Lawrence: Alito’s Draft Opinion Quotes A Man Who Believed In Witches

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 3. 05. 2022
  • With the Supreme Court poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell takes a look at the reasoning behind Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion and explains how it is the result of minority rule in America.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
    About: MSNBC is the premier destination for in-depth analysis of daily headlines, insightful political commentary and informed perspectives. Reaching more than 95 million households worldwide, MSNBC offers a full schedule of live news coverage, political opinions and award-winning documentary programming -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
    Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersCZcams
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
    #MSNBC #JusticeAlito #SCOTUS

Komentáře • 3,7K

  • @wally3586
    @wally3586 Před 2 lety +416

    I have lost 100% of my confidence in this Supreme Court...

    • @calmnsense
      @calmnsense Před 2 lety +2

      The deck is stacked in the SC. It has lost what balance it might have otherwise had when Trump appointed three justices, even though he knows LITTLE about the Constitution or law. Not to mention, it is hard to swallow that a President with Trump's lack of academic credentials, his history of litigation, bankruptcies and corruption in business, and his track record of being inappropriate with women, chooses life time appointments to the bench. It is an abomination of good judgement!

    • @brianwalls5399
      @brianwalls5399 Před 2 lety +33

      I have lost 100% of my confidence in this country!

    • @sofiecarr249
      @sofiecarr249 Před 2 lety +25

      LBanana republic rulings🍌 The Supreme Court should be renamed the MSC..the Macho Sh-- Court. Please 🙏 vote blue..or we lose our freedoms.

    • @barrett7893
      @barrett7893 Před 2 lety +12

      Me too 💯

    • @maryhadda8420
      @maryhadda8420 Před 2 lety +33

      I lost mine at Bush v. Gore.

  • @thomasjackson2223
    @thomasjackson2223 Před 2 lety +47

    I thought Alito was appointed to the Supreme Court, but it seems that he believes that he was appointed as Witchhunter General!
    Can we impeach this nut and remove him from the court?

  • @paulshaw5119
    @paulshaw5119 Před 2 lety +25

    This episode HAS TO BE AIRED ON EVERY TV CHANNEL every single day for at least a month ----THANK-YOU LAWRENCE O`DONNELL!!!

  • @johnroberts5637
    @johnroberts5637 Před 2 lety +48

    My mother was born the year that women got the vote. Seems maybe that's not "deeply rooted" in Americas history either. Any government that conspires to take rights away from it's citizens under any pretext, is not a government "for the people" and need not be supported. Exercise your right to vote before you lose that too.

    • @kathrynjordan8782
      @kathrynjordan8782 Před 2 lety +2

      Women can thank the original suffragettes for the 19th Amendment being passed in 1920. I know that I am and I give thanks to my Great Grandmother for being one of those people who were the original suffragettes. I can only hope that people vote in November like their lives depended upon it because it does. We can’t let the current GOP take over both houses of Congress and take away the rest of our rights

    • @amberfoster3285
      @amberfoster3285 Před 2 lety

      They're getting ready to gut voting rights too! You won't have it for long, it wouldn't surprise me if they overturn the last presidential election and say Trump won.

    • @christinesmith1803
      @christinesmith1803 Před rokem +1

      Wont us to be in their cult NO!

    • @christinesmith1803
      @christinesmith1803 Před rokem +1

      donald trump put them Judges in office so Roe versus Wade could be overturned they are bad watches,they wont us to think its Biden we no better then that.

  • @robertalker652
    @robertalker652 Před 2 lety +561

    Lawrence O'Donnell hit a journalistic Grand Slam with this reporting.

    • @hakapelika7024
      @hakapelika7024 Před 2 lety +1

      Convinced me that putting a hit on my siblings allowed me to grow up a spoiled, only child with daddy issues and no self control.

    • @brianhurtado7089
      @brianhurtado7089 Před 2 lety

      @@glengillham4629 Or if he knew ANYTHING about the Constitution...

    • @caeruleusvm7621
      @caeruleusvm7621 Před 2 lety +6

      @@glengillham4629 That is a very glib, meaningless response. Please provide actual, valid and incontrovertible detail. Failing that, I can only conclude that the liar is you.

    • @caeruleusvm7621
      @caeruleusvm7621 Před 2 lety +6

      @@brianhurtado7089 Please expand on this, as you imply great knowledge. I'm truly interested in your reasoning.

    • @brianhurtado7089
      @brianhurtado7089 Před 2 lety +2

      ​ @Caeruleus vm Hello, Caeruleus.
      Expanding on this, fully, would require (at minimum) a full-on Ted Talk... However, the expansion on that for which you asked is:
      Yes, the Constitution DOES protect many of the rights that "Larry" claims that it does not. Moreover, there is absolutely NOTHING in the Constitution that protects the "right" to abortion. Iat's not a right. I wouldn't even call it a privilege. It is a serious, moral life-choice. As such, it's not the government's business; nor is it within their power to control, in any way.
      With respect to Larry's monologue (of pedantic diatribe), the most critical of the Bill of rights to read is the tenth. Why? Because the Tenth Amendment delegates to the State, anything NOT specifically placed under the purview of the Federal Government. This is critical to the discussion, because the reversal of Roe v. Wade...
      ***DOES NOT***
      ... remove the right to an abortion. It simply puts the matter into the hands of the State (where it has always belonged). Further, those that are decrying that the Supreme court is trampling their rights have likely never read it. Much the same as a christian that makes claims about "morality" that are NEVER stated in the bible, Larry is making claims about "rights" that are absolutely incorrect and have NO support within __THE CONSTITUTION__, and he is completely wrong in nearly everything he states in this video.
      I encourage you to read the bill of rights, specifically, and then read the remaining amendments. These are the primary LIMITATIONS upon the authority of central governance of the population ... by consent of the goverened...
      Those who listen to Lawrence O'Donnell as though he is a worthwhile source of information are not seeking information or truth. They are seeking to hear their preconceived perceptions regurgitated back to them from someone with an extensive vocabulary. He is a part of the "misinformation industrial complex."
      I listen to him for a purpose delineated within the Sun Tzu:
      In order to defeat your enemy, you must fully know and understand him.
      Lawrence O'Donnell is the enemy. Whether you accept it, or not, he is your enemy, too.

  • @susanforrest128
    @susanforrest128 Před 2 lety +265

    Thank you Lawrence. Going back 400 years to control women is beyond belief!!!

    • @anthonyspolar1690
      @anthonyspolar1690 Před 2 lety +19

      @You're Gonna Hate This America IS over 400 years old, 2022 - 1607 = 415 years. The year 1607 is when the thirteen colonies were founded. Looks like you're not a math major.

    • @notchbrook556
      @notchbrook556 Před 2 lety +9

      @You're Gonna Hate This The reference is: Sir Edward Cooke wrote a definition of witches into English law in 1604; the math says 418 years. Nothing to do with America. / Not a math major either.

