SLS VS Starship: Why does SLS still exist?!
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 05. 2024
- NASA just announced the lunar landers for the Artemis program and to everyone’s surprise, SpaceX’s MASSIVE Starship is actually one of the landers NASA chose alongside Blue Origin and Dynetics.
And this is bringing up a lot of questions, some of which we’ll answer in my next video, “Should NASA just cancel SLS and use Starship and / or other commercial launchers for Artemis?”. But today I think we need to settle a lot of debates here first about these two rockets and now more than ever, it’s time we truly pit them head to head.
Part II - Artemis VS Apollo HERE - • Can Starship Help Make...
LINKS:
00:00 - Intro
05:50 - What Makes a Vehicle a Super Heavy Lift Launcher
09:00 - The History of SLS and Orion
18:05 - The Progress and Inventory of SLS/Orion and Starship
27:30 - The Philosophies of Starship and SLS
34:55 - Starship VS SLS
41:50 - Conclusion
Article version [with sources] - everydayastronaut.com/sls-vs-...
--------------------------
Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! - / everydayastronaut
Special thanks to my incredible Mission Directors who TRULY make this whole thing possible! - Aaron Davis, David Glover, Hector Ramos, J, Jared smith, John Malkin, Mac Malkawi, Max Haot, Nicholas T. Gallman, Ole Mathias Aarseth Heggem, Ryan M., Scott G Raderstorf, Tomdmay , TTTA , Turner Hunt
Or become a CZcams member for some bonus perks as well! - / @everydayastronaut
The best place for all your space merch needs!
everydayastronaut.com/shop/
All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastronaut.com/music
I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on CZcams / ourludicrousfuture - Věda a technologie
I just turned 60. I witnessed the moon landing when I was 8 years old, you young people will witness unbelievable things, I envy you
I have this urge to say okay boomer but i respect you i always wished i could see the moon landing.
I wish I was born in those times to witness that kind of amazement.
@bullsballs okay boomer
@mister kluge covid19?
@@pickleism253 or conflict with our friends in china
Imagine the high school reunions.
10 year reunion, water tower construction.
20 year reunion, rocket scientist
Thats funny, and thats from a rocket scientist who now controls water towers.
*Rocket Engineer
20 years? It hasnt even been 5.
@@zilfondel whoosh.
yea imagine thaat haha
The thing I still find most amazing is, well, the Saturn V used literally visible magnets as it's memory for the guidance system programming. This memory was a wire grid sewn BY HAND with iron rings as memory bits. The fact that the Saturn V and lunar module running on magnetic core memory, with only a few kilobits of memory, made it to the moon is astounding. That is still being compared to modern completely digital guidance systems.
*cough* mars climate orbiter
Magnetic core was still being used as primary memory in many new computers into the 1970s.
It just didn't scale as well as semiconductor memory, which is why it eventually died.
Magnetic core memory is still used in certain applications, for very good reasons.
@@foobarmaximus3506 that’s amazing!! Can you elaborate on where it’s used today? And like why? There must be a good reason. Thanks for the response!!
@@bricefleckenstein9666 it’s just so amazing to me (a millennial) that my phone has GB of memory but only KB were needed to guide us to the moon. That’s why I got into engineering, I wanted to know how it worked! Thanks for the response!
Revisiting this episode after 2+ years. Great to realize what’s changed!
What has changed is that Elon s¡mps arent coping but seething.
@@janeydoe7417 Wah wah elon bad :'(
@@Epicurus0 Starship go boom
@@paurodriguezriera7979 I like that reference
@@paurodriguezriera7979 more like nasa go round the moon, starship go boom
Seriously Tim, this series of in depth documentaries are easily the highest quality content on the internet today about space engineering.
Be fair to Scott Manley!
Too long, I have a life.
@@MrRubenkl Yeah, no disrespect. Scott makes really awesome and original content too :)
@@zoidburg2975 I doubt
I wholeheartedly agree!
My father was a NASA engineer (Gemini, Apollo and Shuttle at E&D [Engineering and Development]) and frequently complained about how everything was structured to cost the most and fund contractors at the expense of progress.
Thanks for the boiled down concentrate on this issue.
Welcome to america, i dare you to say one government or private institution that doesn't do this. Even musk is guilty of this.
Sci-fi writer Jerry Pournelle was commissioned to do a study on NASA. He coined the concept the Iron Law of Bureaucracy. Basically there are 2 kind of people in any given organization. The ones interested in the stated mission of the organization. And the bureaucrats that's interested in continuing the organization regardless of what the mission is. The law states the 2nd group will always gain control,
Holy Ravioli Elon has NEVER placed ANYTHING ahead of progress. He has shown time and again that he will invest everything he has to further progress, even if it seems likely he will fail.
@@dyingearth Sad, but True... Because most of the real talent tends to be in the first group.
@@dyingearth Back then there were mostly 'true believers' down in the trenches. I can remember backyard BBQs where they hashed out lots of stuff, month after month. By the time the Shuttle program was mature most of the old guys had retired and all that was left were people there to collect a paycheck. I still know people at Clear Lake NASA but there's no fire in their bellies not spirit of being part of an adventure.
Note my Dad bought a color TV when most were B&W and lots didn't even have one. One of my best memories is each week a dozen NASA engineers would come to our house to watch the latest episode of Star Trek and disect it. Sitting in the corner being seen but not heard while they talked if the future made some amazing memories.
Anyone else here after SN10 bottle flipped itself, landed and then RUD'ed itself to glory?
yup
👋. Crazy they're on SN19 (though they skipped a few)
@@sly_cooper393 They skipped 12, 13(good choice) and 14. So they have 11, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19. So 6 prototypes
The madman literally made a backflip, landed on his feet and then proceeded to explote, what a legend
LOL you missed the ones that blew up evidentially. Now can you tell me what the gaskets are made of that they can reliably withstand rocket engine in reverse heat.
LOL you have no clue
Are you an everyday astronaut at this point? You’re a human encyclopedia of knowledge in rocket and space exploration technology. Not everybody has the ability to do what you do and deliver the information as well as you do.
Dude, it’s impressive. Keep up the great work.
