Top 6 Smoking Guns of Evidence That Sealed People’s Fate at Trial
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 07. 2023
- From high-profile murder trials with life in prison on the line for defendants, to celebrity civil trials with millions of dollars at stake, the jury’s verdict is often influenced by one key piece of evidence. The Law&Crime Network’s Jesse Weber breaks down six smoking guns that sealed people's fate at trial.
Listen to Law&Crime's Sidebar Podcast on Apple & Spotify:
Apple: apple.co/3wMgRgB
Spotify: spoti.fi/3wITe7b
Hosts:
Jesse Weber: / jessecordweber
Angenette Levy: / angenette5
LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:
CZcams Management - Bobby Szoke
Podcasting - Sam Goldberg
Video Editing - Michael Deininger
Guest Booking - Alyssa Fisher
Social Media Management - Kiera Bronson
#CourtMoments #Trial #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on CZcamsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK CZcams CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam - Zábava
The smoking gun in the Darrell Brooks trial was Darrell Brooks. He acted as his own defense, but he might as well have acted as his own prosecution.
And executioner.
That's why one should never, never, act as one's own defense. Always get a legal representative. Even a new lawyer is more likely to know the law better then someone who's never studied law.
Bah, in Darrel Brooks case, that wouldn't have changed anything. There wasn't a world where he wasn't getting life in jail anyway. He's one of the very rare case where it doesn't matter.
Your Honor, subject matter jurisdiction.
Case closed
The smoking gun was him being a male. 6 life sentences? Any girl wouldn’t have got half that if they cried on stand
The smoking gun in the Depp V heard case for me was the "... Tell the world, Johnny, tell them Johnny Depp, I Johnny Depp, man, I’m, I’m a victim too of domestic violence". That's what sealed the case for me, everything else was just a matter of finding out how bad of a person she was, but after that line there was no doubt for me that she was the abuser and that she was fully aware of what she was doing and the terrible situation Johnny was in.
Yeah that's crazy she said that
@@MrVaunorageare you implying she didn’t?
@@superphantom100 No. He's implying that it's crazy she said that.
@@superphantom100 You don't need to overthink it. He merely implied that it was a crazy thing to say for someone who is claiming victim.
What did it for me what the audio recording where she does this evil cackle, can't remember what she said but her voice sounded so evil psycho while she was insulting him then does the evil cackle.
Amber herd is such a kind woman.
Instead of punching Johnny she hit him, truly a saint with a gentle soul.✊️
She only wanted to "hit" the solution out of him.✊
What planet are you on?!
@@xshannonBAKER it’s called sarcasm.
@@xshannonBAKER your stupidity is showing
@Tushar_Talwar_09:
Yes...Amber Heard truly proved to be a warm-hearted philanthropist. :D
COUNTER SUING FOR 1 DOLLAR IS THE MOST SAVAGE THING ANYONE COULD EVER DO
Plus her legal fees.
Donald Trump vs the nfl. He won a dollar for stopping the nfl from being a monopoly
@@oddballskull1941 because it was an antitrust suit, the money he won was tripled. Although because of appeals lasting a while, the NFL eventually had to pay interest, making the final amount owed come to a whopping $3.76 in damages
@@ohboydiamondsmassive W's right there
@@ohboydiamonds i know that boy went skrait to mcdonalds
As a kid, when people were sentenced to hundreds of years. I thought they died, and then they just let the bones sit there in the cell for a few centuries. I guess it was supposed to be symbolic in a sense.😮
😂
Hey, that's not a bad idea, actually....
😂
It would be like way back when, they'd hang the bodies of enemies or criminals at the city gates, to deter invasion/further criminal activity.
Then there was Vlad the Impaler, though that doing that seemed to be more due to his personal enjoyment.
@@kingayy9267 Yeah, Vlad had a deep penetration fetish.
The brutal cross examination of Amber Heard by JDs lawyer Camille Vasquez is one of the most amazing pieces of entertainment I’ve seen in years
0😮❤
I second that.
Really? Domestic violence is entertaining to you?
@@shivtim They didn't say that though, did they?
@@shivtim Comprehension skills of a first grader lmao
I've never understood why someone would sue another person under false allegations. Do they really expect they won't get caught?
Essentially, yes. Though you do sometimes get a few who do it just to financially ruin someone, but that runs the risk of getting countersued for all court costs and more if you're found out.
money.
Works all the time
A combination of extreme hubris, vindictiveness, greed, and other narcissistic traits.
Many do
"Tell people it was a fair fight and see what the jury and judge think. Tell the world, Johnny. Tell them, 'I, Johnny Depp, I'm a victim, too, of domestic violence, and it was a fair fight,' and see if people believe or side with you."
Oh he told the world, Amber... And we all heard it loud and clear.
Yes we did. ❤
the guy trying to sue Gwyneth Paltrow was really hoping that because shes worth millions she would settle for $300,000 quickly and get it over with cause that would be pocket change to her. He clearly wasnt prepared to have his life ripped into by lawyers.
Imagine covering the lawyer's fees of a millionaire actress as damages lol. No more world trips for the old fool.
for the lawyers it was probably a walk in the park, those other trips were pretty damning
The smoking gun in the Depp v. Heard trial was every word Amber said on the stand.
And the videos she recorded
I think the pledging=donating mockery of the listener's intelligence was a turning point.
