Artemis 3 Project: The New Challenge For Nasa, Create A Space Base On The Moon
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 01. 2022
- First Part ► Artemis Project 1, The New Mission to Return To The Moon
• Artemis Project 1, The...
Second Part ► Artemis 2 Project Will Bring To The Moon Instruments And Astronauts
• Artemis 2 Project Will...
Commercial Purposes ► Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com
- -
Artemis 3: The most important mission that will carry the Human Landing System (HLS) will place the next generation of astronauts on the lunar surface, including the first woman.
We talked about the first two stages of the Artemis 1 and Artemis 2 projects in previous videos. In today's video, we will focus on the third stage of the project, Artemis 3.
If you have not yet seen the previous videos about Artemis 1 and 2, we remind you to do so this way, and you will understand much better what Artemis 3 will consist of.
the date of takeoff of Artemis 3 will be established. It is currently estimated that if everything goes according to plan, it could be expected that Artemis 3 will take place before the year 2030.
ARTEMIS 3
Like the previous two stages, Artemis 3 will be carried out with NASA's SLS rocket which will take off from Launch Complex 39B at NASA's modernized spaceport at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
- -
"If You happen to see any content that is yours, and we didn't give credit in the right manner please let us know at Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com and we will correct it immediately"
"Some of our visual content is under an Attribution-ShareAlike license. (creativecommons.org/licenses/) in its different versions such as 1.0, 2.0, 3,0, and 4.0 - permitting commercial sharing with attribution given in each picture accordingly in the video."
Credits: Ron Miller, Mark A. Garlick / MarkGarlick.com
Credits: Nasa/Shutterstock/Storyblocks/Elon Musk/SpaceX/ESA/ESO/ Flickr
1:52 ARTEMIS 3
3:09 HUMAN LANDING SYSTEM (HLS)
4:14 EXTRAVEHICULAR MISSIONS (EVA)
7:25 SAFE RETURN TO EARTH
8:16 THE NEW SPACE AGE
9:15 THE LUNAR BASE
10:59 MARS, THE NEXT TARGET
#InsaneCuriosity #Artemis3project #Artemismission - Věda a technologie
I doubt it'll happen within my lifetime but It would be really awesome if a future moon mission revisited any of the old apallo landing sites
There's already orbital photos of it, but I don't think Artemis is planned to land anywhere near them, they are basically national monuments at this point. We'll get more photos of them though.
@@LisaAnn777 yeah tranquility base is historical now. TBH they will probably send people there to some or protect the area.
If you want to know the truth follow me
nasa never go there forever THEY WILL GO THERE ONLY in 1 condition ( NO CAMERA ! ) 🤣🤣🤣
What are you 90
You should combine all artemis episodes into one documentary.
Just waiting for the images from 8k camera's on the moon's surface. Now that will be awesome 👍
It never ceases to amaze me all that we're about to see. Could there ever have been a better time to live!? 🚀
I am very much looking forward to this Vary Long Overdue mission ! czcams.com/video/_T8cn2J13-4/video.html
1969.
I want to see humans on Mars! Going back to the moon will be cool, but I really can't wait untill humans walk on Mars and I hope to see it in my life.
@@LisaAnn777 Excellent! 🤩
@@LisaAnn777 Most people here on Earth would settle for food and clean water.
Big problem that I saw in the video was that the new lander is to be a two stage afair? What happened to the Space X lander which is one unit for both down and back up?
This video has a lot of TOTALLY WRONG facts, starting with the fact, that the HLS will NOT be a two staged spacecraft. It will be SpaceX's Starship, that does not have a ascent/descent module and will not even close be "similar to the Eagle module"....
@@MrChiefsmaster Yep. Click Bait.
From what I read today starship 1 will be used as the HLS for Artemis 4-9
Either y'all didn't do any research into Artemis 3 or this video was written in like 2015
Considering they are talking about some of the missions that have already happened like they are going to happen in the future.
Dude, u did a great job on this and u are easy to understand and u do a good job explaining everything....SOLID WORK!! Thanks for the hard work!! Thumbs up!!👍👍
Why wasn"t SpaceX mentioned in the human landing system ?
At about the 7:00 mark, he mentions the moon’s gravity as 1/3 G, it’s actually 1/6.
I'm sorry, but did I miss something? I watched your videos on Artemis 1 and Artemis 2, but you seemed to skip ANY INFORMATION on the Gateway Station, other than "Oh yeah, we're putting a station in orbit around the moon. Moving on."
This video is profoundly out of date. Why is it being posted Jan 7th when it was out of date since NASA awarded SpaceX a contract in April 2021 to develop, produce, and demonstrate Starship HLS?
