Video

1) Anyone who doesn't hate the disbelief and shirk of the non muslims is not to be taken as an authority nor are they trustworthy. It is unacceptable to uphold or endorse the jewish or christian beliefs that oppose Islamic ones. Whether it be the trinity from the cross kissers, or angels that possess god's attributes in Judaism (angel who wrestled with Jacob). Anyone who doesn't enjoin good and forbid evil when it is apparent has failed to live according to the Quran and Sunnah that clearly stipulates this injunction and this requires public repentance. 2) We need to hear the methodology of this heretical charlatan so that we may thoroughly refute him and leave his face in the dirt. As it stands, hadith denial is unacceptable given the verse in the Quran (33:34) that commands the believers to recite the Quranic verses AND the Hikmah: “˹Always˺ remember what is recited in your homes of Allah’s revelations and ˹prophetic˺ wisdom.1 Surely Allah is Most Subtle, All-Aware” Aside from the Quran what else in the Islamic tradition can be described as “recited”? The hadith that we quote and narrate. So, hadith have a Quranic precedent and denying them categorically is unacceptable. Denying the methodology for hadith of orthodox Islam is also unacceptable because It is the most meticulous and thorough of all methodologies (assessing the reliability and memory and location and lineage of each person in the chain of a report at a level unparalleled across any of recorded human history) and because of its established veracity we accept them as authentic sayings, and within these authentic sayings is the hadith: Ibn Umar reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, Allah will not let my nation agree upon misguidance. The hand of Allah is over the united community.” Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2167. So straying from the orthodox community on the authentic hadith is problematic and not accepted 3) Homosexuality based on even liberal frameworks of morality is still immoral. 1st liberal framework; harm principle; do what you want as long as it doesnt harm anyone. Reconfiguring and damaging the anal passageway through sodomy is a harm to another person, as is the disproportionate production of STD's from homosexuals that is even equal with the production of std's from heterosexual people despite their demographic being a drop in the ocean compared to us heterosexuals. Therefore it is harmful and immoral. Furthermore, studies have shown that homosexual parents have detrimental effects on any children in academic, professional, and emotional fields. A particular example i'll give now is with daughters and their gay fathers, they're left with attachment issues, find it harder to depend on others, trust issues (Sirota 2009) so even the sociological impact is bad. 2nd liberal framework; Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperatives; "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” This means one should act only in a way that one would want everyone else to act, establishing a universal standard of behaviour. Universalising a practice and determining whether it would be beneficial or anarchical/dysfunctional. eg universalising robbery, if everyone were to rob then there'd be anarchy and also no one would want that done to them. Do the same with homosexuality; if everyone were to be homosexual then the human race's prevalence would be in jeopardy. Furthermore, the amount of disease would be pandemic level. Therefore it is anarchical and immoral. On these consequential grounds, there can be no valid contention to Islam’s disapproval of homosexuality. And you will find that it is the same with all Islamic injunctions; whether related to death sentence to apostates, executing adulterers, captivity, young marriages, colonisation. All of them, when looked at consequentially, are coherent and logically sound and justified. If there’s anyone with doubt about that then let’s address it. But what you don’t do is let these charlatans make their revisionist Islam look fair seeming. In conclusion, we Muslims believe that these things are right or wrong because Allah said so, even if there were no consequential justifications we’d still believe in them. Because Allah is the source of good and bad not inconsistent hypocritical liberals who pick and choose what harms are allowed and disallowed in society, as we’ve just seen with their allowance of harmful homosexuality.

if you are more manlier than aisha debate christian prince !

I watched the clip of him debating shaykh uthman on numerology and the moment he said he believed in numerology, I immediately recognized he's an extreme deviant. On top of that, the Hadith rajection(fully or partially) is just another embarrassment. This guy shouldn't be taken seriously at all.

Who takes these idiots seriously?

He threw Aisha under the bush on fresh and fit and said she was 18! basically saying Aisha's own words are unreliable

didn’t he ashamed him self he humiliated multiple times he is westing his time he will never find asingle mistake ALLAH has perfected this religion and we will spread and defend by his will ALLAHU AKBAR

Great video, Jake, but the only way to really shut Sam down is to debate him in real time. The Christian apologists think he’s invincible and will continue to do so as long as there’s not a single video of him being beaten in an actual debate. I personally think DR Ali Atai could do it but he’s retired from debating. I’ve seen him cover every point Sam’s made in his online lectures.

My suspicious about Sulaiman Ahmed were raised when he endorsed the white nationalist Nick Fuentes tweet that Hamas is was as bad as Likud.

Jake my bro u the man.

Whenever in doubt about how to recite Quran, hear Minshawy or Hosary: The correct recitation with English subtitles: czcams.com/video/cpJKSK1Oevc/video.html.

Is he a qadiyani ?

Just curious, wat do they get trying all sorts of these nonsense? I mean, there wouldn’t be any muslims tats gonna believe n convert for sure.

He doesnt really care whether he speaks the truth or not. As long as he has his audience which takes all he says at face value, he will continue with his content and say whatever nonsense they will buy

Barak Allahu feekum

I like how hadith rejectors, who claim that they're simply being objective when criticizing ahadith, always have views that conveniently align with modern day liberalism. Islam for them was basically liberalism revealed over 1400 years over, before the "evil scholars" turned it anti-liberal. It's laughable because heretics and "skeptics" existed throughout Islamic history. Yet, none of them came to the liberal views they come to. They're not the first "enlightened and brave" people in 1400 years to go against mainstream beliefs. You had people like Ibn Arabi and Ibn Sina expressing heretical beliefs regardless of people's criticisms, yet none of them were hadith rejectors like them or none of them questioned the ahadith about Aisha's age. Maybe because it has nothing to do with objectivity, but simply convenience. Almost as if the views of these hadith rejectors are a product of modernity and due to their "ickiness" with traditional positions that are anti-liberal rather than objectivity. They accuse traditional views as being products of their time, yet the irony is that's what their own views seem like; a product of modern times.

