Sony WH-1000Xm3 vs. Bowers & Wilkins PX
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 09. 2018
- Comparison of two very popular headphones.
Timeline:
Comfort: 0:14
Active Noise Cancellation: 1:38
Battery Life: 4:32
Build Quality/Looks: 5:42
Features: 7:52
Sound: 10:46 - Věda a technologie
I always appreciate when watching your reviews. Thanks for your work.
I appreciate the time stamps in the description box!
I’ve been waiting on this showdown!!!!
Nice review! I would be really interested to hear what you think of the Beyerdynamic Lagoon when it comes out
Got my PXs yesterday and I have to say they are one of the finest headphones I’ve ever purchased. Bluetooth sound is hardly taking a back seat at this point. The build quality is unmatched by anything in the price range anyway (they remind me of my Edition 12s).
They automatically turn on and off don’t even need the power button lol.
And my god they are gorgeous, that gold is just so eye catching in bright rooms and it fits well with navy.
The sound quality is a lot better than I thought it would be. Very clean though it could probably use just a smidgen of bass. Fun sound, produces voices and instruments well. Also the weight didn’t bother me at all after about 2 hours of listening, except for the sound, they were hardly noticeable.
There is nothing I don’t like about these. Also something reviewers failed to mention is that their passive noise canceling is quite good. In other words I don’t even think I’ll need the active one unless I just want to reduce noise while not listening.
Very happy with my purchase. Money well spent!
My first impressions are the same basicly... they look gorgeous,sound amazing..and even smell amazing ;-)
I took back my PX and bought Sony M3 coz of bass. PX bass is too flat
I am also a woman and I've seen plenty of reviews from men saying that they are uncomfortable after a while. Sometimes as woman's we have a little bit smaller heads, have you experienced any discomfort? Thanks!
Paola Ch. D Sry not a woman but the longest I’ve worn these is probably 6 hours straight. Besides my ears warming up I never experienced any pain or discomfort. I’ve recently switched to Master & Dynamic MW50 (on ear), they are much smaller and they hold up very well for the price ($125) maybe you should check those out too.
@@MrHakubi thx!
I have both headphones, the Sony 1000mx3 and the B&W PX.
SOUND:
However, I intend to say that B&W has a
more intense bass, and Sony has a more BOOOMMM bass! Did I make myself understand?
After listening a techno music at high volume,
the results in my head were different:
With the Sony 1000mx3 I kept my head vibrating.
With the B&W PX I got my head to echo inside!
The B&W PX bass comes in inside the head,
and the Sony 1000mx3 vibrates the outside of the head.
Different results for different tastes.
I prefer the Bass of the B&W PX, more real and penetrating, like a punch in the head.
Sony sounds a little artificial.
In addition, the B&W PX volume is higher.
When it reaches the volume limit on the Sony 1000mx3, the B&W still has another 20% to add.
Without a doubt, the sound of the B&W PX is superior, more defined and more elegant.
I say this without any tendency, because I bought both.
Do not forget the following:
B&W is a company dedicated exclusively to sound, equipping high-end cars like Ferrari, BMW's etc.
Sony produces a wide variety of things, from mobile phones to microwaves. B&W is a lady of sound
quality, because she dedicates himself exclusively to this.
COMFORT:
With regard to comfort, the Sony 1000mx3 are more comfortable, nor giving almost by the presence of them in the head. 👍👍👍
However, while the B&W PXs are less comfortable, the ears stay free inside the earpiece, being cooler and not causing perspiration.
The Sony 1000mx3 ears do not have space inside the headphones, and make them perspire on hotter days.
Unsustainable in summer days, much less to walk down the street on sunny days. 👎
The quality of construction is top notch in the B&W PX. All in aluminum, and genuine leather. It costs € 400 in Europe but
pays for the elegance and quality of construction. 👍
The Sony 1000mx3 is all in plastic and synthetic skin. In Europe costs € 380, but it seems that we are buying plastic.👎
However the Sony are lighter and therefore more comfortable. 👍
NOISE CANCELLATION:
The Sony 1000mx3 has a perfect noise cancellation, it looks like you put your head inside a vacuum chamber. Perfect!
👍👍👍
The B&W PX though reasonable in noise cancellation, but are far from the Sony 1000mx3.
