She Sues Her Ex For $500,000 | Full Episode | Personal Injury Court
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- "Baxter v Jones": In this episode of "Personal Injury Court," a woman sues her former lover and bar owner for $500,000 for injuries sustained at his establishment. With his no nonsense approach, Judge M. Gino Brogdon, Sr., presides over the courtroom.
Season 1, Episode 18
Watch The Series: www.fubo.tv/we...
Enjoyed our video? Make sure to like and comment!
Make sure to subscribe: / injurycourt
Follow our Facebook here: / personalinjurycourt
PERSONAL INJURY COURT:
Personal Injury Court demonstrates claims brought to the courtroom over serious injuries leading to serious settlements. With Judge Gino of Personal Injury Court, he'll be presiding over some of the largest claims in TV history.
#PersonalInjuryCourt #InjuryCourt #JudgeGinoBrogdon
She Sues Her Ex For $500,000 | Full Episode | Personal Injury Court
/ @personalinjurycourt
I feel bad for her , but he’s not responsible for her injuries!! He put up a security system to keep thief out!
😅225K 😅
Not only keep thief’s out but also warning sign if she couldn’t read shame on her but she ignored it
@@deangelorucker7793 there is a chance he didnt put those stickers up until after she sued him
I 100 pecent agree but, the judge says he can't have it so it harm people unfotuntately i do not agree with the judge
She saw it the sign. When judge asked did u see sign. U could see her face that she was lying.
Breaking the law and winning a quarter of a million dollars is insane 😂
Ikr 🤦♂️
It really is
Crime pays 💸 💰 in this case.
The electric shock is so egregious that nothing else means.
And they say crime doesn't pay
Are you sure this judge is a real judge? 😂, this is insane. He uses his emotions more than logic
Fr like she breaking into someone house which is a crime and the judge is still on her side and the law said you can project your property. Judge need to retire
Nop he uses the law clearly said u can’t use human trap on business es
I think these are fake but I could be wrong. I looked up the chicken place where the guy ate raw chicken from a place on this channel and it didn’t exist. Plus these verdicts don’t ever make sense.
Wow this is bs this pathetic broad broke in his bar to get her keys and she's getting paid for that ,this judge is worthless like her so if she got shot who's fault would it have been . The judge should be fired
I've said this before too. So annoying 😢
All said and done, there was a Warning Sign which the victim totally ignored in her determination to enter the premises. This I believe resulted in her own negligence and despite her injuries, her partial award should not have been granted.
idk if you missed the 7 times they said it but there was not a sign on the window at the time of the incident
@misseselise3864 they never said that
I absolutely DO NOT agree with this verdict! He had lost enough of his investment in the past that warranted him getting a system installed to deter burglary. He had warning stickers posted! I don’t care about how high the voltage was, if it was a dog would he had been liable for how hard the bite was? This is injustice I’m sorry.
This was so ridiculous exactly he had the warning signs she was breaking in somewhere breaking and entering is against the law this case just had me so mad like is this judge for real now if she didn't know the owner would this have gone another way like y did she win he had all of his evidence and there were signs in multiple spots
@@hexotickitty7829 my thoughts exactly!
Same thing I cited in my comment. What if it was a dog, with the correct signage etc.
@@owlster2008 I feel the judge was fair due to the voltage and the laws regarding that.
Yes he would be responsible if his dog bit someone, the dog is your responsibility in their eyes. This case though is disturbing smh
He stated he was deterring potential burglars, how did the judge cite man trap laws? Deterring and trapping are opposite of each other. The guy was right, she was breaking and entering by opening the window to go into the bar.
This is the world we live in...Like burglars breaking into private property, falling down and suing the business own for their injuries. What gives you the right to enter someone else's property? I feel like the only reason she won was because of their past relationship. If she was a stranger breaking in she would have gotten nothing. That's not right at all. Poor guy has to pay his crazy ex girlfriend. Smh...
