Artemis 2 Project Will Bring To The Moon Instruments And Astronauts
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 05. 2024
- First Part ► Artemis Project 1, The New Mission to Return To The Moon
• Artemis Project 1, The...
Commercial Purposes ► Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com
- -
Artemis 2 is the second stage of the Artemis project and will consist of a series of human-crewed missions aboard the Orion spacecraft. In this mission, the astronauts will prepare for the next ones to establish a base on the Moon.
MISSION
Artemis 2 will be the second stage of the Artemis project. Its launch date will be subject to Artemis 1, and its main objective will be to bring to the moon instruments and astronauts who will make preparations for the safe arrival of humans.
The liftoff of the mission will be the same as with Artemis 1, a Space Launch System (SLS) that will carry the provisional cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) and the Orion spacecraft with a crew of 4 astronauts.
Once the SLS reaches the Earth's orbit, it will decouple and return to Earth. On its own, the ICPS will be in charge of taking the Orion spacecraft to the Moon with fuel-based on Hydrogen and Oxygen.
- -
2:20 Van Allen Belts
3:42 on the moon
3:59 tidal coupling
4:27 WHY IS THE SOUTH OF THE MOON SO IMPORTANT?
5:54 satellite moon reconnaissance orbiter
6:22 return trip
7:23 next missions
8:15 gateway
8:49 1. Power and propulsion element
9:23 2. The Housing and Logistics Outpost (HALO)
10:10 3. Logistics capabilities
#InsaneCuriosity #Artemis2 #Artemismission - Věda a technologie
Hey guys! If you like the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter. You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us
If they aren't actually landing/exploring/building,during those 10 days,why not just send a drone,with cameras/video capabilities,or better yet, on top of that,send 20 rovers to different parts of the moon,while its orbiting and maybe also set up some communication/internet and so on,then the next mission could be an ACTUAL exploration mission,on the actual moon.
I was five years old when first man landed on the moon, me and my first grade class, plus the rest of the school watched it on a big tv. I hope I live long enough for me and my grandchildren to see this happen!
I guess you were in summer school, right?
@@josephg3231 No regular school semester.
NASA Facts: Secret NASA documents reveal the real shape of the Earth!
1 - LOCKHEED SR-71 BLACKBIRD: Technical Memorandum 104330: Predicted Performance of a Thrust Enhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload:
Page 08: DIGITAL PERFORMANCE SIMULATION DESCRIPTION: The DPS equations of motion use four assumptions that simplify the program while maintaining its fidelity for most maneuvers and applications: point-mass modeling, nonturbulent atmosphere, zero side forces, and a “nonrotating Earth”.
2 - NASA Reference Publication 1207: Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model: 08/1988:
2.1 Page 02: SUMMARY: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “fiat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.2 Page 30: 3 CONCLUDING REMARKS: This report derives and defines a set oflinearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.3 Page 102: 16. Abstract: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
3 - NASA General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft:
Page 02: Rigid Body Equations of Motion Referenced to an Arbitrary Fixed Point on the Body There are several approaches that can be used to develop the general equations of motion. The one selected here starts with Newton’s laws applied to a collection of particles defining the rigid body (any number of dynamics or physics books can serve as references, e.g. reference 2). In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a “flat non-rotating Earth” are developed that are not necessarily referenced to the body’s center of mass.
4 - NASA: A METHOD FOR REDUCING THE SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL NONLINEAR SYSTEMS TO PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. JUNE 1971:
Page 12: A NUMERICAL EXAMPLE: Problem Statement: The example problem is a fixed-time problem in which it is required to determine the thrust-attitude program of a single-stage rocket vehicle starting from rest and going to specified terminal conditions of altitude and vertical velocity which will maximize the final horizontal velocity. The idealizing assumptions made are the following:
(1) A point-mass vehicle
(2) A “flat, nonrotating Earth”
5 - NASA Technical Paper Nº 2835 1988: User’s Manual for Interactive LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program To Derive Linear Aircraft Models.
5.1 Page 01: SUMMARY: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
5.2 Page 126: 6. Abstract: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
I wasn’t alive yet but in winter of ‘85/‘86, I was in second grade & we wrote letters to NASA astronauts. NASA sent us back pics of the Challenger crew & some other astronauts. We watched the Challenger launch & disaster on tv in class. We didn’t receive the pics until later that year. It was very sad. 😪🚀
God bless
What an exciting and inspiring time to be alive!
Artemis 2 will not be able to "make a bunch of orbits" - instead they will do a free-return trajectory around the Moon, which means a single flyby of the Moon that will last several days. They're basically flying the same mission as Apollo 13, but on purpose this time.
And no logistic ore a Gateway
If it makes it to the Moon I'll be surprised.
Thank you
@CountArtha More like a repeat performance of the Apollo 8 flight.
