No Time To Die - ANGRY Movie Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 10. 2021
- 💥Patreon ► / angryjoeshow
🔥YT Join ► czcams.com/users/angryjoeshowjoin
👕Our New Merch!► www.roguesapparel.com
AngryJoe, OtherJoe & Alex review Daniel Craigs Last Bond film while AngryJoe Rages at the conclusion of the bond run for this fantastic iteration!
🔴AngryJoeShowLIVE ► bit.ly/38VZ4aY
🎲Our Street Fighter Game! ►bit.ly/3fdulJA
🎬AJSA Displate Posters! ► bit.ly/2HHR9z1
📺Twitch ► / angryjoeshow
🐦Twitter ► / angryjoeshow
🐦Twitter ► / otherjoe_ajs
🌎AJSA Community ► ajsagaming.com
👚AJSA Jerseys! ► bit.ly/2m2YJNq - Hry
Bond can still conceive a child after his family jewels being tortured by Le Chiffre he has balls of steel
There's a deleted scene in Casino Royale where Q installs Nano technology Ball protectors for 007.
hahaha good point
@@Loop-flow this is something kojima would write
@@bgill7475 I've been playing MGS games since the PS1 release :D
I honestly thought Bond became infertile after Le Chiffre repeatedly smashed his balls in Casino Royale
hold the f up. Isn't this the first time Alex gave a higher score than AJ & OJ?? LMAO
He's done it before
Trully a rare moment.
Lower standards improve everything
Because he got it, wereas the other took takes are wrong.
I love when Bond takes a moment to have knock back a shot with Ana de Armas in the middle of a gun fight. That was fun. Ridiculous, but fun.
I didn't liked that. Got Moore vibes from that
Then proceeded to drive 🤣
Wouldn't you? :p She was great!
The Cuba sequence was the best and most fun part of the movie imo
@@brandonclelland8091 hahaha
Alex's look of disappointment after Joe failed to understand his correcting "African American" was hilarious.
@@DerekWong967 Yep... that's the point
@@Ch35h1r3C47 Joe didn't fail to understand it. He understood his mistake, and what he meant was "oh, yeah, of course she's British, since they're all British (and I guess he meant the MI6 agents)". And Alex wasn't disappointed, he just smirked on Joe's comment.
@@Dreamcatcher9000 don't simp
The Best thing in this movie for me was the comeback of the Aston Martin V8 Vantage from Daltons The Living Daylights.
Yeah the Vantage is a awesome car!
I was disappointed that they didn't do anything with the car. It had one heck of a great actionscene in The Living Daylights.
For me one of the most ugliest Aston Martins ever made
My favourite Aston Martin of them all!
@@Warrior_of_Sparta nah man, its hot
I remember as a kid watching old Bond movies that my dad recorded on vhs. But ''my Bond'' was Pierce Brosnan. Golden Eye and Tomorrow Never Dies were the ones I liked back then. Had some good games on consoles, Playstation 1 there was a Tomorrow Never Dies game and on PS2 I remember Nightfire and Everything or Nothing were fun. Ah good times.
The old Bond movies are the best and their games are the best
me too. and the gadgets. to me Bond movie is all about spy, gadgets and being handsome. Daniel Craig only got the handsome part right. Just kidding.
Pierce was the SYMBOL of bond to me.
Yea I was introduced to James bond with tomorrow never lies. Goldeneye was his best one. But I bought the whole blu ray collection and Sean Connery is the best bond. Goldfinger is a classic
@@fenixblade6369 i have all the pierce Brosnan games apart from goldeneye for the n64
So as far as the “Bond being poisoned” you have to remember was that it was engineered to spread through touch. So even if HE never could touch her and he tried to wait out a cure, what if he touched someone else who touched someone else etc etc until it eventually got to his daughter and killed her. Remember the prison scene with Blofeld? She barely brushed his hand and he transmitted it to him and then he died within a minute. THATS the reason he let himself die. To have no risk. He didn’t touch anyone else after getting scratched with it. So he took the safe route and just made sure he was destroyed.
I don't know man If I could pass throug covid without killing my elderly parents Bond could beat that shit withoud killing his daughter.
Let's hope Madeleine doesn't kill any people who happen to be far descendents of Blofeld's family then...
The "venom" were nanobots, right? Why they thought of machineguns from a car lights and not a simple EMP device to kill these bots? Everything electric would have been fried and they were so tiny to probably cause almost 0 dmg to the body if that were the case. Also if bots were made, they could make other bots to kill the previous ones... heck, even make them fail because of a Windows 11 installation blocked from the lacking of a TPM would have worked. But i guess they had to have an excuse to end a character. Now we should legit not have ANY future James Bond protagonists and that makes me go crazy, 007 alwais were James Bond.
Pretty much this, the virus was engineered to pass through non-targets harmlessly until it reached its target, so Bond would basically have to isolate himself from everybody to protect his daughter
Ending sucked. Horrible send off for Bond. No reason to detail it or call it good. It wasn't. Hollywood needs to stop killing off characters when they get old. They literally stole the ending of Resident Evil Village. I hate it. Stop killing characters.
*Joe:* "They just wanted the new 007 to say a 007 can be African American!"
*Alex:* "She's British..."
*Corporate Commander:* "I expected you to talk Joe, but I didn't expect you to die!"
07:40 for those that want to jump straight there.
@@BridAnderson Q, you're brilliant.
Casino Royale is on another level. Skyfall a close second.
Yes!!
Casino royale is perfect definitely my favourite Daniel Craig Bond movie
That intro song alone is so good it gets you excited.
The Final battle of an action movie being a poker game? Ballsy. But fucking genius.
@@SuperMurray2009 I agree. I loved the poker scenes! The tension was beautifully directed. And the acting was 👌👌👌
Yes those 2 films alone are good. This new film felt off and so many holes in the story, it felt rushed.
I would say No Time to Die is third. Spectre was still massively disappointing, and Quantum of Solace is terrible and pointless.
Most of the Bond films are stupid fun. But, Goldeneye is a legitimate masterpiece in the spy genre of films.
So is Casino Royale for me.
