work out which hadiths are authentic? Allah describes Qur'an as Ahsanal hadith, the best hadith so there's no reason to acknowledge anything outside of Qur'an. Anything from outside of it is not guidance from Allah.
@@darfvaderr2191 Alright Prove your point by explaining the 5 Times Daily Salaah using only Ayats of the Quran because the implications of saying that if it is not in the Quran than it is not part of Islam, implies that Salaah is not binding 5 Times Daily as The Quran does not mention the number 5. By saying that every detail of Islam, is in the Quran and no detail is excluded the implication is that A person claiming to be A Muslim can Perform Salaah any number of times that he wants including just two to three times and his Salaah is Valid. It also implies that A person claiming to be A Muslim can perform each Salaah with only One Rakaat each on the Basis that the Quran doesn't mention the Number of Rakaats in each Salaah, it also implies that He can Recite whatever he wants on the Basis that Reciting Surah Fatiha in each Rakaat is never mentioned in the Quran . It also means that he can end the Salaah anyway he wants such as Ending it making Sujood rather than the sitting position as that is also not mentioned in the Quran and I won't even get to leaving out all aspects of The Hajj that is not mentioned in The Quran. The point I'm making is that at no period in Islam's History from the compilation of the Quran to the Modern time has it been stated by Muslims that Islam excluded The Example of the Messenger Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam- and anyone who says otherwise must provide evidence proving that the Earliest Muslims only included details mentioned in the Quran while leaving out details mentioned in the Hadith.
Throughout history both have been classified as 💯% authentic. But because of what is contained in several narrations ,Muslims are slowly rejecting them. Some narrations do destroy the reputation of Mohammad.
@@Guyanababoo217 depends on what type of hadith you're referring to, and yes the weak (ضعيف حديث) contain some lie and contradictions but not the authentic a.k.a sahih hadith, its doesnt contradict itself when put into context. Brother in isalm, If you disagree am opened to refute your arguments
@@taimur74 Say what you want but it's great to see that people are starting to follow the Sunnah of Allah only. Means many people are starting to reject falsehoods and fabrications that have been woven into Islam by the enemies of the prophet.
I have a feeling you probably pushed him out of Islam altogether instead of getting him to accept the Ahadeeth. 😑 You could have proven him wrong using the Quran itself. 🤷♂️
@Abd Al-Razzaq Your suggestion that the Sunnah is contaminated with fabricated ahaadeeth is not valid, because the scholars of this ummah took the utmost care to purify the Sunnah from all alien elements. If they had any doubts about the truthfulness of any narrator, or there was the slightest possibility that he could have forgotten something, this would be sufficient grounds for rejecting a hadeeth. Even the enemies of this ummah have stated that no other nation has paid so much attention to examining its reports and their narrators, especially in the case of reports narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). For it to be obligatory to follow a hadeeth, it is sufficient for it to be known that it is a saheeh (authentic, sound) hadeeth narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was content to convey his message by sending just one of his Companions, which proves that the hadeeth reported by one trustworthy person must be followed. Moreover, we would ask these people: where are the aayaat which tell us how to pray, or which tell us that the obligatory prayers are five times daily, or which tell us about the nisaab on various kinds of wealth for the purpose of zakaah, or about the details of the rituals of Hajj, and other rulings which we can only know from the Sunnah? Al-Mawsooah al-Fiqhiyyah, 1/44 Al-Tirmidhi reported from Abu Raafi’ and others that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “I do not want to see any one of you reclining on his couch and, when he hears of my instructions or prohibitions, saying ‘I don’t accept it; we didn’t find any such thing in the Book of Allaah.’” Abu ‘Eesaa said: This is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. (See Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Shaakir edition, no. 2663). Al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, reported that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Would any of you think, reclining on his couch, that Allaah would only describe what is forbidden in the Qur’aan? I tell you, by Allaah, that I have warned and commanded and prohibited things that are as important as what is in the Qur’aan, if not more so.” (Reported by Abu Dawud, Kitaab al-Khiraj wa’l-imaarah wa’l-fay’). (b) Abu Dawud also reported from al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, that “the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) led us in prayer one day, then he turned to us and exhorted us strongly . . . (he said), ‘Pay attention to my sunnah (way) and the way of the Rightly-guided Khaleefahs after me, adhere to it and hold fast to it.’” (Saheeh Abi Dawud, Kitaab al-Sunnah). (3) The scholars’ consensus (ijmaa’) affirming the importance of the Sunnah. Al-Shaafi’i, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: “I do not know of anyone among the Sahaabah and Taabi’een who narrated a report from the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) without accepting it, adhering to it and affirming that this was sunnah. Those who came after the Taabi’een, and those whom we met did likewise: they all accepted the reports and took them to be sunnah, praising those who followed them and criticizing those who went against them. Whoever deviated from this path would be regarded by us as having deviated from the way of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the scholars who followed them, and would be considered as one of the ignorant. (4) Common sense indicates the importance of the Sunnah. The fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) is the Messenger of Allaah indicates that we must believe everything he said and obey every command he gave. It goes without saying that he has told us things and given instructions in addition to what is in the Qur’aan. It is futile to make a distinction between the Sunnah and the Qur’aan when it comes to adhering to it and responding to it. It is obligatory to believe in what he has told us, and to obey his instructions. The ruling concerning those who deny the importance of the Sunnah is that they are kaafirs, because they deny and reject a well-known and undeniable part of the religion.
Your suggestion that the Sunnah is contaminated with fabricated ahaadeeth is not valid, because the scholars of this ummah took the utmost care to purify the Sunnah from all alien elements. If they had any doubts about the truthfulness of any narrator, or there was the slightest possibility that he could have forgotten something, this would be sufficient grounds for rejecting a hadeeth. Even the enemies of this ummah have stated that no other nation has paid so much attention to examining its reports and their narrators, especially in the case of reports narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). For it to be obligatory to follow a hadeeth, it is sufficient for it to be known that it is a saheeh (authentic, sound) hadeeth narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was content to convey his message by sending just one of his Companions, which proves that the hadeeth reported by one trustworthy person must be followed. Moreover, we would ask these people: where are the aayaat which tell us how to pray, or which tell us that the obligatory prayers are five times daily, or which tell us about the nisaab on various kinds of wealth for the purpose of zakaah, or about the details of the rituals of Hajj, and other rulings which we can only know from the Sunnah? Al-Mawsooah al-Fiqhiyyah, 1/44 Al-Tirmidhi reported from Abu Raafi’ and others that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “I do not want to see any one of you reclining on his couch and, when he hears of my instructions or prohibitions, saying ‘I don’t accept it; we didn’t find any such thing in the Book of Allaah.’” Abu ‘Eesaa said: This is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. (See Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Shaakir edition, no. 2663). Al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, reported that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Would any of you think, reclining on his couch, that Allaah would only describe what is forbidden in the Qur’aan? I tell you, by Allaah, that I have warned and commanded and prohibited things that are as important as what is in the Qur’aan, if not more so.” (Reported by Abu Dawud, Kitaab al-Khiraj wa’l-imaarah wa’l-fay’). (b) Abu Dawud also reported from al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, that “the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) led us in prayer one day, then he turned to us and exhorted us strongly . . . (he said), ‘Pay attention to my sunnah (way) and the way of the Rightly-guided Khaleefahs after me, adhere to it and hold fast to it.’” (Saheeh Abi Dawud, Kitaab al-Sunnah). (3) The scholars’ consensus (ijmaa’) affirming the importance of the Sunnah. Al-Shaafi’i, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: “I do not know of anyone among the Sahaabah and Taabi’een who narrated a report from the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) without accepting it, adhering to it and affirming that this was sunnah. Those who came after the Taabi’een, and those whom we met did likewise: they all accepted the reports and took them to be sunnah, praising those who followed them and criticizing those who went against them. Whoever deviated from this path would be regarded by us as having deviated from the way of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the scholars who followed them, and would be considered as one of the ignorant. (4) Common sense indicates the importance of the Sunnah. The fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) is the Messenger of Allaah indicates that we must believe everything he said and obey every command he gave. It goes without saying that he has told us things and given instructions in addition to what is in the Qur’aan. It is futile to make a distinction between the Sunnah and the Qur’aan when it comes to adhering to it and responding to it. It is obligatory to believe in what he has told us, and to obey his instructions. The ruling concerning those who deny the importance of the Sunnah is that they are kaafirs, because they deny and reject a well-known and undeniable part of the religion.
what does farid think?..does he suppport omar sulaimans views. he seems to hush. if its clearly wrong, there wont be any hesitation from scholars or imams, and influentials.
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](/img/n.gif)
Brother Farid: I'ma just put this book upside down to avoid making any unnecessary commotion.
Le Random Hadith Rejector: Hold my weak arguments
I dont reject all hadith. Just the fake ones. My favourite Is the one where Rasul Allah orders NOT write hadith. Lol
@Anon Ymous ur a christian,, dont talk about Islam 😡😠
@@slavemariyakibtia2666 they are jealous and ashamed that books written by paul and friends don't even have any isnad, nobody even knows who wrote them lol
@@jxcess3891 what is wrong with the Hadith?
@@jxcess3891
Remember the hadith are a secondary source, it may or may not be authentic. However I have a verse from your bible, your primary source.
Genesis 38
7 Judah got a wife for Er, his firstborn, and her name was Tamar.7But Er, Judah's firstborn, was wicked in the LORD's sight; so the LORD put him to death.
8 Then Judah said to Onan, "Lie with your brother's wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to produce offspring for your brother."
9 But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so whenever he lay with his brother's wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from producing offspring for his brother.
10 What he did was wicked in Lord Jesus' sight; so he put him to death also.
So after a man dies the brother can sleep with his wife. That's his religious duty. Lol. Crikey!
