Twittard users have long since left this realm of existence. There isn't a single thing they can say now that won't be out of this world wacky and insane.
@MikuFangirl290-oz7bz Ding ding yep you got it. That's what I meant in my comment. They treat fictional characters like real people and real people like fictional characters is so stupid it's unreal.
Think about all those kids in school having a crush on someone, and they imagine themselves together with them. Now they're called a creep because the imagination didn't consent.
Even the fictional characters in your own head now "can't consent" apparently. So you can't even imagine yourself with a character you made up in your head or you're a "creep". Lmao Leftism is a mental disease.
@@ryonalionthunderThis is why I'm worried when I see a lot of people who are seemingly on our side promoting Christianity as if it will save entertainment.
Dear twitter freaks: Fictional characters can't consent because they're fictional and don't actually exist. Did your favorite artist give their consent to letting you listen to a piece of music that they produced that you like? No they did not.
ive said this once and i'll say it again: "People who worry this much about consent have probably never made it far enough in a relationship where it would matter"
Or, they're likely behaving this way to hide the fact that they themselves won't consider consent when the power is in their hands in a relationship with someone else. I remember Hero Hei said this once: "virtue signaling is in it of itself false virtue", and boy is he correct. A lot of individuals who choose to be obnoxious activists and dictate the creative freedoms of what other artists are allowed to draw and share are very often people who are highly narcissistic, bigoted (ironically) and are somewhat mentally ill, but don't let that last one make you think they have no control of themselves and should be let off the hook.
"probably never made it far enough in a relationship where it would matter" Ah, that old feeling of being called out even though it wasn't directed at me. Oh well, at least I have my anime waifus
Remember. The same people that get mad at characters being sexualized like cammy from street fighter, praised a video game for letting you sleep with a bear
@@ZeldaGuy12345 gay sex? That has nothing to do with it lol they literally praised a game for letting you have sex with a bear but get mad over a fake character
@@gsamov Violence won't make them change their minds. It will just feed into their victim/persecution complex. They need to be put into an inpatient mental health program, preferably one not covered by their insurance. That will give them a REAL reality check.
Apparently, someone once complained about people using s*x toys because objects can't consent. (Heard someone say that they heard that rather than seeing the source for myself, so make of that what you will.)
@@ComposedSage75 And they are forgetting that those fictional boundaries can be broken if it's done in real life as opposite to fiction. For example wise: Cat drinking milk is only a fictional rule, if it's done in real life, The cat will get instantaneous diarrhea.
3rd world problems: Im scared because my children and I might starve to death 1st world problems: Im mad because fictional characters are drawn in a sexual way
@@ComposedSage75 And yet, somehow, they still manage it but completely backwards. They act like fictional characters need to be protected the same way children do, but will also tell real people to die over something stupid and petty.
@@lilpipps167 Prisoner: "I'm in here because I robbed multiple banks. What are you here for?" You: "I written a story of my fictional character getting killed."
Marques: You disrespect the characters feelings by sexualizing them! Me: But what if they want to be sexualized? Marques: *screech like a Twitter demon*
Fictional characters does have feelings... But their feelings are only relevant to the world they belong to, not the real world. That's how suspension of disbelief works. The problem with X-freaks is that they aren't able to suspend their disbelief when consuming fictional content, because they lack the maturity to do so. There are a number of reasons for this, but I think the main one is bad parenting, which makes sense, because we are talking about people that experiences reality mostly through the screen of a smartphone, computer or television.
Agreed. Spending almost every 24 hours on social media is our main concern. Therefore, this can lead to sudden development of mental health disorders, like Schizophrenia, ASPD, pathological paranoia etc. It's quite obvious that they never find true happiness in Cyberspace, instead of going outside to catch a breath of fresh air.
Alright, so then I guess "sexualized" women cannot exist in media anymore, full stop, mods aside. Bayonetta? Get rid of her, because her 'character' cannot possibly have "consented" to wearing what she wears, and her _female_ designer who made her that way should feel very ashamed of herself for violating her own character's nonexistent autonomy. God, I sure am glad I wasn't born a clinically insane person like 90% of Twitter users.
Twatter weirdos think anything remotely attractive in any way is seen as a problem. They glorify the most unappealing and unattractive characters to promote the fantasies in their heads.