Casino Royale was pretty damn good
Casino Royale was a true masterpiece
Goldeneye sucked the video game was the only good thing about it.
@@SUD-yb2pn agreed, with the best Bond villan ever, Le Chiffre
I figured the racist scene was there because
A) It’s impossible to have a black character and not make it about race at least once
B) People these days legit think that creating bio weapons, betraying your colleagues and friends and assisting terrorist organizations is less evil than being racist. The characters seem to think so as well, because she was making a huge deal about bringing him into MI6’s custody, but when he brought that up, it was suddenly not important to take him anymore.
The part about Bond being able to go on isn't accurate. They mention in the film that Hercules can pass through people harmlessly until it reaches its intended target. So even if bond never saw his girlfriend and daughter, interacting with literally anyone else could potentially pass the virus to them.
The real James Bond would’ve just isolated himself until he found a cure or isolated himself period. He wouldn’t have just given up and committed suicide via missiles.
@@cardinalrule6810 Bingo!
@@cardinalrule6810 But what we're trying to say is that is literally impossible. It's not just about touching somebody, the nanobots have become a part of his blood and biology.
For example even when he washes his hands the sink water will likely carry his skin cells which have become coated by nanobots into the water supply thus ending up who knows where. The bots were farmed in water so we know they can survive intense circumstances. You claim Bond can just live a solitary life, fine, but there is literally no way to physically exist on Earth without having some part of you spread. It's definitely weird to think about but that's kind of what makes this movie "sci-fi".
@@greenjelloe418 That's why the Heracles weapon is the most preposterous/powerful weapon ever introduced in the history of James Bond films. But if there's a way to beat it, James Bond will find it. That's why he's James Bond. I refuse to accept that he would commit suicide. I liked Craig as Bond but I'm surprised that he would agree to let his character go out this way. It was not a good sendoff. It did not have an emotional impact on me. It just left me confused, annoyed, and scratching my head.
Not nearly as bad as what The Last Jedi did with Luke Skywalker but still bad enough to leave a sour taste in my mouth. The main character doesn't always have to die to create emotional profundity.
@@cardinalrule6810 Valid criticisms. I just think the biggest issue in the public discourse right now is that some people aren't fully comprehending the power of Heracles but admittedly the film didn't do the best job at getting that across.
And as far as the emotional impact goes, it appears to me that the younger audience responded more positively to the ending than the older folk, in general. I myself am in my 20's and really enjoyed the film and it's ending. Maybe to us Bond is more of a paternal type figure than a "cool guy". Or maybe I'm overanalyzing. Anyway I appreciate your measured response lol.
My Dad who the biggest Bond fan in the world (literally named me after the character) left the theater speechless, all he could muster up was “I need a beer.” I think that perfectly sums up how I feel about this film.
This sounds... Hyperbolic.
But who knows!
I saw it in England, and I saw it at the last showtime on a Friday night. I said the same thing and everywhere was closed🙃
It's the whole industry, not just this film, corrupted by identity politics. It's more than 5 years since I've been to the cinema . Not a penny to support this kind of travesty. They can f off and go broke I careless.
@@zenstrata dude shut up , we don’t wanna hear that crap right now
Get woke, go broke.
It’s the first time I saw Alex gave the highest rating among the three
I couldn't believe it
No surprise given that Alex is the smart one :-)
Alex has badest taste of all
@@kjchannel9615
The movie isn't smart in the slightest
@@janne5766 And you have the "worst" grammar.
Rich Evans: How does it feel to have live long enough to see all your favorite franchises go down in flames?
Mike Stoklasa: Feels great.
Rich Evans: HAHAHA
the ironic thing here - is that us Bond fans have watched the series go down in flames numerous times - just to come back again and again..
people thought Bond was done after Connery left.. OHMSS disappointed audiences and critics upon release - Lazenby quit... Connery comes back for DAF, only does 1 and leaves... no way it could ever continue..... in comes Moore...
Moonraker came out - financially a success - critically, a mess... then by the time Moore at age 57 does A View To A Kill, Bond is "old hat" - it's become passe' - and even Dalton couldn't escape those sentiments..... 1995 - here comes Brosnan and Goldeneye....
then Die Another Day happened............................................... which begot Casino Royale....
the beauty of this franchise is that it continually reinvents itself..
One of the things my grandpa really loves is James Bond movies. He’s getting older now and I don’t know when the next Bond film will happen or if would be alive to see it, but it was nice to go see this movie where they send off Bond.
All the lines about “time” and knowing one day my grandpa will pass and not be there with me for the next Bond film made me tear up a bit. I loved it for that.
Not to mention the all the time in the world stuff was also from On her Majesty’s Secret Service so interesting parallel to that.
@@roboguy75 Now that was a tear jerk of an ending.
Ya same with my dad. He loves James Bond. I was named after his favorite Bond Sean Connery. Would watch all the Bonds together. Not sure he will be around for the next one. Time sucks lol.
@@seanguinn Interesting thing though, how time comes for us all and yet characters like Bond will be around for longer than we will… My 83 year old father was around to watch every single one in theaters, I’ve watched them all too, and now my 16 year old brother is getting into it himself, Craig has been Bond for his entire lifetime. Same will probably happen with whoever is next for the newer generation, maybe one day we will be our fathers’ age and Bond will still be around for our grandkids to watch…
Same here, except it's my dad. Always watched them with him. My older brother as well but yeah time is a cruel mistress :/ glad you enjoyed it though. I have yet to see it.
This basically had the same plot as Hobbs and Shaw. Virus that can target specific DNA, hero reunites with family, final battle on a pacific island, hero teams up with another hero that they don't like but are friends with by the end.
With constant twists of the villain being like "Ha! I've got this variant I made off-screen that will effect your friends or family!"
So it’s basically Foxdie.
@@maxrockatansky2976 A buddy of mine joked that it felt like something that Hideo Kojima might have written! X)
Nothing is stronger than... Family!
Does it end at a graveyard and do father and son hug it out?
They lost me when they said Timothy Dalton movies were bad.
