Flood Geology | Episode 4 | The Receding Floodwaters | Michael J. Oard

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 06. 2021
  • Explore compelling geologic evidence for the Worldwide Flood presented by Michael J. Oard.
    Researcher and scientists Michael J. Oard uses his knowledge of the Ice Age and Missoula Flood to lay out his case for a Global Flood. He shares how many geologic features on the surface of the earth just can’t be explained through slow and gradual processes, but rather, one worldwide Flood. These features include water and wind gaps, the continental shelves, submarine canyons, planation surfaces, pediments, and the spread of exotic rocks. His convincing evidence will challenge conventional thinking, showing how the biblical record makes much more sense of the evidence.
    Stars: Michael J. Oard
  • Zábava

Komentáře • 1,4K

  • @jpdunamislodge
    @jpdunamislodge Před rokem +28

    Outstanding Chanel! What a blessing you guys are. Thank you. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @AntonsClass
    @AntonsClass Před rokem +10

    We truly appreciate you moving around to all of the various locations to show us. That's dedication!

    • @howdydoodey3872
      @howdydoodey3872 Před 3 měsíci

      Why not Australia?
      Because the little Middle East downpour didn't flood Australia, nor Africa, nor Europe, nor the Americas. The world flood is one big lie, or if you prefer, a hoax upon Christians.

    • @walkergarya
      @walkergarya Před 2 měsíci

      It is also a pack of lies and nonsnese.

    • @AntonsClass
      @AntonsClass Před 2 měsíci +1

      @@walkergarya get ye behind me, Satan.

    • @walkergarya
      @walkergarya Před 2 měsíci

      @@AntonsClass There is no Satan just as there was NEVER any global flood.

    • @AntonsClass
      @AntonsClass Před 2 měsíci

      @@walkergarya did I stutter?

  • @aaronchambers9888
    @aaronchambers9888 Před rokem +6

    I love this guy. It's rare to find somebody, that you can feel doesn’t have an adgenda and isn't lying about anything .

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem +2

      ??? He has an agenda and he is lying.

    • @aaronchambers9888
      @aaronchambers9888 Před rokem

      @@norbertjendruschj9121 Really?

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem +2

      @@aaronchambers9888 He starts lying with his first sentence. There are no geological features one can not explain with modern geology. On the other hand there a lot of features which are impossible to explain with a flood.

  • @twostevensinau
    @twostevensinau Před rokem +32

    Really good, just plain Amazing, and really put together well! I wish everyone could see this.

    • @BangChief_AllIsOne
      @BangChief_AllIsOne Před rokem +3

      It's totally up to them.
      "In The Age of Information, Ignorance is a Choice" - Donald Williams
      Salute

  • @hughstan1
    @hughstan1 Před rokem +18

    I can’t even express in words my appreciation for this production. This gentleman is an excellent teacher, and I am so very thankful for the insight and his work and gift of being able to deliver such quality understanding of the world around me. I am also in Montana, I’m just …. Thank you just… thank you!! God Bless..

    • @harrygearhart4520
      @harrygearhart4520 Před rokem

      Glacial Lake Missoula's surrounding hills have water lines, and only go so high. So the planet was never flooded like in a biblical flood. HOWEVER! there was glacial melt flooding all over the Northern Latitudes. I'm from Montana too!

    • @faithijn8338
      @faithijn8338 Před rokem

      @@harrygearhart4520 I’m from Montana too & also have lived & traveled all over the USA & the Globe. Honestly Harry your theory that Lake Missoula water line are proof of no global flood falls as FLAT as the Flathead Valley. Montana is a tiny micro aspect in relationship to the entire globe. The evidence of the Global Flood is overwhelming Harry and denial doesn’t alter evidence.

    • @harrygearhart4520
      @harrygearhart4520 Před rokem +1

      @@faithijn8338 If there are water lines from 12,900 years ago?, where is the water lines from Noah's flood? I just got into an argument over Noah's Ark, just making A FACTUAL STATEMENT! that the Ark could not be built out of wood!, that wood is not a strong enough material to survive the ocean, as big as the Ark was suppose to be?. You see I was a Merchant Marine Chief Engineer, so I know the Ark is just a story, A good story!, but there wasn't A biblical flood. Since you live in Montana, have you ever visited the Channeled Scablands in WA?, That was the glaciers melting. I traveled the world for 41 years, never seen evidence of a biblical flood. Want to learn about ship construction, say wood vs. Steel? Oh!!! Bitterroot!!! Stay safe

    • @TrevoltIV
      @TrevoltIV Před 11 měsíci

      @@harrygearhart4520 Wood is strong enough for an ark if reinforced correctly.

    • @harrygearhart4520
      @harrygearhart4520 Před 11 měsíci

      @@TrevoltIV The largest vessel was named the "Wyoming" it had steel re in forcing was 400 ft in length the Ark was over 500 ft. Noah's Ark is just a story borrowed from the "Epic of Gilgamesh"

  • @ldognz
    @ldognz Před rokem +24

    keep you on...very well presented,good pace,not a boring voice...no boredom set in the entire length of the video which is very rare for long informative videos..thank you

    • @peacefulpatriots
      @peacefulpatriots Před rokem +2

      Actually, it’s one of the smaller ones. Look up Father Founding channel on Rumble. He has a video called What on Earth Happened, that will literally blow your mind. When you get to the channel, search for ‘Ewaranon’. Enjoy!

  • @Daniel90210
    @Daniel90210 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Michael J. Oard. Thankyou so much for this, Ive watched many of your flood series

  • @hennyberends8521
    @hennyberends8521 Před rokem +5

    Fascinating series. Thank you Michael Oard

  • @galenstevenson918
    @galenstevenson918 Před rokem +16

    Really enjoyed the whole series.

  • @marionchase-kleeves8311
    @marionchase-kleeves8311 Před rokem +34

    I grew up in Albuquerque, NM at 5200ft beneath the Sandia peak at 10000ft. The Mt. IS granite with limestone layers on top. 90 miles north is the Valle Grande, the caldera of mega volcano. The fossils on top of the peak are found as far away as Africa in the same stone formation

    • @billbradleymusic
      @billbradleymusic Před rokem +1

      Big boom 💥

    • @marionchase-kleeves8311
      @marionchase-kleeves8311 Před rokem

      @Richard Fox sorry Richard, I lived there and built houses at the foot of the mountain. IT IS GRANITE AND QUARTZ. No shale there. So, we're you there, did you see it? I THINK TIME PASSES DIFFERENTLY WHEN YOU SUPPORT LIES LIKE EVILUTION. The earth is young.

    • @marionchase-kleeves8311
      @marionchase-kleeves8311 Před rokem +5

      @Richard Fox your thin layer is 300 ft thick sea creatures. Hmmm

    • @kyledick9813
      @kyledick9813 Před rokem +1

      @Richard Fox no Richard sorry your secularist view is wrong my friend. None of the theories of the secular geology make sense

    • @mhansl
      @mhansl Před rokem +1

      @Richard Fox spot on.

  • @MazePage
    @MazePage Před rokem +11

    Thank you for this excellent study of the receding waters! Most studies of the flood are of the flooding phases, so good to get this other half! 💖✝️

    • @MrDivineLabs
      @MrDivineLabs Před rokem

      As I have posted somewhere else here: The flooding itself is already difficult to explain without calling on a supernatural cause. The receding water is easier to debunk. If the whole world was already flooded, where would the water recede?

    • @MazePage
      @MazePage Před rokem +1

      @@MrDivineLabs Deeper/deepening oceans?

    • @marionchase-kleeves8311
      @marionchase-kleeves8311 Před rokem +2

      @@MrDivineLabs plate tectonics. Massive upheavals and deep trenches in pacific and Atlantic oceans

    • @ronniebuchanan6575
      @ronniebuchanan6575 Před rokem +1

      ​@@MrDivineLabs read the Bible the mountains rose up the valleys sank down. There is also enough water under the crust to fill the Oceans 3 times. Same as where the water goes when we have a flood and the water goes down plus it evaporates and forms clouds. How much water you think we have in the clouds at any given time? Before the flood it had never rained.

    • @ronniebuchanan6575
      @ronniebuchanan6575 Před rokem

      ​@@MrDivineLabs please watch Standing For Truth Channel. The movie called The best movie explaining Noah's flood. You will no longer find it difficult to explaine the flood. I assure you my friend. If someone doesn't get it from thus movie they are willfully blind to any explanation of the flood.

  • @mikefoht2738
    @mikefoht2738 Před 3 měsíci +1

    I have watched creation videos for over 30 years and this is one of the best and fast paced videos going into great details in explaining everything we see in this post flood world. Uniformitarianism is another word for willful ignorance. Flood geology is the only reasonable explanation for the obvious massive catastrophic things we see that has rearranged the surface of the earth.
    For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: but the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
    2 Peter 3:5‭-‬7 KJV

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před 2 měsíci

      Explain how pollen can violate Stokes Law then. And then we'll start talking about heat.

