The Twelver Imamiyyah Shi’a religion is the only religion on the planet that can’t form a complete narrative of its most important elements strictly from its own books, and is constantly having to refer to-and often even plagiarize-the books of those whom it considers disbelievers. Even the Noble Qur’an has no Twelver Imami chain of transmission.
@samy7013 No religion can form a complete narrative of its most important elements strictly from its own books. That's why religion exists. To offer interpretative power, and this is a good thing. It's dogmatic Sunni Muslims and hyper-Evangelical Christians that make religion such a dark, ugly thing in our 21st-century world.
Ammar nkshwani has paid his followers to comment on Farid and sunnah discourse videos. They don't watch the video they just seeded the comment given to them
I watch the videos. And farid just makes weak claims and argues everything. I did a response video to one of them. I enjoy those who seek knowledge and discuss. So shout out to farid. But his claims are insanely weak. He argues against his own Hadith. And is not consistent with his own sheiks.
@@BigAck don't know which video you are talking about but Farid explains the correct meaning of the thing mentioned in our books. He has given several Shia books references which you guys don't know that they exist. Those hadiths saying the same thing as we preach.
@@altamashbaibars9477 I’m specifically talking about the videos he is defending Umar for causing a dispersion in the home of the prophet PBUH when he was sick. And not allowing him to write a message so “they won’t go astray” I made an extensive video on it. He disagrees with the Sunni sheik Assam Al Hakeem. And Sayed Ammar. And makes very very irrational claims on a very clear verse and story. I don’t mind critical discussions and commentary. But farids whole channel is debating and “proving others wrong” even when he makes weak claims. I’d love to see farid give lectures or actually source things from his own perspective. And not chose points to “try and prove wrong” from others. I think he has a lot of knowledge and can use it much better if he allocates it to his own topics and videos. He seems like he’s been doing this for a while now.
@@BigAck Umar didn't cause any chaos. He just gave his suggestion that other companions differed on this. He had no clue what would have happened. We should have some husn al dhan with people. Never to always doubt their intentions. And if this would have been that important the prophet would have written the will afterwards. Why Shias try to drag someone down with this. Can any human stop prophet from doing anything do you think prophet would not deliver something that's important? Remember prophet didn't do taqqiya of any sort
@@altamashbaibars9477 I don’t know what it has to do with Shia. Is sheik Assam Al Hakeem also trying to drag Umar down. He literally said “Umar thought he prophet was not in the right state of mind. So to preserve the deen of the prophet which is definitely not possible” Am I missing something? If the prophet asked you to get him a pen and paper would you tell him no? Is it up to Umar to preserve the deen of the prophet of man kind. I’m not trying to “bring someone down” I’m analyzing history from 40 sources that say the same thing. And scholars and sheiks much more knowledgeable then you me and farid here all agree on what happened that day. It’s not about the message. It’s about Umar telling the prophet “we don’t need your message. The Quran is good enough” the prophet wanted to state something so they wouldn’t go astray. And they went astray directly after fighting in front of the final prophet of mankind…so much so it frustrated rasool Allah. And got them all kicked out of the home. It isn’t about “putting down” it’s about clear logic and reasoning. Why are we “defending” a clear ill intent by Umar? Would you yourself ever tell a prophet we don’t need your message the Quran is good enough? Or just go get the pen and paper? Especially after witnessing his prophethood for 20 years in person. This was wrong of Umar. Nobody is saying don’t love Umar. Love who you please. But defending I’ll intent against the prophet that frustrated him and prevented him from delivering a message so they wouldn’t go astray. Is not good in any way. And shouldn’t be defended.
@10:45 Prophet Ibrahim(as) and Maryam(as) could not recognize Jibrael the first time. These are examples of how the chosen don't have to be born with a full spritual unveiling.
Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻 Genesis 3:14 X Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life. Isaiah 65:25 THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
"It says it in Bukhari, one way or another," By that logic we find statements of the disbelievers in the Quran, so naudhubillah one way or another Quran contains the rhetoric of disbelievers. But of course Allah only mentions the kuffar's statements for a reason, to refute them. Likewise Imam Bukhari mentioned it for a reason, to show it's not a narration (because it does not even have a hadith) but rather a statement from Az zuhiri that he heard this narration from someone (we have no idea who it is, so majhul)
@condorianonegdiffsgoku bro we've been saying you can't just take reports from bukhari or Muslim, so now there is no legitimacy added to hadith just because it is quoted in Muslim or Bukhari all reports have to be analysed in their merit
The Qur'an says don't obey a sinner. So Shi'as are obedient to Imam Ja'far ul Sadiq (as). But Bukhari believed Imam Ja'far ul Sadiq (as) to be 'Unreliable' as a narrator. So where is The Origin of Imam Ja'far ul Sadiq (as) in The Qur'an and where is the origin of Imam Bukhari ?
So Nakshavani is supposed to be a scholar/academic, or at least someone who is well versed in Shi'ism yet not aware of what Shi'i sources contain in regards to the Prophethood of the Messenger ﷺ
Ammar did not give any evidence of the quotes he used that goes down to the Sahabis. He is just trying to make the Sunnis look untrustworthy. We don't need to resort to someone's dream or some guy who had never met the prophet to learn the biography of the prophet. There are sahabis who described the events in the prophet's life to us.
Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other? Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]? Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran? If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] The difference between Sunni and Shia is that our scholars unanimously agree that the Quran is not distorted you can use as many weak hadith as you want. You won't hear any ridiculous scholars and personalities of Sunni Islam mouthing off these ridiculous things like Shias do despite the Shias being only 10% and Sunnis being majority. You'd think since there are more Sunnis you'd find more ridiculous claims like this coming from Sunnis but it is opposite. For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9 Any sunni who believes that a part of Qur'an has been lost due to goats eating it or men changing it, is a kafir. There is no difference of opinion on this in sunni Islam. No buts no ifs. Your misunderstanding does not change our stance. Aisha (ra) did not believe in tahreef. Stop putting your own view on the hadith. You are just seeing what you want to see. It wouldn't have mattered if goats ate it because people memorise the Qur'an. What you're basically going to find is that this will likely lead into the topic of abrogation and abrogation was completed whilst the Prophet (pbuh) was alive. Islamqa covers this very well. Shias might attempt to steal the chains in the Sunni books and attribute them to themselves, which is pathetic and shows the weakness of their way. `Asim bin abi al-Nujoud, Hafs bin Sulayman and Hamzah al-Zayyat are all great Imams of Ahlul-Sunnah, the Twelvers cannot prove that they were Rafidhi imami Shia neither through their books or ours. If they were to prove that they were Shia, the Shia of the time were Sunni in their worship, and even if they try their best to prove that they were Rafidhah, then even the Imamiyyah at the time had different sects all of them enemies who make Takfeer on each-other. By consensus`Asim and Hafs are two great Imams of Qira’at. The weakness attributed to Hafs is in regards to his skills as narrator, and the accusation of him being a liar is a baseless exaggeration. And if true still doesn’t strengthen Shia’s view. The rules for the authentication of a narrator in a Hadithi chain are different than the rules for the authentication of a Qur’ani recitation. Hundreds of narrations from their infallibles prove that the followers of Ibn Saba claim distortion, and the statement that the chains of transmission of these narrations are weak cannot be accepted for reasons such as: First: The Shiites do not consider the chains of transmission and their lim il rijjal (hadeeth sciences) is very inconsistent Second: The narrations of distortion are abundant (mutawatir) according to them, and if this were the case, their chain of transmission should not be of concern Third: There are Shiite scholars who authenticated the chains of narrations of Hadiths regarding distortion Fourth: Whoever rejects the many narrations about distortion, which amount to nearly two thousand narrations, is obligated to reject the narrations of the Imamate and the narrations of the rajah, the bidaa, and the infallibility, because as their their scholar, Yusuf Al-Bahrani, said: If these narrations aren’t accepted (i.e. the narrations of distortion), despite their abundance and spread, it would be possible to reject to the other narrations related to the religion, since the principles are one, as are the chains, narrators, sheikhs, and transmission. The narrations of distortion that the Shiites have are narrated from the twelve imams who believe in their infallibility, while all those who narrate the absence of distortion from him are the scholars, not the imams. They do not narrate from the imams, and not a single narration says that there is no distortion. Rather, they transmit two thousand narrations from the imams that say there is distortion, and those from whom they quote that there is no distortion are scholars who can aren’t infallible. As for the infallible ones, they quoted from them the statement of distortion, so the Shiites are required to take the words of the infallible ones and not the words of others. Nimat Allah Al-Jazairi said: The narrations that indicate distortion exceed two thousand hadiths. Then he said: He did not come across a single hadith that said otherwise. Yusuf Al-Bahrani said: However, there is no opposition to this narration, as I know, other than a mere claim that is devoid of evidence and does not go beyond mere gossip. All shias should either follow their infallibles or leave this evil religion.
You know... ive never in my life seen someone get shown their own books and still disagree. Hypocrites to the highest degree... and we all know how Allah feels about the hypocrites. InshaAllah if you hold on to the Quran and the Ahlulbayt you'll never go astray.
Allahumma Barik Allahumma Barik BarakAllah Allahumma Barik Allahumma Barik amazing video akhi seriously amazing. Really enjoy and learn alot by you making these videos
Akhi you don't know Aliwites (sect of Bashar Assad, Syrian government) had already made Penity(Five in one) 😂. This Aliwite sect was found by a guy from twelver shia in 9th century.
After reading peshawar nights and then I was guided and reserch for 5yrs properly now I follow true Islam alhamdulila thank you mufti menk and shk uthman farook and many ti guide me to true Islam. ❤
@@samy7013 fake books r u sick 😫 and blind too all sources are from your books 🤣🤣🤣 just say you agreed to disagree THANK ALLAH TO GUIDE ME TO TRUE ISALM AND NOT WHAT YOU ALL BELIVE FROM FAKE BOOKS 😊
@@samy7013 I am guessing he found out how fake these books were. Anybody who makes small effort and research will see what Pashawer nights is, good willing.
