Trump’s Candidates Win Primaries & Kim K Ruins Marilyn’s Dress | The Daily Show
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 05. 2024
- Trump supporters win big in several primaries, the European Court of Human Rights blocks the U.K.’s controversial deportation of refugees to Rwanda, Kim Kardashian damaged Marilyn Monroe’s dress at the Met Gala, and Netflix creates a real-life “Squid Game” competition. #TrevorNoah #DailyShow #Comedy
Subscribe to The Daily Show:
/ @thedailyshow
Follow The Daily Show:
Twitter: / thedailyshow
Facebook: / thedailyshow
Instagram: / thedailyshow
Stream full episodes of The Daily Show on Paramount+: www.paramountplus.com/?ftag=PP...
Follow Comedy Central:
Twitter: / comedycentral
Facebook: / comedycentral
Instagram: / comedycentral
About The Daily Show:
Trevor Noah and The Daily Show correspondents tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and pop culture.
The Daily Show with Trevor Noah airs weeknights at 11/10c on Comedy Central. - Komedie
Dress historians here on YT called this immediately after she wore it and said it would be damaged...and here we are. Such a shame! That dress should have been in the Smithsonian or some reputable museum that knows how to preserve fragile garments.
Agreed! I mean there's an actual American History Museum idk why the dress wasn't a part of that exhibit already. Sad to see the poor decision to have someone wear it. Let alone Kim K who you can see just with your eyes wouldn't fit that dress. I wish they would’ve just made a copy for her...
Right, I can't believe they would even lend it out, no matter who it was to. Accidents happen.
@@KelseyWolf Versace made her a replica that fit her and she changed into it after walking the red carpet in the original despite not being able to close the back. I hope the insurance company goes after her.
How did Kim figure that she’d be able to fit in it! It was sewn to fit Marilyn, like literally sewn on her!
Kim K. may think she is Marilyn's successor, but I disagree. Marilyn had qualities Kim has never and will never even come near having. She should have respected the life of Monroe and donated that dress to a museum.
"They knew that dress didn't fit." Exactly!
The thing that struck me wrong ab the dress and having ANYONE else wear it, is that it was literally designed and made for
Marilyn only, they dyed the dress that color to try and match Marilyn’s skin tone the best they could. It’s a historic piece that is usually stored in a special chamber to regulate the oxygen so it doesn’t get damaged. Mackie, part of the design team for the original dress wasn’t happy that someone besides Marilyn wore it.
I mean, if there was one of Washington’s wigs in a museum, it would be unthinkable for someone to wear it.
So my issue isn’t with Kim, it’s with Ripley’s
for taking that chance.
You made an excellent opinion@Brooke B
It looks like a tan on kim
My problem with the dress situation is Kim advertising that she starved herself to fit into the dress and I’m so sick of glamorizing Ed behaviors.
erectile dysfunction
@@dukstedi 😂😂😂😂stop it she meant eating disorders 🤣🤣🤣🤣
you could do a whole series on how Kim exercised, fasted, did liposuction, packed herself into spanx and whatever to fit into that dress...and even though quite beautiful, she is still no Marilyn Monroe.
MM in that dress was a vision burned into my memory.
Who is Ed?
Marylin was not the same body shape.
Why didn’t they just use a replica dress? They rolled the dice and lost…no sympathy from me. If they really cared about it they wouldn’t try stunts with it for clout
The wildest part is... SHE HAD A REPLICA! That's the one she used after her walk. I DO NOT KNOW why she had to wear the original
There was no rolling dice, this was bound to happen from the second Kim decided she just HAD to have this. She was absolutely tied into the dress and the coat was wrapped around her to hide all the duct tape or whatever was holding the back of the dress closed.
Crazy how the left has suddenly turned on the Kardashians. 😂
@@gateauxq4604 unfortunately they didn’t use aviation grade duct tape
@@jj51424 The left ? Who is talking about politics? We're discussing a dress... 🤔
I'm glad that he pointed it out. She's literally apologizing to the dude for her election on his birthday. And you say this is not a cult? That level of devotion to have to apologize for losing that says a lot man.
Also does she think Obama was the 43th and 44th president? How does someone who doesn't understand how electoral cycles work, runs for office?
africa is the new Austrailia
SO TRUE
SO TRUE
Dear leader must be pleased.
"2022 a$$ into a 1960s dress" -Dolce, that was the best joke!
I'm not a dress historian and my first thought was "it won't fit, it will rip!"
Its Ripley's fault for giving her the dress in the first place.
Ripley's is most at fault. Honestly anyone wearing that dress would have done damage to it and if Ripley's was an actual reputable museum it is literally against the rules for someone to wear an historic piece like that dress. If only it was in the Smithsonian.
Jim Pattinson owns Ripley's, direct complaints to his offices
If Kim was an actual fan of Marilyn... She would've known that dress is made for Marilyn Monroe's body only.
@@satorarepo744 Ripley's is technically a museum, which is why people expect them to abide by standard codes of conduct/handling/storage for pieces like these - particularly those which many would consider national treasures or ones of historical significance (fyi: I don't revere the dress in that way, but I know there are people who do, from fashion/garment enthusiasts to historians and so on).
