Assassin's Creed 4 PS4: Launch vs. 1080p Patch Frame-Rate Tests
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 11. 2013
- Subscribe for more next-gen console and tech analysis: czcams.com/users/subscription_c...
Check out our in-depth analysis on the new Assassin's Creed 4 1080p patch: www.eurogamer.net/articles/dig... - Hry
![[4K] Assassin's Creed Rogue Remastered - PS4/Pro/Xbox One/X Graphics Comparison + Frame-Rate Test](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/S-ZxF1mJOLA/mqdefault.jpg)
Spoiler alert: Both stay @30 without a drop.
Xbone probably chuggs at 720p
Nah, This time around I don't think so. The PS4 runs this cross gen game at a VERY stable 30fps. I think the X1 runs this at 900p or maybe even 1080p but maybe with a less stable framerate.
teunkoerts123 900p for Xbone.
This was when PS4 games actually held a solid 30 FPS at 1080p, now we see 900p with FPS ranging from 20-30
Very good Comparison... But is the 1080p Patch v1.02 or v1.03? I have receive only v1.02 for my PS4
Good to see that the ps4 is holding the same fps on bigger resolution. So....maybe it can do more it just need a good optimization.
This game it´s ART in any resolution !!
Is the 1080p update including in the 1.02 update??? (From the uk)
the best on the pc version is that i can use my two 4K TFT display at once. at right side i have the chest map and on left side the game. and during battles i often grab my oculus rift device for more reality feeling. my 5.1 sound system with b&w nautilus speakes do also very well. ... i like that game. :D
How is 2018, dude?
*****
2014 - 20 nm maxwell - 4k gsync monitor - oculus rift.
lmfao 2000$ to game LOL
@@NomadJedi I'm from 2021, and people do really be like that :/
I feel like they capped the framerate for consistency. Because my pc runs at 60fps at one point then drops to 30 another time. I didn't even realize the fps drop to 30fps its really smooth, But the ps3 and 360 are uncapped why is that?
Bad video encoding destroy any sense of difference between the two. There are un-encoded raw pngs floating about which clearly show the differences, you can't tell from these videos at all. They need to use the higher encoders available to CZcams now to preserve the details, imo.
It's a framerate test... not a graphics test
Do as I do. Look at the video. Now, at the top corners of the video, you should be seeing the FPS (frames per second) of the game, right? Okay, good, now ignore everything else, because this is a frame rate test, nothing more.
Well with limitation of next gen gaming consoles, develover have to makes some sacrifice to get the best experience, such as sacrifice frame rate and devoted the extra memory for level designs like killzone single player have 30fps instead 60fps in online multiple player. Or like xbox one sacrifice resolution to get 60fps without reducing the quality of level designs....btw for singles player 30fps is more than enough since there no latency issues
tks DF
This was the first game i played on my ps4 and i think the pre patch looks better than 1080p, either that or there's something wrong.
There's something wrong with your eyes for sure. I've played the game before the patch and after and I can clearly see the difference when I play and the game.
Nice solid framerate much better than something like 20 between 35 on current gen!
Amazing Ubisoft did a really Good Job ... I wish EA would do a 1080p Patch for BF4 too but it is hard to compare it with this because BF4 is multiplayer and then the frames would drop ...
actually, ps3 's framerate is 40fps sometimes, it's strange
Now compare this to the performance of the shitty Dead Rising game that isn't even as big or graphically pushing and at 720p dips all the way to 18fps.
Kinda disappointing it doesn't run at 60. The feels like it's playing in slow motion to me. And I swear there is some input lag. Edward would some times won't counter even when I press the button
Only 30 frames?
Dang the framerate stayed a constant 30 never dropping or rising, that's a first.
30 FPS. The feel of next gen.
*****
BF4 isn't 60 FPS on PS4. I've seen a frame rate benchmark.
unrealeck On campaign mode it can reach and keep a stable 60fps at times but on multiplayer it averages from 30-60
EchoAxios
Yeah I know.
So not 60 FPS.
unrealeck Yes it is 60FPS on PS4.