Reminds me of when Zero Suit Samus was made separate from Samus for Sm4sh, she was given two alternate costumes that were more casual but showed more skin, as presented in the endings of the various Metroid games. It was a surprise for Sakurai and was the work of a woman.
look how I twist that logic: women IRL should never wear skimpy clothes because it's obvious that sexualizes them and appeal to *desgoosthang* patriarchal rules. Even if the woman in question wishes to wear skimpy clothes of her own volition, she will never be able to consent to every dude, since she can't always know who might see her that kind of BS reasoning is easy to break, you just think about it a little more and it all comes appart
Let's just tell all those "pictures-can't-consent-to-be-drawn"-people that food can't consent to be eaten, hopefully then the problem will sort itself out after a month or so.
Here's my take on the ridiculous idea that since a drawing cannot concent, it is disgusting/immoral/criminal to sexualize it or be sexual aroused by it: Dildos, flesh lights, and sex dolls ALSO do not have the ability to consent. You don't hear about Adam and Eve's adult toys website being accuse of human trafficking.
They did this with Batman right? An also, a cat drinking milk is only a fictional rule, if it's done in real life, The cat will get instantaneous diarrhea.
@@Just_a_random_who_likes_stuffAnd so as a dog drinking milk. (those are explicitly fictional boundaries. One done in real life, you're constantly penalizing yourself. Just like when a cat consumes milk irl, it's constant diarrhea. But in the fictional spectrum, there's no dire consequences.)
I just saw someone say there's no difference between real-life murder and killing characters in video games so the level of insanity these days is really something special. Oddly enough, the people championing the rights of pixels and ink allow for a lot of messed up real life sht. It's the most curious thing.
The comparison doesn't even make much sense. Since it's a deepfake. The acts aren't done by the person. The name itself is admitting that. Chun Li is not real at all.
@@FloraDArtCat From Google Dictionary: "a video of a person in which their face or body has been digitally altered so that they appear to be someone else, typically used maliciously or to spread false information." Can be used for anything, but commonly to make fake porn images and videos.
@@FloraDArtCat essentially, its an AI program designed to imitate the facial features of people, both real and imagined. It's very uncanny how accurate it gets.
@@josueveguilla9069 The Holocaust where they incinerated the jews which happens simultaneously during the WWII, then there's segregation involved happend in the 60s, which led a lot of civil war.
Yeah and characters are also fictional it's like getting upset at me when I start pelvic thrusting the air saying,"the air doesn't consent and you're sexually harassing the air"
Fictional characters are treated BETTER than real people. These Twitterites will scream about "MAP rights" but then claim that 17-year old anime girls must be banned. They're completely fine with underage stuff, as long as it happens in real life.
by that logic, making a fictional character doing anything is assault because they don't consent to fighting or walking to the store or eating a ham sandwich
Don't know about the fanart, but if I remember correctly, RE:Creators had some fictional characters kidnap their creators to write a better ending for them...
It's sad to see when people can't separate fiction and reality. On another note Baldur's Gate 3 has been really good so far. If you do end up getting it and have never played D&D 5e I'd recommend watching a video about how 5e mechanics work while it's downloading. It helped me understand how it plays and I've been having fun.
@@ZeldaGuy12345 I'm just laughing at the true statement you made lol no need to get so pressed At least it has bi rep - we don't get that enough Besides Hero Hei only got famous from talking shit - he's entertaining but he's never confronted anyone in real life that much I can tell "Woke" is a pejorative at this point anyways - "socially aware" would be a more accurate term since it represents certain people in various positions a lot better - more "true to life" as they'd say
It’s sucks how the people who say they’re up to debating or discussing subjects online are so close minded.A lot of those who say something like “prove me wrong and I’ll admit I was” can’t accept that when they receive the facts that contradict whatever they believe. In person they’d crumble but behind a screen they can just dismiss what you said and do some mental gymnastics to explain how they’re still right. 🤦🏾♂️
This has utterly broke my brain. Why are people worried about the emotions of fake people that don't exist, but are so quick to disregard a person's right to live if they disagree on something as petty as pizza toppings or TV shows? I sincerely hope Twitter goes down, at least for a few days. Then maybe people can learn to vet their own thoughts again instead of just spewing out whatever diarrhea their brain comes up with in an out of touch stream of consciousness. Seriously, people will post every few minutes for 16 hours a day sometimes. Don't they have literally anything else to do?
He's putting way too much effort into arguing with people who disagree with him for me to believe he's a troll... which is scary because that means he genuinely believes in what he's saying.
It's sad to see people can't differentiate between real and fictional characters. When I was 5 playing grand theft auto my brother asked me: Do you think the people you are killing are real? And I simply responded with: No of course not this is a game they don't exist.
The guy could have easily had a somewhat reasonable point if Capcom used the likeness of real people as face models for SF6 (they might have, I don't know) and that might also be why Capcom is against nude mods in Resident Evil since they do kinda need to tell their face models "Modders likely will make a nude mod of this character with your face," which could impact their potential partners. Instead he went for the craziest take.
