How US Will DESTROY Russia After Putin Uses Nuclear Weapons
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 26. 04. 2024
- Go to ground.news/militaryshow to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
đđ In a geopolitical chess game, Russia's nuclear threats in Ukraine have the world on edge. With setbacks and U.S. politics influencing the narrative, Europe may bolster support for Ukraine, challenging Russia's stance. Imagine a world where Western military support empowers Ukraine against Russian aggression. Dive into the intricate dance of warfare, politics, and the looming nuclear shadow, where the stakes couldn't be higher. #GlobalPolitics #NuclearThreat #UkraineCrisis #MilitaryStrategyđ„#europe #NATO #russia #ukraine #ukrainewar #militaryanalysis #militarytech #geopolitics
#themilitaryshow - VÄda a technologie
Go to ground.news/militaryshow to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
And why should USA retaliate against Russia for nuking Ukraine ? Why ? Has ukraine signed a defense pact with america ? US will also get nuked to oblivion if they decide to engage in nuclear war with Russia.. Why should the americans risk nuclear war for the sake of an eastern European backwater ?
đđ«”
Stop spreading fake news, the US will not nuke Russia for using nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine does not hold enough strategic importance to the US to risk US cities being vaporized by a Russian strike. That is the whole point of nuclear deterrence. The US therefore does not / will not face Russia in a conflict directly, only through proxies in limited means. If Russia uses nukes against a NATO state, that is a different conversation.
"I don't know what weapons World War 3 will be fought with, but the CZcams comment section will be full of people who think they are smart because they can quote Albert Einstein."
"I pooped my pants" - Albert Einstein, age 4
I applaud your pettiness đ it is something to behold.
â@@anonym1984or some guy named Joe age 81
@@mr.monitor. Why don't you just go to Russia now?
@@mr.monitor. No but we have a lot of witness testimony claiming that DJT wears a diaper and freely unloads his bowls during meetings and other times. DJT also wears a man-girdle.
These type of headlines are the same since 2022...đ
And you want to keep that way.... you dont want to say ever: "he really did it"
Why shouldn't they be? They'll probably be the same in 2025 as well.
Still true though.
Russia has been losing the war on the internet since the war started
Because russia has been threatening the world with nuclear war non stop since 2022.
Purely hypothetical. Let's hope that peace can attained beforehand.
The stealth drone does exist, i saw one in Afghanistan and we were told it doesnt exist and to not take pics or talk about it đ
There are many videos on 'how US would react' and not enough videos on 'how US would prevent'.
The response would be the prevention. If we gave Russia the green light to do ignorant $h!t they would continue to do so. The United States does not have an endless supply of defense weapons to continually shoot down Russian strikes. I don't believe urging them to "talk it out" is a good idea either. Showing them consequences would most likely be the best way to get them to stop.
â@@JacobErickson-cx4dy The MAD Doctrine has worked well for decades. Hopefully it will continue to do so.
Usa is thinking to destroy Not Russia..not only Russia..usa can't win any war..any war.only way is that nato retreat on border from1989.
Usa is only country that use nuclear weapons. Remember.usa figts against 75 percent of the world
@@JacobErickson-cx4dy no, prevention happens before, response happens after
Exactly, prevent is more important!
Buck Turgidson: "I'm not saying we won't get our hair mussed..."
I understood that reference! I do!
@@kyleparish-aaron5764 20-30 million, tops...
@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks.
"Gentlemen you can't fight here...this is the War Room!!!"
@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks!
Russia couldnât even stop a bunch of farmers.đ
BUNCH OF FARMERS WITH US AND ENTIRE EUROPE WEAPONS DOESNT HAVE A COUNTRY HALF OF IT IS WITH RUSSIA đ
Still a bunch of farmers. You think Putin would attack a country with an army that could defend it self? NoâŠ
keep living in delusions
@@michaelvoisine7075 WELL ENTIRE EUROPE AND NATO HAS SENT BEST ARMS RUSSIANS ARE FIGHTING FOR PAST ONE YEAR UKRAINE COMEDIAN PRESIDENT HAS LOST HALF OF HIS COUNTRY
This is why Turkey was denied the F35
US recently said that Turkiye could have F35 planes if it wants to so they started to negotiate the terms again. Moreover, US has already approved 40 units of latest F16 jets and 80 units of F16 upgrade kits for existing fleet of Turkiye.
