WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 11 - Judge Schroeder Reads Jury's First Question
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 11. 2021
- WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK WITH LIVE TRIAL COMMENTARY HERE lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
Live Coverage: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse - Kenosha Shooting
REMINDER of the judge's ruling in defense use of force expert testimony: Schroeder told the attorneys that Black wouldn’t be allowed to testify about what Rittenhouse was thinking when he pulled the trigger or whether he definitively acted in self-defense.
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said if Schroeder allowed Black to testify only about the timeline of events that night he wouldn’t call his own expert to the stand. Defense attorney Mark Richards agreed to the deal.
Charges:
1. First Degree Reckless Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Joseph Rosenbaum)
2. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Richard
McGinnis, reporter for Daily Caller, not injured but near Rosenbaum when Rittenhoue
fired)
3. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (unknown male)
4. First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Anthony Huber)
5. Attempt First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Gaige
Grosskreutz)
6. Possession of a Dangerous Weapon by a Person under the Age of 18 (JUDGE DISMISSED THIS COUNT ON THE DAY OF CLOSING ARGUMENTS)
7. DISMISSED AT THE END OF STATE”S CASE. Prosecution failed to put evidence in front of the jury that there was a lawful curfew in place (appears to be an oversight by prosecution) Defense moved to dismiss, judge agreed. Fail to Comply with Order of Local Government - Emergency Management Activity (citation, carries no penalty) - everyone present was breaking the 7pm curfew issued by the sheriff.
Possible Sentence: Max: Life in Prison Without Parole (WI does not have the DP)
JURY CHOSEN IN ONE DAY. 20 jurors have been selected in WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse. 9 men and 11 women. (8 are alternates)
Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 26, and Anthony Huber, 26, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz, 27. Prosecutors say that Rittenhouse, then 17 and from Illinois, was a vigilante looking for a fight. He, like other right-wingers, went to Kenosha, Wisconsin ostensibly to protect property. This happened as protests over police shooting local man Jacob Blake turned violent. Rittenhouse’s attorneys assert he was acting in self-defense. This case became a cause célèbre among conservatives.
Prosecutors have struggled in court, failing to introduce evidence of prior aggressive behavior. This included evidence showing him attacking a woman who was in an altercation with his sister. The other is that he was closely linked to the violent, far-right Proud Boys organization.
Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder said an appellate court would reverse him if he allowed these in trial. The evidence was too prejudicial, he said. He left it up in the air whether he would allow footage showing someone identified as Rittenhouse discussing a Black man exiting a CVS pharmacy. Rittenhouse believed the man was shoplifting.
#KyleRittenhouse #KenoshaShooting
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on CZcamsTV!
tv.czcams.com/users/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
Who To Follow On Twitter:
@LawCrimeNetwork
@LawCrimeVerdict
@Cathy Russon
@AddiTrialsStuff - Zábava
Wait a minute...did i hear that right? The defence was not provided with the same evidence that the prosecution had? Isnt that like basic law 101? This thing gets weirder every day
Idk how that judge is keeping so calm. I am beyond amazed at his ability to maintain composure. He seems like such a fair, unbiased, and gentle man. He reminds me too much of my grandpa 😩🤣
@@RagnarTheRed-x5s the state had a video that was 4x bigger in file size and of better quality than what the defense was given by the state. This AFTER the state violated the 5th amendment and violated orders by the judge to not talk about past quotes by Rittenhouse...
@UCQbrHE_bV22JePTwBNAikYA not fact at all, he crossed state lines with an illegal firearm and aimed it at Kyle before he was shot.. quite literally everything the media said about Kyle is what the gross kid did lol.
Chick on defence side also said that file name was changed and their files metadata was different. It had different create date
@@ZenKrio Stop getting your info from fake news and actually get the real facts from watching the trial. The firearm was legal (had the legal barrel length as well) and that charge was dismissed.
I'm very pleased that the jury is asking for what they feel they need.
It shows that they are taking this trial seriously.
@@lesliefranklin1870 Yes and no. 3 days of deliberation implies that they're kicking the can. I'm positive they already know what verdict they would turn in, they're just terrified of the mob literally outside the building, and the jurors have been doxxed so their personal safety is as risk too. That's why it's taking so long, and I honestly don't even see them turning in a verdict today.
In the end, I actually predict a hung jury. They don't want to get killed.
@@Nathan-dt2tu if they thought Kyle was guilty the verdict would’ve come out day one so I agree. BEST CASE SCENARIO for prosecution is hung jury. And the judge I believe can still declare mistrial with prejudice if they come back without a verdict. Otherwise the prosecutions case will just get a lot harder next time they charge him.
@@Nathan-dt2tu I've been on several juries. They really don't want to be there. Despite the evidence, there's always at least one who wants to convict and at least one who wants to declare not-guilty. Plus, this really is a complicated case with several charges. The big question is "did Rittenhouse provoke those around him?" That is likely why the jury asked to see the video evidence again.