When Umar himself didn't even let the Prophet (pbuh) write his own hadith then your whole foundation is rocked. Yeah. I'll talk about Sunni Shi'a. Would Umar have even allowed a collection like Bokhari's to exist when he was refusing even The Prophet a paper and a pen to write a document for The Ummah to not go astray ?
@@Aliameemwhy did Umar marry imam Ali’s daughter, Um Kalthoum? And have a son with her, Zaid Ibn Umar (as) , the grandson of Nabi Muhammad ﷺ. If Imam Ali (as) thought Umar ra was good enough to be his son in law, who are you to cast doubt on his character?
@AD-lk9re Umar gave the governance of Shaam to Mu'awiah. The same Mu'awiah that waged a war against Imam Ali (as) Imam Hassan AND Imam Hussein (as) at The Battle of Siffeen. And then , he gave The Seat of Governance / Khilafat to his son Yazid. Who also waged war against yhelImam Hussein (as) and this time got him killed. These are facts number 1. And number 2 even The Prophet Lut offered his daughters to homosexuals in an attempt for them to change their ways. So. There are 2 points of dispute at least between Sunnis and Shi'as relating to number 1 : Imam Ali (as) actually giving his bloodline / non fostered daughter to Umar for marraige - or not & 2: Whether or not Umar was actually a homosexual- or not . The fact remains that if Umar's protest that " The Qur'an is enough for us " carries any weight at all then he is doomed to condemning his own Caliphate in the process Let alone the Qur'anic command to obey The Prophet (pbuh).
@@Aliameem Your understanding of what Lut did is not correct, since a zani does not marry a pure woman according to the Quran and the people of Lut were not pure. He offered his daughters to some people who had not yet performed that action, this is the way that we reconcile this verse, in order to avoid accusing a Prophet ﷺ of committing the sin which you have accused him of. Secondly, Muhammad ﷺ is free of having married the daughter of a homosexual, and taking him as a close friend. As we know, the Prophet ﷺ advised us to take good muslim friends since a man is upon the religion of his friend. Your accusation shows that you disrespect both Muhammad ﷺ and Ali ra, since you accuse them of fraternizing closely with a homosexual. I prefer the sunni narrative which is logical and proven through history, that Umar was good, and thats why the best of Men Muhammad ﷺ took him as a friend and Father and law, and Ali ra took him as a son in law and named 3 of his sons after him. This is what is logical, as a opposed to the autistic shia narrative that Imam Ali had his wife killed by Umar, and then proceeded to marry his daughter off to Umar and also name 3 of his sons umar. Not to mention that Imam Ali gave bay’ah to Abu Bakr and Umar, and Imam Hassan gave bay’ah to Muawiya, and it is kufr to give bay’ah to a kafir. Therefore it is impossible that any of these people were kuffar, rather your understanding is biased, false, and would bear the ramifications of Imam Ali and Imam Hassan being kuffar, due to giving allegiance to non muslims. Overall, shi’ism is full of plotholes, and that is why i left it and became Maliki Sunni alhamdulilah.
I try to be a Shia and always will try to follow that path as it is the most obvious truth to me. Nevertheless, this is NOT the time to be speaking of differences while our brothers and sisters are suffering in Falasteen.
@@abdxllahh Also, you cant just stand there and do nothing and say Allah will help. Countries with the capacity to help have to at least try and not just sit and talk all day.
@@zanejaafar9013So you are saying shia countries are supporting them 😂.. Bro when...? 35000 Palestinians have been killed and What did Iran do for them? They attacked Israel somedays ago only when their own embassy was attacked in Syria.. Second of all Why don't you mention Rafidis killing thousands of muslims in Syria, iraq yemen etc.. they have killed more muslims than Israel. As for the sunni countries.. they might not have attacked Israel directly because US is with them but they have sent thousands of aid trucks to Palestine and still continue to send.
Of course, we should do our best to help the Palestinians. Even some non-muslims are helping them. Tags like Sunni, Salafi only create more divisons among the muslims. I identify as muslim. Also those who take Ali as intercessor are not muslims.
What's wrong if the prophet was bewitched he was a human. We have to keep humans as humans because shirk came to humans because they deeply love those individuals and create super natural stories about them and start worshipping them.
It’s an issue of a perfect message coming through an imperfect vessel (a human who sins). The perfect message of Allah needs a human capable of delivering it. If you knew someone was crazy or saw visions and was easily duped, would you trust what that person was saying? Even if they were just a sinning human, wouldn’t you second guess if they claimed to then be a prophet? Infallibility is a rational conclusion that God’s message must be delivered by the living and breathing Quran (prophet Muhammad pbuh). If he was vulnerable to witchcraft, suicidal thoughts, and satanic verses, how can we trust this person? It’s not a worship of human beings. It’s about respecting their status through rational arguments. If anyone were to be perfect, wouldn’t it be the greatest messenger of Allah?
Does it not say in the Quran Allah's chosen servants are protected? Is The Rasool (SAWA) not one of his chosen servants? I don't understand why that's such a hard concept to grab? You do realize that you're also taking away from Allah (SWT) power as well pretty much saying he isn't competent enough to protect his servant from such evil astaghfiruallah. Fear Allah (SWT) and stop believing such nonsense.
@@rezabaker9845 protected that's why he was saved by Allah. It doesn't mean they will be immune it means in the end Allah will prevail them over evil. Didn't Adam as made a mistake and was influenced by iblees
The fact that the Shia have to rely on Sunni sources for the seerah of the Prophet peace be upon him is more than proof enough that Sunni Islam is correct.
And they would claim their Dajjal Mahdi is the only one who has the Quran and the Seerah, like the mystery of the Xtian "Trinity" XD What exactly do they want us to do? Leave Ahl us-Sunnah and be lost? We have monopoly on Seerah, the science of narrations, Tafseer, Hifz of the Quran, etc. All they have is Shirk and Mutah 🤣
Jazak Allah khair Farid. May Allah reward you . Please do a course to teach us more about Hadith , I am ready to be your first student . It would be very interesting to learn what you have put so much effort into studying and I’m sure many people would agree with me . Again, Jazak Allah khair
Assalamualaikum ges and Assalamualaikum bro, lately I have a problem with myself and I always think and ask something and this is like thinking and also myself worried and confused with the surrounding situation and asking something that is messed up as if not calm like confused with laws of nature, form. and God and other laws including life!! Can you please explain to me about my problem? greetings from Malaysia ☪️🇲🇾❤️😇
brother, I just saw an Islamophobic video that said that AL Quran surah 4:11-12 has a mathematical error!!! Can you expose that because on that channel you always expose their lies, right?
@@Alpha-wolf96 Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻 Genesis 3:14 X Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life. Isaiah 65:25 THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
@@dormantviewer Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻 Genesis 3:14 X Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life. Isaiah 65:25 THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
@@N.D.C.2410 Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻 Genesis 3:14 X Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life. Isaiah 65:25 THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
You won't learn nothing from The Prophet (pbuh) if you're following a man (Umar) who refused to even give him a paper and a pen when he , The Prophet himself wanted to write something down.
Don't comment without studying islamic history. Umar was never interested in narrating the prophet's hadith or biography because he thought that if he made a mistake Allah would punish him. Only basing on the pen-paper incident one cannot say Umar was greedy or a fake muslim, we all know about his contribution and participation in the jihads during the prophet's life time.
Ammar did not give any evidence of the quotes he used that goes down to the Sahabis. He is just trying to make the Sunnis look untrustworthy. We don't need to resort to someone's dream or some guy who had never met the prophet to learn the biography of the prophet. There are sahabis who described the events in the prophet's life to us
@GratefulHuman-en7tq But The Sahaba were not Infallible and The Qur'an says " Do not obey a Sinner " . The Religion of Islam is ' PERFECTED " - ( Holy Qur'an) and it's True representatives therefore are the same ie " Thoroughly Purified " - Holy Qur'an.
@GratefulHuman-en7tq You can't cover for his (Umar's) disobedience. It's as clear as daylight. Calling a spade a spade is all that is required not a plethora of ineffective excuses that will never digress from the litmus test that he already failed.
@@Gatekg "Shia reverts" never provide academic, rational or factual reasons for accepting shiasm. They accept on pure blind feelings...i.e emotions... At least from experience when I ask. On the other hand, ex-christians accepting the Orthodox Sunni narrative is in the multi millions based on academic discourse...
When we get into debates to satisfy our ego, that's definitely not going to lead to guidance. Shias are also used in Sunni transmission of hadith for instance the only narration that claims Othman ibn Afan collected the Qurʾan.
7:10, You know it's bad when he makes the same mistakes as the Jews and the Christians, reading the text improperly while having not understood the basics and having his own terribly irrational foundation.
I think the shii in particular and the Ummah in general should start reading the Qur'an more thoroughly. No wonder the prophet (peace be upon him) will complain that His Qoam left the Qur'an "So if you are in doubt, [O Muḥammad], about that which We have revealed to you, then ask those who have been reading the Scripture before you. The truth has certainly come to you from your Lord, so never be among the doubters." (Quran 10:94)
Don’t they claim/believe the revelation was supposed to go to Ali RA, but by mistake of Jibrael went to Muhammad PBUH? So why would they have his Seerah in their religion.
@@FaridResponds : My memory is fuzzy, brother. Do you know if Nawabakhti mentioned them in his “Book of Shi’a Sects”? The Imamis have splintered so hard and so often, that I honestly can’t keep track of all of their sects.
The angel who has no free will, and only follows Allah swt orders made a mistake? Ooof that is not Shia not Sunni that’s not even a donkey. That’s a wild belief.
I have a question. Could someone attack Islam and say Nabi (SAW) learnt about stories of prophets from Waraqa ibn Naufal since he used to recite the Injeel in Arabic?