    • @bchollis1451
      @bchollis1451 Před 2 lety +5

      @@notchbrook556 You mean like English law, particularly 'common law', has nothing to do with current American legal system of laws (read some history please before speaking)

    • @notchbrook556
      @notchbrook556 Před 2 lety +3

      @@bchollis1451 You have misunderstood the context of these comments but it is forgivable.

    • @richardtheweaver4891
      @richardtheweaver4891 Před 2 lety +9

      True. 400 year old reference?? Unimaginable. I can't believe that a GOPper found a reference less than 1000 years old.

  • @hildy9678
    @hildy9678 Před 2 lety +78

    The best analytical speech Lawrence O'Donnell has ever made, and that is saying a lot! Please forward this speech to everyone you know, regardless of the Party they support.

  • @teslah2997
    @teslah2997 Před 2 lety +23

    As always, Lawrence O’Donnell is SPOT ON!!!

  • @thetalkingbear
    @thetalkingbear Před 2 lety +286

    The Supreme Court should not be allowed to operate in secrecy.

    • @YoursTrulyNeesh
      @YoursTrulyNeesh Před 2 lety +28

      At all! The leak was necessary, honestly

    • @Maya_Pinion
      @Maya_Pinion Před 2 lety +10

      Yes,man....👍👍👍

    • @barrett7893
      @barrett7893 Před 2 lety +9

      Amen 🙏🏿 💯

    • @Mcowling
      @Mcowling Před 2 lety

      When one half of the country has to constantly look to the supreme court to save them from the other half, maybe it is time to admit that the country is built on a broken system.

    • @user-st3wd3jb8o
      @user-st3wd3jb8o Před 2 lety

      Neither is the White House. Release all conversation between Demented Biden and Zelensky, Putin and Xi.

  • @RodolfoLRoiz
    @RodolfoLRoiz Před 2 lety +98

    The good people, those of us who believe in democracy have to vote!!!!
    Vote blue!!!
    Vote blue!!!

    • @mikerada2773
      @mikerada2773 Před 2 lety +1

      😂

    • @larrymitchell3502
      @larrymitchell3502 Před 2 lety

      More hypocrite RethugliKKKans than there are Democrats. Vote 'em out!

    • @Slo-ryde
      @Slo-ryde Před 2 lety

      It might not matter...as the GOP in red and battle ground states....is taking measures of undoing any election result that does not produce a Republican winner.....democracy as we know in this country, is coming to an end....sadly.

    • @jefftheriault3914
      @jefftheriault3914 Před 2 lety +3

      For the remainder of my days.

    • @royjames8295
      @royjames8295 Před 2 lety

      🤣

  • @nancyreese80
    @nancyreese80 Před 2 lety +262

    Thank you, Lawrence! Every person in this country needs to hear your words and your extraordinary synopsis of the Republican horrors.

    • @dokskwyr4353
      @dokskwyr4353 Před 2 lety +4

      Agreed.

    • @AtomicBuffalo
      @AtomicBuffalo Před 2 lety +1

      No one on the Right will find this argument the least bit convincing.

    • @dokskwyr4353
      @dokskwyr4353 Před 2 lety

      @@AtomicBuffalo Agreed. Fortunately they're just an ignorant, brain dead minority who likewise believe in witches. The majority just needs to make itself heard, take charge.

    • @djx7134
      @djx7134 Před 2 lety

      @@AtomicBuffalo Nobody on the right has a brain or a soul, so that's par for course.

  • @stupidd6513
    @stupidd6513 Před 2 lety +13

    If a person can be convinced that we came from dirt man and rib woman who ate magic fruit with talking snake, that person can be convinced of almost anything.

    • @stupidd6513
      @stupidd6513 Před 2 lety +1

      @@MM-kv8uu Utterly ridiculous. Although I would venture to guess that at least HALF of those who claim to don't REALLY buy into the nonsense. It is profitable.

  • @scotchbarrel4429
    @scotchbarrel4429 Před 2 lety +169

    Nominated by the most blasphemous president in history - 💯👏😂

    • @Jerome616
      @Jerome616 Před 2 lety +3

      And it actually does not matter nor is relevant as the argument against the law has nothing to do with Religion…
      🙄

    • @Nobddy
      @Nobddy Před 2 lety +2

      @@Jerome616 Right. That’s why the death penalty is illegal. Wait…

    • @Jerome616
      @Jerome616 Před 2 lety +5

      @@Nobddy exactly, we are not a theocracy nor could we become one thanks to the *drum roll*
      CONSTITUTION!!! lol

    • @Jerome616
      @Jerome616 Před 2 lety +1

      @@gregferguson7737 yep and that was wrong.

    • @nacarreira777
      @nacarreira777 Před 2 lety +15

      Term limits for everyone....SCOTUS included.

  • @jackmeehof2440
    @jackmeehof2440 Před 2 lety +93

    “The purpose of religion is to keep the poor people from killing the rich” …… Napoleon Bonaparte

  • @siobhan2578
    @siobhan2578 Před 2 lety +33

    Lawrence, you are an eloquent, brilliant commentator. Please don’t ever stop educating us, and sharing your wisdom.

  • @GretchenDawntreader
    @GretchenDawntreader Před 2 lety +8

    Also Trump would only have gotten to appoint 2 justices if not for the malfeasance of Mitch McConnell refusing for over a year to process Obama's nominee, holding the seat vacant in the hopes he could hand it to a Republican President. He got his wish and I'm still not sure why McConnell suffered no consequence for refusing to do his job.

  • @buckeyechuck4064
    @buckeyechuck4064 Před 2 lety +296

    So the guy who says it was "wrong from the beginning", didn't say that during his confirmation hearings. Liars all of them.

    • @simonwhite8836
      @simonwhite8836 Před 2 lety

      The only person who told the truth in this is Trump, in one of his incompetent impulsive blurts he announced the justice to replace RBG would be picked by him to ensure Roe is overturned.

    • @maryhadda8420
      @maryhadda8420 Před 2 lety +1

      They are republicans. Nothing else can be expected of them.

    • @vinrico6704
      @vinrico6704 Před 2 lety

      You wouldnt know a liar if Brandon was sitting on your porch telling you he was the grand poo bah of the water buffalo lodge

    • @amgguy4319
      @amgguy4319 Před 2 lety

      Yes, true, but remember, Evangelicals Love Liars. That's one of the main reasons they cherish Trump, well, and for his Adultery with Hookers.

    • @randal_gibbons
      @randal_gibbons Před 2 lety +25

      @@vinrico6704 your ignorance is showing Vinny.

  • @margaretchant5725
    @margaretchant5725 Před 2 lety +256

    OMG! Lawrence you are absolutely correct. Bless you! Thank you!

    • @milferdjones2573
      @milferdjones2573 Před 2 lety

      Starting with massive lies about the founders and then lying by claiming the US is a combined country not a Federation not a good start. We actually have to get rid of the States and change to a unified country if we want to change that and let the States that don't want to do that go. But liberals must make up out minds do we oppose local autonomy or not.