@@charleswest6372 What???...Artemis I made it to the moon
Can't wait for it😍😍
Now, it confirms and motivated me to join ISRO to become a scientist and contribute more towards
it. 🙏🙏🇮🇳
Artemis 2 is a crewed lunar orbit mission, basically A1 but crewed . Artemis 3 is the landing. ICPS doesn’t stand for provisional cryogenic propulsion stage, that would obviously be PCPS. ICPS is interim cryogenic propulsion stage. Finally, the ICPS is the “second stage” and separates before reaching even lunar orbit. It cannot be used for the return. Orion has the ESM (service module) which it uses.
No, Artemis 2 will Fly in a free returne trajetory ground th Moon and not in a orbit
Y didn't we build bases there in 69-70?
NASA Facts: Secret NASA documents reveal the real shape of the Earth!
1 - LOCKHEED SR-71 BLACKBIRD: Technical Memorandum 104330: Predicted Performance of a Thrust Enhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload:
Page 08: DIGITAL PERFORMANCE SIMULATION DESCRIPTION: The DPS equations of motion use four assumptions that simplify the program while maintaining its fidelity for most maneuvers and applications: point-mass modeling, nonturbulent atmosphere, zero side forces, and a “nonrotating Earth”.
2 - NASA Reference Publication 1207: Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model: 08/1988:
2.1 Page 02: SUMMARY: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “fiat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.2 Page 30: 3 CONCLUDING REMARKS: This report derives and defines a set oflinearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.3 Page 102: 16. Abstract: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
3 - NASA General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft:
Page 02: Rigid Body Equations of Motion Referenced to an Arbitrary Fixed Point on the Body There are several approaches that can be used to develop the general equations of motion. The one selected here starts with Newton’s laws applied to a collection of particles defining the rigid body (any number of dynamics or physics books can serve as references, e.g. reference 2). In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a “flat non-rotating Earth” are developed that are not necessarily referenced to the body’s center of mass.
4 - NASA: A METHOD FOR REDUCING THE SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL NONLINEAR SYSTEMS TO PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. JUNE 1971:
Page 12: A NUMERICAL EXAMPLE: Problem Statement: The example problem is a fixed-time problem in which it is required to determine the thrust-attitude program of a single-stage rocket vehicle starting from rest and going to specified terminal conditions of altitude and vertical velocity which will maximize the final horizontal velocity. The idealizing assumptions made are the following:
(1) A point-mass vehicle
(2) A “flat, nonrotating Earth”
5 - NASA Technical Paper Nº 2835 1988: User’s Manual for Interactive LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program To Derive Linear Aircraft Models.
5.1 Page 01: SUMMARY: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
5.2 Page 126: 6. Abstract: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GET, WHAT A JOKE IF NO ONE NOTICES THIS, IT SHOULD BE VERY DETAILED, NOW I AREE WITH SO CALL CONSIPRICY THERORYIST NOW
@@charleswest6372 why would we? You so know the size of the computer that put us on the moon back then right? The tech clearly wasn't there as it is barely now lol
0:05 who dropped a giant cigarette butt on the ground?!
intresting to follow this missions
As far as To Do lists go, I think going to explore the Moon, is at the top of mine. OK, maybe not a to do list. More like a dream list. But still, I got a feeling it would change my perspective on thing's. Figuratively and Literally.
Capricorn One is on schedule.
It march 23rd 2234 and artimis 342 has landed Americas first astronauts since on the moon since 1973.
Great video !
HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GET,?????????????????
Why is the Van Allen radiation belts more of a consideration for this mission as opposed to the Apollo missions which passed through the belts quickly with out problems?
Bcs they're only dreaming
Maybe because of the computers. Microchips etc. are sensitive concerning radiation. However, is it really more of a consideration than with Apollo? Of course also with Aapollo they considered it.
Not only USA & Canada: "The Artemis program is a robotic and human Moon exploration program led by the United States' National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) along with three partner agencies: European Space Agency (ESA), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), and Canadian Space Agency (CSA)."😀😀😀
Sooo, they found the technology they lost from apollo missions?
Reminds me of Don Pettit vid 😂
That's one big step for mankind but one really big leap for the girls!! 🤩
Right.... 2 thin layers offers more protection than a think layer... Makes sense. And you're right the van Allen produces mild radiation.... You clearly know these "facts" are accurate, please continue
Yay
I was born in 1967. I'm just old enough to remember watching astronauts walking on the moon. I've waited for 50 years to see that again.
I just hope I make it long enough to see it happen again. As you get older, the time scale of space exploration really starts to matter.
This will he the first crew that will actually die in space and never return
Will the Gateway have a Starbucks? Maybe not right away.
The ESA service module brings the Orion back not the ICPS
Those Europeans 🥸
2nd flight, not "stage".
I hope they'll call it Moonbase Alpha
In 100 years maybe.
