UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary)
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 04. 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
⭐ Looking for a dashcam for your car? We recommend VIOFO:
A229 PRO 4K ➡️ amzn.to/4bgXLBo (5% off promo code: Ruby229PRO)
A119 MINI 2 ➡️ amzn.to/4aWVo6q (5% off promo code: RubyMINI2)
(affiliate link that may earn us commission) - Purchasing a product using these affiliate links earns us a commission and is a great way to support the channel at no extra cost!
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
The 2 guys on the motorcycle jumping the red made my day 😂😂😂😂😂
I’m a biker, I’m with you on this one. 😂😂😂😂👍
Haa bloody numpty!!
I used to live near there and it made my day that the little shits from Hunslet, Beeston or Middleton got their just deserts.
Had to watch it a few times for added satisfaction.
I laughed out loud and clapped. If I had seen them coming, then I wouldn't have seen them coming...
3:00 Karma!
Yep. Would love to see the police report on this one.
I just pity the car driver.
Was about to say the same. Great result for the bike but no good for the car driver@@bustestlucloc4630
@@bustestlucloc4630 I agree, but I have to confess I shouted 'Yes!' out loud.
@@martingdavies Wonder if I need permission or consent to type #MeToo ?
THE biggest problem is that too many see driving as a convenience only, and not the skill that needs to be constantly honed.
Yes professor,we should all be like you, only you know the correct way of driving
@@FiveDORRA Go back under your bridge troll, and take your fake account with you.
@@FiveDORRA Whatever troll
@@mijimonmaster tell us more professor,how do we make toast? 🤣
@@FiveDORRA Go back under your bridge troll, and take your fake account with you.
No one cares about your crap
3:02 “Alright! Double prizes!”
#6 Potential scammer trying to claim you hit him. See how he changed when he saw the camera?
Think he beeped
First thought tha, but did that Silver car at the junction tyr blocking the cam car?
Migrant scammer.
@phillipgwynne6580 i notice too many people block exits like this. They just cant stand holding back and allowing traffic to move between side roads just inacse they pull in front of them...
My first thought was potential car-jacking.
1:52 what a foul pair and they choose to show the footage.
That guy's cruising for a bruising with that attitude.
5:40 just casually showing himself using a handheld communication device while operating a motor vehicle 😂
It's not handheld
@@JibletParade while he is not holding it in his hand, the device itself is classed as a handheld communication device
@@Umbzard If it's not held in the hand, it's not handheld. Read the actual legislation.
@@UmbzardYou are permitted to use a device provided it is mounted securely in a holder/mount www.gov.uk/using-mobile-phones-when-driving-the-law
@@JibletParade gov website says nothing about exemptions, splend (whatever that is) does. So they'll then pull out the "driving without due care and attention"
3:01 funniest bit of karma I seen for a while 😀
2:00 One of those drivers who sent his video in thinking he's in the right. Just take a little extra time mate, and be courteous. You'll find it pays dividends, and not just in the long run.
Maybe if he had used his indicators, then the pedestrian might have known his intention to park in the bay
He soon changed his tune when he popped over for a chat though 😂
Was about to say something similar. Driver at fault there.
Agreed. Entitled knob. "I'm in a car, get out of my way you pedestrian pleb!"
#4 I phoned Addison Lee to compliment one of their drivers. That's how AL found out someone had stolen one of their cars.
😂
I hope you believe that as much as I do? 😂😂😂😂
#3, if she truly believes that, she's totally in Fairyland and should not have a UK driving licence. This half-arsed hierarchy that's in the Highway Code clearly puts cyclist above motorist so that we have to yield to my whatever tomfoolery the cyclist decides to pull on us. So how could it POSSIBLY be that the cyclist should have to yield to HER? Maybe it's those four interlocking rings on the badge that confer priority...
#5 The driver is an absolute tool. Pedestrians might not be paying attention but all the more reason not to try to force them out of your way.
#11 That's a police driving school car. You should not pass red signals to let emergency services vehicles pass. Better for the trainee driver to have to work out a safe passage through the traffic too.