Android/ Apple APPLICATION:
With respect to the Android application to control the headphones, the Sony is perfect, as well as the indicator sounds in your own language.
The B&W PX are just beeps. 👎👎👎
The B&W PX application only serves to control the level of noise reduction (which is best to keep it OFF), and to control the system to pause the music when you remove the B&W PX from your ears (which works at 80%). The app for B&W PX is terribly basic 👎👎👎
CONCLUSION?
Comparing these headphones to a women, I would say:
That the Sony are that kind of woman, very
devoted to home and children, but a little less beautiful and more chubby.
The B&W PX is that a elegant woman, very pretty, but untidy woman at home.
So, if you prefer the ugly and dedicated woman at home, you will always look at the beautiful woman.
If you prefer the elegant and beautiful woman, you go and wash your dishes at home. You choose. 😁😁😎
I prefer the B&W PX,
although I know it does not have all those features that would do it great.
I'm more of a fan of B&W PX's aesthetic and sound elegance.
If you choose B&W PX you will make a good choice, but sacrificing some aspects of the Sony 1000mx3 that would make music even more enjoyable.
If you buy Sony, you're just one more who bought a headset for €350.
If you buy B & W, whoever watches you knows that you like not just music but sound quality.
Some of the "business" websites that do the comparatives, seem to give 100% preference to Sony, but gave me the impression of sponsorship by Sony.
😀😀😀
Because everyone knows Sony, and a lot of people have never heard of Bowers & Wilkins, only sound connoisseurs know it.
Thus, Sony is more mediated, and ends up having a control of public opinion, and obviously creates a subconscious tendency by Sony, even some of youtubers who make these comparatives
.
If you are young, and like techno, buy a Sony.
But if you are over 40 years old, and want to make up for the lack of youth with charm, buy B&W PX 😎👍 .
.
Lool this was the review we didnt deserve but we needed. I just ordered the px💯👍
@@gabrielbergman1986
good choice 😎👍 .
you just described what i needed to know. You made the decision for me, thanks bro. A lot of reviewers just always say the same thing but they dont say what is relevant. you did . especially that bass description. I also like the bass not to be boomy. But clear and fast and controlled.... Dont know how else to describe it. Im a fan of bw speakers too so i might be prejudiced. But sound is the most important thing for a headphone i think. I see every reviewers saying the confort is not good etc .... I think these people really are hurt pretty easily :p
@@bluetorch002
Hi there,
If you choose B&W PX you will make a good choice, but sacrificing some aspects of the Sony 1000mx3 that would make music even more enjoyable.
If you buy Sony, you're just one more who bought a headset for €350.
If you buy B & W, whoever watches you knows that you like not just music but sound quality.
Some of the "business" websites that do the comparatives, seem to give 100% preference to Sony, but gave me the impression of sponsorship by Sony.
😀😀😀
Because everyone knows Sony, and a lot of people have never heard of Bowers & Wilkins, only sound connoisseurs know it.
Thus, Sony is more mediated, and ends up having a control of public opinion, and obviously creates a subconscious tendency by Sony, even some of youtubers who make these comparatives
.
@@gabrielbergman1986
After that write up, he's sleeping on the Couch! L😂L
I have the PX and XM3’s. Love both. I broke my PX’s through water damage after 8 months of use and decided to replace them with the new XM3’s. This guy said everything I thought about them in this video so no need to repeat. PX win on sound quality (unprecedented detail) and build quality and Sony’s win on everything else. The Sony’s are well-rounded.
Water damage...because of rain, by any chance? Curious how they hold up...
Very good review. I didn't notice if you compared prices, but I'm guessing the B&W costs more. BTW, the Sony can connect to 2 sources if one is for media, and the other for phone calls.
Did you run the PXs in? The sound quality improves massively - bowers and wilkins recommends this and believe me it's true. First wear is going to be a little underwhelming, running in for 24 hours + & you will notice the difference.
I own both of these, I find myself using the Sonys more. The Sonys are so comfortable, especially for us guys with huge heads.
I have a question about the PX. I read the hype but my experience was so different. I hated the sound. To me it was too upper bass emphasized with not enough thump or sparkle. Some songs sounded like the cans had potential (especially the sound stage) but overall I was very disappointed coming from the P7s. Enabling noise cancelling made it better but kinda strange.
