đ„ "PEOPLE LIKE YOU CAUSED VAR!!" đĄ Simon, Danny & Jim GO OFF!
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 14. 02. 2023
- Simon Jordan, Danny Murphy & Jim White don't hold back in their bickering about VAR! Simon points the finger at Danny and other members of football media for being responsible for VAR's introduction. But Danny stands his ground in why he's so against the technology and its effect on fans & players experiences.
Enjoyed this CZcams video? đ
Subscribe here: / talksport
Check out some of talkSPORT's MOST POPULAR content đ„
✠HEATED DEBATE! Simon Jordan & Graeme Souness CLASH over Erik ten Hag's treatment of Man United player Cristiano Ronaldo
âą JORDAN vs SOUNESS đ€Ź | ...
✠Simon Jordan has his say on Gary Neville working for Qatar-based BeIN Sports during the 2022 World Cup
âą đ„Ž Simon Jordan has his...
✠Ben Foster says Edwin Van Der Sar would do minimal training and still be ready to play for Manchester United
âą Ben Foster says Edwin ...
✠Simon Jordan GOES IN on Gary Neville for his Man Utd vs Liverpool commentary
âą Simon Jordan RAGES Ove...
✠Rudiger intermediary Saif Rubie makes bombshell Chelsea claims and clashes with Simon Jordan
âą đ±đ„ Rudiger intermediar...
✠Academy Award Winner Gary Oldman is baffled by Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney's purchase of Wrexham
âą Academy Award Winner G...
✠INCREDIBLE CLASH! Ray Parlour and Robbie Lyle get HEATED over claims AFTV want Arsenal to LOSE!
âą INCREDIBLE CLASH! Ray ...
✠Ben Foster tells talkSPORT that the Premier League would have 'sued' him if he recorded the games he played for Watford
âą Ben Foster reveals Pre...
✠Simon Jordan and Graeme Souness CLASH over Daniel Levy's role at Tottenham
âą Simon Jordan and Graem...
✠Simon Jordan GOES IN on Jurgen Klopp for calling out Gabby Agbonlahor
âą Simon Jordan GOES IN o...
✠Simon Jordan argues that Manchester City do spend FAR MORE than Liverpool and other Premier League clubs
âą Simon Jordan argues th...
✠Simon Jordan reacts to Chelsea owner Todd Boehly's suggestion of a North vs South Premier League All-Star game
âą Simon Jordan reacts to...
✠Is Manchester City's Erling Haaland better than Tottenham's Harry Kane? talkSPORT's Graeme Souness thinks he could be!
âą Is Man City's Erling H...
✠Simon Jordan doesn't think Steven Gerrard has the ability to be a manager in the Premier League
âą Simon Jordan doesn't t...
đ„ïž talkSPORT's Website: /talksport.com/
đČ talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
đ· talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
đ€ talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
đ± talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
đŽ Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
đ Want to see if you feature on our CZcams channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: âą The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#var
#dannymurphy
#matchoftheday
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague
#ChampionsLeague
#FACUP
#SimonJordan
#EuropaLeague
#LauraWoods
#AllyMcCoist
#ManUtd
#ManCity
#Liverpoolfc
#Arsenalfc
#Chelseafc - Sport
Jim, the only person who will ask 50 questions and not allow the person to respond.
đ
He needs to pipe down and listen more
Seems so out of touch and when people donât agree with him, he doesnât let them respond or explain and then just goes ânope youâre wrongâ
Wind up merchant.
Jim was the biggest fan boi to bring it in , đ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ą
Jim White slowly becoming Piers Morgan at talksport.
Piers can make his own arguments, Simon makes Jimâs
@Asher Neyland yeah true I'm thinking about adjetating every one who's in studio with him
@@deeppocketsshortarms2830 ye true, heâs a bit spineless he sides with whatever SJ says
Such an annoying man.
Turtleneck Piers. Wanna-be Ten Haag/Pep
Jim: âWhat do you think about that Danny?â
Danny: âWellâŠ.â
Jim: âWhy wonât you answer Danny?â
Danny: âWellâŠâ
Jim: âCome on Danny you donât know what to say!â
Danny: âWell IâŠâ
Jim: âThere you have it Danny doesnât know what to say!â
That's brilliant! đ
Sometimes (a lot of the time) Jim is completely insufferable đ€Ł
most of the time
I can assure you hes insufferable full stop, a total knob.