In addition to that Turkiye has also managed to produce domestically its own fighter jet called "KAAN" and "HURJET".
Because it could be remotely disabled by the USA to ensure it was only used in circumstances explicitly approved by the USA
â@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044sandbox guy says that the code thing isn't real
@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 you enjoy your charades eh.
@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb it's the software much like how a Tesla car is controlled
THIS CHANNEL is misleading and twisting facts
Because there has to be a narrative. Learn it.
Brother in arms, blood is thicker than water . Wisdom wins . Preparedness prevents war but assured peace .
We really need to keep this conflict conventional. No first strike should be the policy of any sane country.
You consider Russia sane?
â@@starmnsixty1209I certainly don't trust the United States after what they did in 1945 they'll likely be the one's to initiate a nuclear exchange.
@@starmnsixty1209 You can be evil and sane.
Russia is far from sane
Nobody win...all of us gonna die in the first 1 hour
The people that started it all will stay alive in their bunkers for years.
it is not about personal win and survival, rather about personal sacrifice for future and survival of your nation!
beautifully said broâșđ€đ”âđ«đ
â@@tomislavivankovic6971
âThere'll literally be N O T H l N G left. This war is unwinnable apart from negotiating with Russia for peace, otherwise Its beyond any discussion. Extinction is the only path of a nuclear war
Only rats and flies win in wars.
The us isn't immune to nukes. What is this title.
A few of Iran's missiles slipped passed the Iron dome. Now imagine those number of missiles multiplied by thousands(Russian Nukes) and even if one Nuke slips through its over
@@user-nw8zm2wu6o Nukes are not instant nationstate deleters, and we don't need every single city we have to keep going. Do you think a few nukes could cause a nuclear winter or make a wasteland or something? They can't. We've blown up thousands of those things since we invented them. You're aware that Heroshima and Nagasaki were safe to be in after a week, right? Do you think radiation works how it does in Fallout games?
@@user-nw8zm2wu6o It's even questionable how many nukes are even functional. There will be a lot of duds. Nukes need a lot of maintance and with the corruption level in russia, the money they get for it might often not used for that. It's hard to say but fising a nuke is not that easy. It needs a well done mechanism, else it's just a rocket loaded with a lot of radioactive material that wouldn't explode.
The type of nuclear weapon and its design influence the radiation produced. There are two main types: fission bombs, which split heavy atomic nuclei like uranium or plutonium, creating radioactive fallout, and fusion bombs, which combine light atomic nuclei, typically producing less fallout but still some radiation. Fusion bombs are often less radioactive because their fusion reactions produce fewer long-lived radioactive isotopes compared to the fission process. Various factors, including yield, design, and detonation conditions, impact the type and amount of radiation released.
@@melonenlord2723 The President of the United States knows more than you. He isnât taking that risk. That speaks louder than any conjecture youâre making.
Omg unlike Russia when the US makes threats they're not bullshit ! I love it đ
Putin threatened to invade Ukraine and he did đ€
LOL, its amazing the foolery people post in these chats. US won't initiate a nuclear attack unless its been attack first, all that article 5 Bullshit means nothing when millions of your country men could be wipe out in seconds.
With countries with out power. Why they donât do anything against russia.. and other things, they like to do shits using other countries in front of them. They just provide weapons only.
You guys are silly. An increased security in Russias airbases= U.S response to nuclear war. Get outta here man
Clarify, what do you mean?
Please add at least some context if you post out such irrationally placed counterclaims?