So true. She hurt her case so much. And ironically I think in her mind she thought she was helping. Obvi lying about what the police said and saw( shown by body cams). Falsifying evidence and using same pics for different days and events. Her own pictures which never showed what she claimed they did. It was surreal to see. How her legal team went along w it too lol! ..I agree the donation moment was huge. People that were there say some of the jurors' jaws dropped. Bc they got to see how she stubbornly lies and spins in the moment, even w direct evidence against her. They got see how she behaves when caught in a lie; almost delusionally continuing to argue and lie. I feel it helped them view other evidence and parts of trial through that lense. Once they saw how dishonest she could be, it was a wrap imo
@@patricknez7258 Couldn't agree more. The pledge/donation moment was huge. Also the TMZ slip-up. The moment when jurors found out Heard assaulted her ex-girlfriend at the airport. The knife she gave Depp. The fact that she basically said every witness had it wrong. The fact that it was discovered she initiated an arbitration against Depp first. The audio tapes where she's maniacally laughing and insulting Depp. I mean... pretty much everything.
I found the Depphead. You clearly fell for Johnny's lies
The video deposition of Amber Heard was what I thought they were going to play. When she said, "...I wanted Johnny to find out about the divorce through some other source than TMZ, who was alerted....
Don't forget that Amber lied about donating all of her divorce money to charity. The smoking gun for me was the audio of Amber in essence mocking Johnny for not being a man and fighting back against her, not wanting to get into physical fights with her after Johnny had already lost part of his finger from a glass bottle Amber threw at Johnny. Pretty sick stuff from someone who had been playing victim and I beleived had probably been telling the truth until this trial. I'll admit, she had me duped.
Johnny donated all his trial earnings from her to charity, haha
@@rhino202I KNOW!!! So proud of him. I never doubted Johnny Depp…ever.
So maybe what people say isn't always the truth all the time. Doesn't necessarily mean to call them liars, but there are always 2 sides to every story
thought this was just as bad + the tmz guy saying she emailed him the video + the trailer park owner saying she was the one yelling & almost nothing was broken lmaooo she was lying the whole time its crazy she has stans online still 😭😂
She ruined the word pledged for me forever
I suspect that Amber heard vs Johnny depp will be forever remembered. It’s a good case that’ll be talked in law school and on a dinner table too
I’d be GENUINELY surprised if we didn’t get a movie adaptation of that trial some time in the next 20-50 years.
of course it will be remembered, it was streamed online everyday when everyone was locked in their homes. but will people remember the Ghislaine Maxwell trial ? of course not, they didn't even show it and barely reported on it. Epstein already swept under the rug
Kathy Griffin would be a good fit as Elaine Bredhoft since they're both dumbasses who try to present as geniuses.
I'm still staggered that anyone watched it at all. It's one of the base cases that is about as important to humanity as RHBH.
Having dinner with a mega pint
The smoking gun for me on the JD v. AH case, aside from the audio tape, was when she was on the stand and said "that's why I wrote it about him!", and then immediately tried to back track that she meant "about men like him". She did the same thing in one of her depositions. Narcissist at the most extreme, thinking she's smarter than everyone else, but she's so eager to show of her "smarts" that she screws herself over.
She didn't write anything false or maliciously the jury rushed the verdict and they weren't even sequestered. The UK trial had a judge decide it
@@schmumlaufthe UK trial blocked a lot of evidence that was allowed in the US. The US trial was more fair in that sense for sure.
@@cynthiagonzalez3193 do you even know what the trial was about? There's no way that what amber wrote was false or somehow malicious it was all true he's a disgusting drug raddled abuser and r@pist
@@schmumlaufthe UK is even more sexist than the US courts
Wasn't AH also having dinner with the Judge's family?
My theory on the Alex Jones where his lawyers "messed up" is that his lawyers didn't like him in the first. Because when they were told what happened they didn't do anything about it. They were basically like "oh darn. 🤷🏻♀️"
He's garbage
Well it’s not their fault Jones was guilty. If he wasn’t such a terrible person then it would’ve been easier for them.
@@kake1604 I'm saying I think they threw him under the bus on purpose and I don't blame them
That "trial" was just a matter of seeing how much money they could make him pay. No one had to prove that the event was real.
Jones is ready a psychopath! I also think he must smoke road flares 24/7.
What amazes me about the Depp v Heard is that Amber Heard has shown that she has magical healing ability like comic book characters like Wolverine and Deadpool because she was full strength punched in the face countless times with JDs ringed hands according to her but the next day she's completely healed with no contusions , swelling, disfiguration, etc. She NEEDS to be studied by science for the betterment of humankind. Why isn't it happening?!??!
She got a new bruise kit. You wouldn’t know it, it’s from Canada 🤭
Relax dude, it's a makeup technique.
@@Denny_Boi honey; they where being 🎉sarcastic🎉
@@gwennygrausamt A bruise kit from the future even! She truly is an anomaly
Brooks was ridiculous.. I had to remind myself this wasn’t a movie while watching that trial. Wildest trial I’ve watched so far!
I’ve never seen such an angry person in a court room. He made a joke out of it & when called out on making a joke out of it he freaks out
He took his instructions from the New York subway shooter. That one was so madening.
That judge bit her actual tongue to bits I'm sure. She deserved the longest vacation ever lol
There is a different man who represented himself and was allowed to question his own child who he stabbed after forcing the child to hold the gun that killed his mother in front of him. That case was horrible to watch, the man was unhinged during his self representation. I’m in the uk and we defo don’t get to see what happens in courts so watching things like that is beyond my comprehension. Crazy
Some days I couldn’t even watch the trial only highlight reels because Daryl Brooks was so difficult to watch! It was insanity!
Imo, anyone that has ever known someone or had a family member like Amber, could hear it immediately. Constant externalization of blame, gaslighting, lashing out when they are losing or the facts aren't on their side. It feels downright delusional. So disturbing. Glad the majority of people were able to see the truth.
Although I agree with your overall point, I wish you didn't use the word "gaslighting". Another overused and misunderstood word used by people today.