@@fluidlessanimations8689 "I doubt the knew each other before that". Waraqa was Khadijah's cousin, so Mohammed most likely knew his wife's relative. Again, Waraqa is also reported to have been Mohammed's distant cousin. Mohammed was 40 years old when he became a prophet. This allows for ample time for him to interact with Waraqa in Mecca. What evidence do you have that your prophet never heard stories from Jews or Christians in his travels to Syria (which was Christian at the time) or in Mecca?
@@IbnSalama-ok2os (10:16) Tell them: 'Had Allah so willed, I would not have recited the Qur'an to you, nor would Allah have informed you of it. I have spent a lifetime among you before this. Do you, then, not use your reason? This is indeed a very weighty argument in refutation of the unbelievers’ allegation that the Prophet (peace be on him) had himself authored the Qur’an and subsequently ascribed it to God. So far as other arguments are concerned, they might be considered as somewhat remote. But the argument based on the life and character of the Prophet (peace be on him) was particularly weighty since the Makkans were thoroughly familiar with the whole of his life. Before his designation as a Prophet, he had spent a full forty years in their midst. He was born in their city. They had observed his childhood, and then his youth, and it was in their city that he had reached his middle age. He had also had a variety of dealings with them. He had had social interaction, business transactions, matrimonial ties, and relationships of every conceivable nature with his people so that no aspect of his life was hidden from their view. Could there be a more powerful testimony to the truth of his claim to prophethood than his blameless life and character? Two things about the life of the Prophet (peace be on him) were especially clear and were quite well known to all Makkans. First, that during the forty years of his life before his designation as a Prophet, he had received no instruction from, or even enjoyed the company of learned people which could have served as the source of the ideas which began to flow, as would a stream, from his lips as soon as he claimed, at the age of forty, that he had been designated as a Prophet. Before that he was never seen to have been concerned with the problems, or to have discussed the subjects, or to have expressed the ideas which frequently recur in the Qur’an. In fact, none of his closest friends and relatives had foreseen in his pre-Prophetic life any signs indicative of the great message which he suddenly started to preach at the age of forty. These pieces of evidence, taken together, provide incontrovertible evidence that the Qur’an is not a product of the Prophet’s mind; that it had come to the Prophet (peace be on him) from without. For no human being can produce something for which traces of growth and evolution are not found in the earlier period of his life.
@@IbnSalama-ok2osThis explains the fact that when some of the craftier Makkan unbelievers realized the sheer absurdity of their allegation that the Prophet (peace be on him) was the author of the Qur'an, they chose to propagate that there must be some other person who had taught the Prophet (peace be on him) the Qur’an. Such a statement, however, was even more preposterous since they failed to convincingly point out who that other person was who was the true source of the Qur’an. Even leaving aside Makka, the fact is that there was not a single person throughout the length and breadth of Arabia who possessed the competence needed for the authorship of the Qur’an. Had such an extraordinary person existed, how could he have remained hidden from the sight of others? Second, the pre-Prophetic life of Muhammad (peace be on him) clearly shows him to be a man of exceptionally high-moral character for there was not the least trace of any evil - whether lies, deceit, vile cunning or trickery. On the contrary, all those who came into contact with the Prophet (peace be on him) were impressed by him as a person of flawless character, as one utterly truthful and trustworthy An illustration in point is the incident related in connection with the re-building of the Ka‘bah five years before his designation as a Prophet. There was a serious dispute between the various families of the Quraysh on the question as to who should have the privilege of placing the Black Stone in its place in the edifice of the Ka‘bah. In order to reach an amicable accord, they resolved that they would abide by the ruling given by the first person who entered the Ka‘bah the following day. The next day people saw it was the Prophet (peace be on him) who was the first to enter. They exclaimed: ‘Here is a trustworthy man (amin). We agree [to follow his ruling]. He is Muhammad.’ (Ibn Sa‘d, al-Tabaqat, vol. 1, p. 146 - Ed.) Thus, before designating Muhammad (peace be on him) as a Prophet, God had the whole body of the Quraysh testify to his trustworthiness. No room was” left, therefore, for suspecting that he who had never resorted to lying or deceit throughout his life would suddenly resort to fabricating a gigantic lie; that he would first compose something, then deny that it was his work, and would. then ascribe it to od. ° In view of the above, God directs the Prophet (peace be on him) to ask the unbelievers to use their brains before levelling such a stupid allegation against him. For the Prophet (peace be on him) was after all no stranger to them; he had spent virtually a whole lifetime in their midst. In view of the well-known and uniformly high level of his conduct and character, how could it even be conceived that he would falsely ascribe the Qur’an to God if God had not actually revealed it to him. (For further elaboration see al-Qasas 28, n. 109.)
The part of suicide is idraaj of imam Zuhri rahimahullah and the word فیما بلغنا shows the idraaj and Ammar knows this well and Bukhari mentioned the irsaal of Zuhri and also knows Zuhris maraasil are بمنزلة الریح for Ahlul Hadith but the juhhal he has araound him will fan out fror him anyways
This does not make sense, so the prophet gives permission for revelation to start? But revelation comes from Allah…. The prophet is giving permission?….. isnt this a major issue. How do you rhyme this with tawhid and that Allah is the most high and highest authority
Brother, Sam shamoun is growing in popularity and christians now see him as the Christian Zakir Naik. Ive seen christians say that sam shamoun single handedly would destroy all muslim apologists. Can you do what you did with CP, and make rebuttle videos on SS? His channel is called something like Archive. He has over 200k subscribers now and I see no muslim rebuttling him.
You say magic was done on Musa (AS) astaghfirullah where is that mentioned in the Quran? You showed a text of the Quran but it doesn’t add up Faris? I’m a Sunni btw, I’m just questioning how you got to this conclusion?
I mention that because I’m not being biased like a lot of ppl, I’m trying to be open minded. And also because I’m being critical ppl may assume I’m from the other sects. A lot of people from the same sect would support their own regardless without even reflecting on the videos. I just asked a question to on which Farid pointed out. He said that’s in the Quran, where is it, I wanted the verses so I can have a look as well.
I’m a Sunni, I’m telling the truth, it’s Ramadan and I’m fasting. No need to lie! Don’t be suspicious. Yes I agree and disagree with a lot of people even Ammar, but the points he made on the videos I commented on were actually noteworthy. The response from Farid was very weak compared to Ammars points and he looked into evidences from our books hence I thought it was convincing
@szr-ve2qv I am not talking about this video, I am talking about all the videos about Ammar, you think all of them are weak and yet you want me to believe that you're sunni. I am sorry, I can't do that.
Ammar did not give any evidence of the quotes he used that goes down to the Sahabis. He is just trying to make the Sunnis look untrustworthy. We don't need to resort to someone's dream or some guy who had never met the prophet to learn the biography of the prophet. There are sahabis who described the events in the prophet's life to us.
Allahumma salli ‘aala Muhammadin wa ‘aala azwajihi wa dhuriyatihi. (That’s straight out of Sahih al-Imam al-Bukhari. It’s one of the ways that Rasool Allah ﷺ taught his Sahhaba (RAA) to correctly send salawaat upon him ﷺ.) PS: I’m not saying that Brother Farid used this mode of salaah upon Rasool Allah ﷺ, but I am posting it as an example of correct salaah upon Rasool Allah ﷺ, so that people can use it as much as they want, seeking their reward from Allah.
No he didn't. He can only pick at straws . Dr Ammar tramples over everything you believe in. Don't be a Sunni just for the sake of it. Imam Hussein (as) wasn't a Sunni . So why are you ?
@g.h.o.s.t.4.2.04 Someone who follows a school of thought that does not belong to The Ahlulbayt (as) . ie: I when The Prophet pbuh says: " I am from The City of Knowledge and Ali is it's Gate . To get to The City you must enter via The Gate " .. they don't believe it. A Sunni is someone who doesn't follow The School of Thought attributed to Imam Ja'far ul Saadiq (as) .. who is from The Direct bloodline of Fatimah Zahra ( as) and therefore Mohammad (pbuh) . A Sunni traditionally follows 1 of 4 schools of Thought belonging to Imams who arec other than The Ahlulbayt ie The Imams Abu Hanifah, Hanbal, Maalik or Shafi'i... .. when The only school of Thought existing in The Prophet's lifetime was of Imam Ali (as) & his Prophetically affiliated genealogy via The Bloodline of Fatemah (as) .
@user-hc2vk2ic3u Imam Hassan (as) was a soldier in the war against Mu'awiah. .. ( during The Battle of Siffeen ) An Authority over him ( Mu'awiah) ... who Mu'awiah defied . Imam Hassan ( as) was a PART of The Prophet (pbuh) Because The Prophet pbuh said of his Ahlulbayt (as) " I am from them and they are from me " . Imam Hassan (as) clarified that The Imam after him would be Hussein (as) After their Peace treaty however , Mu'awiah ensured that his own son Yazid would succeed him in his own illigitimatre claim to power .. prior to his own death . .. Brribing the wife of Imam Hasan (as) to poison her own husband , with the promise of her being wedded to his own son Yazid was a part of that plan . Like the devil he was however, he said to her afterwards that if she could do that to Imam Hassan (as) she could also do it to Yazid .. so the marriage never even went ahead . In the list of The Sunni Version Twelve Caliphs that The Prophet (ppbuh) prophesised , Mu'awiah comes up as one of them. Yazid comes up as the other . And Imam Hussein (as) doesn't come up at all .