The bike that jumped the red karma came for then quick time 😂😂😂
What's a "red karma"?
#1 great driving from the bookshelf. Gave way at the junction and didn't poke it's nose out over the line like most drivers.
#14 just incriminating himself casually lol
Yes, If you look at the road markings he is the one who cuts across the lanes, there are no markings on approach to the roundabout that I could see.
@@Stone2200I think they’re referring to the use of mobile device while operating a vehicle
@@Stone2200 There were lane markings before the traffic lights (where the road was lighter coloured
He's not incriminating himself. a phone in its holder does not warrant a handheld device. Are you people that thick?
Current law forbids holding a mobile phone while driving. Although this could mean you can tap your screen when your phone is fixed on a mount, the police can charge you for driving without due care and attention or careless driving.
#5 OMG! People in a car park! How could they! If only you put an indicator on as you are meant to "moron"!
"In any interaction between road users, those who can cause the greatest harm have the greatest responsibility to reduce the danger or threat they pose to others." Stop being a dick and let the guy pass before you rage and drive over him.
@@SpudUNoLike Must have missed the part where he drove over him. When you've calmed down from your hysteria you can post the timestamp.
He's in a car park for a busy supermarket, yet is surprised to encounter other shoppers that, heaven forbid, don't immediately jump out of his way.
@@johnmoore2342 Common sense should stop them from walking in front of a vehicle.
@@SpudUNoLike Stop being such a bedwetter.
#12 "People's driving is appalling these days. You wouldn't believe how many accidents I see in my rear view mirror!"
🤣🤣 That will probably be lost on most
3:01 YES YES YES!🤣👏
#2 Good old Lukasz. He's clearly right to be frustrated. That was exceptionally poor planning from the Volkswagan, given they could/should have kept going in order to use the second filter lane rather than trying to cut across.
Ther Highway Code is quite specific about blue-light vehicles and traffic lights - you must not go through a red light to allow them to pass and so, yes, technically they could book you for it.
Something I've learnt recently is emergency service vehicles may keep the lights on, but turn off the sirens as to not intimidate drivers to jump lights. The clip in this video doesn't have sound so is impossible to tell if the sirens were off. If sirens are not sounding, they're telling you they don't expect you to run lights, and will wait until green to put the sirens back on.
This is where having a dashcam may save you from prosecution. You could argue that the mitigating factor for encroachment through the red was to give way to the emergency vehicle and show that the manoeuvre was performed safely without endangering other road user’s including pedestrians. Doesn’t mean to say you’d be successful but you may be.
@@jeremiahd5332that's irrelevant though, you break the rules, you suffer the consequences, doesn't matter if there's a bizzy behind you with special lights on
@@jeremiahd5332 There is literally no way in law to "safely" pass through a red light.
@@Vanders456 I have for over 20 years worked as a front line paramedic for my local Ambulance Trust and have on hundreds of occasions watched motorists safely creep forward to allow my vehicle through. I am not saying they are driving into the middle of the intersection, just creep a few feet beyond the stop line. As per my original comment they could be prosecuted, but could in a court of law possibly be successful in pleading mitigation. I have done two separate 3 week advanced driver training courses, one to enable me to drive the double manned ambulance and then a further course for rapid response. I speak from a position of knowledge and experience.
No 14 messing around with his phone!!
#6 Stonewall trying a fake personal injury claim.
Plot twist: 0:26 wasn't a brake check, just the other driver being pulled into the orbit of Lukasz's "mayhem magnets"
Nobody says plot twist in comments anymore, really, its so outdated. Obviously ive just said it but only to make my point. Its 2024 not 2014 and it wasnt even amusing back then.
@@oddities-whatnot he can say what he wants..🤣
What a pointless comment
Never go through a red light unless a police officer specifically tells you to
Agreed, but if the police continue to sound their siren whilst sat in a queue at a red light, then that is tantamount to them instructing you to pass through a red light (if safe to do so). If the police didn't require you to go through red, they would (should) have muted their siren.
