I have always believed in the bible as being the Holy word of GOD, man could never write such a book plain and simple & I believe 100% that Jesus Christ died for humanity and that He The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Is returning sooner then many think. GOD bless you both for speaking the truth.
@@canadiankewldude so-called up right tree fossils are bracketed by different colored sediments from events taking place in relatively quick succesion.. for example seasonal flooding. You can find different-colored soil horizons along the vertical path of tree roots alive right now.. Rocks fold deform without melting when they are hot/under pressure just like steel.
@@patldennis Yes but while hot/under pressure, chemical changes occur due to the heat and are measurable. They have not been found in relation to these sites.
@@canadiankewldude Lots of metamorphic rocks in these formations. The limestone of Everest/Himalayas is bounded by marble. Marble is the metamorphic form of limestone
I wish I'd been taught this 50yrs ago when I started school. We have been taught so much that is mere theory and conjecture that the truth has been completely obfuscated.
Biological Evolution is an observed fact, the Theory of Evolution is our explanation of that fact. Creationists spew nonsense and fairy tales and expect respect. They do not get it from me.
@@walkergarya Dogma. There is no ape men, no billions of years and your “science” is nonsense. I’ll bet you $10,000 you can’t prove to me that mutational genome improvement is even possible. Because it’s not.
@@TrevoltIV If you set the standard what is regarded at proof, you surely can offer such a bet. Otherwise - using plausible criteria - send the money to walkergarya.
Robert Dunn There is some evidence, but it is based on assumptions. Helping others see the assumptions is key, so they can convince themselves of the overwhelming evidence of Catastrophism.
@@NorthForkFisherman Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,.
I am in portugal and I see these boulders in areas they never could have been deposited unless they moved in water. Please research this and review for us in portugal
Hi - Please I watch these channels hoping to see a comprehensive timeline for YEC, however, all we get is Flood, Flood, Flood. You really need to show ALL the things God has directed at this planet - Please include and explain the asteroid impacts, such as Theia, Vredefort and Chicxulub. Also, we need to look at possibly the largest impact crater (just discovered), the Deniliquin crater. The asteroid impacts look to dwarf the Flood and we really need the experts to explain when these events, along with decades long impact winters fit into the timeline. I'm also curious as to why no ancient cultures mention these asteroid impacts in their writings - Any ideas welcomed.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 Yes I get it, but is ignoring the asteroid impacts, plate tectonics, and heat calculations blatant dishonesty? I have not had one response from the YEC crowd to the many questions I have asked.
@@user-vn8so9rf3d Well, geologists look at facts. Creationists ignore facts and quite often outright lie to theier audience. I am not a religious person but as a geophysicist I feel personally insulted by the stupidity of creationistic claims.
Since the only dinosaur you see are fossils it's obvious that they all drowned along with every- thing else. As they have found dinosaurs with food in their stomachs still meaning the died suddenly
@@Rosie05610 And yet, given that they were all supposed to have lived from the very beginning, they're only found in a very discrete part of the Earth's crust. It's pretty clear that no creationist has spent much time outdoors really seeing the Earth or the fallacy there would be quite apparent.
@@NorthForkFisherman Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,
@@NorthForkFisherman Or maybe atheists have been blinded. Dinosaurs did not die out 65,000,000 years ago. They were called dragons until 1840. In the Bible, they are called behemoth and leviathan. There are human depictions of dinosaurs that are so anatomically correct that they can be identified by species. Mary Schweitzer and now others have identified soft tissue and blood cells in dinosaur tissue and no, ferritin cannot preserve tissue that long. Finally C 14 has been found in dinosaur bones and coal which means less than 60,000 years maximum age. Dr. Snelling has laboriously gone through the evidence and yet the atheist closes his eyes and puts his fingers in his ears. The Apostle Peter wrote two thousand years ago that in the last days, men would deny the flood. You can pretend this is all a myth but the evidence is otherwise. Jesus said that his return would be like the days of Noah and as the Lion of Judah, he will destroy everyone who denies the truth. The age of mercy and grace will be over.
