UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary)
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 05. 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
⭐ Looking for a dashcam for your car? We recommend VIOFO:
A229 PRO 4K ➡️ amzn.to/4bgXLBo (5% off promo code: Ruby229PRO)
VS1 2K ➡️ amzn.to/49zqgIh (5% off promo code: RubyDAVS1
(affiliate link that may earn us commission) - Purchasing a product using these affiliate links earns us a commission and is a great way to support the channel at no extra cost!
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
C.J. Volkert driver needs a ban. Being inconvenienced in a merge-in-turn situation doesn't validate trying to drive somebody off the road multiple times.
I thought it was bad before the accident scene, then he doubled down afterwards much more aggressively. Absolute nutter
Agree 100%👍. That clip should definitely go to the police.
All he had to do was ease off the gas and slip in behind the green truck .. what an arsh-hole
its not a merge in turn its a give way, the mini should have held back, they were both stubborn, but in the eyes of the law it would probably be the mini that would be penalized.give way is just that its give was not take way
@@TKG You're not watching the correct clip
1:25 This is what happens when two idiots meet at the same time ..
Yep. 2 stubborn people clearly. The Mini driver should have just accepted that the van driver was unwilling to let them merge. Would have not added any time to their journey. Totally avoidable.
@@martingdavies True, but then it wouldn't have been such a big deal for the van to let them in also!
#11 a bully who definitely needs his licence revoked
1:49 enterprise van was adamant he wasn't going to give way, and the mini was adamant they had right of way, legally the enterprise van was correct, morally both were in the wrong, if you come across an idiot like this, its just best to let them go 5:40 anyone using their mobile phone while driving should get an instant ban, I mean really? this day and age we have apple car plan and android auto, as for the guy filming, personally I would never approach anyone
Nope , van driver in wrong, mini merging in front of van, van driver forcing mini out,
@@kevinbarnfield8501 the van driver is already on the main road, the dashed line would mean give way, so the van driver could have slowed down to allow the mini to merge but chose to be stubborn, the mini then should have waited behind the give way line until the lane was clear instead of trying to push their way in, I presume there was a vehicle directly in front of the van, so no you are wrong.
@@TKG And more to the point the van was stationary when the mini went into the back of it.
@@kevinbarnfield8501the van has priority as on the carriageway. Mini needs to give way
@@kevinbarnfield8501unfortunately it's not a merge in turn. Mini had a giveway, it's also a legal requirement those joining from a slip road, do so in a safe and legal manner! That said, those on the carriageway should, (not must) aid those joining! If it was me, I'd let the mini join! Ps, did the mini have it's mirrors folded in?
6:46 everything else aside, just because there's a 50mph speed restriction in place doesn't mean you can lane hog.
Not sure I'd continue past that situation with the Range Rover though, would you? Probably best to stay back, catch it on camera, send to police and carry on with your day.
I drove past #3 when I assumed they were exchanging details. Nice to see what actually came before it!!
1:47 He wouldn't have been so aggressive about the merge if he's been driving his Mercedes, but in a hire van, he doesn't care. Foolish of the Mini driver to get into a p*55ing contest with a rental van. Hopefully lesson learned.
It wasn't a merge, van driver had right of way although he was a massive bellend.
Mr. Gobby's Smart Car is also Untaxed and has no MOT!
Likely means no insurance either
#10 - you are sat in an overtaking lane, overtaking thin air? 🤷♂️
like the caption said the motorway was busy, could you not seen it was almost at a stand still so he had to go in the outside lane 🤣
It does worry me how people think its fine to be in the otterlanes if they're going the speed limit even if they're not overtaking.
And then types some waffle trying to justify it.
In the early part of the clip he IS overtaking. At the end, at 6:52, we see that there is a vehicle on his left which undertakes him, so moving left would have been difficult. If everyone is moving at the speed limit, as claimed, then I don't see how he could have moved left safely and legally..
