He is not a linguist. As long as you understand what he's saying, it's perfectly fine. His tone of voice, his pitch, his accent, the size of his penis are all irrelevant. Try to disprove this Rafidi. By the way, who are the Shiites rejecting? Certainly not the Qur'an and Suhhah.
@@szuvibes9474 Yes. Basically the Shia sheikh was reading everything in the book cover even unnecessary parts like the ISBN. The guy in the comment is making fun of that and saying sarcastically that farid’s argument isn’t valid because he didn’t mention the ISBN. 😂
Unfortunately what the shia sheikh did was necessary … I have literally seen comments of people questions even the isbn number he provided thinking maybe what he is talking abt is blatant lies. Alhamdulillah tho, they’re not lies.
@@s.a.a.s2527 I’m 100% sure that the author and title are enough to find a book, ESPECIALLY when you’re reading a literal copy of the book. An isbn won’t change anything. whoever asked for it, doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
Abdullah ibn al Mubarak said: The Religion is for people of Hadith, and Kalām and false talk is for people of opinion (i.e. ahlur ra'iy) and lies are for the Rafidha (Shia)
So basically the first Hadith is rejected due to a faulty chain He didn't bother looking at the chain and said you're rejecting it because it goes against what you believe. Bruhhhhh Wait so the 2nd one has no chain? Wow
What do we expect from a Rafidha!! They always do this, and complain when we bring a Hadith from their sources where the majority of their scholars said it is a Sahih, but one single guy said it is weak because of personal reasons, then they reject it.
@@napolien1310I suggest you watch some of the actual video. He only uses Muslim and Bukhari for the majority of the video, farid here only picks the weak sources because it’s easier for him to breakdown.
@@s.a.a.s2527if the guy loved Ahlul Bayt, he would have tried to look like Ahlul bayt & follow their teachings. Instead, he has tattoos, no beard, & has a moustache
@@napolien1310 IF he can ‘build’ those narratives using the books designated as completely Sahih then my brother it’s not the reading that you have an issue with it’s what is written…
what do you expect from people who claim to follow the prophet, mind you some of them deny the prophethood of muhammad saw entirely, but can’t even read his revelations ie quran.
This is how they deliver talk, they are taught to deliberately exploit emotions over logic, facts & evidence... notice how seamlessly he inserts fabrications or distort the Hadiths with that tone~ It drives you to NOT even check behind him! How else will you build a whole religion based on hatred rather than Kitab Allah & Teachings of wisdom of his prophet?
The entire focus of his lecture is making this clear by the holy Quran that some of the sahabas were hypocrites . So their is nothing such like ultimate decency of the Sahabas . Secondly he mentioned the person walid ibne jumah whose hadiths are accepted by your books but this Hadith was rejected. He never said that it is a confirmed Hadith.
@@everythingandroidoisyou’re right, this is a weak source he uses here in the last 10 mins of his hour lecture. Farid helpfully skips over the evidence in SAHIH MUSLIM that was used throughout the whole lecture…
@@everythingandroidois exactly the same point he is trying to make . You guys take the authenticity when it favors your beliefs and reject it in all other cases .
Also, they do this tactic, where they block you and CZcams doesn't send/post a reply, so "ooohh the sunnis are scared and running" but a small boy with barely any knowledge of Quran can refute them, and many have been doing so.
@@iceycones654 Yes I do "Taqiyya is a Shi'i doctrine that allows a Shi'i to sugarcoat his religion when presenting it to the masses through purposeful lying, distortion and deceit " This is what your Shia Scholar have to say Shaykh al-Saduq, ibn Babawayh al-Qummi in his "al-l 'tiqadat" (p 114) said: "Our belief regarding Taqiyya is that it *is obligatory" . He who leaves it is like he who leaves praying, and it's impermissible to dismiss it until the Mahdi rises. *He who leaves it* before the Mahdi rises *has left the religion of Allah* and the religion of the Imami Shia and *has disobeyed Allah* and the Prophet and the Imams."
@@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul You’re really good at Cherry-picking huh? Putting a false definition, then getting a small section of quote to make you argument look good. Are you sure you are not practicing Taqiyyah? Here’s what Ayatollah Sayyid Mohammad says about the topic. “Question : Did the Prophet and the Imams (peace be upon them) do Taqiyya? Answer : Taqiyya is position that one takes to express an idea he does not believe in or waive his right on a matter, in order to protect himself from being harmed. Taqiyya was established in the Holy Book when Almighty Allah said: “Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security. Allah biddeth you beware (only) of Himself. Unto Allah is the journeying” (3-21). He also said: “Whoso disbelieveth in Allah after his belief - save him who is forced thereto and whose heart is still content with the Faith - but whoso findeth ease in disbelief: On them is wrath from Allah. Theirs will be an awful doom” (16-6). This last verse was revealed when Ammar bin Yasir was coerced to let the idolaters hear what they wanted to hear, words of disbelief, in order to avoid being tortured further. When he stated this to the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his holy progeny), he approved what Ammar did. The Prophet even told Ammar that if the idolaters return to you, let them hear again what you told them. This incident is mentioned in various books of history and Quranic commentaries. The Imams of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) were subject to difficult situations, and they were forced to apparently recognize the rulers of their times, even though the Imams knew of the oppression and tyranny of such rulers.”
Yes skip the whole 1 hour lecture and focus on the end. Incredible way to cut and clip your points. Ammar didn’t use this 1 source to prove his point lol. This is not it family. May Allah guide us all
Let's come to the remaining points after this then. Can you justify this particular point at least for now? How are these two narrations related? And using the second narration, how does that reflect bad on Umar (RA)? How does it make him one of the plotters? When the narration excludes him, if you are to take a certain narration, why don't you take it completely?
Perfectly explained Farid 👌🏽and yes they definitely need to fix the state of their hearts for misinterpreting something that is so clear , even to a non believer
I debated this Ammar guy back 25 years ago in the basement of Abu Ali shisha lounge!!😂 Edgware Road. He was supposed to use his knowledge power to convert me to Shiism.
Alhamdulillah I follow Quran, sahih ahadith, love the Ahlul bayt and call myself a Muslim without any label. Sahih Hadith tell us that Ali RA was upon haq and some people were against him were wrong. Some made apologies and regretted it, yet those that didn’t Ali RA did qunoot e nazilah upon them.
He says 'I wouldn't ask', of course he wouldn't, Allah revealed a whole chapter named Al Munafiqoon and Allah says that the munafiqoon will be in the depths of Jahannam. Someone who doesn't care about themselves wouldn't ask about a matter that is important for Al Akhirah. Ammar seems to think he's infallible. This is why I said, if anyone wants to see a munafiq, they can look at this mushrik Ammar. I seek refuge in Allah to ever be like him ameen
I just refuse to believe this Ammar does not know you could become munafiq for a number of reasons. He basically threw away all the other reasons and jumped to "he's a murderer therefore a munafiq that's why he's asking" conclusion. He's playing games with his audience.
@@f1aziz And that's the problem, whenever an educational discussion happens and you summarise it some very important information are usually left out as what farid did, he only responded to the last 5 mins of the 1hr video, I don't know why he did that maybe he agrees with what Sayyed Ammar said.
So it's Ramadhan, and instead of focusing on spreading love of Gods book and the sunnah, Nakshawani releases an hour long rant every single day spreading hatred over lies that concern historical issues. I don't know what that guy is on.
It isn't really hatred if he's educating the shias about their beliefs using sunni literature. I understand how it comes off, at the end of the day we're all muslims inshallah by god if he sees fit he will place us in jannah inshallah. I am liking these Nakshawani talks, and as a shia myself I will tell you, sometimes I disagree with some things he says because they don't carry a strong backbone of truth. But also, I cannot deny all the great points he makes. I think it's good that he chose to educate the shias about why we believe what we believe, and I think flat out after he proved Hadith Al Thaqalayn and the 12 Caliphates (that lecture was today), that is personally enough for me to believe in twelver shiism. But obviously gathering info is always better. Allah loves the believes that constantly gains more knowledge about the religion. But anyways TLDR, I wouldn't say it's fit that he's basing it on lies cause most points come from ur books. May Allah accept your prayers and fasts this ramadan iA.
“Hated” and “lies” reading Sunni litterateur? Amazing how you analyze things. The only people who “hate” anyone are the extreme Sunni who hate the Shia. I’ve been torn apart my whole life just for being Shia. My family members killed in the Middle East by terror selifi groups. I’d re analyze where the “hate” comes from again.
@@BigAck You seem to have misunderstood my very clear statement. Is Nakshawani just sitting there and reading a book for an hour is he spreading a message and commenting? That's exactly where the "hatred" and "lies" are to be found. In what he says and misunderstands/misrespresents. Simple question to you, is he not spreading hatred? If he makes an hour giving his best shot at convincing his audience that these sahaba tried to kill rasulullah, and that 1.7 billion sunni muslims hold these alleged attempted murderers in very very high regards, is the logical conclusion not to hate them? If you sincerely believe a group of people conspired to kill rasulullah, would you not hate them? So yes, he is spreaidng hatred. AS to the lies, those are covered in the video. When it comes to your experience, that's simply horrendous. Whatever you and your family have been through is an injustice and those who did that to you will face their actions in front of God. Them hating you does not exclude you from hating them. Just as there are "sunni" terrorists killing shia, there are "shia" militia death squads who storm sunni villages and kill all the men. Neither of those groups represent either belief.
@@ahmedhamed1872 Someone else made this point before you, and you both seem to not understand what I'm saying. Think it through brother, what is the logical conclusion of believing what Nakshawani claims here? If you watch his whole thing and believe everything he says, what is the intended conclusion? Is it not that you end up hating those sahaba? How could you believe there is a group of people who attempted to murder rasulullah, and not hate them deeply? On top of all that, what does that make of the 1.7 billion sunnis who hold these people in very high regard and have great love for them? As to the lies, let's assume the absolute best of him and say he isn't purposely leaving out information. The fact that he doesn't give the real reasons behind the narratpr being weak, nor giving the first half of the hadith about Umar asking Hudayfah, would at the very very best make him and unreliable, intellectually dishonest and incompetent source. So if he isn't lying, he is incompetent. And I know for a fact you're smart enough to know that you can lie about any source. I can read the weather forecast and lie about it. So your point about how I can't say he's basing it on lies when he's using sunni literature simply doesn't hold.
بارك الله فيكم... اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين.. اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم.. رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين... لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين..... .''''''' ............... . .. . .. .
