They did something similar where they didn't bring back any of the original cast for the "Scoob!" movie from a few years ago. Couldn't believe my ears when I heard anyone but Frank Welker voice acting Fred.
We're never criticizing the animators themselves, because no one chooses to create a soulless corporate melange. No one sets out to make the worst art that they can. When art sucks it's a matter of resources, management, or direction. At this level of animation, the animators are at the top of their field and they're still just trying to get by. I'm glad YMS brings that up when talking about bad animations.
Nah. "Artists" aren't the special, magical creatures some people think they are. Animating is like any other job, and people phone it in or don't try very hard all the time. Artists need to get over themselves and realize that they aren't any better than other workers just because they make pretty pictures sometimes.
@@Abcdefg-tf7cu Wow, you're so cynical and cool. I've met a lot of animators and people in the creative industry. They're some of the most passionate people I've ever met when it comes to their profession. Sure, it's not true 100% of the time, but 9 times out of 10, the animation is subpar because the execs wanted to save money.
@@kiwipie9415 I'm sorry if my original comment came off as rude. I don't doubt that your friends are passionate about their careers. My point still stands that it is still a job, and plenty of people can and will phone it in when the execs straught up tell them that they are making an assembly line product with as little budet as necessary. Workers have every incentive to phone it in when they are told something like that, and artists are workers like everyone else. You can't tell me that the same level of effort and passion was put into Garfield starring Chris Pratt as was put into The Prince of Egypt or The Lion King.
@@kiwipie9415 I'm siding with the animators, here. They have no incentive to waste their talent if the executives don't pay them enough to try. If a company refuses to pay me what I'm worth, I have no reason to do anything more than the bare minimum.
Yeah I don’t think it’s AI but you hear it in trailers all the time. It’ll show a scene where a character says something that they clearly didn’t say in that particular scene (or just not at that one moment) so they’ll just edit it together and it sounds weird af
@@vingasoline5068 yeah, I don’t think it’s AI here either, but the fact that they couldn’t get a clean take of ****ing “Garfield” to use is kind of hilarious
I'm someone who actually enjoys Garfield and this movie looks so bad. Chris Pratt just isn't a good choice for Garfield, and this plot is all over the place.
The plot line of Garfield's family is so clearly just forced in because Garfield is too simple of a character to do anything actually interesting with so they have to shoehorn in a random adventure story that would never happen in the original comic strip or TV shows.
I think this is showing the trouble with adapting a small comic strip. If you took a panel from a Garfeild Comic Strip and blow it up to the size of a movie screen, it would look like one of these shots. But the Garfeild comic is designed to be printed the size of a postage stamp.
@@goosegas2087 if I had to guess, it would be because it’s TV shorts format. Think about it, most episodes are spilt into 3 shorts of about 7 minutes, and that kind of timeframe naturally makes small, simple stories. When comparing a 3 panel comic strip to a casual TV shorts show, it’s easy to see the similarities in their storytelling and stakes.
@@CaptLuserditto, not sure if i'm gonna bother to watch it. However, even if the bar is below ground level, it's probably going to be one of the better Garfield movies.
Same, I had a few albums of the three panel comics all bunched together. I really liked them and still do. Miss me with anything Garfield related that's not the comics though. Anything else of the IP, be it games, movies, merch, always felt cheap/exploitative.
My least favorite part of this is how they make Garfield seem so enthusiastic and happy. His whole thing is being grumpy and lazy. But in this he seems really happy all the time, and is rarely half-lidded like he is 90% of the time in the comics.
"Does anyone like Garfield?" I do. That one comic strip of Garfield stealing Jon's pipe and smoking it, it... it was truly eye-opening. A CAT smoking a PIPE? It was surrealist comedy at it's finest. Its simplicity is what gives it its flavor, its charm. In a mere three panels, they established a scenario perfectly, set up a joke, and ended with a killer punchline. The CAT smokes a PIPE. The execution was so sharp, so simple, but so perfect. As soon as I saw that fat cat smoke a pipe, I busted my gut laughing. I haven't been happy in five years, but then that absolute zinger appears, and I was truly in stitches. THE CAT SMOKES A PIPE.
