thanks youtube for suggesting me this, as a high command member of a multi-trillion military organization, I will definitely look into buying this particular vehicle
Just check your local ordnance laws; iirc i heard a story about a ssgt who almost bought an lav, but he wasnt allowed to park it anywhere due to parking laww.
Sweden has an AMAZING defence industry. The Saab Gripen, stealth diesel-electric subs capable of silently wiping out entire carrier groups and now the CV90. I wonder how such a small country is able to design and build such impressive weapons systems.
@@bigjo66 One falsehood , meteor missile wouldnt be existing if the americans would have shared their weapons. And since its built like a smart phone , you can use any weapon on it.
@@bigjo66 are you referring to the partnership they madewhith bae whilst trying to market the plane? Or do you know of some development they were involved in?
Sorry but Gripen is a poorman's Typhoon, it's subsystems and weapons are not indigenous (usually found on Typhoon first before a variation is made for Gripen). Sweden may have great engineers but their defence industry is not fully sovereign (e.g. owned by BAE) and reliant on others.
I'm not that well-versed in the Warhammer lore, but, isn't the Imperium of Man AGAINST technological innovation and science? The CV90 is well-known to be advanced and high-tech compared to other IFV's, and this vehicles is literally everything that the Imperium abstains from when it comes to weaponry.
The CV90MkIV is a kick-ass vehicle that should be widely used by allied nations. I am especially impressed by how the engineers kept its size/weight to a minimum, excessive size and weight being the bane of all other current designs. Everyone else is trying to build a new IFV, but they're all actually just designing a medium tank that holds half a squad of soldiers as an afterthought. No IFV will ever be able to go head-to-head with an actual tank, and should not be designed to "sort of" be able to do so...trying to do that just ruins the design and is counterproductive to the original idea that an IFV should bring soldiers to the fight, in relative safety, with some ability to protect itself from less-serious threats.
@@roformer813 Interesting! Do you remember what kind of Leo 2s were participating and how far they could detect the vehicles with their thermals? I am trying to figure out if the A6s will be able to outrange Russian tanks with thermals.
@@roformer813 Thanks for the reply man. Much apreciated! You see I Was watching another youtube channel (blinkovs battleground.) His channel provides well rounded Information and opinions about military topics. About the Situation of tanks in ukraine he stated that leopard has a shorter thermal detection tange than an Upgrades variant of the T-72. I think thats easily disproven...
@@roformer813 it is super interesting stuff for me! This kind of Information is better than my usual doomscrolling! You see, I myself am a pacifist, but my mindset is only possible because people like you are defending the part of the world i live in. In a way I am soaking up all the Information available to get an opinion independently from mass Media.
Why you are so sure that Ajax is waste of £ ? , designing own IFV have advantages , CV90 was made for Swedish army and for Swedish terrain and Swedish army needs , Ajax will fit UK army , I know Poland plan to buy replacement for BMP1 , and CV90 was one of the option there was panned even light tank on this platform PL-01 but there was one issue , CV 90 cant swim was , so Poland start to design own Badger (Borsuk) IFV , that fit Polish needs and tactics . en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL-01 pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/BWP_Borsuk
@@cookiesupervisor2211 The vibration and noise levels make it impossible to use. And it cost £4 billion. I think we should consider that a waste. Still, i'm sure GDLS made the bank managers of the people who chose Ajax very happy.
Why we choose ajax over this gem i will never know. It was in production, can handle cannons larger than 40mm and was owned by bae... sighh... gg Westminster.
@Leslie Dodds So Boris govt is to blame for a vehicle that was ordered in 2010? Ok then. Mind you, the rest of your post is barely legible nonsense as well.
Loved your video on CV90! Now with 2 new customers - Czechs and Slovaks getting 400+ mk4 combined. Svk getting 35mm and Czechs 30mm most likely. CV90 won in all categories in Slovak trials besides logistics, where Lynx was better. Surprisingly more expensive and much heavier Lynx that was offered had worse mine protection (Stanag3b vs 4 on CV90)
Even the older steel track versions are far quieter from the front than an almost 30 ton vehicle has any right to be... /got chased by a CV9040 company while riding a Tgb11 and on foot during conscript training in 2004 ;)
@@detectivepatchouli8266 In warthunder it doesnt have its magnificent engine sound tho, that straight piped v8 is most beautiful engine sound I have ever heard.
I think you meant the Puma which is only 50% made by Rheinmetall. Claimed to have the best protection, the best technology and in a very transportable package. Yet it uses electronics on par with your dad's PS2, has black&white screens, poor situational awareness thanks to its all-camera system and early gen unmanned turret and even after a decade it is still riddled with bugs to fix.
@@willyvereb I don't know, it's hard to say from the video if it's the Puma or the Lynx. Still I agree that the Puma is riddled with problems. Not as much as the A.S.C.O.D. AJAX, but close. I think that the black and white screen were chosen because they are more durable in general and that the turret is a disaster, like it keeps jamming frequently. Now the German army wants to restart: make it so it holds a full squad, has a bigger cannon, active protection system, etc. At the same time they will have to upgrade theyr marder fleet as a stop gap measure. All this will end up doubling the budget and time required for the Puma, and most of this would have been solved if the German army just adopted the Lynx... What a genius move
@@willyvereb For German standards the Puma in 2000s becomes already obsolet for the modern war scenario. So Germans planned to build the Lynx using the technology of the Puma and the Boxer for eliminated the defects of the Puma. But the lynx is only for export market now because the Germans are busy with the French in the Main ground Combat System (MGCS) project.
