UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary)
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 04. 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
⭐ Looking for a dashcam for your car? We recommend VIOFO:
A229 PRO 4K ➡️ amzn.to/4bgXLBo (5% off promo code: Ruby229PRO)
VS1 2K ➡️ amzn.to/49zqgIh (5% off promo code: RubyDAVS1
(affiliate link that may earn us commission) - Purchasing a product using these affiliate links earns us a commission and is a great way to support the channel at no extra cost!
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
#18 narrowly avoids a collision so tries to cause it himself later?
Other white van bent/hit cammers driver side mirror. Cammer thought they where running so they attempted to chase them down and block them.
@@MattiAntsuK cammer hit the other vans mirror as a result of failing to give way to traffic approaching from the right and already on the roundabout, cammer is a twat.
@@MattiAntsuKthat’s still dangerous driving. He should have noted his vehicle reg and submitted to police. “Trying to catch” is not an excuse to break the law.
Undertaking on a roundabout is always going to end badly.
God you’re all so perfect in comments, as if you wouldn’t try and stop someone from getting away in the immediate aftermath of a crash
number 18 is looking to cause an accident driving like a bellend
So not the fact the van driver didn’t indicate to change lanes or check their mirrors? But because the cammer stopped to give the van driver a talking to the cammer is the bellend?
Number 16 is the worst - statistically, it has been proved beyond doubt that the correct spelling of Audi is C.O.C.K.
foreigners
@@beasty7063 And here's the van driver.
@@beasty7063 Yes. Coming to a dead stop on a duel carridgeway makes him far more of a bellend than the other van driver.
I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone thinks it is safe to overtake/undertake on a round-a-bout.
You have no idea about the other persons intensions, they could be lost, on the phone, distracted, a tourist, drunk, or whatever, you cannot just assume they will stick to their lane.
It is foolish to do other than wait a couple of secs till they have turned off.
Yes, Uber cautious on any RAB. ( These dash cam videos should be a warning.)
Last clip. Well done cammer on making yourself TOTW.
Especially through the middle of roadworks
Did I miss something...? What did the cammer do wrong other than to travel in-lane and have the tranny in the tranny sideswipe them?
no 18 what complete n😂b
Polish driver init.
@@symonlibera7011 Racist alert!
@@symonlibera7011 lol
'K'.
@@symonlibera7011 R*acist alert!
#8 ...too close for comfort, but cyclist still felt safe enough to steer with one hand while waving the other in the air.
#10, also don't be a dick by parking practically opposite a junction or turning.
#18 you've got a lot of stick here. So I'm going to add to it. You can clearly see the van has been drifting left right and centre over lanes, why on earth would you think its a good idea to go alongside them?
#18 your driving is absolute garbage, hand your license in and save someone the future agro of an insurance claim or a visit to the hospital.
Inevitable outcome from two crazy white van grandprix drivers. I always want these guys in front and not in my rear view mirror.
#13 A bit rich criticising others when you’re parked on a double yellow near a school yourself. 🙄
I didn’t notice that the first time! Well spotted👍. The police should prosecute him for that too!
My previous office was near a school, and 99% of problems are caused by the parents. Excuse is always the same: "It's only for a bit!"
Have had to wheelclamp so many... Had two of them towed. Damage to our cars on 3 occasions.
I immediately wondered why he pulled off when the other car was mid manoeuvre?
Beat me to it lol
Well done #11 @4:00 - many people would just have ploughed ahead and blocked the Mini driver, causing a massive incident to no one's advantage. Excellent driving.
5:00 Well done Arvind. You did the right thing and protected the cyclist and probably other road users. Hopefully the idiot didn't drive through Richmond Park! 6:27 What a stupid driver!
The cyclist wasn’t much better, looks like he went straight from the left turn lane.
@@thunderbug8640 Cyclists have to ride safely due to people like that taxi driver, and sometimes that means sticking as far to the left despite the road markings, because riding out to a lane will get them killed.
@@BladedFish Cyclists would have been better here to go in the correct lane, i would have. Cyclist was lucky the cammer was patient, 90/100 drivers would assume the cyclist chose the correct lane for their desired direction.
#3 well done for slowing and holding back.
#10 handled that very well, a lot of people would have got into a barney over "priority", nicely done!
lots of "Shouldn't have done that", need more well dones :)
2:05 #6 "My other car has a caravan behind it"
Known as Swan-necking - a sign of a lazy, habitual driver who drives to rote, rather than the conditions
@@type17
Sign of a driver who has no idea of road position and how to take a corner.