The only bond movie dalton did sucks 😂
@@TheGoldenFigo he did two though.
My bad it was so shitty i forgot
@@TheGoldenFigo Its clear you don't remember those movies. Most people who bitch about Timothy Dalton either never saw his films or don't remember them. Dalton understood the character of Bond more than any actor before him. Licence to Kill was ahead of its time in terms of tone and grittiness. Dalton and Craig were the most accurate and believable depictions of James Bond.
This is probably what will happen next….
Old Woman: “Who are you?”
Rey: “I’m Rey.”
Old Woman: “Rey who?”
Rey sees ghost James Bond (Daniel Craig) in the distance.
Rey: “Bond, Rey Bond”
(Insert eye rolling).
Ana de Armas was good in this film. I wish we saw more of her character. I’m surprised Joe didn’t mention her.
He did it was just as brief as her role in the movie
Ana De Armas was terrible
Almost all the marketing I was getting kept focusing on the fact it’s Craig’s last. None of them actually focused on the plot in any way.
Pierce Brosnan deserved another movie over Craig.
@@Edax_Royeaux yep
@@Edax_Royeaux I’d rather old pierce Brosnan than this Daniel Craig movie
@@nuka-girl6960 Maybe watch it first.
That's the tell! As obvious as a weeping eye.
I can see people disagreeing about the ending, however the villain and his plans were plain awful, so underwhelming and unexplained.
Tbh I cared less about the villain and his plan, and more about Bond’s journey.
They explained it
Villains gonna villain I guess 🤷♂️
I liked the ending. And I never have met a Bond villain who was good.
Yeah I understood his revenge party but it didn’t make sense for him to go full world domination
Disagree with Alex - The Living Daylights is a superb globe hopping bond film and was the first iteration of a more lethal Bond.
Amen. People forget Brosnan, as cool as he was had only 1 objectively good Bond film (I'm partial to The World is not enough) whereas both Dalton movies are great and set the blueprint that the Craig films would follow with a cold blooded no nonsense Bond
License to kill was great too! Sanchez is one of the best bond villains and Pam Bouvier was an awesome bond girl! The tank chase at the end was really great, one of the best bond finales imo.
@@fastvalkary725
It’s also one of the surprisingly few where Bond actually does a lot of actual spy work, when he infiltrates Sanchez’ organization and slowly turns Sanchez against all of his own guys (except Benicio Del Toro, who blows his cover near the end). I maintain that the second hour of License to Kill is one of the best hours of any Bond film.
@@YankeeBlues21 exactly. Thank you. I liked Q being on the field too for a little while. It made sense for this film because bond was completely rogue and Q was just caring for his friend lol. Licence to kill is the most underrated bond film ever. Its one of the best.
I really liked No Time to Die. Even though the ending is very sad and not what I wanted, that doesn't make it a bad film. 8/10 for me and legit made me sad at the end
In my opinion it was the best ending to a bond movie it was a decently good film
@@kaixsamuraii thank u....idk what these 3 bimbos are talking about
@@kaixsamuraii wow. you guys clearly do not understand what a bond movie is,or who bond is. my grandad s rolling around in his grave. this movie was agenda pushing garbage. it isnt a bond movie.
In the books there's a 0010 and 0011. They could just keep going. And in the novels they don't reuse 00s apart from 007 taking his mentors number.
There are books?
@@creativename6126 There are lots of books. The Bond series of books was started in the early 1950s by author Ian Fleming. I think he wrote 14 books and several short stories. The Bond book series continued on with various authors over the years.
It was even based on real character.
@@creativename6126 omg, that's like asking if there are Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings books...
its hilarious how 1 new movie makes people believe it’s the law. no more anything. bond will be back with reboots etc etc. it’s just a story to see the inevitable because they decided to humanise the most unreal character on film. so thats done, now back to basics.
00:49 Alex reaction is hillarious lol
🙂🙂🙂🙂... 😯
Casino royal and skyfall where such a higher quality then the other new bonds
the guy who orchestrated all bond's pain doesn't even get to kill him at the end it's just some guy with no connection to bond who kills him
Casino Royal was a great entrance for Daniel. For me his need evil to fight fire with fire is the perfect roll for him.
Give me my bb
Casino Royale he had a brand new Aston Martin for few minutes then rolled it, I would like to have seen more of it like the gadgets.
@@0Tweaky0 Well, the whole point of that film was how they could make him rely on as few gadgets as possible, so we can see what he does on his own. We see the Aston Martin being fully equipped this time around though.
dang, Daniel Craig still looks good though after 14 years.
He never looked as James Bond. The guy has a good villain face and body. Typical brute.
Make up will do that and as the person above has said his brute features help a ton.
@@unwokeneuropean3590 That was the point. They tried to reinvent Bond, and thats what they did.
@@unwokeneuropean3590 nah he comes across a grizzled veteran
@@unwokeneuropean3590 bond shouldn't look like a good guy.
7:50 Joe calling her an African American was such an American moment. At least Alex tried lmao.
Funfact, the forrest fight and that whole daughter introduction scene was filmed in Norway. I got really confused when they played Norwegian childrens TV for a second
Goldeneye and Casino Royale are my two favorites in the entire franchise.
It’s no surprise those two movies are some of the strongest in the Bond franchise as both films were directed by Martin Campbell.
@@maxrockatansky2976 yup. While Martin Campbell has had his hit or misses, he certainly knows how to introduce a new Bond
@@High_Key GREEN LANTERN
Don’t forget Skyfall!
The best and worst huh?
Timothy Dalton movies are liked over here, he brings some realism to it before Craig's first few movies.
Licence To Kill!!!!
Dalton's Bond was really good, much darker story lines as well, Roger Moore was my personal favourite but really all the actors have been great, I fear now that Bond will be dropped and it will just be 007 so God knows it may end up like Dr. Who where anything goes.
Timothy Dalton's Bond was way ahead of its time.
The opening was literally one of the best starting 20 minutes to a movie I've seen. It had everything.
Then the movie ended...
@@kevinusih For me Casino and From Russia have the best openings
@@alexsilva28 forgetting Goldeneye and Skyfall.