Question is have the firmware updates resolved some of the bugs with connection and other stuff. Also does “burn in” (playing them to allow them to “loosen up”), mental burn in (me adapting to a different sound) or physical break-in (the headband and ear muffs fitting better over time due to loosening up) improve the sound?
Thank you.
Generally speaking it does have a polite subbabs and subdued upper treble. But as the pads loosen up to your ears the sound did seem to flesh out a bit for me.
I find the PX to be perfectly comfortable after broken in. Also the fact that they use real leather means that they do need to be broken in, unlike the ones that use fake leather which will eventually start to peel. I don't want to have a $400 pair of headphones that starts falling apart.I don't find there to be any issues with the comfort of the PX and I have a pretty big head although I do have somewhat small ears in comparison.
Hey man have you ever considered doing a comparison between the V-Moda Crossfade Wireless and the Crossfade 2s? I heard it was tweaked a bit.
Crossfade wireless is like the m100 sound profile. Cf wireless 2 has a more balanced profile and they added the extra fold hinge that the m100 has. The rose gold version also has aptx, so they are better suited for watching movies etc. Cf wireless 2 will give you aptx on all colors and AAC.
Which pair stays on your head better if you tilt/shake it a bit?
also went for the PX.. fist day using it.. love it.. only negative is the comfort.. but for the rest the are great.. maybe i also will get the sony.. best of both worlds ;-)
Just wondering if you talk about audio latency in your Jabra Elite 65t video? (czcams.com/video/vdIKG6zciQU/video.html). I don't have time to watch the full video and I might pick up a pair tomorrow as they're on sale but need to know about any lip sync delay
You should review the bowers and Wilkins P9. They are very good.
Everything he said here was true. I have the sennheiser pxc 550's and the Bowers and Wilken's Px's. I'm waiting on the new version of the Wilken's 😎👍🏾
Speedsk8r also have the PX and waiting for PX2:)
Is there any news about PX2
I have PX too and really like them, what would you guys want to be improved with next gen of the headphones?
I would like for them to be a bit lighter, but keep the same build quality if that is even possible.
@@_Mario_PL_ I agree with you and I hope their listening to us for their next version. Everyone else is on their 2nd version or 3rd.... they need to hurry up. The power button and those earcups needs to change I still love them though....
@@Kevinjandro yes, almost forgot about the power button, it does get on my nerves sometimes and feels like it will break with time. The ear cups if they could find a happy medium between the ones that are on there now and something a bit thicker. I don't want them to be as thick or pillowy as others though.
Great review. You should make a comparison Sony WH-1000Xm3 vs Beoplay H9i ;-)
i wud get px
Excellent comparison video!
The sound quality of the PX in flight mode has radically changed after 2 updates (I'm on the latest). I would say it's a lot better than before. In some cases I prefer it with ANC on than off. Anyway, I think the bass of the Px is a touch too dull (like a dull knife). It needs a little bit more sub bass. The Bose qc35 has a much better balance of bass (mid and low) and I can FEEL the bass more in the Bose.
I have a few questions.
1. Is the comfort of the Nuraphone better than the PXs? A lot, a little?
2. Is it possible (have you tried) to EQ (from the app) the Sony to have less midbass and a more balanced bass (like the Bose) and more upper treble extension? What were your results?
Thanks!
The Nuraphones are not as comfortable as the PX. So I hardly use those, but when I do I am always shocked by the sound. I've tried the EQ on the Sony's and it more so distorts the sound then improves. I'll play around with it more.
Bose sound so boring and inoffensive you could describe the sound as grey. I would get the Sony's for sound and NC and since they improved the comfort as well
Always VIRAL agreed. The Bose sound nice at first but artificial and boring to me. I tried them a few times at Best Buy (and credit to Bose for letting the customers try the cans via their phone’s bluetooth, Beats and most other companies don’t allow this). And not loud enough. The Sonys are loud enough and the PXs have volume to spare.
Chris Pineo I have to disagree. Bose sound more clearer and lively imo. The bass is better quality also. Like the reviewer said, sometimes the treble distorts at high volumes though and makes the Bose a little edgy.
