Fujifilm 35mm f/2 R WR Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 07. 2021
- www.DarrenMiles.com - Southwest Florida Portrait, Wedding, Family and Real Estate Photographer.
GET GREAT DEALS ON THE GEAR MENTIONED IN THIS VIDEO FROM B&H HERE:
Fuji 35mm f/2: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...
Fuji XT-3: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...
Great Job, Darren. 👌🏼
I just ordered mine. just here to validate my purchase haha. i am so excited!!!
Great review Darren, thanks. This 35mm, the 18/2, and the 56/1.2 are the three lenses I would get if I ever switch to Fuji from Olympus.
Chose this lens instead of the 18- 55mm ‘kit lens’ and never regretted it.
I was surprised how snappy the focus is on my Xt-1. I use it for documentary work.
Hats off to still kicking it with the xt3!
Don't forget about the XC 35mm f/2. Same lens but, less metal and no aperture ring for 1/2 price.
I only recently purchased the 35/2 and I can only completely agree with your assessment. I was so cheap I purchased a warrantied second hand version saving about 25% on the already ridiculously cheap price. One compensating argument about the f2 stop - on newer bodies like the X-T4 the IBIS allows you to shoot down to 1/30 or even 1/15 meaning you can keep a low iso in certain situations. This lens is a no-brainer for any Fuji owner.
Nice call!
Awesome review Darren. Yeah, the "Fujicrons" definitely have quicker focus than the older f/1.4 lenses. Love the linear motors.
If like me you don't have a wr body to mount this lovely lens on just go for the xc35 f2 for half the price, they have the same formula glass, on the other hand if you do have a wr body it makes sense to go for wr version Darren has.
consider the price, got a 35mm f1.4 of ttartisan for my A6600,i think images by these lenses are really nice even when comparing to the native lenses. :)
hi thanks your video. could you let me know your lens hood's name?
I've done plenty of low light shooting at f/2, including on ISO (called ASA back in the day) 400 film. I really don't understand the caveats, qualifiers, and kvetching. Light has direction, intensity, and color (even in monochrome) and if there's no worthwhile light, there's no worthwhile photo. I'm not arguing with anyone who wants f/1.4 or f/0.95, or whatever. I'm only saying there needn't be so much hand-wringing over f/2. I like the compact size, lower weight, and lower cost. "Fast," to me, starts at f/2.8.
How to get ISO 80?