Stop being an annoying fan boy and play on.
ron shamp
You're the one that's a fanboy. Why? Because you find me annoying for telling you that your favourite system is not running a game at 60 FPS.
It's a fact, it's not my opinion.
without a single framedrop, good!
wow the framerate does not drop at all. thats good. sure i would prefer 60 but a rock solid 30 is good too
i have avg 60fps in 2560x1440 ultra+HBAO(high)+FXAA, system: gtx 580sli and core i5 2500k 4.6ghz. PS4/Xbox one - nextgen? *facepalm*
How to turn off vsync?
Vsync can be turned off getting the PC version. Not sure why you want to do that, though.
Its running at 30fps and still looks soo buttery smooth. My pc runs it on avg 48fps on highest but it doesn't seems that smooth.
That's exactly why. A Game needs to run at a conistant framerate, not a high one. Consistant 30fps, 60fps or 120fps looks (and plays) the best
Shubham Rastogi Are you sure you ran 48fps average??. Average 48fps looks way better than average 30fps. My PC ran AC4 on 45fps average but when I recorded ac4 I locked fps at 30fps and it looked laggy compared to 45fps average.
MashLegend yeh its probaply because playing a game feels different to watching a game be played. even if you look at 60 fps game on youtube your only watching 30 cuz thats akk youtube can do
Its because of vsync
It's actually because that average you pulled isn't also the consistent frame rate you're getting at any given time. That is an average of frames that could range anywhere from 30 to 50 (so inconsistent frame rate) and thus variable frame times. The PS4 benefits from optimization that ensures a 30 fps lock all the time (or mostly) so you get a fluent experience. On PC you can't really do that unless you use v-sync but then again you have to have a machine that can get as many frames a second that your monitor can support at all times, otherwise it's going to break the lock set in place by v-sync and jump a few frames. That makes the game not seem 'smooth on pc'.
Its a solid 30 most likely the ps4 was running at 60 fps but they were seeing lots frame rate dips so they just said fuck it lets lock it down to 30 and add 1080p
Meanwhile xbox one is still on 720p
X1 is on 900p
Meanwhile they are both at 30fps
Too bad they capped it at 30fps. I'm sure there's plenty of headway available of the ps4 to go above that. Wonder if the XB1 will be running 1080p at 30?
Probably not. Have you seen how unoptimized the PC version is? It won't even run max on a GTX 780.
Wtf i thought it was 60fps, that could easily be done on the PS4. C'mon Ubisoft
Cool story bro, I'm running 1080p @60 frames on my PC.
im sure if it can run 900p without fps drop that it could have ran 60fps at 900p if it can do 30fps without any dropped at 1080p and i wonder what it can do at 1080p unlocked.
No way it could run 60fps steady, if it could, don't you think they would implment that already? even my gtx 680 in sli cant get steady 60 frames in every scene it drops in the 50s, and those two cards are like 4 times the raw performance of a PS4 gpu, so that tells you something right there.
killar libya In this game its easy,my old 9600gt gets 50 FPS all Maxed in AC2; the engine is the same,dont demand a lot of power,isnt optimized
metallicaofhammet hahahah you piece of fucking crap-not same engine and you will get on minimum 12-18 fps
I'm sure on screen on your TV it would be a much more noticeable difference. Going to watch the comparisons on here PlayStation 4 vs Xbox 1 battlefield 4. The Xbox of them look better which is not the case . It looks way better on the PlayStation 4
The quality is better on "low settings" with a PC
Pepole saying this is bad it looks good with a steady 30fps ubisoft just locked it there its still looks good though
CZcams compression renders this useless! We need a better quality format for these going forward!
Here here!
This is a framerate test! not a freaking graphics test! Here here!
Don't be ridiculous. This is supposed to be as much of a comparison of image quality improvement from 900p to 1080p as it us frame rate. Not to mention that CZcams is useless for framerate comparisons over 30fps too (which may not matter for but does apply to others).
People want to see image quality AND frame rate.
Here, here!
Buy your own damned servers then, see how much THAT costs.