Anyways, AH did lie repeatedly but she never tried to "gaslight" the jury. She gave them clear and direct lies at every corner...
Amber is so sexy though she gets a pass
My father is so frustrating to deal with…he does all 3 things & more.
@@JimSty-bh1os she gaslit Johnny, which was clear in some of the evidence that was presented.
@@JimSty-bh1os no, gaslighting was an appropriate word to use. Just another one of her tactics.
One thing about the Depp Heard trial is that she always stted the article was never about him, but at one point when she was stressed she said "that's why i wrote the article about him" and it was never picked up.
For me, the smoking gun in the Depp case was when Heard opened a smoke-filled box and removed a gun, describing it as "the smoking gun I used to beat Johnny with". That was tough to come back from.
Norm MacDonald would laugh at that
That Brooks dude had me in tears looking through his pages going over his notes like he was some high-caliber lawyer
and calling hearsay on an eye witnesses testimony
My favorites "who is you?" And "what else do you not recall?" 😂😂😂
My favorite is when he objected to the state dropping the assault charge case against his ex because that's all he prepared to fight
“Interesting…” 😂😂😂
Fake it till you...get sentenced
Im surprised you didn't play the audio where Amber tells Dep no one will believe him because he is a man and she will make false accusations against him that was more damning in my opinion
Facts. The audio tapes were the smoking gun in JD vs AH. 100%. They both have issues, yes. But she admitted that she hit him and blamed it on him running away from fights. What else is needed? So glad he's rid of her.
Yes, that's what sealed her fate for me.
To me the single most smoking gun moment of the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard trial was when Amber tried to redefine "pledged to donate" to "donate" when she was being cross-examined by Camille Vasquez. She didn't simply fail to donate the money to a children's hospital she said she would, money that she got from Johnny, she then attempted to lie about it pretend like she did. If you're going to try to redefine common words in open court and then gaslight everyone about what actually happened in the process and get mad when the everyone else uses a different definition of that common word...that says it all. That's 100% strongly narcissistic behavior. The subsequent sheer brazenness and unrepentance about what she did too; she refused to own up to it when she did a subsequent interview about the trial and came across like "how dare they say negative things about me during the trial!!!," ...as if she had absolutely no idea how a trial should or does work.
I like how in the Kyle case everyone ignored the fact the guy with the pistol had an expired license for it and had a DUI charge which was both dropped so he could testify.
So what? Kyle shouldn't have been there to begin with. He's a murderer that got away with it.
@@lydiaparris3400aha ha 🤣🤣🤣
Rittenhouse is a hero
@@lydiaparris3400 that dude pointed a glock at him had it coming, anyone who brings a gun to a protest knows the risk. i say it played out fairly
He looks so smug. He came there hoping for trouble, and he got it.
Their are still thousands of women everyday on Twitter talking about how Amber was the victim and she never hit him. SHE LITERALLY said it herself she hit him, wtf trial were you watching.
Yeah there are people who still think jfk is alive
Wtf did you expect
I think you’ll find that many of those thousands are people using various names. I think the number of supporters are way less than it looks. And most of them are being rewarded in some way.
As a DV survivor, I support all victims. Amber Heard is an abuser, with a dv arrest history. She used the courts to lie about & destroy a man’s life for attention and a leg up in the divorce. She’s trashy, low class and deserves to be where she is now.
Thousands of women AND men
I work with one
The smoking gun for me with the amber trial was when they said she put her own human poop on the bed and blamed the dog, at that point I knew where this was heading 😭 I didn’t even know much about Johnny or amber before the trial only seen Johnny in movies didn’t know his personal life so I went into that trial extremely unbiased but after I herd that + her weird faces during the court let me know exactly what type of person she was
Hahahaha, same here.
I didn't know much about Johnny, didn't even know he was married to Amber.
@@MayaBishopStan same I honestly didn’t even know who amber was before the trial 😭 I was trying to give her benefit of the doubt bc she was the woman & I seen in the trial Johnny was violent sometimes to but after hearing what she did she was definitely the psychopath that pushed johnny over the edge sometimes. johnny seems like he as a pure soul just anger issues
Ngl you seem ratchet
Same here
@olivialindsey5577
Normally, I'd side with the victim, too, but none of Depp's other exes alleged that he'd been violent toward them.
Including Vanessa Paradis, with whom he was for over ten years.
The murdaugh case still blows my mind! It’s so sad to think they had no idea what was coming and in the moment how scared and confused they had to of been! He’s a MONSTER.
Darrell Brooks choice of witnesses is just mind boggling. To use one his favorite phrases. Every witness he called sealed his fate even more.
"Grounds! Grounds!!... 😂
Imagine being that guy in the first video and being more concerned with money than the lives of your wife and child. As a father the idea of hurting my own child is impossible. Every instinct I have since the moment I became a father is to protect my children even if that requires me to sacrifice my own life to do so. For someone to go against that natural instinct they have to be fundamentally broken psychologically in a way that makes that person no longer human but instead a monster who would murder literally anyone.
I couldn’t have said it better myself. I’m a father as well.
Allegedly, the reason for him even going after his family is BECAUSE he had been "protecting" them or at least their and the family's reputation, alongside with the Fraud/Theft of company/business money.... I absolutely DO NOT condone what this man did, however if you try to get into the possible psyche of the Person during this time, it is understandable why he thought this was the way to go.... He tried to be the "protector" by allegedly covering up for his son(s) crimes, while committing other crimes himself, overwhelming himself with the lies and cover-ups....
@@ninagude0586regardless of his psyche at the time, this man should never step on another glass blade or feel the warmth of the sun, he deserves multiple life sentences with no parole.
