Here's The EU5 Great Powers & Their History Explained
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 04. 2024
- EUROPA UNIVERSALIS 5 Great Powers and the 1337 start explained in detail boyos
✅ EU4 Guides: ✅
✅ 1st Dev diary - • I WAS RIGHT !! EU5 Sta... ✅
✅ 2nd Dev diary - • EU5 Political MAP is H... ✅
✅ 3rd Dev diary - • Here's WHY EU5 Starts ... ✅
✅ 4th Dev diary - • The BIGGEST EU5 NEWS S... ✅
✅ EU5 prediction video - • EU5 Is Here & Starts i... ✅
❤️ PATREON ► / ludiethistoria
💻 TWITCH► / ludiethistoria
👑 DISCORD ► / discord
Vods Channel☑️ @LudiClips ☑️
Personal Channel ☑️ @Ludisan ☑️
Europa Universalis IV is a grand strategy games published by Paradox Interactive. All rights reserved. This is an unofficial video, not endorsed by Paradox Interactive.
The following DLC is used in this series:
Eu4 King of Kings Domination Lions of the North Origins leviathan Emperor DLC, Dharma, Rule Britannia, Cradle of Civilization, Third Rome, Mandate of Heaven, Rights of Man, Mare Nostrum, The Cossacks, Common Sense, El Dorado, Art of War, Res Publica, Wealth of Nations, and Conquest of Paradise.
#eu5 #europauniversalis - Hry
Wanna find out more about eu5? click here czcams.com/video/qV9xudEJZ_Y/video.html
Hi❤
You kinda got the Marinids origin story wrong. The marinids are not from the desert they are from the fertile land which is nowadays located between Morocco and Algeria. Also they did not suffer from arab rebellions since most of the maghreb was still not arabized. Most of the rebellions in the history of north africa are just berber rebelling against the ruling dynasty because they are another group of berbers.
@@kunatix7033 actually you right. I meant that they are berber descent not from the desert. That was bad wording on my side
@@LudietHistoria It's okay I've been following your channel for years and ever since you started giving historical context you've been providing good informations and it's always been a pleasere. That's why I was surprised this time when you talked about desert and arab rebellions lol. Great video as always though, really really hyped for "Project Caesar" as they call it lmao
hungary isnt a great power?
As an Englishman I can confirm that we do all indeed live in swamps and as a result have immunity to the Black Death.
agreed
there is a reason why shrek is based here in the isles :💪💪
meanwhile the Irish actually living in bogs, largely escaping the Black Death.
we arent immune like the English though, because we actually brush our teeth.
@@joedh23 Isn't he Scottish?
And immune to alcohol poisoning too
Golden horde is going to be hard to do right in this game in my opinion, those bad boys are one hell of a horde and are probably going to be very op under the players hand unless they give them plenty of debuffs and disasters like it was historically
golden horse I SUSPECT, not confirmed, but suspect will have some type of HRE mechanics but to a lesser extent to show the different hordes within and the struggle for power they had. Maybe something like that for the jalayrids too? let's see
@LudietHistoria
i would love to see disasters akin to the brutality of the ones anbennar has.
beatable, but sure as heck not for most.
@@LudietHistoriamaybe similar to shogunate mechanics
Needs almost ck3 style succession rules and breakups as a result
Horde armies better be broken in this game until like 1550
they should be broken until late 1400s for sure
@@LudietHistoriait really depends. At this point they were beaten and defeated only slightly less often than other forces in the east.
Maybe make the governments broken too. Always a succession crisis when the khan dies or maybe only get full manpower from plains, steppes, and grasslands all other terrains get a malus akin to the built up holding slots in ck2.
Others should fear them enough to run across some continents.
I hope they include those horde raids in late game. For example Crimean tatars raided area of modern Eastern Poland, Ukraine and South Russia till second half of XVIIc
I'm gonna miss that 1444 map
The real 1444 map was the friends we made along the way
After 3000 hours of staring at the 1444 map I welcome the change.
