Why is China so TERRIFIED of U.S. Weapons (Comparison)
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 04. 2024
- Dive into the ultimate military showdown: China vs. U.S. 🌎💥 Both nations wield advanced armies, packed with cutting-edge tech and weapons. From sniper rifles to main battle tanks, from air and naval power to cyber warfare, and the looming shadow of nuclear capabilities, we dissect who holds the upper hand. 🛡️🚀🔍 Discover the strengths and weaknesses of each side, including the M4/M4A1 Carbine, the QBZ-95, the M1 Abrams, and more. Will recent combat experience tip the scales? A clash between these superpowers could spell global disaster. Let's hope it remains theoretical. #MilitaryMight #ChinaVsUSA #GlobalSuperpowers #usa #china #weapons #militaryanalysis #militarytech #guns #rifle #tanks #fighterjet #navy #rocketlaunchers #sniper #hacker #madeinchina #copycat
#themilitaryshow - Věda a technologie
Wait a sec. The javelin loses to an unproven weapon because the rocket might be slightly bigger? That's pretty stupid.
Especially when the Javelin has been effective against the tanks Chinese tanks are copied from.
Yep that’s where I shut the video off and went to the comment section. Goodbye!
@@sydneycbr This channel is kind of a waste of time. I just turned this video on to get sleepy.
@@sogerc1And yet you take the effort to express your opinion. When i want to sleep I simply close my eyes and do not write any comments. You should try this as well.
@@zenon7094 We get sleepy in different ways.
The current Abrmas M1A2 has a 120mm cannon not 105.
I came here to say the same thing. Such a simple mistake makes them lose so much credibility
If anyone thinks we (U.S.) doesn't have examples of Chinese rifles and MG's you're not thinking.
Slava TSMC 🇹🇼
People seem to forget, the F35 carrying its fuel and payload internal means that it will actually hit its top speed every time. 4 gen aircraft rarely are able to hit its top speed because of carrying their payload on the outside
Dassault Rafale and AirBus planes: hold our BAGUETTE s🥖
@@Booz2020 dont forget Saab. they have no idea how to build a working car, but damn can they make a good jet
USA has never been a paper tiger, whereas, same can not be said of China.
paper tiger is just copium
USA did lose the war against Taliban. It would be very foolish to underestimated your perceived enemy.
@@zollen123 china afraid of taiwan lol
Yeah the same country that fought a 20 year war to replace the taliban with the taliban
@@zollen123 it is foolish to underestimate any country’s enemies, but pretending the taliban won because of their military might vs the USA’s isnt quite right. The war in the middle east was becoming a drain on the state’s budget, and many people back home saw it as a meaningless fight, so moral to keep fighting was down. Usually its money that decides wether or not the US continues to fight a war or not
Top Gun v. Tofu Gun.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Since its founding, China has never initiated a war with another country. A large number of its most advanced weapons have not been made public, so nobody knows exactly what kind of weapons China has or how many.
@@cool_things_collection Not even China knows...
@@cool_things_collection
We all know what Chinese the weapons are since they copied it all from USA.
@@cool_things_collectionChina invaded Tibet and Xinjiang
Interesting that you simply skipped over aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships, and drones.
Agreed. Also submarines and stealth bombers. The aircraft carriers not being compared was sus as f.
He also skipped or just ignored the F-22. Probably because it would have totally thrown his comparisons of fighter aircraft, we all know that they don't have anything to really compete with the F-22 and the F-35 working together...
@@misplacedstarman5455 Yeah ! So, many errors here. And failed to mention the greater range of our aircraft, as well as midair refueling. And how close we have allies that will allow us land and take off very close to China, for instance Japan, Taiwan, Philippines , and I would imagine India as well.
These Chinese weapons comparisons are always assuming that most of China's equipment would actually work.
‘W00tt about of F 35? It fells down even without seeing the enemy!!
@@moisesfuentes2090 sure it does comrade.
