Russia's New Monster Vehicle Created to End War Fast
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 05. 2024
- Since their emergence after World War 2, infantry fighting vehicles have become an indispensable part of modern warfare, combining the mobility of transport vehicles with the protective power of light tanks.
Despite their impressive capabilities, IFVs have been plagued by some of the shortcomings of both conventional fighting vehicles and light tanks. They tend to be slower, bulkier, and less maneuverable than a Humvee while also being more vulnerable than a tank. However, the Russian army is making strides toward addressing these issues by introducing a new, robust solution that boasts unprecedented speed.
Enter the VPK-7829 Bumerang, a direct competitor to the American Stryker. This innovative new vehicle promises to deliver the same level of firepower and protection as its counterparts but with the added speed advantage. In fact, the Bumerang is set to be the fastest IFV in the world, with a top speed that surpasses even the most advanced models currently in use.
If the claims are valid, the Bumerang’s deployment is expected to send shockwaves throughout the military world… - Věda a technologie
Fielded in in impressive numbers just like the Armata and the Felon no doubt.
LOL. Probably :-) In truth, both the Armata and the Felon are just stepping stones to the next generation, and as such make no sense to scale up. The Armata suffers from the same top attack vulnerability as any other current tank, and it's clear to everyone the next generation design to be fielded would have to have that vulnerability addressed. It'd be stupid for the Russians to widely field the Armata without taking that combat experience into account.
The Felon - nice plane, but a bit late to the 5th gen. fighter party. Stealth is a perishable asset given how rapidly the radars and other electronics are evolving. As someone in the US airforce had said, speed is the new stealth. So I expect Russia will keep playing with the Felon in small numbers but will focus on the 6th gen aircraft. The Felon was late by a decade or so because in the 1990s and 2000s the Russians saw no urgency. This time around, for Gen 6, things are quite different.
My thoughts exactly
Well said.
Exactly. If you go on Wikipedia they tell you none have ever been built. This thing is nothing more than vaporware.
Exactly ... basically it is vaporware.
If it's anything like other Russian military vehicles, the models made for testing will be superb. The standard issued models will probably be made as cheaply as possible and break down after 20 minutes of hard use.
Bold of you to assume there will be any models other than the ones made for testing.
@@chefpat5838 I like to be bold on occasion! 😉😆
Like the Armata, tin can??? All show and no blow??
Historically, the Russians have shown they are quite skilled in building Potemkin villages.
it's a shame that humor keeps you in the dark. if you enjoy being right regardless of the facts simply out of emotion or political disagreement, then you are shooting yourself in the foot.
Comrade General: “It will achieve 100 kph.” Comrade private: “Yes, when dropped from transport plane.”
LMAO
I went back in time to elementary school so I can laugh to this joke
Hahaha! Best comment here
Whether you drive at 50 or 100 km/h on a mine. Where is the difference? The result is the same.
@@Medley3000 I like your stupid point to this stupid comment. Cheers.
It will end war fast, it delivers 14 deaths when destroyed instead of 3 like a normal tank
That's assuming they make it to the battlefield in the first place without running out of gas or breaking down due to corruption at all levels being necessary to generate a living since they don't pay their troops fuck all even in peacetime
@@TheOriginalFaxon Funny AND true. 👍
@@TheOriginalFaxon cruel but true😅
@@infernalstormrider IMO title of this video and thumbnail is really out of place, People die there everyday, writing "end war fast" in that meaning is highly inappropriate
@@TheOriginalFaxon Close, but you got it backwards. They don't pay their "troops" f-all due to rampant corruption, not the other way around. Skimming/siphoning starts at the top, and every next layer down has to pay up for the privilege.
and we all know russia never lies and has access to the best tech out there wait a minute lol
Yeah they are superhuman when it comes for military design, or anything for that matter.
All armored vehicles are a trade off between firepower, mobility and armor protection, there will never be a 'perfect' vehicle! All manufacturers lie about the capacity of their product because they are trying to sell them and politicians think there is always 'something' better! The five members of the UN security counsel are US, Russia, China, Britain and France, all of which are big-time weapon sellers so propaganda is always the order of the day! America has been spoiled by not having to fight an equally equipped enemy since WW2 so the ego factor is quite high!
Their best tech was in Ukraine.
@@mountainjeff Yeah it was lol.
Forget about the lol
I like how these videos are presented like a cross between a history video and an advertisement. I build vehicles out of popsicle sticks and this is such a good way to get fundamental ideas.