@@_bav you must obey all traffic rules and laws, so running the red gets you the fine.
@@_bavI've actually asked this to a few police traffic officers and they all say you never go through a Red, the police car/ambulance should wait and should never force you to do something dangerous like that.
You will still get a ticket and points for going through a Red too.
@@EaziGX I've actually sat in a courtroom and witnessed a defendant successfully using the fact that the police continued to sound their siren as a defence against a prosecution for going through a red light (a camera-instigated ticket was issued in this instance). All blue-light drivers are trained to mute the siren when waiting in a queue of traffic that cannot get out of they way, because not to do so places undue pressure on the public to get out of the way.
@@Umbzard Agreed, but the continued sounding of the police siren can be (and has been) successfully argued to be an instruction by the police to proceed through the red light, in which scenario no traffic regulation has been violated.
4:01 Are you a relatively new driver? This can't be the 1st time you've found yourself in this situation. The rules are that you wait until the lights go green or a police officer instructs you to move. A lot of blue light drivers will turn off their lights and sirens to stop cars panicking and jumping the red lights. It's one thing to cross the stop line to allow them through, but you stopped right across actual junction. You definitely shouldn't do that
this
I don't know how is it in UK but in Czech Republic it's written in the law if there's a car with a blue light (police, ambulance, firefighters) you're obliged to make a way even it means slowly and carefully go into intersection on a red. And no, you won't get a ticket for that, because all use of blue light on a car is monitored and all the red light violations from that time on that crossing are dismissed automatically, and if not and you get a ticket you can ask for that record from the emergency call center systems. And of course having a dashcam is ideal to prove innocence.
It makes sense: imagine ambulance with a patient in critical condition or firefighters going to a rescue having to stop at every intersection, kindly asking people to move the vehice even on red... and also police could be on a way to some serious case, some drunk having a hostage holding a gun.
But as I said, maybe in UK it's different in the traffic law (and tbh. if what you wrote is truth than it's stupid)
#17 The amount of kids trying to cross tells you that they don't have another option. Someone should get onto the council to get a proper crossing pedestrian light organised or a lollipop person.
In the meantime, if you could refrain from trying to drive into them while they're trying to cross, that would be great. They're just kids after all, and your journey was only delayed by a matter of seconds.
we call that jaywalking in my neck of the woods
Where I live we have a junction where a few kids have been killed over the years as there’s no pedestrian lights, the council refuse to make the junction safer.
@@george-ev1dq Jaywalking laws vary widely by jurisdiction. In many countries such as the United Kingdom, the word is not generally used and, with the exception of certain high-speed roads, there are no laws limiting how pedestrians can use public highways.
@@bravo2966 Jaywalking is an offence in Northern Ireland UK on any road.
@@bravo2966 Jaywalking is an offence in Northern Ireland UK on any road.
#2 - Aha, welcome back Lucasz!
#7 - Apologies, I enjoyed that more than I should have!
#11 - Never drive through a red light with a blues and twos putting pressure on you, you’ll be the one breaking the law.
1:00 / #3 Abysmal driving, and even worse ignorance of the Highway Code. She's supposed to give way to the cyclist in that situation and I hope Daryll told her. Better still, don't overtake!
If Daryll had moved into Primary Position he could have stopped her doing that...the driver was clueless though so she still could have left-hooked him.!
It’s an instant fail on test.
@@grahamwishart4832 Indeed, perfect example of the dangers of being in secondary across a junction.
@@grahamwishart4832how do you know the driver was a lady?? I couldn’t see the driver, I heard a lady’s voice but assumed she was the passenger who’d just got off the bus!!
@@LAHSS1940 Try reading the captions on the clip...clearly states " she was indicating"!
No 14 is the one who had poor lane discipline
Correct. He just drifts into the middle lane then complains about the other vehicle doing the same.
2:12 wouldn't have killed you to wait 5 seconds for him to walk out of the way. Bellend.