@@lesliefranklin1870 In general, I'd agree with you. But there's a mob waiting to riot outside, MSNBC tried to doxx the jurors, and literally the whole country is watching, with implications on the president.
I think this is a very special case.
Oh my Jesus and they ended a 3rd day of deliberating without a verdict. Even more than this morning, I predict a hung jury.
Judge: treats case as innocent until proven guilty
everyone: the judge is biased!!
U obviously have no idea to rule of law or constitution.....
Kyle Rittenhouse: exercises his right to remain silent
Prosecutor: Your silence suggests guilt..
Unfortunately all the people who watch television crime shows which are filled with police and prosecutor misconduct believe that a person is guilty until proven innocent. And they fail to recognize that the judge has a higher responsibility to the accused, than to the prosecution. When a person is accused of a crime they have the resources of the state, which are enormous, against them. The judge is supposed to be at least neutral , or lean towards the rights of the accused.
@@maxdamagus Kyle wasn't silent when telling his friend that he wished he could shoot people with bullets (on camera) 15 days prior to the shootings.....
@@9776722 and George Floyd robbed a pregnant woman at gun point before he died. So what??
This judge understands innocent until proven guilty!
Exactly , his a real gangster str8 out
When you think about the gravity of these issues and the consequences of how they’re settled, and the centuries of human history and politics and society that led to the reasons for the rules and case law and principles, it’s really a privilege just to watch this unfold.
🤦🏼
well said
Yes despite the mess this court has been in at times, Compare it to a court in other non democratic countries and you will breathe easier
i agree entirely
Not to sure, completely disingenuous prosecution, with seemingly no comeback on their outlandish perspective and all-out lies.
This is so open-and-shut I can only assume that they are scared to rule.
That is my fear.
I hope they give their true verdict. Soon.
incorrect. it is not open a shut and the jury is doing their duty to make sure things are done legally. when you perform jury duty you want to do it right and make sure you have the legal reason as to that right or wrong count. they want to see the video as to make sure kyle was in fact matching his story as to what is seen in the video. its funny how we can say one thing but in fact via video do something else.
Thats my guess to. Maybe they think if they drag it out the mob outside will get bored and go home.
100%. No jury could muster the bravery to speak the truth in this case. It would mean the subsequent destruction of their lives and community. And there won't be a Kyle defending it this time that's for sure
Judge is making a bigger impact than we realize. Standing up to corruption. You have my full support and protection
How does a corrupt judge stand up to corruption?
@@kenchristie9214 slandering the judge, did he hurt your feelings lol
@@kenchristie9214 No, not at all. It's sad to see others continue to be pursauded by propaganda and gaslighting. We should all be on the same side, there's a reason why it's called Divide and Conquer.
I actually love this Judge... yes I don't want them called Victims since that's what the jury is here to figure out. SPOT on that is the purpose of the trial!
They are objectively victims though. 🤨. Facts are not opinions.
@@ryancruz1876 The facts of this case and testimony do not support victim status. They do however support the word Assailants.
@UCz_WB2cGKKApX6bPwRnN8WQ No actually, initially I agreed with the" these guys are victims" narrative of the initial media barrage. However, after watching the trial in it's entirety I have seen that there was a massive amount of misinformation on this case and right now as it stands the facts don't support these 3 people as being Victims. Which you're right was why we needed the trial. But right now based on what's been show IMHO these 3 look like they were assailants and the defendant did nothing outside of defending himself from imminent bodily harm.
He's such a Dad lol
@@AkaAka_AkaAka agree, the media did on purpouse
if the video was degraded and shortened than that is tampering with evidence.
we dont now that.
@Doody Wanks There is an accusation by the defense that evidence was withheld.
And the Jude said they will figure that out later.
At the moment we don’t know.
2:55
@Doody Wanks Yes. Hence the long winded stalling by the prosecutor.
@Doody Wanks I don’t know but I don’t have a degree in law.
And the Jude, prosecutor and defense (who all have a degree and experience) seemed to be ok with making that call later or else the defense could have had complained, but he did not.
So how are we to make a call like “OFCOURSE we do the prosecutor didn’t hand over that full video”.
We should stay calm and keep a level head.
I want to know how the videos were transmitted/passed to the defence team.
As far as I'm aware, he's been proven innocent for quite some time. This has become more political than any trial should be.
This case should never have been brought to trial.
Couldn't agree more
You wrong, this kid is guilty
Exactly, not sure if they were supposed to expect the kid to give his rifle to all the rioter adults around him and let them kill him? I wish one of them be in his spot, and see how they do.
@@alexandraguia2068 how?
The Judge is absolutely right in stating that
"Sometimes there's one piece
Of evidence that is absolutely
Critical. "
Right on the money!!!
A man should never be having to spend so much time and effort in court defending himself from such a ruthless attack from a mob of violent people.
This entire legal proceedings is a waste of time.
A KID should not be going to a highly emotive situation with a gun.