Kinda want to see these vehicles you made
Can't wait to see a javelin put the Boom into the Boomerang.
bumerang have arena/afganit aps kiddo so no javelin you bot 😃😃
@@janpiorkowski3352 Yea but most APS Dont Protect from Top Down attack You Bot. Let alone the fact that The T-90s and T-80s which do have Arena APS dint do jack to the Javelin so cope harder ?
@@cmongler8353 I heard the Afganit system is made to also counter top attack, from Red Effect I think, pretty unbiased dude considering he exposes the weaknesses of both russian and Nato tanks. Not sure about it tho. Also I love how people are acting like an anti tank missile killing a tank is a big deal, it's in the name
@@overthere187 Its not so much its a big deal, its mor so it was never tested in Live Combat against Vehicles as far as I am aware and how effective it is against a vehicle column and two javelin teams
You said it would be introduced in 2021. So Russia has it now? I don't recall seeing any Bumerangs on any footage. I must have missed the footage.
Wow, impressive. These might actually be able to do a full lap of red square on parade without having to be tactically and gloriously towed off
Imagine what I can do against the lgbtq arm of the west 😂
Except it wasn't towed off, the driver was not trained on the T14 since it was a new tank at the time and he pulled the hand brake, that's why in the full video you see the towing vehicle not being able to move it at all, and after that the tank starts moving again just fine. It's ironic how people in the west keep screaming "propaganda" and they fall for the same shit as the russians do. So much hypocrisy on both sides in this war
@@overthere187 right, it's not shit, it's just Russian soldiers are too stupid and poorly trained to operate it, different strain vro
@@kaboonali5466 I'm sure it can drive backwards really fast. Doubt it can outrun an excaliber round or brimstone missile tho.
they''ll be easy to spot on the battlefield just look for the vehicle being followed by a repair truck
🫢
Or being towed.
@@RichardBaran More than likely being towed away by a member of the Ukrainian Farm Division after it has been abandoned because it is out of fuel.
OR DESTROYED BY THE GHOST OF KIEV!!!!
Considering that recently one of the NATO honchos said about the Leopard tanks the following, that "it has not been designed to operate on the battlefield filled with mines artillery and drones", and it require "access to maintenance centers in close proximity" maybe you confused your vehicles??
Unlike an actual boomerang these won’t come back
I didn't see any in the Moscow parade. Vaporware like the T14 Armata. Drone food. Russia has lost 7600 Combat Fighting Vehicles in the Ukraine since Feb 22, counting the 24 yesterday. I haven't seen any of these yet on the battlefield. I'll take the Swedish CV90 Mark IV over this any day, regardless of its speed.
The Rheinmetal Boxer is excellent too 👍
keep drinking that ukranian cool aid
Yes, the Boxer and any of the SWEDISH IFV!!
Lol and the video shows them in parade. 🤣😆🤣
@@redstar8226 like all of Putin's other wunderwaffen, they don't exist outside of parades and propaganda films.
4:17 nice cut away because it couldn't deal with the steep incline 😂
Omg that was awesome.
Based on Armata? Ok then they’ll never be able to actually get them into the field in Ukraine…
The T-15 is based on the T-14 Armata since it's the same platform just different versions for different uses
🤣🤣🤣
@@dylanwhite3383 The T14s that saw mass deployment?
@@BenLJudy funny thing is that we never got to see them in mass 😅
Honestly they can get them in the field, they're just worried that the next headline will be "Ukraine blows up T-14s!" and all their prospective customers will cancel
A small correction. Not all western-made IFVs are "tracked" vehicles. There are about a dozen existing and battle-tested western-made floating 8x8 wheeled IFVs with armor-armament specs and speeds similar to or much better than VPK-7829 "Boomerang" can offer (most of them equipped with the famous 30mm Mk44S Bushmaster II autocannon and ATGMs) e.g. Finnish Patria AMW, Polish "Rosomak", Candian LAV, or Austrian "Pandur" (105 kph), etc. There is more. The Finnish Patria AMW is considered the best construction among them. All is presented upside down. The "Boomerang" is just quite decent and the most modern Russian-made equivalent to them, an answer to those existing constructions. The truth is that the "Boomerang" is a prototype or perhaps a pre-production vehicle, was not field tested yet, and only if properly funded has ever a chance to see the battlefield.
