I Beat An Entire Chess Website
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 05. 2024
- Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
Link to the previous attempt:
• This Is Why Left Hande...
Music used in video:
Honkai Star Rail - Aberrant Receptacle
#chess #ChessBut #drawback - Komedie
that opponent's drawback was pretty hard too
Fr
Yeah but he still just blundered checkmate completely unrelated to his drawback.
Explains why he didn't want to trade queens
more easily exploitable for the opponent, cause it's much easier to visualize his restrictions
@@Cripplified They might have misinterpreted the drawback to mean that it's only game over if they lose their queen
Your opponent was PRAYING you didn’t take the Queen trade at 3:21
not rly considering their takeback
@@cubing7276 watch to the end when their drawback is revealed
@@cubing7276 Yeas really.
Simp: „Welcome to my second attempt“
Also Simp: „100% winrate“
0% + 100% = 100%
Between all winned games, he has won 100% of its games. 😏
As always, you cannot argue with an Asian about math. We are too stupid to understand
@@warny1978 ‘won‘.
@@maegor-targaryen oups
Opponent’s challenge was pretty hard, not only were they down a queen, they had to protect two kings
Drawback Chess. The only chess website where sacrificing the king is a legal move.
I love it. It should be like that normally. Make a mistake and you suffer the consequences.
Sacrificing the king to gain a strategic advantage
real lofe chess:
@@redeye4516 I did this once when I was six. My opponent didnt notice, and I won by taking his queen and making him resign.
The opponent with diplomatic immunity drawback when they have 3 pieces and I only have a king as I run around the board with him: Well shiiiiiiiii
Unlike the previous one, this is actually a great drawback to reveal to your opponent because you both have to think carefully to calculate which squares will be available.
With hindsight 3:17 is checkmate due to the opponents secret rule
Simp technicaly missed mate in 0.
Mate in -1
@@kubaworlapim9166 If you have Mate in 0, look for better.
With hindsight, Simp still didn't know that, unless the player revealed it at game start and thought Simp did know, but either way, could have blocked with queen and assumed no queen trade if queen wasn't traded any of the previous times.
I guess we can safely say simp's opponent didn't reveal their drawback. If they did, they wouldn't have made a risky move like that.
Ah that's why he couldn't trade down his queen, you managed to accidentally put him in the worst possible spot lol
Opponent not only have to protect 2 kings, he have no visual aid to what squares simp can't move to. Probably too difficult for most people to visualize it in realtime to actually make use of it.
Damn, the queen trade could have saved you time.
Being allowed to move a piece that's pinned is hilarious
Well sometimes moving a pinned piece is the only legal move in drawback chess, and sometimes your opponent's drawback prevents him from taking your king anyways, so your opponent actually has no threat.
Opponent straight blundered his own king with that knight move.
I don't know if this has been done, but
Chess, but you are the opposite of a simp. You must murder the enemy's queen and spare the other pieces.
Chess misogynist
With how eager most 100 rated players are to blunder their queen, this challenge would probably be completed in a few moves.
@@np8139 Yes, the challenge is making sure they don't resign and he's still winning while only taking the queen and pawns
I feel the opponent didn't realize what the true drawback was. Because yeah it's hard to develop, but the main problem is that it is hard to defend. Because once a square is defended at least two times it is actually defended 0 times. So you only ever have one defender at maximum. Meaning of the opponent developed pieces and used his pawns, he would have been able to overwhelm Simp's defenses. Though, to be fair, it is hard playing a queen down since she would be the perfect piece for such a strategy.
And you often can't defend a piece if that piece also defends it. For example, he couldn't move a pawn to defend his bishop, since the bishop was able to move to that square too.
"Drawback chess 100% winrate" had me cackling
That was a battle holy hell
In 2:18 wouldn't it be better to move E pawn forward so that you either exchange bishops or can retreat?
Did your opponent actually reveal the challenge at the start? I doubt it because of Queen=king drawback is easy to destroy
Lol your opponent basically has 2 kings, and he loses if just one of them got taken
I'm surprised you've never seen the word 'exclusivity' before! It's not common, per se, but it certainly isn't rare.
Chess Simp has maintained their exclusivity of a 100% drawback chess win rate.