No but he's successfully time traveled from the future... Shhhh
Starship + Superheavy will now be known as "Starship on the cob"
Squid on a cob
yes
Cob on a cob now
Tim seeing starships numbers. "Eh, let's just round up to 100 million."
"Let's normalise it a bit" :D
At the $2 million price tag a dozen normal people could reasonably save enough money to launch themselves into space.
tfw it's more reasonable to assume a 5000% markup than work with the sticker price.
*Me:* _well that's not very fair, why are you nuking starship's cost economy_
*Me seeing the $/kg:* jfc guess not
Still too low
nasa: makes rockets using specialized engineers
spacex: haha water tower go brrr
I laughed too hard at this....
NASA doesn’t want the SLS. It’s the senate.
NASA: Wastes more money than created by God and man in the history of time with no results. Still calls it a success.
SpaceX: Builds a rocket bigger and more capable than the Saturn V in 1/10th the time, with 1/1000th the money. Also provides great entertainment along the way.
"Haha. Water tower go burr." indeed!
@@HelloNotMe9999 Saturn V??? That was made 50+ years ago lol
Do you mean sls?
@@HelloNotMe9999 "1/1000th the money" suuuuuure... more like 1/2 or 1/3, and that's *WITH* the benefits of not having to play politics. You think blowing up rocket after rocket is cheap? It's fast, sure. But it's not cheap.
20:55 talking about "Dear Moon." Oh how far we've come, so excited for you Tim!
I like that framing: the hardest part of SLS isn't designing a rocket that works, it's designing a rocket that politics can't kill.
Don't say that yet, politics is what ended up creating the law. Given enough pressure and people agreeing on it I'm sure they can also amend that law.
But it definitely makes it harder to kill the program.
Another "private companies do it better" Musk fanboy.
@@pcuimac - Not a Musk Fanboy
But Private Companies can do ANYTHING that governments do, BETTER AND CHEAPER, that is not an opinion, that is a FACT.
"but government do this and that that private sector dont do"
1 - See if the Government dont prohibit the private sector to operate in the area
2 - Research if the thing is on a FREE MARKET, government injecting stupid amounts of money on something completely destroys the market.
3 - if it worth the cost, if people need, they will pay for it, that is why Prices exists.
@@brianfhunter sure, but just because a private company can do it cheaper doesn't mean that it'll sell you the product for less. If you need it now or there is no real competition (and I do mean need when I say it, they can't go too bananas on wants) they can set whatever price they want, so careful with your point number 3
@@brianfhunter there's a place for both. Only government will do the research that is not initially profitable. Once that research has practical, profitable applications then the private companies jump in.
"As they stand today, SLS is big, really big! But Starship will be...huge!"
This is the science I can understand. Great work, quality is amazing at every level.
Starship is a huge money pit. SLS has already built and tested The Orion spacecraft and SpaceX hasn't even shown credible designs on a crew cabin .. and may be a decade or more away from making this thing safe for humans.
@@ericmatthews8497 Money pit? 1-10 billions according to Elon. But most of the money came from starlink, NASA just gave them 135 millions, that's nothing.
I don't agree, the ludicrous amount spent on SLS could have been used to greater efficiency and innovation, shortening the time scale by investing in various ways in the private sector.
The problem is by the time this was realizes the rocket was to big to kill like the JSF program which will become obsolete really soon with the Advent of UAVs that can perform ACM.
@@ickbar11 You want more government handouts to private companies that cannot otherwise survive? Looks like I found another leach. All the private company does it better and more efficiently stuff is nonsense. Especially when you're asking for government to pick and choose private company winners by awarding them massive long term contracts, paying for any overruns, etc... You guys might also want to note that Starship is coming up on 8 years now, they are not that far behind SLS in time and I don't think they're where SLS was even on day one yet. So... I don't think Starship will end up working ever. As for Elon... he throws around a lot of numbers I don't believe even remotely. I'm pretty confident it will be more expensive than SLS when all is said and done if it ever reaches completion, it may fail while still being cheaper.
Eric Matthews yay, space x crew demo
Two years later , an obervation.
Tim has deserved his flight on Dear Moon more than any body else, His dedication to accuracy, understanding, and presentation is.... like no other , unique. ... !
no
@@xephael3485 you mean: no, never heard of every day astronaut.
Tienes que vivir detras de la luna, pibe.🇦🇷
Would love to see an updated version of this video soon! Like after Artemis 2 or after starship starts hauling payloads to orbit
It's so much more fun to have a "teacher" that is genuinely excited about their own subjects.
Thanks Tim!
Can’t wait to hear “You are go for TLI” in a couple years, insane!
Yes, and also a good camera live feed
or TMI
Trans-moon injection?
Live HD feed and everything. I can’t wait to hear that in real time.
Yeah
And now 10months later they have:
Flown and landed sn5 (150meters)
Flown and landed sn6(150meters)
Presure Tested sn7
Flown and crashed sn8(12.5km)
Flown and crashed sn9(12.5km)
Flown and landed sn10(12.5km)
Blew up sn10 after landing because why not(not really)
Now thats progress
they flew sn10 twice
Meanwhile
NASA: Green run...postponed!!!
Also NASA: Oh nooo, hey government..can you give me another 1billion dollars worth of taxpayer money to waste?
@@henry55 sn10 flew 4 times. 1st, at liftoff, then at landing, a 2cm hop, then a 200 meter hop, then a 1 cm hop
They flew SN8 up to 12.5km, but flew SN9 and SN10 only up to 10km.
SN10 landed... In the way ot didn't violate the gravitational field laws.
If it explodes, it didn't really land successfully.
It more (maybe) had an engine malfunction, collapsed a landing strut, bounced the nozzle, created a methane/ LOx leak (probably a valve rupture)... And then exploded.
The thing was pitched 15 degrees before it went boom.
It's a step, but let's save the Champaign for a non- incendiary touch down 😉
Here to see how well this aged. Given what appears to be NASA making the award today to SpaceX
I'm predicting SLS will get cancelled this year.
@@willimnot that's just impossible. It's the senate's rocket.
Unless Starship starts to fly and make the SLS looks bad in front of the US public, then maybe.