"Sometimes (a lot of the time)" is superfluous imo
Here's a tip for Simon and Jim : just let Danny put more than 2 words together before interrupting him......
It happens all the time. The more respectful the guest, the more we hear rhetoric shouted loudly over the top of them. Imagine adults acting like 5 year olds and bring paid for it.
3:18?
good point
they have an agenda they've been told to push/endorse. And it ain't just about soundbites and clickbait... generating talksport revenue from "controversy" and fake arguments either. In the end, we don't know why var was brought in, nor why it is being (mis-)used the way it is.... i do however have my suspicions.
Tbh Danny seemed to be interrupting just as often.
It would be nice if Simon and Jim would actually allow Danny to answer these accusations that they lay at his feet... đ€Źđ€Źđ€Źđ€Źđ€Ź
Or answer the questions he put to them. Narrative pushers. đ€
Jim & Simon complete planks , VAR fan boi
danny is brighter and wiser then both of them. gotta love when the guy who talks least makes most sense
@@hotdog9262 Except he is not though. Danny doesn't even know what critical thinking is. He is just spewing yer da talk.
@@asmo2183 what would critical thinking be. he is speaking from the perspective of an ex professional and shares his honest opinions
Jim: What's your 3-point plan then Danny?
Danny: Explains point 1
Jim: OK now you're Howard Webb. What's the first thing you do?
Big fan of Danny Murphy and his measured perspective.
Even though he is wrong.
@@happyapple4269youâre wrong you cretin
Painful discussion. Well done Danny Murphy.
Well said, two against one is never easy
Danny murphy is bang on here, simon jordans take on this was embarrassing
Iâm with Danny
@@paulpurves484 jim is devils advocate and simon made very valid points.
@@happyapple4269 Jim definitely wasnât playing devils advocate I thought he was actually quite unpleasant towards Danny.
Why do they keep pushing VAR "getting more right than it gets wrong"? If I did 100 tasks at work, got 51 right and 49 wrong, I'd be sacked. Getting more right than wrong is not a measure of success.
Bur they got more wrong without var ya big clown
Well it is actually a measure of success. Those numbers youâve chosen are quite poor. If you do 3 tasks and get 2 right and 1 wrong what happens there? If a team gets to 92 finals and wins 50 and loses 42, that suggests to me that theyâre still a hell of a team and have loads of success in that competition. You canât just choose numbers to suit your opinion on it. Iâve only done it to counter your argument
@@shauncrossey8184 I've not chosen numbers to suit any argument, but to simply say VAR has been a success because it gets more right than wrong is ridiculous. The minimum to get more right than wrong would be 51%, which I'm pretty sure everyone would agree would be a terrible record. If they were saying "VAR gets X number more decisions correct than no VAR" then that would be a valid defence, but they're not.
@@grassfret well we donât know the percentages do we, because nobody counts it, because in essence, nobody cares. was never going to be 100% right anyway, but itâs clearly iover 50%, which, I agree isnât great. But itâs not terrible either is it? Clearly room for improvement, which Iâm sure will be sorted
@@shauncrossey8184 you're missing the point, whether it is over 50% or not isn't what they or I am saying. My point is that the statement that Jim and Simon keep repeating is nonsense. "VAR gets more right than it gets wrong" is not the brilliant defence of VAR they seem to think it is.
Fair play to Danny for not losing his cool. He played the game, lived it, was at the receiving end of bad decisions and isn't allowed to answer questions fully. Getting laughed at and belittled.
When Simon was trying to explain his ârulerâ analogy n Danny says âyou know weâre on radioâ. Shut down đ
Not quite correct though, they are on CZcams also, which is visual, i was expecting Simon to comeback with that, doh.
jims self righteous smirk is hilarious đ
This is the Mike, Jay, and Rich of football punditry.
Jim is a complete đ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ą he was the biggest fan boi ,, football was entertainment this radio show is đŻ pathetic
Iâd smack him in his mouth
Iâd smack him in his mouth
He's got a very punchable face.
