The issue with Rotten Tomatoes is that the actual way it determines the percentage isn't by how highly rated the movie is but more if the reviews are positive, no matter what their actual score for it is. It can be the most 6/10 thing ever but if everyone who reviews it says it is a 6/10 then it's technically it's 100% positively rated.
Yeah it’s literally just an aggregate score showing the % of opinions that thought it was at least above average, so if everyone unanimously thought a movie was just pretty decent, it could theoretically garner 100%
It’s not that they’re never right, it’s that they’re unreliable. They gave Ant-Man and the Wasp an 87%, but Equilibrium and Space Jam are in the 40’s. Say what you want about Equilibrium, but it had a lot of great concepts. It wasn’t absolutely amazing, but it gets way too much shit because it came out right after The Matrix. It’s a lot more “Judge Dredd meets V for Vendetta”, which is fucking awesome. It’s also probably the most emotion I’ve seen from Christian Bale (he’s always great, but something about his first time experiencing human emotion is fucking mesmerizing. That’s not something that can be played easily).
@HellSpartan Z ...It was a joke, because he said a bad movie was bad...Did you even listen to what he said, or just reply to this comment immediately, because I feel like with the context, it's obviously a joke.
@@shevankaseneviratne1724 Sure. Completely faithful to the comics and the character. Also respected Daredevil as a character and his development since the Netflix show. Basically easy to have these opinions when chud CZcamsrs don't do the thinking for you
RoS should literally get an award for somehow being a Star Wars movie worse than the prequels. Like I can’t believe someone actually signed millions of dollars off on that. There is nothing redeemable from that trilogy even aside from lightsaber designs. It poisons everything it touches. Comic books. Games. TV shows. Books taking place before even RotJ has references to sequel content. I can’t stand it.
@@staringcorgi6475 the sequels are just trash. I’d watch the prequels every day for the rest of my life it it meant not a single one of the sequels existed.
@@superjlk_9538 the ONLY good thing imo was Kylo Ren's potential by the end of the force awakens. His character design was badass and he had alot of room to grow. But they shit the bed immediately with the Last Jedi
The Menu is great and pretty funny. As someone who enjoys cooking it really does a good job at poking fun at foodie culture and the restaurant industry
Agreed very good film, I think it points fun at more than just food culture and the chef can be seen as a metaphor for artists in many different fields and the people and the people at the restaurant the people who consume the art
Don't look at the tomatometer. That's the percentage of people that rated the movie 50% and up. So if everyone ranked it 51%, the tomatometer would be 100%. You have to look at the average rating to get a real look at it
People need to realize the rotten tomato score is what percentage of critics gave the film a positive rating, meaning a 60% or higher... no body knows how to read the score correctly
Perry sure most ‘critics’ just choose whether they think the move is either rotten/fresh, and then the movie then have 60% fresh reviews it is considered fresh. You can have some critics who gives the movie an A-rating but still rate it as rotten
Metacritics takes the review scores and averages them to a number Rotten tomatos is percentage based That is they take all reviews and say what percentage of them recommend or dont recommend the show Thats why we never see stuff with 100 or 0 on metacritics but on rotten tomatoes its pretty common if no critics recommend the movie it gets a 0
RT is better to use for its ratings out of 10 rather than the percentage. You also have to consider how many critics reviewed it as it takes a large amount of reviews to balance out the score.
The best advice I've ever seen for finding reviews that are accurate for and work for *you* personally is to find reviews made by people or groups of people with the same likes/dislikes and views as you. This makes reviewer content creators really valuable as they tend to put much more of themselves and their preferences out there so you can find ones who align with you in terms of both views- how you fundamentally asses the media, and personal preferences for likes/dislikes. Most likely you will find that you agree with some of them in a lot of areas, but then seemingly inexplicably they will dislike or hate something that you love in one or two areas and vice-versa. So, it is important to pay attention and try to pick those out, but the best reviewers will justify their reasoning and make it pretty clear where their praise or criticism is coming from making it much easier to identify if it falls into a category you'd agree with or if it's one of the personal taste areas you don't. So long as you find reviewers who you fundamentally agree with in terms of *how* they approach their experience of the media and how they process and talk about it then you are likely to get a really great idea of if you'd like something or not
“Even they hate it” So he doesn’t understand what Rotten Tomatoes is just like the rest of the internet. They’re not assigning a percentage based on what they think, they’re compiling reviews from other sites
@@blending_in it just compiles reviews from other review sites and publications. Any and all of them. The only reviews that actually get written on the rotten tomatoes site are the user reviews. If you look at the reviews it tells you the author and publication on all of them.
