@@KaizerHiwatari No, it's like saying letting adults regularly engage in suicide will lead to a society that justifies it for children. THAT'LL never happen, oh wait. Driving is not a moral evil. When you societally endorse moral evils, you get more of them, because it's formative. Driving is a good that everyone understands has risks. Strictly speaking, you can put a child behind a steering wheel with supervision or on your lap like many adults have done. But you can't cut off his genitals, because that's flippin' evil. Differences in when people have priveleges is different than redefining people's understanding of reality, which you truly can't undo easily. They're not really comparable.
Slippery slope is a logical fallacy. You have no proof that one thing leads to another besides your own preconceived notions (and the notions of those you deem to be "authorities") that it's true. Statistically, LGBT people are not the ones preying on kids. "researchers found that a child’s risk of being molested by his or her relative’s heterosexual partner was over 100 times greater than their being molested by someone who identifies as being homosexual, lesbian or bisexual (0.7% of the cases)." -Boston Area R@pe Crisis Center
People don't understand you choose evil, and their future is so terrible as devil now owns them. Look at how they look and say things. They will burn for eternity....that is serious.....
Actually it is. It's not like they're a separate species. What we're trying to defend in reality is innocence. "Minor" is frankly rather arbitrary in quite a few ways, what we're really dealing with is maturity, and that varies by person. And no person is really mature if they think they're the opposite sex or a different species, or whatever is the newest dilusion.
There's nothing to draw, if you believe these are ideas that fundamentally are not choices but who they are then clearly you CAN'T draw that line there because the state can say it's abuse
That’s because people tend to dislike hypocrisy. Heterosexuals never needed to reproduce to get married and the church and society changed marriage plenty of times for us straight folk.
The only people personally I know who are into this are academics and teachers. The only people I know who will freely and openly knock the ideology are working classes. The rest keep quite. It's not intelligence that sees through this, it is those who have sound judgement.
You got it exactly right. They moved forward too quickly, so people weren't "ready" for it. In German, we call that kind of approach Salami Tactics. Basically, going forward a thin slice at a time. This time they cut off a big chunk I guess...
We must protect children at all costs. They barely have any time to be innocent as it is. The history of the catholic and other Christian churches, however, means that no one associated with them can seriously talk about the protection of children.
Eh, the culture decided it didn't care about children with contraception and no-fault divorce. It will catch up to this in no time. (Was this made before laws started being struck down?)
@@Black.Sabbath oh, well, I'm from Colorado where it's always been legal. Cohabitation _per se_ isn't the problem, the contraception and separation is.
To those that do not get it. Here's a gross analogy for a gross topic. It's like saying to satan: I've already eaten this dung pile you served me, but I won't eat this last dingleberry you want me to eat. To which Satan replies: oh shut up, you're already my slave. Sodomy is one of 4 sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance. P.S. There's always mercy and redemption in Christ Jesus for those who repent.
Give me an example of them " coming for kids". I would think and hope the child, parent and medical professionals have gone thru all the gates and checked all the boxes before any surgery. As far as who one chooses to date and love, that's none of your GD business.
Again, these surgeries are simply made up dysphoric nonsense. The proper treatment for dysphoria is counseling, not sexual mutilation and castration. There is no box to justify cutting off a girls clitoris. We literally have laws against it for female genital mutilation, but we're pretending like here it's "makes sense". Also, people are male and female. It's not loving to lie to them about what is proper to their literal entire sexual being.
Also drag queen story hour in libraries and schools is coming for the kids. Drag on Blues Clues is grooming kids. Literally NOTHING about that makes any sense for the age of these kids who shouldn't be sexualized in any way because they're too young for any sexual activity much less disordered activity. So
It’s all a freak show, parents needs to take a stand and stop all in a the schools to indoctrinate. (On another note, Matt, please cut your hair. The top is not looking right! )
You could draw the line at LGB. The T is very different, because it stops being about behaviour of individuals and people's personal morals and becomes about what is true and what people are allowed to say.