I'm not, personally, I'm glad it's gone and replaced with small ottomans
Nobody takes EU4 from you anyways, and Idk if EU5 would at least have bookmark selection window, if Paradox would make only one start option. At least CK3 kept it.
Bet there will be a mod for you
Lithuania and Ottomans must have some massive buffs to take over their historical lands
Lithuania was also Pagan at the it will be interesting what buffs will it offer.
Very simple - make them have better governmental situation than the guys neighboring them. Something like more centralized vs decentralized, because that was what happened historically.
@@Klijavards Lithuania was incredibly decentralized
@@funkerman7 That is just not true, Lithuania was fielding up to 20-25k troops in battles with a population of roughly 1 million. At the same time period England and France were fielding roughly the same amount, whilst England had at least 2 times more people, and France had at least 8 times more. Combine it with a streak of kings going god-mode for a 100 years and weak neighbors, and you have a recipe for absolute domination
@@Klijavardsit was a whole-sale deal iirc. Not only great statesmanship, but also great diplomats, great military, and so on. The ottomans basically had everything falling together.
Are you still getting suggestions for paradox, Ludi? Cuz I have one: I think that loans shouldn't come from a secret infinite illuminatti stash of money like in EU4. I think loans should come from the investment pools of the estates, mainly burghers, nobles and clergy. Taking loans from an estate would also give them influence, and if you are in crippling debt to an estate it would lead to them having progressively more influence in your country, eventually passing laws that favor them and even doing a revolution if it gets out of hand. What do you think? I sounds cool in my head. Cheers!
i pretty much did the video but ofc if you got good stuff can edit it, video coming out this sunday so got time
also paying interest should contribute to paying off the debt, instead of this silly system of infinite debt in eu4
@@spannishpalau2932 Sure! I also think that in a system like this, you could pay your debts with other means, like granting political power through releasing a vassal, or giving away cabinet seats to a specific estate, things like that. It would be much more reflective to what it really happened in real life. It was not uncommon for burgher elites to "buy" political influence during this timeline, for example.
or taking loans from the jews and then expelling them
johan already responded on the DD; countries give loans
I edge to your videos ludi
meow
@@LudietHistoria & Taxes?!
Same
Ghey
To be more precise, the king of Aragon should be called Pere IV de Barcelona. Not d'Aragó, Nobody called him like that and his house was thr house of Barcelona.
Oh and Aragon should have the Neopatria county as their own land😉
very true
Neopatria would be under Sicily at this point (alongside Athens)
I did. I called him like that
Also, the spanish never had colonies. Those lands were vicerroyalties.
@@JustianoHolguin "colony" is a term that indicates "founded city/settlement". It's not something that should be used to talk about areas. The spanish definitely had a lot of colonies because they founded a lot of settlements, it doesn't matter if they ruled those areas the same way they ruled naples or sicily, the settlements would still be called colonies while the territories would not be called colonies anyway. Besides that overseas subjects of different countries had different governments, so while the spanish system was unique, it doesn't mean the others were all the same.
Honestly, there should be a mechanic for the beyliks in Anatolia, where if the Ottomans get annexed by one of them, they receive whatever advantages the Ottomans had to railroad them to greatness. So we could see, instead of the Ottomans, some other beylik being exatly them, but with another name. In EU4's terms, the beyliks should be able to inherit the mission tree from the Ottomans if they get annexed.
So like instead of ottomans being the direct op guy, any beylik that can consolidate anatolia will gte buffs
@@coutinihoho7927 exactly. It would make the game both historical and alt-history in an elegant way
@@lofilipeta while I think that would be very good game wise I think it adds to much alt history for paradox to want to add it
@@coutinihoho7927 if the Ottomans fail, the alt-history is already happening. Giving the other beyliks the chance to be the next Ottomans would make the alt-history correct itself to pretty much regular history. For all the reasons the Ottomans might have had to succeed, in the end they were just one of the beyliks with better leadership and/or luck.
@@lofilipeta yeah true my mistake lol didnt think it through
But can you expel the Jews for 300 Ducats?
😂
Wouldn’t u get ducats ?