  • @firstordercommandergames2542

    Very enlightening, full of truth to those whose eyes are not blind or willingly closed. Could not stop watching although I have many things pending. Can't wait to see the rest of the series, will hold off for now. Gotta get busy, Jesus is coming soon.

    • @anthonysinclair5721
      @anthonysinclair5721 Před rokem +2

      You can say that again! 👍😎

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 Před rokem

      Christians are so dumb and brainwashed that you wouldn't know the truth if it fell from the sky and hit you between the eyes.

    • @waynesumner1829
      @waynesumner1829 Před 9 měsíci

      The geology is much more convincing than the theology. The dual Deities of Genesis 6-9 are very different from the Creator Deity of Genesis Chapter One. He is not a man that He should repent or a spirit that would ever "strive"with the "flesh" of man. His (They) are Plural Elohiym, was very pleased with The Genesis One Creation THAT could not go bad as the Chapter 6 flood bringers claim because according to Genesis 1:31-2:3 the Blessing and Sanctification Finished Work was immutably Perfect!And then there is the problem of Noah's bad behavior after he got off the ark. Genesis One' Deity creates Beings , Spirits of Light in His Likeness , not bodies of flesh from the dust of the ground. The Genesis 1:26&27 male and female are not "Adam 'n Eve"! They are darkness...God is Light! Amen!

  • @arthurtownsend1230
    @arthurtownsend1230 Před rokem +13

    There is coming a day not too far down the road God is going to use his word the Bible to set the record straight concerning the flood, creation and all that is in his written word

  • @cowboygeologist7772
    @cowboygeologist7772 Před rokem +4

    Well done. Thank you so much for your hard work to put this video together.

  • @tasmanwalker8750
    @tasmanwalker8750 Před 7 měsíci +1

    This is excellent. Very clear and convincing.

  • @dynamo6796
    @dynamo6796 Před rokem +11

    I wish there was an animation showing us how some of these things formed. I see evidence of the flood all over. Especially in southern California on the west side of the San jacinto mountains. Giant mounds of rounded rocks & boulders encased in hard soil. Fields of Huge rounded boulders sticking out of the ground. Looks like debris piles as the water receded. The rocks and boulders were rounded by tumbling in the violent waters, like river rock.

  • @vebnew
    @vebnew Před rokem +5

    Excellent

  • @Paul-xv4qh
    @Paul-xv4qh Před 5 měsíci +1

    I'm intrigued by your presentation of post flood hydraulics. Thank you may God bless you
    Noahs decedent
    Paul R

  • @weekendmom
    @weekendmom Před 16 dny

    I recommend Michael J Oord's book Frozen In Time for his perspective on the postflood Ice Age.

  • @luisvelez5695
    @luisvelez5695 Před rokem +2

    I live in the OZARKS the science says this area was a high plateau that was carved into hills by massive flood waters , right out of the travel brochure

  • @ReneeHorth
    @ReneeHorth Před 5 měsíci

    Devils Tower looks like a tree that got busted off during the great flood. Many of the mountains have nothing but petrified wood, all broken up r/t the flood. The diversity of the trees can be seen. Amazing ‼️

  • @avechristusrex31
    @avechristusrex31 Před 5 měsíci

    Fabulous series of videos Michael. God bless this great work. It may very well save many souls! Ave Christus Rex!

  • @sethwarner2540
    @sethwarner2540 Před rokem +5

    Thank you sir for your explanation in sinc with the Bible. I remember seeing huge boulders larger than a house. My opinion is that the flow of water was so huge and fast that the water rolled these huge boulders like they were pebbles Am I right? I used to live in Wenatchee Wa. and saw the sides of the mountains as I drove parallel to the Columbia River. Thank you for speaking constantly as though you know all the expanations for anything we woud encounter, or ask about in terms of the assumption that the Bible is true and relevant! Never once have I heard you say anything about MILLIONS OF YEARS(goodness me I hate to hear that phrase), but always you say before this r after that. Im subscribing/liking. Can't wait to hear you explain the GRAND CANYON!

    • @truthbebold4009
      @truthbebold4009 Před rokem

      I lived down the road in Leavenworth (actually the community of Plain)

  • @vondahartsock-oneil3343
    @vondahartsock-oneil3343 Před rokem +118

    A 100 yr old wooden ship that left Kansas City, sailed down the Mississippi but sank, was recently found in a farmers field. 46 ft down. "Science" would tell us it's millions of yrs old too...The course of the river changed drastically over that 100 yrs of time. There is a museum in KC or near KC with things, artifacts and what not that were found after the excavation. Never been there. I here it's really one of the best museums around. Curated by the finders of the ship. Or used to be. Point is....what old earth creationist miss, is that the Earth was perfect when GOD created it and everything on it. GOD created everything in 6 days and nights and called it GOOD. So I imagine it was not just good, but PERFECT. Then man fell, Lucifer and his buddies fell. GOD sent the flood to get rid of the Nephilim. The earth was not perfect anymore. Now we have earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, and just natural disasters. The flood or GOD remade the earth. The Flood did this. Dr. Hugh Ross, great man, but wrong about the flood being local. I could explain myself much better, but short on time. So sorry. I hope my thoughts came thru tho.

    • @JamesJackson-uu3dc
      @JamesJackson-uu3dc Před rokem +17

      @Richard Fox can you name one instance of observable evolution?

    • @derrickmalone3129
      @derrickmalone3129 Před rokem +7

      @Richard Fox What evidence?

    • @heavenboundtoourlord
      @heavenboundtoourlord Před rokem +7

      Vonda: Neither man nor woman can reproduce with another creature which is not of their own kind.
      Man and apes or monkeys, for example, can not create offspring together. “…but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial….” (1 Corinthians 15:39-40)
      Celestial creatures are heavenly; spiritual.
      Terrestrial creatures are earthly; physical.
      The spiritual bodies of the celestial and the earthly bodies of the terrestrial are totally different. Those of the celestial; angels, are spirits, with no physical anatomy or reproductive organs, and cannot reproduce. They are incapable of impregnating, and incapable of being impregnated. They cannot bear children.
      Luke 24:39 …handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.

    • @robertramsey653
      @robertramsey653 Před rokem +10

      Have you ever seen the things that has been found inside of coal that's supposed to be millions of years old? There are some cool things, that are obviously man made, there is no denying it, but it's not mainstream knowledge. There is a bell, a ladle, a piece of a gear and a few other things. I find that quite interesting, and the only explanation I've ever heard is it must have been aliens. Same explanation for human footprints found not only beside dinosaur footprints, but inside of dinosaur footprints.

    • @robertramsey653
      @robertramsey653 Před rokem +12

      @Richard Fox I'm sorry Richard, I have to disagree with you. There is not a single shred of evidence for macro evolution. Unless you count animation (cartoons) as evidence. Let me ask you this, have you watched or listened to any creationists on this subject? If so, what dont you find believable about their side of things. If not, you should, it might change your mind, it changed mine.

  • @glenkelley6048
    @glenkelley6048 Před rokem +1

    ANOTHER TREASURE DISCOVERED-------CAN'T WAIT TO WATCH IT ALL!

  • @thecuzz1
    @thecuzz1 Před měsícem

    This should be taught in schools

  • @jeff3olsen
    @jeff3olsen Před rokem +6

    Great video! One of my favorite scripture verses says:
    "The scriptures are laid before thee, yea, and all things denote there is a God; yea, even the earth, and all things that are upon the face of it, yea, and its motion, yea, and also all the planets which move in their regular form do witness that there is a Supreme Creator." - Alma 30:44

    • @desireebryant8170
      @desireebryant8170 Před rokem +1

      Scripture? Hmmmm
      Not in the true Bible

    • @jeff3olsen
      @jeff3olsen Před rokem +2

      @Desiree Bryant Hi Desiree, I'm glad you noticed this verse is not found in the bible. Yet, I would think most people who love the Bible (myself included) would agree and rejoice that the whole earth testifies of the truth of the Bible and the reality of a divine creator. Would you at least agree with me on this?

    • @desireebryant8170
      @desireebryant8170 Před rokem +3

      @@jeff3olsen
      Good morning Jeff-
      We are same profession.
      I’m familiar with Alma and cannot agree that is scripture. But yes, one God, our creator who is Jesus Christ in the flesh & Holy Spirit - one God not many 😇

    • @firstnamelastname-kr8dv
      @firstnamelastname-kr8dv Před rokem +1

      These things are already mentioned in the Psalms
      That stuff from alma reads like 19th century theosophy

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem +1

      @@jeff3olsen - An excellent scripture. A second witness of God's truth.. as explained in the Bible.

