Capcom Plans For More Resident Evil Remakes - But What Else Do They Have Left?
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 08. 2024
- Capcom has said the remake train is going full steam ahead for the forseeable future, but with most older mainline games either remade or skipped entirely, how many other stations does this train have to stop at?
This guy has a foot fetish
oh, so anyway
@@Sonicfalcon16 - you got a foot fetish
I'll tell you what's left: fucking DINO CRISIS.
You're killing me here, Capcom.
True and real. Not expecting it, but man would it be cool.
oh yes, I am so down for this one
CV absolutely getting made.
I agree, only because of that survey
"It didn't sell well on sega genesis in 2000." Doesn't say much, it's still the most requested remake by far, mostly because even people who didn't play the original know its our best bet for another re2r type survival horror experience imo
they hate internally that people want that one remade. But people want it. and 6 will get remade eventually
I’m honestly just hanging out for revelations 3
Likewise...loved first 2
Especially with the cliffhanger ending Rev 2 had that's gone absolutely nowhere in the last seven years. They need to hurry up and make Rev 3 already.
Well I got to make an speculation agenda of what could be future re release games. Considering capcoms patterns on their announcement and their releases dates so I guess it could be more or less like this:
-Re code veronica remake (2024 - 2025): Following the line of re2 and re3 remake and maybe having some implementations to make the game more. Also I really hope the game doesnt get the treatment re3r recieved (wich I think it might be really likely).
-Re9 (2025-2026) : Likely being a third person game and probably having a coop to be a setup for a remake of re5 like hiw village was a bit a preparing of re4 remake
-Re1R (2026-2027) : Being like a definitive remake of re1 following the gameplay of re2r, and I hope it creates a more consistent and csnon scenario that both rebecca and barry escapes. And deppending in the year would be a good moment to celebrwte 30th year aniversary of resident evil. And might have the re0 as a dlc for this game
-Re5R (2027-2028): Atm being one of the most ambitious games in the franchise that will probably require the most time to polish the coop and level design since capcom wouldnt want to mess up with re5 because she knows that re5 is one of the most popular games in the franchise. So a re5 remake will take a long time to be well developed (and I hope it does). And depending on the release window of re5 completes 18 years and become a convenient year for a remake of re5.
-Re10/ ReX (2029 - 2030): Having the similar scope to the probably re9 and maybe being more ambitious and expanding more (maybe even getting to be a training wheel for a likely remake of re6 like how re9 would probably be a training wheel for re5 remake). This game can also be a revelations 3.
-Re0 remake (2030 -2031): Would be a smaller project but following the idea of the remake of re1 remake and maybe implementing coop (and training to polish it even more). Or could just be a dlc of re1r that makes sense
-Re6 remake (2031-2032): This would be like a more ambitious project than re5 remake was but with capcom really well trained and prepare to handle such ambition. And also if capcom would remake re5 it would be silly not to remake re6 as well since re6 is also one of the most popular games in the franchise. And this might be a good window to release since it would be a period of 18-20 years anniversary of re6.
Likely revelations 1 and 2 fet remakes to be ported in re engine and also....
A likely remake of re7 in 2035 since it would be a year that this game becomes 18 years old having a good excuse to remake this game.
I also think re5 should have a long time to cook despite how much it would make sense according to current release order. Its legendary emphasis on coop action makes me want it to be a true leap in the series, even being on ps6 if necessary. Whereas a CV remake wouldnt have to look too much better than re2r to please fans of that playstyle imo.
@@marsinvader9078 inoreffer a cv remake rn over a re5r releasing
Re1, Code Veronica X, RE:orc top 3 that need one
Since RE1 already got a remake, I don't see that one happening.
@DiZphunx in 2002 it's one of there most important games I see them doing an RE engine remaster forsure for re1
@@DiZphunx that's a old remake from the gamecube lol it needs a new remake in the RE Engine with the new character models. That remake is 22 years old.