@@CriscCiaddu Eh, I can see Rheinmetall using that to gain extra funds for the project but it's really more of "let's make something out of parts that is known to work". A fallback plan for the Puma's failure. In terms of concept the Lynx is a step back from the Puma. The thing is just that the Puma was built almost a decade ago and thought up even earlier so a lot of technology inside the vehicle is outdated. So I predict a long and costly upgrade process for the Puma which may result in replacing most of the vehicle with Rheinmetall parts.
@@SOUNDWAVEPR In f France we don't have problems and we are preparing a naval version of the CT40. The Integration problems that the UK have is their own issue.
I really appriciate the Danish CV90 to be in its desert camo and slat cage armor. It's a salute to what was achieved with the vehicle. Scandinavian power
GB MOD please take note. Perhaps it is time to apologise to BAE and beg for their original offer. A rebuilt factory on Tyneside to churn out a thousand of these in all variants, for the British Army. Ajax and Ares be damned to hades.
It's interesting how the focus is shifting with the times, as a respond to russias renewed focus on it's feared thermobaric artillery systems recently in Syria (TOS-1 "Buratino"). It is labeled as a sure exterminator of IFV's, but the CV90 is adapting. Also, this shows the positive aspects of a smaller signature, as a difference to the rather large Lynx and Ajax vehicles.
Similarly, General Dynamics and the US back in the 70s were scared that russia could launch a mass scale invasion and their single firing cannons would be deemed too slow and ineffective to stop them. So, eugene stoner made effectively, a large machine gun to kill tanks. Called the aries xm274 That was a very cool tech for its time mounting on the also very cool looking hstvl and himag
The sure exterminator is the 105mm guide munition that the BMP fires from a gyrostabilized turret main gun, with twice the distance of the TOW, while on the move and with a profile half the height of all these rolling barns.
@@MrSlavikman at least these barns have BILLs and SPIKES, not TOWs fyi. And they got more than enough survivability with that engine in the front and armor to resist actual 12.7s while the bmp is not 12.7 rated
I wonder what the mk.5 could bring. Non emitting range finding, Intra-platoon comms/datalink by light, RF-jammer seeking sensors and missile/gun aim, GPS independent location finding (Starnav + INS) maybe - all to make the vehicle ECM proof maybe? Cheers from a former armour infantry guy from the Netherlands.
Gen 5 or 6 will be an integrated drone command platform, with crewed wehicles commanding groups of unmanned drone wehicles. There is no need for a generationshift until then. Sadly the programming side is the main weakness at BAE Hägglunds. Unless they get the sales of this generation wehicles to fund further development, they will probably not rectify it. They are superior at the basic mechanical engineering though. This is the platform you want for peacekeeping operations for the next 10 years. For an active war though, the next war will be fought mainly with uncrewed wehicles, and with hacking to detect, jam, steal control or fool sensors being a major part of the operation. The CV90 is still a good platform for carrying your forward command-and-operations crew who service and control said drones, but will probably not be a front-line combatant.
Polska kończy system ,,topaz"". Połączenie artylerii i pojazdów lądowych i samolotów w jedno. Jeżeli ktoś zobaczy wroga wszyscy o tym wiedzą. Mamy system swój/obcy by nie było bratnich ostrzałów..stawiamy tez na pociski do dzial i mozdziezy,celowanych laserem.w razie wylaczenia GPS nadal dziala.moze podświetla zolniez z znacznikiem,bwp,dron.mniej amunicji do transportu.( tylko amunicja do mozdzierzy jeszcze jest projektowana i probowana)powracamy do termobarycznych pociskow..
People don't realize these videos aren't necessarily for buyers, but are also for prospective employees who see this and realize they want to work on systems like this and so they apply for a job.
Well I can promise you that snow mobility is second to none. I was stationed where they did extensive testing on the first version and it has improved since then and it is equal or better than a snowmobile.
3:48 as a tanker, seeing a turret rotating while a soldiers is standing in it's back that way gives me chills. Is this how they usually operate, or is it just for the video?
Yes, but there are electrical stops to ensure that the turret doesn't cut down the infantry in the back while the roof hatch is open /did basic training in the first generation of the cv90
@@wisdomseeker6804 In some countries they are. Some buyer nations (the Netherlands) have however completely opted out of having roof hatches for the seated infantry. The reason being that if the cv90 would be moving with the turret pointed perpendicular to the direction of travel and hits an obstacle like a tree, the infantry would still be cut down.
@@kk-gr3ly When retreating (or being flanked)...they are designed not to turn to rear at all. Not to mention that they do not swim at all, need always a rare huge slow 30 t bridge. Finnish war is in southeast, fuuuull of lakes, rivers. 😉
@@mattilatvala4164 Does the turret turn fully 360 degrees or is it just not recommended to do that? Does the troop compartment mess with the gun elevation or something?