  • @davidcooper1201
    @davidcooper1201 Před rokem +5

    "But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's Word that the heaven's existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also was the world deluged and destroyed. By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men" (2 Peter 3:5-7).

  • @avechristusrex31
    @avechristusrex31 Před 4 měsíci

    Brilliant video! Thank you!

  • @catbritz9765
    @catbritz9765 Před 5 měsíci

    This is a great series, thank you!

  • @WadeWeigle
    @WadeWeigle Před rokem +9

    This is an excellent informative video. Thank you for sharing this. I live in Virginia where our mountains are supposed to be millions of years old since they are not craggy and tall. But in reality they were just washed smooth like a pebble on the beach from all that receding water from the flood.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 Před rokem +1

      Then why didn’t it wear down the Rockies?

    • @mtman2
      @mtman2 Před rokem

      @@davidgardner863
      They were the higher ground as it all unfolded washing East...!

    • @ronniebuchanan6575
      @ronniebuchanan6575 Před rokem

      Around 6500 years old.

    • @ronniebuchanan6575
      @ronniebuchanan6575 Před rokem

      ​@@davidgardner863 some of t he mountains formed as the flood was receding. The Bible says mount a ins rose up valley's sank down.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 Před rokem

      @@ronniebuchanan6575 , Try 50 million years.

  • @paulbriggs3072
    @paulbriggs3072 Před rokem +8

    This video needs much better visual education. Sheet erosion for instance needs to be clearly shown slicing off undulating geology in simulations or graphics then concentrating force and power into narrower channels as the floodwaters drain lower. Debris flows need to be shown so that people understand this is not mere water we are talking about. The visuals need to much better match what he's talking about WHEN he's talking about it, not showing irrelevant scenes mixed in. Only sometimes does this occur. When it does adequately it could be much helped by arrows pointing to precisely where he means. The neophyte is lost in the complexity of the landscape and unfamiliarity with terms. Video simulations however simple would greatly help. The subject matter is of enormous importance and the presentation at times is excellent and encompassing. I hope he and other like -minded geologists get together and do more detailed videos with more focus on certain easily comprehended aspects. In fact I hope these kinds of videos are made more and more.

    • @blaineoo04
      @blaineoo04 Před rokem

      sludge

    • @jeffbybee5207
      @jeffbybee5207 Před rokem

      He's a geologist? Didn't see evidence of it

    • @Calatriste54
      @Calatriste54 Před rokem +1

      I'm grateful to you, Mike. For all you do. Prior to the 2009 Creation Conference in Bozeman, I did not believe the Biblical account. I tripped over all these rocks of Truth..

  • @skeeterburke
    @skeeterburke Před rokem

    Wow 💗 what an excellent presentation

  • @joanneel9708
    @joanneel9708 Před rokem

    This is Amazing information…..Thank you …

  • @terrylm235
    @terrylm235 Před rokem +5

    Great info.
    The Resurrection, teaching of Christ on the Flood, through the Church, explains the earth's geomorphological features.
    Thanks.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem +1

      Nope, the video is nonsense. As every geologist at countless universities worldwide will tell you.

    • @terrylm235
      @terrylm235 Před rokem

      @@norbertjendruschj9121 Evidence for the Resurrection is watertight and Jesus taught Noah's Flood.
      Dates and ages that conflict with the Flood can be rejected, I have, because assumptions, by so called scientists,
      and faulty conclusions about ages and processeses take us into science fiction.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem

      @@terrylm235 Evidence for the resurrection is as watertight as a sinking vessel and Jesus speaking of Noah´s flood only shows he was an uneducated and superstitious moron.

    • @defenestratefalsehoods
      @defenestratefalsehoods Před rokem

      If you think the flood happened then you need to research ancient civilizations from 4300 years ago. 950 years after the time period of the flood we have the Aztec civilization all the way in South America. The Egyptians have recorded history during that time also. The indus valley civilization and Mesopotamia civilization didnt know they drowned 4300 years ago

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem

      @@defenestratefalsehoods With the Aztec you are on the wrong track. That´s Central America and much later. But I vaguely remember there are early South American civilazations who like the Egyptians just "ignored" the flood.

  • @Delphius-
    @Delphius- Před rokem +5

    There’s more water under us than around us. When the flood happened water most likely came up from under the ground which caused mud flooding, etc.

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem

      Very true. The Earth and all other celestial bodies formed "in and of water" just like it says in scripture. Secular science claims they formed from magma. Whichever liquid formed the Earth is still inside in massive quantities... and it's not magma.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 Před rokem +2

      @@freemind.., You don’t learn geology and astronomy from a mythical book.

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem

      @@davidgardner863 - _"....mythical book."_
      *"Mythical book" isn't what you mean to say because it sounds like the bible doesn't exist except in folklore. You mean 'book of myths'.*
      _"You don’t learn geology and astronomy from a mythical book."_
      *You did. An incredible amount of what you think you know is simply wrong. Soooo.... yeah.*

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 Před rokem

      @@freemind.. , The book of Genesis is the subject here, although not the only one. The Bible is a combination of myth, legend and fact. When myth is proven false, it must be regarded as metaphors. To take it literally is to deny almost every field of science.

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem +1

      ​@@davidgardner863 - _"The book of Genesis is the subject here, although not the only one."_
      *So, you were only referring to the book of Genesis as the mythical book..? But you've also identified other canonical books that you find too sketchy and suspect.. I think we're getting it now.*
      _" The Bible is a combination of myth, legend and fact."_
      *And YOU determine which category any particular piece of the message belongs in? Sounds right.*
      _"When myth is proven false, it must be regarded as metaphors."_
      *Yes, but what if it wasn't actually PROVEN to be false, but people like yourself just didn't like that bit of information or the implications if it were true.. so they relegated it to myth and metaphor??*
      _"To take it literally is to deny almost every field of science."_
      *What do we do when almost every field of science is replete with errors because certain people like yourself didn't like the truth and refuse to acknowledge it?*

  • @walkergarya
    @walkergarya Před 2 měsíci +1

    1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water?
    2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from?
    3. After the flood, where did the water go?
    4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank.
    5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark?
    6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour.
    7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
    8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
    9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species.
    10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife.
    11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
    12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood.
    13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions.
    a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded?
    b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb?

    • @voiceofreason162
      @voiceofreason162 Před 3 dny

      2. 3.
      Huge 'Ocean' Discovered Inside Earth
      By Ker Than, published February 28, 2007
      The finding, made by Michael Wysession, a seismologist at Washington University in St. Louis, and his former graduate student Jesse Lawrence, now at the University of California, San Diego, will be detailed in a forthcoming monograph to be published by the American Geophysical Union. And they did.
      They go further 28th November 2016:
      "Scientists have made an incredible discovery: Earth has an underground ocean - deep underground, in the planet’s lower mantle far beneath the crust.
      The underground ocean consists of water trapped within minerals, and it may be the size of all of the Earth’s oceans put together.
      Those are the findings of two parallel studies conducted by researchers at Florida State University, the University of Edinburgh, and Northwestern University.
      The first study, carried out by Florida State and Edinburgh, found that water can exist far deeper in the Earth’s mantle than previously thought. They focused on how the water could exist so deep within the planet, and found that a mineral called brucite stores it. Their initial studies should that the water stored in the Earth’s mantle could account for as much as 1.5 percent of the Earth’s weight.
      The second study at Northwestern sought to determine how deep the water-storing brucite could go. A Brazilian diamond from a volcanic eruption 90 million years ago offered some clues.
      The diamond contained an imperfection caused by minerals that were trapped within the gem as it formed. The imperfection suggested that the diamond formed in the Earth’s lower mantle, a third of the way to the planet’s core. But it contained hydroxyl ions, which come from water.
      The researchers believe this indicates that brucite containing water can be found in the lower mantle as well.
      The information gathered by the studies shows that water may be an important part of the volcanic process, including “convection” that circulates the molten rock in the Earth’s mantle."
      At first (2007) they thought they'd found something as large as the Arctic Ocean. Now the global observations are in they now know its bigger than all the world's oceans combined, ranging from 160 to 610 miles. The zipper is the Mid-atlantic ridge. Now, I know this, so it wasn't hard finding it. But do you see this in evolutionary text books, school curriculums? MSM? You know the answer. You know why.
      There you go. 2 points off your list. Go research the rest. You're welcome.

  • @dougp59
    @dougp59 Před rokem +5

    Fantastic video! Question. At least in theory, with a continental sheet erosion post-flood event occurring, would one expect to find the geologic column in REVERSE in the sedimentary layers of the continental shelf?