In terms of business then, it is actually inherent in Ripley's business model to do their utmost to uphold those standards, first and foremost for the items in their collection, but also for the industry, as I understand it. I suspect that's why a lot of people are putting their two cents in on how this bit of "business" has been conducted.
You kidding me? Kim is to blame. She didn’t take care the dress as she should have.
Hang on. So Kim K wore the _actual_ dress previously worn by Marilyn Monroe? Not a duplicate? Well, I mean, _sure,_ she might bear _part_ of the blame for wanting to take it out of _storage_ and treat it like the same piece of _clothing_ it used to be. I'm surprised it held together at _all._ But Ripley's bears the _larger_ part of the blame for _letting_ her do that with something that hasn't been worn in more than 60 _years_ instead of giving her the design and telling her to fashion a _duplicate_ that's actually tailored to her _dimensions._
The worst part is Kim had a replica made, but she INSISTED that she just absolutely had to wear the real dress. Her ego and vanity are through the roof.
This feels like "Rich people's problems".🙄🙄🙄
@@sennataylor592 In the end it is mostly Ripley’s fault, because they had the ability to put their foot down and refuse, and did not do it. It’s quite likely that Kim wasn’t aware of the damage she could cause to it, as conserving tends not to be a hot topic. Even if she knew that it would be damaged, Ripley are the owners, and bear the biggest burden of guilt.
This is not coming from a Kardashian stan, btw, I could not be less interested in them and their privileged shenanigans.
@@haveanicedayiguess she herself admits she didnt fit and had to lose 13 pounds in a short time. She knew the dress would be damaged for sure!
It was literally sewn while worn by Marilyn Monroe. Why anyone thought to OK this was absurd
Why wasn’t Marilyn’s dress in the Smithsonian in the first place? It’s certainly iconic enough to be there. And they’d certainly not be about to loan it out to anyone. Big Fat Fail all the way around.
The dress was privately owned and auctioned off. Ripley's was the highest bidder.
@@SonoranStormChaser this is why we should be increasing the funding of legitimate museums
I was wondering 🤔 the same thing! The Smithsonian was at fault for allowing Kim K. to wear a 60 year old dress!
@@arethawalker1724 the point of the comment is that it wasn’t in the Smithsonian. It’s owned by Ripley’s
💯%
Thanks Tevor. I am Rwandan and also Canadian that actually moved to Rwanda and I am happyyyyyyyyyy and their lost really. Better be somewhere they want u and know the struggle of being refugees than anywhere I am not wanted.
I study fashion and textile, so I can say that the Monroe dress is fragile due to it's age. Most likely it is made of natural fiber such as silk with crystal applique. It's why antiques are always handled with special gloves, temperature control show cases. The company obviously don't have such knowledge of natural fabric, silk for example deteriorate over time because it's protein. The crystals weight the dress down. For a person to wear an antique dress almost 8 hours or more, the body temperature, movements etc for sure will damage the dress. They'll need antique textile experts to restore the dress. The ripped is permanent, just like trying to patch a torn paper,it's irreversible.
I don’t think she wore it fit 8 hours. She had a replica dress that she changed into. Of course she should just have worn that replica dress in the first place. Still the situation could have been much worse.
She did stumbled too. I was cringing to imagining the rips it make
@@MissCaraMint It is not just the situation of wearing the dress. It's about what the whole thing is telling us, what it represents. It's about someone just taking whatever she wants because who she is and because her money, despite being something that's part of American history. Idk, i thought north Americans were the ones complaining whenever someone accused them of not having a "culture". And then stuff like this happens, lol
My wife competed as a skater. She made her own dresses. The rhinestones are sewn on, not appliqué. Still, they have to go out and sweep the rink because there’s rhinestones everywhere. They pop off when you move.
@@blanqui2040 exactly!!!
Oh, for goodness sakes. If a Kardashian can't afford to have a duplicate dress made instead of risking an iconic one, who can? Only her ego demanded she do otherwise. Why does she get so much attention in the first place?
You made an excellent opinion @callmeGailyn
A white woman with black women's features. Whether it's the posterior or lips ethnic hairstyles (Kardashians) or the voice (Adele), society seems to associate such things as groundbreaking when anyone but black people do them.
As Barbara Walter's said in an interview to all Kardashian women
"You really have no talent"
Haha
She did have a replica made. She wore it most of the night. But she HAD to wear the real thing for the red carpet
@@abbigailcarr2725 or she COULD HAVE worn literally ANY OTHER DRESS
Kim never should have worn the dress, not just because it's a piece of history but also it didn't fit. She could have easily made a replica which I think would have gotten her much better press AND wouldn't have destroyed something historically significant.
We NEED to be keenly aware that Trump has many Supporters who would crawl over broken glass to vote for him, so if the Left 'sometimes just dont feel like going to vote' is a real bruh-moment. Also, many dont use valueable info-sources like Some More News, Telltale Fireisde Chat and Telltale Unfiltered. Also: support Science-Channel and Conspiracy-Debunk-youtubers (for obvious reasons!!
"I can choose numbers, I'm a college graduate!"--Dulce I love this show.
Ripley’s believe it or not is not a museum, it’s a walk-in game show. I’ve never taken that place seriously, I can’t believe they held such an important piece and I’m not even surprised that they just genuinely gave it away to anybody with money. Very on brand for Ripleys believe it or not.