I truly laugh at the analogy that Putin would actually launch a nuclear device in Ukraine knowing the capability of the European Union and the United States to rain down hell on him
Would NATO cause the end of the human race for Ukraine? I think not. I believe that The West would make large conventional attacks, many in Russia itself. But not so destructive for it to cross Putin's line of threatening the survival of Russia. Since, in this scenario, Putin used tactical nukes in Ukraine, would NATO use tactical nukes in our response? I think not for the same reason as too large of a NATO conventional attack.
â@@elessartelcontar9415That man is talking poop....
If Russia strikes Ukraine with nukes ...
US would do nothing...if they try to play stupid games and hit any Russian platform
Its an open nuclear war between Russia against every country that makes up NATO đđ»ââïž
@@elessartelcontar9415 , having a war criminal on power could also be your end
go to the statistics of nuclea war heads the rest of Europe and all Nato members including USA, UK etc. their nuvlea asernal is less from Russias nuclea asernal.
'Rain down hell'? The only hell possible would be in Europe.
Even with a really limited nuclear exchange (1-2 each side), breaking the nearly 80 year streak of no one using nukes besides for testing (and since the mid 60s only underground tests were allowed) would mean the world could never again be the same. Like how the US was never really the same after 9/11 but this would be on a far greater scale.
Yeah, it would irradiate more steel so that it could not be used for astronomy purposes again in many lifetimes, it would throw off all calculations for carbon 14 in tooth enamel making it harder for criminal investigators to determine the age of corpses, it would possibly require more soil treatment for areas of the most fertile part of Europe and in fourth place it might make some people more likely to use tactical nukes in the future, now that they have actually seen how much damage they cause.
Oh wait, this is like climate change right, one nuke used is one too many?
France did atmospheric tests in Polynesia until 1974.
@@rickfrombohemia9550 And what did the Polynesians have to say about that?
As it was said in the 1960s, there will be nobody left and who want the same leader to lead again if some survive.
Actually there would be plenty of people that survived, I mean 30 thousand years after the asteroid wiped out 80% of life on the planet there were huge pockets of life already coming back, and humans are the most adaptable animal on the planet, there's been 5 mass extinction events and every time life makes it through, in the permian extinction 97% of all life was killed and it came back bigger and stronger than ever, this would be no diffrent.
Video was well done, but title was deceptive and at least bordered on clickbait.
Putin is probably peeing of fear just watching this video
The force multiplier effect can easily overwhelm the enemy even just by using conventional weapons. The enemy would be attacked from many directions all weather , day , night, stealth and with conventional air superiority it would be all over in 24 hours .
'you always have a plan before you get punched in the face"
What also Russia can't see is our new B-21 UCAV Stealth Bomber đ
WW3 will not be fought using Bombers , its 2024 now not 1941
They would likely respond by announcing that Putin had died of a stroke.
7:44 No American wants a nuclear war. But donât think the possibility of one will stop the US and our citizens from defending ourselves and our allies.
Dog barks the loudest doesnât bite.
Or, as my granny said, "The empty bucket rattles loudest."
Had siberian husky ,pitbull mongrel an he couldn't bark when people came over the fence in the backyard to break in he walked up an grabbed them they never heard it coming all you heard was screams an had to go outback pull him off an call the cops an give him a biscut say good boy
âHave no fear for atomic energy, cause non of them can stop the time..â Bob Marley.
USA is a quiet beast not russia a Noise Maker
This guy lost me when he mentioned 'Desert Storm.'
It took us 6 months to get the necessary men and equipment in place for that attack.
With zero resistance...
1) US has various existing nato air bases already in Europe with shorter routes into the region.
2) US wouldnât have to send any land forces since its response would be mainly air strikes, therefore wouldnât need long prep times. In desert storm, 20% of air launched munitions were smart bombs, today itâs more than 90%.
3) You also were lost when he mentioned the fact that the preparation to use nukes would be detected by satellite surveillance/intelligence.
Where do these folks get the idea that Ukraine is losing support. Wake up everyone has doubled down with more help.