    • @jasonstclair1329
      @jasonstclair1329 Před rokem +1

      That’s what I was wondering, but I’m assuming that water would have sped up the decay of biological evidence.

    • @marionchase-kleeves8311
      @marionchase-kleeves8311 Před rokem +1

      Ever seen what a blender does?

    • @ronniebuchanan6575
      @ronniebuchanan6575 Před rokem

      There is no geologic column all these fossils came from the flood during the flood and went through hydro sorting during the flood especially during the
      Tide rise and fall.

  • @tomzeman5964
    @tomzeman5964 Před rokem +3

    Genesis 7:11 the word "BURST" describes the 1st split second exothermal explosion, Bowen Reaction Series & subsequent ballistic deposition of metamorphic & sedimentary layers!

    • @flolou8496
      @flolou8496 Před rokem

      Wow, that's a mouthful, but could you offer an opinion on how what your describing could alter the Radiometric or Carbon Dating 14 used to justify conventional science
      which places the earth's rocks or mantles or layers in the billions of years, if the entire earth's crust and layers were submerged in this ''special flood water'' for so long,

  • @markbernstein3991
    @markbernstein3991 Před rokem +1

    Thanks. Great!

  • @timdurpos3298
    @timdurpos3298 Před rokem +6

    I find your videos interesting and fascinating imagine being a witnesses to this flood God is a wondrous spirit

    • @mtman2
      @mtman2 Před rokem

      That day may come IF we are allowed to see history re•unfold tho likely not for all the world wae Evil living in Darkness as something to leave lie = for grreat wonders yet untold...!

  • @chefboyxrp7336
    @chefboyxrp7336 Před rokem +1

    There is a place in California called Table Top Mountains. You would be fascinated with how they are flat on top. Looks like they we’re just sheared off by a flood .

  • @rockroll9761
    @rockroll9761 Před rokem +3

    how do i buy this video plz?

  • @lawneymalbrough4309
    @lawneymalbrough4309 Před rokem +5

    Republicans. It takes a certain amount t of time to polish a rock I to a smooth round shape like that. They make rock polishers that work on a simular principle. The rocks are tumbled in a drum with water and sand. It takes about a week or two I think. Maybe less time. The point is it takes water to do that which supports a flood hypothesis. You are doing some geogy analysis. Thanks.

    • @ianmonk6211
      @ianmonk6211 Před rokem

      why do you say this to republicans? And what's your point? 2 weeks in a man made machine is not a long time. Evolution says these things took millions of years. I bet there's a lot of liberals pushing the evolution lies as well as Republicans. A glacier and a world wide flood have way more power than anything man can make. If you watch videos on my st Helens and Iceland you can see in minutes canyon formings and forests destroyed

    • @FloridaIndependent
      @FloridaIndependent Před rokem

      MT. HELEN!

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem

      Nope, The flood is nonsense. "Polishing" of stones is done every day in rivers. A flood would not polish and sort stones but produce a great mess. Fundamental Christians are too stupid to understand even the fundamentals of geology.

    • @jeffbybee5207
      @jeffbybee5207 Před rokem

      Rock polishing is a 4 step process generally run each grit for a week so three weeks to rounded and 4th to coat it with polish

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem +1

      @@jeffbybee5207 This might be true in technical polishing and has nothing to do do with what happens in nature.

  • @angelafeldman5903
    @angelafeldman5903 Před rokem +2

    Even the rocks will speak his name!

  • @GodDutyHonorCountry
    @GodDutyHonorCountry Před rokem +16

    The ENTIRE FACE of this Earth, and much the oceanic floor = are ALL explained by The Worldwide CATASTROPHIC Flood!!
    Here in Colorado, is Garden of the Gods, Cave of The Winds, The Royal Gorge, The Rockies,
    The Maroon Bells, and mesas everywhere! = ALL fit The Flood, FAR BETTER than millions of years shaping them.

    • @domcizek
      @domcizek Před rokem

      WELL, BRELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT, NO MENTION OF ALL THE ICE AGES THAT THE EARTH HAD, MANY TIMES IN THE PAST AND WELL DOCUMENTED FACTS

  • @jimjimgl3
    @jimjimgl3 Před 6 měsíci +3

    Next Up: "The Biblical Mystery of how a man who holds a bible up-side-down and had sex with a porn star is supported by evangelicals!"

  • @phillipalexandercarr1462

    Have you sent this video to Randall Carlson? You guys should discuss this, I encourage you to get in touch with him. Best Philly 🐝🎩🇬🇧

  • @tomasweber307
    @tomasweber307 Před 2 měsíci

    The mechanism is a crustal slip. A physical pole shift. The oceans and the atmosphere would continue in the direction of rotation overtaking the land. Some of the land masses would sink. While others rebound and rise. There would also be a slosh back wave after the original.

  • @dynamo6796
    @dynamo6796 Před rokem +14

    devils tower is a tree trunk

    • @jonahwashburn9573
      @jonahwashburn9573 Před rokem +1

      I wish. that would be so awesome.

    • @haggismcbaggis9485
      @haggismcbaggis9485 Před rokem

      It was aliens playing with their mashed potatoes actually.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 Před rokem +1

      It’s what’s left when the volcano has eroded away.

    • @peacefulpatriots
      @peacefulpatriots Před rokem

      Dynamo has it correct. Am ancient silicon based tree, cut down to keep the giants from escaping the flood

    • @argonaught5666
      @argonaught5666 Před rokem +2

      That's nothing, the moon is made of cheese.

  • @sueneilson896
    @sueneilson896 Před 10 měsíci +3

    More utter nonsense from the god botherers. Totally divorced from evidence and reality.

  • @rtchow3000
    @rtchow3000 Před 10 měsíci +1

    these quartz rocks can be seen all over northern ca along I-5. they are huge boulders in different sizes scattered everywhere in the open field.

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon Před rokem +2

    Some geneticist needs to address the “Out of Africa” SNP claim. They have it exactly backwards. When you root the paternal Y chromosome phylogenetic tree where it belongs with Eurasians the descendants of Japheth the oldest son of Noah the SNPs fit perfectly tying the oldest son of Shem, Arphaxad’s IJK SNP to his uncle Japheth which is subsequently *lost* in Arphaxad’s younger brothers, Elam, Asshur, Aram, and Lud. The same is true for Nimrod who is the oldest son of Cush the oldest son of Ham. That’s why Nimrod has the same CF SNP marker as his great uncles Shem’s and Japheth’s descendants which is lost to all the other descendants of Ham who is the *youngest* son of Noah. Neanderthals also share the most DNA with Eurasians anyway so the root of human family tree can’t possibly be in Africa.

  • @cfajohnson5207
    @cfajohnson5207 Před rokem +6

    It is incredible that anyone can be so scientifically illiterate.

    • @michaeluttley3386
      @michaeluttley3386 Před rokem

      Couldn't agree more. Please see my comments if they are allowed.

    • @thomasdykstra100
      @thomasdykstra100 Před rokem +1

      Are you seeking "literacy" from prejudiced armchair theories or, rather, in keeping with the strict guidance of observable evidence? Doubtless, your hostile imagination will not follow facts, so your quarrel merely reduces to a mean spirit.

    • @michaeluttley3386
      @michaeluttley3386 Před rokem

      @@thomasdykstra100
      A very sarcastic reply. My question was quite simple and straight forward. You seem to want to show off your large vocabulary and very sophisticated grasp of the English language with nonsensical statements. What facts or observable evidence am I missing or is my hostile imagination not following, please feel free to elaborate on these.

    • @rolandoaponte214
      @rolandoaponte214 Před rokem +1

      At least bring arguments, not the typical bashing of God-haters.

    • @domcizek
      @domcizek Před rokem

      @@rolandoaponte214 SORRY, SCIENCE DEMANDS OBSERVABLE PROOF OF ANYTHING, THAT IS THE STANDARD, NOT JUST FAITH THAT ANYTHING JUST HAPPENED

  • @anthonysizer2369
    @anthonysizer2369 Před rokem

    Good job! I like how you put this together! I ask one question: Why are there no dinosaurs included on the Ark?