@@Alrucards I didn't
Also Skyfall was like that
Bond films are supposed to be fun. They’re supposed to make you laugh, cheer, and watch the hero be smarter and better than everyone and when you leave the theater, you should be grinning.
Casino Royale was the last Bond film to understand this. Everything after got too personal with Bond. Casino Royale humanized the character appropriately but kept the cheekiness and humor. Everything after is just depressing and boring and I will never understand why Skyfall gets so much praise- that movie was dull as hell.
GoldenEye and Casino are my two favorite Bond films because they knew how to balance Bond’s arrogance, humor and badassness just right. Martin Campbell directed both of those films and it blows my mind that he hasn’t been called back yet to do more.
Y’all are putting out a ton of content right now and the angry army appreciates it ✊
HERE HERE!!✌
3:45 lazenby and dalton, those films again are for me the exact highlights in the franchise haha
A lot of Bond fans would agree with you 😅
One could easily argue that. Dalton was clearly capable, but had some of the weaker scripts in the series.
Gross
Have to agree license to kill was ahead of its time in terms of a bond movie . Still my favorite of the franchise .
@@StudioADcomics Easily. Always been by favourite. Ruthless baddies and ruthless Bond, but still fun.
I thought the movie was fucking dope. The action scenes and cinematography are top notch. Parts of the movie dragged, but I still enjoyed what I saw. Made me wish we had a 007 game.
Well luckily IO interactive, the people behind the current Hitman run, are developing a 007 project!
@@brandonvillanueva1545 yeah, I wanna see how that turns out.
Facts
SPOILERS:
The ending was ridiculous, for a start James bond has an EMP watch which takes out anything electronic and James bond, who gets infected with electronic nano machines, could have easily disarmed them with his EMP watch.
Also I really disliked the me too BS that's forced down your throat whenever they can get the opportunity.
I watched this film yesterday and the awesome bits just get overshadowed by the god awful bits. It's not the worst bond film of all time but It is the worst bond ending of all time. I left the cinema feeling completely numb. My brain was struggling to process what I had just watched. I really felt wounded emotionally by the ending which has carried through to today where this emotion has just continued for me to feel quite sombre. I absolutely love bond and not only did he just die, but he died completely broken after finally getting a family and finding out that the child is actually his daughter. This is such a punch in the face and awful that this feels like a big swivel to the James Bond character and the fans. It's an absolute tragedy, he will never get the opportunity to get to know his child and have the family he always wanted. It just left me feeling empty. This may have effected me more as I have a 15 month old daughter. It made me feel the heartache that bond must have been feeling, by putting myself in his shoes and relating the situation to my wife and daughter and what he must be going through in that moment. It was just a tragic, unfair, deeply depressing disappointment.
I'm half expecting this to be opened up to remove James Bond completely, in order for it to become 007 franchise instead. So that it can include women into being the main character. Poignantly being the death of James bond completely. I can really see this happening which will destroy the franchise entirely.
The nano bots were present throughout his entire bloodstream. Using the EMP would have killed him. His circulatory system would have exploded…
Honesty let them do it it it will fail and have to be rebooted in a decade or two when the Marxist social justice warrior culture dies (hopefully).
So dissapointing identity politics got pushed into his final chapter and then they killed him off. Wtf. Shameful
Agreed
@@stueystyler That's not how it works exactly...
I thought the movie was messy. Started out strong, loved the intro. Waltz was boba fetted. Third act was the fist thing that was kind of more consistent but still weak.
Thanks for not praising it.
The female 007 was completely miscast. She didn't even take the time to learn how to hold a gun right. I can not stand her character.
She was a waste of space.
...but she's black...and a woman...you must be racist!
(SPOILERS) At the end they shouldn't have killed off bond but instead reveal that the female agent is 006, that would be more shocking
You could literally remove her from the movie and it would not change a thing
Definitely a woke casting/character & rushedly added by the woke writer.
Watched Jeremy and Chris’ review first and was excited to see what the boys here had to say about it 😀. Have to say I’m genuinely surprised at this review, just like Alex’s reaction when Joe said he didn’t like it 😂. Totally respect your opinions on it though and fair points. I went to see this in IMAX on opening weekend with family and I really enjoyed it, personally I think it was a fitting end for Daniel Craig’s 5 film story arc that began with the unbeatable Casino Royale, which will be hard to top going forward. My biggest gripes were that I wish they made use of Blofeld more, and also I wish Madeleine came clean sooner. FYI, for those who did not realise, Madeleine did want to tell Bond about the child at first I think as when he pushed her on the train she touched her stomach as she looked at him. I defiantly felt the emotions at the end though, especially with Zimmers epic score building up 😢.
ME TOO DID THE SAME THING!!
@Pazvante Chioru Nice joke, if thats what you speak is true (which isn't) in that case M, Q, Tanner, Madeline and Mathilde should be dead at the end
I'm trying to think back, was the virus anywhere else outside of the island at the end? I remember the conversation at the end about the virus being eliminated once and for all after they blow up the island. If Bond got out, even if he was in isolation, he would be a target as the virus would still be within him. He couldn't let that happen and needed it to be contained within the blast, plus the strong reason of not being able to touch Madaline and his child ever again.
@Pazvante Chioru tell me you didn't watch the film without telling me you didn't watch the film
@Pazvante Chioru pretty sure only like 1 white male main character died in this
The villian was weak. But besides that, I loved it. Fukunagas visual style is awesome.
There are only so many ways you can throw in an aging spy back into the fray, and I think the story was handled well. Especially considering the amount of times it was rewritten.
You haven't a clue
Are you fucking kidding me? This was one of the most convincing villains of the Bond films.
Also, Bond's death makes sense. He had no way out. Him being scratched on the face with the virus or whatever it was, he would have killed his daughter.
@@vincentdc211 what was good about the villain lol. OooOooO I'm russian and evil and lost family hes every villain ever
We still have skyfall and casino royale, i like those two the most of this run
I will never like a single movie from Craig's "run". He as the actor has nothing to do with the Bond appearance, his movies are overly woke and shy of some good funny comebacks and some ladies' a-s-s spanking.