Because he just wants to virtue signal over nothing. Since you spoke about the nude mods, that makes sense not just because of the likeness of the actors, there was an actual issue with Resident Evil 2 remake having nude mods of Sherry who was a kid at the time
@@Ramsey276one Certainly true but it should probably be something that is discussed in the talent-seeking process. If, for nothing else, legal protections. There likely is a case to be made if someone is doing a project with your likeness in it and does not say that the project might lead to breaches in privacy akin to Blender porn that the actor could litigate against the company. It's just best practice to account for that, but being explicit about it might actually turn some people away from the contract. Just because seeing it in writing makes it more tangible than just knowing it's likely to happen.
You know what's funny these people are the same people that believe that their husbando and waifus are real and should be treated as such and they are even worse than those people
as an artist, i have every right over the "consent" of my original characters (OC) which i do not need permission for because they're mine to begin with. additionally western poison has no right to tell us what we can or cannot do when they dont even know the legalities or culture behind H and why fan-art and doujinshi's are perfectly allowed in every part of japans culture.
Well I guess if fictional characters can’t consent then it’s completely legal to use force. Finally someone validated my bondage and forced pleasure art collection.
You'd think that ability to distinguish fiction and reality is something common that you learn about the age 3 or 4. But looking at modern day... I get the impression that this is indeed an incredibly rare skill that basically equates to super-power at this stage.
Ok i know there was an issue with companies when rule34 artists where just ripping the characters code from the game itself. Which i kinda get. That being said the only thing, even those artists/modders agree on, is not to use the voice actors actual voice in it.
As much as I really really want to think this is just trolling (although these days it really is becoming harder and harder to tell the difference between that and a real opinion.) I have to say if this is even slightly real and slightly genuine these are the people that will totally screw us by believing that AI deserves autonomy and personhood. These people would doom the entire human race in an instant just to be morally right on a platform that has shown more times than not nothing could be further from the truth.
Reminds me of a reply to the idea the "stuffed in the fridge" trope. No matter if it's Gwen Stacy or Bruce Wayne's parents, these characters can be killed if the writer wants that. These things are concepts, not real people. You can't bring them down by objectifying them, because that is all they are at best.
Remember when suspension of disbelief was a thing? Fiction is not require to adhere to the real world. In fact, the purpose of fiction is get around the rules of the real world.
I support debating different opinions, it's just that, people really have to stop struggling to argue against ridiculous speeches like that lmao Like, you don't need to make an effort to argue against it, the speech itself already argues against itself as ridiculous as it is. Just make fun of this kind of people, save your energy to discuss and argue against important things.
I mention this before that I remember I had somewhat of a similar argument with somebody when I didn't agree to view fictional characters like they do, and I told them that I'll care when they proved that fictional characters are sentient. And, in order to win the argument, he straight up told me that they were. I just moved on from that because if someone is willing to believe that fictional characters have sentience then there's no real argument to have, because these people either have some serious mental problems or it's so important to "own" someone in an argument that they have to pretend to be clinically insane. They literally sound just like the politicians and media talkin about violent video games just to drum up attention or get you to care about their personal feelings. Oh and FYI, that image you scroll down to was an old h-game called Rapelay. It was the only h-game that I know of that was literally banned in some countries for living up to its namesake. I played it before and it was interesting, but there are far more h games out there with worst themes than that so it's mild in comparison. To all those reading this, you're welcome.
Pin
Yay
Congratulations 🎉
nicee.
Congrats
Really. I am like an minute late.
I wish Twitter can treat real people the same way they treat fictional characters. Maybe the world wouldn't be so bad.
Bruh
Had to reread what you said but I get what you’re getting at
Twittard users have long since left this realm of existence. There isn't a single thing they can say now that won't be out of this world wacky and insane.
@MikuFangirl290-oz7bz Ding ding yep you got it. That's what I meant in my comment. They treat fictional characters like real people and real people like fictional characters is so stupid it's unreal.
Twitter only treat real people normally if they have they/them in their bio.
Think about all those kids in school having a crush on someone, and they imagine themselves together with them. Now they're called a creep because the imagination didn't consent.
We are at THAT level in fact
News flash: We reached that point already.
Funny enough, we’re right back at “If you look at a woman with lust, that’s a sin.” Horse shoe theory is real
Even the fictional characters in your own head now "can't consent" apparently. So you can't even imagine yourself with a character you made up in your head or you're a "creep". Lmao Leftism is a mental disease.
