Cute Puppies Or Vicious Beasts - Up To $280,000 Cases | Double Episode | Personal Injury Court
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2024
- "Williams v Anderson": In this episode of "Personal Injury Court," a woman sues her neighbor for $158,000 when she is brutally attacked by her dogs. With his no nonsense approach, Judge M. Gino Brogdon, Sr., presides over the courtroom.
"Cooper v Jenkins": In this episode of "Personal Injury Court," a service man makes a house call, gets mauled by a dog, and sues for $280,000 in damages. With his no nonsense approach, Judge M. Gino Brogdon, Sr., presides over the courtroom.
Season 1, Episode 118 | Season 1, Episode 36
Watch The Series: www.fubo.tv/we...
Enjoyed our video? Make sure to like and comment!
Make sure to subscribe: / injurycourt
Follow our Facebook here: / personalinjurycourt
PERSONAL INJURY COURT:
Personal Injury Court demonstrates claims brought to the courtroom over serious injuries leading to serious settlements. With Judge Gino of Personal Injury Court, he'll be presiding over some of the largest claims in TV history.
#PersonalInjuryCourt #InjuryCourt #JudgeGinoBrogdon
Cute Puppies Or Vicious Beasts - Up To $280,000 Cases | Double Episode | Personal Injury Court
/ @personalinjurycourt
The lady in the first case was totally robbed, and her injuries were brutal
I don't agree that you can apply one bite rule here. She wasn't just bitten once, but torn apart
Unfair trial she should’ve gotten something for pain and suffering. This woman know what she was doing think she lie to the court about her dog 🐕
Judge that decision doesn't make any sense! It could have been the mail man! Those dogs were not supposed to be outside. They are to be behind the fence.
The owner of the dogs unlocked the gate knowing that there were people at her front door.
That’s a bit much, accusing the owner of releasing her dogs on purpose without a shred of evidence, only supposition. Ridiculous! I too agree that the injured woman should have gotten something to cover her injuries. But the property was properly identified as having dogs on site, which would have been observed if the mother and son hadn’t cut across the lawn to get to the front door. I believe the dog owner should be partly responsible for the woman’s medical costs for her physical injuries only.
That is bs. The owner of the dog has no remorse. I hope you are able to file a civil case. You are a beautiful woman inside and out, are a great mother for protecting your son.💜🙏
Trespassing
💯💯💯
@@RecoveryStrong207explain
I agree with the judge decision
there was no negligence
the dogs were on their premises
and was protecting the property
although it was a very sad situation
you are the bs here. come to my house and my dog will bite you too.
Why would you need a dog whistle unless you've trained them to attack.
Notice she said she was in the back of the house doing laundry. She left those dogs out.
Beware of Dogs
She has a remote control on the fence door.
So true 😢😢😢. This case made me so dam upset 😡. Something is wrong with our judge,I think . Why would you need a dog whistle if the dogs never attacked before?
My thoughts exactly! No need for whistle if they’re not trained to attack
She one of them people that dont like other type of people that's y them other comments in this section fit perfect with my thought I just fell it in my gut.
Exactly! She had that whistle because they already done attacked before.
Exactly......
I have the feeling that she deliberately loosed those dogs.
I feel so sad for Sophia Williams she went through so much harm and lost. It made me upset
Always rules for white people
She should have not only won. But she should have won in the millions. Instead of in the hundred of thousands.
The dog owner has no remorse. 😡
At all!
That was some sh$t there 😢
I agree
None whatsoever smdh
No the dog owner is not remorseful these white people have the most viscious extremely dogs some of these dogs are so dangerous that they sometimes attack their owners one of my friends mother was attacked by her own dogs and murdered I myself was attacked by 2 dogs so now I'm very nervous when I see any dogs if I had my way I would delete most dogs especially the pit bulls they're extremely dangerous
1 bite law is absolutely ridiculous! The 1st attack could leave someone with lifelong medical problems, millions of dollars of hospital costs or even death. 1st bite rule is nuts!!