RE1, Code Veronica and RE5 would make sense from a narrative perspective because it could be marketed as The Wesker Trilogy
100% agree. I think that is a fantastic idea and I wish its what Capcom went with, but unfortunately with RE4 remake in the rear-view mirror and all the teases for RE5, I don't see them going back to do RE1 or CV at any point. I'm hoping they do at least remake CV because it desperately needs it, but I'm just not expecting it to happen.
Outbreak definitely needs a remake
100% agree.
They need a reboot. A fresh new game in raccoon city early outbreak with new characters and more survival horror.
A return to Resident Evil Outbreak, combining the first two games together in a faithful remaster or remake?
*Sign me up!* 😀👍
I severely despise remake and remaster culture that's infected video games and television. Give is brand new content for ffs
Too bad the chances of Capcom remaking their other survival horror games like Dino Crisis and others are pretty much zero. I’d like to see Dino Crisis be remade.
0, CVX, Outbreak, they could do 1 again, 3 needs a complete redo that will never happen, unfortunately.
Then you got series like Dino Crisis and Onimusha that need a comeback just in general.
Onimusha would be great. Samurai games nowadays are all about the spectacle and the code of the Bushido in action. Would definitely love to see a slower-paced, survival-horror take on fantasy samurai come back.
Onimusha would be up there for me. And Dino Crisis. I would like to add Lost Planet, especially seeing Helldivers 2
I Truly enjoyed RE6!
Re1 Remake is the best game in the series you are correct. It's not "outdated". You know what's outdated? People claiming it's outdated because they can't fathom playing games in anyway besides with "modern controls". Which at this point aren't modern because they have been around for 25 years.
The RE1 Remake did become financially successful. Once it was remastered and freed it from GameCube exclusivity in 2014/2015. It's sold over 6 million units now. They should have ported it to PS2 like they did with RE4 and it would have made them money sooner.
The only reason I think there is a possibility of a Code Veronica remake is, they shut down the CV fan project.
Them shutting down the CV fan project, by my understanding, was less because of them doing their own remake and instead because the developers of the CV remake monetised the project via Patreon, which is a violation of copyright laws. You can't get paid using someone else's IP without that IP's lawyers coming knocking, and that's what happened to that remake as far as I'm aware.
That being said, I'm not against a CV remake. I think it needs it more than 4, 5, and 6 do by a long shot and I'd gladly pick it up if they made it. I just don't think it's gonna happen based on how little Capcom has cared about CV since its release vs games like 4, 5, 6, 0, and RE1 remake.
@@ColinMacDaniels I'd totally be down for a classic fixed-camera CV remake. I've been hoping Capcom would just do a big remaster of the 1-4 classic games similar to the Tomb Raider classic collection with updated graphics and controls on modern systems for the sake of preservation, but that's a pipe dream as well.
Small channel but to the point good talking, subscription earned.
Thanks, man. Welcome aboard!
Remaking 5 and 6 would be perfectly fine. No further though, Biohazard would just be weird to remake.
As for Revelations, what you use currently for 4remake control wise...is literally revelations controls just refined.
I doubt they ever remake the revelation games due to how much of it's story that has been reused.
I think RE1 was skipped due to the Remake they made already made back in 2000's
Until 4Remake came out, Remake 1 set the bar for me when it came to game Remakes.
1Remake would be loved by fans, if it was given the 2remake treatment. As long as they didn't make Lisa Treavor like Mr.X.
Outbreak is an absolute blast to this day. File 1 and 2 should just be slapped together in a digital only pick up...
put some servers back up and let party chat be a thing. Old and new fans would love it.
If they make an outbreak file 3 with the remake engine, people would love it.
Now in defense of 6, it would benefit so much from the trimmings that the Remakes had gotten.
I deeply believe 6 has some of the best controls for the 3rd person action genre.
If you tighten up the story of 6 in both pacing and placement, I believe it would be loved as well.
It really is a great game that is just unfairly shit on.
I like to think Resident Evil Outbreak is coming because it appeared on that Nvidia leak that happened three years ago
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I did not know that. Hopefully that ends up being the case.