Yes, but I get the frustration because this happens continually. At my local supermarket I regularly get people walk into a space that I'm actively reversing into, between two parked cars. If they were paying the tiniest bit of attention they'd realise that they were walking into a closed space with a car moving toward them. People move around the _car park_ as if the possibility of there being moving cars there was a likely as winning the jackpot on the lottery.
Soon wilted when confronted. I’m with the pedestrian. It’s a busy car park ffs, people are always gonna be walking about.
Cammer overreacted but wandering through a car park on your phone (particularly if not in designated pedestrian sections) is moronic too
2:53,, those two clowns on the motorbike going through the red light only to get knocked off.🤦♂️🤷♂️
#14. The explanation given for the road layout was complicated enough for it to be confusing for anybody unfamiliar with the roundabout.
11# likely to get a ticket if there are cameras on the lights and it depends on the mood of the judge whether you get points. Police should turn off sirens and wait so as to discourage people from breaking the law. Regardless of circumstances you must obey the HWC.
5:34 Using your phone while driving. Six points and a fine.
Yes. Even if it's in a cradle.
www.gov.uk/using-mobile-phones-when-driving-the-law disagrees with you
No.
@Ruby dash cam academy ,@1;49 what was the outcome of the video of the car forcing the truck to stop on the motorway?.update please?
#14 Poor lane discipline from the man with poor lane discipline. Your Ma will be disappointed.
And using his phone too!
@@kylefox666He's not incriminating himself. a phone in its holder does not warrant a handheld device. Are you people that thick?
The roundabout is a bit odd, 3 lanes joining a 2 lane roundabout with a 2 lane exit, then right after it the inner roundabout lane becomes 3, arguably either of the right hand entries can go to any of the 3 lanes after the exit. Or only the rightmost lane can get to any of the 3. Badly designed and unclear.
@@MikeWalls7829 It's 3 lanes all the way around that roundabout, it is badly painted though, should be spiralled. Tesco started in M3N lane and went to M3S, clear enough on StreetView, Easton Ln Winchester.
@@andyalder7910 yeah people seem to be using it as 2 lanes, good/better road markings would help alot. It doesn't look wide enough for 3 lanes from the video but I'll take your word for it happily. There isn't even markings on the entry, arguably it's only one lane lol
#14 Daryll
a) Turns out you were also in the wrong lane, you should have been in the middle lane approaching the RA.
b) While in control of a motor vehicle, regardless of stationary, regardless of a cradle, you are NOT to touch a mobile device.
Well done, you are wrong on both counts.
b) Wrong!
You can touch, but only for sat nav purposes.
@@terryable-hh4ck Wrong.
#11 3 points and a fixed penalty fine. Going through red lights. Irrelevant that they have blues and 2s on. 😢
I've heard that ambulance drivers are supposed to turn their lights off to stop drivers feeling pressured to run reds. I imagine it's the same for the police.
As you can be directed to pass a traffic light at red by a police officer - as I have been several times - I'd take the view that this was the situation here.
@Graham_Langley Don't assume anything unless you have a verbal command,you'll get the fine and points....also bus lanes etc as well.
@@nonyabusiness999 Last time it was a hand signal. Saved the dashcam footage just in case.
@Graham_Langley I still wouldn't of moved,if you hit another vehicle I bet they'd find a way to wriggle out of it....
#14, he should be careful, using his phone while the vehicle is running even stationary could be considered an offense.
It is an offence, he's not parked.
@@Alan-xv4rlIt's not an offense. It's in its holder. It only becomes an offense when he's holding the phone and being parked makes no difference as he would still be in charge of the vehicle, even if it's off and parked. That's why it's called 'hand-held'.
What part of the phone was held in his hand?
@TheLondonCyclist No don't be that idiot who thinks because it's in a holder your not getting 6 points,physically interacting with a device even in flight mode is an offence the cradle is meant for HANDS FREE USE but he's clearly using his hands so he's basically filmed himself committing an offence and posted in on youtube...