Remember when Ukraine was flooded with 200bn weapons for their amazing counteroffensive? Remember what stelar sucess it was? What do you think 60bn will change? It will prolong Ukrainian demise and make it more bloody.
Well, well let me see. Going on three years for a three week "SMO" that didn't happen. Meat waves attacking instead of trained, prepared or equipped soldiers. I like Ukraine's chances of outlasting Moscovia.
â@@OleDiaBole remember putin his " 3 days to kyiv " , those days are quite long already?
Russia's best men are gone already, and wich outcome he think he will get from this war?
Embarssed his own country,the red army just proves to be camo wearing folks with guns wich doesnt work properly or are not even trained, the majestical su57 is still a mythe, and they use a lot of outdated material (wich is kinda funny since ukraine had even more older soviet stuff but theirs functioning more than russia's own material)
and offers their own people to either join army and die or go to jail for not joining army and only get out if they do (or they fall out of their windows đ€Ą)
Best for russia is to retreat and war will end, simple as that
If ukraine stops defending there will be no ukraine left
Either putin retreats or GIVE UKRAINE ALL THE SUPPORT THEY NEED
Because before war, i think everyone would know some russian guy and we all liked them as people we met at travelling, when going out, but their government is fucking that image of russians in general wich this dumb war
@@jw8567 I guess the biggest loss of war (Avdiika) was taken by shovels as well?. kyslivka & Netailove were just taken today: the front lines are collapsing. A Ukrainian brigade fled a Russian advance at Krasnorivka today. If you actually followed the conflict instead of parrot CNN or whatever CZcams videos you watched from 2022, you will know Russian has advantage of manpower, resources, and time. How can Ukraine outlast Russia when they are literally forcing conscriptions and Russian military is bigger now than it was day of invasion. You are horribly misinformed
Yes , double support , theble losses đđđ
Nobody would survive thatâs the correct summary of this this video
Feel very safe in Asia. My gold investment will sky rock đ€
â@@leedexđđđ
Did you even watch the video?
@@leedexyou think somewhere in Asia is safe? Hope ya got about 10 years of food and water stored up in a deep deep cave!
nuclear warâŠ. It will never ever happen. The scientist that created these weapons leaked the specs to all world powers to make sure one super power has all the power.
Only way to win is not to play
13:30. That is just gold. Pure gold
I just had a thought, how technolical are the Nukes? Yes they are nukes, but how accurate are they, how powerful, what condition are they in compared to Western weapons? Are they even operational like the rest of their equipment in Ukraine?
"Unlike Russia, when the U.S. makes military threats it's not prone to bullshit!" đ
đ It's funny cuz it's true!
Yeah.. Just like in Afghanistan
Just like in Vietnamđ
â@aj9969 If Russia goes like Afghanistan, 90% of Russia will be occupied by NATO, including Moscow, and, after Putin gets killed hiding like coward then dumped into the Artic sea, what's left of the Russia government will hide in China until the US decides it's tired of controlling Russian territory and leaves. Sounds acceptable.
Lol I love it when you trolls bring those up. Vietnam was a war to stop the spread of communism, how many communist countries are there today vs then? Afghanistan, we went there because they were harboring terrorists. Any terrorist that mattered and anyone in Taliban leadership at the time is dead now and I can guarantee you that the current Taliban leadership will do everything in its power to make sure we never have a reason to come back. On the other hand the Soviets were there for only 6 years and collapsed shortly after that. I would also like to point out that the RU army has suffered more casualties in 2 years of war in Ukraine than all US casualties combined since WW2.
@@vicdor1031 Just like ORCS.
Considering that the former nuclear power plant in Chernobyl... (Yes, THAT Chernobyl.) is between Kiyv and the border with Belarus, that would seem to make the likelihood of Russian tactical nuclear weapons use a little more possible...
B-52 still going strong. đȘ
đ
An ancient fucking TURKEY.
Yep. Ponder this for a second. I'm 60yrs old. The newest B52 is older than I am, and is scheduled to be in service for another ~20yrs. Crazy.