I’ll get the Sony if there was a decent way to lower the midbass a little and extend the upper treble a bit.
h1a8 Fair enough. The app’s EQ was a must for me and really helped.
Failing that for just a few bucks there are several EQ apps that can do wonders. I prefer Player Pro for Android and I have Kaisertone for the iPhone. Problem with that is you have to play all music within the app to enjoy the EQ adjustments. Spotify for iOS has an EQ but not Android (last I heard).
I’m very picky about the type of sound I like. Its not necessarily better but its what I prefer so a gently adjusted EQ is almost a must for me. Gone are the days when I cranked 16 kHZ all the way up lol.
I did what most people would find like a downgrade and traded in my PXs for these Sony’s. I had the PXs for almost a year and a big con (apart from poor noise cancelling feature imo) was the comfort. I wear these a lot to study and I thought they would get comfier overtime (like the cushioning/leather would get softer) but it never did. My head would hurt/feel compressed after prolonged use. With these Sony’s, though I had to make major sacrifice in terms of looks (I loooooved the PXs sleek look, these Sony’s are so meh in comparison), comfort and noise cancelling has been so far so great.
There's about a month wait to get the XM3s on amazon. Maybe it's a sign to wait for either Bose or B&W to come out with a challenger?
I'm eyeing the AKG NC700.
@@TheGamingAudiophile those look interesting also I'm just not sure that akg and Samsung can offer a complete package on their first try.
Hi there, what would you recommend as a wireless headphone for making phone calls. I have to do quite a lot of calls and so this is very important for me. Thanks in advance!
Best call quality in a wireless headphone is from the Backbeat 2 Planatronics.
Bad luck for me then. I had those already and I agree that the voice quality is great, but everything else is just not that great. So it seems like I am looking for the second best in terms of voice quality with a slightly better allround performance. Any suggestions?
@@kilianrumpenhorst6786 plantronics 8200 UC
I'm listening progressive, classic rock and sometimes metal. Sony's released one day later when I bought the b&w pxs. From your point of view, should I regret that purchase? Do Sony's act better with my musical taste?
Honestly, the Sony's will sound fine until you hear the PX and then you will notice the extra level of clarity in detail. In sound quality is your main and only category then I would get the PX. But if you want a well rounded headphone, the Sony is the way to go.
I have the Bose and the PX sound slightly more natural and exciting then the Bose because Bose is really boring sounding. You should try the Sony's to see if you like the sound
My tastes are similar. Sound quality and enjoyment is subjective but I could not stand the sound of the PX. Intellectually I understand its spacious and has detail but too much “depth” and midbass. No sparkle or thump most of the time. I wonder if my pair was defective. I liked the P7 wireless a lot.
I’ve been tempted to try a second pair but $400 is a lot to tie up and I don’t want to get flagged for too many returns.
With the Sonys they were better but dull and a bit muffled until I used the app’s EQ. Pushing clear bass down -3 and bumping up 2 KHZ and 6 KHZ +3 got them sounding mighty nice to me. I try to be conservative when I adjust EQ.
All the other factors make the Sonys the clear winner so far.
@@chrispineo1979 it sounds like you need a big thumping bass like beats the way you describe the sound you like
Always VIRAL oh no. Had Beats and returned them. Too processed and artificial. The XM3s with those adjustments sound far better to me than the Beats. EQs can rebalance but they can’t fix artificial. :)
Whats the best here for the gym?
Could you do a review on the NAD Hp70 please?
I'll take a look at those.
My PX also have that headband crinkling, is that normal for leather?
I think so, mine have too. Also, does your wear sensor stop working after about an hour of use? Meaning they don't pause when you lift an earcup or take them off.
Henry Charles sensors usually don't work regardless of how long I've worn it, think it's something to do with the earpads
Hi GamingAudiophile what do you think about the master and dynamic in 2019
Joseph Davenport The MW60?
@@TheGamingAudiophile Which one would you go for mw50+ or mw60 I will mainly be using them with my OnePlus 6
Joseph Davenport Well for that kind of money I honestly recommend the Bose QC35II over them both. But between the MW50+ and MW60, I’d take the MW60.