I have been a CV90-35NL commander for years since they entered service. I have seen the upgrade for this model to come as close to this Mk4. One question... Where the F... do does the backpack going, that of the crew and the infantery... It is funny to have a ATGM and other gatgets... Who is gonna aim that thing what is taking up 'backpack-space'? Back in the day, I have send in an idea to give the commander an GPMG (FN MAG) and a mount for a PzF AT rocket launcher. Because, the way we fought with the CV90, we were too fast to use a IFV as a tank would 'saw' from position to hide. And the PzF on the mount would be just for the flash seconde. The infantery would do the tank hunting. That is why we were so fast... And when we located a tank, the infantery would kill it. Now we have crap all over the turret and everything is doomed to fail, and computers need their 20th reset for the day... Just give the commander its cupola with a MG and PzF. I think that would be simpel enough to work. Even by hand. But yeah... I send in 4 good idea's in, to improve the CV90-35NL in easy, mostly cheap, way's. Even safety stuff was among them... Never heard anything. That would probably be too good to be true I think.
In the lighter Swedish A & B-versions of the 9040 there was compartments for crew backpacks under hatches rear left of the turret. All other gear (for infantry) was carried by tracked non armoured vehicles (Bandvagn 206).
They don’t listen to the men who use them every day and know the vehicles inside and out marking all these vehicle to complicated if this stuff brakes I can’t be fixed without Civilian contractors out on the ground
The CV90MKIV is meant as an export vehicle for countries with specific doctrines. The military you served probably relied on infantry as tank-killers. But some countries would like to have extra fire power with the new ATGM because it can help them reduce the cost of adding additional MBT to the armored unit.
@@Jake-dh9qk I am aware of the Midlife Update of the Dutch CV90-35NL... And that is 'get as close to the Mk-4 as possible' I have no braindamage or other problems with thinking clear... I know my CV90-35NL stuff.
Don't want to ruin your spirit here, but BAE systems isn't Swedish. Far from it, actually. All Sweden (and other interest groups) is providing is a concept on what you wish in an update.
@@swedi3571 There is a section where the same discussion came up where I explained my point further. BAE Hägglunds might be Swedish but I dought that they will devolop already existing systems again just to say its Swedish. Things like Battlemanagementsystems, Firecontrolsystems, Active Protection Systems, Fire Prevention Systems are most likely licensed by BAE itself and lent/ purchased by Hägglunds to reduce coast. Even the ATGM with the camera guidance 6:24 is an Israeli weapon system. Vehicles of this capacity cannot be made by a Nation alone anymore. Germany is currently trying it with the Puma, but we all know how this is going. It's a way to expensive weapon suite that had so far 3 iterations before going into service. Currently, even this vehicle with his 25 in service is using the before mentioned Israeli ATGM for now (There are actually tests with an inhouse variant that has IFF capabilities). Getting to a point. It's a European product and that's fine. You can be proud of it. Swedish quality is the 40mm cannon and its ammunition. BOFORS did an excellent job on that.
Everyone knows that the Royal Army should have gone with the BAE CV-90 in the first place instead of the crappy AJAX made by the Santa Barbara plant of GDELS. It's a good thing that the upcoming Pandur II and ASCOD II armed with 105mm guns of the Philippine Army will be built in GDELS' Czech plant (Excalibur Army).
But can it's armour stop a RPG or IED? Will it need to be upgraded like other IFVs and will that push it over it's limits i'e' will it be to wide for train or to heavy for air?
There is no vehicle that can survive an IED. I've seen people die from IED's in a Leopard 2 (or rather the remains of a Leo2 someone got killed in), if the IED isn't big enough they just put more explosives in it. It's also no longer part of the current threats.
For some reason I wanna see a tank run gaming hardwares like motherboards, processors and etc. Then they can brag to their friends about their sick gaming build
"Yeah my PC has a 40 mike mike. It fires APFSDS and programable HE. It's kinda fast. Also it modular so i can add couple of ATGM's. And yes, it has full RGB. It's nko much but it's mine"
@@damianm-nordhorn116 I get that, but as an American, while I am quite fond of armored vehicles, i have neither the clout to get this adopted nor the funds to appropriate some for myself.
I love the CV 90 and was loving this video until 6:34 when I see a Stormartillerivagn M/43 is used as the target practis. Now I am sad becaus the M/43 belongs in a museum not as a targed. You should sell it to Norway so they can send it to Polen to be restored like the Panzer 3 they sent down.
At 2:14 am Eastern Time, on August 29th, 1997, Skynet becomes "self-aware" the Terminator tells us in his trademark Austrian drawl. After that, humans panic and try to pull the plug, so Skynet fights back.
Being neutral means not interfering in the wars of other countries. To be able to stay neutral during wars of world-scale requires a strong military to defend that neutrality. Look into how Switzerland stayed neutral in World War 2, it wasn't just politics.
Not neutral. We are a an Enhanced Opportunity Partner of NATO. We are a EU country. Plus; we signed the Treaty of Lisbon. So, no neutrality here. And we are happy about just that fact.
Swedish early versions (base 9040, A, & B) have been running coax KSP39 (~Browning M1919 from the 40ies) and newer versions have KSP58 (FN MAG) mounted on top (unsure of the coax capabilities there).
thanks youtube for suggesting me this, as a high command member of a multi-trillion military organization, I will definitely look into buying this particular vehicle
aint you the german kid from roblox?
@@bakedair1577 sarcasm these days
Just check your local ordnance laws; iirc i heard a story about a ssgt who almost bought an lav, but he wasnt allowed to park it anywhere due to parking laww.
Hail cobra
The invasion army from URanus?
So that's where all the RTX3000 series went.
