Showgirl Showdown
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 02. 2022
- The plaintiff met the defendant when they worked as showgirls in Las Vegas. They decided to start a business together, but she claims the defendant backed out of the business. The plaintiff alleges the defendant stole costumes and other inventory from their business, so she’s suing for stolen property. The defendant denies abandoning the business. She’s countersuing for unreturned property and harassment.
- Zábava
"Whoop de whoop de whoop"
"Will talk about that later"
"Period. I got you"😣😩😳😢
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I cringed each time lol. Can't believe she spoke like that in court and to the judge
Ugh.. I cringed @ her the whole time 🥴🥴
Wtf was she thinking talking to the judge like that?
🤣😅. I Got chu..
The judge ruled against the plaintiff because of that slick comment she made to him (We'll talk about that later)!
Exactly, “we’ll talk about that later” and “period I got you.” No respect for the judge
@Say Less Aries baby Lmao.
The judge ruled against the plaintiff bc the contingency “when the lease was sorted out” of her being paid her ownership of the business was met. The defendant was owed the money. The only thing under dispute was *when*. The plaintiff has no right to hold on to what is owed the defendant.
Don't forget them 2 whoopedee whoopedee woop comments. That's slang for the street not the court.
We talk about that later😂😂😂 I fell out my bed!
That had me dying lol...I'm surprised JM didn't really go off on her lol
She forgot who she was talking too 🤣
Judge should of hit her with that "what's wronnnnngggg wit chuuu" line
She wasn’t trying to be disrespectful, Judge Mathis is just so unaware of new slang and always thinks he’s right
@@rileyboi4464 They’re still in court. It’s disrespectful.
The defendant didn’t deserve anything but the plaintiff was too immature to explain her case correctly.
I don’t think she was immature. I think she slipped and said the wrong thing .. NOT EVEN TRYING TO INSULT MATHIS and he got all up in his feeling s and played her . HE KNEW THEN DEFENDANT WAS WRONG
Always stay in character when handling business. That slip up cost her case.🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
The defendant was owed her portion of the business. So yes she “deserved” what she was awarded in court.
@@nickynick_ exactly! For the first time i think he was wrong...he switched it
Thank you. And Judge Mathis made an irrational decision. He needs to retire. He’s too old and cranky now. He’s not even hearing the story all the way out before cutting them off lol
It’s a cold day when you sue, lose and have to pay😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thanks for letting me know what happened ☺️ Because my head is hurting after 5 minutes. They're both slow SMH 💔
😂😂😂
I think what hurt the plaintiff is the way she presented her case, she was talking to Judge Mathis like he was a person on the street , saying “period”, “we’ll talk about later” etc.. the defendant won because she was clear on the items still not sorted out during their “buyout” although she did get some in the value of clothes she took there was still more items remaining with the plaintiff .. her response when judge asked her how much she said I don’t know .. smh , when you’re in court come prepared
Right! It’s not flattering the way she’s talking. They both were talking to him like he’s their friend and they’re not in court. Talking about “whoopty whoo” girl eww you’re presenting your case to a Judge, act like it. She’s all over the place and Judge Mathis had to pull information out of both of them 🤦🏽♀️ my head hurt after this episode
GHETTO will defeat yourself
Because Judge Mathis is so jovial, people take him for granted and think their talking to their uncle.
No honey, he’s less formal not familial.
His patients are short for the younger generation, can't say I blame him. Lol
Knawll, she was being greedy and spiteful and owed the defendant more than just 3 grand actually..
The most confusing case ever😑 get to the point
Right, hurting my head oof
Lol you are so true you telling me I’ll stop playing Cuphead for this bullshit case lol
No she didn’t say “ok Period I gotchu” 😂😂😂🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️😂😂 GIRLLLLLLLLLL
Am I the only one who hates it when people use silly filler words like: “Whoopty-Whoop” and “Blazé-Blazé”? 😂
Only in a professional environment for me
I hate when people use that shit when telling me a story
Not to mention dada dada da!!!