@@son-gohan2246 : The only 2 books that are considered Sahih essentially in their entirety are Sahih al-Imam al-Bukhari (RA), followed by Sahih al-Imam Muslim (RA) (there is a small handful of hadiths in the latter that _some_ scholars have had issues with). The rest of the 6 major hadith books are not claimed to be uniformly at the same level of the books of Imams Bukhari and Muslim, and no Sunni hadith scholar ever claimed otherwise (sorry, your straw man fallacy isn’t gonna fly, dude). Our scholars of hadith have gone through all of the hadiths in the remainder of the 6 books, and they have very authoritative rulings on their gradings. The hadith sciences of the Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah have always been in excellent hands, don’t worry. The Shi’i “hadith sciences” on the other hand are an absolute mess, and always have been.
" Rasoolullah Used to do thauwba/ isthigfar more than 70 times a day, " Rafidi magian : " Yooow, seee. Rasulullah is a SINNER. SEE, IF NOT, THEN WHY WOULD HE DO THAUWA, YOU NASIBI.
@@Akhi_UmarBro, the shia have no idea what's in the Quran other than cut verse out of their context, you'd think they know what Surah Abassa wa tawlla is talking about? they're misguided may allah guide us all to whatever he pleases.
He also used sahih muslim do not forget and muslim in his book used certain narrators in his sahih and sayed ammar is using your sahih books to link it to other sunni books which you are considering weak but it shows clear connection in the story between the authentic hadith and the weak ones to show how you guys manipulated and distorted the hadiths to make sure it covers your sahabas faults. And do not talk about chain of narrators because you guys seem to stick to the weak ones yourself when it comes to taraweeh prayers
@@everythingandroidois the Sunni only use bukari and Sahih when it’s convenient to them. Either take it all or leave it all. Who do you guys think you are to cherry pick sourcing?
@@BigAck your scholars don’t even believe the Quran is preserved they believe it has been changed so don’t even talk about Islam you have no idea what your talking about.
اسلام عليكم ورحمة الله يا فريد I wanted to ask you if you could send me the complete reference of the hadith about omar asking Hudhayfa if he’s a hypocrite from at the end of the video please. Also is there a pdf of kitab al-zuhd by wakee bin Jurrah جزاك الله خيرا 🙏🏻
@@-------....___ Bro don't waste your time with them honestly. Alhamdulillah for guidance and not being a blind follower. To them having a bunch of chain-less narrations with more than a 3-5 century gap is a "definitive argument" like..... you see what I mean. Any honest person who looks for the truth would never reach to this point of in denial but yet again "You don't guide those who you love, but Allah guides whoever he wants". May Allah guide us and keep us steadfast upon the Sunnah.
@@hussainasad7988 he brought a narration from IBN HAZM, And that doesn't even have chain💀 did you even watch the video? And also anyone with the most basic knowledge of hadith science understand that bukhari have weak hadiths, for example sometimes he mention a weak hadith about specific topic and right next to that mention an authentic one about the same thing. Shia's ignorance is going through the roof. Tell me who are the name of individuals in the narration provided by ibn hazm and who are they if you don't lie.
@@hussainasad7988 None of the narrations in the video were from bukhari though.... like how can you be so blind? did you even watch the video?? May Allah guide you.
2024 is a bad ,painful start for wahhabi oriented sunnis as they are forced to wake up to realities in their own books))) but they still prefer to be asleep
Assalamualaikum farid, lately I have a problem with myself and I always think and ask something that and this is like a thought and also myself is worried and confused with the surroundings and asking something that is chaotic as if it is not calm like confused with the law, nature , shape. and god and other laws including life!! can you explain to me about my problem? greetings from Malaysia ☪️🇲🇾❤️😇
Do you know what an ISBN number is? He is reading them for accuracy purposes, so that anyone can uniquely identify the book, of course if interested in serious research.
Shouldn't be calling any Shia 'Syed'. It is a Shia title they allocate to themselves meaning master (or something similar). Ammar should just be called Ammar.
When your great grandfather is rasool Allah. You are sayid. I am sayid Ahmed and I’m so proud of it. You don’t determine who is sayid 😂 rasool Allah did and Ahl ul bait though lineage and time. Your Mahdi will also be a sayid 🤲🏼
Sorry, but you are all giving the correct definition of 'Syed'. What I am saying is, the current Shia use Syed as a title instead, not that they are from the bloodline. I have met many Shia, students of knowledge, who at a certain stage in the learning, start calling themselves Syed.
A study on the ancestry of the Syed indicates that Syed is a "common honorific title given to male Muslims belonging to certain families claiming descent from the Prophet Muhammad" (Belle, et al. Sept. 2010, 217). The Encyclopaedia Britannica similarly states that Syed is an "Arabic title of respect, sometimes restricted … to the Banū Hāshim, members of Muḥammad’s clan" (Encyclopaedia Britannica n.d.). Sources report that the word "Syed" in Arabic means "chief" (Belle, et al. Sept. 2010, 218); "master," "lord" (Encyclopaedia Britannica n.d.) or "prince" (Encyclopedia n.d.a). Some sources claim the name Syed can more generally designate a "holy" person (MRG Aug. 2002, 7; Encyclopedia n.d.a).
@@-------....___ in Shia Islam the only people who are called Sayed are the bloodline of Ahl ul bait. Anyone else to claims to be Sayed is an impostor. I get what you’re saying but if that’s the case is there also Sunni Sayed? If the definition just means someone who is respected? I’ve never met a Sunni label themself as Sayed. I myself am Sayed but only because I can trace my bloodline back to Ahl ul bait. I’ve been Shia my whole life. In and out of Shia mosques across the country. Anytime I’ve met a Sayed they know exactly what imam their lineage is taken back to. I’ve never hear it used as a weightless title in my 27 years of life. I am a Sayed myself. And not a “respected man” but the great grandson of our believed prophet peace be upon him. I understand what you are saying but if someone labels themself as Sayed and are not of bloodline they are just liars.
I agree...hard to listen to anyone, let alone an Imam who has tattoos...and not small ones...looks like full sleeves on both arms ! Tattoos Are Forbidden by Tradition Scholars and individuals who believe that all permanent tattoos are forbidden base this opinion on the following hadith, recorded in the Sahih Bukhari (a written, and sacred, collection of hadith): "It was narrated that Abu Juhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: 'The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) cursed the one who does tattoos and the one who has a tattoo done.' " Although the reasons for the prohibition are not mentioned in the Sahih Bukhari, scholars have outlined various possibilities and arguments: Tattooing is considered mutilating the body, thus changing Allah's creation The process of getting a tattoo inflicts unnecessary pain and introduces the possibility of infection Tattoos cover the natural body and are, therefore, a form of "deception" Also, non-believers often adorn themselves this way, so getting tattoos is a form or imitating the kuffar (non-believers).
@@rosdykalat2620 you’re using bukari to prove tattoos are haram. Though Shia don’t take bukari as authentic. Many things within bukari are not authentic. And even the Sunni sect deny a lot in bukari. Does the Quran say “tattoos are haram?” Or are you just taking your own sect and scholars view on it? Some scholars say it’s haram to eat crab and lobster. And some permit it…what is your point exactly? This is within your own Sunni school of thought? Some scholars make misyar marriage haram and some permit it in Sunni Islam…. You can’t dismiss someone’s knowledge and career because he has tattoos. May Allah guide us all. Do you judge Aisha for conspiring against the prophet. Being jealous. Attacking the name of Khadijah. Being egotistical and fighting with rasool allahs family? Or just Shia or having a tattoo?
He must read the ISBN, otherwise you will not believe him. In Afghanistan. The Saudis have bought huge numbers of old Sunni religious books in order to destroy them. The reason: some parts are not in favour of the Sunni interpretation of Islam. The scandal has reached such proportions that Sunnis are now buying their books from Sunni followers in Iran because they no longer trust books published by Sunni Arabs.
@@Ali-fo4uv provide evidence. I don’t believe a faceless CZcams commenter. Do you think the Saudis care about some random old Sunni Books, especially in rural Afghanistan? How gullible do you have to be.
As-Salamun'alaykum Farid, I really would like you to make some videos regaridng re-establishment of Khilāfah ala Minhajun Nabuwah in modern world, the methodology of Prophetﷺ to establish it and Ijtihad of Shaykh Taqiuddin Nabhāni and his works of implementing Socio-economic-political Syatem of Islām in totality. Can you please discuss those books as well? To unite the Ummah and work for a common goal to safeguard & purify our lands from forign enemies, ideas and false puppet leaderships. It'll increase the IQ of youth and open the doors of discussion & understanding for us laymen, we can't just sit around doing Adhkār whilst our brethren are slaughtered, destroying social systems and UnIslamic wealth distribution, comstitutions, foreign policies, economicsz etc. JazakhAllah khair!
The prophet ﷺ established tawheed and Allah granted him leadership after When the ummah is united upon tawheed Allah will grant us fitting leaders ان شاء الله
The public is a good judge...I believe in Quran and prophet Muhammad (PBUH). i sunnis respect those caliphs and overrate them, shia respect the marjah too much. i never see any sunni scholar talk about those 12 hypcrite 🚯 ? is it because umar name is mentionted one of them? think and decide ♈🚩? this changes everything?
Al-Imām Abū 'Ubayd Al-Qāsim Ibn Sallām (d. 224 hicrī) said: „I lived with the people and talked with people of philosophy etc. and I saw no one, who were more filthier, dirtier, weaker in their proof and who were dumber, than the rāfidah (shiites).“ [„As-Sunnah“ (no. 780) by Al-Khallāl]
This guy only responded to like probably the last 20 or so minutes of Dr. Sayed Ammar’s video. Saying he’s only going to dissect that main arguments. Him quoting the Prophet (S) saying there are 12 hypocrites among my companions is not a main point? Fi Ashaabi Ithna Ashara munafiqan. I guess you could say this dismantles the belief in Adalat Sahabah?
@ghalibahmed6676 Adalah as Sahaba is a concept purely tied to hadith transmission. It means that by and large, according to sunni hadith corpus, it is not known that a sahabi has misattributed something to the Prophet (peace be upon him). It by no means means that all companions are sinless, have not made mistakes (major/minor) and will not be held accountable for their actions. You may not agree to the concept but just wanted to let you know that the actual concept is around hadith transmission.