    • @hakapelika7024
      @hakapelika7024 Před 2 lety

      Yes. We are much better off aborting our poor and importing cheaper, lighter colored poor....

  • @valeriesuttonpayne7413
    @valeriesuttonpayne7413 Před 2 lety +69

    Powerful delivery. All truth. That’s what is so chilling. “We aren’t living in a democracy.” OMG! Heart stopping.

  • @skarasik4021
    @skarasik4021 Před 2 lety +6

    Free speech for corporations is not an enumerated right in the Constitution, and yet we have Citizen’s United. This court has lost all credibility.

  • @stevejohnson2321
    @stevejohnson2321 Před 2 lety +294

    God bless Lawrence O'Donnell for his quiet passion and reasoned certitude.

    • @Maya_Pinion
      @Maya_Pinion Před 2 lety +6

      ✌️

    • @vinrico6704
      @vinrico6704 Před 2 lety

      Hes a horrible animal who defends child castration and murdering inocent children before they are even born... You are also a horrible animal defending him.

    • @phoarey
      @phoarey Před 2 lety

      God exists only in the minds of victims of childhood brainwashing.

    • @pdcdesign9632
      @pdcdesign9632 Před 2 lety

      Is that the same god who advises these conservative religious Republicans judges to eliminate a woman's right to choose 🤔 😳
      You see that. Religion poisons EVERYTHING.

    • @edvh88
      @edvh88 Před 2 lety +2

      For real. He’s one of the only I can listen to.

  • @lissamac8513
    @lissamac8513 Před 2 lety +167

    its time for republicans to feel the wrath of Americans who like the freedoms we have grown to know. time to vote them out!

    • @ajlacostewm
      @ajlacostewm Před 2 lety

      Democrats have ran this country the majority of the time , each time they gave themselves more power ,if you think Republicans have more power you can thank Democrats for giving the government that power .
      Democrats are taking your freedom and you're too blind to see.

    • @lucasnkwentamo976
      @lucasnkwentamo976 Před 2 lety +3

      Excellent journalism.

    • @kosmokritikos9299
      @kosmokritikos9299 Před 2 lety

      The political system in the US. is rigged to require an ultra-super majority to override the authority of the ruling oligarchs that pull the strings of the Republican party. If the day ever arrives when that ultra-super majority is attained, they will abolish voting altogether. Those ruling oligarchs do not care one way or the other about abortion, for it is neither an asset or a liability for them, but they do want the votes of the anti-choice zealots who are no more than a quarter of the population, but will eventually have their way on 100% of the policy. They will not be stopped until they are stopped.

    • @reginafetty6374
      @reginafetty6374 Před 2 lety +9

      @@votive3946 the only true 100% birth control is abstinence or to have a woman's ovaries removed or a vasectomy. Other birth control is flawed and doesn't always work. If a person is married do you think the marriage will last very long when practicing abstinence?

    • @barrett7893
      @barrett7893 Před 2 lety +2

      Amen 🙏🏿 💯

  • @kesart8378
    @kesart8378 Před 2 lety +35

    I am old enough to remember American commentators declaring--prior to JFK'S nomination and election--that Americans would never elect a Roman Catholic-- particularly of Irish ancestry--to the office of the President of the United States. So how did America arrive at a place where Catholics constitute a super-majority of the Supreme Court?
    While ideally this should not be a concern, the fact that Trump clearly chose his three Scotus nominees to please--and cement the support he receives from--Evangelicals, as well as other Christian conservatives, and because all three have stressed the need to respect "the Exercise Clause" (the American constitutional protection of the free exercise of one's religion), at times in opposition to the state's right to ensure the common good, makes it a concern.

  • @1stshepherd
    @1stshepherd Před 2 lety +39

    The constitution is like an honorable and gentleman's agreement. This excludes the entire gop.

  • @rickrose5377
    @rickrose5377 Před 2 lety +322

    A devout Catholic and a decent man, Mario Cuomo's attitude toward reproductive rights was this. He said that although he was personally opposed to abortion, he acknowledged that it was an issue over which decent, well-meaning people might disagree. And he believed it was not his right (nor the government's) to make that decision for other people.

    • @Slo-ryde
      @Slo-ryde Před 2 lety +46

      And this is the crystalized truth....even though he ( or his religious beliefs ) rejected it....he knew that he had no right to impose his beliefs on others ( unlike the right wing Christian sects of today)....because from a Biblical standpoint, we are not responsible for the salvation of other humans.

    • @Eyeluvlola
      @Eyeluvlola Před 2 lety +13

      Exactly how I feel.

    • @xjarheadjohnson
      @xjarheadjohnson Před 2 lety +23

      _“The study of theology, as it stands in Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authorities; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion...and as this is the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.”_
      *― Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason (1794)*

    • @rickrose5377
      @rickrose5377 Před 2 lety +10

      @@xjarheadjohnson
      Yeah, Paine was a deist, as were most of the founding fathers. This was a common point of view in the late 18th century -- the French revolutionaries, of course, were understandably anti-Church -- they saw it as a cynical instrument of amoral power. Which it has often been. But not always and everywhere. This is was a common feeling during the enlightenment, and though it has often been true of institutional Church power, it's profoundly ignorant of the broader history of religion.
      I mean, I like Bill Maher, but he's a complete ignoramus about some subjects and doesn't even realize it.

    • @xjarheadjohnson
      @xjarheadjohnson Před 2 lety

      @@rickrose5377 That's right.
      If those men were alive today, long after Darwin & the light-years of knowledge we have gained about the Universe, (pun intended) I would bet in Vegas they would all be atheist's.
      Bill Maher? Who give a $h!t? What does he have to do with our "modern" 21st Century courts still clinging to ancient religious myth & folklore?

  • @xelamercedes
    @xelamercedes Před 2 lety +182

    The irony is so keen it hurts to think of it. "Deeply rooted in this Nation's history" Alito writes. CRT seeks, among other things, to take a look at the deep roots of the nation's history...

    • @johnsmith9903
      @johnsmith9903 Před 2 lety +11

      i'd add that if they want to talk about the constitution tehn "Well regulated militia " was defined. and Biden could ask all to sign up and register or they could be locked up for treason.

    • @russellsnodgrass9374
      @russellsnodgrass9374 Před 2 lety +9

      @You're Gonna Hate This you're gonna love this, we can't talk about both? Argument seems a little like saying, why you walking down the street AND chewing gum? I don't know, because I can.

    • @KingoftheJuice18
      @KingoftheJuice18 Před 2 lety +13

      @You're Gonna Hate This Because Alito wrote the draft opinion they're talking about, maybe?

    • @tripkings547
      @tripkings547 Před 2 lety

      It was the Justices that made the Roe v Wade ruling in the first place that said abortion was deeply rooted in the nations history, which they then reasoned since they believed this to be the case, abortion should be legal (along with other reasons)
      The current Justices are merely attacking what the Roe v Wade ruling said itself. They are not saying things not deeply rooted in the nations history aren't rights. Roe v Wade made that claim. The current Justices are saying that is not true, therefore Roe V Wade was ruled wrongly because Roe V Wade said abortion was deeply rooted in the nations history to justify the Roe ruling itself.
      Make no mistake, the democrats know this, they just don't care. They know most people aren't going to read the draft, so they can pick parts of it to frame the draft in the most negative light possible.

