This video is an edited version of the lengthy livestream from two weeks ago. A big thank you to @ahmedvertical8143 for his efforts in editing the video. He noticed the problem, solved it himself, and served an audience that don't have the time for a lengthy stream. May Allah reward the brother.
SUNNAH cannot come from the AVESTA in the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOroastrian Converts. The last prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT followed the LAWS in the TAWRAT(according to condtion in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the Tawrat) Sunnah like STONING to death for Adulterer/Adulteress outside the city gates, Sunnah like not shaving off the sides of head and beard. etc
Jazzaka khair, akh farid, i’d suggest to make more short form videos, as the majority of people will not open a 30min video, the reach will be much greater! hafadhaka allah
Assalamualaikum brother Farid, As usual your video is very informative and makes it easy to research about islam. As I have been recently studying Islam more and more I have stumbled upon something which is hard to reconcile and I think all Muslims have come across this, I tried ignoring the fact but it disturbed me a lot and sometimes it makes me question my belief. The issue I am talking about is the Qadr and Qada which is very confusing as it’s hard to reconcile Free will with Qadr. Can you please make a detailed video on this topic. Jazak Allahu khairan.
In a nutshell: Free will and Qadr go hand in hand. Allah is all knowing. He knows what we will do. Allah wrote down the Qadar BECAUSE he KNOWS that THIS is what we will do with our OWN free will. Allah has ultimate knowledge. He KNOWS that person X will never CHOOSE to accept Islam. Therefore he wrote that person X will not die a Muslim. That person chose with his own free will not to accept Islam. The question of free will and qadar is not limited to Islam btw. All beliefs attempt to answer it. But I think Islam has the best answer. Watch the video on sapience institute's londoniyya series: Qadar.
Londoniyya has helped me a lot with some shubuhat as well allahumma barik. Just always remember that your iman needs to be like a tree: strong firm roots whereby gusts of wind don't make it fall down. And even if a storm breaks off all the branches, the root remains. Build your iman on the ultimate facts: Allah is one. He must be one. Islam is the only proselytising Monotheistic religion on Earth. This is the religion of Monotheism. Logic leads to this. Fitra leads to this. This is the only reasonable recourse. Everything besides this is either paganism or remains of unpreserved revelation, or atheistic materialistic nihilism. THIS is the religion of the fitra. From THIS can a human truly have objective purpose. And truly, what better purpose than to do what everything in creation does: submit to the creator. The only entity deserving of worship, by necessity. "And why should I not worship the one who has created me, and to him you all shall return?" That verse answers the three existential questions: Where did I come from? Where am I going? What is the purpose of life? Then move on to the prophet, peace be upon him. How his biography is absolutely not that of a liar. And the many, many examples of that, him praying until his legs bleed, forbidding the charity from reaching his households, and even when his son Ibrahim died how there was an eclipse and people believed it was because of his Son! But he said "The sun and the moon are signs from my lord, and they don't eclipse for the life or death of any of you. So when you see them, supplicate and pray." Then move on to things like the Qur'an being the only scripture worthy of being called the speech of God: where God is directly speaking to his creation, unlike the bible, where it is a boring convoluted historical narrative. It is furthermore preserved, without any shadow of a doubt. Then things like the Qur'an's miracles and things like prophecies and such May Allah keep us firm upon the deen.
@@2ARM4170salam alaikum akhi as far as i know your understanding of qadar is incomplete. There is also an element of determination like when allah says: And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. 7:179
@@AB-xi9im wa alaykum assalam, My understand is the wholistic understanding in the aqeeda of ahlusunnah. You have free will And Allah determines events. Allah determined that person X will entre jinnah Because Allah knows the actions he will do with his free will Because Allah is All-knowing. Allah also decrees life and death and nothing happens out of his will. It is once you look at all the evidences as a whole that you get the statement: Allah KNEW and KNOWS that person X will do y, with his free will, so Allah WROTE that Y shall occur BECAUSE of person X's free will. Anyway Qadar is a huge topic and certainly cannot be discussed in a youtube comment thread.
But how do u know that the original narration itself is correct? Couldn’t someone with historical knowledge just make the Hadith and say that so and so heard the prophet pbuh him say such and such?
i hear some1 in arena hamzas den said, the problem with chinese telephone game is "IT IS SAID SECRETLY to 1 person", if u said it OPENLY to all of those who are present, then see what comes out from the end (at the end is the person who also heared the message)
Go to his channel, click on “live”. It’s gonna show you a list of lives that’s he’s done you’ll find the whole stream there, it’s called “refuting 21 arguments against hadiths” or something like that
اللّهُـمَّ صَلِّ عَلـى مُحمَّـدٍ وَعَلـى أَزْواجِـهِ وَذُرِّيَّـتِه، كَمـا صَلَّيْـتَ عَلـى آلِ إبْراهـيم . وَبارِكْ عَلـى مُحمَّـدٍ وَعَلـى أَزْواجِـهِ وَذُرِّيَّـتِه، كَمـا بارِكْتَ عَلـى آلِ إبْراهـيم . إِنَّكَ حَمـيدٌ مَجـيد Allāhumma ṣalli `alā Muḥammadin wa `alā 'azwājihi wa dhurriyyatihi, kamā ṣallayta `alā 'āli 'Ibrāhīma. Wa bārik `alā Muḥammadin wa `alā 'azwājihi wa dhurriyyatihi, kamā bārakta `alā 'āli 'Ibrāhīma. 'Innaka ḥamīdum-majīd. O Allah, bestow Your favor on Muhammad and upon his wives and progeny as You have bestowed Your favor upon the family of Ibrahim. And bless Muhammad and his wives and progeny as You have blessed the family of Ibrahim, You are full of praise, Most Glorious. Reference: Al-Bukhari, from Al-Asqalani, Fathul-Bari 6/ 407, Muslim 1/306.
اخي باقي رحمه وشفقه اختك في حال ميعلم به الا الله وًّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ مَا كتَبَتَ هَذا الَمَنَاشَدَهَ غَيَرَ مَنَ الَضَيَقَ وّالَفَقَر يَاعَالَمَ حَسَوّا فَيَنَا ارَجَوّكمَ وّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ رَبَ الَعَرَشَ الَعَظَيَمَ انَه الَاكلَ مَا فَيَ عَنَدَيَ بَالَبَيَتَ وًّالَلَهَ يَا اخَوّانَيَ انَهَ اخَوًّنَيَ بَقَعَدَوًّ بَالَيَوًّمَيَنَ مَافَى اكلَ وًّالَلَهَ وًّضَعَنَا كثَيَرَ صَعَبَ نَحَنَ ٦ نَفَرَ دَاخَلَ الَبَيَتَ وًّابَيَ مَتَوًّفَيَ وًّلَا يَوًّجَدَ مَنَ يَعَوًّلَ عَلَيَنَا وًّسَاكنَيَنَ فَيَ بَيَتَ اجَارَ لَانَسَتَطَيَعَ دَفَعَ الَاجَارَ الَلَيَ بَاقَيَ عَلَيَنَا انَيَ دخلة على الله ثمَّ عليكِ اني في وجه الله ثم في وجهك اني اترجاك اتوسل اليك تساعدني لوجه الله. الله يَأْخي منَ الصَبَاحُ حُتا الان يَحُرّم علينا الاكل غير الماء اني اقسم بالله العلي العظيم على كتاب الله اني بنت يتيمه من ومعي اخوان صغار اقسم بالله على كتاب الله ان اخوتي ماعاد يقدرو ينطقو بكلمة من شدت الجوع وبيتنا ايجار وصاحب البيت مقدر ضروفنا يريد الإجار او بيخرجنا إلى الشارع و اني اسالك بالله وانشدك بمحمد رسول الله يا اخي لوانت مسلم وتحب الخير انك تساعدني بقدر استطاعتك هذارقمنا لمن اراد فعل الخير00967.717354582 وايعوضك الله بكل خير فيااخي انت رجال إذا شفت اسرتك جاوعين تعمل المستحيل من اجل تامن لهم الاكل ولكن انابنت عيني بصيره ويدي قصيره ليس لي اب مثلك يسمح دمعتى ويحمينى من الذل والاهانة واخواني سغار ساعدنا انقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع نتبهدل او نموت من الجوع انا اقسم بالله الذي رفع سبع سموات بلا عمد وبسط الارض ومهداني لااكذب عليك بحرف من هذا الرساله واني ماطلبتك إلى من ضيق وقسوت الضروف والحال الذي احنافيه واني وأسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره الامساعدتناانك ترسلي واتساب هذا رقمي 00967.717354582 وتطلب اسمي الكامل في البطاقه وتحولنا عليه ولتاخر علينا احنا في اشد الحاجة والضروف القاسيه جزاك الله خير الجزا..،.،.،.،;":'%''%&":';":💔:&&♡@.....❤😢❤❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤❤🎉❤
I ask Atheist friend can you recall anything from your childhood and he said yes lot of stuff. I then ask him why you can recall any memories is it because it was recorded for some reason? I ask what was the purpose of this recording when we are going to die? Or better yet who want your personal information and it is important enough to be recorded and even you can recall it. Many near death experience folks say their entire life flashed before their eyes, interesting . Hence the term JUDGEMENT DAY. That affirmative heaven action will not work, eveyone will be judge hence the name JUDGEMENT DAY. 3:185 Every soul will taste death. And you will only receive your full reward on the Day of Judgment. Whoever is spared from the Fire and is admitted into Paradise will ˹indeed˺ triumph, whereas the life of this world is no more than the delusion of enjoyment.
