I know some people will use their mobile while in stationary traffic but that driver #7 at 2.45 was a real danger. He wasn't just glancing at it, he was looking down continuously while driving, and near pedestrians too. It's people like him that make Cycing Mikey the good guy.
#1 It's not hard at all to fail to see a car in front of you if you have your face stuck in your mobile phone, rather than watching the road in front of you!
Clip 5, not sure what the cammer wanted the HGV driver to do ? Get out and observe what’s around the junction first, it’s a 40 foot semi , he has to swing wide,or you would be complaining next he’s driven over a pavement …..😐
He took the turn far too fast, especially given the size of his vehicle. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to take up the opposite side of the road you drive on eggshells.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xxtoo fast ? How do you know ? Ive driven class 1, you make quick decisions to take the space you need and get a move on. There was no danger to the car in front. Go and have a lie down if that stressed you too much.
@@oddities-whatnot There was no danger but that was just down to good luck. If the car had been 50 yards further forward there could have been a collision. I was a professional driver from 1984 to 2001. I came across plenty of drivers with your attitude who made out their driving was perfect and defended other truck drivers' bad driving simply because they were 'one of the clan.' I'm well aware of the bullshit comradeship among drivers and it's toxic. You know that manoeuvre would be a fail on your test so why is it acceptable once you have your licence? Taking any bend at that speed on public roads is aggressive and unnecessary. Slowing down there wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to a driver's time scale.
@@oddities-whatnot If a car driver came around a bend at that speed on the opposite side of the road in front of an HGV the HGV drivers would be crucifying the car driver on here.
4:15 I Was like what pedestrian on that bus? I was looking at the wrong one all the time and had to rewind it again, 3rd time I noticed it on the other side.
Ditto. Though I did manage to catch it on the second view but had to watch the third time to see it all unfold. But for 1 3/4 time of that clip, I was scrutinising the bus in front and could see anything happening 8-((...
#8 I know those roadworks well, A3/M25 J10 at Wisley. They're a nightmare, and the truck driver is an idiot for doing that, but the cammer is increasing risk to those in lanes 2 & 3 by not just allowing the idiot to pull in.
No.8 way to make a bad situation worse, well done to you and the van/ trailer in front of you. The HGV either couldn’t get in to the filter lane earlier, or they cocked up, you and the vehicle you were following, absolutely well done, you showed him.
Well done to both of you. The LGV driver is just an arrogant prick who thought he'd try his luck. There's too much of it on our roads these days to just let it go.
Probably not used to traffic coming from that direction on that side. Not an excuse, but easily done in my experience when visiting a drive-on-the-right country.
Definitely a wise thing to do to protect yourself. On the flip side, this shows that people don't always look therefore less vulnerable road users need to be aware of the risk and reduce their speed accordingly. You can only control yourself and not other people. Expecting human beings, who often make mistakes, to not make mistakes imo is insanity
@@suficer7827 nah, if there's a middle island between the lanes like there is here, I rarely bother looking both ways, I'm only crossing the oncoming traffic
re: the clip with the HGV at around 2:20. while right the HGV should giveway until noticed, and allowed to continue it's turn or a clear spot in the traffic. the problem arises with the car infront not being able to view the main road because of a large vehicle waiting to turn into the side road so blocking the view. so that makes drivers following the HGV not think that it might not be safe to be on the wrong side of the main road, I would suggest forward planning when safe to do so, as a 10-15 second wait is far safer and quicker than swapping insurance details or having to wait for an ambulance or police to clear the road.
#3 overtaking isn't "pointless" - it's just normal driving. If you'd rather control your own speed rather than spend your time reacting to the speed of the car in front, overtaking gives you that. You don't have to interpret it as an uninvited criticism of your driving - it's just a thing anyone can do at any time.
Pointless in a 20mph limit where everyone (except the arrogant overtaker) is doing 20. Pointless if you arrive at the next red light at the same time as those law-abiding drivers you just overtook. Etc etc
@@Alan_Clark Overtaking is just changing the order of vehicles in a stream of traffic, it has nothing to do with "save a significant amount of time". Exceeding the speed limit is wrong at every time, but it's not for other road users to assert speed control. Additionally, speed control is something humans are lousy at. Even if one spends 100% of one's time staring at a perfectly calibrated (rarer than hen's teeth) speedometer instead of the road ahead, no two drivers would be going at the same speed even if they claimed the same number. Those differences can be frustrating if the driver behind would naturally drive slightly more quickly than the one ahead. Overtaking fixes that, and drivers should facilitate, not frustrate or berate that.
#5 : Nope, this is a non-issue. The truck driver was already at the junction and was already manoeuvering well before the white car ahead even reached the junction. White car had plenty of time to slow down and give the truck more room to complete their turn.
I'd say the gap wasn't big enough to have been at least close to completion by the time traffic got there. The manoeuvre looked rushed as well. Yes, it's a non-issue (but then, most of the clips in these types of compilation are), but the lorry driver should have waited.
The HGV took the turn far too fast. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to use the opposite side of the road you drive defensively not aggressively. You ASSUME vehicles coming the opposite way in their lane haven't seen you. Its basic common sense.
It is sad people get upset when overtaken. Some are saying the car overtaking was speeding but again, that doesn't mean you or I can play copper and impede the progress of others. It is why you are supposed to move left after overtaking, it is the police who police roads, not us. The overtake was swift and safe, why the cam owner would rush to send it to the net is beyond me.
