"You're temporarily detained for suspicious activity, taking pictures of us.... ....and what I'm doing right now, I'm just trying to take your picture because we're in a public place, and I'm allowed to do that". The hypocrisy is absurd...
+Thomas Nuckles Actually it is NOT. The filming of critical infrastructure IS part of the Terrorist preparation for attack. This is provable. To catch someone doing exactly this DOES give police reasonable suspicion for a detention. This was handled perfectly. This is no different then when an officer observes behavior consistent with casing out a jewelry store that of itself is perfectly legal behavior but leads him to suspect criminal activity MAY be afoot. Terry v Ohio
Whistler White You drank the Kool-Aid didn't you? Since terrorists drive trucks with bombs, does that mean that everyone driving a truck, which is "behavior consistent" with a terrorist driving a truck bomb has provided reasonable suspicion that they are a terrorist? Would you like to ponder how often and how long I could detain you if I used your reasoning and followed you around one day applying it to your every action? Do terrorists buy groceries, gasoline, attend religious services, fly on airplanes? Do you? By the way, there are thousands upon thousands of videos on CZcams of citizens filming the police, and his behavior is perfectly consistent with their perfectly legal and Constitutionally protected behavior. This encounter was about intimidation, not public safety, and to argue otherwise is dishonest.
+Thomas Nuckles So lets just ignore the fact that we have CAUGHT TERRORIST VIDEOTAPING TARGETS to develop plans of attacks. Ignore that when Police see suspicious activity they have a DUTY to stop and investigate to PREVENT crime? How about this. Let's say there was a 30 something year old guy video taping your child's elementary school. No one knows him. Taping the doors, the playground, the busses. Should the Police be called?
The police have the authority to "investigate" any thing they choose to, but they do not have the authority to detain, or in any way interfere with a law abiding citizen engaging in Constitutionally protected behavior. In this case it was absolutely unreasonable to detain the citizen, and there was nothing about his behavior that was in any way more consistent with a terrorist than it was with a police accountability activist. The cop absolutely believed he was approaching a police accountability activist, and you absolutely know it. Go on with your hypotheticals if you must, but this case is open and shut police overreach.
Cop- "cause we like to impose our will and show dominance cause we have tiny dicks and dont know at all what we should be doing. But...thanks to qualified immunity we can get away with everything from harassment to cold blooded murder. "
+timstv75 Everything is damn suspicious to these pigs, meanwhile these pigs commit violations and crimes on duty and off duty and they get away with it..... Just look up this pig NJ Linden cop Pedro Abad who drove the wrong way in Staten Island NYC killed his fellow pig and an innocent person....and yes you guessed right punk cop is walking free after killing two people..... Bunch of welfare collecting bustards who stand around and harassing a person..... Best Regards from NYC
Yall know why its suspicious cause they always doing something they ain't got no business. Sorry I just found this channel 😅 so I'm late lol 😆 😅 don't judge
These are the dumbest idiots in the world.What's wrong with these moron.And they keep saying officers.They don't even no what it means.There's no officer in this video.
That's the thing they'll never understand their overwhelming need to feel in charge and in power makes them unable to realize when they're making themselves look like morons on the internet
"Your license plate says you are a 53 year old white woman..." They just picked the closest car, I shudder to think how many assumptions they make in actual dangerous situations.
Cop claims to be concerned about you collecting "vital information" about the activities in the station. Tells you exactly what vital information he wouldn't want you collecting. lol
+Empty0Set Hahahahahahaha, Yes exactly. Just goes to show how stupid they really are. "uh yeah, if someone wanted to, all of our super secret stuff is right behind that tree and if someone really wanted to do us harm, uh, all they would have to do is uh, look behind that tree. So uh, we're just making sure uh, trees.... and ....stuff.
+trucid2 THIS KID IS TOOOO NICE AT TIMES... WHEN THE COPS SAY STUFF LIKE COPS GETTING SHOT AT OR HURT, HE SHUD BE REMINDED THAT COPS KILL CITIZENS WAAAYYYYYYYY MORE THAN CITIZENS KILL COPS.. SO THAT WHOLE ITS SUSPICIOUS THING IS ONLY A TACTIC TO MAKE CONTACT...