I was busy with Sahoor so sorry I missed this. Genius the way you handled the discussion with that hadith rejector! 👍
Please accept me as a student, Imam.
No issues. You can travel back in time.
Eid mubarak imam 👋
@@ilyasmir6990 the imam never died
@GuruTruthSpeak
The only person in the world who can teach you that is CP!!!
Subhanallah, im a recent revert and just 20 minutes ago, i saw that there are mulitple versions of the Quran due to the inclusion of these extra marks. It put a small amount of doubt in my mind (not much but it slightly fractured my view and i questioned the Quran for a second) this is the first video i opened and it has already answered my questions and doubts, without me even trying to have it answered right now. Glory to Allah
Salam, Jack. Welcome to the family. Do watch my playlist about the Quran. You'll find some videos that should be beneficial.
On reddit there is a community called r/Quraniyoon. Someone posted your video there and from what I read, I think that they believe that there is only one Qira’a which doesn’t make any sense.
The problem with them, is that it is harder to convince them than atheists. If you prove to them that they’re wrong, they might convert to another religion or stop believing in God because they are so convinced that Bukhari is a liar and that the method of transmission can’t be trusted.
May Allah guid them
Abd Al-Razzaq if there is only one qira’a, then which qira’a is the true one?
JazakAllah khair brother this video is full of tremendous benefit.
Salam alaykom
Honestly Bro Farid, it’s so weird to have less than 13K subscribers. May Allah open every closed gate for you and ease your path in Shaa Allah
Subscribes are increasing, Alhamdulillah
Allah blessed you with an amazing refutation against this rejectionist
missed you bro... update regularly if possible
He said he would slow down during Ramadan
Well, you're in luck! Ramadan is almost over which means Farid will go back to his regular upload schedule, inshallah!
@@lemonke3774 Inshallah, but it's also saddening
no hadith is no Quran, easiest verse to refute them,
Quran 6 :89 - They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) who are not disbelievers therein.
Haven't talked to a lot of Hadith deniers, but those I have often ask stuff like, "What if they fabricated something and no one else knew?", "What if only one person knew it?" To which I simply respond, there are literally specific terminologies for hadith with only one chain, hadith with an unreliable narrator, hadith with multiple chain, hadith that are a bit different but have similar meaning. They ask as if those things haven't been taken into account when they totally have and hence even have different grades of ahadith.
The best question to pose them is whether they ever studied usool al hadith. Most of the time the answer will be no. You can end your discussion there.
Does a biologist argue regarding biology with someone who never even studied it? Seems like a waste of time, doesn't it.
I have one principle these days: don't argue with people who don't know Arabic. It saves a lot of time
@@MiroMayne which ayah was the usool in? Which ayah says you must have a huge book case with hundreds of books to "function as a muslim"
Actually where is the hadith regarding usool and muftis and fatwas?
@@MiroMayne another one is actually ask them *why* they reject it. They'll have pretty bad time giving valid reasons
@@jxcess3891 yes because Jesus was suckled and breasfed by Mary
The first time I met a hadith rejecter was about 15 years ago while praying maghrib jama'ah in a Masjid. This guy decided to pray separately than the jama'ah. When my friend next to me told him to come closer and connect the feet and shoulder, he refused. After the salah was finished, he started to explain why. He claimed not to believe in Hadith. Man, was he was the weirdest person(aside from a gay sikh revert) Muslim I ever met. He was spewing ayaat after ayaat and making connections with them to formulate something I couldn't grasp. My friend and I couldn't even follow the connection he was making. He spoke straight for like almost 10 minutes prolly reciting over 20 ayaat from different parts of the Qur'an. He had a British accent as well. Wonder if it was the same guy. Seems like he was prepared for it. After he spoke, my friend was like ok salam alaikum. We simply had no idea where to start discussing with such a guy like him. Never ever met someone like him in the past. Btw, he seemed like someone from the Indian sub-continent. So that added more of a twist.
To a foot to foot salafi, I cant see how anyone can speak to you with logic and reason. But I will assume you believe in the Quran. Here are 2 verses he may have recited: 31.6 and 77.50. Both have the word Hadith in them. There are many others. Read those and the surrounding ayah for now. Inshallah the deen will start to be more logical and reasonable for you. As Allah intended.
"Spewing ayat after ayat" ? Which Muslim would refer to the ayats of Quran being spewed out. You anti quranist have zero respect for the Quran.
@@user-bu9mh9zh1h yes this is how they speak. Like using the ayah as an argument is illogical.. spiritually speaking using anything else is shirk.
@Abu mujaddid no need to get hung up on culture and sexual orientation. This is what ruined Islam and not what it stands for. Culture and tradition are nothing in the aaaakhirah
@@c5quared626 I have coined a term for them now . Anti Quranist. Just as they called us Hadith Rejectors.
Tks brother Farid for allaying whatever doubts mufti a.b.l put in me. May Allah reward you.
إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ سَوَآءٌ عَلَيْهِمْ ءَأَنذَرْتَهُمْ أَمْ لَمْ تُنذِرْهُمْ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ
Indeed, those who disbelieve - it is all the same for them whether you warn them or do not warn them - they will not believe. (quran 2:6)
Mashallah brother may Allah bless you for what your doing. I think you and all the other Muslims youtubers mohammed hijab etc should start a series together like the one with cp and apostate but really goes in depth about who these people are there intentions etc and guy tackling and exposing these people who constantly lie. At the moment David wood is the biggest one with the most views whos constantly lying and misguiding Muslims who haven't studied the deen properly and don't know how to refute them and get easily manipulated and misguided. Salamwalakum hope you have a blessed ramadan and eid.
They already knows our questions, so they memorized weird, complication answers. If you are an average Muslim, you might fall for it. Surprise them with a new questions like Farid did.
Well, said my brother.
I'm really worried about average Muslims who are not aware of this..
They are in high risk😓
This channel is precious
@hadith rejectors:
here are some verses about obeying the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him), so you cannot absolutely deny that we are commanded to obey him
1)
*"Say Obey Allah and the Messenger. But if they turn away, then Allah does not like the disbelievers"* [Quran 3:32]
2)
*"And whoso obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad) then they will be in the company of those on whom Allah has bestowed His Grace, of the Prophets, the Siddiqun (those followers of the Prophets who were first and foremost to believe in them, like Abu Bakr As-Siddiq the martyrs, and the righteous. And how excellent these companions are!"* [Quran 4:69]
3)
*"They ask you (O Muhammad)about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allah and the Messenger.” So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers"* [Quran 8:1]
4)
*"O you who believe! Obey Allah and His Messenger, and turn not away from him (i.e. Messenger Muhammad) while you are hearing"* [Quran 8:20]
5)
*"The believers, men and women, are Auliya’ (helpers, supporters, friends, protectors) of one another; they enjoin (on the people) Al-Ma’ruf (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do), and forbid (people) from Al-Munkar (i.e. polytheism and disbelief of all kinds, and all that Islam has forbidden); they perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and give the Zakat, and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah will have His Mercy on them. Surely Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise"* [Quran 9:71]
6)
*"He who obeys the Messenger has indeed obeyed Allah, but he who turns away, then we have not sent you as a watcher over them"* [Quran 4:80]
so at this point, the fact that we (muslims) are commanded to obey the messenger (may peace be upon him) is pretty much heavily established in the quran.
why would the quran tell us multiple times that we need to obey him (may peace be upon him)?
how would we (the ummah) obey him (may peace be upon him)?
in order to obey him (may peace be upon him), we would need to know his teachings in the first place, wouldn't we? so that leads us to the hadith, the actions and sayings of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him).
now, my issue with people who only read from the quran and not the hadith is the following verse:
*"O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad, pbuh), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination"* [Quran 4:59]
this verse tells us clearly that we refer to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) and the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) when we differ amongst ourselves.
how do we refer to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ)? we use the quran
how do we refer to the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him)? through his teachings. and let me emphasise again, his teachings is in the Hadiths
this verse also points out that we can't just freely determine what each verse means just like that. we need to understand the verses. and so, wouldn't it make sense to refer to both the quran and hadith seeing the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) is the prophet who preached these verses to us? if we ONLY used quran, we wouldn't be referring to the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) at all for any of the verses, and would end up freely interpreting the verses. how do you expect do understand the context of the verses without the hadith in the first place?
to top all this up, the quran says that the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) preaches to us what is halal and haram in this verse:
*"Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in what they have of the Torah and the Gospel, who enjoins upon them what is right and forbids them what is wrong and makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the evil and relieves them of their burden and the shackles which were upon them. So they who have believed in him, honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him - it is those who will be the successful"* [Quran 7:157]
how do you know what the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) has revealed what is haram and halal? through his teachings.
to further prove that the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) was sent to explain the quran is in these verses:
*"With clear signs and Books (We sent the Messengers). And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad SAW) the reminder and the advice (the Quran), that you may explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought"* [Quran 16:44]
what do you think this verse means when it says "explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought"???? it can't get anymore clear than this.
furthermore:
*"And We have not sent down the Book (the Quran) to you (O Muhammad SAW), except that you may explain clearly unto them those things in which they differ, and (as) a guidance and a mercy for a folk who believe"* [Quran 16:64]
so this leads me to a question:
WHERE do you expect to see the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him)???
the quran is the word of ALLAH (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ), and the hadith is the actions and sayings of the PROPHET MUHAMMAD (may peace be upon him)!!!
fr ask urself, if we don't need to know the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him), then why didn't Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) just give the whole quran to those arabs and tell them that's all they need to understand the quran? why was the quran revealed over 23 years, with the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) explaining it???