Something is wrong here, the hls isn't that one shown in the video, which is probably national team/blue origin's hls. It's SpaceX's Starship Hls with a direct ascend design
It's just an infomercial. Their lucky to be able to do anything after Obama gutted NASA and shut down the US Space program!
@@jessemills3845 yeah I mean, but it's still wrong info
@@arno_grnfld455 well, you have to look at the Audience! With the US NON EDUCATION SYSTEM and DEM congress and house ELECTED people that think we landed on MARS in the 1970s! They could put Sponge Bob on there, an they wouldn't know the difference!
@@jessemills3845 look, I don't fucking care, it's wrong info, you can Google it to see what's wrong, I don't care how messed up the education system is or how GOP and the Dems messed up everything I have nothing to do with it, yes they could've gone to mars in the 70s but they don't need to, because the moon landing and other proposed landing is political and not for 'the greater good', and because of technological restraints, Soviet admit loss and Congress reduced NASA's budget and thus preventing further exploration
@@jessemills3845 I don't care that that Obama cancelled the constellation program or trump tried to cancel James Webb space telescope, both side is wrong and don't bring politics into everything
I really envy those astronauts.
Yes of course,new project base at the moon just for army💯☑👍👌🏻🎗✨
The Hailey Clark space station looks great 🎉
Great video !
Very exciting will feel like we are there with them with the high tech cameras out nowadays
We will have nice 4k video it will be great. Some of the Apollo footage that they filmed on the moon does look pretty good though I was just watching some Apollo 17 video and it's surprisingly clear.
@@LisaAnn777
Yeah, but I hope that the new mission will have a live feedback.
Thank you Insane Curiosity compliment video interesting.
I think everybody wants to see the old apollo landing sights filmed by the new crews if they go back
This video has a lot of TOTALLY WRONG facts, starting with the fact, that the HLS will NOT be a two staged spacecraft. It will be SpaceX's Starship, that does not have a ascent/descent module and will not even close be "similar to the Eagle module"....
Could you not just research correctly before publishing this video full of lies?
Where is this information at? Cant seem to find anything that verifies what u or the video said
@@kylealexander7024 - lol Seriously you can't do a simple google search to find out SpaceX was awarded the contract for HLS and that Blue Origin took NASA and SpaceX to court over the contract?
@@UnityMMODevelopers seriously don't care that much either way. I mean u took the time to comment when u could have simple copied whatever it is ur referencing. Being an ass on the internet is more important tho right?
Why does it matter if it’s a man or woman on the surface, they’re astronauts, that’s all that matters.
When humans go to the moon again, I hope they don't destroy my front yard
why do we glove human fingers, when we can create mechanical hands that respond to muscle stimulation?
I do have a question...the proposal of artemis 3 duration is 30 days...6 days round trip and 4 days on the moon...this means that they are going to spend around 20 days living in the Gateway???
"Xemus new sleek design"
Xemu: looks almost the same
NICE NEW SUITS. THE BETTER TO HIDE THE POOL BUBBLES.
Why wasn't the Lunar Starship mentioned?
With Boeing rockets we will be lucky to get to the moon by 2030
Like Apollo there is very little that can be re-used with the launch vehicle.
The Moon's gravity is about 1/6 that of the Earth... not 1/3 (you may be confusing with Mars there,
where the gravity IS about 1/3 that of Earth)
Vanilla ice cream my favourite.
Thought spacex were building the HLS??
At the time of this writing, all indications are that SpaceX is building the HLS. They won the contract, and the lawsuits afterwards were ruled in NASA's favor.
I hope they eventually dig out a sub layer and put something in under ground. A Moon Base-ment, if you will.
so we go to the Moon to generate the means to leave the Moon and return to Earth... hmmm...
06:45 "The objective is that when the ascent module takes off, it does not throw objects that could be dangerous for future missions into the air."
There is no air on the Moon.
"On the Moon gravity is only a third of the gravity of the Earth."
The gravity of the Moon is one sixth that of Earth.
That's good,1/3 of gravity of Earth...It's means for me,habitable& ..it's gone Some special * walk,not run there,work & live with this such Tech & inventions we have,& BILLOINS SHOULD GO TO THE MOON & INVEST*
The gravity of the Moon is 1/6 the gravity of Earth.@@arbanaismailfroto8363
If you are sent to the moon (Luna), how much space would you need for your own personal comfort? Would it be just an 6x8x2 metric space, 72 cubic meters? How much shared community space would you need? Would it be 10 times that?
Very good question.