@@eddherring4972 And the sign said 60, not 50.
Thank god you said it.
Such piss poor and lazy road discipline.
See it all the time and wonder if it’s worth sending in to get reported as allegedly they would get a fine. May try it when I get my new dash cam and get some worthy offenders on film.
#9 another "SMART" driving tool!
Yes beelends drive 'em!
5:28# 9 . Man having a mid life crisis 😂😂..cry about it.
In #3, neither party look good. When faced with this kind of confrontation, one has to decide just HOW far you are willing to escalate the dispute to get your way. The Mini is using all the slip road to merge in. The van is determined not to let him in at any cost. Rather than admit defeat, both try to force the matter in their favour, and the Mini driver ends up bumping the van. His defeat is now doubled, because the van driver will argue that the collision was Mini's fault (it was), and that he was perfectly entitled to claim his priority.
1:40 Doesn't matter what we think. The van had the legal right of way, the mini tried to force their way in, then they drove into the back of the stationary van.
Mini driver's insurance will have to pay for the damage.
Even so, the van driver was being an arse about it. Just let a car in and get on with your day. Instead they've both ended up with a load of hassle. Pointless.
@@Marvhead How's he being an arse about it? By asserting his right of way and not allowing some arse to bully him..?
@@fredmercury1314 Do you always go on your period when you watch these clips?
@@chrisshaw3939 Do you always get blocked for being a childish troll?
@@fredmercury1314 Thanks for confirming you are on your period.
What I think about #3 is that you're all bloody awful drivers.
Exactly, the cammer was obviously up the chuff of the van not letting anyone in too, I'm all for keeping out anyone that cuts you up but they are just trying to merge at the end of the lane, in heavy traffic like that you'd never ever get out of you waited for a massive gap.
@@petersylvester2905 Yeah, the cammer's intent was obvious from the beginning of the clip. You see them make that little "speeding up suddenly while crawling" move that indicates they're trying to close a gap.
5:40
I'd be angry if i was driving a smart car too
Definitely harassment trying to peek in someone's window for no reason
Lol!! If I get anger from a driver...I always say....I'd be upset too if was driving that😂
@@cardinaldevin1647the reason was to record mobile phone use while incharge of a car! Apparently no mot or tax! So a driver who doesn't care for the rules probably lost his licence! Is that a bad thing?
@@terrystratford1235 if you would have gotten caught it would have been six points in a 6 in your case pound fine and the only way he loses his license if he gets caught more than once the only reason I said that is because you're bending overlooking in someone's window which I thought was kind of creepy
@cardinaldevin1647 yes 6 pts and fine for phn. Someone else said car had no tax or mot. If so, insurance is invalid! If all these facts were true, and presented to the court, it's also 6pts for invalid insurance! So potentially a loss of licence, even if he had 0 points! While being creepy, it's not illegal to video Someone in their car(on a public road)! Also, he jumped when he saw the cyclist, if he hadn't been on his phn and concentrating on his surroundings, he would have seen the cyclist! Thus proving why being distracted is a dangerous thing to do while driving!
2:34 I assume the cammer was wearing a motoring helmet.
# 11,, nothing professional about the lorry trying to barge the other lorry out of the way,instead of just tucking in behind it..
#10 "I was in the outside lane because there was a 50mph speed restriction in place".... Yes mate, but that is still the very definition of bloody lane hogging!
#9 Smart car driver “Handbrake on , not in gear “ 🤣 doesn’t not make any difference whatsoever still cannot use your phone 🤡
10# - you're literally sitting in the outside lane, not overtaking, watching that unfold. The irony.
Are you saying you think the cammer should have overtaken? If drivers are acting like idiots at speed in front and close to causing a collision, I would hang back for a short time as well. Nothing to gain by charging forward and getting tangled up in that.
But it's OK because it's "busy" and the speed limit is 50!