THE HARD COLD TRUTH IS QUOTE EVERY LAW IS ILLIGAL BY BOB MARLEY
the reason she won is because he had an electric toaster put on the window. if it were the recommended 2000 volts she wouldnt have been gravely injured. the law is the law and he broke the law by having such a high voltage on that window.
I completely agree with you Rebecca
@helema - tell me if a person has a baseball bat and he breaks into your place, will you be okay giving them a huge reward prize?
@@svjrevolution I think it depends on the situation
This whole thing doesn’t make sense.. watts and Volts are not the same 7k watts is an absurd amount of power. 7k volts makes way more sense judge gets an F for this ruling
She could of waited till the next day. Stay at hotel, motel, friends ect. What she did was clearly break and enter and should receive absolute nothing but a criminal charge
Hi
I would prefer go to jail than pay her that money
Clearly her fault
Could have (could’ve) not could of, but you’re right. That was a her problem not a his problem, but this seems pretty fake so I’m not gonna stress about it
She could've gone by his place of residence. This case makes it right to break and enter if you know the person... this is a sad case. Going to watch more but kind of turned off by this verdict. We didn't hear from the other experts on this case.
He needs to take her to court againnnn
.....another court and another judge. That ruling was ridiculous. She broke in, she broke the law...therefore no compensation. She should be compensated by spending time in jail.
Ttly agree!! She’s the wrong one
It does sound like a personal thing. She should not have tried to get in that bar. She did it to herself. 😱
Yep and now she paid! Cry
And she obviously can't read, there was more than one warning on those windows.
So why she just ain’t break into her own house. Who has there house keys separate from house key. She did that on purpose
The business owner stated that he had 3 to 4 burglaries in six months. Come on judge.
Is there a way that the bar owner can try another judge? This is not fair.
I think he would be able to appeal it. Especially since she trespassed with intent to break an entering and possibly have conspiracy to commit a crime slapped on there bc she plotted her route in n out while ignoring signs on the window.
@@tylercoy6619no when they go on this show they drop the actual civil suit and sign a legal agreement that all rulings are final. Same with any of the court tv shows. It’s kind of like taking a settlement before you know what the deal is.
He can try to sue her back 😅 that’s all
@@yellowdaisysunshine2048talking about shooting yourself in foot.
Right why she get compensated instead arrest for breaking an entry this was wild !
How did she drive to the bar if she left her keys at the other bar?
Not to also mention she had been drinking at a bar then drove
She never should have gone to HIS bar. She's messy and got what she deserved (except for the money).
Or she could have stay with who ever she was partying with and got key the next day
They were her house keys not car keys
She is 100% responsible
Correct
Precisely
No hes responsible as well...voltage too high
@@angelacarlisle1708I think you are the type that would break in as well aren't you
@@SpellOfSin dont be so rude you dont know me so why come out with such an ignorant crass comment its disgusting
If this is a real ruling, then he is a horrible judge! That's breaking and entering regardless. There was clear warning labels on that window and she chose to ignore them.
Why she didn't send a text or call the owner about the key ? Going through a window at night is crazy!
She did. He was busy, getting busy, so he never answered
Indeed
She did text him but he ignored because he was getting down with a chick
He didn’t have to answer. She thought she was entitled to the same rules when they were dating. They not dating she lost the privilege tried to break in and got wheat she deserved
She did but he didn't answer. She had no business doing that
It wasn't the owners fault that she got hurt, she was trying to go through a window while the place was closed. It's called trespassing and whatever happened to her is her own fault
That is so right
And what about the children, what about the animals.
I agree with the bar owner BUT, there should never have been such a high voltage on his alarm system. It doesn't give her the right to try to break in for her keys. She put herself at risk. If you see a sign at the lake that says,
" Danger! Flesh eating piranha !" and you dive in and lose your entire left leg, you can't sue any one because the sign clearly says "Danger! Flesh eating piranha!"