It's funny how NASA completely missed the space boat 😂 2030 for human landing? Until then few private companies and few national space agencies will accomplish the same 😂 Btw, gravity on the Moon is about 1/6 of Earths not 1/3
I feel part 3 was done before parts 1 and 2. Well done, but some misinformation that you can easily pick out by watching the first 2 parts (Or reading the comments below ;-) )
I remember when the 2009 mission to Mars got delayed to 2015 and then 2030. We likely won't even land on the moon again within the next 10 years let alone fucking visit Mars. The world has become so bone idle.
I was excited until they kept pushing back the Artemis 3 part. First it was before 2025, then *around* 2025, now it's like "hopefully" before 2030.
Neat plan. But why not dock with Earth's space station. And then return to planets surface via the Dragon.
Very Interesting idea, but since the return capsule already has energy pushing it for a landing, it would take considerable extra fuel and time to slow it down in space to dock with the space station instead of using the atmosphere to slow it down for a surface landing. Also, I'd wonder if moon dust on the astronauts would contaminate the ISS as they change ships and move cargo.
From a layman's perspective.
How is laundry managed in the ISS? Do they have a washing machine? And how are you going to do that on the moon with all that dust, the regalith and such?
There’s more galaxies out there than people on earth. I suppose everyone will probably want one. Plenty to spare!
well we have Starship New Glenn, if you could make it more Star Trek Enterprise
Moon trip
We need to stop wars on earth and unite
Just a suggestion, instead of living all the junk in space, you already have it in orbit why not use that on the lunar surface as an extra tank, shield or something ?
mars is 1/3 earths gravity the moon is only 1/6 of earths gravity
The Moon's gravity is 1/6 of the Earth's, NOT 1/3!
Gravity on the moon is 1/6 earth, not 1/3.
Moon's gravity is 1/6, not 1/3 that of Earth.
The calculations seem smaller than they should be. The ppe and hhs modules don't seem big enough for what they have planned. The moon is going to need a huge support system to set up on the moon properly. I'm sure NASA doesn't plan on duplicating every single nut and bolt of every machine, technology, special heavy equipment, special tool for the moon, and the cave systems. You're going to need 4 different experts just to set up housing in the cave systems, given there is nothing alive in those systems since there is a regulated temperature in there. ( I know, wild thought) You'll need a mining and drilling expert. A water, geological and geothermal expert, that is used to cave exploration. An electrical engineer and mechanical engineer that can build and design labs, housing, storage units with regulated temperatures, generators, power cells, solar arrays, pipelines and plumbing lines. You are going to need to have some of the smartest mind and hands on earth to go up there and do this correctly. I see why 8 more years is the benchmark, but I don't think the time frame will be met, unless there is a major step up in the amount of people who are capable of doing this type of work on the moon. And the training that is needed isn't developed yet because it's all so new.
A lot of this information is wr0ong...big stuff too
Just machines to make big decisions, programmed by fellas with compassion and vision.
I thought spacex Starship lands with the astronaut on the Moon
Not to nitpick, but gravity on the moon is 1/6 of Earth, not 1/3.
Why is it that this Artemis spacecraft has taken pictures of the lunar surface BUT has found NO evidence of the ALEDGED APOLLO landing sites
Guidelines for artmis moon base we go to artmis
Gravity is a sixth (17 percent) of earths. Not a third.
Let's hope that we will be still here by 2030 in order to establish a moon base cause things in the world are going from bad to worse in peace terms! 🌍💥?
Why won't we be here
@@NonDisclosed what
Getting a little bit ahead of the program here, no?
Why send astronauts to orbit the moon before sending astronauts for moon landings.
Lunar gravity is 1/6 that of Earth, not 1/3.
me and my paul are crafting space craft just me and him
They are talking of $93 billions up to 2025 for the first 3 missions, afterward I doubt they can afford montly trips to the moon🙄
The age of the gundams and the colonies is coming 🤣
sadf They have nothing better to show; this is why they call that capsule a Spacecraft... lol
EVA=Extravehicular activity not mission
Funny how much things have changed in a year lol
First they got to get past ET
So many errors it's scary!
Yeah, what they said. For a science channel to get something so basic so wrong makes me wonder what else I've learned here that it's wrong. That was not an excusable mistake. That was like a historian saying Columbus discovered America.
2030?..I doubt it..The reason is Apophis.
Mission 5 take a photo of the flag to proof the 69 Moonlading was real😅👍🏻
Great now the moon can be orbitted by space junk! It was a mistake that NASA didin't put a permanent base on the moon to cap the Apollo missions.
Unless they build it below the surface, the astronauts are going to get huge doses of radiation.
They won't get there in the first place. That's why Artemis is sending mannequins with radiation testing suits. If it's not safe now, it wasn't in 1969.
Will never happen :) Neeext!