@@TylerWhitlock your prolly one those losers who think burning and looting is peaceful. Get a life
@@bryanmain5990 it’s not peaceful but why was he there with a gun
@@honsen8522 Maybe to defend yourself
@@honsen8522 if I’m not mistaken his uncle had a business in that area and he just went to help out
Wait a second... the instructions that come with the photo manipulation software explicitly state that it is to be used for "investigative use only" and not to be used as evidence in a trial? Shouldn't this be a mistrial right now?
Grow up dude
Kyle is going to be a free man and I’ll celebrate him.
@@Songs-lr4wt
Prosecutorial misconduct is no problem for you, huh?
@@Texasbonez817 me too 🙌🙌
No it would only be a mistrial if:
1. The instruction actually says what the defense claims it says
2. Enhanced footage was actually used.
(3. I think there is a way you can retroactively delete evidence from the trial but I am not sure on that.)
But I guess we will find out in court and not in the comment section of a CZcams video.
Let’s all keep calm and a level head until we know more.
Dismiss with prejudice, thank the jury for their time and stop this criminal prosecution. Remove Binger’s law license and charge him with any crimes committed by withholding evidence and his many other lies during this process.
I doubt. Why was this mistrial being brought up now? How do they know the state didn't know about this footage? How many cameras and phones filmed this event? Who owns the drone? There questions to ask. This is why you might not be a lawyer. You see shear statement as truth. When most motion of dismissal are done early, and late dismissals are late attempts to "win" a case against you. The defense must know more information that could hurt their case, as they are also petitioning motion of dismissal with out re-file. This means the case can not go to trial. A filing of motion of dismissal is also a strategy a defense uses when they are struggling in case as they are looking for an I not dotted.
Lawyers lie. It's just part of the job. ;)
The problem with that is that way, they can start new proceedings against Kyle whenever they want. A mistrial is not a declaration of innocence. A Declaration of innocence cannot be re-tried because that would be “double jeopardy”.
And remove your tin foil hat and step away from the keyboard.
@@MynameIsnotforsell It was brought up last week the judge hadn't ruled on it yet because the prosecution hadn't responded, probably because they have no justifiable response, they just hope the jury comes back with a verdict before the judge rules on the mistrial request. The defense brought it up again after learning the file was intentionally changed it has a different name, file size, and time stamp for its creation. If the judge actually puts the prosecution on record under oath they might very well get disbarred. Kraus stated he has no knowledge of video encoding or anything like that, but he has the encoder software installed on his laptop, that was displayed to the court when he showed the video in question originally, the app is in the same folder as all the video clips. They intentionally lied to the court and falsified evidence by changing the file size given to the defense, a file they presented at the last possible second when they had access to it for over a year. It appears the judge is allowing the jury to agree on a verdict; if not guilty as it obviously should be then he will do nothing which still is insane as these prosecutors should be held accountable, if they somehow come out with a guilty verdict from fear or as a hung jury he will declare a mistrial probably not with prejudice as he as stated he wants a jury verdict on this. The next major issue at hand is the FBI "losing" the HD video clips as well as the FBI contractor hired for recording all this closing his business and disappearing. If the FBI withheld some evidence and destroyed some to protect a narrative, which I think is clear they are fully capable of doing, there needs to be a serious congressional follow-up on this. This has gone way beyond this kid, this is the government acting outside the law in seriously scary ways.
This trial is like a symbolic representation about why we've lost faith in our system.
how do you mean?
@@suspicious2delicious The entire reason a 17 year old kid was there in the first place was because public officials told the police to stand down, refused the national guard, and denied the violence was to advance a political agenda.
Our media convicted the kid before he was even charged, spread lies to the public, and is now encouraging more riots if they dont get their way.
The one who should be on trial right now is Evers and this worthless DA. The only thing Rittenhouse is guilty of is being a 17 year old in an insane society.
Lack of faith in the system is what incited the riots in the first place.
@@stephanjones8424 yeah sure, go ahead riot, pillage, burn and loot poor innocent people's property, that'll show the "system".
@@Jakethegoodman also by your logic, Kyle went there as a vigilante and took the law into his own hands. He went armed and expecting a confrontation. Whether you think it's right or wrong morally, that is definitely a crime in the eyes of the law.
absolutely nuts that the jury has taken this long. if this kid is found guilty it sets a terrible precedent for defending oneself. just throw out the ability to legally defend yourself.
Thats actually what this is all about for the left.
Or, the people recognize that Rittenhouse was looking for a way to kill someone with impunity. He already made comments about wanting to shoot people, wishing he had his AR so he could do-so. They also recognized he was willing to obtain fire-arms illegally. Maybe people aren't falling for the BS this time.
@@risenfromyoutubesashesagai6302 In fact that’s absolutely not what it’s about for the overwhelming majority of fellow Americans who know to not use such identities as if political rhetoric matters whatsoever. Now you know better and not to pretend this is some team sporting event.