I really hope so because the second to last game that got announced was Monster Hunter 6 AKA Monster Hunter Wilds
Also, good taste in music! Subbed just for that! Goddamn i need to replay Valhalla. I got evicted and was so bummed i left it there.
Welcome aboard!
Outbreak i would fuckin kill for an outbreak remake
I don't know what comes next. But I'm sure the RE 1, RE 2 and RE 4 remakes are proofs you can make faithful remakes while being fresh. Meanwhile square enix and it's legion of fake ff7 fans are trying hard to justify the series of garbage fan fiction by the hack Tetsuya Nomura.
And it's about damn time they remake Dino crisis!
This is what I've convinced myself Capcom will do.
2025: RE9
2026: RE1RR w/ 0 as dlc
2027: RE:CVR
2029: RE5R
2030: RE6R/Rev 3/Other
0 as a DLC would certainly be an interesting choice to see play out. It's definitely what the RE3 remake should've been for 2 if they were gonna make it as short and feature-stripped as they did.
Having only really played RE3, 5, and 6 when I was younger, while having a lot of fun with 5 and 6, those two would be very fun with the modern controls. However, Outbreak is prolly the most deserving one if we're being honest. So I'm hoping that gets a release, whether its remake, sequel or remaster
I've burned away so many hours of my life playing RE5 at this point, and I'm so down for a remake that cleans up its rougher edges.
@@Shweelan hard agree
A full redo of RE0 would be the only game that NEEDS a remake. The og is a complete wasted opportunity for the Bravo team.
Yeah CVX, 1 will more then likely see another remake because how much fans love and request these games daily. Capcom wants to make as much money from the series before they end Resident Evil.
RE series will never end....
@@benyang2427 I hope not I been playing since 98 and it's been my favorite series since but there was rumors flowing that 9 or 10 might be the last. That shit had me down af.
@@BigSparky1316 they sit on too much lucrative IP...not to mention their characters and stories are not hardlocked into one setting...unlike TLOU which will end eventually being hardlocked into a post apocalyptic world.
@@benyang2427 yeah no they are, it seems like from 96-05 we got games every couple of years. I think they just don't want to RE6 anything again so they slowed them down and made sure to look at what the fans want more. Tbh I wasn't a massive fan of Village tho its was cool but it was too RE4 for my liking. I love TLOU but the 2nd one seems like it was trying to add too many political statements which turns me off of anything game weather it be left or right wing.
@@BigSparky1316Yeah the Sweet Baby Inc stuff is very tone deaf...on the basis that the gaming community is VERY global & diverse with many players NOT being "white males." I'm pretty sure these are sheltered idiots who haven't traveled to say Asia or Middle East and seen what kind of players there are in these internet cafes LMFAO.
TLOU2 can post whatever agendas they want in their game...but players from more culturally conservative "non-white" countries can opt not to support that game if not having their respective nations outright ban it due to not aligning with their theocratic beliefs...which affects Sony's bottom line which is hurting big time for many reasons now.
Resi Evil OUTBREAK 3 or a follow up from dead aim or a follow on from revelations 2 the story of what happened to the BURTON family and NATALIA
im full remake mania i want them to remake everything veronica ,4 , re 1 again i want it aall outbreak remake everything . they dont miss with thier remakes ik 3 was the worse re remake but i still loved it
I'm more than open for as many remakes as they can manage if they keep up the quality they've had so far.
2:12 RE 5 has tank controls!
They probably mean the lack of Survival Horror. There's literally only 1 puzzle in the whole game.
Shoutout to me and my homies killing each other accidentally with laser beams.
Third comment in 5 minutes but would it be viable to completely scrap RE6 as canon and remake the game starting with the storyboard? I’m hazy but RE6 made no sense story wise anyway.
Really I’ve been dying to see RE1 remade. I think they could and would do the right amount of tweaking to make it a totally new gameplay experience while retaining the core RE1 elements and storyline.