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
Oops. Millions of years never happened. “Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist
1) Your dates for the Egyptian city is not definite, and can most certainly be off by a few hundred years, this is 100% admitted by historians. If anything, the fact that it is so close to that time is actually evidence the Bible is true because that means Egypt would've been one of the first civilizations right after the Tower of Babel event in Babylon which took place directly after the flood, 2) Enough water exists in the mantle of the earth to fill about 3 oceans or so, which is actually still pouring out of the Mid Atlantic Ridge as we speak, just very slowly now. Back during the flood, the ridge would have probably been responsible for tectonic movements which explains why it is smack in the middle of the continents, and each side of South America and North America looks like it fits perfectly into Africa. 3) After the flood, the water could've somehow been re-absorbed back into the ringwoodite mantle, but that is just a hypothesis, we aren't sure exactly how it happened. A better idea is that the earth was much less mountainous before the flood, as the bible describes the mountains rising and the valleys sinking, so theoretically the oceans would have been much shallower, which means the flood would recede as the valleys sank and allowed the oceans to absorb much more water than before. This model would also mean that it would take much less water to cover the earth considering mountains weren't as tall. This makes much more sense to me than the secular model of slow continental drift and tectonic collision causing the mountains, because in that model you have to ignore gravity and the constant pressure to remain spherical, among many other problems. 4) There's no restriction on using steel to reinforce the Ark, we aren't sure exactly what might've been used, we only know what limited basics we were given in the Bible. As to how 8 people could build a ship better than we can, first of all you have to realize it wasn't a ship, it was an ark. It didn't need to be steered or anything, it literally just needed to float aimlessly. You could say the same thing about the Pyramids, how did such an ancient civilization build such amazing structures that we would have trouble building today? Well, they weren't as stupid as secularists like to think. They were even smarter than us, which makes sense considering we have been genetically degrading with every mutation and deletion. I'm sure if we really put our mind to it, we could figure out a way to make a testable ark of the proportions in the Bible, but so far no one has actually tried except for AIG, which is just for show rather than actual use. 5) Animals with odd diets would've just followed their God given instinct to go to the ark, probably eating other things along the way, or simply fasting for the trip, God can prevent them from starving if needed, actually this is a common practice, Christians fast to increase their faith in God because He will prevent us from starving if we trust in Him. The problem with arguments like this is that it undermines the ability of God. If He really does exist, then of course He can manage getting the animals to the ark without a problem. 6) The most logical theory is that they simply hibernated the entire ride. This is possible as we have discovered that literally all animal species have the ability to hibernate if needed. However most don't use that ability unless they are in a desperate state of starvation or something along those lines. God probably just got them to use their hibernation ability on the Ark, thus eliminating all animal duties for Noah's family. 7) The most current numbers I see for land animals is around 6 million, not 8.7 million. And that includes things like bacteria, which obviously wouldn't need to board the ark. But even with your numbers, that would not be a problem. We have observed wolves turn to over 300 different breeds of dogs in only 200 years, however not all would be classified as different "species" because they can interbreed. However it is definitely possible to have different breeds that can no longer interbreed because, for example, the Chihuahua cannot interbreed with a German Shepherd. Of course we artificially selected dogs, so it's likely there wouldn't be as many species in nature, but when 4,400 years are in the mix, that gives a lot of room for more breeding. It is very conceivable that an average of 217 new "species" could arise in that time. You also have to take into account that the term "species" is misused even in scientific articles. It refers to any group of animals that can interbreed, so by that logic, a dingo and a wolf are the same exact species but different breeds because they can interbreed without a problem. And by that same logic, a Chihuahua is not the same species as a German Shepherd, but due to the fact that we have literally observed it to come from wolves just like the rest of dogs, we classify it wrong. Just yet another example of the contradictory secular science ideology, it doesn't really make sense why we would classify Dingoes as a different species but Chihuahuas as the same species, because by the very definition of the word, the opposite is true. This same thing is true for Grolar bears, which is a Grizzly and Polar bear mix. There's many more examples, almost any similar species can interbreed but most of the offspring are infertile, which is the same thing we see in observed cases where the two breeds have been highly changed from the original branch, causing genetic difference that is too great for reproduction. There is no reason to assume that the same thing didn't happen in nature, with different species branching off from one another as they inhabited different regions and slowly bred themselves naturally, along with natural selection picking better suited traits for that region. 8) Same question as the last one. 9) Actually you couldn't be more wrong on this one. Secular scientists have recently concluded that there was definitely a massive bottleneck that wiped out 95% of all life, even marine life, not too long ago. There's really no way to explain that at all besides a giant flood or other catastrophe occurring recently, so it's great evidence that the Bible is true. 10) Which is why we are so genetically similar, not different. What makes you think otherwise? Basically the only differences are minor variations in skull builds, skin colors, and eye/hair colors. We are all 99.9% similar across all of humanity, which is yet another great evidence that we did not evolve over the last 200,000 years, as if that were true we would be quite different by now. Again, we bred dogs in 200 years to be MUCH more diverse than humans have became over the last 4,400 years, so there's observable evidence to prove you wrong. Another fact that lines up directly with the Biblical account is the fact that there are three macrohaplogroups in the human genome, which would make perfect sense because Noah had three sons, who were the fathers to all of humanity. Their three slightly different lineages created the three different haplogroups that we see today.