Dash Cam Van - Black people carrtier was also not paying attention as they went into the back of another vehicle. Not as bad as the silver corsa but not paying attention and not leaving a big enough gap JustSomeVideos0 - if you have video evidence, leave it at that and jsut report it immediately. You are at risk if you start knocking on vehicle windows cos you know nothing about the driver and by making contact with the vehicle, that can be deemed an act of aggression. Whether you are in the right or wrong or somewhere in between, it's just not worth getting involved in case you do it to the wrong person. Dash Cam Van - probs better to just let the HGV in regardless of how they got there. Better than leaving them blocking the M25. Appreciate they shouldn't have been there in the first place but I can't see any good reason why you wouldn't help fix their mistake
Indeed, if you know the guy is already distracted by his phone is it wise to divert his attention _further_ by hammering on his window? I think the answer to that is self evident.
That same tired old trope that’s trotted out every time a HGV drivers poor driving is called into question. He makes the turn blindly without consideration for traffic on the road into which he is turning. He forces the white car to take evasive action to avoid a collision. If you think this is good driving, it just serves to prove just how low the standard is for driving large vehicles. I also expect that you have a defence for the HGV that crosses the solid chevrons on the motorway exit in order to jump the queue, which is an endorsable offence?
@@paul8161You don’t have to be a HGV driver to recognise poor driving. It seems however that CZcams’s HGV drivers believe that the rules and laws of the road don’t apply to them, and when challenged cry like babies and resort to the same two responses. One being ‘you try driving a HGV’. The second being ‘If it wasn’t for HGV drivers the whole world would collapse into chaos’ as they genuinely believe that they are the glue holding society together.
#14 is not Guy Martin, that's a Scott Redding lid. Probably not going to be challenging for Scott's WSBK ride any time soon but if he keeps practicing, you never know
Funny the amount of people claiming the artic going round the corner was wrong because of various reasons they believe to be true in there heads,, yet if go on British streets you will see similar artics having to swing wide to get round a corner without killing everything in their path , and hummm I'm guessing they all passed there tests to be driving artics in the first place, interesting how car drivers are experts at driving massive artics to , go figure. 🤦♂️🤷♂️
#9 I'm guessing the bus didn't wait for the guy, so as he wasn't about to open the doors in traffic, the guy took the opportunity to react to missing the bus.
#13 No, don't drive slowly by. Pull over, call emergency services to advise of a mentally-disturbed woman walking in the middle of the road. Show some humanity.
At least a kind comment in this situation. It was clear that she had some sort of issues that needed assistance. She certainly did not appear to have capacity at that moment in time at least to understand the danger that she was putting herself in.
At 02:03 it's difficult for the HGV to see what's around the corner - he has to get there before he can see. Have a bit of patience with HGVs and buses,
Yep, he couldn't see around the corner before positioning himself to make a necessary wide turn, and if he had stopped, the white car wouldn't have been able to see around him to turn right onto the main road anyway.
He belted out. If he'd been creeping to take a look before he committed I'd be siding with you, but he didn't. He committed _without_ taking adequate time to look, doubly wrong considering how much of the road he knew he was going to take.
@@ianmason. I've looked at it again, and I agree with you - he's quite aggressive. On the other hand, he's practising "might is right", he's a bully. But for self-protection, I wouldn't challenge him.
#13 they should have at least called 999 as its an emergency and the police to get her to safety and find out where she lives and where she was going etc
5:30. Ones I brought my son to school on the same house block. I did not have to cross a street. I took the second corner to the left,still on the pavement. Then a small Peugeot or so came between the poles on the corner, over the pavement where people with children walk, so Infront of us and then went of the pavement at a spot where there was not a car parked,back on the one car wide street (18 mph, 30 kmh) still to fast like the car in this clip. Probably strait out of the Atlas mountains...I was happy the parking spot was empty other wise he would have hit several people on the pavement. So, almost the same situation as in the clip but between the poles, over the pavement. I told the school director/boss about it. Regards from the Netherlands
The clip @ 4:07 regarding the bus. At least point out that it's not the bus in front of the cammer, but the one to the far right that's getting attacked 8-((... I watched it twice before I noticed what was going on to the right of the screen 8-((...
#5. “HGV forcing his way through,” is a misrepresentation of what happened. The HGV began its turn before the Grey Car reached the junction. So wasn’t a problem for them to stop and let the HGV finish its turn, after all it needs a lot more space than a car. And why was the cammer complaining, it didn’t affect them.
Why? Do you really believe any instructor would teach their students to ride like this? Once people have passed their CBT, or driving test, how they behave on the road is entirely up to them, not anybody else🤷♂️
Looks like yellow went in on the wrong side, white went wide to let yellow through, then white had to reverse and turn to let black through. Yellow caused the tangle but white fixed it. Good job white (and black for being patient).
@@ralphyjohn24 Unfortunately insurance companies won't look at it like that if there is a collision. They expect everyone to do their utmost to avoid an accident. If they think someone exacerbated a situation they will share blame.
@@ralphyjohn24 The lorry driver was entirely at fault, 100%. The van driver and more so the cammer had the opportunity to unfuck the situation but chose to make it worse.