There’s at least 4 more potential remakes they could do.
biggest and easiest cash grab of the year and yall actually paying for it 😯
Code Veronica for SURE, then a. RE1 remake in the style of over the shoulder camera into RE5 remake. Then every over the shoulder game will be re-remade with a fixed camera.
I think if RE6 remake does happen, Capcom could (and should) change literally everything, and dumb the game down a bit. We dont need 5 campaigns, just give us 1 really good campaign. Take out literally half of the characters, we dont need Leon, Chris, Ada, Sherry, and f****ing Wesker's son in the game. I mean wtf is this, Avengers Endgame?
Honestly, rather than an RE6 remake, I'd much rather they take the combat/movement tech of RE6 and make it it's own new IP that isn't held back by the genre constraints and fan expectations of the RE community. Having a proper balls-to-the-walls third person shooter character action game with enemy designs and level layouts that compliment it instead of it just being mediocre zombies and mutants like RE6 would be so cool.
RE5 is definitely next i cannot see why Capcom would reamke the less financially successful game first
after that obviously it'd be RE6 it only makes sense
and after that who knows hopefully they go back and do RE1 , RE0 and RE CV
If not that the Revelations games would be nice as a remake even though it's the most unlikely.
Aside from re1 i dont see for any chance of re remakes that arent numbered
Get ready to eat your feet lol it’s going to be Code Veronica next
My prédiction are Re5 is next for sure and I do think Re1 and CVX are comming depending on sales … I dont think re6 is getting remade as you said but I kinda want it rebooted but is very unlikely. I don’t think they gonna touch re0 or outbreak sadly due to the fact that they are less popular.
For the révélation…. 2 is dead dont Even think about it and I really dont think they gonna do 1 But, while playing dead Space remake i got strong rerev1 vibe and i got excited for a remake because this game as a special place in my heart but sadly it wont happen.
NO RESI EVIL 6! PLEASE
In my opinion they shpuld have remade Code Veronica before 4, Resident Evil 4 needed a remake even less then Super Metroid does.
100% agree. CV desperately needed a remake more than 4 did, and I've never liked the fact they skipped over it chasing the higher profits of RE4.
maybe Resident Evil : Degeneration remake, lol.
and i NEED Dino Crisis !!!!!
Them doing movie remakes would be absolutely wild.
@@Shweelan not the movie though, i was talking about the game adaptation for the Nokia N-Gage, haha yeah i know i'm that old🤣
1 (again), CV, 5. Those are the only potential candidates. I agree 0 and 6 won’t happen, 6 is a very misunderstood game though, people don’t know how to play to its strengths.
1 is likely at some point as the 2002 remake is too ancient compared to the recent ones.
But the reason you’re wrong in your arguments for why CV won’t happen is when they made the 2 remake they were not expecting to do more. The 3 remake is blatantly tacked on and clearly wasn’t planned alongside 2. So there was no incentive to begin the remakes from 1 at that stage. They didn’t "skip" 1.
As for CV, it’s extremely likely that 4 was prioritised because of its status. CV is more likely to happen now, not less, as the remake hype is at an all time high due to 4. And you think it makes sense to remake Outbreak? Plenty of people are asking for CV, more than Outbreak…
The argument about poor sales is illogical and uninformed (3 was a sequel to 2 on PS1, a massively successful console, yet barely sold more than CV which launched on Dreamcast during the console gen transition. Even RE4 didn’t sell well until it was on PS2.
They may well go straight to 5 next, as it is a juggernaut, but ruling out CV based on sales of the original is a flawed argument. My prediction is a small scale CV remake of similar length to 3 remake will happen before 5 (which is years off).
A few things to respond to:
1. They did skip over 1. If you want remakes of your franchise done to modernise the series and get new players invested in an experience because you believe the originals don't hold up, you start at the beginning. They didn't start at the beginning because Capcom has said for years that the RE1 remake is modern enough for the industry, and that's why they chose to start with 2. There was no 'incentive' to start with 1 because RE1 remake is playable and accessible on basically everything nowadays for 10 bucks. RE2 and 3 weren't, which is why they got selected.