As an avid rotten tomato checker. I’ve learned these things. If it’s a low critic score, but higher audience score, it’s a really fun movie that doesn’t make much sense. If it’s a high critic score, and lower audience score, it’s a slow movie that acting is great but plot can bore you.
Fr, Bullet train has a really low review on RT but was one of most fun movies I’ve seen. It definitely wasn’t made to be a serious action/mystery movie so I don’t get why people are trying to rate it as if it was. It’s actually a great example of Chekhov’s Gun as almost everything shown is important later on in some way.
@@luckymark571 yup. Always roll my eyes when people say not to trust the critics when audiences rate Ant-man and the Wasp, and other shit like it, 80% or higher. Same with Black Adam. Don't trust rotten tomatoes. Find individual critics your taste aligns with the most and follow that. Not the masses.
Basically, find critics that review the movie for what it is and if it accomplished it, not critics who review it for what it isnt and didnt try to accomplish.
I literally made the same noise as charlie when that she hulk score came up. I watched it and it has like two good moments in the show but the rest is bland and boring. Took me a while to even finish the other half of the show and I'd do it while doing stuff half the time
Best movie with so so reviews was treasure island. Underrated af. I remember watching it as a kid and wondering why I never heard of it past then like with other shows or movies.
The percentage is how many users recommend it overall, NOT how good it is. So a 100% isn't a masterpiece, it's a crowdpleaser. If you want to find which ones they do/don't recommend, click on the percentage and it'll give you the average rating out of 10. It's usually worth seeing if it's a 7/10 or above from critics but opinion is subjective and yes, I, too, have always complained abouy how well received Big Mouth is on there. That show is garbage. Most of the "interesting" tv shows are the very few that aren't reviewed well, like I had a blast with the second season of Homecoming (same with the first, but people liked the first one.)
I prefer trusting neither. I only trust my own scouting or the opinion of a select few friends (not all of them, some are the consoomer kind of audience that enjoys almost everything)
That’s generally true. Critics are too pretentious sometimes (stepbrothers only has a 55) or the audience is to critical of something for being weird or different (the Northman only has a 60)
I don't believe that, audience scores can be very mercurial. For example giving movies low scores for being too weird or nitpicking things like special effects.
It's bc the audience score doesn't have any sort of criteria for leaving a review. You don't even have to say you've watched the movie (a lot of people will review bomb a movie bc they think it's "woke") which leaves the audience rating as something worth noting but not ever really taken seriously
Rotten Tomatoes has very manipulative and arbitrary ways of showing receptions for both critics and audiences. Like, a critic can give a film a 6/10 (a positive score) and they will either make it not a "fresh" score or even make it a splatty tomato score.
Rotten Tomatoes isn’t great, but people don’t understand that 100% on rotten tomatoes could still just be a 6/10 overall while a rotten film could have a way higher average rating if those who gave it a fresh review generally gave it a very high rating like a 8+/10
Most people would disagree, but I really like Water World. I look back on it fondly as a movie I enjoyed as a child, and I just don’t see it being a “bad movie”. So many people disagree with me 😅
I think it's important to note that critics review movies as a job. Most will not care about the property they have to write a review on. Obscure movies usually get shit upon while trending popular movies get praised whether it is terrible or not.
I don't know. I love A24 movies and while they're not exactly obscure, they're not really popular, either, yet they tend to consistently review very well with critics. Maybe you mean more obscure, though. There are a lot of movies.
How does no one understand how rotten tomatoes works. It’s literally just takes hundreds of reviews from across the Internet and weighs them on whether they’re above 50% which is a positive review or below a 50% which is a negative review, the percentage is not a review score it’s just the amount of people who gave it above 50%
That's why the rating out of 10 is always more useful. For example, Lawrence of Arabia has a 94% while Ratatouille has a 96%. However, Lawrence also has a 9.3/10 while Ratatouille has a 8.5/10.
@@PatrickWDunne exactly, just clicking on the review score gives you a better cage of the movies quality and yet the vast majority of people don’t even know that’s a feature on rotten tomatoes
@@justaduck1652 Then that metric score is just so bad then. Percentage of how many "good" or "bad" is just too vague. At least give critics more options rather than just saying it's "good" or it's "bad"
Critics in general don't matter. I find myself quite critical of music (it's not my profession, I'm just very opinionated) and my thoughts on music are not at all in line with most people. I think any artist who thinks a critics opinion is of utmost importance is a fool.