@@unwokeneuropean3590 Bless you
@@unwokeneuropean3590 totally wrong haha
@@unwokeneuropean3590 Bond literally bangs an ex prostitute in Skyfall. How the hell is that woke lmao
@@unwokeneuropean3590What a dogshit take
The poison passes through people like a normal virus (world events may ring a bell), but only harms them if they’re the provided DNA. If Bond left the island it is within the realm of possibility that it gets to his family.
The use of nanobots was clearly an afterthought and shoehorned in after the events of the past 2 years though and as a result film does kind of fall apart.
Out of all the bonds out of all the years they have never killed Bond so why kill him this time just to make a statement I think along with other parts of this movie that I found kind of insulting to the original creators character.
Agreed.
Agree it’s a shitfest. Craig earned a better fate.
Agreed
I was so excited to hear that EON had finally gotten the rights back to use "Sceptre" from Thunderball before 2015. Even though the movie Sceptre was messy, I was happy to know that Blofeld would be back, opening the door to an arch-nemesis. Which was great because in this film, they killed him and the organization off after 1 1/2 uses. Fantastic! Oh, and blow up Bond on your way out the door. Great!
Now we're back to square one... stop trying to make a Bond canon. All the Bond films barely mention any connection to each other. They are fun romp, one-offs, with very little or loose connection to each other. James Bond films just can't work on strict continuity, unless you do a period piece on a spy named James Bond during the cold war period and you make it a Netflix series. That's the only way what they're trying to force into a strict canon would actually work.
Maybe a more serious take on the Ian Fleming stories like Casino Royale. We haven't seen the original no-nonsense Moonraker with Drax being a defense contractor who builds a nuclear missile for England, but is secretely planning to nuke London with the help of the russians. Or The Man with the Golden Gun in which James Bond is brainwashed by russians to kill M and sent to kill cuban assassin Scaramanga as a punishment, who also happens to work for Russia to destabilize the region.
The only thing that was incredible about this film was Ana de Armas, and that didn’t last long enough
Agreed!
Baffles me that they wrote the female 007 as such an annoying character whilst they had Ana embodying the perfect "female Bond"... They actively chose to make Nomi unlikeable instead of a "female Bond" that people would wanna see more of!
Not the actions scenes? Morons hating on this movie for no reason
@@SUD-yb2pn look when someone doesn’t like something you do that doesn’t make them morons, if anything you are making yourself look like a fool
@@lariosmendoza Look when you are excessively criticizing a movie that majority of people seem to have liked, it makes you a moron who doesn’t understand what they’re watching. You look like a fool defending this guy saying Ana de armas was the “only” good thing in the movie when there are many other positive aspects lmao
Casino royale was the PEAK of Daniel Craig’s James Bond. And it was all downhill from there. Skyfall was definitely the second best though.
The biggest problem with the modern Bond films is that Bourne and Mission Impossible are far superior series. Casino Royale would be a mediocre MI or Bourne entry.
@@dereksbooks Bourne and MI are superior at being generic action movies.
Just to point out to Angry Joe and crew, the bots pass through people until they get to their target, so even if bond had no contact, someone who he had contact with, who had contact with someone else, and so on until the bots reach their target. Too big a risk to take.
There were a lot of moments I was asking myself, was that supposed to be a callback to earlier more lighthearted Bonds? For example Bond shooting the wire, causing 007 and The Eastern European scientist to fall into the brick lined window
This feels like they wanted to improve what Spectre failed to accomplish. For me, Skyfall should've been the Craig finale.
Basically, Casino Royale and Skyfall are still the best from Craig's time as Bond. His films have been a rollercoaster ride of quality throughout this run.
@@theprowler18 True, but I'll add Quantum as a guilty pleasure flick when I need a Bourne fix
wish they kept getting better like MI franchise haha. Casino and skyfall were so good. Skyfall was so good i agree it should've been the end film
Spectre was better than this heap of garbage.
100% agree. Craig be undisputed #1 Bond if he ended it with skyfall
I really enjoyed No Time To Die. Though I do agree it could've used more action scenes. But the movie kept me engaged, I never thought about how long it's been or how much longer the movie would be. The ending hit me hard, due to person experiences, and made me shed some tears.
I agree these guys are wrong about this movie. Though the villain in this one was the worst part of this movie. It’s not the actor’s fault though. It was 100 percent lazy writing. They completely forgot they need to make the villain look significantly older than bond’s girlfriend as well. They should have cast an older actor to play the role and they needed to tighten up why he wanted to poison so many people after he had already killed most of his perceived enemies.
It had loads of action unlike Skyfall.
@@RobertK1993 yeah but skyfall was trying to tell a story which they did very successfully. This movie forgot that matters in certain points.
@@blankname6629 yeah I got super confused with the age part. It almost feels like the new screenwriters took an already existing character line and took it into a different direction, and completely forgot that Rami Malek and Lea Seydoux are pretty much same age. His motivations were also very weird - the leap from wanting to avenge his family to wanting to wipe out half the worlds population just doesn’t really land well.
Theres no crying in Bond movies
I quite liked that quick little scene where Bond was in that circular tunnel and he turns and fires at the camera just like in all the credit sequences, except no blood dripping down.
- No Time to Die:
Metascore: 84/100.
Userscore: 8.8/10.
Say what you will about Spectre, but him driving off into the sunset with Madeline was better as a send off
Agreed
Hated that movie also as much as this rubbish. And Madeline was a complete bore.....zero personality.. seriously that woman looks the picture of misery
In the films defense, to get the plot going, I can see the distrust Bond had for Swann initially. She said go to Vesper’s grave where there was a bomb. He fights SPECTRE agents and Primo (the guy with one eye) says that Madeline is a daughter of SPECTRE. Then she says she has something to tell him (implying she’s pregnant) but all the context Bond has is, shit is happening and only one person he thinks knows where they are. By process of elimination, he had to blame her.
I agree
It’s not nearly as contrived as they make it sound
@@icebough4191 Agree.