The Shia have been persecuted in Islam since the Messenger of Allah left this world. Many Hadith and seerah of early Islamic history was censored from the masses to maintain government. Now that it’s no man made caliph to punish people for speaking their mind and mentioning history the truth is coming out. In no type of way was the Ahl Bayt عليه السلام even given the least honor and the proof of which is the grandson of the Prophet was butchered with most of his grandchildren at Karbala by the man made caliph. They say no the Ahl-Bayt عليه السلام has no right to leadership but all agree the Mahdi is a descendant which completely debunks that claim from beginning of caliphate till the end of Caliphate. If not Ahl Bayt عليه السلام than at least it MUST be with the Quraysh. Every single principle in orthodox Islam is arbitrary and can be adjusted by any tyrant calling himself Allahs representative. How can you Sunnis even attempt to call yourself a jamat? You have no khalifate. Until Imam Mahdi takes charge you should at least truthfully and linguistically refer to yourself as Ahl Hadith wa Anti Ahl Bayt.😢
Who did initiate the method of narration (حدثنا،أخبرنا،فلان عن فلان etc) in islamic/Arabic history? This method is also applied by Shia historians/writers too in their hadith/history books. The question is,who did initiate this process and that specific method of narration? Who first used those مصطلحات? It is clear that Sunni scholars initiated that method. Then why did "independent" Shia historians apply the Sunni history narration methodology?😅😂 The answer is, because Shia people did not have any unique thought at first about "how" to preserve their islamic history. So later when they saw Sunnis applying scientific history, they followed and copied it from the Sunnis😂 so poor Shia bros
May I ask what exactly it is about shia islam that you disagree with? Or are you one to believe that shias are kafir? We hold on to Quran and Ahlulbayt as as our beloved rasulallah (pbuh) told us. If you can sum up your point of contention? I'm truly trying to understand what the issue is if we both simply have different sides to the story...where's the problem to it. Genuine query...would be very keen to know!
@flaror3496 so criteria of kafir is anyone who insults the Sahaba? But surely you know all sahaba were not the same. Some turned against the prophets pbuhs mission. Muwaiya also insulted imam ali as per the Sunan of ibn majah. He also fought imam ali as in battle... Aisha fought imam ali as in jamal (does that not categorize as insulting the sahaba,?) Must we all only agree to history in sahih bukhari and sahih muslim? Is it not possible that another historian has a sahih reading? And since when does disagreeing with one sects reading of history make you kafir? That's not the definition, is it?
@flaror3496 my previous reply disappeared somehow Ok so since when does disagreeing with credibility of a sahaba make you kafir? If I believe un tawhid, I believe in our prophet pbuh, the quran and the prophets pbuh teachings, from what I understand, that makes me muslim Why must I be subject to only one version of history? And if insulting a sahabi makes you kafir then you must re evaluate your own stance right? Since muwaiya waged war against imam ali as he even insulted him as per the sunan of ibn majah Similarly aisha waged war against imam ali as in jamal..that isn't a form of disrespect or grave insult? Why is only one sects reading correct? Who gave whom the authority to declare that sahih muslim has got it all right completely? We can agree to disagree that we have our own readings correct? Let's let Allah decide who is a disbeliever and who isn't. Please do think about my points here.. At the end our aim should be to dig for the truth !!
@@zahraS18 because the prophet said so, the one who harms the Sahabah is not from him and he who harms the sahabah also harms the prophet Which makes one a disbeliever Regarding aisha, ali رضي الله عنه never acted towards like you and he was one of the closest companions of the prophet, somehow he was the most knowledgeable of his time but didn't know that the wife of the prophet is some sort disbeliever who intended nothing but harm? Yeah right, laughable beliefs Perhaps i could give you muawiya but not the prophet wife nor his closest companions
One thing I've noticed with a lot of Shia fakers, is how much effort they put into their "performance". They overdo it. It's never "Assalamoalikum". It's always "Assalamoalikum warahmatullah e wabarakaatuhu" with extra emphasis on the enunciation while tilting their heads or moving in other ways, trying way too hard to appear "Islamic". Even the way he says "Sallalahu alaihi wassalam" with unnecessary pauses before or after. They do the same thing in the comment sections. Everytime they're trying to decieve people with falsehood, they start with a long winded Salam followed by "Bismillah Arrahmaan...", then followed by an introduction to something no one asked for... instead of like "Hey, I disagree with this point. Here's a hadith that refutes your point". Nope. it's always a speech.
It's all smokes and mirrors. A big emotional charade. It's never about irrefutable evidence and they crumble the second anyone asks for proof of what they believe...then the lying, cutting verses/hadieths and ignoring said verses/hadieths context ensues.
Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible Genesis 3:14 X Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life. Isaiah 65:25 THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
![Ammar Nakshawani / Assassination of the Prophet ﷺ [Debunked]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Jrjb6KE0FJ4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Ammar Nakshawani / Assassination of the Prophet ﷺ [Debunked]](/img/tr.png)
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/u92BmUM3rxM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[DEBUNKED] The Truth about the Kaaba - Apostate Prophet](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EYzTV_Q-nh0/mqdefault.jpg)
Ammar doesn't want us to read Sunni Seerah, he wants us to read Shia Seerah which relies exclusively on the Sunni Seerah
😂
The guy hasn't read a single book from the library that appears behind him 🤣
@@HH-pv9exif you watched the video fully... you'd see he pulled it from that library...
@@kazshah5371 Bro read my other comment. He hasn't even read the Quran, he's making mistakes left and right.
😂
Al Kafi with its 15000+ narrations only has 92 by the prophet ﷺ, so of course they would turn to us for Seerah
Bingo! You nailed it 100%.
0 narrations of Fatimah RA also. And they claim to love aal albait
Those 92 are not even from the prophet, it's a false attribution. This also extends to their ''Imams''.
And of those 15000 how many false attributions to the imams as 😢😂
@@noface9375 But there is a hammar INNIT
Bro stop making your videos 12 minutes long, Shias are gonna think its an evidence for their imams.
may Allah bless you, for this comment made me laugh hahha
You have 12 likes, so I want like it any further.😂
Thats so funny.....Clown
i thought that was how many men went to aisha house so she can teach them ghusl and encourage zina with her sisters lol
@@ghazialbadry6623MAY allah give you the compensation for your such a comment
" This Sunni Hadith isn't true because I don't like it "
" So what is true "
" I don't know 🐢"
The 12er Shia scholars do guess work on what could be true.
That's what you think 🙃 it's not what you know 😅
@@HH-pv9ex until the 12th Imam's appearance nobody in your sect will know. :)
@@amjadqureshi4622lmao 🤣
@@amjadqureshi4622you mean the dungeon imam in Samara right ?!...🥱😴 wishful thinking,
May Allah bless you Farid. I got the chance to meet Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq and he recommended your channel. I’ve learnt a lot alhamdulillah.
uthman ibn farooq May Allah سبحانه و تعالى preserve him also has a book on imamah
Did you meet him in Kuwait?
The things Ammar Nakshawani says reminds of some of what the Christians say about Isa (pbuh).
It’s the qulou and zendiqah… 🤦♂️
Maybe if he actually studied Shi'i sources rather than cherry pick at Sunni ones to "refute" Sunnis he would see the contradictions in Shi'i sources
He knows already trust me. Hes pretending to be a muslim
Ali, the Muslimlatern and Farid, my two favourites, these guys are just great. may Allah preserve your knowledge
The Twelver Imamiyyah Shi’a religion is the only religion on the planet that can’t form a complete narrative of its most important elements strictly from its own books, and is constantly having to refer to-and often even plagiarize-the books of those whom it considers disbelievers. Even the Noble Qur’an has no Twelver Imami chain of transmission.
Brother... we learnt our "narrative" from your books. Now how about you try reading then yourself. Just like Syed Ammar pointed out.
@@kazshah5371 So you're agreeing that you can't independently substantiate your own narrative?
@kazshah5371 so you'd accept everything within them then? Or just the bits you like?
@samy7013
No religion can form a complete narrative of its most important elements strictly from its own books. That's why religion exists. To offer interpretative power, and this is a good thing. It's dogmatic Sunni Muslims and hyper-Evangelical Christians that make religion such a dark, ugly thing in our 21st-century world.
@@Suleiman212 no we can, we've got the references in both our books and your books. Yall on the other hand selectively choose what fits for you.
Ammar nkshwani has paid his followers to comment on Farid and sunnah discourse videos. They don't watch the video they just seeded the comment given to them
I watch the videos. And farid just makes weak claims and argues everything. I did a response video to one of them.
I enjoy those who seek knowledge and discuss. So shout out to farid. But his claims are insanely weak. He argues against his own Hadith. And is not consistent with his own sheiks.
@@BigAck don't know which video you are talking about but Farid explains the correct meaning of the thing mentioned in our books. He has given several Shia books references which you guys don't know that they exist. Those hadiths saying the same thing as we preach.
@@altamashbaibars9477 I’m specifically talking about the videos he is defending Umar for causing a dispersion in the home of the prophet PBUH when he was sick. And not allowing him to write a message so “they won’t go astray” I made an extensive video on it. He disagrees with the Sunni sheik Assam Al Hakeem. And Sayed Ammar. And makes very very irrational claims on a very clear verse and story.
I don’t mind critical discussions and commentary. But farids whole channel is debating and “proving others wrong” even when he makes weak claims.
I’d love to see farid give lectures or actually source things from his own perspective.
And not chose points to “try and prove wrong” from others. I think he has a lot of knowledge and can use it much better if he allocates it to his own topics and videos. He seems like he’s been doing this for a while now.
@@BigAck Umar didn't cause any chaos. He just gave his suggestion that other companions differed on this. He had no clue what would have happened. We should have some husn al dhan with people. Never to always doubt their intentions.
And if this would have been that important the prophet would have written the will afterwards.
Why Shias try to drag someone down with this. Can any human stop prophet from doing anything do you think prophet would not deliver something that's important?
Remember prophet didn't do taqqiya of any sort
@@altamashbaibars9477 I don’t know what it has to do with Shia. Is sheik Assam Al Hakeem also trying to drag Umar down. He literally said “Umar thought he prophet was not in the right state of mind. So to preserve the deen of the prophet which is definitely not possible”
Am I missing something? If the prophet asked you to get him a pen and paper would you tell him no? Is it up to Umar to preserve the deen of the prophet of man kind.
I’m not trying to “bring someone down” I’m analyzing history from 40 sources that say the same thing. And scholars and sheiks much more knowledgeable then you me and farid here all agree on what happened that day.