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j There're many prophets that have beaten by their people. Bukhari 3477 : has no clue about prophet Isa 'alaihissalam. It's not related to the story of prophet Isa. So concluding that hadits is connected to surah An Nisa 157 is a guess that has no basis.
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j Prophets always pray to their people, even though they were hurt by their people. Prophet Muhammad shalallahu alaihi wasallam pray when his people hurt him in Thaif. "O Allah, give guidance to my people, indeed they do not know". About Luke chapter 23 verse 34 - that not mention about prophet whose face was bleeding. Verse 33 mention a man whose hand was held on the left and right, then nails to the wood. Not bleeding on his face, and did not wipe blood from his face. So that's not what is meant in the hadith. It's not the same as what is mentioned in Bukhari 3477. So there's no contradiction surah An Nisa 157 and sahih Bukhari 3477.
Peace be upon everyone, We the humans want world peace,compassion and love to prevail We the humans want this darkness of vices of inept political leaders to end In the name of God the merciful,the compassionate WE DEMAND PEACE, AMEN AMIN
Dear brother Assalamualaikam, I am a new revert but I am confused on if there is no compulsion in religion, as some verses sort of imply you can force Islam on others, of course it’s because I am uneducated and I accept these as true anyway, I am just confused
@@Jack-qz1lg my dear brother thank you for your time, original verse being, 2:256 and the verse that confused me was then this one, 9:5. Also bukhari 8:387 contradicts it as well (I say contradict but I know it’s not a actual contradiction, just me being unable to understand)
@@user-cv9tc6oq5kRegarding 9:5, Quranic exegetes al-Baydawi and al-Alusi explain that it refers to those pagan Arabs who violated their peace treaties by waging war against Muslims.
There is no compulsion in religion verse is abrogated. Hell, you cant even leave islam as in the hadith the punishment is capital. There is compulsion in religion, especially if you are born muslim.
@@user-cv9tc6oq5k Regarding 9:5. Verses talk about those who broke the treaty, expelled the Messenger ﷺ and attacked Muslims first. Read previous verses (4, 12, 13) in the same Surah 9 for context. In Quran 9:2 Allah ﷻ says that for their treachery Allah ﷻ didn’t punish them straight away but first gave them period of time to leave the land. In Quran 9:4 Allah ﷻ says that exception are disbelievers who honor the treaty, don’t act hostile towards Muslims and don’t support enemies of Muslims. In Quran 9:6 Allah ﷻ says that even during open war if any of polytheists asks for protection then Muslims should protect polytheists and escort them to a place of safety so they may hear the word of Allah ﷻ. And in Quran 9:12-13 we are explicitly told what type of people we are dealing with : people who broke their treaty, plotted to expel the Messenger ﷺ and attacked Muslims first.
I don't think that's the claim, the claim is two people can't agree on what was said or what they saw. The wording in the narattions opens things up to the claim of narrators not being reliable even if they're called sound by their advocates. And a secondary issue that Imam Malik may narrate mursalaat from people who the 6 may narrate Marfooat from, etc. It doesn't mean they're fabricated, but as am absolute source:/ It explains why huffaz of hadith followed one of the 4 Imams, even though they were in position to gauge things to a greater degree.
1.) All you did was link a bunch of dudes saying they heard this and that from the prophet, but can't anyone just attribute someone's name and said this narrator said X,Y,Z and call it a day? 🤣 2.) Every single narrator you mentioned lived 100-200 years after the Prophet's death. Not during. Anas was born 711 AD, 80 years after the Prophet. Case closed. Easy debunk.
1. Yes, except that its very obvious and the muhadditheen picked up on it. If someone fabricates chains then, theyre going to make a lot of mistakes in those chains (like when the isnad chronologically makes no sense or it's impossible the narrators met geographically), or theyll become known for narrating things with unverifiable chains (then they're declared to be unreliable as a whole), or they'll narrate contradictory reports or... I think you get the point. The scholars were incredibly thorough with isnaad. 2. You've confused Anas Bin Malik (who was a sahabi and born in 612) with his son Malik Bin Anas. And the hadith Farid mentions is corroborated by a very similar report with a seperate, authentic sanad from Al-Bara'a Bin 3azib, also a sahabi. "Easy debunk" yea...
What would your response be for a person claiming that as Qur'an is protected by Allah but not the hadith. If prophet (S.A.W) said something but later on it was changed or due to human error it got corrupted i.e added or removed and is now a part of islamic belief. Such as the coming of ESA A.S they claim that this narration is quoted in the books later on but not in the earliest hadith books and somehow it got corrupted and added that ESA A.S will come back. They claim Qur'an doesn't state the coming of him rather it says he is dead.
Do not engage with Qadiyanis, created by the bloody British colonist. They are not Muslims to begin with and likewise the hadith rejector. Allah says, O you who have believed, Obey Allah and Obey the Messenger. Whoever obeyed the Messenger has obeyed Allah. And other similar verses. The Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, said, whoever lies intentionally upon me, let him take his seat in the Hellfire. This hadith is authentic as the Qur'an. Allah preserved the Qur'an and Sunnah, it would make no sense, when Allah commanded you to obey the Messenger and commanded you to follow Muhajiroon and Ansar. How can we obey this command if the Sunnah has not been preserved. It is crystal clear that Allah preserved the Qur'an and Sunnah through Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jama'ah and Allah will continue to do it until the day of judgment. As for 'Eesa/Jesus, peace be upon him, he will return back as Allah says, rather Allah took him up to Himself. The people of the book will believe in him ('Eesa) before his death. The Ahadith of the Prophet, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, is clear that 'Eesa, will return back as this is one of the major signs.
the sunnah clarifies the quran so to preserve the quran's meanings it implies preservation of hadith the coming of isa is a sign of hour this is even in the quran so the one who is claiming otherwise is ignorant of the quran furthermore the hadith on this matter is mutwattir " he is dead" not only ignorant but also a liar aya 57 of al Az-Zukhruf mentionns ISA than aya 61 in the same context says in the meaning of "And indeed, Jesus will be [a sign for] knowledge of the Hour, so be not in doubt of it, and follow Me. This is a straight path." so how can they doubt it "so be not in doubt of it" as for their lie of him being dead in surah An-Nisaa 157 and 158 contains the meaning of that they didn't kill nor crucify ISA and that allah has risen him , than 159 the meaning of "And there is none from the People of the Scripture but that he will surely believe in Jesus before his death. And on the Day of Resurrection he will be against them a witness." the point is there is still people who are from the people of the scriptures that don't believe in him so he is still alive and in the hadith in his time all religions except islam will perish so they will all believe in him so not only the hadiths are in line with quran but they clarify it as in the quran 44 of An-Nahl the meaning of " [We sent them] with clear proofs and written ordinances. And We revealed to you the message that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought." don't listen to hadith rejectors they are ignorant of the quran or they know and are intentionnaly lying
Anyone who JUDGES by the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN Converts is actually following the AVESTA under the name of MUHAMMAD. The Almighty says in the QURAN 5 44-47 And whosoever doesnt Judge by what Allah has """"""REVEALED""""" is a Disbeliever, wrong doer and defiantly disobident. Islam will always be from the QURAN and TAWRAT(according to the condition in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT) The INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to ISA and gives guidance and laws which """""CONFIRMS"""" the laws in the TAWRAT is lost to time.
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j how is that a contradiction? bukhari 3477 is about "As if I saw the Prophet (ﷺ) talking about one of the prophets whose nation had beaten him and caused him to bleed, while he was cleaning the blood off his face and saying, "O Allah! Forgive my nation, for they have no knowledge."" and al aya 157 an-nissa from its meaning negating that they cursifyed or killed ISA first the hadith doesn't say it is isa who bleed to begin with seconde it says "he was cleaning the blood off his face" and someone curisfied can't clean himself as his hands are pinned and if he is killed well it is clear he can't wipe himself furthermore it says he was hit it doens't speak about crusifixtion to begin with If someone twists the hadith from "a prophet" to "isa" and from "beaten" to "crusifyed" and removes "while he was cleaning the blood off his face" that twisting is on him and not a contradiction but his false understanding is wrong
If the hadith was transferred from Ibn Umar through different narrators to people like Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Abu Dawaud and the rest wouldn't that mean the hadith was narrated through the oral recitation system meaning that over time as the hadith was passed down from one generation to the other it might have got completely or somewhat altered changing the original message of the hadith to a certain extent. The hadith system makes me ponder.