2:55 - If you're going to use your mobile phone whilst driving (even though you're on a quiet and fairly wide road, meaning pulling over would not be a big deal), at least make sure you're not around vulnerable road users. 3:45 - Irresponsible, yes. But if you value your health, it's best not to put yourself in the blind spot. Just let them go and move on with your day.
I see no fail while driving. OK, using the phone, a no-go. But the road is blocked up ahead by a cyclist in the mid, so no point in going faster. The bad guy is the cammer in this. Yep a stupid move. Go in the trucks blind spot. On the other hand, please do this while not in a car, more space for everyone else.
3:45 the driver of the semi truck is an idiot, no doubt. Of course he's wrong. But your driving isn't any better, trying to block him from getting onto the exit ramp. I can fully understand that you don't want to let him in, but highest priority should be safety. The trucker created a dangerous situation, you had the chance to minimize it. The truck was stationary in lane 1 and could have moved into the gap to get off lane 1 and onto the exit ramp, but you closed that gap. Well done ... not
@@neuralwarp no, because minimizing the risk of someone else rear-ending him might be slightly more important than showing him how much of an idiot he is and that the cammer has the right of way.
@menorahdarkness4877 me too. Wouldn't want to let the idiot in either. But it would defuse the situation and minimize the risk of someone else crashing into the trailer.
@@EnjoyFirefighting noone should be letting the hgv in. they can rot in the hatched area for as long as it takes the traffic to reduce as far as im concerned. they caused the issue so they can wait.
5# bit confused as to why the channel or person sent the hgv having to go wide to go round a corner and trying to make out its a big deal but hey,,each to their own i guess.🤦♂️🤷♂️..i guess whoever thinks its a problem doesn't get hgvs need alot more room to get about and use more room..plus the clue is in there name..ARTICULATED LORRY!🙄
Nothing wrong with that over take. Just because the camera arrived right behind them is a pointless message here. Why do people hate being passed? What we can’t over take now just in case there is a set of traffic lights half a mile up the road? The fact they may or may not break the speed limit is no concern of the camera car here.
3:23 If you can see an idiot is on the phone whilst driving, why would you put yourself in danger by moving to the other side of the lane and banging on their window?! Baffling behaviour - if someone’s using their phone whilst driving your telling them off isn’t going to stop them, it’s just putting you in the way of getting hurt.
No, I think if have done the same but put myself in a position where I can escape. If I had my way, with a total w⚓️ with no hands on the wheel past a school not looking, he’d lose his mirror and then when he stops and gets out, we’ll carry on and see what else happens. People like this need to know and they don’t care because they know there is no challenge as we’ve all turned into wimps who mouth off and toot horns but do nothing else.
@@maselmThank you, the majority of my stress comes from total t4ats on here. Let’s face it, you can’t get away from travelling unless you are a hermit. I can almost guarantee you p1ss someone off by being selfish and the more people that do it, the more breeds it then society will be even more broke than it already is, perhaps people don’t realise how what they do angers and upsets others and puts us at great risk of being hurt just so they can reach their destination thinking of no one else but themselves. I’m suffering from a crash in 2015 caused by a muppet that will for ever be with me whilst some say “it’s only a car, you’ll be ok”. Not true.
1:24, #3 It's not the distance achieved, but the overtake itself that matters to this kind of driver.. Overtaking is subjective and you never know how much ground that you may make.
If they did that, the country would grind to a halt as most would fail. They can’t even get a simple rule right let alone lane discipline or indicating.
@@911HRW Yes, I would fail because of those bad habits acquired over 53 years. Queue jumping, lane hogging, red light running, chaotic roundabout moves. Other bad habit are available.
The HGV took the turn far too fast. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to use the opposite side of the road you drive defensively not aggressively. You ASSUME vehicles coming the opposite way in their lane haven't seen you. Its basic common sense.
Woman in a blue Audi behind me today furiously messaging away on her phone while in slow-moving traffic. At one point I even stopped and tried to make eye contact in the mirror. She didn't notice a thing - far too absorbed in the bit of plastic in her hand. Trouble is, if she went into the back of me it would be hard to prove she was on the phone as the rear dash cam can't pick it up.
#14 they may not have passed the cbt, but they don't need to either. Could be wrong but a car licence allows the use of 50cc bikes, or it did 25 yrs ago
@@911HRW yes, yet if u passed test before 2001, then u have the right to use a up to 50 cc without anything stopping you. No cbt needed. I guess I was trying to say, don't hate the guy just cause they can ride the bike, but the way they do it was pretty poor. Same as many car drivers though.
If so, he wouldn't have needed L plates. It's a _full_ AM (moped) entitlement that came for free with a full B (car) entitlement, not a provisional one.
He's busy trying to financially ruin people by making them lose their licence or making their insurance go up even though there could be an emergency unfolding and that's why he's texting....unlikely yes.. but I think it's bad karma to go around getting people done by the police, could never be me.. I've pretended to film someone once who was using their phone to make them stop but I wouldn't dream of sending to the police, nasty business that.
#4 Whilst the black car is least to contibute here they should have proceeded with a bit more authority and at least entered the road as that would have put their stamp on it to announce to the white car not to have engaged in the idiocy of going onto the wrong side of the road to exit the junction, white car and yellow car obviously most to contribute here.
Does the cyclist in clip 7 have a life? He has numerous clips out complaining to various drivers. He caused some problems. Just wondering if anyone had got out of their vehicle yet to have a word with him.