    • @KingoftheJuice18
      @KingoftheJuice18 Před 2 lety +12

      @@tripkings547 No, that's wrong. Roe doesn't say that "abortion rights" are deeply rooted in the nation's history. It says that the principles of privacy, personal autonomy, self-definition, the right to choose how and when to procreate, and so forth--which undergird the right to have an abortion--are deeply rooted in the nation's history. Make no mistake, the Alito ruling is an atavistic, self-serving, legal literalism which threatens every right and every protection which is not explicitly stated word for word in the Constitution.

  • @truegrit7697
    @truegrit7697 Před 2 lety +19

    I wish this could be broadcast into every home and office in America!

  • @ikegreen3034
    @ikegreen3034 Před 2 lety +23

    What can parents tell their child if a child wants to know what the Constitution means to the child? Thank you, Lawrence for this insightful message. In the land of the free and the home of the brave, the historical origins of eradication of witchcraft is now a part of the reason for the eradication of a woman’s right to decide whether to have a child. Not medical reasons or scientific reasons or psychological reasons or legal reasons. The eradication of witchcraft still matters to somebody in 2022?!?!🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐

  • @Sticky-Situation
    @Sticky-Situation Před 2 lety +99

    Expand the courts now! Pack the S out of them. Hold these judges who lied under oath accountable.

  • @TallDiana
    @TallDiana Před 2 lety +192

    So the Supreme Court justices have privacy, but WE don’t. 🙄

    • @danielasmus447
      @danielasmus447 Před 2 lety +7

      I know right! I killed some stranger in the PRIVACY of my own home and the police are totally not respecting my 4th amendment rights! Such an injustice..😢

    • @isthattrue1083
      @isthattrue1083 Před 2 lety +8

      4th and 5th amendments are supposed to protect privacy from the government.

    • @isthattrue1083
      @isthattrue1083 Před 2 lety +2

      @Hunters Laptop uh it completely does. In fact, the 4th and 5th amendments protect privacy, but not totally.

    • @isthattrue1083
      @isthattrue1083 Před 2 lety +12

      They'll say whatever they want it to mean and misinterpret it to suit their desires.

    • @jaimepatena7372
      @jaimepatena7372 Před 2 lety +7

      @Hunters Laptop The Constitution is an outline...not a menu.

  • @andyp91
    @andyp91 Před 2 lety +40

    Beautifully researched and explained. Lawrence is becoming a rock star.

  • @chep5958
    @chep5958 Před 2 lety +15

    This is an incredible piece. Thank you for putting the ridiculousness of this decision so plainly for everyone to see.

  • @schweik2145
    @schweik2145 Před 2 lety +386

    Some of the best commentary by anybody that I’ve heard in a long time

    • @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491
      @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 Před 2 lety +12

      a masterpiece and rare The Ethical American..

    • @SuperScratch1
      @SuperScratch1 Před 2 lety +11

      Indeed. Sadly the people who should listen to O'Donnell do not and will not.

    • @timl.b.2095
      @timl.b.2095 Před 2 lety +12

      Yes! I hardly ever look at this channel, but this makes me want more of O'Donnell.

    • @schweik2145
      @schweik2145 Před 2 lety +2

      @@votive3946 thanks

    • @colinstapleton7795
      @colinstapleton7795 Před 2 lety

      @@votive3946 Tucker Carlson is a fascist, anybody who believes in him believes in fascism.

  • @LJ_nowandalways
    @LJ_nowandalways Před 2 lety +29

    Go read the third amendment. If the founding fathers didn't believe in the right to privacy, there's little point to include that amendment. Roe v. Wade stands on SOLID constitutional reasoning.

  • @edvh88
    @edvh88 Před 2 lety +4

    Thank you for your nuance, Lawrence. It’s so important to question these phrases and really examine what they mean.

  • @rafaelvelez1253
    @rafaelvelez1253 Před 2 lety +9

    Have not, can not conceive this to be better presented in a more reasoned, substantiated and eloquent way. Well done!

  • @jamesoconnor9042
    @jamesoconnor9042 Před 2 lety +61

    Does Alito know that the Constitution also doesn’t mention Alito? If destroying America is the job at hand, then Alito is the tool. ❤️

    • @lsubrown34
      @lsubrown34 Před 2 lety +1

      He shall be tried for treason.

  • @debshaw680
    @debshaw680 Před 2 lety +70

    Lawrence isn’t allowed to retire, ever. He had better be doing news from beyond the grave. He’s the last bastion of common sense and fearlessness.

    • @doneestoner9945
      @doneestoner9945 Před 2 lety +7

      I love 💜him

    • @SEVINN567
      @SEVINN567 Před 2 lety +5

      YAZZZZZZZZ!!!!! Love him!!!

    • @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491
      @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 Před 2 lety +3

      lawrence has graduated: America's Guardian Angel kudos please to the angel-legion staff that put this Evidence of Critical Thinking together..

    • @Slo-ryde
      @Slo-ryde Před 2 lety +3

      .......👍........

  • @edward6259
    @edward6259 Před 2 lety +8

    Thank you Lawrence for such a powerful voice for our democracy... this speech must be put in the history books! .

  • @BeatlesFanSonia
    @BeatlesFanSonia Před 2 lety +8

    There were also penalties for giving woman pain reducing meds during birth! Do we want to go back to those days?

    • @Sarah-said
      @Sarah-said Před 2 lety +1

      Some men would be more than fine with that.

  • @michelez715
    @michelez715 Před 2 lety +67

    Passionate and principled - respect to you, Mr O'Donnell.

  • @erinmcdonald7781
    @erinmcdonald7781 Před 2 lety +400

    Your eloquent, incisive commentary hits home, again. Truly appreciate your journalistic integrity and not waiting to publish a book to tell us necessary truths! 💜✊

    • @thomasreaves588
      @thomasreaves588 Před 2 lety

      Witches are real!

    • @jamesvonborcke
      @jamesvonborcke Před 2 lety +17

      @@thomasreaves588 Not the kind that Bible-believing primitive was looking for; Those were figments of myth-induced ignorance and paranoia.

    • @nebtheweb8885
      @nebtheweb8885 Před 2 lety +4

      @@thomasreaves588 Only in your wet religious dreams.

    • @mytruecrimelibrary
      @mytruecrimelibrary Před 2 lety +1

      @@nebtheweb8885 😂😂😂👍

    • @dokskwyr4353
      @dokskwyr4353 Před 2 lety +1

      Right on. Amen.

  • @hollybug-76542
    @hollybug-76542 Před 2 lety +17

    The Hale Doctrine is absolutely disgusting.. the fact he would refer to Hale and that our Justice System has used this Doctrine is beyond egregious.

