UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary)
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 03. 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
⭐ Looking for a dashcam for your car? We recommend VIOFO:
A229 PRO 4K ➡️ amzn.to/4bgXLBo (5% off promo code: Ruby229PRO)
A119 MINI 2 ➡️ amzn.to/4aWVo6q (5% off promo code: RubyMINI2)
(affiliate link that may earn us commission) - Purchasing a product using these affiliate links earns us a commission and is a great way to support the channel at no extra cost!
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
#9 talk about the other car driving in the path of an oncoming car and then you force the red car to come to a near stop with that impatient pass
Yes. I think they were making a point by not letting them out. Best to have aggressive drivers in front of you, not behind.
#6 I thought the video was black and white till I realised was snow 😂😂
4:09 I know the driver of this car, many thanks to Kevin Colman for submitting it, the driver is going to be shown this regularly and get the mickey taken out of him for years to come! 😂
It was quite a good recovery to be fair - he was lucky though, that the cammer spotted what was happening & managed to safely slow down to a stop 😊👍
Would love to have a car like that. looks like it would be fun to drive. Looks like a handful in the damp however. Probably easy to spin the rear being so light.
@@martingdavies I have one as well and yes, at about 1250 lbs and averaging 165 bhp, they demand respect, the line between hero and zero is very thin in the damp.
His ambition outweighed his talents :D
I bet he left some skidmarks.
#10 someone decided to bring their hot wheels out to play 😂😂
4:54 Good job that bus did an “emergency stop” right next to the bus stop it was stopping at anyway!
😂4:10 those pesky scalextrix cars 😂😂
#7 I dont think you are a genuine dashcammer. An accident happens ahead and you stop straight away! That's far too sensible!!!
So did #2
3:22 Yeah, but put it on Arsebook, and his wife will give him a kicking. And she'll still be bringing it up when those kids are in thier thirties.....
Pretty slow emergency stop that bus did 😂
[5:30] Exact same thing happened to me a few months ago. In my case the damage wasn't worth claiming on insurance and the other car got more badly damaged. It was amicably sorted out at the scene.
5:40 - I wish you'd let it pay longer. I love the guitar that was about to play.
Second clip,that junction is a bloody nightmare as the traffic is usually tanking up the road from Kidderminster
#11 love the giant teddy bear over the building.
funnily,to me it looks like a little girl,hair in bunches,hand on hip.
#3 Not really fair to blame the car driver, looked to me like they were holding back as they were unsure if the van was simply going to force its way out. I've been on the receiving end of that myself so I can understand why they were wary of the van's intentions.
nah I think the car was an idiot, literally ensured they stayed at the side of the van... speed up/slow down WHATEVER just anything that ISNT side tailing them.
It looks like both the car and van drivers slammed on their brakes unecessarily. Best thing to control speed in that situation is with the gas pedal (either more gas or take your foot off the pedal) and do it as early as possible so people can slot in smoothly. Van driver was going too fast before they could see the carriageway to judge the gaps but they should have just kept going instead of nearly stopping on the sliproad. And the car driver's actions. Probably not the easiest sliproad for either driver to see because of the curve but there are much worse sliproads around.
#7 Some clever Scots Indy subliminal messaging 😀
2.00 - Aircon drain?
Yo, that clip of the bike guy on his phone... if he's on the road, he's in charge of a vehicle, that's 6 points. People who are drunk and ride a bike get penalised in the same way as drivers do, this should be the same! And with his kids? Absolute idiot!
#12 "Emergency stop" 😂. Bus pulled normally into the bus stop and the cammer, having decided to carry on driving head on towards the clearly visible van, decides to park in the middle of an open road and have a little sulk!
#19 And it is 99% certain she has walked past the crossing knowing she wants to cross the road!!!!
Making pointless statements without proof....
We don't know that but it was pretty stupid not to look both ways.
#7 To my shame, when you speeded up the video post-collision, I couldn’t get the Benny Hill “Yackety Sax” music out of my head...
#10 this happens allot with these types of cars.
I've done it on the racetrack , and on karting tracks - pulling a 360 is impressive though if you can keep going in the correct direction without stopping .
