Video

I bought a 28mm 2.8 based on rave revues such as yours. Everything you said light compact cheap yes BUT very mediocre pics. It was to supplement my superb but heavy 24-120 f4 S lens but is just not good enough, Now saving my drachmas for a 35mm 1.8 S however hope to try before I buy.

Didn't know Nikon has not implemented this feature long ago. I also consider GPS as basic feature of which the consumer cameras like Nikon Coolpix have but is missing in many pro-level Nikon, Sony, and Canon cameras.

Isn't this a basic feature every camera should have? My 750$ entry level camera from 2020 has this feature.

Good review ❤❤❤

No content, BS video

It's the lens I leave on the camera most of the time. Great for travelling, especially when combined with the 14-30.

I have a Z50 with the 2 kit lens and the one I use the most is 50-250 and I think I will be just doing landscape and wildlife. Not really a portrait photographer. Would this lens be a good fit for me.

such a great video & love how in depth you went!! great work 🥰

Nice run trough :-) I bought this lens for exactly the same reason, lots of focal length in a single lens without a lot of weight. I'm going to Iceland in a month and this will be my primary lens and hoping to have a 14-30 to go with it by the time I get get ready to go. Seems like the perfect pairing for less expense, less weight and acceptable image quality.

Great content, just want to make a remark about the astrophotography. I just don't like wide angle lenses for astrophotography, Even the 20 1.8 is too wide. I use it mainly for astro timelapses. But you get so much better results with 50 and panorama merging, or even with 35. The Milky Way is so tiny on 20, not to mention to 14. Absolutely no detail in the core. So I would like nikon to release 35 1.2 for this.

Can you show how you stacked the photos and how to setup a Nikon camera for HDR shooting? Awesome pic by the way!

Can we all agree to never use the word iconic again? Ever?

Great Job Nikon ❤

My 70-200 2.8 is better than my 24-70 2.8. Also the 105mm Macro 2.8 is also an amazing lens for portraiture. It has a unique, clean and interesting rendering. My copy of the 24-70 is a bit weak between 35 and 65mm. Still an amazing lens, but the 70-200 feels more pristine, nicer in out of focus areas and delivers nicer shadows.

This is horrible advice. As with most things, there's a ton of nuance and hard and fast rules usually don't apply.

What is the 2 plastic thingy? I don’t know where you use those?

I'm sorry but you sound only like a seller not really a reviewer. Probably it's just me but when the content is finished I just have a list of features that you demonstrated nothing much. Pretty sure you can push more deep content.

Question.....does the Z6iii have backlit buttons?

Finally I found one photographer that shoot with LCD and doesn't dish out the Z30 because of no EVF, thanks I agree with you 100%

That's really cool ngl

He actually just decided to stay home and make the video with CGI instead.

Nikon killed an amazing company RED. Not sure why anyone would shoot Nikon they don’t have eye detect autofocus.

This is becoming common practice for all camera manufacturers. I pre-ordered my Z6iii and still have three chargers left from my Z6’s and D750. I think a lot of people buying the Z6iii are Nikon shooters that already have them.

seems a little more complicated than on canon r6

Nice video. I'd like to know how the EVF compares. I stayed away from the Z6 and Z7 because the EVF resolution seemed too low. Looks like the Z6 III might have fixed that.

Hallo Why you are not using sunshade with your lens?

Reduced dynamic range

What is the brand and model of the bag at 1:58 ?

I liked the last shot the most. A lot of details and great colour gradation from the darkest to the brightest spot. Nice work!

I am curious to know why you didn’t go for a z7ii with more megapixels as a landscape photographer

Might be a decent camera but 24 megapixels is still below standard for most landscape photographers because you can't crop much also the dynamic range has been tested by several professional photographers on this camera and it is below par for a 24 megapixel camera. I certainly wouldn't buy this camera for landscape photography and the flip out screen is just diabolical to use in most landscape scenarios you need to tilt down screen. There is no advantage with that video centric screen for landscape photographers, I would buy used Z7 ii or z8 without blinking but I would not buy this camera for landscape photography and yes I'm a professional landscape photographer in Australia. I do not recommend people buy this camera for landscape Photography. Yes you can use it for landscape photography but there are so many better options out there. And taking 32 the photos and then stacking them is not gonna work very well if something moves in the scene it's not going to work so you're reliant on no wind Photography yeah that's not gonna work. Just gonna say this people if you are a really good landscape photographer do not buy this camera. There are so many better options honestly if you are a landscape photographer I'd buy used D850 over this any day.or Z7 ii ...or Z8....

would rather buy Z 24-70mm F 2.8, or Z 17-28mm F 2.8

I'm glad you upgraded. Improved in every way. Whenever I wan't more megapixels, I just use the "enhance" feature in Photoshop and Lightroom Classic to double it. Personally, I can't tell any difference.

Quite honestly the partially stacked sensor seems like a big compromise to improved scan speed. I would hope the they put the old BSI sensor with exceed 7 in an upgraded Z5 II like the ZF that would give the same DR. Honestly I can live the rolling shutter in the video I shoot and 20FPS electronic shutter is not a need for me. The dream machine would be the Z8/9 Sensor in the Z6 III body fully stacked sensor with less compromise and decent size and weight body.

Curious if dynamic range could be improved through a software update? I shoot nature (wildlife and landscape), traded my Zf in to the Z6iii for the ergonomics. I could really care less for video. What would be really cool is if Nikon could let us customers do a “build your own” camera. Good info you gave and thanks so much.

Better AF than Z50 and quite a bit

too much waffle lost the point

Although it's a charger that breaks down easily when dropped (I've repaired it myself twice). Still, it's convenient to use a charger and it's a shame that a charger isn't included for those who are reluctant to plug it directly into the camera (even if there's a protection circuit). Also, I don't know if there are people who might be considering a SmallRig EN-15 standard battery (which is directly charged with a USB-C cable) as an alternative to this, but it won't work on the Z6 III. My friends who used the SmallRig battery are telling me that it doesn't work on the Z6 III, and there seems to be no solution at this time. And the battery can't even be updated with firmware

One is cropped and one is full frame. It's not rocket science lmao

Sony a7c 2 & Nikon z6 3 Tell me best camera??? Sir

No se pueden comprar estos lentes. El 14-30 es Full Frame, el 12-28, solo APSC!

I have 4 and want more! 😂😂

Im a Wedding Photographer and Videographer…for me its basically perfect… but i dont wuite see this as a better Landscape Camera then the z7ii… what am i misssing?

agree totally!! it would of only been a small cost for Nikon to include

I will stay with my D 3 the best camera ever made.

Unfortunately, it only works on a tripod and does require an external software. In-camera pixel shift stacking is here since 2015 and handheld since 2020. Sony and Nikon still can't do that. They are really late on this.

I like the 28 mm, but the 40 mm f/2 is my favorite. I‘d love to see Nikon offering a Short Tele around 75 mm with f/2.8 in the same style, it would make for a great trio of light, interesting lenses.

"change this settings in your mirrorless camera an never lose focus again" Talk by yourself, i have a fuji 😅

I agree. However, if u making money off it then go for it. Write it off sell an older model keep 1 gen back. But for us regular folks. Ya. Make it last few yrs

The answer is Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art. Costs about the same, is f/2.8 instead of f/4, is WAY better built and has even better IQ than this Nikon. Sigma rocks! Edit: Now I see this Sigma is not for the Z mount. Pity...