@@paul8161 The HGV took the turn far too fast. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to use the opposite side of the road you drive defensively not aggressively. You ASSUME vehicles coming the opposite way in their lane haven't seen you. Its basic common sense.
@@911HRW I reported two highly dangerous red light runners to the police a three weeks back. I felt no need to get into a confrontation with them about it. The police have the footage and two prosecutions have been started. Anybody who goes about it by chasing people down (yes, even really slowly), tapping on windows and the like is in it for self aggrandisement, not for the public good.
2:55 - Did the cyclist indicate to overtake? Did the cyclist give the vehicle 1.5m space? Yes, the driver is naughty but what care did the cyclist give to themselves (as a "vulnerable road user)? #12 5.30 - I think the caption is wrong - instead of Driver it should read ..Wanker
3.10 cyclist youll get yourself run over if you keep those tactics up.....mind your own business. 5.30 othis is on the increase....being overtsken in a far from ideal situation then the overtaker takes the first left turn usually 5 meters after said overtake........I follow them to see where theyre going and usually they just find their way back to the main road.....they are just being dicks.
I know some people will use their mobile while in stationary traffic but that driver #7 at 2.45 was a real danger. He wasn't just glancing at it, he was looking down continuously while driving, and near pedestrians too. It's people like him that make Cycing Mikey the good guy.
Mikey is always the good guy.
The cyclist was dangerous aswell..
@@menorahdarkness4877Rubbish
Cyclist shouldn’t be trying to approach a moving car on his cycle
Number 7 deserves to go to jail. Monumental stupidity and selfishness.
The Driving Instructor was amazingly calming!
He did really well,, and I hope the poor person having difficulties in the road gets help..I felt for them. ❤
#1 It's not hard at all to fail to see a car in front of you if you have your face stuck in your mobile phone, rather than watching the road in front of you!
Just remember, smart motorway = dangerous. 🙄
@@911HRW It's not the motorway that's dangerous it's some of the drivers that are.
Brake lights don't go on until after the impact.
@@michaelgurd7477Exactly
@@911HRW Good to see you're back again you little liar.
Clip 5, not sure what the cammer wanted the HGV driver to do ? Get out and observe what’s around the junction first, it’s a 40 foot semi , he has to swing wide,or you would be complaining next he’s driven over a pavement …..😐
He took the turn far too fast, especially given the size of his vehicle. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to take up the opposite side of the road you drive on eggshells.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xxtoo fast ? How do you know ? Ive driven class 1, you make quick decisions to take the space you need and get a move on. There was no danger to the car in front. Go and have a lie down if that stressed you too much.
@@oddities-whatnot There was no danger but that was just down to good luck. If the car had been 50 yards further forward there could have been a collision. I was a professional driver from 1984 to 2001. I came across plenty of drivers with your attitude who made out their driving was perfect and defended other truck drivers' bad driving simply because they were 'one of the clan.' I'm well aware of the bullshit comradeship among drivers and it's toxic. You know that manoeuvre would be a fail on your test so why is it acceptable once you have your licence? Taking any bend at that speed on public roads is aggressive and unnecessary. Slowing down there wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to a driver's time scale.
@@oddities-whatnot If a car driver came around a bend at that speed on the opposite side of the road in front of an HGV the HGV drivers would be crucifying the car driver on here.
@@oddities-whatnot
You've just had your arse handed to you lad
#9 not me having to rewind cause I was looking at the bus infront 😂😂😂
4:15 I Was like what pedestrian on that bus? I was looking at the wrong one all the time and had to rewind it again, 3rd time I noticed it on the other side.
totally missed that - I was also looking at the bus in front and wondering what action was supposed to be on this clip.
Ditto. Though I did manage to catch it on the second view but had to watch the third time to see it all unfold.
But for 1 3/4 time of that clip, I was scrutinising the bus in front and could see anything happening 8-((...
Think that the driver of the bus did not stop long enough to onload that angry passenger. Over the top? Yes. Amusing? Also yes.
#8 I know those roadworks well, A3/M25 J10 at Wisley.
They're a nightmare, and the truck driver is an idiot for doing that, but the cammer is increasing risk to those in lanes 2 & 3 by not just allowing the idiot to pull in.
No.8 way to make a bad situation worse, well done to you and the van/ trailer in front of you. The HGV either couldn’t get in to the filter lane earlier, or they cocked up, you and the vehicle you were following, absolutely well done, you showed him.
Well done to both of you. The LGV driver is just an arrogant prick who thought he'd try his luck. There's too much of it on our roads these days to just let it go.
@@IanM18Nothing like a bit of reckless driving to put them in their place, eh? Lorry was in the wrong, but van turned it into a dangerous situation.
Too late. The lorry missed his turning. Drive on to the next junction.
A typical van driver, the worst drivers this world has to offer.
As a road user you have an obligation to do the safest thing, which at that point was to let the lorry in, fuck your ego
Wow i wasn't expecting to see Neville Road on a national video and 2nd video so soon as well. I spent a lot of time there now.
Is it that hard for pedestrians to look both ways before crossing,unless the woman here has 9 lifes we dont know.
Probably not used to traffic coming from that direction on that side. Not an excuse, but easily done in my experience when visiting a drive-on-the-right country.
@@trs4u Shouldn't matter what side the car drives in, one should look both ways no matter the country.