Ive read a handful of Garfield compilation comics. I like Garfield. I wouldnt call myself like a fan per say but it was a good time. I unironically enjoyed it. I also enjoy all the memey stuff like Gorefield and Lasagna Cat
This is a real Monday but I love lasagna. I live in Garfield city and I love Garfield for the ironic sense, but it has looped around to genuine appreciation. It helps being around Garfield way more than the average person day to day
I'll have Adum know that i am one of the few people out there that loves Garfield and thinks he's a national treasure. But that kind of only goes for the comic strip, Garfield's brand of humour has never really worked for a full length film
I will go on the record that I like the Garfield comics from when he could walk until just before his eyes became complete ovals. That sweet spot was the perfect time for me to be into the franchise. I am also an unapologetic fan of the "Garfield Christmas Special" and nostalgically enjoy the "Garfield and Friends" cartoon. Neither this nor the Bill Murray movie look appealing to me, to say the least.
Looking at these half-assed "recognizable property" movies reminds me of that one time a Fox executive told David Fincher during the making of Alien 3 that it didn't matter what the quality of the movie was since, "You could have the whole movie just of a guy pissing on a wall, call it Alien 3, and it'll still make $30 million at the box office". This is what the Garfield movie reminds of. Each. And. Every. Time.
The original strips (I saw something of a compilation book of various eras in 2009 or so) are pretty funny "Garfield & Friends" is also a perfectly swell animated show and the voices for Garfield and Jon (and this includes the Italian dub, amazingly enough) are perfectly cast. Havent seen the holiday specials but I've heard good things about them.
I loved Garfield growing up. I still do. The cartoon from the 80s and 90s was hilarious and sounded like how you'd picture Garfield sounding-this sarcastic, lazy, ahole. And Odie was more of an idiot that Garfield was an ahole to but secretly loved, and it made it funnier when Odie got a one-up on Garfield. Jon was a loser and often exasperated Garfield, yet considered Garfield his friend (which is how being a cat owner works), and Garfield's insults to him were hilarious. It's basically a cat being a lazy, lovable jerk, which is funny. It's when they try to turn it into a movie (and even the animated series, which had action, knew how to properly portray the characters and was properly casted) where they lose it.
I have a very low key obsession with garfeild. Theres something really comforting about that fat orange cat who hates mondays and eats lasagna. Whenever someone wants to buy me a gift its usualy garf related 😁 Ive watched most of the movies, even the weird straight to dvd ones but i really cant see myself going to see this, its just so boring and shallow.
So in the old Garfield cartoon, he is voiced by Lorenzo Music. He also voices Peter Venkman in the animated edition of 'The Real Ghostbusters'. Later on, the celebrity who first played Peter Venkman, Bill Murray, voices Garfield in the movies... Small world, huh?
1:38 I liked Garfield and Friends show because I enjoyed watching some cartoon episodes back then. It’s the only 90’s nostalgia show that it felt like a cool Garfield goat.
Stupid side tangent, but man have trailers really gone down in format. First with them showing a ton of parts from the movie/show and borderline spoiling them. Then the remixed iconic music aspect (that even if it is cool, they just never release seperately from the trailer). And now the final nail in the coffin, showing the already spoiling parts in a quick 5 second flash to say the trailer is about to start.
Why have they included Garfield’s dad when in the books his parental connection was with his mum? Like she was a stray that lives in the Italian restaurant, which is now abandoned, where he was born. I do actually like Garfield IP… don’t like any of the movies though. Only time it worked was the TV show with Lorenzo Music.
