Mother Protects Her Child In Court | Full Episode | Personal Injury Court
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 05. 2023
- "Stone v Campbell": In this episode of "Personal Injury Court," a mother sues for $400,000 when her son tries to make a movie, but gets the shock of his life instead. With his no nonsense approach, Judge M. Gino Brogdon, Sr., presides over the courtroom.
Season 1, Episode 38
Watch The Series: www.fubo.tv/welcome/series/11...
Enjoyed our video? Make sure to like and comment!
Make sure to subscribe: / injurycourt
Follow our Facebook here: / personalinjurycourt
PERSONAL INJURY COURT:
Personal Injury Court demonstrates claims brought to the courtroom over serious injuries leading to serious settlements. With Judge Gino of Personal Injury Court, he'll be presiding over some of the largest claims in TV history.
#PersonalInjuryCourt #InjuryCourt #JudgeGinoBrogdon
Mother Protects Her Child In Court | Full Episode | Personal Injury Court
/ @personalinjurycourt - Zábava
Unbelievable! The judge just gave that boy a license to continue his unacceptable behavior! 🤦♀️
Welcome to being woke 🤣🤣🤣
@@natrambo3589lol😀😅😂
I Agree
Ok Karen!!!!!!!! Ok boomer
I agree Patricia, however not just this boy, all the boys & others who watch this, after an easy payday.
Crime = all associated legal system employment/income, incl all involved in this show.
It's like a burglar injured after entering your home through a dog door, tripping over a floor mat. @17:55 wHAT?
I actually disagree with the judgement. The kids shouldn’t have been there from the beginning. Signs or no signs.
Agreed
That was a sad ruling, mom defending her drop-out trespasser son and now making money for that, sure want's you to be able to trespass on anybody property to get hurt and sue for money, what a sad example from the Judge.
I dissagree I think she had duty to get the fence fix
I agree. The fact that there was a barrier there whether it was fixed or not let's you know that YOU SHOULD NOT PASS.
@@tamaradaughterofoya7512 Same
I disagree with this judgement. She proved she had no idea someone could have been on her property. Regardless if the hole was in the fence already or not, a hole in a fence does not equal a gate or permission to enter.
I agree with you
That's the law these days.
Makes no sense
It’s actually called breaking and entering and they should be pressing charges
They should have had daily security patrols and/or cameras.
Next thing a bank robber is suing the bank for personal injuries that were obtained by them robbing the bank and getting shot by the security personal. Outrageous. Entering through a fence should be evidence enough that that is no proper way to enter the property.
This verdict is so ridiculous he shouldn't have been there
this is freaking accidental from the thunder storm and shockingly!!!!!
Your missing the point regardless of being there or not. The analysis the law gives states that the electrical wire or units have to be free from causing a hazard. Even if the person was walking along the fence and not trespassing the reaction that causes an explosion can still reach him and that’s the point.
Exactly
Situations like this just show people they can get away with doing wrong. I did something illegal, and yes I got hurt, but look at all the money I won. Ugh. And the mom saying “he’s not challenged at school…” 😵💫
And the mom saying "all the other kids go there!" As if that matters! That doesn't mean YOUR kid should go there!🤦♀️
I can't believe a high school dropout got away with 400 stacks! That's some BS. His mom actually condones his behavior? She was SHM disagreeing with her son going back to school!
i was surprised at her
I saw that to.
What does the dad have to say about this situation???
Judge: "You don't see this sign?" Plaintiff: "It was on the other side!" So it seems he did see the sign and chose to ignore the sign.
I disagree with that judgement. The kid trespass on private property so how can he be in the right. He's clearly in the wrong.
That sister needs to take his mom to court because Mrs. , Karen needs to take care of her kid and make sure his a@@ is where he needs to be . Because we all know if he was black he would be under the jail and CPS would be called on the mom .
Facts!
We would all expect a 17 year old to know if u see wires that are hanging down do go there... getting kicked out of school and causing trouble shows that his parents don't care what he does. he wanted to be like other kids going to the train track.. lesson learned don't be a follower
He was never in school long enough to learn basics
@@SquishFish404 right
That was messed up. He was trespassing.
Great-this verdict just gave the delinquent license to commit crime and have his victims pay for any injury when he breaks in to houses and cuts himself on the glass he breaks to enter the home- that is some f'd up law you have there! Momma you are contributing to your son's delinquency by not dealing with his bad behavior.