@@jaxonpecora4391 oh me like this
😂
Hi Ludy, great Video !
Hopefully, We'll have Jeanne d'Arc as a Gigachad General during the Hundred years war
100% we will
@@LudietHistoriaMore than Jeanne d'Arc I want my Jean Bureau, the one and only 💖💖
Actually in this period Georgia is in it's second golden age, under king George V the Brilliant. He politically played and then declared independence from Ilkhanate. Vanquished mongols, conquered whole Caucasus and created such a strong state that in 50 years Timur was unable to fully conquer Georgia even after 8 invasions (1386-1403). These wars spent many Timurid resources and years and saved other countries in the region from conquest. Alas these wars decimated the countryside and led to greatly weakened Georgia afterwards, leading to internal turmoils and eventual break-up.
The Kingdom of Hungary is a complicated thing.
1. During this period, more than 80% of the total population was of Hungarian ethnicity, but this only changed because from 1526 the Turks destroyed much of the territory inhabited by Hungarians. So at the start of the game, there should have been a much lower proportion of people of other cultures and religions (almost all Hungarians were Roman Catholic at the time).
2. Hungary had a brilliant ruler at the time, Charles Robert, who by this time had already fought off all the barons who opposed him and thus absolutely ruled the country. He opened new gold mines, making Hungary the largest gold producer in Europe. He introduced new laws and mediated in the conflict between the Czech and Polish kings at the Congress of Visegrád in 1335. He also founded the Order of St George. He also minted the first Hungarian gold coins. Heir to the throne, Louis the Great became a great general.
3. Hungary was the most powerful country in the region, with increasingly advanced towns and cities and an army that included both Western knights and Eastern mounted archers. There were also German settlers in the eastern part of Transylvania, who built wonderful and prosperous cities, and the Szeklers, who were free men, none of them noble or peasant, in return for protecting the eastern borders and being available in times of war. It is also worth mentioning that Charles Robert was part of the house of Anjou which ment close ties to other countries.
Fkin lol
Sounds like bozgor propaganda
How can you know that 80% of population were hungarians? There were no censuses back then for etnicity or language, more likely there were much less Hungarians and a lot of even now core Hungary lands were still having a huge slavic minority.
Yeah i think that they should have a heavy debuf from collecting taxes and men from non-hungarians so you can expand fast but it will be harder to control.
@@viniciusyugulis7278 prepare for maximum copium because Hungary will rock in 1337.
Actually Caliphate mechanics are complicated. They were just like the Papal State but after Hulagu Han destroyed Baghdad, Mamluks offered his son a shelter in Cairo and recognized him as Caliph. Caliphate transformed itself from both head of state and head of religion to just head of religion, they became bureaucrats basically. Since Caliphate didn't have an army anymore, they became puppets to mighty Mamluks. The last change of Caliphate occured when Yavuz Sultan Selim conquered Egypt. He brought the last Caliph to Istanbul and took his titles to himself. With this change, Caliphate became once more merged with the head of state. So, in Mamluks' case, there was no second head of state but they can add some Caliphate mechanics to Mamluks. It would be fun
Why not bring the concept of the caliphate so It's something like the mandate of heaven ! I mean anyone holding the three holy cities in Islam should be able to take the title and get certain bonuses and also be able to establish certain type of subjects (similar to tributaries) where you're obliged to defend them and based on that your claim of caliph goes up and down.
It's like the defender of the faith but with mechanics
@@meceffeukada3767dotf is just a bland and lackluster system also extremely annoying if you go protestant and try to attack some Catholic then fucking massive France comes to their aid
My best guess, and which would work really nicely, is having executive/ruler and head of state being two different cabinet positions that can be filled by one person or two depending on laws. So Japan would have Shogan (Executive) and Emperor (Head of State), for example. Bonus points, you could have one character be the head of state of multiple countries (the shogun and daimyos for the Emperor, for example)
Agreed with all of the comments. I would just add Jihad. But there should be a local and greater Jihad mechanics. In early stages of the Ottoman expansion (start date of the EU5), Ottomans declared Jihad against the Byzantines and the men around Anatolia came to join the holy war. Ottomans quickly expanded thanks to them.
