Why The US Navy Wants BATTLESHIPS Again (Compilation)
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- 00:00 Why The US Navy Wants BATTLESHIPS Again
15:36 Incredible Reasons Why US Navy Aircraft Carriers are Almost Impossible to Sink
26:58 British SAS Soldiers vs US Navy SEALs - Military Training Comparison
33:20 Aircraft Carrier Comparison: Chinese Type 001A VS The US Ford Class Carrier - Army / Navy Comparison
43:05 Why China Can Finally Defeat the US Navy
52:18 US Navy vs US Marines - What's The Difference & How Do They Compare? - Army / Military Comparison
58:29 Did the US Navy Actually Teleport a Ship?
1:08:02 US Navy SEAL Team 6 vs Delta Force - Who Would Win / Military Comparison
1:19:14 The US Secret Underwater Spy Technology - The US Navy's SOSUS
1:29:30 US Navy Must Do This to Defeat Chinese in War
1:39:45 US Coast Guard vs Navy - What's the ACTUAL Difference? (Military Comparison)
1:51:20 US Navy "UFO Patents"
1:58:39 US Navy vs British Royal Navy - Army / Military Comparison
2:06:53 US Air Force vs US Navy - Who Would Win? (Military Comparison)
2:19:36 US Navy SEALS vs Russian Spetsnaz - Special Forces Comparison
2:41:55 Why US Navy Is Terrified of China's New Submarine
2:53:58 The First US Navy SEAL
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► czcams.com/users/theinfograp...
🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► / theinfographicsshow
Discord ► / discord
Facebook ► / theinfographicsshow
Twitter ► / theinfoshow
💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
www.theinfographicsshow.com
📝 SOURCES:
All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.
Our Secret Weapon for growing on CZcams ➼ vidiq.com/theinfoshow/
3 hour infographics video on Battleships? Answer: Yes.
Except the majority of the video isn't about battleships, but general naval assets lol
@@Halicet yeah...🥲
This is an AI generated script.
@@dherman0001 that's exactly what I thought too!
how are large ship navys fairing in the black sea post age of drone combat?
Im a 38 yr old man, so why do i get giddy as a schoolboy when thinking about battleships, Aircraft Carriers, Jets and guns?!
Simple. It make big boom
'Cause 'Merica
Honestly because it’s hella awesome homie
Trick question.
No matter how old we get…boys will be boys. Farts are always funny and things that go boom are always cool!!
Former Sosus Operator in the mid Seventies. Fairly accurate telling, so much more went on, the Illustration’s however are too simplified to rate for accuracy. It was a boring repetitive watch string, until we tracked a target, then things actually got exciting. We even were able to plot the courses of enemy targets. Pre- computer era; but it was starting up. Salute to all the Vets and active-duty folks. Ocean Systems Technician Petty Officer GTGibbs.
( The cover story for our rate was;Oceanographic Research Technician, they lied to us to get us to sign us up. And only told us the truth. On the first day of “A” School.
for the most inaccurate info on the military , infographics never fails
Even in the different sections on this video, they contradict their facts. Example, one section stating aircraft carriers have a classified speed over 30 knots "and believed to be 50 knots", then 2 minutes later saying top speed of 36 knots. As prior USN, I think I picked out at least 20 pieces of bad info by the 30 minute mark.
@@aradyngaming6263 yeah i know aye
yep. It is good to turn on in the background to initiate deep, deep sleep. Those looking for an education need to seek knowledge elsewhere.
Lol honestly if you want some educational content watch licensed professors or mark Felton 😂
Forgotten weapons
The chieftain
David Fletcher
Bc tank Jesus is yes
And there's quite a few more just check for the "licenses of practice" and you will be fine 😂
P.s
If you reading knows what a license of practice is I don't have to explain this to you
So
beyond that hope you have a good day good luck to you and may you find peace in your domain thnx for reading my long comment X3
But for people who do not know what a license of practice is ,
it is when a person going into a field of study such as psychology for example,
And gain enough knowledge in college to earn a license to practice or use their knowledge in the field legally
but you can only do so if you have a license that allows you to do it , if the person you're watching doesn't have a license for any field that they're talking about it's probably best to not listen to them 100% 😂
Also countries are developing hypersonic missiles just for aircraft carriers. DengFeng etc
i like how the graphics in the beginning of video have the battleship moving in reverse
Its the camera catching up and passing the said ship.. You can tell because the waves start passing at a much faster rate..