@@GasEnjoyer Grass Blade*?? 🤔. Unsure if that's what you meant. And yes, I absolutely agree!! Very vile and heartless individual..... He just was already that even before the murders.
@@ninagude0586 agreed and yes lol I meant grass
I was sedated..heavily medicated, traumatized, just came out of surgery. i remember everything but having a gun in my hand .
The hypocrisy of that man was unreal - he was trying to get Rittenhouse convicted based on lies.
He and his friends tormented and threatened a young boy, stuck a gun in his face and then were happy to lie and say they were the victims until undeniable photographs were presented which made the injustice they were trying to perpetrate impossible to pursue.
Then they have the gall to say they are the ones protecting America - these people who would happily pervert the legal process if it let them hurt the people they hate.
😂
"I procured a firearm while underage via an illegal straw purchase then proceeded to cross state lines into a violent situation, whereupon I proceeded to escalate it then avoid homicide charges based off the only surving victim being technically compromised from a jury perspective".
Yeah real big win for that wElL rEgUlAtEd MiLiTiA
@@APSupernary Wasn't a straw man purchase, it was a completely legal transfer under Wisconsin Statute 948.60(3)(c) as he was over the age of 16 as covered in the court case.
He was driven 10 miles from his mom's house to his dad's house, there happens to be state line in between the towns.
His "escalation" was putting out a fire on a property with fire extinguisher.
The violent, belligerent and convicted FELON Rosenbaum, threatened RIttenhouse, stalked Rittenhouse, then chased him for half a block with the intent to attack him; when Rittenhouse felt that fleeing/retreating was no longer an option to protect himself he shot Rosenbaum. - VALID SELF DEFENCE
After that he got on his phone to a friend to contact the police, he wasn't attacking or threatening anyone. A mob then turned violent and pursued him with the intent to hurt and kill him so he left the scene for his own safety and in attempt avoid using lethal force.
While Rittenhouse was fleeing moving to police to report the shooting (so not attacking anybody) he was assaulted with by another CONVICTED VIOLENT FELON Anthoney Huber who he shot in while being attacked - VALID SELF DEFENCE
And then what this video he only shot Gaige Grosskreutz (with 2 misdemeanor convictions one involving a firearm) once Grosskreutz pointed his ILLEGALLY concealed firearm with the intent to kill Rittnehouse - VALID SELF DEFENCE.
Question should rather be why prosecutors bend to political pressure from the media and aggressively persue the only person who did not break any laws up to the point where they themselves are breaking the law and let people who actually broken the law go.
@@APSupernary let's see , it wasnt an illegal straw purchase , he didn't cross state lines with it , and by escalating it you mean cleaning off graffiti and putting out fires then running away when threatened ? And every one of the victims ( alive or not ) was compromised from anyone's perspective ( jury or not ) . Maybe try reading ?
I do find it funny how terrible Amber Heard's acting was in the courtroom. It is also so telling when someone is non-verbally directing every single statement they make at the jury, like they're pleading with them instead of having faith in the truth of their case.
Holy crap, ain’t that the truth.
You're supposed to talk to the jury in a trial. That part of it isn't a negative, for her. Like, she's an awful enough person, without you having to invent things that aren't true. Like, another insane and guilty person in this video, Darrell Brooks, got angry at the cops who were giving their witness evidence in the trial, because the cops were looking at the jury and directing their answers to them. Because that's what you're SUPPOSED to do and what you're literally told by the judge to do. Darrell Brooks didn't understand that, and his insanity and paranoia made him think the cops were trying to unduly influence the jury somehow.
So you're literally sounding as insane as people like Darrell Brooks and Amber Heard by making a comment as daft as this. It's not a good look, bro.
@@duffman18define making others question their sanity because of your manipulation.
@@duffman18she looked like an insincere lunatic, thank goodness you weren't in the jury.
@@duffman18i agree w u brother but chill out
I think there was 2 other smoking guns in the Depp case, his former girlfriend testifying that he did NOT push her down the stairs as Heard had been claiming (and showing clear affection for him & how he handled her fall, despite him being her ex) and the TMZ reporter when testifying about whether Heard was the one that had sent them the video & other manipulation of the situation for her own benefit. He said nothing objectionable, answers like, when asked why he was at a location "because I was told to be there" & he explained the TMZ procedure for verifying videos & how long each took, with it taking about 15 minutes if the video came from the person in it & they regularly received info from said person & had previously verified who they were. Asked how long it took them to verify the edited Depp/Heard fight video straight after explaining all the above & he answers "about 15 minutes
At the very end of AH's testimony she also said, "and that's why I wrote the op-ed anout JD" 🙄
Well who else was it about? Nothing she said was untrue or inaccurate but they lied about the dogdoo and you all fell for it
@quajeezo Prove it. She lied lied lied. No, no, "we" didn't. 😏
@@schmumlauf Besides, she said it wasn't about him. . . . More lies.
@@schmumlauf You do realize that part of her case, what her and her team argued, was that the article was not specifically about Depp? You know that right? You did watch the trial?
@@schmumlaufsilence, troll
The bigger smoking gun in Depp vs Heard was the Australia recordings that couldn't be played in court due to other people being in them.
With Amber stating that she was sorry, she loves him, it was an accident, she didn't mean to hurt him to the person searching for the missing part of JD's finger.
The paramedics saying she wasn't injured despite her claiming that was the night he SAd her with a broken bottle.
I remember in the Rittenhouse trial how the prosecution actually made the argument: "A skateboard isnt a weapon. Kids get them for Christmas."
Craziness. A knife isn't a weapon either... chef's use them to cook.