  • @braddreadfulwater2037

    Genesis 1 tells us that the earth was covered with water and Hashem separated the waters which included receding water to make dry land. So we actually have two Flood type events receding to make dry land within approximately 1400 years. That does reinforce your conclusions greatly. Good video. Thanks

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Před rokem

      That’s the sediment that’s rotated at the bottom of the Grand Canyon

  • @richardtofield5210
    @richardtofield5210 Před rokem +1

    if wave swell size is only up to 5 metres, why is wave height reduced so much by the continental shelf which is 100 metres deep? does this mean that waves are formed by energy drawn up from the depths even though they seem to be coming from the centre of the low pressure system

  • @walterulasinksi7031
    @walterulasinksi7031 Před rokem +1

    The title of this video by itself is an indication, that the “flood” was a human memory of a Mega Tsunami. For the water to recede, it went back to where it came from. Anyone that understands the water cycle on the planet can understand this. The amount if water never changed, therefore the “ Flood” stories from around the inhabited parts of the planet when the story arose, primarily around the Indian Ocean, did nit then have much if any contact with other civilizations and for their part could believe that everyone else was drowned except for their “ hero”. A farmer who saved his animals along with his family.
    Such us the nature of. Story Telling. When you experience something, it is subjective and in telling your tale of the experience, you become the hero as you survived to tell the tale. Every thing other than your own experience is fabulist expansion. Such as building a vessel large enough to accommodate a breeding pair of every type of creature still in existence. It us a device that humans use to explain how other creatures are still in existence. And attempt to persuade one of the validity of a notion as to why they and themselves are still in existence.
    By placing the entire story into a framework of a supernatural power. It tries to force one to suspend their disbelief, which is the more natural human condition. Such tales can no longer be considered even as allegorical.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 Před 5 měsíci

      Wow a mega tsunami that lasted 150 days...now that is a tsunami.....LOL

    • @walterulasinksi7031
      @walterulasinksi7031 Před 5 měsíci

      @@alantasman8273 the Tsunami was the major deluge. It was caused, if the cosmologists have it correctly, by an deep i,pact from a comet into the Indian Ocean. This would have also thrown up huge amounts of water vapor that would have fallen as rain, much like the Monsoons that affect much of southern Asia annually, but on a wider scale. For a local area to have months if rain while unusual is not impossible. In October of 2004, in Los Angeles, the rain began and did not stop until April of 2005. Which the daily amounts varied, much of it was heavy rain and whenever I was out, jokingly asking everyone they had an Ark.

    • @walterulasinksi7031
      @walterulasinksi7031 Před 5 měsíci

      @@alantasman8273 To those that think that it does not pour in the desert, I can refer you to the recent major rains in Saudi Arabia that caused major flooding in Mecca and Medina, it would not surprise me to hear of the Arabian peninsula being in a super bloom, as is frequent when deserts have huge rainfalls.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 Před 5 měsíci

      @@walterulasinksi7031 A Tsunami does not last for 150 days as the water prevailed upon the Earth as it did during the Noahic flood. Not even a comet hitting the ocean would cause waters to rise above the mountains as the bible describes.

    • @walterulasinksi7031
      @walterulasinksi7031 Před 5 měsíci

      @@alantasman8273 as with most, you have not read the story correctly. Nowhere does it say that the flood lasted 250 days. Only that there were forty days and forty nights of rain along with the deluge. The Tsunami is considered to have been. Kilometer high ( 60% of a mile). Uf you remember the 2011 Tsunami of only 50 ft high ghat struck Japan, you might have heard that it followed the river coursed up to a mountain lake over a hundred Kilometers away and flooded it to three times it’s size with ocean water. That lasted there for over a year. As to this event, it most likely reached as far as the Arrata mountains in the north of Iraq/ Turkye, then slowly receded back into the Persian gulf
      The Forty days and nights is a principle that was used during Desert Shield in the 1980’s when the US bombed Bagdad military communications and headquarters to force Saddam Hussain out of Kuwait.

  • @jamesstewart4677
    @jamesstewart4677 Před 5 měsíci

    Yes, "plane" amazing!

  • @vaughnp3283
    @vaughnp3283 Před rokem

    Finally someone gets it right. Check out the book. The deluge story in stone

  • @stephenjohnhopkinson8096

    Can I please help you with your version of events.

  • @varstick6
    @varstick6 Před rokem

    Thank you for this excellent presentation, I'm impressed with all the driving you guys must have done to go to all the places you wanted to film and walk.
    Serious suntans too!
    OK so a professor who had his career destroyed by talking and writing about catastrophic earth changes needs mentioning here.
    He stated that there's evidence that Venus was once a wandering planet and in its near misses of Mars and Earth caused biblical damage to both.
    He said that Venus almost touched Earth causing the oceans to leave their homes and gather at the poles taking nearly every soul to rest.
    That the tectonic effects were unimaginable.
    Oceans flowed over mountains, the Chinese had a emperor who was so upset because the ocean had filled a valley in the mountains where he grew up, he called the brightest surviving engineers to drain the valley.
    A guy volunteered and failed, he was executed.
    Another succeeded and was rewarded.
    This is recorded.
    There's bones of Arctic animals mixed up with bones of desert animals in high mountain cracks on earth, the earth was robbed of some of its speed by Venus, the Calendar used to be 10 months long as counted, there's a 'water clock' in Egypt (Khem) that counts shorter hours than we have now.
    The planets are not as they were.
    Read David Talbott- the saturn myth
    And Immanuel Velikovski' Worlds in Collision, Earth in upheaval, Peoples of the sea.
    The Velikovski heresies by Scranton or think on what Velikovski said about "Manna from heaven" and how it saved people from certain death.
    What he said about changes in times and seasons,
    The Red world, a hail of stones, Naptha, the darkness and the earthquakes.
    He considered scientific knowledge, he made predictions concerning Venus that have been proved correct,
    and took myths from people all across the planet and made sense of what they ALL said, the synodical year of Venus and how it became the morning star, Yuddha, Tao, Huitzilopochtli, Fenris wolf, the Kings of the gauls being borne atop a shield to stop the sky from falling on the people, think that was mere superstition? Or something they saw?
    Ask yourself, why was there a worldwide fixation on Stonehenge similar circles if the heavens were a benign place?
    It's because it was a comet that came to rest as a morning star, Mars threatened us too.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 Před 5 měsíci

      Wandering planets do not just settle down into orbits around a Sun ....The same was said about the Moon but it too has been disproven.

  • @mikechambers3920
    @mikechambers3920 Před rokem +1

    This guy is on track. Another thing that needs to be taken into account is the Crucifixion. The Western Hemisphere was upheaved during that time.

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      Prove it. The people who were living here seem to have no particular record of it.

    • @mikechambers3920
      @mikechambers3920 Před rokem

      @@NorthForkFisherman There is a record of the ancient inhabitants of the Americas, that explains it. Jesus Christ also validates it. I ask you to read the Book of Mormon. It is that ancient record. It will open your eyes to the truthfulness of what the Lord has revealed to us His children.

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      @@mikechambers3920 You mean the one that was read out of a magic hat and absolutely SKEWERED by South Park?
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    • @mikechambers3920
      @mikechambers3920 Před rokem

      @@NorthForkFisherman I have no idea where you got your info, but until you have read it and prayed about it, you will never understand. It is a 2nd witness to the Bible. Bless you my brother.

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      @@mikechambers3920 Eris and Coyote are my guides. You've been fun, but if you think the Book of Mormon has anything to do with reality, all I need ask is the same thing I've been asking:
      "where did the heat go?"
      If you can explain that clearly, then you have something worth listening to.

  • @dougeisner44
    @dougeisner44 Před rokem +1

    So if it rained for 40 days it must have rained on the oceans as well so where would the water drain to if everything is full already?..

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Před rokem

      You don’t understand enough to ask answerable questions

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      @@cosmictreason2242 And you don't give a meaningful response.

    • @luisdestefano6056
      @luisdestefano6056 Před rokem +1

      Simple. It rained 9 km of water in 40 days, or 225 meters per day (2 city blocks). Or 9 metres (3 floors high) per hour. Fortunately god gave Noah and his family a big umbrella, so they didn't get wet, but he forgot to write this down. Water was drained down earth's edges, because as we all know earth is flat.

  • @busker153
    @busker153 Před rokem

    Unless erosion stops when uplift occurs, and vice versa, you are stuck with the problem of erosion fighting uplift. Basically, whichever process operates faster would be the only one witnessed.

  • @Angie-GoneSoon
    @Angie-GoneSoon Před 11 měsíci

    How many miles up did the flood waters go?

  • @bonnielucas3244
    @bonnielucas3244 Před 8 měsíci

    Although I could talk about what I have seen in my driving trips within the USA, I will say that just in my home state I see plenty of evidence for an enormous water catastrophe from long ago. Without getting out of the car. Just looking at lots of sediments along roadsides that were exposed when highways and secondary roads were constructed and lots of road routes were excavated. Ancient sediments laid down by extensive water catastrophe is obvious if one realizes that is exactly what they are driving past.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 7 měsíci

      Read a geology book.