Uh, correction. USS Missouri and USS Wisconsin were the two battleships in Desert Storm, which were classified as Iowa-class battleships because Iowa was the first one created. Iowa was never in Desert Storm.
The New Jersey shelled Druze Militiamen in Lebanon in 1984.
🤓
@@juliodyarzagaray desert storm was 1991.
@@xiaoka I know. This wasn't Desert Storm. This was Lebnon 1984 in retaliation for Hezbollah's suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine and French army barracks. The New Jersey was brought back before the Missouri and the Wisconsin and actually used in combat in the Middle East first.
NO IT Was Not
When are you going to continue the "I survived X days of the invasion" series? We NEED to know how it ends!
Yes, please
Try stopping 16 inch volleys with CIWS. Excalibur-type guidance could also be adapted for 16 inch projectiles, and probably laser guidance too.
Excalibur uses GPS
@@pottyputter05 Yes. It does.
There's a sayin in military aviation: If you get close enough to the enemy to engage in a dogfight, something has gone SERIOUSLY wrong. The ship launching the 16 inch volley is not going to get within firing range of most targets - and it doesn't have enough top armour to protect against inbound missiles which can actively target soft spots
Try getting in range with 16in guns when your enemy has antiship cruise missiles
More importantly 16 inch shells can be replenished at sea! Missiles, especially v.l.s. launch Missiles have to be replenished pier side.
It’s also worth noting that our understanding of trajectories has only increased over time as well meaning there are ways to provide better accuracy with a bullet then there was decades ago.
I made the mistake of getting lost on Ft. Bragg in 1992 on National Guard duty while driving a deuce and a half by myself which was already against orders but I was late to Guard duty and had to make the drive by myself. I pulled up to the wire at the guard shack to ask for directions and was on on my face before I knew what happened with many a muzzle pointed at me. My commander had to come get me. I had no idea I just pulled into Deltas kingdom. The fence with razor wire and worn in humvee tracks inside it, in the middle of a fenced in area is there for a reason. Back then anyone could drive on base no questions asked in most areas.
I think the reason they're going to go ahead and introduce these analog systems again. Are they are going to use emp.
EMPs? Military equipment is hardened forever now. Maybe not all. Yet much of it is for the exact reasons you fear.
Remember we went haywire with Nukes and nuclear strategy back during the Cold War. We legit thought any war would be a nuclear one.
Electromagnetic pulse, Fry's electronic systems efficiently. If they start using that all that push button warfare and guidance system stuff goes to the toilet.
You cannot hack an analog system is the main reason
Or are Smart Enough To Know It Can be Used Against Them
Today’s technology like the electromagnetic gun and laser on an auto or remote battle ship!! The US will never concede the sea to China numerous ship. We will fight inside shade of their defense zone.
the voice actor is very iconic
I think the voice actors in the AI.
Bring back the Montana Class and the 18" Guns. With Gluide and Excalibur technology.
Never exactly built the Montana, but yeah, a modern version of one would be nice to have one or two of those.
Iowa class, not, Montana and it was 16" (406) guns.
@@brandonlevy8680 I am aware of the Iowa class, Montana Class development was mothballed in lieu of the aircraft carrier. The US once fielded the 18"/48 caliber Mark 1 naval guns. So no correction needed thanks
@@gforce0311 you said "bring back". Which means it was once around and it wasn't. It never made it past the drawing board. So yeah. Correction needed.
@@gforce0311 , never built . So never mothballed.. the design was shelved .
I read once that when the New Jersey was off the coast of Lebanon, some of our Marines were taking artillery or large caliber mortar rounds from an adjacent ridge from their position so they called for naval gunfire support from the New Jersey on the ridge from where they were receiving insurgent fire. So the New Jersey unleashes some volleys from their 16" rifles on the offending position. So New Jersey radios hey Marines did that suppress the fire from the ridge? The Marines answered, yea roger New Jersey, except there's not a ridge there anymore lol!
That Is A Battlewagon for you
USS Wisconsin was the last Battleship to see combat, the USS Iowa was decommissioned by Desert Storm
The mysterious unspoken threat the Zumwalt destroyers were not fully capable of destroying? I'm going to go out on a limb and say that would be submarines.
the cost of operating these ships
One thing to note is, that an Ticonderoga class missile cruiser is a quarter of the size of an Iowa class. If you took like a container ship... filled it with MK41 VLC, you could probably hold more than 1000 missiles..