@@charleswest6372 Was just a reference to the videogame "Moonbase Alpha"
🤣
aeiou
I dont think most are old enough to get the reference love that show
I wish they would make a new Saturn rocket. The Saturn v was the neatest thing ever
Yeah, I wish they would too. But I guess that although it's obviously not a NASA rocket, at least there's still SpaceX's Starship which is super awesome too. I love that there's even a lunar version of Starship too, it's so badass.
@@Tharsis_ yeah that’s is true. Something about the Saturn v is just so damn neat to me but I love everything in the old Apollo missions I can’t imagine being on one of those flights to the moon. Incredible what people can do
The Artemis rocket has the same carrying capacity of the Apollo, or so I'm told.
But the Apollo had a powerful third stage, capable of changing the orbit from that originally achieved with a launch from Cape Canaveral, to an equatorial orbit coplanar with Moon orbit, and then inject to the Moon. And the twin spacecraft had the power to slow down and enter a circular Moon orbit, and then leave from there with an Earth injection.
In Artemis the third stage and the moon spacecraft (the European module) are no more than toys when compared to Apollo, and the whole mission is playing with orbits to save mass and fuel, but I just don't understand why...
Because it’s supposed to dock with gateway which CAN change its orbit. Also because lower costs are an easier sell to Congress
ตัวกันหันไอพ่นมันควรจะมีฝาครอบคือรูปทรงมันจะคล้ายเครื่องยนต์เครื่องบินโดยสารตระกูล 7 ของโบอิ้ง
7:45. Apollo 17 used a pressurised rover? Really? Don't think so.
VivaPamplona, I like your observation.
I think they did not explain it right. I think they should fix it and say, " they will bring a rover like Apollo 17, but this will be pressurized."
The way they recorded it is confusing. It makes you understand that the Apollo 17's rover was also pressurized.
@@jap1260 I think you are correct
We are waiting Artemis 2 mission
Interesting to see the start of Manned Spaceflight to the Moon as the Artemis II crew members were named... reminds us of the 1968 Apollo 8 mission.
Exciting mission but... Mission to " Deep Space " was surely the wrong term here
The edge of our Solar System isn't even Deep Space!
The nearest Star at 4.2 light years isn't even Deep Space!
When?
Launch it already, they had 50 years to prepare for this
seriously, are you going to ignore the Hubble Space Telescope, which launched more than 30 years ago or the just recent James Webb Telescope? or the DART mission they've been working on for years in advance? or how about the ENTIRE SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM THAT RAN FOR ALMOST 40 YEARS JUST AFTER THE APOLLO PROGRAM? so no, they haven't had 50 years to prepare for this, nimrod. how about instead of saying it like a stuck-up neanderthal that you work for NASA, huh? see how you'll bring your genius intuition, buddy
I think there is difference between the icps and orions service module. icps will seperate on assend (step 3 of attached photo) while orions service module will seperate before reentry us you say the icps will do (step 8) upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Artemis_2_Trajectory.jpg the rest of the content is correct and this is a technicality so nice video
Yeah, the ICPS will only be used on day 1 of the mission. It will separate from the core stage and put itself into a parking orbit; then it will fire a second time to raise Orion's apogee. They are going to have to use the Orion service module's engine to finish the TLI maneuver, because the ICPS is under-powered and doesn't have enough delta-v to get Orion all the way to the Moon. The Apollo missions were much more elegant, with a single TLI burn, because the Saturn V was powerful enough to send the spacecraft on a free-return trajectory from its initial parking orbit without the need to use the Apollo service module. The Exploration Upper Stage that was _supposed_ to be ready for Artemis 2 would have been able to do that.
You are correct. The author needed to do a little more homework on this video.
Exactly, the ICPS is an upper stage for getting Orion+Service Module to the Moon. Power, supplies, life support etc for Orion comes from the ESA-built Service Module
Here after crew announcement
1:20 skip the "previously on Artemis..." intro
HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GETS, WHAT A JOKE, SOMETHING IS BEING HIDDEN, THESE DIGITAL VIDEOS SHOULD BE crystal CLEAR
NASA please have Artemis take a picture from moon orbit of the Original moon landing site and zoom in on the flag, the parts of the lander remaining and even the footprints if the pixels allow. This should stop the idiots that believe we never really landed on the moon.
It wouldn't stop them. China has already confirmed and taken pics of some of our landings. Idiots will always be idiots
It won’t, the only thing that will is sending them to space
Look up the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter pictures of the apollo sites.
what you use for radiation shield in this mission ?
Oh the same for Apollo, a lot of luck...
Did you bother listening to the video that you're commenting on?
Prostitution will be hard with the launch of ARTEMIES 5= SATURN V 5 IN conjuction with Martian 3 missions to Mars and Saturn.
We are go to artmis 2 moon missions
Can't wait to watch her trying to park the lunar module.