@@ryonalionthunderThis is why I'm worried when I see a lot of people who are seemingly on our side promoting Christianity as if it will save entertainment.
Dear twitter freaks: Fictional characters can't consent because they're fictional and don't actually exist.
Did your favorite artist give their consent to letting you listen to a piece of music that they produced that you like? No they did not.
This right here 🎯🎯🎯
That's actually implied consent because they made the music public. Not the best analogy.
@@tarrantwolf Baby with a beard with ( _most likely_ ) left leaning ideology offended at people with Based and Fact-pilled takes
The way you put it the argument does sound dumb
@@tarrantwolf So??
You didn't add anything
ive said this once and i'll say it again:
"People who worry this much about consent have probably never made it far enough in a relationship where it would matter"
Or, they're likely behaving this way to hide the fact that they themselves won't consider consent when the power is in their hands in a relationship with someone else. I remember Hero Hei said this once: "virtue signaling is in it of itself false virtue", and boy is he correct. A lot of individuals who choose to be obnoxious activists and dictate the creative freedoms of what other artists are allowed to draw and share are very often people who are highly narcissistic, bigoted (ironically) and are somewhat mentally ill, but don't let that last one make you think they have no control of themselves and should be let off the hook.
"probably never made it far enough in a relationship where it would matter"
Ah, that old feeling of being called out even though it wasn't directed at me. Oh well, at least I have my anime waifus
@@TheAdventGamerSelf-awareness is the biggest winners anyway.
Or theyre a c*ck
For someone who is offended on behalf of people that literally do not exist, they will never make it far enough in life at all.
I don't know what to blame, their sheer stupidity or the education system for not possibly teaching them what the concept of fiction means.
Defo sheer stupidity cause we already are taught that in elementary/primary school
I blame media and live action TV for blurring the line of reality and fiction on purpose.
Not dealing with enough problems in real life. So they don't appreciate escapism.
Why not both?
@@DiabolicCrusherit's always both and galore
Remember. The same people that get mad at characters being sexualized like cammy from street fighter, praised a video game for letting you sleep with a bear
As well as praised Cuties.
@@Asertix357 oh that's right. They gave cuties good reviews 🤮
@@ZeldaGuy12345 gay sex? That has nothing to do with it lol they literally praised a game for letting you have sex with a bear but get mad over a fake character
All part of the hive mind of idiocy they’re apart of. One is acceptable and the other is demonized. People like the ones on Twatter play favorites.
@@maverick9357 You are the bear. You only get that scene if you play as a Druid.
People that take character’s seriously that are not real seriously need a reality check
Reality check via metal baseball bat =]
@@gsamov Violence won't make them change their minds. It will just feed into their victim/persecution complex.
They need to be put into an inpatient mental health program, preferably one not covered by their insurance. That will give them a REAL reality check.
Seriously. lol
@@OtakuUnitedStudio Easiest thing? Dachau.
Send. THOSE FREAKS. there.
More like touching real kids and cry about drawing
"Characters can't consent"
Well yeah. They're objects, not people. Pure figments of imagination.
A manifestation created from the mind of creative people.
@@thecompareablezombie An idea, a thought, an abstraction one can engage with within the abstract flow of one's imagination.
Apparently, someone once complained about people using s*x toys because objects can't consent. (Heard someone say that they heard that rather than seeing the source for myself, so make of that what you will.)
When someone starts talking about fiction characters that's where you know you have to either not take them seriously or just ignore them.
Venti is speaking facts
They can’t separate what’s real and what’s fake. It’s pathetic.
@@ComposedSage75 And they are forgetting that those fictional boundaries can be broken if it's done in real life as opposite to fiction. For example wise: Cat drinking milk is only a fictional rule, if it's done in real life, The cat will get instantaneous diarrhea.
3rd world problems: Im scared because my children and I might starve to death
1st world problems: Im mad because fictional characters are drawn in a sexual way
@@ComposedSage75 And yet, somehow, they still manage it but completely backwards. They act like fictional characters need to be protected the same way children do, but will also tell real people to die over something stupid and petty.
Most sane person online gives rights to characters.
Looks like I'm going to jail because I written my oc being murdered (in a mystery story I'm writing) See y'all in jail 👋💀
@@lilpipps167 Prisoner: "I'm in here because I robbed multiple banks. What are you here for?"
You: "I written a story of my fictional character getting killed."
People can't tell reality from fiction anymore. Fictional characters don't need to consent because they aren't real.
*clears throat* Bridget
It's only specific parts of First world Western countries.
Marques: You disrespect the characters feelings by sexualizing them!