Right, reasonable suspicion a crime has been committed or is about to be committed. This stupid corrupt pig did not have reasonable suspicion of any kind.
reasonable suspicion of an ARTICULABLE crime. that means the officer that is detaining you must say exactly what crime he or she thinks you may be about to commit, whether it be burglary, assault, murder, terrorism, etc. simply looking or acting "suspiciously" is not a crime.
It's also "not common practice" to come and start interrogating a citizen for conducting constitutionally protected activity. Ugh I can't stand these oath violators.
this was a bit before auditing became a big thing. these cops were living in a totally different age. It doesn't make it right of course, but i feel like it's becoming more rare to find cops this fucking stupid. It still happens, but i think the cops are becoming more aware of what their actual jobs are.
Supervisor: "What's going on?" You: "I was hoping you could tell me. I was walking down the street taking pictures when I was accosted by these officers who threatened me with violence if I tried to leave."
Supervisor shows up to find a few dead cops killed in self defense of unlawful activities by scum operating under the "color of law." Be a nice change of pace once in a while.
When I called, the officer I spoke with said, I paraphrase, that the officers on site would have been justified arresting him for terroristic threat. And that they are looking into it. We spent the next 10 minutes or so trying with me trying to understand how filming and walking into a store is terroristic threat. Scratching Dallas off my list of possible relocation spots.
+Rich Gajus I would have a field day in court if they arrest me on a bogus charge like that. In fact I would go inside the station and calmly wait for them to arrest me. You can watch the video and see that no threat was made physically or verbally. This guys are idiots.
+aeiou That police department can't possibly be stressed if they can spare so many officers to attend that non-incident! It's just bullying by numbers!
what is the officers name/badge you spoke to. we can all consider him an applicant for future youtube stardom. since he obviously has not "gotten it". We can gladly accept him into our civil rights education program. at the end of our program we give a degree that allows you to flip burgers for the rest of your working life.
And all texts, emails, instant messages and call log of the phone he used to take the photos. It's all public information now that he's used that phone in the course of his "duties"
Nah, that one is lawful. He stated what he thought it was and how it could be contraband so long as the initial stop was legit it's fine. He should have said something prior to reaching towards him but still it would hold up in court.
I know this was years ago but the comment above is dead wrong. Terry v Ohio. He was NOT lawfully detained. So they had NO right to search him in anyway. Lawsuit.
@@502iswatchingyou7 It's not technically a "search"... it is a brief intrusion to confirm that no weapons are present. That may be unwelcome, but it is a legitimate procedure.
@@tomwatson9032 plz work with me here! In the video above, the cops were wrong. It was an unlawful "pat down" for two reasons: there was neither reasonable suspicion of crime, nor reasonable suspicion the man was armed and currently a threat. Police acted out of fear of the unknown, not rational and articulable facts on the ground. We can't be apologists for this unconstitutional conduct. Cops don't get to put the Constitution on hold because they don't like what a person is doing. I taught 4th Amendment up to an academy level, and it is the central theme of the book I'm currently writing. If a man wants to take a picture of a building from a public sidewalk in broad daylight, here in the United States of America, he shouldn't have to fear the police.
The cop had no right to put his hands on you or to detain you. I would not have been so friendly toward some stranger who put his hands on me and held me against my will.
It's amazing how whenever someone's recording somewhere there's always been a rash of break-ins or someone is always being assaulted or attacked as always seeming to be something going on but law enforcement never seems to be there though coincidence I think not
It is always nice when someone acts pleasant while they are being a jerk. I'm so sick of people using very, very rare examples as reasons for violating people.
Cops are allowed to do pat downs without consent or probably cause. I don't agree that they should be allowed to do this but they are allowed. Technically, pat downs are not searches. Again, I don't agree with it but it's the way it is. The supposed justification is "officer safety"
8 years later and truthfully things are getting better, thanks to people like Phillip Turner. Thanks Phil! You are the man and we appreciate what you did !
ˇNo problemˇ is consent dude , say ˇno thank youˇ . ˇI do not consent ˇ and NEVER SAY ˇI understandˇ . ask them all sorts of questions and let them convict themselves but stop letting them get you to answer even a first question . as soon as you consent to commerce with them during an investigation , they can say you told them ANYTHING while they conversed , true or not true . if they are doing an investigation you can not be answering question , ask them if they are investigating .. (you are awesome and i love you and your videos) be safe.