Mr No logic making arguments against Islam is like watching someone with leg braces falling down a flight of stairs 😂😂😂

18:02 one more Jahl and ignorance of “Shaykh” Sulaiman spotted. He mentions Ibn Al-Arabi on top and then Ibn Arabi down below. Both are completely different people with diametrically opposing beliefs. Lol

Hadith is sunnah it’s so important. It’s our deen.

SubhanAllah I didn’t know he was Sulaiman was Quranist. Glad you made the video

He definitely can read Urdu which is written in arabic text but don't know any arabic.He is just a Quack and Charlatan.😂😂😂😂😂

Well, Muhammad is prophesized in the Old Testament here is evidence "Muhammad ﷺ in the Book of Daniel" by many prophets one message.

I have no clue how this guy got himself "appointed" as an unofficial spokesperson for our community. I've heard this guy say some bizarre stuff that has absolutely no basis in the deen, to the contrary. As Jake has pointed out it's not even clear that this Sulaiman guy is a part of Ahlul Sunnah wa Jamaah.

THANKS a lot for this video. It is important to expose these people. I don't know much about him but always had a bad feeling about him. Plus the misinformation he is spreading on X.

MR no logic 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

Do these people have humiliation kink? Seriously, these Christians can't have enough

#GazaGrifters #GazaParasites

salam jake , what sect do you believe in

jake can you make some videos against christian prince?

Jake left this debate with his tail between his legs no doubt dubs all around for Jay Dyer

No! actually Shifaa is philosophical - and Qanoon is medical

Thank you jake .. just my doubt increases. Cause most those on Twitter are not sunni , they are either pro Russians or shiates or quranist liberals.

When he was reading arabic i was praying that he would prounce some words rightly , so that nobody would blame you Brother jake for refuting such person .. but thankfully he made some sound arabic . 😂😂

This is so disgusting. We are sick of those people.

This Sulaiman is not even an actual Shaykh. To get that title you have to 7 yrs of Islamic and Arabic studies before deciding to be an imam, scholar or missionary/debater. He has done an MA in Philisophy but that is not legitimate study on its own. Whereas if you look at brother Mohammad Hijab, Hijab lists his qualifications and when Hijab completes his study he can then be an Islamic scholar

Thank you for addressing this Jake

Finally man , our ummah needs people like you man , Today, our ummah is led by emotions, not facts !!

I remember a time where Piers Morgan show starting being no-go zone for Muslim for its unfair treatment and this guy kept on tweeting to the point of begging, some big Muslim like Hamza tzortzis (I think..?) had to tell him to stop I don't care how vocal he is on X but to beg to be on a show and say nasty stuff about those who gone on it before and tell them how horrible they thinking you could do better is just pathetic and incredibly stupid

That guy was begging, on twitter, to be on Piers' show.

Sulaiman Ahmed and Shoaib are both Qadyanies ; not believing in Hadith , Mohammed PBUH NOT the last messenger and Jesus PBUH will never come back to earth at end times!!!!

I don't even trust or take any information from him like when he made a mistake by saying Malaysia has a President although we are a Constitutional Monarchy country. Imagine something as simple as that, he made a mistake but when someone pointed it out he still didn't correct himself. And for this case it's a big mistake. Really glad you're exposing him especially on his deviancy.

Assalamualaikum warahmatullah, may Allah bless you. I was seeing a lot of his tweets but didn’t know who he was jazakAllahukhair bringing this to light.

I don't know this sulaiman ahmed guy, but I don't think Dr. Shoaib Ahmed Malik is a hadith rejector or something (I'm not either). As far as I know he's an Ash'ari so he holds that Ahaad hadith are probable not certain (ظنية الثبوت) which is ,i don't care if you don't like it, the preponderant opinion (جمهور الأصوليين والمتكلمين، الأئمة الثلاثة أبي حنيفة ومالك والشافعي ومحققي الحنابلة), and this doesn't reject the rulings or Sharia. So yes hadith are not as reliable as the quran that's a fact and the prominent opinion by scholars. As an example, don't you remember what was Ibn Taymiyya response to Shiites on the Mahdi hadith?! إن هذا من أخبار الآحاد ، فكيف يثبت به أصل الدين الذي لا يصح الإيمان إلا به؟ Also stop calling non-atharis (as you call them) deviants. I don't know what's your academic qualifications on Islamic theology, but from some of your videos on Aqedah I don't think you fully understand the Ash'ari or even Ibn Taymiyya's position. You need more study before talking about this stuff, and untill then Just stick to Christian theology you're qualified in that.

He can be easy friends with no logic. Which Islamic school did he went to to call himself sheikh.

I've seen this guy on twitter, didn't know he claimed he was a religious scholar. Definitely won't be following him from now on as his beliefs seem problematic at the least.

Thank you very much for enlightening us....We thought he was a sheikh......

Good video brother, May Allah bless you and accept your efforts.

Jazakallah khairun brother

the moment I heard his Quran reading, at 10:00 I knew he was working on an anti-Islam secret agenda jazakAllahhukhairan brother Jack for exposing these " MODREN JAHILS"

this guy only accepts hadith that goes with his modern liberal moral framework A MODERN HERETIC.

For any nonsense there always will be audience and followers.