And there is a greater Jihad which can only declared by the Caliph himself. Every Sunni nation obliged to join. There can be some adjustments like if Caliph have few legitimacy you can decline or if you have bad relations with Caliph you can also decline the call.
And the developers can add much more fun, Caliph mechanic has lots of potential.
@@resentfuldragon Agreed! There should also be an event for the Alevis. They became dominant in Anatolia but the Ottomans fought against them and made Anatolia majority Sunni. It was the opposite what Safavids did in Persia.
Actually, the English and French had about the same manpower pool size; the French restricted arms to almost exclusively the nobility, while England allowed yeoman soldiers, so despite having 4 times the population, the "total" forces were more or less equal (though the English had to keep a lot across the Channel)
juste 4 times ? more 10 times in my opinion (england=2 million and France= 20 million)
Depends on the time period we talking about. You are right though the french did restrict recruitment to noblez and upper class early on especially
@@morganrenders3139France had about 14-16 million people at this time not 20 million. Historical French region was smaller than modern France. They were still the largest kingdom in Europe. England’s population was about 4-5 million. This is before the black death obviously.
@@digiorno1142 yes you are true, if we add english possession in France, sry
I loove that food is becoming so important to the game. Having Egypt and Mesopotamia as Ottomans should make your population go nuts, not just "raise your national supply limit".
Also, I hope they simulate how a diversity of food made Western Europe's population explode. Potatos, tomatos, rice, beans, etc. And I wonder if that hightened rate of growth might have other effects, like plagues and urbanization.
Really excited for the economic diaries, hopefully they talk about it since they teased food as an important resource on this week's!
There's also a link to metabolic health and having easy access to pure sugar, rather than getting it through fibrous fruits and vegetables
I really liked the historical bits ludi added throughout the video
12:27 yes it will the portuguese sucession war between 1383 and 1385 as well the ferdinands wars between 1369-1382 between castile portugal and even in a certain part from england and france
Small correction: Teutonic Order didn't take the lands from Polish crown by military means initially, because they were invited by Polish influential noble to "deal" with pagan Prussians (which meant genociding them) and basically lead to centuries of conflict between Poles, Lithuanians and Teutons
And then they fabricated documents and got help from the Pope to take land from Poland and establish a state of their own, they failed in Hungary, went to Poland
They did. They were asked to help crushing the rebels in Danzig for their allied polish prince but then kept wgole province for themselves.
they were supposed to suppress rebellions and wars in Pomerania when the then Polish king was taking care of the brothel after the death of the Czech king and the end of Czech rule over Poland.
However, the Teutonic Knights occupied Pomerania and did not return it to the Polish crown
More people died of Swamp Fever in England than the plague is just that the two at the same time was devastating even up to the Industrial revolution and the irrigation of farm fields did Swamp Fever drop dramatically the fact was that vast parts of England were indeed Swamp except in the South East made life really tough out of 6 children 4 were expect to die before the age of 11 , In my local church you can see graves of children with the epitaph "Died To Marsh Fever".
21:05 Gazi means soilder that managed to return alive after war. little fact the wife of Orhan is an princess from Byzantium and Orhan even fight for the John VI cause he is the father-in-law of orhan.
Veteran*
Gazi is an Arabic word that translates to "conqueror"
@@oussama1811 Probably, he is talking about modern meaning in Turkish. In the Ottoman sense, it was mostly Muslim warriors who fought against non-Muslims. In this case, it was the warriors against the Byzantines.
You missed the most important super power, "Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor", who allied in 1337 with the england vs france, and also started with a pope conflict, and granted in 1337 the crusade privilege to the Teutonic orders against lithuina and russia.
In some way, he is the big "all fronts superpower", france, pope, lithunia/russia.
And never forget, in 1356, the hanse gets founded (out of the many city state alliances, which were building up in the HRE since 1219).
So i would say, HRE start will be one of the most interesting starts of the game.