Certainly, the US can carry out a strike like this and cause great harm to Russia, but a strike like this will not be a picnic and the Russian response that will come after it will be very ugly and Europe will certainly pay the biggest price
I honestly donât think they do.. they donât have the capability to launch tons of nukes at once, they donât even have good air defence...
Europeans would literally be gengis khans footstool and been annihilated by the Turks if the Russians didn't fight them for so long, same with the Nazis and Napoleon
@@mark.rwho are you referring to?
@@mark.rDonât Fucc around and find out đ€âąïž
The US is as close as Europe over the North Pole
I don't know if automatic by CZcams or a setting by the content creator but these double ads in the beginning AND middle AND end of this video is excessive
AdBlock exists for a reason
I got tired of ads. Premium is worth it. Other than that, find a good ad blocker
Adblock plus, also works well on X.
USA wont risk New York for Kyiv.
12:50 - "...intercepted BY the target's main hull" would be more accurate
Pretty sure no one will survive here. Peace and dialog is whats needed.
Empire Of Lies đșđČ
shitting your pants already Ivan?
The US has already anything it would. The notion that the US would destroy Russia is really exaggerated. The repercussion of a US strike on Russia would be dire for all of us
Will any any of the two nations survive it
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face đđđ
USA had plans on Abram tanks toođđ
đ€ŁâŠ how many ruzzian tanks are over đ
â@@Gmordor How many NATO tanks are destroyed đ
@@GmordorSoviet Tanks helped both Ukraine and Russia to gain territories left and right and on the other hand, Abrams,Leopards and Challengers did absolutely nothing except getting barbecued đ
Delusional! That is a serious problem. Get help.
The idea is to prevent their use.
The US won't be first-use. Putin on the other hand, I'm not so sure
both sides having them is the prevention. Neither side can stop the return volley. Even if Russia nuked the Pentagon, US AWACS aircraft would assume command and control of US nuclear subs around the world. I'm sure Russia had similar redundancies in place if Moscow was hit. There is no escape or "winning" for either side. That is what has prevented nuclear weapons from being used for over 70 years and it's not changing any time soon. Don't bother listening to the saber rattling from Putin. In the 70's and 80's the nuclear rhetoric was even worse than it is now.
Russia has been warned. Don't even think of going there!
Lmao đ
They know it. They would have already used tactical nukes in Ukraine if they thought they could get away with it.
The first move in any war between Russia and NATO is, NATO would most likely seize Kaliningrad
and so what sherlock
you do understand they have as many assets ready to launch as we do right.... this isn't oh we need to load up first kind of scenario.
Very little thought going on here
Nobody wants to be turned into radioactive ash. Those in control of nuclear missile bases don't want that to happen to their loved ones -- their kids and grandkids.
comes down to capabilities and I'll keep with Western tech because Nato wargear actually works. Eastern wargear depends entirely on how poor an individual is and whether selling the part is worth it.
What nucleat threat number are we from bunker grandpa and his serfs are we on by today? Number 20?
38
The human race is at a moment of historic danger: The Doomsday Clock is still 90 seconds to midnight! 90 seconds away from the destruction of human civilization and possibly the human race.
Some history helps with context as to the significance of the Clock;
Founded in 1945 by Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and University of Chicago scientists who helped develop the first atomic weapons in the Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock two years later, using the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet. The Doomsday Clock is set every year by the Bulletinâs Science and Security Board in consultation with its Board of Sponsors, which includes nine Nobel laureates. The Clock has become a universally recognized indicator of the worldâs vulnerability to global catastrophe caused by man-made technologies.
Russian "bear"đ....koala bear yeah.
plush bear
usa won't do shit.
ah
such pleasant copium
@@electricspeedkiller8950thatâs some good copium, where can I get some
Let's all cling to our ignorant perspectives and laugh haha
6 companies own all media in the world. So there's that
Who owns the media in Russia? đ€
â@@bixbysnyder-00Putin of course. But who cares? Russia is such a great country that does not invade other nations and threats with nuclear weapons to ensure no one can aid invaded country directly.