I actually wanted them to say what GPU they are using. Really curious but my bet it is old designs
@@aceofhearts573 they’re an Intel derivative, other than that I know nothing about them
i am one of the victims. ;-) where is my asus rtx 3080 gaming tuf? well inside this tank. ;-)
@@patkorre3177 it’s not a tank
@@Muffinkakes1 it is a tank tho
Oh look, a new war thunder premium vehicle
Oh yes please, would throw money at Gaijin immediately.
I would buy
Consoomers gonna Consoom
lmao you actually called it
gaijin just dropped prem cv90 ifv for denmark in swedish tree
Sweden has an AMAZING defence industry. The Saab Gripen, stealth diesel-electric subs capable of silently wiping out entire carrier groups and now the CV90. I wonder how such a small country is able to design and build such impressive weapons systems.
evolution, you haven't been able to survive in the harsh north if you're stupid. Nordic population has the highest average IQ in the world.
Gripen was developed with co-operation from BAE, and it uses an American designed engine, American designed weapons.
@@bigjo66 One falsehood , meteor missile wouldnt be existing if the americans would have shared their weapons. And since its built like a smart phone , you can use any weapon on it.
@@bigjo66 are you referring to the partnership they madewhith bae whilst trying to market the plane? Or do you know of some development they were involved in?
Sorry but Gripen is a poorman's Typhoon, it's subsystems and weapons are not indigenous (usually found on Typhoon first before a variation is made for Gripen). Sweden may have great engineers but their defence industry is not fully sovereign (e.g. owned by BAE) and reliant on others.
I'm certain the God Emperor would highly approve of the MkIV mod.
Especially that camo
A morale boost indeed for those who offer their lives to hold the line in the name of our God Emperor!
Seems a good vehicle for The Death Korps!
He says it’s, “Pretty Dope.”
I'm not that well-versed in the Warhammer lore, but, isn't the Imperium of Man AGAINST technological innovation and science?
The CV90 is well-known to be advanced and high-tech compared to other IFV's, and this vehicles is literally everything that the Imperium abstains from when it comes to weaponry.
The CV90MkIV is a kick-ass vehicle that should be widely used by allied nations. I am especially impressed by how the engineers kept its size/weight to a minimum, excessive size and weight being the bane of all other current designs. Everyone else is trying to build a new IFV, but they're all actually just designing a medium tank that holds half a squad of soldiers as an afterthought. No IFV will ever be able to go head-to-head with an actual tank, and should not be designed to "sort of" be able to do so...trying to do that just ruins the design and is counterproductive to the original idea that an IFV should bring soldiers to the fight, in relative safety, with some ability to protect itself from less-serious threats.
I agree. Well said.
The bradly can and will go head-to-head with mbts
@@roformer813 Interesting! Do you remember what kind of Leo 2s were participating and how far they could detect the vehicles with their thermals? I am trying to figure out if the A6s will be able to outrange Russian tanks with thermals.
@@roformer813 Thanks for the reply man. Much apreciated!
You see I Was watching another youtube channel (blinkovs battleground.) His channel provides well rounded Information and opinions about military topics. About the Situation of tanks in ukraine he stated that leopard has a shorter thermal detection tange than an Upgrades variant of the T-72. I think thats easily disproven...
@@roformer813 it is super interesting stuff for me! This kind of Information is better than my usual doomscrolling! You see, I myself am a pacifist, but my mindset is only possible because people like you are defending the part of the world i live in.
In a way I am soaking up all the Information available to get an opinion independently from mass Media.
Why the British army doesn’t have this instead of wasting millions on the Ajax , someone got payed
Why you are so sure that Ajax is waste of £ ? , designing own IFV have advantages , CV90 was made for Swedish army and for Swedish terrain and Swedish army needs , Ajax will fit UK army , I know Poland plan to buy replacement for BMP1 , and CV90 was one of the option there was panned even light tank on this platform PL-01 but there was one issue , CV 90 cant swim was , so Poland start to design own Badger (Borsuk) IFV , that fit Polish needs and tactics .
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL-01
pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/BWP_Borsuk
@@cookiesupervisor2211 Ajax doesn't work.
Millions ? Try *BILLIONS !!!*
@@cookiesupervisor2211 The vibration and noise levels make it impossible to use. And it cost £4 billion. I think we should consider that a waste. Still, i'm sure GDLS made the bank managers of the people who chose Ajax very happy.
@@cookiesupervisor2211 I would say if it can deal with swedish terrain/deep snow. it can handle ALL TERRAINS.
I want this in my Swedish tech tree, Anton!
swedish quality! gosh that camo looks so fricking good..... proud to be a Swede
Bro you already lost the war. There wasnt even a shot fired.
@@bigboi7817
Are you brothers ?
Take that discussion over family dinner.
@@bigboi7817 so I lost a war because I like the camo? where are you from?
it is not a swedish anymore. BAE systems bought all your company's. Now it is a english IFV
that camo is from imported Czech Republic version, you can read about it at armored warfare game topics
Why we choose ajax over this gem i will never know. It was in production, can handle cannons larger than 40mm and was owned by bae... sighh... gg Westminster.
Money. An ever flowing money goround that’s purely there to line big business pockets and nothing to do with defending you and I.
@@tonkerdog1 Aussies positively screwed on their sub project.
And they are most important allied navy in the South Pacific.