Wait wait wait... So I've been scrolling through the whole comment section and no one has even mentioned how far superior the iMDB-rating system is to the Rotten Tomatoes-system?
Don't trust TV scores. They collect reviews of individual episodes and skew towards first impressions as more reviews will be of the first episode. I also think audience scores are just as bad if not worse than critic scores. They will be nicer to crowd pleasing movies (rise of skywalker, fantastic beast movies, avatar the way of water) and will be harsher to thinkier movies (basically anything made by A24).
Here's a guide on how Rotten Tomato critics scores works: Below 3: Actually terrible movie, even critics hated it 3-7: Great, classic, actually good movies Above 7: "Safe" movies, like Marvel and Disney live action remakes
House of the dead by uwe boll might be the worse thing I've ever seen. I was so hyped in 7th grade to see it. You could literally see wires and cardboard used in props for the zombies it's wild on top of just being bad.
Ive always known Rotten Tomatoes to have shit takes, but one recent shit take that i donT understand for the life of me is Bullet Train Bullet Train came out this year and it didnt not receive good score. Critic: 54, Audience: 76. Perosnally id give it at least an 85%. Bullet Train was REALLY well done in terms of action, editing, and writing. People have compared it to Pulp Fiction but with more Japanese and twice as much ADHD. The movie is MADE for people with ADHD. The critic reviews make no sense, they just hate it for the sake of hating it, with no specifics critic on why it was bad.
It's good but derivative; felt like a wannabe Guy Richie or Tarantino film and turned into a shitty CGI fest towards the end. Overall it was a fun movie though, 7/10.
Audience scores on rotten tomatoes are much worse. A movie can do 1 thing that isn’t generic or make a point that is slightly left-of-center and you’ll get some of the most deranged commenters ever come mass review the movie.
I run a movie theater company. Film companies release movies they know will do poorly during the month of January. There are a few exceptions, but January is the least profitable month for movie theaters.
I work at a movie theater and I think this January is an exception. M3gan, Avatar 2, A Man Called Otto, and Plane are all selling very well, which is surprising to all of us. Our least profitable month was actually September if I remember right.
@@macatk35 Dude I know!!! My General Manager was saying “no way Otto is gonna sell” so he scheduled it into one of the smaller theaters. As you could imagine that caused quite a problem when the first few shows nearly entirely sold out 😂. I wish more attention had gone to Babylon, because I thoroughly enjoyed that movie and thought it was the best movie we’ve had in the past few months. It’s definitely gonna be divisive with how graphic and explicit it is, considering almost everyone over 45 or so that bought a ticket asked for a refund within the first 15 minutes of the movie 😂😂
@James Dean definitely didn't get the recognition it deserved. Fortunately my boss ignored home office and told me to schedule Otto in 3 screens because she felt the older crowd would like it.
I fucking hated that movie tbh but I could never pinpoint why. I'm not a huge fan of the original manga or anything, just something about the film didn't vibe with me I guess.
@@house_cocoon For me, the main character never had to struggle or fail in order to learn her lessons or improve herself. Anytime she started to fail, she was just too naturally gifted or the plot shoehorns a solution in. Her mistakes weren't punished and successes weren't earned.
I think RottenTomatoes is just used for guidance, like any other review you would watch. You're using it just for an idea, but you'll end up making your own opinion on it when you go watch it.
People, stop looking for a score to know if something is worth it, read opinions on people you consider have good criteria and that's barely even worth doing, at the end of the day, there is no objective way to measure this things beside the I didn't got a seizure watching it or I did.
No, they are not. Theres a bunch of film critics who are good, but there's even more bad ones, so is a little hard tho find them. Finding one good game journalist is a challenge, mostly because seems like they wanted to be journalist, but not a GAME journalist.
Some film critics actually became successful directors like Truffaut, Godard and Paul Schrader. I've never seen a game critic become a successful game developer.
The issue with Rotten Tomatoes is that the actual way it determines the percentage isn't by how highly rated the movie is but more if the reviews are positive, no matter what their actual score for it is.
It can be the most 6/10 thing ever but if everyone who reviews it says it is a 6/10 then it's technically it's 100% positively rated.
Oh, I had no idea
Yeah it’s literally just an aggregate score showing the % of opinions that thought it was at least above average, so if everyone unanimously thought a movie was just pretty decent, it could theoretically garner 100%
Letterboxd is better than Rotten Tomatoes
Its also not consistent so a 5/10 can count as both positive and negative at times so its we
That is only for the critics score though.
puss in boot's 2 scores are high and deserved. it was a great movie.