Salam brother, Excuse me for this off topic message, but I had a request; Recently a series of anti Islamic (and anti religion in general) channels are getting more and more popularity, and they (three to be exact) are all governed by a man named Adam elmasri, he was even in a mythvideo video criticizing Islam. There also little to no rebuttals toward him, only thing i found was a brother that made a rebuttal to him a while back, but Adam recently made a response to his rebuttal. (Although it seems like there is a lot of people criticizing him in Arabic videos but unfortunately I don't speak Arabic, and it seems like he has responded to some of them) I wanted to know, would you take a look at his stuff and answer him if you can? It's getting out of hand
I ask that you please give a detailed response to the following comment. This is something I would like to know as well. "Akhi Farid, this is Mohammad from Brisbane, Australia. I have someone locally here in Brisbane who rejects hadith. When I sent this video to him, he came back with this following response: All he was trying to show in that video was that Bukhari didn't fabricate those hadiths. However, this is not our issue, and he even then admits that you could argue that someone at the beginning of the chain fabricated them. So all he showed was that these hadiths are plausible historically passed down narrations of things that possibly happened (i.e. people said this & people did that at this time or the other, which have absolutely NO impact on the Theology of The Religion nor become an extra part of it), which I have never argued against, as I have always claimed that these are HISTORY books. Even the Christians and Jews can show that their narrations were historically passed down through several different chains of people, but they CANNOT show that they are from God & His Messenger. What he didn't, and CANNOT show is that these hadiths are RELIGIOUS Books that are from Allah and His Messenger and therefore form part of the Theological ideology of The Religion alongside The Quran (which is the ONLY Theological Text approved by Allah and His Messenger). Our issue is whether these narrations are from Allah & His Messenger and therefore from an extra part of The Theology of the Religion. What you and others don't seem to understand is that the Messenger's words are NOT Muhammad's personal words but are in fact only The Words of Allah that he is honorably relaying (passing on) to us in his Role of Messenger of Allah. That's the whole point of the role of Messenger of Allah. It's NOT to give you his own words, but simply to relay the Words of Allah. So you need to stop conflating the Words of Allah which are relayed by His Messenger (which constitute the Theology of the Religion) with the personal words of the man Muhammad outside of his relaying role of Messenger (which do NOT form a part of the Theology of the Religion but are merely his own free willed personally chosen speech)."
@@pingu.3712 JazakAllah khair brother, this had been weighing down on me for a while becauseI could not come to a reconciliation with this. A response would be greatly appreciated.
it is enough that that man says there is 3/2 daily prayers and not 5 and that you can do whatever amount of sujoud or ruku'e in the prayer if true this a catastrophy who in his right mind would listen to him
Anyone say this claim that Hadith is after 200 or whatever He or she doesn’t know that the smallest student of Hadith will laugh so hard because it is very obvious that the claimer has no knowledge at all about how Hadith where written and memorised in first place and he or she don’t understand the difference between collecting what is already written and memorised but making them in a book that have them all This is a huge claim from them to say after 200 years because this show us the ignorance and dishonesty when it comes to knowledge
Anyone who JUDGES by the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN COnverts is actually following the AVESTA under the name of MUHAMMAD. The Almighty says in the QURAN 5 44-47 And whosoever doesnt Judge by what Allah has """"""REVEALED""""" is a Disbeliever, wrong doer and defiantly disobident. Islam will always be from the QURAN and TAWRAT(according to the condition in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT) The INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to ISA and gives guidance and laws which """""CONFIRMS"""" the laws in the TAWRAT is lost to time.
Not a Christian Here But I do have questions Did Muhammad See Allah? No Aisha, the wife of the Prophet Muhammad, stated that anyone claiming that Muhammad saw Allah is a liar. She cited the Quranic verse: “No vision can grasp Him” (Quran 6:103) and “None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah” (Quran 6:103). Yes: Muhammad did in fact see Allah Narrated AbdurRahman ibn A’ish Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said: I saw my Lord, the Exalted and Glorious in the most beautiful form. He said: What do the Angels in the presence of Allah contend about? I said: Thou art the most aware of it. He then placed HIS PALM between my shoulders and I felt its coldness in my chest and I came to know what was in the Heavens and the Earth. He recited: ‘Thus did we show Ibrahim the kingdom of the Heavens and the Earth and it was so that he might have certainty.’(6:75) Darimi reported it in a mursal form and Tirmidhi also reported. (Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 237; ALIM CD-ROM Version) Narrated Mu’adh ibn Jabal Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) was detained one morning from observing the dawn prayer (in congregation) along with us till the sun had almost appeared on the horizon. He then came out hurriedly and Iqamah for prayer was observed and he conducted it (prayer) in brief form. When he had concluded the prayer by saying As-salamu alaykum wa Rahmatullah, he called out to us saying: Remain in your places as you were. Then turning to us he said: I am going to tell you what detained me from you (on account of which I could not join you in the prayer) in the morning. I got up in the night and performed ablution and observed the prayer as had been ordained for me. I dozed in my prayer till I was overcome by (sleep) and lo, I found myself in the presence of my Lord, the Blessed and the Glorious, in the best form. He said: Muhammad! I said: At Thy service, my Lord. He said: What these highest angels contend about? I said: I do not know. He repeated it thrice. He said: Then I saw Him put his palms between my shoulder blades till I felt the coldness of his fingers between the two sides of my chest. Then everything was illuminated for me and I could recognize everything. He said: Muhammad! I said: At Thy service, my Lord. He said: What do these high angels contend about? I said: In regard to expiations. He said: What are these? I said: Going on foot to join congregational prayers, sitting in the mosques after the prayers, performing ablution well despite difficulties. He again said: Then what do they contend? I said: In regard to the ranks. He said: What are these? I said: Providing of food, speaking gently, observing the prayer when the people are asleep. He again said to me: Beg (Your Lord) and say: O Allah, I beg of Thee (power) to do good deeds, and abandon abominable deeds, to love the poor, that Thou forgive me and show mercy to me and when Thou intendst to put people to trial Thou causes me to die unblemished and I beg of Thee Thy love and the love of one who loves Thee and the love for the deed which brings me near to Thy love. Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said: It is a truth, so learn it and teach it. Transmitted by Ahmad, Tirmidhi who said: This is a hasan sahih hadith and I asked Muhammad ibn Isma'il about this hadith and he said: It is a sahih hadith. (Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 245; ALIM CD-ROM Version) Al-Bayhaqi also narrated the hadith "I saw my Lord" in al-Asma’ wa al-Sifat with a sound chain but with the addition: "in the form of a curly-haired, beardless young man wearing a green robe," a condemned, disauthenticated addition and concatenation with another hadith that refers to Gibril. Hence al-Suyuti interpreted it either as a dream or, quoting his shaykh Ibn al-Humam, as "the veil of form" (hijab al-sura)… (Islamic Doctrines and Beliefs: Volume 1: The Prophets in Barzakh, The Hadith of Isra’ and Mir’aj, The Immense Merits of Al-Sham, The Vision of Allah, Al-Sayyid Muhammad Ibn ‘Alawi al-Maliki, translation and notes by Dr. Gibril Fouad Haddad As-Sunna Foundation of America 1999, pp. 137-138; bold and underline emphasis ours) What’s strange is that the Quran Explicitly says that no one has ever seen Allah Surah Al-An’am (Chapter 6), verses 103 No vision can encompass Him, but He encompasses all vision. For He is the Most Subtle, All-Aware. I said to 'Aisha, "O Mother! Did Prophet Muhammad see his Lord?" Aisha said, "What you have said makes my hair stand on end! Know that if somebody tells you one of the following three things, he is a liar: Whoever tells you that Muhammad saw his Lord, is a liar." Then Aisha recited the Verse: No soul can know what it will earn tomorrow.’ (31.34) She added: "And whoever tells you that he concealed (some of Allah's orders), is a liar." Then she recited: ‘O Apostle! Proclaim (the Message) which has been sent down to you from your Lord…’ (5.67) ‘Aisha added. "But the Prophet saw Gabriel in his true form twice." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 378) Aisha said, "If anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen his Lord, HE IS A LIAR, FOR ALLAH SAYS: ‘No vision can grasp Him.’ Quran (6.103) And if anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen the Unseen, he is a liar, for Allah says: ‘None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah.’" (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 477 All the Scholars and Muslims say and agree that the Prophet Muhammad was illiterate man am not sure if that's true because in Hadith 114 in Ibn `Abbas said, "When the ailment of the Prophet became worse, he said, 'Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.' If it was the companions of Muhammad who would write for him he would have not say Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement instead he would of said you will write he would not speak in the first person.