"understand" is a legal term at the very least in court. Telling someone you 'stand under' their authority. 'I get what you're doing', might be safer to avoid that loophole of _'he said he understood so he consented'_
and where was the articulated suspicion of the crime in order to have a lawful search for a suspected weapon NOT articulated again ? . The reason there is no articulation is because this is not a Peace Officer and this domestic police terrorist , by duties of citizenship , should be stood up to . A Camera saved the tax payers money of an honorable funeral .
The cops always have a sad story to justify their activity!!!! 'Special' laws are created to protect their actions. Officer Rossi, the one who threatens children.
After almost 30 years in law enforcement I cannot believe how bad some of these police officers are. For instance he appears to have used his personal iphone. You could file to get a hold of his personal phone as evidence of your possible civil rights violation. You never use your own phone on duty. He is going to get it subpoenaed.
Yet cops seems to be nice his real intensions are unlawfully detain and intimidate. In other words HARASS. how many fucking pictures u need ?!! And why wouldnt u leave after u find out guy is not doing anything wrong.
"Suspicious" is so broad of a term. Hell, walking down the street holding a ham piglet isnt commin practice...but according to these cops, it is detainable.
When the 2ond 3rd 4th cop shows up and says "what's going on " save your breath and say , ask him ! See if cop #1 was payin attention or even gives a shit😄
Very interesting that they didn't say anything about being concerned that you were filming in front of a school! They were only concerned about THE DEPARTMENT.
The cop taking the unnecessary photos really let himself down.Hes a grown man behaving like a child and should not have the responsibility of carrying a loaded firearm.
This cop seems to have forgotten that he is a public servant. We don’t pay our servants to investigate constitutional activities. I think it’s suspicious that a 25 year veteran police officer would be so confused about the law, perhaps he’s looking for an early retirement?
I would have had that cop detained because he took your picture in public. that was "suspicious". Just want to say keep doing what y'all are doing because it really helps the normal law abiding citizens remember we actually do have rights.
There is no such thing as detention, either you are under arrest or you are free to go. The SCOTUS could give whatever OPINION(opinions are not laws and the judiciary branch CANNOT write or make laws, only give OPINIONS) they want on detention. The facts still remains the State Legislator (ones who MAKE and/or WRITE) only have procedures on ARREST, not detentions. When the police makes contact with you, by the procedures set forth by the Legislators or the State, you are under ARREST and make be taken to jail, or released etc. If you cannot proceed forward or backward, you are "at rest/arrest". Same reason why the citation says ARRESTING OFFICER. If the police takes a picture of you on duty, always do a public records request for that picture. Also tell the officer at the scene taking the picture that you plan on doing a request for your complaint and you will need that picture as evidence and if it is deleted or missing that will be seen as tampering with evidence.
I've always said, if you don't want someone knowing your security procedures then don't put it in the middle of a neighborhood! Put a damn wall up around the parking lot if you're that concerned about people seeing your cars.
Here the world can still see how criminal officers behave towards the population, how they conspire against an innocent person moving in public space. The officer is not alone in this, he conspires with his superiors and he hears their approval.
8 years later and cops still don't understand that filming in public is a Constitutionally protected right and, unless you live in a stop-and-ID state, you are not legally obligated to ID yourself with no crime involved. officer training in this country is an absolute joke.
They question your intentions of harm to their officers, but never ask themselves "why do we feel the public hates us"? 8 officers vs a camera and they still don't get it.
Hmmm, I wish to not answer questions, first thing he does. Ask more questions. You should have asked him if he was under the influence of something since he clearly didn't understand what you said.
JFC, I've never seen a group of people so focused on their "safety", especially since they claim to be getting paid to insure our "safety". We know that's a big fat lie, but they like the way it sounds ...
+The Battousai With people like this www.9news.com/story/news/crime/2015/12/08/lakewood-officer/76986074/ existing in this country, the police do it for their own safety to make sure the person baiting them to intentionally get their attention isn't going to bust out a gun. I can post way more instances of people trying to kill police officers if you want me to
+Avenged Rider The video you posted has little to do with a first amendment audit. Any time a police officer pulls over a car he must take precautions obviously, but after he questioned this fellow, and frisked him, he should have left it alone. He was clearly harassing him because there was an incident with an officer he was there filming about, and they wanted him gone.