Fr tho. It's great.
Definitely
It was an amazing movie
It’s not that they’re never right, it’s that they’re unreliable. They gave Ant-Man and the Wasp an 87%, but Equilibrium and Space Jam are in the 40’s. Say what you want about Equilibrium, but it had a lot of great concepts. It wasn’t absolutely amazing, but it gets way too much shit because it came out right after The Matrix. It’s a lot more “Judge Dredd meets V for Vendetta”, which is fucking awesome. It’s also probably the most emotion I’ve seen from Christian Bale (he’s always great, but something about his first time experiencing human emotion is fucking mesmerizing. That’s not something that can be played easily).
@@futuristrick”if you don’t like the same movies I like, you have bad taste in movies” -🤓
Charlie gave "Let's Be Evil" way too much credit. He actually made it sound better than it was.
Yeah it's almost like he has own tastes in things & his own opinions 😅
@HellSpartan Z ...It was a joke, because he said a bad movie was bad...Did you even listen to what he said, or just reply to this comment immediately, because I feel like with the context, it's obviously a joke.
@@TheZipperDragon shut
@@NOT-A-Monolith the front door
@@TheZipperDragon it's obviously a joke they just braindead
I was thinking at first "Rotten Tomatoes isn't that bad" then I saw their score for She-Hulk.
Nope, the score for She-Hulk is deserved, no matter what CZcamsrs who do the thinking for you say
@@acdcfan014 Lets hear your thoughts then. Defend she hulk instead of just calling everyone a bunch of mindless haters.
@@shevankaseneviratne1724 Sure.
Completely faithful to the comics and the character. Also respected Daredevil as a character and his development since the Netflix show.
Basically easy to have these opinions when chud CZcamsrs don't do the thinking for you
@@acdcfan014 The comics change all the time. U adopt a shitty comic u get a shitty series. It means both are bad.
@@shevankaseneviratne1724 which youtuber gave you this opinion
The rise of skyWalker is actually the only correct critical reception I’ve ever seen on RT movie was literally unwatchable
RoS should literally get an award for somehow being a Star Wars movie worse than the prequels. Like I can’t believe someone actually signed millions of dollars off on that. There is nothing redeemable from that trilogy even aside from lightsaber designs. It poisons everything it touches. Comic books. Games. TV shows. Books taking place before even RotJ has references to sequel content. I can’t stand it.
The people who like it don’t like it for good reasons most are just bashing the last jedi which i think is better
@@staringcorgi6475 the sequels are just trash. I’d watch the prequels every day for the rest of my life it it meant not a single one of the sequels existed.
@@superjlk_9538 the ONLY good thing imo was Kylo Ren's potential by the end of the force awakens. His character design was badass and he had alot of room to grow. But they shit the bed immediately with the Last Jedi
The RT is botted or artificial increased. No normal fan likes it only journalist and reylo fans like it and that’s not 86%
Finally other people can see how bad Rotten tomatoes is.
One easy example
They liked Cuties
Its not rotten tomatoes specifically, its the critics that submit there opinion
@Carl Gunderson Lets not forget ant man and the wasp has like a 80% on rotten tomatoes
@@luckymark571 are the critics not the main part of rotten tomatoes 💀💀💀💀
@@epicfishbowl6425 not really, both the audience and critics have the same power
Cuties has an above average critic score everywhere.
The Menu is great and pretty funny. As someone who enjoys cooking it really does a good job at poking fun at foodie culture and the restaurant industry
Agreed very good film, I think it points fun at more than just food culture and the chef can be seen as a metaphor for artists in many different fields and the people and the people at the restaurant the people who consume the art
That and the chef wanting an actor dead for no other reason than being in a shitty movie is hilarious to me
@@flyingfish64 my headcanon is that instead of wanting to kill john leguizamo for the made up movie they used it was actually for the pest instead
@@strawboyhawkins3 OK that's pretty good
Don't look at the tomatometer. That's the percentage of people that rated the movie 50% and up. So if everyone ranked it 51%, the tomatometer would be 100%.
You have to look at the average rating to get a real look at it
Not true, the threshold is 60% but not far off.
People need to realize the rotten tomato score is what percentage of critics gave the film a positive rating, meaning a 60% or higher... no body knows how to read the score correctly
Perry sure most ‘critics’ just choose whether they think the move is either rotten/fresh, and then the movie then have 60% fresh reviews it is considered fresh. You can have some critics who gives the movie an A-rating but still rate it as rotten
Nobody knows how to read it correctly because they don’t know how to DISPLAY it correctly
Honestly he should do a moist meter on puas in boots. The movie needs a lot more traction
The Menu was actually really good, plus Anya Taylor-Joy is a great actress
Moonfall got 36% on rotten tomatoes 😢
Because it’s a piece of shit
I love how some movies can have 90 percent on rotten tomatoes but 60 on metacritic
Metacritic is usually pretty accurate on video games but it's still not the best for movies.