*"[We sent them] with clear proofs and written ordinances. And We revealed to you the message that YOU MAY MAKE CLEAR to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought."* [16:44]
this verse states that explanation of the quran OUTSIDE of the quran is VALID, and specifically valid if it comes from the PROPHET MUHAMMAD (MAY PEACE BE UPON HIM)
so if Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) HIMSELF says that Muhammad's (may peace be upon him) explanation is valid, then the AUTHENTIC HADITHS ARE VALID.
the same people who gave us the hadith are the same people who compiled the quran into a book through memory
that's how the quran was originally preserved, by memorisation and scribes. when it was turned into a book was after the passing of the prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him). and how did they turn it into a book? by recollection of memory, as well as the scribes but not the scribes alone
so, you can accept the quran but will deny hadiths from the same people who passed down the quran?
mutawatir sahih hadiths were written down and mostly preserved via memory by the same people who preserved the quran through memory. these weren't different people, yet you reject these people who compiled the quran into a book?
may Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ) guide us
JazakAllah Khair brother it's sad there's so many Prophecies that Muhammad made and came true watch THE FORBIDDEN PROPHECIES for any Muslim to reject this is equivalent to Kufr
Well said
jxcess3891 are you Hadith rejector? Btw some hadiths are fabricated others aren’t
@@jxcess3891 yes i do what's wrong with it?.
@@ultimatetruth9241
are you familiar with what the term "right hand possess" in the quran?
"And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your *right hands possess* . [This is] the decree of Allah upon you. And lawful to you are [all others] beyond these, [provided] that you seek them [in marriage] with [gifts from] your property, desiring chastity, not unlawful sexual intercourse. So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. And there is no blame upon you for what you mutually agree to beyond the obligation. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise" [4:24]
im sure those women in that hadith were basically is what the right hand possess (concubines). the only way you can obtain a concubine is through war.
By rejecting Hadith ALL TOGETHER your Also rejecting the Seerah of the Prophet because Hadiths are snapshots of the Seerah so using this logic we don't Know who Muhammad PBUH was All we know is the Quran, WE DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN ARABIA DURING HIS LIFE NOTHING
@Anon Ymous by that your contradicting the Ayat of Quran Surah Al Qalam Ayat 4: And verily, you (O Muhammad ) are on an exalted standard of character. Using your logic how do we know who he really was since He was the Last Prophet???? Quran says multiple places OBEY THE MESSENGER And in Surah Nisa 4:59 O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result
So How do we refer back to the Messenger if the Hadiths are false????
@Abd Al-Razzaq and the Quran itself* The Hadith gives us context on when the ayats we're revealed without it some ayats don't make sense ex. Surah Al Masad without Hadith we don't know what the Surah is talking about or the background on what's going on or why it was revealed
@@islamicdefender2941 There was a hadith narrated by Aisha ra, where she said the prophet was the Quran in his action, so his character would be literally following the Quran.
But Allahu 3alam tbh.
They also say the first Caliphas didn't like hadiths, and that Judges didn't use hadiths for jurisprudence, and that they are hearsay.
To be real, i'm still battling this stuff.
The Quran has more detail on how to establish salat than i thought tho, a brother compiled many ayat and did a Quranic prayer and he got it quite close to what we do, without using hadiths... in fact another hadith narrated by Aisha ra states the prayers were sets of 2 and later they got incremented in rakat, and the brother got that there are two rakat in every salat using the Quran alone.
But Allahu 3alam brother.
I think we should follow the Quran, and the rest is debatable.
But takfiring someone without right is as dangerous as what some do with the Quran, reading metaphores when the verses are clearly literal... if you get me... that's wrong.
Especially when we have this:
5:69
إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ وَٱلَّذِينَ هَادُوا۟ وَٱلصَّـٰبِـُٔونَ وَٱلنَّصَـٰرَىٰ مَنْ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْـَٔاخِرِ وَعَمِلَ صَـٰلِحًۭا فَلَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ ٦٩
Indeed, the believers, Jews, Sabians and Christians-whoever ˹truly˺ believes in Allah and the Last Day and does good, there will be no fear for them, nor will they grieve.
- Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran
(And the verse about Islam means that, submission, whoever seeks other than submission as his way it won't be accepted from him/her, but if you interpret submission to mean sunnism then that's exactly what Allah says is "wishful thinking" or desires)
2:111
وَقَالُوا۟ لَن يَدْخُلَ ٱلْجَنَّةَ إِلَّا مَن كَانَ هُودًا أَوْ نَصَـٰرَىٰ ۗ تِلْكَ أَمَانِيُّهُمْ ۗ قُلْ هَاتُوا۟ بُرْهَـٰنَكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ صَـٰدِقِينَ ١١١
The Jews and Christians (((and many other sects))) each claim that none will enter Paradise except those of their own faith. These are their desires. Reply, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Show ˹me˺ your proof if what you say is true.”
- Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran
2:112
بَلَىٰ مَنْ أَسْلَمَ وَجْهَهُۥ لِلَّهِ وَهُوَ مُحْسِنٌۭ فَلَهُۥٓ أَجْرُهُۥ عِندَ رَبِّهِۦ وَلَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ ١١٢
But no! Whoever submits themselves to Allah and does good will have their reward with their Lord. And there will be no fear for them, nor will they grieve.
- Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran
Assalamu alaikum
Great work brother. I always pose to them to explain sura al fil (elephant) for me as they all interrupt it so differently. But with Hadith it gives you all the understanding clear as day
Circumstances made me who I am like i said people have different views on different suras without the context and hadith has alot of context not all but alot. Hence why i used sura al fil as if you just read it without knowledge on it you could explain it many ways. Hadith clarify this and hadith is from Muhammed pbuh the same man that brought you Quran so its not complicated. Remember who brought you the quran, Muhammad transmitted through to shahaba who transmited it into book form. Same as hadith.
Circumstances made me who I am so history is ok but hadiths are not!? So believing in historians is ok but not the shahaba i get you stance. Everyone can have their own opinions. But yours is a pretty weak with one from that statement you just made.
Circumstances made me who I am without hadiths you have no knowledge of islamic history as you have already concluded. I think your just struggling in the whole concept of hadiths and the way they were preserved through time. The science to hadiths are astonishingly amazing, just as the quran came from the same people that complied them, you believe these people to be liers or decieving but the fact is they came from the same people that brought the quran. You can send me verses but me going through them is not going to confirm to you that there correct as you already have your back to the wall regarding these issues. Theres many many more issues we could go through all day along regarding these issues. eid mubarak and may allah bless us all inshallah
@@Guyanababoo217 I agree with a lot of what you said. In fact, isn't it better if we take a more Qur'an centric position than to over-rely on Hadith? I will add on if I can.
Salamun alaikum, eid mubarak
Circumstances made me who I am you keep talking about people being illogical when you’re the illogical one yourself. You found some contradictory hadith so you conclude that all hadith are untrustworthy. You wouldn’t apply this level of skepticism to anything else except the Hadith. I’ll have you know, that the reason there are contradictory hadith and hadith that go against the Qur’an is because they were made to be that way by the Abassids. The Abassids destroyed all the previous hadith books and instead forced the hadith authors at the time to compile books with supervision from the political black hand. So that’s why you will see hadith in the SAME book that contradict one another. The compilers weren’t stupid, they were under pressure to fabricate hadith otherwise the books would never have been allowed to be made.
You’re just one side of the extreme. You have fanatics who believe that ALL hadith no matter what are authentic if they come from an authentic source regardless if they clearly contradict the Qur’an and then there are people like you who reject ALL hadith even if they compliment the Qur’an. Both extremes are wrong. We must take a moderate approach and a Qur’an centric approach concerning hadith.
Good video bro. Thank you! 👍👍👍🔥🔥🔥
Yes, a very simple question is very effective to make someone to start thinking..
May Allah gives us a wisdom to spread truth.
"أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِى حَآجَّ إِبْرَٰهِۦمَ فِى رَبِّهِۦٓ أَنْ ءَاتَىٰهُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلْمُلْكَ إِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَٰهِۦمُ رَبِّىَ ٱلَّذِى يُحْىِۦ وَيُمِيتُ قَالَ أَنَا۠ أُحْىِۦ وَأُمِيتُ قَالَ إِبْرَٰهِۦمُ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأْتِى بِٱلشَّمْسِ مِنَ ٱلْمَشْرِقِ فَأْتِ بِهَا مِنَ ٱلْمَغْرِبِ فَبُهِتَ ٱلَّذِى كَفَرَ وَٱللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِى ٱلْقَوْمَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ" Al-Baqara (2:258)
"Have you not considered the one who argued with Abraham about his Lord [merely] because Allah had given him kingship? When Abraham said, "My Lord is the one who gives life and causes death," he said, "I give life and cause death." Abraham said, "Indeed, Allah brings up the sun from the east, so bring it up from the west." So the disbeliever was overwhelmed [by astonishment], and Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people." Al-Baqara (2:258)
As a CP fan, I have no such problems, because we only accept the hadiths of Imam Murrah.
Wtf are you doing here? This video isn’t even related to you Cp fans
@@carljohnson2194 My friend, there are two kinds of people in the world - those who care about the great writings and texts of the past, and those who don't. I watch both channels. The reality is, people generally increase their knowledge by watching all dedicated serious debates and discussions. Unlike many CP followers, I like Farid and I like Muslims. He doesn't need to be 'right,' he needs to be learned for me to watch him, and he often is. Muslims' devotion is not in question in my mind. Neither is their sincerity.
And besides which, there is SO MUCH rubbish talked about and debated all over the world these days - do you not realize you are participating in the greatest intellectual argument of our times? We should all be grateful just to be here, and listen to all sides.
John Ward so you are not actually a Christian?