Me: But what if they want to be sexualized?
Marques: *screech like a Twitter demon*
Twatter loves something to be mad at and that would definitely do it.
Literally, Satanichia from Gabriel Dropout in a nutshell.
Fictional characters does have feelings...
But their feelings are only relevant to the world they belong to, not the real world. That's how suspension of disbelief works. The problem with X-freaks is that they aren't able to suspend their disbelief when consuming fictional content, because they lack the maturity to do so. There are a number of reasons for this, but I think the main one is bad parenting, which makes sense, because we are talking about people that experiences reality mostly through the screen of a smartphone, computer or television.
Agreed. Spending almost every 24 hours on social media is our main concern. Therefore, this can lead to sudden development of mental health disorders, like Schizophrenia, ASPD, pathological paranoia etc. It's quite obvious that they never find true happiness in Cyberspace, instead of going outside to catch a breath of fresh air.
Cell didn't consent to his face being used for your views.
That's true, he just posted picture of a 6 year old without their consent.
Boom. Get played.
Twitter: Stop lewding Hot, Sexy, Voluptuous, beautiful and breedable characters because you're disgusting.
Me: No!
I agree with every single one of those words.🤤👍
Alright, so then I guess "sexualized" women cannot exist in media anymore, full stop, mods aside. Bayonetta? Get rid of her, because her 'character' cannot possibly have "consented" to wearing what she wears, and her _female_ designer who made her that way should feel very ashamed of herself for violating her own character's nonexistent autonomy.
God, I sure am glad I wasn't born a clinically insane person like 90% of Twitter users.
Twatter weirdos think anything remotely attractive in any way is seen as a problem. They glorify the most unappealing and unattractive characters to promote the fantasies in their heads.
That's rather funny as probably most of of her outfits are made up of her own hair.
@@JakeSweeperpretty much asking her to go full on bald. 🤣
Reminds me of when Zero Suit Samus was made separate from Samus for Sm4sh, she was given two alternate costumes that were more casual but showed more skin, as presented in the endings of the various Metroid games. It was a surprise for Sakurai and was the work of a woman.
look how I twist that logic: women IRL should never wear skimpy clothes because it's obvious that sexualizes them and appeal to *desgoosthang* patriarchal rules. Even if the woman in question wishes to wear skimpy clothes of her own volition, she will never be able to consent to every dude, since she can't always know who might see her
that kind of BS reasoning is easy to break, you just think about it a little more and it all comes appart
Let's just tell all those "pictures-can't-consent-to-be-drawn"-people that food can't consent to be eaten, hopefully then the problem will sort itself out after a month or so.
Hopefully..... Hopefully.............
Should say water instead, it'd be much faster that way since people can't survive more than a few days without water.
Say it with me guys
FICTIONAL 👏 CHARACTERS 👏 DO 👏 NOT 👏 NEED 👏 TO 👏 CONSENT 👏 BECAUSE 👏 THEY 👏 ARE 👏 LITERALLY 👏 FICTIONAL
Also even if they needed to consent how tf would they??
@@Ralsiay e s
@@Ralsia And even if they did somehow consent then what could you even do?
@@theoaky8924 idk, some people literally unironically have discord esex in vcs im sure some ppl would figure something out 😭😭
@@Iamnobody543 that wouldn't be the characters consenting tho, that would be the artists forcing them to say yes
Here's my take on the ridiculous idea that since a drawing cannot concent, it is disgusting/immoral/criminal to sexualize it or be sexual aroused by it: Dildos, flesh lights, and sex dolls ALSO do not have the ability to consent. You don't hear about Adam and Eve's adult toys website being accuse of human trafficking.
Don't forget anything else people use. For example: bananas or pillows.
didn't know that fictional characters need to consent
They're people to you creep!
They don't cuz they're not real
Also one comment is not visible
They did this with Batman right? An also, a cat drinking milk is only a fictional rule, if it's done in real life, The cat will get instantaneous diarrhea.
@@Just_a_random_who_likes_stuffAnd so as a dog drinking milk. (those are explicitly fictional boundaries. One done in real life, you're constantly penalizing yourself. Just like when a cat consumes milk irl, it's constant diarrhea. But in the fictional spectrum, there's no dire consequences.)
@@Just_a_random_who_likes_stuff It might've been me, but my comment is visible.
It's so sad how people don't know what the difference is between reality and fiction😢
The only thing I can think of for why people act like this is that they're just mad that there are people who lust over the female characters.
@@Luminus2 Fr
Sometimes I have to wonder if these people try to speak on "behalf" of these fictional characters because it gives them a warped sense of authority.