@@moisesfuentes2090What about everything China makes? 💩
Almost everything you use every day is from China 😂
@@BobJason1 Wrong! I gave up wasting my money on Made in China years and years ago. I got tired of being disappointed. 😁
There were several mistakes with the graphics that have the info swapped or just wrong from the narrator
Its typical from videos that basically are done in a crunch and focus on general more biased information
Weight measurement goes from metric to imperial without any logic.. it's lik a.i. made this.
a channel that doesn't know much about military hardware and reads from a Wikipedia page says a👎
War between China and the U.S. will be primarily naval and air warfare. The comparisons of ground forces and equipment is comparatively irrelevant. Troops are highly unlikely to engage.
You're not wrong, but eventually in all likelihood the US would gain the advantage, and we could then see amphibious assault.
@@johnd.7792 230+ times larger shipbuilding and 2 times overall industry especially 30 times drones... US has more carriers, china has more missiles not an apples to apples comparison
@kylexu227 we have proven technology, they do not.
We have naval experts that know the ship inside and out, due to extensive experience with said ship.
We have fighter pilots that have more flight hours in a year, than a lot of pilots have as total flight hours.
We have the infrastructure to keep the battles around, or over their country, ensuring that said construction infrastructure stays safe.
I am also going to say, if we did get into a war with China, we would greatly increase of ship building efforts , same with bullets, missile, aircraft, tanks, MBR...
Or do you really think the US would go along business as usual with such a frightening opponent?
@@johnd.7792 proven tech over soviet era t72 and conscripted iraqis. Besides intercepting subsonic houthi drones US navy hasn't fought a peer competitor since the second world war and "if that war to happen where would the money come from? US needs foreign countries to by its 34.8 trillion dollar debt. Chinese carrier aviation tbh is very bad and will stay subpar for decades but land based aviation and missiles is the primary focus. The US will not and cannot fight a conventional war against the PRC in the asia pacific and certainly will lose the technological edge eventually. I from hong kong so i don't want to seem biased but the most sophisticated fighter the US has had an air to air kill against is a mig 29s from the 90's(correct me if im wrong on this but based on what I know this seems to be correct) and the f22 which america prides itself in has less than 150 operationally capable and its only air to air kill was against a spy or weather balloon. Back to the topic of manufacturing the US economy is a speculation bubble and housing based economy but also has a sophisticated tech sector while china is a manufacturing+infrastructure based economy with middle-high end tech. As we can see in ukraine, even a significantly smaller opponent can hold out if not stall a much larger enemy especially with drones. Who makes the DJI drones used on both sides? China's population is declining but the US labor force is declining too. Nobody here in the US wants to work in the manufacturing industry anymore and it doesn't seem to be getting any better. Even politically the US would be fighting an even more unpopular war and this time instead of the US losing a few troops and dominating the US military and economy would suffer a huge blow which would be felt by the public. While china can manufacture most things, not all, but most by itself the US inflation would reach heights that dwarf 2008 and the 1930s
that's what they said about vietnam and the middle east. not saying one side is better than the other (uncle sam) but boots on the ground will always be a part of any war
Seems there is a mistake at 15:47. Top speeds of the tanks are opposite (M1 is 42 MPH and type 99 is 50 MPH)
Got to say, giving the advantage to the HJ12 ATGM is kinda dumb. Sure, it might be bigger but the Javelin is absolutely proven whereas the Chinese knockoff is not. You really should rethink your choice.
I pray to God that none of this amazing technological weaponry is ever brought to bear against each other. 🙏🏽
Chinese weapons are Temu version of the western weapons
Nevertheless, USA is scared!
@@moisesfuentes2090 Says who?
@@moisesfuentes2090lol no one is scared of China. Maybe people used to worry about Russia before Ukraine, but we've always known that china is nothing more than an overly ambitious and utterly incapable joke militarily speaking.
Slava 🇹🇼
Really? They had balls flying over your head for weeks though. Other than Temu. The USA is now in decline. Just look at how American cities are dressed. Dilapidated infrastructure, old airports, roads that can't even be seen in third world countries. America is no longer the center of the world.
FYI, the XM7 is only being tested and fielded by the US Army. That may change down the road, but for the moment, only the Army is going to have them. The US Marines main infantry rifle is the M27. Rear echelon troops retained the older M4s.
The US won't be using battle tanks in a war with China. This is known knowledge so not sure why you added that
neither will China, since they don't work.