Another small correction... Reporting the specs on what the Russians say it is.
Another small correction... You said what people said, which is hearsay. Existing and tangibly tested versus planned. Well, we shall see what will come of it :)
Well said!👍
Taking into account the chest pounding that came out of Armata T14 tank pre-launch, the one that stopped during the Kremlin parade etc, we should be careful about what the real capabilities of this burperang are. Same as with the Russian claims about their t-72 etc., etc. On top of that, whatever happens, I doubt that with the current production difficulties they will be able to roll it or perhaps, if they do at all, they might be able to produce lower quality (lack of electronics) small batches that won't come out in time and won't be probably relevant for their scrwdup invasion of Ukraine. So, indeed, let's see.
@@RichardBaran people always go off specs since many countries like the US use specs as the minimum a piece of equipment is supposed to be able to do, so things like aircraft carriers and jets can go faster than the listed speed for example. In Russia since at least the Soviet era has treated specs as a GOAL to aim for while often falling short. T-34s often got wrecked by guns that shouldn't have been able to penetrate the T-34s armor and tanks often had varying max speeds, famously shoddy reliability, and they misfired more often then they should have.
Correction, the Stryker you said at 7:14 has max speed of 53 km/hr but the correct max speed is 97 km/hr or 60 mph.
And that is only If you dont Touch the injectionsystem, Just Higher the fuelrate, its one screw ... One of our Training Marder ifv once was cought on the Autobahn with nearly 120 kpm😅 a Boy with a broken Heart at the wheel trying to save His Relation......was a Bad Idea für this fellow.
The Stryker is a pos. Constantly break down. If the shock absorbers are extended because you were running over a large hole or a ditch the armor exposed above the wheels is just millimeters thick. A 308 can penetrate it and the crew is right behind that.
Here comes another 8 year prototype that is actually just even with a 60 year old Bradley and gets discontinued after 10 vehicles
What is the top speed 180 km / per hr some thing?
While Stryker is no more it's speed was 60 mph or 97 km/h which is far from claimed 53 km/h. Also there is a big difference when comparing road speed with terrain speed.
Javelin food. "Highly advanced Russian design" (Translation): Technologically, finally reaching where the M2 Bradley was in 1985, except for speed.
Bradleys are burning in Ukraine, right now, as we speak.
Don’t think you’ve seen all them
Bradley lay dead in Ukraine ohh and leopards 🐆 all armour is the same I get fucked up when you fighter peer to peer
These are very good to protect soldiers against unarmed civillians, just like their Typhoon collegues.
Oh my god who would have thought anti tank missiles are good against armored vehicles? Glad so many people on the internet changed their profession from virologists to war experts
@@overthere187 it is evident they completely suck at both.
Like the T-90
Like the leopard.
Like the Bradley.
Once it's in missle range 💥!!
while t-90 has ERA, missle most likely can't penetrate it armor, especially t-90m
It just takes that one missile that can kill it.
@@trololoevthat's wrong. Ukraine took out T-90Ms with missiles
@@leonnunhofer3453 well, sometimes it destroy tanks, sometimes don't. But I didn't agree that tank in missile range are automatically destroyed one.
"the striker has a manned machine gun, making it less effective than...."
*[Proceeds to show footage of a Stryker shooting its unmanned, remotely controlled machine gun firing*]
Thank you for slowing your speech..I'm sure many viewers will appreciate it as well. Now we can get every word.
I'm impressed by how many troops it can hold - makes the $triker/kill ratio much better! 😛
Which Strikers - the one that keep getting barbecued on Russian drone feed every hour?
@@swedhgemoni8092 yea the same one
western hardware is only good in Hollywood movies
LMAO what kill ratio are you talking about that can't be proven in the battlefield? Did you see the amount of ass the Russians kicked over the past 3 days? Search "Lancet drone" and educate yourself
@@swedhgemoni8092 i quite enjoy seeing US/NATO tax payer money put to good use lol - expensive tanks and armored vehicle bbqed to nothing by cheap Ruski drones shortly after entering battlefield
@@AM-cs8yi
Let's be honest now, plenty of IFV are barbecuing on both sides.
Only a partisan hack would argue otherwise.
Made with only the strongest cardboard armor plating technology can produce
Hahahah
You can’t argue one thing about the Russians. They produce a target rich environment for their opponents. 😂
The Strykers road speed is 100 kph and has an unmanned remote control weapon station firing either 50 cal or 40 mm Mk 19. The Stryker Dragoon has a 30mm turret.