Like their face!!! The plaintiff should have at least got pain and suffering!
She had multiple bites
U can see.that wicked defendant sly smile fake cry ..this is an unfair judgment 😢
@@Honeyboo9038 exactly
I just now saw this case but you got to be kidding me you telling me the plaintiff is not getting any money.
Over a dumb blank blank law. Look at thoes injuries that the dog owner allowed her dogs to caused.
If I could help the woman who is suffering, I would.
Animal Control Take away the Owner dogs and doesn't need them back because she irresponsible.
I cried when the judge let the dog owner away, she deserves better than that. 💔
She can take it to a higher court if she knows she can
please be careful on line!!! there are predators everywhere. Stay safe PLEASE ❤
@@crayCray420 i know but thank u❤️
😔💔indeed🙏
She should have been awarded the money for that dog attack.shes scarred for life.
The way that she just smiled in the end says that she was guilty from the start.
More like she don't have to give money I would be smirking, smiling maybe laughing walking out of that court.
Yes, horrible lady
Yell I belive she was and the judge know it too
That was utterly wrong that law needs to be changed that woman suffered all of that damage that woman should have been liable for letting her dogs do that to this woman that was obviously wrong for that judge to say about a first bite the dog bit the woman. Several times the judge is wrong😮
Yeah the first verdict was BEYOND UNCOOL! LOOK AT ALL THAT DAMAGE SHE SUFFERED FROM THOSE DOGS! Naw that's not right! The owner IS RESPONSIBLE! Dogs can switch up at any time!
She should have some reparations addressed for medical expenses (obviously not committing a crime to go up to the door like a mailman etc). Huskies should have a 8ft fence and nothing to climb on because they will hop over and it's extra important for trained dogs.
I lost all respect for this judge😢SMH
What if this was the mail man? Or a delivery person, or court staff trying to serve her papers? I would appeal. That one but rule thing seems ridiculous. The one bite rule only applies to New York and Cali I’m guessing she is in on of these states. In PA there is no one bite rule. But it’s crazy to think a dog can just attack you and nothing can be done about it
That's exactly what I was saying....not to be compensated at all like nothing. At the end of the day her dogs bit her
Well said
That leads me to the conclusion that that woman told those dogs to attack Ms. Williams and those dogs deserve better. The Dogs should be de-programmed placed in a loving caring home. Ms. Williams medical bills should be taken care of by that woman!
😢sooo true
B but why were they in the yard regardless if there's a rule about why weren't they in the yard not roaming in front of the house, if that's the case if someone is walking across the street from her house they wouldn't attack.
That was a wrongful ruling on the first case. I'd get a lawyer and appeal. Don't give up.
💯💯💯💯
I wish I would’ve went to small claims court smh
She willingly went on private property and she was not invited to do so by the owner a big as day sign told her dogs could be anywhere on the property as long as they were not on the sidewalk or road That was one house I would have by passed and also 2 dogs 2 people only one was attacked by both dogs as soon as the boy moved one dog would have let go and attack the boy but the mother is were they felt the aggression and the threat coming from that's also why the little boy was not attacked also owned dogs and lived with them I really do feel bad for the woman but she trust passed on someone else's property.
@tinadavis7016 the dogs bite with out being provoked. Not to mention there was no sign claiming no trespassing in the main yard. Nor any sign in the front windows of the home. I have beware of dogs signs on both sides of my fence and in my front window. If you have territorial dogs or guard dogs that are large enough to jump a fence to attack by standards then you should pay the price. What if you were just walking by? What if your child was near that house? The point is if they jump for a person in the yard (trespassing or not) it can lead to others at risk.
I Feel bad for her really
How heartless can you be...after verdict she leaves laughing while your dogs injured and scared a woman. This is not justice....unbelievable...😢.
People with dogs show no remorse and they don't control their dogs. If a service person is coming to your house, uou ought to put the dogs away and out of the way
They’re actors - this show openly doesn’t feature the real people from the cases.