That thing won't make it there. Faked it in 60s but this time we can't with modern electronic communications.
🤦♂️are you serious with me rn? the moon landing WAS. NOT. FAKED. NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY. MILLIONS, MAYBE BILLIONS SAW THE ROCKET FLYING TO SPACE IN PRACTICALLY REAL TIME. UNLESS BILLIONS OF PEOPLE WERE HALLUCINATING, THE APOLLO MISSION WAS REAL. R E A L .
actually, men are statistically worse drivers than women! they get into more accidents! :)
Is it the building of Artemis 1 or is it the building of Artemis 2
The footage shown is of Artemis 1 being assembled.
Keinen einzigen Fehler! Bitte!
If we are using the Space X Starship as the lander for the Luna mission, then why continue with Artemis? Just in case Space X fail? Seems a waste of resource without a lander on the SLS rocket.
This post didnt age well
The SpaceX lander is part of Artemis. It’s scheduled to be used on the Artemis III mission. SpaceX also has options with NASA for landers on other future Artemis missions.
antteeeeee water!
Oh I get it its the youtube bloggers doing this.
I have no idea why we aren't spending the same amount or more on first exploring our oceans. Don't get me wrong, I love that we are exploring space, but I want the same attention spent on discoveries and mysteries here at home.
Do you plan on fleeing to the water during a world ending apocalypse?
In the long run though, there's a huge amount of natural resources out there in space waiting to be taken advantage of. It would be good for humans to get to the point where we can reap those resources sooner rather than later, just in case. And it'll be a long time coming, so I say push it hard now. The future will thank us for it.
@@deanroddey2881 Also we will gain much more knowledge and tech from space than the ocean. The ocean is good for biology, but biology isn't as useful as physics, chemistry, astronomy, and seeing space is cooler.
Write to your congressman and senator and urge them to increase the funding for NOAA
Whatever they carried in first looked like a big cigarette butt lol
if the human race are going to stay on the moon is there any plans to planet hop from planet to planet or do we go further afield in our solar system.
Of the inner terrestrial planets, Mercury orbit too close to the sun to be viable and Venus atmosphere is so dense and toxic the pressure alone caused a Soviet lander to stop working after only a few hours. Mars is far more suitable for colonization at its distance, but has a very thin atmosphere. Beyond that, the other planets are gas giants and do not have a suitable surface to land on. Some of their moons could be a future target, but the years just to get there would be a significant portion of a human’s life even at the fastest speed we can currently travel. Those missions would take a lot more technology and spacecraft of a significant size than we currently have. I’m sure one day exploration will go beyond, but planet “hopping” becomes exponentially more difficult.
Its really more a question of energy use for deltaV changes in orbit. Dropping down into a gravity well is easy, the return to an escape velocity orbit is very expensive. Even orbiting the moon or other body requires a huge expenditure of energy to reach escape velocity. It is inefficient and unproductive to planet hop as you put it.
NASA says that Artemis 2 will have the first Canadian to go to the moon. Also, in 2025, Canada will launch something that Canada is a stranger to: A lunar rover.
Well... they have experience with robotic arms, I think they’ll figure out the rest
Take to the moon.
15 years we can buy a $15,000 bottle of Moon Water.
Trust me, the Japanese will buy it to freeze for cocktails. When glacial ice in your cocktail isn't quite enough
My dream come true I work with SpaceX togheder we need to creat SpaceBase and develop life in oder s planet
Ones year ago space and 🌎😉
you would think that the US itself would be able to build the crew module, but esa solves that task. That's a bit strange.
_you would think that the US itself would be able to build the crew module,_
They did. ESA built the Service Module.
The ESA attached kinda trailer to the crew compartment. Providing power, heat, Oxygen, Nitrogen, and telemetry to the crew.
@@renepiepenburg4663 "Providing power, heat, Oxygen, Nitrogen, and telemetry to the crew" = keeping them alive. Pretty amazing that its ESA and not NASA, who claim to have travelled so many times to the moon, that they cant do it themself, but need another spaceagency to deliver.
@thomasdanielsen9941
It's called international cooperation you ever heard of it?
@@carcinogen60yearsago sure. Or its because the US cant themself. Please note, how little the US space agency do themself. Russian technology made ISS possible. European technology made it work. The US provided a system overpriced and out of touch, based on a dream (the shuttle) and today its a private company who solved how to send humans to the ISS again. The rocket technology used to this day is based on nazi technology, and clearly the US has been able to move from that point, even with a huge military budget. We still live in the afterlife of WWII, so thats what its really called, follow who ever stood up after the war. And that was the USA being far away from the battlefield having destroyed most of europe.