Chris cant change his voice to save his life, chris Pratt voices himself Chris Pratt, it worked for Emmett because was random Lego man like Chris was at the time
I know people go "It's fine if it's bad, it's a kid's movie", but Garfield REALLY DOES just look like a whatever passable kids movie. It's cute, it's doing the comic strip style, the animations at least feel fun and cartoonish, and it'll probably have a fine whatever "found family" message that's going to be pretty inoffensive. Compared to something like The Lorax, it's honestly probably going to be just okay. It's not Kung Fu Panda or How to Train Your Dragon, but I doubt little kids are really too bothered by some wonky lighting or awkward pacing. It honestly just looks fine, you know? It'll probably just be okay for what it is.
5:41 if I were an animator, I would made the best lasagna meal that it looks more realistic and well made pasta dish ever. Looks like pancakes wrapped up into a red jam paste sandwich. It tried to be lasagna instead Adam can’t explain the 12 principles of animation.
"does anyone like Garfield" I used to. When I was a child I read the Garfield comic strip, books, watched the cartoon and loved the holiday specials. He was a sarcastic, lazy cat and has a dry wit. Sometimes he would do something zany but mostly it was just sarcasm through his half-lidded cartoon eyes. As time has gone on, he has changed a lot. He now moves his mouth when he talks, which is something he didnt used to do because we were hearing his thoughts not him actually talking. He's gotten more cute-e-fide but that was always happening to him. This is MY Garfield anymore but whatever, I still have the holiday specials and old comics and books. Sad that the newer gen doesnt have the sardonic, lazy, witty Garfield but I guess the Fortnight Generation wouldnt like that.
Given the cheaply made Garfield content that’s been released in the last decade or so like Garfield Cart, I wouldn’t be surprised if a big chunk of this was AI generated.
It's a real shame, I'm a big fan of Garfield (own several of the comic strip collection books, watched the TV specials as a kid, etc.) but whenever someone adapts him to another medium it's basically always shit. Always feels like they're trying to do more with the character than is necessary. Anyway I Saw the TV Glow looks sick.
2:10 you can tell that it’s Nicholas Hoult as Jon character’s voice, but it almost felt like Nicholas Hoult AI voice which you believe it’s not him. I rather watched him eating a rich delicious in The Menu after he got killed while trying to escape away from Ralph Fiennes.
I’ll never understand the appeal of Garfield as a franchise. I watched the cartoon when I was like 8 and have barely thought about anything in the franchise since.
I think the bulk of good Garfield stuff comes from the 80's. Some of it from the 90's, though the comic itself had lost steam by then. It was a time when the franchise had an actual creative backbone, especially in the TV specials. I'll always stand by stuff like Here Comes Garfield and A Garfield Christmas as unironically good. It's true the franchise was milked shamelessly from day 1, but it had talented people behind it for a time, before slowly becoming the shell it is today.
I used to be annoyed when Adum would complain about how a trailer isn't in 4k or doesn't have subtitles. Now I hope trailers are in 1080p and have no subtitles so he can't enjoy it.
@@mdude3 Seriously it wasn't until he started saying "Trailers are in 4k now YOU'RE WELCOME." That I thought to myself "I want every movie trailer to look like it was filmed on a mid-2000s flip phone just to piss Adum off."
15:32 "Looks dope! I wish I could *see* it, but, aw, damn it, I just hit myself in the balls" So do the ushers perform scrotal checks before they let you in the theater up there in Toronto, or what
I love Garfield. My father got me the DVDs for Garfield growing up and had books of the comics. However, this movie is just AWFUL. I wish it was just about baby Garfield. It would have been cuter and no Chris Pratto
"Do any real people like Garfield?" That's a very good question, because I've met a few people who are Garfield fans in my life and they never seem like real people 😂
@@YMSHighlights so what you are saying is that adum is a hypocrite who demands that everyone else makes 4k videos but doesnt want to do it himself. hmmm
I am so glad Chris Pratt voices every role instead of long standing voice actors known for voicing the characters on TV/in games
They did something similar where they didn't bring back any of the original cast for the "Scoob!" movie from a few years ago. Couldn't believe my ears when I heard anyone but Frank Welker voice acting Fred.
We're never criticizing the animators themselves, because no one chooses to create a soulless corporate melange. No one sets out to make the worst art that they can. When art sucks it's a matter of resources, management, or direction. At this level of animation, the animators are at the top of their field and they're still just trying to get by. I'm glad YMS brings that up when talking about bad animations.