I mean he clearly was overtaking but slowed down for the range in front of him. Then made the smart decision of not driving towards two idiotic drivers fighting with each other. Its called defensive driving
@@The_Real_JN more the fact that in the text he's used "it's a 50mph limit" and "it's busy" as a justification for just sitting in the outside lane. Neither of those things justify lane hogging. He wasn't lane hogging in this particular clip but given what's said in the text it's probably reasonable to think he just carried on sitting in the outside lane. Probably a fair assumption that the altercation between the Range Rover and the Volvo was also a result of the Volvo refusing to move out of the outside lane. The Range Rovers behaviour isn't justified of course, but that doesn't mean the Volvo is innocent. Lane hogging is a major problem on many roads.
I'm also surprised nobody has picked up on the blue Merc speeding up to speed match as the cammer overtakes, another classic motorway sin.
#2 driving at 15mph wondering why people are getting frustrated, could easily have turned in before they pedestrians even got to the junction.
The new rule about giving way to pedestrians waiting to cross is stupid.
I bet its due to idiots being run over while walking looking at their phone :(
Rule 170: "give way to pedestrians crossing or waiting to cross a road into which or from which you are turning. If they have started to cross they have priority, so give way"
The driver did the correct thing, unlike the driver behind who commited a section 3 offence.
@@ditch3827 so he broke that rule then as he didn't wait for the next person to cross, naughty cammer 👍🏻
@@jdzero5978 They were nothing like half a mile away. When you turn you have to give way to traffic whose path you are crossing.
@@ditch3827 If he'd just got on with the turn then both cars could likely have gotten through without inconveniencing the pedestrians
"Sure mate, lie your face off, get abusive, blame me rather than taking responsibility for your selfish, illegal, dangerous driving. Enjoy the well deserved points and be a better person".
In case anyone missed it at 4:48 😆
4:58 #9 - I'm guessing the driver was already looking at his phone while he was pulling up. The cyclist had zeroed in on hime before the car stopped.
Yup. The original footage is on my channel showing a zoomed slowmo when he drives up while looking down and typing away. That was the main issue. However the courts like undeniable evidence for which use while stationary (still illegal) suffices. So it's rather an Al Capone style approach- spot them using in motion but the evidential footage is while stationary. If I filmed everyone using their phone while stationary I'd never get to work!!
You have to wonder what terrible life choices the cyclist has made if they have to get their jollies by hanging around on the pavement waiting for drivers using a mobile and only then entering the road. He ends up going in the opposite direction to the one he started in, it's at that point you know he's not _incidently_ recording misbehaving drivers but is out _only_ to to do so.
@@ianmason. sounds good to me, good on him. Less idiots who think using a phone whilst driving is acceptable, lovely 6 points 🤣
@@swinchester6132 If it was merely incidental I wouldn't have a problem, it's that he's actively seeking them out and *_always_* has a confrontation with them. It's the active confrontation he's getting off on, that's malfeasance or at least misfeasance.
Yes the smart driver wasn't so smart, but the cyclist is a bit of an entitled dick to actively go out into traffic and seek a confrontation. Must make him feel big about himself
Number 9, makes no difference pal, learn the law. It is ILLEGAL
just got to be a sad prick to police it in your spare time. he was stationary no ones gonna die
@@dnpulse6142 The saddo is the driver.
It's good to see you keep commenting despite your compulsive lying.
@@dnpulse6142 more like a responsible citizen making out roads safer and saving lives.
@@dnpulse6142 the reason for this is that drivers using their phone when stationary at lights, just go when they glance up and notice that the lights have turned green, without properly observing the traffic around them before they move off (i.e. panic response), which is dangerous. The driver was also spotted using the phone whilst moving too, so I have no sympathy for them.
6:42 So basically you're saying "I'm hogging the outside lane because there's a 50 mph restriction in place". It doesn't work like that. And "the motorway was busy" is also not an approved reason for lane hogging. The fact you feel you have to make excuses means that you know you're doing it and shouldn't. Who do you think you're fooling? You obviously _know_ better so _act_ better.