"Exclusive" comes up fairly frequently, but specifically "exclusivity" isn't one I see very often now that I think about it
@@QuokkaWaka I think it's something more often in writing (like articles and so on) than something spoken irl or in films
I don't think the opponent revealing their drawback should be disqualifying but if that's the challenge you want to take ok.
That opponent gave up knowing his queen and king are sitting ducks lmao
Brilliant, that deserves a 100% win rate.
Green Elephant 💀
Бро нееет 💀
Bro is actually insane, what's your real rating?
100
Simps real rating is like 1800-1900. He's a strong intermediate player.
Chess Simp themselves would probably be like:
_That information is classified. You're permabenned._
Not sure if this is how it works, but at 1:58, e5 was an option, threatening his bishop back, and after Bxe5, Be6 is now possible, saving the bishop. But it end up working out lol, allowing the queen to infiltrate
I don’t see why you wouldn’t trade queens, your queen touches to many squares so you can’t move other pieces
The opponent played really bad by opening their center, when they basically have to defend two kings!
I wonder what would be the best strategy with that drawback. d and e pawn moves seem too risky. Maybe trying to castle as fast as possible, starting with e3? But the problem is, after castling, your rook ends up between your king and your queen, and it cannot get out easily…
Or maybe just a crab opening?
(note that I’m not any good at chess)
The opponent doesn't know your queen is a king tho, so bluffing isn't necessarily a _bad_ tactic, and it allows your queen to help apply pressure even when it's practically useless
@@QuokkaWaka sure, but that strategy is likely to lead to a queen trade!
You’re basically an anime character at this point.
3:35 if the opponent doesn't want to trade queens it could be essential for their challenge.
There are many drawbacks that prevent opponents from capturing, so aggressively trading (or ideally winning material) is a viable strategy - especially if you benefit from a less crowded position anyway.
Yeah, indeed you got 100% winrate👀
gj on the 100%.
I like the HSR music.
I actually think your opponent is low-rated, though
Well, should have traded queens^^
Still won, nice game, even though the enemy just blundered^^
Ha! Maidenless opponent
Should’ve traded the Queen lol
I think the opponent was a Paid actor, Or they forgot the king is still a king and can end the game if they lose the king.
How ironic
Well, how much time have you been on chess in total?
3:40 It's weird that d2 isn't forbidden, as both Queen and Bishop can take the Horsie. c3 is also not taboo for some reason.
a5 isnt forbidden too, so i assume its simply because the forbidden square highlights werent updated for the bishop move yet
D2 Wasnt forbidden because it only shows wich squares are available AFER the opponents move. since he moved the pawn in the way the bishop couldnt see the knight anymore if he had move anything else taking the horsie would have been forbidden
wait we had 100% win rate + 100% was 200% - 100% was 100% + now 100% would be 200% or am I missing an attempt?
100 percent win rate btw
ANTI SPOILER BARRIER - oh wait he spoiled it in the title anyway.
How are those barriers meant to work anyway? They're never the top comment, and on mobile the comment shown on the "click to open" button changes every few seconds anyway.
@@romangiertych5198 most of them are just to farm likes... for what reason? We'll never know.
@@andrewluo3792 Ah yes, farming likes, that's why the second part exists.
@@romangiertych5198
They used to be, and it means that on mobile you can put the video in fullscreen before the comment on the button changes
You could have won the game earlier if you had captured his Queen 😉
Video 133 of asking simp to play fps chess
Day 15
Chess,but the game must end with a Bishop and knight checkmate
Why didn't you read your opponents drawback afterwards? And explain to us low elo viewers what that explains about his previous moves
wht is wensite
simp knows pythagorean theorem but doesnt know how to do percentage
Very impressive, this drawback was hard (someone should sugest the queen challenge to simp, but i guess it wouldn't be too hard for him)
he shouldn't be able to move the horsey tho, it was pinned
guess Drawbackchess didn't program that
You can blunder your king in drawback chess, since your opponent might not be able to take
You don't even have to move out of check and can't stalemate. You can even move your king into check
48 minutes
Comment
An Asian failing at basic math when calculating win percentages. How shameful.
Simp: You missed the joke, permabanned. 😅