@@carljohnson2194 Depends what you mean 'Christian...' lol
Jesus Christ's ancestors were Joseph, the chief adviser to the Egyptian king, and his wife Asaneith, the Graeco-Egyptian priestess of Neith (Athene) in the court of the Pharaoh. Which makes Jesus Christ a Greek-Egyptian in substantial part and a high aristocrat at that. He and his mother spent fourteen years at 'the mansion of his Uncle, Cleophas, in Egypt; this would be the same kind of thing as if I said I spent fourteen years in a mansion in Mayfair, London which belonged to my uncle 'Mr Windsor...'
The Romans FEARED some claim to kingship by Jesus at the specific time and tried him for that charge - Jesus was there within 60 - 40 years of the life of Julius Caesar, whom the Romans had committed the patricide of (murdered), and who everyone knows, including all academic historians without exception, had a son by Cleopatra, the very last regent of Egypt.
Jesus was NEVER king OF the House of Judah, he was king OVER Judah at the time according to law...
So what do I think?
I think all of you, Muslims and Christians alike have it all f*d up massively and are avoiding going after the main game - WHO killed the legitimate heir to the throne of Egypt and Rome? And why do people to this day seek to obscure this issue, the attachment of blame to those to whom it must be held responsible, and the restoration of a legitimate kingship of any mind of so-called 'Sacred Throne' which is what people called the line of Theuth (Dawud in the Arabic, David in the Hebrew) without which there is no legitimacy to ANY rulership on this planet anywhere that claims line of descent through the civilizations of Greece, Rome, and even London, where let's face it, they too committed the regicide of their own real king Charles I.
This is the true meaning of 'kufr;' namely, those who COVER UP MURDERS.
It started with Cain killing Abel, and it hasn't stopped since.
Both 'sides' (not to even bother mentioning the ludicrous Hebrew religion and ideology) are riddled with fabricated stories and filled with third-hand mischief designed to keep you all ignorant and your arrogant and petty little heads filled with confused simplistic gibberish taking any chance of understanding away from you.
Your leaders spend atrocious amounts of time and money talking nonsense that can add not one single second onto your life, not one hair onto your head, nor open one single narrow doorway to the heaven that you claim to seek.
While you live, your ego arrogance takes you ever and ever further away from understanding, and on your deathbed, well, you expire, and your soul flies about twittering like a pathetic little bat in a darkened cave from which there is no escape. Is there only one god, or three gods? Or three gods in one God? And nine gods in Egypt and 33 million officially in India?
One god, but his messenger killed people...
Or one of Three Gods, but that one was killed by ordinary people, and then went away so we can't ask him any questions...
You are confused, all of you.
Bring me a glass of water, I won't turn it into wine for you, but I do need to drink it for the heat from all of your stupidity.
And no, I am not an atheist.
You are all pathetic.
You argue about things you don't know the first thing about.
God is POWER, powerful, and GOOD. He kills no one and desires no one's death. But YOU live in death, and you seek it, and you desire it, and you do it, every day in every thing you say and think and do.
You - the human - have death residing in you, and you are in love with it. You have ignorance living in you and you are in love with it.
I am not your savior, and moreover, I will not save you. Save yourselves. If you can.
Let your Muhammad from the punishment of the grave, save you, if he can. Let your Quran, save you, if it can. All dead things. Dead, dead, dead. Command them to stand and walk. If you can. Call to them to help you, if they will answer you.
You think you are honest and sincere, devoted to God. But you are lying to yourself.
Don't ask me who my God is. I will not tell you.
Here 2 more :غليت الروم
I boiled the Romans
The Romans were boiled
علبت الروم
I canned the romans
The romans were canned
Or the romans boiled.
Or I made the romans boil.
Assalaamu alaikum I have got a question. Is Jewish god hashem and Allah the same god?
@@carljohnson2194 alaikom assalam we can say that he is the same God who sent Moses, David, Jacob, and all the prophets, peace be upon them, but we cannot equate them in the attributes. The Jewish god regrets and makes mistakes, and he is afraid of Adam to eat from the tree of eternity and many other deficient characteristics. These attributes cannot Be in God Almighty ALLAH.
Luffy Dono so their god is different from us? And what about Christian god?
Loved these
I had several dialogues with Quranists who rejecting ritual solat. Then I asked them how Rasulullah established his prayers which has been mentioned in 49 verses in Al-Quran. Since most of the QUranists like to list all the berses, I also lists all the 49 verses' number here, too.
May Allah guides us all.
Al-Baqara (2:3,43,83,110,125,177,277)
Aal-i-Imraan (3:39)
An-Nisaa (4:77,102,103,142,162)
Al-Maaida (5:6,12,55)
Al-An'aam (6:72)
Al-A'raaf (7:170)
Al-Anfaal (8:3)
At-Tawba (9:5,11,18,71)
Yunus (10:87)
Hud (11:114)
Ar-Ra'd (13:22)
Ibrahim (14:31,37,40)
Al-Israa (17:78)
Taa-Haa (20:14)
Al-Anbiyaa (21:73)
Al-Hajj (22:35,41,78)
An-Noor (24:37,56)
An-Naml (27:3)
Al-Ankaboot (29:45)
Ar-Room (30:31)
Luqman (31:4,17)
Al-Ahzaab (33:33)
Faatir (35:18,29)
Ash-Shura (42:38)
Al-Mujaadila (58:13)
Al-Muzzammil (73:20)
Al-Bayyina (98:5)
Yo Salam farid , I think u should make response videos to ‘islam critiqued’ Cos he makes some stupid claims and his audience really thinks great of him 😂
@@jxcess3891 y'all have no other works except to support some random CZcamsrs?
@@jxcess3891 Whatever helps you sleep at night, bud.
@@jxcess3891 And also dismissing his points as "non academic crap" really shows your comprehension skills in analyzing information. Please.
For rejecting Hadith you also reject the Prophesies Muhammad PBUH made and came true which is major kufr
Which prophecy? About Mahdi the Shia? That's a joke. Even some say Dajjal is misinterpreted.
Jazakum Allah khairan
جزاك الله خيرا
@Farid Responds Ya akhee, why don't you start teaching us some basic stuff about Quran (history) and how hadith is compiled including the history of the compilers. Many of us could benefit inshaallah. Jazakallah!
@theraven900 Uh.. from Jews???
@theraven900 some day after, u will alse reject the quran anyway 😒
@@slavemariyakibtia2666 I like your name.
@theraven900 Your already reject the Quran when it says to follow the prophet.
@theraven900 😂😂😂🤣🤣 You're an idiot. Get lost.
Good stuff. That is a good way to convince someone of the isnaad authenticity
It demonstrates the fallacy of the Quranists position that the Quran is self contained and needs no other outside sources including the Prophet.
@@OriginalAndroidPhone why do we have written copies of the quran al kareem from approx hijra, when we have hadith from when? what is the oldest written copy of a hadith book you know? 300 yrs after? long time, who was your forefather from 300 years ago? was he truthful or a liar? you will probably say truthful.. such is the course of isnad and usool. if you dont like my hadith you will find a transmitter to be a liar, such is the case for most transmitters. no validity, far from the quran. the diacritical marks were engrained in qirat, while the consonants were written concurrently. lets not pretend the sanaa manuscripts were found with hadithi instructions on how to "do islam, because the quran is not intelligible" not intelligible for the idiot farsi scholars who were scared to get killed by ruthless rulership.
@@c5quared626 Lots pf problems with what you have written. (1) EVERY argument you make against the historical reliability of hadith just further undermines the Quran. Every one. This is because there is no Quranic history/authenticity without hadith. None. (2) Hadith were always a natural part of Islam from day 0. Bukhari was written around 200 yrs later, but hadith did not begin with Bukhari...
@@OriginalAndroidPhone so the letters of Umar r.a. are not a historical record? The Quran amongst the people of kufa is like the buzzing of the bees, make sure and not distract them with hadith. And he didnt threaten to beat Abu hurrairah for narrating false hadith and quotes? Esteemed Sunni scholars have acknowledged their validity, but swept them under the rug. Along with hadith, " do not write what I do". And the fact that umar and Abu bakr r.a. burned their hadith collections after hearing this. A few miscreants were able to hold on to hadith and those were corrupted soon enough. To the point where we have discrepancy in every single point. Pee sitting down or stand up? There are hadith for both, and then endless nonsense about how to justify one scholars position, everyone gets bullied into submission. Recall imam Abu hanifah died incarcerated. Why? Going against the rulers, so do we know what his thoughts really were? My theory is that he was against circulating hadith(my self and many historians believe kitab al athar is not the work of imam A.H.). Then came abrogation of the Quran with hadith, this is what imam shafi started, check the books brother. Ask your mufti.
No it's not. If you would continue reading after this ayah, it's pretty clear exactly what the reading is. Use your common sense, is that too much to ask a salafi? I guess
JazakAllah
THIS WAS AWESOME.
Did Arabs at the time of the Messenger know how to read and write Arabic and as they did how does knowing how to read a word prove that we must follow hadith?
Reading the Arabic Qur'an and reciting orally has come down through non hadith chains of narrators so this is not proving the necessity of hadith authors, just proving that hadith are casting doubt on the authenticity of the Qur'an and we need hadith to re-establish the authenticity of the Qur'an!!!!! That is the level of 'scientific' hadith transmission and understanding!
Brother..... Your beard ❤️
Ikr It’s nice 👍🏻
@@infinityApologeticsClips does your condemn lgbt?
@@infinityApologeticsClips quran does so I'm not .
@@infinityApologeticsClips the story of Lot (as) . You murtad? You didn't read the quran properly?