You made an excellent liz Lemon
Well and that's the problem. We're in this situation Because Ripley's is not a real museum. Real museums have International rules and agreements about how that dress was supposed to be handled. Unfortunately, the dress was sold at auction out of private collection and Ripley's was the company with the money to buy it. The whole situation is upsetting, but at least it's bringing to light the work of Fashion Historians and Preservationists and generally making people aware. KK will now always be the woman who partially destroyed Marilyn's gown.
Ahh I see what you did at the end there. Very clever.
Yeah. They should have never gotten their hands on it but unfortunately Marilyn’s estate landed in the hands of someone who never knew her or cared about her and she sold all of her stuff to the highest bidder. Disgusting. Shame on Anna Mizrahi
Unfortunately Ripleys owns quite a few museum worthy pieces.
I mean.. garment historians literally warned everyone this would happen
Everyone with a basic knowledge of how textiles work already knew KK damaged it by wearing it...
@@Mhidraum absolutely.. but when you learn more about the dress, you learn why THIS particular dress was one of the worst historical garments she could've worn. Like as a layperson, I could tell it was a bad idea, I have some basic sewing knowledge, but then I started listening to garment historians/preservers and finding out about why this dress is so delicate...... it's such a slap in the face
And you can get "zip panels" that cover the part that doesn't quite zip all the way up. They look better than just not having it zipped and she could absolutely afford to have one made.. but still, covering it up is still your best bet, because it just won't look right, it does more affect the fit and flow than the actual look of the zipper lol
Yeah, it was their dress. It's still just a dress.
@@Mhidraum I disagree. Kk didn’t. Ripley did by lending it, to be Worn / sat in/ sweated in; by a Human being!
Then complains n whines! Next time Ripley don’t lend out historical pieces to be worn, or insure the heck out of them! But quit the WhineFest
The issue I mostly have with the Rwanda situation is that it isn't likely to change anything for the refugee crisis.
Aside from the fact it's blatantly the UK trying to avoid its responsibilities as a nation when it comes to refugees and asylum seekers and taking care of them themselves (which they're already doing an abysmal job of anyway), the plan is for people who arrive in the UK illegally to then get deported to Rwanda for processing, so what?
It still means you need to get to the UK first to get deported from there in the first place, the smugglers and traffickers don't care where those who pay them end up, they'll have the money, and as far as they're concerned they did their job of getting them to the UK illegally, if they're subsequently deported to Rwanda that isn't their problem.
And from the reports I've seen where journalists asked refugees themselves if the plan would make them think twice about trying to get to the UK, it doesn't look like it will deter them from attempting to cross over either, given the idea is being deported to Rwanda so they can have their application processed to then go to the UK legally once their migration status is sorted (or come up with a plan B for if the home office says no), which means the smugglers and traffickers are still going to get their money and keep doing it.
I can understand why people might take it as Europeans being racist and assuming Rwanda isn't going to have basic amenities, but it's also far more than that, it is another showy plan from the UK government with no real substance that isn't going to work just to try and desperately cling onto power.
It's also fairly racist from the UK government, because we all know it's predominantly aimed at refugees from the Middle East, I doubt it's going to be an option for refugees from Ukraine.
The UK has no responsibilities to accept refugees.
And even if you disagree, just compare the number of refugees the UK has already taken in compared to the likes of China, Japan, Korea, or, literally the entire African continent.
Also, Middle Easterners aren't a race.
You are absolutely right. …. I doubt it would apply to the refugees from Ukraine. (Honestly i am just happy they beat us to it, because this has been the plan from Denmark for a few years, but they are still working out the legal angle, on how to not only deport to there but also make it into a processing center. So people do not cross over and enter the continent to get to the country they plan. ….. but we have distinguished between the migrants and the refugees, and both should be treated equally, it should not be so in a perfect world, but the number of poor migrants absolutely outnumber the refugees) but now England came first so i would think we are leaning back and taking a look at what is the problem according to the court. And then adding that to the complete law that will be passed at some point with refugees/migrants from outside Europe)
@@OC-CPA 1) nations do have some responsibility to at least keep them alive long enough to process the application, they don't have to accept the application, I never said that they did, but they do have to process it and the refugees need to be somewhere while they wait, it's why there are detention centres in the first place.
Deporting them to Rwanda for processing isn't going to help the human trafficking problem, it isn't going to deter refugees, it is however going to be a great way for the UK to put the refugees out of sight and out of mind, thus shirking responsibilities, or at least being able to blame Rwanda for any further scandal on the conditions refugees are kept in.
2) I never said Middle Easterners were a race, just that before Russia invaded Ukraine, the refugee crisis was coming from that geographical area, and people from the Middle East, strangely enough, don't tend to be white. The majority of Ukrainians on the other hand are white. Yes racism plays into it.
3) The UK has already taken far less refugees than they SAID they would take. Don't say you're going to take X many people and then not take X many people. And if you're going down that road, look at how many the UK has taken compared to France or Germany, every country takes in different amounts depending on their policies, the people in charge, and the mood of the population, I'm not angry about that. I'm angry about the broken promises and the empty solutions
@@mortyjansen399 That is true, it is important to distinguish between refugees and migrants, but tbh, the media has been using the two terms so interchangeably it can be hard to discern the truth sometimes.