It's annoying as heck...at all times, for me.
😂😂😂I know
They are both young and inexperienced! The plaintiff had me when she said “”we can talk about it later”! 🤣🤣🤣
I was very much confused but the defendant didn’t need to walk away with 3 grand 😬
I don’t think the lady really explained herself well in this case to have to pay.
She still put money down on the business. It’s not like she didn’t put money down on anything. The plaintiff didn’t explain herself well at all though. She left me so confused 😐
Now I could be wrong, but I believe I understand why the defendant won. The defendant let the plaintiff know she wanted out and that she was willing to sell the plaintiff her 1/2 of the business. All the plaintiff had to do was access the current value of the company and send an official offer to the defendant. When the Defendant “stole” the items, she was still part owner of the company so she basically moved her own items and so JM “divided up” what’s was left since it wasn’t half, which the plaintiff confirmed. The apartment is a non-issue because the lease ended and the Plaintiff obviously wasn’t charged anything for it or she would’ve added that to her suit. Whatever license thing the Plaintiff was relying on saying the Defendant wasn’t a legal owner of the company anymore was probably done illegally (like ignorant of the law kind) and that’s why Judge Mathis didn’t go into it.
Lol !
You are right but the plaintiff did that to herself one saying wanted to give her 1500 and 2 she admitted that she more value of property than the defendant
This just KILLS ME people go down to the court house go though the process of GOING TO COURT and don't have proof don't want to talk about the case talk ignorant and then lose more money than what they ask for. That always amaze me.
I agree. It’s several individuals who believe it was comments that hurt the plaintiff’s case. I beg to differ, there have been unfortunately several other individuals whose grammar is not suitable in court and the ruling is found in his/her favor by Judge Mathis. As you stated, it was the lack of evidence and testimony of things that were in favor of the defendant.
* several individuals in the comments*...
Whoopedee whoopedee whoop! That part of the plaintiffs comments just floored me. Like girl wth do you think you are?
This was a complete mess. Don’t go into business with a friend. All these places are hiring let them make a way for themselves 🤷🏾♂️
There is nothing wrong with doing busin3ss with friends.
The problem is they had no clear plan of what they were doing. Whether or friend or stranger, that's a bad idea.
They didn't even have basic shit like if the business needed to be bought out, how would they do it.
@@ddavis8988 no no there is…juss like how they say don’t roommate with yo friends…it always ends badd
@@itsjustme9682 the reason those go bad has nothing to do with them being friends and family. It has to do with you not having a plan.
A bad plan is gonna fail no matter who you go into business with.
It’s the glasses on the tip of her nose for me looking out them like a straight grannie 😭😂
It’s lowkey irritating me that she won’t push them thick ass mf’s up! 😂😂
@@BeeetchImStacia 🤣🤣🤣🤣yesss
@@BeeetchImStacia I’m done 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I can’t breathe 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Imagine suing your ex business partner and you leave owing them 🤣
Whew they’re all over the place in this case! The plaintiff is talking fast and the defendant keeps interrupting
She lost that case as soon as she said they would talk about the lease later. Judge made a point to her by judging in the defendant's favor because she didn't deserve a dime. smh
Exactly...judge Mathis was wrong...she wasnt trying to be spiteful...she appeared she was nervous
So she Quit on the business that wasn't even her idea... then came back saying you owe me for quitting.
Aaaaannnnnddddddd got 3 g's by the end of the case!
Then throwing unnecessary info in bout how she didn't even want to go into business. Girrrl, who the f cares? You did and now it's over. That's the most irrelevant piece if info she gave. " I didn't even want to go into business!"😵
🚨This is a perfect example of telling too much info and not enough at the same time. They both are shady and talk out of both sides of their neck. If she would have left it at business abandonment and not made a side deal, she would have gotten all she wanted. But no, she tried to be too smart and made a contract ontop of a contract, so the most recent one is valid. Bloop.
Nailed it.
