Nikon Z 135mm f1.8s Plena VS Nikon Z 24-200mm f4-6.3 VR for LANDSCAPE PHOTOGRAPHY

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 26. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 11

  • @MrSimonj1970
    @MrSimonj1970 Před 5 měsíci +5

    Nice to see your lack of lens snobbery despite owning the best one! I like the 24-200mm a lot, but I went with the 24-120mm instead, I need the f/4 more than the extra 80mm.

  • @torchedfire5659
    @torchedfire5659 Před 5 měsíci +4

    this guy deserves more subs 100%

  • @Thomas-fk6ep
    @Thomas-fk6ep Před 5 měsíci +2

    How about the Nikkor Z Macro 105mm F/2.8 for Landscapes? My 90mm Tamron shot beautiful cityscapes, but I sold it after switching to mirrorless.

    • @TheProjectPhotography
      @TheProjectPhotography  Před 5 měsíci +1

      Hmm I think you'd get a similar feel in terms of focal length to the Plena but definitely a tad shorter. I do tend to shoot quite a few images at 105mm tbh so I can definitely see it working. Best thing to do is try it out for yourself!

  • @javierflorian6
    @javierflorian6 Před 5 měsíci

    Please do a review of the new 28-400z lens

  • @tonyhayes9827
    @tonyhayes9827 Před 5 měsíci +1

    About the Plena. That point about the panoramas is very interesting,. Haven't heard that before. Opens up a whole new use case for this lens. I don't really use it for landscape otherwise. Its more about subject isolation for me. Nice vid.

  • @Thomas-fk6ep
    @Thomas-fk6ep Před 5 měsíci

    I prefer the 1mm lens @ 8:07 :)

    • @TheProjectPhotography
      @TheProjectPhotography  Před 5 měsíci +1

      Dang I can't believe I didn't catch that. I meant to put 135mm, I apologize for the wrong number.

  • @KibbitUpIt
    @KibbitUpIt Před 5 měsíci +1

    Nice review as always