We start the HRE pre 1356 golden bull, which marks the beginning of decline of the empire. So you can get the empire to a totally different road in a 1337 start.
I think my "thing" with Europa Universalis is to play the "little nations" (as in "about to be destroyed by a bigger nation" or just has not much territories), so for EU5 I might go for any of the Beyliks as my first run.
I hope that there is a law system similar to Vic 3, not sure how it could be implemented but whenever it mentioned "depends on your laws," I get the idea that some of these laws may be a Segway into Vic 3.
An example being; Having serfdom be a law of your realm, and having to remove it in order for pops to migrate to cities.
They mention laws often in these diaries but do not mention how they work, I'm excited to see what's in store for them. I do hope there will be a Vic style system which allows a nation to develop its economy, society, and power structure.
Hi Ludi, I loved the history lesson on the great powers, and therefore learning a bit more on how the past happened. I would be very interested if you made more videos like this one, where you focus on an aspect of history, and explain the situation!
Really liked this video format. I like this type of short history lessons. It keeps me hyped.
The video we were looking for!! Thank you Ludi. This context video is great.
Glad to hear it bro
I'am excited to see EU5, I'am now learning EU4.
Oh shit, you actually did my suggested video? Ludi you legend.
Edit: Everything I see about EU5 sounds good. Can't wait for another game to sink all my free time into.
I hope horde governments finally get a full rework. Having to pacify your sons/brothers instead of random cursed events that cause 50 k rebels to spawn in bumF nowhere
Ludi, I really enjoy your tangential commentary!
:)
Glad you enjoy it!
I’d love to see that trade routes become more viable/affordable depending on the route they take.
For example if the best possible route is blocked by bandits or hostile nations/armies, then the next best route (which would have to take a detour) would be less worthwhile in terms of profit/cost
Love the breakdowns every week.
Normally I'm not commenting that much, but I heard its helping the vids and I also love this historical Ludis videos where we can learn about geopolitical situation around the world and inaccuracies that happens in games like EU4.
Really putting the 'et Historia' in Ludi et Historia, great vid!
Really like those videos, where u just sit and explain history, u should definitely do more of those
Great video as always!!
This is my favorite topic going into eu5! Would love a video about smaller nations, maybe rising powers?
On the Indian part, Kalinga kingdom will be very interesting nation to play, it was one of the oldest ancient Janapada since late Vedic period, domination of Mauryan dynasty, and this time 1337 still exist
Japan will be very interesting this time, for few years, the Imperial family retained their status as absolute rulers, trying to go back to old Heian tradition, which made Samurais really angry, then the rise of Ashikaga with the best Shogun of the time
On Persia part, imo Yazd will be interesting to play, they were under Muzaffarid dynasty and conquered some lands and form Persia, until they get conquered by Timurids, will try playing that to prevent Timur from taking over Persia
On Mexico, aside from Aztec rise to power, they should make Tlaxcala a unique nation with flavor, they were actually a republic, they vote rulers through merit, and successfully repel the Aztec assaults many times and allied with the Spanish
Awesome video, Ludi. Congrats for the knowledge and didactics. This video was very funny history lesson. I don’t mind at all seeing other videos like this one. You should consider starting a secondary channel on medieval history.
Ludi casually dropping some royal gossip in the middle of the history lesson 😂
Minor correction. White and Nlue Hordes actually had separate Khans, but the Khan of Blue Horde was subservient to the Khan of White Horde. Relatively soon after the start, White Horde had a massive succession crisis resulting with Khan becoming a puppet of nobles and Blue Horde no longer obeying the Sarai. This lasted until Blue Horde actually took over the White Horde.
Nah, you not mentioning Hungary in the GP list is the most romanian thing you could've done.