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa@@
Her lack of self-accountability is crazy!!
From what the Judge said he stated that the law said =You can protect your business but you cannot set a " man trap" . The volts were too high and thats why she won. Imgine the thieves took advantage of you then you installed security to find out that you could have let the thieves continue to break in . $250.000 is a lot of dough😢😢
She shouldn't get compensated..it was breaking and entering
Did she not know how to call the number to the business and let them know “hey I left some keys in your place of business is there any possible way I can retrieve it/them?”
Or did she leave her phone in there too or did she even have a phone
@@patricemerriman1369 she did! the defendant stated that she called him at 2 o’clock in the morning and he figured she was just trying to talk to him but that wasn’t the case she was calling about her keys and he said he seen it but he was with a whole other female “ doing his thing “ and said he wasn’t going to answer her. so yes she did try to contact him, he’s the owner of the bar.
Agreed especially when there are stickers telling her the window is electrified
He should press charges on her. He spent $3000 for his alarm system of course there gonna be stickers and im sure she saw them.
She drove back to the bar therefore she had her keys. She was going back hoping for something else. He needs to now sue the security company.
she most likely meant house keys because she mentins wanting to go home after a long night
My sentiment...she probably was going back for "some"
I usually agree with the judge but he dropped the ball on this one
She knew what she was doing by making such a high amount to sue him for. She probably knew the judge would give her at least half... so she is a scam artist. The kind that would injure themselves for a claim.
Must be the truth I thought the same thing
Well, it’s fake so no worries for concerns 😂
i agree entirely with you. her demeanour says it all.
Didn't know court went by feelings and not law, breaking and entering is against the law
exactly and the window has a sign
its the idea she didn't even go through the window she only touched it
right!! not to mention he kicked her out of his club for fighting.
That decision was not fair on the business owner. There were signs posted on the window and she still neglected the warnings. That was her fault.
@@chasegriffin2193 she only get to touch it because there's a voltage that electrocuted her. Her injury is an evidence that she attempted to break-in. Thus, it is not just an idea but a fact that she was breaking-in.
Yes her injury’s are bad, and she left her keys in his bar. What she should of done was call non emergency number or in contact with him or just get a cheap hotel for one night. It’s not his faults she left her keys and he had signs warning. This judge is daft
Some exes always feel they are privileged, you moved on and still want to venture his premises
Now the business owner sues the security company for installing a dangerous illegal unit.
THAT!
Sounds EXACTLY like someone like him would do.
He turned it up to the highest point
Yep
That part
How did she win????! She tried to break into his business! Im disappointed with this ruling
This is everyone's sign to go break into someone's property and then sue them for injuries. :D
Can he sue the company that he bought it from
He could but as the owner, it's His responsibility to know the voltage.
Judge you are wrong for that verdict !
This guy don't deserve to be a judge 😢😢....
Who else noticed no other judge reviewed this case, why?? Because he gave a wrong verdict... absolutely not his fault
U know what, I noticed that too he usually has other judges say sighing about the cases after they happen 🤔
If I leave my keys at the bank and they’re closed.. I guess I can just go through the window lol… This verdict is wrong!!!
This is why I don't watch him often cause he is known for making judgements with his feelings
Not a fair judgment. She was breaking an entry..🤬
This judge is so unfair
I luv this judge cuz he follows the law
She shouldn’t have gotten anything but I feel her pain and I feel sorry for the business owner
This judge needs help
@@shervonbobb399 Nah u do
She wasn’t breaking and entering and the defendant knows that. She wouldn’t have known about the window if HE hadn’t told her.
@@DeathValla 😂😂
if he had told her then she should of known what it's there for
This judge should go back to law school and learn more about reality
Judge also under the law …he just tell the law what people dont know.. its not the personal decision. Blame the law not judge👌👌
Why not simply call the ex and say she must get her keys? Crawling in through
a window like a burglar.