If you watch these Russian clips, you see that really nobody is looking. "I have green so they must stop"..….
Definitely a wise thing to do to protect yourself. On the flip side, this shows that people don't always look therefore less vulnerable road users need to be aware of the risk and reduce their speed accordingly. You can only control yourself and not other people. Expecting human beings, who often make mistakes, to not make mistakes imo is insanity
@@suficer7827 nah, if there's a middle island between the lanes like there is here, I rarely bother looking both ways, I'm only crossing the oncoming traffic
0:25 #1 A good example of the 'legal undertaking' that so many are not sure about.
7:10 lol, its not unreasonable for any vehicle to stop here if they can't clear the crossing.
Well said👍. Despite his other generally poor riding, he actually did the right thing there!
re: the clip with the HGV at around 2:20. while right the HGV should giveway until noticed, and allowed to continue it's turn or a clear spot in the traffic. the problem arises with the car infront not being able to view the main road because of a large vehicle waiting to turn into the side road so blocking the view. so that makes drivers following the HGV not think that it might not be safe to be on the wrong side of the main road, I would suggest forward planning when safe to do so, as a 10-15 second wait is far safer and quicker than swapping insurance details or having to wait for an ambulance or police to clear the road.
#14 is actually more competent than the thousands of foreign 'delivery riders' in outer London!
#3 overtaking isn't "pointless" - it's just normal driving. If you'd rather control your own speed rather than spend your time reacting to the speed of the car in front, overtaking gives you that. You don't have to interpret it as an uninvited criticism of your driving - it's just a thing anyone can do at any time.
Agreed. People are allowed to overtake you. You don’t have to get emotional about it, just move on.
Overtaking is pointless if it doesn't save a significant amount of time., especially when you have to exceed the speed limit to do it.
@@Alan_Clark What’s “significant” to you might be different to someone else 🤷🏻♂️
Pointless in a 20mph limit where everyone (except the arrogant overtaker) is doing 20. Pointless if you arrive at the next red light at the same time as those law-abiding drivers you just overtook. Etc etc
@@Alan_Clark Overtaking is just changing the order of vehicles in a stream of traffic, it has nothing to do with "save a significant amount of time". Exceeding the speed limit is wrong at every time, but it's not for other road users to assert speed control. Additionally, speed control is something humans are lousy at. Even if one spends 100% of one's time staring at a perfectly calibrated (rarer than hen's teeth) speedometer instead of the road ahead, no two drivers would be going at the same speed even if they claimed the same number. Those differences can be frustrating if the driver behind would naturally drive slightly more quickly than the one ahead. Overtaking fixes that, and drivers should facilitate, not frustrate or berate that.
6:46 my lady shave goes faster than that lol
#5 : Nope, this is a non-issue. The truck driver was already at the junction and was already manoeuvering well before the white car ahead even reached the junction. White car had plenty of time to slow down and give the truck more room to complete their turn.
I'd say the gap wasn't big enough to have been at least close to completion by the time traffic got there. The manoeuvre looked rushed as well.
Yes, it's a non-issue (but then, most of the clips in these types of compilation are), but the lorry driver should have waited.
The HGV took the turn far too fast. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to use the opposite side of the road you drive defensively not aggressively. You ASSUME vehicles coming the opposite way in their lane haven't seen you. Its basic common sense.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx😂😂
#1 probably on the phone….
just like #7
It is sad people get upset when overtaken. Some are saying the car overtaking was speeding but again, that doesn't mean you or I can play copper and impede the progress of others. It is why you are supposed to move left after overtaking, it is the police who police roads, not us. The overtake was swift and safe, why the cam owner would rush to send it to the net is beyond me.
Dash Cam Van - Black people carrtier was also not paying attention as they went into the back of another vehicle. Not as bad as the silver corsa but not paying attention and not leaving a big enough gap
JustSomeVideos0 - if you have video evidence, leave it at that and jsut report it immediately. You are at risk if you start knocking on vehicle windows cos you know nothing about the driver and by making contact with the vehicle, that can be deemed an act of aggression. Whether you are in the right or wrong or somewhere in between, it's just not worth getting involved in case you do it to the wrong person.
Dash Cam Van - probs better to just let the HGV in regardless of how they got there. Better than leaving them blocking the M25. Appreciate they shouldn't have been there in the first place but I can't see any good reason why you wouldn't help fix their mistake
Indeed, if you know the guy is already distracted by his phone is it wise to divert his attention _further_ by hammering on his window? I think the answer to that is self evident.
2.12…. Hgv was turning left … not forcing his way through….. try driving an HGV see how YOU!! Get on ??💪💪😆😆👍
Ahh but there's lots of arm chair hgv drivers on utube who are expert's 😂.
That same tired old trope that’s trotted out every time a HGV drivers poor driving is called into question. He makes the turn blindly without consideration for traffic on the road into which he is turning. He forces the white car to take evasive action to avoid a collision. If you think this is good driving, it just serves to prove just how low the standard is for driving large vehicles.
I also expect that you have a defence for the HGV that crosses the solid chevrons on the motorway exit in order to jump the queue, which is an endorsable offence?
@@paul8161You don’t have to be a HGV driver to recognise poor driving. It seems however that CZcams’s HGV drivers believe that the rules and laws of the road don’t apply to them, and when challenged cry like babies and resort to the same two responses. One being ‘you try driving a HGV’. The second being ‘If it wasn’t for HGV drivers the whole world would collapse into chaos’ as they genuinely believe that they are the glue holding society together.