@@SteubenThursday To clarify, I would draw the line in different place in church and in wider society. I would suggest that you can draw a line between LGB and T in wider society.
Like normalizing and legalizing homosexuality wasn't going to lead where we are now. Of course it was. That was the point.
It is slippery slope.
Yet it’s organisations like the church which oppose homosexuality where large proportions of child rape occur.
@@Sungod77777 and not a fallacy
“It doesn’t hurt anyone!!1”
Their biggest lie.
Never forget, it’s all or nothing.
Yes!
It's literally not, though. This is like saying "letting adults drive is only going to lead to children driving!" It's nonsense.
@@KaizerHiwatari Fortunately, driving doesn’t involve sodomy and morally corrupting society for Moloch and Baal.
@@KaizerHiwatari It's all nonsense. These people don't understand anything and are just using scare tactics to make money off of ignorant bigots.
@@KaizerHiwatari No, it's like saying letting adults regularly engage in suicide will lead to a society that justifies it for children. THAT'LL never happen, oh wait.
Driving is not a moral evil. When you societally endorse moral evils, you get more of them, because it's formative. Driving is a good that everyone understands has risks. Strictly speaking, you can put a child behind a steering wheel with supervision or on your lap like many adults have done. But you can't cut off his genitals, because that's flippin' evil.
Differences in when people have priveleges is different than redefining people's understanding of reality, which you truly can't undo easily. They're not really comparable.
This extreme, too, can slip even further down the road of crazy. Be satisfied with nothing less than sainthood!
Thursday looks less nerdy than he sounds
I always thought he sounded like Jonah Hill
@@stevendouglas3781nah its a pseudonym
Good clip.
Exactly…anything with the LGBTalphabet is a slippery slope from day 1
Slippery slope is a logical fallacy. You have no proof that one thing leads to another besides your own preconceived notions (and the notions of those you deem to be "authorities") that it's true. Statistically, LGBT people are not the ones preying on kids. "researchers found that a child’s risk of being molested by his or her relative’s heterosexual partner was over 100 times greater than their being molested by someone who identifies as being homosexual, lesbian or bisexual (0.7% of the cases)."
-Boston Area R@pe Crisis Center
Can you give me a jumpscare warning before you show me a pic of Dylan Mulvaney?
😂😂😂
😂😂
People don't understand you choose evil, and their future is so terrible as devil now owns them. Look at how they look and say things. They will burn for eternity....that is serious.....
It's not difficult to draw a line at MINORS!
Actually it is. It's not like they're a separate species. What we're trying to defend in reality is innocence. "Minor" is frankly rather arbitrary in quite a few ways, what we're really dealing with is maturity, and that varies by person. And no person is really mature if they think they're the opposite sex or a different species, or whatever is the newest dilusion.
There's nothing to draw, if you believe these are ideas that fundamentally are not choices but who they are then clearly you CAN'T draw that line there because the state can say it's abuse
Well, the g ays crossed that line and y ou continued to do nothing as always.
To groom the children, you have to groom the adults first. - paraphrase from Carla van Dam, PhD
too fast too soon. now were rejecting it all. people cannot say they’re against gay marriage at the workplace anymore.
That’s because people tend to dislike hypocrisy. Heterosexuals never needed to reproduce to get married and the church and society changed marriage plenty of times for us straight folk.
The only people personally I know who are into this are academics and teachers. The only people I know who will freely and openly knock the ideology are working classes. The rest keep quite. It's not intelligence that sees through this, it is those who have sound judgement.
Stupid people can’t have sound judgement 🤷♂️
homie do you know how much teachers are paid. they are working class, love
@@leme9909Radicals take teaching positions to get to the kids. It's not about money for them.
@@leme9909 in my country working class refers to min wage. Teachers are on more than that.
Now Thursday is using the chanel to just make clips of himself ;)
You got it exactly right. They moved forward too quickly, so people weren't "ready" for it. In German, we call that kind of approach Salami Tactics. Basically, going forward a thin slice at a time. This time they cut off a big chunk I guess...
Thursday shows that he is more than a button pusher, but an euridite thinker!