11) Nowhere in the Bible does it say only one window was present, that is based on a slight mistranslation from the original Hebrew that could also mean "light" rather than "window". Other scripture seems to imply that might have been instructions for each window individually, rather than instructions to build one single window. It may also have been completely unrelated to windows, maybe it was instructing Noah to build lighting or something, we aren't 100% sure but we assume it was probably windows. The Ark Encounter has those systems in place not only to prevent suffocation, but also for comfort. Plus I believe they went with the single window approach which is not necessarily biblical. 12) At some point, "lots" of "local" floods becomes pretty suspicious when you realize they are literally all over the world. Not only that, but marine species are buried right along with land species, which implies the flood was coming from the ocean. 13) Again you're placing a lot of faith in these dating methods. Assuming the method used was carbon 14 dating, it is largely known that carbon 14 has still not reached equilibrium in the atmosphere yet, so presumably it has been accumulating since the beginning of time. Not only that, even if we ignore that fact, carbon dating is not exact and leaves hundreds of years wiggle room. I trust carbon dating over any other method because we can observe it take place much better, also other forms of radiometric dating have been utterly debunked and actually can be used as very good evidence for a young earth now, such as Uranium-Lead dating, using Z-pinch cold fusion emulations of neutron stars, we observe rapid decay of uranium into different naturally found elements, with their parent and daughter elements present. If these exact elements were dated by unknowing evolutionists, they would claim they are billions of years old, but we literally watched them form just like they would in a neutron star, which is how they theorize that all the earth elements formed originally. The Egyptian culture didn't exist at all before the flood, it began after the Tower of Babel incident where God separated Man into different groups. The Egyptians are interesting actually because they are the ones that carried on the Tower of Babel idea the most, with their pyramids. Pyramids are the structures that "lead to the gods" just like the Tower of Babel (or, Ziggurat of Babylon) was described. I would probably refrain from calling Christians "fools" if I were you, since you apparently believe we all came from inorganic material that we still can't even produce life from WITH intelligence, let alone WITHOUT intelligence by random chance, in a universe that supposedly created itself from random chance, without the opportunity for random chance even existing in the first place. Makes a whole lot more sense to believe in God than all that nonsense. I'm a biologist, I used to be an atheist but when I went to college I realized evolution is more of a fairy tale than science. Last time I ran the numbers, the chances of just a single celled organism occurring anywhere in the universe, let alone right on the perfect planet that actually allows it to thrive, is about 1/10^39,000. To put that in perspective, you could win the Powerball lottery every single day for 10,000 years and not even make a dent in that number. The estimated number of atoms in the known universe is 10^82. So you're placing faith in something that is mathematically impossible. Imagine randomly selecting one atom in the entire universe and getting it right, and then doing that like 1,000 times without fail. At some point, one begins to wonder if there's a cheat code...