@Kay N u hit it right on the head with that break down
With all due respect: Does the plaintiff even have the looks to be a "showgirl"?? 🤨🤨🤨
I’M DYING 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
HELL NAW
@@jasminejazijaz8002
Hahahaha! Tell me about it girl! 🤭🤭🤭
Very well said!!! 🤣🤣🤣👍🏾
Lol I was thinking exactly that
If you gonna be a judge you need to judge right and not based on a feeling, I didn't even finish the case but I'm reading the comments... judge Mathis be getting in his feelings to much and don't judge fairly because of that sometimes
I agree 100% Idk who's worse, him letting tge plaintiff talk to a judge that way OR the judge taking everything so personal and judging on emotion
Right.. he even misunderstood the girl saying she want $3,000 after he asked her how much she wanted for it. When he ruled he said she told him the value was $3,000 so she only received $1,500
Lol you better hope Judge Matt this don’t read this comment🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I would think he judges according to to the law
Y'all talking about JM being annoying???? What? Judges don't like when plantiffs or defendants don't have their facts in order. And going to JM is an option, no one forced either one othem...
From jm if sum one has ah case on da other person ohhhh yesss dat other person HASSSSS TO GO TO COURT BIE
@@datpaperladi6391 huh???? You type like they speak... point lost
JM is a legend, ain't no one said he was annoying, stop making lies up
@@terencemayers6568 your comment is annoying... scroll through the comments... a few certainly did say it. Before you call someone a liar... have your facts straight.
@@lotusgsxr750 typical another angry black woman
There's a reason why people always say, don't go into business with your best friend, because you're likely to end up losing both.
Judge Mathis is so annoying sometimes. I wish I could be in the audience. It’s clear the girl considered physical altercation as fist fighting and her actually fighting back. But a phone hit her and yes that’s physical, but more so assault.
Thats what I thought! I understood what she was saying “she wasn’t physical” per say but it got physical from the other party so it was assault actually. He be a asshole sometimes and its annoying. He knew what the girl meant just being a bitch lol
That's why he's a TV judge 🤣
I wish you was in the audience as well so he can lock your d a up for contempt
And exactly WHAT would u do in the audience?? 🤔🤔🤔 Ya ass would shit right there shakin ya head stfyytryna talk tough on CZcams Comments... U lame asf for that stop the cap 🤣
@@Longpipejang deadass lmfao mf really tryna act like that bout that life and above anyone else lmfaoo 🤣 😭☠️
His judgement made no sense in this case at all.
I find it extremely hard to believe either were "show girls" in any capacity, let alone making "alot of money" in that profession
😁
🤷🏾♀️
I used to live in Vegas. It don’t take much. Lol
@@montewilson9567 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣
Just because you're not swearing & rolling you're eyes doesn't mean you can't be disrespectful. The Plaintiff is being disrespectful to the Judge. "We"ll talk about that later." "That's what I'm trying to get to, can I keep going" "Period, I gotchu." He is not the homie and the Defendant doesn't seem very bright.
Yadda yadda, blah blah blah, wudeva wudeva, periodt 👀🥹
Never go into business with a friend or family. Do it yourself.
i. almost died. when plaintiff said we will talk about it later. like she was gonna see judge mathis. after court session.
That show annoyed me senseless… I’m confused how the business that wasn’t even the defendant’s business idea, who then quits how they access to then come back and make profit from a business they left with no notice? How does this make sense and his weird hostility with the plaintiff when both of these woman couldn’t articulate one sentence they were both jokes omg!
He definitely ruled wrong on this one. Just my opinion.
@@missouriscratch3146 I agree I don’t understand…
They was 50-50 partners that’s how
I don’t know why some in the comment section disagree with judgement. The defendant had invested in the business (50%) so rightfully so, the plaintiff has to buy her out. Doesn’t matter if she quit, she still deserve her buyout/return and if not she’s still part owner.