At the very least have 100+ Harpoons in disguised containers.
@@Stellar001100That is actually kind of the design philosophy of the danish frigates. That things come in "container" modules so you can basically tailor the ships for the mission at hand. In reality its a lot more complicated, as you would need to have multiple different container modules and it takes a long time to reconfigure a ship etc. but it is a thing non the less.
Seems like a great job for unmanned submersible gun ships.
Imaging a “boat” surfacing 6-8 miles off shore, touting large, auto loading guns, dumping 60-100 rounds onto targets.
Then slips below the surface. Retreats and is reloaded.
There are countermeasures against missiles. There is none for line of site weapons like guns. When I was in, they developed guided 8 inch shells.
Of course there's a counter for guns. Not be in range of them, throw up a smoke screen, let the sub support sink said gunship, air support. If you have to close in for guns, mistakes have already been made.
No true. Artillery shells can be intercepted.
For every like I’ll do 5 pushups
We got 5, jffjfhfurffuguf nchfhf cfhhd dhdhdj. 5.. going once.. going twice!!!!!
liked this so much i subbed :D
Iowa was not the final battleship to see combat. Missouri and Wisconsin were the two deployed to Desert Storm. Iowa had already had her number two turret center gun blow out.
The most effective Armor made by the US and UK is Chobham Armor, now, Imagine a battleship made with Chobham armor. Even if a Anti-ship missile made to the battleship it would likely do insignificant damage. and I think if 16 inch artillery shells meant for Battleships are still in stockpile, something I highly doubt, then it would be to America's advantage to update and redesign the massive guns to modern standards with more powerful explosives and also incorporate Excalibur technology into the shells to make them significantly more accurate and able to track moving targets. Plus there are already experiments being conducted to incorporate Ramjet engines into artillery shells (the XM1155 program) which would incorporate long range capabilities into artillery shells and combined with Excalibur smart technology into those shells a new Battleship could send special shells far from being within enemy reach and still do serious damage to and sink enemy aircraft carriers, battleships, submarines and supply vessels without ever endangering itself. If I could have any influence in this kind of project I think I could generate a Battleship that would be virtually unsinkable, and be an enemy navy's worst nightmare. Plus still be able to go broadsides with any of the world's battleships and come out on top with barely a scratch, send the crew out with some fresh paint to repair the only thing damaged in battle, the hull's paint scheme, and markings.
Accuracy by Volume
We had accuracy and volume
31:38 Also colt ar-15 is NOT an automatic rifle. The Navy uses M-16's and M-4's. ( AR stands for ARmalite.)
Exactly Right BUT YOU CAN NOT TELL THAT TO A DEM !!
If you really want to be technical, the M16 and M4 are AR-15's. The XM16 was based off of the AR15 which was designed specifically for the Army to create a new weapon to replace the M1 Carbine. It didn't make it, so Armalite released it to civilian while Colt reworked it for military usage, which was later accepted.
Awesome video.
I don’t pit brother against another brother, unless they’re in a bar they’re all equally insanely trained and equally capable of handling their missions❤😂
I love these videos and want to see them all!
Bring back the battleships with railguns instead of cannons.
Tri system railguns with a multi system 10 terawatt DE targeting systems.. CIWS an Sparrow for secondary defense systems
that would just be worse, you lose all the benefit of cannons for the ability to poke tiny holes in the biggest vehicles on earth.
I live where the are testing the actual rail gun... The thing is loud and can be heard from a distance. It's an absolute wonder weapon
World of Warships dropped the ball on not sponsoring this video.
Contrary to infographics, the BB’s were not brought back for shore bombardment needs, rather b/c Reagan committed to a 600 ship navy & so many of our cruisers were retiring & building capacity could not fulfill needs, so it was decided to bring the Iowas out & modernize as “real big” missile cruisers, with 16” guns indeed, but also armor sides & deck that could still take absorb significant damage.
Modern battle ship would go crazy
one of the most important parts from the wilderness training for SAS is memory. You will be asked to tell the trainers how many trees in an area or what colour a bridge was something like that. If you fail to answer these you are immediately expelled.
reminded me of Robert De Niro
in Ronin 🙂
That’s not true
It looks like you have your Zumwalt-class destroyer sailing backwards.