@@TrevoltIV Your dates for the Egyptian city is not definite, and can most certainly be off by a few hundred years, this is 100% admitted by historians. If anything, the fact that it is so close to that time is actually evidence the Bible is true because that means Egypt would've been one of the first civilizations right after the Tower of Babel event in Babylon which took place directly after the flood,
@@TrevoltIV 3) After the flood, the water could've somehow been re-absorbed back into the ringwoodite mantle, but that is just a hypothesis, we aren't sure exactly how it happened. A better idea is that the earth was much less mountainous before the flood, as the bible describes the mountains rising and the valleys sinking, so theoretically the oceans would have been much shallower, which means the flood would recede as the valleys sank and allowed the oceans to absorb much more water than before. This model would also mean that it would take much less water to cover the earth considering mountains weren't as tall. This makes much more sense to me than the secular model of slow continental drift and tectonic collision causing the mountains, because in that model you have to ignore gravity and the constant pressure to remain spherical, among many other problems.
There was not one flood but there have been several and more will come. Plato said that. Our planet Earth is suffering from a cycle of disasters. It is not possible to explain history when you do not know about the cycle of natural disasters that are causing a huge tidal wave, flooding and many more awful effects. That cycle is mentioned in several ancient books as the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Maya. As an effect of these recurring disasters, civilizations come and go in a fixed schedule. One of them reaches a very high level of skills and education that is higher than ours today. They constructed the pyramids because they knew that they would vanish because the next disaster was about to occur. And that Previous Civilization, not aliens, will have saved knowledge somewhere in the Great pyramid. To learn much more about the cycle of recurring floods, the recreation of civilizations and its timeline, ancient high technology and alien deities, read the eBook: "what I know about Nibiru". You can read it on every computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: know nibiru
@@nibiruresearch Multiple non avian dinosaur lineages waxed and waned over the entirety of the Mesozoic era. For example ZERO stegosaurrids were extant at the time of the Chicxulub impact. You've heard the anecdote that we are closer in time to T. rex than T. rex is to stegosaurus haven't you? What's that? You can't even misunderstand properly?
Millions of years never happened. “Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist
@@jackstrawfromwichita9369 Ross: Just another YEC moron. Obviously an animal can make thousands of track fossils and just one body fossil. So what are the chnces to find body fossils older than track fossils?
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
@@jrsimeon02 Because when too many people believe stupid things it is dangerous for society. Examples of this is the rise of Hitler, Boris Johnson and Donald Trump.
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
@@norbertjendruschj9121 Exactly, you can always say that everything is possible with god. Why do we need evidence in that case? Everyone who doubts will go to hell anyway.
Thanks for pointing the truth out Dr.Snelling .
Snelling is a fraud and should have his credential revoked for intellectual fraud.
I have always believed in the bible as being the Holy word of
GOD, man could never write such a book plain and simple &
I believe 100% that Jesus Christ died for humanity and that
He The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Is returning sooner
then many think. GOD bless you both for speaking the truth.
So you drank all the religitard koolaid. Sad you cannot read the bible and see it for the collection of fairy tales and barbaric morality it is.
Brilliant explanation re the folding of rocks and polystrate trees, Gods word is true and reliable , thanks George .
too bad both are demonstrably not true.
@@patldennis Please, demonstrate.
@@canadiankewldude so-called up right tree fossils are bracketed by different colored sediments from events taking place in relatively quick succesion.. for example seasonal flooding. You can find different-colored soil horizons along the vertical path of tree roots alive right now.. Rocks fold deform without melting when they are hot/under pressure just like steel.
@@patldennis Yes but while hot/under pressure, chemical changes occur due to the heat and are measurable.
They have not been found in relation to these sites.
@@canadiankewldude Lots of metamorphic rocks in these formations. The limestone of Everest/Himalayas is bounded by marble. Marble is the metamorphic form of limestone
I wish I'd been taught this 50yrs ago when I started school. We have been taught so much that is mere theory and conjecture that the truth has been completely obfuscated.
Satan is the god of this world so it's definitely no surprise we are utterly plastered with delusion and confusion.
Biological Evolution is an observed fact, the Theory of Evolution is our explanation of that fact.