Never Say NEVER 😎 Justin Bieber
Depends where the war occurs. Mostly superpowers do proxy wars.
Stryker's and Bradley's, atgm's,
Half the video was the US weapons have been tested and work chinas have never been used in combat
Thank you for the video really appreciate it there good and interesting 🧐
3:54 please don't call the "magazine" a "clip". A clip is a complete different thing than a magazine and i was actually expecting that the people behind this channel knew the difference between a clip and a magazine.
How can you give the slightest trust to a "military channel" if they don't even know basic firearm parts
Given that the 2nd best army in the world “Russia” has proven to be a joke if it didn’t have the numbers… I’m not worried too much about China
There's nothing to laugh at. Russia fought NATO forces for two years without a single attack on its homeland, took large tracts of land in Ukraine, and grew its economy. And NATO? Ukraine?
Delusional, Russia has lost at min 100,000 troops. They are still fight Ing to take a country or should have taken in a week. Nothing but a paper tiger
@@user-me4tj9re7m Russia has not fought a single NATO soldier. Stop repeating Russian lies. Ukraine is not in NATO. Volunteers who fought in Ukraine to help are individuals and not part of NATO. NATO, an alliance with sovereign member states, has only given aid in terms of materiel, trainers and money. NATO could clear the skies of Russian aircraft and enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine and shatter the Russian land forces in a few months (or less) if it ever came to actual conflict. Don't kid yourself, Russia is only still in the fight BECAUSE NATO isn't.
Ya are you assuming this Asian Vehicles have fuel in them cause the world got notified that the whole Chinese military found out that the fuel in there equipment were or was either empty or watered down because the soldiers where stealing it.
No estimate of Command & Control and logistics?
Here I’ll make a quick summary for everyone,
The USA spends 800 billion on military assets.
China spends 200…
Yep, to be the best you have to R&D the best (funding.) rather than stealing intellectual property from your adversary who is ahead of you.
Budget is one thing but preparedness is much better
Yeah, but China's dollar goes further, a lot further. We pay our military servicemen better then China does, and as can be seen our equipment costs more to make and maintain, so really the spending edge is tiny, if we have any.
@@amandawallace891
I’m sure the junk that China builds cost much less.
@@amandawallace891
Because China has slave workers US does not.
The proper term is 'service rifle', not 'battle rifle'. Battle rifles are a specific category of rifle to which only the XM7 in this video belongs. The rest are all categorized as assault rifles due to their use of an intermediate rifle cartridge. The term 'service rifle' is a good catchall for any standard issue rifle, no matter the type, and would be best used here.
Is that official terminology?
_'Battle Rifle'_ sounds like a wonderful catch-all alternative to _'service' or _'assault.'_
@@zoopdterdoobdter5743 just like AR=Assault Rifle if you ask biden
Yeah the FN is a "battle rifle" but not an "assault rifle".
Abrams has not used the 105mm main gun since OG M1 they are using the 120mm main cannon now, IIRC all abrams have been up-gunned to 120mm
At 15:48 you have the top speeds and operational ranges reversed on the pics vs the narration.
Fire arms mentioned between the two are all considered lethal. However, when it comes to combat, that depends on the terrain on who's on the vantage position and the undetermine number of troops' presence during the fight.
Can you please also show measurements in metric system? lbs means nothng to majority of the world but the USA. Thank you
I bet 90% of his audience is in America. Both would be good.
Perhaps it should be in a foreign language? Which do you prefer Chinese or Russian?
@@americansailor7967 he is already mixing metric and imperial measurement throughout the video, why not just show both
We prefer to use lbs of Big Mac per freedom bullet here. Use Bing if you need to convert that to metric
@thekhan1987 Cry me a river about it 😭 😄😄😄
Copying, WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING,
the Fundamental Design Philosophy,
is a BAAAAD IDEA !
The Roman's pulled it off pretty good for awhile I here
@@crazyirish209the Romans actually took the time and effort to intimately learn and understand integrated technology and fundamental concepts. They even socially integrated conquered peoples into their military culture to learn new tactics, employ new weapons, and perfect their training regimen.