So i guess the question for sunnis is what books are reliable according to u since everything that doesnt fit ur narrative is weak... not reliable..no chain..person not reliable etc etc etc..i doubt any book can ever be used against a sunni since u can always say well so n so isnt reliable or this or that excuses after excuses
Well maybe because there were lots of hadith made to make a fake narrative, your comment can really go both ways, for Farid, or Ammar. Still we know authenticity is essential.
@@everythingandroidois a Hadith is either 100% credible. Or it’s 100% garbage. You can’t cherry pick what you want from bukari and Sahih and then throw away the “weak parts” that makes the whole book weak.
We give reasons for why a hadith is reliable and not reliable. You honestly expect people to accept any report that comes thier way for no reason. You have to give us reasons as to why the report should be trusted otherwise how can we know its not a lie. 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@everythingandroidois no it cant lol ur the ones that say ur books are the most sahih after the quran ..shias dnt say that their books are 100 percent when it comes to narrations..but ive always been given the impression by sunnis that everything in bukhari is authentic even if it disrespects the prophet.
@@averagegamerz4157 we dont say that tho idk why you guys strawman like crazy. if anything shias are the only sect of a religion in which their most authentic books like usul al kafi contain the most weak hadith known to date, famouse ones like confirming that the holy quran has 17,000 ayahs. there is a difference between Sahih Al Bukhari and the Bukhari (general compilation of every hadith) on its own. we as sunnis know our way of hadith sciences and you guys dont, we can point out if a narrator was thiqa or not trustworthy, due to their reputation and opinions of scholars around the same time they lived. for example ibn ishaq is known to have narrated among the most hadith and almost everyone like imam dhahabi states that he is not trustworthy since he was a well known liar.
This was a good video, thank you, you still not have provided any rationalization as to why would Omar be worried about this. I'm not making any claims here, but what Ammar is saying here is. Why would Omar be worried about being on the list unless he knows deep inside him he's one? One might argue that it is some sort of humility on the part of Omar, we were taught to be humble and not have any delusions about our "fate" in heaven or in hell, or make our assumptions about our status "good" or "bad", but hypocrisy is a totally different issue, you will surely know if you're a hypocrite or not, there is no point of being humble in this regard! So why would Omar RAA be worried about this? Was the main question It can also be argued that Omar was clearing his name for the benefit of someone else who doubted him. But I've never come across any story where Omar's faith was questioned. So, to be totally fair, there is a question to be asked here.
The Prophet SAW used to make Tawbah all day, constant dhikr, standing in salah until his ankles would swell up because he feared the hellfire so much. If you use the same logic that Ammar is using, you would conclude that Muhammad SAW is is guilty of a big enough sin to send him to hell Astaghfirullah.
Why did the prophet Ibrahim A.S. Fear that he or his children would fall into idol worship? By your logic Prophet Ibrahim A.S. Would secretly have these feelings? Of course not our beloved prophet A.S. Feared transgressing and angering Allah and knew that he was a human and didn’t want to anger Allah who he loved the most, we must reflect and fear Allah, no Muslim should think they can not be a hypocrite, we should all fear this if we do not reflect on ourselves and be harsh and fear than we can easily fall, this is what made umar R.A. Such a great leader he feared doing wrong and reflected upon himself and actions may Allah be pleased with him
Still havent responded to his question. What is self reflection got to do with that situation. If your certain your not one of the plotters then why ask am i one of them?
Genuinely confused how does this negate the argument made my Nakshawani. If sahabi who were travelling with prophet were munafiqs then it affects the view of sahaba as a whole… the bit abt the munafiqoon being Abu Bakr and Umar where he reads from some questionable sources that to plant the idea that perhaps it was them but he didn’t focus on that, he spent 30 mins at least explaining how RusulAllah said that there were SAHABI that were MUSHRIQs. I feel like we need farid to breakdown the points he was making in the bulk of the video.
The reason you’re lost and confused is you want to accept every Hadith that could look bad for some sahabas while rejecting EVERY SINGLE HADITH that praises any single one of them. Your worldview is completely slanted and you’re wondering why you’re lost and confused in your nonsense.
It is already known from the Quran that some were munafiq, this isn't a revelation. Also the report itself shows Umar was not a munafiq, so no idea why you think it helps the shia argument
@@iceycones654 your 12th imam is not the Mahdi. No Sunni has ever said that he is the Mahdi. The name of the Mahdi is Muhammad ibn Abdallah, not Muhammad ibn al-Hassan.
@@King-qk1de Tattoos Are Forbidden by Tradition Scholars and individuals who believe that all permanent tattoos are forbidden base this opinion on the following hadith, recorded in the Sahih Bukhari (a written, and sacred, collection of hadith): "It was narrated that Abu Juhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: 'The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) cursed the one who does tattoos and the one who has a tattoo done.' " Although the reasons for the prohibition are not mentioned in the Sahih Bukhari, scholars have outlined various possibilities and arguments: Tattooing is considered mutilating the body, thus changing Allah's creation The process of getting a tattoo inflicts unnecessary pain and introduces the possibility of infection Tattoos cover the natural body and are, therefore, a form of "deception" Also, non-believers often adorn themselves this way, so getting tattoos is a form or imitating the kuffar (non-believers).
Why don’t you talk directly with each other ? Really, some of us wants the truth but not in a bad way, why it has to be conflictual ? We have to be united and respectful with each other as long as we believe that Allah swt is the only god and Muhammad peace be upon him is his messenger
@@isafcb312 If you are united about tawheed and truth, why is Palestine still getting bombarded by Israel and Saudi isn't doing anything along with the other gulf countries? While the only ones helping them are nonsenical shias such as the Houthis, Iran and Hezbollah and non-muslims like South Africa? May Allah (SWT) free Palestine and free the world from zionist agents like yourself.
Shias are similar to other religions with their text rather than understanding the text in its full meaning, context and reliability, they pick out arguments that is based on their nonsubstanstial narrarives. May Allah keep us steadfast in the straight path and protect us from being so astray and blinded by hatred.
Farid doing the job , Makes me wonder where the rest of the brothers are ? It is true that you only find them harsh with those who are close to them , sorry i know I probably shouldn't have commented on this but it's the truth
Again your reply is poor and you’ve avoided lots of points deliberately as you’ve not got the evidence to back yourself up. Honestly Nakshawani’s lectures have really opened by heart and mind.
All these qadianis and worse than qadianis the imamite shia use sunni books with the lens of their own. Why would a sunni imam write that sahaba murdered prophet and still say may Allah be pleased with them? Does it make any sense?
From a dead women that died 3 years prior to aishas marriage 😂 the problem is not even the jealousy it’s that she also insulted her by saying an old women with no teeth and red gums and allah has given u meaning prophet a better wife in her stead I will give the reference wich r in ur books sahih al Bukhari 3821 btw this is from ur books not sahih al shia 😂
The sunnis say that those who insult the wives of the prophets are kaffir so by ur criteria she, aisha is a kaffir because she insulted another wive of rasullallah? Or because she is aisha she is allowed to do such stuff and also don’t forget the battle of jammal don’t even get me started on that topic 😂
@@user-vk9dw7er6h sayid Ammar also loves rasool Allah. Does that give him the right to speak the way he does about Aisha and Hafsa? I guess when you love the prophet you can be jealous. Conspire against him. And his family. Why not drink and smoke and steal too? It’s normal. Any normal person makes mistakes right?
@@BigAck I don't think you love your mother the same way your father loves her ( think you get that point). So don't be confused. If you don't have any argument shut down your mouth.
Using Sayed's series as clickbait, jazakhallah kheir brother. Perhaps the reason you don't have a time slot on an international channel is due to the lack of interest in your content.
Having a time slot on an international channel means nothing, let's say I say that about some sunnis which I can give examples of, would that make a difference to you? Also on clickbait, why are you fooling yourself? Ammar is using clickbait every single episode with faces of different sunnis, maybe you guys are just not looking at them, I don't know.
Why would a Muslim cast so much doubt in choice of the Prophet SalAllahu 3layh wa Aalih wasallam? I am careful not to call these Rawafid as Kuffar, Allah knows best
@@muhammadtasiu5473 in your dreams pal your scholars couldn't do it in fourteen centuries don't get excited your just a gassed Shia you'll calm down in muhurrum.
Nakshawani is sick like most Shia Apologizets. What I don't know is what he was thinking, that he will not be rebutted and because of Gaza people will take this as truth.
So these narrations from Sunni ahadith literature arw da'if, when it suits the sunnis of course but yet they still managed to find their way into your books. If the Ahadirh were meant to be followed, why were these weak narrations approved and put into your books to read? 😂😂 I'd laugh loudly if this wasn't such a tragedy.
JazakAllah Khair brother Farid. If Ammar knew about this hadith and it's context and still made the video to make Omar RA look bad, then he is a liar and an evil person that no Shia should listen to.
@@wizzard9531 Are you Allah (SWT) that you know he isn't a muslim? By saying this, you might jeopardize your afterlife so always be careful with saying such things. Muslims should always give each other the benefit of the doubt in all cases.
@@AliZaidi-ul1ef another shi’i committing literal blasphemy that asks if I’m Allah. Those who accuse the companions and wives of the prophet ﷺ are denying the Quran and this is stated several times within and by scholars - that takes them out of Islam
@@wizzard9531 The Quran also accuses the wives of the prophet and some of the sahaba. Has the Quran been taken out of the fold of Islam lol? "يَا نِسَاءَ النَّبِيِّ مَنْ يَأْتِ مِنْكُنَّ بِفَاحِشَةٍ مُبَيِّنَةٍ يُضَاعَفْ لَهَا الْعَذَابُ ضِعْفَيْنِ ۚ وَكَانَ ذَٰلِكَ عَلَى اللَّهِ يَسِيرًا. وَمَنْ يَقْنُتْ مِنْكُنَّ لِلَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ وَتَعْمَلْ صَالِحًا نُؤْتِهَا أَجْرَهَا مَرَّتَيْنِ وَأَعْتَدْنَا لَهَا رِزْقًا كَرِيمًا." “O wives of the prophet! Whoever of you commits an open indecency, the punishment shall be increased to her doubly; and this is easy to Allah. And whoever of you is obedient to Allah and His Apostle and does good, We will give to her reward doubly, and We have prepared for her an honorable sustenance.” إِنْ تَتُوبَا إِلَى اللَّهِ فَقَدْ صَغَتْ قُلُوبُكُمَا ۖ وَإِنْ تَظَاهَرَا عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ" مَوْلَاهُ وَجِبْرِيلُ وَصَالِحُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۖ وَالْمَلَائِكَةُ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ ظَهِيرٌ. عَسٰى رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبْدِلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ مُسْلِمَاتٍ مُؤْمِنَاتٍ قَانِتَاتٍ تَائِبَاتٍ عَابِدَاتٍ سَائِحَاتٍ ثَيِّبَاتٍ وَأَبْكَارًا." “If you both turn to Allah, then indeed your hearts are already inclined (to this); and if you back up each other against him, then surely Allah it is Who is his Guardian, and Jibraeel and the believers that do good, and the angels after that are the aiders. Maybe, his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins.” ضَرَبَ اللَّهُ مَثَلًا لِلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا امْرَأَتَ نُوحٍ وَامْرَأَتَ لُوطٍ ۖ كَانَتَا تَحْتَ عَبْدَيْنِ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا صَالِحَيْنِ فَخَانَتَاهُمَا فَلَمْ يُغْنِيَا عَنْهُمَا مِنَ اللَّهِ شَيْئًا وَقِيلَ ادْخُلَا النَّارَ مَعَ الدَّاخِلِينَ “Allah sets forth an example to those who disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of Our righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with those who enter.”