Yup, unmanned but with access to get to it and after disconnecting the servos, can be manned.
send them so they can burn like the leopards 😂😂😂
Yup, and the Canadian version of the Stryker has a 2man turret with a 25mm cannon. Im noticing more and more that this channel puts out a lot of incorrect information.
@@blyat4998couldn't help yourself could you vodnik troll
@@blyat4998there are strykers in the graveyard.
no matter how impressive you make the equipment sound if the troops are poorly trained it doesn't matter.
which is factor possible to change.
right now it is most experienced soldiers on Earth.
lmfao still with the american propaganda of russian troops being poorly trained
Also if it breaks down a lot, costs a lot and needs a lot of maintainance
This may be another example, like the SU-57 and Armata, where Russia builds excellent prototypes that fall flat when it comes to export sales. Without export sales, Russi cannot afford to build their new tech. Besides, Ukraine is severely hurting Russia's attractiveness as an arms supplier for several reasons.
The Armata prototypes weren’t exactly all stellar…breaking down in Red Square during a parade exposed that fact. And no one proofed the concept of the crew being tucked away in the hill. Any tanker will tell you why that is a disaster waiting to happen, especially with a drunk conscript Army at the controls. Put a 3” pipe on the hood of your car and try driving around in the woods and let me know how that works out for you.
Another lesson learned by Russia, re SU-57...don't go into developing next gen technology with India. (Of all the countries out there...India?? Really??)
They don't offer any history once so ever in terms of competent aircraft design, specialized factories or workforce that could contribute to its construction, or any materials that could be used.
India would literally just be a financial partner...and an unreliable one at that. (As proven in this very case)
Lesson learned I imagine...China would be a better partner if for no other reason than it actually brings more to the table than money
@@chrisburke624who else would work with them? Just about everything since Sputnik has been a shitshow.
@@wesw9586 True. I think their options are the Chinese, or the Chinese
@@chrisburke624 I think Russia's days of being a leading arms supplier are over, at least for a very long time.
They're still using incandescent lights on there it can't be that advanced
The new Textron Cottonmouth, highlights and interesting approach for the USMC. It might be worth having a look at....
It's hard for every nation to create such a veicheels, because now we have advanced drones and ATG's.
Knowing Russia it will be a Lada with a hundred year old engine, 2 AK's duct taped to the roof that they pushed down a hill to go faster
AND it will be more effective that anything NATO have, as usual
Boomerang with guided artillery rockets and AA defense would too be awsome as theyre fast scoot and armored
This war has become the gold mine for the arms manufacturers !
So the Russians built a Stryker. So what.
The speedy Boomerang can turn around and retreat faster than all the others.
meanwhile Bradleys don't even have time to turn around but burn to crisp by a 30k drone. lmao
At least the soldiers survive and don't end up like a burned Russian vodnik soup that's been left out for a month😂
@@brianv1988 no way you actually believe they survive. Of course there will be few that do but if hit by an ATGM, they are 100% dead. Tank shell, dead. Artillery, dead. AT mines, dead. So if 80% of all people in all the bradleys destroyed are dead, counting the 20% that live is unreasonable. So many videos of unreliable bradleys being humps of metal in the battlefield.
South Africa have been using similar fast IFVs since the 1970s.
It is called the Ratel. Could travel at speeds of 100km/h easily. The Ratel 90 was even used successfully against Russian tanks.
where was it used against russian tanks? I mean, they used them themselves
Rodesia never die 💯🇷🇺
Don’t forget about the Rooikat, not for infantry transport, but 8 wheeler armoured car that can do 120 km/h
@@IVAN_IVANO It is no longer there. It died years ago, are you alright?
@@jaycee9752 nah.. its just occupied right now :)
Your videos are amazing🙂
At 4:19 the movie stops as the New Monster Vehicle can’t drive up the hill. Kind of funny 😂
So it will blaze around the "battlefield" at 100 kph but the battlefield has to be properly prepared and smoothed first so it doesn't beat all those soldiers inside into mush.
I'd like to see this do 100 kmh through a minefield
or rough terrain.
Hahaha or up a hill
How well does it do with shredded tires?
Always the innovators.
They’re just now trying to bring out competition to the Stryker and USA is phasing it out
The M2 Bradley also has ports for 2 TOW Missles and carries extra TOW Missles inside. So the M2 Bradley has anti-tank capabilities.