She tried to
She said that she tried to contact him to get them. I’m certain it was probably before going in to try and retrieve them, but even if she is in the wrong for trying to get them or him not being aware of how high the voltage was, 1) for that size window, you don’t need that kind of security like that and not ask about the voltage that it holds, 2) she should’ve called and not text him about retrieving the keys and 3) why weren’t her keys in her purse or pockets?
Whoever does the special effects makeup for this show needs a raise.
A very difficult one on the one hand she was breaking and entering on the other his alarm system could be considered the equivalent of a loaded shotgun at the door but one thing is for sure they're both very lucky that that electricity didn't stop her heart
Trey should take the case to another court and another judge. That ruling was ridiculous. She broke in, she broke the law...therefore no compensation. She should be compensated by spending time in jail.
😀
Why would you touch a window with warnings of electric shock
Window was clearly marked. She had no business breaking into his bar. She should have gotten her keys before she left. Not to mention she had been drinking & DROVE from one bar to his bar. I don't feel she should be awarded.
His system WAS a bit much.
Could she actually fit in the window?
Hahaha exactly
That man needs to sue the alarm company that set the voltage to 6000 and injuring that woman
As the owner, it's His job to check the voltage.
Why did she have her car keys and not her house keys? And what's with the Judge's attitude with the feelings? All her fault. Bad judgement.
Facts it seems like if a thief was breaking in your home and u shot him or her he would still be blamed for protecting his property
The window literally says don’t touch its electric 😂
She had no business trying to break in. Sorry for her injuries but you get what you deserved
I don't get it. She was breaking into his business!! She deserves everything that happened to her! He didn't install the system with a caveat saying "except for my ex when she tries to get in without my knowledge"! It's obvious her hands would not still be seeping or she would not have been able to work at all. I think she deserved it and I'm a 65 year old white woman.
It's the responsibility of a business owner to make sure their premise is safe. A security system is for prevention. If he install 2000 volt system as recommended then this case would have a different result. If you install a system that can caused serious harm even death then the intent of the business Owner was questionable. What if that was a child? Kids don't adhere to warning they think it's a hoax. What if a police or fire fighter want to get in for emergency.
I hope everyone has a wonderful Friday evening ✌🏻
Thank you. Hope you have an amazing weekend ❤
That's BS she shouldn't have tried to break into that bar and as far as I'm concerned I would have done the same thing if I owned it
Wonder if he attempted to press breaking & entering charges. If I was in his shoes, I would have that same reaction.
Well im off to go touch afew windows for a nice pay out😂😂
She shouldn't have gotten a dime. She was wrong to be breaking in there and they were clear signs on the window
😮😮😮unbelievable verdict
I know right . The judge I feel is wrong on giving her anything.
True so true she knew what she was doing why she couldn’t just call the place of business if it wasn’t too late and they wasn’t closed and say “ hey I left my keys inside your bar is there any way that I can retrieve it?”
So if I break into a place and get an injury, I can sue the owner?
Very nice. I found myself a new scam
😀
The judge ruled it wrongly. I must say he seemed biased
Is there a max limit of voltage a security company can install? In Australia you are not even allowed to have electric windows
I’ve only been on here for 3 mins and already I see her hair line keeps dividing as she’s talking 😅 😂
Not his fault
I like how when he told her to go up to the board and show where she put her hands she acted as if she couldn’t do it but as soon as she won that money her hands flew up in the air
I completely disagree with his ruling. Even though it was a deadly injury. When him said 49-51% that was just a Noo. I wanted to hear what the other attorney would say like the other cases
Imagine commiting a crime by breaking in. only to get rewarded when you F around and find out.
She was trying to get in someone else's establishment after having a argument in his place of buisness!! She definitely caused her own injury. He didn't know it was that much voltage and he had signs up, so yeah she shouldn't get NOTHING!!!