Special Needs more like 😂
1:00 What was wrong with this exactly? Sure, it didn't get them anywhere, but I fail to see how this was worth remarking over
Cammer is psychic and knows state of all traffic lights within a five mile area.
The thing wrong was them speeding in a 20
Assuming it really is a 20
On another day, the cam car wouldn't have seen the overtaking car further up the road.
@@malcwhite There were plenty of "20" signs on the road surface throughout the clip.
4:24 - He was trying to swipe right
#14 is not Guy Martin, that's a Scott Redding lid. Probably not going to be challenging for Scott's WSBK ride any time soon but if he keeps practicing, you never know
Funny the amount of people claiming the artic going round the corner was wrong because of various reasons they believe to be true in there heads,, yet if go on British streets you will see similar artics having to swing wide to get round a corner without killing everything in their path , and hummm I'm guessing they all passed there tests to be driving artics in the first place, interesting how car drivers are experts at driving massive artics to , go figure. 🤦♂️🤷♂️
#9 I'm guessing the bus didn't wait for the guy, so as he wasn't about to open the doors in traffic, the guy took the opportunity to react to missing the bus.
#13 No, don't drive slowly by. Pull over, call emergency services to advise of a mentally-disturbed woman walking in the middle of the road. Show some humanity.
That's exactly what I thought, poor girl - hope she gets some help. 😢
At least a kind comment in this situation. It was clear that she had some sort of issues that needed assistance. She certainly did not appear to have capacity at that moment in time at least to understand the danger that she was putting herself in.
Yes. Many dash cam clips show folk go merrily on their way following some kind of incident.
Number #10 amateur 7.5 ton driver. Check his tacho ! Number #13 hope she is okay, clearly very troubled. Sad really to see that.
At 02:03 it's difficult for the HGV to see what's around the corner - he has to get there before he can see. Have a bit of patience with HGVs and buses,
The issue was the speed he went at. If there had been a car in the space he couldn't see, it would have been a close call.
Yeah , looked a bit quick for my liking
Yep, he couldn't see around the corner before positioning himself to make a necessary wide turn, and if he had stopped, the white car wouldn't have been able to see around him to turn right onto the main road anyway.
He belted out. If he'd been creeping to take a look before he committed I'd be siding with you, but he didn't. He committed _without_ taking adequate time to look, doubly wrong considering how much of the road he knew he was going to take.
@@ianmason. I've looked at it again, and I agree with you - he's quite aggressive. On the other hand, he's practising "might is right", he's a bully. But for self-protection, I wouldn't challenge him.
5:07 cammer pulls off without checking mirrors?
Disgusting behavior!
#13. The Cops in New York stopped her on a dui and asked her to walk along a white line... They didn't tell her to stop!
#13 they should have at least called 999 as its an emergency and the police to get her to safety and find out where she lives and where she was going etc
Lol #9 bus pedestrian is like "well you don't need it cus you aren't using it anyway"
5:30. Ones I brought my son to school on the same house block. I did not have to cross a street. I took the second corner to the left,still on the pavement. Then a small Peugeot or so came between the poles on the corner, over the pavement where people with children walk, so Infront of us and then went of the pavement at a spot where there was not a car parked,back on the one car wide street (18 mph, 30 kmh) still to fast like the car in this clip. Probably strait out of the Atlas mountains...I was happy the parking spot was empty other wise he would have hit several people on the pavement. So, almost the same situation as in the clip but between the poles, over the pavement. I told the school director/boss about it. Regards from the Netherlands
6:55 HOW get you a license on your island out there?
The clip @ 4:07 regarding the bus. At least point out that it's not the bus in front of the cammer, but the one to the far right that's getting attacked 8-((...
I watched it twice before I noticed what was going on to the right of the screen 8-((...
#8 - S/he made a mistake ... let them in rather than potentially cause an accident!
#8 Just let the truck in FFS. The cammer accelerated just to cut it off. Is it worth damaging your car fo
r?
#10 99....100.. Coming ready or not.
The car was ridiculously stupid to drive across the front of the truck pulling out.
#14 wonder where he got his licence a box of cornflakes or a lucky bag of
#5. “HGV forcing his way through,” is a misrepresentation of what happened. The HGV began its turn before the Grey Car reached the junction. So wasn’t a problem for them to stop and let the HGV finish its turn, after all it needs a lot more space than a car. And why was the cammer complaining, it didn’t affect them.
The channel over eggs the situation for sensational content, seems alot of blowing simple things out of context for veiws/likes for the channel.
Shes got issues. Well I would never have guessed 😂
03:46 why didn’t the driver just wait?
Some woeful driving, cycling and commenting by many of the cammers. Perhaps each item should be marked out of 10 by a professional driver?
#14. If he did pass and not just "buy it" then the instructor needs sacking.
Why? Do you really believe any instructor would teach their students to ride like this? Once people have passed their CBT, or driving test, how they behave on the road is entirely up to them, not anybody else🤷♂️
1:37 what in gods name is going on here ? Is the black car causing the obstruction?? ..
Looks like yellow went in on the wrong side, white went wide to let yellow through, then white had to reverse and turn to let black through.
Yellow caused the tangle but white fixed it. Good job white (and black for being patient).