Don’t fall for the Weaponized identity politics and agitprop! MSM has swayed nobody and we all are relevant as fellow Americans. Full stop
@@TenderViddlez all of that means nothing when he is being chased and attacked. and if people somehow see anything but self defense, their lenses are smeared and influenced.
@@TenderViddlez Rosenbaum threatened to kill Rittenhouse TWICE if he was ever alone. Well, Rittenhouse was finally alone. Rosenbaum saw this and clearly tried to make his promise come true. So, after having his life threatened TWICE, Rittenhouse tried to avoid the situation by 1) yelling "friendly, friendly, friendly, 2) running away, and 3) pointing the rifle at Rosenbaum to get him to stop chasing him which clearly did not deter Rosenbaum.
He exhausted his options and then feared for his life when he 1) heard a gunshot behind him and 2) had his gun grabbed by Rosenbaum. Clear self-defense, so let's stop praising child molesters like they are heros.
Judge: "Is that true?"
Binger: "Uhhh...."
Judge: "Let's not get ahead of ourselves..."
Idk but that was hilarious to me.
He actually said "the evidence in this trial does not say that"
If you ask me the part right after what you say the judge is thinking and gets accompanied by perfectly times pew pew noises lol 😂
@@CarTwenty4 but the claim was the owners manual on which it was filmed does state not for use in forensic evidence. That is what the judge was asking and the prosecutor answered a different question. Of course their evidence does not come with a disclosure that it isn't fit for forensic evidence.
@@AngryGinja It seemed obvious that the judge was distracted by something that we couldn't see on camera as well as trying to gather his thoughts, with that being said I laughed out loud and had to watch it 3 more times. lol
@@michaelcharlier3621 perfect timing in my opinion it gave me a nice chuckle 🤣
Binger: your honor that's why I don't read anything outside of the court.
Yeah ok dude
What a a liar.
I like this Judge, he knows the Constitutional authority of the jury.
😂
@@canoeshoe coming from me, a person with a law degree, yes this judge is very well educated and does understand very well the constitutional authority of the jury… so the original poster is not incorrect.
i hope he does, but he has overstep his boundaries.
@@MynameIsnotforsell Elaborate.
the constitution in america is a joke
Prosecutor is grasping for straws! If this kid is convicted of murder then I have lost all faith in our judicial system. Don't trust the system!
He will be found guilty, to prevent the riots in the city. Your country's laws are now made by the Mob and Leftist media outlets. The UK is going that way also
@@coolhand755 well good thing they can bypass the jury if that happens... the evidence is not strong enough for "beyond all reasonable doubt".
He killed the skateboard dude, he should be locked up.
@@Wunderkinddd You mean the guy that was bashing a kid's head with a skateboard? Good riddance.
@@Wunderkinddd if he didn't bash the skateboard on Kyle's head he would still be alive
“Leeetttss nooott be haaasssttyy” - Judge Treebeard in State of Fangorn V Hobbits, motion to dismiss charges of being Orcs, and Arson
Honestly, Middle Earth has a better legal system than the United States of America at this point… *cough* GUANTANAMO *cough*
The fact this is taking so long is disturbing
Probably threats and bribes being thrown at the jurors from behind the scenes.
That just means some are saying guilty 😔 and some saying innocent so it will be a hung jury poor kid will have to go through this again
QQs about due process 😆
One word: fear. The mob proved its more powerful than the law
Nice to hear him talk about the common people!!
Not guilty!
sociopath
@@spybaz why?
@@nolly8202 Ignore them...no brain cells lol
2-less-criminals
Evil-follows-evil
Like-a-shadow?
@@nolly8202 You people think it's OK for someone to kill other innocent people (innocent until proven guilty)? You want some spoiled brat 17 yr old deciding the law? You're OK with a kid gunning down people when he created the environment all by himself? You're a bunch of sociopaths. No better than the Taliban. Disgusting country you live in.
Huber : he was a skater boy
Ar15: said see ya later boy
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yes bro🤣🤣🤣🤣
Only thing Rittenhouse did wrong was killing 2 scumbags instead of 3
@@wernersteynberg4034 I agree , gaige should of taken one to the head aswll
😁😁
It's almost like this is the first time any jury has ever reviewed video footage.
Crazy huh?
I think they haven’t seen in to the detail they are now.
The issue was more about video quality and if it was AI enhanced.
This trial is monumental on setting the definition of self defense
This judge is good. His defense of juror's intelligence in general was admirable to hear.
@@01FUMBLE idk i think he’s okay
Judge is a pure bampot
Judicial misconduct was rampant throughout the trial. He was giving testimony from the bench and should be sanctioned.
@@01FUMBLE Seems like people are quite polar on this, but I see a bit of where you're coming from. The judge has made some very good impartial decisions, however I do agree with the leftists that the judge is actually on Kyle's side on some of his rulings/decisions.
My feelings aside (Kyle's innocent in my view, and in my view there's absolutely no doubt of that), this means nothing for the outcome of the trial. The jury is supposed to be getting the information from both sides. The judge is there as a babysitter to ensure proceedings are done properly.