Nah. "Artists" aren't the special, magical creatures some people think they are. Animating is like any other job, and people phone it in or don't try very hard all the time. Artists need to get over themselves and realize that they aren't any better than other workers just because they make pretty pictures sometimes.
@@Abcdefg-tf7cuLike Onision. I'm sure his writing sucks because he had to self publish, and not because its just awful.
@@Abcdefg-tf7cu Wow, you're so cynical and cool. I've met a lot of animators and people in the creative industry. They're some of the most passionate people I've ever met when it comes to their profession. Sure, it's not true 100% of the time, but 9 times out of 10, the animation is subpar because the execs wanted to save money.
@@kiwipie9415 I'm sorry if my original comment came off as rude. I don't doubt that your friends are passionate about their careers. My point still stands that it is still a job, and plenty of people can and will phone it in when the execs straught up tell them that they are making an assembly line product with as little budet as necessary. Workers have every incentive to phone it in when they are told something like that, and artists are workers like everyone else. You can't tell me that the same level of effort and passion was put into Garfield starring Chris Pratt as was put into The Prince of Egypt or The Lion King.
@@kiwipie9415 I'm siding with the animators, here. They have no incentive to waste their talent if the executives don't pay them enough to try. If a company refuses to pay me what I'm worth, I have no reason to do anything more than the bare minimum.
It's like they couldn't even get a good take of them saying "Garfield" and had to splice two together. Bodes super well
Yeah I don’t think it’s AI but you hear it in trailers all the time. It’ll show a scene where a character says something that they clearly didn’t say in that particular scene (or just not at that one moment) so they’ll just edit it together and it sounds weird af
@@vingasoline5068 yeah, I don’t think it’s AI here either, but the fact that they couldn’t get a clean take of ****ing “Garfield” to use is kind of hilarious
@@peteralfredhess it really is lmao. At least we know this movie is gonna suck already
"Does any REAL person like Garfield?" Bro has never seen a Quinton Review video
Listen... As long as Calvin & Hobbes remains untouched... All is balanced.
Calvin To be voiced by Chris Pratt
I fear the day Bill Watterson dies and the rights go to someone else. He's 65, I hope he's healthy, stays that way and lives to a hundred.
@@FraterSbeveI’m sure there will likely be attempts to make a Calvin and Hobbes film once Bill dies
Don't jinx it!!!
Featuring The Rock as Hobbes
I'm someone who actually enjoys Garfield and this movie looks so bad. Chris Pratt just isn't a good choice for Garfield, and this plot is all over the place.
Someone what?
@@Rihcterwilker *Enjoys. I mistyped.
Same. It looks good, but his voice is AWFUL and the story doesn’t feel like Garfield at all
I mean, he was not a good choice for mario and that movie made a billion dollars. Money talks
The plot line of Garfield's family is so clearly just forced in because Garfield is too simple of a character to do anything actually interesting with so they have to shoehorn in a random adventure story that would never happen in the original comic strip or TV shows.
Always with the Olive Garden product placement in these D tier animated movies
Holy shxt u noticed that too 😂
Oddly enough, Olive Garden was name-dropped in that live action Garfield movie from the early 2000s too.
I think this is showing the trouble with adapting a small comic strip. If you took a panel from a Garfeild Comic Strip and blow it up to the size of a movie screen, it would look like one of these shots. But the Garfeild comic is designed to be printed the size of a postage stamp.
Then why did the tv show have no trouble putting it on the screen. (Not the shoddy 3D one, the OG.)
@@goosegas2087 if I had to guess, it would be because it’s TV shorts format. Think about it, most episodes are spilt into 3 shorts of about 7 minutes, and that kind of timeframe naturally makes small, simple stories. When comparing a 3 panel comic strip to a casual TV shorts show, it’s easy to see the similarities in their storytelling and stakes.