But so incredibly woke.
@@slmyatt More important than Japan ? Hardly.
@@stevenjones916 Japan is in the south pacific?
@Leslie Dodds So Boris govt is to blame for a vehicle that was ordered in 2010? Ok then. Mind you, the rest of your post is barely legible nonsense as well.
i really do love military engineering. its so intresting to see how countries design and use different vehicles
CV90 FOR THE WIN!!! Love it!
Loved your video on CV90! Now with 2 new customers - Czechs and Slovaks getting 400+ mk4 combined. Svk getting 35mm and Czechs 30mm most likely. CV90 won in all categories in Slovak trials besides logistics, where Lynx was better. Surprisingly more expensive and much heavier Lynx that was offered had worse mine protection (Stanag3b vs 4 on CV90)
Even the older steel track versions are far quieter from the front than an almost 30 ton vehicle has any right to be...
/got chased by a CV9040 company while riding a Tgb11 and on foot during conscript training in 2004 ;)
i`ve been playing in War Thunder of this tank , any version of this tank is really solid good , especially the CVv90120 tho
@@detectivepatchouli8266 In warthunder it doesnt have its magnificent engine sound tho, that straight piped v8 is most beautiful engine sound I have ever heard.
@@detectivepatchouli8266 Did you really just think that war thunder translates to real life. No. Big No.
@@detectivepatchouli8266 CV is not a tank that is IFV!!
@@stanislavt6376 Its a tank. While its an IFV it also falls under the definition of a tank and a light tank.
This is a nice Infantry support/fighting vehicle. Im impressed with what has gone into the planning and engineering of this war fighting vehicle.
Vehicle .. Without that 'a' ;)
Yeah spell check,sorry.
I love how this video kept trowing little shades at the rheinmetall Lynx
I think you meant the Puma which is only 50% made by Rheinmetall. Claimed to have the best protection, the best technology and in a very transportable package. Yet it uses electronics on par with your dad's PS2, has black&white screens, poor situational awareness thanks to its all-camera system and early gen unmanned turret and even after a decade it is still riddled with bugs to fix.
@@willyvereb I don't know, it's hard to say from the video if it's the Puma or the Lynx. Still I agree that the Puma is riddled with problems. Not as much as the A.S.C.O.D. AJAX, but close. I think that the black and white screen were chosen because they are more durable in general and that the turret is a disaster, like it keeps jamming frequently. Now the German army wants to restart: make it so it holds a full squad, has a bigger cannon, active protection system, etc. At the same time they will have to upgrade theyr marder fleet as a stop gap measure. All this will end up doubling the budget and time required for the Puma, and most of this would have been solved if the German army just adopted the Lynx... What a genius move
@@revolverDOOMGUY Puma problems are a closed chapter. Ajax problems - I don't think they opened it entirely.
@@willyvereb For German standards the Puma in 2000s becomes already obsolet for the modern war scenario. So Germans planned to build the Lynx using the technology of the Puma and the Boxer for eliminated the defects of the Puma. But the lynx is only for export market now because the Germans are busy with the French in the Main ground Combat System (MGCS) project.
@@CriscCiaddu Eh, I can see Rheinmetall using that to gain extra funds for the project but it's really more of "let's make something out of parts that is known to work". A fallback plan for the Puma's failure. In terms of concept the Lynx is a step back from the Puma. The thing is just that the Puma was built almost a decade ago and thought up even earlier so a lot of technology inside the vehicle is outdated. So I predict a long and costly upgrade process for the Puma which may result in replacing most of the vehicle with Rheinmetall parts.
Could be much better choice than the current Ajax.
It could almost certainly fit the
CT 40
ct40 is a very compact design for its capability, and many of these bodies are designed to be able to receive different turrets
@@Sharpysaurus You say that it is prone to jamming so can you provide sources ?
Keeping the 35mm or going large with the 50mm, both already integrated into the turret would be better then the CT40.
@@polduran just search it up. CT40 is notorious for giving IFV crews a pain in the ass.
@@SOUNDWAVEPR In f
France we don't have problems and we are preparing a naval version of the CT40. The Integration problems that the UK have is their own issue.
I really appriciate the Danish CV90 to be in its desert camo and slat cage armor. It's a salute to what was achieved with the vehicle. Scandinavian power
Good work, gentlemen, perhaps I will see them in our Czech army
No matter which system they will end up with, they are all great IFVs
We hope so 👍🏻
As a Swede i must say that i am really proud of the CV 90 and Hägglunds.
GB MOD please take note. Perhaps it is time to apologise to BAE and beg for their original offer. A rebuilt factory on Tyneside to churn out a thousand of these in all variants, for the British Army. Ajax and Ares be damned to hades.
Take general dynamics to court and get the tax payers money back
@@akatheboy1071 MoD procurements are incompetent fools but General Dynamics are most certainly not. There will be a copout clause in the contract.
What a beauty. Sincerely hope it wins Czech army tender for new IFV(up against Lynx KF41 and ASCOD42)
The lynx is better.
Great, very informative vid. Perfect delivery of information. Thank you.
It's interesting how the focus is shifting with the times, as a respond to russias renewed focus on it's feared thermobaric artillery systems recently in Syria (TOS-1 "Buratino"). It is labeled as a sure exterminator of IFV's, but the CV90 is adapting. Also, this shows the positive aspects of a smaller signature, as a difference to the rather large Lynx and Ajax vehicles.