This is likely the result of a diesel spill on the road surface .
No. 10- ‘weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee’!
4:51 It was only an emergency stop because the cammer refused to brake earlier.
#9 was impatient because she was getting twitchy. That's a drug deal at 4:00.
#10 a 7 will do that on damp roundabouts with too much gas 😆
Lucky you pointed that out...
High power to weight ratio and no LSD
Or where there is a diesel spill
4:22 that cloud ☁️ above that building is such a cool shape
Good spot. Another comment likened it to a Teddy bear, but my first was that thing in the fridge in Ghostbusters.
Looks like a giant looming over the building
@@mrtp4422 that’s what I thought with an arm sticking out
Number 7 YES; NO IDEA WHAT HAPPENED. YYEEESSSSSS
3:13 There are all kinds of laws that apply to motor vehicles but not to cyclists; speed limits, MoT's, insurance, VED. Phone use is just another example of that, so don't be surprised.
speed limits... they apply to cyclists
MOT.....bikes dont weigh 2 tonnes, the risk of them not being road worthy is minimal to other road users.
insurnce..... most have it anyway, not required as a bike doesnt weight 2 tonnes so the potential damage to other road users is minimal
VED.... they pay it, they pay the same amount as electric cars do
phone use is still just as illegal for a cyclist to do it as any other road user
@@whitemarmite No, speed limits do not apply to cyclists, nor are they banned from phone use. Look it up. BTW, I am not saying any of these things should apply to cyclists, I am simply stating the law.
@@jdb47games although they dont apply as a standard ruling, cylists can still be charged with dangerous cycling. the equivalent of dangerous driving, and that can be for speeding, running red lights, riding while on the phone. providing that as a result of their actions, they are deemed to be riding dangerously.
18 can be split into sensible versus technically correct.
Very few car drivers are aware of all HwC rules, especially ones that aren’t directly car related. But in this instance the bike is allowed to filter.
The bike is aiming to run between lanes of the stopped traffic and before it arrives there, it’ll pass the car on the easiest side to begin filtering.
Logically it’s safer to filter once the traffic is stopped. Let the car find its place. But technically filtering is allowed at slow speeds and hence many bikers will take that rule and apply it everywhere. Therefore, technically the car cannot change lanes without ensuring it is safe to do so, being aware of close proximity traffic, especially those moving from behind and even those allowed to filter. On test it’d be an immediate fail for the car.
But in the common world of UK roads, the vast majority drive well away from the rules and just point where they want to go. So logically the bike shouldn’t be pushing the gap until all vehicles in front are stopped. He can then filter past the vehicles, including the furthest front vehicle (1) as long as it’s not a pedestrian crossing.
After the cars mistake the bike should just proceed. But he’s thrown his hands up in frustration and attempted to make the car aware he’s there… but unlikely the car knows why. None of this would be acceptable on a test or to plod, but it’s not exactly road rage, he just looks fed up and carries on to the front.
#7 - Are drivers not taught how to take a left hand bend ?
#3 Is the reason why I get pissed off with some drivers... don't bother getting behind the wheel if you're not gunna build up speed and merge with conviction!
4'10" verdient ihm recht!
6:42 The bike was at fault because the rider turned a non-incident into an opportunity to vent his displeasure at not getting any action from his missus.
18, probably the bike. Angle can be deceptive, but seemed like car had sufficient room in front of bike.
Car changed lanes in front of the bike for no reason other than to block the biker filtering. Selfish, ignorant and needs a smack.
Probably not considering you're not supposed to change lanes when approaching lights. The manoever reduces the amount of braking distance the rider originally had and then has to brake harder. My bad. They both change lanes at the same time. Maybe the driver isn't indicating but it's hard to see.
Got nothing to do with choosing lanes between the two of them. The car shouldn’t be randomly changing lanes without looking behind to ensure it’s safe to do so. Unfortunately very few people are aware that where that traffic queues, the bike is allowed to filter. The bike will be aiming to run down the broken line between lanes. So the last thing the bike expects, and the last thing the car should be doing is changing its mind.