Like people fleeing Syria during the war there were called both refugees and migrants, when most people fleeing that area just wanted to escape a warzone, same happened with other countries.
I guess I just don't really understand how people would risk their lives and come to Europe illegally just to come work in Europe. Just because I don't understand why though doesn't mean they shouldn't be treated with basic human dignity. Something that's been a bit lacking lately in many places.
@@hannahsmart4494
1) Nobody is dying because they're being sent to Rwanda. That was literally Trevor's point. It's not like the UK was shipping them off to North Korea or Yemen.
2) So? Culture is a thing, and Brits clearly share more culturally in common with Ukrainians than Iranians, Pakistanis, Iraqis, Afghans, or Bangladeshis (who were the top five nationalities for UK asylum applications in 2016). More similar cultures means easier assimilation and less cultural friction. Countries have a right to be selective with their immigration.
3) Politicians make empty promises all the time. Regardless of what some politician said in the past, the nation's best interests should always be prioritized when possible. The UK isn't obligated to do anything just because France or Germany did it. The UK is an independent nation.
🤣 Oooh Trevor! As a Rwandese I must say that you made my day! I guess we get to keep our kidney then🤦🏾♀️
"We also got racists white ppl you left them behind!"
I spit out my invisible coffee ☕ lol
Yeah
"Waiting for a developed kidney" trevor always finds a way to show africa that they don't see on tv
Thankful to have Trevor accurately representing Africa to the world 🌍
Africa is a nice country, just hope they dont end up behaving like blacks in America
Lol me too
WITH THE MONEY K.K. HAS EASILY SHE COULD HAVE HAD A REPLICA MADE VS. WEARING A HISTORICAL ITEM: MATCHING MARILYN IS NOT POSSIBLE ANYWAYS.
She did have a replica she only wore thie MM dress for the picture she changed once she was at the top of the stairs
@@eliza9011 vanity at its worst.
@@eliza9011 But that's weird that just that one instance she lost some crystals and damaged it. She should have worn the replica all night.
She wanted to compare herself with Marilyn Monroe she wants people to say she look better than Marilyn Monroe in that dress and that's what kim really wants LoL 🤣🤣🤣
That is why I don’t understand why she wanted to wear a dress that was sawn on other woman so it fit perfectly to that woman’s body.
A very selfish act on her part. Shame on her. That dress was in a controlled environment for a reason - it’s vintage not wash & wear.
Those Ks aren't too smart.
I liked Dulce's part here. Great stuff. She actually did her job, calling the numbers.
Thanks For Standing Up For a small country # Rwanda 🇷🇼 that is trying to make a difference on the African continent
They are not volunteering to take the refugees out of human kindness. They are being paid millions of pounds by the UK government.
They're also taking £120 million ($155 million) plus operational costs, it's not out of the goodness of their heart.
#Rwandaiskilling😡😡🤬
Rwanda deserves better. Making deals with U.K. is always a bad idea
It's a dictatorship.
You can’t wear a size 4 dress with a size 18 derrière. Facts matter.
Faaaaccccts
Marilyn was not a size 4
@@kimb6974 I think they were just exaggerating Kim K’s extreme body measurements vs Marilyn’s 🤔
@Bjk g “tHis iS uNnAccEpTablE” it’s not that serious fr.
Size matters!
“They took a 2022 a$$ and put it in a 1960’s dress” 😂🤣😅
Who’s gonna tell her those aren’t sequins. Those are Swarovski Crystals. 😂 Dulce never ceases to make me laugh. I love her so much.
I’m wondering … how did Kim think she was going to fit into Marilyn’s dress? There’s gotta be a difference of at least 2 or 3 dress sizes between them. Maybe Kim forgot what size she wears… or no one told her what size Marilyn’s dress is 🤔😂
She went on a special diet to fit and used lots of shape wear. Also I don’t think the back ever did close properly.
Shes en intitled cow who destroyed ALOT OF PEOPLES hearts.
who cares?
What I wonder is why the owner didn’t freaking CHECK before they let her have it. It’s sad about the dress, but the owner is an idiot.
We're all wondering that. I know I did, given the thiccness involved. But if the custodians of the dress didn't see her wearing it as a problem then it's not ours to care about really.
Ridley’s shouldn’t have loaned the dress, but Kim had no right asking to borrow it in the first place. She has access to just about everything. This stunt earned her a lot of press, but she clearly has no conscious or respect for historical objects.
Perhaps Ripleys got paid for loaning the dress out! We will not know how their arm was bent!
She has replica of the dress, she wore it the rest of the night. Idk why she insisted to still wear the original in the red carpet tho, and basically destroying the og dress.
I blame Ripley’s way more than Kardashian … she’s unlikely to understand the physical impacts to the dress, but as a conservators of the dress Ripley’s should have know better. (And they totally got just as much press out of the stunt, if not more.)
@@aubreysong because she is full of herself.
Narcissists usually don't respect anyone or anything else.
A few thoughts on the Rwanda piece,
First, this a violation of the spirit of asylum, including the Dublin Conventions (EU agreement to require those seeking asylum to apply in the first country they arrive) as it off-shores migration to a "third safe country."