I think we have ample evidence that the Van Allen belts are no worry to humans passing through, since Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins all lived to a ripe old age and did not suffer any effects, even with no radiation shielding. *wink*
Miss ussr space program 😂
7 years old when they walked on the moon 🌛 I watched the whole thing I was in aaaaahhh....now it makes me think that maybe they never set foot and that why Artemis 1 is a test run or there's a asteroid coming right for us and their trying to push it out of our way ...... they are all theories of course.... maybe to many movies?
I WAS 15 WHEN GENE CERNAN MADE THE LAST KNOW MAN ON THE MOON THANK GOD I MADE IT TO MY 2RD SPACERACE, BUT I ASK YOU.....................HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GET, WHAT A JOKE , THIS REALLY MAKES ME BELIEVE THEY (((ARE HIDING ))))) THE SURFACE LUNAR DETAILS.......
Too many Star Trek movies indeed.
Bloss keinen Fehler übersehen und auch an Plan B,C, D....Z....denken
Keinen winzigen Fehler!
💪💯♥️🙏♥️🌎
I don't see the point of Artemis 2. Four days staring at the moon? Why the need to send humans? I love space travel exploits but this particular mission makes no sense.
HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GETS, WHAT A JOKE, SOMETHING IS BEING HIDDEN, THESE DIGITAL VIDEOS SHOULD BE CLEAR AND NOT BLURRED OUT, ..............DO YOU AGREE, 55 BILLION AND WE WHO PAID FOR THIS GET GARBAGE VIDEO , I WAS SO LOOKING TOWARDS A NEW GENERATION OF LUNAR SURFACE VIDEOS, HECK THE QUALITY IS VHS LEVEL BLURRED OUT ON PURPOSE WHATS your opinion??????
Seems like a waste, they could at least pre-stage supplies on the surface for use by Artemis 3.
Because NASA is probably using the tried and tested method of “7,8,9,10,11” (Apollo 7 through to 11) testing everything on the rocket and space craft. If anything Apollo 10 was kinda a waste of time tbh.
You must be more clear about ICPS
How many billions are we spending this time.
Not nearly enough.
Sad that NASA has retired their 747SP SOFIA a while back
Nasa needs to invest in rocket re-usability otherwise Artemis model is DOA already
Well, they're reusing shuttle parts to obligate each state to work on it, building support to essentially chain each states representatives to support funding for the program. See how NASA does that?
What if the conspiracy is that they go to a military facility for having been criminals. Regarding how people would be going to a program for getting medical treatment. Regarding needing special military medical facilities without the public addressing the content of it directly. Because of how space stations could be like a theme park lie for society to address health care without it being a concern greater than unbelievable
Social behavior conduct. Because of how the new age of criminals is like a virus. Thus, the context of people being trained to understand real criminals from others. Regarding how lying to the public is a project for making dreams come true. Thus, the context of questioning when media portrays how everyone is resuscitated and brought to better health.
Regarding how people can have new lives and be fully healthy (new bodies).
Potentially, the excessive depth of education related to the health care is like fighting for the education to be divided for purposes of reducing fears about mistakes and bad behavior.
Very poor video. incorrection nomenclature confusing the Service Module, built by ESA, and stage that performs the trans-lunar injection. Tone of video is 3rd grade level. A good copyeditor would have fixed the script.
Wrong Artemis 2 will Fly with the Icps to a high Earth Orbit ans than in a free Returns trajectory around the Moon, no orbit no gateway, no logistic. And the Apollo 17 dosnt auf a presurised roverRover
Interesting that no images are captured of the ALEDGED APOLLO landing sites. Also....IF the technology exceeds the technology from 1969 Apollo narratives, then there should be milliseconds on the pictures taken
NASA Facts: Secret NASA documents reveal the real shape of the Earth!
1 - LOCKHEED SR-71 BLACKBIRD: Technical Memorandum 104330: Predicted Performance of a Thrust Enhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload:
Page 08: DIGITAL PERFORMANCE SIMULATION DESCRIPTION: The DPS equations of motion use four assumptions that simplify the program while maintaining its fidelity for most maneuvers and applications: point-mass modeling, nonturbulent atmosphere, zero side forces, and a “nonrotating Earth”.
2 - NASA Reference Publication 1207: Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model: 08/1988:
2.1 Page 02: SUMMARY: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “fiat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.2 Page 30: 3 CONCLUDING REMARKS: This report derives and defines a set oflinearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.3 Page 102: 16. Abstract: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
3 - NASA General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft:
Page 02: Rigid Body Equations of Motion Referenced to an Arbitrary Fixed Point on the Body There are several approaches that can be used to develop the general equations of motion. The one selected here starts with Newton’s laws applied to a collection of particles defining the rigid body (any number of dynamics or physics books can serve as references, e.g. reference 2). In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a “flat non-rotating Earth” are developed that are not necessarily referenced to the body’s center of mass.