Please make a video responding to his video called Quran & sunnah or ahulbayt he did this video on night (7) PLEASE FARID MAKE A RESPONSE i will pay even for u to make that video
@@FaridResponds brother wallah I did not understand what he was saying for example is the Hadith not sahih are we supposed to follow Quran and sunnah or Quran and ahulbayt or quran or all three
@@duckyisdaddymaterial6524 The authentic version of the report says to follow the Quran and to take care of Ahlulbayt. We have to follow the Sunnah either way, but the wording of that hadith is incorrect.
I see what you did there, using Ammar Nakshawani's full name in your CZcams post. Quite tactical, I must say. Nakshawani is a Shia scholar revered in the Shia community and the broader theological academia world. As for you, I must admit, your name or work hasn't crossed my path before. And making fun of a scholar engaged in their academic duties is not only disrespectful but also undermines the importance of scholarly work. ISBN serves as a fundamental tool in academia, enabling researchers, educators, and students to access, cite, and build upon existing knowledge with accuracy and integrity. Ridiculing someone for utilizing ISBN or engaging in scholarly activities is inappropriate and goes against the principles of intellectual discourse and respect for academic endeavors. As an academic, where can I read your analysis or, should I say, your résumé? Please refer me to your books with their ISBN numbers.
What are your qualifications, Farid ? Did you go madressa to learn this knowledge or were you independent researcher ? And for how long have u been researching Hadiths and everything Islam for ? Genuine question
The entire Muslim ummah trying to do dua for Gaza and increase good deeds as much as possible meanwhile polytheist rafidhis: *Let's recycle our old rubbish arguments and try raise some doubts against Islam*
Doubts on a false narrative of Islam, which has made the ummah weaker as a whole. This false version of Islam is part of the reason none of the gulf states are supporting Palestine. They aren't following the true teachings of the religion.
its lovely how u skipped the part where he shows ur sahih books bukhari and muslim who narrate from him. Why is ur 5 out of 6 sahih books using him and doesnt have a problem with it.
calling hudaytha a hypocrite. its funny how u can accuse ammar of his opinion of the hadith but not the hypocrisy when u state ur opinion of the hadith u presented. mashallah nice work
bro the evidence is not only in the last parts of his videos, this doesnt mean anything, farid just keeps making excuses saying ayesha is jealous because she loves him and that omar rejected the prophets writing because he is "worried"🤦♂️, not only that the prophet was going to write THE SUCCESSOR AFTER THE PROPHET, now i aske you why did omar reject pen and paper.
@@boah2759 it seems you misunderstood me, I said farid can't respond to Sayyed Ammar's first arguments because they are solid and can't be disputed. As in Sayyed is right in every way.
How can you claim you debunked the hadith when you just claimed the narrators were anonymous without listing their biographies? You didn't mention Abu Tufayl. Isn't Abu Tufayl a well known companion of Imam Ali (as)? How is he anonymous?
Nakshawani probably didn't expect Farid and Sunnah Discourse to tag team him into extinction.
Sunnah discourse is going in as well. Both are Defenders of the sunnah❤ jazaahumullahu Khayran❤
Nakhjavani the Tattooed dragged himself into the mess
He has no shame
He would not stop spreading lies
Because in his shia religion doing taqiyya is obligatory
@@7625e Didn't one of the guys from Sunnah Discourse become LGBTQ+?
Nothing was debunked
0:47 , 1:13who the heck is "ibn kuthayrr" ?
The tatooed rafida need to go to kindergarten school so that he can learn English properly
He is not a linguist. As long as you understand what he's saying, it's perfectly fine. His tone of voice, his pitch, his accent, the size of his penis are all irrelevant. Try to disprove this Rafidi. By the way, who are the Shiites rejecting? Certainly not the Qur'an and Suhhah.
You have no arguments lol
@@son-gohan2246 average response from a rafida😂
@@son-gohan2246 why I have to present an argument when Farid already refuted nakjawani the 🤡?
If your MAIN argument is to attack his tattoos, you are finished. KHALAS
7:08 you didn’t read the isbn number so your argument isn’t valid.
Some people won’t understand you’re joking 😂
@@redstonexgamer4238it was sarcasm?
@@szuvibes9474
Yes. Basically the Shia sheikh was reading everything in the book cover even unnecessary parts like the ISBN. The guy in the comment is making fun of that and saying sarcastically that farid’s argument isn’t valid because he didn’t mention the ISBN. 😂
Unfortunately what the shia sheikh did was necessary … I have literally seen comments of people questions even the isbn number he provided thinking maybe what he is talking abt is blatant lies. Alhamdulillah tho, they’re not lies.
@@s.a.a.s2527
I’m 100% sure that the author and title are enough to find a book, ESPECIALLY when you’re reading a literal copy of the book. An isbn won’t change anything. whoever asked for it, doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
Abdullah ibn al Mubarak said: The Religion is for people of Hadith, and Kalām and false talk is for people of opinion (i.e. ahlur ra'iy) and lies are for the Rafidha (Shia)
I’m a rafidah and I’m proud and I will go to paradise with rasool Allah .
@@Johnny-xk7vw عليكم السام ولعمة الله يا كافر عنيد
@@Johnny-xk7vw you believe sayidna Ali ra couldn’t even defend his wife and unborn baby that’s why it’s your sunnah to be a coward 😂
@@YALR-nh2tvHow come Uthman couldn’t protect his wife when his people rioted against him?
@@iceycones654We don’t call upon Uthman ؓ for help unlike what twelver shi’is do with Ali ؓ
So basically the first Hadith is rejected due to a faulty chain
He didn't bother looking at the chain and said you're rejecting it because it goes against what you believe.
Bruhhhhh
Wait so the 2nd one has no chain?
Wow
What do we expect from a Rafidha!!
They always do this, and complain when we bring a Hadith from their sources where the majority of their scholars said it is a Sahih, but one single guy said it is weak because of personal reasons, then they reject it.
@@napolien1310I suggest you watch some of the actual video. He only uses Muslim and Bukhari for the majority of the video, farid here only picks the weak sources because it’s easier for him to breakdown.
@@s.a.a.s2527 uses them for what!? To build false assumptions and create scenarios that fit his narrative!!?
We know.
@@s.a.a.s2527if the guy loved Ahlul Bayt, he would have tried to look like Ahlul bayt & follow their teachings.
Instead, he has tattoos, no beard, & has a moustache
@@napolien1310 IF he can ‘build’ those narratives using the books designated as completely Sahih then my brother it’s not the reading that you have an issue with it’s what is written…
I still dont know who “ibn Kuthayyyr” is
what do you expect from people who claim to follow the prophet, mind you some of them deny the prophethood of muhammad saw entirely, but can’t even read his revelations ie quran.
The great Sunni muhaddith mufassir Ibn Koothère
😂😂
What are you saying@@amirtjuh
@@aftabhossain264 it’s there, you can re-read it if the first time was not sufficient.
Why does this Rafidi sound always like a baby girl complaining, with his wired accent in Arabic and English?
I think that kafir just does it for emphasized effect. Kind of like how anime girl Japanese is exaggerated and annoying
He is cursed.
Concentrate on the content! Otherwise you ridicule yourself. May Allah guide us all.
@@never-say-diehis content is even more ridiculous lol what you on about
This is how they deliver talk, they are taught to deliberately exploit emotions over logic, facts & evidence... notice how seamlessly he inserts fabrications or distort the Hadiths with that tone~
It drives you to NOT even check behind him!
How else will you build a whole religion based on hatred rather than Kitab Allah & Teachings of wisdom of his prophet?
The entire focus of his lecture is making this clear by the holy Quran that some of the sahabas were hypocrites . So their is nothing such like ultimate decency of the Sahabas .
Secondly he mentioned the person walid ibne jumah whose hadiths are accepted by your books but this Hadith was rejected.
He never said that it is a confirmed Hadith.
So this is authentic evidence he can use? You guys will take authenticity as essential at some points then let it go at other points, confused.
@@everythingandroidoisyou’re right, this is a weak source he uses here in the last 10 mins of his hour lecture. Farid helpfully skips over the evidence in SAHIH MUSLIM that was used throughout the whole lecture…
@@everythingandroidois exactly the same point he is trying to make . You guys take the authenticity when it favors your beliefs and reject it in all other cases .
@@s.a.a.s2527Because they don't really have much to do with the assassination or they were just built upon conjecture.
Bro atleast give the man some respect, he made a whole 1hour video, and you dismantle it in less than 10 minutes 😂
AsSalamu Alaykum to all Muslims.
Ammar cheerleaders have no shame in the comments
Guys just ignore them
They are just practicing their holy taqiyya
Also, they do this tactic, where they block you and CZcams doesn't send/post a reply, so "ooohh the sunnis are scared and running" but a small boy with barely any knowledge of Quran can refute them, and many have been doing so.
Do you even understand the concept of Taqiyyah lol.
@@iceycones654
Yes I do
"Taqiyya is a Shi'i doctrine that allows a Shi'i to sugarcoat his religion when presenting it to the masses through purposeful lying, distortion and deceit "
This is what your Shia Scholar have to say
Shaykh al-Saduq, ibn Babawayh al-Qummi in his "al-l 'tiqadat" (p 114) said:
"Our belief regarding Taqiyya is that it *is obligatory" . He who leaves it is like he who leaves praying, and it's impermissible to dismiss it until the Mahdi rises. *He who leaves it* before the Mahdi rises *has left the religion of Allah* and the religion of the Imami Shia and *has disobeyed Allah* and the Prophet and the Imams."