@@TheGamingAudiophile Ok I really appreciate the quick response but I recently had the Nuraphones and they sound fantastic but just to uncomfortable for me also had the Bose qc35ii b&w px and the Sony 1000 xm3 returned them all but I never tried the Master & Dynamic
The latest Earphone in our shop is releasing, would you love to have a try and review on it?
Sure.
Glad for your reply, may I have a contact with you on Facebook or Email? Here is mine: wuukaren756@gmail.com
More details will be share soon~
What are the differences between bluetooth 4.1 and 4.2 for headphones?
Probably power consumption at most.
Transfer speeds and power consumption.
Imo, ANC capabilities on headphones/earphones have lately been an overhyped feature. Do we really need ANC if we're just looking for a good pair of headphones w/ good passive isolation, or do we just want ANC because all the brands say we need it? Likewise for all the other bells & whistles that the Sony and Bose headphones may tout.
For daily use, my train/bus commutes (in Singapore) isn't really an issue for me in terms of noise. Neither do I don't fly that often. Hence, I rarely use the ANC feature. Perhaps the B&W PX has really good passive isolation for my head shape.
Anyway, the Sony and Bose equivalents might do better in most other areas, but most of these features are gimmicks to me anyway. And if i'm going to spend this much on a pair of headphones, I'd make sure that my $$ is being spent on good sound quality (w/o ANC), good passive isolation & long-lasting build quality. Everything else is just marketing and/or noise (for a lack of a better pun).
Noisy open office spaces and working from caffes are my primary reasons for using ANC.
Tried the PX's. Decided to return them after 30 mins...they are the heaviest and most uncomfortable headphones in this price range. Doesn't matter what they sound like if they hurt my head everytime I put them on.
I have just got the Sony's because I found the wires on my Meze 99C's were a pain in the ass when doing stuff out and about, often yanking the bloody things off my head by mistake. I've now got the best of both worlds; when I'm sat down listening to music I use my Meze's connected to an Audioquest Dragonfly red and get the superior sound quality and when I'm out and about doing stuff I get more than decent sound from my Sony's with decent sound isolation. Both are really comfortable. Meze's are similarly balanced to the Sony but with a much more natural sound and clarity and detail throughout the frequency range. Sorted!
Is your SQ comparison based on Apt HD enabled playback on both headphones?
Yep on my Note 9 with FLAC files and Spotify in Extreme.
@@TheGamingAudiophile did you root your note 9 to get aptx hd? Or are you using LDAC?
@@YL_SC I'm using LDAC.
Why does my
Xm3 sound louder and have more bass with cable plug than Bluetooth is it just me ??!
Cali United Wired still sounds better than Bluetooth on most sources due to the better chance of a more powerful amplifier.
TheGamingAudiophile but did you experience this on yours Sony xm3 ???? For me the Bluetooth don’t sound as good with the cable plug in
@@jj-yg5tv Its really common sense, its like that on most bluetooth headphones, since raw data and more power is supplied to your headphones.
@@jj-yg5tv if you're using your mobile, what codec are you using? If dual audio is on in your BT settings I'm pretty sure it defaults to SBC, which could explain your issue
I have a XZ Premium and run LDAC which is the best Bluetooth codec. It is almost as loud and sounds almost identical to wired. This is not true for every other Bluetooth codec which can take a serious nosedive in sound stage, dynamics and frequency response plus lower volume.
Sony M3s are best in sound for the music i listen to
If you like base the nuraphones are much better, or the vodaphones
How are they for gaming? You seem to be forgetting that that should be important in your reviews as it is part of your youtube name. :-)
I hardly game anymore honestly lol.