Bradleys did destroy Iraqi Tanks in Iraq War
Bradley - an infantry fighting vehicle that wanted to become a tank, but became only at the training grounds 🤣 Although at a cost it overtook the Russian tank by 1,5 times 😁
Your obsolete Bradleys burn like hell in Ukraine.
@@TheDrAstrov Not hard to overtake the russian tank by cost, when russian tank is a cheap piece of shit.
@@Cardboard_Man 😂🤣So far, all American weapons have turned out to be shit.. sorry - expensive shit.
Cool info, thanks.
Way back in the late 1980's and early 1990's South Africa fielded 8wheeled IFV's as light tanks in their conflict against the russian backed cuban forces. The Rooikat had a top speed of 120km/h on paved surfaces and it was very manoeuvrable and highly effective against T55/T62 and later model tanks. It easily outran the Landrover defender i was issued with as a camera vehicle and I had to request to be deployed and embedded with the command element of the unit, just to keep up. So, in effect I had a Rooikat as a camera platform during a cross border strike. Wondeful camera platform. At the height of the cuban/russian conflict in that theatre, the south african forces were numerically outnumbered 15 to 1. More than 15 thousand were deployed agains fewer than 1000 south african forces. The speed and mobility of the 8 wheeled ifv's were the significant factor in the south african's halting the advance of an overwhelming numbers of opposing forces. That was in the late 1980's already... unbelievable that the rest of the world still has not caught up.
Good comment. Yip, they were good, as well as a bunch of other equipment such as G5 155mm artillery, G6 self propelled and many more. I know this because I was there.
But ...... this Ukraine war has brought valuable lessons to modern conventional warfare. Armor is not invincible, it has to used as part of a combined unit. The South African border was was primarily a bush war for decades, and only in the last year or so became somewhat conventional. The Rooikat was never used in bush warfare, and sparingly used in a more conventional role toward the end. And just like today's war .... needed support from other units and importantly, needed effective air support, which the SA air force lacked while deep into enemy territory. So, it was used very effectively, but more in a strike capability .... hit and run.
By the way, this Russian is more compatible to the Ratel troop carrier, 10 man fighting crew and a range of weapon platforms.
The Rooikats and Ratels were notoriously ineffective against the T-55s, let alone T-62s! They only had theoretical chance if they were able to hit them from sides and not being spotted by anyone from the enemy forces.
On the other hand both Rooikat and Ratel were easily destroyed by the 14.5 mm HMG which was a common armament on Angolan vehicles.
@@matovicmmilan Agree
As a result, the Apartheid State's incursions into the young republics of Angola and Namibia were repelled and racists learned a good lesson.
Boomerang? Doesn’t that turn around and hit you in the…😂
Talking about mobility: did you see the turn radius?
This makes me recall something I've heard before: "Yes, they look very pretty, but can they fight?"
‘If the claims are valid”. You can just stop there.
I'm very glad to see Russia has devoted quite so much time and effort to developing quite such an impressive looking target.
For now thw target are Leo2 and M2 Bradly and next M1 Abrams...
Omg they lost a tank in war it must mean they're losing! Sure hope there's not a large discrepancy in tank losses on one side only or that'd be bad news.
@@stink1382 they've lost 1900 according to open source data and satellite imagery - and they're sending in tanks from the 1950s now. Their doctrine is not only weak to begin with but it's being really badly implemented - empirical evidence is so remarkably abundant that they had to send hordes of russbots out to argue with people online.
@@miguelgarr576 they will try to target these, sure - and there will be losses, that's what happens in war. But the wildly overblown claims of Russia and their achievements is so great that the collapse of the image of the efficacy of Russian weaponry is causing major problems for Rosoboronexport, well beyond mere shortages of components or sanctions.
Remember they're up against a largely non-professional Ukrainian army too - sure they've had some training and have vastly better equipment and doctrine generally speaking but I think they're just up against people fighting for their homeland, that's always dangerous.
Lets not forget that some of the gear we've sent to Ukraine - thinking of the Challenger II tank - is pretty tough, one of those took 70 - SEVENTY - RPG hits and the worst damage was to the sighting system (the crew were unharmed though probably had ringing in the ears I suspect). That tank was back in action six hours later.
@Miguel Garr tell that to the thousands of russian tanks who are rusting in Ukraine.
I like the low profile turret.