Just an advice from us, do not dulge in yourself with knowledge while you are in a terrible state. Begin with small things, learn the shahadah, what it means, then Salah, how did the Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, prayed and so on. Like in school, in kindergarten, they learn the alphabet letters, and so on. This islamic 'ilm, which is more important than what you have learned from your School. Greetings from Scandinavia.
In the Quran had no Word Call-- "" Muhammad "" But Then Why in the Quran had or has Mudammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , ?? Then -- What is the Meaning of "" Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIN , Muhammad"AAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAN , Muslim"AAAN , Muslim"UUUN , ????
In the Quran Surah No--47 Named it Was Called -- Al-Qital ( The Fighting ) ,After that -- Top Islamic Scholars They were lied They Were Changed The Name They Put New Named Called -- Muhammad , But Surah "" Muhammad And In the Quran -- [ Muhammad"UUUN , IIIN, AAAN ] Completely Different From Each Other ,
Hadith rejectors never object about Quran . But , Attacking the hadiths with same possible objections . Objections are : may be hadiths are fabricate , may be hadiths are wrong .... may be 'etc' . Their logics are like that may be your parents are not biological parents , may be DNA test is wrong etc . Anyone can do these objection in any things . All this objections are logical fallacy , not exist in reality . Even they don't use this method in their real life and about Quran. But , In term of Hadith they do it . Because enemy of their desire is Hadith and proof . Hadith rejectors do the same fallacy . Those are only take mutawtir narrations do the same fallacy . We declare a narration authentic based on Previous Hadith Scholars sayings means our declaration based on proof . On the other hand , hadith rejectors have no proof for possible objection . Our hadith authentication fully based on proof means Jarh also Tadil is based on proof . Very interesting thing is how they do fallacies and reject proof .
Religion is based on logic, if you want to know the logic, try thinking about it Islam continues to say Christians are unreasonable, stupid, idiots but still cannot prove that Jesus or Isa was sinful, Many Christians who have converted to Islam also said that Christianity makes no sense but still cannot prove that Jesus was a sinner. But millions of former Muslims who believe in Jesus would definitely say that Muhammad's life was very evil and depraved, as said by Nabeel Quraeshi, a former Pakistani Muslim who said that Muhammad in history was very different from Muhammad in the Muslim hearts. Try to think about which logic is true, Christianity or Islam, think deeply about the millions of ex-Islamists who say it themselves, doesn't that mean there is something wrong? think seriously for the safety of your soul. Study Muhammad's life carefully, is Muhammad really a figure whose life should be emulated? If you're curious, why don't you want to study Muhammad's historical life in the Koran and Hadith? See Nabi asli. CZcams channel discussed based on the Koran and Hadith itself
Don’t strawman your opponents position, nobody is saying that Bukhari fabricated ahadeeth. Bukhari came when Ahadeeth were already fabricated. Bukhari himself had over 600,000 ahadeeth that he rejected.
Every Muslim knows there are fabricated and weak hadith. Thats not the problem. The problem is when you reject the Prophets judgement entirely by assuming every single hadith is fabricated - which is absurd.
@@MiloBoz No one is saying every single hadith is fabricated, but the overwhelming majority are, as they appear over a century after the Prophet (s). The entire “science” of jarh and ta’deel is subjective opinion that cannot be proven in itself. So the entire science of hadith is based on a circular argument.
@@JohnSmith-ib1ky Actually Quranists do say that and reject ahadith as a whole. Also your argument that they are fabricated because they were written down 100 years later is a fallacy. Its same fallacy made by atheists about the Qur'an. You yourself just admitted some are not fabricated, deapite being written down later. As for the science of knowing which ones are authentic and what is not - that is something which requires expertise the quranists are lacking. I dont think there exists even a single quranist who can recite the Book of Allah, letalone to have expertise in hadith sciences. Who are the top 5 "Quranist" Qur'an reciters? In all the years of quranist dawah , I dont think they've even produced one actual Qur'an reciter with proper tajweed.
@@MiloBoz If you are really interested in this topic I’d advise you to go through Dr Joshua Little’s 500 page thesis on the hadith of the age of Ayesha. Something that up until now almost all Sunnis viewed as fact when it turned out to be nothing more than a polemical fabrication of Hisham bin Urwa to elevate her status against the Shi’a when he moved to Kufa.
@@JohnSmith-ib1ky What are the qualifications of this "Dr Joshua Little", what is his religion and who are his teachers? If he has not a Muslim who has mastered classical Arabic and other areas of hadith sciences, then he's not qualified to have an opinion on any aspect of the religion and especially the sciences of hadith. Phd thesis' written by disbelievers to be judged academically by other disbelievers at pagan universities - they hold zero weight in religion and are fully rejected. Refusing to accept is worse than refusing to accept that only qualified doctors should perform surgery in hospitals.
If this brother still believes Aisha was 9 then nothing he says is worth considering as knowledge because the foundation upon which you judge information is questionable. I dont mean to slander you, as in you intend malevolence. I doubt your intellect and rationale. When you skip tons of sources that prove her adulthood, and take the laughable stance you did, theres just no way to take you seriously.
32:12 If only you could see the wicked hanging their heads ˹in shame˺ before their Lord, ˹crying:˺ “Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back and we will do good. We truly have sure faith ˹now˺!” (32:22) And who is more unjust than he who is given good counsel through the Signs of his Lord and yet he turns away from them? Surely We will exact full retribution from such criminals. (29:2) Do people think that they will be let go merely by saying: “We believe,” and that they will not be tested,1 (29:3) for We indeed tested those who went before them?
This video is an edited version of the lengthy livestream from two weeks ago. A big thank you to @ahmedvertical8143 for his efforts in editing the video. He noticed the problem, solved it himself, and served an audience that don't have the time for a lengthy stream. May Allah reward the brother.
MashaAllah
Ameen
Ameen
Aneen
Ameen
Please do more livestreams about this! Next, the companions and main narrators
Simple and humble
Akhi you are inspiring many Muslimeen. JazakAllah for your work. Inshallah I will start my own journey like this
Brother Farid, defender of the sunnah mashaAllah
SUNNAH cannot come from the AVESTA in the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOroastrian Converts.
The last prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT followed the LAWS in the TAWRAT(according to condtion in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the Tawrat)
Sunnah like STONING to death for Adulterer/Adulteress outside the city gates,
Sunnah like not shaving off the sides of head and beard. etc
Jazzaka khair, akh farid, i’d suggest to make more short form videos, as the majority of people will not open a 30min video, the reach will be much greater! hafadhaka allah
I’m famous 🦆❤. Jazak Allahu Khaira for your efforts akhi
lucky duck
Good work brother. We really appreciate your knowledge and sharing it with your Ummah
May Allah reward you and the brother who shorten the video immensely
Perfect Answer, good work brother.
May allah bless and honor farid Ameen ya rab.
Allah*
Very helpful video mashallah, may Allah reward you
Jazakom Allah khair
❤ Ily bro, May Allah elevate you
BarakAllahu feek
Ily bro thank you may Allah bless u
BarakAllaahu Feek!
12:24 Another chain
١٩٢٦ - عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، عَنْ مَعْمَرٍ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ بْنِ عُمَيْرٍ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، قَدْ سَمَّاهُ، عَنْ نُعَيْمِ بْنِ النَّحَّامِ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ مُؤَذِّنَ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ فِي لَيْلَةٍ بَارِدَةٍ، وَأَنَا فِي لَحَافٍ فَتَمَنَّيْتُ أَنْ يَقُولَ: صَلُّوا فِي رِحَالِكُمْ، فَلَمَّا بَلَغَ حَيَّ عَلَى الْفَلَاحِ قَالَ: «صَلُّوا فِي رِحَالِكُمْ»، ثُمَّ سَأَلْتُ عَنْهَا فَإِذَا النَّبِيُّ ﷺ: كَانَ أَمَرَ بِذَلِكَ
المصنف - عبد الرزاق
Let's see those manuscripts.
MashaAllah
Assalamualaikum brother Farid,
As usual your video is very informative and makes it easy to research about islam.
As I have been recently studying Islam more and more I have stumbled upon something which is hard to reconcile
and I think all Muslims have come across this, I tried ignoring the fact but it disturbed me a lot and sometimes it makes me
question my belief.
The issue I am talking about is the Qadr and Qada which is very confusing as it’s hard to reconcile Free will with Qadr.
Can you please make a detailed video on this topic.