She may be part owner but her buyout was set and determined while she was in court and he made it very clear so even the defendent knew. My personal feeling was that no one should have gotten any money because the defendant essentially took items out of the business that equaled more than the buy out and the plaintiff essentially thru loosing inventory settled the amount owed. (Just my opinion)
Once I heard
Whoop de whoop de whoop I knew she’d lose the case
😂😂😂😂😂😂
These people can’t even tell a coherent story 🙄😱
Judge Mathis was completely off his rocker on this case
He was very annoying and wouldn't let her finish. He's quick to talk about being " hip" to the young people but missed that this girl was just speaking a little slang not disrespecting him
@@raquelh8791 and this is not his first time smh
He's alot of his rocker
He’s off his rocker a lot.
Recently he hasn’t been hearing people out and it’s annoying. The reason she didn’t give her an amount is because the defendant didn’t keep the original agreement. I wouldn’t have given her amount either if she changed up our agreement.
First of all, the ruling amount was incorrect based on what he asked the defendant. When the plaintiff said the items she had were worth way more than 5k, but she didn’t know how much, he turned and asked the defendant how much she WANTED for them and she said $3k… during the ruling, he said the defendant said the plaintiff’s possessions were worth 3k, thus splitting that in half (on top of the buyout money). She should’ve walked away with $4500 based on what he said during the case.
Omg yesss I was waiting on someone to catch that… had my head spinning 😅😂😂
They had to split the cost equally thus making it £1500 each.
@@cherylene180 Did you even ATTEMPT to read what I wrote….
I read the whole thing and there’s no need to be so defensive. I just explained why she got $3000
You can act like a pro and act perfect in front of a judge but it's that last minute that shows who they really are.
Doyle: Greg Maeethis
Gets me everytime😂
🤔
@@Lyfe164 his accent
@@paynefam1786 oooo o k good lookin lmfaooo i was genuinely confused 🤣🤣
JM "Who threw the first punch?"
D "She hit me first.."
JM "Oh, kay good.."
Lol 🤣🤣🤣
I'm so confused. Both the plaintiff and the defendant gave me a headache!!
The plaintiff had a off-putting attitude 🤣🤣 Judge Mathis made his decision early. Oh well. 🤷🏾♀️
You don’t think getting bust in the head is physical 💀🤣🤣🤣
They definitely did not present their cases well at all and as a black woman myself, I'm embarrassed at how they behaved as business owners smh
Me too thank you for saying it. All the drama between them wasn’t even necessary. I think they could’ve had a successful business going but the drama is for the birds in the business world
I think the plaintiff started off well but JM crossed her up so bad the whole thing went left in a hurry. 🤦🏽♂️
As a black women omg sooo cliche. They are young don't forget that. I'm sure they will from there mistakes. 🙌🏾
So Unnecessary To Say. These Are Immature Girls. Hopefully They Will Learn In Due Time!!!
@@maxine3020They are not girls, they are grown women. We need to stop treating adults as children. 🤦🏾♂️
Plaintiff was a bully to the other girl I can tell and she clearly thinks she runs everything. Glad the defendant got her judgement.
I agree with the judge for this ruling. The plaintiff confirmed that ownership is 50/50 and confirmed that the items she has left in the business was more than $5000 so the defendant left with less than half of their ownership. She offered to buy her out, if her name was removed from the lease. The kease expired and she never told her an amount. Her claim was dropped and because the defendant left with less than 50% of the dissolved business she owes her
Defendant didn’t need to win that. She got her money when she took the inventory. Whether they put in for the inventory or not she left the business and her buyout cost was set. At that point she didn’t own anything pertaining to the business.
The plaintiff had not set a buy out amount when the defendant took the inventory
And a buyout is not just for inventory or tangible items in a business its also for interest or stake in the business. So 1500 for a successful small vegas business is reasonable.
She wasn't given a buyout amount and wasn't paid either. Over 10k in inventory and the defendant only wanted $1500. Sounds like she just wanted out but the plaintiff really didn't want her to go.
