Eoin’s sense of humor always has a way of making my day! And I love how comfortable Eoin has gotten that he almost burped @12:26, I bet he’s got beast mode skills 💪. Have a great day fellas.
At 7:30 you’re talking about ligaments and tendons healing faster with ped use. How’s this? I always thought they lagged behind in strengthening especially with peds because your strength shoots up so much and they can’t keep up with the load like. I thought ped use could almost increase the % of tissue injuries since the load is increasing faster than they’ve adapted
There's been studies suggesting Deca has positive effects on joint health. According to them it's all about their effects in Androgen Receptors, so probably all androgenic drugs have a similar effect.
On gear, the muscles will grow at a far faster rate. Ligaments and tendons do still see a fair benefit, however not on the level that muscle tissue does. So in essence, someone on gear will likely still have far stronger joints and connective tissue compared to a regular person, however they’re own muscle mass is still far ahead of their connective tissue strength, which is why you see so many connective tissue injuries in athletes on peds.
@@matthewmckee6289 You see many connective tissue injuries in natties too. Sure, muscle grows at a faster rate on gear compared to the strengthening of connective tissues, *but so it does as a natty*. Can you point towards any data that shows juiced athletes suffering MORE than allegedly natties of connective tissue injuries? Anecdotal evidence is okay too. Most natties I know struggle with tendinopathies, most freak injuries during major lifts of juiced athletes I can remember in strength sports were muscle tears so I'd really like to understand if there's any basis for this affirmation other than mere inference.
So the research evidence in relation to PEDs increasing or decreasing tendon strength is still up in the air. The argument that the muscles outstrip the connective tissue over time may or may not be true but I think it's much closer to bro science as opposed to actual science. There's probably a lot of context on that though depending on what PED is used. Mostly though any PEDs will provide a better environment for any organic tissue to recover in, so from high training load a PED user will always be better of compared to a natty.
Alright, then what do you think about taking gear, not just to become stronger, but to help with joint issues? If were not talking about 1 injury but systemic stuff that does not get better with years of physio and the injuries prevent you from doing pretty much any sports.
I mean it’s really up to you. I would probably put that in the same camp as TRT. If you have some sort of condition that is just decreasing your quality of life, I don’t see any issues. Assuming you don’t want to seriously compete or anything like that.
Why would you want to take gear? Do you think its going to solve your injuries? Have you sought advice from sports physician if physio did not work? What do you do outside physio session? Do you do your rehab meticulously and religiously? Are your nutrition and recovery on point? People choosing to take gear at age of 35 yrs or less are looking for shortcuts if they don’t really have serious medical condition.
Love the video, but wish you would have first seen Squat University’s post promoting where rounded backs can work - would love to hear your views on this
Talk about the dosages and the most popular peds for weightlifting, i know it's unethical because you are not qualified (i guess)but most people will use having or not knowledge
I can’t imagine they would make a video like this. As much as I would like to see it just for the information, it would make it look like they’re endorsing the use of them.
You can't really say that lifting with more rounding is going to get u injured though. As you know injuries are multifactorial, especially looking at it through the biopsychosocial model you just can't chalk injuries up to technique. We aren't machines & the biomedical is dated. As S&C coaches you both know how adaptable the body is (think of Wolf's & Davis' laws) & how the body will adapt given sufficient rest & adequate programming. So I don't know why you're saying this tbh. For performance yes I definitely agree having good technique is great but for health/injury risk it just doesn't matter very much. As long as u progress steadily & aim to keep similar technique throughout (drastic changes in anything are obviously a bad idea be it technique with a max lift or training volume) I like the channel & don't have any hate for you guys, I just disagree on this issue.
@@sikastrength No, I'm just saying it doesn't play as large a role as is suggested in relation to risk of injury. It's just one of many things that contributes towards getting injured with other factors including age, previous injuries, over training, low experience with training, poor recovery as well as the fact that sometimes shit happens. Why we get injured & how to screen and try to prevent injuries is still something we don't know that much about (I say this as someone currently studying Physiotherapy). Hence why a lot of screening for injuries doesn't work well. I think the amount of emphasis on technique specifically is overstated & it is not this huge or really reliable predictor of injury like many believe. Poor technique can contribute but it's just one piece of the pie in terms of getting an injury & should be framed as so imo. I hope that makes sense & keep up the great work lads as you's have some seriously good content and I don't mean this as an insult just a disagreement.
Coordinating your t-shirt colours with the things on the wall behind is next level production value
It's what the people came to see 👀
Eoin’s sense of humor always has a way of making my day! And I love how comfortable Eoin has gotten that he almost burped @12:26, I bet he’s got beast mode skills 💪. Have a great day fellas.
lol!! I feel like I got called into the principal’s office xD thanks for answering the question, yall, sorry for the snark. 🙏
Can't express how insightful and entertaining these videos are. Cheers boys 🙏
his back was rounding during initial pull but everything else was world class timing of acceleration and pulling down
2:29 smirking at Eoin saying doo doo lmao
I actually just laughed out loud at the naming quip.
sometimes a yacked back just looks round like a turtle shell almost lol
100%
->Iranian team entered the chat (by jumping half a meter forward in the snatch)
Theyre tested so they cant be doping tho lol
(I am not serious.)