Jazak Allahu khairan.
In a nutshell:
Free will and Qadr go hand in hand.
Allah is all knowing. He knows what we will do. Allah wrote down the Qadar BECAUSE he KNOWS that THIS is what we will do with our OWN free will.
Allah has ultimate knowledge. He KNOWS that person X will never CHOOSE to accept Islam. Therefore he wrote that person X will not die a Muslim. That person chose with his own free will not to accept Islam.
The question of free will and qadar is not limited to Islam btw. All beliefs attempt to answer it. But I think Islam has the best answer.
Watch the video on sapience institute's londoniyya series: Qadar.
Londoniyya has helped me a lot with some shubuhat as well allahumma barik.
Just always remember that your iman needs to be like a tree: strong firm roots whereby gusts of wind don't make it fall down. And even if a storm breaks off all the branches, the root remains.
Build your iman on the ultimate facts: Allah is one. He must be one. Islam is the only proselytising Monotheistic religion on Earth. This is the religion of Monotheism. Logic leads to this. Fitra leads to this. This is the only reasonable recourse. Everything besides this is either paganism or remains of unpreserved revelation, or atheistic materialistic nihilism. THIS is the religion of the fitra. From THIS can a human truly have objective purpose. And truly, what better purpose than to do what everything in creation does: submit to the creator. The only entity deserving of worship, by necessity.
"And why should I not worship the one who has created me, and to him you all shall return?"
That verse answers the three existential questions: Where did I come from? Where am I going? What is the purpose of life?
Then move on to the prophet, peace be upon him. How his biography is absolutely not that of a liar. And the many, many examples of that, him praying until his legs bleed, forbidding the charity from reaching his households, and even when his son Ibrahim died how there was an eclipse and people believed it was because of his Son! But he said "The sun and the moon are signs from my lord, and they don't eclipse for the life or death of any of you. So when you see them, supplicate and pray."
Then move on to things like the Qur'an being the only scripture worthy of being called the speech of God: where God is directly speaking to his creation, unlike the bible, where it is a boring convoluted historical narrative. It is furthermore preserved, without any shadow of a doubt.
Then things like the Qur'an's miracles and things like prophecies and such
May Allah keep us firm upon the deen.
@@2ARM4170salam alaikum akhi as far as i know your understanding of qadar is incomplete. There is also an element of determination like when allah says:
And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind.
7:179
@@AB-xi9im wa alaykum assalam,
My understand is the wholistic understanding in the aqeeda of ahlusunnah.
You have free will
And Allah determines events.
Allah determined that person X will entre jinnah
Because Allah knows the actions he will do with his free will
Because Allah is All-knowing.
Allah also decrees life and death and nothing happens out of his will.
It is once you look at all the evidences as a whole that you get the statement:
Allah KNEW and KNOWS that person X will do y, with his free will, so Allah WROTE that Y shall occur BECAUSE of person X's free will.
Anyway Qadar is a huge topic and certainly cannot be discussed in a youtube comment thread.
@@2ARM4170 yeah i dont think yt comment section is the best place to discuss this. May allah keep us on the straight path
But how do u know that the original narration itself is correct? Couldn’t someone with historical knowledge just make the Hadith and say that so and so heard the prophet pbuh him say such and such?
i hear some1 in arena hamzas den said, the problem with chinese telephone game is "IT IS SAID SECRETLY to 1 person", if u said it OPENLY to all of those who are present, then see what comes out from the end (at the end is the person who also heared the message)
I love you my dear brother.
Akhi how do we join your online sessions?
So how can we know Nafii for example was a reliable transmitter in the chain? Jazak Allah khairan akhi, all other points were well explained
His status was determined by contemporaries.
@@FaridResponds thank you akhi❤
Asalamukium Farid, are you going to persue scholarship in sha Allah may allah allow us to become scholars
Tazkiya is from Islam.
Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him gave tazkiya to different sahaba ij different topics.
Where can I find the full live stream for this one?
Go to his channel, click on “live”. It’s gonna show you a list of lives that’s he’s done you’ll find the whole stream there, it’s called “refuting 21 arguments against hadiths” or something like that
Best video in the English language on this topic
اللّهُـمَّ صَلِّ عَلـى مُحمَّـدٍ وَعَلـى أَزْواجِـهِ وَذُرِّيَّـتِه، كَمـا صَلَّيْـتَ عَلـى آلِ إبْراهـيم . وَبارِكْ عَلـى مُحمَّـدٍ وَعَلـى أَزْواجِـهِ وَذُرِّيَّـتِه، كَمـا بارِكْتَ عَلـى آلِ إبْراهـيم . إِنَّكَ حَمـيدٌ مَجـيد
Allāhumma ṣalli `alā Muḥammadin wa `alā 'azwājihi wa dhurriyyatihi, kamā ṣallayta `alā 'āli 'Ibrāhīma. Wa bārik `alā Muḥammadin wa `alā 'azwājihi wa dhurriyyatihi, kamā bārakta `alā 'āli 'Ibrāhīma. 'Innaka ḥamīdum-majīd.
O Allah, bestow Your favor on Muhammad and upon his wives and progeny as You have bestowed Your favor upon the family of Ibrahim. And bless Muhammad and his wives and progeny as You have blessed the family of Ibrahim, You are full of praise, Most Glorious.
Reference:
Al-Bukhari, from Al-Asqalani, Fathul-Bari 6/ 407, Muslim 1/306.
WAS buhkari from the ZOROASTRIAN MAGIAN Family of PERSIAN empire???
اخي باقي رحمه وشفقه اختك في حال ميعلم به الا الله وًّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ مَا كتَبَتَ هَذا الَمَنَاشَدَهَ غَيَرَ مَنَ الَضَيَقَ وّالَفَقَر يَاعَالَمَ حَسَوّا فَيَنَا ارَجَوّكمَ وّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ رَبَ الَعَرَشَ الَعَظَيَمَ انَه الَاكلَ مَا فَيَ عَنَدَيَ بَالَبَيَتَ وًّالَلَهَ يَا اخَوّانَيَ انَهَ اخَوًّنَيَ بَقَعَدَوًّ بَالَيَوًّمَيَنَ مَافَى اكلَ وًّالَلَهَ وًّضَعَنَا كثَيَرَ صَعَبَ نَحَنَ ٦ نَفَرَ دَاخَلَ الَبَيَتَ وًّابَيَ مَتَوًّفَيَ وًّلَا يَوًّجَدَ مَنَ يَعَوًّلَ عَلَيَنَا وًّسَاكنَيَنَ فَيَ بَيَتَ اجَارَ لَانَسَتَطَيَعَ دَفَعَ الَاجَارَ الَلَيَ بَاقَيَ عَلَيَنَا انَيَ دخلة على الله ثمَّ عليكِ اني في وجه الله ثم في وجهك اني اترجاك اتوسل اليك تساعدني لوجه الله. الله يَأْخي منَ الصَبَاحُ حُتا الان يَحُرّم علينا الاكل غير الماء اني اقسم بالله العلي العظيم على كتاب الله اني بنت يتيمه من ومعي اخوان صغار اقسم بالله على كتاب الله ان اخوتي ماعاد يقدرو ينطقو بكلمة من شدت الجوع وبيتنا ايجار وصاحب البيت مقدر ضروفنا يريد الإجار او بيخرجنا إلى الشارع و اني اسالك بالله وانشدك بمحمد رسول الله يا اخي لوانت مسلم وتحب الخير انك تساعدني بقدر استطاعتك هذارقمنا لمن اراد فعل الخير00967.717354582 وايعوضك الله بكل خير فيااخي انت رجال إذا شفت اسرتك جاوعين تعمل المستحيل من اجل تامن لهم الاكل ولكن انابنت عيني بصيره ويدي قصيره ليس لي اب مثلك يسمح دمعتى ويحمينى من الذل والاهانة واخواني سغار ساعدنا انقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع نتبهدل او نموت من الجوع انا اقسم بالله الذي رفع سبع سموات بلا عمد وبسط الارض ومهداني لااكذب عليك بحرف من هذا الرساله واني ماطلبتك إلى من ضيق وقسوت الضروف والحال الذي احنافيه واني وأسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره الامساعدتناانك ترسلي واتساب هذا رقمي 00967.717354582 وتطلب اسمي الكامل في البطاقه وتحولنا عليه ولتاخر علينا احنا في اشد الحاجة والضروف القاسيه جزاك الله خير الجزا..،.،.،.،;":'%''%&":';":💔:&&♡@.....❤😢❤❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉❤❤🎉❤
I ask Atheist friend can you recall anything from your childhood and he said yes lot of stuff. I then ask him why you can recall any memories is it because it was recorded for some reason? I ask what was the purpose of this recording when we are going to die? Or better yet who want your personal information and it is important enough to be recorded and even you can recall it. Many near death experience folks say their entire life flashed before their eyes, interesting . Hence the term JUDGEMENT DAY. That affirmative heaven action will not work, eveyone will be judge hence the name JUDGEMENT DAY.