But cars do. And the bike has to be aware of that until everything is stopped.
And the throwing up of arms is frustration. I don’t think it’s road rage. It just looks like fed up - hence he then carries on to the front. Drama over.
In summary the car has absolutely made a mistake. But secondary to that the bike shouldn’t be pushing the gap until it’s safe to do so - taking the extra steps of caution and ensuring he’s been seen is all the better.
No 15. Humps installed like this don't help much. 1) If you have lights on or running lights, the movement up and then down could make it seem like a flash, to say I let you out ( I know, don't bother going there with flashing to let people out, fact is, it happens) 2) by slowing down, the other driver see this and reassess the gap, not accounting for speed up after the hump. Personally, knowing this I try and drive with this in mind on badly designed roads like this.
number 8, in Germany it is, 60€ and if you have a drivers licence, 3 points.
3:13 The pushbike is neither powered nor licensed nor insured so not an offence. It is very stupid though, to be in traffic and not in total control of one's driving, especially with passengers!
#3, Over the years I have seen way too many vans in that situation barge their way onto the carriageway, regardless of any vehicle that might have priority. Been on the receiving end of a fair few, too. Car driver was possibly (probably?) reacting to a hazard that didn't actually manifest itself this time. Irritating for cammer maybe, but I won't criticise the car driver for playing it safe...
4:08 - The classic 'running out of talent before you ran out of money'.
It wasn't even snap oversteer, it was progressive and slow. One of the easiest to correct.
#18 looks like they changed lane at the same time, but the bike wasn't going at an appropriate speed for the road conditions ie. Slowing/ stopped traffic
Nobody at fault, the biker appears to overreact
Biker was slowing to filter to the front, car changed lanes in front of him for no other reason than to block the biker. Selfish, ignorant and needs a smack.
No 13 is a specific offence , failure to give way at a crossing and a disqualification is available , handheld phone use is another specific offence , and this could be considered dangerous driving .
It’s scary to know these people are on the roads
#8 The police are correct. The law on mobile phone use only applies to the drivers of motor vehicles and not to cyclists or pedestrians.
cammer is just triggered because its a cyclist. Happens all the time sadly. Ride on the road and you get abuse by cars. Use the bike lanes and you get Karan mothers using it with their prams screaming abuse at you.
Isn’t a bicycle a form of vehicle and if it isn’t why is it permitted to be on the road. It should be illegal to operate a mobile phone while in motion including bicycles
@@beasty7063 Not a *motor* vehicle though. The Road Vehicles (and Use) Regulations 1986, (amended 2003) only prohibits the use of mobile phone usage when driving a motor vehicle. Cyclists, horse riders and pedestrians are therefore exempt from this law. A person *could* be dealt with under not-paying-due-care-and-attention related legislation.
What the law *should* be and what it is, are very different things.
FYI, the roads arent just exclusively for use by vehicles.
The law showing yet again that it is indeed an a*s.
@@noodlechild666 it shouldn’t matter if it is motorised or not. It’s still a moving vehicle that can cause injury to the user and pedestrians. So there fore it should be illegal for them as well.
4:46
AutoGlass Repair
AutoGlass REPENT
Dont think the bus had a leak...just looked like water
#7: is that Penicuick, Deanburn? I hate that part. Residents parking all over the bends. Whoever planned that area was an absolute d***head.
#2 - I think you mean "SMIDL" (SMID Look)
#8 - It actually isn't!! It probably should be though, but how would you enforce it?
#9 - Well, at least she was in front of you, and hence easier to avoid.
#10 - Unplanned panoramic view of the surrounding countryside! ;)
#21, where the hell are you driving? Fallujah?!?!
3:15 Maybe not illegal but completely stupid.
#14 you could see he was trying to pull out: totally avoidable.
other driver was meant to wait for him to pass, he had already commited to passing traffic you can see that by what side of the road he was on.
Parked driver pulling out is still legally wrong.
5:08 I know exactly why he didn't stop and gave you the finger, it wasn't because he was on the phone.......
#15 who let mr Magoo drive?
im kinda glad the police decided not to do anything if the thing in question wasnt illegal. That would open a can of worms im not gona enjoy
The red car driver was...