@@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul You’re really good at Cherry-picking huh? Putting a false definition, then getting a small section of quote to make you argument look good. Are you sure you are not practicing Taqiyyah? Here’s what Ayatollah Sayyid Mohammad says about the topic.
“Question :
Did the Prophet and the Imams (peace be upon them) do Taqiyya?
Answer :
Taqiyya is position that one takes to express an idea he does not believe in or waive his right on a matter, in order to protect himself from being harmed.
Taqiyya was established in the Holy Book when Almighty Allah said: “Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security. Allah biddeth you beware (only) of Himself. Unto Allah is the journeying” (3-21).
He also said: “Whoso disbelieveth in Allah after his belief - save him who is forced thereto and whose heart is still content with the Faith - but whoso findeth ease in disbelief: On them is wrath from Allah. Theirs will be an awful doom” (16-6).
This last verse was revealed when Ammar bin Yasir was coerced to let the idolaters hear what they wanted to hear, words of disbelief, in order to avoid being tortured further. When he stated this to the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his holy progeny), he approved what Ammar did. The Prophet even told Ammar that if the idolaters return to you, let them hear again what you told them.
This incident is mentioned in various books of history and Quranic commentaries. The Imams of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) were subject to difficult situations, and they were forced to apparently recognize the rulers of their times, even though the Imams knew of the oppression and tyranny of such rulers.”
@@IrfanAhmad-uv4ullol thats why Ammar ibn Yasir did taqiyya when his mother was killed lol
Ammar, surrounded by books…steeped in ignorance
Ouch! 🤣😂😁
The Prophet was bewitched??
The prophet failed his mission in naming a successor and guiding the people, leaving only 5 sahabah and the rest apostated?@@MusayibShah-mv4xd
Yes skip the whole 1 hour lecture and focus on the end. Incredible way to cut and clip your points. Ammar didn’t use this 1 source to prove his point lol. This is not it family. May Allah guide us all
Let's come to the remaining points after this then. Can you justify this particular point at least for now?
How are these two narrations related? And using the second narration, how does that reflect bad on Umar (RA)?
How does it make him one of the plotters? When the narration excludes him, if you are to take a certain narration, why don't you take it completely?
@@The1991AHKhes scared to answer bro
In shia sect, ahlul bayt used to lie 24/7. That's enough to debunk this whole sect
Hope you know the prophet PBUH is part of the Ahlulbait
Where does it say in shia sect that Ahlul-Bayt used to lie 24/7?
Astagfirullah.. Can't believe you would actually say that.. 😮😮
@@kutsie529 then believe it
Perfectly explained Farid 👌🏽and yes they definitely need to fix the state of their hearts for misinterpreting something that is so clear , even to a non believer
no he just said his own aqida is wrong lol
I debated this Ammar guy back 25 years ago in the basement of Abu Ali shisha lounge!!😂 Edgware Road.
He was supposed to use his knowledge power to convert me to Shiism.
Well you’re not guided. It seems like he is helping a lot people looking into these passages and becoming Shia.
Alhamdulillah I follow Quran, sahih ahadith, love the Ahlul bayt and call myself a Muslim without any label.
Sahih Hadith tell us that Ali RA was upon haq and some people were against him were wrong.
Some made apologies and regretted it, yet those that didn’t Ali RA did qunoot e nazilah upon them.
Yooo the beginning had me screaming 😭😭 I ain’t ever seen anyone do that, not even David wood or ridvan gets to that level
He says 'I wouldn't ask', of course he wouldn't, Allah revealed a whole chapter named Al Munafiqoon and Allah says that the munafiqoon will be in the depths of Jahannam. Someone who doesn't care about themselves wouldn't ask about a matter that is important for Al Akhirah. Ammar seems to think he's infallible. This is why I said, if anyone wants to see a munafiq, they can look at this mushrik Ammar. I seek refuge in Allah to ever be like him ameen
I just refuse to believe this Ammar does not know you could become munafiq for a number of reasons. He basically threw away all the other reasons and jumped to "he's a murderer therefore a munafiq that's why he's asking" conclusion. He's playing games with his audience.
@@f1aziz There was a whole 50min explanation before the part where farid "responds" to, I recommend you watch the whole video.
@muhammadtasiu5473 Gimme the short version of what he said, please.
@@f1aziz And that's the problem, whenever an educational discussion happens and you summarise it some very important information are usually left out as what farid did, he only responded to the last 5 mins of the 1hr video, I don't know why he did that maybe he agrees with what Sayyed Ammar said.
@@f1aziz If you want to know what Sayyed Ammar said then it's better you watch his video, no knowledge is a waste.
So it's Ramadhan, and instead of focusing on spreading love of Gods book and the sunnah, Nakshawani releases an hour long rant every single day spreading hatred over lies that concern historical issues. I don't know what that guy is on.
It isn't really hatred if he's educating the shias about their beliefs using sunni literature. I understand how it comes off, at the end of the day we're all muslims inshallah by god if he sees fit he will place us in jannah inshallah. I am liking these Nakshawani talks, and as a shia myself I will tell you, sometimes I disagree with some things he says because they don't carry a strong backbone of truth. But also, I cannot deny all the great points he makes. I think it's good that he chose to educate the shias about why we believe what we believe, and I think flat out after he proved Hadith Al Thaqalayn and the 12 Caliphates (that lecture was today), that is personally enough for me to believe in twelver shiism. But obviously gathering info is always better. Allah loves the believes that constantly gains more knowledge about the religion. But anyways TLDR, I wouldn't say it's fit that he's basing it on lies cause most points come from ur books. May Allah accept your prayers and fasts this ramadan iA.
“Hated” and “lies” reading Sunni litterateur? Amazing how you analyze things.
The only people who “hate” anyone are the extreme Sunni who hate the Shia.
I’ve been torn apart my whole life just for being Shia. My family members killed in the Middle East by terror selifi groups.
I’d re analyze where the “hate” comes from again.
@@BigAck You seem to have misunderstood my very clear statement. Is Nakshawani just sitting there and reading a book for an hour is he spreading a message and commenting? That's exactly where the "hatred" and "lies" are to be found. In what he says and misunderstands/misrespresents.
Simple question to you, is he not spreading hatred? If he makes an hour giving his best shot at convincing his audience that these sahaba tried to kill rasulullah, and that 1.7 billion sunni muslims hold these alleged attempted murderers in very very high regards, is the logical conclusion not to hate them? If you sincerely believe a group of people conspired to kill rasulullah, would you not hate them? So yes, he is spreaidng hatred. AS to the lies, those are covered in the video.
When it comes to your experience, that's simply horrendous. Whatever you and your family have been through is an injustice and those who did that to you will face their actions in front of God.
Them hating you does not exclude you from hating them. Just as there are "sunni" terrorists killing shia, there are "shia" militia death squads who storm sunni villages and kill all the men. Neither of those groups represent either belief.
@@ahmedhamed1872 Someone else made this point before you, and you both seem to not understand what I'm saying.
Think it through brother, what is the logical conclusion of believing what Nakshawani claims here? If you watch his whole thing and believe everything he says, what is the intended conclusion? Is it not that you end up hating those sahaba? How could you believe there is a group of people who attempted to murder rasulullah, and not hate them deeply? On top of all that, what does that make of the 1.7 billion sunnis who hold these people in very high regard and have great love for them?
As to the lies, let's assume the absolute best of him and say he isn't purposely leaving out information. The fact that he doesn't give the real reasons behind the narratpr being weak, nor giving the first half of the hadith about Umar asking Hudayfah, would at the very very best make him and unreliable, intellectually dishonest and incompetent source.
So if he isn't lying, he is incompetent. And I know for a fact you're smart enough to know that you can lie about any source. I can read the weather forecast and lie about it. So your point about how I can't say he's basing it on lies when he's using sunni literature simply doesn't hold.
😂 technically you also filled air time by letting him read ISBN
By letting him read a point was being made about its ridiculousness
بارك الله فيكم...
اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين..
اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم..
رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين...
لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين.....
.'''''''
...............
.
..
.
..
.
Your reply to him is so childish based on his reading out isbn numbers. You have no other argument against him.
That is what happens when they cannot respond.
3:33 so your calling your sahih books unauthentic lol
Not sahih books.
it is one of your 6 books so it is basically the same@@everythingandroidois
@@son-gohan2246 : The only 2 books that are considered Sahih essentially in their entirety are Sahih al-Imam al-Bukhari (RA), followed by Sahih al-Imam Muslim (RA) (there is a small handful of hadiths in the latter that _some_ scholars have had issues with). The rest of the 6 major hadith books are not claimed to be uniformly at the same level of the books of Imams Bukhari and Muslim, and no Sunni hadith scholar ever claimed otherwise (sorry, your straw man fallacy isn’t gonna fly, dude).
Our scholars of hadith have gone through all of the hadiths in the remainder of the 6 books, and they have very authoritative rulings on their gradings. The hadith sciences of the Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah have always been in excellent hands, don’t worry. The Shi’i “hadith sciences” on the other hand are an absolute mess, and always have been.
" Rasoolullah Used to do thauwba/ isthigfar more than 70 times a day, "
Rafidi magian : " Yooow, seee. Rasulullah is a SINNER. SEE, IF NOT, THEN WHY WOULD HE DO THAUWA, YOU NASIBI.
Nooo shias believe prophet was infalliable u sre the people who belive he can disrespect the blind we hold the prophet to a much higher standard
@@thegamingoreo502What was Surah Abasa referring to?
Good point!
@@Akhi_UmarBro, the shia have no idea what's in the Quran other than cut verse out of their context, you'd think they know what Surah Abassa wa tawlla is talking about? they're misguided may allah guide us all to whatever he pleases.
@@HA-td3uw Ameen akhi.
He also used sahih muslim do not forget and muslim in his book used certain narrators in his sahih and sayed ammar is using your sahih books to link it to other sunni books which you are considering weak but it shows clear connection in the story between the authentic hadith and the weak ones to show how you guys manipulated and distorted the hadiths to make sure it covers your sahabas faults. And do not talk about chain of narrators because you guys seem to stick to the weak ones yourself when it comes to taraweeh prayers
Do not talk about chain of narrators, who do you think you are?
@@everythingandroidois the Sunni only use bukari and Sahih when it’s convenient to them.
Either take it all or leave it all. Who do you guys think you are to cherry pick sourcing?