Jim taking this somewhat personal, lets face it, when he was on SSN he was pressing the NEED for VAR to come into the sport every shift. Certain media companies had their rhetoric and we all know the technology just isnt good enough, neither are the folks operating it.
I remember in late 2017 when many fans were wanting video refs in the sport, every comment I saw whenever there was a bad decision said "we need video technology"
How is it not good enough?
Danny was brilliant. Articulated his argument eloquently
I have to admit I was with Danny on this one. Simon blaming the media and yet can't realize he is right there amongst it as part of the media!
@@batmanmartin496 bit like trump claiming he was an outsider lol similar degree of self-importance and pomposity shared too. "look at ma big words!"
Danny complaining of goals being ruled out for being an inch offside was just plain daft.
Jim dont know what he thinks till Simon tells him and refuses to let people answer
If danny could speak it would be a miracle.
If Danny could think it would be a miracle.
+The only time Danny finished a sentence is when Jim played a recording
Danny is bang on with this subject.
Nothing worse than listening to someone asking a question, then the same person talking over the person trying to answer it. And SJ just thinking he knows everything.
Danny first thought Simon was on his side before, Simon reminded him he's not đđ
Simon = top LAD proper clobber
The side of truth
@@MW92. Not in this case.
I get why Danny's getting cooked... but let's applaud him for being spontaneous. The likes of Souness and Keown would have gotten triggered.
And maybe that's why we haven't seen Graeme since LMAO
Pliz remove Danny n Abonglahor from Talksport
@@petebodom bringing Danny Murphy down to Agbonlahor level, come on
Go to minute 4.38 , Simon gives Danny a wink cause he knows there arguments / debate makes for good listen
đđ
ALL HAVE OVERLORDS. DONE FOR MONEY NOT TO INFORM.
If you put it as 4:38 it will jump there when you click on the number. Clicking the dots on the right allow you to edit your comment.
What wink? Danny was reacting to Jim bringing up a statement that he made previously......đ
@@gooner72 Look at 4:36 instead.
You can have sympathy for a ref in real time not being able to get a call right. You can't with a man with endless replays who still can't get offsides, penalties, red cards right.
And when it takes several minutes to come to the wrong decision......
I'm a 52 year watcher and attender of football matches in England and VAR, for me has destroyed our game. I can't enjoy my team scoring now and the excitement has gone. Yes, I used to get miffed at replays showing offside (before VAR), but I would have that back in a heartbeat! If VAR stays, our game is dead, as it leaves the game open to corruption and game fixing!
Maybe your team didn't score fake goal var to stay
Did Simon just give a shout out to Judge Dredd?đđ This guy.
Poor guys canât cope with Dannyâs common sense. The other two creating Dannyâs argument (straw man) and saying heâs wrong.
Jim was never this much of a knob on sky đ
'Well you can't polish Turds can ya!'
OMG that was such a brilliant call. I was on the floor dying đ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
jim is just the scottish jeremy vine
That's is spot on fella. He plays dumb and throws muck around.
Thatâs spot on both CuâŠ.. Nts , Jim was the biggest VAR fan boi complete đ€Ąđ€Ąđ€Ą Simon & Jim know nowt
Still think Jeremy vine is worse
Jim and Simon are the new chuckle brothers
When var was first discussed, it was to stop errors that were "clear and obviouse". It has evolved into a phorensic analysis of every goal. My answer is to allow referees to referee the game, each Captain will be allowed one or two challenges, if the referee was correct, a challenge is lost, similar tennis, where the system seems to work well.
Exactly, if it takes several minutes at a match in order to pore over the minutiae then it is not âclear and obvious.â
Actually a class idea this, shame the Premier league and its refs are absolute clowns
Spot on good idea
American Football does the same. Great idea. One often argued how accurate is offside technology when the moment of impact is impossible to gauge on a TV screen AND the millimeters of where an arm, shoulder, head, or leg is is questionable... Any decision that is millimeter close should asshats be given to the offensive team. Similar to the "tie goes to the runner" rule in American baseball.
Except when you've used your tow decisions the other team will make a red card tackle buy only get a yellow
Good discussion well done danny
Well done Murphy! Two against one and you handled it like a boss.