Metacritics takes the review scores and averages them to a number
Rotten tomatos is percentage based
That is they take all reviews and say what percentage of them recommend or dont recommend the show
Thats why we never see stuff with 100 or 0 on metacritics but on rotten tomatoes its pretty common if no critics recommend the movie it gets a 0
RT is better to use for its ratings out of 10 rather than the percentage.
You also have to consider how many critics reviewed it as it takes a large amount of reviews to balance out the score.
The best advice I've ever seen for finding reviews that are accurate for and work for *you* personally is to find reviews made by people or groups of people with the same likes/dislikes and views as you. This makes reviewer content creators really valuable as they tend to put much more of themselves and their preferences out there so you can find ones who align with you in terms of both views- how you fundamentally asses the media, and personal preferences for likes/dislikes. Most likely you will find that you agree with some of them in a lot of areas, but then seemingly inexplicably they will dislike or hate something that you love in one or two areas and vice-versa. So, it is important to pay attention and try to pick those out, but the best reviewers will justify their reasoning and make it pretty clear where their praise or criticism is coming from making it much easier to identify if it falls into a category you'd agree with or if it's one of the personal taste areas you don't. So long as you find reviewers who you fundamentally agree with in terms of *how* they approach their experience of the media and how they process and talk about it then you are likely to get a really great idea of if you'd like something or not
I have fondness for 2000s films there are quite few underrated gems.
dude i’m so glad someone else was terrified when they were little of “one missed call”
“Even they hate it”
So he doesn’t understand what Rotten Tomatoes is just like the rest of the internet. They’re not assigning a percentage based on what they think, they’re compiling reviews from other sites
Wait, what do you mean other sites?
@@blending_in it just compiles reviews from other review sites and publications. Any and all of them. The only reviews that actually get written on the rotten tomatoes site are the user reviews. If you look at the reviews it tells you the author and publication on all of them.
8:01 "da go tuh duh" lol
As an avid rotten tomato checker. I’ve learned these things.
If it’s a low critic score, but higher audience score, it’s a really fun movie that doesn’t make much sense.
If it’s a high critic score, and lower audience score, it’s a slow movie that acting is great but plot can bore you.
Wrong
@@Tobythecatrocks why
@@Tobythecatrocks definitely not wrong, above comment is pretty much dead on
Fr, Bullet train has a really low review on RT but was one of most fun movies I’ve seen. It definitely wasn’t made to be a serious action/mystery movie so I don’t get why people are trying to rate it as if it was. It’s actually a great example of Chekhov’s Gun as almost everything shown is important later on in some way.
More like critics look for art, audiences want low-brow enertainment.
All Rotten Tomatoes really tells me is a lot of well known critics have no taste in movies.
And the audience is kinda rigged to
It goes both ways honestly
@@luckymark571 yup. Always roll my eyes when people say not to trust the critics when audiences rate Ant-man and the Wasp, and other shit like it, 80% or higher. Same with Black Adam. Don't trust rotten tomatoes. Find individual critics your taste aligns with the most and follow that. Not the masses.
Basically, find critics that review the movie for what it is and if it accomplished it, not critics who review it for what it isnt and didnt try to accomplish.
I literally made the same noise as charlie when that she hulk score came up. I watched it and it has like two good moments in the show but the rest is bland and boring. Took me a while to even finish the other half of the show and I'd do it while doing stuff half the time
2:26 "you might also like:" putting Gods of Egypt next to Ben-Hur is sacrilegious enough to warrant another crusade.
11:10 "Is it Dare Devils?" 💀💀💀
Even though I'm one of the 5 people that thought The Last Jedi was alright, I still don't agree with the overly high critic score
It only gets a high score if you’ve never seen a Star Wars movie before. Even it’s Sci-Fi elements don’t work within the lore.