It looks ridiculous but I lowkey like it. Like a cyberpunk-esque vehicle or in a board game
They will make exactly 2, one prototype and one for production.. Biggest features will be, invisibility
Oh, this will flood Ukraine along with scores after scores of T14s. Both are totally real vehicles that exist in the real world.
@@chrigoog Hahahahaha stop trying. Everyone knows T14 only exist in parades. Just another piece of shit like al the other equipment.
tell him if he wants to see them he can go volunteer for ukraine
@@chrigoog
Our IFV’s, AAV’s and LAV’s are combat proven. ‘Nuff said!!
Against sandals, yes.
@@christosswc what the hell are you talking about? If you’re gonna comment how about making sure it makes sense
@@christosswc ☠️☠️☠️
@@417jumps3Reading comprehension DEFINITELY needs work if you couldn’t understand that. American vehicles are proven against jihadis that use 60 year old RPG-7s but have yet to go up against MODERN AT weapons like the Kornet, Métis-M and Krizanthama. The Kornet alone has knocked out a number of Israeli Merkava IIIs and IVs which are modern in their own right.
@@departmentoftheeruseanroya9106 crawl back under your rock. I’ve already wasted enough of my time reading and responding to you…
Like most Boomerang’s they return back to where they came from
Just do the Mars combustion engine production.
Fast eh? So, it either has a massive fuel tank, terrible range, or light armor, or some combination of the three.
This remark da me when the BMP-T Terminator ( cue dramatic music) arrived in Ukraine . There was fanfare, the pro Russian folks were ecstatic, bragging about its fearsome armaments. One terminator got destroyed, one got damaged and the other 8 kinda went quiet
Not a singlee xtremiantor was destroyed and all are performing well, ony one was lost due to severe malfuntions and rusians decideid to destroy it.. ok?
By the way they keep performaning and extremianting entires infatary unsits in forests...russinas dont show their tatics to enemy so they dotn make movies about it, like the new wepon they hae,, you even dont know it exsit,, ,,, thas wahy your loosing so many menn in ukrnaina in the recent week.
there are more than 8 termiantors in front line...and all of them are reallu very active,, wahy do you thing entire units of ukraninas are decimated and are loosing terrain,, with russia trenches??
ask ukrain whjat happened to them when they did run from bacmut,, they were presecuted by two terminators, you know what happened to them,-- theuy dont tell you that??? 750 deads in a single day...
@@robertokandal oh sure, Pregozhin would likely disagree with that number, seeing as he has more respect for the UAF than the Botski’s do, he has voiced this many times.
I know you guys like to throw around big numbers but c’mon dude. An rpg to the turret of a terminator would buckle the barrels and detonate the ATGM’s. Why you here anyway, bugging me?
I actually think Russian engineers are very good, I like the vehicle in this video it’s just that Russia tends to overhype everything when they likely only have a few.. It’s a shame they didn’t get to the moon coz the Russian lunar lander is a work of art
@@robertokandal dude calm down, if the Ukrainians are getting decimated why they still fighting and why is Russia losing 9000 soldiers a day?
Only joking buddy, but Russia is losing soldiers everyday as is Ukraine, because it’s a war not some sort of special operation, why do you guys still call it that? It’s just daft, call it what it is
Does that small turret have hypersonic flying capabilities?
does you step dad beats you at home ??
Omg I'm dying!!
@@janpiorkowski3352 Is this your way of telling us you need help? If so there are phone numbers we can give you.
All you need to know about Russian technological advantages can be found in Western Computer Chips.
I’m sure they will be able to field 10s of them. Maybe even a couple dozen. New tech slapped together with duct tape and glue full of fresh conscripts will surely turn the tide …
Old tech with a body kit. Lol
And then a hellfire smashes in its side from a reaper drone
Pointless….
OMG its even more awesome than Aramata. Too bad they never going field it.
This reminds me of the US program to make amphibious tanks for storming beaches… which ended up being too slow to evade missiles and too expensive once that was realized. It was cancelled.
The Bradly has been upgraded to a 30mm. This will tear through many vehicles on battlefield.
Now they are burning in ukraine.
It just needs to go through the corruption filter to see what it would actually look like in production, given wooden blocks inside reactive armor etc.. After that I believe the lego tank would give it a run for its money.
Wooden blocks in reactive armor? You making this shit up?
@@definitelyfrank9341 Yeah but they used hard wood so it doesn't burn 😂😂😂.