@@fauxpolecat3456 They seemed to me to be complaining about the aesthetics tho, not the pretty obvious problem of dragging a comic strip to 90 min.
@@goosegas2087i mean, think of the size and dimensions of typical tv screens that the og show was formatted for. very different than a movie today
I loved Garfield when I was younger and some of the more absurdist comic strips can still get a chuckle out of me.
i still love garfield which makes me hate this movie even more
@@CaptLuserditto, not sure if i'm gonna bother to watch it. However, even if the bar is below ground level, it's probably going to be one of the better Garfield movies.
The first ten-fifteen years of the comics was great, still love Garfield
Old Garfield was great, the new stuff is not my cup of tea. But that's the way the author wants this property to go, so it's his choice.
Same, I had a few albums of the three panel comics all bunched together. I really liked them and still do. Miss me with anything Garfield related that's not the comics though. Anything else of the IP, be it games, movies, merch, always felt cheap/exploitative.
My least favorite part of this is how they make Garfield seem so enthusiastic and happy. His whole thing is being grumpy and lazy. But in this he seems really happy all the time, and is rarely half-lidded like he is 90% of the time in the comics.
I heard the big twist is Garfield is Nermal's dad and Odie's his mom
So angry birds 2
That was a joke at least half Odie is a boy
*_garfield labyrinth flashbacks intensifies_*
@@SunnLikesStuff now im imagining garfield in a blonde wig and tight pants
I'm Sorry What???
I like Odie, mostly because he doesn't talk, and just does visual gags.
Reject Nermal, embrace Odie
"Does anyone like Garfield?"
I do.
That one comic strip of Garfield stealing Jon's pipe and smoking it, it... it was truly eye-opening. A CAT smoking a PIPE? It was surrealist comedy at it's finest. Its simplicity is what gives it its flavor, its charm. In a mere three panels, they established a scenario perfectly, set up a joke, and ended with a killer punchline. The CAT smokes a PIPE. The execution was so sharp, so simple, but so perfect. As soon as I saw that fat cat smoke a pipe, I busted my gut laughing. I haven't been happy in five years, but then that absolute zinger appears, and I was truly in stitches. THE CAT SMOKES A PIPE.
The reason why Jon sounds so weird is because he’s being voiced by Nicholas Hoult, He’s a british guy doing an american accent.
"Let us get that!"
- CP Pratt
This trailer actually manages to capture the soporific effect of the comics! Super excited to get some quality sleep when this comes out!
Why do we even have a Garfield movie in 2024. Dude just let it fucking die already.
Ehh. It’s like 4 decades newer than Superman.
If they’re still doing *what if man but strong* , I see how we still get cat enjoying food
That last sentence can sum up most of the modern MCU these days
Jim Davis loves selling out the fat cat, it's easy merchandising money
Cats have 9 lives
No
Ive read a handful of Garfield compilation comics. I like Garfield. I wouldnt call myself like a fan per say but it was a good time. I unironically enjoyed it. I also enjoy all the memey stuff like Gorefield and Lasagna Cat
Garmfield
Garfield Minus garfield is hilarious
I really love the 80s Garfield, still do. Some 90s too. Some of today, even. But not this depiction.
Everyone of the 80s and 90s specials seem like a more enjoyable experience. At least from what we've seen so far, but I doubt I'm false
Ill stand by Bill Murray’s Garfield
Bill Murray at least knew what Garfield ought to sound like. CP doesn't give a flying fuck he's just gonna do his normal speaking voice
Bill Murray was the perfect choice for that role, it was the entire rest of the movie that was the problem…
A cat scan!
Roger Ebert gave it 3.5 stars
Bill Murray is THE voice of Garfield to me. Anything else is unacceptable. If they had only gotten Murray, I would be in.
This is a real Monday but I love lasagna. I live in Garfield city and I love Garfield for the ironic sense, but it has looped around to genuine appreciation. It helps being around Garfield way more than the average person day to day
Who’s your favorite president?
Garfield City is a limbo land between reality and unreality.