@@807800 I’m thinking that’s a real possibility. Musk says he wants starship in orbit by July.
@@807800 I just don’t understand the point of sls. If SpaceX can land a starship on the moon they could just as easily put one in orbit as a command module. So why are Orion and sls needed?
@@decentish8546 like i said, it's senate rocket. Sls created so these senators could keep the job in their state after the shuttle retirement, NASA never asked for it.
So, even if the sls program becoming the most ineffective, the most inefficient program ever, it wouldn't be canceled.
But, if starship becomes operational and make sls looks stupid in front of everyone in the US, with enough pressure then maybe, maybe the senate would think twice about it.
I can explic: That Russian high-altitude suit was pimpin'! You've grown out of it as a professional, but it hasn't grown out of our hearts.
_sheds a single manly tear_
It was a "gimmick", but it was effective in helping me recognize who he was in the early days, after which his effective analysis and excellent questions cemented him as one of my favorite CZcamsrs. It was good, and you're right that it's also good that he's grown past it.
Come for the gimmick. Stay for the substance.
I concur with the sentiment of the comments and subcomments. If he should get his hands on a SpaceX Spacesuit though, wearing it would be a proud display of where he has arrived at.
I kinda hope Tim will put it on for a special occasion, maybe in his recap of the Demo 2 launch. (No way he'll wear it for the launch itself!)
Nasa: Rockets are very delicate pieces of engineering
SpaceX: Look at my water tower, it can fly LOL
Nasa: ....
I'd trust work by water tower makers. When dealing with anything that contains massive pressures, "failure is not an option", so they have the right mindset for spaceflight vessels.
Litterally, the wright flyers flew their powered plane after decades of careful preparation, Louis Bleriot crossed the channel by using the cheapest engine he could buy, that had so much play that it wouldn’t jam when overheating. Space-X is the next phase waiting to happen.
That's the difference between scientists working in the public sector and engineers in the private sector. One plans all day and wastes money in a bureaucracy the other actively works and wastes money on constantly upgrading due to their failures. The scientists will have less failures, but the engineers will learn more real world information.
@@Apersonnamedme Most of science is empirical (i.e. requires real world data), and most of the people building rockets at NASA are engineers. Bureaucracy is not about science vs engineering. Bureaucracy exists because they're using taxpayer money, approved by (democratically) elected public officials. The only way I see NASA doing something closer to SpaceX is if the US becomes an authoritarian regime led by technocrats. The next best alternative is just to let SpaceX do their thing, then copying ideas from them.
@@JuanCamiloGamboaHiguera all i can say is patents is chasing to them.
I'm actually glad the NASA Boeing Artemis SLS project and Orion Spacecraft are under development! Hope to see them fly soon! As you once said, I cheer them all on!
I just watch this for the first time and find it illuminating. I have followed Starship and SLS through various sites including this one and NSF and others.
Thanks for the time you put into this project. It will interesting to see where we are say in a year or even 6 months after both SLS and Starship have tested.
Everything about Starship sounds ludicrous.
But, just a few years ago, reusing an orbital booster, by landing it back on its butt, sounded ludicrous too.
The concept of landing a rocket was never quite so ludicrous, because the way I saw it,
all they needed to do was add more fuel and legs, sacrifice payload weight to do so
But reusing a Megarocket? It seems easier to reinforce a smaller rocket for reentry than reinforcing a large rocket, maybe space x will learn this, maybe they won't, starship might have a far final smaller payload weight than elon envisioned
If that be the case, he might find it easier to build an orbital ship with starship and leave reentry to the smaller rockets, it's a pretty dicey game, the bigger it is, complexity goes up but starship looks so flimsy
Yeah it was. It was science fiction and hadn't been proven.
You do know vertical rocket landings were done before in the 90's? The only thing space x did that wasn't done before was doing it with a rocket coming from orbit. But vertical rocket landings within atmosphere were done decades ago...
@@bkreativepainting7461 It depends how you see reentries.
Lets's say you fire bullets into the water but you want them to land on the ground of the pond , without getting deformed. What do you do?
You reenforce them, harder bullets, More resisting meterials, optimized shape for penetrating the water surface &c.
But there is also another way to get your "projectiles" safely to the ground of the pond. You can reduce their density and increasing their volume in order to have them floating, in hobes over the ponds water surface only haveing short contact with the water. The projectile would rotate so there is no wear on one place but the "work" of hitting the water surface and jumping off of it would be equaly distributed on a large part of the projectile. Once the hobs over the water surface reduced the speed enough the projectile would endup like a floating tank on top of the pond and slowly sink to the ground.
A realy cool way to reduce the density of your space vehicle is to keep the empty tank! And use it to hob and float in the surface of the atmosphere. The idea is a way slower entry into the gas and having way more speed bled of in the zone where atmosphere and space meet.
There should be an option to give a second like when re-watching this kind of videos 5 months later
What?
agreed, even now with all the new stuff that happened it's still sooooo relevant
I liked your comment twice.
See what I did there? Time to start double liking these videos.
....hold my wine 🍷
@@lillyanneserrelio2187 Wine f***
@@lillyanneserrelio2187 and how did you double like?
Successful SLS launches: 1
Successful Starship launches: 0
the fact that my favorite tractor brand was included in a space video makes me happy lol. I love farming
5:50 - What makes a vehicle a super heavy lift launcher
9:00 - The history of SLS and orion
18:05 - The history of starship
22:30 - The progress and inventory of sls/orion and starship
27:30 - The philosophies of starship and sls
34:55 - Startship vs sls
41:50 - Conclusion
wow pinned so quickly, thanks tim
@@cubecraftgalaxy5973 just dont edit thr comment or you will lose the pin
why is your Icon a screenshot from spaceflight simulator
CubeCraftGalaxy Thanks for the timestamps, very much appreciated. Also (no hate or anything), on the “The philosophises of Starshop and SLS” you misspelled starship. Again no hate
Yo i play sfs too, how many stations do you have up yet?
... and there go *my* afternoon's plans.