2. RE2, 3, and 4 remake were all planned years in advance and developed alongside each other. The RE4 remake started development in 2018, which was a year before the RE2 remake even released and got all the critical acclaim and success it did. The 2 remake wasn't a low-budget gamble that they springboarded off in surprise of its success, they knew 2, 3, and 4 were going to make boatloads of money, which is why they developed them. CV was never included in this plan because Capcom does not care about CV.
3. 3 didn't 'barely sell more' than CV Veronica. RE3, on one PS1 release, sold a million units more than CV did across 2 separate ports of the game. RE3 sold 3.4 million units on PS1 and CV sold 2.5 across two separate consoles. When you're pulling in an extra third of what your follow up does in a single release when they fail to sell as much as you do across two, you're not 'barely doing better', you're absolutely smashing them. It also doesn't look good for CV when RE3 was a slapped-together cash grab made at the end of a console's lifespan vs CV being Capcom's brand new, next-gen RE game made to push technological boundaries, and it sold almost a million less than a game Capcom threw out onto the PS1 with barely a year's development time.
4. Resident Evil 4 1.7 million units on the Gamecube, and then went on to sell 2.3 million units on the PS2. CV sold 1.1 million units on the Dreamcast, and 1.4 million on the PS2. It was the lowest-selling game in the series at that point, is the lowest selling mainline entry of the franchise to this day, and RE0/RE1 remake went on to sell over double what CV did on one Gamecube release. RE4 and CV aren't in a similar ballpark of 'failing to launch until their second attempt', RE4 outdid CV in sales on launch and then bodied it on the second go at market, and that's not even counting the extra ten-plus million sales the game got when Capcom kept rereleasing and remastering it vs leaving CV in the dirt outside of 1 2011 HD remaster for consoles.
5. It's not ranking CV's sales on its original release. It's ranking it based on how Capcom has ignored CV for decades and doesn't make any attempt to sell it to the masses. RE4 is one of the most ported games of all time, 0 and RE1 remake got HD ports fourteen years after their initial release that released physically, and you can go out right now and buy RE1R, 0, 4, 5, and even 6 on physical disks as standalones or bundle deals like the 'origins pack' or the 'action pack'. Code Veronica got a PS3 remaster in 2011, and Capcom has slapped it up on storefronts with no promotion for every generation since. There are no physical copies of CVX HD anywhere in existence, they don't bundle CVX with any of the other games digitally on storefronts, CVX isn't even available on Steam in the modern day despite games like RE1 remake and 0's HD ports getting made for PC, which CVX HD never got.
Capcom historically does not care about CV, and every subsequent rerelease or remaster it got felt like a low-effort attempt to squeeze blood from a stone that barely had any in it to begin with, while they've spent the last 20 years willingly milking millions of dollars of profit from nearly every other game in the series goes to show that. I'm not basing my lack of belief in CV remake on anything other than sales numbers and Capcom's own history with how badly they've mistreated CV.
I've said before that I'm not opposed to a CV remake and wanted one long before we got an RE4 remake, but it's just that based on everything I've researched and seen about how Capcom treats CV and views it historically, I just don't see them ever touching that game with the remake wand, and I will be genuinely floored if we get a CV remake at any point. I'll be over the moon to get one and will play it on launch happily, but I just don't ever see it happening.
@@Shweelan
First, thanks for reading and for the in depth response, and I have a few things to say back:
1. They didn’t skip 1, they made 1 already, that was the logic (the Silent Hill devs have something to say about starting at the beginning btw). But they have in fact already pondered openly about remaking it a second time in interviews, which throws out your point about it supposedly being modern enough (which they have not said). They will remake 1 again anyway eventually, but they did 2 'first' because at the time, they were not planning more, they are on record admitting to having no idea if the game would pay off…they did not have 3 let alone 4 happening in the background. With 2 they were simply responding to fan requests from 2002 to remake it like REmake. There are even concepts of it in fixed camera, why would these exist if 3 was planned alongside it? Obviously it wasn’t, that was thrown together in a year.