Creationists spew nonsense and fairy tales and expect respect. They do not get it from me.
@@TrevoltIV There is no satan, no god and your bible is nonsense, cover to cover.
@@walkergarya Dogma.
There is no ape men, no billions of years and your “science” is nonsense.
I’ll bet you $10,000 you can’t prove to me that mutational genome improvement is even possible. Because it’s not.
@@TrevoltIV If you set the standard what is regarded at proof, you surely can offer such a bet. Otherwise - using plausible criteria - send the money to walkergarya.
The whole idea of millions of years is just ridiculous - and there isn't even one shred of evidence that actually supports the idea.
Robert Dunn
There is some evidence, but it is based on assumptions.
Helping others see the assumptions is key, so they can convince themselves of the overwhelming evidence of Catastrophism.
@@knightclan4 agreed. When a sentence starts out with "Millions of years ago..." ,it just means they don't know.
Other than the amount of heat involved...
But details? Who needs 'em? We've got our little bloody book of fables and bullshit, so we're good! /s
The petrol or fuel in your tank is based on testing such a concept. You should boycott petroleum and petroleum products.
@@NorthForkFisherman Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,.
I am in portugal and I see these boulders in areas they never could have been deposited unless they moved in water. Please research this and review for us in portugal
I have no doubt these stones were dropped where they are by retreating glaciers, not by any fairy tale flood.
love it😊
for such great evidence and check the views. however Christ says when the Son of Man come will He find faith
Hi - Please I watch these channels hoping to see a comprehensive timeline for YEC, however, all we get is Flood, Flood, Flood. You really need to show ALL the things God has directed at this planet - Please include and explain the asteroid impacts, such as Theia, Vredefort and Chicxulub. Also, we need to look at possibly the largest impact crater (just discovered), the Deniliquin crater. The asteroid impacts look to dwarf the Flood and we really need the experts to explain when these events, along with decades long impact winters fit into the timeline. I'm also curious as to why no ancient cultures mention these asteroid impacts in their writings - Any ideas welcomed.
If you want a real timeline, forget the YEC nonsense and read a geology textbook.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 Yes I get it, but is ignoring the asteroid impacts, plate tectonics, and heat calculations blatant dishonesty? I have not had one response from the YEC crowd to the many questions I have asked.
@@user-vn8so9rf3d Well, geologists look at facts. Creationists ignore facts and quite often outright lie to theier audience. I am not a religious person but as a geophysicist I feel personally insulted by the stupidity of creationistic claims.
Question what happend to dinos and flod
Since the only dinosaur you see are fossils it's
obvious that they all drowned along with every-
thing else. As they have found dinosaurs with
food in their stomachs still meaning the died
suddenly
@@Rosie05610 And yet, given that they were all supposed to have lived from the very beginning, they're only found in a very discrete part of the Earth's crust. It's pretty clear that no creationist has spent much time outdoors really seeing the Earth or the fallacy there would be quite apparent.
@@NorthForkFisherman Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,
But specifically, Damir, there was no global flood, and the remaining theropod dinos are now known as birds.
@@NorthForkFisherman Or maybe atheists have been blinded. Dinosaurs did not die out 65,000,000 years ago. They were called dragons until 1840. In the Bible, they are called behemoth and leviathan. There are human depictions of dinosaurs that are so anatomically correct that they
can be identified by species. Mary Schweitzer and now others have identified soft tissue and blood cells in dinosaur tissue and no, ferritin cannot preserve tissue that long. Finally C 14 has been found in dinosaur bones and coal which means less than 60,000 years maximum age. Dr. Snelling has laboriously gone through the evidence and yet the atheist closes his eyes and puts his fingers in his ears. The Apostle Peter wrote two thousand years ago that in the last days, men would deny the flood. You can pretend this is all a myth but the evidence is otherwise. Jesus said that his return would be like the days of Noah and as the Lion of Judah, he will destroy everyone who denies the truth. The age of mercy and grace will be over.
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water?
2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from?
3. After the flood, where did the water go?
4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank.
5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark?
6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour.
7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species.