At 7:30 you’re talking about ligaments and tendons healing faster with ped use. How’s this? I always thought they lagged behind in strengthening especially with peds because your strength shoots up so much and they can’t keep up with the load like. I thought ped use could almost increase the % of tissue injuries since the load is increasing faster than they’ve adapted
It is not contradictory. Sure tendons and ligaments grow a bit faster with PED use compared to natty, but muscles grow way faster.
There's been studies suggesting Deca has positive effects on joint health. According to them it's all about their effects in Androgen Receptors, so probably all androgenic drugs have a similar effect.
On gear, the muscles will grow at a far faster rate. Ligaments and tendons do still see a fair benefit, however not on the level that muscle tissue does.
So in essence, someone on gear will likely still have far stronger joints and connective tissue compared to a regular person, however they’re own muscle mass is still far ahead of their connective tissue strength, which is why you see so many connective tissue injuries in athletes on peds.
@@matthewmckee6289 You see many connective tissue injuries in natties too. Sure, muscle grows at a faster rate on gear compared to the strengthening of connective tissues, *but so it does as a natty*.
Can you point towards any data that shows juiced athletes suffering MORE than allegedly natties of connective tissue injuries? Anecdotal evidence is okay too. Most natties I know struggle with tendinopathies, most freak injuries during major lifts of juiced athletes I can remember in strength sports were muscle tears so I'd really like to understand if there's any basis for this affirmation other than mere inference.
So the research evidence in relation to PEDs increasing or decreasing tendon strength is still up in the air. The argument that the muscles outstrip the connective tissue over time may or may not be true but I think it's much closer to bro science as opposed to actual science. There's probably a lot of context on that though depending on what PED is used.
Mostly though any PEDs will provide a better environment for any organic tissue to recover in, so from high training load a PED user will always be better of compared to a natty.
Lmao you guys get it more than coaches who powerlift and coach the deadlift their whole lives. Bravo lads.
For a beginner lifter what should be the rep range per set your opinion. Physical literacy-lack of strength
This is a good video. I am not an algorithm.
Alright, then what do you think about taking gear, not just to become stronger, but to help with joint issues? If were not talking about 1 injury but systemic stuff that does not get better with years of physio and the injuries prevent you from doing pretty much any sports.
Anavar is still Rx'd for this but not deca. There's decent medical literature supporting anavar but not deca.
I mean it’s really up to you. I would probably put that in the same camp as TRT. If you have some sort of condition that is just decreasing your quality of life, I don’t see any issues.
Assuming you don’t want to seriously compete or anything like that.
Why would you want to take gear? Do you think its going to solve your injuries? Have you sought advice from sports physician if physio did not work? What do you do outside physio session? Do you do your rehab meticulously and religiously? Are your nutrition and recovery on point? People choosing to take gear at age of 35 yrs or less are looking for shortcuts if they don’t really have serious medical condition.
Love the video, but wish you would have first seen Squat University’s post promoting where rounded backs can work - would love to hear your views on this
Talk about the dosages and the most popular peds for weightlifting, i know it's unethical because you are not qualified (i guess)but most people will use having or not knowledge
I can’t imagine they would make a video like this. As much as I would like to see it just for the information, it would make it look like they’re endorsing the use of them.
Every coming state side?
Is a slight rounded upper/ mid back on deadlifts bad for natties??
6:40
Depends, but probably not. As long as you literally aren’t bent like a shrimp, some spinal flexion is perfectly fine contrary to popular belief.
Well. Why are these athletes not slamming these things like creatine? If it makes you perform and be strong? Utilize it is what I say.
How’s the baby finger doing, Eoin?
You can't really say that lifting with more rounding is going to get u injured though.
As you know injuries are multifactorial, especially looking at it through the biopsychosocial model you just can't chalk injuries up to technique. We aren't machines & the biomedical is dated.
As S&C coaches you both know how adaptable the body is (think of Wolf's & Davis' laws) & how the body will adapt given sufficient rest & adequate programming. So I don't know why you're saying this tbh.
For performance yes I definitely agree having good technique is great but for health/injury risk it just doesn't matter very much. As long as u progress steadily & aim to keep similar technique throughout (drastic changes in anything are obviously a bad idea be it technique with a max lift or training volume)
I like the channel & don't have any hate for you guys, I just disagree on this issue.
Just to be clear you're saying technique doesn't matter in relation to injuries?
@@sikastrength No, I'm just saying it doesn't play as large a role as is suggested in relation to risk of injury. It's just one of many things that contributes towards getting injured with other factors including age, previous injuries, over training, low experience with training, poor recovery as well as the fact that sometimes shit happens.
Why we get injured & how to screen and try to prevent injuries is still something we don't know that much about (I say this as someone currently studying Physiotherapy). Hence why a lot of screening for injuries doesn't work well.
I think the amount of emphasis on technique specifically is overstated & it is not this huge or really reliable predictor of injury like many believe. Poor technique can contribute but it's just one piece of the pie in terms of getting an injury & should be framed as so imo.
I hope that makes sense & keep up the great work lads as you's have some seriously good content and I don't mean this as an insult just a disagreement.
0:05 roid rage :O
Algorithm... More drugs more better
Wanna do heavy top sets as a power lifter? How about max reps on heavy deadlifts? Oh and you want it to be productive you say? Hmmm… 💉💉💉💉
I thought you were a weightlifter
if anybody wants to watch that russian video here is the link
czcams.com/video/9zsExvk0-0w/video.html