I suppose we should let CZcams do it sense it has the billions of dollars laying around.
Flawless Victory.
Bleh 30fps is painful when your used to 60+
While 60fps would be great and I'm disappointed a cross gen title cannot achieve that easily... I'd rather it remain locked rock solid at 30fps like this than do what Killzone did. I honestly think Killzone would have felt far superior to play if they'd locked it at 30, the fleeting moments of near 60fps look lovely and then you do something and it drops, it's very distracting. I hope going forward more devs push for locked 60fps but yet again, when you could have better image quality and drop to 30 I think most will go that route, they just BETTER ensure it's locked 30 and doesn't dip from there as that is inexcusable. I never understand why they can't pare back the graphics just a little and give us a good gameplaying experience.
Actually, Killzone was patched and now you can select to lock the framerate to 30.
insane next gen peasant box
ps4 winner of this gen console war
Gotta love the fake console war.
Playeressence.com yup, pcmasterrace is the only true next-gen.
E SC I don't believe there is a "master race"
Its all about the games, not the hardware.
30 FPS? Damn that's a pain in the ass! I've been gaming at 120 FPS all these years and this seems so unplayable to me.
You guys better wait for the PS5 to come out...
SkrewdriverGR 🤷🏻♂️🖕🏻
@@vintendio You seem
Mad do you need a pillow?
It came 7 years later and still 30 would like to see your respond 🤣
Yes you can never see the differences in these videos but it's a huge difference in person trust me I have both and I have the same game on both and it's a huge leap forward on ps4. I'm extremely disappointed with Microsoft because I've always preferred the Xbox over Playstation since Xbox came out. My x1 is for xbox exclusives only .a flip flop from last gen. If it wasn't for titan fall I would have waited on x1
They couldve had 30fps for cutscences and uncapped for gameplay...
Its totally possible.
The game probably would've hovered at around 30-50fps.
But why 30fps?
Wonder if they didn't lock it like this if it would be fluttering around 40-50 fps and having screen tearing.
ps4 is really awesome device
Is there a difference if the game run it at 60 fps? From what I observe this gameplay is silky smooth eventhough at 30fps
Considering it's a 3rd person stealth game, you don't need 60fps. But you would notice a difference if the game were to run at 60fps, you always will.
Only when there's fast movement you'll notice, if you focus on it.
You wont notice difference on youtube video, but there is rather big difference between 30 and 60 fps. If you're used to gaming on consoles 30 is fine, but going from 60fps on pc to 30 on console in same game is instantly visible.
F3TiSH You'd be surprised how many console games run at 60fps.
IamAnthonological Basically none of the triple A titles
obviously the ps4 could handle 60fps but ubisoft kept it locked at 30.
if anyone here cant see that the ps4 can handle 60fps and its ubisoft fault for locking the fps at 30.
look at the video, it had no drops whats so ever that why
***** So does that mean that Resident Evil 4 could run at 60 fps? Because IT had no drops whatsoever, even if they had to fake the widescreen. I would much, MUCH rather have a consistent fps than the occasional 60 fps.
360FireFallen
if the ps4 hardware was weak as you people think it is, it couldnt have run the game in 1080p native with no frame drops.
But I guess you think the ps4 sucks and the xbox one is better
microsoft paid ubisoft to cap the fps at 30 because the ps4 would've shown drastically better framerate than the xbone otherwise. you heard it here first.
No frame drop below 30 fps don't mean there won't be frame drop from 60 to 30 fps (which is just as bad). Ubisoft just made the easy choice to lock it to 30fps to prevent frame drop in exceptionnal situation which is logical since most people wouldn't see the difference (but that doesn't mean there isn't any)
Well this aint locked at 30fps im halfway through and when you board big ships like the man o war you get framerate drops while fighting. You also get minor dips here n there throughout the game. They should have locked it to 60fps with the ps4 and kept the 900p resolution because thats what the game was finished on. Updates i find fuck up games
PS4 can play Battlefield 4 multiplayer/campaign at 1080p 60fps but AC: BF can't run higher than 30fps? Lol wtf
ps4 runs bf4 at 900p at 60fps
not 1080p native...