@@dc-4ever201 Zero evidence supporting your claim.
@@definitelyfrank9341 plenty of evidence to support that claim they were attaching wooden tree trunks and blocks to the front of transport trucks to try and protect the engines and the drivers google is your friend Tovarish
@@definitelyfrank9341true!
They're also getting more from their north Korean allies which are a genius use of cereal packets painted green.
North Korea can only send the packets though as they don't have the cereal....
I'm picturing a couple hundred of these things crossing the Dnieper. The ukes would be saying "Oh shit!"
In Quick Moves, is the future, fire a projectile and move quickly. Very very good.
The real question: How does it stand up to HIMARS and drone delivered explosives?
Really doubtful it'll handle an RKG3. Those things are old, but slap some fins on them and drop them from an octorotor and I have a feeling it's a *lot* cheaper as a top attack munition than many other options. Because of it being a drone present, it's inherently going top attack, so unless these vehicles have an absurd amount of top armor, it's gone. Given the claims of speed, they're running out of fuel if they have enough armor to stop that *and* meet the claims for speed, and that's a major if.
the same way a leopard stood up to 152mm shelling
One 223 shot and the whole thing is disabled. Maybe even a 22. Lol
Do youstill have himamrs?' of keep playing with droens,, and wait to wina war with drones...
@@RichardBaran my crossman .177 would take it out
I bet they're with the T14s at the far rear lines of the fight not even moving an inch forward.
These probably work hand-in-hand with the Checkmate.
might be like the LADA Niva. you can buy one you just dont want to go anywhere in it
It has the mist powerful turretspring ever!
The "VPK-7829 Bumerang's" Rear Hatch appears to be very small compared to other IFVs, so this will still make it difficult for disembarking troops...
At least they won't have to disembark from between the wheels.
@@ferky123 And in front of the rear wheels.
Actually no. The vehicle is just large.
Not saying it’s a bad vehicle , saying it hasn’t been battle tested and I’m sure allied countries will find its weak points and exploit them and will build something better than it, everything has it good and bad qualities, but I believe it comes down to the crew , a machine is nothing without a human
true, a good afv can be rendered useless by a terrible crew afvs are complex machines that require alot of training to use effectively same with aircraft and ships
It's biggest weak point is is made up sepcs
No hitech sensors - it is an easy-peasy adversary.
So I'm still waiting to see the *"NEW MONSTER VEHICLE CREATED TO END WARS FAST"* 😂
yes, at bit like hitlers wunderwaffen, just "ready" for mass production in a few month, and they never came and they lost the war
I still like the wart hog
A pair of A10s will make short work of a column of these slow moving targets.
The German leopard 2's and our Bradley vehicles don't seem to be helping , I've just seen many videos of them on fire and abandoned on the frontline .
...it`s a war...what would you expect...no losses?
No confirmation in the mainstream so probably bs.
@@red_lantern and I like you, if they say that a tsunami is coming to your house, you won't believe it either?
Lol the tank losses only get hyped when its russian lol when it's a NATO tank meh it's going to happen.
Only took how many T90s, 80s, 72s, 55s..?
Nice… but they will have to find a Russian soldier who isn’t drunk to drive it… that’s not going to happen.
I wonder how it will hold up against Mavik-3 drones?
Always promising unmatchable crushing invincibility. Certainly the best machines operated in Red Square on parade day.
It will be impressive to see how quickly they get destroyed, IF they ever get built and deployed into the battlespace.
You are deluded. Ukraine is getting destroyed by Russia
When was this announced? When was this first seen? Anyone know?
This is the first I've heard of the bumerang. I haven't been keeping up with the war though. But this video said it was coming out in 2021 & this video was just uploaded this year
OK, but will it be just as good as the Armata?
If your description of this vehicle is accurate, then it could become a problem. BUT based on displays of recent Russian equipment, will it be delivered anytime soon and with what non-working systems? Interesting report. Thank you.
Kind of like the F-35 which cost 78 millions to build and pretty much is worthless as it has so many problems hardy any actually fly
@@Kenny-bj2zq With more than 450 produced and in active service so far, I'd say that they work...
Russian claims! 😂
Ok, mask boy. Don't forget to get your booster shots.
Toyota is going to dominate the 100th running of 24hrs of LeMans for the sixth time in a row. Where is Nissan on this one?
@@thelatearthurmorgan6158 Your comment presupposes and suggests a lot… a lot about yourself.