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 Před 6 měsíci +2

      Two false assumptions here. One is that you believe all the strata were deposited more or less simultaneously (over thousands, not millions of years).
      The other is that you omit mention of all the other strata which are NOT deposited under "catastrophic" or even just high energy water conditions. Clays, shales and most limestones (especially chalk) can only accumulate in low energy, quiet water conditions. IOW they are NOT flood deposits. Moreover, mixed in with these sediments are beds of volcanic lava (some are pillow lavas which do form in submarine eruptions, but many others are sub-aerial and from land volcanoes). And again, cross-cutting these beds are igneous intrusions (dykes) which have to be younger in age that the sediments they cut.
      Thus your survey is unsound through poor sampling.
      Mind you, that is not to deny past catastrophism. Yes, there is much evidence for many sub-aerial floods in just the USA alone. However, even the greatest of these (perhaps the Lake Missoula floods) only affected a tiny area of the North American continent. IOW it was NOT worldwide. And they did not occur all at the same geological time. IOW they do not support Genesis.

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před 5 měsíci

      @@alanthompson8515 And all the fossil pollen that is laid down in nice neat horizons as well. Yes, when you start talking about Stokes Law and how it directly applies to sedimentation, Creationists quickly start spouting that verse from Romans. You all know the one. And they quite simply miss the irony of it, neh?

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 Před 5 měsíci +1

      @@NorthForkFisherman I have it on good authority that most young earthers think the opposite of irony is wrinkly.

  • @faithijn8338
    @faithijn8338 Před rokem +1

    I would love to hear a video on Carbon dating & facts & truth and accuracy. I have been fascinated my 74 yrs by PSNW GEOLOGY and watched some professors that are obviously unbelievers. In Washington/Oregon Columbia River Gorge & all the places in this video I’m familiar with. In respect to the academics I just cannot buy into their teaching on plantations; coulees, calcretes, cobbles, erratics & more as to their Dating of rocks etc; in the millions like 81 million, 64mil etc. As a Creationist it does not ring true to my Biblical World View. That is why I’m thrilled with us series. I want TRUTH, those geologists have egos as big as Texas & totally reject a flood view as it crumbles careers built on Sand.

    • @jaysmith5047
      @jaysmith5047 Před 11 měsíci

      Those without a flood view seem to have to jump through a lot of hoops. Why can't the simplest explanation be the best? Because then they would have to acknowledge God.

    • @waynesumner1829
      @waynesumner1829 Před 9 měsíci

      Reply to walterulasinksi: for this Jewish fable to have accomplished its "righteous" vengeful , retributive sin and corruption earth-cleansing purpose Noah's float boat should have sunk the very first day with all its passengers drowned like all the other hapless "air-breathers" for which there was no berth left aboard "H.M.S. Noah's Ark!

  • @sherrysmithrice1973
    @sherrysmithrice1973 Před 11 měsíci

    People forget that the Ark was found on Mt Ararat. Every year scientists go to study it.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 8 měsíci

      Except it wasn´t. It was just a landslide, vaguely resembling the spape of a ship. But some morons believe everything.

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 Před 6 měsíci

      Nah. A few tourists is all. There's an Info centre and a café about a 1/2km from the site. The Turkish authorities appear to prefer a hands off approach to the claims, despite Nuh (Noah) being a prophet of Islam.
      The science is long since in. If this weird but natural geological outcrop HAD been what was claimed for it, archaeologists would have appeared in swarms funded by Evangelical American dollars. (Imagine the fuss if access had been denied!)
      Mind you, Ken Ham, he of The Ark Encounter and Answers in Genesis agrees with me: "These claims regarding this site have been made for more than 25 years and have been refuted many times before. We don’t need to find the Ark to accept it as a historical reality"
      IOW people forget this because it's NOT the Ark.

  • @jpdunamislodge
    @jpdunamislodge Před rokem +1

    There are many Bible verses about the “rocks crying out the truth” about God.

  • @nincumpoop9747
    @nincumpoop9747 Před rokem +2

    But where did so much water come from & where did it go? It doesn’t make sense.

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Před rokem

      The ocean. The ocean.

    • @waynesumner1829
      @waynesumner1829 Před 9 měsíci

      Reply to Learn Quranwithme: Dear people of the "Book' Quran (Muslims), how sad it is to see by your misperceptions, your unfounded belief system that you have made yourselves poor, pitiful Spiritual orphans, having no Father, no Mother, no Brother, no Comforting Spirit of Truth to share with you the Eternal Love, Joy and Peace of the Living GOD of Abraham, Isaac, Israel and yea His Son Ishmael as well. So we go to our knees in prayer for Ewe 🐑 Our fellow Sheep who seem to be running with the goats 🐐: Our Heavenly Father, Chay Elohiym, have We not All One Father, and Mother, Hephzibah, Jerusalem Above, the Mother of Us All, and Is there not One Son and Brother/Saviour of the world, the Great Rays ☀️ That shineth Everywhere, even in Mecca and Medina, whose Name is I Am the Way, the Truth and The Life,not Allah. If Mohammed were here in this Holy Instant He would,no doubt Worship His GOD and Father in Spirit and in Truth! May Our Brothers so long orphaned by the bondage of Islam, come to the Great Adoption of the Sons of GOD, whereby We cry ABBA Father! Amen. This prayer 🙏💕 has been answered!!!

  • @opendstudio7141
    @opendstudio7141 Před 8 měsíci

    Personally, I have yet to witness anyone explorer the possible acidic condition of the fountains that God opened. There was some mechanism active that consumed flesh and erased the technologically advanced cities of the children of Cain. Too, formed certain crystalline and mineralized structures like mica and fossilized wood. Also, etched an eroded remnants of the cities that continue to fascinated and perplex scholars and experts.

  • @mahimadeka8639
    @mahimadeka8639 Před 10 měsíci

    Why can't the science make use of the innovative 3D technology used in the cinemas and the real-world imagery to show how the great flood occurred in history?

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před 5 měsíci

      Because it didn't actually happen. I mean, we can do an apocalypse movie again and again. But it's still just fiction,

  • @bonnielucas3244
    @bonnielucas3244 Před 8 měsíci

    There is an astonishing info card that features a small bell made of a metal compound that has not been seen for a very long time. This small bell with a handle shaped as a winged god was found in a coal seam in a USA state, but it is from what is now the Middle East. It has to have been trapped thousands of years ago under huge amounts of vegetation which became coal, at a time when the American continent was contiguous with the Eurasian continent. There is no other explanation for its location in a coal seam in what is not the eastern USA.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 7 měsíci

      You shouldn´t believe such stupid frauds. But probably you are very prone to stupid frauds - as all religious people.

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 Před 6 měsíci

      One person was present when the Upshur bell was found. 10 year old Newton Anderson might well have believed it fell out of a lump of undisturbed coal, but he probably didn't know that other man made objects had been found encased in coal balls (a feature produced during mining).
      So that is at least one "other explanation".
      This possibility doesn't remove the strangeness of an antique casting turning up in 1940s West Virginia. Perhaps someone was playing a trick on him?
      So that is another "other explanation".
      Geologists worldwide agree that homo sapiens has been around for no more that 300,000 years while the Virginia coal seams were deposited in coastal swamps around 300,000,000 years ago. They would point out that, unless something like The Tardis was involved, the bell and the coal seam cannot possibly be contemporary.
      So there is "other explanation" number three, although it's not really an explanation. Just a fact.
      Am I right in guessing that you find this bell "astonishing" because it seems to support the idea that planet earth is just a few thousand years old? If so, then I am astonished that such unscientific mumbo-jumbo is still being taught to the gullible.

  • @jeffreyrayborn1871
    @jeffreyrayborn1871 Před rokem

    i ask because the amounts of water your describing to move the sediments would fill the oceans far deeper than they exhist now. not to mention that you say the erosion we see under the ocean is part of the sheet flow and smallflow theories??? if the erosion under the ocean happened as you say < then where did the flowing water go and how did it both rise above the ocean to be eroded and be under the ocean at the same time??????

  • @jeffreyrayborn1871
    @jeffreyrayborn1871 Před rokem +2

    so where did all this water go???
    because the way your describing it it could only happen on a flat earth. and the waters washed off the earth to go ??? where???

  • @timdurpos3298
    @timdurpos3298 Před rokem +2

    Some amazing power that did that

  • @998SBayliss
    @998SBayliss Před rokem +1

    Incredible evidence. Just think about what the word incredible literally means and it sums this theory up.

  • @johngray2829
    @johngray2829 Před rokem

    I believe the planation surfaces explain where the water for the flood came from, the sky, and frozen. Genesis 1:6 explains the expanse I'm referring to eigh. In many ancient texts and elders of different nations there are stories of when the sky fell eigh. Having miles of ice around the whole earth also explains why before the flood people lived over 1000 years. And Noah's children after only lived around 300 years old. The asteroid would have separated pangea in one impact. The blue ice we used to see in the arctic came from the sky.