Some of his actions have been good. Others, I feel like he's gone beyond true impartiality and aligns with the defendant.
If you feel like arguing real points instead of calling people jokes, feel free to share your opinion. I'll answer.
Edit: To be specific, one of the worst things the judge did was to be completely oblivious to the fact that evidence wasn't submitted, and ask for the defendant's attorney to confirm such an allegation. Over a week after discovery. A full day after deliberation had started. This is 1) malicious from the prosecution but more importantly 2) This act alone calls questions about the legitimacy of the proceedings, unless a mistrial is declared. Judge has been overall solid, but a few of his actions have needed answers.
@@Nathan-dt2tu a judge should be favoring the defense in all cases. The state is the one that has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt and the judge is there that they do so fairly according to the law. The judge hasn’t ruled on anything egregiously in favor of the defense. If he was actually so biased, he would’ve already ruled a mistrial.
The supervising Bailiff is the only one that should be with the jury in case the Jury has another question for the Judge.
FREE KYLE !
Hi from South Africa 🇿🇦
Kyle GUILTY.. from 🇮🇱🇮🇹🇮🇸🇮🇷🇮🇶🇮🇴🇮🇳🇮🇲🇭🇷🇭🇹🇭🇺🇮🇩🇮🇪🇮🇱🇭🇳🇭🇲🇭🇰🇬🇾🇬🇼🇬🇼🇬🇹🇬🇹🇬🇱🇬🇶🇬🇶🇬🇷🇬🇸
Now why would some random from South Africa even give 2 shits about this case 🤥🤥🤥
Worry about your 3rd world country first. We don't need an opinion from a peasant. 🤷🏾
@@antonioacosta5841 🤣🤣🤣👌🏽
@@realdluvchrist5447 Game over little fella. Time to start looking for a real job, you're not cut out for this.
I love how the judge just rambles on, I like hearing his stories.
He’s like the old man substitute teacher lol
This is kinda disturbing why does the jury even need to re-watch the videos. Like there's been numerous videos from numerous angles. Clear cut self defense.
I like how he admonishes the media for opinionated commentary.
stop it with ur big words
I like how media never mentions their news reportings are opinions until they are caught lying.
Agree!
if it's a lie it isn't opinion, it's manipulation.
I like how he’s talking about both sides being at fault for it
Why does everyone do while they wait for the jury?
Could be days... do they just sit in the courtroom and wait?
I’m pretty sure. Yesterday or the day before the judge mentioned that people can bring things like books to occupy themselves
Need be within 10 minutes from courthouse. The defendant was there all day because he thought jury had no brain cells and would come back instantly using emotion for verdict.
They all pull out their Nintendo Switch consoles and organise a little Super Smash Bros tournament.
@@rubyoro0 the fact they are taking this long proves they have none. He is innocent period.
@@rubyoro0 well yea a guilty verdict would be emotionally driven for sure.
But, I also expected a no Brainerd innocent verdict.
The fact its taking so long is very strange.
There's no case, the prosecution was a disaster, ... what could they possibly be doing all this time?
I knew the night it happened he was innocent
This judge is simply amazing. Wow
That first pan looked professional as heck!
Yeah. I was thinking we should get a tv show that starts just like that.
I can’t wait for the Hollywood recreation of judge yelling at binger.
This is one great judge. Really wants fairness of trial in spite of everything, shows his humanity, and wants to follow the rule of law as it was intended to be used: to keep the innocent innocent until proven guilty.
not guilty!
The second people have to question if the jury should see a video more then twice is where things fade that fine line of what is right, thank god for this judge.
given the time frame that the events took place joseph lunging at him gave him no choice but to fear for his life
How about when Kyle said friendly then dropped a fire extinguisher then pointed his gun before any chase ever happened that’s when you lose the right to self defense you pointed your gun at someone for no reason
Kyle is guilty and if you are smart then you would know what too
@@RosinDaddy5280 public braindead moment
@@RosinDaddy5280 Hey just wanted to let you know, there is a video of the incident as it unfolded. You should definitely check it out.
It shows us exactly what happened.
In the video you can see a mob chasing a kid who then attack the kid. Luckily though, he had means to defend himself.
One guy kicks him while he fell on the ground, another hits him with a skateboard which can easily kill a human. And the third guy pulled a gun and aimed at him.
It was an intense few seconds. But luckily for the kid, it was all caught on camera by the mob.
@@theindiediary5950 lmao, yes you're right. That's everything that happened AFTER he murdered the first guy
@@MrSkrifle there's footage of the events leading up to the first shooting too, after the group Kyle was with put out the burning dumpster, Joseph threatened that he'd kill anyone of them if he caught them alone that night. FBI drone footage tracks Joseph leaving the altercation then waiting in Ambush as Kyle runs by, Joseph intercepts and starts to give chase along with 2 others one fires a Glock into the air behind Kyle, he turns around to see Joseph chasing and the 2 others and keeps running, joseph catches up and makes a lunge at Kyle. There was no time for Kyle to know if all three 3 were trying to rush him and with the gun shot fired just moments before Kyle's turns to see Joseph lunging and fires for fear of his life.