@@aitch8237To use it in a cradle is hands free only and as he clearly filmed himself using the phone with his hands and posted it on youtube isn't the cleverest thing he could of done,it's 6 points and a fine for physically interacting with a mobile device even if its in flight mode....don't be that idiot who gets 6 points and fine because you got the law wrong...
You're not required to break the law to let a blue light through. Some blue light drivers are bad and think they're above the law. I never mount kerbs and pavements or go through the red lights. In the end the responsibility lies with you and they won't back you up.
#14 🤦♂️
#11 highway code says to not go though a red light, let the emergency people do it, and yes, you can get a ticket for it, and if you appeal it, most cases will end up with you paying a fee, because you broke the law. (bad UK road law)
That does sound dumb. Here in Sweden if emergency vehicles are approaching from behind whils't sitting at a red light. You are allowed to pass the stop line 1 car lenght while you turn hard towards the curb, with caution ofcourse.
I'm not sure there are cameras to catch red light jumpers in Belfast, but even so I've gone through a red before and moved to one side to let an ambulance through, I'm not going to stop someone getting to hospital if I can do that safely.
You can still be fined and get points on your licence for going through a red light to allow an emergency vehicle to pass. I would wait behind the stop line until the light changes to green then proceed through and allow space for the emergency vehicle to pass. An emergency vehicle should deactivate their sirens in this situation if there is no safe path for them due to the red light and wait they should then reactivate when the light changes to green. You will not be prosecuted for waiting however you can be for going through.
I'm not sure I'd agree it's a bad law. What if the cammer had gone through the red and been hit by another car, or hit a pedestrian?
Leave it to the professionals to assess the risk of going through red lights.
@@Stone2200 I hope people from the UK are aware when driving abroad they're in fact supposed to go through a red light, and would get a ticket if they don't
4:13 Yes you will get a ticket if it has a camera at the junction as That is Illegal, you can not go through a red light even to let police past.
Unless an uniformed police officer instructed you to.
#14 should be reported to police for using phone while driving.
2:10 that not a road, its a car park, and even then he would have had the right of way as the driver was turning.
Give way to pedestrians. He saw the pedestrian, anticipated what he was going to do, and still thought he had the right to run him over. Deluded and dangerous.
Not to mention I could hear the voices clear as day but not one tick of an indicator! As far as the pedestrians were concerned, the cammer was going straight on
A lot of old people are just psychotically entitled. "I paid my taxes!"
Whatever you guys do, don't bother looking when crossing a road. Remember you have right of way.
On a public highway pedestrians DO NOT have "Right of Way" they have "Priority" BIG difference, Priority is GIVEN by the driver, ie. pedestrians should wait until the vehicle stops, they cannot just step into the path of a moving vehicle, for obvious reasons. In a car park the drivers should always stop for pedestrians as there are not normally pavements or walkways and they are the most vunerable users.
No 6 definite svammer. We can all expect to see even more of these in coming years.
An imported nuisance
9. didn't look like you could go into the middle lane. fault on cammer
Agreed. Having watched this back a couple of times, I'm convinced the lane the cammer is in becomes the far left one as you continue on the roundabout.
@@davisbloke agreed. At least if you follow the road markings. Which the cammer quite clearly didn't.
Although to his partial excuse it's a bad design. The middle (cammer's) lane goes both E & W while the right hand lane only goes E. On the roundabout the right two lanes (which right lane leads into) go E, while the left hand lane the cammer is led into goes elsewhere.
But I think that still means the cammer needs to be careful when changing lanes.
After first viewing I thought this was going to be the most commented on clip for the cammer being in a straight on/left turn lane and going right but when you look at it the road markings are shocking. The lane he is in is marked for both A47 E & W, the lane to the right is A47 E, the ‘straight on’ lanes then change to 2 right lanes for A47 E. The cammer is in the correct lane.
Dejavu comment here: I’m not local to Gatwick, but do occasionally fly from there and the standard of driving from Addison Lee on the M23 and around the airport is typical of this clip at 1:40
3:54 In reply to the question, yes you can get a fixed penalty notice going through a red light even when making way for an emergency vehicle ie ambulance.! The only way to get it waved is the hassle of an appeals process. The RAC website has a good article on this issue.