Op: they are designed unrealistically!
Dhalsim and Zangief behind a corner: thank god they didn’t see us!
O
M
G
XD
This is what people who hate gamers truly fear. People who cannot see the difference between fiction and reality.
What's worse is that gamers, who can actually separate fiction from reality, get to pay the embarrassment and call outs cause of these kind of people
That moment when basement dweller gamer has more logical sense than internet roaming keyboard warriors
I just saw someone say there's no difference between real-life murder and killing characters in video games so the level of insanity these days is really something special. Oddly enough, the people championing the rights of pixels and ink allow for a lot of messed up real life sht. It's the most curious thing.
Him comparing deepfakes to sexualisation of FICTIONAL characters is concerning
The comparison doesn't even make much sense. Since it's a deepfake. The acts aren't done by the person. The name itself is admitting that. Chun Li is not real at all.
What's "deepfakes"?
@@FloraDArtCat From Google Dictionary: "a video of a person in which their face or body has been digitally altered so that they appear to be someone else, typically used maliciously or to spread false information."
Can be used for anything, but commonly to make fake porn images and videos.
@@FloraDArtCat essentially, its an AI program designed to imitate the facial features of people, both real and imagined. It's very uncanny how accurate it gets.
Almost seems like he doesn't know the difference no matter how many times the difference is pounded into his head.
Definitely the type of people that wake up and the first thing they do is grab their phone and look up something to be mad at.
They cannot consent because fictional characters are NOT people, just polygons and pen strokes - WTH
Welcome to Clown Planet, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome? Bro, we've always been living in one. It just took us a while to realize
@@goldie8501 Sad but true.
@@josueveguilla9069 We always lived in this planet filled with wars, idiocracy, dictatorship, and by the books racism.
@@SweetBaby2GT "Racism"? Such as?
@@josueveguilla9069 The Holocaust where they incinerated the jews which happens simultaneously during the WWII, then there's segregation involved happend in the 60s, which led a lot of civil war.
Yeah and characters are also fictional it's like getting upset at me when I start pelvic thrusting the air saying,"the air doesn't consent and you're sexually harassing the air"
Once again, we live in a time where fictional characters are treated like real people
Fictional characters are treated BETTER than real people. These Twitterites will scream about "MAP rights" but then claim that 17-year old anime girls must be banned. They're completely fine with underage stuff, as long as it happens in real life.
@@SchemingGoldberg And they say anime fans are pedos...lmao
the fact people are scared about a fictional characters feelings and pronouns mean the world needs a hard reset please
by that logic, making a fictional character doing anything is assault because they don't consent to fighting or walking to the store or eating a ham sandwich
People who can't tell the difference between reality and fiction are scary.
More like infuriating.
more like being one step away from a Mug shot
This guy is obviously upset that he has to share his waifus.
*Our waifus*
Lol 😂
Imagine if the guy complaining saw rule 34 of chun li. He would have a heart attack lmao
That would be a funny idea for a story. Fictional characters gain sentience and are immediately disturbed by the fanart made of them.
That means Ultron is now real
Ultron saw all this happening and wanted to end it before it got to this point
Seen plenty of fanart based on that proposal.
Don't know about the fanart, but if I remember correctly, RE:Creators had some fictional characters kidnap their creators to write a better ending for them...
I’m always down for a story that plays with how real fiction is or can get lol
This is the type of person who Chris Chan can convince that the dimensional merge is real
I can see it being the case.
It's sad to see when people can't separate fiction and reality.
On another note Baldur's Gate 3 has been really good so far. If you do end up getting it and have never played D&D 5e I'd recommend watching a video about how 5e mechanics work while it's downloading. It helped me understand how it plays and I've been having fun.
@@ZeldaGuy12345lmao
Baldur's Gate 3 is woke trash, i ain't touching that
@@ZeldaGuy12345 I'm just laughing at the true statement you made lol no need to get so pressed
At least it has bi rep - we don't get that enough
Besides Hero Hei only got famous from talking shit - he's entertaining but he's never confronted anyone in real life that much I can tell
"Woke" is a pejorative at this point anyways - "socially aware" would be a more accurate term since it represents certain people in various positions a lot better - more "true to life" as they'd say
@@ssarellas do bi and gay people make you cry bub?
The statement "Characters can't consent, you're all disgusting" should only be replied to with "Fiction isn't reality, you need help"
Along with the ever popular "Go touch grass!"
People who complain about fictional characters either have no life, or they are psychopaths.
And as usual, I promise this is one of those "people" who are okay with Cuties.