The Prosecution Knew who jumpkick man was and didn't tell the Defense until last Thursday preventing the Defense from calling him.. He contacted the Prosecutors in hopes of getting immunity for his laundry list of FELONIES for his testimony. Prosecution declined but didn't tell the Defense..
Can only mean that they were afraid that what he would have said would undermine the prosecution
@@TrueFork well they did call Gaige up haha
Yeah it's hard to believe that the prosecution is more criminal than the defendant. Worse yet leftist seem to think it's okay for the ends to justify the means. How sick leftist are is scary.
How does this even make it to the court room? This evidence isn’t even remotely admissible at this point. I personally don’t think the drone footage was admissible in the first place
@matty kelly The child molester was the one that first provocked him and got shot as far as I know. The one with the gun was the one that got shot in the arm and survived.
There was drone footage??
@@dorisaffissio1649 Self defense isn't murder, I don't see how your case has any legal grounds. You could argue from a moral perspective what he did was wrong, but it seems pretty clear he''ll be found not guilty
@@dorisaffissio1649 you mean Kyle? I doubt he has kids.
@@dorisaffissio1649 left-leaning people always end up defending monsters because of political optics and obfuscation. Do better.
I wonder if found guilty, if the judge would set aside the verdict. I think he would have sufficient grounds to do so. Think the judge is hoping for a clean not guilty verdict to avoid appeals.
hes already planning to acquit by throwing out evidence proving he intended to shoot and kill people
Can he basically nullify the verdict
He is gonna get guilty verdict. Not guilty verdict comes early
@@Songs-lr4wt in 2003, a jury in Oakland, California deliberated 55 days before acquitting three police officers accused of assaulting and falsely arresting residents. Can't say with confidence that it will go either way.
@Jacob none of that was allowed in court and anytime the prosecutor would ask him a tough question the judge would make him back off
Binger doesn't read the news or watch the news? I don't believe that in the slightest; he strikes me as the sort who is glued to the media, looking for every bit of ego gratification he can find regarding his performance.
Yep he only watches the news when he is on the news he is one of those look at himself in the mirror types.
Ironically this is how news gets spread…assumptions. Maybe you’re correct, but all it is is an assumption.
@@sprokow Given that I at no point claimed to know this, only stated my belief, it would require somebody repeating my expressed belief as if it were reported fact for that to happen. I do not believe that is my fault if people do that. I didn't even pull a leftist press stunt of trying to make it sound like fact with a couple of weasel words in there. I opened right up with "I don't beleive that..." and "he strikes me as..."
Kinda funny the prosecution says the law is clear when they clearly did not care when saying stuff about Kyle's right to remain silent
I cannot believe deliberations will be going into a third day. What on earth could be so difficult to decide about this trial? If there is such a thing as self defense, this was most assuredly it. What are they doing???
Unfortunately being a delusional member of the loser's cult you have lost touch with reality so you can't grasp what normal people do. An unarmed man with an illegally obtained AR15 with 30 full metal jacket rounds pointing the gun at people until he got chased away is no victim. The law says so. Being chased by a single 5'4" 150 pound man does not put his life in danger. The first shot immobilized and the 4th shot that killed him went in his back. He then became a fleeing "active shooter" and everyone has a legal right to stop him. Of course you think the January 6th rioters who beat police with flag poles carry the American flags were peaceful tourists I'm sure as well. Sorry but your world doesn't exist in reality.
It's simple. The violent and deranged left wing mob and media have been threatening more violence and destruction not only to the country but to the individuals on the jury. There are people on the jury that are scared to have themselves or their family assaulted or potentially killed if they don't go along with the mob's demands of crucifying a kid for self-defense against 3 grown adults.
@@INoIFearIGaming Sounds like it is time for the system to start attending to the law, arresting law breakers, and putting down those who would cause harm. That is what civil societies do. Enough cowering and pandering.
@@bkipme3766 The Democrats in power want to see this country crumble which is why they are doing their best to erode the system of law and order. Everything they do, they do to create lawlessness and disorder and degeneracy.
@@bradcanning875 except that he didn't point the gun at anyone until Rosenbaum started chasing him. And that Rittenhouse would have had no way of knowing or processing that Rosenbaum was disabled within three quarters of a second. And that a 150 lb person at full run lunging at him would tackle him into a car and do considerable damage even before he was able to get his hands into position to defend himself. And losing access to his gun really wasn't a reasonable option given that there was a gunman who had already fired from nearby and Rittenhouse might have needed to defend himself against.