7
3وععععععععععقعاعغعڑڑصصغڑصصص
Similarly, General Dynamics and the US back in the 70s were scared that russia could launch a mass scale invasion and their single firing cannons would be deemed too slow and ineffective to stop them.
So, eugene stoner made effectively, a large machine gun to kill tanks. Called the aries xm274
That was a very cool tech for its time mounting on the also very cool looking hstvl and himag
The sure exterminator is the 105mm guide munition that the BMP fires from a gyrostabilized turret main gun, with twice the distance of the TOW, while on the move and with a profile half the height of all these rolling barns.
@@MrSlavikman at least these barns have BILLs and SPIKES, not TOWs fyi. And they got more than enough survivability with that engine in the front and armor to resist actual 12.7s while the bmp is not 12.7 rated
I wonder what the mk.5 could bring. Non emitting range finding, Intra-platoon comms/datalink by light, RF-jammer seeking sensors and missile/gun aim, GPS independent location finding (Starnav + INS) maybe - all to make the vehicle ECM proof maybe? Cheers from a former armour infantry guy from the Netherlands.
Probably something like the PL-01 concept also and being able to see what other vehicles can see by a push of a button on a monitor
Gen 5 or 6 will be an integrated drone command platform, with crewed wehicles commanding groups of unmanned drone wehicles. There is no need for a generationshift until then. Sadly the programming side is the main weakness at BAE Hägglunds. Unless they get the sales of this generation wehicles to fund further development, they will probably not rectify it. They are superior at the basic mechanical engineering though. This is the platform you want for peacekeeping operations for the next 10 years. For an active war though, the next war will be fought mainly with uncrewed wehicles, and with hacking to detect, jam, steal control or fool sensors being a major part of the operation. The CV90 is still a good platform for carrying your forward command-and-operations crew who service and control said drones, but will probably not be a front-line combatant.
Polska kończy system ,,topaz"". Połączenie artylerii i pojazdów lądowych i samolotów w jedno. Jeżeli ktoś zobaczy wroga wszyscy o tym wiedzą. Mamy system swój/obcy by nie było bratnich ostrzałów..stawiamy tez na pociski do dzial i mozdziezy,celowanych laserem.w razie wylaczenia GPS nadal dziala.moze podświetla zolniez z znacznikiem,bwp,dron.mniej amunicji do transportu.( tylko amunicja do mozdzierzy jeszcze jest projektowana i probowana)powracamy do termobarycznych pociskow..
Jag är stolt över er, fortsätt med det goda arbetet.
Sverige är bäst
People don't realize these videos aren't necessarily for buyers, but are also for prospective employees who see this and realize they want to work on systems like this and so they apply for a job.
Lets hope Canada picks this one for infantry fighting vehicule
Well I can promise you that snow mobility is second to none. I was stationed where they did extensive testing on the first version and it has improved since then and it is equal or better than a snowmobile.
I really like the camouflage scheme - but I'm not sure I can afford one
3:48 as a tanker, seeing a turret rotating while a soldiers is standing in it's back that way gives me chills. Is this how they usually operate, or is it just for the video?
Yes, but there are electrical stops to ensure that the turret doesn't cut down the infantry in the back while the roof hatch is open /did basic training in the first generation of the cv90
@@axelkarlsson9578 Thanks for the info. having those electrical stops makes sense. cheers
@@shubidubi2821 Glad to help :)
Actually those are standard procedures...
@@wisdomseeker6804 In some countries they are. Some buyer nations (the Netherlands) have however completely opted out of having roof hatches for the seated infantry. The reason being that if the cv90 would be moving with the turret pointed perpendicular to the direction of travel and hits an obstacle like a tree, the infantry would still be cut down.
already got my order in, can't wait to take it for a spin
Thank you for not disabling the comment section
Is that the Czech emblem at 06:43 on the sides of the turret? 🤔
It seems so, Czechia is testing the CV90, Lynx and ASCOD.
Yes, it is, this is the vehicle sent for Army tests to Czech republic. The whole paint-scheme was, AFAIK made for Czech Army.
Also czech lion on hull
@@davidskr4924 Oh, I thought it was a Halland lion :P
This video forgot to mention that the mid life upgrade for the Finnish used 101 CV9030s was announced in 23.6.21
Can we get now a really rotating turret? 🙂
@@mattilatvala4164 Is there somekinda problems with those turrets?
@@kk-gr3ly When retreating (or being flanked)...they are designed not to turn to rear at all. Not to mention that they do not swim at all, need always a rare huge slow 30 t bridge. Finnish war is in southeast, fuuuull of lakes, rivers. 😉
@@mattilatvala4164 Does the turret turn fully 360 degrees or is it just not recommended to do that? Does the troop compartment mess with the gun elevation or something?
@@kk-gr3ly I was told it is unable, by a senior top top top 😉 (armored/mechanized ) unit wartime commander.
Love that splinter camo pattern
I have been a CV90-35NL commander for years since they entered service.
I have seen the upgrade for this model to come as close to this Mk4.
One question...
Where the F... do does the backpack going, that of the crew and the infantery...
It is funny to have a ATGM and other gatgets... Who is gonna aim that thing what is taking up 'backpack-space'?
Back in the day, I have send in an idea to give the commander an GPMG (FN MAG) and a mount for a PzF AT rocket launcher.