By that "logic" nothing is a weapon because kids get everything for Christmas. 😂
Carrying an assault rifle across state lines to murder multiple people, including shooting at emergency personnel as they attended to the victims of your mass shooting (word for word of the EMS personnel who tried to save the lives of Rittenhouse's rampage), apparently isn't a crime either, according to the incredible state of Wisconsin. Good job Judge Schroeder. Btw, this judge denied the use of the term "victims" during trial, when discussing Rittenhouse's murder victims (the people Rittenhouse shot and either wounded or killed). Judge Schroeder also openly played "God Bless the USA" during trial, (which, as we all know, is a Trump campaign song). Good Lord, our country is doomed.
@@GSeward God Bless the USA was around LONG before Trump. You know there was a whole world of politics and problems pre Trump, right? You obviously know NOTHING about the actual case since you think the rifle was brought across state lines. You also don't know it is LEGAL for a minor to carry that rifle because of the length of the barrel due to hunting laws. He was being attacked and defended himself! Your emotional tirade does not supersede the law!
@@GSewardI seriously can’t tell if your trolling 🤣 if so we’ll done. And if your serious I hope you don’t have kids. Bcuz you won’t be able to protect them 🤡🫡
For amber heard it was the photo editing comparison the defense proved was photoshopped
Don’t forget Amica creame not existing when she said it did and for her saying that she was so good with makeup that she erased any bruising.
and she admitted on the stand she wrote the op-ed
To be fair there were so many moments in that trial which could be described as a smoking gun. The audio recordings, the photoshopped images, the photographer who proved she staged a photo op, the lies about the donations, her endorsing the op ed's title. She took so many L's in that trial.
There were way too many against her. 😅
"That's my bicep vaporizing."
That picture is amazing. Don't play with guns kids.
In the Rittenhouse case there was also the drone footage. The prosecutors gave a low quality, hard to see, copy to the defense while trying to hide the real, high quality video. If the defense had asked for a mistrial the judge would have granted it, but there was no need to since Kyle was clearly going to win.
Scumbag prosecutors
I don’t get it where are you for or against Rittenhouse?
@@MitchConner2000 doesn’t matter whether you for or against Kyle. You should just be pro-truth. And the truth is that Kyle acted in self defense
@@pizrux6592 Well said 🙌
@@pizrux6592 going to a place intending to shoot someone then shooting someone is not self defense. He told people he wanted to shoot protestors. It's why he obtained the rifle. It's why he was driven there. Nothing about any of his actions indicated that it was self defense.
Imagine going on so many international vacations for leisure that you forget if you went there or not
“An actress” isn’t even accurate to describing Amber anymore 🤣🤣 don’t think it ever was
No wonder Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted. I didn't follow the case because of politically charged it was, but wow. What a slam dunk for the defense. Don't see that often
From Scotland this looks like the wild west.
My question is, were the 2 people that Rittenhouse did kill, before this or after this?
@@davidworobec1673 They were before. Gage was the last one to be shot. The first guy started chasing him, trying to get his gun, and after he was shot, the crowd went nuts and all started chasing him, some thinking he was just a guy shooting people and not realizing it was self defense. One guy tried to punch him, which knocked him down, and another guy comes up and tries to kick him. The guy who tried to kick him was shot at once, but was not hit. The 2nd guy to be shot hit him with a skateboard while he was on the ground and then tried to take his rifle and was shot and was killed. Then our boy Gage comes up and points his gun at him and started advancing which is when he was shot in the arm. In my opinion, the first guy who was shot, the guy who first started chasing Kyle is to blame for all of this. The others honestly probably thought they were doing good by chasing a guy who had just opened fire when in reality it was just self defense, not some crazy guy with a gun.
Still doesn't erase the fact that Rittenhouse and his twin piggy faced mother aren't two raging piles of dog excrement.
@@android12921- You’re defending a convicted ped, wife beater and armed robber/bugler?
The Rittenhouse case had too many smoking guns to count. The drone footage, McGiunnis's testimony, phone video, every state witness was in effect a defense witness.
the fact that Kyle has absolutely no medical training means it would be literally impossible and legally wrong to help anybody. A child spree killer lied about his motive and you fell for it. Oh do you not like that one because it destroys you narrative that he was there to help? He literally could not help, and did the exact opposite. Weird how the totally legit lawyers didnt bring this up.
@@mikeespinoza5733
YOU WROTE
the fact that Kyle has absolutely no medical training means it would be literally impossible and legally wrong to help anybody.
REPLY
Did you watch the trial? Kyle was certified in first aid. He offered first aid.
YOU WROTE
A child spree killer lied about his motive and you fell for it.
REPLY
Spree Kller? Describe the interactions of Rosenbaum and Rittenhouse right up to the shooting in a way that sounds like a spree killer. All the actions. Just facts, no speculating.
YOU WROTE
Oh do you not like that one because it destroys you narrative that he was there to help?
REPLY
That's not my "narrative". I don't pretend to read minds. There is no evidence that he had bad intentions.
YOU WROTE
He literally could not help and did the exact opposite. Weird how the totally legit lawyers didn't bring this up.
REPLY
Did you watch the trial? Binger tried and failed to make those exact points.
@@mikeespinoza5733hey buddy, unless you know things for a fact, keep your opinions to your self and stfu.
@@mikeespinoza5733 even if he went there to kill people (highly doubtful) he would still be justified in self defense because people were literally in the process of attacking him within arm's reach when he shot them, after he fled and was cornered.
Not being his 'victim' was literally as easy as not assaulting him.
'totally legit lawyers' know that someone 'illegally' offering medical aid doesn't negate their right to self defense.
@@sub-harmonik Exactly.
the voice recording was one of the smoking guns but someone mentioned somebody while being questioned that wasnt meant to be mentioned so you could see depp's team silently cheer about this and brought in the person the next trial which was a big play in the case.