I don't care what your politics are, justified self defense
binger should be on trial ,complete circus
This is a fantastic judge and I personally believe he’s probably the best judge for this case he knows the laws and only wants to hear both sides of the story and wants an honest ruling and wants an honest verdict he doesn’t care about political standings and political views he just wants the truth of what happened if it was self defense or murder which is what a good judge does
Let the poor kid go…he’s been through enough.
For a smart kid he sure is an idiot.
love this judge!!
Lol when that Nintendo sound went off lol around 4:00 ish
The judge says he will think about live trials in the future. The DA has done many hings during this trial he should be disbarred for. Its good for the public to see this.
I was astounded when the DA to quote the judge, "committed a grave constitutional violation". That error would be unacceptable for a rookie law student let alone a DA.
So what is the purpose of viewing it in the courtroom if "everyone" but the bailiff is shooed out? Why not just take them the laptop?
Control of the evidence
Control of evidence and the idea is to keep the actual jurors(the 12) as anonymous as possible
So they could view the 'evidence' on the 4K TV.
I think the Defence Team should take their 4K TV and tell the State where to go!
the judge is there lol
Juries are sequestered during deliberation until they come out with a verdict, they are not to interact with anyone, not of the court.
😂judge's brain froze and had to reboot. You can even hear it. Freezes 3:10
Error Notification 3:20
Power down 3:23
Aaaand we're back 3:27
😂😂
You can hear the AOL dialup tone hahaha
lol
He's careful to choose his words.. his brain is way better than Biden's.
Great Judge. Kudos
I actually liked the fact the Defendant picked out of the tumbler.
what does that mean? i was confused about that?
@@justinneal4661 they had 18 jury members that way if a juror was dismissed or could not continue, they have other jurors that saw the whole case. Then the defendant got to pick the jurors by pulling names from a tumbler.
@@FrankDaBank25 he picked the 6 that were to be dismissed
The prosecutor just seems like a huge jerk like he’s so rude to everyone including the judge never would want to hire him ever
He works for the state
@@clugzo oh yeah thats right then he should be even more professional
@@clugzo My thoughts exactly. Go to the DMV, Tax Office, Welfare, Social security office, etc. Employees of the government do not need to follow the same rules as everyone else. They can be rude and lie without repercussion, they can not be fired.
I sincerely hope the houses of the jurors are under guard during this..
Why do they seem so unprepared for a question about where the jury is supposed to review video evidence? Hasn't this come up before? This is the first time a jury has ever asked to re-watch video evidence???
Why do people keep saying he was too young for the gun? He was 17. State of Wisconsin 17 yrs old and older you can carry a rife. Period. He didnt break the lay. They guy with the pistol on the other hand did. Because his concealed carry permit was revoked.
Media bias cherry picking “facts” to paint the picture that fits their narrative.
Are they going to show the video the prosecution kept from the defense???
Lol okay biased much?
It was played numerous times over the beginning of this week. And it wasn’t “kept from the defense”, it was sent to them but the phone it was sent to compressed the file.
It still violates disclosure rules, potentially. Besides, the evidence in question will be ruled inadmissible if this requires future litigation.
@@bridgetives359 compressed means it would be blurrier. you have to deliberately edit it to make it zoomed in and shorter, which is what the defense is alledging.
@@REDDAWNproject Thanks for the clarification. I watched the arguments about it but I missed that part.
Wish all judges were this way.
A man's life is on the line and the jury doesn't have every single thing used as evidence at their fingertips with a quality monitor in the deliberation room?
If there was no one to put on the stand to testify about the drone footage then the footage should not have been shown, IMO
The defense should have been able to review the footage, and they didn't get it until after they were allowed to bring evidence. This is shady getting shadier
Agreed. IMO Judge Schroeder should have denied this evidence submission by the prosecution.
If he gets charged i will loose all respect for the legal system
He's already been charged. Civics much? I wish low IQ people wouldn't post on CZcams.
Too late.
Lol!!! This is what will put you over the edge??? There are so many cases that have occurred that I have lost my faith in the justice system......
He has already been charged
"Loose"
What is that "pew pew pew" sound? Is that a text notification?
The judge spaces out often. And weird sounds in the back make it almost cartoonish. 😂
Hi from Australia
This judge is awesome ☺️. I really like him. Innocent let the young man on his way. We should have him in the military captain Kyle R.
Defense seems terrified of the drone footage and the jury is taking a while... curious.
Why wasn't the jury sequestered? Seems like that would have been a good idea.
Right.
What does sequestered mean exactly? Just asking because I genuinely don’t know.
@@gavinlee27 A dequestered jury is kept together for the duration of the trial. Jurors are accommodated at a hotel.
I was wondering the same thing
This judge needs his own show.
Sounds like he's developing a strong disinterest in that. He's just a good representation of his duties to the public
He belongs on SNL.
He belongs on the SCOTUS and needs a raise.
@@donlang5841 SNL is already unfunny enough.
@@feddymacfedderman SNL hasn't been funny since Eddie Murphy
Binger, continues to be a binger.
Binger till the bitter end
Cheap Little finger
I had no idea the jury was even allowed to ask questions. That's cool.