10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife.
11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood.
13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions.
a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded?
b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb?
c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost.
Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
Oops. Millions of years never happened.
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains:
“This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.”
Dr. Marcus Ross
Phd paleontologist
1)
Your dates for the Egyptian city is not definite, and can most certainly be off by a few hundred years, this is 100% admitted by historians. If anything, the fact that it is so close to that time is actually evidence the Bible is true because that means Egypt would've been one of the first civilizations right after the Tower of Babel event in Babylon which took place directly after the flood,
2)
Enough water exists in the mantle of the earth to fill about 3 oceans or so, which is actually still pouring out of the Mid Atlantic Ridge as we speak, just very slowly now. Back during the flood, the ridge would have probably been responsible for tectonic movements which explains why it is smack in the middle of the continents, and each side of South America and North America looks like it fits perfectly into Africa.
3)
After the flood, the water could've somehow been re-absorbed back into the ringwoodite mantle, but that is just a hypothesis, we aren't sure exactly how it happened. A better idea is that the earth was much less mountainous before the flood, as the bible describes the mountains rising and the valleys sinking, so theoretically the oceans would have been much shallower, which means the flood would recede as the valleys sank and allowed the oceans to absorb much more water than before. This model would also mean that it would take much less water to cover the earth considering mountains weren't as tall. This makes much more sense to me than the secular model of slow continental drift and tectonic collision causing the mountains, because in that model you have to ignore gravity and the constant pressure to remain spherical, among many other problems.
4)
There's no restriction on using steel to reinforce the Ark, we aren't sure exactly what might've been used, we only know what limited basics we were given in the Bible. As to how 8 people could build a ship better than we can, first of all you have to realize it wasn't a ship, it was an ark. It didn't need to be steered or anything, it literally just needed to float aimlessly. You could say the same thing about the Pyramids, how did such an ancient civilization build such amazing structures that we would have trouble building today? Well, they weren't as stupid as secularists like to think. They were even smarter than us, which makes sense considering we have been genetically degrading with every mutation and deletion. I'm sure if we really put our mind to it, we could figure out a way to make a testable ark of the proportions in the Bible, but so far no one has actually tried except for AIG, which is just for show rather than actual use.
5)
Animals with odd diets would've just followed their God given instinct to go to the ark, probably eating other things along the way, or simply fasting for the trip, God can prevent them from starving if needed, actually this is a common practice, Christians fast to increase their faith in God because He will prevent us from starving if we trust in Him. The problem with arguments like this is that it undermines the ability of God. If He really does exist, then of course He can manage getting the animals to the ark without a problem.
6)
The most logical theory is that they simply hibernated the entire ride. This is possible as we have discovered that literally all animal species have the ability to hibernate if needed. However most don't use that ability unless they are in a desperate state of starvation or something along those lines. God probably just got them to use their hibernation ability on the Ark, thus eliminating all animal duties for Noah's family.
7)
The most current numbers I see for land animals is around 6 million, not 8.7 million. And that includes things like bacteria, which obviously wouldn't need to board the ark. But even with your numbers, that would not be a problem. We have observed wolves turn to over 300 different breeds of dogs in only 200 years, however not all would be classified as different "species" because they can interbreed. However it is definitely possible to have different breeds that can no longer interbreed because, for example, the Chihuahua cannot interbreed with a German Shepherd. Of course we artificially selected dogs, so it's likely there wouldn't be as many species in nature, but when 4,400 years are in the mix, that gives a lot of room for more breeding. It is very conceivable that an average of 217 new "species" could arise in that time. You also have to take into account that the term "species" is misused even in scientific articles. It refers to any group of animals that can interbreed, so by that logic, a dingo and a wolf are the same exact species but different breeds because they can interbreed without a problem. And by that same logic, a Chihuahua is not the same species as a German Shepherd, but due to the fact that we have literally observed it to come from wolves just like the rest of dogs, we classify it wrong. Just yet another example of the contradictory secular science ideology, it doesn't really make sense why we would classify Dingoes as a different species but Chihuahuas as the same species, because by the very definition of the word, the opposite is true. This same thing is true for Grolar bears, which is a Grizzly and Polar bear mix. There's many more examples, almost any similar species can interbreed but most of the offspring are infertile, which is the same thing we see in observed cases where the two breeds have been highly changed from the original branch, causing genetic difference that is too great for reproduction. There is no reason to assume that the same thing didn't happen in nature, with different species branching off from one another as they inhabited different regions and slowly bred themselves naturally, along with natural selection picking better suited traits for that region.