No 7. Yes then. Yes Today 👍
If bikers drove more like cars there would be less accidents
I thought that if you are on the road then you obey the laws of the road full stop but as you know some cyclists goes through red traffic lights and they don't care about hitting your car cause they're not insured some don't even have lights on their bicycles riding at night just plain stupidity.
#8 I dont know the Law in UK, but in Germany it's illegal to use your Phone on a bike - Fine is 60€
4:12 Hmmm? Track tyres still fitted? Or just piss wet n' baltic.
3:11 the police are correct in that it isn't illegal. In my opinion, anyone using a phone while in control of ANY vehicle should be illegal though.
This "parent", however, is displaying a distinct lack of common sense or care for their kids. Embarrassing and stupid.
0:33 and he's got a licence?
They hide their true personality from the test examiner.
3:12 I don't blame the cammer for being angry. Note the idiot cyclist wears the "Look at me, I'm following the rules" helmet while endangering the lives of children. Shocking.
#9 parks on pavement nearly hitting a pedestrian. If that were me I would have had a go at her. Always an Audi
Other makes and models of vehicle are available when making poor driving decisions
#1 the driver was more than likely using his phone.
An advanced driver positioning out for an extended view around the bend .
@@derekheeps8012
Talking out your arse.
@@Leidolfr
Wrong
@@derekheeps8012Pretty pathetic trolling.
#8
Riding while on the phone.
That's without due care and attention.
And with a live load?
That's gross negligence.
Would imagine it doesn’t apply to non motorised vehicles like speed limits. Cycling like at 6mph doesn’t pose any danger to others. Compared to a one tonne kill box capable of £100mph+
#2 lets all blame the motorbike
I thought the bike might have obscured his view initially, but looking back at the clip, the bike is level with the cars rear wheel so I cannot understand why the driver doesn't see the car approaching from the left. If that had been a bike instead of a car, it might have been fatal.
@@martingdavies Might have been sun glare for the driver. But then they saw the car in front so who knows.
Clip #20 if the car had room to 'undertake' you on the left, you had room to drive on the left, 90% of people who 'undertake' are only facilitated by people who lane hog.
Agreed.
Chatting shit, the car was in the process of overtaking the micro. The car that undertook and then pulled out in front was driving like a twat.
Cammer was approaching a car on the left to overtake, the dick undertaking barely managed to squeeze through.
Seems as if he has form, going by the "comment".
The cammer also stated clearly they'd done it before and got hit. Serial lane hogger in action.
3:16 guessing when the cyclist has a accident he will be naturally blaming the other party despite being on his phone and not paying attention to his surroundings.
You mean as in clip 13?
@@se-kmg355.bloke on phone riding his bike concentrating on his phone call more than his riding.,,as he went around the roundabout..he could have been carrying a child in front of the bike by the looks of the helmet in the video close up.
@@se-kmg355 cyclist on round about on mobile phone yapping away with child on the front of his bike.
Please report dangerous drivers to local police, sending videos in to a YT channel doesn't help that much. Sure it's laughable to see these idiots but give your video evidence to the police so they can have points added to their licences and fined!!
Problem is half the time they say you have missed the window or they don’t follow up and when you do you’ve missed the window or they just don’t care and say not gonna persued . I’d rather they be shamed online and actually get some repercussions than nothing.
#8 well, it bloody should be illegal. Still, the rider can shield himself from a crash, using the children as a crumple zone!
it is the responsibility of the driver to give way at the give way line and not to hit the rider or anyone else on the roundabout, which he did so with everyone not doing anything wrong it was all a non-event.
in other words, dash cammer just being an arse because its a cyclist.@@ditch3827
@@ditch3827 You do realise that accidents don't only happen on roundabouts?
@@bustestlucloc4630 Of course but this clip is about roundabouts
@@ditch3827 @ditch3827 No it isn't. It's about a fool on a bicycle using a phone. He wasn't on a roundabout at the beginning of the recording and he was still on the phone as he exited the roundabout at the end of the clip.