It’s not about the message. It’s about Umar telling the prophet “we don’t need your message. The Quran is good enough” the prophet wanted to state something so they wouldn’t go astray. And they went astray directly after fighting in front of the final prophet of mankind…so much so it frustrated rasool Allah. And got them all kicked out of the home.
It isn’t about “putting down” it’s about clear logic and reasoning. Why are we “defending” a clear ill intent by Umar?
Would you yourself ever tell a prophet we don’t need your message the Quran is good enough? Or just go get the pen and paper? Especially after witnessing his prophethood for 20 years in person.
This was wrong of Umar. Nobody is saying don’t love Umar. Love who you please. But defending I’ll intent against the prophet that frustrated him and prevented him from delivering a message so they wouldn’t go astray. Is not good in any way. And shouldn’t be defended.
May Allah send peace and blessing upon Muhammad and his family and his companions ameen
Allahumma Ameen!
Whose Muhammad ?? I know rasool muhamamd Sallahu alihi wali wassallam
@10:45 Prophet Ibrahim(as) and Maryam(as) could not recognize Jibrael the first time. These are examples of how the chosen don't have to be born with a full spritual unveiling.
Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻
Genesis 3:14
X
Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life.
Isaiah 65:25
THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
Dude wants us to believe that the sunni sources aren't authentic and wrong while presenting us with his authentic presumptions🙃
Akhi your accent imitation 🤣🤣🤣
May Allah preserve you 😎🤜
"It says it in Bukhari, one way or another," By that logic we find statements of the disbelievers in the Quran, so naudhubillah one way or another Quran contains the rhetoric of disbelievers. But of course Allah only mentions the kuffar's statements for a reason, to refute them. Likewise Imam Bukhari mentioned it for a reason, to show it's not a narration (because it does not even have a hadith) but rather a statement from Az zuhiri that he heard this narration from someone (we have no idea who it is, so majhul)
So Bukhari is not Sahih?
@@smhark786
The disconnected reports may not be. This is something you learn if you actually read a description of the book.
@condorianonegdiffsgoku bro we've been saying you can't just take reports from bukhari or Muslim, so now there is no legitimacy added to hadith just because it is quoted in Muslim or Bukhari all reports have to be analysed in their merit
The Qur'an says don't obey a sinner. So Shi'as are obedient to Imam Ja'far ul Sadiq (as). But Bukhari believed Imam Ja'far ul Sadiq (as) to be 'Unreliable' as a narrator. So where is The Origin of Imam Ja'far ul Sadiq (as) in The Qur'an and where is the origin of Imam Bukhari ?
@@smhark786
Whatever suits them
So Nakshavani is supposed to be a scholar/academic, or at least someone who is well versed in Shi'ism yet not aware of what Shi'i sources contain in regards to the Prophethood of the Messenger ﷺ
May Allah increase your knowledge even more. Always a treat to watch these refutations.. Jazakallahu khairan
JazakAllah khair
Farid brother can you please make an in-depth video where you go through many narrations about the 12 imams (as) and show if they're authentic or not
Jazak Allah ghair
Even if they tried their best to write one, it would turn into a Seerah of their 12 Demi-Gods lol. They can't help it.
You referencing shias here?
Ahlul zina wal bidah, ya ibn aisha, know your place
@@ghazialbadry6623 bar shia dajjal Mahdi ibn Narjes lanat beshumar
@@ghazialbadry6623 ibn londi Narjes. Bar shia Mahdi lanat
@@ghazialbadry6623 ibn Mutah ibn Narjes, back to the c@ves with your 12th Imam
"You ask me excellent excellent question." 😂 I'm ded
Hilarious 😂
Do you know what's the source for that sound clip? Have been wondering for a while 🤣
Ammar is right in this topics
Ammar did not give any evidence of the quotes he used that goes down to the Sahabis. He is just trying to make the Sunnis look untrustworthy. We don't need to resort to someone's dream or some guy who had never met the prophet to learn the biography of the prophet. There are sahabis who described the events in the prophet's life to us.
Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other?
Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]?
Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran?
If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household]
The difference between Sunni and Shia is that our scholars unanimously agree that the Quran is not distorted you can use as many weak hadith as you want. You won't hear any ridiculous scholars and personalities of Sunni Islam mouthing off these ridiculous things like Shias do despite the Shias being only 10% and Sunnis being majority. You'd think since there are more Sunnis you'd find more ridiculous claims like this coming from Sunnis but it is opposite.
For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9
Any sunni who believes that a part of Qur'an has been lost due to goats eating it or men changing it, is a kafir. There is no difference of opinion on this in sunni Islam. No buts no ifs. Your misunderstanding does not change our stance. Aisha (ra) did not believe in tahreef. Stop putting your own view on the hadith. You are just seeing what you want to see. It wouldn't have mattered if goats ate it because people memorise the Qur'an. What you're basically going to find is that this will likely lead into the topic of abrogation and abrogation was completed whilst the Prophet (pbuh) was alive. Islamqa covers this very well.
Shias might attempt to steal the chains in the Sunni books and attribute them to themselves, which is pathetic and shows the weakness of their way. `Asim bin abi al-Nujoud, Hafs bin Sulayman and Hamzah al-Zayyat are all great Imams of Ahlul-Sunnah, the Twelvers cannot prove that they were Rafidhi imami Shia neither through their books or ours. If they were to prove that they were Shia, the Shia of the time were Sunni in their worship, and even if they try their best to prove that they were Rafidhah, then even the Imamiyyah at the time had different sects all of them enemies who make Takfeer on each-other.
By consensus`Asim and Hafs are two great Imams of Qira’at. The weakness attributed to Hafs is in regards to his skills as narrator, and the accusation of him being a liar is a baseless exaggeration. And if true still doesn’t strengthen Shia’s view.
The rules for the authentication of a narrator in a Hadithi chain are different than the rules for the authentication of a Qur’ani recitation.
Hundreds of narrations from their infallibles prove that the followers of Ibn Saba claim distortion, and the statement that the chains of transmission of these narrations are weak cannot be accepted for reasons such as:
First: The Shiites do not consider the chains of transmission and their lim il rijjal (hadeeth sciences) is very inconsistent
Second: The narrations of distortion are abundant (mutawatir) according to them, and if this were the case, their chain of transmission should not be of concern
Third: There are Shiite scholars who authenticated the chains of narrations of Hadiths regarding distortion
Fourth: Whoever rejects the many narrations about distortion, which amount to nearly two thousand narrations, is obligated to reject the narrations of the Imamate and the narrations of the rajah, the bidaa, and the infallibility, because as their their scholar, Yusuf Al-Bahrani, said: If these narrations aren’t accepted (i.e. the narrations of distortion), despite their abundance and spread, it would be possible to reject to the other narrations related to the religion, since the principles are one, as are the chains, narrators, sheikhs, and transmission.
The narrations of distortion that the Shiites have are narrated from the twelve imams who believe in their infallibility, while all those who narrate the absence of distortion from him are the scholars, not the imams. They do not narrate from the imams, and not a single narration says that there is no distortion. Rather, they transmit two thousand narrations from the imams that say there is distortion, and those from whom they quote that there is no distortion are scholars who can aren’t infallible. As for the infallible ones, they quoted from them the statement of distortion, so the Shiites are required to take the words of the infallible ones and not the words of others.
Nimat Allah Al-Jazairi said: The narrations that indicate distortion exceed two thousand hadiths. Then he said: He did not come across a single hadith that said otherwise.
Yusuf Al-Bahrani said: However, there is no opposition to this narration, as I know, other than a mere claim that is devoid of evidence and does not go beyond mere gossip.
All shias should either follow their infallibles or leave this evil religion.
Salam aleykom farid, Please keep going with these video's inshallah. May Allah Swt bless you ameen.
You know... ive never in my life seen someone get shown their own books and still disagree. Hypocrites to the highest degree... and we all know how Allah feels about the hypocrites. InshaAllah if you hold on to the Quran and the Ahlulbayt you'll never go astray.
Farid didn't disagree to anything, perhaps you rewatch the video lol.
The way he pronounces the letter S is like a 🐍
@shahriar4706it may be Arabic letter swad and and the lette seen
Allahumma Barik Allahumma Barik BarakAllah Allahumma Barik Allahumma Barik amazing video akhi seriously amazing. Really enjoy and learn alot by you making these videos
Thank you for your hard work and efforts.
Shia in 100 years: here is our trinity.
Akhi you don't know Aliwites (sect of Bashar Assad, Syrian government) had already made Penity(Five in one) 😂. This Aliwite sect was found by a guy from twelver shia in 9th century.
@@patop6419 hhhhhh they are lost, some more lost than others.
No that’ll be twelvenity
Alhamdulillah .. great response my akhi Jazakallah khayr.. ! hope you do more dismantling of his content!
After reading peshawar nights and then I was guided and reserch for 5yrs properly now I follow true Islam alhamdulila thank you mufti menk and shk uthman farook and many ti guide me to true Islam. ❤
So the fake books of the Twelver Imamis led you to Sh. Uthman and Sh. Menk? So you’re a Sunni now, or am I misunderstanding?
@@samy7013 fake books r u sick 😫 and blind too all sources are from your books 🤣🤣🤣 just say you agreed to disagree THANK ALLAH TO GUIDE ME TO TRUE ISALM AND NOT WHAT YOU ALL BELIVE FROM FAKE BOOKS 😊
@@samy7013
I am guessing he found out how fake these books were. Anybody who makes small effort and research will see what Pashawer nights is, good willing.
What is peshawar nights??
Salaam Farid. I was born & brought up Shia but you make some excellent & very compelling points in this short & well explained video. With Duas.
Salam akhi do u wanna talk about sunni-shia if ur still shia we could talk
When Umar himself didn't even let the Prophet (pbuh) write his own hadith then your whole foundation is rocked. Yeah. I'll talk about Sunni Shi'a. Would Umar have even allowed a collection like Bokhari's to exist when he was refusing even The Prophet a paper and a pen to write a document for The Ummah to not go astray ?