@@cigmorfil4101 That too...
#18 - Mr Koorlvah needs to take a retest.
it's not "Koorlvah". It's just Kurwa 🙂 there are no l's in there 😁
Dont try to undertake on a rounderbout. Give each other space.
Is that similar to a 'roundabout'?
#17 wants reporting to police..utter muppet.
They were don't worry 😀
#13 - Maybe you shouldn’t have been parked on a double yellow!
LOL, what double yellow would that be?
@@george-ev1dqthe very visible one he was on.
@@AdamGreyable you feeling OK? the car was sitting at a junction waiting for the lights to change, no double yellow lines there Kid.
@@george-ev1dq That's #12 smart-ass
Perhaps so, but does that really negate the fact that the other person was using their phone behind the wheel?
0:25 Lemme guess, the copper didn't stop for the red to make sure it was even safe, which is what the EMS does in the U.S, slow down as they approach a red light in case other light is green to make sure other vehicles have stopped instead of just blitzing through. No doubt the copper gonna get a stern talking to for sure.
#7 Aren't you supposed to tie a visible flag (rag, etc) on the end of anything projecting that far from your vehicle?
^that - plus it looks like he had a passenger, they could have guided them if the visibility was that poor. But maybe I'm mistaken about the passenger.
Yes. And also, as it is impossible to see while reversing there, why didn’t he ask the passenger to get out and see him back🤷♂️
If it overhangs by more than 1 metre. Looks like it was close but not exceeding?
Rearward extents: Less than 1 metre, no requirements, between 1 and 2 metres ends must be made visible, more than 2 metres, less than 3.05 proper marker boards, more than 3.05 meters must give police two days notice and need a load attendant/follow vehicle. Frontward: Les than 2m no requirements, 2 to 3.05 metres attendant required, > 3.05 police notice and attendant.
@@funlovingvoyeur Yeah, my thoughts exactly. definitely a passenger there who could have stepped up.
5:51 - Mill Hill Circus. That's always a headache, especially if you're coming off the Watford Way or from Mill Hill Broadway, where incidentally, there's two blocks of flats just off the l that road. One called Damon House and the other is Murray House. A nod to Damon Hill (who grew up in Mill Hill) and the late, great Murray Walker.
Lane 3 as you approach that junction, cut in on the roundabout, undertake everyone going up to Apex corner, get in lane 2 and sweep round onto the A1, move over to lane 3, wait until you pass the speed camera and boot it up to stirling corner. Thats normal driving in London
6:47 guy walks into a tree
Well spotted 🤣🤣
But it was a trunk road. (Then he branched off.)
5:52 Audi driver driving like a bell end. Has this rare event ever been captured on camera before?
Are there others ? 🙄🙄👎👎
Funny how this channel shows all sorts of drivers driving all sorts of brands, but some people can't make it past the brand.
Only about two or three million times. Quite rare, so you have to hunt for them 😂😂
@@Manu-Official Won't anybody think about those poor Audi drivers.
#2 is 100% on the copper - they cannot just drive straight though hitting people
The requirement on the police when using their exemption to drive through a red is to treat it not as a STOP but essentially as a GIVE WAY. He didn't give way. The actual wording used is "the red signal shall convey the prohibition that that vehicle shall not proceed beyond the stop line in a manner or at a time likely to endanger any person or to cause the driver of any vehicle proceeding in accordance with the indications of light signals operating in association with the signals displaying the red signal to change its speed or course in order to avoid an accident".
2:11 the amount that do this , right turns too is huge! Steering wheel attendants only i am afraid
#6 I see this all the time, it's so unnecessary and more dangerous than people realise.
#18 other road users 'taking the racing line' around roundabouts while you're picking a lane and staying in it is annoying, but doesn't justify taking them hostage.
#10 great example of defensive driving. Good anticipation. Not angry, no horn. Just avoided an issue and moved on. 👍
#18 Cammer sees vehicle not staying in their lane and decides to undertake it on a roundabout.
Some context for #14: that's the B321 going up Richmond Hill. The cyclist is going up a very steep hill.
No wonder the white van man drives like a twonk and nearly wiped out the bus, It has no tax, MOT or insurance.
It had so many advisories on its last MOT on its breaking system I'm surprised they work.
An Audi driving like a bellend? Shocker
6:35 😂😂😂what a pr#ick😂😂
Last footage was definitely clip hunting or a serious case of being a tosser.
Compilation showcases UK's bad drivers and driving fails.
Ah, the berk in a merc!