@@lucascofell4680 these aren't actors they just put their cases on TV just like with any court.
@@Trini-town222 no, these people are indeed actors.
The court cases are pulled from real cases but these are not the actual people. The show doesn’t hide this either, they say in the description on the show website.
What about leash laws? The dogs got out of the fence and we’re not contained during the attack. Bogus court. She should’ve taken her to peoples court or judge Judy
Or the city's civil court
Because the lady who got bitten was on property that was not hers and she was not invited to be there that's why I don't go on property that I was not invited to be on or in. the postman the lady probably knows the time he is delivering her mail. Police sheriffs will look for those signs before they just walk on the property
If she went to judge Judy the most she could have gotten is $5,000. And she doesn't award pain and suffering.
People start gofundme for bogus reasons. She has a legitimate one. She can raise those funds in no time.
The way she said “ her land “ made me feel some type of way 😂
Right. And she wasn't trespassing.
Same
Ÿeah I picked up racist
@@granniekpartyfavorsshe trained those dogs to be racist...
Of course she had them fake white tears, which they use, and play victim, plus that 1 bite rule law is the most ridiculous thing. her ancestors use to set there dogs on us for sport.
She should go after the Insurance company . At the very least they might pay for the medical bills
I meant home owners Insurance
@@meganstrain7119 that's what I was wondering. if home insurance would cover something like this. Though with the dog being in that aggressive category. They probably have some loop hole in the policy not applying to certain breeds. Like most apartments do, they deny certain breeds.
That's bullsh*t I say she has 2 dogs that's 2 bites she should've gotten the money. I have a feeling those dogs have attacked before.
But that's where the victim should have being in proof since she is suing that's why they went to court to show any and all proof as to why the other party was in the wrong
I think so too
Oh please! You are so full of it. Go away
Nope, something provoked those dogs...if they attacked before, there would definitely be records.
I'm assuming she couldn't go through her homeowners insurance because she have vicious dogs
Shocked by verdict 😢
Yesss I’m trynna rewind and fast forward to see wat the verdict was and it’s nothing that’s messed up she didn’t get anything for the injuries I’ll sue the courts and the lady they would have had me f**** up fr that’s crazy
Judge Judy would have a field day with this
Yes where is she? Wow😮
Bruhhh 😂 she would've flipped her top 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Met her nice lady, but I disagreed with most of her cases ..
Yup
Judge Judy would of said restrain your dogs no matter what ..
Why doesn't the owner of the dogs bear responsibility when the dogs jumped the fence? Doesn't the owner have to be in full control of her dogs? Whether or not they have ever been aggressive or not.
A same thing me a say once u got dog u afto know whats going on so that f up and the judge is wicked
Because the dogs were on her property.
Yes the same way u would look after ur kids every move so u should ur dogs at least train them properly just imagine u being the victim I bet u wouldn’t have said what u said
@@mwest61219how is what u said was even right them dog getting out the fence to bite a mother and her son was ok in your book because they was on there Property Property ooo ok
Whenever someone comes to my house I put my dog in my room, my dog is very territorial and aggressive especially against men. You take precautions to make sure no one gets hurt
I do too. Until they get through the gate and in the house then I can let him out . But no one can get through the gate even if they have been to our house before 🐶
Sure you can do that if you’re aware that someone is coming,but this is a case of someone just showing up without forewarning missing the sign and everything. Dog owner had no chance to put the dogs away 🤷♀️
This show just lost all my respect with this first case that lady was attacked and brutalized by those dogs and that lady knows she walking out the court room smiling and laughing at the expense of someone else's pain which is wrong
Mines toooo
She wasn't smiling at her pain. She was smiling from relief that she didn't have to pay
I cannot believe that woman didn't get any money for all that damage from the dogs.
Exactly, just sad
a lesson in why not to trespass
@@AllanPowell Is knocking on someone's front door considered trespassing in America?
In Au, if you don't want someone at your front door, build a fence & gate with intercom.