Simon is right though pundits like Danny Murphy are the reason itâs there in the first place
They tried to do this to Souness... bad move! Mr Souness won it with one arm tied behind his back. White & Jordan always pick on Danny and Martin Mckeown, but White holds back to let Simon get first dibs at them. If it's not going as planned, White splatters his breeks.
@@dj22jamesy souness went off the show he couldnât handle been called out for things
People saying itâs adds drama and makes it more exciting etc are fans who sit at home and watch the game. When your in the stadium and itâs freezing and like old Trafford have no big screen you have no idea whatâs going on. Also I agree with Danny since var when u celebrate thereâs always a slight holdback in case itâs ruled out, even if somebody smashes in a 30 yard rocket your thinking was someone in the way for it to be ruled out. I say scrap it and people need to accept mistakes from refs/linesman
I totally agree. When at a stadium it hardly adds to the excitement, it is boring and incredibly frustrating indeed for the crowd.
đ đ đ
Well said agree with you đŻ % !
But fans won't accept it.
They lost their minds for over 20 years since football was on telly. Every ref was wrong.
Fans just moan non stop unless it benefits their teams.
@@kevinkilbane2007 Fans been moaning about refs since football began in the 19th century and still do, so won't make any difference.
@@kevinkilbane2007 get rid of the refs or var quite simple
Sorry but Jim White is the biggest muppet going
I dont understand how he still hosts a show hes a moron
slow sports news
Jim âleftistâ white
Jimbo trying hard to join up The Jordanite Club Association, but we have refused his letter.
Do a vote on TS and see how many ppl who work at TS would vote to keep it in!!! Jim and Simon are the only 2 ppl at TS who want to keep it!! Might as well work for the TalkTV
I am no fan of Danny Murphy but I agreed with a lot of what he said. The spectacle of football is worse because of the ridiculous forensic analysis on offsides and /or the VAR room chiming in on incidents in an inconsistent manner. Originally I wanted VAR to remove goal/no goal like Lampard for England or the Spurs goal against MUFC. Every single time football is slowed down it heads towards American football which for me is not why I watch it. For the record I also agree with Simon that VAR gets more right than wrong. Maybe speed of decision making is the key?
Donât mention the var!
I mentioned it once but I think I got away with alright!
Brill đ€Ł
Will you stop talking about the var.
Well Germany started it!
Danny is correct, VARs killed the excitement!
I usually agree with Simon but in this occasion I agree with Danny, especially when it comes to the offside by a toe
But Danny is wrong about offside. The law states that a toe is offside, so until they change the law, then VAR is correct to rule those goals out.
That's like saying the speeding law was introduced to stop people driving at 50mph on residential streets so you can't pull me over for doing 32 đ€·ââïž
@Magikarp Splashy shut up you GOON đ
@@magikarpsplashy what are you talking about? How does that make him wrong?? Before VAR when was anyone flagged for being offside by a toeđđ?! Never, and making road speed analogies to offsides in football makes you sound like an even bigger twatđ
@Campbell Moffat and they wrong not to flag. Look up what the offside rule says and then you'll understand why you're wrong.
And I'd rather be a twat that's correct than a great guy that's a pillock đ
@@magikarpsplashy you arent correct thoughđ
Before VAR nobody had ever been flagged offside by a toe, how could they have had that down as a rule when technology wasn't as good even 5year ago otherwise we would have had VAR a long time ago, anyone that has played football at any level growing up, especially as a striker learned how to bend the run playing of the shoulder, etc and there needing to be in front of the player by at least a full arm and leg, etc never a toe so you can talk about what the rules say all you want that isn't the topic of discussion here it's about VAR decisions being ridiculous and Danny said how stupid that rule is so all you are doing is repeating yourself about a rule that was only introduced with the VAR technology not before and everyone including footballers agrees how stupid it is and it should be changed back to before with that rule obviously you haven't played the game at any level because nobody that has would make a ridiculous statement like what you have just madeđ€
Simon is such a wind up and Jim absolutely loves it haha. Itâs great to watch / listen to even if they arenât always right. Very entertaining
It is spelt "a n n o y I n g" iirc
The Premier League half-arsed the implementation of VAR from the get go. When VAR debuted at a World Cup, the biggest stage in football, it went off almost without a hitch. One of the defining things about the implementation by FIFA was in allowing the on-field ref to go and take a look at the screen and decide for himself, much like TMO in Rugby will ask the on-field ref to take a look at something. What the Premier League did in the beginning was to limit the opportunity of the ref to take a look on the screen which did more to undermine the refs. Aside from offside which is an objective issue, everything other decision should reside solely with the on-field ref. VAR should not be making decisions, only advising the ref to take another look. And for God's sake mic them up so we can hear what they're saying and how they justify and reason their decisions.