I'm sure it can run at higher than 30 fps, but I guess they want it locked at a perfect, consistent 30 fps. I actually might prefer 30 fps at times depending on the game, 60 fps can look more soap opera like.
I'd rather have a game with solid 30fps than 60fps all over the place
i thought it was 1080p @60fps lol
¿This is Next Gen? ...
No,Tom Clancy's The Division is it
Arletless This is too fucking hilarious when I see your comment now :D
+ShadowRiDerAlOne especially now :D
ESPECIALLY now.
Lol at these jokers saying 30 fps is better. God, you'll take anything they throw at you won't you?
Wait I thought this game was supposed to be 60 fps?
Apparently that was only multiplayer
Стабильные 30 fps - не плохо. Хотелось бы увидеть результат Xbox One. :)
It's so solid at 30fps they should have just unlocked it
duplicate frames or a really low framerate give the effect of stuttering. There's no reason for them to lock the framerate, unless the game is only just managing 30fps and really needs those extra few frames worth of resources, which is clearly not the case here. Killzone SF has an unlocked framerate in the SP and regularly hovers around 45fps.
I see not one difference between 900p and 1080p.
Because this is youtube, you cant see the difference
what the F the new consoles are suppose to do 60fps what the hell happened
30 fps is totally unacceptable these days.
1280x720 = 921,600 pixels
1600x900 = 1,440,000 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
Whoever claims he can't tell the difference needs glasses.
Or their screen isn't a 1080p screen? Most laptops these days are only 1366x768.
Edward Zhang
Full HD is the way to go these days.
even battlefield 4 run with 60 fps on ps4 why ac 4 don't
Its only 30 fps because its locked... if it could could only reach 30 it would have dropped a few times but im sure it would reach 60
Ps3 and X360 run this at 40fps hmm
+rulewski33 as a maximum, they usally stay in the 25fps area usally dropping to 20fps from what i remember seeing
+BritishActionGamer The PS3 version is prone to 20fps drops while the X360 version doesn't seem to go below 26fps. Both versions are capable of hitting 40fps in certain areas. Both versions usual sit at the 30-36fps region.
Seriously i wish they would have locked the framerate on xbox 360 and ps3. I try and play on my 7 year old xbox. With it being that old and the unlocked fps... lets just say it's a damn nightmare. i go from a steady 30 to 16 and i just finish the mission and get off the game because it gives me a headache. ;/
This was nine months ago, dark times within my head and stupidity flowed through my body. Let's just forget I ever commented this... Haha.
whattttttt? 30 FPS?? WHAT A FUCKK?? THIS VERSION IS UGUAL A OLD-GEN -.- WHAT A FUCKK??
A remastered game for the PS4 capped on 30 fps seriously?
"remastered" it came out when the ps4 was already out lol. its just a ps4 port with higher resolution and better textures.
Yeah but for ex The last of us was originally for ps3 and it's been remastered with 60 Fps on the PS4.I was going to buy Black Flag for Ps4 but 30 fps hurts my eyes ,I'd rather get it on pc with some mediocre controller port.
eh...... last of us is a totally different story. it was only developed to the playstation, it was linear AF, and it was a naughty dog game ofc its amazingly 60fps. the problem with people is that they think 30fps is totally unplayable while it isnt. like seriously.... a steady 30fps with proper motion blur should do the work lol.......
If I play on 480p will I get slightly better frames per second on ps4?
lol no this isnt pc bud
+Azure Neptune come on, there's no need to be a coward and block me just because you know I'm right.
30fps? Bitch please. Pc will do.
what the hell 30fps on next gen........
Wasn't this game 60 fps
Multiplayer is 60 fps. :)
Ok thx
1080p 30fps what a joke
720p 30fps with dropping on the xbox one is more of a joke.