Slava 🇹🇼 Heroyam TAIWANese 🦾
A couple of items on your video (Which is great).
1. The 277 Furry is a barrel burner. In its SAMMI spec it is producing over 80,000 PSI on the barrel and moving the projectile close to 3,000 - 3,100 FPS from the 250. There is a reduced load that reduces the power to about that of the 6.5 creedmoor. If running a barrel with full power loads, the barrel life is less than half the SAWs expectancy. This may bring in new issues as it has not really been tested in the field, and ammunition production is very limited at current. Even to the military.
2. The 338 Norma is in very very limited usage as the navy is still adopted to the 338 LM. Many of the new Barrets are still chambered in the 338LM vs the norma.
3. On the cyberfront, the chinese have been advancing their programs by far over the U.S programs for the last 5 years. Not to mention there have multiple cases of intentional back doors being integrated into common products that would lend an advantage to the chinese.
4. The largest threat to our abilities to wage war is our strategic reserves, which have been depleted down to their lowest point since about 1983. As of 2 weeks ago, a refusal order to restore the reserves by the current administration has put the U.S in a position of weakness over many of our adversaries, and aided to the increase in prices. At the moment, our abilities are hampered by these levels. Our capacity is 714 million barrels, and we are currently at around 371 million.
With strategic strikes to Bryan Mound, Big Hill, West Hackberry or Bayou Choctaw, we could be crippled.
It is not cannon that is missing on J-20, but the engine that fits to gen5.
The Zumwalt class has been a complete disaster which is why that line of ships has been discontinued.
quick there is a good deal at Temu on the HR-12 for $27.95 there are bugs and flaws with them, 1 will most likely explode when you try to use it, 2 if it doesn't explode in your hands it's pretty sure to hit within 700m of the target, 3 if you are lucky enough to hit the target against all odds you can count on it to make a dent. so hurry up to buy.
26:02 - The Minuteman III is currently armed with either the W78 in a Mk-12A reentry or the W87 in a Mk-21 reentry vehicle NOT the W62, the W62 was retired in 2010 (Do your research).
The Chi-coms have superior numbers of men(cannon fodder). The real question is how much ammo does the US have, and will it be enough.
Winning a war is on will instead of weapons, this has been repeatedly proved in Americans' war failure so many time.
3:54 the WHAT is behind the trigger?
China’s priority when making weapons or anything is appearance rather than quality
If so, why is the US afraid of China's electric cars, 5G phones, and even hot air balloons?😂😂😂😂😂
14:10 cmon.. the wider diameter is due to the lack of high quality materials and cheaper components needing more space. clearly.
In my opinion, AMERICA has the advantage, because of its recent combat experience.
What backward countries do you mean? Against China, you can't even see the other side's people because China has countless drones.
No contest and everyone knows it. That's why China does not support Russia in their war.
The Chinese seem to love the letters H and J. Seems to show up somewhat frequently across various of their military tools.
歼击机（jian ji ji） 轰炸机（hong zha ji）
it boils down to combat experience, training, doctrine and moral
I would like to point out a HUGE mistake already in this video, when he sited the amount of gun powder he actualy listed bullet weights not powder weight. No way in hell are you going to pack 63gr of powder into a 5.56x45 NATO case, take it from someone who makes ammo. Heck you have to really compress your charge for a 30-06 case to get it to hold that much.
Edit. Another mistake the M1 originally came with a 105mm but was upgraded to the 120mm decades ago, nobody uses the 105 anymore, oh and it has one 50 cal machine gun the others are 30 cal. This guy clearly knows very little about this subject so you might want to find a more informed source if you want accurate information. Oh and he got the max speeds reversed as well in case you did not notice in addition to getting the age of the Abrams WAY off, designed in 1972 and entered service in 1980 it has been in service for 44 years not 20. An Army friend of mine was involved in the original XM1 prototype testing in the 70s so I know a little about this thing, sadly I don't know nearly as much about the F35 so I would not be able to point out any potential mistakes there.
Abrams tanks proved themselves in the 1st Gulf War... 30+ years ago.
Yep just look how they're performing against the superior Russian weaponry
Russia is killing Abrams at will in Ukraine.