Whatever happened to that Swedish submarine that "sunk" the us carrier in war games, I think they went undetected too
Ha Ha, Yeah I Heard About that
I mean, Space Battleship Yamato foretold this!
Star Blazers!
I want them back but modified a bit, bigger, better, more hightech, imagine it having 100 tomahawks
And railguns. Nuclear generator is just about the only thing we have that could power them.
Just need to create a barrel that can hold up. Currently they're good for 1-3 shots before they are trash. They are hugely expensive too.
If the kitty hawk can take all that and float, without the support of a crew, I'd be amazed to see what the Ford could take!
Someday we will
When are the challenge videos coming back we all miss those and the I survived nuclear war series
VERY NICE VIDEO 🇺🇸 👍 🙂
Before anyone brings up the sub section of the video and mentions the recent RN Sub missile launch fiasco. Can I remind you the vessel and crew (British) performed flawlessly.....The Polaris missile on the other hand............
A shell is very hard to hit with plane or missle. So the battle ship can be needed and the shells cost less.
Devgru actually offers services for military and civilians…,let say you think you have what it takes to be a seal…, they have civilian courses, and many operators already apart of Jsoc also can and do receive training from Devgru programs…, they are the ROTC of the jsoc world. Other branches special missions groups also have similar but lesser known programs.
nice
Love your content!!! 🚢
It's not Colorado, it's Coronado. You know, at the beach, near the ocean. Where the Navy Seals operate.
You didn’t mention the F 35 with the aircraft carrier, I’m pretty sure you left a lot more than that out then that highly capable for offensive defense that’s my thoughts
Yeah Ford is so complex that she likely skipped 5 or 10 generations in carrier tech. Usually they include a new system or 2 to work out with a new ship. With ford they developed and improved 23 systems. Thats why it took so long and went way over budget.
Can the salvos from the battleship be retrofit with jdam?
Battleships would be the only reason for me to cross-rate to a surface sailor
Forget battleships, they need more subs
And the first salvo fired from the second turret on the Iowa blew itself to smithereens killing everyone in it.
Sweet
I am 48, have developed cold asthma and feel a bit out of shape put fun to know I can still meet the requirement for a navy seal. A bit hard now but when I did my military service in the Swedish military it would have been very easy. Well i did beat my whole regiment for the running back then.
There's alot more than running requirements 😂 technically at age 48 you don't even meet the age requirement so what are you talking about 😂
45:30 has some pretty entertaining graphics.
It is like explosive minigun sat close range vs snipers at close range
I hate when I watch that other copycat channel of yours thats really low effort and does zero research, thinking its your video. Good content again, thanks!
The zumwalt was suppose to give us something like a modern day battleship. However, the technology just isn’t quite there yet. I’m sure we are still trying to perfect the zumwalt main weapon system.
The Missouri was also in combat in the first gulf war
the 16 inch guns can fire a 8 inch saboted rocket assisted perjectal they tested this at NWC China lake back during the vietnam these had a range of 90 miles.
Once the round gets above enough of the atmosphere, wind resistance is very low.
New concept "optionally crewed arsenal ship"
Newport News shipbuilding thank you
Interesting
I think battleships will be superior if they make the shells smart, just like what they have in their howitzers
just like the russins able to shoot missiles from the barrel of their tanks so can battleships
Battleship vs Houthis. perfect.
For land targets missiles compared to battleship shells are way more expensive.
P what about this has anything to do with the military wanting new battleships
1.5 miles in 11 minutes for the seals is nuts. I hear most guys can do it in 10.5. crazy
Why are many of the ships in this video moving backwards?
Your information and content are good. The narrator maintains a consistent and intelligible pace thats easy to follow, but the "graphics" are childish and cheesy.
How does the F in SCIF mean 'space'? Who was the brains behind that idea?😂
The F stands for facility, Infographics while entertaining, gets things wrong a lot. Not massively wrong, but little details here and there.
For explosive power and with the new tech in radar these ships will be almost unstoppable. They probably have missiles and some of the other modern weaponry. Nuclear engines? That I believe with these ships that is needed. What do you think? Of the 3 huge guns with 3 cannons each and just only having 2 huge guns. The 1 huge gun will be replaced with missiles.