3:185
Every soul will taste death. And you will only receive your full reward on the Day of Judgment. Whoever is spared from the Fire and is admitted into Paradise will ˹indeed˺ triumph, whereas the life of this world is no more than the delusion of enjoyment.
brother Farid is there an Tafsir in English that include the miracles and evidences of Islam
For example in the bukhari chain, does anyone go to AY and ask AY if the chain is true?
Abu Nu'aym (hadith #1560) has another path from AY, in which he is narrating it to Bakr bin Sahl.
So yes, even on that level it is corroborated.
@@FaridRespondssahih bukhari hadith number 3477 contradict Quran surah 4 verse 157
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j
There're many prophets that have beaten by their people.
Bukhari 3477 : has no clue about prophet Isa 'alaihissalam. It's not related to the story of prophet Isa.
So concluding that hadits is connected to surah An Nisa 157 is a guess that has no basis.
@@suluhsabil I think maybe u are wrong beacuse coincidence this sahih bukhari hadith number 3477 match gospel of Luke chapter 23 verse 34 read
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j
Prophets always pray to their people, even though they were hurt by their people.
Prophet Muhammad shalallahu alaihi wasallam pray when his people hurt him in Thaif.
"O Allah, give guidance to my people, indeed they do not know".
About Luke chapter 23 verse 34
- that not mention about prophet whose face was bleeding.
Verse 33 mention a man whose hand was held on the left and right, then nails to the wood.
Not bleeding on his face, and did not wipe blood from his face.
So that's not what is meant in the hadith. It's not the same as what is mentioned in Bukhari 3477.
So there's no contradiction surah An Nisa 157 and sahih Bukhari 3477.
12:03 Hadith system is like a web linking each narrater to the other its very similar to evolutionary biology.
When is the book out brother Farid u ain't gonna run from the question 😂😂
Publisher sent me a cover just a couple of days ago. It needs some minor changes. Will update you folks when I have more info.
@@FaridResponds I love brother for The sake of Allah ❤️❤️❤️
@@djazairion6200Farid is writing a book ?
@@islamforever5875 ohh absolutely, it's named why the sahaba رضي الله عنهم became Muslim
Peace be upon everyone,
We the humans want world peace,compassion and love to prevail
We the humans want this darkness of vices of inept political leaders to end
In the name of God the merciful,the compassionate
WE DEMAND PEACE,
AMEN AMIN
Yahya Bin Yahya who narrates from Malik in the Muwatta is different from Yahya Ibn Yahya who Muslim narrates from.
Alhamdulillah for the blessing of Islam
Dear brother Assalamualaikam, I am a new revert but I am confused on if there is no compulsion in religion, as some verses sort of imply you can force Islam on others, of course it’s because I am uneducated and I accept these as true anyway, I am just confused
Wa 'alaykumus-salam.
Which verses are you referring to?
@@Jack-qz1lg my dear brother thank you for your time, original verse being, 2:256 and the verse that confused me was then this one, 9:5. Also bukhari 8:387 contradicts it as well (I say contradict but I know it’s not a actual contradiction, just me being unable to understand)
@@user-cv9tc6oq5kRegarding 9:5, Quranic exegetes al-Baydawi and al-Alusi explain that it refers to those pagan Arabs who violated their peace treaties by waging war against Muslims.
There is no compulsion in religion verse is abrogated. Hell, you cant even leave islam as in the hadith the punishment is capital. There is compulsion in religion, especially if you are born muslim.
@@user-cv9tc6oq5k Regarding 9:5.
Verses talk about those who broke the treaty, expelled the Messenger ﷺ and attacked Muslims first. Read previous verses (4, 12, 13) in the same Surah 9 for context.
In Quran 9:2 Allah ﷻ says that for their treachery Allah ﷻ didn’t punish them straight away but first gave them period of time to leave the land.
In Quran 9:4 Allah ﷻ says that exception are disbelievers who honor the treaty, don’t act hostile towards Muslims and don’t support enemies of Muslims.
In Quran 9:6 Allah ﷻ says that even during open war if any of polytheists asks for protection then Muslims should protect polytheists and escort them to a place of safety so they may hear the word of Allah ﷻ.
And in Quran 9:12-13 we are explicitly told what type of people we are dealing with : people who broke their treaty, plotted to expel the Messenger ﷺ and attacked Muslims first.
I don't think that's the claim, the claim is two people can't agree on what was said or what they saw. The wording in the narattions opens things up to the claim of narrators not being reliable even if they're called sound by their advocates. And a secondary issue that Imam Malik may narrate mursalaat from people who the 6 may narrate Marfooat from, etc.
It doesn't mean they're fabricated, but as am absolute source:/
It explains why huffaz of hadith followed one of the 4 Imams, even though they were in position to gauge things to a greater degree.
It is actually the more common claim. It may not be yours, but it is popular.
1.) All you did was link a bunch of dudes saying they heard this and that from the prophet, but can't anyone just attribute someone's name and said this narrator said X,Y,Z and call it a day? 🤣
2.) Every single narrator you mentioned lived 100-200 years after the Prophet's death. Not during. Anas was born 711 AD, 80 years after the Prophet.
Case closed. Easy debunk.
1. Yes, except that its very obvious and the muhadditheen picked up on it. If someone fabricates chains then, theyre going to make a lot of mistakes in those chains (like when the isnad chronologically makes no sense or it's impossible the narrators met geographically), or theyll become known for narrating things with unverifiable chains (then they're declared to be unreliable as a whole), or they'll narrate contradictory reports or... I think you get the point. The scholars were incredibly thorough with isnaad.
2. You've confused Anas Bin Malik (who was a sahabi and born in 612) with his son Malik Bin Anas. And the hadith Farid mentions is corroborated by a very similar report with a seperate, authentic sanad from Al-Bara'a Bin 3azib, also a sahabi.
"Easy debunk" yea...
What would your response be for a person claiming that as Qur'an is protected by Allah but not the hadith. If prophet (S.A.W) said something but later on it was changed or due to human error it got corrupted i.e added or removed and is now a part of islamic belief. Such as the coming of ESA A.S they claim that this narration is quoted in the books later on but not in the earliest hadith books and somehow it got corrupted and added that ESA A.S will come back. They claim Qur'an doesn't state the coming of him rather it says he is dead.
Do not engage with Qadiyanis, created by the bloody British colonist. They are not Muslims to begin with and likewise the hadith rejector.
Allah says, O you who have believed, Obey Allah and Obey the Messenger.
Whoever obeyed the Messenger has obeyed Allah.
And other similar verses.
The Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, said, whoever lies intentionally upon me, let him take his seat in the Hellfire.
This hadith is authentic as the Qur'an.
Allah preserved the Qur'an and Sunnah, it would make no sense, when Allah commanded you to obey the Messenger and commanded you to follow Muhajiroon and Ansar. How can we obey this command if the Sunnah has not been preserved.
It is crystal clear that Allah preserved the Qur'an and Sunnah through Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jama'ah and Allah will continue to do it until the day of judgment.
As for 'Eesa/Jesus, peace be upon him, he will return back as Allah says, rather Allah took him up to Himself.
The people of the book will believe in him ('Eesa) before his death.
The Ahadith of the Prophet, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, is clear that 'Eesa, will return back as this is one of the major signs.
the sunnah clarifies the quran so to preserve the quran's meanings it implies preservation of hadith
the coming of isa is a sign of hour this is even in the quran so the one who is claiming otherwise is ignorant of the quran furthermore the hadith on this matter is mutwattir
" he is dead" not only ignorant but also a liar
aya 57 of al Az-Zukhruf mentionns ISA than aya 61 in the same context says in the meaning of "And indeed, Jesus will be [a sign for] knowledge of the Hour, so be not in doubt of it, and follow Me. This is a straight path."
so how can they doubt it "so be not in doubt of it"
as for their lie of him being dead
in surah An-Nisaa 157 and 158 contains the meaning of that they didn't kill nor crucify ISA and that allah has risen him , than 159 the meaning of "And there is none from the People of the Scripture but that he will surely believe in Jesus before his death. And on the Day of Resurrection he will be against them a witness."
the point is there is still people who are from the people of the scriptures that don't believe in him so he is still alive and in the hadith in his time all religions except islam will perish so they will all believe in him so not only the hadiths are in line with quran but they clarify it as in the quran 44 of An-Nahl the meaning of " [We sent them] with clear proofs and written ordinances. And We revealed to you the message that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought."
don't listen to hadith rejectors they are ignorant of the quran or they know and are intentionnaly lying
@@mohamedcherifchabane688Oh brother sahih bukhari hadith number 3477 contradict Quran surah nisa verse 157
Anyone who JUDGES by the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN Converts is actually following the AVESTA under the name of MUHAMMAD.