@@Aliameemwhy did Umar marry imam Ali’s daughter, Um Kalthoum? And have a son with her, Zaid Ibn Umar (as) , the grandson of Nabi Muhammad ﷺ. If Imam Ali (as) thought Umar ra was good enough to be his son in law, who are you to cast doubt on his character?
@AD-lk9re
Umar gave the governance of Shaam to Mu'awiah.
The same Mu'awiah that waged a war against Imam Ali (as) Imam Hassan AND Imam Hussein (as) at The Battle of Siffeen.
And then , he gave The Seat of Governance / Khilafat to his son Yazid.
Who also waged war against yhelImam Hussein (as) and this time got him killed.
These are facts number 1.
And number 2 even The Prophet Lut offered his daughters to homosexuals in an attempt for them to change their ways.
So.
There are 2 points of dispute at least between Sunnis and Shi'as
relating to number 1 : Imam Ali (as) actually giving his bloodline / non fostered daughter to Umar for marraige - or not
& 2:
Whether or not Umar was actually a homosexual- or not .
The fact remains that if Umar's protest that " The Qur'an is enough for us " carries any weight at all
then he is doomed to condemning his own Caliphate in the process
Let alone the Qur'anic command to obey The Prophet (pbuh).
@@Aliameem Your understanding of what Lut did is not correct, since a zani does not marry a pure woman according to the Quran and the people of Lut were not pure. He offered his daughters to some people who had not yet performed that action, this is the way that we reconcile this verse, in order to avoid accusing a Prophet ﷺ of committing the sin which you have accused him of.
Secondly, Muhammad ﷺ is free of having married the daughter of a homosexual, and taking him as a close friend. As we know, the Prophet ﷺ advised us to take good muslim friends since a man is upon the religion of his friend. Your accusation shows that you disrespect both Muhammad ﷺ and Ali ra, since you accuse them of fraternizing closely with a homosexual. I prefer the sunni narrative which is logical and proven through history, that Umar was good, and thats why the best of Men Muhammad ﷺ took him as a friend and Father and law, and Ali ra took him as a son in law and named 3 of his sons after him.
This is what is logical, as a opposed to the autistic shia narrative that Imam Ali had his wife killed by Umar, and then proceeded to marry his daughter off to Umar and also name 3 of his sons umar.
Not to mention that Imam Ali gave bay’ah to Abu Bakr and Umar, and Imam Hassan gave bay’ah to Muawiya, and it is kufr to give bay’ah to a kafir.
Therefore it is impossible that any of these people were kuffar, rather your understanding is biased, false, and would bear the ramifications of Imam Ali and Imam Hassan being kuffar, due to giving allegiance to non muslims.
Overall, shi’ism is full of plotholes, and that is why i left it and became Maliki Sunni alhamdulilah.
I try to be a Shia and always will try to follow that path as it is the most obvious truth to me. Nevertheless, this is NOT the time to be speaking of differences while our brothers and sisters are suffering in Falasteen.
We dont need Your support for palestine,Allah is sufficient for them and the whole ummah
@@abdxllahh Shia countries and militias are the only ones supporting them, where are all the Sunni countries then?
@@abdxllahh Also, you cant just stand there and do nothing and say Allah will help. Countries with the capacity to help have to at least try and not just sit and talk all day.
@@zanejaafar9013So you are saying shia countries are supporting them 😂.. Bro when...? 35000 Palestinians have been killed and What did Iran do for them? They attacked Israel somedays ago only when their own embassy was attacked in Syria..
Second of all Why don't you mention Rafidis killing thousands of muslims in Syria, iraq yemen etc.. they have killed more muslims than Israel. As for the sunni countries.. they might not have attacked Israel directly because US is with them but they have sent thousands of aid trucks to Palestine and still continue to send.
Of course, we should do our best to help the Palestinians. Even some non-muslims are helping them. Tags like Sunni, Salafi only create more divisons among the muslims. I identify as muslim. Also those who take Ali as intercessor are not muslims.
What's wrong if the prophet was bewitched he was a human. We have to keep humans as humans because shirk came to humans because they deeply love those individuals and create super natural stories about them and start worshipping them.
Yes but wonce their aqeedah about the prophet is flawed, therefoee they cannot fathom this.
It’s an issue of a perfect message coming through an imperfect vessel (a human who sins). The perfect message of Allah needs a human capable of delivering it.
If you knew someone was crazy or saw visions and was easily duped, would you trust what that person was saying? Even if they were just a sinning human, wouldn’t you second guess if they claimed to then be a prophet?
Infallibility is a rational conclusion that God’s message must be delivered by the living and breathing Quran (prophet Muhammad pbuh).
If he was vulnerable to witchcraft, suicidal thoughts, and satanic verses, how can we trust this person?
It’s not a worship of human beings. It’s about respecting their status through rational arguments.
If anyone were to be perfect, wouldn’t it be the greatest messenger of Allah?
Does it not say in the Quran Allah's chosen servants are protected? Is The Rasool (SAWA) not one of his chosen servants? I don't understand why that's such a hard concept to grab? You do realize that you're also taking away from Allah (SWT) power as well pretty much saying he isn't competent enough to protect his servant from such evil astaghfiruallah. Fear Allah (SWT) and stop believing such nonsense.
@@rezabaker9845 protected that's why he was saved by Allah. It doesn't mean they will be immune it means in the end Allah will prevail them over evil.
Didn't Adam as made a mistake and was influenced by iblees
@@TicTacTechYT you worship imams without a doubt all 12vers do
Jazakallah Khair. It's kind of embarrassing really, may Allah guide us all to the straight path and punish those wilfully leading people astray.
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
THank you
The fact that the Shia have to rely on Sunni sources for the seerah of the Prophet peace be upon him is more than proof enough that Sunni Islam is correct.
Shia Islam can be proved from The Qur'an but Sunnism, your Four Schools of Thought and Ibn Taymiiyyah can't.
@@Aliameemyour religion is man made and incomplete, so you have to rely on the people of sunnah for parts of islam😂
And they would claim their Dajjal Mahdi is the only one who has the Quran and the Seerah, like the mystery of the Xtian "Trinity" XD
What exactly do they want us to do? Leave Ahl us-Sunnah and be lost? We have monopoly on Seerah, the science of narrations, Tafseer, Hifz of the Quran, etc. All they have is Shirk and Mutah 🤣
and taqiyyah
Barakallahu feekum
Jazak Allah khair Farid. May Allah reward you . Please do a course to teach us more about Hadith , I am ready to be your first student . It would be very interesting to learn what you have put so much effort into studying and I’m sure many people would agree with me . Again, Jazak Allah khair
Assalamualaikum ges and Assalamualaikum bro, lately I have a problem with myself and I always think and ask something and this is like thinking and also myself worried and confused with the surrounding situation and asking something that is messed up as if not calm like confused with laws of nature, form. and God and other laws including life!! Can you please explain to me about my problem? greetings from Malaysia ☪️🇲🇾❤️😇
brother, I just saw an Islamophobic video that said that AL Quran surah 4:11-12 has a mathematical error!!! Can you expose that because on that channel you always expose their lies, right?
@@Alpha-wolf96 Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻
Genesis 3:14
X
Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life.
Isaiah 65:25
THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
Allahumma barik
Akhi, why haven’t you guys spoken on brother Hani? I couldn’t believe my ears when I heard what he turned into
Salaams. You wrote a paper on shia hadith vs Sunni hadith. Can you please post the link?
👏🏼💯
Very good
“A kneeeee on the back” 😂
Assalamualaikum from Malaysia
I'm also from Malaysia but in Selangor 😘
@@N.D.C.2410 Me also..Nismilan yo..huhu
Brother your nickname 🗿
@@dormantviewer Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻
Genesis 3:14
X
Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life.
Isaiah 65:25
THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
@@N.D.C.2410 Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible 😂😂👇🏻
Genesis 3:14
X
Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life.
Isaiah 65:25
THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
There was no Shia seerah book till the end of the 20th Century.
This kazzab Nakshwani is rewriting history.
You won't learn nothing from The Prophet (pbuh) if you're following a man (Umar) who refused to even give him a paper and a pen when he , The Prophet himself wanted to write something down.
Don't comment without studying islamic history. Umar was never interested in narrating the prophet's hadith or biography because he thought that if he made a mistake Allah would punish him. Only basing on the pen-paper incident one cannot say Umar was greedy or a fake muslim, we all know about his contribution and participation in the jihads during the prophet's life time.
Ammar did not give any evidence of the quotes he used that goes down to the Sahabis. He is just trying to make the Sunnis look untrustworthy. We don't need to resort to someone's dream or some guy who had never met the prophet to learn the biography of the prophet. There are sahabis who described the events in the prophet's life to us
@GratefulHuman-en7tq
But The Sahaba were not Infallible and The Qur'an says " Do not obey a Sinner " .
The Religion of Islam is ' PERFECTED " - ( Holy Qur'an) and it's True representatives therefore are the same ie " Thoroughly Purified " - Holy Qur'an.
@GratefulHuman-en7tq
You can't cover for his (Umar's) disobedience. It's as clear as daylight. Calling a spade a spade is all that is required not a plethora of ineffective excuses that will never digress from the litmus test that he already failed.
I hope he doesn’t forget to give the ISBN of the book he will recommend.
Why don't you make a playlist of Rad Shia videos
The shia narrative is comical thus why no reverts in their hilarious sect.
Alhamdulillah I'm a revert and a shia. Always keen to learn and read critically of all the material out there !
@@zahraS18 I'm very curious, what do you think of the video? I'm a sunni and would like your perspective.
@@Gatekg "Shia reverts" never provide academic, rational or factual reasons for accepting shiasm. They accept on pure blind feelings...i.e emotions...