#16 People need to realise that us Audi A1 drivers have excellent reactions and world class braking systems
Lol,🤣🤣🤣
6:49 You cut the pedestrian walking into a tree!
2:10 if it had really thought it was driving a lorry it would have positioned itself properly and not neded to swan neck (which actually makes it harder to get round the corner).
#10 Suppose that you're on your driving test & the examiner asks you to park on the left; if you park opposite a junction (as VN04LNK) did, you will fail to pass the test as you stopped in an unsafe position. The text on the video is correct, but had the Honda not been opposite the junction, no danger would have arisen.
#6 What is it with cars who have to go into the right hand lane nearly to to turn left , it’s not hard to stay in the same lane to turn left , if you can’t do that then you shouldn’t be driving 😂
The front wheels will always give away what the driver is going to do.
#8 Normal behaviour in Bradford.
They like to u-turn at those lights too. Driving in town is a nightmare, especially when most don't have insurance as you'd need a valid licence for that.
3:36 the perfect case of give way being ignored, again where's all the mouths on here that say you do not need to give way both ways
Cyclist in#15 needs glasses I think😮
1:36 would we get to "net Zero" quicker if there were more "Pelican Crossings"?
Well #18 behaved like a right twunt! Yet he probably thinks he was in the right 🙄
0:28 that's exactly why emergency services have to treat red lights as give way and are only allowed to go a max of 15mph through them, they're also supposed to turn off their sirens so people aren't intimidated to break the law by going through a red to let them pass.
If the cops wanted to go through a red, they'd need to get out and guide the traffic through
2:25 is why more than other vehicles, you reverse commercial vehicles into a parking space Planning your exit has to be a consideration when you park.
When I worked for a certain courier company, I always did a quick check to make sure I could get out easily. A DPD driver got himself stuck trying to go down a road I realised would take more time to get in and out of than having to do a walk. I feel bad for not helping him out but I had a schedule of my own to worry about.
Also, translation for 3:25 for those who, like me, don't speak that language: _I'm less than impressed by that and would be grateful if you would reconsider doing that in the future. Kind regards. The Driver._
Clip #5 @1:27 - When karma strikes back. How glorious it is to see ;-))...
"Didn't see the red light" - in other words "driving without due care and attention"
2:49 #7 I nodded off reading the text on this clip. Sooooooooooooooo long.
5:53 - they’re not known as ‘Audiots’ for nothing !
#10 The HWC has this to say:
There's a junction just ahead on the right. What should you do? You should never overtake as you approach a junction. If a vehicle emerged from the junction while you were overtaking, a dangerous situation could develop very quickly.
The emerging vehicle has ever right to turn left. The cammer requires the use of the opposite lane in order to pass the parked vehicle safely. The cammer should approach with caution and prepare to stop which the do do. The vehicle turning left did nothing wrong and the cammer did nothing wrong, therefore this clip is a non event.
Firstly Rule 10 of the Highway Code says nothing of the sort and relates to tactile paving.
Rule 167 covers over taking at a junction and states: ‘Do not overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road…
As a do not rule it is not a law but only guidance
Rule 172: on the other hand states:
The approach to a junction may have a ‘Give Way’ sign or a triangle marked on the road. You MUST give way to traffic on the main road when emerging from a junction with broken white lines across the road.
As such the van was in the wrong. Any MUST rule in the Highway Code is supported by a law, in this case S36 RTA.
Also, the cam car wasn’t ‘overtaking’. Overtaking is the act of passing a slower moving vehicle. He was passing an obstruction on the main carriageway. In this instance (and even if he was overtaking) he still maintains priority on the main carriageway.
@@76leeds first it’s clip 10 not rule 10 secondly the vehicle turning left has priority as soon as it passes the give way markings as it becomes an oncoming vehicle. Simple as that, however had that vehicle been turning right it would have to give way to the cammer.
@@76leeds you prat, clip 10 not rule 10 of the HWC and the vehicle turning left has priority as it maintains its own carriageway where as the cammer has to use the opposite lane. It’s the reason the HWC states caution overtaking at junctions for exactly this type of occurrence. The vehicle emerging has to give way to traffic from the right only. Can’t be more simple than that.
#18 camera driver TOTW you tried to undertake them and then came to a complete stop in a live lane how many more accidents do you want to try and cause
3:50 with regard to the overtake at the junction. We had this scenario as a question on a CPC course. The driver exiting the side road has priority. Your commentary is incorrect.
#8...🤣🤣🤣
# 15,,wtaf was that crazy woman on the bike thinking, or in her case not thinking..wow.🤦♂️🤷♂️
Probably an insurance scam.