The main issue is that in rugby the on field referee doesn't get told to look at the screen, he will request what he wants to see in collaboration with the tmo BUT THE ON FIELD REF IS IN CHARGE. The tmo can't undermine him. Then there's also the fact they show it on the screen for the entire stadium as opposed to just the viewers at home. Them nobody is left out.
I said at the beginning the refs were sabotaging it and I still feel that way
Jim going âScrap itâ took me
Huge Simon Jordan fan but Danny Murphy in the right here, let him answer đ€Šââïž
That pause to see if the goal stands spoils the moment of celebration for players and fans
Absolutely correct Danny
Jim sticks up for his mate far to much.
it's getting disgusting.
@@bringinitdown. It reminds me of when I was a young lad who got loved up by an older woman.
Simon's comment re. the referee calling for VAR (rather than VAR calling the ref) is bang on ... this is essentially what happens in rugby, where the ref. calls the TMO to confirm (or otherwise) the on-field decision. (Yes, there are a small number of times when the TMO will alert the ref to something they may have missed, but this is the exception rather than the norm).
100 plus mins these days and they get it wrong as well.
The refs would get hounded by the players and managers, the game would grind to a halt
I was always under that impression. I thought VAR was brought in just as a visual aid to the ref if they requested it when they weren't sure regarding a decision??
I'm with Danny 100%! The millimeters offside calls are excruciating to see. It's getting worse. Give the advantage to the attacking player, it's been like that, the advantage used to go to the attacking player now it favors the defender, the attacking player will always lean forward, hence, advance few inches forward.
I felt psg offside 82 min goal was a joke toe offside come on
I've always said this, just give the benefit of the doubt to the attcking player. Often we see really good goals getting ruled out because some guys sleeve was offside. Its killng the game.
If a goal is not ruled out for being "millimetres offside" Paulo, then how far offside must a player be before he is offside? It must be the same for every match, every team, every player. Therefore the line has to be drawn somewhere which means wherever it is drawn "millimetres" over that line will be enough to be offside.
@@markchapman2933 Just the fact that the conceding team don't even complain the legitimacy of the goal says it all. It's true that offside is offside, but the forensic analysis in every goal scored is ridiculous, if that's the case then they should also have to look at every session of the play for a possible offside offense, not only when a goal is scored. It's not good for football when you see referees doing their best just to disallow a goal, they are looking for every tiny details just to rule it out and it's ruining the game. The technology was never about the toe, shoulder, armpit, forehead inches offsides; it was for the "clear and obvious" errors, meaning, the blatant errors that somehow the referees didn't spot or ruled very incorrectly which these offside calls are not. For there to be an offside both feet/heels of the attacking player has to be completely forward in relation to last defending player, the way it is now it's creating lazy defending and inhibiting the whole process and art of attacking. As if it's not already too difficult teams will now have to find for even more creative ways to score a goal just to ensure it doesn't go the surgery room (VAR) to see if it lives or dies
Let Danny speak ffs!!
5:07 That smirk from Simon
Simon always believes he knows beyond everyone and would never allow you to speak whilst he talks above you .... unbelievable
Snow Man He's a Narcissist, loves himself, and never allows anyone to speak! Danny was correct, and Posh Boi was an absolute đ€Ą Pity about the Crystal Palace job Simon, not over it yet???? PMSL!!!
@@sprinter1832 Murphy was absolutely right but am sad that Jim is a puppet and has always been cos he wants views for his show with the presence of Jordan... he didn't back Murphy when Jordan was shutting the man down
Simon hes just sounds like a Noisy exuast on wind up like hes in Courts Var Has been a joke Simon Must be drinking something
@@christopherwayne6275 đ đ
White and Jordan love the sound of their own voices.
At least let the man talk
only solution is fully automated or allow managers to challenge calls in real time like NBA or NFL. Just accept the change.