Kate Moss wasn’t going to be brought in as a witness until amber said Johnny pushed her down the stairs. Totally a lie.
I remember watching every second of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and my jaw DROPPING when that "smoking gun" testimony was made.
Gage F'd around and found out in many ways. Went on the stand and didn't even make up some vague responses, just straight up said "yeah nah, he should have shot me"
@@Joe_P I'd have to rewatch it due to it being so long, but I remember him trying to avoid admitting the fact he pointed the gun first, and wasn't even supposed to have a gun (handgun) in the first place.
Legit I was shook! I actually went into the Rittenhouse trial thinking this kid was crazy and guilty even though I barely saw any info about it. I was very easily swayed well before the ‘smoking gun’ testimony of Gaige
@@jessice293 Agreed! I went in with the opposite opinion but thought he should get charged for having a weapon as a minor in public. Still shocked he got out of it tbh.
@@jessice293 Both went there for trouble
Social media has been amazing in the fact that it proves people are liars. That doctor suing Paltrow TOTALLY got found out as a liar 🤦🏼😂
I knew he was a liar the instant I heard he was claiming all these massive life-changing injuries while she got off without a scratch. How much does she weigh? 120 lbs dripping wet? How is she going to put a guy in hospital by ramming into him without suffering any injury herself, unless she's wearing the Iron Man suit at the time?
I know! Even before I actually became interested in that trial, the first tiny article I read had my first impressing being that he was just someone out for money from someone famous. Then, it started picking up attention, so I started looking for clips of the trial, and this guy wasn't smart enough to pull it off. Every part of his claim against her vs his own testimony + his bragging about his great life on social media = just destroyed his character.
Darryl Brooks wasn’t a clown in that court hearing, he was an entire circus….
I remember in the Depp case was when Heard mentioned a makeup brand name and also provided a date, and said brand's Twitter account responded by stating that the company hadn't even existed at the time that she gave.
The product she mentioned didn't exist. It was a color correcting kit from Milani that was launched in 2017, eventhough she claimed violence in 2016.
This channel is one of the best on CZcams. No spin. Just facts. Thank you.
Lol
I agree!! Love it!
There is absolutely spin on this channel. It’s owned and operated by Dan abrams for god sake. I’m not saying it’s bad, but it exists.
I mean, there's no spin when they just stream live trial footage. There's _definitely_ spin on other things, and a *lot* of it in this video. It's actually quite a shame, because a lot of what they omit is more compelling than what they share.
Huh? This IS my fav channel! “DarRel brooks built a fort with all those records boxes … he is a MESS and one of my favorite trials ! Best entertainment ever ( Dan … meh ) not so much
You missed Chris Watts. When the neighbor showed video to police officer of CW backing his truck into garage (loading bodies into truck) in the very early morning, which CW never does that.
I think this is just covering the last year of trials. Was Watts 2022?
@@mc-rn8ro Watts plead guilty and was sentenced in 2018
I love how the Murdoch case, Paul unknowingly caught his own killer and bought him to justice. Sad but satisfying.
Glad people are finally able to accept that Kyle Rittenhouse was not the terrible murderous instigator he was painted to be, and that his acquittal was 100% the right ruling.
Some are but some cant. I am an atheist and identify as liberal but it sickened me to see many of my fellow atheists, who claim to be about reason and evidence, double down claiming that Rittenhouse fake cried and he got away with murder, etc. Never let it be said that freethinkers exist......they dont
as someone who was against kyle rittenhouse until this video just now, it goes to show that if you’re not in the courtroom and hearing the facts of the case, stfu
Lets normalize 17 year olds bringing out their ar-15's to protests! Mann im glad I do not live in a third world country like america
Mlm😅.😅.😅m😅😅mnemonic😅 m.😅m may only only one or 😅 o oi 😅oi
@rplute n
never forget how hard the media pushed the rittenhouse case lol.
Yeah all the while epsteins girl’s trial was getting no coverage
It's pretty crazy how very very serious and big of a deal some of these trials were, murders and mass shootings and that the biggest and most famous of a deal is a defamation case ultimately stemming from a divorce
Because those are more common than a male making public that he was the victim in an abusive relationship
@@piroko13 and it was also a very famous celebrity, on top of being an incredibly socially taboo situation.
A defamation case with defecation!
The other cases were somewhat straight forward, we knew what happened, 3 Of them had either video of the act happening or video that makes it's impossible to dispute what happened or happened in public for everyone to see (Alex Jones).
The Gwyneth Paltrow one is the only where new information came out, but that case was either just a scammer trying to get money or a movie star being a terrible person. So not really that interesting
JD v AH on the other hand, we got to dive deep into their personal life and find out many new things about them. We also had to pay a lot more attention to determine what was going on.
baby, that case was about DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. If you see it as just divorce then you should research this case before speaking about it.
The kyle Rittenhouse one really completely destroyed the prosecution... the guy got the perfect shot to disarm the guy while not continuing to shoot and he had the trigger discipline to not fire till he was being aimed at... that ruins it all because it's incredibly hard to paint such a man as a murderer.
As someone who thinks he shouldn’t have been there with a gun strapped across his chest, I agree and appreciate this perspective. I don’t own guns and know that takes either serious luck or really good reactions during times of stress
@@StarfayeArt people were there to cause problems why would anyone go there to help unarmed?
Either of those "guys" are interchangeable. Grosskreutz didn't fire at all, instead only trying to disarm Rittenhouse.
@christopherh.p.4680 Be fair. I can't speak for Rittenhouse's fearful state of mind either, but all of that happened just after he killed someone armed with a plastic bag. Also, he fell over.
@@MuninnMyrkviGrosskreutz put his hands up, KR lowered his rifle, the Grosskreutz drew his pistol. Definitely not "interchangeable".