I'll have Adum know that i am one of the few people out there that loves Garfield and thinks he's a national treasure. But that kind of only goes for the comic strip, Garfield's brand of humour has never really worked for a full length film
Shoutout Lorenzo Music for the most iconic Garfield voice
Lorenzo Music IS Garfields voice!
THANK. YOU!
Rip to a real one
I will go on the record that I like the Garfield comics from when he could walk until just before his eyes became complete ovals. That sweet spot was the perfect time for me to be into the franchise. I am also an unapologetic fan of the "Garfield Christmas Special" and nostalgically enjoy the "Garfield and Friends" cartoon.
Neither this nor the Bill Murray movie look appealing to me, to say the least.
Bad trailer editing sounds like the old YTP editing…. But worse.
Looking at these half-assed "recognizable property" movies reminds me of that one time a Fox executive told David Fincher during the making of Alien 3 that it didn't matter what the quality of the movie was since, "You could have the whole movie just of a guy pissing on a wall, call it Alien 3, and it'll still make $30 million at the box office".
This is what the Garfield movie reminds of. Each. And. Every. Time.
The original strips (I saw something of a compilation book of various eras in 2009 or so) are pretty funny
"Garfield & Friends" is also a perfectly swell animated show and the voices for Garfield and Jon (and this includes the Italian dub, amazingly enough) are perfectly cast.
Havent seen the holiday specials but I've heard good things about them.
The specials are in fact really good, I recommend to start with Here Comes Garfield since that one can be pretty emotional
I hope Chris Pratt keeps putting in less and less effort in each role just to see how far he can take it.
At least Bill Murray tried in 2003
*2004
@@goGothitaLOL oowf! That long ago 🥲
And 2006
I loved Garfield growing up. I still do. The cartoon from the 80s and 90s was hilarious and sounded like how you'd picture Garfield sounding-this sarcastic, lazy, ahole. And Odie was more of an idiot that Garfield was an ahole to but secretly loved, and it made it funnier when Odie got a one-up on Garfield. Jon was a loser and often exasperated Garfield, yet considered Garfield his friend (which is how being a cat owner works), and Garfield's insults to him were hilarious. It's basically a cat being a lazy, lovable jerk, which is funny. It's when they try to turn it into a movie (and even the animated series, which had action, knew how to properly portray the characters and was properly casted) where they lose it.
I have a very low key obsession with garfeild. Theres something really comforting about that fat orange cat who hates mondays and eats lasagna. Whenever someone wants to buy me a gift its usualy garf related 😁
Ive watched most of the movies, even the weird straight to dvd ones but i really cant see myself going to see this, its just so boring and shallow.
I can't believe it Garfield has always been a pillar of quality
So in the old Garfield cartoon, he is voiced by Lorenzo Music. He also voices Peter Venkman in the animated edition of 'The Real Ghostbusters'. Later on, the celebrity who first played Peter Venkman, Bill Murray, voices Garfield in the movies...
Small world, huh?
This feels like such an illumination movie.
1:38 I liked Garfield and Friends show because I enjoyed watching some cartoon episodes back then. It’s the only 90’s nostalgia show that it felt like a cool Garfield goat.
I'll stick to the Garfield Show if I need to see some animated Garfield shenanigans
That show was my childhood in the 80s and 90s
It would be hilarious if they were meta enough to include Garfield Minus Garfield.
ROMEOW & JULIET.... how did they NOT land on ROMEOW & JULIET before MEW-LIET??
More people need to be upset about this
In a perfect society, we would have "Romeow and Mew-liet" together
🧏♂️ liet
Garfield is like sonic he’s just popular because he exists
Garfield suffers so that Calvin & Hobbes remains unsullied.
Garfield Minus Garfield would make a better movie
Garfield Minus One
or its sequel, ‘Garfield -1 2: Garf-zilla’
Stupid side tangent, but man have trailers really gone down in format. First with them showing a ton of parts from the movie/show and borderline spoiling them. Then the remixed iconic music aspect (that even if it is cool, they just never release seperately from the trailer). And now the final nail in the coffin, showing the already spoiling parts in a quick 5 second flash to say the trailer is about to start.