#13. There's more out than in !!
number 12 is just unbelievable what goes through the only brain cell they have
cammer driving too slow which annoyed them but still no excuse
#1 Very easily if they were on their phone.
#14 it's quite easy to pass a CBT to be honest. You'd be surprised the people they let on the roads
6:04 Darwin award goes to the person walking in middle of road instead of pavement
Who obviously had mental issues..seriously!.🤦♂️🤷♂️
Report drivers of passenger vehicles for doing that sort of thing, they lose their license.
#8 Goes to show that there is no situation so bad that a bellend with a dashcam can't make it worse.
did nothing wrong though. the truck made the situation worse by continuing to try and get in.
@@michaelh7741 If you think the cammer and the van in front of them didn't make the situation worse then you shouldn't be driving.
If you're trying to say anyone other than the lorry driver was at fault there then you're the bellend.
@@ralphyjohn24 Unfortunately insurance companies won't look at it like that if there is a collision. They expect everyone to do their utmost to avoid an accident. If they think someone exacerbated a situation they will share blame.
@@ralphyjohn24 The lorry driver was entirely at fault, 100%. The van driver and more so the cammer had the opportunity to unfuck the situation but chose to make it worse.
2:55 - If you're going to use your mobile phone whilst driving (even though you're on a quiet and fairly wide road, meaning pulling over would not be a big deal), at least make sure you're not around vulnerable road users.
3:45 - Irresponsible, yes. But if you value your health, it's best not to put yourself in the blind spot. Just let them go and move on with your day.
I see no fail while driving. OK, using the phone, a no-go. But the road is blocked up ahead by a cyclist in the mid, so no point in going faster. The bad guy is the cammer in this.
Yep a stupid move. Go in the trucks blind spot. On the other hand, please do this while not in a car, more space for everyone else.
3:45 the driver of the semi truck is an idiot, no doubt. Of course he's wrong. But your driving isn't any better, trying to block him from getting onto the exit ramp. I can fully understand that you don't want to let him in, but highest priority should be safety. The trucker created a dangerous situation, you had the chance to minimize it. The truck was stationary in lane 1 and could have moved into the gap to get off lane 1 and onto the exit ramp, but you closed that gap. Well done ... not
Trying to prevent him from committing an offence? A good citizen.
@@neuralwarp no, because minimizing the risk of someone else rear-ending him might be slightly more important than showing him how much of an idiot he is and that the cammer has the right of way.
I can understand why some folk don't want to let these bully boys in though
@menorahdarkness4877 me too. Wouldn't want to let the idiot in either. But it would defuse the situation and minimize the risk of someone else crashing into the trailer.
@@EnjoyFirefighting noone should be letting the hgv in. they can rot in the hatched area for as long as it takes the traffic to reduce as far as im concerned. they caused the issue so they can wait.
Oh dear. The entitled cyclist overtook within 1.5m of a car, unsafely, without signalling, and on a zigzag marking.
so what?
@@george-ev1dqSo he’s criticising someone else while doing things wrong himself!
@@waltersobchak1719 what did he do wrong?
@@george-ev1dq Read the first post above☝️
5# bit confused as to why the channel or person sent the hgv having to go wide to go round a corner and trying to make out its a big deal but hey,,each to their own i guess.🤦♂️🤷♂️..i guess whoever thinks its a problem doesn't get hgvs need alot more room to get about and use more room..plus the clue is in there name..ARTICULATED LORRY!🙄
Nothing wrong with that over take. Just because the camera arrived right behind them is a pointless message here. Why do people hate being passed? What we can’t over take now just in case there is a set of traffic lights half a mile up the road? The fact they may or may not break the speed limit is no concern of the camera car here.
It's the other half of Must Get In Front - Must Be In Front
3:23 If you can see an idiot is on the phone whilst driving, why would you put yourself in danger by moving to the other side of the lane and banging on their window?! Baffling behaviour - if someone’s using their phone whilst driving your telling them off isn’t going to stop them, it’s just putting you in the way of getting hurt.
No, I think if have done the same but put myself in a position where I can escape. If I had my way, with a total w⚓️ with no hands on the wheel past a school not looking, he’d lose his mirror and then when he stops and gets out, we’ll carry on and see what else happens. People like this need to know and they don’t care because they know there is no challenge as we’ve all turned into wimps who mouth off and toot horns but do nothing else.
@@911HRW 😂😂😂 Hope you get your anger issues sorted mate. Whatever you’re going through I hope you come out the other side
Whilst I definitely don't condone using the phone Whilst driving his driving seems safer than your riding.
@@maselmThank you, the majority of my stress comes from total t4ats on here. Let’s face it, you can’t get away from travelling unless you are a hermit. I can almost guarantee you p1ss someone off by being selfish and the more people that do it, the more breeds it then society will be even more broke than it already is, perhaps people don’t realise how what they do angers and upsets others and puts us at great risk of being hurt just so they can reach their destination thinking of no one else but themselves. I’m suffering from a crash in 2015 caused by a muppet that will for ever be with me whilst some say “it’s only a car, you’ll be ok”. Not true.
@@911HRW Hahaha you're lying again. You wouldn't do a thing.
1:24, #3 It's not the distance achieved, but the overtake itself that matters to this kind of driver.. Overtaking is subjective and you never know how much ground that you may make.
There is an argument for having to resit your test every 10 years, some of the driving is lazy ,arrogant and down right dangerous.