@SuperJLK _ Tbf I treat each Star Wars trilogy on their own plus I'm a pretty light Star Wars fan with dumb opinions
I’m not a huge Star Wars fan but I enjoyed every Star Wars movie and personally like rosw but a lot of people don’t like it but I personally like it
@@bigbaldhead5763 honestly good for you. Don't feel bad if your opinion is unpopular compared to other people
I enjoyed Last Jedi, it just had some super shit moments
I was so happy that the Great Wall was mentioned
Best movie with so so reviews was treasure island. Underrated af. I remember watching it as a kid and wondering why I never heard of it past then like with other shows or movies.
that and Titan A.E.
both were absolute bangers
@@Laachen Both of those AND the lost city of atlantis... the trilogy of underrated cartoon films
@@jfells4838true, those movies hold a special place in my heart
92% of reviewers watched She-Hulk and said "Yea. I dig this. Gonna watch it. Everyone should watch it
it’s dumb fun so i see why
@@bananaking664 It's unbearable to watch, the hell are you on about?
It's called shilling.
@@KingKayro87 nah it was funny and dumb seems you take it seriously
@@bananaking664 no way anyone other than the arm pit hair women voted it above 0%
When Critics reinvented "Dislike Bombing"
The only rating system I trust is the Moist Meter
0:58 as of writing this, Big Mouth's score is now 99%, we may now all rest easy.
Thats still a stupid score but something is something
@@Banana807 yeah it is very dumb
Letterboxd is the best rating system. They are usually very critical so if something gets a 4 star average, it's probably really good
Later seasons of a show will always have very biased ratings because no one is watching 6 seasons of a show they hate.
For me I use both scores on rotten tomatoes. A good film on there has around the same critic and audience score. So I won’t say it’s useless.
6:00 charlies death cry came out
Rise of Skywalker definently had bots on the audience score on rotten tomatoes.
Heavily underrated: 2017 power rangers movie. I was good, left lots to be desired, but still entertaining
How has She Hulk more Rotten Tomatoes then fricking Titanic?! 💀
Venom was one of my favorite Marvel movies, its so bad that its amazing, and the difference in ratings on rotten tomatoes is wild lmao
Venom 2 was genuienely pretty decent tho.
The percentage is how many users recommend it overall, NOT how good it is. So a 100% isn't a masterpiece, it's a crowdpleaser. If you want to find which ones they do/don't recommend, click on the percentage and it'll give you the average rating out of 10. It's usually worth seeing if it's a 7/10 or above from critics but opinion is subjective and yes, I, too, have always complained abouy how well received Big Mouth is on there. That show is garbage. Most of the "interesting" tv shows are the very few that aren't reviewed well, like I had a blast with the second season of Homecoming (same with the first, but people liked the first one.)
Am I the only one that trusts critic scores way more than audience review bombed scores lol
I prefer trusting neither. I only trust my own scouting or the opinion of a select few friends (not all of them, some are the consoomer kind of audience that enjoys almost everything)
@@PyrelordPazuzu if a movie has less than 50% rotten tomatoes I’m not going to watch it in theatres and spend $20
@@sam_Invincible that's my secret, I don't watch them on theatres
@@PyrelordPazuzu Avatar was great on the big screen
@@PyrelordPazuzu same
the ONLY time the scores are accurate is when both the audience and critic scores are similar
Except for horror movies
That’s generally true. Critics are too pretentious sometimes (stepbrothers only has a 55) or the audience is to critical of something for being weird or different (the Northman only has a 60)
I agree, for example The dark knight
I don't believe that, audience scores can be very mercurial. For example giving movies low scores for being too weird or nitpicking things like special effects.
Its funny to think about the audience score doesn’t age well 50% of the time. Sometimes its more trash or sometimes it turns out to be a decent watch.
Audience scores are full of the slack jawed yokels. Anyone thinking that the audience score is more trustworthy is generally dim.
It's bc the audience score doesn't have any sort of criteria for leaving a review. You don't even have to say you've watched the movie (a lot of people will review bomb a movie bc they think it's "woke") which leaves the audience rating as something worth noting but not ever really taken seriously
Rotten Tomatoes has very manipulative and arbitrary ways of showing receptions for both critics and audiences. Like, a critic can give a film a 6/10 (a positive score) and they will either make it not a "fresh" score or even make it a splatty tomato score.
Rotten Tomatoes isn’t great, but people don’t understand that 100% on rotten tomatoes could still just be a 6/10 overall while a rotten film could have a way higher average rating if those who gave it a fresh review generally gave it a very high rating like a 8+/10
Mario Movie:
56% 🤢
96% 🍿
Yeah this is telling me something
i actually love King Arthur 2017
Most people would disagree, but I really like Water World.
I look back on it fondly as a movie I enjoyed as a child, and I just don’t see it being a “bad movie”.
So many people disagree with me 😅
At 11:59 in a single picture you get what is wrong with the Star Wars community. Oh my god.
