The #1 Argument Against Noah’s Ark DEBUNKED | Show Trailer
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 02. 2024
- We’re addressing the #1 argument made against Noah’s ark in season 2 of the Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark. In this trailer, Calvin Smith gives us a sneak peek of some of the questions he’ll be answering about dinosaurs and Noah’s ark.
You can watch season 1 here: www.Answers.tv/the-genesis-ac... - Zábava
Looking forward to this. If I may make a suggestion it would be to turn the volume of the background music down a bit. At points in this trailer, the music nearly overwhelms the voice narration. Thank you.
I can't wait to watch it!!
japanese history never mentions any flood though it predates the supposed time of the flood. china did have a horrible flood about the correct time , but most survived living in treetops
that's why old earth creation is more likely they are counting the genealogies and coming up with a young earth, so you get a date for the flood, but these genealogies are not complete there's gaps in them because they are only mentioning specific people that were written about in the bible otherwise you would have a way longer list. so, the date for the flood goes further back into history. its either that or another thing is that not all Christians believe in a literal flood that its mythological and shows the character of God that he will judge and redeem. It could be an allegory there are allegories in the bible.
How about funnel web spiders from Australia?
Go Calvin!
the dinosaurs were in the ark.. in the Ark Survival Evolved/Ascended game.
I love these series
The truth hits everybody, the truth hits everyone! It's up to you whether you want to accept it or not. God's truth stands eternal!
Which one?
God does not exist
Noah died before jesus was born, so I guess Noah was not saved and went to hell?
Read Hebrews 11 and you have your answer.
1 peter4:6 for this cause was the gospel preached to those who are dead.
Noah was a great man
Christians are often told they must read the Flood story as literal history, giving them a detailed straightforward description of the Flood. Ken Ham and his ilk insist on this and accuse anyone who disagrees with him of having betrayed the Bible. According to Ham et al., If you don’t believe that there was a global flood with waters that covered the highest mountains and that Noah and his family survived in a 510 foot wooden boat with pairs of all the animals of the world on board, then you don’t really think that the Bible is true. To support his view, Ham marshals “scientific evidence” that no research geologist, even Christians, would support, since that evidence has been long discredited. The irony is that Ken Ham has not only misrepresented the science but misreads the Bible. The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.