True shit 😂😂
Hungary tried to fight Venice, Serbia came in and bitched slapped Hungary. Serbian Empire broke Hungary tried to take advantage of that and in return were the only country in history to lose to Tsar Uroš the Weak, like Uroš had lost 99% of all his wars if it wasn't him beating the Hungarians he would have lost every war he fought in
The Marinids were a Zenata tribe (one of the largest Berber confederations) from modern-day north Algeria (they did not come from the desert). Back then most peoples of North Africa (the Maghreb) identified themselves as Berber and not Arab. Arabization didn't kick in yet. So, it will be interesting to see what the developers will make of it.
Great video! A similar breakdown of the Holy Roman Empire would be interesting!
Can't wait for the 'Forming Prussia by 1345' video
In this time hungary was the strongest kingdom in its region,from 1342 the king of hungary (Nagy Lajos) Louis the great from the house of anjou will be a pretty badass king,so i hope that hungary will get a more important role in the next eu
Ironically i could also see missions for them to go to war to PU France due to the Anjou being related to the Capet, but 1337 the last of the main Capet died and the Valois (Capetian secondary line) was elected as the new dynasty, so in hundred years war shenanigans entirely possible that another Kingdom if doing miraculously well could try its luck.
Population wise Hungary was the strongest in the region, as they had about 3 000 000 population, but I would say that Serbia would was better millitary wise as it had a lot of mercenaries and Serbian ruler (Stefan Dusan) menaged to defeat both Carl Robert and Lois the Great and capture Macva twise
@@milosmladenovic2661says the Serb 🙄
@@mickethegoblin7167 You can check if I am wrong, google is free,Srefan Dusan defeated both Carl Rovert and Lois
yeah, trade is def going to be like meio and taxes.
The "local and global markets" is exactly like the sectors mechanic in the mod.
so beautiful to see this happen, a not laggy and with good UI version of M&T
Due to a leg injury at a battle, Timur had a lame foot. That's why he was called Timur-i lenk (or Timur the lame) by the opponents.
talking about the great powers and explaining the history was super interesting
Eu5 lookin like a mix between imperator and meiou and taxes, and I’m all for it
17:40 This is a bit unhistorical. War between Poland and Teutonic Order de facto ended in 1332. Then truce was sign for some months, but when Polish king died before end of the truce his son extended the truce for longer time. Eventually truce was extended many more times up until 1343 when official peace treaty was signed, but since 1332 there were no fights.
What i wish they add is the ability to stabilize the HRE,give the Emperor more power and eventually the ability for the Emperor to help Countries like the Süd and Nord Bund to form as well as the ability to annex more and more of the HRE as Emperor
Bro After 2h made 11k views, congrats bro, your content is always fun and interesting to watch
Great video packed with historical knowledges!
No mention of the Kingdom of Hungary? Hahaha, i know you guys aren't best friends... At least in my "book" it deserve to be mentioned as a great european power in 1337.
Timur was called "The Lame", not as a reference to his character or personality, but because of injuries he suffered in his youth, which led to the loss of a couple of fingers in one hand and the loss of one leg. He was indeed lame
Thank you so much, my premier source of EU knowledge. :-)
I wonder what they will do about a potential kalmar union.
One thing I was trying to do in a mod I was tinkering on was having the kalmar union be a single province nation. But it would have to balance the interest of the kingdoms under it, or else they might rebel.
I wonder if these nations that are not directly tied to land, or how the phrasing was might affect how unions may play out. I love the idea of playing as the union rather than the nation. Would be akin to player multiple nations I guess :)
Not every Mamluk was of Turkic descent though. Namely, Egypt employed a lot of kidnapped Georgians and Circassians and they, for example, were the ones to lead the second and last Mamluk dynasty since 14c - Burjis or Burgites, staying in control up till 19c., even after Ottomans' expansion. The first dynasty was Turkic though, just not exclusively.
Same thing with the Indian and Persian Mamluks (or rather Ghulams) - the name signified a status, not an ethnicity. Lots of Caucasians over there as well.
These types of videos make you stand out from other CZcamsrs :)
In 1383-85 Portugal had a succession crisis that led to wars with Castille, so that could be a refresh to a campaign in iberia pre-colonization
very good historical context !