That was against old tech Russian hand-me-down tanks. M1 was new tech. And inferior tank crews in the Iraqi stuff.
3:52 Magazine, not clip. >:(
15:05 105mm cannon is the "newer" cannon you say?
I think the biggest thing that everyone of these videos misses the mark on is the level of support personnel the US has. There is not a single nation in the world, and very few collections of nations, that can rival the supply and support capabilities of the US armed forces. Most of these countries could support a short blitzkrieg style war before being bogged down like Russia ot worse. China has a differing, but similar, issue. The large amount of imports of food to China, the fact that their economy is so very beholden to foreign export markets (especially the US), India so very much wanting them to FAFO as it is, the problem with numerous quality issues with Chinese equipment being reported frequently, and biggest of all is the fact that China has overmortaged itself at home and abroad in building projects that have a looming bubble about to burst worse than the American housing bubble in 2008 that will make it incredibly hard to finance war efforts without becoming financially beholden to other nation/s/. China is weak and they know it. That's why they constantly rattle their sabers, like little dogs that like to bark because their afraid.
yes usa number 1🤪
@@user-ew3oy3gn4c yes, at the moment, the US tops its near peer rivals. Even China, which is where I'm guessing you hail from. Yes, even with all the reverse engineered tech you guys have stolen from other countries. Doubly yes, even despite tour hypersonic missile. Worst case scenario, we turn your lands to glass. So yes, US is number 1 in military might and not much else.
Why does Yellen want to visit China? The United States is under pressure to cut interest rates.
The economic situation of the United States is not necessarily better than that of China.
Spoiler alert: Not China
'Clip behind trigger'. No it's a magazine. Clip and magazine are not synonyms.
China would have advantage in a war over Taiwan because of Taiwan’s proximity to China but their weapons systems and soldiers are untested and unproven in combat. China’s last war was in 1979 against Viet Nam…Viet Nam kicked China’s ass…nobody knows how a war between America and China oulf turn out BUT I give the edge to America’s Armed Forces with it’s battle tested soldiers and military leadership.
In 1979, the Sino-Vietnam War. The Chinese national army faces not only Vietnamese militiamen, but also Vietnam's elite main force.
The six main forces of the Vietnamese army are: 308 Division, 312 Division, 316A Division, 320 Division, 304 Division, and 325 Division.
The 325th, 304th and 320th Divisions were sent to capture Cambodia.
The Vietnamese 308th Division and the 316A Division faced the Chinese army. The 316A Division was wiped out by the Chinese army in northern Vietnam. The 308th Division returned to defend Hanoi and refused to go north to support the 316A Division. The 308th and 312th Divisions protect Hanoi.
February 17 to March 16, 1979. The Chinese army destroyed the industrial area in northern Vietnam and then withdrew its troops to weaken Vietnam's military purpose. The Viet Cong Le Duan sent the 312th Division to pursue the Chinese army. The 312th Division of the Vietnamese Army was severely damaged by the 121st Division of the Chinese Army.
War casualty results:
Chinese casualties: 6,954. (China data)
Chinese injured: 21,000. (China data)
Chinese casualties (Vietnamese data): about 27,000 (the introduction card of the Sino-Vietnam War in the Vietnam War Museum states that the Vietnamese army destroyed eight regiments of the Chinese army, and their number was about 27,000)
Vietnamese soldiers killed: about 57,000 (Chinese data)
Vietnamese militiamen killed: about 70,000 (estimated based on abnormal death reports of Vietnamese residents)
With due respect. The question is, how do they maneuver, we talk about experience and technique in maneunvering and how it was made, the quality, and the pilot. Thank you.
15:09 am I tripping or did he say 105mm main cannon and multiple .50 caliber machine guns?
15:45 now that is just sloppy
11:30 - WWI towards the end of the war both sides, especially the Imperial German army, used large bolt-action antitank rifles.
Colleges Man VS high school
M4= updated M16, from what i see!
TOFU 🤣😂🤣
I wouldn't exactly describe the chinese as incredible especially there military!
In a "Marching With Style" contest, the PRC wins easy. But all that snappy parading around takes heaps of practice, and time. That's time NOT devoted to the training needed for actual combat.