I saw your Bose Qc 35 review and I agree with you regarding the sound. I have the Sony 1000xm3 and pxc 550. The sound from the Bose is the crispest with great sense of expansion. The sennheisers sound low and pathetic. No bass, no highs and muffled mids. The Sony have bass, vocals sound "nearer" to the ears compared to the Bose since the latter provide a better sense of spatial listening. I like both implementations. I also find the bass on the Bose to be the most realistic. You get the rumble when you expect it in a song. It's not overdone and feels real. The sonys create an unnecessary deep rumble all throughout the song which feels digital to the ears. I agree with you regarding your comment on Mr Mobile's review of the Sonys. He and Boredatwork didn't agree with you but I now know that you were right regarding the sound of the Bose. Also the Rtings channel review also showed how objective assessment proves the Bose to be better. My question is: Do the B&W PX sound rich with deep organic rumble in bass? I've learnt to appreciate clarity and crisp vocals listening to the Bose and I'd like to have something similar. I'll be honest with you, I'm a basshead. I am coming from the Sony XB950bt. But I think it's time for an upgrade in sound quality. It's been 3+ years with my Sonys and I've been fully satisfied with them. I would like to have superior sound while not compromising on bass much. I understand that the PX or for that matter other headphones in this range won't give me the extra bass that I'm used to from the Sonys but I don't want that anymore. I am looking for a sound quality upgrade with headphones that don't sound completely flat like the Sennheisers. I want something more fun and involving. I see from your reviews that you prefer the Bose and PX over the Sony sound-wise. I have a similar ear so I thought I'd ask your help. I can return the 1000xm3 to Amazon. I'm leaning towards the PX. Your suggestion and inputs in this regard would be greatly appreciated.
Nipun Sharma The PX sounds very clean however these low bass and upper treble is recessed in comparison to the more neutral sounding Bose.
@@TheGamingAudiophile Okay. So that means the bass doesn't make itself feel as much as the Bose? The upper treble of the Bose can get shrill in some EDM songs.
Nipun Sharma Yes, the PX bass is not as balanced and also lacking in the subbbas notes. But the punch in the bass is more so than the bass. The rumble is less. If the music gets shrill, you’re probably listening to loudly. Try to limit the volume from your headphones to no more than 85dB.
@@TheGamingAudiophile Sir, thanks a lot! I've been ordering and returning so many headphones on Amazon that now I fear they'll flag my account for too many returns or worse close my account. It does make me feel bad as well. It's been a really frustrating month. Got the v moda Crossfade 2 wireless, B&O H4 and H7, Sennheiser PXC and now the Sony 1000s. Except the Sony I've returned them all. Got the Bose QC from the Bose store so I'll keep them. I'm apprehensive about ordering the PX since there aren't many reviews on CZcams. Only the most popular headphones have the most reviews (The Bose and Sony) I feel whether it'd be worth it. If I do order them and if I if I do like them more, then I'll probably sell the Bose. I'll wait for the refund for the Sennheiser to reflect back in my account before deciding. What would you say? Should I order them?
PS: I'll take care not to listen at high volumes. I generally don't, but it's in this testing and comparing phase that I crank them all the way to hear the difference in sound and levels of distortion. But one does get habituated to it and begins listening at a higher than usual volume. So it's definitely worrisome. Thanks again! I really appreciate all your help :)
Nipun Sharma Definitely give the PX a try and check this article out that explains that lower volume actually allows you to hear more detail in the music: www.innerfidelity.com/content/loud-music-sucks
I find the px way better, maybe its dependable on which particular genre of music one prefers, but for classical music, ochestrial music, bowers and wilkins is way ahead, bass wise, sony is deeper, but for me, a deep loud bass, tends to drown out the rest of the music.
Sony doesn't drown anything. With Sony you can even tweak your bass while you cant tweak anything on px
Px all the way
Well the Sony XM3 refuses to go into pairing mode. I’ve tried to reset the headphones via the 7 second push but no dice. Any suggestions?
Finally got it to work. Just tried to get it in pairing mode several times then it worked. Not sure I can trust them now.
Now they won’t turn on at all. Ugh!
I liked them but if one pair does this maybe I’ll just spend my $350 elsewhere. A shame the reliability doesn’t match the features.
@@chrispineo1979 Damn, what did you end up having to do? I received mine today.
Anthony Paramo I returned them and got a refund. I’ll probably get another pair when a black one is available, when finances improve a little and when I haven’t heard of more issues like mine.
I think it was a fluke. My XM2s are fine and always reliable.
Which one has better bass
Aziq Aqil XM3’s have wayyy more bass. The PX have a punchy, tight bass with unprecedented detail, though. But if you’re after bass, go with the Sony’s because you get an equalizer in-app that can really crank the bass and no EQ with the PX app.
Sony does have great bass. PX has boring bass delivery...it is too flat and laid back
VS sennheiser 550...plisss
Owned pxc550 and B&W pxc550 is no where near the sound of B&W. Pxc550 only win the comfort. Best sound is B&W but Zero Comfort, hurts my ears and heavy weight.. never owned Sony WH before so no comment.