Why have they included Garfield’s dad when in the books his parental connection was with his mum? Like she was a stray that lives in the Italian restaurant, which is now abandoned, where he was born.
I do actually like Garfield IP… don’t like any of the movies though. Only time it worked was the TV show with Lorenzo Music.
Chris Pratt is getting that bag. I'd sell out too if I could.
That said this is insufferable
Chris Pratt in *"Things Happen For 2 Hours Until The Credits Roll: The Movie"*
YOU JUST SAVED ME FROM WATCHING THIS!!!!
Chris cant change his voice to save his life, chris Pratt voices himself Chris Pratt, it worked for Emmett because was random Lego man like Chris was at the time
Why does Hollywood insist on putting CP into so many movies?
Garfield is funny because of his dry humor and dead pan deliveries. Why can't any modern iterations of him get that right?
every single alt girl im talking to is excited for this dont ruin this for me adum
He's watching TikTok on TV?
Anyone notice Odie’s just constantly having a “seriously?” reaction? He shrugs, rolls his eyes, facepalms…yes I’m sure eventually it’ll be funny.
How did they manage to make the blue recliner look like the most uncomfortable piece of furniture ever, even for a cat???
I know people go "It's fine if it's bad, it's a kid's movie", but Garfield REALLY DOES just look like a whatever passable kids movie. It's cute, it's doing the comic strip style, the animations at least feel fun and cartoonish, and it'll probably have a fine whatever "found family" message that's going to be pretty inoffensive.
Compared to something like The Lorax, it's honestly probably going to be just okay. It's not Kung Fu Panda or How to Train Your Dragon, but I doubt little kids are really too bothered by some wonky lighting or awkward pacing. It honestly just looks fine, you know? It'll probably just be okay for what it is.
5:41 if I were an animator, I would made the best lasagna meal that it looks more realistic and well made pasta dish ever. Looks like pancakes wrapped up into a red jam paste sandwich.
It tried to be lasagna instead Adam can’t explain the 12 principles of animation.
Its gonna make a lasagnillion dollaroos.
I love it. Me and all the boys are gonna see it and it’ll make a Garfillion dollars at the box office.
Heathcliff superiority
"does anyone like Garfield"
I used to. When I was a child I read the Garfield comic strip, books, watched the cartoon and loved the holiday specials. He was a sarcastic, lazy cat and has a dry wit. Sometimes he would do something zany but mostly it was just sarcasm through his half-lidded cartoon eyes. As time has gone on, he has changed a lot. He now moves his mouth when he talks, which is something he didnt used to do because we were hearing his thoughts not him actually talking. He's gotten more cute-e-fide but that was always happening to him. This is MY Garfield anymore but whatever, I still have the holiday specials and old comics and books. Sad that the newer gen doesnt have the sardonic, lazy, witty Garfield but I guess the Fortnight Generation wouldnt like that.
Fellas I hate to admit, but I'm hoping to unironically (or at least ironically) enjoy the Garfield movie. I'm part of the problem 😔
Gonna say it
Garfield Gets Real > The Garfield Movie 2024
Given the cheaply made Garfield content that’s been released in the last decade or so like Garfield Cart, I wouldn’t be surprised if a big chunk of this was AI generated.
Not trying to defend it or anything but the movie's been in development since like 2016, feel it's unlikely they're doing AI
"looks like a keeper"
Yeah, a keep'er away from me!
I genuinely love the comics, real person I promise
I remember liking the old Garfield cartoons but that speaks more to how good at his job Lorenzo Muzak was
I love that scoot is garfields dad
I Saw the TV Glow, looks a lot like Magic for Beginners by Kelly Link
It's a real shame, I'm a big fan of Garfield (own several of the comic strip collection books, watched the TV specials as a kid, etc.) but whenever someone adapts him to another medium it's basically always shit. Always feels like they're trying to do more with the character than is necessary.
Anyway I Saw the TV Glow looks sick.