2. I believe RE3 got the green light basically when 2 was released, and 4 shortly after when 2 was received so well. We can ultimately never know, but RE3 suggests it’s not a game that was planned alongside 2. It wasn’t the acclaim that spurred them to get started on 3 and 4 either but the sheer hype that 2 was creating, they knew 3 could ride the hype, and 4 was just a solid bet for obvious reasons.
3. RE3 selling 3.4 on the PS1 is not very impressive for the PS1 or for the franchise. Do you realise how big that console was? And 3.4 million was already a huge drop off from what RE2 had sold. CV also sold 2.9 million, not 2.5, and in the market it released into, is more impressive. Not that these sales are remotely relevant for these older games and whether they are remade or not.
4. I don’t know where you get your sales data, but neither RE1 remake or Zero sold anywhere near "over double" than CV did. RE4 was a totally different story as it didn’t just attract RE fans, that’s like saying RE5 bodying every game means something other than action games typically sell best. But we all knew that, didn’t we?
5. You’re acting like CV is a modern enough game that can be easily released to the masses, when the fact is, it simply isn’t. It did get. 7th gen remaster, and got a release on PS4, but little can be done with it when it is barely out of the PS1 era, it’s dated af. Meanwhile, REmake and Zero still look phenomenal and hold up significantly more than CV. Have some perspective. There’s a reason Capcom don’t promote it, it’s too old and looks it. No remaster is helping that. RE4 is ported so much because it can be, it is technically advanced enough yet simultaneously not so much, that it is able to be ported to a lot of systems.
"Capcom historically does not care about CV" sorry but this is a baseless and unfounded claim. They bothered to recreate it in the Darkside Chronicles at the height of the Wii’s success in the wake of RE4, and they bothered to remaster it for PS3 which is about the best they could do with it. Your logic is akin to saying they didn’t care about RE2 or 3, until randomly in 2019 they did.
One final point I think is of more importance than people think, is numbers. CV not having one is definitely a black mark on it in terms of marketing strategies.
And all this is why I will not be floored at all if a remake is announced. I would be floored if they touched Outbreak however…
@@unr8ted77 Thank you for your own response. I'm sorry if my replies seem a bit short and to the point, but it's because I spent the last 45 minutes writing a proper comment that went into much greater detail, only to have CZcams close the comment reply when I clicked on my original comment to double check a point I'd made, meaning I lost that comment completely and have had to start over.
1. Not to be disrespectful by repeating this, but the remakes of 2,3, and 4 were all developed together. You can read about it on their Wikipedia pages, developer interviews, and community discussions. It's a well-known and as proven as it can be fact about the games at this point. 3 wasn't rushed into development after an unsuspected success of 2, they started 2 in 2015, 3 in 2017, and 4 in 2018 and they were planned from the start. They skipped over CV and it was never included in this plan.
2. My previous point basically says the same thing I'd respond to this with.
3. I don't believe judging game sales by the console's userbase is a good argument. The Switch sold 140 million units and Tears of the Kingdom sold 20 million, which is barely 14% of the console's userbase, but nobody calls that a small amount or disappointing sales. I think instalments in franchises should be comparable, especially when its a survival horror franchise and those historically were a pretty niche corner of gaming that didn't do RPG or platformer numbers. I also think sales numbers for original releases are important to remake discussions because they're the pre-existing userbase. If you remake a game that sold 15 million units and a game that sold 3 million units, you will have 12 million extra eyes on the first remake because people played it before and are probably likely to play it again.
4. I got my numbers from the VGchartz page for RE franchise sales.
5. I do think it's 'modern enough' to be released to the masses. Outside of its aged 3D graphics, it still controls basically identically to 0 and RE1 remake, and they're still selling all 3 of them on modern hardware, just giving the other 2 way more attention and promotion. 0 and RE1 remake are constantly on the front page of steam with RE franchise and Capcom game sales, while CVXHD isn't even on steam and is seemingly never going to be. I also don't think graphics are important to most gamers when buying games. Square Enix still sells an HD version of FF7, a game that looks horrendous by today's standards, and people still bought it in droves because the game plays good, which is the real deciding factor.