I have the 550s, and have had all 3 versions of the Sony 1000s. Sent the XM3s back. Noise cancelling much worse than the 2s and the sound is actually worse (though less distortion at highest volume). 550s remain my most used, and I've kept the 2s for planes. Tried 3 pairs of XM3s, and all clearly worse when directly compared to the XM2.
Hi
I'm going to buy the XM3, I tried the PX and I did not like it very much !!
Nuraphone, sony or bowers and wilkins for rock and hip hop
Sony or Nuraphone. Can't wear the Nuraphones for long though.
Bowers and Wilkins PX is made for classics. It is too flat for Hip Hop
Sony may have a tiny edge in ANC.....but Bowers and Wilkins kills them in sound quality. In order for the Sony to sound good, you have to play with the EQ. Bowers and Wilkins does not have that and it beats the pants off Sony. Plus the build quality of the Bowers are second to none
the cake is a lie.
Just got the Sony WH-1000Xm3. Stopped working after i did the FW upgrade via my Iphone. The only reaction i can get is from the power light when i hold the powerbutton, it gives i a blue light for like 0.2 of a second. Tried all ways of factory resetting, but stuck with the same issue :/ Hoping anyone else experienced the same and has a solution :) Will probly end up returing them and getting a new pair as both the previous generations have served me well
You may need to get a replacement. The connection possibly failed during the update process and bricked the headphones.
Wow what a bummer. Hopefully mine don’t do that when they come.
Will it re update
Nah, has to have a bluetooth connection to get contact with the app where the firmware is updated from, and since it wont power on its impossible
naits66 i just updated mine yesterday without any issue. I made sure to not touch the phone and the headphone lol. Also make sure you have enough juice in your headphones before updating.
does any reviewer care about sound???
The Sony cant use LDAC with EQ(sound priority), so i had to use (stable connection without LDAC) to get the sound i want, so in other words the LDAC is totally useless for me. I also have the B&W H9i, and the sound is alot better from the B&W without any EQ on both!
What phone do you have? I have a Sony XZ Premium and it has a built in EQ that you can use to adjust sound away from the XM3 app.
Edwin Hernandez I guess he use an iPhone, have you tried using the m3 on Samsung s9+ with Dolby atmos
@@Slycarlo unfortunately not, I have a Sony XZ Premium. After a week the honeymoon period is over. They aren't that great compared to the original MDR1000X. I actually find they make my ears hotter quicker. Also the sound is very unbalanced, the bass is really overwhelming. There isn't much presence for the mids to thrive in. Last but not least the MDR1000X do a better job of passive noise isolation with better insulation. The only thing that the M3's are better for suppressing high frequency sounds by like 20 percent but it doesn't do as well in suppressing mids like MDR1000X so I can still here winds and humming of window AC where MDR1000X almost makes window AC vanish. I am returning my M3's today as I do not find it is worth the upgrade.
@@LazyCrazyGuy
P 20 pro
All you do is review wireless headphones (aka headphones with highly compressed audio quality)
How come you never review any good WIRED headphones??
Check my channel, that's all I reviewed initially. Bluetooth is what's in the now and what most people are interested in. So I prefer to give my opinion on the market that matters now. I do have a review of the Campfire Andromedas coming soon.
Oh Mah Gawd!🙃😃😄 I bought the BW Px’s and they sound awful! I thought they would sound waaaaay better but they just don’t. I’m going to buy the Sony’s tomorrow!
need to break them in for 20 hours or they don't sound right
Cool story!
Probably the first guy who complained about the sound of PX...unless you are comparing your px to the wired / non-ANC headphone at the same price range.
@@handlewithcare777 He's just a troll.
Works for sony
The PX are obviously gonna sound better because they're $50 more. I don't think the PX are worth it because they're uncomfortable and no hard shell case
I agree with you.
price doesn't necessarily mean they sound better
@@MichaelM28 good point however if they're $50 i expect them to sound better
there's also the build quality difference to consider
I have the Bose and I can clearly say that the Bowers and Wilkins sound slightly more natural and more exciting because Bose is really boring and that's it. Sony has the best sound to me
Sony is lightyears better than bnw