+Avenged Rider My question is why was Mr. Turner approached in the first place? If cops respond to crime,,what crime was this cop responding to? According to you standing on a public sidewalk, filming, is provoking. Right?
What's truly suspicious is how these goons are allowed to be police officers.
Worse Gang in America
Suspicious activity misdemeanor or felony? This day and age many people video police !
Punk ass shouldn't be a cop if he's so scared for his safety
"You're temporarily detained for suspicious activity, taking pictures of us.... ....and what I'm doing right now, I'm just trying to take your picture because we're in a public place, and I'm allowed to do that". The hypocrisy is absurd...
+Thomas Nuckles Seriously!
+Thomas Nuckles Actually it is NOT. The filming of critical infrastructure IS part of the Terrorist preparation for attack. This is provable. To catch someone doing exactly this DOES give police reasonable suspicion for a detention. This was handled perfectly. This is no different then when an officer observes behavior consistent with casing out a jewelry store that of itself is perfectly legal behavior but leads him to suspect criminal activity MAY be afoot. Terry v Ohio
Whistler White You drank the Kool-Aid didn't you? Since terrorists drive trucks with bombs, does that mean that everyone driving a truck, which is "behavior consistent" with a terrorist driving a truck bomb has provided reasonable suspicion that they are a terrorist? Would you like to ponder how often and how long I could detain you if I used your reasoning and followed you around one day applying it to your every action? Do terrorists buy groceries, gasoline, attend religious services, fly on airplanes? Do you? By the way, there are thousands upon thousands of videos on CZcams of citizens filming the police, and his behavior is perfectly consistent with their perfectly legal and Constitutionally protected behavior. This encounter was about intimidation, not public safety, and to argue otherwise is dishonest.
+Thomas Nuckles So lets just ignore the fact that we have CAUGHT TERRORIST VIDEOTAPING TARGETS to develop plans of attacks. Ignore that when Police see suspicious activity they have a DUTY to stop and investigate to PREVENT crime? How about this. Let's say there was a 30 something year old guy video taping your child's elementary school. No one knows him. Taping the doors, the playground, the busses. Should the Police be called?
The police have the authority to "investigate" any thing they choose to, but they do not have the authority to detain, or in any way interfere with a law abiding citizen engaging in Constitutionally protected behavior. In this case it was absolutely unreasonable to detain the citizen, and there was nothing about his behavior that was in any way more consistent with a terrorist than it was with a police accountability activist. The cop absolutely believed he was approaching a police accountability activist, and you absolutely know it. Go on with your hypotheticals if you must, but this case is open and shut police overreach.
"You're not doing anything wrong."
Well then why are you detaining me?
Cop- "cause we like to impose our will and show dominance cause we have tiny dicks and dont know at all what we should be doing. But...thanks to qualified immunity we can get away with everything from harassment to cold blooded murder. "
the cops in this video should be ashamed of themselves
+timstv75 Everything is damn suspicious to these pigs, meanwhile these pigs commit violations and crimes on duty and off duty and they get away with it.....
Just look up this pig NJ Linden cop Pedro Abad who drove the wrong way in Staten Island NYC killed his fellow pig and an innocent person....and yes you guessed right punk cop is walking free after killing two people.....
Bunch of welfare collecting bustards who stand around and harassing a person.....
Best Regards from NYC
That is the problem they have no shame, honor or integrity.
Shame requires self awareness.
Yall know why its suspicious cause they always doing something they ain't got no business. Sorry I just found this channel 😅 so I'm late lol 😆 😅 don't judge
They are. That’s why they go home and beat up their wives.
What they fail to comprehend is that THEY are the story.
These are the dumbest idiots in the world.What's wrong with these moron.And they keep saying officers.They don't even no what it means.There's no officer in this video.
@@miltonphinn3422 should need more than a GED to be a civil servant
That's the thing they'll never understand their overwhelming need to feel in charge and in power makes them unable to realize when they're making themselves look like morons on the internet
Suspension is that A Felony or misdemeanor MOOSE BRAINS
"I'm gonna take a picture of this Prius in front of a school, it looks suspicious."