6. "They bothered to recreate it in the Darkside Chronicles". Yes, but they also massively rewrote and overhauled CV's characters and plotline to be vastly improved while the other games were given minor touch ups and lore additions to sand the messy bits down. This shows that even seven years after CV released, Capcom was already looking at it as a problem child that needed to be fixed, whereas all the others were left mostly alone. This approach to CV combined with the lack of promotion of its HD ports, lack of porting to any PC hardware since the HD rerelease, and the fact they concurrently developed RE2,3, and 4 together while willingly skipping over CV entirely is pretty strong evidence that Capcom doesn't particularly like or care about CV, because if they did, they'd have put more effort into trying preserve and maintain it rather than rewrite it and ignore it with every subsequent generation.
7. I also believe you can 100% make the argument that Capcom didn't care about OG RE2 or 3 after the PS1 era. Both of those games are impossible to play on modern hardware without emulation, and your best bet is using a 20-30 year old console. Other PS1 trilogies like Spyro, Crash, and Tomb Raider got fully-fledged remasters and remakes to bring them onto modern systems with deserved facelifts, and even famous industry hacks like Konami at least slapped all of their MGS games up to a certain point onto a single disc for every platform in 2023 and sold it for 60 dollars, which despite being a ripoff, is still better treatment than what Capcom gave to OG RE2 and 3. The closest we've got to the PS1 games on modern hardware is the emulated port of the director's cut of RE1 on the PS5, with rereleases of OG 2 and 3 nowhere in sight, even after the massive success of the remakes of 2 and 3 and the fans having spent the last five years begging Capcom to release a RE Classic Collection containing the first 3 games.
8. I also 100% agree with you that CV got unfairly ignored due to lacking a number. CV is, by all rights, the actual RE3 due to how much it continues the narrative of the franchise vs the actual RE3 being a mostly-forgettable side story that didn't really advance anything. The only reason Nemesis got the title of 3 instead of CV was because they'd signed a deal with Sony to have a mainline trilogy on the PS1, and they bolted it on to Nemesis during development, leaving CV out in the cold.
I've personally been asking for a CV remake for years now because I believe it desperately needs one the most out of all the remaining classic RE games, but personally do not believe it will get one due to Capcom's history with neglecting CV.
they dont need to remake 6. And they truly fumbled the assets of 3. So for remakes? lets start with Dino Crisis, re5, Code Veronica.
Then, because they fumbled nemesis and racoon city, I'd like to see them take certain things from 6 (like maybe ada, jake, chris) and put them in a game that is not the worst game ever (which 6 100% was, it was horrible on all levels, its unplayable trash). So make that a RE9 or RE10. Something with multiple choices, alternate routes (alternate endings), in depth crafting ala re3 og, an old school score, nemesis even? but make the map a character in its own right. and fuck NEST ditch that map.
I dont care about revelations sorry - and I never played outbreak. After ALLLLL of that I think then we should see an epic, highly detailed RE1 remake. That should put us like 12 years down the line right??
1:16 What is a dousing stick??
Code Veronica X
5
And will be interesting what they do with 6
wdym capcom will definitely remake code veronica for the dozens of fans who want that game remade
Plenty...lol
I hope they remake dark side and umbrella chronicles as actual fps not on rails
Like a 7-style first person survival horror experience or a CoD campaign set in RE locations?
@@Shweelanthey just kinda take a lot of the survival stuff out and blast your way through a fast paced retelling of stories. I haven’t played COD in years. Keep the fast paced vibe of the rail shooters but not on rails essentially.
Something along the lines of the Not A Hero DLC for 7?