That may be a first instict, but come on - he had 5 years to think about it. Spectre knew how he felt about Vesper (his handling of White showed that rather well) - you think it would be complicated to have someone watch the grave/city and prepare a welcome (even if it takes years for him to arrive)?
@@icebough4191 I remember them reacting to the first trailer for this movie and they didn't know who Blofeld was lol, they're not the biggest fans of the series.
Also the fact that Vesper had betrayed him, of course he's going to be more defensive and jump to conclusions when it seems another one of his partners has betrayed him. It's a shame that they completely miss the whole set up and say "they love James Bond" without having any understanding of his character.
Joe, I feel like you are confused on what "plot hole" actually means.
A lot of people are actually. Rarely do you see someone using the term properly.
Joe Mama
I think it all depends on whether the ending was impactful.
It worked for me so I really enjoyed it. If that didn't for you, I can understand why people hate it. Probably explains why the film is so massively divisive
I dont mind what happened, its how they did it. This film didnt earn that ending.
Way more problems than just the ending for me. Long list.
@@tomr6955 like?
Henry Cavil has great potential for being a James Bond he deserves it
Nah he’s much better as a TV star than he is in film
@@thedeepfriar745 da faq?
Henry Cavil wouldn't suit the role. Other than being a well known actor who happens to be British. Just because you like an actor doesn't mean they would suit any role. Don't get me wrong, I like how he comes across as a person and I'd give a Bond movie with him in it a watch, but there are others who could fit the character better, no shade being thrown Cavil's way. I can see Idris in the role. The way he carries himself, I think would suit the role. I'd also happily see an unknown in the role as long as he fits the character.
Too tall
No no no. James Bond shouldnt be the muscle guy. Craig was a bad Bond.
I'm glad I'm not the only one with same exact opinion. It's a real shame, here's hoping we can get a new bond and it goes in a more traditional direction!
It wont ever happen man. I just wish they'd end it here. Its only gonna get worse.
New 007 will be strong lesbian black woman
Next bond im sure will go all in with leaving out many of bonds "toxic" masculinity aspects. Thanks twitter.
@@mariobadia4553 god i hope so
@@mariobadia4553 a dark skin black woman will never be the main character of a big budget action movie
No offense but it sounds like you guys haven’t read the books because if you had you’d know how deeply bond was hurt by Vesper so putting Madeleine Swann on the train made a ton of sense. Having read the books as well you could really feel the deep emotion going through Bond, like when the bullets were being fired over and over again at the bulletproof glass at Madeleine. This film was loaded with nods to people who have read the books. Felix made reference to one of the key lines in the Casino Royale when he talks about how it’s hard to figure out who the villains are and who the heroes are...this was a key conversation in Casino Royale that let you into Bond’s state of mind and inner turmoil. Tons of lines were referencing Bonds past feelings and emotions. To rate this film a 4 is a joke to me. The film had incredible sound throughout and was the complete cinematic experience. I can agree that outside of the opening scene, the villain was a big letdown and I also didn’t like the ending, but a 4-6 rating is a joke imo.
A non satisfying ending has the potential to ruin an entire film.
The term ‘universe’ is what caused this shit mess, they did away of stand alone films due to the bond ‘universe’ trying to act like marvel
I absolutely loved it. The ending made me cry. You truly don’t know what you had until you’ve lost it. Daniel Craig has been Bond ever since I knew what Bond was. This movie felt more old school to me, with all the jokes and the callbacks to On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (one of my all time favs). Plus Zimmer’s score was breathtaking. I found NTTD a great send off for Daniel Craig’s Bond.
And yes, Ana de Armas needs her own spy movie!
Same here, I grew up watching the classics, but Craig has been Bond as long as I've known Bond. For Craig I thought it was an appropriate send-off. Didn't think the whole movie was perfect but was a solid entry
Mediocre at best...the movie itself had nothing special. Script was not very good and the story was rushed in my opinion.
@@mr_movieguru no
The agent who only had "3 weeks training" was a highlight and she really looked like she threw her kicks. It looked like believable action in comparison to something like Harley Quinn
She really did do those kicks. They were against stunt men. But she is the one kicking... There is some great behind the scene footage on it if you search youtube
She was a better "female Bond" than the actual female 007
Not to mention she was hot as fuck.
I agree, she was such a boss in that fight scene. Incredible.
I love you Joe. This is the first time I can't entirely agree with you on a review.
Only the first time?
@@MarioBario for a movie review yeah. For the other stuff like games sure there's ones I don't agree. But he generally likes alot of the same movies I do.
The best part of the whole movie was Bond in the reggae dancehall bar - once I heard the music and vibes, the juices started flowing back in me and I needed to go out and find a dancehall bar - loved that they incorporated that.
The best James Bond movie was directed by Micheal Bay.
Watch the movie "The Rock".
Thats literally the best send off to Sean Connery's James Bond.
There's a theory that John Mason (Connery's character) was actually James Bond captured. Pretty interesting.
Great movie, however I found Cage to be extremely annoying..
The Rock has literally nothing to do with a Bond movie...
I don't know why people seeing a youtube video about "the Rock is a James Bond movie" and praising that point trough the whole internet
This suffered the same fate as Brosnan's movies: First movie was a masterpiece, then all the next were either ok or mediocre.
Rest were mediocre or ok 🤔
Cough Skyfall cough
Skyfall was far better than ok or mediocre
@@FabTBC skyfall was ok, it felt nothing like a james bond movie but at least it wasn't quantum solace.
Don't shittalk TND and TWINE like that.
Skyfall is a superb film too.
Spectre throws a BIRTHDAY PARTY for Blofeld, enabling someone to wipe out every Spectre agent?? Seriously?? Did they steal this as a discarded plot from Austin Powers, too???