Micah Tischler Only 49:20 🙄 I was kind of hungry but maybe the food can wait 😬
it's only 50 minutes, it's an episode of Better Call Saul, nothing more
What plans do people have anymore
Well, it's good to know I'm not the only one....
@@giovannifoulmouth7205 19 hours later.....
As a fellow Iowan I appreciate the analogy you made between Starship/Super Heavy and Corn/Cobb. Truly we are a highly cultured and sophisticated state
19:45 Going from conference questions to personal interviews! Amazing work Tim
Seeing this just 4 months later is crazy, there are already 5 more starship prototypes, 2 of which have flown
I know right the rate at whick spaceX is producing prototypes is truly astonishing
Very very crazy and true!
ikr
Was just thinking the same thing... and now we're building the booster!
@@danielsobowale9496 Its due to them not being afraid of failure. NASA was more like this in the past, and then people died and NASA lost a lot of that drive (and funding)
The SLS looks retro and very cool. The starship looks more modern and is also very cool
It actually is a close rendition to an old black n white movie that had a rocket that used water to propel it.
@@MLOCharmer Are you talking about the sea dragon?
@@ES_Spotter I don't know it was an old black n white movie on tv I saw as a kid.
in other words, both rocket look cool in they're own way :D
@@ES_Spotter she is probably talking about the sea dragon
At $2000/kg you could very easily have university (or even high school) teams working on small payloads that hitch a ride on starship. That's absolutely amazing to think of! In some cases, the launch wouldn't even be the main cost.
Not quite how it works.
@@bear3616 Exactly how it works since spaceX already sells "hitchike seats" on rockets for somewhat "cheap"
Well I can certainly tell you which one launched first.
1 minute in: "What can this guy tell me I don't know?"
45 minutes in: *flipping to my third page of notes* "How does he get all this information?! And, where can I get more?"
He spends years on his videos I swear😆. Kinda like Scott Manley, but Scott seems to not even have to do any research, he just knows
@@Formula1st well I guess Tim tries to be more “professional” but Scott is just more chill about it and doesn’t have to worry about everything as much
@@adamkerman475 and Tim does this full time - Scott has a day job and as he points out - just does his videos in his spare time
Well the landing legs
Landing PAD on the moon!!
reddit spacex, lot of usefull information
Now I'll always call the Starship/Super Heavy combination "Starship on the cob"!
We have falcorn heavy and starship on the cob now haha
😹👍
@6:50 Falcon Heavy is now technically an official heavy lift launch vehicle!
Wasn't the idea about Falcon that it was going to be cheaper because of being re-usable? How many Falcon heavies have been re-used?
@@PDVismthere has only been one falcon heavy launch
@@_ColaDev Cheers, I admit I didn't look it up because if you hear the musk loving crowd they make it sound as if it has launched multiple times with full re-usability. In actually fact, so far it only had one test flight. And if you use the logic of the Starship launch that test of the Falcon heavy was a failure because it didn't blow up. :)
Alway shave to laugh saying that SpaceX is revolutionary reusable rockets. Saying that it can be is not equal that it is.
See the Falcon 9's. Some had a partial re-use but there have been plenty that didn't have a single bolt re-used because they needed the thrust to get it in a high enough orbit.
@@PDVism True. I’m surprised Falcon Heavy even succeeded, I mean Elon himself admitted he thought it’d fail
Watching this nearly 4 years later makes you appreciate the speed in which spacex have developed starship and the raptor engine
Starship isn't done being developed yet.
disappointed by the lack of Buzz Aldrin punching a flat earther in the face footage after that statement.
I'd like to see a video of him paying the one dollar in damages to that a-hole. Pay him in pennies.
@@TonyNalagan Pay him with a fist-full of dimes. You know where.
He punched a moon landing denier.
" we will likely see explosions."
Starship SN8 high altitude test
" he he"
Well, *technically* it landed
Just not in one part
Nah, it was just a rapid unscheduled disassembly
Or Kaboom🔥
No its not called explosion! You have to call it "rapid unscheduled dissassembly"
So SLS just launched a moon mission recently and it was successful despite delays with launch, all while starship is still waiting for it's first orbital test flight. Personally, i'm very happy nasa didn't scrap SLS like a lot of people have suggested here on youtube. Otherwise artemis would have been delayed by months if not years waiting for starship to get built.
Couldn’t agree more and that was half the point of this video!
My point exactly
more spaceships more fun :)
Spacex was delayed for 6 months because of woke environmentalists in the FAA
Now we know. ;)
This channel blows my freaking mind it's just so high quality compared to the usual youTube videos. Man it's a great time to witness not only a new age in space exploration, but the ability to turn on my phone or PC, watch this channel and get excited is just so wholesome in these times! Thank you alit for giving us this content!
I'm really glad that there is such a high quality channel that is non-biased. Some CZcamsrs idolise Elon, and others hate him
Vivek Patel In this case (comparing Space X vs. SLS/SLA) bias is needed if you want to see movement in the space program. US politicians (bless their corrupt hearts) are biased against Space X. Fact!
IMO, this channel is "biased to neutral". He is always traying to picture that everythink is at the smae level.
You see, performing Ice Bucket Challenge on most outrageous claims and ideas is not 'hate' regardless of what Musk-infatuated snowflakes think. That's why Common Sense Sceptic, Thunderf00t and Pressure Fed Astronaut and few others are necessary.
@Sherlock Whole mess oh, surely convention is debatable, but he makes reasonable case on most ocassions.
Please tell me where that non biased channel is? I'm currently on Everyday Astronauts channel.
I've moved from Argentina (dropping out from Electronics Engineering) to Spain, to keep studying Engineering. Hopefully I'll strat Telecommunications engineering (applied to aerospace) on next September. A huge change in my life with the only hope of maybe putting my grain of sand in all this. All the way here, you were, and keep being a source of inspiration, and I thank you so much for all the work you do. You're really the best. Greetings Tim! Loved this video. I just wathed it all in one sitting. Thank you!
Muy cheto amigo 🗿
@@_KillerD_ Gracias crack!! En mi canal voy mostrando el proceso. Date una vuelta si querés 😊🚀
De ley lo vas a lograr! Saludos de Alemania
I hope you get a chance to work on some of the exciting and a bit missions!