Next month you're in Southern russia
Presenting a Slippery Slope Fallacy (and bold-faced lies) while complaining about going down a slippery slope is hilarious.
The slippery slope is not a fallacy.
I really enjoy Thursdays commentary! So when I hear him talk I think to myself, this is going to be good.
The jumpscare
It is literally a Pandora’s box!!
We must protect children at all costs. They barely have any time to be innocent as it is. The history of the catholic and other Christian churches, however, means that no one associated with them can seriously talk about the protection of children.
The Thursday show, starting Thursday!
feat. Matt Fradd,
But seldom St Thomas Aquinas!
Wait...is that Thursday?
You should interview Thursday
Thursday is lovely !
Thursday's shirt! My skates from 1984! 😂
Eh, the culture decided it didn't care about children with contraception and no-fault divorce.
It will catch up to this in no time.
(Was this made before laws started being struck down?)
They are now granting cohabitating couples marital rights so that there’s no point getting married.
@@Black.Sabbath not sure how that's relevant.
That's basically common law marriage, which has been around forever.
@@michaelmicek Except it isn’t. That doesn’t exist, which is why Liebour are introducing it.
@@Black.Sabbath oh, well, I'm from Colorado where it's always been legal.
Cohabitation _per se_ isn't the problem, the contraception and separation is.
Have a God blessed day everyone ❤
Why do you associate with Daily Wire then? Seems a bit inconsistent.
👹
Smart kid that Thursday
The pope today is not helping sadly
What ya have here might be science
To those that do not get it.
Here's a gross analogy for a gross topic.
It's like saying to satan: I've already eaten this dung pile you served me, but I won't eat this last dingleberry you want me to eat.
To which Satan replies: oh shut up, you're already my slave.
Sodomy is one of 4 sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance.
P.S. There's always mercy and redemption in Christ Jesus for those who repent.
Is Matt perming is hair 🤣
I love your rollerskate shirt
FINALLY!!! SOMEONE IS SAYING IT!
Finally? This has been being said for years by many.
Give me an example of them " coming for kids". I would think and hope the child, parent and medical professionals have gone thru all the gates and checked all the boxes before any surgery. As far as who one chooses to date and love, that's none of your GD business.
Again, these surgeries are simply made up dysphoric nonsense. The proper treatment for dysphoria is counseling, not sexual mutilation and castration. There is no box to justify cutting off a girls clitoris. We literally have laws against it for female genital mutilation, but we're pretending like here it's "makes sense". Also, people are male and female. It's not loving to lie to them about what is proper to their literal entire sexual being.
Also drag queen story hour in libraries and schools is coming for the kids. Drag on Blues Clues is grooming kids. Literally NOTHING about that makes any sense for the age of these kids who shouldn't be sexualized in any way because they're too young for any sexual activity much less disordered activity. So
We didn’t care with whom yall were sleeping with until yall lgtb degenerates came for our kids and cancelling us for disagreeing with your lifestyle.
The US have to abolish the civil rights act to solve this problem.
A commentary with Thursday? That's super! Give the guy behind the mic a mic! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
I think communally we have found the hill on which we are willing to die.
What the actual f&-k is this...
It’s all a freak show, parents needs to take a stand and stop all in a the schools to indoctrinate.
(On another note, Matt, please cut your hair. The top is not looking right! )
You could draw the line at LGB. The T is very different, because it stops being about behaviour of individuals and people's personal morals and becomes about what is true and what people are allowed to say.
Hey, why does it seem like I know you?
Has Thursday ever mentioned you on the show?
The civil rights act crossed the line.
@@SteubenThursday To clarify, I would draw the line in different place in church and in wider society. I would suggest that you can draw a line between LGB and T in wider society.
@@greggauthier5012 Drawing a line and defining a principle are synonyms.
@@AquinasUltra Could you expand on that. What did the civil rights act define and what line did it cross?
Cringe
No U
yes, the lbgqt movement and the extremes it has reached is very cringe, indeed
Yes lgbt is cringe