That shit made me laugh! I thought the word suspicious was his favorite word the way he was throwing it around
+john barrington And then a few minutes later someone else drives it away. Hahaha
I had to pause the video I was laughing so hard!!! This is one nervous piggy haha FTP
🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Your license plate says you are a 53 year old white woman..." They just picked the closest car, I shudder to think how many assumptions they make in actual dangerous situations.
`That cop is seriously psycho
Which one isn’t?
6 cops respond to a citizen NOT breaking any law....
Sad.
Cop claims to be concerned about you collecting "vital information" about the activities in the station. Tells you exactly what vital information he wouldn't want you collecting.
lol
+Empty0Set Hahahahahahaha, Yes exactly. Just goes to show how stupid they really are. "uh yeah, if someone wanted to, all of our super secret stuff is right behind that tree and if someone really wanted to do us harm, uh, all they would have to do is uh, look behind that tree. So uh, we're just making sure uh, trees.... and ....stuff.
+trucid2 THIS KID IS TOOOO NICE AT TIMES... WHEN THE COPS SAY STUFF LIKE COPS GETTING SHOT AT OR HURT, HE SHUD BE REMINDED THAT COPS KILL CITIZENS WAAAYYYYYYYY MORE THAN CITIZENS KILL COPS.. SO THAT WHOLE ITS SUSPICIOUS THING IS ONLY A TACTIC TO MAKE CONTACT...
Well no one ever accused cops of being intelligent. These traitors to the people should eat their service weapons.
I am taking pictures of you its okay your on a public sidewalk....Anyone else notice the irony?
Yes yes I did....
Stupid pig thinks he can detain someone without probable cause.
Right, reasonable suspicion a crime has been committed or is about to be committed. This stupid corrupt pig did not have reasonable suspicion of any kind.
reasonable suspicion of an ARTICULABLE crime. that means the officer that is detaining you must say exactly what crime he or she thinks you may be about to commit, whether it be burglary, assault, murder, terrorism, etc. simply looking or acting "suspiciously" is not a crime.
Exactly; the SCOTUS has ruled that mere suspicion is not reasonable cause for detainment.
The Police don't need Probable Cause to Detain, only Reasonable Suspicion. Probable Cause is what is essential to affect a lawful arrest.
6 cop cars. There must be zero crime in Dallas and the surrounding communities. Glad to see our tax dollars being wasted.
It's also "not common practice" to come and start interrogating a citizen for conducting constitutionally protected activity. Ugh I can't stand these oath violators.
bacon cops
this was a bit before auditing became a big thing. these cops were living in a totally different age. It doesn't make it right of course, but i feel like it's becoming more rare to find cops this fucking stupid. It still happens, but i think the cops are becoming more aware of what their actual jobs are.
If he’s searching you for his “safety” why is he reaching blindly into a pocket that may contain what he believes to be a needle? Liar.
Why is he reaching into a pocket at all?
Police earn the hate
Supervisor: "What's going on?"
You: "I was hoping you could tell me. I was walking down the street taking pictures when I was accosted by these officers who threatened me with violence if I tried to leave."
+trucid2 Exactly this.
Supervisor shows up to find a few dead cops killed in self defense of unlawful activities by scum operating under the "color of law." Be a nice change of pace once in a while.
When I called, the officer I spoke with said, I paraphrase, that the officers on site would have been justified arresting him for terroristic threat. And that they are looking into it. We spent the next 10 minutes or so trying with me trying to understand how filming and walking into a store is terroristic threat. Scratching Dallas off my list of possible relocation spots.
+Rich Gajus I would have a field day in court if they arrest me on a bogus charge like that. In fact I would go inside the station and calmly wait for them to arrest me. You can watch the video and see that no threat was made physically or verbally. This guys are idiots.
+aeiou being creepy is not a crime. le officers need to stick to what they are.... LAW ENFORCEMENT officers......not anti creepiness officers.
+aeiou That police department can't possibly be stressed if they can spare so many officers to attend that non-incident! It's just bullying by numbers!
what is the officers name/badge you spoke to. we can all consider him an applicant for future youtube stardom. since he obviously has not "gotten it". We can gladly accept him into our civil rights education program. at the end of our program we give a degree that allows you to flip burgers for the rest of your working life.