Te deseo lo mejor crack!
"The upcoming Europa Clipper... is legally mandated to fly on SLS."
Nasa: looks at SLS
Nasa: looks at SLS again
Nasa: looks at Falcon Heavy
Nasa: "has selected Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) of Hawthorne, California, to provide launch services for Earth’s first mission to conduct detailed investigations of Jupiter's moon Europa."
Its august 2021 and Starship just got stacked onto its booster for the first time, and this video seems even more relevant.
Everyday Astronaut yesterday: It would be crazy if NASA chooses spacex starship as one of their Landers
Nasa: We choose spacex as one of our landers
Who thinks the the everyday Astronaut is a future teller
HE IS A MARTIAN FROM THE FUTURE
i hope you still remember the time he said "it would be crazy if they put a tesla on the falcon heavy test flight"... just saying
@@Berndy true
Clairvoyant?
I'll put down my vote... Tim the Space Prophet!!!
It makes sense that rocket engineering done by NASA would be so timid in its approach. Everything is at the mercy of the politicians.
SpaceX's approach to rocket engineering reminds me of how Skunk Works did things back in the day when they were developing fighter jets, spy jets, etc jets....
Kelly Johnson was never so cavalier. Musk's South Padre Island operation is a maker space in the worst sense, just fools with tools and no adult supervision.
@Daniel Roig well, better crash now than crash when there's human in it
'member the X-33/VentureStar? Also by Skunk Works and 98% complete before congress just refused to sign the budget for the remaining 2% (TWO PERCENT!!). The US would have been flying on a really futuristic spacecraft by now if it hadn't been for that.
Either way designs like the SLS will continue to exist likely forever, as governments consider space access a strategic asset, which means it's never going to be left entirely to privates, much like we still build military or national guard vehicles even though commercial cars and ships exist.
Could we get an updated version of this video?? Crazy how much has happened with Starship, the Artemis program and SLS in the last year!
Starship is going nowhere. Blew up its own pad.
@@Withnail1969
Unga: Bro I just made this circle-thing that, I think, if attached to a box, could help us transport things
Bunga: Cool, have you made it yet?
Unga: Well, I tried, but the stick I was using as an axil broke, so I was thinking-
Bunga: Useless.
Unga: What?
Bunga: It broke, thus, is doomed to fail
Unga: But if I just get a stronger stick I-
Bunga: Nope.
My brother in christ, you are bunga
@@Withnail1969 great reply to a year old post... I think everyone and their grandmother knows of starships very successful first flight test that went somewhat better than expected!
Hi Tim. Great job on the content and presentation! I would love to see an update on Apr 30, 2021. One year progress comparison.
imagine a starship painted like a HUGE corn on the cob, that would make Tim's day
name stage 1 to cob.
@@williamarmstrong7199 elon is a genius
Cydonius1 if only that wouldn’t mess things up
Paint would burn up
A half eaten one. Only the portions with ablative tiles painted like intact kernels
Simple answer: "Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"
and then make first contact 😎
its not a question,its the government first law.
or, in this case, 12 times the price.
Twice the price? Worst case scenario for StarShip vs best case scenario for SLS (Block 1B): SLS costs 10 x as much per kg TLI. Therefore the question should be "Why build one, when you can have two at 11 times the price?"
SLS is a billion dollar a flight waste
I was born in Titusville Florida, which is across the river from KSC. When I left 10 years for ago to join the Navy, They started working on this. Never in the time that as gone by did I ever think I would be working as a Quality Inspector on the Orion Spacecraft. Thank you so much for these videos. I'm looking forward to the wild future that's coming our way!
That is some very thorough reporting, you have impressed this viewer.
Nicely done!
Hey, Tim!...
Concerning Iowa-
Remember, James Tiberius Kirk also grew up there. So...
Being from Iowa is not necessarily a bad thing!
GREAT VIDEO! Cannot wait for 'The rest of the story'!!
He missed a perfect opportunity to say "I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
Yes, he dang near killed me with the John Deere comparison and added the Iowa remark. Although the John Deeres I grew up on only had two cylinder motors. Which I drove on an Iowa farm that was only a half hour drive from Riverside, Iowa which is the future hometown of Captain Kurt. I wonder if Elon would paint Starship green and yellow? Thanks for the Iowa and John Deere usage. Gave me a chuckle.
Plus Radar O'Reilly was from Ottawa, Iowa
Grew up in Iowa, could not be more proud. The State is a gem and often overlooked. I've always enjoyed meeting Iowans because they are naturally, sceptical and intellectually stubborn. Keep being Iowan and questioning everything. Be sceptical and be an Iowa bastard. It will serve you well.
Ok corn boi
This made me love the Saturn V even more, so many decades ago still the king of them all
Saturn V is so powerfull its put a entire space station in orbit in one launch its amazing
@@ricardorola509 but what you are forgetting is that skylab was the hollowed-out second stage fuel tank of the Saturn v so was a bit different from say putting the ISS or other stations in space.
@@benjamindavies1188 Skylab weight 170,000 pounds(77,000 kg) put in orbit in one launch and this is not the limit for Saturn V its amazing
@@benjamindavies1188 Skylab replaced the third stage.
It is the Great Pyramid of Giza (tallest building) of rockets. though it probably won't be the king for 4000 years like the pyramid was.
The Saturn V was a beast... shoulda revamped that instead of the sls
It wouldn’t be worth it, not only would you have to redesign a lot of the parts to bring them up to modern standards, but the rocket itself is extremely dated and uses inefficient fuels.
Glad you said "Team Space" I seriously LOVE renewed energy in development of vehicles for lunar and further landings. It is VERY exciting to me. The more people on this earth we have doing it, the cooler it is going to be.
Orange rocket: good
Shinny rocket: Too good
Dark 074 As nouns the difference between shiny and shinny
is that shiny is (informal) anything shiny; a trinket while shinny is (canada) an informal game of pickup hockey played with minimal equipment: skates, sticks and a puck or ball or shinny can be moonshine (illegal alcohol).
@@erikincph calm down its a single n
@@erikincph The grammar police are allot like the Spanish Inquisition.. NO ONE EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!!! Anyway.. bless their hearts for trying.