I find that audience scores mean even less, a lot of people bomb certain things for dumb reasons. Critics at least try to be respectable. (Usually)
Audience scores are full of 1s and 10s trying to outweigh each other. How many movies have you seen that are that good or bad?
This is why if you use rt you look at the overall score too
I think it's important to note that critics review movies as a job. Most will not care about the property they have to write a review on. Obscure movies usually get shit upon while trending popular movies get praised whether it is terrible or not.
I don't know. I love A24 movies and while they're not exactly obscure, they're not really popular, either, yet they tend to consistently review very well with critics. Maybe you mean more obscure, though. There are a lot of movies.
@@Hocotatium111 Yeah, I meant stuff that is not mainstream media. But I suppose it just depends.
Why didn’t he read the critics consensus for moonfall lol
How does no one understand how rotten tomatoes works. It’s literally just takes hundreds of reviews from across the Internet and weighs them on whether they’re above 50% which is a positive review or below a 50% which is a negative review, the percentage is not a review score it’s just the amount of people who gave it above 50%
That's why the rating out of 10 is always more useful. For example, Lawrence of Arabia has a 94% while Ratatouille has a 96%. However, Lawrence also has a 9.3/10 while Ratatouille has a 8.5/10.
@@PatrickWDunne exactly, just clicking on the review score gives you a better cage of the movies quality and yet the vast majority of people don’t even know that’s a feature on rotten tomatoes
@@justaduck1652 Then that metric score is just so bad then. Percentage of how many "good" or "bad" is just too vague. At least give critics more options rather than just saying it's "good" or it's "bad"
You’re wrong 😊
Im a regular hood dude doing food reviews on my CZcams channel :/
Isn’t RT owned by a movie studio or something? I remember hearing that somewhere..
The rise of Skywalker is a crime against humanity
Alita was great. It was such a fun movie.
They did score the first mummy.
Critics gave it a 61
Audiences gave it a 75
4:05 What about Moonfall?
Critics in general don't matter. I find myself quite critical of music (it's not my profession, I'm just very opinionated) and my thoughts on music are not at all in line with most people. I think any artist who thinks a critics opinion is of utmost importance is a fool.
King Arthur: Legend of the sword was a good movie. Absolute crime that it wasn´t successful.
Wait wait wait... So I've been scrolling through the whole comment section and no one has even mentioned how far superior the iMDB-rating system is to the Rotten Tomatoes-system?
My rating system:
* don't see it ever,
* don't pay to see it,
* don't pay to see it in theaters,
* you should go see it,
* go see it in 4DX
My name is Megan, I don’t think I’ll subject myself to a single episode..
No king Arthur movie was as good as the one where the kid found Excalibur and put it under his bed when he went to school
@moistcharlieclipsofficial_ while Charlie is a Saint like Nicholas, I doubt he giving away random prizes to random ppl like me thanks.
Master of Disguise has a whole 1%
still waiting for a moonfall 2 announcement
Don't trust TV scores. They collect reviews of individual episodes and skew towards first impressions as more reviews will be of the first episode.
I also think audience scores are just as bad if not worse than critic scores. They will be nicer to crowd pleasing movies (rise of skywalker, fantastic beast movies, avatar the way of water) and will be harsher to thinkier movies (basically anything made by A24).
Speed Racer 2008 currently has a 41% score on Rotten Tomatoes… think about that.
How can rate any movie a zero percent? I feel like that type of score is meant for something that can't be deemed as a movie.
Yeah, like at that point it wouldnt be a movie it would be a boredom shit fest
How do you not know how to use rotten tomatoes
There’s a lot of incest in star wars
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty is 52
Here's a guide on how Rotten Tomato critics scores works:
Below 3: Actually terrible movie, even critics hated it
3-7: Great, classic, actually good movies
Above 7: "Safe" movies, like Marvel and Disney live action remakes
I used to rely on RT five to seven years ago. Now I rely on the people I follow on Letterboxd.
The moist meter should have a website nvm it does
3:16 that dry jerkin' sound is crazy annoying lol
House of the dead by uwe boll might be the worse thing I've ever seen. I was so hyped in 7th grade to see it. You could literally see wires and cardboard used in props for the zombies it's wild on top of just being bad.
She-Hulk is fine lmao
Ive always known Rotten Tomatoes to have shit takes, but one recent shit take that i donT understand for the life of me is Bullet Train
Bullet Train came out this year and it didnt not receive good score. Critic: 54, Audience: 76. Perosnally id give it at least an 85%. Bullet Train was REALLY well done in terms of action, editing, and writing. People have compared it to Pulp Fiction but with more Japanese and twice as much ADHD. The movie is MADE for people with ADHD.