Because, the way we fought with the CV90, we were too fast to use a IFV as a tank would 'saw' from position to hide.
And the PzF on the mount would be just for the flash seconde.
The infantery would do the tank hunting. That is why we were so fast... And when we located a tank, the infantery would kill it.
Now we have crap all over the turret and everything is doomed to fail, and computers need their 20th reset for the day...
Just give the commander its cupola with a MG and PzF. I think that would be simpel enough to work. Even by hand.
But yeah... I send in 4 good idea's in, to improve the CV90-35NL in easy, mostly cheap, way's. Even safety stuff was among them... Never heard anything.
That would probably be too good to be true I think.
I think your suggestions ended up in some durch army bureaucrats file archive without ever reaching someone who'd understand the suggestions...
In the lighter Swedish A & B-versions of the 9040 there was compartments for crew backpacks under hatches rear left of the turret. All other gear (for infantry) was carried by tracked non armoured vehicles (Bandvagn 206).
They don’t listen to the men who use them every day and know the vehicles inside and out marking all these vehicle to complicated if this stuff brakes I can’t be fixed without Civilian contractors out on the ground
The CV90MKIV is meant as an export vehicle for countries with specific doctrines. The military you served probably relied on infantry as tank-killers. But some countries would like to have extra fire power with the new ATGM because it can help them reduce the cost of adding additional MBT to the armored unit.
@@Jake-dh9qk
I am aware of the Midlife Update of the Dutch CV90-35NL...
And that is 'get as close to the Mk-4 as possible'
I have no braindamage or other problems with thinking clear... I know my CV90-35NL stuff.
this is awesome, definitely be picking this one up
Im sure we gonna make the best out of it!!! Big gratitude from Ukraine!!!
Swedish Quality 👌🏻
Don't want to ruin your spirit here, but BAE systems isn't Swedish. Far from it, actually. All Sweden (and other interest groups) is providing is a concept on what you wish in an update.
@@mad_villain8580 BAE Systems is british but the subsidiary, BAE Systems Hägglunds, the company developing the CV90 was made in Sweden.
@@swedi3571 There is a section where the same discussion came up where I explained my point further.
BAE Hägglunds might be Swedish but I dought that they will devolop already existing systems again just to say its Swedish. Things like Battlemanagementsystems, Firecontrolsystems, Active Protection Systems, Fire Prevention Systems are most likely licensed by BAE itself and lent/ purchased by Hägglunds to reduce coast. Even the ATGM with the camera guidance 6:24 is an Israeli weapon system. Vehicles of this capacity cannot be made by a Nation alone anymore. Germany is currently trying it with the Puma, but we all know how this is going. It's a way to expensive weapon suite that had so far 3 iterations before going into service. Currently, even this vehicle with his 25 in service is using the before mentioned Israeli ATGM for now (There are actually tests with an inhouse variant that has IFF capabilities). Getting to a point. It's a European product and that's fine. You can be proud of it.
Swedish quality is the 40mm cannon and its ammunition. BOFORS did an excellent job on that.
@@mad_villain8580 BAE Systems bought Hägglunds because of their expertise to make these kind of vechiles.
It's Swedish. It may have a foreign owner these days but the engineering, the R&D, manufacturing skills , build quality...all Swedish.
Ah love the CV90, keep it up BAE.
Beautiful beast!
By the Omnissiah, its beautiful!
I wish that AČR (the czech army, whose insignia is lion, a lion is on the side of this CV90) will buy this, it would be so great
there was a round flag symbol too on the turret.
Your wish has been granted.
I would like to thank the CZcams algorithm for showing me this video, I was looking for a new tank to put in my living room
Def buying this when my next paycheck comes in!
Everyone knows that the Royal Army should have gone with the BAE CV-90 in the first place instead of the crappy AJAX made by the Santa Barbara plant of GDELS.
It's a good thing that the upcoming Pandur II and ASCOD II armed with 105mm guns of the Philippine Army will be built in GDELS' Czech plant (Excalibur Army).
LOOKS BETTER THAN WHAT WE THE BRITISH ARE GETTING ALL SORTS OF PROBLEM S THANK FOR A LOOK AT WHAT WE WANT.
Constant shade thrown at Rheinmetall Lynx lmao.
Is Thermobaric protection a standard for these kind of vehicles?
The WWII Tiger tank actually had pretty good tactical mobility; strategically tho it was a nightmare. Great video, I'd love to buy some sneaky ifvs!
That was random least to say
Only one question remains; is it värdegrundscertifierad?
It is also miljöcertifierat and vegan.
svan-märkt IFV.
Rainbowwarriorhandheartgreta
3.35 what is that blue dots sensor?
That camouflage looks so cool
Why the hell is the MoD bothering with the Ajax/Ascod?
But can it's armour stop a RPG or IED?
Will it need to be upgraded like other IFVs and will that push it over it's limits i'e' will it be to wide for train or to heavy for air?
Well, look the video, and all your questions gets answered.
There is no vehicle that can survive an IED. I've seen people die from IED's in a Leopard 2 (or rather the remains of a Leo2 someone got killed in), if the IED isn't big enough they just put more explosives in it. It's also no longer part of the current threats.
Slovakia has now ordered 152 pieces 🇸🇰
Can't wait to see how much an upgrade pack will be
proud driver of this beast
For some reason I wanna see a tank run gaming hardwares like motherboards, processors and etc.