Exactly how competent is the Russian nuclear weapons? We know how competent the military and equipment are!!! lmao
Đ„ĐŸŃĐ”ŃŃ ĐżŃĐŸĐČĐ”ŃĐžŃŃ?)
they've been pushing all of nato back with shovels and turtle tanks
You do realize that they're winning right? The ukr summer counter-fail was a joke and nato tactics were exposed as garbage and at the moment the abrams that were sent over there are being pulled from the frontlines.
So the west overated their weapons and they were all destroyed. How many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of western weapons have been sent to Ukraine? All destroyed by Russian weapons
Things would get really proportional, really fast.
Aha! A kindred spirit. All praise @FatElectrician !
Weâre doneâŠ.good bye life on earth
A child wrote this title. A child that doesn't understand Russia has missiles with nuclear warheads pointed at the USA
and the US has nuclear missiles pointed at Russia, what's your point?
â@@Jadefox32the point is US would do nothing and tremble when Russia hits Ukraine with nukes
â@@JusticeGranville-uk8wwthats wrong, and i can prove that in seconds. If ukraine gets hit with nukes, then nuclear fallout and radioactive particles will enter into NATO territory. If you look into the NATO articles, the NATO Members are FORCED to intervene if something like that would happen. So no, youre wrong.
@@Jadefox32 get owned
@@JusticeGranville-uk8ww âthe point is US would do nothing and tremble when Russia hits Ukraine with nukesâ
You are mistaking a Promise as a Bluff.
I was in US Naval Aviation (P3C) for 10 years during the cold war with the USSR. Tactical Nukes were part of the US Military doctrine.
Our Flight Crews were required to be Nuke Load certified once a year and every so often I would see a bird roped off with a Dummy Nuke sitting on an ordinance rack being loaded by a flight crew. Not once did my thought process go,
âWe will never use them.â,
instead in went,
âSomeday that could be the real thing.â.
This seems like a really irresponsible way to talk about something so serious.
Russia is already shivering. Drones and ATACMS on Putinâs mansions, all of them. Homeless Putin begging for a bottle of vodka.
United Kingdom/Great Britain đŹđ§ (UK/GB) vs North Korea đ°đ” (NK/DPRK), who would win in a conflict without nukes involved
Where do they fight? Why, and how? They're about as far away as countries can get, as the ship sails...
Brittain would not have to fight alone.
no chance at all if it were to measure up to the west.NK has nooo
If UK invaded NK they lose
If NK invades UK they lose. It's a lose lose situation
I'm not sure North Korea have much animosity towards the UK, there are embassies in both nations.
russian bots in 3..2..1..
I see the American bots already got started
Russia strong! đ·đșđ·đșđ·đș
braaap
Take meds
Controlled đ·đș
What are we talking about here us all being dead? đ
It was a 6 week air and missile campaign in Desert Storm. I was there!
Wouldn't tactical Nukes block Russia's ability to be able to pass through because of radiation. Therefore narrowing lanes they can attack through, making it easier to defend those lines. (Assuming quantities of losses of where they are targeting isn't significant)
Very little long lasting radioactive fallout if the nuclear weapon detonated properly.
The fallout from atomic bombs falls down to a safe level in just a couple of days bion.
@@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Many thanks
Just ask the Russian soldiers who dug all those foxholes in Pripyat how the Russian military feels about fallout...
So, was Russia that reckless to rely on Western technology for oil refining?
West wasnt expected to backstab and become unfairly hostile post 1995. It slowly tried to harm like boiling a frog
no choice
all russian tech is western tech. russia dosent make anything except war. (they couldnt even make a car. remember the lada?)
@@ronchasr6656 and you are still losing with best nato missiles, drones, tanks, air defense failing against them ? You are losing lol
Stop dreaming mate!!!â@@meteorknight999
"I demolish my bridges behind me, then there is no choice but to move forward." - Fridtjof Nansen
Fear leads to hate according to the Jedi.
what is he gonna do with ukraine if he turns it into nuclear wasteland,makes no sense
But heâs going to nuke because heâs losing. Thatâs the story you are supposed to be hearing.