Amazing video as always, however if I can correct one thing is that the caliph that was in Cairo wasn't the ayyubid but the Abbasid because Qutuz the guy who fought the mongols have killed the last ayyubid sultan of Egypt
Love those historical videos
market isolation from being an exclave is stupid especially if the distance through another trade node is small. realistically, caravans or whatever could just travel through, unless the local regimes actively stopped them...
I hope paradox doesn't JUST focus on the military of the ottomans and actually give importance to their diplomatic brilliance as well
Voltaire's Nightmare has a pretty detailed map going back to that time
I am giddy for the Black Death, and hopefully a rework for plagues in general, if PDX doesn't implement a more active population mechanic, then a lowering of development
Oh wait,, Lithuania should be Romuvan (not the name at the time, but an actual European religion, as opposed to a Semitic). I hope there plenty of flavor about a "pagan crusade" to restore the European faiths
Давно так пристально не следил за телодвижениями Парадоксов. Участие в проекте Йохана и разработчиков Мейо знатно разжигает мое предвкушение. Надеюсь, что игра будет обречена на успех!
5:35 little inaccuracy - it wasn't Ayyubid, but (disguised as) an Abbasid caliph in Cairo. Ayyubids themselves were sultans on the service of nominal caliph, just like Mamluks would do later)
History teacher: What makes Timur great?
Ludi: He made Ottoman sultan his little shnapple-doop
I wonder how eu5 will handle Lithuania's rapid expansion and the Northern Crusades in general.
we both know pretty badly and anachronistic
Ludi you should start doing alternate history/what ifs
Having an early game modifier to simulate the lingering effects of the black would be interesting. should effect manpower/production, but slowly go away each year, even have positive effects after the negitive ones go away to simulate the production efficiencies and changing of ways that came out of it.
Looking forward to playing Teutonic Order in the 1300's!
Militarily, something that’s lost completely in EU4 is how seasonal warfare was. It might be helpful to make armies move more rapidly and to make battles more decisive/deadly as well as armies ravaging the countryside more devastating.
I hope the armies are just more realistic and impactful. Let’s be able to move our troops around and raid!
I can't wait to play Ahiler! I wonder how they are going to integrate to game since they were not a Beylik but a guild organization. Also, I really want to see Tengrist minority in Anatolia, especially around the mountainous and pastoral areas.
Ludi, thank you for your videos! Can you pls make a fresh guide for Privelegies? What do you thinki to combine a privelegies at start of the game to get 3 advisers with 50% discount? It boosts start at very significant way
Thank you very much for this approach and applying my suggestion. I guess its harder to prepare video, but I wish you +100k views.
Hearing your opinion about start date and dev diary features is best ❤
You exaggerated Teutons a lot, yes they were heavy Knights mostly, but whole order had often 50-200 of those in battle, rest were soldiers from conquered lands and mostly mercenaries from around Baltic Sea and Germany mostly, tldr Lithuanian-Polish army and Teuton was pretty much in 80-90% equipped the same, Even France at the time couldn't field a army of Knights so why would teutons have money and manpower for it.
They would have more because the tuetonic order was getting volunteers from all over Europe. They were also a militarized state, so there military was going to be much larger then there size would indicate.
No, they had a disciplined force of German mercenaries funded by the donations of European Crusaders and their control over the Baltic trade.
They were a highly professional force with better armament compared to surrounding powers due to said higher income.
Plus, those 200 were FULL Ritterbrüdern of the Order, there were still hundreds of initiates and so-called Halbbrüdern who were trained and equipped similarly.
Maybe the bigger world events (Fall of yuan, 100 years war etc.) will look a bit like the struggles from ck3? I think it would fit really well into Eu 5 to be honest. I cant wait for this game! Great content as always Ludi. Keep it up!
Hell hundred Years war could even include a legitimacy for the french throne where all members of various Capetian familly lines participate in an attempt to truly claim the Capetian trone, considering France was the single strongest power in Continental Europe early on (sides from United HRE ofc), keeping it chaotic for like the first 50/100-ish years would be decent for game balance
Ludi can you please talk about the dev diaries for the next dlc about the hordes and timurids?