Dogs must be secure in yards, on leash out of yard, unless approved exercise area.
These 2 dogs would have been put down, owner/s face massive fine, maybe jail if the kid was also attacked.
@@AllanPowell Is knocking on someone's front door considered trespassing in America?
In Au, if you don't want someone at your front door, build a fence & gate with intercom.
Dogs must be secure in yard, on leash if out, unless approved exercise area.
These 2 would have been put down, owner/s face massive fine, maybe jail if the kid was also attacked.
I equally can't believe you think this is real. It's based on real cases, but these are actors...very bad ones i should point out
Get a Lawyer Mama
She's chargeable.
File against her homeowners insurance
THAT IS SO WRONG, SHE KNEW THEY COULD BITE OR SHE WOULDN'T HAVE HAD A BEWARE OF DOG SIGN.
That sign was in the wrong place, and there was no gate to protect her, no sign in front of that gate.
Sometimes people use those signs as a deterrent to thieves even if they don't have a dog as the thieves might believe there is a dog lurking so risk of being bitten
Well in my country, the law says that you have to have a sign if the dog/s have a yard access, no matter the dog size, breed or behaviour history. It's even recommended for apartments to have it on their doors if the dog is inside.
I have a beware of dog sign and my dog is old and no teeth. But she still barks. Those signs do not mean they will bite. But if u come on my private property I wouldn't gaf if u do get but. Stay off my property.
That just isn't true. I have a beware of dog sign up and you know what kind of dog I have a four-and-a-half pound Yorkie. I don't care what the woman was going to that lady's house for she was still trespassing
I think that she let those out on purpose. She is lying 🤥
Don't matter if she did it remember it's her property and that 1st bite rule don't go to people place without permission if you see a dog sign
@@mike122017 That is unreasonable. So no mail? no deliveries? No girl guide cookies sales? No surprise guests?
I thing so to become how d fock them come get out jus so
@@pettybettyjayMy thoughts exactly.
I believe the same thing and was going to use trespassing as a excuse all the time
Hopefully she files a civil suit and didnr have to sign anything preventing her from doing so by coming on the show. There should be some kind of compensation for her injuries and future surgeries that is nuts!
I do not understand how someone can sue and win after their dog was injured by another dog (even if it was the first incident of aggression), but a person who was injured so severely loses??!! That’s nonsense!
Black Boule judge!!!
That’s so Sad for that poor lady
Right and what's sad is the last lady that lost she can legally pay a $1 a month to pay off the award
She was not invited on the property in the first case by the property owner in the second one the repair man was invited on the property by the home owner so the guard dog was supposed to be put in a locked room so the dog could not bite the service dog we can't walk up to doors on private property without a invite from the home owners or owner. I felt that was not the first time those women had a problem with one another all the Blacks on that street remember the woman's face and stay away from the house and her property the Judge would have awarded her if she was not on that property at the time of the attack 2nd case she lost because she invited the repair man on the property to service what ever it was so property owners with dogs when you invite people on your property always make sure your dogs are locked away from being able to attack someone if they open the wrong door
Was she invited on that property or did she just go on the property uninvited if she was in the road and got attacked she would have won it's okay to feel for how her face was damaged but she went on private property without being invited. The two dogs not one dog was going after the young boy they just went for his mother
the judge was really trippin in this first case she deserved the 158,000 she asked for i couldn't imagine her trauma she's facing mentally.. the defendant 's denial really shined through about those dogs. no empathy whatso ever
She deserved every penny her face aline will need surgery that woman seemed prejudice and kept saying her land h she had no remorse what so ever I felt so bad for that lady
@@odettawhite6255 i got racist vibes all through that case surprised the judge bypassed that
Does this now mean Judge that, Anyone going onto that lady's land to knock on her door are in danger of being attacked by those two dogs? Even though she has a sign 'Beware of Dog'. And she has a fence which did NOT keep those dogs in, but most importantly, in that state, isn't a large dog supposed to have a proper caged, lockable enclosure as well as a gated fenced in area clearly signed 'Large Dangerous Dogs Beware'? If not Judge why, because how is a person like the postman, or a visitor or kiddies (children) supposed to be safe? Entering her property? The one bite law, I dont understand. In the end those two dogs attacked a lady whom just went to knock on The defendant's door thinking her son and her were safe. I think that you can have laws in place and peaces of paper signed by VIPs, these things will not physically stop a dog from attacking. I believe The Owner was negligent also for not having control of her dogs. The Beware sign should be Dangerous Dogs on the premises. It means to me that any child in trouble or visiting doing charity 'Are' In danger of being attacked because the dogs were loose on her land, but aggressive enough to cause thousands of dollars in personal damage just because she was knocking on the door. That poor lady should have come out of that court with at least her personal injuries paid. This is another worse incident waiting to happen. Once an aggressive dog bites and draws blood, it will very likely keep keep doing it. I beleive the Owner was Negligent in this case.