I sincerely do like older garfield. Garfield 9 lifes was a great film, there was a sense of melancholy that made the world feel real.
2:10 you can tell that it’s Nicholas Hoult as Jon character’s voice, but it almost felt like Nicholas Hoult AI voice which you believe it’s not him.
I rather watched him eating a rich delicious in The Menu after he got killed while trying to escape away from Ralph Fiennes.
I’ll never understand the appeal of Garfield as a franchise. I watched the cartoon when I was like 8 and have barely thought about anything in the franchise since.
It’s just about a cat doing nothing, that’s it. No idea how you can make an interesting movie out of that
@@txwtwi actually think it’s a fine concept for a three panel newspaper comic just not a movie
@@CaptLuseror a TV show for that matter, especially in a post Simpsons, Family Guy, and SpongeBob world
Bring back Bill Murray....
That Patreon read speedrun has got to be world record 🔥
I think the bulk of good Garfield stuff comes from the 80's. Some of it from the 90's, though the comic itself had lost steam by then. It was a time when the franchise had an actual creative backbone, especially in the TV specials. I'll always stand by stuff like Here Comes Garfield and A Garfield Christmas as unironically good.
It's true the franchise was milked shamelessly from day 1, but it had talented people behind it for a time, before slowly becoming the shell it is today.
I used to be annoyed when Adum would complain about how a trailer isn't in 4k or doesn't have subtitles.
Now I hope trailers are in 1080p and have no subtitles so he can't enjoy it.
The virgin complainer vs the chad sadist
@@mdude3 Seriously it wasn't until he started saying "Trailers are in 4k now YOU'RE WELCOME." That I thought to myself "I want every movie trailer to look like it was filmed on a mid-2000s flip phone just to piss Adum off."
i absolutely love garfield, but i can't say whether i'm actually real
Now that’s a comment
Garfield and Friends is the best it ever got for official material.
Garfield tale of two kitties was kino dont lie
4:52 product placement of PopChips…to go. Come on I wanna Omaha Steaks Lasagna meal!!!
Watching the Pamtri Garfield animation on repeat for an hour and a half is a better Garfield experience than this movie will likely be.
I loved Garfield as a kid, had like 6 books and watched Garfield and friends daily. Anything past that is meh...
15:32 "Looks dope! I wish I could *see* it, but, aw, damn it, I just hit myself in the balls"
So do the ushers perform scrotal checks before they let you in the theater up there in Toronto, or what
I completely forgot Snoop Lion was a thing
dismissive Drake: GF means ‘girlfriend’
approving Drake: GF means ‘Garfield’
This is going to be the best movie of all movie
The wild robot: “am I nothing to you?”
Pyrocynicle would adore that character design
I love Garfield. My father got me the DVDs for Garfield growing up and had books of the comics. However, this movie is just AWFUL. I wish it was just about baby Garfield. It would have been cuter and no Chris Pratto
I like garfield
Imagine Garfield was a unique movie that takes the idea of Garfield the inescapable eldritch cultural icon n makes it the villain
"Do any real people like Garfield?"
That's a very good question, because I've met a few people who are Garfield fans in my life and they never seem like real people 😂
Adum I am Garfield’s number 1 fan, don’t invalidate our existence pls we have feelings
7:05
Me (As John Hammond from Jurassic Park: “I really hated that man (Adam). 😒
Quinton Reviews is the only person I know who likes Garfield legitimately
HUH 🗣️
"garfield is meant to sound a lil gay" TRUE RANDOM TWITCH CHATTER
i wonder what adum thinks about olivia not uploading his work in 4k
Well, he only sends me 1440p footage.
@@YMSHighlights so what you are saying is that adum is a hypocrite who demands that everyone else makes 4k videos but doesnt want to do it himself. hmmm
I love Garfield
I love how they portray Garfield's laziness like sitting down and other things yet to be shown!
My husband says the garfield comic isn’t even funny. The memes of Garfield are what makes it popular especially the crackhead plush toy
i'm still trying to understand why they chose Edamame as the trailer's song lol