Goal line technology worked a treat. The problem with VAR is that it does not focus on the clear and obvious mistakes - instead it tries to microanalyze everything.
No, that was the start of this foolishness...if goal line then why not other things too? The difference between winning and losing is not whether something crossed the line or not...a team can also lose due to a wrong throw-in, a wrong offside, an undetected foul, a dive etc....As soon as you start messing with the simplicity and fluidity of the game you are chipping away at it.
Can't believe I'm actually with Danny on most of this
I donât care anymore about how right the decision is and the subjective decisions still not getting it right. They could get 100% of all decisions right and Iâd still hate it. Purely because of disallowed goals, and not being positive a goal is a goal until a minute or 2 later. Absolutely ruined everything we loved about football. We live for our team hitting the back of the net and celebrating. Barely celebrate goals anymore. VAR is awful when youâre a matchday goer.. football is dead đ
Jim was insufferable in this one. Give Danny a chance to reply
Heâs insufferable on a daily basis lol
The fans going to the game (all who matter as Danny rightly said) are not for var.
They are getting it wrong on a video replay technology. That's mental
Open the mics like other sports and use the pitchside screen more !!
I think the issue with this might be lower leagues can't afford the big screens and technology required
Absolutely loved that clip... see what happens when you are allowed to debate rather than just throw insults at someone they don't agree with. Both had valid points and neither scored points yet both opinions were heard and listened to albeit with Jim interrupting đ€Ł . Me personally VAR has made the referee on the pitch act like a scared little child afraid to make a decision incase he looks like a twit on the big screen, but then it doesn't help when the ones looking at the screen can't help the guy that's making the initial decision in the first place. Scrap the offside scrutiny of an armpit or hair offside give the advantage back to the attacker make the criteria be if its a whole foot in front of the defender or the full shoulder or a part of the chest then call offside otherwise advantage to the attacker for his momentum stuff like that then it will be quicker to make decisions. VAR has taken away common sense literally by refs not thinking basic common sense.
The whole reason all of these people have jobs is because football is a globally popular leisure activity and form of entertainment. Danny was trying to make that point several times but wasn't allowed to get a word in.
I think we all watch for different reasons...for me the entertainment comes from the jeopardy of the game not celebrating goals adding a wait after goals are scored is more jeopardy not less...I like VAR...so who died and elected Danielle here the entertainment expert?
Simon roasted Danny on the problem with football punditry here. There would be no VAR if ex footballers didnât want to keep to hammering ref decisions for dollar on tv.
My three points to fix it. 1 have Webb lead it. 2 mic all the refs for the stadium and fans can hear decisions. 3 have interviews for reffs after games to hold them accountable
Can you get me the 4th pint please Walter, Peroni please pal
How about you become ref since you know it all
@@kevinkilbane2007 so your ok with around 5 terrible calls every weekend that hugely affect the outcome of games and has everyone talking about the calls instead of the games all week? and don't want an explanation on it your just ok with statements like "sorry we got it wrong this week" when its every week? this is what you want in football?
The sarcasm and pride in that studio was top notch.
also repect to danny keeping his cool ,as simon does seem a a bit directive towards danny
His jealousy is fierce, he doesn't like the fact the guys on MOTD have all done good things in the game, and takes it out on Danny.
Joe cole and Rio Ferdinand: "be angry Danny!"
The only problem I have with VAR is these silly offsides where the attackers toe is just in front of the defender it's ridiculous! They should change the rules and give the attacker the benefit of the doubt if the offside decision is to close to call with the naked eye. It really is that simple!
One of the reasons for VAR was the, Maradona "hand of God" goal, for example
VAR has changed the football in a way I didn't expect, example, the centimeter offside decisions.
This is a great argument. Danny has great points. Simon also.
This is an important topic in football, today.
What aren't counted are the instances where VAR don't even look at.
by listening to talkSPORT now I have increased my vocabulary, yesterday I learned about pontificate, today vociferous, thanks
Simon, "guys like you" includes you
Danny is spot on for once. Var is needed however, it should need a lot of improvement and therefore should not have entered football with all these glaring problems. Refs will always get slack and that's part and parcel of football, with or without technology.
He talks himself into knots
Itâs not var itâs the refs making the decisions, the same refs who are making mistakes with a video replay are the ones you guys want to trust ref a game without mistakes.