You can’t set a buyout cost on your on. It must be part of the contract or agreed upon. And you definitely have notify the other party of what you believe it is. She did none of that. Since she had no idea of the worth of her own inventory (liar) judge went with the defendant. The plaintiff is an idiot
Her buyout wasn’t set because they didn’t agree to it.
Plaintiff rude, I knew she lost when she said "we'll talk about that later" surprised he didn't hit his gavel immediately after that.
Neither of them r "show girls" material.
That kiss though at the end 😱 That was POWERFUL! No words they’ve both used could match that deadly gesture ☠️
That's usually what people do when they're not intelligent enough for words lol
That attitude is probably why she keeps getting her ass whooped..
She did that after the plaintiff cursed her
She walked in suing for 5k and left owing 3k, she didn't plan her case well. She would have done better not to sue her, probably lead by her emotions and not be logic and reasons smh
This case and judgement was annoying. You know, like Whoopty whoop Whoop But, "We'll Talk About That Later".
💀💀💀🤣😂😭😭
“She doesn’t think getting bust in the head is getting physical”
Lol..right
I'm like WTF!
Sometimes judge Mathis tries to trip up and find inconsistencies that aren’t there
I would think the buy out means that she wouldn’t be able to take half of the business I’m confused.
I’m still stuck
This was a mess!😩😩
“We’ll talk about that later”…Omgosh! 😂😂🤣
I can see who had the brains and mouth in the friend ship and who was the looks 😂😂😂
We'll talk about that later,JM, no we won't We'll talk about it Now, Chi eye flatlined, lmao 🤣😂😆
The plaintiff was snitching on herself the whole case 😂😂😂
“…Whooptee Whooptee Woo” 😂🤦🏾♂️
The plaintiff didn’t know anything about her own case😂😂😂
A business owner in court that says whoopty whoop whoop 🙄
I could not follow this case judge had way more patience than usual.
I was confused the whole time.
Golly that’s a mess 🙄 I was waiting for JM to tell the plaintiff don’t get slick with me
I think it's time for JM to retire. He's getting extremely ornery.😒
this case is crazy. he must’ve gotten pissed office before this case.
She hit the stand 1000 times! LOL Geesh
Ugh sometimes Mathis is annoying. Let them speak. Him interrupting asking questions trying to guide them where he wants the dialog to go gets confusing.
Why the very end have me in complete stitches 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is a hot mess 😳
This is bothersome because if you breached the contract and didn’t want to do the business anymore, accept the L and don’t be petty about the materials you purchased FOR the business. She had no use for them and shouldn’t have taken them. You wanted out of the business, be patient about the buyout and sit down somewhere. If you are going to JM, be articulate and consistent and to the point because she should have won the case but lost on basically a technicality/presentation lol
not cosmeholics anonymous being in the comments. That's so random lol
And making comments like " whoopedeee whoopedee whoop" is not an articulate way to be explaining anything in court.
Judge got mad after that we'll talk about that later comment. He should of gave the plaintiff money alone. When he heard about all the fights the defendant got into. She's a mess!!
No shade but I’m not paying money to take pictures with EITHER of them.
🤭
Just because u say no shade don’t mean u didn’t just shade them lol
These chicks are kind of…awkward 🥴
I still don't understand what's going on....
Something about the defendant reminds me of the rapper Big Sean 🤔... like she could be his sister or cousin maybe.
It’s the mouth 👄😭
Spot on😂
LMFAOOOO i can't unsee it
@@scottrogue946 ... and the eyes 👀
Not Big Sean 😩💀
Whoopty-whoopty-whooooooop!” Huh?! 😩🥴
This case is nerve racking. On to the next.
I'm confused on this judgement. The girl was owed $1500 in buy out but she took 5K worth of stuff. She said what the plaintiff had was worth more than what she took. When Mathis asked her how much she wanted for the stuff she said 3k. Now the defendant has 8k from the buy out?