+Rich Gajus I am scratching my head on that one. That sounds like bluster
This isn't Iraq or Afghanistan.
"stations being ambushed" rofl, paranoid much?
Do a request for all the photos he took
And all texts, emails, instant messages and call log of the phone he used to take the photos. It's all public information now that he's used that phone in the course of his "duties"
You should file a complaint of possible drug use against the officer taking the all the pics... he is obviously on something!!!
Do it "real quick"!
I agree. Coke head
They all sat around and rubbed one off while looking at the pics!
did that cop just come up to him and search him? that officer needs to lose his job
Nah, that one is lawful. He stated what he thought it was and how it could be contraband so long as the initial stop was legit it's fine. He should have said something prior to reaching towards him but still it would hold up in court.
I know this was years ago but the comment above is dead wrong. Terry v Ohio. He was NOT lawfully detained. So they had NO right to search him in anyway. Lawsuit.
Well i agree but why in the hell did I not hear the Auditor refuse him to search!!!!!!!
@@502iswatchingyou7 It's not technically a "search"... it is a brief intrusion to confirm that no weapons are present. That may be unwelcome, but it is a legitimate procedure.
@@tomwatson9032 plz work with me here! In the video above, the cops were wrong. It was an unlawful "pat down" for two reasons: there was neither reasonable suspicion of crime, nor reasonable suspicion the man was armed and currently a threat. Police acted out of fear of the unknown, not rational and articulable facts on the ground. We can't be apologists for this unconstitutional conduct. Cops don't get to put the Constitution on hold because they don't like what a person is doing. I taught 4th Amendment up to an academy level, and it is the central theme of the book I'm currently writing. If a man wants to take a picture of a building from a public sidewalk in broad daylight, here in the United States of America, he shouldn't have to fear the police.
They all say “We welcome transparency”... but when they see someone holding them accountable, it becomes an “Officer Safety Issue”.
Perfect example of why implied immunity needs to go
I love that they were taking pics of a car that wasn't even yours😂😂
The cop had no right to put his hands on you or to detain you. I would not have been so friendly toward some stranger who put his hands on me and held me against my will.
A very good way to get stabbed in the throat. Unlawfully touching a citizen. I would have NO sympathy.
It's amazing how whenever someone's recording somewhere there's always been a rash of break-ins or someone is always being assaulted or attacked as always seeming to be something going on but law enforcement never seems to be there though coincidence I think not
Any officer using that crap response should be told..... Then you must be the worst police force ever with all that crime happening on your watch.
When is ok for the government to walk up to a Citizen and reach into his pockets?! How is this ok?
If the cop is concerned about his safety while a citizen is on the street not breaking any laws, maybe the officer should stay away from the citizen.
It is always nice when someone acts pleasant while they are being a jerk. I'm so sick of people using very, very rare examples as reasons for violating people.
He keeps taking pics like he is really doing something 🤣🤣
They wanted multiple angles for facial recognition....
At 830 I noticed the black Prius that they photo'd the plate to drove off. I guess they got the wrong intel on the vehicle. LOL
HA ha. The black cop gave you more information than the camera ever could. What a bunch of clowns !!!!
Why didn't the cops stop the guy that stole your Prius at the end of the video.......
Good catch. The stupid cop ran the wrong plate
4:44 that car was definitely suspicious, it was trying to hide behind them bushes 🤣🤣🤣
The white cop sounds like that car salesman from the movie Fargo.
wtf!!!! Did you just let him walk up and search you?
Went out like a sucka huh!?
Cops are allowed to do pat downs without consent or probably cause. I don't agree that they should be allowed to do this but they are allowed. Technically, pat downs are not searches. Again, I don't agree with it but it's the way it is. The supposed justification is "officer safety"
1:01 Cop is scared of a pen. LMFAO
When a cop says “here’s the deal”
Here’s the deal. Real quick.
Ever been arrested?
Oooh,
and a, “sit tight” at the end.
Trifecta!!!!!!!