I never really looked into the Rittenhouse case. I thought it was about a guy just shooting into a crowd from 100 feet away. How wrong I was.
That's what the far left propaganda machine tried to push.
It pretty much was. Lol had he not been there in the first place it wouldn't have happened
@@nghtguy13if the rioters weren’t there either, giant moot point you made 👍
@@nghtguy13 sir you clearly didn’t pay attention to the truth of the case and everything that happened if you’re still saying that.
Completely nonsensical argument
@IWontBuy-RP your whataboutisms are showing.
Im surprised Sanderson didnt come to court wearing a neck brace to really try & drive it home how "injured" he was/ still is from the accident that happened years ago 🤣🤣
He admitted he traveled and did lots of fun stuff after the injuries 😂 🤦
It was honestly such a cash crab
"Tell the world Johnny, tell them : "I Johhny Depp, a man, I'm a victim too of domestic violence." ~AH. He told us, we believe him.
I love how people look at the jury to try and convince them like if that’s gonna work.
Woah. I never knew the Amber Heard recordings and just got really excited Depp won. Now listening to those recordings just... wow. People still believe she innocent? Dude try avoid conflicts and hated getting hit and she didn't care. I hope best for Depp after listening to these recordings.
Yes more of this content!!! You guys are the best ❤
13:05 anyone who defends themselves in a court of law has a fool for a client.
well he is probably new poster boy for when someone says that that is trial case its refering to.
The smoking gun for me in the Depp Vs Heard trial was when she finally said, "...and that's why I wrote the op-ed." The trial was to locate the truth in terms of whether she wrote the op-ed with malicious intent. That was so satisfying to see.
Love the video and your all the material you upgrade, I hope this channel keep growing up ⬆️ 👍🙏🏻☺️ thanks for everything
6 life sentences and 700 more years is crazy….
The Kyle case was such a waste of time. Why wasn’t the guy that tried to shoot him in jail right now? Basically admitted to trying to commit murder
There were so many smoking guns in the Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp case, the plaintiffs could have been accused to be in possession of a weapons arsenal.
I watched the brooks trial from start to finish and it was so wild to me. Every single twist and turn was whackier than the one before it and it would have been funny if it wasn’t so troubling.
Darrel Brooks’s defense that he just doesn’t exist was hilarious
What?
His lawyer was terrible!
@@mrceresa1 he kept refusing to to be addressed as himself - it was weird
He said he was a ‘sovereign citizen’ look it up, it’s kind of crazy
No but the important thing is whether or not he was angry.
Jesse Weber - you bring the best contents!!
The smoking gun in AJ'S trial was the judge declaring him guillty and not allowing an actual trial.
Exactly. That whole court case was a complete sham.
Don't talk rot 😅
Agreed. You see where the bias of this host swings. Regardless of what someone thinks of Jones the more you look into it the more it sets a bad precedence.
Alex Jones refused to comply with discovery and lost the case before it could even go to trial. That's 100% his fault. He decided not to take part of the trial and paid the price
The poor pup in the first video, never being able to see Paul again who he clearly loved so much
Putting Amber Heard in the same thumbnail with Brooks and Jones is hilarious 😆
Amber heard is the prime example of karma coming back to collect big time
1 billion dollars in damages… Lawyers emailed evidence to the plaintif… That’s actually insanity, what a hit job
Wow, that's a good thing someone was recording a video of Rittenhouse shooting Grosskreutz when he pointed his glock at him. I don't think they would've been able to prove that. All the eye witnesses would've just said Rittenhouse just murdered two guys and not killing them out of self defense.
For me, the Rittenhouse prosecutor flagging the whole courtroom with an AR15 was probably the highlight of the WTFness of that whole trial
tbf it should have gotten the prosecutor disbarred and jailed
@@LukeSawardMusic I was shocked that it didn't result in a juror hitting the deck and complaining directly to the judge
How many "criminals" were jailed without a way to prove their innocence and vice versa. To feel utterly defenseless, helpless to prove the truth.
Alex Jones’s lawyer should have been disbarred and replaced. Who would ever hire someone after that 😳
Enjoyed this episode! Keep them coming 👏🏽
The smoking gun in the JD V AH was Heard’s entire testimony
Not only did that guy get his bicep vaporized, he got vaporized on the stand.
The Darell Brooks trial is like locking a toddler in a room with some boxes and hours of spare time
While what Alex Jones did was terrible, those punitive damages are kind of ridiculous. Not to mention that he’s just gonna declare bankruptcy, pay pennies on the dollar, and quickly bounce back because of his high-profile name.
"Listen to what Amber said" > Ad start rolling.
That was perfect...
That doctor was wild he was out here spending the money before even going to court for it
It’s the way he says “don’t tell me what it feels like to be punched” that hurts my heart. His vocal tone suggests genuine disdain for Amber’s minimization. He just wanted her to understand how real the pain felt and for her to call him baby after denying he was punched straight to his face is so abhorrent. She disgusts me to no end.
Not going to lie, I genuinely believe Alex when he said he gave the phone to his attorney to "find" the Sandy Hook messages. Mostly because I can't imagine that he wouldn't delete them if he looked himself.
I've watched mostly all these cases & there were a lot of smoking guns not just one . The evidence was mounting against them.
Depp v Heard, if the jury concluded she acted with malice on all counts, how is it possible they decided Adam Waldman calling her story a hoax was defamatory? Make it make sense.
The part of the statement that the jury didn't agree with on Waldman's part was where he said they purposely called the police a second time and roughed the place up. The police had said they showed up twice for a different reason than a second call. That's how it makes sense
@@hunterkelley5159 Correct. It had to do with there being a second call. I can’t recall for certain, but I believe the second 911 call was left out of evidence, so I don’t believe the jury even knew there was a second call. Was kind of a BS finding, but these are ordinary people who don’t have legal training and did the best they could.