This judge loves to hear himself talk and pass judgement on matters outside the courtroom.
It’s crazy that they would need to see anything, it’s very clear that Kyle was defending his own life. This verdict should’ve taken less than 5 minutes
I bet you see Bunnies bouncing on your My pillow too.
@@markkrueger9922 yeah okay Mark, we all respect you... lmao 🤣
It's clear when you see video evidence. It's not clear without it. If it was shown in a screen and jury were not able see it from close enough or properly, then it's hard to know for them without checking it. That's basically the main reason how you know it's self defence, because you've seen it properly on your computer's screen.
@@PovilasPanavas it's not self defense when you provoke a situation when you point a loaded weapon at someone kyle had no reason to kill an unarmed man he could have just injured him but he shot him 4 times which shows he was trying to kill not defend himself
Kyle is guilty of unlawful thoughts.
The back-and-forth in this trial is insane.
The prosecution and jurors are clearly trying to get a mistrial declared, so that they don’t have to take any blame and can use the judge/courthouse rules as their scapegoat.
The judge can see what they are trying to do and is doing his best to just get the just outcome from the jury - acquittal.
I hope the judge doesn’t give in.
At this point a mistrial would be better than a not guilty for the prosecution.Clearly the law and justice do not matter to these liars.
I think you’re exactly correct. The longer they deliberate, the worse it looks for the defense.
Yeah. I think the jury wants to say not guilty but were afraid to do it too fast. The prosecution definately looking for a way out. They have to know this trial was bs.
The judge reminds of the late actor Peter Boyle who acted as
Raymond’s father in the TV series “Everybody Loves Raymond”.
I wonder what search engine the prosecution prefers to use... 🤔
He will be made an Example of and a message to anyone who thinks they can use Self defense or stand up against the Machine .
That's really scary
It's a no brainier if your life is on the line. Do what you gotta do.
Negative wrong answer. You do not bring them to court to view video under scrutiny of lawyers.
Since the beginning of time jurors have been able to handle the evidence, examine it during deliberations.
What complicates this is the prosecution's withheld high-definition video. Now you cannot show them the low-def manipulated video.
But, you send every file into the deliberation room give them good high-definition fairly good-sized screens to view it on. Do not give them the low definition manipulated video, but rather Just a note saying it has a legal challenge and they will need to rely on memory on the Drone footage.
Censure the prosecutors for withholding evidence.
Best of luck on the BAR exam!
Yes I was on jury duty and the judge said ( rely on memory) the same thing to me on a fender bender case. Guess what I was against a high pay out. Went back in court said no, sent back to try again and less of 5 mins. Came back to court and I agreed with with everyone for a pay out of 250,000.00. guess I won't get called again. I told the judge and defense attorney what they did was wrong by not informing the jury on their duties step by step.
@@trevor4533 Best of luck on the Block Exam
@@oceanside2152 OH NO NOT THE BLOCK. ANYTHING BUT THE BLOCK!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I think they shouldn't rewatch any of the drone footage and be instructed to ignore it, since it was withheld from the defense
What is that weird intermittent sound?
So now we find out the prosecution knew who the "jump kick man" was all along. Jeezuz, mistrial with prejudice should be declared ASAP.
3:12 those noises are actually this strange robot's brain resetting.
The judge is a very good defense attorney
Does the jury have access to the movie Roadhouse to help with decision making?
Let the jury watch.
Mistrial with Prejudice!
Did the prosecution identify and approach jump kick man and offer immunity for his testimony without telling the defense?
Jump kick man hasn't been found
If he is the guy I'm thinking, he came to the prosecution and asked for immunity which they denied then denied they knew who he was during the trial.
@@carolecollins853 He was identified today. He served 5 months for battery and was released from jail about 3 weeks ago. Maurice J. Freeland
@@cody4916 good work 👍🏻
The jury should have full compliance to whatever evidence is available
Is the judges chair just a gaming chair with a fancy top?, cuz when he leans back it also moves
We refer to those as office chairs...
I thought it was odd too but I’m no attorney.
Wrong , you *are* an attorney.
This case is pretty cut and dry, but there is always one juror who doesn't seem to get it. This case should have never been presented. If he is convicted it is a travesty and miscarriage of justice.
Is it not strange for anyone else that all these ppl (judge, prosecutors, attorneys) are having these conversations ever so casually as if they were sitting around discussing this at a coffee shop or over Sunday breakfast, as this kid sits here waiting on his fate?
They do this on the daily so the weight of the decision isn't baring like it would on an outsider. And the procedural debate and reflection is pretty normal.
@@willyjimmy8881 🙏🏽
"Judge Schroeder Reads Jury's First Question" except it is their THIRD question, not the first.
This Judge is the best judge the defense could ever hope for. Thank goodness good judges still exist.
NOT guilty by reason of mob insanity
how is this trail still going on..
I don't know what's going on starting at 3:09, but I hope Vic Berger clips it for his next piece.