@@Shweelan yeah that would be pretty cool. Play through the games in mini campaigns like how left for dead was
Why RE 0 hasnt been remade is beyond me. That game actually needs it while re4r is purely a money grab. Smh
I was surprised how good it was though. It’s been said again and again, but they really remade that game proper. Not my favorite modern RE, but I liked it better than RE3 remake.
@sealife12 oh the game is great, yeah. Still, re4 didn't NEED it. I seem to be one of the few who definitely preferred ashley in the original I've found
Nobody gives a fuck about 0 , 4 is peak
@@MrAweezeit did need it
@blackvalio4060 well if it did need it, they failed because OG re4 >
Dino Crisis remake plz
This.
shadow of rome underrated game need remake
I'll respect your opinion as an obvious RE fan, but, as someone who's first RE game was RE1 remake, I hope and pray TO GOD they remake it again with the first person stuff because my second RE game was RE2 remake. 2re was the first game since DEAD SPACE that had me legitimately scared. Dead Space as a kid gave me such an overwhelming since of dread back in the day that i was feeling noxious just on the starting menu. 2Re did the same thing to me as an adult and i loved it.
Absolutely disgusting. Why would they remake the best game on the series, which is itself a Remake already.
@@RexVergstrong because a first person RE1 in the new engine with more shambler type zombies would be sick as fuck.
The first game remake is literally over 20 years old lol. It would be a good idea to have it made with RE Engine.
@@Phreal95 sure didn't feel like it when I played it. Crazy.
@@alastor8091Yeah, no.
Re1 remaster was good but I think a first person remake would be awesome. Give re7 fans a treat
The smaller layout and claustrophobia of the RE1 mansion's tighter corridors probably would lend itself well to first-person. Hell, it being in first-person was the plan for the original game back in the day that they had to scrap due to technical limitations.
capcom listens to fans, re2 was the most requested so the started there, they will remake based on popularity rn so cope 😂
Right, but by that logic of 'remaking based on popularity', wouldn't the next game to be remade be RE5 since it was the highest-selling game in the series for almost a decade before RE7?
Remake RE3 properly
If only.
RE1, RE0, RE Code Veronica, RE5, RE Outbreak. once all these games have been remade, they may as well just go on and remake 6, 7 and maybe even 8 because at least a decade will have past by then. they could also just start over by that point too and just remake re2, re3 and re4 again.
Resident evil operation raccoon city remake??? 😏
That would be the most insane wildcard play possible and I'd respect it based solely on that.
Ff7 remake and rebirth really at least to me make re2 and re3 remakes look mid
Personally, I don't really think they're comparable. RE2 and 3 are remakes trying to faithfully recreate their originals whilst modernising some really outdated gameplay elements, whereas FF7 Remake and Rebirth are sequels to FF7 in a completely different genre masquerading as remakes on the surface.
I’m sure they have Code Veronica planned. Really wish they would remake Outbreak though.
Code Veronica. Enough Said
you will look really stupid when they remake CV 😂😂😂 Capcom has already shut down the fan remake of CV, which something similar had happened back in 2015 when Capcom did the same with a fan remake of RE2 that was being made by Italian programmers. Then we ACTUALLY got re2 remake. Just wait
As far as I'm aware, they shut down the fan remake of CV because they started monetising it via Patreon. Getting paid from using someone else's IP is illegal, and doing so will almost always get the lawyers of said IP knocking at your door. But I'm open to being wrong. Like I've said before, I'm someone that wants a CV remake and thinks it deserves it more than 4 and 5 do, but I'm just not expecting it to happen based on Capcom's historical mistreatment of CV and how little they care about it.
@@Shweelan like I said, same thing happened with RE2 reborn project. Capcom shut it down for the exact same legal reason. There are already rumors that CAPCOM is working on 5 resident evil games at the same time. In these 5 projects, one of them might be CV.
I hope they're working on a CV remake. I've been asking for that for years and felt it deserves it more than 4 and 5 do. It's just based on the research I've done into how poorly CV performed and how little care Capcom has given it compared to its siblings in the ensuing years, I just don't believe they'd actually spend the money remaking it.