The reason motorways are congested is because of all the lane hoggers. If everyone obeyed the keep left unless overtaking rule, we'd suddenly see our motorways open up and breathe again.
#3 BOTH complete 🔔🔚's
#9 extreme bullshitting man - he can say what he likes - but he's in charge of a vehicle on the road while using a mobile device - I think that's known as a slam dunk .....I mean it's only half a car anyway .....
I don't do it, don't approve of others doing it but this cyclist is a grade A c*nt
The last driver was being absolutely ridiculous trying to get the other driver off the road was dangerous, there are other cars on the road too, considering lorries are big too, he could of crashed or into another car!
Christ who taught you English?
@@Kieran.Rob53 get a life
2:00 Similar truck did that against bus, hit it, and drove off.
#9 is the cyclist voiced by Noel Fielding? xD
No. Noel Fielding is cool.
The Mini driver @0:57 into the video must be a new driver. _You never challenge for a tight space with a rental van._
oxfordshire, loads of drivers have no clue what the highway code is - I see this sort of nonsense every time I drive.
Cyclist started discution when it wasn't his place to do so. He was on the foot path so none of his concern
#11 I can't wait to hear who all the truck drivers who claim it's always a car driver's fault blame for that one.
#10 why did you sit in the outside lane? Also shown yourself as a bad driver.
There needs to be harsher penalties for leaving the scene of an accident, even if it's just a wing mirror.
It should automatically be whatever the maximum penalty is for leaving the scene of an accident plus driving without due care and attention, on the presumption that you were paying so little attention, you didn't realise you'd hit another vehicle.
They also need to do something about these kids on bikes. Public roads are not the place to be doing tricks for your own amusement. I don't even understand why you'd be doing tricks if you're just riding on your own. Who are you trying to impress?
Lad's just doing it for fun. The problem is he's doing it on a main road with cars everywhere. We really just need to figure out how to educate lads like that in a way that makes them not be a danger to themselves and others. Why can't he do tricks in a cul-de-sac like 90% of kids when I was growing up?
I think the little display was an "in your face" to the impatient, honking cammer. Up until the point they knew they were going to pass the cammer they were riding well.
7:00 - What the actual F...?
#10 I'd be concentrating on driving rather than watching the road rage. The overtaking lane is for overtaking. Quite clear that you weren't watching the road.
#3 It amazes me how people would rather trash their cars than back down. Yes it's infuriating when people force their way in but that emotion is far better than all the hassle if you collide. Your journey is going to be delayed, you might even have to wait for a recovery truck, you might have to deal with a psycho who wants to fight you, you have to ring the insurance company, you have to piss about taking your car in for repair, you're possibly without a car for a week, you may get points on your licence, your insurance premium will probably go up next year and for what? All that because your ego wouldn't allow you to back down. And that van driver is in the shit because the rental company will look at that footage (if they got hold of it) and see that the collision was the result of road rage. I doubt the minimal insurance that comes with a rental van will cover him. I certainly wouldn't want to risk it.
I would think the idiot in the Lorie would understand that they can lose their license in the last video, I saw several reckless and careless things that can end their truck driving career early. Also, that Van driver is going to be playing the please explain game to Enterprise Rent-a-Car soon
#3 Van driver was definitely at fault. While yes it is his right of way, delibrately blocking an emerging vehicle from entering a motorway or dual carriageway can be considered aggressive driving
At 3:00, he has as much right to the traffic lane as you do. With all the parked cars, he COULD have taken the entire lane legally.
Isnt the issue that he wasn't holding his handle bars and so was swerving all over the place and then proceeded to do a wheelie?
#6, the temptation to open the door at the lights would have been hard to ignore..
1:02 van driver was being a massive 🔔 end, but mini driver not much better
Other way around. They were both bell ends, but the Mini driver had a mandatory give way that he failed to comply with.