I wonder what the outcome of #17 was ? If any.
Indeed. Enquiring minds want to know! There’s a very easy prosecution for dangerous driving!
I submitted it to Metropolitan Police at the time, pretty sure they prosecuted the driver. It didn't go to court so can only assume driver took points and fine.
#9 - typical vehicle overtaking a cyclist. "Shall i give them space? Nah lets go as close as i can"
I'm guessing you're a cyclist. It does not matter what you drive or ride you will always get crap drivers and cyclists. I've seen people not give room to cyclists but also seen cyclists cause a crash because they did not stop at a red lights and just went straight through. Works both ways. Let's all work together and listen to the rules of the road no matter what you are on the road with
Maybe I'm too Dutch, but it seemed like enough space.
How was that too close though? Cyclist probably couldn't even have touched the cab if he extended his right arm.
@SVEVelsen probably because it's clearly not 1.5 meters which the law requires at speed below 30mph...
@@SVEVelsen 1.5m minimum up to 30mph, 2m over 30mph. However, out of duty of care and common decency, if the opposite lane is clear (which it was) you give as much room as you can, especially when you are driving a vehicle that could easily kill someone even at a low speed.
I think all these drivers won their licenses in a Raffle . As soon as they get their licenses they drive how they want and you have to be a mind reader too to guess where they are going, the amount of cars I see everyday going to work the majority don’t even use their indicators, appalling driving 😂
Gonna say I didn’t even notice what #18 did wrong? He was just stopping the van from driving away without exchanging details
Exchange details for what .... They didn't touch ...
5:37 could that have been an insurance scam . As the driver goes by the male cyclist he looks in the direction of the female she then pulls in front of cam car??
#1 I wonder if that's why they have multiple vehicles when traveling like this? #4 makes me sick when I see people on their mobile phones, no need for it #5 really hope the police were able to dish out the justice on this one#7 reversing on to a main road, I see this a lot, especially not looking, whilst not illegal, its advised not to, and this is why, to be honest I thought it was illegal, only I had to look it up, that's why I watch these clips, it shows you how NOT!!! to drive#15 I have to admit as a kid I did the same thing, not sure what the cure is, maybe be prepared for anything#18 so many drivers can't negotiate lanes, just easier to let them get on with it, again clips like this have made me more aware of the idiots on the road, sometimes you just know they are going to side swipe you, but then the cammer does exactly the same thing, and decides to get out of their vehicle (Not sure if the van hit them though)
1st numpty try looking left and right even if it is on green.
No 16 an Audi with working indicators 🤔
Tiresome.
#7, I'm reversing out. Good luck, everyone else
#10 You should take care that the route is clear. Blindly pulling out opposite a junction is not wise. Like wise for the van. They should make sure their route is clear. All that being said, the Xtrail should not have been parked there. Rule is don't park within 15m of a junction especially opposite.
The route on the major road WAS clear, right up to the moment the van pulled out without checking left first.
The cammer was travelling at a safe speed, and completely prepared to stop before reaching the badly parked car. They actually did so, both safely and without fuss.
Short of having a motorcycle escort riding ahead to block entering traffic, I'm not sure what else you think the cammer could have done to fix the other driver's carelessness. (3:38 to 3:55 for anyone who wants to check back).
Everything else you stated was correct though.
@@cargy930the van has the right of way .... As your side of the road is blocked you should stop to allow traffic on the correct side of the road to have priority
@@alanwm1986 If both were already travelling on the major road you'd be right. But they weren't. The van failed to Give Way when exiting from a minor road. Cammer fixed his mistake. End of story.
Have you not realised yet, AUDI,MERC and BMW drivers have to drive like a bellend, it is part of owning a german car
#7 No tax, no MOT
#17 no MOT
Just checked. #7 MOT ran out on 5th Feb this year, but as there is no date stamp on the footage, it may have been legal at time of the recording. same as #17, ran out November 2022. Again, we can't be sure as no date stamp, and you can see by the leaves on the trees it was possibly late Autumn.
Moron
Only Fools...
SEND.THEM.BACK!! ENGLAND FOR ENGLANDERS
Shouldn't be reversing onto a main road anyway.
#6 I don’t know why the cammer tries to go alongside there. You can see the car turning left is stupidly straddling both lanes. Why not just hold back and wait until the other car turns & gets out of the way? Would’ve been a non event that way
That uphill cyclist pissed me off. Move over and definitely don’t go straight on from a left turn only lane!
The taxi flashing his lights and being a crap driver is a good reason why i wont use a taxi these days. I would rather crawl than use them. Over priced and over rated, Most of them have to ask you for directions to!!!