Hovering over 2:54 on the timeline and CZcams helpfully points out "Most Replayed". You're not kidding, I had a good laugh at those two unpleasant idiots getting their just desserts.
If the lights are red, you have every right to stay where you are, even if the police or other emergency services have their blues or twos on. In fact, they are supposed to turn off their sirens if the lights are red. You will get a ticket for driving through a red light even if it means letting the police get on their way
#9 You pull into their lane and use your horn to further stress them out whilst forcing them into a lane they didn't want to be in. Watch your own footage and see how they follow the lines and you don't.
Read the road markings; both right hand lanes go to the A47E and the two lanes in the gyratory were also marked A47E. I think the road markings are a bit confusing there though and the cammer could have avoided the problem by not keeping directly next to the blue car
@@Junbav looking at the road markings, the cammer cuts over to the right lane, and then proceeds to tell the other driver off with his horn. Cammers lance becomes far left lane.
@@JunbavThe road markings are contradictory but the lane markings are clear. The other car was following the lane markings correctly. The cammer ignored the lane markings and moved right regardless with his fist on the horn.
7:20 reminded me of that old game, Lemmings!
the motorcyclist with pinion rider going thru the red light...karma
#14 Using their phone! 🙄
He's not incriminating himself. a phone in its holder does not warrant a handheld device. Are you people that thick?
@@TheLondonCyclist Why are you sucking off lorry drivers?
@@TheLondonCyclist Not only are you wrong, you keep repeating your error. Are you that thick?
@@TheLondonCyclist You can still be charged for not being in proper control of your vehicle. If he wants to change track, he can actually tell his phone's voice assistant to do it without taking his eyes off the road.
@@stephandolby You can be charged with 'driving without due care and attention' but that's only in situations where it's warranted aka swaying put of a lane, sitting at a green light tapping away at your car screen or phone screen... doesn't really matter. Driving without due care and attention can be for everything and anything. A phone in its holder has no offense attached to it specifically.
3:10 people misinterpret the horn as a reprimand. This was justified as the driver behind needed to sound a warning as there was a danger the cammer could have reversed into them (maybe the cammer put their vehicle into reverse and the reversing lights came on?).
In the driving test, if you are reverse parking, you have to wait for other traffic to pass (or wait) before manoeuvring.
Correct. I'd likely use my hazards too after getting to the left lane. There's a left turn ahead of the cammer...the car who tooted might have though the cammer was aiming for that road before reversing into traffic.
2:08 it's not a road, it's a car park, you don't own the car park, he can walk there.
#11 You should not break any laws. Excerpt from Highway Code Rule 219 "...Consider the route of such a vehicle and take appropriate action to let it pass, while complying with all traffic signs. ...". You have to comply with all traffic signs, including red traffic lights. In this case, there's not much the driver could have done. If the van driver had seen/heard the siren sooner, they could have held back behind the second car to give the police a route through.
Although I'm sure neither the cammer nor the van are likely to get a ticket since they were acting in good faith and put nobody in danger.
Correct, however a marked police car could direct you to go through red lights and you must comply if they do so.
I once followed an ambulance - blues and two's - with my son on board through three sets of red lights in Nottingham. No action was taken.
At 4:06 >"I would wait for the lights to change before letting the police car through. Edge over if you can, but you ought to get a ticket for going through."< is my understanding.
#8 No, the horn use at 3:15 was not justified. If there are free on-street parking spaces adjacent to the lane you are using, a car stopping and reversing does not mean the driver has not seen you. It might mean the driver hasn't realised you are a self-important twonk or, rightly, doesn't care whether you are or not.
#11 You can be done for going through a red light even if you are making room for an emergency vehicle on the blues.
people like #3 are infuriating. why would you overtake there if you knew you were turning left?