Riaz Qureshi Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And (remember) Loot (Lot), when he said to his people: ‘Do you commit the worst sin such as none preceding you has committed in the ‘Aalameen (mankind and jinn)?
Verily, you practise your lusts on men instead of women. Nay, but you are a people transgressing beyond bounds (by committing great sins)’”
[al-A’raaf 7:80-81]
“And (remember) Loot (Lot), when he said to his people: ‘You commit Al‑Faahishah (sodomy the worst sin) which none has preceded you in (committing) it in the ‘Aalameen (mankind and jinn)’”
[al-‘Ankaboot 29:28]
That is a very fair question to ask to anyone about any document, not just hadith rejector or about quran.
If someone doesnt really know the correct sentences or statement in a document, how can they say they understand the correct message the document try to convey?
Jzk for this share
He just gave you gish-galloping and arguments from intimidation, nothing of real substance
1.Root words are defined by the context not diacritical marks. Arabic today doesn’t even bother with diacritical marks so claiming that’s a big deal is an utter lie.
2. The Quran is not for recitation but for understanding which is what a message is for.
Always on this mystical magical Arabic nonsense.
Salam brother first i have you thank you for dealing with honey man and his approch to representing Quran stories ..i am a big fan. But i also want to thank you for this video because i am now even more adamant about being a hadith rejector and rely on Quran alone. Salam Alaykom brother.
Kinda enjoy your stories 😁😁😁
make video Against khareji shia and david wood
Go to sunni defence for his videos against shias
As salam alikum
Walaikumsalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu
I m your new subscriber bro... MashaAllah
Amazing response against that hadith rejector. Eid Mubarak! Can you please respond to people making fake testimonies of going to heaven or hell. These are mostly Christians.
Qur'anists do not realise that they only represent an insignificant minority and that Allah (swt) would never have allowed the followers of Truth to be in such a small number. Sunni Muslims represent the majority of Muslims, therefore, the majority of Muslims are on the right path.
@Mehmet Ekrem Barut
Pathetic logic, you say ? Then you're saying that Allah (swt) did not keep his promise of spreading Islam all over the world (most Muslims are Sunni) and that the Prophet (asws) did not tell the truth when he said that towards the end of times Muslims would be in great numbers (most are Sunni), albeit useless for most, and that practically all his efforts and suffering, as well as those of his supporters, were for nearly nothing, only ending up with a ridiculous number of 'true' followers ? Do you really believe that Allah (swt) will allow in Jennah an insignificant portion of humanity (prob. a few 100 000s), namely a tiny sect which doesn't even follow the teachings of the Prophet (asws), against billions in Gehennem ?
No, you're the one with the pathetic logic.
@@ilhamh4359 Perhaps you should take into account that you are quoting "Muslims would be in great numbers" instead of "Sunnis would be in great numbers"
@@ExtremeCrafter
Sunnis are the only true Muslims and they are in great numbers. Anybody who deviates from the Sunnah of the Prophet (asws) is a phony Muslim.
@@ilhamh4359 you are saying that a sect has the "true muslims"
listen to yourself
@@ExtremeCrafter
Sunnis are not a sect, they are the true Muslims, even if many nowadays are not practicing properly, and this does not make them deviant.
Not a hadith rejecter but if you read the next verse.. I think it gets clear that the previous one clearly means : "The Romans are vanquished" and not the other way around.
@Mohammed Shorif That's right. I was just pointing out the weakness of that example.
@@TheLuminationCZcams You realize that the word in the next verse can also be read as "victorious" without any diacritical marks also right? It's the same root, ghalaba.
@@HilyahAsSalaf 😂😂 hadith rejectors back to square one
@@gilabola4642 so the romans were victorious, in a nearby territory, after their victory, they will be victorious ? does not make sense at all
Great video
When Brother Farid comes to speakers corner next time the hadith rejecting will tremble with fear.
Couldn’t you also bring up that the Qur’an also has a sanad?
Hafs narrates from Asim who narrates from Abi Abdur Rahman al Sulamee narrates from Zaid ibn Thabit narrates from Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ)?
So if anyone rejects the Hadith transmission tradition is implicitly rejecting Qur’anic transmission?
That is basically the point that Br. Farid implied in his story. With no diacritical marks, the only way to properly know the correct recitation is through the sanad of the Qur'an. This sanad goes through the same processes as the isnad of the hadith so this is why we say if you reject hadith you have rejected the Qur'an.
Talal Siddiqui the Quran is not about the correct recitation but about understanding the message and Arabic doesn’t concern itself with diacritical marks it’s meaning all depend on root words.
Stop talking about things you have no knowledge of.
@@TheQuranExplainsItself Brother Farid literally showed in his video how changing diacritical marks can change the meaning from the Romans lost to the Romans won. How can you say they're not important then? And this is just an example Br. Farid used to show how sanad applies to the Qur'an just like it does to hadith.
@@talalsiddiqui2061 hM
Talal Siddiqui the definition of a root is dependent on the context. Arabic does not employ diacritical marks. Go look up any Arabic now
If you believe that Hadiths are fabricated, then you might as well reject the Qur’an too.
Allah gave guarantee of preservation of Quran. Please dont compare that with any works of man.
The quran has numerical patterns and miracles and also incredibly complex linguistics that is the biggest miracle of the quran
Guts Black yea check out the channels binlmad al ateeqi he also goes deeper into the numeric miracles
@@c5quared626 I agree. However, the method of compiling them are similar. Of course, the Quran is superior but rejecting Hadiths is irrational imo
@@ng3933 ok so if I was to procure a manuscript with a bunch of hadith, and their valid isnad attached.. is it rational to just start believing in it? And betting your afterlife on it? That my friend is irrational, and that my friend is exactly what hadith are to me.
Wa alaikum Salaam 🔥👍❤️
Arabic, the perfect language for word of Allah!
Yes I just wanted to put the book upside down and not bring attention to myself and then create a youtube video to bring attention to myself.
Hadith rejector = Gone in 60 seconds
Very nice
Love you bro ♥️♥️♥️
There is a channel called Quran Centric. Please invite him on/speak to him. He sounds very similar to this guy because when I talked to him he had an answer to everything no matter how incoherent or inconsistent it was.
Especially watch his video on Quran complication, in the first 7 minutes he uses circular reasoning to prove his points i.e. he is clueless about the complication of the Quran and just assumes things.
So yeah, please check it out.
How at all did he use circular reasoning in his videos?
@@JA-be7me In his Quran compilation video his first evidence was to quote a verse from the Quran.
@@linkup901ify i don't see how that is circluar reasoning.
@@JA-be7me When you are trying to prove the Quran you have is the one that Muhammad pbuh revealed and use the Quran itself to prove this it is using the conclusion in the premise I.e. circular reasoning. First you have to establish the verses you are using are legit before using them. Otherwise your assuming what you were supposed to prove.
@@linkup901ify he is using the quran to prove his points. I.e gods words unless you don't agree its gods words also. Lol
We are presented with a straw man hadith rejecter and a 'refutation'. Pray this, how do you do that etc. but what is lacking is any Qur'anic authorisation for a true muslim to follow the hadith and sunnah of a man, even if he was a Messenger. There is no Qur'anic verse from Allah stating that the Messenger could give his sayings as a source of guidance, and in fact we have a set thatabsolutely, unambiguously, most certainly has him being commanded by Allah not to given any:
69:40 This is the revealed Word in the dialect of a noble Messenger. [44:58]
69:41 This is not the utterance of a poet. Seldom do you choose to believe.
69:42 Nor is it the word of a soothsayer. Little of your intellect do you bring to use.
69:43 It is a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds.
69:44 And if he had ascribed his sayings to Us,
69:45 We would have taken him by the right hand,
69:46 And would have cut off his Aorta.
[‘Wateen’ = Artery of the heart = Life line = Life-artery = Strength = Revelation to the Prophet. This implies that no true Prophet could possibly propagate falsehood]
69:47 And none of you could stop Us from doing that.
69:48 But, it is a Reminder and a giver of eminence to those who seek to live upright.
69:49 We know well that among you will be deniers.
69:50 And this denial will become a source of regret for the rejecters.
69:51 It is the absolute truth.
69:52 Strive to manifest the glory of your Lord’s Tremendous Name.
So the only hadith and sunnah we are to follow as per the Qur'an are the hadith and sunnah of Allah contained within the Qur'an. All the verses like obey the Messenger, the Messenger does not speak of his own accord, etc that are misunderstood to mean the hadith and sunnah of the Messenger, blatantly contradict the above verses and so cannot mean this. But that is all the Bukharian hadith worshippers have as evidence; SO THEY ARE QUR'AN REJECTERS!
I will take my chances on Judgement Day as a hadith rejecter, can you do the same?
Did you even watch the video from start to finish? Your argument is completely destroyed.
@@gilabola4642 There is no verse in the Qur'an to follow the hadith and sunnah as recorded in Bukhari etc. so my argument refuting the rejection of a 'hadith rejecter' stands. can you provide a Qur'anic argument destroying Qur'an alone?
@@truehikma your argument doesnt even have a leg, let alone can stand. Muslim recite quran because we recite as per narration from imam of qiraat. The knowledge of how to recite as Farid clearly explained in the video, reaches us through different chain of narrations all the way back to Rasulullah ﷺ. Even when trying to refute ahadith, you yourself have to depend on chain of narrators. Quite sad really
@@gilabola4642 I am sorry but the Qur'an has come down to us by both oral and written, each protecting the other, as Allah said He would collect and preserve it.
Now we have hadith stating that an unknown recited it differently and it is only the hadith narrators that protects the Qur'an from corruption. UTTER RUBBISH!