Now I see why a lot of kids get away with crimes. This was ridiculous.
That’s alright karma gonna eat him and his Mama up. I bet he tells his Mom what to do😩
Ok mom is complaining her son could be killed doesn't care to make sure he stays off private property he deserved what he got if you think about it. It's sad it happened but she should had been a parent and the fact he is a trouble maker in general I rule for the train yard looks like his mom needs to learn to parent better. It's sad with his mom making excuses why he broke in, why he got kicked out of schools why he always causes trouble. She needs to wake up and realize she needs to be a parent not a friend
This ruling was fukin ridiculous... All this done was encourage the kid to go back out and do it again, and to believe he can get away with it next time. This taught him nothing.
While these cases are fake and they are paid actors supposedly they are based on real cases. There is no way a kid can trespass injure himself and make the landowner pay. And if it is real and the law supports this verdict it does not surprise me at all. Welcome to America!
P.s. this mother should be ashamed of herself. What a poor excuse for a parent!
These are real cases and the judge has the law degree not you suckas
I've to applaud the defendant for her intelligent 👏
He just awarded him to be a even bigger nuisance to the community smh. Now every teenagers out there gon do the exact same thing and get away with the "Law"
Cool, let's all go trespass and get hurt and get a huge settlement. Make sure to go out when there's a thunderstorm. The land owner is responsible at that point. /s
What a terrible judgement for a kid that is going nowhere. The judge literally just enabled that kid, and others, to go out to do these things without taking responsibility for their actions. Yikes, Gino. Yikes.
That is your opinion your law degree if you please
@@joshsims9642 going onto private property to vandalize is a crime.
@@joshsims9642I think the Judge will Be Interested in the Boy's Mom 😁.... Because the Judge Clearly Said It's Not The Land Owner's Responsibility but Gave the Boy the Money 💰 😅....
This was a sad case. That boy is troubled and entitled. And I'd have to imagine that he got some sort of pain medication for his injuries. With his personality he's going to be an addict in no time. I wish him the best and hope he turns his life around.
trust me he probly more addicted to tiktok than any painkiller would get you addicted to
And got expelled from school and didn't get to class like he supposed to
How dare you first of all how dare you just assume someone is going to be an addict because of a doctors and pain killers!!! I have 10’years sober. And your just uneducated on this entire situation. He might be a punk kid but not an addict stop
@@gusgus2062 congrats on having 10 years sober. I just hit my 8 year mark literally 2 days ago.
Starting today, many deliquent people can be compensated by doing illegal thing...that judge must need to change his color
The mothers face looks like she knows she should lose but is trying as hard as she can
If the boy was trespassing, it's not the land owner's responsibility to protect him. He's fully responsible for his own injuries. WORST VERDICT EVER..
Wrong judgement electrical hazard are natural u don't know why wen it occurs why blame lady for the hazard
I guess now you can trespass-get hurt then make money even if you break into somebodies property, railroad should sue the trespasser for stressing you out and taking the courts time.
An F in Biology means he doesn't anything about electrical engineering? What has this kid been learning. Oh I forgot - he hasn't been learning.
Such a dumb ruling! So anyone can go and get hurt by themselves and take away 400k?
This just shows that you can get awarded by doing something wrong and getting hurt by your own actions...isn’t there a saying that you should be responsible by your own choices?. I guess it doesn’t apply to this case...
I disagree with the judgement
I hope Miss Campbell can appeal this ridiculous verdict. I hope she does and wins
This judgement throws a big shadow over the common sense AND legal position of this matter: I find this to be an affront to our revered Lady Justice !
[from a lawyer in Thailand]
This judgment doesn't make sense to me. The defendant has put everything it takes to secure the premises. Therefore she can't be held responsible for this trespasser's injury. Everyone knows he is at fault by getting into restricted area. No, no, no, You gotta kidding me!
WOW! I am shocked! Why did the judge award for trespasser? Not sure how did he became the Judge!
No one can make me believe that this guy didn’t know this was a public area.
This judge is insane, his ruling is biased. I watched few episodes and I noticed one thing “biased ruling “. Never gonna watch these again
His rullings are not biased it’s based on law
I totally agree that this verdict is wrong he shouldn't have been on private property period!!!