4 - NASA: A METHOD FOR REDUCING THE SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL NONLINEAR SYSTEMS TO PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. JUNE 1971:
Page 12: A NUMERICAL EXAMPLE: Problem Statement: The example problem is a fixed-time problem in which it is required to determine the thrust-attitude program of a single-stage rocket vehicle starting from rest and going to specified terminal conditions of altitude and vertical velocity which will maximize the final horizontal velocity. The idealizing assumptions made are the following:
(1) A point-mass vehicle
(2) A “flat, nonrotating Earth”
5 - NASA Technical Paper Nº 2835 1988: User’s Manual for Interactive LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program To Derive Linear Aircraft Models.
5.1 Page 01: SUMMARY: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
5.2 Page 126: 6. Abstract: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
@Moosecracks There are plenty of photos of the landing sites taken by the LRO probe, retard.
I would like to see you try to use the ESM to change the orbital inclination JUST to see the ACTUAL APOLLO landing sites. Not worth the fuel, Artemis 4 and beyond might go to them though
You mean the European Service Module?…
What about first trans ?
Male or female?
@@TruckerJenkins82 I'm not sure but neither are they
What about the gender fluid? 😭😭😭
I’m not sure we need a pride month celebration on the moon right now. The first trans furry has already gone to space. Calm. The. Hell. Down.
@@nasa_fanboy4434I’m not sure there is such thing as “gender-fluid” because your genitalia cannot just change to our liking
I cant with these comments, this is so funny.
Really , an airplane mounted telescope? Its not like we spent 30 years developing a multi billion dollar space based telescope. Good to know they'll be using the new bb guns instead of the nuclear bomb options. I mean why drive a Tesla when we can just make better soapbox cars.
NASA Facts: Secret NASA documents reveal the real shape of the Earth!
1 - LOCKHEED SR-71 BLACKBIRD: Technical Memorandum 104330: Predicted Performance of a Thrust Enhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload:
Page 08: DIGITAL PERFORMANCE SIMULATION DESCRIPTION: The DPS equations of motion use four assumptions that simplify the program while maintaining its fidelity for most maneuvers and applications: point-mass modeling, nonturbulent atmosphere, zero side forces, and a “nonrotating Earth”.
2 - NASA Reference Publication 1207: Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model: 08/1988:
2.1 Page 02: SUMMARY: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “fiat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.2 Page 30: 3 CONCLUDING REMARKS: This report derives and defines a set oflinearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
2.3 Page 102: 16. Abstract: This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a “flat and nonrotating Earth”.
3 - NASA General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft:
Page 02: Rigid Body Equations of Motion Referenced to an Arbitrary Fixed Point on the Body There are several approaches that can be used to develop the general equations of motion. The one selected here starts with Newton’s laws applied to a collection of particles defining the rigid body (any number of dynamics or physics books can serve as references, e.g. reference 2). In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a “flat non-rotating Earth” are developed that are not necessarily referenced to the body’s center of mass.
4 - NASA: A METHOD FOR REDUCING THE SENSITIVITY OF OPTIMAL NONLINEAR SYSTEMS TO PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. JUNE 1971:
Page 12: A NUMERICAL EXAMPLE: Problem Statement: The example problem is a fixed-time problem in which it is required to determine the thrust-attitude program of a single-stage rocket vehicle starting from rest and going to specified terminal conditions of altitude and vertical velocity which will maximize the final horizontal velocity. The idealizing assumptions made are the following:
(1) A point-mass vehicle
(2) A “flat, nonrotating Earth”
5 - NASA Technical Paper Nº 2835 1988: User’s Manual for Interactive LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program To Derive Linear Aircraft Models.
5.1 Page 01: SUMMARY: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
5.2 Page 126: 6. Abstract: The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and “flat and nonrotating Earth” assumptions.
HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GETS, WHAT A JOKE, SOMETHING IS BEING HIDDEN, THESE DIGITAL VIDEOS SHOULD BE CLEAR AND NOT BLURRED OUT, ..............DO YOU AGREE, 55 BILLION AND WE WHO PAID FOR THIS GET GARBAGE VIDEO , I WAS SO LOOKING TOWARDS A NEW GENERATION OF LUNAR SURFACE VIDEOS, HECK THE QUALITY IS VHS LEVEL BLURRED OUT ON PURPOSE
@@antman6495 I agree. We're being lied to and or kept from seeing what's up there. Either it's not what they say it is or they aren't really going there. I find it obviously a deception when they said its illegal for them to look back at the earth with these telescopes. What better way to calibrate an instrument than to look at or test something you already know about and can see and verify. It's like checking out dirt or water from another planet with out comparing it to our own samples. When they show me a fake picture of the stuff that's already supposed to be left on the moon with there magic telescope then I'll be impressed.
@@antman6495 czcams.com/video/sDggkBUSZl8/video.html
Check this out
Yeah... why not just use Hubble or JWST?