#3 On a slip road you have to give way to traffic already on the carageway, but it doesn’t really excuse the guy trying to run them off the road
They are as bad as each other. Van uninterested in aiding traffic flow, but mini should have just backed off and taken the gap that'd come from a following vehicle
@@joncurtis199 the van driver allowed the two cars in front of the mini to merge to aid traffic flow, mini driver 100% at fault.
#7. No tax or MOT. Probably no insurance either, mmmm.
Must be Del-Boy.
Enterprise driver in the wrong.
#2 - I have been known to have a "stall" if someone does that to me.
#3 - The "MINI" is also known as the "BMW 0.5 Series"; enough said?
#10 - And your point is? An abated speed limit is not a defence against your terrible lane discipline.
If you hear a horn it's incumbent on you to stop, and make very careful observations to see what hazard is being warned of. If you cannot see the hazard you should repeat your observations in case you missed it the first time. This may take some seconds and hugely exaggerated movements so that everybody knows that you have looked carefully in all your mirrors and not abrogated your duty to take especial care once warned of a hazard.
#10 just because it says 50mph that doesn't mean you can hog lane at 50mph. Fiesta should have moved to the left if not overtaking .
#2 you could have easily entered that road/car park. You waited around 4-5 seconds before the pedestrians even entered the roadway.
SO. Another driver who complains about someone doing the right thing. The white car actually biped as the pedestrian were crossing.
you have a very poor grasp of time, cammer did the correct thing by waiting, it is all in the GB highway code if you took the time to read it.
@@alanhindmarch4483 I'm not saying the white was correct for beeping, but the pov driver stopped when he didn't need to. The white car likely would have to though.
@@TK7-VB Im pretty sure both cars could have gotten through, cam car kind of needlessly was over-cautious.
@@TK7-VB A delay of maybe 15 seconds to ensure that the pedestrians, busy talking to each other, could cross the entrance safely. Really, get a grip; it's not a race out there, it's called sharing the highway, and anyone driving a ton of steel crossing paths with folk on foot needs to behave accordingly and use a little patience. The driver of the white car could clearly see the pedestrians as well, but obviously thought a world-shattering 15 second delay was worth more than the care being shown by the driver in fornt of them.
#7 don’t know how old this video is but according to the .gov website the M.O.T ran out in 2021
well Enterprise is a rental. so why would the driver care about it getting hit. or about how he drives it.....
Clip 3 van driver at fault behaviour unacceptable
#9 walks out to the middle of 3 lanes of traffic and stands there berating someone else for not understanding rules of the road. What a knob end!
Agreed, what a bell end.
#3 Van driver's COTW for me, they could've just held back for three seconds and let the mini in, but now held up five-ten minutes swapping details, the Mini was a prick too, but what if all other vehicles were bloody minded too? Wait a year?
"Bad cyclist - Who would be at fault if he had an accident" Well i guess that all depends on who swings their door open first to try and take him out 🤣
Ive seen so many bad driving clips and 90% is just due to inpatience and entitlement. Ffs grow up when driving its pathetic.
#6 - the cyclist would be at fault if he had an accident. Mainly because he isn’t cycling in a safe manner, doing wheelies and not stopping for the traffic lights !
#9, who's he even talking to??
A total duckhead by the sound of it.
#6 "no helmet" - cycling helmets are optional. I've never seen a lad like the one in the clip wearing one, purely because they're seen as a safety feature and therefore are not cool. However, at the beginning of the clip up until he was bullied by the beeping horn, he was not doing anything wrong. He's perfectly entitled to ride in the middle of the lane, he wasn't putting the cammer at risk. Yeah lads like this can be annoying, but for many motor vehicle drivers it seems that the mere sight of a bike makes them act and drive like a twat.
#9 typical reaction from someone who likes to bully and intimidate and not take any personal responsibility for their own actions.
#2 - You don't need a car... It would be faster walking. You waited on purpose. 18 mph... really? People like you cause accidents!