The critic reviews make no sense, they just hate it for the sake of hating it, with no specifics critic on why it was bad.
It's fun even the critics agree I also watched it like multiple times but it isn't really a great movie
It's good but derivative; felt like a wannabe Guy Richie or Tarantino film and turned into a shitty CGI fest towards the end. Overall it was a fun movie though, 7/10.
Because RT’s rating system is trash. You cant properly rate a movie by only having 2 rating choices.
Loved loved loved Alita: Battle Angel. Probably watched it like 7 times
Audience scores on rotten tomatoes are much worse. A movie can do 1 thing that isn’t generic or make a point that is slightly left-of-center and you’ll get some of the most deranged commenters ever come mass review the movie.
So do User Scores on RT tbh
A beloved movie doesn't mean it's a good movie. Maybe in a bad-good movie way.
Noooo way rise of skywalker got that big of a rating by the audience. It was hated by many, it even came close to the last Jedi and that says a lot
What search engine does he use
Opera GX really cool if you on windows, also you can use his download link to support him. No downsides.
The Rise of Skywalker was botted. There are some very illustrative videos showing how repetitive and obviously generated the 5 star reviews are.
I run a movie theater company. Film companies release movies they know will do poorly during the month of January. There are a few exceptions, but January is the least profitable month for movie theaters.
February is similar, and funny enough Morbius was gonna come out in February but got delayed to March- which probably only helped it bomb financially.
I work at a movie theater and I think this January is an exception. M3gan, Avatar 2, A Man Called Otto, and Plane are all selling very well, which is surprising to all of us. Our least profitable month was actually September if I remember right.
@James Dean is the that crazy?! I had no idea Otto was going to sell so good. Especially being on streaming platforms!
@@macatk35 Dude I know!!! My General Manager was saying “no way Otto is gonna sell” so he scheduled it into one of the smaller theaters. As you could imagine that caused quite a problem when the first few shows nearly entirely sold out 😂. I wish more attention had gone to Babylon, because I thoroughly enjoyed that movie and thought it was the best movie we’ve had in the past few months. It’s definitely gonna be divisive with how graphic and explicit it is, considering almost everyone over 45 or so that bought a ticket asked for a refund within the first 15 minutes of the movie 😂😂
@James Dean definitely didn't get the recognition it deserved. Fortunately my boss ignored home office and told me to schedule Otto in 3 screens because she felt the older crowd would like it.
I know I'm in the minority here, but Alita Battle Angel was just AWFUL to me.
No you’re right it was a really stupid movie
I didn't like the end that much
I fucking hated that movie tbh but I could never pinpoint why. I'm not a huge fan of the original manga or anything, just something about the film didn't vibe with me I guess.
@@house_cocoon For me, the main character never had to struggle or fail in order to learn her lessons or improve herself. Anytime she started to fail, she was just too naturally gifted or the plot shoehorns a solution in. Her mistakes weren't punished and successes weren't earned.
Same tbh lul
I think RottenTomatoes is just used for guidance, like any other review you would watch. You're using it just for an idea, but you'll end up making your own opinion on it when you go watch it.
This is why IMDb without its reviews is 10000000x better
Ant Man & The Wasp was a solid 7.8/10. One scene took me out but then brought me back in. Well, not 100% back in but 90%.
Charlie how the hell can we trust you when you dont love at least one movie most people hate?
People, stop looking for a score to know if something is worth it, read opinions on people you consider have good criteria and that's barely even worth doing, at the end of the day, there is no objective way to measure this things beside the I didn't got a seizure watching it or I did.
Rotten tomatoes also said ZSJL is good and ZSJL is really, really not good at all
Its not good at all, its great.
I think movie critics are about on par with gaming journalists, lol.
And somehow they still manage to be 10 times smarter than general audiences who are functionally retarded.
No, they are not. Theres a bunch of film critics who are good, but there's even more bad ones, so is a little hard tho find them. Finding one good game journalist is a challenge, mostly because seems like they wanted to be journalist, but not a GAME journalist.
Some film critics actually became successful directors like Truffaut, Godard and Paul Schrader. I've never seen a game critic become a successful game developer.
"If its low on rotton tomatoes it must be especially shit."
So im guessing you didnt like the Mario movie.
The video seems to betray the title lol
That is 100% true. Trust yourself
They should change it to 7 or 8.