Oh woman
WHY doesnt the Artemis Rocket use Falcon 9 Rockets from SpaceX as boosters therefore lowering the cost ??
The falcon 9 boosters are not powerful enough to take the payload to the moon
wow
1Canadian, 3 Americans Artemis2; Excited@@@@Nasa
Why did NASA have to qualify the future Artimes trips to the moon by saying it will send a "female' and a 'colored person'?
Jews
because it's a fun fact, and as a woman it made me smile :)
@@celestialite9566 'Fun'? No , 'pandering ' is closer to the mark!
@@Rocky-xx2zg pandering to who? 50% of the population? i don't think you're using that word correctly :(
@@celestialite9566 Pandering to blacks and feminists!
Foooooo
So, what do we have? The United States declares itself the only space hegemon, and assigns itself the role of managing the entire outer space. Those countries who are ready to recognize their authority and obey, they will allow space exploration within the limits allowed by the United States. And they will even help them a little, if the role assigned to them requires it, and correspond to the interests of the United States. And to those who disagree with this state of affairs, the United States actually declares a space war. This is what they call: the Artemis program. Russia and China have already been declared enemies in advance, and a law has been passed on countering and prohibiting cooperation between the Russian and Chinese space programs. That is, the United States professes the principle: who is not with us, is against us! And as we can see, this is their approach in everything, whether it's water, land, sky, or space. I'm afraid that with this approach, sooner or later, they will no longer start a cold war, which is already underway, but will unleash a full-fledged third World war.
You should get out more 🤔
You really need to take your meds.
At a cost of $94 billion, sheer waste of money
Plot twist: That's not even 1% of USA entire revenue in the last 10 years (the value you mentioned, was used in the past 10 years)
So is going to waste billions in conquering funny countries with funny names! And end up as a loser 😂
INTERESTING.... APPARENTLY Artemis 2 will use lasers to beam high-definition video from the moon .... HOWEVER....THOSE laser beem video will take LONGER TO TRANSMIT than the ALEDGED APOLLO MISSIONS communications and live video.....INTERESTING
The moon is slowly moving away from us each year by 3 cm.
I'm sorry, but you will no longer be allowed to land on the Moon without paying tribute to President Xi.
Lmao, that’s why we have to get there first, Americans don’t like taxes
To date america takes the black and white pucks of galaxys moon, stars and universe So it can tell What ever Kaka meme stories about everything it want
Was this translated by Google from a language other than English? Martian, maybe?
First comment
I WONDER WHY NASA OFFICIAL VIDEOS HAVE THE COMMENT LINES UNAVAILABLE, ITS BECAUSE EVERYONE WOULD COMPLAIN ABOUT ..... THE ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 52 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GETS,
WHAT A JOKE, SOMETHING IS BEING HIDDEN, THESE DIGITAL VIDEOS SHOULD BE CLEAR AND NOT BLURRED OUT, ..............DO YOU AGREE, 55 BILLION AND WE WHO PAID FOR THIS GET GARBAGE VIDEO , I WAS SO LOOKING TOWARDS A NEW GENERATION OF LUNAR SURFACE VIDEOS, HECK THE QUALITY IS VHS LEVEL BLURRED OUT ON PURPOSE
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Carefully doesn't show you the SpaceX lander because it makes it obvious how unimaginably stupid the current plan is.
👿👿👿👿👿👿👿👿
Why? It is not much different than Apollo. We been to the moon. Why go back 53 years later? The Artemis is not much different than the Apollo Capsule. How many people would these dollars feed.
What? Hey let's not have a military budget either because it could feed ppl. Maybe ypu don't know Medicare and welfare pays out so so so much more than nasa ever gets. Like really don't cry about point five percent of the US national budget. Why aren't you crying about the 2.6 billion spend to study genders..............
Have you never heard of helium3? Do some reserch
Because Apollo went to land on the moon, Artemis is going to stay on the moon. But I agree with how much money these guys need to do something again.
If you knew anything about Artemis or Apollo, you would know there nothing alike.
Just had start right off the bat with the required propaganda: "..the first woman to....". OK, click.
genuine question, how is that statement propaganda? i'm pretty sure it's just a fact, and one that most women do find interesting. please educate me!
I was never alive for the first man on the moon, but I’ll see the first woman on the moon and if I’m lucky, on mars.
The first women on Kalpana Chawla
2 catastrophic failures in 20 years and we should trust nasa to send people to the moon?
Yes......... The only other options that make sense are the CNSA (China) and Space X both of which are only operating in low earth orbit, the only man rated Space X rocket is the falcon 9 which can’t preform as mission this big. And China is building their own space station
Thanks to Nike and Apple and the dumbocrats
@@hm-ys4ym oh dear... that's enough Internet for you, old fart
@@littlegrandpa2062 blood and treasure..., like peeing in the wind
Yeah on a vehicle that didn't have an abort system.