Mysterious threat : militia boat carrying a nuclear warhead tipped torpedo. One where the boat launching does not even know they are launching a nuke at the enemy naval target.
Carrier groups are vulnerable to nuclear strike, so that would be a true vulnerability to the strength of US carrier groups (and Chinese or Russian carrier groups). Kinda like hand grenades.. you don't have to hit the target with a nuke... you just need to get it close.
@@HalicetHorseshoes and hand grenades. “close is good enough” 😂
battleship Texas with 12' GUNS has been just recently restored.
What happened to the Rail Gun?
The USS Missouri (BB-63) was the last Iowa class battleship that saw action in the Gulf
The uss Wisconsin was the last one to fire a shot in anger.
The USS MISSOURI fired the first shots of the Gulf War
She did. She also fired 783 16 inch rounds and 28 tomahawk missiles compared to Wisconsin’ 319 16 inch shells and 24 tomahawk missiles. Both ships played a pivotal role in convincing the Iraqis that the us was going to launch a amphibious invasion thus forcing the to divert vast military resources for a invasion that never came.
Guided shells would be a game changer
Ok the ASVAB scores max out at 150 so i dont know how you get a 220. The AFQT score is a percentile so it maxes at 99. Not sure where they got that info from.
I've noticed that you keep making ships move backwards.
The Navy is now perfecting missile re-supply at sea. This is a game changer.
Next to pop up are drone launching ships
Our Navy should never be without!!
Seals usually involved water but post gwot they have a counter terrorist group besides regular seals closer to delta the true difference is one needs the navy ones a fully contained unit that has its own intel logistics etc etc
"Why? Because other places have oil or something? Idk. Video over." -canadian
"Boring and overall not needed....just like canada." - real countries
It's going to be a Dawgy Dawg world.
Why not do a hybrid Battleship / submarine
Another thing once everyone is out of missiles shoot we still have the 16inch
a battleships with the latest tech largest size and right build would dominate the seas as a modern battleship with as many rail guns as an old battle ships regular cannons would be devastating to enamies. I'm sure there would be many other ultra modern systems they would possess to survive.
fancy carrier vs tactical nuke .. game over
FLAK vs drones. Go!
why? they are sent in numbers with your aircraft carriers, so why not deploy more?
It’s funny seeing ships sailing backwards.
Battleships are fantastic mobile artillery that's why.
You are wrong about the explosive charges in missiles versus bursting charges in battleships shells. Most battleship shells had a bursting charge of less than 100lb. Most surface to surface missiles have warheads of at least 500lb. The damage battleship shells did was due to their weight and momentum not the bursting charge.
We wouldn't need unguided shells if we just manufactured systems that we already paid to develop. This would drop the price of guided munitions much closer to where it should be. Like for example why are we developing new land attack missiles that we cant afford when we already have ones that work great that we could be making more of them wich would drastically drop the overall cost.
sir why would you need guided shells to bombard dudes in a trench.
A secure scif? Is that trunps bathroom?
Too change them into huge anti drones shields
I mean having 12 16inch guns that can devistate anything is crazy
Makes me wanna play world of Warships lol
So like… why has no one made sailing drones? If an aircraft carrier just had swarms and swarms of explosive drones that could protect it, whether it be in the air from missiles or from smaller boats on the water, imagine adding an emp to those drones. I wonder if an emp burst could knock out a missile’s tracking capability and increase the chance of it missing. They’re cheap and have proven to be quite reliable as of late.
Naval drones are a thing if that's what you're referring to. Estonie is notoriously working on unmanned boats and recently, a Russian ship was sunk by a Ukrainian unmanned suicide boat.
@@AJVD2123 yeah I’m thinking swarms are the next threat instead of smaller boats, drones go crazy. Ships need to have like a couple emp bursts that disperse around them if they wanna take out mass swarms but even then, if they were sent out in constant waves it could be quite problematic.
@@da_mitchello2815 Defence communities have known for a very long time that the main threat to any counter-measure has always been saturation. And with the advent of drones and other unmanned systems, it has become easier, safer and cheaper than ever to saturate extremely expensive pieces of hardware. It's something that is revealing a new challenge for modern military thinkers. We can no longer use missiles valued at several million dollars to intercept drones that barely cost a fraction of that. Especially if they send enough to completely overrun our defences.
Yeah, but what about all the collateral damage?