Cause an accident for following just under the speed limit of the road?
Yes waiting for the peds to cross as they are legally required to do.
At first i agreed but then I saw that the sign said "20" on the lamp post at the start. I do think both cars could have easily nipped through before the pedestrians though, it did seem like cam car was being inconsiderate there.
How fast do you want them to drive on a road with a 20 mph speed limit? Do tell us, we’d all love to know.
@@samgill3418 It did look unnecessary. However, it's a moot point whether the white car behind would have taken the turn in time not to make the pedestrians wait. And the toot makes it pretty clear that the driver would not have waited, regardless.
#6 Darwin missed a species
0:38 'Waiting for them.' There was plenty of time to turn before those pedestrians were anywhere near.
They were on the carriageway when the other car used the horn. It would have been illegal for the first car to continue as it was then the second car turned the corner.
@@ditch3827 He was waiting long before that.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx So? He is perfectly within his rights to be considerate to the pedestrians.
@@ditch3827 You don't hold up the flow of traffic waiting for pedestrians to arrive at the kerb edge ffs. Imagine if we all did that. The entire country would grind to a halt. There was absolutely no reason to wait. Just go, be gone and the pedestrian crosses when he arrives and you are gone. I don't understand why you are struggling with this.
So, how many pedestrians have you nearly run over this week?
I can always spot a clown cyclist way off. They are often bow-legged, furiously pedalling at a low speed and weaving wildly as if a straight line is unheard of...let alone the wheelies.and hands-off.
5:44 I wonder how many cyclists this guy has caught breaking the rules...none right??
If people took driving more seriously he wouldn't ever spot anyone. This is not a difficult concept to understand.
0:58 #3 slipways aren't "merge in turn". Right of way is right of way. If a line of traffic with right of way doesn't want you to merge, your one option is to *wait*. Too many drivers seem to believe intimidating other road users or taking the piss is ok if you get away with it.
#4 for context you had a 8FOOT TRAILER BEHIND YOU , SLOW THE FK DOWN AS YOU HAVE A HGV THAT IS COMING AT THE SAME OR SIMILAR SPEED AS YOURSELF, WHERE EXACTLY DID YOU THINK HGV MAN WAS GOING, CLUE ON YOUR BIT OF ROAD IN THE PINCH POINT!!!🤦♂️🤷♂️.Notice a few cammers bang on the dashcam and then feel completely free to criticise everyone else's driving apart from themselves, hilarious 😂.
Well the white lines for the mini are give way to traffic already on the road however enterprise gives zero f’s about anyone around him so a real stand up guy.
I wonder if the collision was a deliberate attempt to get the rental van driver screwed over by Enterprise?
the Van driver allowed the two cars in front of the mini to merge onto the road, he cannot just stop and let everyone merge, mini driver is 100% at fault.
Clip #2, as soon as he honked, i would have waited for the next pedestrian to cross. That will teach him.
There was plenty of time to make the turn before the pedestrians even stepped into the road. The dash cam driver was being WAY too cautious.
@@wallycustard1281 here in the beautiful Netherlands we are used to give way to straight going traffic on the same way, in this case pedestrians. I think the cammer did a nice job by being patient and nicely following the road rules. He did a good act of defensive driving.
@@gerhard6105he doesn't look or sound confident enough to be driving, he was doing 15mph , sometimes less, maybe even a learner?
@@gerhard6105new UK highway code rules essentially mean the same thing.
@@petersylvester2905yes cammer was driving excessively slow.
0:36... In Canada, Quebec. The Pedestrians have priority if they and the car arrive at the intersection at the same time. Here The car arrives before. The car doesn't have to wait.
This is from UK, what has Canada got to do with it?
Well that's the Quebecois for you. In Vancouver the drivers stop in plenty of time, in fact I've almost felt the need to jog to the junction so I don't hold them up because they stop so early.
#7. Either illegal immigrant or uninsured or both.