Was there anything mentioned about influence of rivers on autonomy (sorry, control)? I believe they should work as roads, and maybe even better, but was this discussed in any way, or do I have to ask him myself?
Thanks for mentioning Kingdom of Serbia, Romanian bro!! I cant wait to play it, because on EU4 its such a S&M thing if you know what I mean...
I hope will have some flavor with missions or some events (or however is going to be called in EU5... sorry Project Cesar): Gigachad Dusan who turns Kingdom into Empire on 1346, than he dies on 1355 from Plague, and than civil war - fractioning into smaller states, and than 2 (maybe 3) big events (Battles) that decimated population that I wont mention not to trigger some nations...
Can't wait to conquere all of the Balkans then have Stefan Uroš Nemanjići become the Car of Serbia and bring me back to reality.
Also Serbia in EU4 is great, I have played it so much I can consistently beat the Ottomans while my only ally is Milan
R.I.P Tlemcen
R.I.P my TlemcenBoys
What did they serve other then fast expansion option for morocco, tunis and granada.
@@freerolll tlemc en 😢
Do they need to add band-aids in the form of modifiers? Seems to me control + population mechanics may possibly do most of the heavy lifting on breaking up your delhis and yuans. I don't think it will take too much unique events and modifier fiddling to make them break up most of the time.
yeah with enough famine and plague big empires will surely crumble
"Other income" is likely for income from events and decisions and missions
18:33 The Teutonic Order: suffering from success
This is sounding more and more like Imperator merged with EU. Im here for it. Most of the systems in Imperator, when fleshed out, were really good.
Just realized that the Hohenzollern only rule Nürenberg in 1337, and I don't think I need to explain how Important the Hohenzollern are.
4:18 partition real split of ck, basically
Needed to advance those culture tech 😂
I recently fall in love with Imperator Rome and i hope EU5 will get better start
Bravo pour votre culture et vos connaissances.
merci ^^
Real, Ludi knows so much about history that we wonder if he got his knowledge by listening to his classes, or by playing for 10 hours everyday eu3 during his childhood
I'm pretty sure the horde colours is just a code for importance. So golden horde would be led by those closest to the kahn
My one and only concern is if the economic min-maxing overpowers the other gameplay mechanics like in vicky3, hopefully (most likely what it will be)economics are much simpler in EU5, maybe just a bit more complex than EU4. Would also be nice if there was a way to let certain in-game actions be done automatically (like the new auto-conversion in eu4 or other QOL additions).
oh man hadnt heard that the meiou & taxes guys got hired thats pretty sweet
I am mostly excited about Bohemia gameplay. Charles IV. Holy Roman emperor, King of Bohemia, King of Germany, King of Italy and King of Burgundy. And after that, Hussite wars.
Even if I have a lot of hope for EUV and from what we know with the tinto talk, it's really going in a very good direction, we should not forget that Paradox have to make dlc about their game. So, I don't expect having flavor for every country at launch date. For example, Persia or Morroco ( for the country you mentionned ) will probably not have anything except maybe something to simulate how the country was doing at game start. Same for a lot more btw. But if that's the only thing, I'm all for it. I'm okay with dlc, I just want them to add flavors for country and not global basic mechanics
Funnly enough it is also a period when Poland became one of the strongest kingdoms in Europe. Our King Kazimierz The Great reformed our country and expanded kingdom south (Red Ruthenia). It is also when we won impoertant war against Bohemia and Teutons (basically war that ensured our survival).
Poland was never the strongest in europe or even close to it. Matter of fact, the biggest problem of poland, was that they THOUGHT they were the strongest, and every time they did, they would get they az beat and put back into place
@@artyomarty391 Poland was a major player during these times and what you are writing is simply incoreect. I have never stated that Poland was THE strongest I wrote that it was one of the strongest European nations and that time. Also Poland was a major power succesfully longer than Austria and Prussia.
@oliwierbroda2575 maybe major in Eastern Europe...
@@mickethegoblin7167 major in whole Europe.