At least from experience when I ask. On the other hand, ex-christians accepting the Orthodox Sunni narrative is in the multi millions based on academic discourse...
@@rizwanramzan5729ya mostly of them convert to Shiism because of emotional like story about Karbala not by logical like oneness of Allah.
If u truly a "revert", u just travelled from one corner of the hell to another corner.
When we get into debates to satisfy our ego, that's definitely not going to lead to guidance. Shias are also used in Sunni transmission of hadith for instance the only narration that claims Othman ibn Afan collected the Qurʾan.
👍👍👍
And in their sect, imams used to lie upon minor issues on the excuse of taqiyyah.
Muhammad a.s was described in Injil. Its not strange that a monk who knew Injil to recognized Muhamed a.s as prophet
Where did he get his tatoos from? Chili Hadith ?
Sometimes I feel that shias are actual aliens from another galaxy.
7:10, You know it's bad when he makes the same mistakes as the Jews and the Christians, reading the text improperly while having not understood the basics and having his own terribly irrational foundation.
I think the shii in particular and the Ummah in general should start reading the Qur'an more thoroughly. No wonder the prophet (peace be upon him) will complain that His Qoam left the Qur'an
"So if you are in doubt, [O Muḥammad], about that which We have revealed to you, then ask those who have been reading the Scripture before you. The truth has certainly come to you from your Lord, so never be among the doubters." (Quran 10:94)
Ammar just spoke like a christian would do. Kufr after Kufr. May Allah reward you and increase your Ranks for this enlighting video Brother 🌹
What are you talking about? Your discussion doesn’t make sense.
YA FARID RESPOND TO TRENT COUNCIL’S ISLAM VIDEOS LIKE HIS MOON SPLITTING AND STUFFFFFF
does that stuff affect you personally?
Farid's impression of nakashwani was hilarious 🤣
Interesting how you say that the Prophet, peace be upon him, couldn't pray before Surah fatiha is revealed... because...no one prayed before it ?
Don’t they claim/believe the revelation was supposed to go to Ali RA, but by mistake of Jibrael went to Muhammad PBUH? So why would they have his Seerah in their religion.
Nah. That's an ancient Shia sect called al-Ghurabiyya. They don't exist anymore.
@@FaridResponds : My memory is fuzzy, brother. Do you know if Nawabakhti mentioned them in his “Book of Shi’a Sects”? The Imamis have splintered so hard and so often, that I honestly can’t keep track of all of their sects.
The angel who has no free will, and only follows Allah swt orders made a mistake? Ooof that is not Shia not Sunni that’s not even a donkey. That’s a wild belief.
I have a question. Could someone attack Islam and say Nabi (SAW) learnt about stories of prophets from Waraqa ibn Naufal since he used to recite the Injeel in Arabic?
not possible since waraqat ibn naufil died soof after prophet recieved his first revelation, i doubt they knew eachother before that
@@fluidlessanimations8689 : You are correct, indeed.
@@fluidlessanimations8689 "I doubt the knew each other before that".
Waraqa was Khadijah's cousin, so Mohammed most likely knew his wife's relative. Again, Waraqa is also reported to have been Mohammed's distant cousin. Mohammed was 40 years old when he became a prophet. This allows for ample time for him to interact with Waraqa in Mecca.
What evidence do you have that your prophet never heard stories from Jews or Christians in his travels to Syria (which was Christian at the time) or in Mecca?
@@IbnSalama-ok2os
(10:16) Tell them: 'Had Allah so willed, I would not have recited the Qur'an to you, nor would Allah have informed you of it. I have spent a lifetime among you before this. Do you, then, not use your reason?
This is indeed a very weighty argument in refutation of the unbelievers’ allegation that the Prophet (peace be on him) had himself authored the Qur’an and subsequently ascribed it to God. So far as other arguments are concerned, they might be considered as somewhat remote. But the argument based on the life and character of the Prophet (peace be on him) was particularly weighty since the Makkans were thoroughly familiar with the whole of his life. Before his designation as a Prophet, he had spent a full forty years in their midst. He was born in their city. They had observed his childhood, and then his youth, and it was in their city that he had reached his middle age. He had also had a variety of dealings with them. He had had social interaction, business transactions, matrimonial ties, and relationships of every conceivable nature with his people so that no aspect of his life was hidden from their view. Could there be a more powerful testimony to the truth of his claim to prophethood than his blameless life and character? Two things about the life of the Prophet (peace be on him) were especially clear and were quite well known to all Makkans. First, that during the forty years of his life before his designation as a Prophet, he had received no instruction from, or even enjoyed the company of learned people which could have served as the source of the ideas which began to flow, as would a stream, from his lips as soon as he claimed, at the age of forty, that he had been designated as a Prophet. Before that he was never seen to have been concerned with the problems, or to have discussed the subjects, or to have expressed the ideas which frequently recur in the Qur’an. In fact, none of his closest friends and relatives had foreseen in his pre-Prophetic life any signs indicative of the great message which he suddenly started to preach at the age of forty. These pieces of evidence, taken together, provide incontrovertible evidence that the Qur’an is not a product of the Prophet’s mind; that it had come to the Prophet (peace be on him) from without. For no human being can produce something for which traces of growth and evolution are not found in the earlier period of his life.
@@IbnSalama-ok2osThis explains the fact that when some of the craftier Makkan unbelievers realized the sheer absurdity of their allegation that the Prophet (peace be on him) was the author of the Qur'an, they chose to propagate that there must be some other person who had taught the Prophet (peace be on him) the Qur’an. Such a statement, however, was even more preposterous since they failed to convincingly point out who that other person was who was the true source of the Qur’an. Even leaving aside Makka, the fact is that there was not a single person throughout the length and breadth of Arabia who possessed the competence needed for the authorship of the Qur’an. Had such an extraordinary person existed, how could he have remained hidden from the sight of others? Second, the pre-Prophetic life of Muhammad (peace be on him) clearly shows him to be a man of exceptionally high-moral character for there was not the least trace of any evil - whether lies, deceit, vile cunning or trickery. On the contrary, all those who came into contact with the Prophet (peace be on him) were impressed by him as a person of flawless character, as one utterly truthful and trustworthy
An illustration in point is the incident related in connection with the re-building of the Ka‘bah five years before his designation as a Prophet. There was a serious dispute between the various families of the Quraysh on the question as to who should have the privilege of placing the Black Stone in its place in the edifice of the Ka‘bah. In order to reach an amicable accord, they resolved that they would abide by the ruling given by the first person who entered the Ka‘bah the following day. The next day people saw it was the Prophet (peace be on him) who was the first to enter. They exclaimed: ‘Here is a trustworthy man (amin). We agree [to follow his ruling]. He is Muhammad.’ (Ibn Sa‘d, al-Tabaqat, vol. 1, p. 146 - Ed.) Thus, before designating Muhammad (peace be on him) as a Prophet, God had the whole body of the Quraysh testify to his trustworthiness. No room was” left, therefore, for suspecting that he who had never resorted to lying or deceit throughout his life would suddenly resort to fabricating a gigantic lie; that he would first compose something, then deny that it was his work, and would. then ascribe it to od. ° In view of the above, God directs the Prophet (peace be on him) to ask the unbelievers to use their brains before levelling such a stupid allegation against him. For the Prophet (peace be on him) was after all no stranger to them; he had spent virtually a whole lifetime in their midst. In view of the well-known and uniformly high level of his conduct and character, how could it even be conceived that he would falsely ascribe the Qur’an to God if God had not actually revealed it to him. (For further elaboration see al-Qasas 28, n. 109.)
The biggest work on seerah on prophet Muhammad by a shia scholar is:
الصحيح من سيرة النبي
The part of suicide is idraaj of imam Zuhri rahimahullah and the word فیما بلغنا shows the idraaj and Ammar knows this well and Bukhari mentioned the irsaal of Zuhri and also knows Zuhris maraasil are بمنزلة الریح for Ahlul Hadith but the juhhal he has araound him will fan out fror him anyways
I've said it before & i'll say it again, PHD Holder Tattoo Nakhjavani (may Allah lengthen his life so we may hear more of his comical stuff ) 😂😂😂😂😂
Does anyone else think Ammar sounds like a reformed Ali G?
This does not make sense, so the prophet gives permission for revelation to start?
But revelation comes from Allah…. The prophet is giving permission?…..
isnt this a major issue. How do you rhyme this with tawhid and that Allah is the most high and highest authority
how about aban bin uthman's maghazi?
11.48 killed me 😂😂
what I see as a common theme in the sunni world is justification for all actions. Astagfurilla
Some how these are same arguments provided by the Hadith rejecters when they want to criticize the Sunnah
❤Farid Responds,killer of Dr Ammars Logic.
Killer ? What refutation has he made lol ?
🤣🤣 His Histrionic outbursts are Entertaining especially when Pleading something
Brother, Sam shamoun is growing in popularity and christians now see him as the Christian Zakir Naik. Ive seen christians say that sam shamoun single handedly would destroy all muslim apologists. Can you do what you did with CP, and make rebuttle videos on SS? His channel is called something like Archive. He has over 200k subscribers now and I see no muslim rebuttling him.
Sam shamoun already ran away from sheikh uthman
Reading ibn ishaq and zurhi’s wikipedia is kinda interesting,. Actually,. I wonder what madhab they followed 🥱
Sunni Or Shia The Main Question Is Why Is It That Allah Never Abolished Slavery And Child Marriages
You say magic was done on Musa (AS) astaghfirullah where is that mentioned in the Quran? You showed a text of the Quran but it doesn’t add up Faris? I’m a Sunni btw, I’m just questioning how you got to this conclusion?
It's strange that you keep mentioning that you're a "sunni " in every comment you post on here
I mention that because I’m not being biased like a lot of ppl, I’m trying to be open minded. And also because I’m being critical ppl may assume I’m from the other sects. A lot of people from the same sect would support their own regardless without even reflecting on the videos. I just asked a question to on which Farid pointed out. He said that’s in the Quran, where is it, I wanted the verses so I can have a look as well.