  • @ChemSurvival
    @ChemSurvival Před 2 lety +38

    "If you are using 'deeply rooted in this nation's history' as the basis for what... is.... just, then you are morally lost." Indeed, this is American exceptionalism at its absolute WORST! Supreme court opinions are not always simple, but that little nugget of truth resonates no matter what the circumstances. Shame on anyone (even a Supreme Court Justice) who would use that sentiment as even a fraction of a justification for anything.

    • @oliver_twistor
      @oliver_twistor Před 2 lety +5

      Also, conservatism in a nutshell. They would be happy if time suddenly stopped and we could all live a short, ignorant, filthy and disease-ridden life some time during the Middle Ages. Conservatives hold it to be true that everything was better in the past, the further back, the better.

  • @rodiculous9464
    @rodiculous9464 Před 2 lety +49

    He's quoting 15th century England? Well I do believe a war was fought to be free from them. 🤔

    • @mrb.5610
      @mrb.5610 Před 2 lety +6

      Abortion is legal in the UK.
      Maybe fighting that war wasn't such a good idea.

    • @respectfulwisdom9405
      @respectfulwisdom9405 Před 2 lety +2

      15th Century England committed genocide.

    • @DonCarter720
      @DonCarter720 Před 2 lety

      War is exactly what white nationalist want. They push as far as they can because they know the threat of war helps them get away with it. Like putin is doing with nukes.

    • @mrb.5610
      @mrb.5610 Před 2 lety +2

      @@respectfulwisdom9405 Which country/civilisation *doesn't* have a few skeletons in their cupboard ?
      The real shame would be to not learn from history and try to be better.

    • @ghost8178
      @ghost8178 Před 2 lety +2

      @@respectfulwisdom9405 yeah so did Americans to the natives

  • @luciannbrewer2441
    @luciannbrewer2441 Před 2 lety +167

    Best of best reporting on this topic!!!! Thanks to all involved! I’m almost in tears. About time these words were spoken on National News.

  • @deidreanne4768
    @deidreanne4768 Před 2 lety +4

    I’m nominating you the best news commentator on this whole topic. Every single clip I’ve watched so far, you have shot it out the park. Keep it up

  • @cherylalt101
    @cherylalt101 Před 2 lety +14

    Well said Lawrence! That was an unbelievably important and informative 12:30 minutes. Thank you!

  • @lspthrattan
    @lspthrattan Před 2 lety +192

    It's way past time they started to seriously examine ALL the justices currently serving on the Supreme Court, with a view to whether they have committed perjury during their confirmation hearings. ALL of them, just to be sure there's no political bias. Just review their recorded answers and statements, verify them, and indict or not, as needed.

    • @bonnie43uk
      @bonnie43uk Před 2 lety

      Absolutely Julia... They lied UNDER OATH. ..these are the highest judges in the land. Scum.

    • @mkuhnactual
      @mkuhnactual Před 2 lety

      To what end? To give them a fine they'll happily pay? There is only one mechanism for punishing justices: impeachment. And the votes aren't there because of our undemocratic senate.

    • @greeceuranusputin
      @greeceuranusputin Před 2 lety +6

      The problem here is that perjury doesn't apply to opinion, they can just say they changed their mind, at least when it comes to them saying they'd uphold Roe.

    • @brandxmuddy3614
      @brandxmuddy3614 Před 2 lety +3

      Whoa man, what a silly thing you said there kiddo. Please, please please leave the thinking to the adults. Go do something useful and for the sake of our nation, I’m asking that all simple-minded people, like yourself, not ever vote, have children or be in charge of anything or anybody. Thank you.

    • @eddybrevet6816
      @eddybrevet6816 Před 2 lety +1

      Darkness lies disguised as light

  • @batgurrl
    @batgurrl Před 2 lety +50

    Lawrence, I’m watching your actual show now. Your commentary is superb and on point. These are such disturbing times and your fine journalism helps me cope a bit.

  • @c.t.murray3632
    @c.t.murray3632 Před 2 lety +3

    Lawrence O'Donnell thank you very much for this great information. Keep talking about it , this country has to learn the deficiencies of our democracy.

  • @g.g.matuga4986
    @g.g.matuga4986 Před 2 lety +4

    “Burst of verbal dementia,” great line.

  • @portmantologist
    @portmantologist Před 2 lety +96

    Incidentally, there were discussions about invoking the 25th amendment on Reagan because of his cognitive decline that turned out to be due to Alzheimer's.

    • @Maya_Pinion
      @Maya_Pinion Před 2 lety +1

      And,they luv to pick pick on Joe ......Reagan was"duh" and they hid it,Nancy ,then,was the power,and u know if.✌️

    • @maryhadda8420
      @maryhadda8420 Před 2 lety

      Reagan always was stupid.

    • @erikehlert
      @erikehlert Před 2 lety +1

      Relevance?

    • @russellsnodgrass9374
      @russellsnodgrass9374 Před 2 lety +4

      Alzheimers is cognitive decline. In case there was some question about that.

    • @portmantologist
      @portmantologist Před 2 lety +7

      @@erikehlert Lawrence draws a lot of parallels between Trump and Reagan, and stated that there was serious discussion about using the 25th to remove Trump, so it's worth pointing out that the same was true of Reagan, though a lot less publicly.

  • @always-ask-why
    @always-ask-why Před 2 lety +145

    Holy Camoly! This was a powerful speech full of meaningful truths!

  • @rissabiagi1570
    @rissabiagi1570 Před 2 lety +5

    This is, by far, one of the best news reports I have ever seen. So well done!

  • @darttoyou1398
    @darttoyou1398 Před 2 lety +5

    "With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion."
    Professor Steven Weinberg

  • @twylaingerson5945
    @twylaingerson5945 Před 2 lety +192

    Lawrence, all your programs are sooo valuable, but this one should be transcribed into our classroom and history books.

    • @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491
      @jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 Před 2 lety +6

      absolutely Abe Lincoln Top Quality

    • @borman2426
      @borman2426 Před 2 lety +7

      Fact.

    • @jaywalters5255
      @jaywalters5255 Před 2 lety

      @@jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 even Lincoln said "had it been up to him, he'd send all blacks back to Africa." And all the time knowing all so- called blacks were not from Africa but right here in "Turtle Island".

  • @ccole1255
    @ccole1255 Před 2 lety +80

    Thank you for reminding us of the PROFOUNDLY UNDEMOCRATIC NATURE OF THE US SENATE.

    • @charlesasmith7836
      @charlesasmith7836 Před 2 lety +7

      Indeed it's sickening 😠😔

    • @GermanConquistador08
      @GermanConquistador08 Před 2 lety

      You literally vote on them - Abortion is evil, evil has no rights.

    • @phillipbradshaw4006
      @phillipbradshaw4006 Před 2 lety +3

      That’s because we live in a republic.