Just like the man with the dumpster was liable that woman with those vicious dogs was liable. Mrs Williams should have been given at least part of that money for all those injuries
Second case: the defendant is a heartless loud mouth. Even if you believe your dog is innocent, you should still show some compassion for the plaintiff. Also, if you have a guard dog, someone should have met the plaintiff at the front to make sure something like this doesn’t happen.
None of these owners had their "beware of vicious dog" signs put up properly where visitors could see them either.
She kept saying "if he followed directions" um ma'am if you would have followed the directions on the paperwork, by checking the box that says "dogs" we wouldn't be here.
I thought the same thing. At least put the dog up. Chain him up
She was absolutely ridiculous...Inhumane response to the whole situation. She was lying I'm sure about him never attacking anyone. That's probably why she didn't check that box on the service request! And here's a better question... Why the heck wasn't she home when the repairman showed up anyway?! That doesn't make any sense to me!
@@sornaurahayes1887she was home out back near her pool the dog was in the side of the house through a door entry. In the house the man opened it went through and was attacked he was suppose to go to the front door but said he assumed side but at the same time swears that was also the left door but it was clearly the right door. But he stated he was so use to it being the side for he knew that had to be the door. His brain obviously played tricks on him. However she should have checked the box for dogs so he could have been on alert or had dog spray out just in case something smh. They both were at fault.
These cases look so real, but both cases had their dog signs put up in the wrong places, where people couldn't see them.
The paranoia of Americans never ceases to amaze me. Protection dogs that will rip anyone up just for walking through the wrong door. Why does anyone need a dog like that? Unless you have something needing protected that's a target for armed gangs then there's no need for a dog like that. What happens when the woman's little niece or nephew or a friends child is there visiting and walks through the wrong door?! Absolutely ridiculous
U are right in alot aparts but I still feel if u gave a person clear Instructions on were they should go in your home as a Visitor u should follow and there shouldn't be no kids coming to her home that doesn't know her dog and if there is im pretty shore she would know about it b4 hand he is an adult so giving him instructions on were to go was a no brainer
I guess the woman with no moruse will still be smiling . Sick.
The way the law work is freaking crazy,so there have to be a second victim to die or get injured before anything else can be done.The dog owner shows no remorse,no sympathy even to offer am sorry my neighbour my dogs did this to you.This is no freaking trespassing,am really mad at how the system works.
I dont agree with this she looked so sad shocked she couldnt even talk or defend herself , Am glad she didnt have to pay for anything am also sad for the victim but am sure she will make sure it doesn"t happen again
She was sad and shocked until the ruling she Was relieved and happy so she could have definitely been acting that she is sorry and I doubt she will do something about it cause if she truly was sorry she would have properly apologized and kicked the idea of breeding out her head those were two dogs who could each thought differently yet both attacked her severely she was wrong and should have had to pay
Go after the homeowners insurance
I was so surprised with the first verdict.
If the boy was provoking he would’ve been the one with all those injuries. Not her
How in the world did the second case win in favor of the plaintiff, but the first case is denied based on the same law?