Where is the cherry picking in Bukhari and Muslim? Btw, do you accept all narrations in al kafi?
@@BigAck your scholars don’t even believe the Quran is preserved they believe it has been changed so don’t even talk about Islam you have no idea what your talking about.
اسلام عليكم ورحمة الله يا فريد
I wanted to ask you if you could send me the complete reference of the hadith about omar asking Hudhayfa if he’s a hypocrite from at the end of the video please. Also is there a pdf of kitab al-zuhd by wakee bin Jurrah جزاك الله خيرا 🙏🏻
JazakhAllah khair for these vides Akhi🤍
Can everyone please watch the full videos of Sayed Nakshawani and not be emotionally involved. Please be true to yourself
Nashkawani presents a definite argument. You need facts.
You need to leave Shiism
@@-------....___you need to leave prejudice first,let alone any secterianism
@@beyinvebeden6527 💯
@@-------....___ Bro don't waste your time with them honestly. Alhamdulillah for guidance and not being a blind follower. To them having a bunch of chain-less narrations with more than a 3-5 century gap is a "definitive argument" like..... you see what I mean. Any honest person who looks for the truth would never reach to this point of in denial but yet again "You don't guide those who you love, but Allah guides whoever he wants". May Allah guide us and keep us steadfast upon the Sunnah.
Reason you have short response is because most of the things he says you can’t disapprove as he reads from your books
Like bringing a hadith that doesn't have chain? That's surely strong argument
@@professorparadox795 strange all Hadiths in Bukhari that don’t suit you strangely have a weak chain shocking
@@hussainasad7988 he brought a narration from IBN HAZM, And that doesn't even have chain💀 did you even watch the video? And also anyone with the most basic knowledge of hadith science understand that bukhari have weak hadiths, for example sometimes he mention a weak hadith about specific topic and right next to that mention an authentic one about the same thing.
Shia's ignorance is going through the roof.
Tell me who are the name of individuals in the narration provided by ibn hazm and who are they if you don't lie.
@@hussainasad7988 None of the narrations in the video were from bukhari though.... like how can you be so blind? did you even watch the video?? May Allah guide you.
Jazaakum llaahu khair
2024 is a bad ,painful start for wahhabi oriented sunnis as they are forced to wake up to realities in their own books))) but they still prefer to be asleep
You’re _literally_ hallucinating.
We know about your rafidhi books 😂 Full of kufr
Assalamualaikum farid, lately I have a problem with myself and I always think and ask something that and this is like a thought and also myself is worried and confused with the surroundings and asking something that is chaotic as if it is not calm like confused with the law, nature , shape. and god and other laws including life!! can you explain to me about my problem? greetings from Malaysia ☪️🇲🇾❤️😇
What is your problem?
One by one, elaborate more.
Ask anything, insha Allah.
@@TheSlaveOfAllah1992 pls bro, my question is most difficult and this will make me murtad !!!!
@@TheSlaveOfAllah1992 pls bro I really confused with mine!!
@@TheSlaveOfAllah1992 brother, my question is so confusing to my mind and myself and can make me apostate!!
@@TheSlaveOfAllah1992 brother, my question is so confusing to my mind and myself and can make me apostate!!
Do you know what an ISBN number is? He is reading them for accuracy purposes, so that anyone can uniquely identify the book, of course if interested in serious research.
Too bad that he's not as concerned about all of the narrators in the asaaneed.
This is the problem with Shias. You’re obsessed with everything except proper isnaad.
@@ahmedreads1794 Why blame Shias for the content of the Sunni books?
he has a camera on the damn book lol
he doesnt need to read it out also
Shites are not Muslims
Shouldn't be calling any Shia 'Syed'. It is a Shia title they allocate to themselves meaning master (or something similar). Ammar should just be called Ammar.
It means he is supposedly a descendant of RasulAllah (SAW), but that does not really hold weight on him as an individual academic.
When your great grandfather is rasool Allah. You are sayid. I am sayid Ahmed and I’m so proud of it.
You don’t determine who is sayid 😂 rasool Allah did and Ahl ul bait though lineage and time.
Your Mahdi will also be a sayid 🤲🏼
Sorry, but you are all giving the correct definition of 'Syed'. What I am saying is, the current Shia use Syed as a title instead, not that they are from the bloodline. I have met many Shia, students of knowledge, who at a certain stage in the learning, start calling themselves Syed.
A study on the ancestry of the Syed indicates that Syed is a "common honorific title given to male Muslims belonging to certain families claiming descent from the Prophet Muhammad" (Belle, et al. Sept. 2010, 217). The Encyclopaedia Britannica similarly states that Syed is an "Arabic title of respect, sometimes restricted … to the Banū Hāshim, members of Muḥammad’s clan" (Encyclopaedia Britannica n.d.).
Sources report that the word "Syed" in Arabic means "chief" (Belle, et al. Sept. 2010, 218); "master," "lord" (Encyclopaedia Britannica n.d.) or "prince" (Encyclopedia n.d.a). Some sources claim the name Syed can more generally designate a "holy" person (MRG Aug. 2002, 7; Encyclopedia n.d.a).
@@-------....___ in Shia Islam the only people who are called Sayed are the bloodline of Ahl ul bait.
Anyone else to claims to be Sayed is an impostor.
I get what you’re saying but if that’s the case is there also Sunni Sayed? If the definition just means someone who is respected? I’ve never met a Sunni label themself as Sayed.
I myself am Sayed but only because I can trace my bloodline back to Ahl ul bait.
I’ve been Shia my whole life. In and out of Shia mosques across the country. Anytime I’ve met a Sayed they know exactly what imam their lineage is taken back to.
I’ve never hear it used as a weightless title in my 27 years of life. I am a Sayed myself. And not a “respected man” but the great grandson of our believed prophet peace be upon him.
I understand what you are saying but if someone labels themself as Sayed and are not of bloodline they are just liars.
السلام عليكم
The guys hand is full of tattoos, isn’t that enough to refute him ? What kind of imam has a tattoos ?
I agree...hard to listen to anyone, let alone an Imam who has tattoos...and not small ones...looks like full sleeves on both arms !
Tattoos Are Forbidden by Tradition
Scholars and individuals who believe that all permanent tattoos are forbidden base this opinion on the following hadith, recorded in the Sahih Bukhari (a written, and sacred, collection of hadith):
"It was narrated that Abu Juhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: 'The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) cursed the one who does tattoos and the one who has a tattoo done.' "
Although the reasons for the prohibition are not mentioned in the Sahih Bukhari, scholars have outlined various possibilities and arguments:
Tattooing is considered mutilating the body, thus changing Allah's creation
The process of getting a tattoo inflicts unnecessary pain and introduces the possibility of infection
Tattoos cover the natural body and are, therefore, a form of "deception"
Also, non-believers often adorn themselves this way, so getting tattoos is a form or imitating the kuffar (non-believers).
@@rosdykalat2620 you’re using bukari to prove tattoos are haram. Though Shia don’t take bukari as authentic. Many things within bukari are not authentic. And even the Sunni sect deny a lot in bukari.
Does the Quran say “tattoos are haram?” Or are you just taking your own sect and scholars view on it?
Some scholars say it’s haram to eat crab and lobster. And some permit it…what is your point exactly?
This is within your own Sunni school of thought? Some scholars make misyar marriage haram and some permit it in Sunni Islam….
You can’t dismiss someone’s knowledge and career because he has tattoos. May Allah guide us all.
Do you judge Aisha for conspiring against the prophet. Being jealous. Attacking the name of Khadijah. Being egotistical and fighting with rasool allahs family?
Or just Shia or having a tattoo?
He is saying that The Prophet S.A.W know all the hypocrite, but doesn't know that omar abubakr and utman are munafik or not.
What are you trying to get at?
Why does Ammar add a ch at end of his sentences?
He must read the ISBN, otherwise you will not believe him. In Afghanistan. The Saudis have bought huge numbers of old Sunni religious books in order to destroy them. The reason: some parts are not in favour of the Sunni interpretation of Islam. The scandal has reached such proportions that Sunnis are now buying their books from Sunni followers in Iran because they no longer trust books published by Sunni Arabs.
What a stupid lie lol.
Typical example of Shia taqiyya.
More shia conspiracy without any evidence to back it up
This is so ridiculous lmao
@@syed2194it’s true
@@Ali-fo4uv provide evidence. I don’t believe a faceless CZcams commenter. Do you think the Saudis care about some random old Sunni Books, especially in rural Afghanistan? How gullible do you have to be.
JazakAllahu khairan
Did you type the translation on Microsoft word 😂
As-Salamun'alaykum Farid, I really would like you to make some videos regaridng re-establishment of Khilāfah ala Minhajun Nabuwah in modern world, the methodology of Prophetﷺ to establish it and Ijtihad of Shaykh Taqiuddin Nabhāni and his works of implementing Socio-economic-political Syatem of Islām in totality. Can you please discuss those books as well? To unite the Ummah and work for a common goal to safeguard & purify our lands from forign enemies, ideas and false puppet leaderships. It'll increase the IQ of youth and open the doors of discussion & understanding for us laymen, we can't just sit around doing Adhkār whilst our brethren are slaughtered, destroying social systems and UnIslamic wealth distribution, comstitutions, foreign policies, economicsz etc. JazakhAllah khair!
The prophet ﷺ established tawheed and Allah granted him leadership after
When the ummah is united upon tawheed Allah will grant us fitting leaders ان شاء الله
We have Khilafah today.
@@bayern1445where?
@@azzz1578 that’s good, but *how* are you going to achieve that? The prophet didn’t just sit back and wait, he was proactive
@@user-op8fg3ny3j in Iraq and Syria
It’s a metaphysical matter.
Yeah but Ammar at least have the correct ISBNs. Or does he?
The public is a good judge...I believe in Quran and prophet Muhammad (PBUH). i sunnis respect those caliphs and overrate them, shia respect the marjah too much. i never see any sunni scholar talk about those 12 hypcrite 🚯 ? is it because umar name is mentionted one of them? think and decide ♈🚩? this changes everything?
Al-Imām Abū 'Ubayd Al-Qāsim Ibn Sallām (d. 224 hicrī) said:
„I lived with the people and talked with people of philosophy etc. and I saw no one, who were more filthier, dirtier, weaker in their proof and who were dumber, than the rāfidah (shiites).“
[„As-Sunnah“ (no. 780) by Al-Khallāl]
As always steeping down to insults instead of listening. Indeed it’s true what Allah says about the Deaf Dumb and Blind of this world.