    • @gladtobefreeagain7375
      @gladtobefreeagain7375 Před 2 lety +3

      The framers of our Constitution knew & approved of the "undemocratic meaning disproportionate" nature of the Senate. They knew tiny Rhode Island would have same # of Senators as New York. It was to offset (like English House of Lords) the proportionate "democratic " nature of House of Representatives. The Senate is currently worthless because of its self imposed rules including the filibuster & 60 vote requirement designed to give just one Senator or a minority of senators the power to hold up legislation for all. This plus corrupt campaign funding has brought us to this low point for both Senate & SCOTUS. Same root problem really.

    • @gladtobefreeagain7375
      @gladtobefreeagain7375 Před 2 lety +1

      The simplest solution does not require a Constitutional amendment & it fixes Electoral College until it can be removed formally. Make House of Representatives truly proportionate (as in 1 man 1 vote) AGAIN by striking down the law called Apportionment Act of 1929 which limits Congress to 435 Representatives. Peg every seat to population tied to the smallest district in the U.S. Use US Census to adjust every 10 years. In 2020 census, smallest would be Wyoming's sole congressional district (currently Liz Cheney's seat) representing 581,000 people. Congress would grow 30% from 435 to 567 overnight to fairly represent 329.5 million people AND number of ELECTORAL COLLEGE votes would also expand 30% to MATCH each states delegation. Thus, Californians would have a true proportionate voice in electing President again instead of only 70% of their fair share based on population.

  • @fastbow9
    @fastbow9 Před 2 lety +28

    You defined trump perfectly “Uneducated in all things and doesn’t know who Christianity was named after”.

  • @Clovis_Rose
    @Clovis_Rose Před 2 lety +3

    This amazingly well done! Thank you for saying so well what NEEDS to be said. Thank you for using your platform to expose this horrific attack on our democracy!

  • @mecster2121
    @mecster2121 Před 2 lety +140

    Alito also invoked a 13th century treatise about abortion in the leaked draft! How many women had any say in these historic writings?! It's insane.

    • @mattsmith1126
      @mattsmith1126 Před 2 lety +9

      Yes the logic is really bad

    • @bcalvert321
      @bcalvert321 Před 2 lety

      80 million killed and you don't care. Going along with murder makes you an accomplice.

    • @GermanConquistador08
      @GermanConquistador08 Před 2 lety +4

      Evil has no rights - Abortion will be outlawed.

    • @proggravezilla4175
      @proggravezilla4175 Před 2 lety +5

      It is so unfair! How many wymen had anything to say in what this lug white-man Alito wrote?

    • @jonbongjovi1869
      @jonbongjovi1869 Před 2 lety

      DID YOU JUST SAY THAT.....PEOPLE WHO LOUDLY ADMIT THEY BELIEVE IN VIRGIN BIRTHS and INVISIBLE SKY DADDY might be insane.
      YOU ARE MORE INSANE:
      YOU TOLERATED THIS LITERAL INSANITY and Normalized these sick super-nazis.
      RELIGION is the most EVIL and murderous force in history!
      AND YOU ALL JUST SHRUGGED!

  • @Spyderredtoo
    @Spyderredtoo Před 2 lety +133

    Alto probably couldn’t find any more recent authority for his morality.

    • @shanejohns7901
      @shanejohns7901 Před 2 lety

      The religious programming causes their brains to constantly believe that the perfected existence was back in the past somewhere, because the Garden of Eden story is in the mythological past. Getting right wingers to believe that the 'Best is yet to come!' is difficult, despite their rather silly and heavily ridiculed recent attempt at branding it.

    • @EricRoberts2112
      @EricRoberts2112 Před 2 lety +15

      What morality?

    • @thetruthserum2816
      @thetruthserum2816 Před 2 lety +1

      Barbarism in full display in the 21'st Century. They'd claim that the Earth was flat if they could get away with it...

  • @hVF8KZuQPeCc8u
    @hVF8KZuQPeCc8u Před 2 lety +5

    Lawrence O'Donnell has been a long time fav for me since first watching him on the McLaughlin Group a long time ago. Just want to express my appreciation for his honest, candid and penetrating journalism that gives voice to many of us progressives/liberals/malcontents. He definitely demonstrates the ability to be hard hitting without the rancor and obnoxiousness of so many political and media figures of the day. GroupMcLaughlin Group

  • @tysonp5245
    @tysonp5245 Před 2 lety +5

    The GOP lives in a world of blissful ignorance & contradiction

  • @lamplighter5545
    @lamplighter5545 Před 2 lety +51

    The principle of judicial review isn't mentioned in the Constitution either. The Supreme Court gave themselves that right in Marbury v. Madison.

    • @navilluscire2567
      @navilluscire2567 Před 2 lety

      That's what I was thinking too! He (Alito) by his own STUPID 'logic' would basically render the Supreme Court ineffectual, pointless, a buch of empty tittles. I mean *"judicial review"* is as you pointed out is NOT mentioned anywhere in the constitution and is literally their *ace in the hole,* it's what makes them, the so called "SCOTUS" even remotely important as a branch of government.

    • @bonnylopez198
      @bonnylopez198 Před 2 lety +3

      Thank you for making that excellent point!!

  • @sachung
    @sachung Před 2 lety +72

    Alito and his colleagues should not be allowed to travel any more as it’s NOT clearly stated in the Constitution!

    • @TheLadyrose01
      @TheLadyrose01 Před 2 lety +3

      Especially on our dimes and cents

    • @TheChopf26
      @TheChopf26 Před 2 lety +1

      The right to travel is definitely in the Constitution......thanks for showing us that you've never even read the Constitution.

    • @alkazar625
      @alkazar625 Před 2 lety

      Your statement is like saying "The constitution doesn't say you can breathe so that would mean that no one can breathe". Like stfu. The SCOTUS can't just pull random rights out of thin air. It is Congress's job to amend the constitution, not the Supreme Court.
      Jeez. You people are so inept and immoral.

    • @rudeboyjohn3483
      @rudeboyjohn3483 Před 2 lety

      @@TheChopf26 And because I know you don't actually give a single fuxk about what it actually says, and will just probably "report" my comment so no one sees the proof of you being completely and utterlly fuxking wrong: I'll paste the entire Constitution for you I know you've never read it, because of course you didn't.

    • @rudeboyjohn3483
      @rudeboyjohn3483 Před 2 lety +1

      @@TheChopf26 lol yep, you reported it. Typical lol

  • @KingoftheJuice18
    @KingoftheJuice18 Před 2 lety +18

    When I was growing up, I used to think the U.S. governmental design was a work of genius. Tragically, over the last 40 years or so, its flaws and fissures have been exposed more and more by unscrupulous men and women and wealthy interests.

  • @patcomerford5596
    @patcomerford5596 Před 2 lety +11

    Excellent monologue!
    Six Roman Catholics on the Supreme Court - OMG!
    Jesus, America is well on the way to becoming a fully-fledged extreme right wing nation!

    • @loxodoncyclotis1823
      @loxodoncyclotis1823 Před 2 lety +1

      The six include Sotomayor who's clearly not right wing. Also Roberts apparently doesn't support Alito's opinion. This court is definitely extreme though.