Cyclist innit. I get far too many people who overtake me dangerously or break the speed limit to overtake me coming up to traffic far far too often. Boggles my mind. You can literally see the queue of cars for hundreds of metres and people will still pull stupid overtakes to get there 3s faster.
@@mctrials23 When I used to cycle I often had roads where I was doing the speed limit but would be overtaken still. Must Get In Front Syndrome
No.7 😂😂... poor car tho
Karma is a bitch!
#14 professional driver self-incriminating himself by showing a video of him operating a mobile phone whilst in charge of a vehicle 🙄
Can't be incriminating as he hasn't broken any laws.
Just interacting with a touch screen of a phone, even when it is in a holder and even when stationary at a red light is an offence under UK law.
@@davidpowell8249No it is not. It's only an offence if it's held in your hand.
@@davidpowell8249 Wrong! Where do you guys get this (mis)information?
My mistake, use of a phone touch screen whilst in a holder is deemed to be hands free in law, even though it is clearly hands on!
The law that would apply to "hands-free" use would then be distracted driving/failure to control vehicle, which isn't evidenced here.
#6 - I think he’s trying to do the walking equivalent of the guys in clip #7 !
1st one is Drayton road on the mile cross estate in Norwich
3:00 well that was dumb. you hurt someones bike :( i love the matching outfits too < 3
Tesco vs lorry- can't believe the lorry driver posted a video of him playing with his fone
He was stationary and the phone was in a cradle. No problem
@@mrbadger9920 your right ,I didn't know you could touch it in a cradle
@@flumoxeduk2379you can't it's an offence and the coppers will be only to pleased to fine you . If you touch a phone with the engine running in a vehicle even if you're parked you can be fined
@@alanedwards3180Not if its in a proper holder attached to the vehicle
@@alanedwards3180 Such nonsense. Did you just dream that?
1:20. And what dangerous manoeuvre did the trucker pull on the taxi prior to his clip ? People don't react this way without provocation. You can clearly see the trucker returning to the inside lane at the start of the clip. I'd put money on that the trucker indicated and pulled straight out without consideration, and cut up the taxi. Bet he carefully edited the clip before sending it to the police.
Ahaaa, clip #10, Tynewydd, I live there. When I drove minibuses for schools I used to tell the kids to cross behind the bus and not in front, or preferably wait until I had left. Not hard to do for the driver here or the PDA (or escort as we call them). Common sense really as kids to day have none.
Hello neighbour. It’s terrifying in the mornings when the Cymmer and Treorchy Comp buses race down at about 40mph. Then there’s the idiots driving up Wyndham Street at about 60 at peak school times. It’s gone crazy here. 👍
Stopping on a Motorway, just because you think another driver has wronged you, when all 3 lanes are running at full speed has to one of the stupidest things a driver can do. That could have gone south very quickly.
Another round of who cares how close the HGV is behind me.
2:56 sometimes karma got style 😁
You will get a ticket for driving on red. Doesn’t matter what is behind you with lights and sirens. I don’t move.
The biker who went through the red light got instant karma 😂
And what was that bloke doing in the road? Maybe some injury scam?
At 5:51 Clear as day from the start that the Tesco van is in lane two and the cammer is in lane three. A 5:54 it is the Cammer who moves across into the Tesco lane. Finally at 6:09 the Tesco van is still in lane two and cammer is in lane three, as if by magic! Gesticulation is cancelled. ( I get the 'poorly marked road markings' but if the cammer knew this...
He touches his phone screen two or three times which is illegal and tenders him liable to the penalties they are more than willing to hand out.
#7 just hope the driver and car are ok, but seeing them two fly made my day these idiots never learn
#7, comeuppance at its finest...
4:15 the UK is the only place where you can't go through a red light in order to clear the path for an emergency vehicle and you can get a ticket.
In other countries it's rather the other way around, you'd rather get a ticket if you don't go through a red light then
Wrong. Belgium also doesn't allow you to break traffic rules to give space to emergency vehicles.