This judge doesn’t know what he is doing clearly. I’m so upset with his judgment. He shouldn’t have been there. The place is been inspect every 2 weeks and the last day of inspection was shown end to you and. Mhen get that man out of that court room.
The Judge is Interested in the Boy's Mother 😅... Judge See's Everything 😅
I totally disagree with this ruling. Not only should trespassers not be awarded for any injuries they get while committing a CRIME, but they should also be arrested. Everyone should know that railroad equipment and buildings (even if abandoned) are owned by the railroad company and unauthorized people are not allowed around them. Even with a hole in the fence, those kids know that they were not allowed in that area.
The final judgement in this case should've been in favor of the defendant, not the plaintiffs. The kids had no permission or authorization to be on that property to begin with. Plus, he technically even admitted to having seen the "no trespassing" sign by claiming it was "on the other side". So to have known it was on the "other side" you would have to have seen it and ultimately choose to ignore it. So yes, the kid's burn injuries were 100% his own fault and should not have gotten a penny of the $400k he was incorrectly awarded.
Definitely true. But at the same, the reason it favors the plaintiff in this case is only because of the hole in fence. There was no evidence to prove the hole was covered or the fence was fixed with a new fencing. There was also no sign to show warning of what could happen to trespassers if they trespass, nor extra security around that spot. For example, Hacksaw Jim Duggan has warning signs for trespassers that if they trespass, they'll be shot on premises. With this case, there is only the authorized personnel sign, but there's no warning sign for trespassers if they were found on premises.
Even if there is a hole in the fence there’s a fence. A fence means this is not YOUR property
Wow hes a disgrace for a kid should not have won , now hes gonna be even more worse. And the mother worst parent of the year
Another poor verdict! 🤦🏽♀️ Terrible parenting!
I truly disagree with how this turned out. The mother should have been. More present in his doing . Then allowing him not to go to school is ridiculous
This was an exciting case, but I'm thoroughly disappointed by the ruling. If these are the kinds of rulings the Court will deal out, then maybe we should turn our attention to Stand-Your-Ground laws. Under Stand-Your-Ground laws trespassers are the perpetrators & whatever befalls them is on them, not the landowner.
Love His Honor's rulings and his intelligent and compassionate courtroom demeanor, but I would have ruled differently. This ruling was too arbitrary. In my opinion, the railway should have been held liable for ⅓ of the ask, the boy should have been held responsible for ⅔.
Btw, did you notice the way the mother was shaking her head "no" when His Honor ordered her son back to school??? Peculiar...🧐
No stand your ground laws only are for a certain group of people.
This case makes me sick !!! It’s literally everything wrong with American today ! Judge is NOTHING short of a complete IDIOT !! Should be removed from bench immediately!!! And kid and his parents should been SUED !!! For damaged they caused to trains property PERIOD !!! What an awful ruling …. ….
"It's your high school record" watched his face fall 😂😂😂😂 that's a B&X attorney. She does her job and minor records aren't sealed until 21, not 18.
5:17 That looked like fireworks.
Perfect example of you see someone jump you gonna jump too
I’ve watched dozens of these videos, and this is the only one that I can say. I totally disagree with the verdict . I highly doubt the Trainyard knew these kids were using it as a film set . The mother is just as bad ( and worse) as the son, condoning this behavior, knowing that he is flunking out of school. There is no parenting going on. She’s looking at the dollar signs that her son could bring home by his videos and now with this verdict. She is the root of the issue with her complete absence of parenting skills in this situation. What kind of future does this kid have if he can’t even make it through high school? High school is not impossible to pass for most kids. It’s just a matter of discipline, unless you have a learning disability, which appears he does not.
That mother needs to learn her son to read😊
The kid is rich now. He not going to finish school. He should not been there in the first place.
Why they don't cancel this show this judge is something else
This is so pathetic law, you could call it law for karen .. haha
Just gave this “child” the ammunition to do more damage in the community. Trespassing is a crime regardless of the injuries. Shame on you judge.
Wow, this ruling is pathetic! Whether there is a wall/ fence or NOT…. We do not have the right to be trespassing on property… PERIOD!
wow the mom even went to decline her son going back to school shes shaking her head no
It means personnel were about to be in jeopardy!