White Justice and Black Unjustice!!! This judge is biased against his own people.
The second case I agree. Because the defendant failed to warn him about the dog. He got mauled by her dog. So I'm glad he won the case.
If she has a poster that says beware of dog then she knows her dogs are aggressive and not safe
You're absolutely right
If you have dogs state laws states you have to have a beware of dog sign
@@taymoneythamodelstate laws vary state to state, so even by the internal logic of your claim it’s wrong lol
@@taymoneythamodelon top of that, states only require such signs for dogs deemed as vicious or aggressive
@@taymoneythamodel Yes, in Georgia, dog owners must post a "Beware of Dog" sign if their dog is classified as dangerous or vicious and the sign is clearly visible to the public. The sign must be posted at every entrance to the property.
A dog may be considered dangerous if it:
Bites someone and breaks their skin
Attacks someone and causes injury
Kills a domestic animal while off the owner's property
So not just any dog requires a sign lol
The Huskies case was totally wrong Judge must be blind he was wrong in this case - they must of been a hole in her fence or it’s too small that dogs can easily jump over. That lady is a lair - am so glad her little boy was safe. 😢
What state allows a 'one-bite' forgiving law? I never heard of this?
Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, New York*, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota**, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Wyoming.
Oregon 😮 they need to change that IMMEDIATELY
Is what am saying. What happens if it was a kid?
The Owner of the Dogs is insane claiming ringing the Doorbell is trespassing.
Girl that 's not a dog that's a WOLF 😬😬😬😬😬😬
The other lady didn't show no compassion. She was just laughing because she didn't have to pay nothing for the person getting bitten and damaged and stitched up and everything
In both cases, the dogs never bit anyone before. How is it that the first lady got nothing because of the one bite rule, but the second case got paid even though the dog never bit anyone before. I found it all unfair. The first lady should have gotten paid, too. She was really in bad shape.
I was thinking the same thing and I’m confused!
The second case, they were expecting the man and they had a dog considered vicious. They should have properly secured the dog. The First case no one was expecting the lady and there is no proof her dogs were ever vicious before.
In the second case, the dog appeared to be a bulldog or pit which is considered a vicious breed and the one bite rule does not apply to these breeds. Plus, they expected him and told him go through the door on the left. There were 2 left doors so the instructions weren't clear. AND when placing the work order she did not mark the box asking if she had a dog/s. She said if she marked the box then they wouldn't send anyone out so she lied, therefore, placing him in clear and present danger. In the first case, Huskies are not considered a vicious breed so the one bite rule applied, unfortunately.
Big facts this is what I was trying to say like I really thought I was the only one until I seen your comment it just doesn't makes any sense
@@ndjesuslivesbull she knew her dog was and the second lady gave that man clear Instructions on were he should enter her home like come on now this is in favor of whites 😒 🙄
I call bogus “huskies never got loose” they’re escape artists.
They “scream” and they’re escape artists. Daughter wanted one and I showed her videos of huskies. After the video she’s like nope I don’t want one no more! Lol
I disagree with that Judge's decision. 🙏🏽Please🙏🏾 consult a Personal Injury Attorney in your area, Ma'am! I feel this is at the least, a "Partially At-Fault" decision that SHOULD have Granted you SOME of your Medical Expenses covered, as well as an Award for Pain & Suffering. This entire situation is horrible & I pray you eventually heal well from these injuries!
That's what I'm saying, she should haave gotten SOMETHING! Those dogs could have KILLED HER! This is awful. I can't imagine how defeated she must of felt.
Exactly! I would be going after her insurance company.
She should have asked for more money at least $2million or $3mil
I hope everyone has a wonderful Sunday night and or day ✌🏻
Shalom peace 🙏
Yes you too❤️🖤💚🥰
I had a husky, its hard for me to even imagine she was able to train hers as an attack dog. If someone had broken in they were only had been at risk of being licked to death. Its widely known huskies are not gaurd dogs. Very unusual story.