The shia bro was not proving shia belief......he was using 6 hadith books to explain his position
This guy only responded to like probably the last 20 or so minutes of Dr. Sayed Ammar’s video. Saying he’s only going to dissect that main arguments. Him quoting the Prophet (S) saying there are 12 hypocrites among my companions is not a main point? Fi Ashaabi Ithna Ashara munafiqan. I guess you could say this dismantles the belief in Adalat Sahabah?
Facts
What's the concept of Adalat Sahaba?
@@The1991AHK the belief that all the companions of Rasulallah (S) are righteous and that they’re all in jannah and we must respect and follow them
@ghalibahmed6676 Adalah as Sahaba is a concept purely tied to hadith transmission. It means that by and large, according to sunni hadith corpus, it is not known that a sahabi has misattributed something to the Prophet (peace be upon him).
It by no means means that all companions are sinless, have not made mistakes (major/minor) and will not be held accountable for their actions.
You may not agree to the concept but just wanted to let you know that the actual concept is around hadith transmission.
جزاك لله خير❤
So i guess the question for sunnis is what books are reliable according to u since everything that doesnt fit ur narrative is weak... not reliable..no chain..person not reliable etc etc etc..i doubt any book can ever be used against a sunni since u can always say well so n so isnt reliable or this or that excuses after excuses
Well maybe because there were lots of hadith made to make a fake narrative, your comment can really go both ways, for Farid, or Ammar. Still we know authenticity is essential.
@@everythingandroidois a Hadith is either 100% credible. Or it’s 100% garbage.
You can’t cherry pick what you want from bukari and Sahih and then throw away the “weak parts” that makes the whole book weak.
We give reasons for why a hadith is reliable and not reliable. You honestly expect people to accept any report that comes thier way for no reason. You have to give us reasons as to why the report should be trusted otherwise how can we know its not a lie. 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@everythingandroidois no it cant lol ur the ones that say ur books are the most sahih after the quran ..shias dnt say that their books are 100 percent when it comes to narrations..but ive always been given the impression by sunnis that everything in bukhari is authentic even if it disrespects the prophet.
@@averagegamerz4157 we dont say that tho idk why you guys strawman like crazy. if anything shias are the only sect of a religion in which their most authentic books like usul al kafi contain the most weak hadith known to date, famouse ones like confirming that the holy quran has 17,000 ayahs. there is a difference between Sahih Al Bukhari and the Bukhari (general compilation of every hadith) on its own. we as sunnis know our way of hadith sciences and you guys dont, we can point out if a narrator was thiqa or not trustworthy, due to their reputation and opinions of scholars around the same time they lived. for example ibn ishaq is known to have narrated among the most hadith and almost everyone like imam dhahabi states that he is not trustworthy since he was a well known liar.
This was a good video, thank you, you still not have provided any rationalization as to why would Omar be worried about this. I'm not making any claims here, but what Ammar is saying here is. Why would Omar be worried about being on the list unless he knows deep inside him he's one?
One might argue that it is some sort of humility on the part of Omar, we were taught to be humble and not have any delusions about our "fate" in heaven or in hell, or make our assumptions about our status "good" or "bad", but hypocrisy is a totally different issue, you will surely know if you're a hypocrite or not, there is no point of being humble in this regard! So why would Omar RAA be worried about this? Was the main question
It can also be argued that Omar was clearing his name for the benefit of someone else who doubted him. But I've never come across any story where Omar's faith was questioned.
So, to be totally fair, there is a question to be asked here.
Not humility, but the constant self-reflection is a sign of faith. Making sure that your actions are purely for Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala).
The Prophet SAW used to make Tawbah all day, constant dhikr, standing in salah until his ankles would swell up because he feared the hellfire so much. If you use the same logic that Ammar is using, you would conclude that Muhammad SAW is is guilty of a big enough sin to send him to hell Astaghfirullah.
Why did the prophet Ibrahim A.S. Fear that he or his children would fall into idol worship? By your logic Prophet Ibrahim A.S. Would secretly have these feelings? Of course not our beloved prophet A.S. Feared transgressing and angering Allah and knew that he was a human and didn’t want to anger Allah who he loved the most, we must reflect and fear Allah, no Muslim should think they can not be a hypocrite, we should all fear this if we do not reflect on ourselves and be harsh and fear than we can easily fall, this is what made umar R.A. Such a great leader he feared doing wrong and reflected upon himself and actions may Allah be pleased with him
Still havent responded to his question. What is self reflection got to do with that situation. If your certain your not one of the plotters then why ask am i one of them?
you have already been answered @@Storifactz
what the heck was that weird tongue lick he did at 2:40
It can be an involuntary display of contempt or disgust and given what he’s saying before it happens it probably is that
This is the first time I’ve seen that happen, so it can’t be that common. Reminds me of a snake or lizard.
“ibn KuThAiR” Can you read the author’s name correctly?!
Genuinely confused how does this negate the argument made my Nakshawani. If sahabi who were travelling with prophet were munafiqs then it affects the view of sahaba as a whole… the bit abt the munafiqoon being Abu Bakr and Umar where he reads from some questionable sources that to plant the idea that perhaps it was them but he didn’t focus on that, he spent 30 mins at least explaining how RusulAllah said that there were SAHABI that were MUSHRIQs. I feel like we need farid to breakdown the points he was making in the bulk of the video.
His entire argument is built on hadiths that are weak.
The reason you’re lost and confused is you want to accept every Hadith that could look bad for some sahabas while rejecting EVERY SINGLE HADITH that praises any single one of them. Your worldview is completely slanted and you’re wondering why you’re lost and confused in your nonsense.
Yes 🙌
It is already known from the Quran that some were munafiq, this isn't a revelation.
Also the report itself shows Umar was not a munafiq, so no idea why you think it helps the shia argument
@@karimmezghiche9921nope go rewatch
Rafidis are children of Musailama kazzab, why they hate first 3 khulafa is because they put their Dad in place.
No wonder their 12th imam is Dajjal.
Lol 😮
So the Mehdi (As) is the dajjal?
@@iceycones654 no he meant among the twelve greatest imam they had , the 12th one is dajjal , not Mehdi
Their 12th imam never existed, there is no proof that he ever existed.
He cannot be the dajjal.
@@iceycones654 your 12th imam is not the Mahdi.
No Sunni has ever said that he is the Mahdi.
The name of the Mahdi is Muhammad ibn Abdallah, not Muhammad ibn al-Hassan.
Those tattoos are a refutation (unless done during a previous Jahilliya). Don't even need his absurd stupidity to think that was a confession.
He’s a Shia they allow tattoos
@@King-qk1de
Tattoos Are Forbidden by Tradition
Scholars and individuals who believe that all permanent tattoos are forbidden base this opinion on the following hadith, recorded in the Sahih Bukhari (a written, and sacred, collection of hadith):
"It was narrated that Abu Juhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: 'The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) cursed the one who does tattoos and the one who has a tattoo done.' "
Although the reasons for the prohibition are not mentioned in the Sahih Bukhari, scholars have outlined various possibilities and arguments:
Tattooing is considered mutilating the body, thus changing Allah's creation
The process of getting a tattoo inflicts unnecessary pain and introduces the possibility of infection
Tattoos cover the natural body and are, therefore, a form of "deception"
Also, non-believers often adorn themselves this way, so getting tattoos is a form or imitating the kuffar (non-believers).
@@rosdykalat2620 I agree akhi I know tattoos are haram but some or all Shias allow it and consider it halal idk why
The real ones will watch this in 480p بارك الله فيك
Watching in 480p to feel like the good old days when Farid had a potato setup.
Why don’t you talk directly with each other ? Really, some of us wants the truth but not in a bad way, why it has to be conflictual ? We have to be united and respectful with each other as long as we believe that Allah swt is the only god and Muhammad peace be upon him is his messenger
We do not have to be united with twelver Shia this ikhwani nonsense we are only united upon tawheed and the truth
@@isafcb312 If you are united about tawheed and truth, why is Palestine still getting bombarded by Israel and Saudi isn't doing anything along with the other gulf countries? While the only ones helping them are nonsenical shias such as the Houthis, Iran and Hezbollah and non-muslims like South Africa? May Allah (SWT) free Palestine and free the world from zionist agents like yourself.
We don’t unite with rawafidhs they’re declared kafir by most or all scholars
So if i understand correctly, the last report has nothing to do with the raiders story? Ammar just tried to make the connection himself?
Yes.
@@FaridResponds okay shukran brother
Shias are similar to other religions with their text rather than understanding the text in its full meaning, context and reliability, they pick out arguments that is based on their nonsubstanstial narrarives.
May Allah keep us steadfast in the straight path and protect us from being so astray and blinded by hatred.
Farid doing the job , Makes me wonder where the rest of the brothers are ? It is true that you only find them harsh with those who are close to them , sorry i know I probably shouldn't have commented on this but it's the truth
Ge didn't debunk anything, he went to the weakest source that ammar used to debunk. What about the sahih Muslim hadith? Read your books
@@smhark786 So you acknowledge the authenticity of our books? Or do you believe what you want and deny what you want?
Again your reply is poor and you’ve avoided lots of points deliberately as you’ve not got the evidence to back yourself up. Honestly Nakshawani’s lectures have really opened by heart and mind.
The famous Ibn Kuthair brother of imam Murra
All these qadianis and worse than qadianis the imamite shia use sunni books with the lens of their own. Why would a sunni imam write that sahaba murdered prophet and still say may Allah be pleased with them? Does it make any sense?
Qadianis are worse than Shia. Shia can be included as Muslims although heretical in their beliefs. Qadianis are plainly outside of Islam.
He reads the number cause u guys r twisted 😂 cut and past videos . Deny. Sorry farid try harder 🎉
Bringing a hadith which doesn't have chain is even an argument?
@@professorparadox795 disconnected hadiths are sahih for these majoosi
You Skipped a video on Aisha being jealous of Khadija I want a respones from that video made by Ammar, go on don’t be afraid 😂
Of course she will be jealous because she loves her husband
From a dead women that died 3 years prior to aishas marriage 😂 the problem is not even the jealousy it’s that she also insulted her by saying an old women with no teeth and red gums and allah has given u meaning prophet a better wife in her stead I will give the reference wich r in ur books sahih al Bukhari 3821 btw this is from ur books not sahih al shia 😂
The sunnis say that those who insult the wives of the prophets are kaffir so by ur criteria she, aisha is a kaffir because she insulted another wive of rasullallah? Or because she is aisha she is allowed to do such stuff and also don’t forget the battle of jammal don’t even get me started on that topic 😂
@@user-vk9dw7er6h sayid Ammar also loves rasool Allah. Does that give him the right to speak the way he does about Aisha and Hafsa?