That train company can sue them now
The boy got rewarded for breaking the law
Teach your children to be a leader not a follower
My lord,this is unbelievable
NO CHIEF GIVE BACK $60K TO THE MOM NOW AND LET THEM HAVE THE $540K WHEN THIS DUDE FINISH COLLEGE
this is not right ... i am really starting to believe this is some kind of joke... this kid is doomed
This is making me rethink this show an why didn't he have other lawyers way In
That is the dumbest result. Lol
teenagers with little or no education can still make something of themselves when given a chance
True words or they can come to Judge Bruno's court room and get paid for being reckless
It’s the law not the judge he is doing his job
That was a totally ridiculous decision. Shame on the judge for awarding all that money that this lousy kid will likely use to continue his illegal antics on private property. Horrible decision.
Natural justice he was injured when he was tresspassing. No payment.
I will bet that judge would rule differently if fast and furious used his car to shoot a movie with without his permission
The mother should have put the boy in detention for a long time instead of suing anyone
I partially disagree with the judgement, but law is law I'm afraid. The only part of the judgement I can agree with is the literal hole in the defendant's case of the fence. The plaintiff mentioned he and his friends have been doing these stunts for the past couple months, with this railway being the recent target. So that means the hole had been there for multiple days. Or at least 14 days considering the recent fence inspection was at least 2 weeks ago.
Plus, another problem is there's no warning signs on the property that trespassers will be forced out in some manner. There is the restriction sign saying the property is for only authorized personnel, but that's it. There is no warning sign of forced removal to reinforce that the property is private and restricted. Plus, there's no watchman, surveillance, or any kind of guard to show the place isn't abandoned.
So he commits criminal trespassing ignores safety signs but others must pay for his injuries during the commission of a crime
What? I can't believe the outcome. There's a reason there's a fence. That kid knew he wasn't supposed to be there.
That's judge is unbelievable
That kid is so soft and he is like a street goon
He doesn't deserve a penny
This judge is mad clearly
🙄 WOW!!! So its not a land owers responsibility to protect Trespassers from getting hurt, yet the Trespasser does get hurt and sues !!!!🤔
The woman had documents, evidence and more! They checked their property EVERY TWO WEEKS! How did the boy get 400,000 for trespassing and getting hurt trying to do his Jackie Chan movie?
So really it's nothing nobody can do if someone trespass on your property and get hurt.
Unreal.
The kid shouldn’t care about social media and if you get plenty views on your video, he got injured, but he was trespassing on private property. She better hope she has a strong document to back up her story.
This is a terrible judgement
So unbelievable it could of been some little guyforks or something
Sorry this judge is absolutely ridiculous his decision sometimes are actually soo wrong , we need a new judge
It seems like his mother only cares about the money, her son shouldn’t have been there!!!!
Wrong judgement!!!
I don't agree with the jury's decision, that child will be harmed a lot more because he was favored and his mother was complacent, she didn't even preach about her son, so we will see that child again in court.
How is the representative able to gain access to his academic records..
This is how I know that this show is fake!
That mother needs help too she just want money she dnt care if he's going to school or not she loves what he's going around doing
Heavily disagree with this judgement. I live in nyc where teens ride on top of moving trains that go in tunnels all over bridges. It's stuff like this that make kids think its okay. He shouldn't have gotten anything
Im a 9 year old and il say thay PUT THE SIGNS ON THE OTHER SIDE
His videos are most based on emotions. No sense of judgement
Bad judgement, so unfair. I can guarantee this boy will blow those $$ and cause more problems
Also, doesn’t someone have the right to protect their property???!!!! What if they got shot, what then? The signs clearly stated to stay out. SMH.
I just don't understand how..how how..
Judge is Interested in The Boy's Mother 😅
poor decision Sir, very poor,,i am disappointed, that young man will rob a bank one day and get hurt,, or could go to jail,a very irresponsible mother too,i am disgusted
There is no other judge in the world with biased and wrong judgements. It does not make any sense and hard to agree with the judgement.
That boy is a problem child, train tracks carry's electric common sense tells you to do not enter
He's done some dumb stuff
He had no business out there
Reminds me of a case where a guy got hurt breaking into someone's house and getting hurt. They actually made the homeowner responsible for the injuries. Btw that wasn't on this show it happened in real life I can't remember what state it was