@@szr-ve2qv I read all your comments, and in each of them, you agree with Ammar, so I don't think you are who you claim to be.
I’m a Sunni, I’m telling the truth, it’s Ramadan and I’m fasting. No need to lie! Don’t be suspicious. Yes I agree and disagree with a lot of people even Ammar, but the points he made on the videos I commented on were actually noteworthy. The response from Farid was very weak compared to Ammars points and he looked into evidences from our books hence I thought it was convincing
@szr-ve2qv I am not talking about this video, I am talking about all the videos about Ammar, you think all of them are weak and yet you want me to believe that you're sunni. I am sorry, I can't do that.
why this guy has tattoos?
BRO GOT COOKED SO HARD😭
It is a metaphysical matter 😂
I've just come here to say that 😋
Ammar did not give any evidence of the quotes he used that goes down to the Sahabis. He is just trying to make the Sunnis look untrustworthy. We don't need to resort to someone's dream or some guy who had never met the prophet to learn the biography of the prophet. There are sahabis who described the events in the prophet's life to us.
Why doesnt he send peace and blessings upon him correctly
what’s wrong w it. He just doesn’t say wa sallam at end
Allahumma salli ‘aala Muhammadin wa ‘aala azwajihi wa dhuriyatihi. (That’s straight out of Sahih al-Imam al-Bukhari. It’s one of the ways that Rasool Allah ﷺ taught his Sahhaba (RAA) to correctly send salawaat upon him ﷺ.)
PS: I’m not saying that Brother Farid used this mode of salaah upon Rasool Allah ﷺ, but I am posting it as an example of correct salaah upon Rasool Allah ﷺ, so that people can use it as much as they want, seeking their reward from Allah.
Farid literally lied about the Quran and took one verse out of context lol
You destroyed this clown
No he didn't. He can only pick at straws . Dr Ammar tramples over everything you believe in. Don't be a Sunni just for the sake of it. Imam Hussein (as) wasn't a Sunni . So why are you ?
@@Aliameem define a sunni.
@g.h.o.s.t.4.2.04
Someone who follows a school of thought that does not belong to The Ahlulbayt (as) .
ie: I when The Prophet pbuh says:
" I am from The City of Knowledge and Ali is it's Gate . To get to The City you must enter via The Gate " ..
they don't believe it.
A Sunni is someone who doesn't follow The School of Thought attributed to Imam Ja'far ul Saadiq (as) .. who is from The Direct bloodline of Fatimah Zahra ( as) and therefore Mohammad (pbuh) .
A Sunni traditionally follows 1 of 4 schools of Thought belonging to Imams who arec other than The Ahlulbayt ie
The Imams Abu Hanifah, Hanbal, Maalik or Shafi'i...
.. when The only school of Thought existing in The Prophet's lifetime was of Imam Ali (as) & his Prophetically affiliated genealogy via The Bloodline of Fatemah (as) .
@@AliameemAl hussein RA was a follower of the sunnah and accusing him of not is a horrible slander
@user-hc2vk2ic3u
Imam Hassan (as) was a soldier in the war against Mu'awiah. .. ( during The Battle of Siffeen )
An Authority over him ( Mu'awiah)
... who Mu'awiah defied .
Imam Hassan ( as) was a PART of The Prophet (pbuh)
Because The Prophet pbuh said of his Ahlulbayt (as)
" I am from them and they are from me " .
Imam Hassan (as) clarified that The Imam after him would be Hussein (as)
After their Peace treaty however , Mu'awiah ensured that his own son Yazid would succeed him in his own illigitimatre claim to power .. prior to his own death . ..
Brribing the wife of Imam Hasan (as) to poison her own husband , with the promise of her being wedded to his own son Yazid was a part of that plan .
Like the devil he was however, he said to her afterwards that if she could do that to Imam Hassan (as) she could also do it to Yazid .. so the marriage never even went ahead .
In the list of The Sunni Version Twelve Caliphs that The Prophet (ppbuh) prophesised , Mu'awiah comes up as one of them.
Yazid comes up as the other .
And Imam Hussein (as) doesn't come up at all .
Does the shai have serrah in the first place😅
The Shia have been persecuted in Islam since the Messenger of Allah left this world.
Many Hadith and seerah of early Islamic history was censored from the masses to maintain government.
Now that it’s no man made caliph to punish people for speaking their mind and mentioning history the truth is coming out.
In no type of way was the Ahl Bayt عليه السلام even given the least honor and the proof of which is the grandson of the Prophet was butchered with most of his grandchildren at Karbala by the man made caliph.
They say no the Ahl-Bayt عليه السلام has no right to leadership but all agree the Mahdi is a descendant which completely debunks that claim from beginning of caliphate till the end of Caliphate.
If not Ahl Bayt عليه السلام than at least it MUST be with the Quraysh.
Every single principle in orthodox Islam is arbitrary and can be adjusted by any tyrant calling himself Allahs representative.
How can you Sunnis even attempt to call yourself a jamat? You have no khalifate.
Until Imam Mahdi takes charge you should at least truthfully and linguistically refer to yourself as Ahl Hadith wa Anti Ahl Bayt.😢
Who did initiate the method of narration (حدثنا،أخبرنا،فلان عن فلان etc) in islamic/Arabic history? This method is also applied by Shia historians/writers too in their hadith/history books. The question is,who did initiate this process and that specific method of narration? Who first used those مصطلحات? It is clear that Sunni scholars initiated that method. Then why did "independent" Shia historians apply the Sunni history narration methodology?😅😂 The answer is, because Shia people did not have any unique thought at first about "how" to preserve their islamic history. So later when they saw Sunnis applying scientific history, they followed and copied it from the Sunnis😂 so poor Shia bros
Ammar's beliefs sound like those of the Barelvi Sufis in the Subcontinent.
What exactly is Ammar Nakshawani's field of expertise? He has a PHD in what?
Also, isn't tatoos haram in Islam?
Tattoos are forbidden indeed. Shias aren't of this religion, they broke off Islam. Some of them are and some aren't, but they are all misguided.
4:37
“Ya dhaktor”
LOL!
May I ask what exactly it is about shia islam that you disagree with? Or are you one to believe that shias are kafir? We hold on to Quran and Ahlulbayt as as our beloved rasulallah (pbuh) told us. If you can sum up your point of contention? I'm truly trying to understand what the issue is if we both simply have different sides to the story...where's the problem to it. Genuine query...would be very keen to know!
If your question is sincere farid posted recently the problem of proving imamah from twelver sources. Maybe give that a look
We don't do takfeer to all shia, only the ones that insult the sahabah
@flaror3496 so criteria of kafir is anyone who insults the Sahaba? But surely you know all sahaba were not the same. Some turned against the prophets pbuhs mission.
Muwaiya also insulted imam ali as per the Sunan of ibn majah. He also fought imam ali as in battle...
Aisha fought imam ali as in jamal (does that not categorize as insulting the sahaba,?)
Must we all only agree to history in sahih bukhari and sahih muslim? Is it not possible that another historian has a sahih reading?
And since when does disagreeing with one sects reading of history make you kafir? That's not the definition, is it?
@flaror3496 my previous reply disappeared somehow
Ok so since when does disagreeing with credibility of a sahaba make you kafir?
If I believe un tawhid, I believe in our prophet pbuh, the quran and the prophets pbuh teachings, from what I understand, that makes me muslim
Why must I be subject to only one version of history? And if insulting a sahabi makes you kafir then you must re evaluate your own stance right? Since muwaiya waged war against imam ali as he even insulted him as per the sunan of ibn majah
Similarly aisha waged war against imam ali as in jamal..that isn't a form of disrespect or grave insult?
Why is only one sects reading correct? Who gave whom the authority to declare that sahih muslim has got it all right completely?
We can agree to disagree that we have our own readings correct?
Let's let Allah decide who is a disbeliever and who isn't. Please do think about my points here..
At the end our aim should be to dig for the truth !!
@@zahraS18 because the prophet said so, the one who harms the Sahabah is not from him and he who harms the sahabah also harms the prophet
Which makes one a disbeliever
Regarding aisha, ali رضي الله عنه never acted towards like you and he was one of the closest companions of the prophet, somehow he was the most knowledgeable of his time but didn't know that the wife of the prophet is some sort disbeliever who intended nothing but harm? Yeah right, laughable beliefs
Perhaps i could give you muawiya but not the prophet wife nor his closest companions
Farid, please comment on his Tato . 🤢
@@xinobieeStick to anime ya ibn zina wal bidah
One thing I've noticed with a lot of Shia fakers, is how much effort they put into their "performance". They overdo it. It's never "Assalamoalikum". It's always "Assalamoalikum warahmatullah e wabarakaatuhu" with extra emphasis on the enunciation while tilting their heads or moving in other ways, trying way too hard to appear "Islamic". Even the way he says "Sallalahu alaihi wassalam" with unnecessary pauses before or after.
They do the same thing in the comment sections. Everytime they're trying to decieve people with falsehood, they start with a long winded Salam followed by "Bismillah Arrahmaan...", then followed by an introduction to something no one asked for... instead of like "Hey, I disagree with this point. Here's a hadith that refutes your point". Nope. it's always a speech.
It's all smokes and mirrors. A big emotional charade. It's never about irrefutable evidence and they crumble the second anyone asks for proof of what they believe...then the lying, cutting verses/hadieths and ignoring said verses/hadieths context ensues.
Lol
Meanwhile, "scientific" findings in the Christian obscene bible
Genesis 3:14
X
Then the LORD said to the serpent: "Because you have done this, cursed are you among all livestock and among all forest animals; it is in your belly that you will spread and the dust of the ground you will eat all the days of your life.
Isaiah 65:25
THE WOLF and the lamb will eat grass together, the LION will eat straw like the ox and the serpent will live on dust.
what?
Exactly 😂 Hella acting! Doing the most yet nothing 😂 cringe to be fair.