The Qur'an reciters have preserved this 100% as does the manuscripts, no doubt, but everyone knows that forged, weak, doubtful, dubious, not agreed upon, hadith abound in the fairy-tale collections so where was this 100% preservation of the hadith when they 100% preserved the Qur'an? If the same people did it then something went wrong.
Also, and you have failed to understand the only important point that needs addressing, DOES THE QUR'AN AUTHORISE THE MESSENGER TO GIVE US HIS HADITH AND SUNNAHS AS PART OF OUR ISLAMIC DEEN?
You and the Bukharians say yes, the Qur'an says no.
Your choice, Qur'anic Islam or shirk 'islam'.
@@truehikma chain of narrators are still required in oral or written transmission. When someone memorised the whole quran, they will receive an ijaza in Quran recitation with a chain of narration to Rasulullah ﷺ. There is still chain of narration and narrators in that transmission. You really dont have a slightest clue about this, do you?
You are brilliant
Jazakhallahkhairun for posting this , however do you have any more arguments dealing with hadith rejectors ?
Farid please talk about how stoning is mentioned for adulterers in Bukhari but not mentioned in Quran?
Why the prophet said to kill anybody who leaves their religion but the Quran says the opposite?
Why did Aisha say the stoning verse got eaten by a goat?
Why is homosexuality punishable by death but no prescribed punishment is given in the Quran?
I haven’t found satisfactory answers so thanks a lot if you respond 🙂
RedAkira _ Thanks for the answer.
But isn’t the goat eating the stoning verse sort of related to other Hadith which mention the prophet ordering people to be stoned? Umar (RA) had asked why the stoning punishment was done then this goat eating hadith comes along.
All aside, why did the prophet order stoning for a punishment when it’s not in the Quran? We have to reject that Hadith no? It contradicts Quran.
the quran says obey the messenger (may peace be upon him)
the messenger (may peace be upon him) spoke of the stoning punishment, and also implemented it
therefore, the stoning punishment is a legitimate hadud punishment in islam
homosexuality is punished by death under strict circumstances
one of the circumstances is sodomy occurring in public. are you going to defend people commiting sodomy in public?
RedAkira _ So the verse got lost? But the Hadith on goat eating it was weak. Where’s the evidence that stoning was the first punishment?
i m The stoning punishment contradicts Quran, end of. Who do you believe? Bukhari or Quran?
The adoption of hadith is a big contradiction to the belief that the Quran is perfect and complete. The use of hadiths in conjunction with the Quran can only be justified through cognitive dissonance and justified idolatry. Interestingly, Farid seems to suggest that the current Quran is not perfect and complete.
Mohamed Ismail You merely justify the use of the Sunnah without addressing the core issue here. What does being perfect and complete mean? The hadiths don’t just supplement the Quran, they add things to it as well. As such they complement the Quran, which in essence implies the incompleteness of the Quran. What is the purpose of the Quran? The Sunnah also implies that Muhammad was under divine inspiration 24/7 insofar all his utterances and actions were divinely inspired. In essence that would also make him divine. Are you claiming divinity for Muhammad? At some point you must stop to realize the implications of your beliefs. Please speak to the points, not around them.
Can you provide where the Quran says unequivocally ( that is without having to resort to stretchy extrapolations) that Muhammad’s actions and words should be recorded to serve as a supplement to the Quran? Was Muhammad the message himself? If indeed, he was a mere messenger and had delivered through Quran the very message that aught to save human souls, wouldn’t that fact relegate the hadiths to mere historical texts without any impact on the salvation of the Muslim? You cannot reconcile all these contradictions. Either you accept that the Quran is not perfect and complete and therefore is made perfect and complete by Muhammad, or you continue to cling to the claim of perfection and completeness of the Quran and reject the hadiths as salvational texts. You can’t logically make both claims.
Mohamed Ismail Look at my initial post, you can clearly see that I’ve attached the two words, because that’s the belief I am addressing. You’re claiming that you think the Quran to be perfect but not complete, right? Yet you didn’t define what perfect means as I asked you. In fact you haven’t addressed anything at all. You simply stated the negative. I asked for verses that do not require extrapolations, unequivocal ones. Muhammad was the embodiment of the Quranic message? Expand on that please: what does that mean and what are the implications of such belief?
I am curious to see how you define perfection as related to the Quran. I asked you to tell me the purpose of the Quran, which you didn’t answer. Once you answer my questions fully you will see the contradictions in your beliefs.
You seem to be the one using straw man’s argument: I never claimed that complete and perfect mean the same thing. I simply used them in conjunction, since that’s the belief I was addressing initially. You’ve responded that the Quran was perfect, without clarifying the extent and nature of the perfection, and saying nothing about completeness. Your initial response was just dogmatic and failed to clearly summarize your belief. Had you said that you believe the Quran to be perfect but not complete, we could have saved substantial time. But the contradictions are still salient.
Can you please answer my questions properly so we can fully address the verse you’ve cited?
Mohamed Ismail Bro, you’re playing, right? The questions are in my last post that you’ve just responded to. Ok then
1 what is the definition of perfection as related to the Quran? Please briefly elaborate on the religious implications of such definition.
2. What is the purpose of the Quran?
3. What do you mean by Muhammad is the embodiment of the Quranic message? What’s the religious implication?
Abd Al-Razzaq brother. Happy to see you here.
"So, in which statement/hadith after this will they believe?" (Qur'an 77:50)
HOLY TRINITY ONE GOD HAS ALREADY CONFUSED THE MIND, SOUL & THOUGHTS OF FARID BECAUSE OF MY FAITH IN JESUS, AMEN
Are u crazy? Please keep on believing that 1+1+1=1
Yaa Akhi I would like to listen about the issue of "Mu'tazila & Jahimia in detail "...Jajakallah hu khairan
Everything in islam is rejected by muslim, hadith is daif, quran is daif, muhammad is daif, allah is daif, islam is daif , this is the daif religion 🤣
If you bothered to watch the video, you'd realize that is what I am calling against. ;)
u acting like banu Israel, head of denial and conspiracy
CPIG fan (Abdul CPig and his desciple) making ignorant statement like CPIG himself 😁😁😁😁
No you idiot. The hadith books provides chains of narrators in order for us investigate the authenticity of each report. And Abu Dawud himself the compiler of Sunan Abu Dawud commented on some hadiths in his book as being Daif, so does this means that Abu Dawud is rejecting his book?. If a Hadith is Daif it's because the chain of narrators is disconnected (I.e narrators didnt hear from each other) or one of the narrators is unknown. when we say its Daif it's because of evidence and chain of narrators
We dont say that all hadiths are Daif. We don't say that Quran is Daif you buffoooooooon. You don't even know what chain of narrators is. You are a joke idiot
Your Bible is written by unknown authors whom you dont even know the first letter of their first name to begin with. And Bible was edited hundreds of times and still being edited. Your Christianity is a joke
Ana uhebbuka fe Allah wa asaalu Allaha an yuwaffequka fe al dunya wa al akherah.
wa aleikom Assalaam wa rahmatuLlah wa barakatuH
I'm surprised he did not have an answer. The answer is the same way that the poetry of pre-Islamic Arabia is known to us... Arabic heavily leans on context to provide for the diacritical marks, clearly this is why they were not employed in the first place.. it was thought unnecessary for a native speaker. The marks were finally written down not for the Arabs, but to make reading easy for the non-Arabs. I think with your example though, you are alluding to the fact that the preservation of the qira'at are similar to hadith so its difficult to accept one and not the other, which is a separate issue.
The next verse right after "the romans were defeated" gives you the right sense without the diacritical marks. If in the verse 2, you read it as they won, the verse 3 does not make sense. How can they win, and then stand again from their defeat and win ? No need for hadith here.
@@EchosDeSagesse 1) that only solves the meaning, not how it was recited out of the 3 options given (differing dialects in that area at that time are not doubted by any linguist). You have no Quranic basis to assume it is recited how arabs would today recite it based on todays dialect for passive verbs
One of my question to hadis rejectors is, how Al-Quran came to them? and how they sure that Al-Quran is authentic from Rasulullaah?
Salam alaykum, as a student of Arabic I need help mainly with the words of Arabic. I get confused sometimes. Nahw and Sarf isn’t the hardest thing for me alhamdulillah I struggle with wording sometimes. Any books/pdf to help with this?
Practice makes perfect akhi. Have some patience as it is a part of the process. If you're are not struggling then you should be worried.
You should study basic nahw books in Arabic and focus on the i'raab/tarkeeb (syntactical dissection). E.g. شرح مئة عامل، هداية النحو ، الكافية لابن حاجب.
In the process you will do a whole lot of expanding vocab and discovering wording and phrases (make sure to read the commentaries).
كتب في البلاغة والأدب (لغة):
الكامل في اللغة والأدب للمبرد (i advice this one) ،
أو أدب الكاتب لابن قتيبة،
أو البيان والتبيين للجاحظ،
أو الأمالي لأبي علي القالي،
أو سحر البلاغة وسرُّ البراعة لأبي منصور الثعالبي؛
These are some adab and arabic related books that will make you a faseeh inshallah, it's also what students of knowledge advice, also the books of "ghareeb alhadeeth" or "ghareeb al Quran" which talks about the ambiguous words in kitab & sunnah; and they should come first. Allah knows best and we ask him to increase in knowledge
More storytimes pls
6:43 It's been around a looong time. I used to have a book in the 80's that talks abt deriving all those things from Quran verses. Hmmm I wonder where is it now (the book) LOL
Ied mubarak all.
Please make video on Harris Sultan
Contact Farid on twitter and also Tell him to do a series with help of Adnan rashid and Mansur etc on Bill warner he is very famous anti islamic people
😂😂😂 checkmate!!