    • @patcomerford5596
      @patcomerford5596 Před 2 lety

      @@loxodoncyclotis1823 O.K., it is five extreme right wing Roman Catholics sitting on the bench of the S.C.

  • @chomp54321
    @chomp54321 Před 2 lety +16

    I applaud you for saying out loud what is so very apparent for people who care about democracy: the U.S. is the most undemocratic democracy in the world. It is a shame, really.

  • @wat146
    @wat146 Před 2 lety +190

    I don’t think safe abortions were a thing in the founding fathers’ time.
    With Alito’s logic, the second amendment only permits muskets.

    • @davezad
      @davezad Před 2 lety +23

      It also does not include a supreme court. If we're being "originalists" and all.

    • @justinbremer2281
      @justinbremer2281 Před 2 lety +8

      I dunno, it might allow flintlock pistols, too...
      /s

    • @bobbun9630
      @bobbun9630 Před 2 lety +15

      Safe by modern standards, no, but then lots of medicine at that time was unsafe (and ineffective!) by today's standards. Abortion was available, though, and generally legal in early pregnancy. Alito is wrong on the "deeply rooted in American history" claim. It's actually blanket bans on abortion that are not deeply rooted. Most of them didn't come about until the post civil war era.

    • @moosepocalypse6500
      @moosepocalypse6500 Před 2 lety +4

      Imagine robbing a bank at musket-point...
      I have one shot, who's getting it? 😅

    • @wtaylor774
      @wtaylor774 Před 2 lety

      🤣🤣

  • @annmckee7119
    @annmckee7119 Před 2 lety +9

    Electoral college votes should be assigned by percentage of votes cast in a state, not winner take all. Republicans might have a hard time ever reaching the White House again but after what they've done, I could live with them having to struggle a little.

  • @JabroneyDirt
    @JabroneyDirt Před 2 lety +4

    Man, Just wanna say what a privilege it is to listen to Mr O'Donnell once again playing the role of America's Voice of truth, ;laying it all out as plain as can be and showing just how corrupt the GOP has become. The Next Brokaw in the flesh.. Thank you sir. You are a True Patriot.

  • @bidenschef7462
    @bidenschef7462 Před 2 lety +37

    Separation of CHURCH and STATE

    • @dan_hitchman007
      @dan_hitchman007 Před 2 lety

      Just as most of the Founders wanted. They saw the danger in a theocracy.

  • @alonsonavarro2126
    @alonsonavarro2126 Před 2 lety +17

    Well said and done. Thank you I wish all Americans saw it that way, but the republican party's base are blinded by grievance, anger , and lies, by their leadership. So sad for America. Vote blue in 22' 💙💙💙💙💙

  • @never2yield20
    @never2yield20 Před 2 lety +4

    Brilliant absolutely Brilliant Lawrence O’Donnell. Bravo. This needs to change or else it is back to the dark ages with Alito leading the way.

  • @Anonymous47
    @Anonymous47 Před 2 lety +3

    Thank you Lawerence for articulating better than I could on women's privacy! He has articulated about Minority deciding for the country with two presidents that lost popular vote decing the fate of women's right to choose, better than any lawyer could! He articulated how flawed our democracy is and the democratic process is better than an political scientist could. Salute, with tears.

  • @Dan-ud8hz
    @Dan-ud8hz Před 2 lety +369

    “The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.”
    ― Niels Bohr

    • @deborahedelman2659
      @deborahedelman2659 Před 2 lety +7

      👍👍👍

    • @m8hackr60
      @m8hackr60 Před 2 lety +8

      Excellent and fitting quote!

    • @djl5634
      @djl5634 Před 2 lety

      Exactly killing humans should be illegal. The right to life is above all rights. The baby is not part of the mother. And if u don't want children get sterilized

    • @bcalvert321
      @bcalvert321 Před 2 lety

      Biden, and MSNBC never tell the truth.

    • @joanfrellburg4901
      @joanfrellburg4901 Před 2 lety +5

      And a little poison in the right place. -- Pootin

  • @Lollolune
    @Lollolune Před 2 lety +66

    Robert’s words calling for the investigation: how incredibly ironic 🤦🏻‍♀️

    • @Mcowling
      @Mcowling Před 2 lety +3

      The true irony is Alito saying the constitution makes no mention of abortion and the only mention of it in the Bible is a set of instructions on how to perform one.

  • @bobscherer5343
    @bobscherer5343 Před 2 lety +1

    Truly amazing journalism! Thank you for your integrity and intelligence!!

  • @dmgranger90
    @dmgranger90 Před 2 lety +9

    It's the typical conservative mindset, Lawrence. They only recognize power, specifically the power they themselves wield. They are also incapable of viewing anything from a perspective other than their own, unless that perspective is somehow in agreeance with views they already hold. When these two traits of only recognizing your own power and narcissism meet, it usually results in decisions or judgements being made that are in total disregard to precedent or previous policy; based on nothing other than the fact that they now hold the position of power to make said decision. This has shown to be the case time and time again by conservative judges being more than willing to ignore precedent in favor of political gain.
    In Trump's case, I'm guessing it was caused by malignant narcissism and was more egocentric. In the case of the Justices, it seems to be narcissism in the form of religious fanaticism. Both are still narcissistic in nature and overcompensate for an inferiority complex, but instead Trump's need of immediate gratification through self benefit and constant praise of others, they appear to actually believe that they are "doing God's work." and are soothing their need to feel righteous in the eyes of invsible their Skydaddy. Refer back to the text messages on Meadow's phone for a plethora of examples of other extremists.
    This is dangerous, Lawrence. This is delusion. Within a generation, we will have a theocracy and probably a dictatorial style government. Journalists need to stop playing neutral and take a stance by asking the hard questions to their politicians. Neutral does nothing but make it easier for the oppressor to oppress.

  • @tbaldh
    @tbaldh Před 2 lety +82

    Well said Lawrence, it is assuring to hear these egregious constitutional flaws commented from a white man.

    • @Maya_Pinion
      @Maya_Pinion Před 2 lety +10

      Women of all ethnicities thank u this day Lawrence!

    • @christianhume7618
      @christianhume7618 Před 2 lety +5

      Yes, Lawrence has an outstanding record of fair commentary on matters of race in America.

  • @renejean2523
    @renejean2523 Před 2 lety +27

    The reference to Donald Trump's "latest burst of verbal dementia". LOL 😄
    We love you, Lawrence!

  • @JK-jl1bf
    @JK-jl1bf Před 2 lety +3

    These are Human Rights!!! They don’t need to be in a Constitutional Document to be something that no one can take away.

  • @pupuleknk
    @pupuleknk Před 2 lety +4

    Maybe I've missed something but I think having mentioned that abortion is not mentioned in the constitution is more relevant to the argument against this opinion. I seemed to remember that the ninth amendment states, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Seems to me that the case precedent retained the right to the people, which they are now trying to deny them. I am not a lawyer or specifically a student of constitutional law so maybe someone else can explain how they feel this is not an important consideration.