#8.... but there are plenty of damned good reasons why it SHOULD be illegal!
7:38 .. that bed shop looks grim as fuck ..
At 4.18 Noddy is a shit driver !
8# you’d have to be mad to have your children like that. 😳
#1 the van in the opposite lane was probably using their 'phone. SO dangerous. Which brings us to #8 and the trike. Social Services need to be involved in that one.
Why? It is quite legal.
@@ditch3827 being legal doesn't mean it's sensible.
Advanced drivers are taught to position out on the approach to left hand bends to extend their view around the bend , and to sacrifice the cornering position if an oncoming vehicle is sighted - exactly what happened .
@@ditch3827 at best not a specific offence - can still be dealt with as careless or dangerous cycling : not being in proper control of the contraption ; then the question of child endangerment arises , with social services being called upon to determine whether this is the action of a responsible parent - which it clearly is not .
@@bestintheworld568It's legal so why would social services be involved?
20, you are in lane 2 when there was space to be in lane 1 and holding up a car behind you, then it looks like you try to speed up to block them but that could be the camera. if you had driven on the left in lane 1 after you overtook the car behind thats in lane 1, you would not have any dash cam footage to show as it would be a non event. unless you were overtaking some imaginarry cars the camera could not see but you and the car that undertook you could?
#18 motorcyclist suddenly finds the ability to filter, nob.
How come it upsets you, nob?
@@goodyeoman4534 it doesn’t just noted that the motorcyclist is crying then remembers filtering
So biker is slowing to filter when a car changes lanes in front of him for no other reason than to block him filtering, biker then stops to exchange words with the driver and you see.....what? Were you watching the same video as the rest of us or were you playing road rash on your phone at the same time?
@@swoop1352bike remained in right lane throughout car moved left, probably saw the worn out left filter arrow and moved back to the right lane so the motorcyclist wasn’t inconvenienced in any way. Simple.
Some cars deliberately block bikes from filtering - they seem to resent it. Otherwise explain in this case why did the red car change lanes so many times. A lot of car drivers will make room for filtering bikes, but as I have found out myself, there are some real A-Holes out there.
Wait till Audi start making vans
I'm looking forward to them joining Formula 1 - should make the races a bit more interesting than they currently are!
they are called VW vans, been making them for years.
Bikers always a much to so about nothing!!!
If it's not illegal to ride that bike it should be. i was on the canal towpath when a bike towing 2 kids came past, the trailer came unhooked i towed them for 45 minutes until he came back to see where they were, they could have gone into the canal for all he knew, he was very thankful and i made the kids think it was a game so all ended well.
First clip is NOT careless driving : on the contrary , positioning out for a left hand bend is an advanced technique , taught at police college , to extend one's view further around a bend - on sighting the oncoming vehicle , the driver correctly sacrificed his cornering position . While the camera driver can be forgiven for his ignorance , it is astounding that the police , or a court , would not know this .
Tha cammer needs to get his daily dose of "snitchy good vibes" .. I should imagine he got the best BJ ever when they found out the poor van driver was being done ... Bet they where so proud of themselves.
You spout anymore hot air you could fly a balloon.
Positioning out is normally taught within your own lane moving away from the line to sacrifice vision for safety. Advanced drivers may also offside, but they would have moved back far sooner. I'm pretty sure Roadcraft makes no mention of continuing in a straight line towards the oncoming car as the bend curves away from you
@@davet2555 It can be taught offside where vision is limited ; he did return in time
Derek, Derek, Derek…if you think that’s how police are taught to drive you really shouldn’t be on the road.
Riding a bicycle while using a phone could be considered as reckless riding ......
I would. The law on the other hand seems happy to let cyclists do pretty much as they like with no comeuppance.
Can be charged as careless or dangerous cycling .
@@derekheeps8012 'Can' being the operative word.
@@bustestlucloc4630 And the complainer has the right to demand to know why not - or indeed go directly to the fiscal , who can rip into the police for not doing their jobs . Police complaints is another option . There is no need to accept no for an answer .
@@bustestlucloc4630Pretty much like drivers, judging by the number of phone users I see every day.