Orange rocket still bad
I like pink
Public: "Yo Boeing why the rocket taking so long?"
Boeing: "Money!"
The ULA is the worst.
Sadly it is the existing "money before work with no guarantee" culture in Congress that is the root of this evil. Congress will hold the money source for ransom until All their favorite legacy contractors have had a taste. Then demand that they be kept in the system, all the while not demanding they achieve anything in the way of progress.
Elon is a good example of independence from handouts / bailouts. *drops mic*
Boeing is used to getting more and more money due to the cost-plus way the federal government does business. It's always been a criminal way of doing things. It appears Boeing doesn't make any of it's employees answer for mistakes made, particularly it's engineering department, i.e. the Starliner capsule that didn't know what time it was among other things.
I hope Musk and SpaceX continue to make leaps and bounds progress over everyone else.
@@myfavoritemartian1 This can be short circuited by firing enough of Congress and replacing them with people who aren't compromised by the military industrial complex
o boy i want so much a updated video, your videos are great, i love this format
Tim, you talked about that tractor and got me all invested in farming gear now!~
Tim you're a star. I'm always so excited when you upload because I know for the next hour or so I'm going to be soaking up a bunch of space stuff like a sponge. Thanks for all the effort you put into these!
I hope you will become fully moist by the end.
Excellent video!! although I'm more "Team Starship" I was surprised to see how much SLS hardware is already done, and I liked the explanation on NASA's philosophy behind it ;)
SLS is pretty much go. Starship still looks like a sylo.
Just seeing this!! Your john deere tractor analogy was right on!! Loved it!
What spaceX have achieved in 2 years are just freaking mind blowing....
yet they don't get any attention... which is also freaking mind blowing. They're basically launching the biggest rocket in history and it's being ignored.
@@xephael3485 Are you serious? It is reported on more than anything else in all of space exploration
@@xephael3485 It should work first.
@@paurodriguezriera7979 it's working just fine. They're accomplishing development goals already. The rocket was likely damaged by concrete debris because they didn't have a water deluge system in place for this test yet...
@@xephael3485 No, it's not working just fine, and if u think so then u must be blind. A rocket that obliterates its launchpad, fails to decouple and blows up is not working fine, no matter how you look at it.
"Why do both rockets exist?!"
They don't. Not yet, as fully assembled, functional vehicles, anyway. SLS has been in development longer and is much closer. But the folks at SpaceX are very talented.
I wish them both well. And am a big fan of having multiple, independent, launch systems. Better for redundancy concerns, and cost concerns.
This is simply national security imperatives; it was very strange for the USA to let it manned space flight capacity slip and they are just making sure that from now on there will be two or three companies that can simply these services the same way there are 2 or 3 companies that can produce aircraft, ships, tanks, etc etc .
Aka SLS is gonna be canceled at 98% progress and be years behind schedule while starship will be on mars
"and cost concerns". A little late to put cost pressure on SLS. Too bad Starship wasn't around 5 yrs ago, and do to SLS what they have done to the LEO rocket industry and to Boeing's manned ISS program.
@georgio m IDIOT! SpaceX are the only ones that can land their rockets! They ALREADY own the game! Boeing is in it STRICTLY for the money....which is why they will milk NASA for as long as they can and never upgrade their CRAPPY OLD TECH! You also conveniently forget that EVERY space agency has had setbacks! While SpaceX has had it's share of failures, their innovation and progress is still AMAZING! Now go away you sad little hater.
@georgio m you mean the rocket which managed to go from paper to hot fire in a few weeks, compared to the SLS which uses parts developed over 30 yearsand still hasn't been completed
Why does SpaceX even exist if we already have the GPS Guided 9 Liter Turbo Diesel Powered 4 Trek 8RX 410 John Deere Tractor with an infinitely variable transmission and 85cc deplacement integrated hydraulic pump with 227 Liters per minute of hydraulic flow, air conditioned and heated, 10 inch touch screen displays and digital monitoring
Finally someone asking the real questions
Put the jokes aside,
Because human never satisfy.
Huh?
Because it “isn’t environmentally friendly” as the hippies would say
I wonder if Elon will buy one of them tractors to use on his first Martian farm.
It is very satisfying to see references to Aerojet. Dr. Theodore von Karman was my Godfather and was a founder of JPL and Aerojet. My father worked at the Aerojet Azusa plant and my mother worked on Lee Edison’s biography, “The Wind and Beyond”. Dr Von Karman had such an impact on the fields of Aerodynamics and Astronomics that he received the first National Medal of Science from President Kennedy in 1963. The divider between the earth and space is referred to as The Karman Line. We used to visit him at his home in Pasadena, CA when I was just a young space enthusiast. He passed when I was eleven and remember his funeral service and seeing many of the giants of the world of jet propulsion. Again, thanks for bringing back a lot of good memories.
Love this video! Love your analogy of offering to sell a modern tractor to a 1800's farmer that wants to buy a plow that's draw by a horse. It puts it more into perspective. I can now forgive NASA for not instantly jumping onboard with Starship.
Also reminds me of the many people who were skeptical of iPhone back in 2007. Loads of people got hyped up, but many, especially in the corporate world were unsure about it.
@@VivekPatel-ze6jy yep, they were so skeptical of it that Microsoft actually had a funeral for it 😂😂 look it ip
It was Heinlein, or Pournelle who said, “once you’re in LEO, you’re halfway to anywhere. It strikes me that shipping components to LEO, and doing assembly and fuel transfer would be the most straightforward process. But, they’re not asking me. . .
Thanks, Tim, for another great video.
It's quite difficult to rendezvous in space, though. And assembling in space might result in a lot of debris. So, assembling in LEO might not be a good idea.
_Refueling_ in LEO is more sensible though. Just one rendezvous (between the waiting Starship and the refueler Starship) instead of many rendezvous-es (between the Assembly station and lots of supply vehicles). That's why SpaceX's proposal for landing on the moon involves at least 1 LEO fuel transfer.
Yeah, orbital refueling is the way to go. Google the ACES orbital refueling concept. Very cool idea from about a decade ago.