Putin will not nuke Ukraine thatâs for sure. Fight for the country and then make it wasteland? Nope
@@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Ha ha. Well put. Ukraine has already won the media war.
Considering how effective the US Navy was at helping fight off the Iranian missiles, which are Russian clones, Ukraine is unlikely to come to the point of being attacked in such a matter.
â@@andrewalderman9489It's a warned strike, also most of the projectile are bait
This is a stupid captionâŠ.If the bear uses nukes there wonât be anything left of the nukeee to respond at allâŠ..
Imagine WW3 based on new-for UFC style war-type, all Politicians must fight it out themselves, only with UFC rules - and draw up a contract to the aftermath of the result. Can you imagine the audience đPeope would vote Arnold for president!
The Bible describes the symptoms of nuclear sickness very well. It will happen, sooner of later.
Americans have always fought wars on sides of Russia or allies. Never alone. Alone it has been a bully to weaker nations
The aliens will stop a nuclear war
There's actually a possibility that they might
Bleep.
Not likely, because there's evidence in antiquity of devastating nuclear exchange, yet no one stopped it -> see Mahabharata
Russians would remove Putin themselves like the Italians did Mussolini & the Romanians removed Tchouchesku.(if the spelling is right)
May as well rename the video to how civilization as know it ends.
The bear only has a bark !
There's a line where Dr Strangelove asks the Soviet: 'But why didn't you announce it to the world? It only works as a deterrent if you announce it to the world!' I guess Joe Biden never saw that movie.
You got MAGA on your mind. Good luck!
@@RalphDavis-qk2xy By MAGA you mean the Russian conspiracy with the republican party to overthrow my democracy? They're always on my mind. The kneejerk defense of Joe is out of fear. Being afraid to criticize your candidate honestly is not something winners do. We need a better candidate to defeat fascism. And not just in the election which does little if Joe wins. Globally.
Fun fact: many people who can't stand Joe Biden also can't stand Donald trump!
Weird I know!
He would be too stupid to understand.
You can criticize Biden on many things, but you can't say he does not understand Putin. Biden has been warning about Putin since 1999. Furthermore, the US stance on Russian use of nukes has been communicated to Russia privately since the war began. The Russians know where the US stands
And Russia will not retaliate.
MAID - MUTUAL ASSURED INTERNET DISCONNECTION
đđ cleverđ
so..once russia detonates the nuclear weapon...where do it think the radiation will fall unto? ukraine is attached to nato and russian allie territories...
Maybe a good reason we shouldn't be provoking a nuclear power on the other side of the world over a border dispute.
@@Joe-Przybranowski so..he willing to risk radiation fallout into Belarus and back into Russia? OR where the Russian separatists are near Moldova??? Sounds like a narcissistic dictator...Megatron over decepticon type of shit mentality...HELL. his own effin troops in ukraine??
@@Joe-Przybranowski it's like...how longshank was in braveheart...when his subordinate warned him that if you shoot the arrows...you would hit our own troops sire... lmmaoo..."we got reserve...it will hit theirs as well...ATTACK..." LLMMAOO
Modern nukes have very little fall out compared to the first one's
â@Joe-Pryzbranowski This is more than a border dispute. This is a full scale invasion by Russia.
Putin will not use nukes. End of discussion
I like the part , Putin carelessly talking with threatened moving nukes around can easley loose them , too an enemy.
Ukraine has such great air defence? Really?
They will now
What rubbish,Russia has been refining oil for a hundred years and saying it needs the west to do so is ludicrous
The Missile Knows Where It Is...
What if the missiles are already in place?
I donât know why America think they can destroy Russian
And you think That the US wouldn't be struck back?
No.
@@piotrmontgomerytv7786 5000k ? good luck with that
@@piotrmontgomerytv7786 God? Do you have any proof because the government doesnât have any on him. If anything God would let millions or billions of people die off.