8)
Same question as the last one.
9)
Actually you couldn't be more wrong on this one. Secular scientists have recently concluded that there was definitely a massive bottleneck that wiped out 95% of all life, even marine life, not too long ago. There's really no way to explain that at all besides a giant flood or other catastrophe occurring recently, so it's great evidence that the Bible is true.
10)
Which is why we are so genetically similar, not different. What makes you think otherwise? Basically the only differences are minor variations in skull builds, skin colors, and eye/hair colors. We are all 99.9% similar across all of humanity, which is yet another great evidence that we did not evolve over the last 200,000 years, as if that were true we would be quite different by now. Again, we bred dogs in 200 years to be MUCH more diverse than humans have became over the last 4,400 years, so there's observable evidence to prove you wrong. Another fact that lines up directly with the Biblical account is the fact that there are three macrohaplogroups in the human genome, which would make perfect sense because Noah had three sons, who were the fathers to all of humanity. Their three slightly different lineages created the three different haplogroups that we see today.
11)
Nowhere in the Bible does it say only one window was present, that is based on a slight mistranslation from the original Hebrew that could also mean "light" rather than "window". Other scripture seems to imply that might have been instructions for each window individually, rather than instructions to build one single window. It may also have been completely unrelated to windows, maybe it was instructing Noah to build lighting or something, we aren't 100% sure but we assume it was probably windows. The Ark Encounter has those systems in place not only to prevent suffocation, but also for comfort. Plus I believe they went with the single window approach which is not necessarily biblical.
12)
At some point, "lots" of "local" floods becomes pretty suspicious when you realize they are literally all over the world. Not only that, but marine species are buried right along with land species, which implies the flood was coming from the ocean.
13)
Again you're placing a lot of faith in these dating methods. Assuming the method used was carbon 14 dating, it is largely known that carbon 14 has still not reached equilibrium in the atmosphere yet, so presumably it has been accumulating since the beginning of time. Not only that, even if we ignore that fact, carbon dating is not exact and leaves hundreds of years wiggle room. I trust carbon dating over any other method because we can observe it take place much better, also other forms of radiometric dating have been utterly debunked and actually can be used as very good evidence for a young earth now, such as Uranium-Lead dating, using Z-pinch cold fusion emulations of neutron stars, we observe rapid decay of uranium into different naturally found elements, with their parent and daughter elements present. If these exact elements were dated by unknowing evolutionists, they would claim they are billions of years old, but we literally watched them form just like they would in a neutron star, which is how they theorize that all the earth elements formed originally. The Egyptian culture didn't exist at all before the flood, it began after the Tower of Babel incident where God separated Man into different groups. The Egyptians are interesting actually because they are the ones that carried on the Tower of Babel idea the most, with their pyramids. Pyramids are the structures that "lead to the gods" just like the Tower of Babel (or, Ziggurat of Babylon) was described. I would probably refrain from calling Christians "fools" if I were you, since you apparently believe we all came from inorganic material that we still can't even produce life from WITH intelligence, let alone WITHOUT intelligence by random chance, in a universe that supposedly created itself from random chance, without the opportunity for random chance even existing in the first place. Makes a whole lot more sense to believe in God than all that nonsense. I'm a biologist, I used to be an atheist but when I went to college I realized evolution is more of a fairy tale than science. Last time I ran the numbers, the chances of just a single celled organism occurring anywhere in the universe, let alone right on the perfect planet that actually allows it to thrive, is about 1/10^39,000. To put that in perspective, you could win the Powerball lottery every single day for 10,000 years and not even make a dent in that number. The estimated number of atoms in the known universe is 10^82. So you're placing faith in something that is mathematically impossible. Imagine randomly selecting one atom in the entire universe and getting it right, and then doing that like 1,000 times without fail. At some point, one begins to wonder if there's a cheat code...