But it sure looks impressive. Maybe the PRC has 2 armies, since they got so many serving. One army takes 8 hours a day walking around, real fancy like, and the other practices invading Taiwan.
MADE IN CHINA🗑️ vs MADE IN USA 🇺🇸
I'll save you the watch... Who wins... nobody, unless you count the military industrial contractors.
To find out if the us will win a war, you analyze the political landscape, not the order of battle.
The best move for the Chinese is to create the perception of a looming war right before and election and watch to see what happens.
That's what TikTok is for.
Whoever attacks the other loses. Neither can invade the other successfully.
The Zumwalt is switching out the 155 cannons for hypersonic missiles.
The m1 Abrams has a 120 mm smooth bore Cannon and they were deployed to the US army in the mid-1980s I know I was in the third armored division in the mid-1980s in Germany
Wait I thought the Abrams had a 120 millimeter main gun🤔
The QBZ-95 is being replaced with the QBZ-191.
All those russians that loves COD and used the javalines got to taste what it iwas like on the receiving end.
FYI - tanks have guns. not cannons. and the abrams has a 120mm gun. not 105mm.
How much is made in Hong Kong?
You have stated double the amount of powder in both the Chinese and US rifles. Quack
The answer is no-one wins
Is it not a case where alot of china's military numbers are made up of older equipment, i.e like older tank variants or older jet varients copies of soviet jets
Your impression of the Chinese military is stuck in the 1990s.
I’m puzzled why aircraft carriers were left out of the equation.
So the HJ-12 wins because it has a few more mms in width? I’ll bet the targeting system on the Javelin is considerably more advanced. It’s also been proven to actually work. How many tank kills does the HJ have in actual combat?
105 mm gun? 15:07 are you sure about that sport?
120mm lol, caught that too.
Type-99’s armour is just cardboard. Oh, and paint.
"the clip is behind the trigger" ?
sigh
The Zumwalt has proven to be a white elephant
not sure why they added that. America has all but phased that project out. it's dome amd has been for years.
What? No mention of submarines!
The U.S. only has 3 Zumwalts and they're not deployed.
There is no functional difference between the M4 and M4A1. One has a 3 round burst the other is full automatic. The A1 has a heavier barrel. They take the same magazines.
Poor old china paper tiger they just copy stolen western design's and from obsolete russian designs and try to reverse engineer 😆
Why is the abrams faster than the type 99. The abrams is 50 mph while the type 99 is 42 mph
China not afraid of US F35 or F22 , China build all Fighter Jet with AI and it more improves rather then US fighter jet.
Seriously you called the magazine a clip! So many inaccuracies in this video!
Out of all the inaccuracies, that is the one you're worried about? Lol
@@rayzerot It is the most basic information how can you get that so wrong.
War is inevitable but this type of war will be decided by nuclear capabilities…..
As you said on paper China are paper
15:43 this is clearly a mistake to show the Abrams are fastere then the Tipe 99 but says the opposite
the average speed of a Chinese tank is... broke down.
The Beatles forever ♾️
Um, that was a magazine, not a "clip".
Well comparing the Javelin to its Chinese counterpart. If it weighs the same as the Javelin but has a bigger warhead, where did the Chinese scrimp to save weight? Tube thinner, electronics shaky mounted.
China can't just buy soldier experience. So even if weapons and equipment are the same, China falls short.
No rifles in the video use “clips”. They use magazines!
Jeesus can't you use metrics ?
We prefer lbs of Big Mac per unit of freedom bullet around here
convert it yourself. you do t need to be spoonfed.
US and China did fought before. During the Korean War and some part during the Vietnam War. The only thing that prevent these two countries goes full out War is. Nuclear War, which country will be the one who started?
Schrodinger's China lol. On one hand, imperialist China is supposedly aggressively provoking and invading its neighbors while on the other hand they're lacking actual combat experience since 1979.😂
Incorrect the Abram’s uses a 120mm not a 105
Perfect Voice
If the J20 was a perfect copy of the F35 then it would have the same bad design flaws as the F35. It gives the thumbnail a new meaning for “bad copy”
The J-20 is not a fifth gen aircraft.