  • @dougthomson1566
    @dougthomson1566 Před 2 lety +116

    Brilliant commentary Lawrence, brilliant.

    • @coreyham3753
      @coreyham3753 Před 2 lety +8

      Lawrence is 100% right on with his commentary.

  • @Iquey
    @Iquey Před 2 lety +260

    Why is the SUPREME™ court suddenly so concerned about their own privacy, but don't care about any common woman or AFAB person's privacy?

    • @charlesasmith7836
      @charlesasmith7836 Před 2 lety +20

      Hypocrites BIGLY 😠

    • @louisecollard2320
      @louisecollard2320 Před 2 lety +11

      What Lawrence states is that the constitution doesn't say a person has a right to privacy, hmm. Well if that's the case, one can say that about every move, action any and everyone makes. Does executive privilege come under that decision.

    • @telebubba5527
      @telebubba5527 Před 2 lety +11

      Cause they don't want their crimes to become public.

    • @vynidalopes251
      @vynidalopes251 Před 2 lety +3

      Great question! Would like to know the answer to that

    • @ytsks
      @ytsks Před 2 lety +9

      @@louisecollard2320 Operative word is "explicitly". In normal countires natural rights do not need to be specifically named in a paper. Only in religious backwards states that may be needed, as rules there often go against human logic or moralty.

  • @celticgypsy11
    @celticgypsy11 Před 2 lety +5

    An excellent commentary, which is deeply appreciated, particularly with regard to the issue of privacy. Thank you for your consistent integrity and clear, concise reporting.

  • @auntyconnie3941
    @auntyconnie3941 Před 2 lety +1

    Lawrence O'Donnell is excellent in explaining things to his audiences. You are fantastic.

  • @borg9355
    @borg9355 Před 2 lety +52

    Down with the electoral college.

    • @j.r.weaver9110
      @j.r.weaver9110 Před 2 lety +4

      And two senators per state.

    • @gopher7691
      @gopher7691 Před 2 lety

      Yes. Let’s let ballot box stuffing Demo(n)crats determine who the president is

    • @razaahmad9133
      @razaahmad9133 Před 2 lety +2

      Ahhh I see
      Democratic norms are only important if they’re in your own political interests

    • @j.r.weaver9110
      @j.r.weaver9110 Před 2 lety +1

      @@razaahmad9133 Wyoming having the same power as New York is not a democratic norm.

    • @razaahmad9133
      @razaahmad9133 Před 2 lety

      @@j.r.weaver9110 well it actually is based on what we have agreed to under the constitution
      Now if you want to get rid of the senate at least be honest and own the fact that you also want to completely upend and alter our system of government and you also have to relinquish your right to accuse conservatives of disregarding institutional norms

  • @jaemac1410
    @jaemac1410 Před 2 lety +176

    That was an excellent segment, Lawrence!

    • @saiyedakhtar3931
      @saiyedakhtar3931 Před 2 lety

      His whole argument falls apart when asked: why don't you pass a specific amendment rather than making up interpretations. That was the original intent. So, you wanted updated fundamental right? Get an amendment done! You can't have judgments make up gibberish interpretations based on what they feel instead of the law as written. It also circumvents the power of congress to pass laws. The failure to pass new laws is a failure to convince others something is needed.

  • @KTBroadcasting
    @KTBroadcasting Před 2 lety +3

    You're tapping into the legacy of men like Kronkite, Wallace & Frost here. Nice job, Mr. O'Donnell! It will be insteresting to see if America lets this stand, or fights to correct it; but in either case I think over the next decade, I suspect we will see a LOT of Constitutional & Government reform, whether that will be a history we're proud of or the something we have to endure will depend on who is the architect for that reform.

  • @adeleennis2255
    @adeleennis2255 Před 2 lety +5

    My great (x13) grandmother was aborted post-birth by the “good” Christians of Salem in August 1692. Her two oldest boys were tortured in an effort to elicit a guilty plea. My gram never broke because she was not a witch. She was, however, not afraid to speak her mind.

    • @a.katherinesuetterlin3028
      @a.katherinesuetterlin3028 Před 2 lety

      And that was enough for them to sentence and accuse her of being a witch: she being an "undutiful," outspoken woman in puritanical America. This happened to far too many women, just because they wouldn't bow down.

  • @nedgrant918
    @nedgrant918 Před 2 lety +42

    “The very worst thing that has ever happened to the Supreme Court…”: Donald trump.

    • @andrewpierce1588
      @andrewpierce1588 Před 2 lety +11

      Mitch McConnell…

    • @sierranevada1265
      @sierranevada1265 Před 2 lety

      @@andrewpierce1588 actually, the Federalist Society whispering in Moskva Mitch's ear.

    • @franklinnanai2745
      @franklinnanai2745 Před 2 lety +5

      You forgot republicans.

    • @bonnie43uk
      @bonnie43uk Před 2 lety +3

      He's done more than Jesus for Christianity... In his own head he probably thinks that's true. Sad.

    • @DonCarter720
      @DonCarter720 Před 2 lety +3

      You mean mitch mcConnell

  • @clarkekent9560
    @clarkekent9560 Před 2 lety +72

    Masterful commentary, once again Lawrence has brilliantly explain with clarity the State of affairs thank you Sir.

  • @aliceputt3133
    @aliceputt3133 Před 2 lety +2

    Excellent Lawrence! This is what the Media needs.

  • @richardmorrow3051
    @richardmorrow3051 Před 2 lety +1

    One of the best speeches I have heard in some time! Awesome delivery and examples

  • @erincoco612
    @erincoco612 Před 2 lety +12

    Can I give this man a hug? Please. Thank you sir.

  • @olddoug8945
    @olddoug8945 Před 2 lety +79

    Lawrence O’Donnell --- BRILLIANT AND INTENSE.

    • @charlesasmith7836
      @charlesasmith7836 Před 2 lety +6

      Yes 😄👍

    • @tedfurlo2268
      @tedfurlo2268 Před 2 lety +1

      I agree.

    • @recoilrob324
      @recoilrob324 Před 2 lety

      O'Donnell has an intense case of TDS. What a petty and bitter man.

    • @brenkelly8163
      @brenkelly8163 Před 2 lety

      Brillant! Yes, this is one of most powerful speeches I've seen. Too bad that no democratic candidate can match it. If they could, they wouldn't need to spend all their time fundraising on CZcams only to lose in the fall. With just that passion of speech, they could win in a landslide in the fall.

    • @GermanConquistador08
      @GermanConquistador08 Před 2 lety

      Abortion - Evil and Murderous.

  • @colinstapleton7795
    @colinstapleton7795 Před 2 lety +2

    I truly love this man's point of view, I feel like i'm listening to my grandpa.

  • @ytilaerdragon7441
    @ytilaerdragon7441 Před 2 lety +3

    We need a second bill of rights. Now, before mid-terms.