Rwanda is specifically under scrutiny from various human rights defenders for the imprisonment of Paul Rusesabagina, the manager of the famed Hotel Rwanda.
For asylum seekers, choosing the UK is a decision composed of a plethora of reasons, and it is inhumane to continue a cross-continental version of Australia's off-shoring practices.
Anti-human trafficking/people smuggling efforts are often used to cover-up ulterior motives from authorities. These activities do occur and migrants are in danger, but for the most part agencies like the Home Office use this as a guise to cover up an insane practice. In other words, if your concern is human traffickers, you protect the victims by sending them to a country they have no connections to and declare them safe ? Is this punishing the victims to send a message to the perpetrators ? The EU's anti-traffikcing rhetoric is fraught with problematic arguments and motives, and studies show that practices like off-shore detention do not deter migration. Also, the mental abuse on migrants is often worse and makes them eventually eligible for asylum by virtue of their torturous conditions. Finally, no study has conclusively demonstrated that such efforts has stopped human trafficking/people smuggling. In the case taking place in Africa, it is often the criminalisation of transporting people who consented and asked for assistance in using safe routes. The criminalisation drove them underground and leads them to take more dangerous routes and studies have shown that this increases the death rate and makes migration more dangerous than it was before securitisation.
Lastly, as for the "legality" and "legitimacy" of these flights, court challenges reduced it to one person, so that flight was for one person. How is this considered to be protective if UK courts found legal challenges in the idea of the practice?
In summary, the UK is openly violating the spirit of its international commitments to provide asylum to those seeking protection from persecution, the tone-deaf choice of Rwanda ignores current controversies through the imprisonment of Paul Rusesabagina, the anti-trafficking argument is superficial at best and hypocritical at worst, and legality of this practice is being challenged domestically in UK courts even before the European Convention of Human Rights (from which the UK is a party and original writer)
- Fan of Trevor Noah and French/Pacific Islander student of Human Rights in Paris
The Kardashians are so full of themselves. Seriously who thinks to wear something like that? That's how high she thinks of herself. Ripley is just as at fault for letting her.
I am glad I waited to the end before commenting on Kim Kardashian trying to fit into Marylin Monroe's dress. Dulce Sloan covered it perfectly.
Totally 😂
😁😅
Trevor: Most archivists wear gloves when dealing with historic artifacts to avoid getting oils on it. What she did was outrageous.
2 different bodies. That was dumb; make a replica
That is done with very expensive artifacts. Sure it is a piece of history but the future decides whether the history is worth preserving or not. It takes resources and touch ups to preserve history. Also it has no relevance to the average person.
@@MP-qb6lv they did, yet they still wore the dress
@@ulrichraymond8372 Apparently to Kimmy (& subsequently to her followers) there is still relevance to That Dress or Kimmy wouldn't have bothered wearing it. Kimmy likes to be NOTICED. Just wearing any old dress, by any old designer, wouldn't have gotten Kimmy the NOTICE she wanted. I hope all her followers will finally realize how worthless she really is, so much so, that she had to wear a HISTORIC DRESS to make sure she was NOTICED, at all. Ugh, I hate that whole family & the people who give them any relevance.
Hey Kimmy, did you pass the California Bar Exam yet?
Sharon … FYI… There are a lot of fashion archivists who don’t wear gloves when handling historic textiles because (1) they block your sense of touch enough that it’s much harder to tell when you are putting too much strain on the fragile fabric and (2) gloves create more friction than clean hands and are less likely to snag the fabric.
Also, I totally agree that it was outrageous that she was allowed to wear it!
Trevor, you really missed the mark on the Rwanda deportation issue. Deporting asylum seekers to a different country is an abdication of responsibility and almost always leads to worse outcomes for the asylum seekers (see Australia's awful Nauru detention camps). In addition, it's illegal for the UK to do so under the Refugee treaty --it violates the non refoulement clause. And finally, Rwanda specifically is currently headed by a dictator, and the regime has convicted a number of asylum seekers for "offences" like speaking to human rights agencies. Human Rights Watch has more info. Even setting that massive issue aside, Rwanda currently has very few application processing officers, which means that the asylum seekers could be stuck in limbo for years, unable to get jobs or move on with their lives.
That said, I do think moving the asylum seekers from Libya to Rwanda might be measurably better for them -- Libyan detention camps are operated like prisons with a number of people already murdered. But again, it's a bandaid on a gaping wound that's been allowed to fester due to the world's richest countries choosing to look away.
Rwanda cannot be compared to the Nauru and Manus Islands. That was literally putting asylum seekers in prison. Rwanda isn't an unpopulated island in the middle of nowhere, it's a large country.
You know the Arab emirates are headed by dictators but you still drool over them right
Would like to know where you are from and Have you ever been to Rwanda????
Some of you people ramble on about dictators but ignore the fact that these countries are better than most countries across the world. Majority of their people are thriving compared to other places.
Libya was also under a ‘dictator’ yet it was one of the most economically developed countries in Africa. Now it’s filled with detention camps due to NATO and organization which GB is a part of!!!
What Trevor missed was that the UK should keep those refugees cause they kept quiet and let their Allies destroy Libya and several other Arab Nations. Heck they even participated.