This one does.
🇺🇳4:56
Please don't destroy the moon ,because it help the ocean to stay low 🙏
Those tides are one of those things that made this planet so successful for life
Lol no one is destroying the moon...
Nahhhhh we’re gonna hollow out the moon and make a mini Death Star lmao.
ADD
They have only found 2 faults. Thiers 7 more. Check boosters and REALESSE . And the pipe in the top of the engine. I told you so. It will be the biggest and another fail. BEWARE SATURDAY CAN'T GO AHEAD. DON'T SAY I NEVER TOLD YOU. AT LEAST YOU WILL HAVE THE BIGGEST FIREWORK IN HISTORY. SPACE X....
this post didnt age very well..lol. Spacex fan boys
I hope the first woman to the moon would be AOC. Then leave her there.
DUSTIN HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) 55 BILLION AND THIS IS WHAT THE TAXPAYER GETS, WHAT A JOKE, SOMETHING IS BEING HIDDEN, THESE DIGITAL VIDEOS SHOULD BE CLEAR AND NOT BLURRED OUT, ..............DO YOU AGREE, 55 BILLION AND WE WHO PAID FOR THIS GET GARBAGE VIDEO , I WAS SO LOOKING TOWARDS A NEW GENERATION OF LUNAR SURFACE VIDEOS, HECK THE QUALITY IS VHS LEVEL BLURRED OUT ON PURPOSE, YOUR OPINION, I WAS WAITING JUST FOR THE CLEAR VIEW
wow, clever joke! you should do stand up, you're SUPER funny! :)
Out of all the insane women out there, even in politics, you could've named so many better candidates...
Did you leave Marjorie Taylor Green out because she doesn't even believe we landed on the moon? 😂
MTG in orbit don’t spoil the moon.
If anyone ever lands on the moon the world be a whole new kind of woke. I'm pretty sure that the ones going there will use pronouns that equate that they identify as selfbreeding aliens.
actually barbara im pretty sure everyone uses pronouns! they're just a part of speech! :D
All those Apollo trips to the moon... what did we get from them? Ummm .. a half dozen bags of rocks.. Only cost 13 billion... must be nice rocks?
I'd call you an idiot but that would be an insult to idiots. If you think the only benefit we received from the Apollo program was rocks, you shouldn't be breathing according to Darwin.
NO EXISTE EN EL MUNDO REAL, ES CGI.
You clearly have no brain.
With all the problems, with all the poverty and suffering on earth, this is how government chooses to spend our money. Three issues to realize with the idea of space travel and colonization of places like the Moon and Mars. None of the energy expended will benefit anyone alive today. Generally, the development of space travel and its science is defence related and will be weaponized somewhere with the usual justifications of world political imperatives. Finally, I can not guess how long it will be before space travel will be allowed for average citizens. We have already seen if you want to hitch a ride on a rocket going anywhere the invoice will be millions and millions of dollars. That fact alone disqualifies the majority of people on our planet. Consequently these reasons beg the question, "who is this massive effort to benefit?" It surely will not be the starving and unhouse. None of these funds will help clean up the mess we have made of oceans and countrysides poisoned with man made chemicals. I submit the only reason for space travel is the continued support of the Military Industrial Complex. I am not against the possibility of space travel sometime in the future, but right now is the worst time in our history to run away from problems here on earth.
Its nothing more than a government jobs program employing lots of scientists and engineers to build something we don't need in the most expensive way possible. Your idea that it is in support of the MIC is close to reality, many many political jurisdictions have high paying technical jobs that are part of the NASA supply chain that are on the edge of military use.
HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW ((((((( INTENTIONALLY BLURRED THE CLOSE-UP LUNAR SURFACE IS ))))) i waited 55 years for just this return to lunar orbit to seee the new digital quality and NASA does it , YOUR JUST TAX PAYERS YOUR NOT WORTHY OF ALL THE ANCIENT LUNAR SECRETS
I got 2 sentences in and it's clear you haven't done any reserch in the topic. Medicare and welfare pay put way more than nasa ever even gets. Nasa gets point five percent of the national budget. And maybe your confused how funding and money works, when nasa spends its funding it literally goes back into the economy.
No one is running away from problems on earth. There is so much tech devoloped for space that ends up being used daily by average ppl. That tech gets utilized in much more ways than just for space exploration. There are 100s of more organizations working on feeding the hungry and cleaning our oceans and planet than space organizations.
You should watch mark robers video on if NASA is a waste of money, it’s a good watch, and so is your opinion.
It's too bad CZcams removed the dislike button. "First woman to the moon"? How tacky, no one cares about their gender
I still have one.
Dont like this or comment… lets go Brandon!
Absolutely right! The most important point is just to get another HUMAN back on the surface.
actually, i DO care! as a woman, it's awesome to see that we can do these cool things too :)