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      "Having miles of ice around the whole earth also explains why before the flood people lived over 1000 years."
      OKAY...
      How does that work? Specifically?
      And I'd really like to know how sunlight can get through "miles of ice". Because...it actually can't. Water attenuates visible light very, very well

  • @jeffbybee5207
    @jeffbybee5207 Před rokem

    How much water are you figuring to flood the earth? And if you figer everything was flat then what caused the mountians to rise?

  • @robertsummerfield3386

    Great presentation.
    Now watch:
    _"The best movie ever made about Noah's Ark"_

  • @popwillodrum1
    @popwillodrum1 Před 9 měsíci

    Consummate support of an argument for a Global Flood and geological consequences of such a massive retreat but little or nothing on where the water went back to.
    Sorry i must have missed it can anyone enlighten me please?

  • @jdr9419
    @jdr9419 Před rokem

    There are floods every year. If you look at it as a fable it’s a warning to humans to be prepared for floods.

  • @jonrev5630
    @jonrev5630 Před rokem

    How would this flood model relate to the geology of New Zealand ?

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      it doesn't because it never happened.

    • @waynesumner1829
      @waynesumner1829 Před 9 měsíci

      Reply to Jungle Jargon: sometimes we just cain't see Forest for lookin' at the trees...where did Noah's 16 grandsons of whom the post-flood world 🌍 was to be re-populated find wives of child-bearing age. Shem's daughters are one possibility, but they would be 1st cousins. And who were to be the wives and mothers of the next generation, Noah's great-grandsons. You do know that the "Land of Nod" was a magical place since Cain found a wife there! Maybe Nod was a land in the middle of the hollow earth that was flood-proof that had a large population of fertile virgins, and that's where Shem, Ham and Japheth 's sons and grandsons found wives! What thinkest thou? Are you sure the Flood was universal? And what is "sinful" about eating and drinking and marrying and giving in marriage. If the people who were murdered in the flood, had been fasting, teetotaling virgins would "the LORD God" still have sent the Deluge? I Am a born-from Above Johnine, Jamesish, Pauline Christian,Trinitarian, non-infernalist ,AKJT TrueScripture adventist ex-atheist , but Noah's Flood, God rest his Soul, just don't hold "🌊"water!

    • @waynesumner1829
      @waynesumner1829 Před 9 měsíci

      If the Genesis chapter 6-9 Floof Story holds water 🌊, then it was the greatest 1st Degree murder spree known to man . Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not even a drop 💧 in the bucket 🪣 in comparison! This grand-scale homicide was planned with malice and aforethought by two merciless deitys that had the power and intent to personally perform this dastardly deed by bringing forth a deadly world-wide deluge with no regard for the the decidedly Innocent victims, the children under 12 yrs. (the age of accountability) and the nursing and parental-dependent young of the so-called "corrupt", death-penalty-deserving animal and plant species. And if Noah had not been privy to the "Hydrocaust" genocidal plan, he would have revolted against his enabling partners - in -crime to which instead he had sold his sorry soul in an 8 for 8 million cowardly exchange. And he never once opened his mouth to warn the curious passersby, many of which were no doubt well-known neighbors and associates. The last thing he needed as the ark was nearing completion, was a real revival and a boatload of new converts. And who would be left to hold these two sadistic deities to account. No one ...that is but a Higher Power, the Most High GOD of All Grace and Mercy!

  • @Staystrong123
    @Staystrong123 Před rokem +2

    One question ❓ is the earth flat?? Excellent information, a great way to get some education they lied about in school 😁

    • @ansfridaeyowulfsdottir8095
      @ansfridaeyowulfsdottir8095 Před rokem

      No, of course it's not flat.
      And there's no education in this drivel. THIS is where you will find the lies.
      {:o:O:}

    • @peacefulpatriots
      @peacefulpatriots Před rokem +1

      Not flat, but textured. It’s definitely not a God forsaken globe

    • @peacefulpatriots
      @peacefulpatriots Před rokem

      The seas are flat, the earth is the dry terra firmament portions of our realm

    • @susanjaeger9851
      @susanjaeger9851 Před rokem +1

      It's a flatie.

    • @FloridaIndependent
      @FloridaIndependent Před rokem +1

      NOT. WE KNOW IT. PEOPLE IN THE PAST ALSO KNEW IT'S NOT.

  • @egggmann2000
    @egggmann2000 Před rokem +2

    I’m surprised they did not mention the expanding earth theory. It’s the most sound theory of the flood I’ve seen. The earth was much smaller before the flood, with compressed water, the crust cracked and the oceans were formed by the earth expanding and stretching to its current size

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem

      And why should the earth expand? I assume just to give you a reasoning for your superstitious nonsense. But physics doesn´t bend for Christian morons.

    • @defenestratefalsehoods
      @defenestratefalsehoods Před rokem +2

      You still need to account for the several civilizations that didnt know they drowned and had recorded history during that time of the flood. The Egyptians, indus valley civilization, and Mesopotamia civilization. 950 years later we had the Aztec civilization halfway across the world.

    • @MrWeezer55
      @MrWeezer55 Před rokem +1

      That's possibly the dumbest 'theory' I've ever heard.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před rokem +1

      @@MrWeezer55 Oh, on creationist sites are a lot of eager contenders 😁

    • @domcizek
      @domcizek Před rokem

      THATS BECAUSE IT IS NOT EXPANDING, DUE TO PLATE TECNTONICS, A WELL PROVEN FACT, THE GROUND YOU WALK ON WILL EVENTIALLY BE FOLDED BACK INTO THE EARTH, PRODUCING MANY VOCANOS, THAT IS HOW VOLCANES ARE MADE

  • @Steven-rp8zo
    @Steven-rp8zo Před 9 měsíci +1

    Really good visuals on this presentation. All one needs to do is go visit Grand Canyon or see some of the national parks in Southern Utah. Believe your eyes and not secular zealot scientism lies.

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 8 měsíci +1

      Yeah, the Grand Canyon is perfect proof for the deep geological time. Only undereducated Bible enthusiasts can´t see that. Greetings from a geophysicist.

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 Před 6 měsíci

      @@norbertjendruschj9121 Agreed. I've never really grasped why so many YECs pick on the GC for supposed Genesis Flood "evidences".
      That's not to say that the area isn't amazing. I find the real geology / geomorphology so much more amazing (as in awe-inspiring) than the fictions of the creationists. Their ideas are amazing, as in SMH unbelievable, simply because their presuppositions / dogmas always trump empirical evidence. And yet they still try to appear scientific!
      Greetings from a mere retired geology teacher.

  • @jasonhenn7345
    @jasonhenn7345 Před rokem

    Alluvial deposition, exponentially

  • @thebuff7271
    @thebuff7271 Před 11 měsíci

    When will people learn...The Bible is absolute truth. Hundreds of translations, scrutinized and criticized and yet, its never been wrong

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 8 měsíci

      The Bible is mostly bullshit. An accurate translation of bullshit is still bullshit.

  • @BobSmith-ew5oi
    @BobSmith-ew5oi Před rokem +2

    Summed it all up in the first few words.Scientific evidence needed to prove flood myth but unfortunately no single piece has ever been found to verify this impossible fable.

    • @kyledick9813
      @kyledick9813 Před rokem +1

      Uh huh... Yet the secularist theory has unprovable constantly changing timelines. Not to mention no way to explain formation of much of the features of the earth

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Před rokem +1

      The evidence is overwhelming for the flood

  • @georgehays4908
    @georgehays4908 Před rokem

    I started to watch because it makes sense ! Another great guy , a creationist is Walter Veith . He is @ Clash of Minds on CZcams ! If you liked this....... , you will like Walter ! Maranatha !

  • @LordRustyMcAlpin
    @LordRustyMcAlpin Před rokem

    The earth was in pangia form when the fountains of the deep broke open and hit the firmament. Which made it rain. And covered the whole earth. Then as the water was receding the waters cut the lands. Forming the continates. Creating the low places forming the oceans.

  • @jpdm8663
    @jpdm8663 Před rokem

    One thing I don’t think I heard was if the whole earth was covered in water, where did it recede to?

    • @jpdm8663
      @jpdm8663 Před rokem

      Ok, so at 18:21 he says the sea floor sank and then the mountains rose, that’s a lot of tectonic activity going on. I don’t see it.

    • @jpdm8663
      @jpdm8663 Před rokem

      I do believe in a great flood mainly because of many cultures having the same story, I just don’t understand where all the water went afterwards.

    • @jpdm8663
      @jpdm8663 Před rokem

      He does know how to explain a lot, very intelligent. I would love to pick his brain about geology.

    • @roscius6204
      @roscius6204 Před rokem +1

      @@jpdm8663 What about the ancient cultures that didn't get flooded?
      Bit inconvenient aren't they?