We ALL know the immigration problem in Europe got worse after the death of Gadaffi and the Arab Spring. Even terrorism across the world got worse after US invasion in the Middle East.
They made the problem they should keep it!!!
Trevor doesn't understand the UK Government deportation situation. The big thing is that government can't be trusted. They tried to deport elderly people who were living there for 40 plus years because their country of origin was not UK, even though they were asked to come from common wealth countries to help with rebuilding after WW2. They are called the Windrush people. It is hypocritical because Priti Patels parents are also migrants so for her to come up with this outsourcing idea is kind of disturbing. People are not really saying that Rwanda is a terrible place, the main issue is the UK government not helping these people but trying to off load the problem somewhere else, far away where these people won't probably be checked on. Out of sight out of mind, we've seen how things like this are done badly like in Australia and Christmas island and even Calais. Rwandans aren't doing it to be nice either but because they are getting paid. Now the UK government is suggesting to electronically tag these human beings. This was always about getting POC out of UK. It's all kinds of messed up and not a solution.
The Daily Show being really super-creative with its format. I like it a lot. Instead of “correspondents” they have traffic/weather/lotto for commentary on the news. I like it. really clever.
Me too! Love it!
and stock market !
I have to agree. I am captivated.
Agreed, I am a Trumper and I like to tolerate Trevor unlike most left wing mainstream B.S. you people call entertainment. I can bearly tolerate S.N.L anymore because comedy is so offensive to left wing politics/or peoples feelings and they are themselves to dumb to realize they are being attacked from within the party they support.
Yes very interesting
How hard would it have been for Kim to hire a team to construct a replica of the dress? No one would have known the difference.
You made an excellent opinion @Ayesha shakir
She actually had a substitute that she changed into later in the night.
She did, she wanted to wear the original though
Exactlyyyyyyy
I agree! It was her ego and status that got her in that iconic dress. Such a disservice to a historical icon.
What happens when you stretch a gown 6 sizes bigger and convince your self it fit ? Aren't you more worried of what ppl might say, should you happen to tear out of it ? IT'S A MARILYN DRESS 👗 ONLY FOR MARILYN... no one can do what she did, beauti is admired and talked about when only one wears it...
She could barely walk in that dress or get up the steps.
Ripley’s should be ashamed for letting her wear it!!! What made her think she could actually fit the dress in the first place????
“You know that dress didn’t fit” 😂😂😂 I was dying
Trevor is the best, I wasn't really sure about him when Jon Stewart first picked him to lead The Daily Show but man Trevor proves he's the best in the business every day!
I'm still lost at why they would even give her the original dress.
@@strange4change_6 That's absolutely baffles me
@@strange4change_6 ikr, they should never have left it out of their sight and taken it back once the replica was made.
The moment Kim slipped her lifted cheeks into that dress, it was no longer Maryln Monroe's. It belonged in a museum, not on someone else's body.
No respect at all from Kim and the Ripley organisation . The Met gala should have banned her before showing up on the red carpet !
💀
"numbers have existed for thousands of years, i didn't make them up" made me gigglesnort
"Congratulations mummy, you just won lotto!" 😅😂😂😂😂
The one thing I don’t get about the Kim Kardashian thing with Marilyn Monroe’s dress is why bother? She had a replica made, it would have been wiser if she stated she was given the approval to wear it but declined out of respect. And people probably would have congratulated her about that! Then again not expecting anything about person who wanted to market her skims as kimonos originally before facing backlash.
why congratulate her on something any rational person would have done? if I had the money I would only wear the replica and return the dress once the dress was made.
Because some people have weird obsessions with Marylin. Kim jumped at the chance because the just the idea that she and Marylin wore the same thing was too much for her to resist. Never mind that Marylin herself never wanted anyone els to wear it.
Rwanda was my favorite country. Nicest people. Beautiful landscape. I would rather be there than London. It has the most reliable internet now on top.
StarLink(TM) agrees.
Not to mention the weather and scenery are better in Rwanda!
Rwanda is also effectively a dictatorship, has a terrible human rights record, and is actively destabilizing other countries in the region. Oh, and they kidnapped the protagonist of Hotel Rwanda from another country, tortured him and there's no hope of a fair trial.
There are functioning democracies in Africa, but Rwanda is not one of them.
I'm sure you're an African humiliating another African country. No one wants to see an African country rise to power, but it's unfortunate that even Africans strive to prevent any country from developing and making a difference in Africa. If you're talking about human rights and you still think European countries are the ones who follow them, you should reconsider. You can't forget what they did to Africans centuries ago during the colonial period, and how they continue to destroy African countries today! Just relax and let an African country make a change for once... FYI, every powerful country in the world violets human rights.
Sooo no different from the UK and America. Actually sounds better. Thanks for the promotion.
I dont understand how they could lend out a collectible like that... You should not be allowed to do that... Like are we allowed to rent the David sculpture for backyard garden parties?? No.
Agreed it should be like that however you when you have money and fame few things are out of your reach.
“…. Most of them didn’t drawn …” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I love how she just calling the numbers at random without actually the machine picking the numbers so you can then call them out. Lotto has never been easier
Coz she still thinks maybe that counting last time was wrong and he „is actually“ the 46th president instead of biden
@@DGHF what?! The heck is you talking about bro I'm talking about dulce it has nothing to do with the election
I love the joke too
I love that I saw that in the video too.