She was hoping she could catch him with another woman
😂😂😂😂 some time this judge judgment is out of this world
This judge needs to be tried and fired for unlawfully deciding verdicts based off biased emotions 🤣
Raised them hands wit no problem wen she heard that amount 💯💯 it’s 100% her fault
I don't know about this final judgment. Why is it legal to build electric fences to keep borders safe from intrusion or ok to shoot trespassers for reasons of self defense. Isn't it possible that this lady could be the one who had burglarized that property several times in the past?
He needs to Sue the alarm company for setting a too high voltage on the window now… crazy! Breaking and entering she shouldn’t have gotten anything!
She had no rights to BREAK IN to his property … this is her fault !
If, the law says you cannot injure someone to protect your property, then how is it that a, shot-gun, Guard dog, or electric fences are at all legal??? If I had a vote in this case, I would have voted against the plaintif.
She was wrong but I see where the issue lies. The voltage was too high. Look at her hands 😳😳Also It’s not breaking and entering until you enter.
I agree with him. Criminals shouldn't have any rights.
That verdict is ridiculous, she ought not to have gotten a dime
This verdict is totally wrong, you have a right to protect your property, something is wrong with this judge
WOW! He really awarded her for B&E! That’s crazy.
that judgh is a fool!!! he say the guy is 51% at fault cause of the mantrap!! he should look it up first before he use it ,the guy put stickers on window so that "aint" a manhunt he just gave the woman the money cause the guy dind want to apologise to her and he should not as she wanted to do a brake in!!!
As a homeowner, if someone gets hurt on your property, I am responsible someone can sue me.
She should have turned to him and ... I am sorry I had to break in your property but pay me .... he would have been feeling some type of way... besides the insurance is paying her
Reading is fundamental 😂😂
In this case I agree with the verdict. It's clear that she had no right trying to enter any closed establishment after hours. However it is the owners responsibility to know the amount of voltage going through the system, the amount of damage it would cause, and the law.
Porter vs Frazier! Porter vs Frazier! Porter vs Frazier! Say it with me, everyone…!
This poor man was not in the wrong at all! She tried to break in and the security system got her...that's on her 100%..the computer graphics used to create her hand injuries...smh that team needs a bigger budget lol
Bro anyone can be a judge nowadays or something😂
This is a terrible judgement. That's not the first time Judge Gino gave a bad judgement.
I am disappointed to this day about how he judged the incident involving the peanut butter flavored chili
Unfortunately he usually does
He is wrong for that one. She was breaking an entry. The signs were up on the window. He should go back to court and fight this.
This is a true example of how unfair the world is these days.... The rich get richer and the poor get poorer 😡
I am so angry at this judge how do you do that
Just saw this. "Hairspray" knows breaking in is NOT the appropriate way to enter a business! She felt entitled to do what she wanted and got fried to pry. This thinking is ridiculous. She could've broken into her own place and went to bed. Go back during business hours. What's next, breaking into her favorite store? Nasty injuries, but it never would have happened if she did NOT break in. Check your system, sir. These criminals need to be held accountable so people won't feel the need to go to extreme meausres and handle it themselves.
She said she drove back to get her keys. How did she start her car? I think she was mad because she got kicked out and went back to break in with bad intentions. She got instant karma in return.
Judge is wrong
At this point ma man could have let the
Robbers come in cause ain’t no robbers stealing 250 k from him 😂
Prime example of women not having to be accountable for their actions, I hope that man never gave her dollar
I feel like the judge didn't llike his attitude.. and she had no business breaking and trying to enter . If he would of gave a better apology, he would of won. It was her fault.
If you wanted to keep your place safe just put bars on the windows cause if you have electricity on your windows then people are gonna to die from this bar and it’s not safe
She's even laughing because she actually got away with it
I love how the plaintiff is kind and respectful whereas her ex is cursing and just being mean to her.
She basically stole from him again. She is no different than the people that broke in before he put the system in. Our justice system is truly broken.