If they did that, the country would grind to a halt as most would fail. They can’t even get a simple rule right let alone lane discipline or indicating.
There'd still be bell wipers
@@911HRW Yes, I would fail because of those bad habits acquired over 53 years. Queue jumping, lane hogging, red light running, chaotic roundabout moves. Other bad habit are available.
2:19 Not the HGV drivers fault. The car should be aware of the vehicle and should of stopped to let the Lorry through.
The HGV took the turn far too fast. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to use the opposite side of the road you drive defensively not aggressively. You ASSUME vehicles coming the opposite way in their lane haven't seen you. Its basic common sense.
Woman in a blue Audi behind me today furiously messaging away on her phone while in slow-moving traffic. At one point I even stopped and tried to make eye contact in the mirror. She didn't notice a thing - far too absorbed in the bit of plastic in her hand. Trouble is, if she went into the back of me it would be hard to prove she was on the phone as the rear dash cam can't pick it up.
#14 they may not have passed the cbt, but they don't need to either. Could be wrong but a car licence allows the use of 50cc bikes, or it did 25 yrs ago
Nope. CBT to ride a 50 now.
@@911HRW yes, yet if u passed test before 2001, then u have the right to use a up to 50 cc without anything stopping you. No cbt needed.
I guess I was trying to say, don't hate the guy just cause they can ride the bike, but the way they do it was pretty poor. Same as many car drivers though.
If so, he wouldn't have needed L plates. It's a _full_ AM (moped) entitlement that came for free with a full B (car) entitlement, not a provisional one.
@@ianmason. They may not be aware of the rule. I can't keep covering all the bases for you Ian. It's becoming a common problem with your replies.
7 - OK, if I have to leave you 1.5m, why don't you leave me 1.5m?
He's busy trying to financially ruin people by making them lose their licence or making their insurance go up even though there could be an emergency unfolding and that's why he's texting....unlikely yes.. but I think it's bad karma to go around getting people done by the police, could never be me.. I've pretended to film someone once who was using their phone to make them stop but I wouldn't dream of sending to the police, nasty business that.
He wasn't moaning about the space that was left. It was the fact that the guy was staring at his phone while driving.
really need the 10,000 bed mental hospitals back around the world cause so many need some kind of help or drugs to keep them asleep
#12 - luckily he only tried to hit the kid with his car. Luton can be alot worse with children, especially the girls. If you know, you know.
As I often say: nothing good ever came out of Luton; trust me, I was born there.
@@simonmeadows7961 Why should we trust you, you were born in Luton! 😉
#12 - Irresponsible parent spotted near school - fixed it!
KF16 FUV Moron of the week, and a danger to schoolkids.
#4 Whilst the black car is least to contibute here they should have proceeded with a bit more authority and at least entered the road as that would have put their stamp on it to announce to the white car not to have engaged in the idiocy of going onto the wrong side of the road to exit the junction, white car and yellow car obviously most to contribute here.
2:58, I don't see the cyclist giving 1.5 m clearance to the car, but that's all right isn't it, like jumping red lights.
Because the cyclist isnt the one causing potential harm driving over a tonne of metal and glass. It's not rocket science is it?
@@oliverturner128 No it's not rocket science it is the LAW but only for one party apparently.
Does the cyclist in clip 7 have a life?
He has numerous clips out complaining to various drivers.
He caused some problems.
Just wondering if anyone had got out of their vehicle yet to have a word with him.
Cyclists think they're police now?
Lorry on #5 did nothing wrong, just turned around the corner.
Look again.
@@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xxand see what?
@@paul8161 The HGV took the turn far too fast. He'd have failed his test doing that. If you have to use the opposite side of the road you drive defensively not aggressively. You ASSUME vehicles coming the opposite way in their lane haven't seen you. Its basic common sense.
yet one more clclist thats got a camera and thinks they are policer officer 🤣
I’m sure you wouldn’t act the same if you saw a serious law being broken, you’d look the other way wouldn’t you.
Here's 50p, go buy a dictionary
@@911HRW I reported two highly dangerous red light runners to the police a three weeks back. I felt no need to get into a confrontation with them about it. The police have the footage and two prosecutions have been started. Anybody who goes about it by chasing people down (yes, even really slowly), tapping on windows and the like is in it for self aggrandisement, not for the public good.
#13 disgraceful driving instructor, mental problems?!?!?!?
meh people got their own sh*t going on, also he's literally in the middle of work
#13 Looks and sounds like shes been denied PiP Payments.
Sympathy not denegation please.
@@terryable-hh4ck Your in the wrong world. send your Sympathy to the government see what you get.
2:55 - Did the cyclist indicate to overtake? Did the cyclist give the vehicle 1.5m space? Yes, the driver is naughty but what care did the cyclist give to themselves (as a "vulnerable road user)?
#12 5.30 - I think the caption is wrong - instead of Driver it should read ..Wanker
Nothings worse than a nothing better to do cyclist
3.10 cyclist youll get yourself run over if you keep those tactics up.....mind your own business.
5.30 othis is on the increase....being overtsken in a far from ideal situation then the overtaker takes the first left turn usually 5 meters after said overtake........I follow them to see where theyre going and usually they just find their way back to the main road.....they are just being dicks.
You choose to pick fault with the cyclist rather than the div texting approaching a crossing? Really?! Have a word with yourself 🤡