That’s what I was thinking! If the plaintiff owned inventory worth more than the 5k worth of inventory the defendant left with, why did she say what the plaintiff had was only 3k and why did she get half of that when she didn’t return half of the 5k of stuff she left with? If the plaintiff said it was more, like 7k for example, would the defendant get 3500 of that?? So confused.
Funny
@@Chitosiri wow I see you really tried to break it down. I still don't agree. 1. You cant try to make up figures and expenses like paying employees. I agree she owed 50% and $1500 was clearly not 50%. The defendant took $5k then asked for $3k from what she left. The Judge I guess determined he would split the $3k and also make the Plaintiff pay $1500 buy out because she said she would before the defendant took $5k. Lol So that's 5k +1500+1500
Showgirls where???😳
Times are tuff Lmao.
If there is any case to appeal it would be this one lol the judge dropped the ball big time. Might have ever got him confused
The plaintiff month got her in trouble
I knew she was going to lose when she said we can talk about that later😂😂😂😂but damn she really really lost
What an odd case. Nothing about them was entertaining so the slang and not being organized doesn’t get you anywhere. If you feel you are owed something and have enough evidence to win a case, use it. Imagine they went to their local court acting like that?! Just because this court is on tv, doesn’t mean you get to act like a buffoon. Unfortunately, the defendant was no better but that’s business. Don’t get mad when you don’t know your rights.
Exactly! Right on!!! 🤭🤫🤫🤣🤣🤣🤣
Some people always judging like they are a Saint Holy Saint at that I have seen worse cases and they are young ladies I'm sure they will get better with time
@@kaylee3867 I think so. To be smart enough to start a business that young is admirable. Many creatives make terrible business ppl, tho. Lol Funny enough I want to be a judge when I was kid. I probably would have been a calmer Mathis. Smh
Ain't no way in hell the plaintiff has a sugar daddy.
She dressed down for court
It doesn't take much depending on how much game you can run lol.
Let me tell you. I'm a stripper of 20 years (retiring next month). There's girls at the bar I work at that literally have half their teeth... Top half of the top and bottom half of the bottom, and the breath to go along with it. Every girl there has sugar daddies, even that one. Size, shape, color, smell, age (in my case)... Doesn't matter, we all have our guys.
Watcha base that opinion on?
I don't even know what I just watched
I know right
Why are we going around the mulberry bush with this?
The way judge Mathis’ condescending remarks go over heads 🥴
EXACTLY!!!
I hate the way that he sometimes is like “oh ok because a second ago I thought you said [blah blah]” trying to be smart… like she CLEARLY didn’t mean it was her idea to start the business initially, but she later agreed…..
Hey JM Fam!
That kiss at the end!😭
That was POWERFUL! Words could not match that deadly gesture
Lmaoooooo I’m how she went to court to pay lmaoooooo
She told Judge Mathis she will talk about it later! Damn 😂 😂
They both slow as hell lol the girl wit glasses was winning until she told the judge talk about it later😩
Both of these girls are embarrassing 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 they clearly don't understand the court system
Now this one. IDK. The defendant should’ve had to return the materials and still obtained the 3K. She walked out on the business like a thief in the night and she wasn’t too convincing today. She clearly took the materials to initiate a reaction. She got it and they ended up in court.
Judge can be so ignorant sometimes. Defendant didn’t take the plaintiff off the lease so she had to finish the lease out wrongfully.
Lmfao, she tried to look like an educated nerd for court with them glasses but ended up losing.
Judge Mathis is so used to being in his element and in front of the cameras that he forgets that most people are not! 😅 One wrong slip up and he will not let you live it down for the rest of the case! I have watched so many of these where he cuts people off and asks the, to explain but he won’t let them explain. Then there are the times when he asks a simple question and they go in a loop 😂
Not in the courtroom talking about, “period, I got you.” 😑😑😑😑😑
Plaintiff didn't represent herself well. That's why she lost. Judge is still a judge 🤷🏾♂️
the lady in the blue in the audience is in every video in the same seat 😂😂😂