True most Huskies are softies. But i have seen cases of aggressive huskies
Any dog can be agaggressive, especially if they are trained to be
Question is, why did she have a whistle
She said she had a dog whistle, which means she had to be training them to attack someone or she is a bad pet owner.
I've owned two... They can be quite aggressive.
I have a feeling hers were trained to be aggressive, and deliberately loosed on that poor woman and her child..
The face of those dogs say something else !
2- The love for animals is way too much , is more than for human !
The defendant might have commanded the dogs to attack cause she is black!! I saw her smirks seeing the victim cry😢
I have watched the people’s court and judge M always says they have to be on a leash or fenced in and if they escape the fence it’s the owners fault.
This court can't be real. Dogs escape out of their fenced yard and maul a lady. Any other court would have paid the victim.
Lol it's not it's never real.
This woman deserved the money…her dogs destroyed her life
That ruling on the one bite rule, is ridiculous. A lion never bites anyone before, yet the first time he does he is put down. What if the one bite kills?
Someone from my community CAN'T even receive JUSTICE in Animal Court....against an animal!!!👀 "THEIR so called" legal/justice system continues to be a FRAUDULENT CESSPOOL!!! Ipray the first victim receives some JUSTICE, and COMPENSATION for her horrific injuries!! Glad that she was able to PROTECT her son!!
Should have took this to the peoples court!
The owner of the dogs 🐕 sent them. She said, *"They were trespassing."* She's too comfortable about this. 😢
This evil woman is laughing 😮
That woman has no remorse or care for a woman who could of lost her life. That little boy could have lost his mother!
Judge Judy would of done the first victim justice.
My question is why is she eearing a whistle just off the top? There waa a reason why she had it in the first place. That peobably wasnt the first time those dogs were aggressive and now that theyve had that taste we'll see if there will be another incident
the wounds to your body heal with time but not the soul
Poor lady. I wouldn't want to go out in public with all those scars on my face either. Even with all the scars on her face, she is a beautiful lady.
Why do they feel that it's not important to have the doors locked with dogs of that size.
She should have sued for much more
What would happen if a delivery driver had to go to her house
Exactly!
Ive seen other cases like the girl who got mauled by the two dogs while dog sitting. People always act like oh not my dog until it is
One of his famous quotes
"Let's get into the legal sauce😂"
I just looked it up. This is a real judge, re-enacting real cases. The people involved are actors presenting what really happened in the original suits. All involved know the eventual outcome of the case. The show was removed from the air years ago!📜⚖️
That first case was a horrible verdict. That woman's dogs destroyed that poor woman and could have killed her son. Judge should be ashamed of himself.
This is for the first video: I hope she still gives her a check a little more then what she asked, and helps her to show how truly sorry she feels about the whole situation.
You’re kidding right? That woman isn’t going to give that poor woman a dime. She was laughing and smiling as she left because she won
First time I’ve seen this show and the last time I’ll watch. Total injustice
That first lady in that first case needs to go after that dog owners homeowners insurance
The judge is wrong , had that been just the boy going to the door of that ladies house , he would be dead for sure , shame on this judge !
I just said basically the same thing to my husband. However, it's shame on the law, not the judge. He has to follow the law and rule according to it. He didn't like it anymore than we do.
Beautiful Huskies!! I bought a six month old Husky and not even six hours in the backyard of mine. My neighbor pop his head over to see what was making noise and he all most got his head ripped off. Now there best friends.
Because the dog was protecting its property it was doing what it was supposed to do
That google picture of a house💀💀💀
The first case....the dogs should be put down and the owner charged. I hope she pursue further legal assistance!!!