I bet you’re right
"It's okay guys, they're just sexualizing real children to show that sexualizing children is wrong!"
And the CW Powerpuff Girls.
He does mention liking pizza in his bio. Not weird in itself but weird to put in your bio.
With that take, I don't think OP has the brain capacity to consent either.
It’s sucks how the people who say they’re up to debating or discussing subjects online are so close minded.A lot of those who say something like “prove me wrong and I’ll admit I was” can’t accept that when they receive the facts that contradict whatever they believe. In person they’d crumble but behind a screen they can just dismiss what you said and do some mental gymnastics to explain how they’re still right. 🤦🏾♂️
Guess the tables are turned. Back then they said my waifus aren't real and will never love me. Now they say my waifus are real and have rights.
Fictional characters also don't care if you sexualise them
This has utterly broke my brain. Why are people worried about the emotions of fake people that don't exist, but are so quick to disregard a person's right to live if they disagree on something as petty as pizza toppings or TV shows? I sincerely hope Twitter goes down, at least for a few days. Then maybe people can learn to vet their own thoughts again instead of just spewing out whatever diarrhea their brain comes up with in an out of touch stream of consciousness. Seriously, people will post every few minutes for 16 hours a day sometimes. Don't they have literally anything else to do?
That's a westerner issue. Japanese Twitter is not involved with it, but the westerners dragged it anyways.
I'm sorry, but there's moments where I broke my brain more than only Twitter.
Yeah seriously how do they feed themselves if they are online 18 hrs a day 😂
He's putting way too much effort into arguing with people who disagree with him for me to believe he's a troll... which is scary because that means he genuinely believes in what he's saying.
It's sad to see people can't differentiate between real and fictional characters. When I was 5 playing grand theft auto my brother asked me: Do you think the people you are killing are real? And I simply responded with: No of course not this is a game they don't exist.
The guy could have easily had a somewhat reasonable point if Capcom used the likeness of real people as face models for SF6 (they might have, I don't know) and that might also be why Capcom is against nude mods in Resident Evil since they do kinda need to tell their face models "Modders likely will make a nude mod of this character with your face," which could impact their potential partners.
Instead he went for the craziest take.
Because he just wants to virtue signal over nothing. Since you spoke about the nude mods, that makes sense not just because of the likeness of the actors, there was an actual issue with Resident Evil 2 remake having nude mods of Sherry who was a kid at the time
Any MoCap/voice actor/model that hasn't realized they will be R34'd is a bit too naive or inexperienced
@@Saltedroastedcaramelayooooo I forgot abt that mess 💀 mfs weird asf for doing all that
@@Ramsey276onedoesn't justify it especially when Sherry fell victim to that too
@@Ramsey276one Certainly true but it should probably be something that is discussed in the talent-seeking process. If, for nothing else, legal protections.
There likely is a case to be made if someone is doing a project with your likeness in it and does not say that the project might lead to breaches in privacy akin to Blender porn that the actor could litigate against the company. It's just best practice to account for that, but being explicit about it might actually turn some people away from the contract. Just because seeing it in writing makes it more tangible than just knowing it's likely to happen.
You know what's funny these people are the same people that believe that their husbando and waifus are real and should be treated as such and they are even worse than those people
I honestly think more tournaments should be run this way. Helps ensure the characters dont bring any hidden weapons.
dear twitter users google the definition of fiction
This is legit. I’ve killed my OC, now I’m being investigated for murder
I also played GTA and now I'm being arrested because video games cause violence. Wait a second...
Twitter will never stop being a clown fest over fictional character.
The things that happen on X is wild.
-Noooo!!! you can’t do a lewd drawing of that fictional character, she can´t consent!!!
-My guy, she’s a cartoon, she doesn’t even exist 💀
To answer the question as to why Chun Li gets so many costumes, She is called the First Lady of Fighting for a reason.
as an artist, i have every right over the "consent" of my original characters (OC) which i do not need permission for because they're mine to begin with. additionally western poison has no right to tell us what we can or cannot do when they dont even know the legalities or culture behind H and why fan-art and doujinshi's are perfectly allowed in every part of japans culture.
Arguing for "people" that don't exist. Did they get consent to fight on their behalf?
I'm lewding Mitsuri Kanroji right now as we speak. Almost done with her rule 34 😂
"Never argue with with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
Internet conspiracies have made me suspicious of anyone who puts pizza in their bio.
Well I guess if fictional characters can’t consent then it’s completely legal to use force. Finally someone validated my bondage and forced pleasure art collection.