Number 18 needs to be shipped to Rwanda.
Or leg it to Ireland before they're caught.....😮
Your comment tells us you're not the brightest.
Clip 18, when will people learn, dont try and undertake/overtake on a roundabout, just stay back. You can almost guarantee that someone will cut across a lane. Why risk smashing your car just to prove a point? Then to carry on, stop the offending vehicle in the middle of a dual carriageway and get out to road rage!!!
Yes the vehicle cut across into your lane, but you handled the whole encounter so badly, that perhaps you shouldnt have a driving licence.
#14. You could have, and should have passed the cyclist completely safely at slow speed before he reached the parked car on his side.
7:06 #18 Over/under taking on a RAB can lead to well, all sorts of stuff. Like, a revenge overtake and block, then suddenly a door opens giving a clear view of the mirror. Does the driver exit the van? Does he don his baseball bat? Does he realise he is a bellend/knob?...cont. page 94.
#15: I wonder if the cyclist tried the line, "The Highway Code says I have priority, now"...
Frankly, she never gave the cammer a chance; at least the dashcam proves whose fault it REALLY was...
No doubt she will be defended on here at some point.
@@bustestlucloc4630 Gosh, yes. There's always a lycra warrior lurking about these channels, solely to remind us plebian motorists to kiss the backside of any cyclist who lifts their arse from the saddle...
@@mikethecabbie8476Driving without due car and attention. If it was a cyclist who nearly hit the pedestrian you'd be blaming the cyclist.
@@bustestlucloc4630Yep....just got the first one!
@@mikethecabbie8476 I'm afraid he's one of the usual suspects. He thinks cyclists can do no wrong despite the rest us seeing multiple offences on a daily basis.
why do people on these videos keep saying "koorva" ?
❤
PSNI accident probably caused by music on too loud in civilian vehicle drowning out all other external sounds. Hearing is a 360 degress sense and kinda useful when driving. Why so some drivers have to have as many decibels as their hearing can stand when driving?
And if they were actually clinically deaf would you still blame them for not hearing the PSNI rather than the PSNI vehicle for failing to "not proceed beyond the stop line in a manner or at a time likely to endanger any person or to cause the driver of any vehicle proceeding in accordance with the indications of light signals operating in association with the signals displaying the red signal to change its speed or course in order to avoid an accident"?
Nice one number 14! Wish more people would drive around cyclists like you
I will more cyclists would be courteous and follow the rules.
#2 knowing the psni they were rushing to the chippy before it closed, keystone kops ffs.
LOL, no chppys in Bangor, in fact there are practically no shops in Bangor.
@@george-ev1dq that's the truth lol
#18 (7:03) A ridiculously bad piece of driving from cammer. Trying to squeeze past on a roundabout like that to get one more car in front is about as stupid as you can get.
04:10 - Where's @CyclingMikey when you need him? 🙂
3:30 to be fair, I think the walker is on the wrong side of the road
What walker?
@@kgbgb3663 #9
No. 18 and what have you learned? Also, where contact was made ISH, looks like you were in their lane. This was totally avoidable.
#14 Cyclist should have had the decency to let the vehicles past. They should also have been in the right lane at the junction to turn right.
but he never turned right.
@@george-ev1dq Watch the clip again.
@@bustestlucloc4630 why would I do that?
@@george-ev1dq To watch them turn to the right of course!
@@bustestlucloc4630 try reading the road markings, there is a left turn lane and a straight ahead lane only, no right turn lane in the entire video
I'm waiting for the usual comments about cyclists that should pay 'road tax'.......when it's a 'vehicle excise duty'
And yet the .gov web page to pay it is headed "Tax your vehicle" and the words excise or duty don't appear anywhere thereon.
@@electrogrimSo what. It's VED and based on your engines emissions.
@@garyboyle695 My point is whining pedants who keep smugly trotting out "It's not tax, it's VED" when what's it's called is the least important element of the argument. Is it even possible to be a smug whiner? Some people seem to manage it. It's about as convincing as Jacob Rees-Mogg trying to win a point by denying the last 200 years of langauge evolution.
@@electrogrim A 'duty' is a type of tax,,,,,,,
@@CaroleEvans93436 Yes, I know, and a paper in the HoC actually describes VED as a tax. Obviously I completely misunderstood your first comment as drawing an important distinction between them when you said 'road tax'.......when it's a 'vehicle excise duty' when you were actually saying that the terms are synonymous.
Number 11, stick to talking about driving during your driving lessons.