Dannyâs point about football being entertainment is absolutely spot on. Now when a goal is scored first thing in my mind is that the VAR bods are franticly running back through 30 seconds of play to find something to rule out the goal. If you are followed by the police for long enough, they will find a broken brake light.
I like Danny..he puts his argument forward really wellâŠ.and has play the game!,
Danny is spot on with he point VAR has ruined the love for football
Problems started when football media went from being 10 minutes at the end of the news, to 24/7 Channels and stations that need content,
Ref watch on sky sports is a joke.
Too many fans are experts but don't even know the laws of the game
Those 3 keep Talksport relevant! đâïž
Well done Danny! 100% on your side.
it's not VAR it's the fact that PL officials aren't fit for purpose, VAR works fine in other leagues
Hey Danny! I feel for you going up against these 2! They act like politicians.
You should watch some Rugby games while the six nations is on and watch how well they manage and communicate with players!
THIS IS HOW FOOTBALL GAMES NEED TO B REFEREED
Rules need to be overhauled to take into consideration the video referee. Noone wants an offside decision/disallowed goal for a toenail thats offside by 1mm.
Simon is correct. If people like Danny constantly criticise referees then there will always be huge pressure to add technology to help referees.
I don't care the experience, I just want the right decision.
You clearly never been to a football match live then
@@acenmitch1048 Yeah clearly, if the opposite team won 4-0 and all goals shouldn't have been allowed, you would have preferred this because play wasn't interrupted lol?
@@xbriskx thatâs not real life mate. Itâs the complex decisions which they always get wrong that take 5 mins. Also 0 explanation to the crowd who paid ÂŁ30+ for the experience. Compared to the plastic fans watching on TV
@@acenmitch1048 Nothing wrong with VAR itself then, just the idiots who use it, Howard Webb will sort it out.
Dannys bang on!
For startersall tr grounds with poor camera angles need to have more cameras looking along the pitch and more ariel cameras!!!
I don't particularly like Simon but this is SO true. The first thing pundits talk about is ref decisions, moaning about them, even if a team has been hammered for 90 mins.
Always a great show when simon is there
Even bringing in ex players won't help. Depends what generation they are from, and they'll still have to go by a guideline and rules. And what they see and what we see will always cause a stir. VAR was the last nail in the coffin that changed it from a game to a business.
Jimbo complaining about MOTD pundits by saying "I'm Not Having It" yet he's on here having same narrative describing VAR & officials week in week out. Need to take a look in mirror Jimbo
The offside rule should be changed and made easier for everyone. In my opinion, there are only 3 options. 1) Get rid of the offside rule 2) Use automatic offside technology or 3) offside sounds be when there is daylight between the attacker and the defender
An inch offside is offisde.
No its not. Advantage was always towards the forward. An inch isnât offside. Offside was ALWAYs half the body
But that was because refs were having to compensate for human error on the level of physical capacity (delay in the eye's vision), and that aside, halfway of a body is still an objective, measurable threshold which either is or isn't met, and you would still be offside if you were a toe-length more than a half-body offside. Realise that, on principle, you're not asking for a different metric or larger margin of error, you're literally advocating for subjectively granted benefit of the doubt on a systemic level; for something like offside that's fundamentally black or white, that just doesn't make sense.
@@richardashton2160 Danny Murphy is that you?
Danny is the Kevin De Bruyne of TalkSport ("Let me speak") đ
Bang out of order on Danny Murphy! Jim and Simon ganged up on him and even cherry picked their arguments! Had that tape on the ready to play! Danny was caught in the headlights! They also do this to Martin Keown
Simon is absolutely on point here, Danny can't remember what he said yesterday
Jim the out of touch dinosaur strikes again
âWhat do young people have to do with it?â
Simon we have to accept it đ€Łno we donât
Danny how do you work with these two ??
I say you double the linesman on the side of the field and allow more open communication between the refs and the linesman like in rugby. In rugby the linesman has a chance to state what theyâve seen and then from that the ref can make the final call. You double the linesman so each linesman gets a quarter of a field. Makes it easier to manage aswell
Jim you are obnoxious! Danny deserves a medal to put up with the pair of bully's! Well done Danny, a true legend
08:23 đđđ