KevJumbaify RIGHT!!! its so sad... if people only investigates or had the knowledge they could have sucha better experience... oh well cant make them all buy computers... ahaha
They locked it at 30fps becauce pc will talk again
I think PS4 can handle this at 60 fps
so nextgen is alla about 30 fps? fuck this
Only on PS4 not xbone
***** Xbox is worse.
***** Uninformed ignoramus is ignoramus.
Good job Ubisoft!!
When did people start giving a Shit about frame rate..lol
When they heard tales of 'PC master race'.
***** Come on, tell me more about that Titan you don't have.
ps3 and 360 already do 30fps
it looks like a last gen game anyways.
tham steady 30fps
Trust me on this the only way thay made this run on console at 30 fps 1080p is at medium PC settings. I did a comparison between medium and high and consoles look excactly like medium with ssao and without god rays, volumetric fog, motion blur and physx. I would say price to performance with all considered console and pc are about the same. The reason why a good gaming pc is double the price of a ps4 is because it is literally double as good it games plus games are cheaper and it is a PC! PCs are just better value at the cost of inconvenience. A ps4 is equivalent to an r7 260x and you can build a rig for 380 bucks with that gpu. 20 dollars cheaper than a console, although without windows but you can get that for free anyways and you dont have to pay 50 bucks a year to play online and games are usually half price of console and there are litterealy about 100x more games for pc including indie titles.
There are god rays on consoles and volumetric fog as well, do not lie plz
It looks much better than medium. I'd say high-very high mix. The biggest difference between the PS4 and PC versions is ambient occlusion. HBAO+ really does make a difference. That said SSAO still does a good job. The textures are nice and sharp on PS4 and the effects work seems the same as well (bar PhysX but that tanks frame rate in a big way).
Krush
Still if you can run physx at max which you can on a 980 its gorgeous.
Marcus Christensen "on a 980" and how much 980 costs smartman?
Runs much better than the PC version, that's for sure. PC is all over the place between 30 and 60 FPS, very jarring. That's amazing it runs at 30 FPS on the PS4 without a single drop.
PC version looks substantially better to be honest. I guess it's cause of all those Nvidia features.
***** All I know is that the PC version has some nVidia exclusive tech. You can read this article if you want a better explanation.
www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/assassins-creed-iv-black-flag-graphics-and-performance-guide
why are you talking about the PC version, when this video has nothing to do with PC!?
30 fps ?
i can dl porn convert 2 movies stream on twich comment this vid and still run this crap at 60+ on my pc
go next gen -.-
its people like you why people hate pc gamers. If you like pc gaming then play it. Why do you feel the need to hate on other gaming devices?
I have it on pc with my 660 ti oc with Intel I7 3770k with 8gigs of ram and it's about the same as a PS4 so I'll hold off on buying one yet. I hope to god games would look better then this next year. I do say this is the best assassin's creed game better then the original
Fake it the ps3
this is why you pc game people
Before we delve into the whole "I can build a PC that can play every game on Earth at extreme settings for $400" argument, no, no this isn't the reason why people choose PCs over consoles.
smokebomb.exe and PC´s are very problematic for people who doesn´t know how to use them
Yeah, because soooo many people in America don't know how to use a PC.
borrado
last gen runs on 35fps, dafuq is this bullshit
the next gen can run it on 60fps
ubisoft fixed it on 30fps
last gen version was 720p, more loading time, less AA, less shadows,lighting and particle effects plus this s locked 30fps and never drops, but I doubt last gen version won't drop to 27fps or below
Iraqi ProGamers
yea but last gen console was running on 40 fps sometimes. But yea, the next gen had better graphics.
on my pc this game run at 80fps 1080p
Nice, but we pay only 400 euro in stead of 4000
Luciano Nooijen actually you can get a gaming pc for 300 euros which is more powerful than console
Lol hell no man, check your sources :P
lol
blahh!
i had a gaming PC but then i got a PS4, & now my cat use's my PC as a litter tray.
wtf 30 fps? gay feeling like ps3 all over again
lol apscale patch
30fps??????kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk....old gen........................pc wins .....fatality.
lol 30 fps.
***** Aww, what's wrong? Can't back up your claims peasant?
*****
No really, continue with your peasantry.