Daniel Craig is the Christian Bale of the Bond Franchise. His Bond films are The Dark Knight Trilogy of the franchise. Craig made Bond, dark, gritty and a believable character again. He brought the franchise back to it's roots. Just like Christian Bale and Christopher Nolan did with the Batman character. Casino Royale is the Bond version of Batman Begins. It gave fresh new life to the Bond Franchise, and brought it back from the goofiness and the over the top galore of Die Another Day. Just like Batman Begins did it after the backlash with Batman & Robin. Craig made the Bond films, dark, believable and realistic again. Also you could say that No Time to Die is the Bond version of The Dark Knight Rises. As Bond sacrifices himself to save the world just like Batman did it in The Dark Knight Rises. Both the Bond and Batman films have had a similar evolution in tone and depiction. By initially starting off as dark and gritty, then becoming camp and over the top. Then becoming dark, grounded, realistic and serious in tone again.
They should have done a Dark Knight Rises ending, Bond watches his wife and child from a far at a cafe in Matera.
Not killing Bond is like an unwritten rule.
Or we see him back in Jamaica. A fan edit would do the trick
@Jerry L So does kill him in the end.
I sincerely love this movie, I cried at the end. For me ending was very satisfyting and work for this Bond. The Craig movies have always been different from other Bonds, more connected between each others, Bond was the more affectionate tough guy instead of the playboy gentleman like his predecessors. Plus, these movies were a reboot and happened on a different timeline than Connery to Brosman. So this ending fits perfectly. If he said screw my family I will want live, i would be piss of, it could work for Brosman and Connery, but not for Craig, who's Bond want to stop live as spy and when he have occasion he would live agent live.
Now the question is whether they will do another reboot or go back to the original timeline and do a semi-sequel to Brosman
YOu have very low standards.
@@Schinak well, if you're expecting oscar material from a Bond film you will be disappointed every time, I didn't expect much and felt satisfied compared with what's on nowadays
@@Schinak My standards are well, my standards. And movie was good, review and peoples I talk after cinema agree.
My Bond is a ladies man using women for pleasure and his job, do whatever he needs to do his job, never quits and always prevails in the end.
This Bond is a family man, doesn't care about his job, quitted two times and dies in the end.
@@konradpietrzak3842 I felt that the movie was a perfect send off for Daniel Craig. In fact I agree with Chris Stuckmann: This is the best final movie for any Bond actor.
I respect Joe’s opinion, but I think he has bad taste. He thought the action in Mortal Kombat was well directed, but that the action here was serviceable?? GTFO with that bullshit. This was a great Bond movie with a fitting end to Daniel Craigs run. It played more into the traditional Bond character than Craig’s other films while still holding true to his interpretation. Anddddd this is the first Bond movie to really truly explore Bond’s vulnerable side. When he actually has time to let his love bloom and grow. I thought his relationship with Madeleine was the best and most well developed relationship Bond has had with any woman in a Bond movie. Period. Yea the villain’s motivations are a bit goofy and he comes out of nowhere, but Rami’s performance elevates the fuck out of it. For me it goes Casino Royale, Skyfall, No Time To Die, Spectre, and then Quantum of Solace. I think the top three are all the best Bond movies we’ve ever gotten. Daniel Craig is the GOAT.
Exactly. Craig's Bond has always been closer to Fleming's original work. Not the Moore/Brosnan over the top campy stuff
Imagine a Superman movie where Lex Luthor dies almost as an afterthought, Wonder Woman drowns, and then Superman kills himself because Lois Lane suddenly is made out of kryptonite. Yeah, that's totally a Superman movie I'd watch... 🙄
At least he wasn't bi.
@Numpteez But in this case, I think it's an apt comparison. There are so many ways this movie could've been better--they had the ingredients. Killing everyone off was the cop-out, lazy option. I'm definitely not going to stop espousing that.
Moment he died some of the old people got up and walked out right away. Can’t blame them. Bond is a character that is always supposed to get out of impossible situations he is put in. They really did him dirty.
Not really, his character death was done pretty well in my opinion
@@criticizedreviews1081 you have clearly overlooked 60 years of james bond history.
@@bradleypeckham714 well you clearly don’t want to evolve after 60 years. Haha I’m a hardcore fan and I loved it.
So we need to keep a character the same lol?
I'm sure they'll go back to churning out standalone, recycled, low stakes Bond films at some point. There is obviously a big market for it judging by how many people have taken issue with the Craig era Bond.
Fully apart from the actual goodness or bad of the movie I feel AJ didn't even go into the idea of reviewing this movie fully. He admits not completely remembering the previous 1 or 2 last movies' details especially given the expanse of time between them so looks to Wiki? Isn't that instead of reading a book, or watching a movie(s), using Cliff's Notes/Spark Notes & half-assing it? By these three it sounds like this Bond movie is stale.
I’m glad that I’m not the only one that thought this movie did a disservice to Daniel Craig’s James Bond, and frankly felt shoehorned and didn’t need to exist.
They have been trying to take out escapism and move into realism ever since Daniel Craig stepped in and to me that was the dumbest thing. I could go on and on but in came Ethan Hunt to save the day and get me back into escapism. I think the fact that Tom Cruise was doing his own stunts gives me the same thrill as it did waiting for the new Bond movies that came before Daniel Craig took on the character. The British have sold their top clubs to the Americans and they they have also surrendered their best movie spy to Hollywood
Church!
As a Bond movie, Casino and Skyfall are the best. I had fun with it and a great time at the movies but not the best Bond movie ever made.
Goldeneye is better than all The Craig Movies
@@theitfactorjameswheezer2852 yeah no casino royale is miles better than goldeneye
@wespozo what a bozo casino royale is better than any bond movie before it what a clown lmfao
@@greasy4457 you’re a clown. Goldfinger is the best bond film ever made. And Sean Connery takes a dump on Craig as an actor
@@theitfactorjameswheezer2852 nah goldfinger is solid but casino royale is way better lmfao you have real shit taste in movies you know that?
Alex's face from 7:55-8:05- fkn priceless!! He stole the show as Lady D, but now he owned AJ ffs!
I was angry at the fact that absolutely no one thought: Hey, since you can code/program the nanobots to attack certain dna.... theeeen, you can re-program the nanobots to some other completely random dna, or to inject new nanobots that destroy these old ones!! Since they created these ones, then sure then can create new ones! -_-
It was mentioned a couple of times, that 007's don't really have a long life expectancy. In all the films (that I've seen), they lead cool lives, but they're always shallow.