The Almighty says in the QURAN 5 44-47
And whosoever doesnt Judge by what Allah has """"""REVEALED""""" is a Disbeliever, wrong doer and defiantly disobident.
Islam will always be from the QURAN and TAWRAT(according to the condition in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT)
The INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to ISA and gives guidance and laws which """""CONFIRMS"""" the laws in the TAWRAT is lost to time.
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j
how is that a contradiction?
bukhari 3477 is about "As if I saw the Prophet (ﷺ) talking about one of the prophets whose nation had beaten him and caused him to bleed, while he was cleaning the blood off his face and saying, "O Allah! Forgive my nation, for they have no knowledge.""
and al aya 157 an-nissa from its meaning negating that they cursifyed or killed ISA
first the hadith doesn't say it is isa who bleed to begin with
seconde it says "he was cleaning the blood off his face" and someone curisfied can't clean himself as his hands are pinned and if he is killed well it is clear he can't wipe himself furthermore it says he was hit it doens't speak about crusifixtion to begin with
If someone twists the hadith from "a prophet" to "isa" and from "beaten" to "crusifyed" and removes "while he was cleaning the blood off his face"
that twisting is on him and not a contradiction but his false understanding is wrong
@Farid Responds i see many people going astray because of Scam Shamoun, you should refute his claims against islam
If the hadith was transferred from Ibn Umar through different narrators to people like Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Abu Dawaud and the rest wouldn't that mean the hadith was narrated through the oral recitation system meaning that over time as the hadith was passed down from one generation to the other it might have got completely or somewhat altered changing the original message of the hadith to a certain extent. The hadith system makes me ponder.
How If they all narrated the same thing ?
@@Mimi-Maa18 they could have later agreed on the same part of the hadith which may not be the original messege.
@DomainofKnowlegdia how ? How would people from different generations, and sometimes different places, agree on the same lie ?
@@Mimi-Maa18 Because of Faith in Allah
@@DomainofKnowlegdia I didn't say why, I said how ? Your argument doesn't make sense
Salam brother,
Excuse me for this off topic message, but I had a request;
Recently a series of anti Islamic (and anti religion in general) channels are getting more and more popularity, and they (three to be exact) are all governed by a man named Adam elmasri, he was even in a mythvideo video criticizing Islam.
There also little to no rebuttals toward him, only thing i found was a brother that made a rebuttal to him a while back, but Adam recently made a response to his rebuttal. (Although it seems like there is a lot of people criticizing him in Arabic videos but unfortunately I don't speak Arabic, and it seems like he has responded to some of them)
I wanted to know, would you take a look at his stuff and answer him if you can? It's getting out of hand
Indeed, there are many responses to this person in Arabic. He is generally a dishonest person in reporting, and lies a lot about the sources he cites
@samirhachad643
Yes, he seems disingenuous to me, but due to his involvement with mythvision I thought that we need to respond to him more seriously
I ask that you please give a detailed response to the following comment. This is something I would like to know as well. "Akhi Farid, this is Mohammad from Brisbane, Australia.
I have someone locally here in Brisbane who rejects hadith.
When I sent this video to him, he came back with this following response:
All he was trying to show in that video was that Bukhari didn't fabricate those hadiths. However, this is not our issue, and he even then admits that you could argue that someone at the beginning of the chain fabricated them. So all he showed was that these hadiths are plausible historically passed down narrations of things that possibly happened (i.e. people said this & people did that at this time or the other, which have absolutely NO impact on the Theology of The Religion nor become an extra part of it), which I have never argued against, as I have always claimed that these are HISTORY books. Even the Christians and Jews can show that their narrations were historically passed down through several different chains of people, but they CANNOT show that they are from God & His Messenger. What he didn't, and CANNOT show is that these hadiths are RELIGIOUS Books that are from Allah and His Messenger and therefore form part of the Theological ideology of The Religion alongside The Quran (which is the ONLY Theological Text approved by Allah and His Messenger).
Our issue is whether these narrations are from Allah & His Messenger and therefore from an extra part of The Theology of the Religion. What you and others don't seem to understand is that the Messenger's words are NOT Muhammad's personal words but are in fact only The Words of Allah that he is honorably relaying (passing on) to us in his Role of Messenger of Allah. That's the whole point of the role of Messenger of Allah. It's NOT to give you his own words, but simply to relay the Words of Allah.
So you need to stop conflating the Words of Allah which are relayed by His Messenger (which constitute the Theology of the Religion) with the personal words of the man Muhammad outside of his relaying role of Messenger (which do NOT form a part of the Theology of the Religion but are merely his own free willed personally chosen speech)."
okay, this is interesting brother, i will come back to u with an answer
@@pingu.3712 JazakAllah khair brother, this had been weighing down on me for a while becauseI could not come to a reconciliation with this. A response would be greatly appreciated.
FARIIID PLEASE REFUTE MUHAMMADFROMGOD’S VIDEOS ON HADITH REJECTION
it is enough that that man says there is 3/2 daily prayers and not 5
and that you can do whatever amount of sujoud or ruku'e in the prayer if true
this a catastrophy who in his right mind would listen to him
Anyone say this claim that Hadith is after 200 or whatever
He or she doesn’t know that the smallest student of Hadith will laugh so hard because it is very obvious that the claimer has no knowledge at all about how Hadith where written and memorised in first place and he or she don’t understand the difference between collecting what is already written and memorised but making them in a book that have them all
This is a huge claim from them to say after 200 years because this show us the ignorance and dishonesty when it comes to knowledge
Anyone who JUDGES by the HADITH collection authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN COnverts is actually following the AVESTA under the name of MUHAMMAD.
The Almighty says in the QURAN 5 44-47
And whosoever doesnt Judge by what Allah has """"""REVEALED""""" is a Disbeliever, wrong doer and defiantly disobident.
Islam will always be from the QURAN and TAWRAT(according to the condition in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT)
The INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to ISA and gives guidance and laws which """""CONFIRMS"""" the laws in the TAWRAT is lost to time.
Dude. Did u just wake up hangover?
Not a Christian Here But I do have questions Did Muhammad See Allah? No Aisha, the wife of the Prophet Muhammad, stated that anyone claiming that Muhammad saw Allah is a liar. She cited the Quranic verse: “No vision can grasp Him” (Quran 6:103) and “None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah” (Quran 6:103). Yes: Muhammad did in fact see Allah Narrated AbdurRahman ibn A’ish Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said: I saw my Lord, the Exalted and Glorious in the most beautiful form. He said: What do the Angels in the presence of Allah contend about? I said: Thou art the most aware of it. He then placed HIS PALM between my shoulders and I felt its coldness in my chest and I came to know what was in the Heavens and the Earth. He recited: ‘Thus did we show Ibrahim the kingdom of the Heavens and the Earth and it was so that he might have certainty.’(6:75) Darimi reported it in a mursal form and Tirmidhi also reported. (Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 237; ALIM CD-ROM Version) Narrated Mu’adh ibn Jabal Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) was detained one morning from observing the dawn prayer (in congregation) along with us till the sun had almost appeared on the horizon. He then came out hurriedly and Iqamah for prayer was observed and he conducted it (prayer) in brief form. When he had concluded the prayer by saying As-salamu alaykum wa Rahmatullah, he called out to us saying: Remain in your places as you were. Then turning to us he said: I am going to tell you what detained me from you (on account of which I could not join you in the prayer) in the morning. I got up in the night and performed ablution and observed the prayer as had been ordained for me. I dozed in my prayer till I was overcome by (sleep) and lo, I found myself in the presence of my Lord, the Blessed and the Glorious, in the best form. He said: Muhammad! I said: At Thy service, my Lord. He said: What these highest angels contend about? I said: I do not know. He repeated it thrice. He said: Then I saw Him put his palms between my shoulder blades till I felt the coldness of his fingers between the two sides of my chest. Then everything was illuminated for me and I could recognize everything. He said: Muhammad! I said: At Thy service, my Lord. He said: What do these high angels contend about? I said: In regard to expiations. He said: What are these? I said: Going on foot to join congregational prayers, sitting in the mosques after the prayers, performing ablution well despite difficulties. He again said: Then what do they contend? I said: In regard to the ranks. He said: What are these? I said: Providing of food, speaking gently, observing the prayer when the people are asleep. He again said to me: Beg (Your Lord) and say: O Allah, I beg of Thee (power) to do good deeds, and abandon abominable deeds, to love the poor, that Thou forgive me and show mercy to me and when Thou intendst to put people to trial Thou causes me to die unblemished and I beg of Thee Thy love and the love of one who loves Thee and the love for the deed which brings me near to Thy love. Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said: It is a truth, so learn it and teach it. Transmitted by Ahmad, Tirmidhi who said: This is a hasan sahih hadith and I asked Muhammad ibn Isma'il about this hadith and he said: It is a sahih hadith. (Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 245; ALIM CD-ROM Version) Al-Bayhaqi also narrated the hadith "I saw my Lord" in al-Asma’ wa al-Sifat with a sound chain but with the addition: "in the form of a curly-haired, beardless young man wearing a green robe," a condemned, disauthenticated addition and concatenation with another hadith that refers to Gibril. Hence al-Suyuti interpreted it either as a dream or, quoting his shaykh Ibn al-Humam, as "the veil of form" (hijab al-sura)… (Islamic Doctrines and Beliefs: Volume 1: The Prophets in Barzakh, The Hadith of Isra’ and Mir’aj, The Immense Merits of Al-Sham, The Vision of Allah, Al-Sayyid Muhammad Ibn ‘Alawi al-Maliki, translation and notes by Dr. Gibril Fouad Haddad As-Sunna Foundation of America 1999, pp. 137-138; bold and underline emphasis ours) What’s strange is that the Quran Explicitly says that no one has ever seen Allah Surah Al-An’am (Chapter 6), verses 103 No vision can encompass Him, but He encompasses all vision. For He is the Most Subtle, All-Aware. I said to 'Aisha, "O Mother! Did Prophet Muhammad see his Lord?" Aisha said, "What you have said makes my hair stand on end! Know that if somebody tells you one of the following three things, he is a liar: Whoever tells you that Muhammad saw his Lord, is a liar." Then Aisha recited the Verse: No soul can know what it will earn tomorrow.’ (31.34) She added: "And whoever tells you that he concealed (some of Allah's orders), is a liar." Then she recited: ‘O Apostle! Proclaim (the Message) which has been sent down to you from your Lord…’ (5.67) ‘Aisha added. "But the Prophet saw Gabriel in his true form twice." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 378) Aisha said, "If anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen his Lord, HE IS A LIAR, FOR ALLAH SAYS: ‘No vision can grasp Him.’ Quran (6.103) And if anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen the Unseen, he is a liar, for Allah says: ‘None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah.’" (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 477
All the Scholars and Muslims say and agree that the Prophet Muhammad was illiterate man am not sure if that's true because in Hadith 114 in Ibn `Abbas said, "When the ailment of the Prophet became worse, he said, 'Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.'