Dear 7lb 6oz baby Jesus... my tax bill is hurting me from watching this video. Do I dare watch part two? Haha
You can take them to court for this. You should of if you didn't man.
xbluepuddingx - he did... It’s one of the most important 1st and 4th Amendment Lawsuits...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_v._Driver
Everything’s “suspicious”
8:21 someone is driving away in your car! LMFAO
if he is using his personal phone while on duty do a public records request for all the pictures on that phone,,,is that possible??
Piggy 1 being as intrusive as he can with that camback.
Both officers need to lose their accreditation but officer Younger deserves to be put in general population.
8 years later and truthfully things are getting better, thanks to people like Phillip Turner. Thanks Phil! You are the man and we appreciate what you did !
ˇNo problemˇ is consent dude , say ˇno thank youˇ . ˇI do not consent ˇ and NEVER SAY ˇI understandˇ . ask them all sorts of questions and let them convict themselves but stop letting them get you to answer even a first question . as soon as you consent to commerce with them during an investigation , they can say you told them ANYTHING while they conversed , true or not true . if they are doing an investigation you can not be answering question , ask them if they are investigating .. (you are awesome and i love you and your videos) be safe.
"understand" is a legal term at the very least in court. Telling someone you 'stand under' their authority. 'I get what you're doing', might be safer to avoid that loophole of _'he said he understood so he consented'_
agree
and where was the articulated suspicion of the crime in order to have a lawful search for a suspected weapon NOT articulated again ? . The reason there is no articulation is because this is not a Peace Officer and this domestic police terrorist , by duties of citizenship , should be stood up to . A Camera saved the tax payers money of an honorable funeral .
Thy Horror I agree with you 100000%
If you cops weren't so trigger happy in this country, you wouldn't have to worry so much for your safety
The lies start when they say “here’s the deal...”
My God, more cruisers respond to a man with a camera in front of a police station than respond to an armed robbery in progress...
The cops always have a sad story to justify their activity!!!!
'Special' laws are created to protect their actions.
Officer Rossi, the one who threatens children.
"because of 9/11, we're gonna need to fuck you in the butthole."
After almost 30 years in law enforcement I cannot believe how bad some of these police officers are. For instance he appears to have used his personal iphone. You could file to get a hold of his personal phone as evidence of your possible civil rights violation. You never use your own phone on duty. He is going to get it subpoenaed.
mark rippt really ? 30 years and you still can’t believe it ?
Once again imagine how this would have turned out without the recorder running and the ability to real time store and post on CZcams.
Every time the officer says “real quick” do 100 sit-ups. 😆
Yet cops seems to be nice his real intensions are unlawfully detain and intimidate. In other words HARASS. how many fucking pictures u need ?!! And why wouldnt u leave after u find out guy is not doing anything wrong.
i think they just use face recog. software now so they can always get ID
at 6:15, you can say I can plainly sit in a car and write down all the habits of the lot. That is not illegal either.
Appreciate your calm yet professional and highly educated demeanor enjoy your videos without the yelling and cursing thank you for your work !
wow really all these cops for filming lol what a joke
"common practice"...? Who are they to say what's common for anyone to do?
"Suspicious" is so broad of a term. Hell, walking down the street holding a ham piglet isnt commin practice...but according to these cops, it is detainable.
When the 2ond 3rd 4th cop shows up and says "what's going on " save your breath and say , ask him ! See if cop #1 was payin attention or even gives a shit😄
Very interesting that they didn't say anything about being concerned that you were filming in front of a school!
They were only concerned about THE DEPARTMENT.
😥
The cop taking the unnecessary photos really let himself down.Hes a grown man behaving like a child and should not have the responsibility of carrying a loaded firearm.
Asking for ID for no crime or traffic infraction is very *SUSPICIOUS*
6 cops for filming from a public sidewalk "real quick"
Right he wasn't even on the property
This cop's fake "nice" routine is just gross. He's worse than the stereotype of a used car salesman.
That first cop is such a phony being so nice an explaining everything. They are all phony!!!!!!!!!!!!STAY SAFE
classic example of them trying to sell "We're scared and we want you to be scared, too"
What a farce. That white cop walks up to you and searchs him? The privilege is outrageous.
How many people were injured in the ambush with cameras....
Every method actor should watch this cop to train for a character who is passive aggressive.
Im sitting here saying just shut the fuck up now my dogs are looking at me funny lol
I remember when this was first posted. I thought it was crazy how you Gabe up and made it so easy for this psycho cop to easily take tori pictures.