Car is untaxed and un-MOT'd.
Let me guess, you read the Sun or the Mail and love Lee Anderson.
@@garyboyle695 Let me guess, you are the same smug tw@ you have always been.
@@garyboyle695 Let me guess, you suck off minorities because it makes you feel enlightened.
@@garyboyle695 why else would he do a runner ?
Both those lorry driver at the end need their licences removing. Professional drivers my arse.
#5 Was the passenger having a baby?!
Either that or getting one !!
@@johndilloway9762 😂
#9, if you are not a copper, then you have no authority to confront the driver. By all means, report with the video evidence, but if you are going to puff yourself up like that you can expect an aggressive response...
That's a dangerous thing to do. Leave it to the Police, they have stab vests and tasers. You have a cycle helmet and lycra.
C.J Volkert driver is a typical Lorry driver ..Limited speed but always want to overtake something that is going 1 MPH slower ...cutting off anyone who happens to be passing them at the time.....then they sit up your Arse when the Speed is reduced to 50....Bullies
Clipp 11 both hgv drivers should lose license and massive fines
Idiotic Enterprise van driver better have taken out the enhanced cover or his credit card would be getting a hammering!
0:42 shouldn’t have waited for the pedestrians
at 0:42 the pedestrians were on the carriageway so had priority. Rule 170: "give way to pedestrians crossing or waiting to cross a road into which or from which you are turning. If they have started to cross they have priority, so give way"
@@ditch3827 if you look they were still on the pavement when the car was at the junction
@@JamieNoid But obviously about to cross and hence had priority.
@@ditch3827 but the car was there first so the car had priority, pedestrians only have priority if they step into the road/junction
@@JamieNoid When you turn, you have to give way to traffic whose path you wish to cross and all the more so if they are more vulnerable in the hiearchy.
4:18 yes cyclist and your point...move on mate!!!
He is highlighting a poor quality driver- good on him.
Are you the dick in the Merc?
@@nwcitroen2222 The cyclist won't sleep with you.
#2
you're ridiculous. Just because you've got all day doesn't mean everyone else does. Get on with it!
#6 only person who is a fault is cyclist if they want to mess about on the roads And see if everyone misses them when they do crash, crack on, literally 😂.
Absolutely!! Beeping and making a fuss does nothing, just massages your ego. What a pleb!
0:24 Grant Shapps changing priority to pedestrians waiting to cross at junctions is possibly the most unsafe piece of legislation in recent years. Most pedestrians even seem confused by it. BTW I follow THC.
It's not really confusing or unsafe if everyone adheres to it, unlike the car behind. I mean why is it Brits have such an issue with change, and consideration for others?
@@isthatreallytruetho It is unsafe if traffic is having to come to a halt on an A road to let someone cross who is confused why a car has suddenly stopped to try and let them cross when they where otherwise going to wait for it to pull in.
@@dejanbrice8774 There are cycle lanes where cars have to stop before turning left and yield to cyclists. There are times when there is traffic and cars will have to stop, or a narrow entrance, or whatever the situation. It doesn't matter the reason someone has to stop their car, if you are paying attention and know the HC then it shouldn't be an issue.
@@isthatreallytruetho Just because someone has made it and put it into the highway code doesn't mean its a safe thing to do. We only have to look at the smart motorway network to quantify their judgement abilities.
@@dejanbrice8774 You can't really compare a motorway to an A road. I would rather stop and risk the car behind hitting me if they're not paying attention, than turn and hit a pedestrian who knows they have priority.
#3 / 0:57 - the van was way behind the Mini and should have just let it merge - it's crazy to resist at those speeds. The Mini driver should have hung back instead of trying to force a way in; the cammer let it in without fuss. Difficult to tell whether the Mini driver was angry or just flustered, but it was appalling from both of them, with practically zero at stake for either.
I said a similar comment , I agree with some of your comment.
Wonder how many cyclists have gone to A&E to remove helmet cams from their arses?