Shes traumatized that poor lady 💔🙏
I can't even watch the next episode 🙄🥺 that's not being fair
Oh my! She didn't ✔️ that she had a guard dog. She's responsible. Her dog is "Trained," to attack
She didn't have that sign up she no she's not telling the truth about then dogs. i hope she get every penny 🙏
She thinks she's gotten the victory with her smirks,but them two dogs will be dead
No matter how much I love my dog and how sweet he is. If he EVER hurt someone like that I would put him down and pay for what happened. I have an extremely sweet husky but I know he’s bite a handler for trying to muzzle him when they found him in an abandoned apartment (kennel & no food) he even bite clean through his own tongue. I would never let that happen. Be more responsible with your dogs. Outside leash them / know someone is coming over put them away in a KENNEL 😢 so sad for these people. Hope they get the help they need
Why would u put down ur dog when it has no rabies? If ur dog has that behavior its the owner’s fault for raising them probably ina negative way
@@jassypr well you have to understand I got him when he was 7 years old and someone else abused him for those long years and was left behind to die. And he is quite aggressive at times ( mostly when I try to take his toys) It’s the law so no one else gets hurt. It’s sad but true. If he were to ever go after someone for no reason and they sue the courts would require me to put him down
@@StabbieStab555 true, it’s always the law to be followed. I just can’t accept that dogs that has a life have to go through that, i was traumatized as a kid before when our dog got killed for barking and neighbors ate him after that… that’s why i cant let dogs nor cats be killed etc… but if they have rabies i mean euthanized is really the answer… 😔
Right I appreciate yall conversation it's more reasonable to the situations at hand
Plesssss tell me that was a typo. I can't wrap my mind around something so obscene😮😮😮
The One Bite Rule Is Ridiculous. It was two dogs so technically she was bitten more than once by two different dogs and they didn't bite just once they bit multiple times and slashed up her face and legs and arms, and lets not forget who the Huskies Ancestors are people Wolves are they cute and even tempered do they need to be provoked to attack no they do not they can attack simply from being hungry or maybe Karen's Dogs didn't like the music she was blasting and wanted her to shut it off maybe it was the sound she uses to cause them to attack and why have a dog whistle if they are such great dogs.
The way those attacked that woman, They had been trained how to Attack !!! I guess the woman that was attacked researched the 2 bite rule’s
This judge is too personal
Trespassing doesn’t include someone walking up to ring your doorbell, and it should not result in a vicious dog attack. I’m pretty sure people have rang that nut’s doorbell before.
The lady should have had a fence in the front and the dogs getting out of the back gate should show negligence period🤨❤️🖤💚
Is there a go fund me page for this woman? How old is the case?
It's not real
For the first case based on the real woman. I hope she is doing ok.
28:43 can’t clutch them together but you hold the Cain with that’s hand 😂😂😂
That's a nightmare. And that woman stands there with a narcissistic look on her face. That poor woman got attacked and that does not just effect someone physically, it's emotionally damaging.
What about the defendant's homeowners policy that should cover dog bites. ???
Also that sign was on the fence it was not on the house. We put up no trespassing and private property signs also we have what is called. ""The purple fence law"" in Texas... Wondering what state this is in...
I definitely don't understand the decision...
Simple animal went animal but again you wouldn't care because it was human that was attacked
BAD Ruling!!! She should have gotten money at least forher medical bills!!!
The law can be helpless. Why wouldn't some folks end up taking the law into their hands?
That woman knew them dogs was aggressive!
Husky owner here! Never okay! I have three and love them dearly but they would have been put down. Period. My heart breaks for this women and her injuries are absolutely horrendous! Owner is also awful and shows no remorse! I have full control over my dogs and they are NEVER left outside alone!
What are the audience clapping for in 1st case
That lady sure lost trust in law.
If this is not fake .. I would never go on someone’s property if they had a sign up saying beware of dogs
If I was the owner of those huskies I would feel horrible! I would definitely pay for all those medical expenses or at least half of them
Imma be honest she did have a sign up telling and informing her in big bold red letters 😂😂😂dog protect there home simple
I agree that these dogs probably have a tact before. I also believe that she has the dogs trying to attack. Because she said this woman was trespassing just by coming and knocking it on her door. That sounds very fishy to me!
And VERY RACIST😮