You see things as black and white. Politics is a team sport. The guy who doesn’t agree with you about Russia living up to its claims, must also be vaxxed? And you disagree with this person on both issues… so you are against the vaccine? So this is how you see things, meaning… you’re a conservative who likes Russia, and Putin more than Biden, and thinks Fauci should be in jail, right? If so, it seems like you are projecting here.
It’s kind of sad if someone can derive this much about *you* from a defensive reply where someone ridicules “Russian claims”, isn’t it?
And fwiw, I’m anti mandate when it comes to the vaccine, and not a US citizen, so you can have fun trying to figure me out, or make assumptions. Or, you can look within and figure out why the fk you are such a cookie cutter person, and why aren’t your beliefs more self-derived and varied?
Western claims 😂😂😂 Leopards dont burn! Million time repeated bsh! 🤦Even In Russian recruitment advertising video 2 soldiers piss on it literally and one of them said "they said it dont burn" other one answered " oh it burns its kinda hard to put fire off"
😂😂😂
South Africa had this and more in the Ratel IFV in the seventies (1970s) already.
I though a Boomerang was only an Australian thing lol
Russia is too busy retrofitting and fielding tanks from the 1950's to have the manpower to field something brand new that also represents a complete change in doctrine.
The Free Russia Legion has turned them around , say boomeranged, them back into Russia!
stop spreading bizzare c0nspiracy theories
@@hari1408 name your IFV boomerang and suffer the consequences
Yeah, I’ll stick with the Stryker.
It exists but is not being used. So since 2015, it is a concept only with no production numbers of note.
😂😂😂
Speed, mobility, and firepower. Looks like they're planning on at least some having turrets with four ATGMs and a 30mm, presumably a coax PKT, so that's no lighter than a BMP2. Probably D tier armor to make it light enough to zoom. Only way to put good enough armor to actually protect and go that fast is slapping a bigger engine in there, which means more fuel, but I'm sure they can handle it just like they handled fuel in the initial push towards Kiev.
In other news, do tractors count as military aid? Asking for a friend.
Edit: Finished the video. Kinda painful to watch. Sounds a lot like what Russian manufacturers say about everything they make and what the Kremlin spouts as propoganda. "Better in all ways! More advanced! Russia stronk!" circlejerk. No shot it works as well as advertised.
-The SU57 was called stealthier than the West by the Kremlin, but it has a radar cross section (RCS) of 0.1 to 1 square meters. The F22 has an RCS of 0.0001 square meters.
-The 6B47 was said to have better protection than the US MICH2000s and ACHs. The US helmets have deflected 7.62x54r rounds from SVDs in a few occasions and the soldiers survived. Either the Russian military issues airsoft replicas or the 6B47 can't deflect a large guy's fist without caving in.
-The range of a Kornet is a joke. Sure the missile will fly that far, but the user sure as hell won't see what it's flying at and who knows if it'll actually hit. That's why some Kornet launchers on vehicles launch two missles. The TOW can see far further and actually goes where it's pointed. There are light guided and laser guided versions depending on what's needed.
-The T14 is so advanced that it doesn't have the ability for the commander to look around and have situational awareness! Ask any tanker ever. Even a nice camera isn't enough to know what's going on, much less a periscope.
-The BMP is amphibious... as long as it's extensively maintained and prepared beforehand without the underpaid soldiers selling off the parts to put food on their table.
I would call all of these Russian superweapons paper tigers, but it'd be an insult to paper tigers. It's another showpiece at best and a mass grave at worst.
Ain't reading this but yeah some Russia propaganda is just soo loud and the weapons in real life are just sh*t.
"Potemkin vehicle." Big hat, no cattle.
@@solarium4659 Fair enough. It is a wall of text.
TL;DR: Every improved statistic puts strain on the engine and the energy to make it happen comes from somewhere, so more fuel is needed. Also Russian history of accuracy of statements.
What Russophobic nonsense. It's just ridiculous to read the comments of Western chauvinists who are illiterate in engineering
Nonsense! You are completely illiterate in engineering. Typical western redneck
Oh, GREAT!!! Another Javelin Anti Tank Missile Magnet!!! Bring it!!!
Does anyone know the ifv of the thumbnail?
“Boomerang” really? Couldn’t they use a Russian name instead of stealing something from us Aussies? 🙄
It perfectly describes how the turret will take flight.
Hahaha exactly