Lol. This car looks suspicious. This sunlight looks suspicious. That stray cat is suspicious.
This cop seems to have forgotten that he is a public servant. We don’t pay our servants to investigate constitutional activities. I think it’s suspicious that a 25 year veteran police officer would be so confused about the law, perhaps he’s looking for an early retirement?
If you were there to gather intel on the place, they would never know.
If no complaint was made the auditer may as well have stayed at home. He had them bang to rights and they walked off laughing'
I would have had that cop detained because he took your picture in public. that was "suspicious". Just want to say keep doing what y'all are doing because it really helps the normal law abiding citizens remember we actually do have rights.
Get one of those goofy little dust masks it screws up there biometrics.
How do these cops sleep at night knowing they violated law abiding citizens rights.
There is no such thing as detention, either you are under arrest or you are free to go. The SCOTUS could give whatever OPINION(opinions are not laws and the judiciary branch CANNOT write or make laws, only give OPINIONS) they want on detention. The facts still remains the State Legislator (ones who MAKE and/or WRITE) only have procedures on ARREST, not detentions. When the police makes contact with you, by the procedures set forth by the Legislators or the State, you are under ARREST and make be taken to jail, or released etc. If you cannot proceed forward or backward, you are "at rest/arrest". Same reason why the citation says ARRESTING OFFICER.
If the police takes a picture of you on duty, always do a public records request for that picture. Also tell the officer at the scene taking the picture that you plan on doing a request for your complaint and you will need that picture as evidence and if it is deleted or missing that will be seen as tampering with evidence.
I've always said, if you don't want someone knowing your security procedures then don't put it in the middle of a neighborhood! Put a damn wall up around the parking lot if you're that concerned about people seeing your cars.
Here the world can still see how criminal officers behave towards the population, how they conspire against an innocent person moving in public space.
The officer is not alone in this, he conspires with his superiors and he hears their approval.
The funniest thing is someone drove that black car off lololol.
8 years later and cops still don't understand that filming in public is a Constitutionally protected right and, unless you live in a stop-and-ID state, you are not legally obligated to ID yourself with no crime involved. officer training in this country is an absolute joke.
They question your intentions of harm to their officers, but never ask themselves "why do we feel the public hates us"?
8 officers vs a camera and they still don't get it.
Hmmm, I wish to not answer questions, first thing he does. Ask more questions. You should have asked him if he was under the influence of something since he clearly didn't understand what you said.
I would've mentioned his illegal u turn first thing...
file a public records request on the phone he was taking pictures with, if they refuse you can get him on tampering with evidence.
The cop asking if you wanted a report is funny as hell.
That's a couple hundred thousand dollars of manpower for nothing.
That's not even Batman's car...!!??!!
JFC, I've never seen a group of people so focused on their "safety", especially since they claim to be getting paid to insure our "safety". We know that's a big fat lie, but they like the way it sounds ...
Officer Younger....your favorite crime apparently....”Suspicious Activity!”
He first cop was extremely nice to the guy. There is a difference between exercising your rights and intentionally provoking the police
+Avenged Rider Yeah he was extremely friend. Walks up to me and starts touching me and going into my pockets. Rights were violated from the start.
+The Battousai With people like this www.9news.com/story/news/crime/2015/12/08/lakewood-officer/76986074/
existing in this country, the police do it for their own safety to make sure the person baiting them to intentionally get their attention isn't going to bust out a gun. I can post way more instances of people trying to kill police officers if you want me to
+Avenged Rider shill
+Avenged Rider
The video you posted has little to do with a first amendment audit. Any time a police officer pulls over a car he must take precautions obviously, but after he questioned this fellow, and frisked him, he should have left it alone.
He was clearly harassing him because there was an incident with an officer he was there filming about, and they wanted him gone.
+Avenged Rider My question is why was Mr. Turner approached in the first place? If cops respond to crime,,what crime was this cop responding to? According to you standing on a public sidewalk, filming, is provoking. Right?
I lost tracked to the number of police officers who responded to a guy with a camera filming on a public sidewalk.
25 years of service and he just learned 38.02. I just know he's the one they'll pick to train at the police academy!