Then they can brag to their friends about their sick gaming build
"Yeah my PC has a 40 mike mike. It fires APFSDS and programable HE. It's kinda fast. Also it modular so i can add couple of ATGM's. And yes, it has full RGB. It's nko much but it's mine"
CV90 ist a masterpiece
1:38 lol is that the Lynx as a comparison in the background silhouette?
Yes not too subtle jab there haha.
And it won't deafen the occupants or shake them to death and can reverse over obstacles over 8 inches high unlike the UK's new AJAX 🤦
ah perfect, this is perfect for my daily use to the office.
Is it available in Warstock Cache & Carry? i might be interested
Im glad we (Czechs) decided for CV90 and it will be produced in Czech rep.
Gotta love how the basically called the warrior and Bradley aren't modern and puma and others are too thick
The warrior is dogshit wym
Do not ever call a "Puma" fat, they get very angry at You.
I think he called the Bradley fat too.
@@jakobholgersson4400 Americans dont deny their flab
@@jakobholgersson4400 Shot not, the comedy about its birth with Kelsey Grammer is perfect.
Congratulations for being picked by both Czechs and Slovaks!
Kan man få den i Volvo ocean blue? 😊👍🏻🇸🇪
Ukraine needs 1000 of these ASAP
There will never be such BMPs in Ukraine
5:59
This is where the best part begins
Everything from the visuals to the background music just oh so good
I had no idea Ukraina stretches from the Caucasus to Scandinavia. I hope BAE weapon systems are better than the map from 2:36
Map is from an old board game called RISK , so not a product made by BAE.
Even though the game is 40 years old , I can still recomend it :)
Love the paint job
Love the camo pattern.
I'll be sure to consider purchasing some if I'm ever head of a military organization CZcams.
Well, there are many Czechs around here commenting.
This ad might sneak into Czech military minds, deciders and those they're listening to as well.
@@damianm-nordhorn116 I get that, but as an American, while I am quite fond of armored vehicles, i have neither the clout to get this adopted nor the funds to appropriate some for myself.
I love the CV 90 and was loving this video until 6:34 when I see a Stormartillerivagn M/43 is used as the target practis. Now I am sad becaus the M/43 belongs in a museum not as a targed. You should sell it to Norway so they can send it to Polen to be restored like the Panzer 3 they sent down.
I frowned when I noticed that too. That poor old M43 should be in a museum :(
It really is a shame
Yes we should start a petition to save Sven. Sven is what I have named the M/43 :-)
How much does the new MKIV Cost?
And which Advantages does the Tank habe in comparison to a Train which I could afford as Well.
Can I have one for driving in Vancouver BC please?!!
Ok, using GPU's now... but the real question is - can you mine bitcoin on it?
Can it run Doom?
@@sw1nkz50 Well I guess if you don't mind weird controller... maybe NFS would be better?
@@Beneficiis Nope, Doom all the way
Are these on amazon?
Hell yeah a BAE-Fjällräven collab!!
400! For the British Army please
Seems like the best bet
Still need some other
Variants for engineers ,command and recovery more like we need about 700
And the UK bought the AJAX ?
Awesome
Can it be carried in an Airbus A400M?
Getting their pitch video ready for when AJAX gets canned. lol
So what is wrong with AJAX. Spain and Austria use it already.
Film sponsored by Fjällräven :)
Both from Övik!
very impressive vehicle don’t know which looks better the lynx looks very impressive to they make the Bradley look like a Model T
Absolute beauty
Beter than Bradley
>>> ... " EMP " ...
What's a those small round tubes at 2:14? Some kind of rockets, flares?
Smoke launchers
Vad är det för fel på kamouflaget?
"Artifical learning and machine learning", anyone say Skynet. 😂 Sorry Sven cannot execute that command.
At 2:14 am Eastern Time, on August 29th, 1997, Skynet becomes "self-aware" the Terminator tells us in his trademark Austrian drawl. After that, humans panic and try to pull the plug, so Skynet fights back.
We should’ve picked the CV-90 over the rubbish Ajax
Great Vehicle! Props from Germany!
Unser puma ist aber besser
Good job sweden share your information to the world!
They give us the gift on ´knowledge and ikea!
Svengelska is strong with him
Internationally it's Swenglish,
only in Sweden we use Svengelska
Ah yes, Sweden. The "Neutral" country with the most advanced military tech lol.
Being neutral means not interfering in the wars of other countries. To be able to stay neutral during wars of world-scale requires a strong military to defend that neutrality. Look into how Switzerland stayed neutral in World War 2, it wasn't just politics.
@@dutchdiveking Switzerland? hmmm let's see hmmmmm ah yes giant pile of money....
Not neutral. We are a an Enhanced Opportunity Partner of NATO. We are a EU country. Plus; we signed the Treaty of Lisbon.
So, no neutrality here. And we are happy about just that fact.
Sounds solid. I'll take one please! Do you offer any kind of financing on this, or is it cash only?
Is there an option for a coaxial or an OHW mounted machinegun?
It has a 7.62 coax, yes.
Swedish early versions (base 9040, A, & B) have been running coax KSP39 (~Browning M1919 from the 40ies) and newer versions have KSP58 (FN MAG) mounted on top (unsure of the coax capabilities there).
There is also the on-top remote-operated weapon-station.