Assalaamualaikum brother farid, have you seen the video of mohammed hijab criticising ibn tayymiah?
go to 24.58 and 2.238, and u find how many prayers u have to do which they are 3, fajr, isha and WUSTA, now let me ask you this,for those who follow hadiths, where did u get asr and zhur from? and where did u get rakats if it is not in the quran? many people also confuse tasbee with salat, if u go to 24.41 it tells u there is a difference.
I have listened to a lot of Ahal al Hadith saying if you don't believe all of what Bukhari says you are a kafir. They use three fallacies: 1) Follow the messenger means follow the Nabi 2) If you read Quran how do you know how to pray? 3) Quran transmission is the same as Hadith transmission. The first fallacy ignores that it says follow the rasool because he has a Rasaleh - The Quran not a book written 200 years after prophet Muhammad (pbuh) without his permission. The second fallacy ignores the fact that the hadith will not tell you how to pray from A-Z, Muslims already prayed for 200 years before the Hadith and the Quran teaches us how to do wuduh, where to face, when to pray and prostrating actions. The third fallacy (which is used in this example) is trying to tell people that the Hadith is transmitted the same way as the Quran. His example is poor as you can find the meaning in the next verse. But when it comes Quran transmission - it was compiled 20 years after the prophet's death following that it was mass transmitted which made it difficult to change and easy to see if faults happen when it was copied. Also, it is done in a certain style. The Ahadith were written down 200 years afterwards and overwhelmingly ahad (single narrator) where provided Bukari feels the narrator is trustworthy anything can be said. By the way, I am don't deny all hadith, but for clerics to say all hadith must followed without the matn compared to the Quran is negligent on their part.
How do you know that the Quran was compiled 20 years after the Prophet's (peace be upon him) death?
@@FaridRespondsHi Farid,
We know from various historical accounts (both Muslim and non- Muslim) that Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) lived around the time stated that he lived. We know that the Quran would have had to be produced before the 4 Khalifah died as Sunnis and Shia use the same Quran.
Farid I have a video idea 💡 people are saying Allah is devil because bells are from shatian and and when Muhammad got revelation it sounded like bells
So the hadith contains the correct pronunciation of the quran? Not sure what point he was making, but maybe i missed it. I thought the quran was remembered in the hearts of the believers.
@Ahmad Shaikh
okay thanks Ahmad. Although i imagine writing it down during the prophet's time played a role in its preservation. You have all these fabricated hadiths that came afterwards, but not fabricated qurans.
@Ahmad Shaikh
So apparently, hadiths were collected by a few companions but then Umar ibn Khattab instructed them to be burned due to fear of mixing up with Gods words. But then hadiths were later instructed to be written down during the late ummayad and early abasid period, which would place them in the 8th century. These were during political strife so you can imagine the motivations to fabricate hadiths in favour of one party over another.
Because of this, I dont think you can exactly compare the Quran with hadiths in terms of reliability. E.g., if someone cites me a passage from the Quran, I'm not going to ask him which narrator said this. In general, I dont think there was much of a debate about the quranic recitation, although I'll admit, I dont know much about the history of the quran and you do have anti-Muslims exclaiming the Quran isnt reliable either.
With that said, I'm also not saying that the hadith are unreliable. I understand that muslim scholars tried their best to sift out the bad from the good. Hadiths do play an important part of the muslim lifestyle b/c they contain wisdom and guidance.
zaynab and Islamhater:Muhammad married adopted sons wife?
zayed was salve, Muhammad freed him take him as adopted son and give marriage him with zaynab,Muhammad also gave marriage gift,,, but zaynab cant continue her marriage with him because zaynab was quraish and mismatch with zayed,, when zayed told Muhammad that he cant continue with zaynab then Muhammad told him not to be divorced, but though Muhammad loved zaynab, so Allah revealed his love,, and then after divorce Muhammad sent her request of marriage through zayed and zaynab prayed sothat Allah sent a ayat for her about her marriage with Muhammad,,, Allah didnt abolish child adoption, Allah clear that adopted son is not anyone’s own son, in married life zaynab tell ayesha with pleased that Allah sent a ayat mentioning her name,, if Muhammad had lust on zaynab why he gave marriage his son zayed to zaynab,,rather he could marry zaynab,, but he loved his adopted son zayed so he give marriage his with zainab,,, one thing was zayed was a black slave in his first life but then Muhammad freed him and take him as adopted son and give marriage to zaynab who was quraish,, so a girl from quraish cant continue her marriage life with zayed who was black slave,,, but Muhammad also loved zayed no matter he black or not
Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said:
وَإِذْ تَقُولُ لِلَّذِىٓ أَنْعَمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَأَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ وَاتَّقِ اللَّهَ وَتُخْفِى فِى نَفْسِكَ مَا اللَّهُ مُبْدِيهِ وَتَخْشَى النَّاسَ وَاللَّهُ أَحَقُّ أَنْ تَخْشٰىهُ ۖ فَلَمَّا قَضٰى زَيْدٌ مِّنْهَا وَطَرًا زَوَّجْنٰكَهَا لِكَىْ لَا يَكُونَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ فِىٓ أَزْوٰجِ أَدْعِيَآئِهِمْ إِذَا قَضَوْا مِنْهُنَّ وَطَرًا ۚ وَكَانَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ مَفْعُولًا
"And [remember, O Muhammad], when you said to the one on whom Allah bestowed favor and you bestowed favor, Keep your wife and fear Allah, while you concealed within yourself that which Allah is to disclose. And you feared the people, while Allah has more right that you fear Him. So when Zayd had no longer any need for her, We married her to you in order that there not be upon the believers any discomfort concerning the wives of their adopted sons when they no longer have need of them. And ever is the command of Allah accomplished."
(QS. Al-Ahzaab 33: Verse 37)
Why do people have a problem with this? It's fine..
@@JW-ec1to we need to answer them,, you also should not believe blindly, rather we need to khow the truth
@@slavemariyakibtia2666 Totally agreed.
Hi Farid,have you seen this CIRA international CZcams channel?. please you need to check them.
What’s your opinion on Ibn Arabi ?
Brother I want to ask u some questions about Islam
Bro Farid you workout?
These guys call them selves Monotheists.
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته يا اخونا، عساك بخير و في صحة و عافية.
كان عندي سؤال عن الشيخ ربيع المدخلي، و قلت خليني اسألك عشانك ذكرته في احد فيديوهاتك. سؤالي هي ايش رأي العلماء فيه، و ايش منهجه عشان دائما نسمع كلمة مدخلي تطلق في الغرب بشكل سلبي.
الي اعرفه ان الشيخ كان يمسح الارض بالإخوان في ايامه، و لكن تلامذته تعصبوا على الناس و صار عندهم انحراف و بدؤو يشددوا على الناس، و تجد كثير منهم في الغرب و يسمون انفسهم سلفيين، و لكن تجدهم متشددين.
بس الزبدة، ايش رأي العلماء فيه (علماء الخليج اقصد)، و ايش منهجه و كيف اختلف مع بقية العلماء و لماذا سمي فرقة خاصة بإسمه.
و شكرا على القصة المشوقة، و الله يبارك فيك و ينفع بك الامة و المسلمين و تقبل الله منا و منكم شهر رمضان.
HOW TO LEARN ARABIC LANGUAGE and Also from Online for Free kindly HELP brother and i am learning Basic of Arabic language for free from FreeQuranEducation CZcams channel
لا اعرف عنه الكثير ،لكن اتباعه مشهورون بالجرح والتعديل و تبديع المسلمين.
Kindly also ENGLISH
@@Hello-vz1md It's great that you are learning Arabic, a difficult but beautiful language that will help you understand Islam better. Good luck and may Allah bless you.
@@babahadjihq thanks brother any suggestions or any kind of help to FULLY learn Arabic language
Assalamualaikum bro Farid this group in USA they have you tube channel D muslims lead by Hamzah Abdul Malik ....they have madrasahbin Indonesia Ad Zaytun
In fact the second way of recitation is the correct one, the Roman were victorius!. The first contact Muslim army against the Roman occured in September 629AD where the muslim army moved north with rocky hills of Moab on their left, not too long after they crossed the lower foothills of the mountain suddenly they found themselves in the presence of Roman army 3x larger, estimated 10 thousand strong of Byzantine soldiers. Inexperience Muslim army were trapped! The Muslim defeated, the Roman was victorius. The exact location of Mu'tah battle is a small plain near a village of Mota (Mu'tah) located what is today southern Jordan.
In the summer 636AD, the battle of Yarmuk, lasted 6 days near the Yarmuk river. The battle regarded as one of the most decisive victory for the Muslim army. This was a complete victory for the muslim which took place 7 years after an embarrassing loss in the first contact at a battle of Mu'tah, a fulfillment of prophecy Quran 30:4.
What is a mutawatir hadith?
A Muslim who is logical would reject some Hadith which the scholars call authentic. There’s Hadith which go against the Quran and science. The prophets people rejected Hadith which they felt didn’t sound right that weren’t logical.
@@YourLordIsOne Who's to say who has sufficient knowledge to judge whether a hadith hours against the Qur'an when we have common sense.
This is also ridiculous as we already have Qur'an!! Which is the guidance! So why are we wasting time trying to work out which hadiths are authentic?
Allah describes Qur'an as Ahsanal hadith, the best hadith so there's no reason to acknowledge anything outside of Qur'an. Anything from outside of it is not guidance from Allah.