Russia's barely even able to retaliate when Ukraine throws a few drones at them. Unless they're willing to delete their whole country by starting a full-on nuclear attack, there's nothing they could do to retaliate. Putin might be crazy but he's not dumb
@@Wyomingchief Even if he wanted to attack the U.S./NATO, Putin does not have the unilateral authority to launch weapons from his nation's nuclear arsenal. There are others in the chain of command who don't want their loved ones turned into radioactive ash.
In 2024 the USA wanna use tactics of Iraq and Afghanistan war lmao against Russia đ đ đ
Why do canopies on aircraft bulb outside the profile of the planes.
Like with the F35 they have video relay to pilots helmets displaying the are so why not put the pilot inside the fuselage more thus lowering drag
This is not factual
Using conscripts as cannon fodder doesn't quite work as well in an air war. Maybe putin can find some WWI biplanes in his junkyard.
They are doing pretty well so far being only armed with shovels and convicts right?
No such thing as cannon fodder in this war clown. Every soldier counts for both zelensky and Putin
To jsou sprĂĄvnÄ zvolenĂ© zbranÄ proti USA đđąđźđ đ
I'm glad I'm not russia or from russia
Let us not forget that Russia and China share the same continent. Not only are Russian nuclear weapons to keep NATO at bay, itâs also the largest military, the PRC. China is growing at an alarming rate and with a population of over 1 billion, it also poses a threat to Russia.
Russia has around 6500 nukes, only less than 2000 active, a third of those high yield, 2 thirds low yield. High yield nukes delivered by rockets and missiles probably around 1000 if not less. NATO has similar numbers but 2 thirds are high yield. There are over 20.000 cities in the West, around a billion people. There are some 1100 cities in Russia, some 145 million people. In a full nuclear exchange, Russia must choose its targets carefully, it can not hit them all, not enough nukes. But the West has enough nukes to hit all cities in Russia several times and still have spares. In the absolutely worst case scenario, 300 million westerners would die but Russia would be GONE FOREVER!
You say things on CZcams but not things that are real on ground.
@@africanintelligentrevoluti1446 What exactly is your point? Enlighten us!
@@3ast3rn3r What I say is,
Actually, western are still having in their minds, the old world but things have changed.
So now there's no America that will still say I am the best in this or no one is that.
US is never again the first power at all for were they tempt to have some advantages, they are beaten somewhere else and annihilating the power.
1-Fort air furtivity, US are not the first or the only one.
2-For missiles, US are not the first or the only one.
3-For the nukes, US are not the first.
4-For Economy, US aren't longer the first.
So they can never carry again any war like before against the 3 firsts like China, Russia or India.
Times have changed
enjoying your life in a fantasy world? so 300 millions lives would be a chicken change?
@@AfiaA.-vb3xz Nobody mentioned any chickens! The point was, if a full blown nuclear war were to happen tomorrow, the West would lose a third of the population, while Russia would be forever gone, erased from history! And under these circumstances, Russia is still the one threatening with nuclear war! If I were Biden, I would remind them publicly what the situation is and advise them to go easy with the threats!
big not very hidden secret: Ukraine has tactical nukes too
2) the cluster nuke across near poland would cut off supplies and they already had a no fly zone , while then the suwalki gap could secure st. Petersburg (?) [edit: by closing simultaneously] (?)
In the short term, the American response would be a total fuck up by Biden.
The us isn't immune to nukes. What is this title
Nobody is suggesting the US is immune. Russia however is incapable of winning against the US.
Russia sure thinks it is⊠đ
try watching the video, it's about Putin using nukes on Ukraine and how the US would respond. Putin isn't insane. He knows that using nukes on the US is suicide.
Do you really think the USA is inferior to Russia In nuclear armanent or maintenance of their assets?
Russia invasion showed us a fair bit, and unless you're trying to win bit in a casino, betting or Russia isn't the winning man's bet in anything military.
@@danielferreira3573 what will you sacrifice to so called 'win'?