@@TrevoltIV Your dates for the Egyptian city is not definite, and can most certainly be off by a few hundred years, this is 100% admitted by historians.
If anything, the fact that it is so close to that time is actually evidence the Bible is true because that means Egypt would've been one of the first civilizations right after the Tower of Babel event in Babylon which took place directly after the flood,
@@TrevoltIV 3)
After the flood, the water could've somehow been re-absorbed back into the ringwoodite mantle, but that is just a hypothesis, we aren't sure exactly how it happened. A better idea is that the earth was much less mountainous before the flood, as the bible describes the mountains rising and the valleys sinking, so theoretically the oceans would have been much shallower, which means the flood would recede as the valleys sank and allowed the oceans to absorb much more water than before. This model would also mean that it would take much less water to cover the earth considering mountains weren't as tall. This makes much more sense to me than the secular model of slow continental drift and tectonic collision causing the mountains, because in that model you have to ignore gravity and the constant pressure to remain spherical, among many other problems.
There was not one flood but there have been several and more will come. Plato said that. Our planet Earth is suffering from a cycle of disasters. It is not possible to explain history when you do not know about the cycle of natural disasters that are causing a huge tidal wave, flooding and many more awful effects. That cycle is mentioned in several ancient books as the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Maya. As an effect of these recurring disasters, civilizations come and go in a fixed schedule. One of them reaches a very high level of skills and education that is higher than ours today. They constructed the pyramids because they knew that they would vanish because the next disaster was about to occur. And that Previous Civilization, not aliens, will have saved knowledge somewhere in the Great pyramid. To learn much more about the cycle of recurring floods, the recreation of civilizations and its timeline, ancient high technology and alien deities, read the eBook: "what I know about Nibiru". You can read it on every computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: know nibiru
When you wish youtube had a laugh react like facebook.
@@patldennisThere is nothing to laugh about. Only about the fairy tail about the dinosaurs that are wiped out by one asteroid.
@@nibiruresearch Multiple non avian dinosaur lineages waxed and waned over the entirety of the Mesozoic era. For example ZERO stegosaurrids were extant at the time of the Chicxulub impact.
You've heard the anecdote that we are closer in time to T. rex than T. rex is to stegosaurus haven't you?
What's that? You can't even misunderstand properly?
@@nibiruresearch Randall Carson inspired BS
Sitchen is wrong.
Zim is wrong.
They deceive you.
The lies that religious grifters tell for moneh
Millions of years never happened.
“Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains:
“This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.”
Dr. Marcus Ross
Phd paleontologist
@@jackstrawfromwichita9369 Ross: Just another YEC moron.
Obviously an animal can make thousands of track fossils and just one body fossil. So what are the chnces to find body fossils older than track fossils?
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water?
2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from?
3. After the flood, where did the water go?
4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank.
5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark?
6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour.
7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species.
10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife.
11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood.
13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions.
a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded?
b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb?
c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost.
Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
If you think this is not true, why spend so much time disproving it?
@@jrsimeon02 Because when too many people believe stupid things it is dangerous for society. Examples of this is the rise of Hitler, Boris Johnson and Donald Trump.
@@walkergarya then stop believing in macro evolution or you're part of the problem.
@@jrsimeon02 Bullshit. Biological Evolution, including "macroevolution" is an observed fact.
@@walkergarya we're going to have to agree to disagree
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water?
2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from?
3. After the flood, where did the water go?
4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank.
5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark?
6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour.
7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species.
10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife.
11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood.
13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions.
a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded?
b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb?
c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost.
Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
With god everything is possible😀😀
@@georg7120 Without evidence I have NO reason to believe in any god.
@@georg7120 Without using your brain, everything is believable.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 Exactly, you can always say that everything is possible with god. Why do we need evidence in that case?
Everyone who doubts will go to hell anyway.
@@georg7120 Who cares for a imaginary pisspot god?