    • @NorthForkFisherman
      @NorthForkFisherman Před rokem

      @@jpdm8663 But he doesn't talk about how much energy this would take and how that energy decays into heat and what effect that would have on the total environment. Details matter.

  • @lxckdown32
    @lxckdown32 Před rokem +1

    In the first part about the “Phases” as you call them. You said the entire earth was covered with water from the continuous 40 days and night of rain. And you state that the entire earth is covered with water. Water does one thing very well. It starts filling at the lowest point. Then will continue to fill up slowly until everything is covered. At that point. The water around the entire world is at the same “level” point. But the depth of the water will obviously vary. So that being a actual fact. Because the best way determine if something is level. Is to use a water level. My point. If the water is level around the entire earth. Where is the water going to drain to. The only way the water level will drop is thru evaporation. Not draining. Because every void will be completely filled with water. So your so called “draining “ should not occur until almost most of the evaporation has occurred. Water hydraulic will be mostly static. And the water kinetics won’t occur unless there is another intense short term deluge. Or a massive displacement of water. Such as a large object striking somewhere in the worlds ocean.(I.e. meteor, comet, space debris of some kind). Otherwise it’s just evaporation. Because the water has no where to “drain” to. Since according to your Genesis interpretation. The water covered the entire earth. This is a law of nature. When it concerns water. I’ve used water level calibrate my levels and “Laser” levels as well. Water is the only true level. Just saying.

    • @twood6992
      @twood6992 Před rokem

      The continents and mountains rose up and oceans basins sank lower. The flood waters filled the lower ocean basins and exist there to this day.

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem

      Anthony Soltero - You have a valid point that no one wants to address. First, the Earth wasn't completely covered in water after 40 days of rain. The text says that on day 40 the rain stopped but that the water kept rising. It was on day 40 that the ark was finally lifted off the ground and began to float. The water kept rising until day 150 because the bulk of the water was coming from inside the Earth. Everyone will argue that there isn't water inside the Earth, but there is.
      The Earth is round because it formed from a liquid. Science says it formed from magma, and scripture says it formed in and of water. Whichever liquid it formed from is still contained in large quantities inside the Earth. If there was a global flood (there was) then the scriptures are true, and there is likely 100 times more water INSIDE the Earth than is found in the surface oceans. Here's the problem - What forced that water out from inside? Why did it sit on the surface and not rush right back in for several months? What finally caused it to go back inside? If God wanted to destroy the world, He could have just caused everyone but Noah and his family to disappear or turn to dust. The fact that He would choose a natural catastrophe like a Flood shows that He wanted to leave room for speculation and the necessity for the implementation of faith. It also means that there must have been a natural mechanism for the Flood event, and a reasonable answer for the other questions... and here it is:
      The crust of the Earth is roughly the relative thickness of the skin of an apple compared to the rest. The landmasses are essentially floating on water due to being thin and wide, but also due to *centrifugal force created by the Earth's rotation.*
      Roughly 4,400 years ago, in the Spring of 2345 BC, *another large celestial body passed close enough to disrupt the Earth's rotation causing it to slow.* Without the centrifugal force imparted by rotation, the landmass (Pangaea) began to sink slowly into the waters below. This easily flooded the entire Earth *by submersion,* and was also the cause of the fracturing of the super-continent, Pangaea, which was never properly explained either.. until now.
      After the celestial body had passed, the *Earth's axial spin rate slowly began to increase* over time, until reaching equilibrium again---which likely took many months. As rotation speed increased, so did centrifugal force.. and *the landmass began to rise* again to the surface.
      In short, *the water stayed where it was.* It would have appeared that the water was rising and then later receding.. but in reality, *the land was sinking and then rising anew.*

    • @twood6992
      @twood6992 Před rokem

      @@freemind.. Psalm 104 gives further description of the flood waters in that the mountains rose up and ocean basins went down. The flood waters receded to the lower basins we have today. The mountains rose considerably as part of the flood event as volcanic activity, mountain range building, and rapid continental movement took place in the decades and centuries after the flood. Massive volcanic activity and warm ocean waters created perfect conditions for the post flood ice age that occurred a few hundred years post flood. The bible answers your questions if you read it carefully.
      "He set the earth on its foundations, so that it should never be moved. You covered it with the deep as with a garment; the waters stood above the mountains. At your rebuke they fled; at the sound of your thunder they took to flight. The mountains rose, the valleys sank down to the place that you appointed for them.
      Psalm 104:5‭-‬8

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem

      @@twood6992 - _"The mountains rose considerably as part of the flood event as volcanic activity, mountain range building, and rapid continental movement took place in the decades and centuries after the flood."_
      *Most of the mountain building and volcanic activity took place DURING the Flood.*
      _"The flood waters receded to the lower basins we have today."_
      *There were hills, valleys, oceans and mountains before the Flood. However, even if you could argue that the land was level before the Flood, the current oceans would cover the flat landmass with around 12k feet of water. That is not nearly enough to account for the evidence left behind for the Flood. The water had to have been 30k feet deep or more to have provided the requisite pressure necessary to create quartz-based mineral formations.*
      *The fact that the land was separate from the oceans means that the land was NOT simply level. Therefore, EXTRA water ABOVE sea level would be needed to flood over the top of the land. That water resides inside the Earth in and below the crust. It was ejected through the fountains of the deep until even the highest mountains were covered, which did not occur until day 150 of the Flood. The scripture says "the waters stood above the mountains", not that the water fled and later the mountains rose up.*

    • @freemind..
      @freemind.. Před rokem

      @@twood6992 - _"Massive volcanic activity and warm ocean waters created perfect conditions for the post flood ice age"_
      *There was never a global ice age. Ice ages are simply hypothesized with the goal of explaining phenomena that can't be explained without acknowledging the Flood. There is more evidence against ice ages than for them. There was, indeed, a noticeable drop in temperature after the Flood as evidenced in tree ring chronologies, but no ice age.*

  • @marcusmuse4787
    @marcusmuse4787 Před 3 měsíci

    couldn't this be old earth and flood related? young earth is hard for people to believe.

  • @harryfoster6374
    @harryfoster6374 Před rokem

    Tectonic plate, and the Magnetic North changing events,many times over over millions of years has had a lot to do with the earths surface remodelling and corresponding tsunamis., and is and has to be the reason for such violent events.

  • @spanishpeaches2930
    @spanishpeaches2930 Před 11 měsíci

    What caused the massive flooding in the first place?

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 8 měsíci

      Pure phantasy.

    • @spanishpeaches2930
      @spanishpeaches2930 Před 8 měsíci

      @@norbertjendruschj9121 Well, there seems to be evidence of water cascading , but how was the flood started? Meteors into thick ice sheets might be a propability. I don't know obv...just speculating

    • @norbertjendruschj9121
      @norbertjendruschj9121 Před 8 měsíci

      @@spanishpeaches2930 There have been spectacular floods in the earth´s history - an easy reading would be Montgomery´s "The Rocks Don't Lie" but something like Noahs flood is not possible. It´s just a story.

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 Před 6 měsíci +1

      @@norbertjendruschj9121 Montgomery's book is an excellent read. Recommended.

  • @thomasballentine9496
    @thomasballentine9496 Před 11 měsíci

    It seems like you may have learned your Rocky Mountain geology from the renowned Wyoming geologist David Love. Much of your geology closely parallels his as set forth in Rising from the Plains by John McPhee. Only they made Love stop teaching Sunday school in Laramie when he started talking about the earth being millions of years old. If, perhaps, you learned your geology from David Love, then it is probably correct that you were in disagreement about his interpretation of the timing and duration of events.

  • @mugsymegaton3769
    @mugsymegaton3769 Před rokem

    Devils tower,
    could be a petrified tree stump ?

    • @domcizek
      @domcizek Před rokem

      HAHA, GOOD TRY, IT IS JUST ROCK, AND THI TYPE Igneous rock (derived from the Latin word ignis meaning fire), or magmatic rock, is one of the three main rock types, the others being sedimentary and metamorphic. Igneous rock is formed through the cooling and solidification of magma or lava.
      The magma can be derived from partial melts of existing rocks in either a planet's mantle or crust. Typically, the melting is caused by one or more of three processes: an increase in temperature, a decrease in pressure, or a change in composition. Solidification into rock occurs either below the surface as intrusive rocks or on the surface as extrusive rocks. Igneous rock may form with crystallization to form granular, crystalline rocks, or without crystallization to form natural glasses.

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Před rokem

      No stop. We know how to tell what a tree looks like

    • @mugsymegaton3769
      @mugsymegaton3769 Před rokem

      Stop what ?
      I simply posed the question.
      Furthermore, if you know how to tell what a tree looks like, how can you say it doesn’t look like a tree stump ?