WOW THANKS FOR EXPLAINING THE JOKE
Ripley should’ve just given her the replica without telling her it’s a replica. Poor choice on their part and not surprising on hers. She has no understanding of culture and history therefore always appropriating it for her selfish needs.
Can we get a compilation of all of the funny middle names that Trevor has used on Trump and Biden???😅
Orange Man, Deranged,
I love Trevor for saying exactly what I was thinking about the refugee situation 🤣🤣
Leave it to a Kardashian to destroy something truly iconic.
Yep
Turns out it was a fake news story. Ripley's announced the dress was not damaged by Kim and was returned in the same condition as it was received. An apology is deserved but not expected.
@@IKRico-jg3ej: you believe the ripley's statement? that's like believing trump about the election. maybe let's ask an objective third party?
@@peterg5383 You are way too invested in the conspiracies of a freakin' dress. Focus on a conspiracy that matters...Trump Sedition is real.
@@IKRico-jg3ej: i'm not "invested in the conspiracies of a freakin' dress" at all. i'm invested in debunking bad reasoning - you're a case study.
Bet UK didn't have Ukrainian refugees going to Rwanda.
Didn’t they refuse to take them in at all?
@@FuzzyKittenBoots I'd heard they're having some issues with abusive hosts, so that indicates that Ukrainian refugees were, in fact, taken in. Which is wonderful, they need it...but it's still racist AF.
Ukraine is in Europe.
Well noted.
Might not be. if they know how to behave in a different country.
"Most of them didn't drown." Except Jason. Poor Mrs. Voorhees. Watch out Noah. 😆🤣
Kim Kardashian of all people should know that if it doesn't fit, you must, a, quit.
Could Kim not have just gotten an exact replica that was tailored for her body like 💀
What's worse is that she did. She wore the replica at the party. She only wore the original on the red carpet.
@@auqustfire that's so weird ....😑
the original was open from the waist down in back.....That's why she had the faux white stole she had wrapped around her to hide the horrible sight.
so ridiculous! she was hoisted up a few steps then was whisked away to put on her replica dress...which fit her oversized fake caboose.
.. And "who lives in Africa" 😂😂😂😂
Giving Kim the dress is like giving a kid the Mona Lisa and letting them draw all over it…
Exactly!
It's both Ripley's and Kim's fault. Kim had the money, power, and common sense. No one made her wear it. She chose to wear a historical garment to an art museum's fundraiser. Ripley's was irresponsible, but Kim Kardashian is an incredibly powerful American billionaire. She knew what she was doing.
(the lotto bit was hilarious though)
Crystals made by a famous fashion designer not the same as sequins.
“Never forget those who have ‘wronged’ them” is a main characteristic of malignant narcissism.
Narcissism garners SUCCESS ask any billionaire how they became successful and l guarantee you THEY THEY THOUGHT ONLY OF THEMSELVES!
That's psychology 101#
You made an excellent opinion @Andrew Johnson
" I can choose numbers, I'm a college graduate."
"Numbers have existed for thousands of years, I'm not making up numbers."
Even a middle school graduate would know lol .
Perhaps Kim and her collaborator felt she should replace Marilyn...As if to say “I deserve the same adoration...”.🥳 It was meant to create controversy and keep her in the limelight. Celebrities must stay relevant.
"We have to interupt the business model of the gangs" 😂 😂 just lowkey a way of being like "we don't wanna take any more immigrants".
That man does not have a way with words.
Around here #45 is the Mongolian Beef combo, and #46 is the Orange Chicken.
It seems to me #45 should be the Orange Chicken...
@@hkrug666 I thought about changing my post before your reply. I can't disagree.
Trevor as a camp counselor is the basis of the Friday 13th remix! 😱
How’d they manage to get KK into that dress and get the zipper up? Marilyn didn’t have a big honking rear end.
Trevor: "Most of them didn't drown"
Crowd: (it's a perfectly normal statement)
He is absolutely right about Rwanda! I've heard people being appalled because they think Rwanda is this terrible war-stricken country. Rwanda is one of the most developed countries in Africa and is very clean and organised. Yes, the principle of sending refugees to another country is morally ambiguous but honestly I wouldn't be too upset about living in Rwanda!
NOT REFUGEES!!!!
Stop bandying around this word. These are economic immigrants. If they were truly refugees fleeing for their lives, why leave the safety of Europeans countries? Why not apply for asylum there?
Why risk the journey to UK when you've already reached safety?
@@karenrumney5210 let them stay in their area. Europe is also full. They aren’t refugees they are able bodied young men who seek fortune and better life. I can’t blame them, my dad did the same thing when he moved from North Africa to Europe. But the reality is reality and it’s full, and the people who come don’t make the society better ..
I have a Mexican friend who stayed in Rwanda for a whole month with his gf!
Waited for her to break into a breathy song of, “Happy Birthday…. Mr. President…” Was frightened for my eyes!
It really makes me sick that she even wore this dress…I remember when MM wore it to sing Happy Birthday to JFK… It was special and Kim is NOT!
She has the replica of the dress, why she had to wear the original tho?
Because she wanted to.
A bloated ego that matches her body?