@@PanduPoluan You speak as if we hadn't been doing this for the past 20 years with the ISS... We've got it down to a T, automated rendezvous and 8hr EVAs for component assembly/maintenance.
Building a LEO assembly station + fuel depot would probably pay for itself, given enough time. Even become a sprawling hub. At some point we're going to need ships bigger than Starship.
@@armr6937 the issue is how many billions that 2 man EVA costs, to do the work that would take a few minutes with a big crew on earth.
That's why ISS used the largest subsections they could fly and had minimum work designed to be done on orbit.
If you want something larger for interplanetary missions, you send up the largest chunks you can fly, and have them designed to be able to be joined together with the least human touch, possibly even roboticlly.
Humans are VERY inefficient with no gravity, and very limited in motion in bulky suits.
So don't expect to see ANY construction in leo, just possibly assembly of quick connect sub sections.
And there is also no need for a fuel depot.
Instead of launching a big empty tank then launching tankers to fill it, and having to maintain the cryo in a liquid state for long periods, you just launch as many tankers as needed, dock them together, and then pump it over.
@@armr6937 As you have yourself said, it took _decades_ to build the ISS. And every addition had to be meticulously planned and executed. Then after adding a component, hours upon hours of EVA to connect the bits, not to mention hours upon hours to test the integration (electrical & otherwise) of the new modules.
Refueling is much simpler: Align the ports, dock/connect, and pump until the refueler is empty. No need for electrical connections, leak tests, contaminant test, etc. All the necessary components are self-contained -- and _ruggedized_ -- in the first vehicle.
The ruggedization is actually quite important: It's hard to ruggedize things (especially components) in microgravity. But if the things are rugged enough to survive liftoff from Earth, then it should be rugged enough to survive interplanetary travel which will likely employ much less thrust / force / acceleration.
When you have grownup on a farm in Texas, go to college for agriculture and completely understand his tractor reference.
Loved it! Where’s the next video you mention? Coming?
For those who think NASA hasn't been doing anything the past 30-50 years and that SpaceX is picking up their slack, Tim is doing a great job explaining the differences, because right now we need both. From a layman's point of view, reconciling these design philosophies is what is going to make us truly starbound.
Or we can cancel the SLS that was SEVEN YEARS behind schedule and let the companies that are actually building and launching rockets do the work.
@@danlorett2184well starships super heavy blew up and Sls put Orion around the moon. You can’t compete with government money.
Sls's progress is actually giving me hope for it
Me too... To be honest, I didn't realize they had so much done already... I'm glad it has not been a total waste... and it will have some interesting capabilities... Starship is a bit different.. It's a More People Bus, and That's Good.. but SLS will have major capabilities for Non Human Massive things.. and who knows.. Maybe Nasa will become a believer in re usability and modify SLS, but my hope is that Nasa Gets out of the Rocket Building Business, and gets deeper into the Rocket Buying Business.. the advancements for the planet will be MUCH better... Not unlike the advent of Airline Travel.
@@wizardnetwork I mean nasa has a lot of employees and many of them people who have already built many rockets in their time, they definitely have the capability to make something reusable 100% come true I just hope they make it sooner rather than later
@@emilianozamora399 I know it sounds strange, but I would rather Hope they get out of the rocket building business because the commercial sector develops more, and better rockets so they have plenty of rockets to choose from to launch the missions that they want to launch... Nasa's much better at science than developing spacecraft.. In my Opinion...
@@wizardnetwork I mean how do commercial sectors have "better" rockets than nasa? Nasa is capable of definitely making good rockets it's just that they are limited by what the government wants and that is providing jobs to various parts of the country, not making one rocket in house
@@emilianozamora399 I think that's exactly the point. From the knowledge standpoint, Nasa could definitely build amaing rockets. Nasa is just limited by politics. Funding companies like Spacex to develop rockets, wil be better. Nasa should focus on things like exploration satellites, like James Webb or Clipper. That's i think the way Nasa should go.
Omg I was just sitting here having a bit of a sad evening (due to tons of plans being cancelled because of the pandemic) and trying to cheer myself up with some of your old videos and then I see the notification for this video. Day saved!
Thank you for all your hard hours long research and work to do these reports. TY Tim. God Bless.
I have no doubt your videos are watched and used to help those working on and building the space industry. Your doing a great job.
"I'm showing my Iowa again".
Seems like a disproportionate amount of astronauts and even space-related scientists and engineers come from agriculture-heavy states.
Maybe clear star-filled skies while growing up are the inspiration for it.
No, it's because AG people know how to not give up. People in the city want everything handed to them on a silver platter by the government. The mentality makes the difference.
they just wanna get out of iowa lol
Many astronauts come from Ohio, because that's where wright pat airforce base is. The skies here are utter garbage, nearest dark sky spot is like 8 hours away in west Virginia.
"I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space"
I'm lucky.
Space is directly over my house.
You guys can come over and look at it, if you want.
“If your design is taking to long your design is wrong”
-Elon Musk
Right as I commented this it showed the clip
Too
crew dragon took 5 years to be developed,so.....
@@kuartz. yes, BUT it is not a failure design.
@SHIRIL I said, Failure DESIGN, not a failure LAUNCH.
...lol, Crew Dragon design is wrong??
Commenting on this video from the future- It's now November of 2011, Starship has successfully had a high altitude flight test and successfully landed. BFR booster is now fully built, Starship has a full belly of heat tiles, and we're now waiting for the first orbital test flight in late 2021 or sometime in the first half of 2022. SLS... yeah, still no significant progress.
Lmao. I LOVE how yourcomnent shows howcrazu Musk s¡mps are. Their delusions of grandeur for SpaceX is astonishing.
Thanks Tim, great information on space travel, keep your documentaries coming
Starship as a lander? Imagine they would put a whole starship on top of SLS
If we rip off fins and change fuel to hydrolox, yes
SLS couldn't physically lift it.
P Kelly or fit it the diamter is different
Every time the Starship lands there is going to be Starship mass amount of lunar dust all over the place. I love it! :D
@@eekamak A large portion of that dust (and pieces a lot larger than dust) will reach escape velocity. That means everything in Lunar orbit is going to get scrubbed by the exhaust. Many pieces will end up flying towards Earth.