With the delays: 2230
He keeps saying, The next humans on the moon. When China, is going to get there first 🤣
I was 14 in 1969 watch the Apollo 11 moon landing live on tv. I was 17 in 1972 watch the Apollo 17 and watch the B-52 bombing Hanoi and seeing the American POW'S come home in 1973. The Apollo program and Vietnam War started in the early sixties and it ended in the early seventies 10 long years but we got the job done👍 . Between 1968 and 1972, 24 men flew to the moon and 12 walked upon its surface. Sure okay Boomer 👌😛
My concern? All this talk of mining! Humanity has a well established record for this and once corporate greed is involved (as even mentioned here) we all know too well what will become of our Moon. Also, do you know how critical the Moon’s size, density and EXACT position impacts the very existence of all life on Earth? It’s a good job none of us will be here to see this all pan out.
The moon may be a fraction of the earth's mass but it is by no means small, even if we did our damn best to try and reduce its size we wouldn't be able to make enough of a difference for there to be a problem.
Low earth orbit first lol
You would be exposed to a lot of radiation unless the moon base was covered with a lot of moon soil.
2030 is ridiculously far away for a manned landing. Surely others will get there first.
Like who? Elon Musk? BwahahahahahahahahahaYeah right.
@@billquigley6556 Anyone. It's just the Moon, not Mars.
Amazing content bro, keep it up 🔥
Not again the US sci-fi movie about US moon landing.
"...into the air." Really?
2030 moon colony a3 . Mars starts 2030 colony 2060
Where is SpaceX?
Blowing up on the landing pad?
At the time of this writing, we know - as a matter of fact - that SpaceX's proposal was chosen on April 16, 2021. We've known about this since that date, it wasn't kept a secret. The fact that this channel goes out of its way to NOT mention SpaceX's proposal is disappointing, and the fact that factual inaccuracies have been placed into the script as a result (such as the idea that there will be an ascent stage and a descent stage) is doubly disappointing and dare I say even insulting. I'm not sure why this channel chose to go out of its way avoid mentioning the commercial providers and only mention the government stuff - do the writers have a problem with private businesses being a part of the program? Are the writers hoping that NASA will go back to selecting one of the other designs? This is baffling.
The idea of an "ascent and descent" stage wasn't a given *even if we assume the video was created before April 16, 2021* - at 0:55, we get a glimpse of the SpaceX proposal, so they should have known that a single stage system was one of the candidates. The proposal by Blue Origin - which is being used for most of the renderings - was three stages.
This video needs a do-over.
Source for the selection of SpaceX's proposal:
www.nasa.gov/press-release/as-artemis-moves-forward-nasa-picks-spacex-to-land-next-americans-on-moon
Source for Blue Origin's proposal being a three stage system:
www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-names-companies-to-develop-human-landers-for-artemis-moon-missions
They are talking about some of the missions that have already happened like they are going to happen in the future, so obviously this was written a while ago and their just being lazy and rehashing it.
Artemis 3 doesn't use The Gateway Toll booth.
HLS is single stage Starship, that ship is the Lunar base.
You should delete this video.
2030?? Haha what. A Moon base in 8 years? If they said 80 years from now I still would’ve laughed… We haven’t even sent a person to the moon in my lifetime and I’m almost 43.
Indubitably.
Hopefully, we'll be laughing together in a few years when we see it happen!
🇺🇳8:45
@@renegirard6524
yeahh that lunarbase is already ages in bizniz i guess. 😂
@@renegirard6524 Sadly, not just outdated. SpaceX's single stage proposal is shown - the video is simply poorly researched.
...and no cringworthly "Millionaire Match" sponsor.
Starship? Bwahahahahahahahahaha
Are the women more qualified than any other men or are they being sent because they are women?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Meal study program.. Iam hungry i need to get out of early childhood kidnapping and kidnappers i have travelled for a very long years of pain spines and dust passing star theory. Let me carry my buggage and sur far on my journey to spark welt. Remember i need food.
Why is this video spending so much time making sure I know women will be sent to the moon?
If they would have used Elon Musk's reusable heavy lifter the expenses would be a lot lower and it is more reliable. The SLS is new but there is no real innovation. It seems like the real brain is still Werner van Brown that developed the engines for the space shuttle 50 years ago... 50 years in space science is very old. We use it once and it gets destroyed... and it is not even close as efficient as the turbo engines version built by Russia, because it bleeds un-burnt fuel!
It is good that we go to the moon, but it has to be done with a fiscal budget that is sustainable in the future.
Cost will kill this project; it cost about as much as an election; tough choice democracy or the moon!
my guy, i guarantee you have no idea what you are talking about.. F1 engine for the Apollo program took inspiration from Werner van BRAUN. The Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-25 has nothing to do with Braun. AND the RS 25 is one of the most efficient liquid engine on planet and uses turbo fuel pumps so what are you on about