None (for obvious reasons).
Remember that comment if a loved one is injured or killed by a distracted driver. You've the intellect of a brick.
@@nwcitroen2222 Their arseholes were already wide enough to accommodate the helmet cam.
2:13 "They're trying to get run over. Without a helmet." Shows the attitude that cyclists have to put up with. The cyclist is doing nothing wrong. Taking a position a metre away from the doors of parked cars is not "Trying to get run over", it's doing exactly the right thing.When there's a gap the cyclist pulls to the left to try and accommodate following traffic. Then the cammer gives them a couple of beeps for having the temerity to be on the roads and yet fails to pass then when the bike is riding in the gutter. It's only later that the cyclist starts being an arse, at the early point the cammer makes their remarks _they_ are the problem. I suspect the being an arse is down to perceived provocation from the cammer; that doesn't excuse it, but it might explain it. The cammer needs to send their driving licence back to Kelloggs.
0:24 cammer your driving is annoying, you are driving 17-19 mph, you slow down even more before turning and you have plenty of space, the pedestrians haven't reached the edge of the road yet and you are already waiting
He was being considerate to the pedestrians.
Ah, somebody else so observant that they haven't realised the road has a 20 mph limit.
#9 these cylists are getting out of hand, you think they stop other cylists to report them to police when they bomb through red lights?
Still he shouldn't be on the phone so🤷♂
My thought exactly this guy needs to get a life
@@JustCallMeHorse yeah agreed, and how many cyclists is mikey or whatever his name is letting pass through red lights in London? Easy to pick on traffic offences when they have a badge on the front and back.
I think you'll find that cars cause more damage and death than bicycles in accidents. I bet you've got another daft comment about cyclists paying for 'road tax' and insurance ready to go....
@@ymirfritz9989it's actually the registration that makes it easy. Car brand badges mean nothing🤦🏻♂️. Would you like people to chase others through red lights so they can pull them up on their dangerous driving/riding?🤷🏻♂️ maybe you could invent a reliable way of tracing the cyclist so a punishment can possibly be enforced.
Well well well...there's a surprise who leaves the accident on 3:30 🙈
Slippery slope with plastic cops on bikes
If people were better drivers he wouldn't catch people out.
There's no need for the confrontation other than that want likes and content, you can upload the clip and the driver will be prosecuted just the same without the confrontation.
@@petersylvester2905sounded like the driver was the one giving it all the confrontation despite telling the cyclist to calm down.
@@petersylvester2905Do stupid things in a potential killing machine, be prepared to be called out for it.
@@garyboyle695 you can call them out without putting yourself in danger though, but that doesn't make CZcams content.
That effiing headcam cyclist needs to get private prosecuted for assault (knocking on a car window), obstructing the highway, and causing a car to pass within 1.5m of a cycle (by approaching it); and be fined and banned.
Not the brightest are you?
So, what you are saying is that it is ok, and perfectly legal, for motorists to use their mobile phones whilst operating a vehicle?!
@@user-ve8fu9ti5i Only if they're hitting cyclists.
@@garyboyle695 Interesting that you haven't commented on the appalling riding of the cyclist in clip #6. Not the brightest are you?
You crack on and pop down to your local nick with your video, and bigger ego ,while they listen to you then laugh you out the building .🤦♂️🤷♂️
Cyclist acting like they are the law because they have camera on their head are going to start getting knocked out and the camera nicked.
Advocating for assault and theft? You sound nice.
@@nwcitroen2222 You really want to suck that cyclist off.
#6 - Bad cyclist. Like there's another sort.
5:42 Cyclist, are you some kind of psycho?
No, but the car driver clearly gets very emotional far too easily.
Are you the dick driving the car?
The Smart arse on His phone!, What a Knob.
Not so smart. Him or phone.
#7 Location A1 Southbound - Wyboston village
#4 fucking hell it's the end of the world, quick, put it on CZcams! 🥱