FMS A6M ZERO hot ESC fix Next Flight with RadioLink Gyro RC plane
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- LINK to my Fitting a Radio Link gyro - • Radiolink Byme-A Fligh...
LINK to my unbox & Build - • FMS A6M ZERO V2 800MM ...
LINK to my Airbrushing this beautiful bird - • How to Airbrush RC Pla...
The A6M Zero was a long-range fighter aircraft operated by the Imperial Japanese Air Service. In early combat operations, the Zero gained a legendary reputation as a 'dogfighter' remaining king of the air until around 1943. The aircraft was designed with long range and performance in mind, durability and pilot protection were not considered priorities and this led to many very good pilots to loose their lives. Ultimately this resulted in an Allied advantage later in the war.
Affiliate product LINK www.banggood.com/FMS-A6M-ZERO...
RadioMaster TX16s Affiliate LINK www.banggood.com/RadioMaster-...
Thanks for Watching
Like comment subscribe
Very nice build and very nice flying. Your channel has me wanting to be a better pilot. I recently destroyed an 880mm P51 because of a bad receiver/gyro combo that killed a new plane. I repaired it, and with the Byme A gyro and separate new receiver, it flew flawlessly. but the previous crash damage from the maiden, rendered the fuselage not air worthy. The same day I crashed a 64mm F22 because I assigned the wrong switch for the gyro in the transmitter. The F22 launched and flew perfectly, I was doing great, until I realized that I had NO GYRO and was flying raw. I panicked, I tried to bring it back in one peice but a quick low speed Uturn stalled it and it fell like a stone. Long story short, I will practice being more meticulous about my builds and how I program my radio. This is what your channel has taught me.
Another 'stunning' video. Keep up the great content 💪
Thanks for comment its a great hobby
Excellent flight!
Thanks for stopping by
looking good mate. zero is next on my list.
Yes I like the look and shape
Nice flight!! The thrust angle of your motor is precisely where it should be ! If it wasn't, the plane would not have flown as well as it did . I thought I had the same problem with my Parkzone F4F Wildcat, until I enquired about it ! Parkzone told me that"s the way it was designed and that was not a problem !!
Ok good to know different brands have different thrust angles thanks
Nice flight my guy . I cant wait for those 70mm edf flights
Thanks for the Inspiration
@@blowy48flyrc I know you can do it . get the e-flite habu rtf and I promise its all over from there . 💪
at 7:32, when a scale looking prop is used, instead of an E prop, Performance is being Sacrificed for LOOKS. when the model is sitting STILL.!
Hi friend, I am building one for me, with 70cm wingspan and is weighing 320gr / 11,29oz with a 3s 850mah lipo in the nose. How much weighs yours? Nice warbird!
I have 800mm f4u corsair, running on 2200mah 3s, great planes, I get to fly over 10 min. Planing to put flaps and retracts and planing to get p51 soon I would like to see your review on p51, also I was wondering how big is the battery hatch on zero, I plan to run 4s on those 800mm after changing motor and esc, do you think 4s will fit in zero ?
That is is big battery our Hking Corsair has a very small battery bay and just tryed I 4cell 1300 in zero and it doesn't fit
@@blowy48flyrc Hey Thank you for trying that ! Yea I had to do some carving on the f4u canopy to fit 2200mah
@@justeamx yes a lot of the 750mm 800mm planes need extra weight so good idea
information. at 5:48, imo, an electric power system does not need any thrust offset. when a manufacturer chooses to utilized certain design features and seems to have an explanation for doing so, that does Not make it an OPTIMAL design choice. this method (using negative aoa at the motor to cause positive aoa at the wing) Results in a less-than optimal thrust Line. this is true, because, the thrust Line Should be, roughly parallel to the center line and it Should Intersect the place where the c-m is Supposed to be located.! (c-m is center of mass.) yes. these rules are not absolute; there are occasions when this intersection is not present. in such cases, the dom can, to a degree, be tuned for 'a best flying result'. (dom is distribution of mass.) one of the points being made here is, it is not wise to Assume that a designer/manufacturer of a kit/model has made No mistakes. every time that the wing of a scale model has a scale profile, a Mistake Has been made.! googletranslate
As a beginner I have had problems with thrust caused from crashing a lot thanks for your comment