But what if Ripley gave her another replica though, but told her it was the original? They must have known her thiccness wouldn't fit in.
Because someone said she could! I would also weir it if the ones that were supposed to take care of it told me I could...
@@MkurugenziMwenyekiti she’s not thick, it’s plastic 😂😂😂
The squid game reality show is eerie. It just shows how the theme of the show went over everyone’s head. Sad & scary.
It won't be about dangerous games anyway.
@@freespiritable They still missed the point.
They missed it. Honestly the first episode made it obvious. Every one after just went deeper in the pool
Bruh people legit thought it was criticizing Communism not Capitalism. People are dumb
It doesn't miss the point, it proves it. Themes don't pay the bills, yo.
Rwanda is super nice, all it was doing was helping these people. Keep it up Rwanda!!
Trevor being so silly, Mona Lisa and I would use tongue 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Your such a cutie!!!💕
It's unfortunate that _anyone_ even has to know who the Kardashians are.
For real… those self-absorbed idiots are treated like royalty. I just don’t understand their appeal.
Agreed
Indeed
She's famous for being famous. That is how shallow America has become.
To be fair the same thing could be said about almost all the royal families 💔 They are truly American royalty.
Actually real royal families have a symbolic role for the country where they reign. The queen of England represents tradition and history of the country.
Very strange to compare her with a family that became famous following a sextape leak . .
@@FuzzyKittenBoots .. no. Nooooo. Noooo. No. Just no.
1) UK’s royalty in comparison are at least incredibly educated, well-mannered and bring hope & healing awareness to many humanitarian causes… not just which Kardashin’s a** is biggest. 🙄🙄🙄🙄
2) again.. just NO.
💯
@@FuzzyKittenBoots yeah and it's still absurd but at least they have a history and a tradition. This is just another level.
Love the lotto lady, I need more of her energy in my life.
Thanks for standing up for small country like 🇷🇼🙌🏼
Messing up Monroe’s dress is F’d up.
Dude should never hare leant her jack. She has money she could've paid to get a replica made and wore that. Hope she has to pay for the damages. Who does that? Return something that they entrusted you to return as you picked it up as?
💯%
No one should have rented out that dress in the first place. The dress was an iconic dress and should only be on display, not worn! Ripley’s was the problem!
You made an excellent opinion @Sherita walker
i missed this set up so much....so happy its back
Trevor, you are the best. Thanks for the objective assessment of the news.
WHY was it so necessary for Kim Kardashian to wear Marilyn Monroe's dress?
Couldn't she had a replica made? The dress in question was made to Marilyn's exact measurements and was actually sewn into it BTW.
She DID have a replica MADE for her for the party. She wore THE dress for the five minutes of pictures on the red carpet.
@@universegirl1313 5min it's all it took
because she thinks she can do anything and ruin anything
We’ll I’m waiting for her to wear lady Ga GA’s original meat dress, I’m assuming it’s getting kinda ripe by now
@@universegirl1313 still...? It made no sense. Ah well.
I had a sequin dress for my Jr high prom & can confirm that you start with all sequins on the dress, but you don't end with it all on the dress.
Hahaha. Make sense especially the Kim. Part
Dulce is out here snatching wigs. 🤣🤣🤣 I can't!
I feel like the more you watch Dulce the funnier she gets, down to the point just her tone and smile alone have me screaming 😂 she don't even need to make a joke, I'm already on the floor 🤣
We NEED to be keenly aware that Trump has many Supporters who would crawl over broken glass to vote for him, so if the Left 'sometimes just dont feel like going to vote' is a real bruh-moment. Also, many dont use valueable info-sources like Some More News, Telltale Fireisde Chat and Telltale Unfiltered. Also: support Science-Channel and Conspiracy-Debunk-youtubers (for obvious reasons!!
Squid game wasnt just about the games - it was the drama too. It was the relationships and the stories behind the characters
It was also about the subtle undertones of capitalisms problems. All of that is lost in this new reality tv stuff. In actuality netflix is using squid games to make a reality tv show, a genre that is characterized by toxic consumerism, that goes against the entire moral message of the original show.
@@thekingofgaming7497 💯
When I heard Netflix was bringing back squid games, I was so excited. I am just now finding out it's going to be a reality show 😭😭😭
Still haven't watch that show...
@@thekingofgaming7497 exactly!
Dulce hits every time
0:13 take a shot everytime he says elections. I dare you
the fact that they allowed her to wear itmakes the problem on them
I blame Ripley's for it. They should not have the responsibility of an iconic piece of US history because they obviously didn't take that responsibility seriously. An historical artifact should be celebrity proof. Ripley's should not sell the dress, they should donate it to an actual museum. I'm sure they made plenty of money from letting Kim Kardashian use it, they should cut their loses and do the right thing.
Dulce looks beautiful. Love the dress!
Trevor my Dear, can't get enough of you.😘
I can't stop laughing. Love all the way from Saint Martin SXM.
EVERY Kardashian ruins EVERYTHING they come in contact with
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Like Trump.😊
Dulcé Sloan dress is fire!!!! Looking great!
The politicking in the US never ends does it? It must be so exhausting to be constantly barraged with the narcissistic BS!
Ripley's Believe it or Not is not a serious museum. Such direspect to Marilyn's legacy