I guess when you love the prophet you can be jealous. Conspire against him. And his family. Why not drink and smoke and steal too? It’s normal. Any normal person makes mistakes right?
@@BigAck I don't think you love your mother the same way your father loves her ( think you get that point). So don't be confused. If you don't have any argument shut down your mouth.
Allahumma barik
madness lol. BarakAllahu feek ya Farid.
8:01 ❤
Sayyid Tattoo Ibn Kuthair Nakhjavani (may Allah lengthen his life so we hear more of his comical stuff ).
Using Sayed's series as clickbait, jazakhallah kheir brother. Perhaps the reason you don't have a time slot on an international channel is due to the lack of interest in your content.
Having a time slot on an international channel means nothing, let's say I say that about some sunnis which I can give examples of, would that make a difference to you?
Also on clickbait, why are you fooling yourself? Ammar is using clickbait every single episode with faces of different sunnis, maybe you guys are just not looking at them, I don't know.
Why would a Muslim cast so much doubt in choice of the Prophet SalAllahu 3layh wa Aalih wasallam?
I am careful not to call these Rawafid as Kuffar, Allah knows best
The ISBN number got me! 😂😂😂
Can you imagine a shia ever doing a counter rebuttal to this? Nop shop closed 😅
Because this isn't even a rebuttal, he only confirmed what Sayyed Ammar said, and if you want a rebuttal I can answer your questions.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 in your dreams pal your scholars couldn't do it in fourteen centuries don't get excited your just a gassed Shia you'll calm down in muhurrum.
That guy never stops, how many times does he need to get refuted
I wouldnt really call a 9 minute response video to a 50 minute video a refutation
@@Ya_Ali_313_ doesnt matter what you think man worshiper ,its still a refutation
and tell ammar to stop wasting time then it wont be a 50 min video
@CoYg6942 why you crying?
@@Ya_Ali_313_ who crying? And literally your pfp is shirk ya Allah 🙂
@szuvibes9474 that's your favorite word, isn't it? Not gonna bother explaining intercession or really anything that includes using your brain.
Nakshawani is sick like most Shia Apologizets. What I don't know is what he was thinking, that he will not be rebutted and because of Gaza people will take this as truth.
❤
So these narrations from Sunni ahadith literature arw da'if, when it suits the sunnis of course but yet they still managed to find their way into your books. If the Ahadirh were meant to be followed, why were these weak narrations approved and put into your books to read? 😂😂
I'd laugh loudly if this wasn't such a tragedy.
JazakAllah Khair brother Farid. If Ammar knew about this hadith and it's context and still made the video to make Omar RA look bad, then he is a liar and an evil person that no Shia should listen to.
He does, he isn’t a Muslim to begin with
Yes, may Allah be pleased with our beloved Umar R.A. May Allah curse his slanderers and liars
@@wizzard9531 Are you Allah (SWT) that you know he isn't a muslim? By saying this, you might jeopardize your afterlife so always be careful with saying such things. Muslims should always give each other the benefit of the doubt in all cases.
@@AliZaidi-ul1ef another shi’i committing literal blasphemy that asks if I’m Allah. Those who accuse the companions and wives of the prophet ﷺ are denying the Quran and this is stated several times within and by scholars - that takes them out of Islam
@@wizzard9531 The Quran also accuses the wives of the prophet and some of the sahaba. Has the Quran been taken out of the fold of Islam lol?
"يَا نِسَاءَ النَّبِيِّ مَنْ يَأْتِ مِنْكُنَّ بِفَاحِشَةٍ مُبَيِّنَةٍ يُضَاعَفْ لَهَا الْعَذَابُ ضِعْفَيْنِ ۚ وَكَانَ ذَٰلِكَ عَلَى اللَّهِ يَسِيرًا. وَمَنْ يَقْنُتْ مِنْكُنَّ لِلَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ وَتَعْمَلْ صَالِحًا نُؤْتِهَا أَجْرَهَا مَرَّتَيْنِ وَأَعْتَدْنَا لَهَا رِزْقًا كَرِيمًا."
“O wives of the prophet! Whoever of you commits an open indecency, the punishment shall be increased to her doubly; and this is easy to Allah. And whoever of you is obedient to Allah and His Apostle and does good, We will give to her reward doubly, and We have prepared for her an honorable sustenance.”
إِنْ تَتُوبَا إِلَى اللَّهِ فَقَدْ صَغَتْ قُلُوبُكُمَا ۖ وَإِنْ تَظَاهَرَا عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ" مَوْلَاهُ وَجِبْرِيلُ وَصَالِحُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۖ وَالْمَلَائِكَةُ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ ظَهِيرٌ. عَسٰى رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبْدِلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ مُسْلِمَاتٍ مُؤْمِنَاتٍ قَانِتَاتٍ تَائِبَاتٍ عَابِدَاتٍ سَائِحَاتٍ ثَيِّبَاتٍ وَأَبْكَارًا."
“If you both turn to Allah, then indeed your hearts are already inclined (to this); and if you back up each other against him, then surely Allah it is Who is his Guardian, and Jibraeel and the believers that do good, and the angels after that are the aiders. Maybe, his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your place wives better than you, submissive, faithful, obedient, penitent, adorers, fasters, widows and virgins.”
ضَرَبَ اللَّهُ مَثَلًا لِلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا امْرَأَتَ نُوحٍ وَامْرَأَتَ لُوطٍ ۖ كَانَتَا تَحْتَ عَبْدَيْنِ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا صَالِحَيْنِ فَخَانَتَاهُمَا فَلَمْ يُغْنِيَا عَنْهُمَا مِنَ اللَّهِ شَيْئًا وَقِيلَ ادْخُلَا النَّارَ مَعَ الدَّاخِلِينَ
“Allah sets forth an example to those who disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of Our righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with those who enter.”
Please make a video responding to his video called Quran & sunnah or ahulbayt he did this video on night (7) PLEASE FARID MAKE A RESPONSE i will pay even for u to make that video
This was refuted yesterday on Sunnah Discourse.
@@FaridResponds brother wallah I did not understand what he was saying for example is the Hadith not sahih are we supposed to follow Quran and sunnah or Quran and ahulbayt or quran or all three
@@duckyisdaddymaterial6524 The authentic version of the report says to follow the Quran and to take care of Ahlulbayt. We have to follow the Sunnah either way, but the wording of that hadith is incorrect.
@@FaridResponds thank you sm brother جزاك الله خير
@@FaridResponds Ahlul-Bayt = Sunnah so no worries.
I see what you did there, using Ammar Nakshawani's full name in your CZcams post. Quite tactical, I must say. Nakshawani is a Shia scholar revered in the Shia community and the broader theological academia world. As for you, I must admit, your name or work hasn't crossed my path before.
And making fun of a scholar engaged in their academic duties is not only disrespectful but also undermines the importance of scholarly work. ISBN serves as a fundamental tool in academia, enabling researchers, educators, and students to access, cite, and build upon existing knowledge with accuracy and integrity. Ridiculing someone for utilizing ISBN or engaging in scholarly activities is inappropriate and goes against the principles of intellectual discourse and respect for academic endeavors. As an academic, where can I read your analysis or, should I say, your résumé? Please refer me to your books with their ISBN numbers.
Another amazing video
What are your qualifications, Farid ? Did you go madressa to learn this knowledge or were you independent researcher ? And for how long have u been researching Hadiths and everything Islam for ?
Genuine question
You didnt say fire intro, utterly disappointed😭
Yaaa teasin maiii .. majoosi maddad Ammar Ganesh nakjavani
Ibn kuthir 😂
I'm pretty sure I heard Kuthair
@@kledmohd4230 yes, you said it correctly.
The entire Muslim ummah trying to do dua for Gaza and increase good deeds as much as possible meanwhile polytheist rafidhis: *Let's recycle our old rubbish arguments and try raise some doubts against Islam*
Doubts on a false narrative of Islam, which has made the ummah weaker as a whole. This false version of Islam is part of the reason none of the gulf states are supporting Palestine. They aren't following the true teachings of the religion.
its lovely how u skipped the part where he shows ur sahih books bukhari and muslim who narrate from him. Why is ur 5 out of 6 sahih books using him and doesnt have a problem with it.
calling hudaytha a hypocrite. its funny how u can accuse ammar of his opinion of the hadith but not the hypocrisy when u state ur opinion of the hadith u presented. mashallah nice work
Bro the reason its a long lecture because he builds up the context 😂😂😂. You just cherry pick and take out of context
Why is he having a tatoo ?
Shia claim it is halal
Do you have ig? Brother
Jazakallahu khayran
he should’ve stuck to his george floyd lectures💀
Subhanallah
bro you only rebutteled on like the last two minutes of his video. This dosent mean anything
I was also wondering where the beginning of sayyed's video is, maybe because he has no argument with it because it's true beyond doubt
bro the evidence is not only in the last parts of his videos, this doesnt mean anything, farid just keeps making excuses saying ayesha is jealous because she loves him and that omar rejected the prophets writing because he is "worried"🤦♂️, not only that the prophet was going to write THE SUCCESSOR AFTER THE PROPHET, now i aske you why did omar reject pen and paper.
@@boah2759 Sorry for not being clear, what I meant was farid couldn't respond to Sayyed Ammar's first minutes because it is indisputable.
@@muhammadtasiu5473 bro ammar used sahih bukhari or muslim, one of them how is that undisputable
@@boah2759 it seems you misunderstood me, I said farid can't respond to Sayyed Ammar's first arguments because they are solid and can't be disputed. As in Sayyed is right in every way.
You call this a response? You’re waffling no intellectual benefit only squashed by your own books and evidence how humiliating 🤦🏻♀️
Farid, you need to learn from your book.
1:14 🤣 I'm wheezing bruh
How can you claim you debunked the hadith when you just claimed the narrators were anonymous without listing their biographies? You didn't mention Abu Tufayl. Isn't Abu Tufayl a well known companion of Imam Ali (as)? How is he anonymous?
Never said he is anon. Watch again.
@@FaridResponds If you're not treating him as anon, why didn't you mention him once in the video? He also transmits this hadith.
@@thesociallyradicalguitaris9589 He doesn't narrate the report that lists the names.