As much as I'd like to see Starship on the surface, as cool as it would look, I'm hesitant.
I learned a lot but I had already came to the same conclusion you did. I get so sick of arguing with the NASA haters. People don't realize how much NASA helps spacex
Exactly
it's just a shame how much politics corrupts the science. they were focusing on all these oldspace projects for the longest time, and they keep changing their plans to the point where nothing gets done. It's good that there's infrastructure for supporting companies like SpaceX, though.
This is a great video that needs to be updated with the 2023 progress by both systems.
I am so addicted to this channel. I wish you reach 20 million subs soon. The content here is all you need for starship and its details.
I’m very late watching this one but it was interesting. I was a contract negotiator for the Air Force earlier in my career and then went to defense contractors. Your observations on keeping a big, complex project going across administrations was spot on. Secondly, I feel validated finally to hear somebody else but me say SpaceX is following the Soviet development model. I was 9 when I watched Neil walk on the moon. Very disappointed in the massive lull in manned exploration. It’s great to see so many young people so excited. Keep up the good work.
Just remember Tim, James Tiberius Kirk IS from Iowa.
Or at least will be :-)
And in another episode he said he was from Alpha Centauri.
@@surferdude4487 "No, I'm from Iowa. I only work in outer space." Kirk, Star Trek IV
@@marshallwebber9682 Yes, I'm aware of what he said in Star Trek IV. In Star Trek TOS Season 1 "Tomorrow is Yesterday",
Kirk: I'm a little green man from Alpha Centauri. A beautiful place, you ought to se it.
Of course, he might have been lying to the Air Force Colonel who was interrogating him.
@@surferdude4487 he was not lying, he was exercising sarcasm :)
One year later, successful 10km hop n' flip, first full starship stack and orbital test weeks away. Wow. And SLS still isn't really any further.
SLS is pure pork, another disposable system that will be lucky do what it was built for... wayyyy over budget, and wayyy overdue...
It’s been more than a month and still no orbit
This comment aged poorly.
Elon saying "not elon time" doesn't make it not elon time
SLS is an incredibly complicated human rated space launch system being developed by world class engineers. While 'starship' is an empty underdeveloped stainless steel fuel tank with some rockets bolted to it being blown up in the desert. It is pretty insulting to the engineers at NASA when you compare the two. Star ship will never launch humans into space while being anything close to the current 'design' mock ups. For one there is not even an LES system on the starship design which means it will not be human rated and I don't see how they could integrate one with the current design unless they start over.
SpaceX's philosophy here of making everything simple is a misunderstanding of why engineers work towards simplicity. You first design a very complicated system that works very reliably so you understand it and then you streamline it to make it even more reliable ergo making it 'simpler'. You cant just start with making a simple system and skip the understanding part like SpaceX is doing now. That way you will run into a wall when you try to make it reliable. This is why they have made zero progress in the past year.
3 years later, we see why SLS still exists. SLS is about to send a crew of 4 humans around the moon, meanwhile Starship hasn't even managed to reach orbit and reenter safely as of April 16th 2024. That's why SLS exists. Because we'd be fucked without it.
Just finished watching Tim. Very well made video, highly descriptive and very informative. As an ordinary person who loves Space you smashed the presentation of information for the general mind and I respect the time you put into these videos. Truly opened my eyes to the two programmes.
And to anybody else reading this comment, please watch the whole video from start to finish, it deserves all your time.
Totally Agree with your last statement.
Petition to send MKBHD and a few RED's to Moon and Mars
MKBHD and Everyday Astronaut for the first CZcamsrs to the Moon!
MKBHD "so I been living on mars for a week now".
@@jamesrwinters Tim and Scott Manley deserve to go to space more than most in my opinion.
F*ck Reds. Send him with some arri alexa LF’s 😍
@@linecraftman3907 Oh yeah, big time.
A little lengthy, but I love the attention to detail and the objective discussion of the pros and cons of both launch systems - Great Job!
To answer the question: For now, it's because SLS actually works! :p
Orange rocket bad shiny rocket good.😂that got me good
Orange rocket bad.
@Daniel Michael Who would make a good shiny man? Jeff Bezos?
Sneaky george Orwell animal farm reference there - 4 legs good, 2 legs bad. Haha gold
Orange rocket bad. Shiny rocket bad.
_GREY AND GREEN ROCKET GOOD._ *Soviet Union’s National anthem starts playing*
Sharkcraft but soyuz 2 has pretty shiny fairings
"Why does SLS still exists"?
Translation: "Why is BOEING still a NASA contractor?"
@Shem Casimir Because lobbying is legal and effective. So if nothing else shareholders will demand it, at some point. Cost+ plus contracts are not unique to NASA or government aerospace as a whole. The fix would involve making lobbying illegal and ineffective, which in turn would probably require deep campaign finance reform, including budget caps. Which would be fine with me. The current system is corrupting, and hostile to democracy.
@@thimkful Don't get your hopes up LOL. Would be a true fix for sure. You have my support on all of that.
@@thimkful Out of genuine curiosity. What way could you make lobbying "illegal" that doesn't obviously fly in the face of the right to petition? As far as "budget caps" same thing, how can you place limits on the ability of someone to advocate for themselves?
@@thimkful Maybe reducing the size and the power of the government to a bare minimum could be an even more effective fix? Corruption and money from private donators will always find their way into Washington, there's not much you can do about that! But what you CAN do, is limit the negative outcome of that corruption by eliminating the government's ability to do certain companies/industries a huge favor. Big private donators would still exist then but they wouldn't donate nearly as much, cause the investment risk would be much higher for them. They'd only support policies that are generally helping the economy - Policies that are not just helping themselves to make more profit, but also smaller companies and entrepreneurs, which are no less important for the future of our economy.
@@gtafreak73 lol crazy has entered the chat
As usual sir very well done I thought your example of the plow was quite appropriate
See Destin Sandlin's "I was scared to say this to NASA, but I did anyway".
Yes, it is indeed a very good talk. And read SP287 while you're at it.