Necessity is the mother of Invention...and Wish Fulfillment is the 'creepy uncle' that noone likes to talk about. ~_^
You'd think that ability to distinguish fiction and reality is something common that you learn about the age 3 or 4.
But looking at modern day... I get the impression that this is indeed an incredibly rare skill that basically equates to super-power at this stage.
Was I the only person irritated that on the background game they weren't drinking a Wiggenweld potion to heal when they were about dead? 😂
I'm in lost on how they treat fictional characters to be "alive".
Dude without a doubt has a skeleton, no, a whole graveyard stuffed in his closet.
His bio does say he likes pizza. Not weird on its own but definitely an odd thing to put in your bio.
So X (Twatter) is off their meds again? Good grief, they need a stronger dose! 😂
“The characters can't consent”
Damn, they go this hard for people made out of ink/pixels.
They got rejected by a fictional character in a dream for being creepy
Since when can drawings consent?
We need more Hero Hei drinking coffee ASMR
The Cell reaction was the best part, like I'm sure it was consensual when he vored 17 and 18.
This guy would shut down a kids lemonade stand for not having a business permit.
Ok i know there was an issue with companies when rule34 artists where just ripping the characters code from the game itself. Which i kinda get.
That being said the only thing, even those artists/modders agree on, is not to use the voice actors actual voice in it.
these people, make the task of AI to surpass human intelligence seem like a breeze
I like how some People try to be Smart & claim to have Morals, but then They have some sort of Mental Faults Themselves..
"Fictional characters can't consent."
You know what else they can't do? They can't do an alive.
As much as I really really want to think this is just trolling (although these days it really is becoming harder and harder to tell the difference between that and a real opinion.) I have to say if this is even slightly real and slightly genuine these are the people that will totally screw us by believing that AI deserves autonomy and personhood. These people would doom the entire human race in an instant just to be morally right on a platform that has shown more times than not nothing could be further from the truth.
"Steet fighter is not sexual."
Ryona video creators : Hold my clips.
Moral high ground no fun allowed is out of control 😂
...you know why they can't consent mate? CAUSE THEY AIN'T REAL!
Reminds me of a reply to the idea the "stuffed in the fridge" trope. No matter if it's Gwen Stacy or Bruce Wayne's parents, these characters can be killed if the writer wants that. These things are concepts, not real people. You can't bring them down by objectifying them, because that is all they are at best.
"fictional characters can't consent to anything" yeah tell that that to all the doujinshi
Reminds me of that black mirror episode “The Waldo Moment”
Ah yes, we wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of the major corporations by sexualizing their characters.
you have my consent to pin
Most of the problems that arise from these kinds of issues is people can’t distinguish fiction from reality.
Remember when suspension of disbelief was a thing? Fiction is not require to adhere to the real world. In fact, the purpose of fiction is get around the rules of the real world.
I support debating different opinions, it's just that, people really have to stop struggling to argue against ridiculous speeches like that lmao
Like, you don't need to make an effort to argue against it, the speech itself already argues against itself as ridiculous as it is.
Just make fun of this kind of people, save your energy to discuss and argue against important things.
I mention this before that I remember I had somewhat of a similar argument with somebody when I didn't agree to view fictional characters like they do, and I told them that I'll care when they proved that fictional characters are sentient. And, in order to win the argument, he straight up told me that they were.
I just moved on from that because if someone is willing to believe that fictional characters have sentience then there's no real argument to have, because these people either have some serious mental problems or it's so important to "own" someone in an argument that they have to pretend to be clinically insane.
They literally sound just like the politicians and media talkin about violent video games just to drum up attention or get you to care about their personal feelings.
Oh and FYI, that image you scroll down to was an old h-game called Rapelay. It was the only h-game that I know of that was literally banned in some countries for living up to its namesake. I played it before and it was interesting, but there are far more h games out there with worst themes than that so it's mild in comparison. To all those reading this, you're welcome.
"in order to win the argument, he straight up told me that they were" in the movies, this is where you run
Been online enough to know people who think like that have some very messed up fantasies.
Maques : Fiction Characters need consent & not be sexualize.
Rule 34 artists : Oh no Anyways
Plot twist: Chun Li is a Futanari. Her opponents and rivals are all literally screwed.
uhhh
@@ozhinz What? Is it really that bad?
No.please no.
@@josueveguilla9069It's a girl with a d***
@@desirefabela6421 Yes, please, yes.
Shame on you guys for objectifying…***checks notes***…objects.
And the floor never said "step on me." I still do it
"Characters can't consent"
Not a problem 😈
It's kind of ironic that a lot of people that claim fictional characters can't give consent never really respect real people's boundaries