If it was the companions of Muhammad who would write for him he would have not say Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement instead he would of said you will write he would not speak in the first person.
I don't know why CZcams always deletes my response 🤦♂️
Just an advice from us, do not dulge in yourself with knowledge while you are in a terrible state.
Begin with small things, learn the shahadah, what it means, then Salah, how did the Prophet Muhammed, salalahu aleyhi wa salam, prayed and so on.
Like in school, in kindergarten, they learn the alphabet letters, and so on.
This islamic 'ilm, which is more important than what you have learned from your School.
Greetings from Scandinavia.
@@user-hi5xq7nx2y try to respond again
I am skeptic of your claims u might've copied from a missionary post cause I fact checked it and didn't find anything similar
@@Jaywalker45 What does your instincts say about Hadith 114?
Im number one?
No, Allah is
Brother refute Apostate Alladin
In the Quran had no Word Call-- "" Muhammad "" But Then Why in the Quran had or has Mudammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , ?? Then -- What is the Meaning of "" Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIN , Muhammad"AAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAN , Muslim"AAAN , Muslim"UUUN , ????
What are you talking about ?
In the Quran Surah No--47 Named it Was Called -- Al-Qital ( The Fighting ) ,After that -- Top Islamic Scholars They were lied They Were Changed The Name They Put New Named Called -- Muhammad , But Surah "" Muhammad And In the Quran -- [ Muhammad"UUUN , IIIN, AAAN ] Completely Different From Each Other ,
Hadith rejectors never object about Quran . But , Attacking the hadiths with same possible objections . Objections are : may be hadiths are fabricate , may be hadiths are wrong .... may be 'etc' . Their logics are like that may be your parents are not biological parents , may be DNA test is wrong etc . Anyone can do these objection in any things . All this objections are logical fallacy , not exist in reality . Even they don't use this method in their real life and about Quran. But , In term of Hadith they do it . Because enemy of their desire is Hadith and proof . Hadith rejectors do the same fallacy . Those are only take mutawtir narrations do the same fallacy . We declare a narration authentic based on Previous Hadith Scholars sayings means our declaration based on proof . On the other hand , hadith rejectors have no proof for possible objection . Our hadith authentication fully based on proof means Jarh also Tadil is based on proof . Very interesting thing is how they do fallacies and reject proof .
When will you start to refute the anti Islam videos again?
Religion is based on logic, if you want to know the logic, try thinking about it
Islam continues to say Christians are unreasonable, stupid, idiots but still cannot prove that Jesus or Isa was sinful,
Many Christians who have converted to Islam also said that Christianity makes no sense but still cannot prove that Jesus was a sinner.
But millions of former Muslims who believe in Jesus would definitely say that Muhammad's life was very evil and depraved, as said by Nabeel Quraeshi, a former Pakistani Muslim who said that Muhammad in history was very different from Muhammad in the Muslim hearts.
Try to think about which logic is true, Christianity or Islam, think deeply about the millions of ex-Islamists who say it themselves, doesn't that mean there is something wrong? think seriously for the safety of your soul. Study Muhammad's life carefully, is Muhammad really a figure whose life should be emulated? If you're curious, why don't you want to study Muhammad's historical life in the Koran and Hadith?
See Nabi asli. CZcams channel discussed based on the Koran and Hadith itself
Don’t you brush your hair? You look very untidy . Personal hygiene is a part of the sunnah of the Prophet.
Don’t strawman your opponents position, nobody is saying that Bukhari fabricated ahadeeth. Bukhari came when Ahadeeth were already fabricated. Bukhari himself had over 600,000 ahadeeth that he rejected.
Every Muslim knows there are fabricated and weak hadith. Thats not the problem. The problem is when you reject the Prophets judgement entirely by assuming every single hadith is fabricated - which is absurd.
@@MiloBoz No one is saying every single hadith is fabricated, but the overwhelming majority are, as they appear over a century after the Prophet (s). The entire “science” of jarh and ta’deel is subjective opinion that cannot be proven in itself. So the entire science of hadith is based on a circular argument.
@@JohnSmith-ib1ky Actually Quranists do say that and reject ahadith as a whole.
Also your argument that they are fabricated because they were written down 100 years later is a fallacy. Its same fallacy made by atheists about the Qur'an.
You yourself just admitted some are not fabricated, deapite being written down later.
As for the science of knowing which ones are authentic and what is not - that is something which requires expertise the quranists are lacking. I dont think there exists even a single quranist who can recite the Book of Allah, letalone to have expertise in hadith sciences.
Who are the top 5 "Quranist" Qur'an reciters? In all the years of quranist dawah , I dont think they've even produced one actual Qur'an reciter with proper tajweed.
@@MiloBoz If you are really interested in this topic I’d advise you to go through Dr Joshua Little’s 500 page thesis on the hadith of the age of Ayesha. Something that up until now almost all Sunnis viewed as fact when it turned out to be nothing more than a polemical fabrication of Hisham bin Urwa to elevate her status against the Shi’a when he moved to Kufa.
@@JohnSmith-ib1ky What are the qualifications of this "Dr Joshua Little", what is his religion and who are his teachers?
If he has not a Muslim who has mastered classical Arabic and other areas of hadith sciences, then he's not qualified to have an opinion on any aspect of the religion and especially the sciences of hadith.
Phd thesis' written by disbelievers to be judged academically by other disbelievers at pagan universities - they hold zero weight in religion and are fully rejected.
Refusing to accept is worse than refusing to accept that only qualified doctors should perform surgery in hospitals.
If this brother still believes Aisha was 9 then nothing he says is worth considering as knowledge because the foundation upon which you judge information is questionable. I dont mean to slander you, as in you intend malevolence. I doubt your intellect and rationale.
When you skip tons of sources that prove her adulthood, and take the laughable stance you did, theres just no way to take you seriously.
Hello brother!! How can i contact you❤
32:12
If only you could see the wicked hanging their heads ˹in shame˺ before their Lord, ˹crying:˺ “Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back and we will do good. We truly have sure faith ˹now˺!”
(32:22) And who is more unjust than he who is given good counsel through the Signs of his Lord and yet he turns away from them? Surely We will exact full retribution from such criminals.
(29:2) Do people think that they will be let go merely by saying: “We believe,” and that they will not be tested,1 (29:3) for We indeed tested those who went before them?