@@darfvaderr2191 Alright Prove your point by explaining the 5 Times Daily Salaah using only Ayats of the Quran because the implications of saying that if it is not in the Quran than it is not part of Islam, implies that Salaah is not binding 5 Times Daily as The Quran does not mention the number 5. By saying that every detail of Islam, is in the Quran and no detail is excluded the implication is that A person claiming to be A Muslim can Perform Salaah any number of times that he wants including just two to three times and his Salaah is Valid. It also implies that A person claiming to be A Muslim can perform each Salaah with only One Rakaat each on the Basis that the Quran doesn't mention the Number of Rakaats in each Salaah, it also implies that He can Recite whatever he wants on the Basis that Reciting Surah Fatiha in each Rakaat is never mentioned in the Quran . It also means that he can end the Salaah anyway he wants such as Ending it making Sujood rather than the sitting position as that is also not mentioned in the Quran and I won't even get to leaving out all aspects of The Hajj that is not mentioned in The Quran. The point I'm making is that at no period in Islam's History from the compilation of the Quran to the Modern time has it been stated by Muslims that Islam excluded The Example of the Messenger Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam- and anyone who says otherwise must provide evidence proving that the Earliest Muslims only included details mentioned in the Quran while leaving out details mentioned in the Hadith.
I too reject hadiths if Quran don't confirms it.
I reject all the hadith not written in the 7th century.
@Mohamed Ismail the hadith written in the 7th century are the only authentic hadiths
@Mohamed Ismail whats authentic about anyother hadiths?
@Mohamed Ismail Authenticity comes from the source
@Mohamed Ismail do you know of any hadith written by Al-Bukhari?
@Mohamed Ismail 'someone said'...I asked if you know of any Hadith written by Al-Bukhari.
Do you think Sahih Bukhari and Muslim are one hundred percent correct?
Throughout history both have been classified as 💯% authentic. But because of what is contained in several narrations ,Muslims are slowly rejecting them. Some narrations do destroy the reputation of Mohammad.
You cannot demonstrate that the Quran is.
Yes it has been proven
@@Guyanababoo217 Go on then.
@@Guyanababoo217 depends on what type of hadith you're referring to, and yes the weak (ضعيف حديث) contain some lie and contradictions but not the authentic a.k.a sahih hadith, its doesnt contradict itself when put into context.
Brother in isalm, If you disagree am opened to refute your arguments
Djazakalahgair
Lol you triggered all the Hadith rejectors in the comments 😆
These himaar are spamming like crazy
But encouraging to see there are actually many hadith rejectors! The tide is turning! 💪
@@darfvaderr2191 yes just like you see lots of flies around garbage 👍
@@taimur74 Say what you want but it's great to see that people are starting to follow the Sunnah of Allah only. Means many people are starting to reject falsehoods and fabrications that have been woven into Islam by the enemies of the prophet.
I have a feeling you probably pushed him out of Islam altogether instead of getting him to accept the Ahadeeth. 😑
You could have proven him wrong using the Quran itself. 🤷♂️
@Freee Yemeni Falcon
This information is not easy for all to swallow. 🤷♂️
Is somebody a disbeliever if he reject a sahih hadith?
Yes
@Mohamed Ismail Thank you
@Mohamed Ismail yes you made a point
@Abd Al-Razzaq and what they say depends on Islam so yeah we should follow Islam
@Abd Al-Razzaq yeah so what's your argument
I have a question ?? Why do you believe in something which is culturally transmitted in you ?
@Abd Al-Razzaq Your
suggestion that the Sunnah is contaminated with fabricated ahaadeeth is not valid, because the scholars of this ummah took the utmost care to purify the Sunnah from all alien elements. If they had any doubts about the truthfulness of any narrator, or there was the slightest possibility that he could have forgotten something, this would be sufficient grounds for rejecting a hadeeth. Even the enemies of this ummah have stated that no other nation has paid so much attention to examining its reports and their narrators, especially in the case of reports narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
For it to be obligatory to follow a hadeeth, it is sufficient for it to be known that it is a saheeh (authentic, sound) hadeeth narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was content to convey his message by sending just one of his Companions, which proves that the hadeeth reported by one trustworthy person must be followed.
Moreover, we would ask these people: where are the aayaat which tell us how to pray, or which tell us that the obligatory prayers are five times daily, or which tell us about the nisaab on various kinds of wealth for the purpose of zakaah, or about the details of the rituals of Hajj, and other rulings which we can only know from the Sunnah?
Al-Mawsooah al-Fiqhiyyah, 1/44
Al-Tirmidhi reported from Abu Raafi’ and others that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “I do not want to see any one of you reclining on his couch and, when he hears of my instructions or prohibitions, saying ‘I don’t accept it; we didn’t find any such thing in the Book of Allaah.’” Abu ‘Eesaa said: This is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. (See Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Shaakir edition, no. 2663).
Al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, reported that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Would any of you think, reclining on his couch, that Allaah would only describe what is forbidden in the Qur’aan? I tell you, by Allaah, that I have warned and commanded and prohibited things that are as important as what is in the Qur’aan, if not more so.” (Reported by Abu Dawud, Kitaab al-Khiraj wa’l-imaarah wa’l-fay’).
(b) Abu Dawud also reported from al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, that “the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) led us in prayer one day, then he turned to us and exhorted us strongly . . . (he said), ‘Pay attention to my sunnah (way) and the way of the Rightly-guided Khaleefahs after me, adhere to it and hold fast to it.’” (Saheeh Abi Dawud, Kitaab al-Sunnah).
(3) The scholars’ consensus (ijmaa’) affirming the importance of the Sunnah.
Al-Shaafi’i, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: “I do not know of anyone among the Sahaabah and Taabi’een who narrated a report from the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) without accepting it, adhering to it and affirming that this was sunnah. Those who came after the Taabi’een, and those whom we met did likewise: they all accepted the reports and took them to be sunnah, praising those who followed them and criticizing those who went against them. Whoever deviated from this path would be regarded by us as having deviated from the way of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the scholars who followed them, and would be considered as one of the ignorant.
(4) Common sense indicates the importance of the Sunnah.
The fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) is the Messenger of Allaah indicates that we must believe everything he said and obey every command he gave. It goes without saying that he has told us things and given instructions in addition to what is in the Qur’aan. It is futile to make a distinction between the Sunnah and the Qur’aan when it comes to adhering to it and responding to it. It is obligatory to believe in what he has told us, and to obey his instructions.
The ruling concerning those who deny the importance of the Sunnah is that they are kaafirs, because they deny and reject a well-known and undeniable part of the religion.
Your
suggestion that the Sunnah is contaminated with fabricated ahaadeeth is not valid, because the scholars of this ummah took the utmost care to purify the Sunnah from all alien elements. If they had any doubts about the truthfulness of any narrator, or there was the slightest possibility that he could have forgotten something, this would be sufficient grounds for rejecting a hadeeth. Even the enemies of this ummah have stated that no other nation has paid so much attention to examining its reports and their narrators, especially in the case of reports narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
For it to be obligatory to follow a hadeeth, it is sufficient for it to be known that it is a saheeh (authentic, sound) hadeeth narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was content to convey his message by sending just one of his Companions, which proves that the hadeeth reported by one trustworthy person must be followed.
Moreover, we would ask these people: where are the aayaat which tell us how to pray, or which tell us that the obligatory prayers are five times daily, or which tell us about the nisaab on various kinds of wealth for the purpose of zakaah, or about the details of the rituals of Hajj, and other rulings which we can only know from the Sunnah?
Al-Mawsooah al-Fiqhiyyah, 1/44
Al-Tirmidhi reported from Abu Raafi’ and others that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “I do not want to see any one of you reclining on his couch and, when he hears of my instructions or prohibitions, saying ‘I don’t accept it; we didn’t find any such thing in the Book of Allaah.’” Abu ‘Eesaa said: This is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. (See Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Shaakir edition, no. 2663).
Al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, reported that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Would any of you think, reclining on his couch, that Allaah would only describe what is forbidden in the Qur’aan? I tell you, by Allaah, that I have warned and commanded and prohibited things that are as important as what is in the Qur’aan, if not more so.” (Reported by Abu Dawud, Kitaab al-Khiraj wa’l-imaarah wa’l-fay’).
(b) Abu Dawud also reported from al-’Irbaad ibn Saariyah, may Allaah be pleased with him, that “the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) led us in prayer one day, then he turned to us and exhorted us strongly . . . (he said), ‘Pay attention to my sunnah (way) and the way of the Rightly-guided Khaleefahs after me, adhere to it and hold fast to it.’” (Saheeh Abi Dawud, Kitaab al-Sunnah).
(3) The scholars’ consensus (ijmaa’) affirming the importance of the Sunnah.
Al-Shaafi’i, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: “I do not know of anyone among the Sahaabah and Taabi’een who narrated a report from the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) without accepting it, adhering to it and affirming that this was sunnah. Those who came after the Taabi’een, and those whom we met did likewise: they all accepted the reports and took them to be sunnah, praising those who followed them and criticizing those who went against them. Whoever deviated from this path would be regarded by us as having deviated from the way of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the scholars who followed them, and would be considered as one of the ignorant.
(4) Common sense indicates the importance of the Sunnah.
The fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) is the Messenger of Allaah indicates that we must believe everything he said and obey every command he gave. It goes without saying that he has told us things and given instructions in addition to what is in the Qur’aan. It is futile to make a distinction between the Sunnah and the Qur’aan when it comes to adhering to it and responding to it. It is obligatory to believe in what he has told us, and to obey his instructions.
The ruling concerning those who deny the importance of the Sunnah is that they are kaafirs, because they deny and reject a well-known and undeniable part of the religion.
@@ibnmuhammad886 people like you repeatedly insist "the scholars... the scholars"
why do you believe your scholars so much?
there video going around that imam omar sulaiman supports lgbt. so should islam.suport lgbt. he is very influential in america.
my name is my name what kind of common interest
what does farid think?..does he suppport omar sulaimans views. he seems to hush. if its clearly wrong, there wont be any hesitation from scholars or imams, and influentials.