I think the story of how Daniel Craig's Bond managed to get close to something that had more meaning was a very welcome thing in this movie and something that was new and refreshing (he was already more human than the other Bonds in Casino Royale).
What I thought after watching a lot of the bond movies where it was the last movie for an actor (old and new) is that they most likely died later on a cool mission where they saved the world again. Daniel Craig's Bond does the same, but we got to see it as well this time. It was very sad, but it showed very well, the kind of sacrifice every Bond is expected and willing to make and that being a 007 means you'll never lead a normal life.
In this way, he was different from the bonds that came before him, because he had a lot more to lose.
I agree with a lot of other criticism about the movie, but to me this aspect was well executed.
I understand this point of view and it is relevant to how 00 agents are perceived but the ending of NTTD could have been much better. Most bond fans as ourselves believe it should follow a Fleming formula because that is what makes bond. And the more it veers off that path the less it becomes bond. If I wanted a personal story I would watch something else but when I choose to watch a bond film I want bond. Not a story of 00 agents or some personal family matter.
13:22 Verdict
Gracias kind sir
Why did bond reintroduce Madeline to Nomi in the island again when nomi and Madeline met during the interrogation of the leader of spectre
Plot holes
reshoots
The killing of Madeleine's mother makes no sense either. It's said two times in Spectre Mr. White had divorced. Also... Mr White killing a family? Mr White who left Spectre because of Blofeld killing women and children, Mr White?
The first hour of this movie was awesome; pure Bond.
Once you leave Cuba it's all downhill and into the shitter.
People can defend it all they want, but there's a reason the film is losing screenings in theaters left and right. People aren't into it.
Couldn't agree more
Facts
It was waller bridged !
There were some elements of her writing style to some of the previous Craig films... this "humanity" they've tried to bring to a character that's normally much more complex / mysterious. Skyfall ballsed up, a lot, by showing us his childhood home, introducing his guardian (Kinkade)...
P W-B finished it off by introducing a daughter that totally changed his usual motives, mystery.. the whole dynamic and theme (overall).
The 007 re-designation was a trope, it felt like it was trying to hard to make a statement... in many ways it felt like a generic action film that had a load of Bond references retroactively applied to it to try and turn it into part of the franchise. An Easter Egg portrait of Bernard Lee in the background, an OHMSS style opening title sequence. The only piece for me that was truly worthy was the chase sequence with the DB5 in Italy.
The final sequence felt like it'd been rushed through (like the new Star Wars films). I don't believe that that's something the fans wanted, I'm sure more fans will dislike it than praise it.
It was a redux of OHMSS mixed with a little Dr No and the original novel for You Only Live Twice... Except terribly sub-par of any of those core ingredients.
Uninspired.
I'm diggin that look Joe, I'm gonna have to get me a jacket like that...
The movie, overall, feels like a nearly 3 hour epilogue to Spectre. It feels like it’s just tying up the loose ends from that movie.
The villain is also very forgettable and his motivations were very dull. If it wasn’t for Rami Malek’s great performance, he would have been the worst villain in the Daniel Craig saga.
Agreed. It was not an very good movie. Bad storytelling. They ledt alot on the table. Didnt like the villain either. No story about him what so ever.
As soon as he moaned about OHMSS and Dalton I thought he aint got a clue
Can't believe they took the ball torture scene from Casino Royale and turned it into a whole movie.
AJ- “I hate it”
I felt that.
Why? Without Spoilers?
@@SuperMurray2009 they’re just complaining. Excellent conclusion to the series and I wasn’t once bored. People just love to over criticize anything and everything nowadays
@@sharpshoota8274 Well you're talking to a guy who loved TLOU part 2 so.
@@SuperMurray2009 oh… lol. Nah I’m just kidding, I never actually played it but I saw most of what happens in the game. Don’t listen to any negative reviews for this movie it’s great. And try to stay away from the spoilers.
@@sharpshoota8274 One dude in the comments already spoiled the ending.
Well we still have Ethan Hunt and the Mission impossible team
The first movie turned the mc of the series into a traitor before killing him. Pissed me off big time.
May be the only movie that survived such a derail of a classical character. This type of move kills franchises. Ask Disney.
Tom Cruise will be 80 years old and still be doing Mission Impossible XXVI: Grandpa’s Day Out
For now.
Way better movies than these Daniel Craig movie. Mission impossible puts these movies to shame in terms of stunts and entertainment
Last movie gonna kill ethan hunt too i’ll bet
It's a Nicholas Sparks chick flick movie in disguise as a spy movie. Star wars girl picked up on it so well, I didn't even think about that.
Glad to see the comment section not changing their view on the movie just cause Joe didn’t like it. I loved the movie and think it’s one of the best send offs to Bond there could’ve been.
You're goddamn right
totally agree. was an amazing send off.
I dont get the criticisms. I honestly think it might be the best Bond film Ive ever seen. blown away.
@@jj6392criticism is mainly due to the ending, I think. I thought it was terrible to see Bond give up and die.
@@molin1310 I thought it was fitting for Craig's Bond. Honestly enjoyed it more than CR and Skyfall. Shed a few tears also.
interesting, jeremy jahns said he liked the movie while angryjoe said he hated the movie, two very different perspectives and they are best friends, what a interesting oddity
You can be best friends even if you don't like the same things.
how tf is that an interesting oddity lmao.
I mean... Jeremy is actually good at reviewing films, though 😂
Oh come on Joe. Spectre was a joke. And how many times has Craig’s Bond retired? Ending the movie with him sailing off into the sunset would’ve not been impactful.
Excellent point.
I mostly enjoyed this movie, but what about that scene with the bad guy and the daughter? She's the perfect hostage against bond and his mother (and used as such), both are on the loose and trying to destroy all his plans, but he suddenly decides to let her go, because she bit him in the hand and basically just doesn't like him?
Wtf, really surprised of Joes opinion with this one. I thought this movie was one of the best
It was, at least #3 in the order. They have some really odd opinions sometimes.
People are pretty divided on it