@@BDM276 alright, then let's say most countries. Like Germany, where you're supposed to clear the path for an emergency vehicle indicating its right of way by using both emergency lights and siren.
The law doesn't specify on how to clear the path, it rather says "do whatever makes most sense and is necessary in a specific situation", which also means to go through a red light and into an intersection, even if there's a red light camera. Can't be fined for doing so, only if you don't, then you might get a ticket. Although unlikely, it's possible
It depends if there is a camera on the lights, if there is you get a ticket if not the police tend not to prosecute because you did it to help them.
@@peterwright9546 here you'd get a ticket for not clearing the path. Even if there'sa red light camera you're required to clear the path for the emergency vehicle
@EnjoyFirefighting it's also not true in Sweden or The Netherlands. Probably others too. So "all" or "most" are both inaccurate.
4:10 legally you don't have to move because YES you can still get fined
04:16 - To answer your question as a 30 year traffic cop, we are now taught to turn off blues and twos when approaching traffic lights on red. The reason is that though we are exempt under emergency conditions, the general public are not. Therefore, technically, you commit an offence by letting us through. This is very unfair on you, hence we should be turning it all off. Hope this answers the question.
4-00 I had to do the same last year nothing came of it but saved my footage in case😀
#1 "inproperly"
unproperly?
You sure about that?
@@aitch8237 I am very much imsure.
#11 i wouldnt worry about the ticket, if you do get one you can easily contest it. I got a ticket / fine for stopping in a yellow box because the driver in front me had to stop since a pedestrian stepped into the road. I contested it as preservation of life and it got thrown away.
#7 couldn’t wish for a better outcome.
#14 Should send a copy of the video to the police; I am sure that they would be very interested in him fiddling with his mobile while driving a lorry (even stopped at a junction it is still illegal to use a mobile, even hands free, while driving).
4.35 A pillar problem here so not even possibly awhare that there was a problem.
2.32 he thought you had his dingy ! the lady that though her indicator means that gives her right of passage , lots of them do that !
The truck was in the wrong lane on the outside lane, the Tesco was in the correct lane
You see similar appalling driving by Sainsbury's delivery drivers around their Brookwood (Woking) store.
2.06 what? Pedestrians have priority, the end! Just wait a few seconds to turn into the parking space. Drivers like this need a head check
Sounds like he almost got a head check.
0:38..Poor driving from NA60, but Cammer accelerated as a 'revenge' tactic.
#4 Addison Lee is 10 immigrants sharing one license for each car. I follow them around Heathrow all the time, absolutely diabolical drivers
Last clip,
Children are not taught how to cross the roads now, I had two instances in one day of them looking directly at me, then stepping out into the road in front of me, as though they were making sure they had been seen, and expecting me to stop in traffic
#5 1:51 I think the cammer is the one at fault here. Could he not have been patient and polite and just let the man on the phone walk past before driving into the parking bay?? Some people 🙄 I think that man on the phone had every right to say what he's problem was. I would have given him a right ear full if it was me.
#5 should have their licence revoked.
#11 Stay never go thru the red light even when they have blues and twos
They are meant to turn off the sirens if you are stuck at a red light
Surprised that Lukasz Maziarski still wants to drive around for a living after all the stupid drivers he comes across.
The crazy part is a lot of posters blame him for other people's terrible driving.
2:22 con artist after compo
You don't go through a red light in order to make way for an emergency vehicle
#3 why on earth did that driver over take the cyclist when she was going to turn left in a few yards.
Because they are a motorist and think they own the roads. This happens daily on my commute.
@@garyboyle695maybe stop holding us up then
@2:25 i would be looking in the rear view mirrors too, one can distract you in front while 2 others can sneak from the sides and car jack you in broad daylight
@4:02 i had a situation where i was directed by copper to move forward as the light was red, and then to find out that i was liable for running a red light. so in the uk, don;t run a red light. on the continent, you have to move for a blue lights and sirens on, if you don;t move, you are a pedestrian for 2 3 months.
oh they definitely ain’t thieves, 100% trying to get a payout