The count against Depp was pretty much semantics, because Waldman laid out a specific timeline and gave specific details of what he believed happened, so its much easier to pick apart a very detailed statement and say 'Okay, well we didn't see or hear a second 911 call, so he got that wrong' and that could easily equate to it being said 'maliciously' if to them he obviously knew there wasn't a second call. There was actually a second call, and funnily enough *Elaine* brings it up either in her opening or her closing, where she says 'And there was two calls, but we'll show you that they weren't at the same time' I think she specifies that they were like 8 minutes apart or something because she goes on to say that the short amount of time means that it wasn't Amber's friends calling once, the officers getting there and finding no damage, and then the friends calling again to try and stage the scene but rather it was the friends calling twice to try and get cops there faster.
Courts did not allow the evidence of the actual second 911 call to get in. It was clearly Raquel Penington speaking. If that had been given to the jury, no way they would have sided with Amber on that one.
The lawyer I watched go over the case said they likely found that the defaming part was that they roughed the place up before calling 911 a second time. If the jury didn't believe Amber set up the scene they could take the statement as defamatory
I never watch famous court cases while in progress. It's enough to see this fair and succinct summary. Many thanks!
For the Rittenhouse trial, I would've charged them both with intention to harm or kill. Neither of the involved parties needed to be there, and neither needed to bring a loaded and lethal weapon. In my eyes both were hoping to shoot someone. Not to mention Kyle had to drive 20 miles to even get to the scene - That's planned and intentional. Moral of the story is don't give teens guns
which is just a 30 min drive. Your charges would go nowhere because you base it on ignorance
That teenagers shouldn't be allowed to own guns is blatantly obvious to most everyone except people in the US.
@@Mastermirror89Well considering the charge was dropped, he was legally allowed to own it, and was 17... 1 year before 18, legal adulthood. so sorry try again.
It's called, and say it with me, S E L F D E F E N S E
And get this, owning and possessing a gun, does not waive that right. He went there, with a license, to give aid.
It's called, and say it with me, S E L F D E F E N S E
And get this, owning and possessing a gun, does not waive that right. He went there, with a license, to give aid.
Oh yes Ambers Audios spoke Volumes.. as did her testimony & behavior on the stand! She Seriously thought she would fool Everyone with her "Innocent" Act too! 😏 Just Thankful for people with common sense!
She did in Europe. Pretty sure he lost some kind of similar case with her there before this one.
@@derek488 Actually She Didn't! There was a case in the UK Against the Sun Newspaper.. Amber 💩 was their witness! 😅 Meaning She could say whatever without having to show proof of her Stories Authenticity! 😒
@@derek488 No he lost a case against the sun for defamation where AH was a witness and that UK trial was full of irregularities and odd behavior from AH legal team and also the judge in charge
@@derek488 And also in the UK trial, since it was not a legal battle between AH and JD directly a lot of evidence from Johnny's side was dismissed
@@derek488 He lost a case against The Sun. Proving a news company defamed you is almost impossible due to laws protecting the press. But the same news company thinks Obama and Harry styles are having an affair, so their journalism isn't exactly credible.
Jesse Weber YOU are absolutely one of the very best interviewers / liasin between those you interact with &; your instinctive subconscious line of artfully posed questions . .You never appear disinterested only offer your years of having absorbed human Piccadillos then promote the current broadcast into showing how they may be affecting a new situation .All. in a well modulated vouceb that encourages us to absorb exactly where this new story may be heading .
I remember the fights I got into because of the Amber Heard case. I’m on Johnnys side and a coworker was on Amber’s side. When Amber was found Gulity, I looked at her and said “So she’s innocent right? The jury thinks differently. She’s getting what she deserves” That coworker quit the same day. 😂
Might have been bc u were just plain annoying in other wayd
Amd then everyone clapped
Im still amazed amber won any money in that trial. She lied under oath the whole time and still the judge wanted to be fair and award her 2 million. What is wrong with this world
It's because the evidence of what Johnny's lawyer claimed was not admitted. The statement she won defamation for was actually true. They just couldn't prove it in court due to the evidence being disallowed.
well that 2 million is the last money she’ll ever make.. at least in america as an actor
I am in no way defending Alex Jones for the absurd statements he made but the amount of money they required him to pay is ridiculous. Over a billion dollars is so much it takes away from the point of it all together. It turns the entire case into circus, they might as well said he owed a Biggillion dollars.
While putting their pinky to their lip.
He said nothing that thousands of others haven't said, and he refuted the statements years before the lawsuit. The trials were a politically motivated witch hunt.
Not only that but his layers should be disbarred. They obviously sent all that stuff on purpose. What lawyer “accidentally” sends things to District attorneys lol
Alex Jones was right jar is getting full
@@donthaveaname1086well Alex jones lied on the witness stand which is also a crime
"i didn't hurt you, i was hitting you!" 😶
Rittenhouse is pointing his gun at him & obliterating his bicep. Rittenhouse was clearly already pointing his gun at him before he pointed his own gun at Rittenhouse. So it’s ok for Rittenhouse to be an open threat to him but not for him to respond in the sane manner. Rittenhouse pulled the trigger. He hadn’t.
and by then he had already shot two other people! i think the prosecutor handled the case so poorly
this was absolute gold! I am soo glad that I got to see this. Thank you
Dude killed his son to distract from his financial dirty deeds?
I'd rather die than my sons get injured in the least.
How is that his first path instead of life insurance fraud? One is stealing from an insurance company and the other is killing your family, you would think he would try the former.